This application is a 371 filing of International Patent Application PCT/EP2008/062018 filed Sep. 11, 2008.
This invention relates to a method of producing a structure by layer transfer. This method is especially used in the manufacture of SOI (silicon-on-insulator) structures using a SmartCut™ technique.
SmartCut™ enables a fine layer of a donor substrate to be transferred to a receiver substrate and initiates the following stages:
The substrates generally occur in the form of circular wafers; for example, 300 mm wafers are currently in use.
The peripheral area in which transfer of the fine layer has not taken place is called the crown. In relation to
Prior to direct wafer bonding, it is possible to bring about plasma activation of the surface of at least one of the substrates. This activation enables the bonding strength to be improved significantly.
The bonding strength can also be improved by adapted cleaning prior to bonding, for example a type O3/SC1/SC2 sequence in which the SC1 is carried out at a temperature of under 50° C.
However, it has been found that improving the bonding strength can produce an uneven crown width (referred to in the jargon as a “jagged edge”) in the final product, in other words, the SOI obtained following detachment. What happens here is that following detachment, the crown also includes small isolated zones that have also been transferred.
The width of the crown is therefore made uneven by the random, local enlargement of the transferred zone over several hundreds of micrometres towards the edge of the receiver substrate. The enlargement of the transferred zone is visible in the photos in
Document WO2007/06145 discloses a method for preventing the formation of edge voids in an SOI, which are non-transferred zones located preferentially at the periphery of the SOI.
One of the aims of the invention is therefore to improve the method of producing a structure by layer transfer, so as to guarantee that the edge of the transferred layer is even, without any local enlargement.
A first object of the invention is a method of producing a semiconductor structure by transferring a layer of a donor substrate to a receiver substrate, including the following stages:
According to other possible features of the invention:
Other features and advantages of the invention will emerge from the detailed description that follows in relation to the attached figures in which:
Notes on SOI Wafers:
When the Smart Cut™ technique is used, the donor substrate 30 may, for example, be covered with a layer 20 of oxide. In a manner familiar to the person skilled in the art, the oxide can be deposited or else formed by thermal oxidation of the donor substrate.
The donor substrate 30 then undergoes an implantation of atomic species, such as hydrogen and/or helium, for example, the dose and strength of which are adjusted so as to obtain an implantation peak at a depth matching the thickness of the layer of donor substrate to be transferred. Zone 31 into which the atomic species are implanted is called the embrittlement zone.
Once the surface of the donor substrate 30 and/or the receiver substrate 10 has undergone plasma activation, where appropriate, the substrates are brought into contact and direct wafer bonded.
The effect of the plasma activation is to increase the bonding strength between the two substrates.
This increase in bonding strength can also be obtained by means of O3/RCA cleaning prior to bonding, in which the SC1 is carried out at a temperature below 50° C. This cleaning is well known to the person skilled in the art and will not therefore be described in detail here. It is simply pointed out that RCA involves a sequence of baths referred to as SC1 and SC2. SC1 is a mixture of H2O, H2O2 and NH4OH. SC2 is a mixture of H2O, H2O2 and HCl. Rinsing stages in H2O are inserted between the SC1 and SC2 baths. O3 cleaning corresponds to a first H2O bath in which the ozone gas is dissolved.
As can be seen in
The donor substrate 30 is then detached along the embrittlement zone 31. To achieve this, the detachment can be started by mechanical force or an increase in temperature; the detachment spreads across the entire surface in the form of a detachment wave. The SOI structure thereby obtained is represented in
For a 300 mm wafer, the peripheral crown CP is typically 1 mm wide relative to the edge of the wafer.
The jagged edge phenomenon revealed in the introduction is explained by the presence of transferred zones (in other words, oxide 20 and a fine layer 32) within the peripheral crown CP.
In the plasma activation processes commonly used, the plasma activates the substrate's entire useful surface (referred to as the “front”) and the wafer edges, but not the back, which is not exposed to the plasma, because it is sitting on an electrode.
Detailed Description of the Invention
The jagged edge phenomenon would appear to be due to excessively strong bonding at the edge roll-off of the wafers.
In fact, in the event that bonding takes place following plasma activation or adapted cleaning of the donor and/or receiver substrate before bonding, the two wafers adhere to one another more strongly, which reduces the width of the crown following transfer.
This is explained by the fact that the edge roll-offs are not prominent angles, but rather gradual curves of the wafer edge.
If the bonded wafer edges display local irregularities, the transfer following plasma activation reproduces these possible irregularities in the crown, leading to a jagged edge.
If there is no activation, the bonding does not spread to these uneven edges (although one cannot exclude the possibility of surface irregularities existing further within the substrate, which are not revealed due to the local parallel configuration of the bonded surfaces) and the transfer produces crowns that are wider and, above all, more even, in other words, without jagged edges.
In general terms, the invention makes it possible to avoid the jagged edge phenomenon by controlling the activation or cleaning of the surface of the substrate that has been treated, so as to control the bonding strength between the two substrates. It is envisaged, in fact, that if a weak bonding strength can be maintained or achieved around the periphery of the substrates, the risk of transferred zones emerging in the crown will be limited.
To this end, a first solution is to keep the bonding strength low in the peripheral area by not carrying out activation in this area.
An alternative would be to reduce locally the higher bonding strength obtained by activation or by cleaning prior to bonding.
In both cases, the activation or cleaning prior to bonding is controlled, so that at the end the increase in bonding strength between the substrates is weaker in the peripheral area than in the central area of these substrates. Typically, the bonding strength in the peripheral area will be at least 15% lower than the bonding strength in the central area of the substrates.
A first embodiment of the invention consists of the plasma activation of one and/or the other substrate being bonded over its (their) entire surface except for the peripheral area.
A variant of the invention consists of plasma activation or cleaning before bonding of the entire surface of one and/or the other of the substrates to be bonded, followed by localised deactivation (prior to bonding) only in the peripheral area.
The peripheral area in which the deactivation or non-activation takes place will typically be between 0.2 and 10 mm wide, more particularly between 0.5 and 2.5 mm and preferably 2 mm.
This width typically corresponds to a width greater than or equal to that of the crown which, at the start of the detachment, generally displays a width of between 0.2 and 2 mm and more particularly between 0.8 and 1.2 mm.
In practical terms, it may be advantageous to produce a reference structure beforehand using the same procedure as for the structure it is hoped to obtain, in other words:
The width of the crown on the receiver substrate is then measured on this reference structure, after which the width of the peripheral area is determined, so that it is greater than or equal to the width of the crown measured on the reference structure.
It is likewise possible to proceed through repetition, in other words, by setting an arbitrary width for the peripheral area, 2 mm for example, then initiating the procedure described in the invention and measuring the width of the resulting crown. For the following structures, the width of the peripheral area is adjusted, so that it is greater than or equal to the width of this crown.
First Embodiment:Non-Activation of the Peripheral Area
A first possible embodiment of the invention involves conducting plasma activation before bonding, this being controlled so that the edges of one or both substrates subjected to the plasma are not activated by it.
Hence, the bonding strength between the substrates in this peripheral area increases to a lesser extent than in the central area, if it increases at all.
The initiation of this sort of plasma activation depends on the type of equipment used for the plasma treatment.
Where plasma is generated by a source that is smaller than the substrates to be treated, sweeping the whole surface routinely enables the entire substrate, including its periphery, to be uniformly treated.
The invention therefore involves modifying the sweeping action so that the wafer edges are not treated with plasma, such as by sweeping the substrate surface excluding the few last millimetres from the edge, in other words, at least the width of the future crown, with a “punctiform” plasma source. A punctiform source refers here to a source with a surface area measuring a few mm2.
In the case of plasma generated by a linear source longer than the greatest substrate dimension (i.e. the diameter in the case of circular wafers), movement in one direction makes it routinely possible to treat the whole surface of the substrates uniformly in one or several sweeps.
The invention therefore involves splitting up this linear source into a succession of small punctiform sources and sweeping the surface to be treated by switching on the small sources only when they are not facing the periphery of the substrates.
With reference to
In the commonest case in which plasma is generated by a fixed source with a size comparable to the substrates, the invention involves eliminating or confining the plasma, so that it does not activate the periphery of the wafer 4.
To this end, the invention envisages, for example, confining the plasma by preventing it from treating the edge of the wafer.
With regard to
This screen may, for example, be made from the same material as the substrate being treated, a configuration that will make it possible to restrict contamination of the latter.
This screen, divided into two diametrically opposed, mobile sections, may be set in place before and removed after the plasma treatment, thereby facilitating manipulation of the substrates following in the equipment.
This screen need not necessarily be made from solid material; it may also be a grid in which the greatest mesh size is smaller than the Debye length, so that it is seen by the plasma as a solid material, but permits the circulation of neutral species (the use of a grid makes it possible to achieve fewer disturbances in the gas flow). The conductive material from which the skeleton of the grid is made can then be covered with a coating to prevent any contamination of the substrate—an Si or SiC film for Si substrates, for example.
Second Embodiment: Deactivation of the Peripheral Area
According to a variant of the invention, the growth in bonding strength is achieved through plasma activation or adapted cleaning of the entire surface and of one and/or the other substrates to be bonded prior to bonding, followed by localised deactivation (prior to bonding) only in the peripheral area, for example with aid of chemical cleaning.
In fact, plasma activation involving surface modification to a depth of some tens of angstroms can be partly or completely destroyed by chemical etching of all or part of the plasma-modified thickness at the edges of the substrates, so as to achieve an even crown width.
Likewise, in the context of adapted cleaning prior to bonding, deactivation can be achieved by a slight increase in the micro-roughness of the surface in the peripheral area (average roughness typically increased in the order of 0.3 angstrom in the peripheral area).
From a practical point of view, in relation to
The chemical products dispensed are such that they will etch the material(s) present on the surface activated by plasma or cleaning. For example, in the presence of SiO2 a mixture based on NH4OH, H2O2, H2O can be used (e.g. SC1 diluted at 20-80° C.) or even a very dilute HF acid-based solution (e.g. HF 0.5% to etch 4 nm followed by the dispensing of ozonised water, in order to restore the hydrophilia of the wafer edge prior to bonding).
The etching solution remains localised in the peripheral area, thanks to the centrifugal force generated by the substrate's rotation.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07 57511 | Sep 2007 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/062018 | 9/11/2008 | WO | 00 | 3/1/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/034113 | 3/19/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5298465 | Levy | Mar 1994 | A |
5423918 | Gupta et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
20040082148 | Maleville | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050266653 | Moriwaki | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050268850 | Ma | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060141746 | Delattre et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070148912 | Morita et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 272 142 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0 649 165 | Apr 1995 | EP |
7249749 | Sep 1995 | JP |
WO 2007060145 | May 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, PCT/EP2008/062018, mailed Jan. 19, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100304507 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |