Method of monitoring a surface feature and apparatus therefor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9955910
  • Patent Number
    9,955,910
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 28, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 1, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
Dimensions of a surface feature are determined by capturing an image of the surface feature and determining a scale associated with the image. Structured light may be projected onto the surface, such that the position of structured light in the captured image allows determination of scale. A non-planar surface may be unwrapped. The surface may alternatively be projected into a plane to correct for the scene being tilted with respect to the camera axis. A border of the surface feature may be input manually by a user. An apparatus and system for implementing the method are also disclosed.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a method of monitoring a surface feature and an apparatus for performing such monitoring. The method and apparatus may find application in a wide range of fields from industrial applications through to medical or veterinary applications such as monitoring dermatological surface features such as wounds, ulcers, sores, lesions, tumours, bruises, burns, psoriasis, keloids, skin cancers, erythema etc.


BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION

Various techniques have been used to monitor wounds, ulcers, sores, lesions, tumours etc. (herein referred to collectively as “wounds”) both within hospitals and outside hospitals (e.g. domiciliary based care, primary care facilities etc.). Typically these wounds are concave and up to about 250 millimeters across. Manual techniques are typically labour-intensive and require examination and contact by skilled personnel. Such measurements may be inaccurate and there may be significant variation between measurements made by different personnel. Further, these approaches may not preserve any visual record for review by an expert or for subsequent comparison.


A number of techniques for the automated monitoring of wounds have been proposed; see for example U.S. Pat. No. 6,101,408, U.S. Pat. No. 6,873,340, U.S. Pat. No. 4,535,782 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,967,979. A common approach is to place a reference object next to the wound and determine the size of the wound utilising the scale of the reference object. It is often undesirable to place a reference object near to a wound and this requires an additional cumbersome step for a user and risks contamination of the wound. Further, when the target is not in the plane of the wound, or if the wound is not planar, there will be errors in any area calculation.


WO 2006/078902 discloses a system in which the scale of a captured image is determined using a laser triangulation sensor. The distance of the camera from a patient's skin is determined using the position of a laser spot in the image. Only a single laser spat is used and the laser is used only in a simple distance measurement.


Systems utilising stereoscopic vision and automated boundary determination are known but they are expensive, complex, bulky and require significant computational power. Further, automated identification of the boundary of a wound may be inaccurate and variable. U.S. Pat. No. 6,567,682 and US2005/0084176 use stereoscopic techniques and automated wound boundary determination requiring intensive processing and bulky equipment.


Other systems, such as that described in US2004/0136579, require the camera always to be positioned with a guide against the patient's skin. While this consistently positions the camera a desired distance from the surface to be photographed and therefore sets the scale of the image, it is unwieldy and requires undesirable contact with the skin, risking contamination of the wound.


US2005/0027567 discloses a system in which a medical professional may enter patient information into a portable computing device. A nurse may also photograph the patient's wounds, these photographs becoming part of the patient's record. However, use of this image data is limited and the computing device is effectively used simply to allow notes to be taken.


It is an object of the invention to provide a simple, inexpensive and repeatable method that does not require a scale reference object to be employed and that may be performed at remote locations or to at least provide the public with a useful choice. It is a further object of the invention to provide an apparatus that is simple, portable, inexpensive and easy to use or which at least provides the public with a useful choice.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

There is thus provided a method of producing a projection of a non-planar surface feature comprising:

    • a. projecting structured light onto the surface feature;
    • b. capturing an image including the surface feature;
    • c. determining the three-dimensional coordinates of structured light elements within the image; and
    • d. unwrapping the image based on the three-dimensional coordinates of the structured light elements to produce a planar projection of the surface feature.


According to a further embodiment there is provided a method of determining the area of a non-planar surface feature comprising:

    • a. projecting structured light onto the surface feature;
    • b. capturing an image including the surface feature;
    • c. determining the three-dimensional coordinates of structured light elements within the image;
    • d. determining scale attributes for regions of the image on the basis of the three-dimensional coordinates of the structured light elements; and
    • e. determining the area of the surface feature by scaling regions of the surface feature based on the scale attributes.


According to another embodiment there is provided a method of producing a projection of a surface feature comprising:

    • a. capturing an image of a surface feature;
    • b. determining from the image the coordinates of a plurality of points of the surface feature in three-dimensional space;
    • c. determining a plane in which at least a subset of the coordinates lie; and
    • d. projecting the image onto the plane to produce a transformed image.


According to a further embodiment there is provided a method of determining at least one dimension of a surface feature, including:

    • a. capturing an image including a surface feature;
    • b. determining a scale associated with the image,
    • c. manually inputting at least part of an outline of the surface feature; and
    • d. determining at least one dimension of the surface feature using the manually input outline data.


According to another embodiment there is provided an apparatus including:

    • a. a camera for capturing an image including a surface feature; and
    • b. a portable computing device including:
      • i. a display configured to display the image and to allow a user to manually input at least part of an outline of the surface feature; and
      • ii. a processor configured to determine a scale associated with the image and to determine at least one dimension of the surface feature using the manually input outline data.


According to a further embodiment there is provided a portable apparatus including:

    • a. a camera for capturing an image of a surface feature;
    • b. a portable computing device including a processor adapted to determine a scale associated with the image; and
    • c. a positioning module allowing the position of the apparatus to be determined.


According to another embodiment there is provided a healthcare apparatus including:

    • a. a camera for capturing an image of a surface feature on a patient;
    • b. one or more auxiliary sensors for determining a physical or chemical parameter associated with the patient; and
    • c. a portable computing device configured to receive image data from the camera and output from the auxiliary sensors, including a processor adapted to determine a scale associated with the image.


According to a further embodiment there is provided an apparatus including:

    • a. a camera for capturing an image including a surface feature; and
    • b. one or more structured light projectors configured to project structured light onto the surface, the structured light including two or more structured light components, each projected at a different angle to the camera's optical axis.





DRAWINGS

The invention will now be described by way of example with reference to possible embodiments thereof as shown in the accompanying figures in which:



FIG. 1 shows the principle of operation of an apparatus according to one embodiment;



FIG. 2 shows an image of a surface feature with a single stripe projected onto the surface feature;



FIG. 3a shows an image of a surface feature with cross hairs projected onto the surface feature;



FIG. 3b shows a cross-sectional view of a wound;



FIG. 4 shows an image of a surface feature with a series of dots projected onto the surface feature;



FIG. 5 shows one embodiment employing a personal digital assistant (PDA) for performing methods of the invention;



FIG. 6 shows a bottom view of a Tablet PC and 3-D camera;



FIG. 7 shows a top view of the Tablet PC and 3-D camera of FIG. 6.



FIG. 8 shows an alternative apparatus and method;



FIG. 9 shows an image illustrating a method of using the apparatus of FIG. 8;



FIG. 10 shows an apparatus according to a further embodiment; and



FIG. 11 shows a system according to another embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1 the general principle of operation of a first embodiment of the invention will be described. A camera 1 has an optical axis 2 and an image capture region 3. Laser 4 is disposed in a fixed angular relationship to optical axis 2 so that the fan beam 5 is disposed at angle a. to optical axis 2. In this embodiment laser 4 generates a single stripe 6. Alternatively a laser projecting a single dot could be used. The camera 1 is preferably a high resolution digital colour camera. Optionally, an illumination means (such as a white LED 44 for low power applications) can be used to give relatively constant background lighting.


In use the assembly of camera 1 and laser 4 is directed so that optical axis 2 is aligned with the central region of wound 7. Laser 4 projects stripe 6 across wound 7 and the image is captured by camera 1. It will be appreciated that due to the fixed angular relationship of the laser fan beam 5 and the optical axis 2 that the distance of points of stripe 6 from camera 1 may be determined: the distance of points of stripe 6 along the x-axis shown in FIG. 1 is directly related to the distance of the point from camera 1.


In a first embodiment the assembly of camera 1 and laser 4 may be positioned above wound 7 so that stripe 6 is aligned with optical axis 2. This may be achieved by aligning cross hairs (or a dot) in the centre of a display screen displaying the image with the centre of wound 7 and stripe 6. In this way the camera is positioned a known distance away from the centre of wound 7 and so a scale can be determined.


The area of a wound may be calculated by calculating the pixel area of wound 7 from a captured image and multiplying by a known scaling factor. This technique may be effective where camera 1 can be oriented normal to the wound 7 and where wound 7 is generally planar. This technique offers a simple solution in such cases. However, many wounds are not generally planar and images may be taken at an oblique angle. In such cases this approach may not provide sufficient accuracy and repeatability due to the camera axis not being perpendicular to the wound and significant variation in the distance from the camera to the wound from that assumed.


In a second embodiment an image may be captured in the same fashion except that the stripe need not be aligned with the optical axis of the camera. An image as shown in FIG. 2 may be obtained. Points 9 and 10, where the outline 8 of wound 7 intersects stripe 6, may be used to calculate scale. From the locations of points 9 and 10 in the image 3 their corresponding (x, y, z) coordinates can be obtained using the known relationship of the laser-camera system. Thus a scale factor may be determined based on the x,y,z coordinates of points 9 and 10 to scale the area 7 to produce a scaled value. Whilst this technique does not require a user to align the stripe with the optical axis it still suffers from the limitations of the technique described above.


In one embodiment laser 4 projects structured light in the form of laser cross hairs onto the image capture area. An image captured according to this embodiment is shown in FIG. 3a. The laser stripes 11 and 12 captured in the image may be identified automatically based on colour, intensity etc. The outline 13 is preferably user defined by drawing the outline on a touch display screen displaying the image. The image points 14, 15, 16 and 17 where cross hairs 11 and 12 intersect with outline 13 may be automatically determined. From these points their corresponding (x, y, z) coordinates can be obtained as above. These three-dimensional coordinates may be utilised to determine the best-fit plane through all points. The best-fit plane will generally be the plane having the minimum sum of squared orthogonal distances from the points to the plane. The image may then be projected onto this plane using, for example, an affine transformation. The resulting image is now scaled linearly and orthogonally. The area within outline 13 may then be calculated from this transformed image. Any number of laser stripes may be used and these stripes may intersect with each other or not.


This approach has the advantage that it provides correction where an image is not taken normal to a wound. Determining the area within a two dimensional outline rather than in three dimensional space also reduces the computational load.


A wound depth measurement may also be derived as will be explained in connection with FIG. 3b. The point 18 of greatest depth b from best-fit plane 19 may be determined iteratively or by other methods. This may be determined for an individual point along one of the cross hairs 11, 12 or for a group of points.


Utilising this information standard wound measurements may be made. The so-called “Kundin area” may be calculated by obtaining the maximum linear dimension of the wound and the short axis (orthogonal to the long axis) of the outline and multiplying the product of these measurements by π/4. The so-called “Kundin volume” may be calculated from the product of the two diameters, the maximum depth and a factor of 0.327. The dimensions may be determined and the volume calculated by a local processor. Various other algorithms may be used to calculate wound volume as appropriate for the circumstances.


Referring now to FIG. 4 another implementation is shown. In this case a series of three laser dots 31, 32 and 33 are projected instead of one or more laser stripe. The laser dots are projected in a diverging pattern so that as the device is moved towards or away from the surface feature the spacing between the dots may be scaled so that they may be aligned with the outline of the wound 30. This approach has the advantage that the intersection between the stripes and the wound outline does not need to be determined as in previous embodiment. Further, the plane passing through the three points may be easily calculated. A further point 34 may be provided for depth calculation. Point 34 will preferably be placed at the position of maximum wound depth.


The outline of the wound may be determined utilising image processing techniques. However, the results of such techniques may be variable depending upon image quality, available processing capacity and the optical characteristics of the wound. According to a preferred embodiment the outline is input by a user.


Apparatus for performing the method may take a variety of forms ranging from a stationary system (having a stationary camera or a handheld camera connected wirelessly or by a cable) to a fully portable unit. Portable units in the form of PDAs, cell phones, notebooks, ultramobile PCs etc, including an integrated or plug-in camera allow great flexibility, especially for medical services outside of hospitals. Referring now to FIG. 5 an apparatus for implementing the invention according to one exemplary embodiment is shown. The apparatus consists of a PDA 20 including a camera, such as a Palm or HP iPaQ, having a cross hair laser generator 21 which projects cross hairs at an angle to the optical axis of the PDA camera (as shown in FIG. 1). For this embodiment the cross hair laser generator may be offset from the camera by about 50 millimeters and disposed at an angle of about 30° to the optical axis of the camera. An image is captured by the camera of the PDA and displayed by touch screen 22. A user can draw an outline 24 about the boundary of the wound 25 using input device 23 on touch screen 22. The apparatus may allow adjustment of outline 24 using input device 23.


In one embodiment placing input device 23 near outline 24 and dragging it may drag the proximate portion of the outline as the input device 23 is dragged across the screen. This may be configured so that the effect of adjustment by the input device is proportional to the proximity of the input device to the outline. Thus, if the input device is placed proximate to the outline the portion proximate to the outline will be adjusted whereas if the input device is placed some distance from the outline a larger area of the outline will be adjusted as the input device is dragged.


Utilising manual input of the outline avoids the need for complex image processing capabilities and allows a compact portable unit, such as a PDA, to be utilised. Further, this approach utilises human image processing capabilities to determine the outline where automated approaches may be less effective.


Once an image is captured it may be stored by the PDA in a patient record along with measurement information (wound area, wound depth, wound volume etc.). An image without the cross hairs may also be captured by the PDA deactivating laser 21. This may be desirable where an image of the wound only is required. Where previous information has been stored comparative measurements may be made and an indication of improvement or deterioration may be provided. Where the PDA has wireless capabilities images may be sent directly for storage in a central database or distributed to medical professionals for evaluation. This allows an expert to review information obtained in the field and provide medical direction whilst the health practitioner is visiting the patient. The historic record allows patient progress to be tracked and re-evaluated, if necessary.


Measurements of other wound information may also be made. The colour of the wound and the size of particular coloured regions may also be calculated. These measurements may require a colour reference target to be placed within the image capture area for accurate colour comparison to be made.


According to another embodiment a 3-D camera may be employed. FIGS. 6 and 7 show a tablet PC 26 having a stereoscopic 3-D camera 27 connected thereto. Tablet PC 26 is a notebook PC with an interactive screen such as a Toshiba Portege M200 and camera 27 may be a stereo camera such as a PointGrey Bumblebee camera. In this embodiment the stereoscopic camera 27 provides three-dimensional image information which is utilised by the tablet PC 26 to produce a three-dimensional model. However, as in the previous embodiments, a user utilising input device 28 may draw outline 29 around the wound displayed on the tablet PC screen. Utilising the three dimensional data, area and volume may be directly calculated.


In other embodiments “time-of-flight” cameras may be substituted for camera 27. Time-of-flight cameras utilise modulated coherent light illumination and per-pixel correlation hardware.


Referring now to FIGS. 8 and 9 an alternative apparatus and method will be described. The apparatus shown in FIG. 8 includes a pair of lasers 35 and 36 which project crossing fan beams 37 and 38 onto surface 39. Lasers 35 and 36 are maintained in a fixed relationship with respect to each other and camera 40. By utilising crossing beams 37 and 38 the spacing between beams 37 and 38 may be adjusted by a user over a convenient range by moving the assembly of lasers 35, 36 and camera 40 towards or away from surface 39.



FIG. 9 illustrates use of the apparatus shown in FIG. 8 in relation to a cylindrical surface 42, such as is typical for a section of an arm or leg. The method may be applied to any surface that may be transformed to a planar (flat) form, i.e. “unwrapped”. In the case of a “developable” surface, there is no distortion and the surface remains continuous, by definition. When fan beams 37 and 38 are projected onto cylindrical surface 42 they curve in a diverging manner as shown in FIG. 9. A user moves the assembly of lasers 35 and 36 and camera 40 with respect to the surface 42 so as to place beams 37 and 38 just outside the boundary 41 of a wound. Camera 40 then captures an image as shown in FIG. 9. For larger wounds the beams 37 and 38 may be within the boundary 41 of a wound.


The three-dimensional locations of elements of beams 37 and 38 may then be determined from the captured image. A three dimensional model of the surface (grid 43 illustrates this) may be calculated using the three dimensional coordinates of elements along lines 37 and 38. The model may be an inelastic surface draped between the three-dimensional coordinates of the structured light elements, or an elastic surface stretched between the three-dimensional coordinates, or a model of the anatomy, or simply a scaled planar projection. A model of the anatomy may be a model retrieved from a library of models, or simply a geometric shape approximating anatomy (a cylinder approximating a leg, for example).


In a first method the three dimensional surface may be unwrapped to form a planar image in which all regions have the same scale (i.e. for a grid the grid is unwrapped such that all cells of the image are the same size). The area within wound boundary 41 may then be easily calculated by calculating the area from the planar image.


Alternatively the area within wound boundary 41 may be calculated by scaling the areas within each region according to scale athibutes associated with each region (e.g. for the grid example normalising the total area within each cell to be the same). The granularity can of course be adjusted depending upon the accuracy required.


This approach could be extended so that a plurality of parallel crossing lines are projected to achieve greater accuracy. The lines could have different optical characteristics e.g. colour) to enable them to be distinguished. However, the two line approach described above does have the advantage of mimicking some manual approaches currently employed which involves tracing the wound outline onto a transparent sheet and then calculating the area.



FIG. 10 shows an apparatus according to a further embodiment, in which one or more further sensors are provided. The apparatus 50 includes a PDA 51, with a housing 52 containing a camera 53, laser generator 54 and a GPS receiver 55. The GPS receiver may alternatively be provided in a separate module, within the PDA 51 or in a plugin card. When external to the PDA, the positioning module may be connected to the PDA via any suitable wired or wireless connection. Positioning systems other than GPS may also be suitable.


Use of a positioning system allows automation of tasks and validation of actions. This may be achieved using the apparatus alone, or through communication with a central computer system and database. For example, a nurse may be using the apparatus to monitor wound healing for a patient. The nurse arrives at the patient's home and the position of the home is determined using the GPS system. The position may be used in determining an address. This may be used to ensure that the nurse is at the correct address, possibly by comparison with a schedule of patient visits.


In response to determination of an address, the system may automatically select a patient associated with that address from a patient database. Alternatively, for a new patient, the nurse enters patient information using the PDA and this information is automatically associated with the address determined using the GPS receiver. This avoids the necessity to enter a large amount of data using the PDA. Similarly, the position may be used directly without converting to an address, to select a patient associated with that position, or to associate a new patient with a position.


The positioning system may also be used in auditing user actions. For example, a nurse may enter patient information and this may be verified using the position data by checking it against a patient database. This also allows an employer to monitor staff actions, to ensure that a staff member has in fact visited a particular address or patient.


Data gathered using the GPS system may also be stored for future reference. For example, travel data may be gathered by monitoring position information over a period of time. This data may be used later in estimating travel times between sites and in establishing or optimizing travel schedules for workers.



FIG. 10 also shows an auxiliary sensor 56, connected to the PDA via a wired connection 57. A wireless connection may also be used and any number of auxiliary sensors may be connected to the PDA. Auxiliary sensors could also be included in the module 52. The auxiliary sensor allows further data to be gathered. For example, where the apparatus is used to capture an image of a wound in a patient's skin, the auxiliary sensor will allow measurement of another physical or chemical parameter associated with the patient, such as temperature, pH, moisture or odour. The auxiliary sensor may also be an optical probe, which illuminates the skin or wound and analyses the spectrum of scattered light. For example, a fluorescence probe could be used.


In one embodiment the auxiliary sensors include a Doppler Ultrasound Probe. The management of some types of wound, such as vascular ulcers, requires measurement of blood-flow in the underlying tissue and Doppler Ultrasound is the method generally used to perform this measurement. Low-power Doppler Ultrasound Probes such as those used in foetal heart-beat monitors may be suitable. This would make it unnecessary for a patient to visit a clinic or hospital, or for a separate ultrasound machine to be transported.


Data gathered from the auxiliary sensors may be associated with a particular address, patient or image. Data may be displayed on the PDA's screen, and may be overlaid on the associated image. The combined information may enable more advanced wound analysis methods to be employed.


Use of auxiliary sensors allows many measurements to be more easily performed at the same time as an image is captured and by the same person. (In a medical setting, this person may also be performing wound treatment.) This is efficient and also allows data to be easily and accurately associated with a particular image or patient.


In any of the above embodiments the section containing the lasers and camera could be combined so that they can be housed in a detachable unit from the PDA, interfaced via a SDIO or Compact Flash (CF) slot, for example. This allows added convenience for the user, plus enables lasers and cameras to be permanently mounted with respect to each other, for ease of calibration. Furthermore, the camera can be optimally focussed, and an illumination means, such as a white LED, may be used to give relatively constant background lighting.


In any of the above embodiments the section containing the camera and/or lasers could be movable with respect to the PDA (being interconnected by a cable or wirelessly). This allows independent manipulation of the camera to capture wounds in awkward locations whilst optimising viewing of the image to be captured.


In any of the embodiments described above, multiple images may be captured in rapid succession. This is particularly advantageous where structured light (e.g. a laser) is used. For example, two images may be captured: one with the laser on and one with the laser off. Subtracting one of these images from the other yields an image with just the laser lines (disregarding the inevitable noise). This facilitates the automated detection of the laser profiles. Other combinations of images may also be useful. For example, three images could be captured: one without illumination but with the laser on, one without illumination and with the laser off and a third image with the illumination on and the laser off. The first two images could be used to detect the laser profile, while the third image is displayed to the user. The first image, showing the laser line with the illumination off would have a higher contrast, so that the laser line would stand out more clearly. Capturing the images in rapid succession means that the motion of the camera between the images is negligible.



FIG. 11 shows a system including one or more portable apparatuses 60 such as those described above. These apparatuses 60 may communicate via a communication network 61 with a central server 62. Preferably the apparatuses 60 communicate wirelessly with the server 62. The central server 62 may utilize an external database 63 for data storage.


This centralised system allows appropriate categorising and storage of data for future use. For example, by mining historical data from the database it is possible to analyse the efficacy of a particular treatment or to compare different treatments. Statistical trends of conditions, treatments and outcomes can be monitored. This data can be used to suggest a particular treatment, based on a set of symptoms exhibited by a particular patient. Data can provide predictions for wound healing. Where actual healing differs from the prediction by more than a threshold, the system may issue an alert.


A healthcare provider can use the data to audit efficiency of its whole organisation, departments within the organisation or even individual workers. Historical data may be compared with historical worker schedules to determine whether workers are performing all tasks on their schedules. Efficiencies of different workers may be compared.


There are thus provided methods of measuring wounds that are simple, inexpensive, repeatable and may be performed remotely. The methods utilize human image processing capabilities to minimise the processing requirements. The methods do not require the placement of articles near the wound and allow historical comparison of a wound. The apparatus are portable with relatively low processing requirements and enable records to be sent wirelessly for evaluation and storage.


While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in detail, it is not the intention of the Applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and method, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the spirit or scope of the Applicant's general inventive concept.

Claims
  • 1. A method for determining the area of an anatomical surface feature, the method comprising: capturing an image of the anatomical surface feature with a capture device of a handheld unit, wherein the handheld unit comprises a PDA, notebook, ultramobile PC, tablet, or cell phone;displaying the image of the anatomical surface feature to a user via a touch-screen display of the handheld unit;creating an outline of the anatomical surface feature on the touch-screen display, wherein creating the outline includes enabling the user to trace at least a portion of the outline on the touch-screen display;enabling the user to adjust the outline manually by selecting and moving a portion of the outline to change the position of the portion relative to the image of the anatomical surface feature, thereby creating a revised outline of the anatomical surface feature; anddetermining the area of the anatomical surface feature based on the outline or the revised outline.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein enabling the user to trace at least a portion of the outline includes enabling the user to trace the portion of the outline while the image of the anatomical surface feature is displayed.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining a perimeter measurement of the anatomical surface feature based on the outline or the revised outline.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein creating the outline includes using image processing techniques.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the image is a two-dimensional image of the anatomical surface feature.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the image represents a three-dimensional model of the anatomical surface feature.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the method further comprises projecting structured light onto the anatomical surface feature.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the structured light guides the user in positioning the capture device relative to the anatomical surface feature.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, further comprising determining a depth of the anatomical surface feature based on the structured light.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising determining a volume of the anatomical surface feature based on the area and the depth.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 wherein the capture device and the touch-screen display are both within a single housing of the handheld unit.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 wherein determining the area of the anatomical surface feature is performed by a computing device, and wherein the computing device is within the single housing of the handheld unit.
  • 13. A method for determining the area of an anatomical surface feature, the method comprising: capturing an image of the anatomical surface feature with a capture device of a handheld unit, the handheld unit configured to be supported solely by a user's hand during the capturing of the image;displaying the image of the anatomical surface feature to a user via a touch-screen display of the handheld unit;creating an outline of the anatomical surface feature on the display, wherein creating the outline includes enabling the user to trace at least a portion of the outline about the boundary of the anatomical surface feature on the touch-screen display; anddetermining the area of the anatomical surface feature based on the outline.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 wherein creating the outline includes enabling the user to trace at least a portion of the anatomical surface feature on the touch screen while the image of the anatomical surface feature is displayed.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, further comprising enabling the user to manually adjust the outline to create a revised outline on the display.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising determining a perimeter measurement of the anatomical surface feature based on the outline or the revised outline.
  • 17. The method of claim 13 wherein the image represents a three-dimensional model of the anatomical surface feature.
  • 18. The method of claim 13 wherein the method further comprises projecting structured light onto the anatomical surface feature.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 wherein the structured light guides the user in positioning the capture device relative to the anatomical surface feature.
  • 20. The method of claim 18, further comprising determining a depth of the anatomical surface feature based on the projected structured light.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, further comprising determining a volume of the anatomical surface feature based on the depth and the area.
  • 22. A system for determining the area of an anatomical surface feature, the system comprising: a portable capture unit configured to be held solely by a user's hand during use, the portable capture unit including— an image sensor configured to generate image data characterizing the anatomical surface feature;a touch-screen display for displaying an image of the anatomical surface feature based on the image data generated by the image sensor; andan input device configured to receive user input related to a location of the boundary of the anatomical surface feature relative to the displayed image; andone or more controllers having memory and processing circuitry, wherein the one or more controllers are configured to be in communication with the image sensor, the display, and the input device, and wherein the memory includes instructions that, when processed by the processing circuitry, cause the one or more controllers to: display the image of the anatomical surface feature on the display;create an outline of the anatomical surface feature on the displayed image;adjust the outline based on user input received from the input device, thereby creating a revised outline of the anatomical surface feature on the display; anddetermine the area of the anatomical surface feature based on the outline or the revised outline.
  • 23. The system of claim 22 wherein the memory includes instructions that, when processed by the processing circuitry, cause the controller to process the image of the anatomical surface feature to create the outline.
  • 24. The system of claim 22 wherein the controller is configured to enable the user to trace around the image of the anatomical surface feature on the touch screen to create the outline.
  • 25. The system of claim 22 wherein the input device enables the user to drag at least a portion of the outline relative to the image of the anatomical surface feature to create the revised outline.
  • 26. The system of claim 22, further comprising a structured light arrangement having a known positional relationship relative to the image sensor.
  • 27. The system of claim 26 wherein the structured light arrangement is configured to project visible light onto the anatomical surface feature.
  • 28. The system of claim 26 wherein the portable capture device further includes the structured light arrangement.
  • 29. The system of claim 26 wherein the structured light arrangement is configured to project infrared light onto the anatomical surface feature.
  • 30. The system of claim 22 wherein the portable capture unit includes the one or more controllers.
  • 31. The system of claim 30 wherein the portable capture unit includes a single housing, and wherein the image sensor, touch-screen display, and one or more controllers are all within the single housing of the portable capture unit.
  • 32. The system of claim 22 wherein the portable capture unit comprises a cell phone or tablet.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
543003 Oct 2005 NZ national
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/164,793 filed May 25, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/272,719 filed May 8, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,377,295, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/083,491, filed May 11, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,755,053, which is a 371 U.S. National Phase of International Application No. PCT/NZ2006/000262 filed Oct. 13, 2006, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (346)
Number Name Date Kind
3335716 Alt et al. Aug 1967 A
4090501 Chaitin May 1978 A
4170987 Anselmo et al. Oct 1979 A
4236082 Butler Nov 1980 A
4505583 Konomi Mar 1985 A
4515165 Carroll May 1985 A
4535782 Zoltan Aug 1985 A
4556057 Hiruma et al. Dec 1985 A
4724480 Hecker et al. Feb 1988 A
4736739 Flaton Apr 1988 A
4768513 Suzuki Sep 1988 A
4773097 Suzaki et al. Sep 1988 A
4821117 Sekiguchi Apr 1989 A
4839807 Doi et al. Jun 1989 A
4851984 Doi et al. Jul 1989 A
4894547 Leffell et al. Jan 1990 A
4930516 Alfano et al. Jun 1990 A
4957114 Zeng Sep 1990 A
4979815 Tsikos Dec 1990 A
4996994 Steinhauer et al. Mar 1991 A
5003977 Suzuki et al. Apr 1991 A
5016173 Kenet et al. May 1991 A
5036853 Jeffcoat et al. Aug 1991 A
5080100 Trotel Jan 1992 A
5157461 Page Oct 1992 A
5174297 Daikuzono Dec 1992 A
5241468 Kenet Aug 1993 A
5319550 Griffith Jun 1994 A
5363854 Martens et al. Nov 1994 A
5369496 Alfano et al. Nov 1994 A
5396331 Kitoh et al. Mar 1995 A
5408996 Salb Apr 1995 A
5421337 Richards-Kortum et al. Jun 1995 A
5515449 Tsuruoka et al. May 1996 A
5519208 Esparza et al. May 1996 A
5528703 Lee Jun 1996 A
5531520 Grimson et al. Jul 1996 A
5532824 Harvey et al. Jul 1996 A
5561526 Huber et al. Oct 1996 A
5588428 Smith et al. Dec 1996 A
5590660 MacAulay et al. Jan 1997 A
5603318 Heilbrun et al. Feb 1997 A
5627907 Gur et al. May 1997 A
5644141 Hooker et al. Jul 1997 A
5648915 McKinney et al. Jul 1997 A
5673300 Reckwerdt et al. Sep 1997 A
5689575 Sako et al. Nov 1997 A
5699798 Hochman et al. Dec 1997 A
5701902 Vari et al. Dec 1997 A
5717791 Labaere et al. Feb 1998 A
5740268 Nishikawa et al. Apr 1998 A
5749830 Kaneko et al. May 1998 A
5784162 Cabib et al. Jul 1998 A
5791346 Craine et al. Aug 1998 A
5799100 Clarke et al. Aug 1998 A
5810014 Davis Sep 1998 A
5910972 Ohkubo et al. Jun 1999 A
5921937 Davis Jul 1999 A
5946645 Rioux et al. Aug 1999 A
5957837 Raab Sep 1999 A
5967797 Maldonado Oct 1999 A
5967979 Taylor Oct 1999 A
5969822 Fright et al. Oct 1999 A
5974165 Giger et al. Oct 1999 A
6032070 Flock et al. Feb 2000 A
6081612 Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. Jun 2000 A
6081739 Lemchen Jun 2000 A
6101408 Craine Aug 2000 A
6208749 Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. Mar 2001 B1
6215893 Leshem et al. Apr 2001 B1
6265151 Canter et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266453 Hibbard et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272278 Takahata et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278793 Gur et al. Aug 2001 B1
6307957 Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. Oct 2001 B1
6324417 Cotton Nov 2001 B1
6359513 Kuo et al. Mar 2002 B1
6381026 Schiff et al. Apr 2002 B1
6392744 Holec May 2002 B1
6396270 Smith May 2002 B1
6413212 Raab Jul 2002 B1
6421463 Poggio et al. Jul 2002 B1
6427022 Craine et al. Jul 2002 B1
6491632 Taylor Dec 2002 B1
6567682 Osterweil et al. May 2003 B1
6594388 Gindele et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594516 Steckner et al. Jul 2003 B1
6603552 Cline et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611617 Crampton Aug 2003 B1
6611833 Johnson Aug 2003 B1
6631286 Pfeiffer et al. Oct 2003 B2
6648820 Sarel Nov 2003 B1
6671349 Griffith Dec 2003 B1
6690964 Bieger et al. Feb 2004 B2
6715675 Rosenfeld Apr 2004 B1
6754370 Hall-Holt et al. Jun 2004 B1
6770186 Rosenfeld et al. Aug 2004 B2
6798571 Wetzel et al. Sep 2004 B2
6809803 O'Brien et al. Oct 2004 B1
6810279 Mansfield et al. Oct 2004 B2
6816606 Wetzel et al. Nov 2004 B2
6816847 Toyama Nov 2004 B1
6862410 Miyoshi Mar 2005 B2
6862542 Lockhart et al. Mar 2005 B2
6873340 Luby Mar 2005 B2
6879394 Amblard et al. Apr 2005 B2
6907193 Kollias et al. Jun 2005 B2
6915073 Seo Jul 2005 B2
6922523 Merola et al. Jul 2005 B2
6941323 Galperin Sep 2005 B1
6961517 Merola et al. Nov 2005 B2
6968094 Gallagher Nov 2005 B1
6993169 Wetzel et al. Jan 2006 B2
7006223 Mullani Feb 2006 B2
7013172 Mansfield et al. Mar 2006 B2
7015906 Olschewski et al. Mar 2006 B2
7027153 Mullani Apr 2006 B2
7040536 Rosenfeld May 2006 B2
7054674 Cane et al. May 2006 B2
7064311 Jung et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068828 Kim et al. Jun 2006 B2
7074509 Rosenfeld et al. Jul 2006 B2
7103205 Wang et al. Sep 2006 B2
7106885 Osterweil et al. Sep 2006 B2
7127094 Elbaum et al. Oct 2006 B1
7127280 Dauga Oct 2006 B2
7128894 Tannous et al. Oct 2006 B1
7130465 Muenzenmayer et al. Oct 2006 B2
7136191 Kaltenbach et al. Nov 2006 B2
7155049 Wetzel et al. Dec 2006 B2
7162063 Craine et al. Jan 2007 B1
7167243 Mullani Jan 2007 B2
7167244 Mullani Jan 2007 B2
7194114 Schneiderman Mar 2007 B2
7212660 Wetzel et al. May 2007 B2
7227621 Lee et al. Jun 2007 B2
7233693 Momma Jun 2007 B2
7248724 Gutenev Jul 2007 B2
7295226 Meron et al. Nov 2007 B1
7298881 Giger et al. Nov 2007 B2
7347365 Rowe Mar 2008 B2
7376346 Merola et al. May 2008 B2
7400754 Jung et al. Jul 2008 B2
7421102 Wetzel et al. Sep 2008 B2
7440597 Rowe Oct 2008 B2
7450783 Talapov et al. Nov 2008 B2
7489799 Nilsen et al. Feb 2009 B2
7495208 Czarnek et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496399 Maschke Feb 2009 B2
7509861 Masotti et al. Mar 2009 B2
7538869 Treado et al. May 2009 B2
7545963 Rowe Jun 2009 B2
7580590 Lin et al. Aug 2009 B2
7581191 Rice et al. Aug 2009 B2
7587618 Inui et al. Sep 2009 B2
7595878 Nelson et al. Sep 2009 B2
7613335 McLennan et al. Nov 2009 B2
7620211 Browne et al. Nov 2009 B2
7647085 Cane et al. Jan 2010 B2
7668350 Rowe Feb 2010 B2
7684589 Nilsen et al. Mar 2010 B2
7729747 Stranc et al. Jun 2010 B2
7735729 Rowe Jun 2010 B2
7738032 Kollias et al. Jun 2010 B2
7751594 Rowe et al. Jul 2010 B2
7765487 Cable Jul 2010 B2
7819311 Rowe et al. Oct 2010 B2
7869641 Wetzel et al. Jan 2011 B2
7876948 Wetzel et al. Jan 2011 B2
7881777 Docherty et al. Feb 2011 B2
7894645 Barsky Feb 2011 B2
7912320 Minor Mar 2011 B1
7912534 Grinvald et al. Mar 2011 B2
7931149 Gilad et al. Apr 2011 B2
8000776 Gono Aug 2011 B2
8019801 Robb et al. Sep 2011 B1
8026942 Payonk et al. Sep 2011 B2
8071242 Rosenfeld et al. Dec 2011 B2
8078262 Murphy et al. Dec 2011 B2
8094294 Treado et al. Jan 2012 B2
8105233 Abou El Kheir Jan 2012 B2
8123704 Richards Feb 2012 B2
8161826 Taylor Apr 2012 B1
8165357 Rowe Apr 2012 B2
8184873 Rowe et al. May 2012 B2
8213695 Zouridakis Jul 2012 B2
8218873 Boncyk et al. Jul 2012 B2
8218874 Boncyk et al. Jul 2012 B2
8224077 Boncyk et al. Jul 2012 B2
8224078 Boncyk et al. Jul 2012 B2
8224079 Boncyk et al. Jul 2012 B2
8229185 Ennis et al. Jul 2012 B2
8238623 Stephan et al. Aug 2012 B2
8306334 Paschalakis et al. Nov 2012 B2
8326031 Boncyk et al. Dec 2012 B2
8335351 Boncyk et al. Dec 2012 B2
8437544 Boncyk et al. May 2013 B2
8457395 Boncyk et al. Jun 2013 B2
8463030 Boncyk et al. Jun 2013 B2
8463031 Boncyk et al. Jun 2013 B2
8467600 Boncyk et al. Jun 2013 B2
8467602 Boncyk et al. Jun 2013 B2
8478036 Boncyk et al. Jul 2013 B2
8478037 Boncyk et al. Jul 2013 B2
8480641 Jacobs Jul 2013 B2
8488880 Boncyk et al. Jul 2013 B2
8494264 Boncyk et al. Jul 2013 B2
8520942 Boncyk et al. Aug 2013 B2
8533879 Taylor Sep 2013 B1
8548245 Boncyk et al. Oct 2013 B2
8548278 Boncyk et al. Oct 2013 B2
8582817 Boncyk et al. Nov 2013 B2
8588476 Spicola, Jr. Nov 2013 B1
8588527 Boncyk et al. Nov 2013 B2
8638986 Jiang et al. Jan 2014 B2
8661915 Taylor Mar 2014 B2
8712193 Boncyk et al. Apr 2014 B2
8718410 Boncyk et al. May 2014 B2
8734342 Cable May 2014 B2
8755053 Fright et al. Jun 2014 B2
8768052 Kawano Jul 2014 B2
8774463 Boncyk et al. Jul 2014 B2
8787621 Spicola, Sr. et al. Jul 2014 B2
8787630 Rowe Jul 2014 B2
8795169 Cosentino et al. Aug 2014 B2
8798368 Boncyk et al. Aug 2014 B2
8800386 Taylor Aug 2014 B2
8824738 Boncyk et al. Sep 2014 B2
8837868 Boncyk et al. Sep 2014 B2
8842941 Boncyk et al. Sep 2014 B2
8855423 Boncyk et al. Oct 2014 B2
8861859 Boncyk et al. Oct 2014 B2
8867839 Boncyk et al. Oct 2014 B2
8873891 Boncyk et al. Oct 2014 B2
8875331 Taylor Nov 2014 B2
8885983 Boncyk et al. Nov 2014 B2
8892190 Docherty et al. Nov 2014 B2
8904876 Taylor Dec 2014 B2
8913800 Rowe Dec 2014 B2
8923563 Boncyk et al. Dec 2014 B2
8938096 Boncyk et al. Jan 2015 B2
8939918 Richards Jan 2015 B2
8948459 Boncyk et al. Feb 2015 B2
8948460 Boncyk et al. Feb 2015 B2
8997588 Taylor Apr 2015 B2
9014513 Boncyk et al. Apr 2015 B2
9014514 Boncyk et al. Apr 2015 B2
9014515 Boncyk et al. Apr 2015 B2
9020305 Boncyk et al. Apr 2015 B2
9025813 Boncyk et al. May 2015 B2
9025814 Boncyk et al. May 2015 B2
9031278 Boncyk et al. May 2015 B2
9036947 Boncyk et al. May 2015 B2
9036948 Boncyk et al. May 2015 B2
9041810 Ecker et al. May 2015 B2
9110925 Boncyk et al. Aug 2015 B2
9116920 Boncyk et al. Aug 2015 B2
9135355 Boncyk et al. Sep 2015 B2
9141714 Boncyk et al. Sep 2015 B2
9148562 Boncyk et al. Sep 2015 B2
9154694 Boncyk et al. Oct 2015 B2
9154695 Boncyk et al. Oct 2015 B2
9167800 Spicola, Jr. Oct 2015 B2
9179844 Fright et al. Nov 2015 B2
9186053 Viola Nov 2015 B2
9224205 Tsin et al. Dec 2015 B2
9235600 Boncyk et al. Jan 2016 B2
9244943 Boncyk et al. Jan 2016 B2
9262440 Boncyk et al. Feb 2016 B2
9288271 Boncyk et al. Mar 2016 B2
9311540 Ecker et al. Apr 2016 B2
9311552 Boncyk et al. Apr 2016 B2
9311553 Boncyk et al. Apr 2016 B2
9311554 Boncyk et al. Apr 2016 B2
9317769 Boncyk et al. Apr 2016 B2
9324004 Boncyk et al. Apr 2016 B2
9330326 Boncyk et al. May 2016 B2
9330327 Boncyk et al. May 2016 B2
9330328 Boncyk et al. May 2016 B2
9330453 Soldatitsch et al. May 2016 B2
9342748 Boncyk et al. May 2016 B2
9395234 Cosentino et al. Jul 2016 B2
9399676 Schurpf et al. Jul 2016 B2
20020197600 Maione et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030004405 Townsend et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030006770 Smith Jan 2003 A1
20030031383 Gooch Feb 2003 A1
20030036751 Anderson et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030085908 Luby May 2003 A1
20030164841 Perry Sep 2003 A1
20030164875 Perry Sep 2003 A1
20030231793 Crampton Dec 2003 A1
20040014165 Keidar Jan 2004 A1
20040059199 Thomas Mar 2004 A1
20040117343 Johnson Jun 2004 A1
20040146290 Kollias et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040201694 Gartstein et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040225222 Zeng et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040264749 Skladnev Dec 2004 A1
20050027567 Taha Feb 2005 A1
20050033142 Madden et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050094262 Spediacci et al. May 2005 A1
20050111757 Brackett et al. May 2005 A1
20050154276 Barducci Jul 2005 A1
20050190988 Feron Sep 2005 A1
20050237384 Jess et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050259281 Boust Nov 2005 A1
20050273267 Maione Dec 2005 A1
20060008178 Seeger et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060012802 Shirley Jan 2006 A1
20060036135 Kern Feb 2006 A1
20060036156 Lachaine et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060044546 Lewin et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060072122 Hu Apr 2006 A1
20060089553 Cotton Apr 2006 A1
20060098876 Buscema May 2006 A1
20060135953 Kania et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060151601 Rosenfeld Jul 2006 A1
20060204072 Wetzel et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060222263 Carlson Oct 2006 A1
20060268148 Kollias Nov 2006 A1
20060269125 Kalevo et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070065009 Ni et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070125390 Afriat et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070129602 Bettesh et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070276195 Xu Nov 2007 A1
20070276309 Xu Nov 2007 A1
20080088704 Wendelken Apr 2008 A1
20080126478 Ferguson et al. May 2008 A1
20080275315 Oka et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080312642 Kania et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080312643 Kania et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090118720 Black et al. May 2009 A1
20090213213 Fright Aug 2009 A1
20100020164 Perrault Jan 2010 A1
20100091104 Sprigle et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100156921 Mclennan Jun 2010 A1
20110125028 Wood May 2011 A1
20120275668 Chou Nov 2012 A1
20130051651 Leary Feb 2013 A1
20140088402 Xu Mar 2014 A1
20140354830 Schafer et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150089994 Richards Apr 2015 A1
20150150457 Wu et al. Jun 2015 A1
20160206205 Wu et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160284084 Gurcan Sep 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (24)
Number Date Country
2642841 Jan 1981 DE
3420588 Apr 1989 DE
4120074 Jan 1992 DE
119660 Sep 1984 EP
355221 Feb 1990 EP
552526 Oct 1997 EP
650694 Jul 1998 EP
1351036 Mar 2005 EP
1248237 May 2006 EP
1210906 Jun 2006 EP
1946567 Jul 2008 EP
1611543 Jun 2010 EP
1584405 Sep 2010 EP
2570206 Mar 1986 FR
293713 Sep 1997 NZ
2000003210 Jan 2000 WO
2000030337 May 2000 WO
2002065069 Jun 2002 WO
2002001143 Jul 2002 WO
2002093450 Nov 2002 WO
2004092874 Nov 2004 WO
2004095372 Nov 2004 WO
2005033620 Apr 2005 WO
2012146720 Nov 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (129)
Entry
Callieri, M., Cignoni, P., Pingi, P., Scopigno, R., Coluccia, M., Gaggio, G., & Romanelli, M. N. (Nov, 2003). Derma: Monitoring the Evolution of Skin Lesions with a 3D System. In VMV (pp. 167-174).
Thali, M. J., Braun, M., & Dirnhofer, R. (2003). Optical 3D surface digitizing in forensic medicine: 3D documentation of skin and bone injuries. Forensic science international, 137(2), 203-208.
Afromowitz, et al., “Multispectral Imaging of Burn Wounds: A New Clinical Instrument for Evaluating Burn Depth”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 35, No. 10, pp. 842-850; Oct. 1988.
Ahroni, JH et al “Reliability of computerized wound surface area determinations” Wounds: A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice, No. 4, (1992) 133-137.
Anderson, R., et al. “The Optics of Human Skin”, The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 13-19; Jul. 1981.
Armstrong, DG et al “Diabetic foot ulcers: prevention, diagnosis and classification” Am Fam Physician Mar. 15, 1998; 57 (6):1325-32, 1337-8.
Bale, S, Harding K, Leaper D. An Introduction to Wounds. Emap Healthcare Ltd 2000.
Beaumont, E et al “RN Technology Scorecard: Wound Care Science at the Crossroads” American Journal of Nursing Dec. 1998 98(12):16-18, 20-21.
Bergstrom, N, Bennett MA, Carlson CE. Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guideline No. 15. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research 1994: 95-0652: [O].
Berriss 1997: Automatic Quantitative Analysis of Healing Skin Wounds using Colour Digital Image Processing: William Paul Berriss, Stephen John Sangwine [E].
Binder, et al., “Application of an artificial neural network in epiluminescence microscopy pattern analysis of pigmented skin lesions: a pilot study”, British Journal of Dermatology 130; pp. 460-465; 1994.
Bland, JM et al “Measurement error and correlation coefficients” BMJ Jul. 6, 1996; 313 (7048) :41-2.
Bland, JM et al “Measurement error” BMJ Jun. 29, 1996; 312 (7047) :1654.
Bohannon Richard; Barbara A Pfaller Documentation of Wound Surface Area from Tracings of Wound Perimeters [E].
Bostock, et al, Toward a neural network based system for skin cancer diagnosis; IEEE Conference on Artificial neural Networks, ISBN: 0-85296-573-7, pp. 215-219, May 1993.
BPG2005: Assessment and Management of Foot Ulcers for People with Diabetes:Nursing Best Practice Guidelines, Toronto, Ontario [E], Mar. 2013.
Briggs Corporation: Managed care making photo documentation a wound care standard. Wound care solutions product catalog 1997.
Brown, G “Reporting outcomes for Stage IV pressure ulcer healing: a proposal” Adv Skin Wound Care (2000)13:277-83.
Callieri 2003: Callieri M, Cignoni P, Pingi P, Scopigno R. Derma: Monitoring the evolution of skin lesions with a 3D system, VMV 2003. 8th International Fall Workshop, Vision, Modeling, and Visualization 2003, Nov. 19-21, 2003, Munich, Germany [E].
Campana: XML-based synchronization of mobile medical devices [E], 2002, 2 Pages.
Cascinelli, N., et al. “Results obtained by using a computerized image analysis system designed as an aid to diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma”, Melanoma Research, vol. 2, pp. 163-170, 1992.
Collins, C et al “The Role of Ultrasound in Lower Extremity Wound Management” International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds (2002) 1: 229-235.
Daubechies, I., “The Wavelet Transform, Time-Frequency Localization and Signal Analysis”, IEEE Trans Inform Theory, vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 961-1005; Sep. 1990.
De Vet, HC et al “Current challenges in clinimetrics” J Clin Epidemiol Dec. 2003; 56 (12) :1137-41.
Debray, M., Couturier P, Greuillet F, Hohn C, Banerjee S, Gavazzi G, Franco A. “A preliminary study of the feasibility of wound telecare for the elderly.” Journal of Telemedicine & Telecare 2001: 7(6): 353-8. [A].
Duff, et al. (2003), Loftus Hills A, Morrell C 2000 Clinical. Guidelines for the management of venous leg ulcers: Implementation Guide. Royal College of Nursing; 2000: 001 (213): 1-48. [E].
Ercal, F., “Detection of Skin Tumor Boundaries in Color Images”, IEEE Transactions of Medical Imaging, vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 624-627, Sep. 1993.
Ercal, F., et al. “Neural Network Diagnosis of Malignant Melanoma From Color Images”, IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 837-845, Sep. 1994.
Ferrell, B “Pressure ulcers. Assessment of healing” Clin Geriatr Med (1997)13:575-87.
Fitzpatrick, R et al “Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials” Health Technol Assess (1998); 2 (14) :i-iv, 1-74.
Flahr, et al. 2005: Clinimetrics and Wound Science [E].
Flanagan, M. “Improving accuracy of wound measurement in clinical practice” Ostomy Wound Manage Oct. 2003, 49(10):28-40.
Flanagan, M., “Wound measurement: can it help us to monitor progression to healing?” JWound Care May 2003, 12(5):189-94.
Gilman, T “Wound outcomes: the utility of surface measures” Int J Low Extrem Wounds Sep. 2004; 3 (3) :125-32.
Goldman, RJ “The patientcom, 1 year later” Adv Skin Wound Care Nov.-Dec. 2002; 15 (6) :254, 256.
Goldman, RJ et al “More than one way to measure a wound: An overview of tools and techniques” Adv Skin Wound Care (2002) 15:236-45.
Golston, et al. “Automatic Detection of Irregular Borders in Malanoma and Other Skin Tumors”, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 199-203, 1992.
Graaf, R., et al. “Optical properties of human dermis in vitro and in vivo”, Applied Optics, vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 435-447, Feb. 1, 1993.
Greene, A., “Computer image analysis in the diagnosis of melanoma”, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology; vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 958-964, 1994.
Griffin, JW et al “A comparison of photographic and transparency-based methods for measuring wound surface area” Phys Ther Feb. 1993; 73 (2) :117-22.
Hansen 1997: Wound Status Evaluation Using Color Image Processing Gary: L. Hansen, Ephraim M. Sparrow, Jaydeep Y. Kokate, Keith J. Leland, and Paul A. Iaizzo [E].
Hayes 2003:Hayes S, Dodds, S. Digital photography in wound care. Nursing Times 2003:9(42):48-9. [A].
Herbin, et al, Color Quantitation Through Image Processing in Dermatology; IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging, vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 262-269, Sep. 1990.
Hibbs, P “The economics of pressure ulcer prevention” Decubitus Aug. 1988; 1 (3) :32-8.
Houghton 2000: Houghton PE, Kincaid CB, Campbell KE, Woodbury MG, Keast DH. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers. Ostomy Wound management 2000: 46(4): 20-6, 28-30. [A].
Huang, C., et al.“Border irregularity: atypical moles versus melanoma”, Eur J Dermatol, vol. 6, pp. 270-273, Jun. 1996.
Iakovou, D. et al., “Integrated sensors for robotic laser welding,” Proceedings of the Third International WLT-Conference on Lasers in Manufacturing, Jun. 2005, pp. 1-6.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2004/028445 filed Sep. 1, 2004.
Johnson, JD (1995) Using ulcer surface area and volume to document wound size.
Jones, et al, An Instrument to Measure the Dimension of Skin Wounds; IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering, ISSN: 0018-9294; vol. 42, Issue 5, pp. 464-470, May 1995.
Jones, TD “Improving the Precision of Leg Ulcer Area Measurement with Active Contour Models”, PhD Thesis (1999) http://www.comp.glam.ac.uklpages/staff/tjones/ThesisOL/Title.Htm.
Jones, TD et al “An active contour model for measuring the area of leg ulcers” IEEE Trans Med Imaging Dec. 2000, 19(12):1202-10.
Kenet, R., et al. “Clinical Diagnosis of Pigmented Lesions Using Digital Epiluminescence Microscopy”, Arch Dermatol, vol. 129, pp. 157-174; Feb. 1993.
Kloth, LC et al “A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Noncontact Normothermic Wound Therapy on Chronic Full—thickness Pressure Ulcers” Advances in Skin & Wound Care Nov./Dec. 2002, 15(6):270-276.
Koren, et al, Interactive Wavelet Processing and Techniques Applied to Digital Mammography; IEEE Conference Proceedings, ISBN: 0-7803-3192-3; vol. 3, pp. 1415-1418, May 1996.
Kovesi, P., “Image Features From Phase Congruency”, University of Western Australia, pp. 1-30; Technical Report 9/4, Revised Jun. 1995.
Krouskop, TA et al “A noncontact wound measurement system” J Rehabil Res Dev May-Jun. 2002, 39(3):337-45.
Kundin 1989: Kudin JI. A new way to size up a wound. American Journal of Nursing 1989: (2):206-7.
Langemo, DK et al “Comparison of 2 Wound Volume Measurement Methods” Advances in Skin & Wound Care Jul./Aug. 2001, vol. 14(4), 190-196.
Langemo, DK et al “Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques” Advances in Wound Care Nov.-Dec. 1998, 11(7):337-43.
Laughton, C et al “A comparison of four methods of obtaining a negative impression of the foot” J Am Podiatr Med Assoc May 2002; 92 (5) :261-8.
Lee, et al, a Multi-stage Segmentation Method for Images of Skin Lesions; IEEE Conference Proceedings on Communication, Computers, and Signal Processing, ISBN 0-7803-2553-2, pp. 602-605, May 1995.
Levoy, et al. “The Digital Michelangelo Project: 3D Scanning of Large Statues,” ACM, 2000.
Lewis 1997: Lewis P, McCann R, Hidalgo P, Gorman M. Use of store and forward technology for vascular nursing teleconsultation service. Journal of Vascular Nursing 1997. 15(4): 116-23. [A].
Lewis, JS, Achilefu S, Garbow JR, Laforest R, Welch MJ., Small animal imaging. current technology and perspectives for oncological imaging, Radiation Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA, Eur J Cancer. Nov. 2002;38(16):217-388.
Li, D. 2004, Database design and implementation for wound measurement system. Biophotonics, 2004: 42-43. [E].
Lorimer, K “Continuity through best practice: design and implementation of a nurse-led community leg-ulcer service” Can J Nurs Res Jun. 2004, 36(2):105-12.
Lowery et al., “Technical Overview of a Web-based Telemedicine System for Wound Assessment,” Advances in Skin & Wound Care, Jul./Aug. 2002, pp. 165-169, vol. 15, No. 4.
Lowson, S., “The safe practitioner: Getting the record straight: the need for accurate documentation,” J Wound Care, Dec. 2004, vol. 13, No. 10, [retrieved on Dec. 17, 2004). Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.journalofwoundcare.com/nav?page=jowc.article&resource=I455125>, 2 pages.
Lucas, C., “Pressure ulcer surface area measurement using instant full-scale photography and transparency tracings,” Advances in Skin & Wound Care, Jan./Feb. 2002, [retrieved on Jul. 28, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3977/is_200201 /ai_n904 . . .>, 7 pages.
Lunt, M.J., “Review of duplex and colour Doppler imaging of lower-limb arteries and veins,” World Wide Wounds, 2000, [retrieved on Apr. 17, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2000/sept/Michael-Lunt/Dopple . . . >, 6 pages.
Maglogiannis et al., “A system for the acquisition of reproducible digital skin lesions images,” Technol and Health Care, 2003, pp. 425-441, vol. 11.
Malian et al., “MEDPHOS: A New Photogrammetric System for Medical Measurement,” 2004, Commission V, WG V/3, 6 pages.
Mallat, S., et al. “Characterization of signals from multiscale edges”, IEEE Trans Patt and Mech Int'l; 14:710-732; 1992.
Marchesini, R., et al. “In vivo Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Skin Pigmented Lesions. III. CCD Camera-Based Reflectance Imaging”, Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 151-154; 1995.
Marjanovic et al., “Measurement of the volume of a leg ulcer using a laser scanner,” Physiol. Meas., 1998, pp. 535-543, vol. 19.
Mastronjcola et al., “Burn Depth Assessment Using a Tri-stimulus Colorimeter,” Wounds—ISSN: !044-7946, Sep. 2005, pp. 255-258, vol. 17, No. 9.
McCardle, J., “Visitrak: wound measurement as an aid to making treatment decisions,” The Diabetic Foot, Winter 2005, [retrieved on Mar. 30, 2008). Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_ mOMDQ/is_ 4_8/ai_n16043804/print>, 4 pages.
Menzies, S., “The Morphologic Criteria of the Pseudopod in Surface Microscopy”, Arch Dermatol, vol. 131, pp. 436-440, Apr. 1995.
Nachbar, et al., “The ABCD rule of dermatology”, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 551-559, Apr. 1994.
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, “FAQ: Photography for pressure ulcer documentation,” 1 1P56, 4 pages.
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, Position Statement, 1998, [retrieved on Jan. 6, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.npuap.org/>, 2 pages (Pressure Ulcer Healing Chart attached, 2 pages).
Oduncu et al., “Analysis of Skin Wound Images Using Digital Color Image Processing: A Preliminary Communication,” Lower Extremity Wounds, 2004, pp. 151-156, vol. 3, No. 3.
Pages, Jordi, et al., “Plane-to-plane positioning from image-based visual serving and structured light,” Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sep. 28-Oct. 2, 2004, pp. 1004-1009.
Patete et al., “A non-invasive, three-dimensional, diagnostic laser imaging system for accurate wound analysis,” Physiol. Meas., 1996, pp. 71-79, vol. 17.
Pehamberger, H., et al. “In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. I. Pattern analysis of pigmented skin lesions”, Journal of American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 571-583, Oct. 1987.
Plassman, et al. “Problems of Assessing Wound Size,” Would healing Research Unit, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff CF4 4XN, Wales, UK (1993) (Unpublished).
Plassmann et al., “MAVIS: a non-invasive instrument to measure area and volume of wounds,” Medical Engineering & Physics, 1998, pp. 332-338, vol. 20.
Plassmann, P., “Recording Wounds—Documenting Woundcare,” Medical Computing Group, 1998, pp. 1-31.
Romanelli et al., “Technological Advances in Wound Bed Measurements,” Wounds, 2002, pp. 58-66, vol. 14, No. 2, [retrieved on Apr. 8, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http:/lwww.medscape.com/viewarticle/430900_print>, 8 pages.
Russell, L., “The importance of wound documentation & classification,” British J Nursing, 1999, pp. 1342-1354, vol. 8, No. 20.
Salcido, R., “The Future of Wound Measurement,” Advances in Skin & Wound Care, Mar./Apr. 2003, pp. 54, 56, vol. 13, No. 2.
Salmhofer, et al., “Wound teleconsultation in patients with chronic leg ulcers,” 2005.
Sani-Kick et al., “Recording and Transmission of Digital Wound Images with the Help of a Mobile Device,” 2002, 2 pages.
Santamaria et al., “The effectiveness of digital imaging and remote expert wound consultation on healing rates in chronic lower leg ulcers in the Kimberley region of Western Australia,” Primary Intention, May 2004, pp. 62-70, vol. 12, No. 2.
Schindewolf, et al. “Comparison of classification rates for conventional and dermatoscopic images of malignant and benign melanocytic lesions using computerized colour image analysis”, Eur J Dermatol, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 299-303, May 1993.
Schindewolf, T., et al. “Classification of Melanocytic Lesions with Color and Texture Analysis Using Digital Image Processing”, The International Academy of Cytology, Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology, vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-11, Feb. 1993.
Schindewolf, T., et al. “Evaluation of different image acquisition techniques for a computer vision system in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma”, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 33-41, Jul. 1994.
Schultz et al., “Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, Mar./Apr. 2003, p. SI-S28, vol. 1 1, No. 2, Supplement.
Sheehan et al., “Percent Change in Wound Area of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Over a 4-Week Period Is a Robust Predictor of Complete Healing in a 12-Week Prospective Trial,” Diabetes Care, Jun. 2003, pp. 1879-1882, vol. 26, No. 6.
Sheng, Chao, Brian W. Pogue, Hamid Dehghani, Julia A. O'Hara, P. J. Hoopes, Numerical light dosimetry in murine tissue: analysis of tumor curvature and angle of incidence effects upon fluence in the tissue, Proc. SPIE, vol. 4952, 39 (2003), DOI:10.1117/12.474081, Online Publication Date: Jul. 28, 2003.
Smith & Nephew, “Leg ulcer guidelines: a pocket guide for practice,” National Guideline Clearinghouse, U.S. Dept of Health & Human Services, 2002, [retrieved on Jan. 10, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://guidelines.gov/content.aspx?id=9830&search=Pressure+Ulcer>, 17 pages.
Smith & Nephew, “Visitrak Wound Measurement Device,” Wound Management, [retrieved on Apr. 7, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://wound.smith-nephew.com/us/node.asp?NodeId=3 I 20>, 7 pages.
Smith & Nephew, “Guidelines for the Management of Leg Ulcers in Ireland” www.smith-nephew.com.
Smith et al., “Three-Dimensional Laser Imaging System for Measuring Wound Geometry,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 1998, pp. 87-93, vol. 23.
Sober, et al., “Computerized Digital Image Analysis: An Aid for Melanoma Diagnosis”, The Journal of Dermatology, vol. 21, pp. 885-890, 1994.
Solomon et al., “The use of video image analysis for the measurement of venous ulcers,” British J Dermatology, 1995, pp. 565-570, vol. I 33.
Steiner, A., “In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. II. Diagnosis of small pigmented skin lesions and early detection of malignant melanoma”, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 584-591; Oct. 1987.
Stoecker, et al. “Automatic Detection of Asymmetry in Skin Tumors”, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 191-197, 1992.
Takiwaki, et al., “A rudimentary system for automatic discrimination among basic skin lesions on the basis of color analysis of video images”, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 600-604, Apr. 1995.
Tellez, R., “Managed Care Making Photo Documentation a Wound Care Standard,” Wound Care, 1997, [retrieved on Aug. 29, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://woundcare.org/newsvol2n4/arl.htm>, 2 pages.
Thawer et al., “A Comparison of Computer-Assisted and Manual Wound Size Measurement,” Ostomy Wound Management, Oct. 2002, pp. 46-53, vol. 48, No. IO.
Umbaugh et al., “Automatic Color Segmentation Algorithms with Application to Skin Tumor Feature Identification”, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, pp. 75-82, Sep. 1993.
Umbaugh, et al., “An Automatic Color Segmentation Algorithm with Application to Identification of Skin Tumor Borders”, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 227-235, May-Jun. 1992.
Umbaugh, et al., “Automatic Color Segmentation of Images with Application to Detection of Variegated Coloring in Skin Tumors”, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, Dec. 1989, pp. 43-52.
Vermolen et al., “A simplified model for growth factor induced healing of circular wounds,” 2005, pp. 1-15.
Voigt, H., et al. “Topodermatographic Image Analysis for Melanoma Screening and the Quantitative Assessment of Tumor Dimension Parameters of the Skin”, Cancer, vol. 75, No. 4, Feb. 15, 1995.
Walker, N, Rogers A, Birchall N, Norton R, MacMahon S. Leg ulcers in New Zealand: age at onset, recurrence and provision of care in an urban population. NZ Med J; 2002; 115(1156):286-9.
Walker, N, Vandal A, Holden K, Rogers A, Birchall N, Norton R, Triggs C, MacMahon S. Does capture-recapture analysis provide more reliable estimates of the incidence and prevalence of leg ulcers in the community? Aust NZJ Public Health 2002; 26(5):451-5.
Walker, N., Rodgers A, Birchall N, Norton R, MacMahon S. The occurrence of leg ulcers in Auckland: results of a population-based study. NZ Med J; 2002: 115 (1151): 159-162.
Wallenstein et al., “Statistical analysis of wound-healing rates for pressure ulcers,” Amer J Surgery, Jul 2004 (Supplement), pp. 73S-78S, vol. 188.
Wilbright, W.A., The Use of Telemedicine in the Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration: A Pilot Study, Advances in Skin & Wound Care, Jun. 2004, [retrieved on Jul. 28, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_ qa3977/is_200406/ai_n942 . . . >, 6 pages.
Wild et al., “Wound healing analysis and measurement by means of colour segmentation,” ETRS Poster Presentation V28, Sep. 15, 2005, V28-I 7, 1 page.
Williams, C., “The Verge Videometer wound measurement package,” British J Nursing, Feb./Mar. 2000, pp. 237-239, vol. 9, No. 4.
Woodbury et al., Pressure ulcer assessment instruments: a critical appraisal, Ostomy Wound Management, May 1999, pp. 48-50, 53-55, vol. 45, No. 5, [retrieved on Dec. 8, 2005]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://gateway.ut.ovid.com.ezproxy.otago.ac.nzigw2/ovidweb.cgi>, 2 pages.
Woodbury, M.G., “Development, Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of a New Leg Ulcer Measurement Tool,” Advances in Skin & Wound Care, May 2004, [retrieved on Jul. 28, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3977/is_200405/ai_n942 . . . >, 7 pages.
Zhao, et al, The Classification of the Depth of Burn Injury Using Hybrid Neural Network; IEEE Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, ISBN 0-7803-2475-7; vol. 1, pp. 815-816, Sep. 1995.
Zimmet, “Venous Leg Ulcers: Evaluation and Management,” American College of Phlebology. 1998.
Zuijlen, PPM., Angeles AP, Suijker MH, Kreis RW, Middelkoop E. Reliability and Accuracy of Techniques for Surface Area Measurements of Wounds and Scars. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds 2004: 3(1) 7-11.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170042452 A1 Feb 2017 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15164793 May 2016 US
Child 15338216 US
Parent 14272719 May 2014 US
Child 15164793 US
Parent 12083491 US
Child 14272719 US