The invention relates to a method of monitoring a surface feature and an apparatus for performing such monitoring. The method and apparatus may find application in a wide range of fields from industrial applications through to medical or veterinary applications such as monitoring dermatological surface features such as wounds, ulcers, sores, lesions, tumours, bruises, burns, psoriasis, keloids, skin cancers, erythema etc.
Various techniques have been used to monitor wounds, ulcers, sores, lesions, tumours etc. (herein referred to collectively as “wounds”) both within hospitals and outside hospitals (e.g. domiciliary based care, primary care facilities etc.). Typically these wounds are concave and up to about 250 millimeters across. Manual techniques are typically labour-intensive and require examination and contact by skilled personnel. Such measurements may be inaccurate and there may be significant variation between measurements made by different personnel. Further, these approaches may not preserve any visual record for review by an expert or for subsequent comparison.
A number of techniques for the automated monitoring of wounds have been proposed; see for example U.S. Pat. No. 6,101,408, U.S. Pat. No. 6,873,340, U.S. Pat. No. 4,535,782 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,967,979. A common approach is to place a reference object next to the wound and determine the size of the wound utilising the scale of the reference object. It is often undesirable to place a reference object near to a wound and this requires an additional cumbersome step for a user and risks contamination of the wound. Further, when the target is not in the plane of the wound, or if the wound is not planar, there will be errors in any area calculation.
WO 2006/078902 discloses a system in which the scale of a captured image is determined using a laser triangulation sensor. The distance of the camera from a patient's skin is determined using the position of a laser spot in the image. Only a single laser spat is used and the laser is used only in a simple distance measurement.
Systems utilising stereoscopic vision and automated boundary determination are known but they are expensive, complex, bulky and require significant computational power. Further, automated identification of the boundary of a wound may be inaccurate and variable. U.S. Pat. No. 6,567,682 and US2005/0084176 use stereoscopic techniques and automated wound boundary determination requiring intensive processing and bulky equipment.
Other systems, such as that described in US2004/0136579, require the camera always to be positioned with a guide against the patient's skin. While this consistently positions the camera a desired distance from the surface to be photographed and therefore sets the scale of the image, it is unwieldy and requires undesirable contact with the skin, risking contamination of the wound.
US2005/0027567 discloses a system in which a medical professional may enter patient information into a portable computing device. A nurse may also photograph the patient's wounds, these photographs becoming part of the patient's record. However, use of this image data is limited and the computing device is effectively used simply to allow notes to be taken.
It is an object of the invention to provide a simple, inexpensive and repeatable method that does not require a scale reference object to be employed and that may be performed at remote locations or to at least provide the public with a useful choice. It is a further object of the invention to provide an apparatus that is simple, portable, inexpensive and easy to use or which at least provides the public with a useful choice.
There is thus provided a method of producing a projection of a non-planar surface feature comprising:
According to a further embodiment there is provided a method of determining the area of a non-planar surface feature comprising:
According to another embodiment there is provided a method of producing a projection of a surface feature comprising:
According to a further embodiment there is provided a method of determining at least one dimension of a surface feature, including:
According to another embodiment there is provided an apparatus including:
According to a further embodiment there is provided a portable apparatus including:
According to another embodiment there is provided a healthcare apparatus including:
According to a further embodiment there is provided an apparatus including:
The invention will now be described by way of example with reference to possible embodiments thereof as shown in the accompanying figures in which:
Referring to
In use the assembly of camera 1 and laser 4 is directed so that optical axis 2 is aligned with the central region of wound 7. Laser 4 projects stripe 6 across wound 7 and the image is captured by camera 1. It will be appreciated that due to the fixed angular relationship of the laser fan beam 5 and the optical axis 2 that the distance of points of stripe 6 from camera 1 may be determined: the distance of points of stripe 6 along the x-axis shown in
In a first embodiment the assembly of camera 1 and laser 4 may be positioned above wound 7 so that stripe 6 is aligned with optical axis 2. This may be achieved by aligning cross hairs (or a dot) in the centre of a display screen displaying the image with the centre of wound 7 and stripe 6. In this way the camera is positioned a known distance away from the centre of wound 7 and so a scale can be determined.
The area of a wound may be calculated by calculating the pixel area of wound 7 from a captured image and multiplying by a known scaling factor. This technique may be effective where camera 1 can be oriented normal to the wound 7 and where wound 7 is generally planar. This technique offers a simple solution in such cases. However, many wounds are not generally planar and images may be taken at an oblique angle. In such cases this approach may not provide sufficient accuracy and repeatability due to the camera axis not being perpendicular to the wound and significant variation in the distance from the camera to the wound from that assumed.
In a second embodiment an image may be captured in the same fashion except that the stripe need not be aligned with the optical axis of the camera. An image as shown in
In one embodiment laser 4 projects structured light in the form of laser cross hairs onto the image capture area. An image captured according to this embodiment is shown in
This approach has the advantage that it provides correction where an image is not taken normal to a wound. Determining the area within a two dimensional outline rather than in three dimensional space also reduces the computational load.
A wound depth measurement may also be derived as will be explained in connection with
Utilising this information standard wound measurements may be made. The so-called “Kundin area” may be calculated by obtaining the maximum linear dimension of the wound and the short axis (orthogonal to the long axis) of the outline and multiplying the product of these measurements by π/4. The so-called “Kundin volume” may be calculated from the product of the two diameters, the maximum depth and a factor of 0.327. The dimensions may be determined and the volume calculated by a local processor. Various other algorithms may be used to calculate wound volume as appropriate for the circumstances.
Referring now to
The outline of the wound may be determined utilising image processing techniques. However, the results of such techniques may be variable depending upon image quality, available processing capacity and the optical characteristics of the wound. According to a preferred embodiment the outline is input by a user.
Apparatus for performing the method may take a variety of forms ranging from a stationary system (having a stationary camera or a handheld camera connected wirelessly or by a cable) to a fully portable unit. Portable units in the form of PDAs, cell phones, notebooks, ultramobile PCs etc, including an integrated or plug-in camera allow great flexibility, especially for medical services outside of hospitals. Referring now to
In one embodiment placing input device 23 near outline 24 and dragging it may drag the proximate portion of the outline as the input device 23 is dragged across the screen. This may be configured so that the effect of adjustment by the input device is proportional to the proximity of the input device to the outline. Thus, if the input device is placed proximate to the outline the portion proximate to the outline will be adjusted whereas if the input device is placed some distance from the outline a larger area of the outline will be adjusted as the input device is dragged.
Utilising manual input of the outline avoids the need for complex image processing capabilities and allows a compact portable unit, such as a PDA, to be utilised. Further, this approach utilises human image processing capabilities to determine the outline where automated approaches may be less effective.
Once an image is captured it may be stored by the PDA in a patient record along with measurement information (wound area, wound depth, wound volume etc.). An image without the cross hairs may also be captured by the PDA deactivating laser 21. This may be desirable where an image of the wound only is required. Where previous information has been stored comparative measurements may be made and an indication of improvement or deterioration may be provided. Where the PDA has wireless capabilities images may be sent directly for storage in a central database or distributed to medical professionals for evaluation. This allows an expert to review information obtained in the field and provide medical direction whilst the health practitioner is visiting the patient. The historic record allows patient progress to be tracked and re-evaluated, if necessary.
Measurements of other wound information may also be made. The colour of the wound and the size of particular coloured regions may also be calculated. These measurements may require a colour reference target to be placed within the image capture area for accurate colour comparison to be made.
According to another embodiment a 3-D camera may be employed.
In other embodiments “time-of-flight” cameras may be substituted for camera 27. Time-of-flight cameras utilise modulated coherent light illumination and per-pixel correlation hardware.
Referring now to
The three-dimensional locations of elements of beams 37 and 38 may then be determined from the captured image. A three dimensional model of the surface (grid 43 illustrates this) may be calculated using the three dimensional coordinates of elements along lines 37 and 38. The model may be an inelastic surface draped between the three-dimensional coordinates of the structured light elements, or an elastic surface stretched between the three-dimensional coordinates, or a model of the anatomy, or simply a scaled planar projection. A model of the anatomy may be a model retrieved from a library of models, or simply a geometric shape approximating anatomy (a cylinder approximating a leg, for example).
In a first method the three dimensional surface may be unwrapped to form a planar image in which all regions have the same scale (i.e. for a grid the grid is unwrapped such that all cells of the image are the same size). The area within wound boundary 41 may then be easily calculated by calculating the area from the planar image.
Alternatively the area within wound boundary 41 may be calculated by scaling the areas within each region according to scale athibutes associated with each region (e.g. for the grid example normalising the total area within each cell to be the same). The granularity can of course be adjusted depending upon the accuracy required.
This approach could be extended so that a plurality of parallel crossing lines are projected to achieve greater accuracy. The lines could have different optical characteristics e.g. colour) to enable them to be distinguished. However, the two line approach described above does have the advantage of mimicking some manual approaches currently employed which involves tracing the wound outline onto a transparent sheet and then calculating the area.
Use of a positioning system allows automation of tasks and validation of actions. This may be achieved using the apparatus alone, or through communication with a central computer system and database. For example, a nurse may be using the apparatus to monitor wound healing for a patient. The nurse arrives at the patient's home and the position of the home is determined using the GPS system. The position may be used in determining an address. This may be used to ensure that the nurse is at the correct address, possibly by comparison with a schedule of patient visits.
In response to determination of an address, the system may automatically select a patient associated with that address from a patient database. Alternatively, for a new patient, the nurse enters patient information using the PDA and this information is automatically associated with the address determined using the GPS receiver. This avoids the necessity to enter a large amount of data using the PDA. Similarly, the position may be used directly without converting to an address, to select a patient associated with that position, or to associate a new patient with a position.
The positioning system may also be used in auditing user actions. For example, a nurse may enter patient information and this may be verified using the position data by checking it against a patient database. This also allows an employer to monitor staff actions, to ensure that a staff member has in fact visited a particular address or patient.
Data gathered using the GPS system may also be stored for future reference. For example, travel data may be gathered by monitoring position information over a period of time. This data may be used later in estimating travel times between sites and in establishing or optimizing travel schedules for workers.
In one embodiment the auxiliary sensors include a Doppler Ultrasound Probe. The management of some types of wound, such as vascular ulcers, requires measurement of blood-flow in the underlying tissue and Doppler Ultrasound is the method generally used to perform this measurement. Low-power Doppler Ultrasound Probes such as those used in foetal heart-beat monitors may be suitable. This would make it unnecessary for a patient to visit a clinic or hospital, or for a separate ultrasound machine to be transported.
Data gathered from the auxiliary sensors may be associated with a particular address, patient or image. Data may be displayed on the PDA's screen, and may be overlaid on the associated image. The combined information may enable more advanced wound analysis methods to be employed.
Use of auxiliary sensors allows many measurements to be more easily performed at the same time as an image is captured and by the same person. (In a medical setting, this person may also be performing wound treatment.) This is efficient and also allows data to be easily and accurately associated with a particular image or patient.
In any of the above embodiments the section containing the lasers and camera could be combined so that they can be housed in a detachable unit from the PDA, interfaced via a SDIO or Compact Flash (CF) slot, for example. This allows added convenience for the user, plus enables lasers and cameras to be permanently mounted with respect to each other, for ease of calibration. Furthermore, the camera can be optimally focussed, and an illumination means, such as a white LED, may be used to give relatively constant background lighting.
In any of the above embodiments the section containing the camera and/or lasers could be movable with respect to the PDA (being interconnected by a cable or wirelessly). This allows independent manipulation of the camera to capture wounds in awkward locations whilst optimising viewing of the image to be captured.
In any of the embodiments described above, multiple images may be captured in rapid succession. This is particularly advantageous where structured light (e.g. a laser) is used. For example, two images may be captured: one with the laser on and one with the laser off. Subtracting one of these images from the other yields an image with just the laser lines (disregarding the inevitable noise). This facilitates the automated detection of the laser profiles. Other combinations of images may also be useful. For example, three images could be captured: one without illumination but with the laser on, one without illumination and with the laser off and a third image with the illumination on and the laser off. The first two images could be used to detect the laser profile, while the third image is displayed to the user. The first image, showing the laser line with the illumination off would have a higher contrast, so that the laser line would stand out more clearly. Capturing the images in rapid succession means that the motion of the camera between the images is negligible.
This centralised system allows appropriate categorising and storage of data for future use. For example, by mining historical data from the database it is possible to analyse the efficacy of a particular treatment or to compare different treatments. Statistical trends of conditions, treatments and outcomes can be monitored. This data can be used to suggest a particular treatment, based on a set of symptoms exhibited by a particular patient. Data can provide predictions for wound healing. Where actual healing differs from the prediction by more than a threshold, the system may issue an alert.
A healthcare provider can use the data to audit efficiency of its whole organisation, departments within the organisation or even individual workers. Historical data may be compared with historical worker schedules to determine whether workers are performing all tasks on their schedules. Efficiencies of different workers may be compared.
There are thus provided methods of measuring wounds that are simple, inexpensive, repeatable and may be performed remotely. The methods utilize human image processing capabilities to minimise the processing requirements. The methods do not require the placement of articles near the wound and allow historical comparison of a wound. The apparatus are portable with relatively low processing requirements and enable records to be sent wirelessly for evaluation and storage.
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in detail, it is not the intention of the Applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and method, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the spirit or scope of the Applicant's general inventive concept.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
543003 | Oct 2005 | NZ | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/164,793 filed May 25, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/272,719 filed May 8, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,377,295, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/083,491, filed May 11, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,755,053, which is a 371 U.S. National Phase of International Application No. PCT/NZ2006/000262 filed Oct. 13, 2006, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3335716 | Alt et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
4090501 | Chaitin | May 1978 | A |
4170987 | Anselmo et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4236082 | Butler | Nov 1980 | A |
4505583 | Konomi | Mar 1985 | A |
4515165 | Carroll | May 1985 | A |
4535782 | Zoltan | Aug 1985 | A |
4556057 | Hiruma et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4724480 | Hecker et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4736739 | Flaton | Apr 1988 | A |
4768513 | Suzuki | Sep 1988 | A |
4773097 | Suzaki et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4821117 | Sekiguchi | Apr 1989 | A |
4839807 | Doi et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4851984 | Doi et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4894547 | Leffell et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4930516 | Alfano et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4957114 | Zeng | Sep 1990 | A |
4979815 | Tsikos | Dec 1990 | A |
4996994 | Steinhauer et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5003977 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5016173 | Kenet et al. | May 1991 | A |
5036853 | Jeffcoat et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5080100 | Trotel | Jan 1992 | A |
5157461 | Page | Oct 1992 | A |
5174297 | Daikuzono | Dec 1992 | A |
5241468 | Kenet | Aug 1993 | A |
5319550 | Griffith | Jun 1994 | A |
5363854 | Martens et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5369496 | Alfano et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5396331 | Kitoh et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5408996 | Salb | Apr 1995 | A |
5421337 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5515449 | Tsuruoka et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519208 | Esparza et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528703 | Lee | Jun 1996 | A |
5531520 | Grimson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5532824 | Harvey et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5561526 | Huber et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5588428 | Smith et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590660 | MacAulay et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5603318 | Heilbrun et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5627907 | Gur et al. | May 1997 | A |
5644141 | Hooker et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648915 | McKinney et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5673300 | Reckwerdt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5689575 | Sako et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5699798 | Hochman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701902 | Vari et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717791 | Labaere et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5740268 | Nishikawa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749830 | Kaneko et al. | May 1998 | A |
5784162 | Cabib et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791346 | Craine et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799100 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810014 | Davis | Sep 1998 | A |
5910972 | Ohkubo et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921937 | Davis | Jul 1999 | A |
5946645 | Rioux et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5957837 | Raab | Sep 1999 | A |
5967797 | Maldonado | Oct 1999 | A |
5967979 | Taylor | Oct 1999 | A |
5969822 | Fright et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974165 | Giger et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6032070 | Flock et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6081612 | Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081739 | Lemchen | Jun 2000 | A |
6101408 | Craine | Aug 2000 | A |
6208749 | Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215893 | Leshem et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6265151 | Canter et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266453 | Hibbard et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272278 | Takahata et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278793 | Gur et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6307957 | Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324417 | Cotton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6359513 | Kuo et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381026 | Schiff et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392744 | Holec | May 2002 | B1 |
6396270 | Smith | May 2002 | B1 |
6413212 | Raab | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421463 | Poggio et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427022 | Craine et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6491632 | Taylor | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6567682 | Osterweil et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6594388 | Gindele et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594516 | Steckner et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603552 | Cline et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611617 | Crampton | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611833 | Johnson | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6631286 | Pfeiffer et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6648820 | Sarel | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6671349 | Griffith | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690964 | Bieger et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6715675 | Rosenfeld | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6754370 | Hall-Holt et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6770186 | Rosenfeld et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798571 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6809803 | O'Brien et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810279 | Mansfield et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6816606 | Wetzel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816847 | Toyama | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6862410 | Miyoshi | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6862542 | Lockhart et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873340 | Luby | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879394 | Amblard et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6907193 | Kollias et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915073 | Seo | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922523 | Merola et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6941323 | Galperin | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961517 | Merola et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6968094 | Gallagher | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6993169 | Wetzel et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006223 | Mullani | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7013172 | Mansfield et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015906 | Olschewski et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027153 | Mullani | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7040536 | Rosenfeld | May 2006 | B2 |
7054674 | Cane et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7064311 | Jung et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068828 | Kim et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7074509 | Rosenfeld et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7103205 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7106885 | Osterweil et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7127094 | Elbaum et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7127280 | Dauga | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128894 | Tannous et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7130465 | Muenzenmayer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136191 | Kaltenbach et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7155049 | Wetzel et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162063 | Craine et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7167243 | Mullani | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167244 | Mullani | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7194114 | Schneiderman | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7212660 | Wetzel et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7227621 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233693 | Momma | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248724 | Gutenev | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7295226 | Meron et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7298881 | Giger et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7347365 | Rowe | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7376346 | Merola et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7400754 | Jung et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7421102 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440597 | Rowe | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7450783 | Talapov et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7489799 | Nilsen et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7495208 | Czarnek et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496399 | Maschke | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7509861 | Masotti et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7538869 | Treado et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7545963 | Rowe | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7580590 | Lin et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7581191 | Rice et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587618 | Inui et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7595878 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7613335 | McLennan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620211 | Browne et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7647085 | Cane et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7668350 | Rowe | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7684589 | Nilsen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7729747 | Stranc et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7735729 | Rowe | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7738032 | Kollias et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751594 | Rowe et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765487 | Cable | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7819311 | Rowe et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7869641 | Wetzel et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7876948 | Wetzel et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881777 | Docherty et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894645 | Barsky | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7912320 | Minor | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7912534 | Grinvald et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7931149 | Gilad et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8000776 | Gono | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8019801 | Robb et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8026942 | Payonk et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8071242 | Rosenfeld et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8078262 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8094294 | Treado et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105233 | Abou El Kheir | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8123704 | Richards | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8161826 | Taylor | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8165357 | Rowe | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8184873 | Rowe et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8213695 | Zouridakis | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8218873 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8218874 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8224077 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8224078 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8224079 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8229185 | Ennis et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8238623 | Stephan et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8306334 | Paschalakis et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8326031 | Boncyk et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8335351 | Boncyk et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8437544 | Boncyk et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8457395 | Boncyk et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8463030 | Boncyk et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8463031 | Boncyk et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467600 | Boncyk et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467602 | Boncyk et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478036 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8478037 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8480641 | Jacobs | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8488880 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8494264 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8520942 | Boncyk et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8533879 | Taylor | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8548245 | Boncyk et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548278 | Boncyk et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8582817 | Boncyk et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8588476 | Spicola, Jr. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8588527 | Boncyk et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8638986 | Jiang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8661915 | Taylor | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8712193 | Boncyk et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718410 | Boncyk et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8734342 | Cable | May 2014 | B2 |
8755053 | Fright et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768052 | Kawano | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8774463 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8787621 | Spicola, Sr. et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8787630 | Rowe | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8795169 | Cosentino et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8798368 | Boncyk et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8800386 | Taylor | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8824738 | Boncyk et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8837868 | Boncyk et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8842941 | Boncyk et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8855423 | Boncyk et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8861859 | Boncyk et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8867839 | Boncyk et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8873891 | Boncyk et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8875331 | Taylor | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8885983 | Boncyk et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8892190 | Docherty et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8904876 | Taylor | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8913800 | Rowe | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8923563 | Boncyk et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8938096 | Boncyk et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8939918 | Richards | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8948459 | Boncyk et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8948460 | Boncyk et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8997588 | Taylor | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9014513 | Boncyk et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9014514 | Boncyk et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9014515 | Boncyk et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9020305 | Boncyk et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9025813 | Boncyk et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9025814 | Boncyk et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9031278 | Boncyk et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9036947 | Boncyk et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9036948 | Boncyk et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9041810 | Ecker et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9110925 | Boncyk et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9116920 | Boncyk et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9135355 | Boncyk et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9141714 | Boncyk et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9148562 | Boncyk et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9154694 | Boncyk et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9154695 | Boncyk et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9167800 | Spicola, Jr. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9179844 | Fright et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9186053 | Viola | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9224205 | Tsin et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9235600 | Boncyk et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9244943 | Boncyk et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9262440 | Boncyk et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9288271 | Boncyk et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9311540 | Ecker et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9311552 | Boncyk et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9311553 | Boncyk et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9311554 | Boncyk et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9317769 | Boncyk et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9324004 | Boncyk et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9330326 | Boncyk et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9330327 | Boncyk et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9330328 | Boncyk et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9330453 | Soldatitsch et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9342748 | Boncyk et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9395234 | Cosentino et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9399676 | Schurpf et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20020197600 | Maione et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004405 | Townsend et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030006770 | Smith | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031383 | Gooch | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036751 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030085908 | Luby | May 2003 | A1 |
20030164841 | Perry | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030164875 | Perry | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030231793 | Crampton | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040014165 | Keidar | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040059199 | Thomas | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040117343 | Johnson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040146290 | Kollias et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040201694 | Gartstein et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225222 | Zeng et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040264749 | Skladnev | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027567 | Taha | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033142 | Madden et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050094262 | Spediacci et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111757 | Brackett et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050154276 | Barducci | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190988 | Feron | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237384 | Jess et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050259281 | Boust | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273267 | Maione | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008178 | Seeger et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060012802 | Shirley | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036135 | Kern | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036156 | Lachaine et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060044546 | Lewin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072122 | Hu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089553 | Cotton | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098876 | Buscema | May 2006 | A1 |
20060135953 | Kania et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060151601 | Rosenfeld | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060204072 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060222263 | Carlson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060268148 | Kollias | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269125 | Kalevo et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070065009 | Ni et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070125390 | Afriat et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129602 | Bettesh et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070276195 | Xu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276309 | Xu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080088704 | Wendelken | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080126478 | Ferguson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080275315 | Oka et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312642 | Kania et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312643 | Kania et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090118720 | Black et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090213213 | Fright | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100020164 | Perrault | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100091104 | Sprigle et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100156921 | Mclennan | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110125028 | Wood | May 2011 | A1 |
20120275668 | Chou | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130051651 | Leary | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140088402 | Xu | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140354830 | Schafer et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150089994 | Richards | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150150457 | Wu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160206205 | Wu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160284084 | Gurcan | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2642841 | Jan 1981 | DE |
3420588 | Apr 1989 | DE |
4120074 | Jan 1992 | DE |
119660 | Sep 1984 | EP |
355221 | Feb 1990 | EP |
552526 | Oct 1997 | EP |
650694 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1351036 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1248237 | May 2006 | EP |
1210906 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1946567 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1611543 | Jun 2010 | EP |
1584405 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2570206 | Mar 1986 | FR |
293713 | Sep 1997 | NZ |
2000003210 | Jan 2000 | WO |
2000030337 | May 2000 | WO |
2002065069 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2002001143 | Jul 2002 | WO |
2002093450 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2004092874 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004095372 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005033620 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2012146720 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Callieri, M., Cignoni, P., Pingi, P., Scopigno, R., Coluccia, M., Gaggio, G., & Romanelli, M. N. (Nov, 2003). Derma: Monitoring the Evolution of Skin Lesions with a 3D System. In VMV (pp. 167-174). |
Thali, M. J., Braun, M., & Dirnhofer, R. (2003). Optical 3D surface digitizing in forensic medicine: 3D documentation of skin and bone injuries. Forensic science international, 137(2), 203-208. |
Afromowitz, et al., “Multispectral Imaging of Burn Wounds: A New Clinical Instrument for Evaluating Burn Depth”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 35, No. 10, pp. 842-850; Oct. 1988. |
Ahroni, JH et al “Reliability of computerized wound surface area determinations” Wounds: A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice, No. 4, (1992) 133-137. |
Anderson, R., et al. “The Optics of Human Skin”, The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 13-19; Jul. 1981. |
Armstrong, DG et al “Diabetic foot ulcers: prevention, diagnosis and classification” Am Fam Physician Mar. 15, 1998; 57 (6):1325-32, 1337-8. |
Bale, S, Harding K, Leaper D. An Introduction to Wounds. Emap Healthcare Ltd 2000. |
Beaumont, E et al “RN Technology Scorecard: Wound Care Science at the Crossroads” American Journal of Nursing Dec. 1998 98(12):16-18, 20-21. |
Bergstrom, N, Bennett MA, Carlson CE. Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guideline No. 15. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research 1994: 95-0652: [O]. |
Berriss 1997: Automatic Quantitative Analysis of Healing Skin Wounds using Colour Digital Image Processing: William Paul Berriss, Stephen John Sangwine [E]. |
Binder, et al., “Application of an artificial neural network in epiluminescence microscopy pattern analysis of pigmented skin lesions: a pilot study”, British Journal of Dermatology 130; pp. 460-465; 1994. |
Bland, JM et al “Measurement error and correlation coefficients” BMJ Jul. 6, 1996; 313 (7048) :41-2. |
Bland, JM et al “Measurement error” BMJ Jun. 29, 1996; 312 (7047) :1654. |
Bohannon Richard; Barbara A Pfaller Documentation of Wound Surface Area from Tracings of Wound Perimeters [E]. |
Bostock, et al, Toward a neural network based system for skin cancer diagnosis; IEEE Conference on Artificial neural Networks, ISBN: 0-85296-573-7, pp. 215-219, May 1993. |
BPG2005: Assessment and Management of Foot Ulcers for People with Diabetes:Nursing Best Practice Guidelines, Toronto, Ontario [E], Mar. 2013. |
Briggs Corporation: Managed care making photo documentation a wound care standard. Wound care solutions product catalog 1997. |
Brown, G “Reporting outcomes for Stage IV pressure ulcer healing: a proposal” Adv Skin Wound Care (2000)13:277-83. |
Callieri 2003: Callieri M, Cignoni P, Pingi P, Scopigno R. Derma: Monitoring the evolution of skin lesions with a 3D system, VMV 2003. 8th International Fall Workshop, Vision, Modeling, and Visualization 2003, Nov. 19-21, 2003, Munich, Germany [E]. |
Campana: XML-based synchronization of mobile medical devices [E], 2002, 2 Pages. |
Cascinelli, N., et al. “Results obtained by using a computerized image analysis system designed as an aid to diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma”, Melanoma Research, vol. 2, pp. 163-170, 1992. |
Collins, C et al “The Role of Ultrasound in Lower Extremity Wound Management” International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds (2002) 1: 229-235. |
Daubechies, I., “The Wavelet Transform, Time-Frequency Localization and Signal Analysis”, IEEE Trans Inform Theory, vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 961-1005; Sep. 1990. |
De Vet, HC et al “Current challenges in clinimetrics” J Clin Epidemiol Dec. 2003; 56 (12) :1137-41. |
Debray, M., Couturier P, Greuillet F, Hohn C, Banerjee S, Gavazzi G, Franco A. “A preliminary study of the feasibility of wound telecare for the elderly.” Journal of Telemedicine & Telecare 2001: 7(6): 353-8. [A]. |
Duff, et al. (2003), Loftus Hills A, Morrell C 2000 Clinical. Guidelines for the management of venous leg ulcers: Implementation Guide. Royal College of Nursing; 2000: 001 (213): 1-48. [E]. |
Ercal, F., “Detection of Skin Tumor Boundaries in Color Images”, IEEE Transactions of Medical Imaging, vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 624-627, Sep. 1993. |
Ercal, F., et al. “Neural Network Diagnosis of Malignant Melanoma From Color Images”, IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 837-845, Sep. 1994. |
Ferrell, B “Pressure ulcers. Assessment of healing” Clin Geriatr Med (1997)13:575-87. |
Fitzpatrick, R et al “Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials” Health Technol Assess (1998); 2 (14) :i-iv, 1-74. |
Flahr, et al. 2005: Clinimetrics and Wound Science [E]. |
Flanagan, M. “Improving accuracy of wound measurement in clinical practice” Ostomy Wound Manage Oct. 2003, 49(10):28-40. |
Flanagan, M., “Wound measurement: can it help us to monitor progression to healing?” JWound Care May 2003, 12(5):189-94. |
Gilman, T “Wound outcomes: the utility of surface measures” Int J Low Extrem Wounds Sep. 2004; 3 (3) :125-32. |
Goldman, RJ “The patientcom, 1 year later” Adv Skin Wound Care Nov.-Dec. 2002; 15 (6) :254, 256. |
Goldman, RJ et al “More than one way to measure a wound: An overview of tools and techniques” Adv Skin Wound Care (2002) 15:236-45. |
Golston, et al. “Automatic Detection of Irregular Borders in Malanoma and Other Skin Tumors”, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 199-203, 1992. |
Graaf, R., et al. “Optical properties of human dermis in vitro and in vivo”, Applied Optics, vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 435-447, Feb. 1, 1993. |
Greene, A., “Computer image analysis in the diagnosis of melanoma”, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology; vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 958-964, 1994. |
Griffin, JW et al “A comparison of photographic and transparency-based methods for measuring wound surface area” Phys Ther Feb. 1993; 73 (2) :117-22. |
Hansen 1997: Wound Status Evaluation Using Color Image Processing Gary: L. Hansen, Ephraim M. Sparrow, Jaydeep Y. Kokate, Keith J. Leland, and Paul A. Iaizzo [E]. |
Hayes 2003:Hayes S, Dodds, S. Digital photography in wound care. Nursing Times 2003:9(42):48-9. [A]. |
Herbin, et al, Color Quantitation Through Image Processing in Dermatology; IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging, vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 262-269, Sep. 1990. |
Hibbs, P “The economics of pressure ulcer prevention” Decubitus Aug. 1988; 1 (3) :32-8. |
Houghton 2000: Houghton PE, Kincaid CB, Campbell KE, Woodbury MG, Keast DH. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers. Ostomy Wound management 2000: 46(4): 20-6, 28-30. [A]. |
Huang, C., et al.“Border irregularity: atypical moles versus melanoma”, Eur J Dermatol, vol. 6, pp. 270-273, Jun. 1996. |
Iakovou, D. et al., “Integrated sensors for robotic laser welding,” Proceedings of the Third International WLT-Conference on Lasers in Manufacturing, Jun. 2005, pp. 1-6. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2004/028445 filed Sep. 1, 2004. |
Johnson, JD (1995) Using ulcer surface area and volume to document wound size. |
Jones, et al, An Instrument to Measure the Dimension of Skin Wounds; IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering, ISSN: 0018-9294; vol. 42, Issue 5, pp. 464-470, May 1995. |
Jones, TD “Improving the Precision of Leg Ulcer Area Measurement with Active Contour Models”, PhD Thesis (1999) http://www.comp.glam.ac.uklpages/staff/tjones/ThesisOL/Title.Htm. |
Jones, TD et al “An active contour model for measuring the area of leg ulcers” IEEE Trans Med Imaging Dec. 2000, 19(12):1202-10. |
Kenet, R., et al. “Clinical Diagnosis of Pigmented Lesions Using Digital Epiluminescence Microscopy”, Arch Dermatol, vol. 129, pp. 157-174; Feb. 1993. |
Kloth, LC et al “A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Noncontact Normothermic Wound Therapy on Chronic Full—thickness Pressure Ulcers” Advances in Skin & Wound Care Nov./Dec. 2002, 15(6):270-276. |
Koren, et al, Interactive Wavelet Processing and Techniques Applied to Digital Mammography; IEEE Conference Proceedings, ISBN: 0-7803-3192-3; vol. 3, pp. 1415-1418, May 1996. |
Kovesi, P., “Image Features From Phase Congruency”, University of Western Australia, pp. 1-30; Technical Report 9/4, Revised Jun. 1995. |
Krouskop, TA et al “A noncontact wound measurement system” J Rehabil Res Dev May-Jun. 2002, 39(3):337-45. |
Kundin 1989: Kudin JI. A new way to size up a wound. American Journal of Nursing 1989: (2):206-7. |
Langemo, DK et al “Comparison of 2 Wound Volume Measurement Methods” Advances in Skin & Wound Care Jul./Aug. 2001, vol. 14(4), 190-196. |
Langemo, DK et al “Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques” Advances in Wound Care Nov.-Dec. 1998, 11(7):337-43. |
Laughton, C et al “A comparison of four methods of obtaining a negative impression of the foot” J Am Podiatr Med Assoc May 2002; 92 (5) :261-8. |
Lee, et al, a Multi-stage Segmentation Method for Images of Skin Lesions; IEEE Conference Proceedings on Communication, Computers, and Signal Processing, ISBN 0-7803-2553-2, pp. 602-605, May 1995. |
Levoy, et al. “The Digital Michelangelo Project: 3D Scanning of Large Statues,” ACM, 2000. |
Lewis 1997: Lewis P, McCann R, Hidalgo P, Gorman M. Use of store and forward technology for vascular nursing teleconsultation service. Journal of Vascular Nursing 1997. 15(4): 116-23. [A]. |
Lewis, JS, Achilefu S, Garbow JR, Laforest R, Welch MJ., Small animal imaging. current technology and perspectives for oncological imaging, Radiation Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA, Eur J Cancer. Nov. 2002;38(16):217-388. |
Li, D. 2004, Database design and implementation for wound measurement system. Biophotonics, 2004: 42-43. [E]. |
Lorimer, K “Continuity through best practice: design and implementation of a nurse-led community leg-ulcer service” Can J Nurs Res Jun. 2004, 36(2):105-12. |
Lowery et al., “Technical Overview of a Web-based Telemedicine System for Wound Assessment,” Advances in Skin & Wound Care, Jul./Aug. 2002, pp. 165-169, vol. 15, No. 4. |
Lowson, S., “The safe practitioner: Getting the record straight: the need for accurate documentation,” J Wound Care, Dec. 2004, vol. 13, No. 10, [retrieved on Dec. 17, 2004). Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.journalofwoundcare.com/nav?page=jowc.article&resource=I455125>, 2 pages. |
Lucas, C., “Pressure ulcer surface area measurement using instant full-scale photography and transparency tracings,” Advances in Skin & Wound Care, Jan./Feb. 2002, [retrieved on Jul. 28, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3977/is_200201 /ai_n904 . . .>, 7 pages. |
Lunt, M.J., “Review of duplex and colour Doppler imaging of lower-limb arteries and veins,” World Wide Wounds, 2000, [retrieved on Apr. 17, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2000/sept/Michael-Lunt/Dopple . . . >, 6 pages. |
Maglogiannis et al., “A system for the acquisition of reproducible digital skin lesions images,” Technol and Health Care, 2003, pp. 425-441, vol. 11. |
Malian et al., “MEDPHOS: A New Photogrammetric System for Medical Measurement,” 2004, Commission V, WG V/3, 6 pages. |
Mallat, S., et al. “Characterization of signals from multiscale edges”, IEEE Trans Patt and Mech Int'l; 14:710-732; 1992. |
Marchesini, R., et al. “In vivo Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Skin Pigmented Lesions. III. CCD Camera-Based Reflectance Imaging”, Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 151-154; 1995. |
Marjanovic et al., “Measurement of the volume of a leg ulcer using a laser scanner,” Physiol. Meas., 1998, pp. 535-543, vol. 19. |
Mastronjcola et al., “Burn Depth Assessment Using a Tri-stimulus Colorimeter,” Wounds—ISSN: !044-7946, Sep. 2005, pp. 255-258, vol. 17, No. 9. |
McCardle, J., “Visitrak: wound measurement as an aid to making treatment decisions,” The Diabetic Foot, Winter 2005, [retrieved on Mar. 30, 2008). Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_ mOMDQ/is_ 4_8/ai_n16043804/print>, 4 pages. |
Menzies, S., “The Morphologic Criteria of the Pseudopod in Surface Microscopy”, Arch Dermatol, vol. 131, pp. 436-440, Apr. 1995. |
Nachbar, et al., “The ABCD rule of dermatology”, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 551-559, Apr. 1994. |
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, “FAQ: Photography for pressure ulcer documentation,” 1 1P56, 4 pages. |
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, Position Statement, 1998, [retrieved on Jan. 6, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.npuap.org/>, 2 pages (Pressure Ulcer Healing Chart attached, 2 pages). |
Oduncu et al., “Analysis of Skin Wound Images Using Digital Color Image Processing: A Preliminary Communication,” Lower Extremity Wounds, 2004, pp. 151-156, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Pages, Jordi, et al., “Plane-to-plane positioning from image-based visual serving and structured light,” Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sep. 28-Oct. 2, 2004, pp. 1004-1009. |
Patete et al., “A non-invasive, three-dimensional, diagnostic laser imaging system for accurate wound analysis,” Physiol. Meas., 1996, pp. 71-79, vol. 17. |
Pehamberger, H., et al. “In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. I. Pattern analysis of pigmented skin lesions”, Journal of American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 571-583, Oct. 1987. |
Plassman, et al. “Problems of Assessing Wound Size,” Would healing Research Unit, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff CF4 4XN, Wales, UK (1993) (Unpublished). |
Plassmann et al., “MAVIS: a non-invasive instrument to measure area and volume of wounds,” Medical Engineering & Physics, 1998, pp. 332-338, vol. 20. |
Plassmann, P., “Recording Wounds—Documenting Woundcare,” Medical Computing Group, 1998, pp. 1-31. |
Romanelli et al., “Technological Advances in Wound Bed Measurements,” Wounds, 2002, pp. 58-66, vol. 14, No. 2, [retrieved on Apr. 8, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http:/lwww.medscape.com/viewarticle/430900_print>, 8 pages. |
Russell, L., “The importance of wound documentation & classification,” British J Nursing, 1999, pp. 1342-1354, vol. 8, No. 20. |
Salcido, R., “The Future of Wound Measurement,” Advances in Skin & Wound Care, Mar./Apr. 2003, pp. 54, 56, vol. 13, No. 2. |
Salmhofer, et al., “Wound teleconsultation in patients with chronic leg ulcers,” 2005. |
Sani-Kick et al., “Recording and Transmission of Digital Wound Images with the Help of a Mobile Device,” 2002, 2 pages. |
Santamaria et al., “The effectiveness of digital imaging and remote expert wound consultation on healing rates in chronic lower leg ulcers in the Kimberley region of Western Australia,” Primary Intention, May 2004, pp. 62-70, vol. 12, No. 2. |
Schindewolf, et al. “Comparison of classification rates for conventional and dermatoscopic images of malignant and benign melanocytic lesions using computerized colour image analysis”, Eur J Dermatol, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 299-303, May 1993. |
Schindewolf, T., et al. “Classification of Melanocytic Lesions with Color and Texture Analysis Using Digital Image Processing”, The International Academy of Cytology, Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology, vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-11, Feb. 1993. |
Schindewolf, T., et al. “Evaluation of different image acquisition techniques for a computer vision system in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma”, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 33-41, Jul. 1994. |
Schultz et al., “Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, Mar./Apr. 2003, p. SI-S28, vol. 1 1, No. 2, Supplement. |
Sheehan et al., “Percent Change in Wound Area of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Over a 4-Week Period Is a Robust Predictor of Complete Healing in a 12-Week Prospective Trial,” Diabetes Care, Jun. 2003, pp. 1879-1882, vol. 26, No. 6. |
Sheng, Chao, Brian W. Pogue, Hamid Dehghani, Julia A. O'Hara, P. J. Hoopes, Numerical light dosimetry in murine tissue: analysis of tumor curvature and angle of incidence effects upon fluence in the tissue, Proc. SPIE, vol. 4952, 39 (2003), DOI:10.1117/12.474081, Online Publication Date: Jul. 28, 2003. |
Smith & Nephew, “Leg ulcer guidelines: a pocket guide for practice,” National Guideline Clearinghouse, U.S. Dept of Health & Human Services, 2002, [retrieved on Jan. 10, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://guidelines.gov/content.aspx?id=9830&search=Pressure+Ulcer>, 17 pages. |
Smith & Nephew, “Visitrak Wound Measurement Device,” Wound Management, [retrieved on Apr. 7, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://wound.smith-nephew.com/us/node.asp?NodeId=3 I 20>, 7 pages. |
Smith & Nephew, “Guidelines for the Management of Leg Ulcers in Ireland” www.smith-nephew.com. |
Smith et al., “Three-Dimensional Laser Imaging System for Measuring Wound Geometry,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 1998, pp. 87-93, vol. 23. |
Sober, et al., “Computerized Digital Image Analysis: An Aid for Melanoma Diagnosis”, The Journal of Dermatology, vol. 21, pp. 885-890, 1994. |
Solomon et al., “The use of video image analysis for the measurement of venous ulcers,” British J Dermatology, 1995, pp. 565-570, vol. I 33. |
Steiner, A., “In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. II. Diagnosis of small pigmented skin lesions and early detection of malignant melanoma”, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 584-591; Oct. 1987. |
Stoecker, et al. “Automatic Detection of Asymmetry in Skin Tumors”, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 191-197, 1992. |
Takiwaki, et al., “A rudimentary system for automatic discrimination among basic skin lesions on the basis of color analysis of video images”, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 600-604, Apr. 1995. |
Tellez, R., “Managed Care Making Photo Documentation a Wound Care Standard,” Wound Care, 1997, [retrieved on Aug. 29, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://woundcare.org/newsvol2n4/arl.htm>, 2 pages. |
Thawer et al., “A Comparison of Computer-Assisted and Manual Wound Size Measurement,” Ostomy Wound Management, Oct. 2002, pp. 46-53, vol. 48, No. IO. |
Umbaugh et al., “Automatic Color Segmentation Algorithms with Application to Skin Tumor Feature Identification”, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, pp. 75-82, Sep. 1993. |
Umbaugh, et al., “An Automatic Color Segmentation Algorithm with Application to Identification of Skin Tumor Borders”, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 227-235, May-Jun. 1992. |
Umbaugh, et al., “Automatic Color Segmentation of Images with Application to Detection of Variegated Coloring in Skin Tumors”, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, Dec. 1989, pp. 43-52. |
Vermolen et al., “A simplified model for growth factor induced healing of circular wounds,” 2005, pp. 1-15. |
Voigt, H., et al. “Topodermatographic Image Analysis for Melanoma Screening and the Quantitative Assessment of Tumor Dimension Parameters of the Skin”, Cancer, vol. 75, No. 4, Feb. 15, 1995. |
Walker, N, Rogers A, Birchall N, Norton R, MacMahon S. Leg ulcers in New Zealand: age at onset, recurrence and provision of care in an urban population. NZ Med J; 2002; 115(1156):286-9. |
Walker, N, Vandal A, Holden K, Rogers A, Birchall N, Norton R, Triggs C, MacMahon S. Does capture-recapture analysis provide more reliable estimates of the incidence and prevalence of leg ulcers in the community? Aust NZJ Public Health 2002; 26(5):451-5. |
Walker, N., Rodgers A, Birchall N, Norton R, MacMahon S. The occurrence of leg ulcers in Auckland: results of a population-based study. NZ Med J; 2002: 115 (1151): 159-162. |
Wallenstein et al., “Statistical analysis of wound-healing rates for pressure ulcers,” Amer J Surgery, Jul 2004 (Supplement), pp. 73S-78S, vol. 188. |
Wilbright, W.A., The Use of Telemedicine in the Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration: A Pilot Study, Advances in Skin & Wound Care, Jun. 2004, [retrieved on Jul. 28, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_ qa3977/is_200406/ai_n942 . . . >, 6 pages. |
Wild et al., “Wound healing analysis and measurement by means of colour segmentation,” ETRS Poster Presentation V28, Sep. 15, 2005, V28-I 7, 1 page. |
Williams, C., “The Verge Videometer wound measurement package,” British J Nursing, Feb./Mar. 2000, pp. 237-239, vol. 9, No. 4. |
Woodbury et al., Pressure ulcer assessment instruments: a critical appraisal, Ostomy Wound Management, May 1999, pp. 48-50, 53-55, vol. 45, No. 5, [retrieved on Dec. 8, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://gateway.ut.ovid.com.ezproxy.otago.ac.nzigw2/ovidweb.cgi>, 2 pages. |
Woodbury, M.G., “Development, Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of a New Leg Ulcer Measurement Tool,” Advances in Skin & Wound Care, May 2004, [retrieved on Jul. 28, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3977/is_200405/ai_n942 . . . >, 7 pages. |
Zhao, et al, The Classification of the Depth of Burn Injury Using Hybrid Neural Network; IEEE Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, ISBN 0-7803-2475-7; vol. 1, pp. 815-816, Sep. 1995. |
Zimmet, “Venous Leg Ulcers: Evaluation and Management,” American College of Phlebology. 1998. |
Zuijlen, PPM., Angeles AP, Suijker MH, Kreis RW, Middelkoop E. Reliability and Accuracy of Techniques for Surface Area Measurements of Wounds and Scars. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds 2004: 3(1) 7-11. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170042452 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15164793 | May 2016 | US |
Child | 15338216 | US | |
Parent | 14272719 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 15164793 | US | |
Parent | 12083491 | US | |
Child | 14272719 | US |