Patent Grant
10144100
The present invention concerns a method for producing a dentist tool formed by an overlay to be used by a dentist in removing tooth structure from a tooth, said method comprising the steps of:
determining a predetermined part of tooth structure to be removed so as to prepare said tooth for further treatment;
determining an overlay fitting said tooth and fitting at least a part of a neighboring tooth of said tooth;
simulating a movement to be followed by a dentist cutting tool in order to remove at least a part of said predetermined part;
determining a first guiding edge within said overlay, said first guiding edge corresponding to said movement so that it is provided to contact said dentist cutting tool following said movement, thereby being provided to guide said dentist cutting tool in a predetermined position, said first guiding edge being part of a guiding means;
producing said determined overlay with said guiding means.
The present invention further concerns a dentist tool to be used by a dentist in removing tooth structure from a tooth of a patient, which tooth is to be prepared for further treatment, said dentist tool comprising:
an overlay having a shape and dimensions so that it is releasably fixable over said tooth and being attachable to that tooth or to at least a part of a neighboring tooth of said tooth;
a first guiding edge within said overlay that is provided to contact a dentist cutting tool following a predetermined movement, said first guiding edge thereby being provided to guide said dentist cutting in a predetermined position.
When a patient needs a crown, bridge, onlay, inlay, veneer, or other restoring or other dental prosthesis and/or aesthetic tooth treatment, conventionally, during an initial office visit, the dentist identifies the needs of the patient and determines an appropriate treatment. During subsequent visits, in case the tooth comprises damaged and/or infected tooth structure, the dentist removes this tooth structure and reconstructs the tooth as much as possible using conventional techniques. Thereafter, the dentist performs the final preparation of the tooth for further treatment by removing tooth material, which is to be interpreted as original tooth structure and reconstructed tooth structure, with a dental cutting tool such as a high-speed drill. Relying upon eyesight and expertise, the dentist uses the drill to shape the tooth in a form that is suitable for further treatment, in particular a form onto which a crown, bridge, onlay, inlay, veneer or other tooth restoring part can be mounted. Then, the dentist takes an impression of the dental arch in which the prepared tooth is located, and sends the impression to the dental laboratory to have the dental technician make the restoration part. Using the impression of the prepared tooth, the dental technician produces a restoration part that matches the color, geometrical and material specifications, and sends it to the dentist. At the patient's final visit, the dentist adjusts the restoration part as necessary before fitting it in place.
A further dentist tool is disclosed in EP1547544. This dentist tool decreases the impact of the experience and expertise of the dentist onto the treatment, and it is used by a dentist in boring an artificial tooth root cavity. In EP1547544, guiding means, formed by a cylindrical hole, for guiding a drill in a straight-forward way, is provided. In such a manner an artificial tooth root cavity can be bored with greater precision even by a less experienced dentist. Moreover a suitable root cavity position can be calculated based on the information processed by the computer, so as to form in the most optimal way a cavity in the jaw bone.
A drawback of the known dentist tool is that it can only be used by a dentist in boring holes into the jaw bone. This dentist tool is not suitable to be used by a dentist in preparing a tooth for further treatment.
A further dentist tool is disclosed in DE4012327, which is considered close prior art. This dentist tool is formed by a template that comprises a guiding edge for guiding a dentist cutting tool along a predetermined movement. The guiding edge is provided at a predetermined height so that besides the position, also the depth of the dentist cutting tool can be guided. DE4012327 furthermore teaches how the dentist can use the template by placing the template in the mouth of the person and, using a moving-plate fixing the tilt of the dentist cutting tool into a predetermined inclination, running with the dentist cutting tool along the guiding edge thereby removing predetermined tooth structure.
A drawback of this known dentist tool is that the tilt is, because of the moving-plate, fixed in a predetermined inclination. Thereby, the dentist tool cannot guide a dentist cutting tool in a complex movement where also tilt variations occur. In particular when working with complex surfaces such as teeth, such complex movements are preferable.
It is an object of the present invention to provide method for producing a dentist tool that is suitable for guiding a dentist cutting tool along a complex movement.
To this end, the method for producing a dentist tool according to the present invention is characterized in that said method comprises the further steps of:
determining a second guiding edge within said overlay that is spaced apart from said first guiding edge by a distance d of at least 0.5 mm, said second guiding edge corresponding to said movement so that it is provided to simultaneously with said first guiding edge contact said dentist cutting tool following said movement, said first and second guiding edge thereby being provided to guide said dentist cutting tool in a predetermined tilt, said second guiding edge being part of said guiding means.
The presence of the second guiding edge in the overlay results therein that the movement of a dentist cutting tool can be guided along a predetermined surface, whereas, in the prior art, the movement of the tool can only be guided along a predetermined line. Thereby also a guidance of the inclination of the dentist cutting tool can be obtained, which is not possible in the prior art. The presence of the second guiding edge results in that a dentist cutting tool can be guided along complex movements where position variations as well as tilt variations occur.
The determination of a predetermined part of tooth structure to be removed has the effect that this does not any more depend on the skills of the dentist. Determining and producing guiding edges into an overlay, which guiding edges are suitable for simultaneously contacting the dentist cutting tool, allows the cutting tool to be guided along a well determined path in an at least partially predetermined way. The overlay, having the guiding edges, accurately indicates onto the tooth the part to be removed from the tooth as determined by the computer. Moreover the tool according to the invention is provided to assist the dentist in removing tooth structure as the tool allows a dentist to remove at least part of a predetermined part of tooth structure.
It is to be noted that the term fitting is not to be interpreted in the narrow sense that the overlay should closely surround the teeth. It moreover should be interpreted as that an overlay should surround the teeth so as to be adequately in contact with the teeth and so that, once applied, it will not be released even if certain pressure, due to a normal use of the overlay, is applied.
Preferably, the method of this invention further comprises the steps of:
acquiring three-dimensional data relating to a shape of at least said tooth and at least said part of said neighboring tooth;
processing said three-dimensional data with a computer so as to determine significant dimensions and orientations for said overlay;
processing said three-dimensional data to determine said predetermined part.
Depending on the individual dental situation of a patient, the computer is programmed to determine an optimal way for shaping the tooth into a shape that is suitable for further treatment.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, said first and said second guiding edge are designed for simultaneously contacting said dentist cutting tool at contacting points being longitudinally distanced from each other by said distance, said guiding edges thereby defining a guiding surface along which said dentist cutting tool is to be guided.
By simultaneously contacting two guiding edges with a cutting tool at contacting points being longitudinally distanced from each other, the cutting tool can be guided at least partially in a predetermined way. Preferably the cutting tool moves along the two guiding edges and thereby defines a guiding surface. This surface comprises the two guiding edges, and a cutting tool can be guided along this surface. This allows an accurate guiding in two dimensions.
Preferably, said guiding means comprise a guiding groove, which defines a path extending in a surface of said overlay and suitable for guiding said dentist cutting tool along said path in such a manner as to enable a guided removal of at least partially said predetermined part of tooth structure.
The two guiding edges, being distanced from each other, can be located one on the one side and the other on the other side of the path thereby defining the path between the two guiding edges. To this purpose, the distance between the two guiding edges should be substantially equal to a diameter of the cutting tool. Using the dentist cutting tool by simultaneously contacting the two guiding edges and following the path allows a guidance of the cutting tool at least in two dimensions. Considering a longitudinal cutting tool, the surface defined by the two guiding edges in this configuration will be substantially perpendicular to the direction of the cutting tool in use. The preferred tilt of the cutting tool, in this configuration, is perpendicular to the plane that is formed by the two guiding edges.
The two guiding edges, being distanced from each other, can also be both located on one side of the path. At least a third guiding edge will then define the other side of the path. Considering a longitudinal cutting tool in this configuration, the surface defined by the two guiding edges will be substantially parallel to the direction of the cutting tool in use. The third guiding edge in this configuration will provide a further guidance to the cutting tool thereby increasing the accuracy of the process of removal of tooth structure. Using the dentist tool by simultaneously contacting the two guiding edges and following the path in this configuration allows a guidance of the cutting tool in two dimensions and a guidance of inclination of the cutting tool.
Preferably, the method comprises the further steps of:
producing a tooth restoration part having an inner shape determined so as to fit a predetermined remaining part of tooth structure of said tooth, and having an outer shape determined so as to fit together with remaining neighboring teeth.
An advantage of the method according to the invention is that the shape of the remaining part of tooth structure of the prepared tooth is known in advance due to the guided removal of tooth structure. This improves further treatment, such as preparing a temporary or final inlay, onlay, bridge, crown or veneer in advance based on the three-dimensional data. This results in that less office visits are required, as the dentist can both prepare the tooth and mount the tooth restoration part onto the prepared tooth in one single visit. This way of working does not only save time and thus costs, also the inconvenience for the patient is strongly decreased. Furthermore the chances that a prepared tooth gets contaminated, and the resulting complications, are reduced to a minimum.
Preferably, the method comprises the further steps of:
processing said three-dimensional data to simulate a tooth restoration part having an inner shape determined so as to fit a predetermined remaining part of tooth structure of said tooth, and having an outer shape determined so as to fit together with remaining neighboring teeth;
producing said tooth restoration part.
Thereby, an individually designed tooth restoration part can be delivered together with the dentist tool according to the invention. This is possible because the final shape of the prepared tooth, when using the dentist tool, is known in advance. The result is that less dental visits are required to place a restoration part.
Preferably, said predetermined part is determined by:
firstly determining an outer shape of said tooth restoration part so is that it fits together with remaining neighboring teeth, and determining an inner shape of said tooth restoration part that is compatible with said outer shape;
secondly determining a shape of remaining tooth structure so that said tooth restoration part having said inner shape fits said shape of remaining tooth structure;
thirdly determining said predetermined part as being the part of tooth structure to be removed so as to have said shape of remaining tooth structure left.
Starting with determining a tooth restoration part instead of, as conventionally, preparing the tooth, has an advantage. A tooth restoration part can be determined having an outer shape so as to optimally fit together with remaining neighboring teeth. Procedures for determination of such an outer shape are known to the person skilled in the art. An inner shape is then determined, which inner shape is compatible with said outer shape. Criteria for being compatible depend on the material that is to be used and mainly concern strength parameters, production parameters and parameters relating to the mounting of the restoration part onto the tooth and/or teeth. Preferably the inner shape is determined in such a manner that a minimum amount of material is required to produce the tooth restoration part. This at its turn results in that the remaining tooth structure, required to fit to this inner shape, is as large as possible, namely, the more material of a restored tooth is tooth restoration material, the less material of that restored tooth is tooth structure. Then the predetermined part can be determined as being the part of tooth structure to be removed so as to have said shape of remaining tooth structure left. Thus first determining the tooth restoration part, results in that a minimum of tooth structure is to be removed from the tooth and maximum conservation of the original tooth structure. As it is best to maintain as much of the original tooth structure, this is an advantage.
Providing the determined tooth restoration part having the determined outer and inner shape together with the dental tool, results in that less office visits are required because the dentist can prepare the tooth and mount the tooth restoration part onto the prepared tooth in one single visit.
Preferably said dentist tool comprises at least one further overlay, said overlay and said at least one further overlay being determined to guide a dentist tool in removing tooth structure in a plurality of stages, in which said guiding means in said overlay is provided to guide said cutting tool in one of said plurality of stages, and at least one further guiding means in said at least one further overlay is provided to guide said cutting tool in at least one further of said plurality of stages, the method further comprising the steps of:
determining at least one further overlay fitting said tooth and fitting at least a part of said neighboring tooth;
simulating at least one further movement to be followed by said dentist cutting tool in order to remove at least one further part of said predetermined part;
determining at least one further first guiding edge within said at least one further overlay, said at least one further first guiding edge corresponding to said at least one further movement so that it is provided to contact said dentist cutting tool following said at least one further movement, thereby being provided to guide said dentist cutting tool in a predetermined position, said at least one further first guiding edge being part of said at least one further guiding means;
determining at least one further second guiding edge within said at least one further overlay that is spaced apart from said at least one further first guiding edge by a distance d of at least 0.5 mm, said at least one further second guiding edge corresponding to said at least one further movement so that it is provided to simultaneously with said at least one further first guiding edge contact said dentist cutting tool following said at least one further movement, said at least one further first and second guiding edge thereby being provided to guide said dentist cutting tool in a predetermined tilt, said at least one further second guiding edge being part of said at least one further guiding means
producing said at least one further overlay with said at least one further guiding means.
Producing a plurality of overlays instead of just one overlay provides a further flexibility in the method for producing the dentist tool. Different overlays can be provided for guiding a dentist cutting tool along different sides of the tooth to be prepared, so that for example a circumferential path can be defined by using multiple overlays each defining a different segment of the circumferential path. Multiple overlays furthermore allow to use different dental cutting tools, which is necessary in some cases. Different overlays can be provided for preparing a tooth in multiple stages, in which for example a first stage is provided to smoothen the upper part of the tooth, a second and a third stage are provided to cut away the longitudinal and transversal sides of the tooth, and a fourth and fifth stage are provided to round off the edges between the longitudinal and transversal sides each at a different side of the tooth. Preparing a tooth in stages allows each overlay to be designed having guiding edges which are particularly determined for guiding the cutting tool in a particular way characterized by the particular stage.
The invention will now be described in more details with respect to the drawings illustrating some preferred embodiments of the invention. In the drawings:
In the drawings a same reference number has been allocated to a same or analogous element.
The terms “lower”, “upper” etc. and derived directional terms such as “horizontal” and “vertical” are based on a normal configuration of an overlay as shown in the drawings, wherein the overlay fits onto teeth with their root extending vertically downward. The term dentist in this text is not to be interpreted restrictive and can also be read as dental technician, dental assistant, dental auxiliary, dental therapist, dental designer etc.
The invention provides a method for producing a dentist tool formed by an overlay 1 to be used by a dentist in removing tooth structure. Furthermore, the invention provides an overlay 1 obtainable by this method.
The dentist tool according to the invention is preferably used by a dentist in preparing a tooth for a restoration such as placing inlays and onlays, crowns, bridges, and veneers. Such restoration requires a restoration part to be produced in order to fit the tooth after the latter has been prepared. Using the dentist tool according to the invention results in that the shape of the prepared tooth, which conventionally is only known after preparation, is determined in advance. Based on this knowledge, a restoration part can be produced in advance so that this restoration part is available to the dentist even before he or she starts preparing the tooth, and can be mounted directly after preparation of the tooth. This results in that the patient suffers less inconvenience, in particular that the number of visits to the dentist are reduced. Furthermore the chances that a prepared tooth gets contaminated, and the resulting complications, are reduced to a minimum.
Preferably, preparing a tooth for further treatment is performed onto a substantially healthy tooth. When a tooth is damaged or infected, the damaged and/or infected parts of the tooth will have to be removed first, and the tooth will have to be reconstructed before preparing the tooth for further treatment. This minimizes the chance that an infection develops underneath a tooth restoration part. This also maximizes the lifetime of the tooth restoration part as the basis for the tooth restoration part, namely the tooth, does not contain damaged parts any more.
It may be possible to utilize an overlay made for one tooth in the preparation of a tooth of another patient, where such other patient's tooth has sufficiently similar dimensions and shape. Therefore, it is within the scope of this invention to have prepared some overlays which can be standardized, reused and/or reproduced. Also, it is within the scope of this invention to utilize data obtained in the preparation of prior overlays and restoration parts in the design and generation of new overlays having substantially similar dimensions and shapes.
Several methods are known for acquiring three-dimensional data from a patient's dentition. Such data can be retrieved, for example by processing photographs taken from the patient's dentition. Another method is making a physical impression of the dentition and then subsequently scanning this impression or a reversed cast of the impression. Such scanning can be conducted with a CAD/CAM 3D scanning device. Illustrative of such a device is the FreeForm® from SensAble Technologies Inc. of Woburn, Mass., USA. While such a scanning device can scan a model of the dental arch with a tolerance of about 10 μm this does not take into account other error factors obtained from the making of the impression and the casting of the dental impression. In preparing the ultimate restoration part or dental prosthesis, these other error factors or tolerances must be considered.
The CAD program chooses the specific configuration for the overlay, sometimes referred to as reduction trays, and ultimately the configuration for the prepared tooth by utilizing certain protocols which are based on prior experience for preparing dental prostheses.
In one embodiment of the invention, the digital file for the subject tooth can be compared with an existing database for such prostheses. Such an illustrative database is available from Heraeus Kulzer Tooth Library of Heraeus Kulzer GmbH of Hanau Germany. This data base has also been integrated into the SensAble Dental Lab System (SDLS). A prosthesis (e.g. a crown or onlay) comparable to that appropriate for the subject tooth is chosen from the Kulzer database. That prosthesis information includes the configuration and dimensions for the prepared tooth, which would correspond to the internal surface of the prosthesis. This internal configuration in the Kulzer database for that prepared crown is utilized to design the overlays (reduction trays) for use in the preparation of the patient's tooth. In the design of the overlays, fundamental principles and objectives known in the art are utilized, for example to remove the minimum amount of original tooth surface.
For example, in a set of overlays or reduction trays, there may be one overlay or tray for reduction of the medial and distal surface (front and back) and another tray for the occlusive (top) surface. Also, there could be two finishing trays which cut lingual (tongue) surface and buccal (cheek) surface of the tooth. For preparation for a crown, one would need additional trays for gingival margins.
The foregoing describes a typical use of the method but a greater or fewer number of reduction trays or overlays may be appropriate to carry out the preparation of the tooth for later installation of the dental prosthesis or restoration part. After acquiring the three-dimensional data of the tooth, this data gets processed by a computer so as to determine an overlay 1 fitting the teeth 2 of the patient. To this end, the inner shape of the overlay preferably corresponds to the outer shape of the tooth to be prepared and to the outer shape of at least part of a neighboring tooth. Overlay should fit the teeth in such a manner that once the overlay is placed onto the teeth, it will only come off by applying a sufficiently high force to the overlay. During preparation of the tooth, small forces may be applied to the overlay, which preferably should not modify the position of the overlay on the teeth. Preferably, the overlay 1 extends over the teeth 2 so as to also cover part of the gingiva 3 or of neighboring teeth for stability purpose and protection purpose. As the dentist will use the overlay 1 for removing tooth material, it is advantageous that the overlay 1 is located onto the tooth in a stable way. As an example, an overlay 1 closely fitting the tooth, two neighboring teeth, and part of the gingiva 3, ensures that a dentist can arrange and maintain the overlay in a stable position during removal of tooth structure. When the overlay 1 covers a part of the gingiva 3, at least this part of the gingiva 3 will be protected during the process of removing tooth structure.
It is to be noted that an overlay 1 according to the invention can cover multiple teeth at once and can be provided to be used by a dentist in preparing a plurality of teeth using one single overlay 1. This can be advantageous in the process of preparing teeth for placing veneers. Such an overlay comprises guiding means, as will be explained further, for each tooth that needs to be prepared.
The determined overlay 1 has a thickness 4 that mainly depends on the required strength thereof, and thus also the material it will be made of. An overlay 1 according to the invention can have a constant overall thickness 4. A substantially constant overall thickness is preferred for an overlay to be used by a dentist in preparing a tooth or teeth for placing veneers. An overlay to be used for preparing a tooth for placing a bridge or a crown preferably comprises an upper, guiding part 5, and a lower, supporting part 6. The supporting part 6 of the overlay 1 will ensure that the overlay 1 can be arranged in a stable way onto the teeth 2, whereas the guiding part 5 of the overlay 1 will guide the dentist cutting tool and preferably will also determine the maximal penetration depth of the cutting tool in the tooth. To this end, the thickness of the guiding part 5 of the overlay 1 will preferably be determined case by case together with the determination of the guiding means 7, as will be explained further. The thickness 4 of the supporting part 6 of the overlay 1 can be more freely chosen depending on the preferences of the dentist and/or the programmation of the computer.
After acquiring the three-dimensional data, this data gets also processed by a computer so as to determine a predetermined part of tooth structure to be removed from the tooth by the dentist. The predetermined part will be determined in view of the further treatment. If a particular shape of the prepared tooth is required for allowing further treatment, the predetermined part will be chosen so that after preparation of the tooth, this particular shape will remain.
Determining the predetermined part depends on many parameters and will differ from case to case. Parameters are the location of the tooth in the mouth of the patient, amount and location of the damaged tooth structure, distance of the tooth to neighboring teeth, etc. In a preferred embodiment, the computer will also take into account the different parts of the tooth such as the enamel, dentin, pulp, cementum, etc. in determining the predetermined part. It is also understood within the general aspects of the invention that the patient's tooth may have to be built up through conventional techniques and materials prior to the actual step of preparation of the tooth, utilizing the overlay.
According to the invention, the computer is programmed to determine the predetermined part of tooth structure to be removed without assistance of a dentist except for what concerns the input of the initial data of the tooth. However also according to the invention, the computer can be programmed to determine the predetermined part in cooperation with a dentist, where, for example, the dentist decides on some parameters. This cooperation can be established by visualizing data relating to the tooth onto a computer display and allowing the dentist at least to enter one parameter relating to the preparation of the tooth. Preferably a preview of the tooth is visualized onto the computer display together with a preview of a simulation of the prepared tooth, so as to allow a dentist to see the impact of chosen parameters onto the prepared tooth. The latter feature provides a larger degree of freedom to the dentist and allows a less experienced dentist to consult a more experienced dentist about a case, based on the data in the computer. In this manner, the method for producing a dentist tool according to the invention allows a less experienced dentist to decide on a further treatment and prepare a tooth for further treatment with a same quality as if he or she was an experienced dentist.
In another embodiment, the computer is programmed to determine the predetermined part of tooth structure to be removed in several phases. At the end of each phase, the computer proposes a simulated solution to the dentist and requests for approval or correction of the proposed solution.
Preferably the predetermined part will be determined in several steps. In a first step, the outer shape of the tooth restoring part is to be determined so that the tooth restoring part fits with the remaining teeth and fits into the dental arch of the patient. A bite lift or other corrective amendment can be directly integrated into the design of the outer shape. Then, based on this determined outer shape, an inner shape gets determined that is compatible with the outer shape. In such a manner, a tooth restoration part can be determined having an optimal outer shape, and an optimal construction in the sense that it is strong enough and a minimum of material is needed. In a following step, the shape of remaining tooth structure is to be determined so that the inner shape of the tooth restoring part fits the remaining tooth structure after removal of tooth structure. In a final step, the predetermined part of tooth structure is determined as the part of tooth structure to be removed to have the shape of remaining tooth structure left. This way of working allows determining the outer shape of the tooth restoring part using best fit programs. Conventionally, the dentist will not follow the steps in the succession as mentioned above. The dentist will work the other way around, as the dentist will need to know the shape of the prepared tooth to determine the inner shape of the restoration part, after which the dentist will determine an appropriate outer shape. Firstly determining the tooth restoration part, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention, results in that a minimum of tooth structure is to be removed from the tooth and a maximum conservation of the original tooth structure can be obtained.
Once the predetermined part has been determined, guiding means can be determined. The purpose of the guiding means is to guide a dentist cutting tool, i.e. a drill, along a simulated movement whereby the cutting tool removes at least a part of the predetermined part. To this end, it will be understood that in some cases, the dimensions of the dentist cutting tool, such as the length, diameter, cross-sectional form, etc. will be determining for which movement is to be made with the cutting tool to remove a certain part of tooth structure. It will also be understood that in many cases, it will not be sufficient to make one single movement for removing all the predetermined part. Via computer calculation and/or simulation, one or more movements can be simulated for removing the predetermined part of tooth structure. It is to be understood that a movement in this context does not only relates to a two-dimensional position, but relates to the movement of the cutting tool in all its aspects such as horizontal movement, vertical movement and tilt movement.
The guiding means according to the invention comprise at least two guiding edges 11, 12 (
The guiding edges 11, 12 are determined in correspondence with the simulated movement of the dentist cutting tool such that both guiding edges 11 and 12 are simultaneously in contact with the cutting tool following the movement. Preferably, the guiding edges are simultaneously and constantly in contact with the cutting tool, preferably during the whole of the movement. The contact between a guiding edge and the cutting tool, along the movement, is preferably a point of contact.
Preferably the two guiding edges 11, 12 are spaced apart from each other with a distance d of at least 1 mm, more preferably of at least 2 mm and most preferably of at least 3 mm. Increasing the distance d between the two edges 11, 12 will increase the guiding quality as it will be much easier for a dentist to control the cutting tool 10 onto larger guiding means.
The guiding edges 11, 12 are provided in such a manner as to be simultaneously contacted by the cutting tool at two contacting points. As illustrated in
However the guiding edges 11, 12 can also simultaneously contact the cutting tool 10 at two contacting points being located each at one side of the cutting tool 10, as illustrated in
A combination of these two mentioned configurations is illustrated in
As can be seen in
For mounting a crown or a bridge, the tooth is to be shaped into a truncated pyramid having rounded edges. To this end the outer and upper part of the tooth are to be removed. This removal of tooth structure can be guided by the dentist tool according to the invention.
Preferably the removal of tooth structure for preparing a tooth for mounting a crown or a bridge is performed in several stages shown in
In a second and a third stage, shown in
In a fourth and fifth stage, shown in
In this succession of stages, the first stage could be executed as the last stage instead of as the first. However tests have shown that starting with smoothening the upper part of the tooth is advantageous in the process of preparing the tooth.
Once the overlay 1 and the guiding means are determined, the determined overlay 1 having the determined guiding means can be produced. This can be done by any known means such as a CAD/CAM system, rapid prototyping or 3D printing. When multiple guiding means have been determined, multiple overlays 1 can be produced each comprising one or several guiding means. Preferably, a rapid prototyping apparatus creates the overlay with a tolerance of about 30 μm.
The overlay 1 has, as already mentioned above, a lower, supporting part 6 and an upper, guiding part 5. As can be seen in the figures, the guiding part 5 has a certain thickness 8, which defines the height 8 of the path and enables the cutting tool to be guided in the vertical way. Preferably the supporting part 6 and/or guiding part 5 comprises a vertical opening 9 from the side to the guiding groove 7, provided to serve as an entrance into the guiding groove 7 for a dental cutting tool. In particular when a cutting tool has a tip portion that has a diameter that is larger than the diameter of the main portion of the cutting tool, for example a high-speed drill with a tip in the form of a ball, this opening is advantageous. Entering such a cutting tool into the guiding groove 7 via the upper part of the overlay would at least partially widen the guiding groove 7 thereby at least partially taking away its possibility to firmly guide the cutting tool along the predetermined path. Furthermore a side entrance 9 is preferred over an entrance via the upper part as it will be easier to enter the cutting tool in a controlled manner into the guiding groove 7.
When a guiding groove 7 is determined to form a circular path in the horizontal plane, it will be preferred to split up this path into several segments, and produce multiple overlays 1 each having a guiding groove 7 corresponding to one segment of this path. This will result in a set of overlays 1 which can be used by a dentist one after the other to remove tooth structure following this circular path. Each overlay 1 of the set of overlays 1 will guide the cutting tool along a particular side of the tooth.
In the embodiment where the predetermined part is not determined based on the shape of the tooth restoration part, the latter can be determined based on the data in the computer. Outer shape of the tooth restoration part can be determined in several ways, all known to the person skilled in the art. A bite lift or other corrective amendment can be directly integrated into the design of the outer shape. A first possibility is to shape the tooth restoration part so that it resembles the outer shape of the original tooth. A second possibility is to shape the tooth restoration part so that it fits with neighboring teeth. A third possibility is a combination of the first and second, and modifies the shape of the original tooth to better fit with the neighboring teeth. Inner shape of the tooth restoration part will be determined based on the simulation of the preparation of the tooth. As the tooth will be prepared in a guided manner, it is known in advance what the shape will be of the prepared tooth. The inner shape of the tooth restoration part will be chosen so that it fits the shape of the prepared tooth.
Preferably the method according to the invention further comprises the step of producing a tooth restoration part.
Similar to the determination of the predetermined part, a tooth restoration part can be determined by a computer without any interaction of a dentist. However it will be preferred that the computer determines the tooth restoration part in cooperation with a dentist, for example in a way as described above. The computer can, in this process of determining a tooth restoration part, perform predetermined clinical checks and alert the dentist in case the tooth restoration part does not meet the standard norms. This will enable a dentist to design a tooth restoration part in a fast and reliable manner.
The production of the tooth restoration part can be done by any means known to the skilled person such as a CAD/CAM system.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/698,777 filed Feb. 2, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,640,338, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/364,216 filed Feb. 2, 2009, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 472004 | Sweet | Mar 1892 | A |
| 1407840 | Cruttenden | Feb 1922 | A |
| 1772027 | Baumgarten | Aug 1930 | A |
| 2303475 | Karlstrom | Dec 1942 | A |
| 2591183 | Mintz | Apr 1952 | A |
| 2597661 | McPhee | May 1952 | A |
| 2621408 | Klein | Dec 1952 | A |
| 2634501 | Linet | Apr 1953 | A |
| 2644235 | Mintz | Jul 1953 | A |
| 2675615 | Rosenberg | Apr 1954 | A |
| 2770040 | Moyer | Nov 1956 | A |
| 2986816 | Zeman | Jun 1961 | A |
| 3011259 | Baum | Dec 1961 | A |
| 3063149 | Suga | Nov 1962 | A |
| 3254413 | Suga | Jun 1966 | A |
| 3376643 | Nealon | Apr 1968 | A |
| 3407503 | Nealon | Oct 1968 | A |
| 3445935 | Marshall | May 1969 | A |
| 3508334 | Weissman | Apr 1970 | A |
| 3585723 | Simor | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3600810 | Marshall et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
| 4144645 | Marshall | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4473354 | Rigaud et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4504230 | Patch | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4526542 | Kochis | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4744757 | Adair et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4778387 | Komatsu | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4941826 | Loran et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4997369 | Shafir | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5015183 | Fenick | May 1991 | A |
| 5118294 | Kurer | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5133660 | Fenick | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5192207 | Rosellini | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5224049 | Mushabac | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5257184 | Mushabac | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5343391 | Mushabac | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5347454 | Mushabac | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5359511 | Schroeder et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5368478 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5431562 | Andreiko et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5447432 | Andreiko et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5448472 | Mushabac | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5454717 | Andreiko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5545039 | Mushabac | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5562448 | Mushabac | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569578 | Mushabac | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5575646 | Giannella | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5575656 | Hajjar | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5641287 | Gittleman | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5725376 | Poirier | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5768134 | Swaelens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5800168 | Cascione et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813859 | Hajjar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5897315 | Nakayama et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5975893 | Chishti et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6030211 | Sandhaus | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6049743 | Baba | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6183248 | Chishti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6190171 | Hajjar et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6213770 | Kuhn | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6254639 | Peckitt | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6257892 | Worthington | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6309215 | Phan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6382975 | Poirier | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6390812 | Chishti et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6398548 | Muhammad et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6406292 | Chishti et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6447296 | Worthington | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6457972 | Chishti et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6485298 | Chishti et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6511323 | Wilkinson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6527550 | Hajjar et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6537067 | Wennemann | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6554611 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6626672 | Been | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6641340 | Hajjar et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6685469 | Chishti et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6705861 | Chishti et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6722880 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6767208 | Kaza | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6786726 | Lehmann et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6814575 | Poirier | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6957118 | Kopelman et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 7004757 | Wilkinson | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7059850 | Phan et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7097451 | Tang | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7108511 | Shatkin | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7110844 | Kopelman et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7121825 | Chishti et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7123767 | Jones et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7125248 | Phan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7134874 | Chishti et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7140877 | Kaza | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7147465 | Jung et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7172424 | Wu | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7245977 | Simkins | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7287982 | Riley et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7331786 | Poirier | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7346417 | Luth et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7357637 | Liechtung | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7367801 | Saliger | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7377778 | Chishti et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7383094 | Kopelman et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7384266 | Wen | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7393211 | Wilkinson | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7442040 | Kuo | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7474307 | Chishti et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7476100 | Kuo | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7536234 | Kopelman et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7555403 | Kopelman et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7572125 | Brajnovic | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7590462 | Rubbert | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7653455 | Cinader, Jr. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7658610 | Knopp | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7695281 | Burger et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7708557 | Rubbert | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7734368 | Kopelman et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7774084 | Cinader, Jr. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7801632 | Orth et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7802987 | Phan | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7837469 | Chishti et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7845942 | Wilkinson | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7862336 | Kopelman et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7866980 | Poirier | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7905726 | Stumpel | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7996099 | Kopelman et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8011927 | Berckmans, III et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8021153 | Poirier | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8038440 | Swaelens et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8041439 | Kopelman et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8043091 | Schmitt | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8099268 | Kitching et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8170327 | Glor et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8301287 | Kopelman et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8359114 | Steingart et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8359115 | Kopelman et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8425973 | Dunne | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8449296 | Liechtung | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8454362 | Rubbert | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8454365 | Boerjes et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8562340 | Chishti et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8602780 | Rubbert | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8640338 | Jacquemyns | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8651859 | Chishti et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8651860 | Kwon | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8721329 | Hultgren et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8734150 | Chishti et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8753114 | Vuillemot | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8753118 | Randall | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8803958 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8807999 | Kuo et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8828287 | van der Zel | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8897526 | MacLeod et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8926327 | Massad | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8954181 | MacLeod et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 9011147 | Jacquemyns | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9044296 | Randall | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9069914 | Kopelman et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9089388 | Zegarelli | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9125712 | Kraemer et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9161824 | Chishti et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9168114 | Jung et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9186228 | Kopelman et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9208531 | Boerjes et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9220576 | Heinz et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9295534 | Ruppert et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9299192 | Kopelman | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9320575 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9411910 | Methot | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9579170 | Van Lierde et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 20010036617 | Karmaker et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020160337 | Klein et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030008259 | Kuo et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064346 | Wennemann | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20040043355 | Jonsson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040248065 | Schneider | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050014109 | Lim | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050095554 | Wilkinson | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244782 | Chishti et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050282106 | Sussman et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060008777 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060127848 | Sogo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20070218423 | Sapian | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070238068 | Comfortes | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292821 | De Vreese | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080085490 | Jabri | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080153067 | Berckmans et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080176187 | Stumpel | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080259411 | Karlsson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080287953 | Sers | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312659 | Metzger et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080318187 | Wilkinson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090004629 | Fishman et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090263764 | Berckmans, III et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090291417 | Rubbert et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100173259 | Vogel et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185201 | Kim | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100192375 | Jacquemyns | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100196842 | Jacquemyns | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110245951 | Gantes | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110269104 | Berckmans, III et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120143364 | Mcleod et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120175799 | Karlsson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120178045 | Massad | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120270176 | Jacquemyns | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120322025 | Ozawa et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130108988 | Simoncic | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130108989 | Kim | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130115573 | Lampl | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130177864 | Hultgren et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130209953 | Arlinsky et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130224691 | Liechtung | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130244208 | Rubbert | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130277874 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130337412 | Kwon | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140008826 | Dierkes et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140080093 | Rubbert | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140113251 | Schweiger et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140193769 | Mackey | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140193770 | Mackey | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140193772 | Mackey | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140205968 | Jung et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140215804 | Jacquemyns | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140234804 | Huang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140242541 | Jung et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140242547 | Randall | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140248577 | Tahmasebi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140255873 | Bullis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277665 | Fisker | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140308623 | Chang | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140315154 | Jung et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140316750 | Jung et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140358497 | Kuo et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150057675 | Akeel et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150150684 | De Clerck | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182301 | Hegland | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150202028 | Randall | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150216638 | Baaske et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150230894 | Juzbasic et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150250568 | Fisker et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150251405 | Kopelman et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150257853 | Jacquemyns | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150282913 | Zegarelli | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150289954 | Chang | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150302170 | Berckmans, III et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150327967 | Baaske et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160000522 | Ripoche et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160008093 | Lampl | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160030141 | Kopelman et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160074141 | Lozada | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160143716 | Beyer et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160143717 | Samrano | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160157970 | Gantes | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160193019 | Heinz et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 12407 | Jul 1903 | AT |
| 13375 | Sep 1903 | AT |
| 2002210903 | Feb 2006 | AU |
| 1678254 | Oct 2005 | CN |
| 4012327 | Oct 1991 | DE |
| 19947844 | Apr 2001 | DE |
| 102010031018 | Jan 2012 | DE |
| 1547544 | Jun 2005 | EP |
| 2272462 | Jan 2011 | EP |
| 2742906 | Jun 2014 | EP |
| 08-010268 | Jan 1996 | JP |
| 3114270 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 2007511275 | May 2007 | JP |
| 20030064772 | Aug 2003 | KR |
| 20120053455 | May 2012 | KR |
| 20160018156 | Feb 2016 | KR |
| 20160018158 | Feb 2016 | KR |
| 20160056855 | May 2016 | KR |
| 1438757 | Nov 1988 | SU |
| 1674828 | Sep 1991 | SU |
| 9115163 | Oct 1991 | WO |
| 9627343 | Sep 1996 | WO |
| 3032131 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| 0234154 | May 2002 | WO |
| 2005055852 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| 2007104842 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| 2009000505 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009048475 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009073498 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009089129 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2009094576 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2009105684 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| 2011003612 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| 2012006717 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| 2012076574 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2012085285 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2012110850 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2012162605 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012163466 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2013026600 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013181721 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2014135178 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014138643 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014198873 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| English Machine Translation of WO 2009000505A1, Thomas Engelhardt, Dec. 31, 2008. |
| Russian Office Action for Application No. 2011136473 dated Feb. 22, 2014. |
| Mexican Office Action for Application No. MX/a/2011/008128 dated Apr. 9, 2014. |
| Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2011-546876 dated Aug. 5, 2014. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 12790260.9 dated Jun. 19, 2015. |
| Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2010209671 dated Jan. 29, 2014. |
| Mexican Office Action for Application No. MX/a/2011/008128 dated Nov. 11, 2014. |
| Canadian Office Action for Application No. 2,750,698 dated Apr. 10, 2013. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/039569 dated Sep. 14, 2012. |
| P. Hahn, Fracture strengh of 3-unit inlay bridges after thermo-mechanical fatigue in a chewing simulator, http://www.gapless.de/, Oct. 25, 2001, 2 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Application No. 201080014124.5 dated Sep. 18, 2013. |
| Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2011-546876 dated Dec. 20, 2013. |
| Search Report for Russian Application No. 2014151779 dated Dec. 20, 2016. |
| Australian Examination Report for AU2017204455 dated Apr. 18, 2018. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140215804 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12698777 | Feb 2010 | US |
| Child | 14170120 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12364216 | Feb 2009 | US |
| Child | 12698777 | US |
