The present invention relates generally to a method for protecting the structure of a building from attack by termites.
Existing pest control methods differ for new build and retrofit installations. For example, currently, in new build installations control is achieved by use of a passive barrier. Conversely, in retrofit installations the common control method involves the use of chemical treatment. Failure of performance may occur in both of these common methods currently used.
In the case of a passive barrier, for example of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,417,017, even a very small failure can effectively have the same result as having no barrier at all, since termites are able to pass through very small openings. Consequently, 100% performance of a control method of this type is difficult to achieve for a new build housing installation. An additional problem with this method of pest control is that damage to the barrier may occur during work being undertaken subsequent to the initial installation, such that later alterations may damage the integrity of an existing well-fitted barrier.
The treatment of existing buildings when infested with termites generally relies upon the delivery of a fumigating chemical and/or pesticide to the total area of the underside of a building, where access is difficult. Consequently, the effectiveness of this fumigation method is reliant upon the operative's efficiency. It is unlikely that 100% of the termites will be killed on every such treatment, leaving some in place to continue damaging the building, which means that a further treatment is required periodically, for example every three months, which is a labor intensive as well as a costly procedure, and more importantly the building is gradually damaged more and more by the termites which are not killed off at each treatment as their population builds up again.
Various systems have been tried to keep termites at bay to protect buildings. Japanese publication document 11-036470 (Kagawa) describes a system in which a treatment agent (ozone) is delivered as a fumigation treatment in to an already-infested building with the intention of killing the insects in place in the building by applying a concentration of treatment agents sufficiently high for this purpose and for relatively short duration since, while such serious and potentially harmful fumigation is taking place in the building it is wise, if not downright necessary, for the building to be evacuated of its human inhabitants. Kagawa describes a treatment effected by infusing ozone for something in the region of two hours until the termites are killed.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,327,812 (Hedman) also relates to a fumigation treatment of up to six hours. In such fumigation treatments it is not possible to allow human habitation to continue. Another Japanese patent 6-3273902 (Miwazawa) involves utilizing a detector to sense the migration of termites in order to trigger the infusion of the treatment agent sufficient to kill the termites. This treatment is applied once the termites are in the building, and the aim of the treatment is to kill the termites entirely, although as discussed above, it has to be recognized that such total eradication is rarely actually achieved in practice.
An alternative approach is utilized in other circumstances, where it is known to utilize long term low level infusion of ozone, for example as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,514,343 (Garbut), which keeps molds and bacteria at bay in animal housing. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 6,325,971 (Hayes) describes a system for distributing ozone throughout a poultry house, including the step of infusing a litter bed with ozone. The ozone is maintained at exposure levels lethal to pathogens within the litter bed indefinitely. The Garbut document describes the use of ozone in enclosed spaces, primarily fruit storage rooms or animal housing, with ozone being used to lethal effect on bacteria, fungus and molds. The document also refers to the maintenance of a residual amount of ozone sufficient continuously to suppress the bacteria, fungus and molds whilst being safe for human exposure to allow workers to move in and out of the ozonated area without hazard.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,276,304 (Tai) refers to the introduction of ozone beneath the ground, namely into the material within a manure pit beneath ground level constituting part of the interior of a pig raising house.
Although it is recognized in these documents that a low level of ozone may achieve the desired lethal effect while nevertheless being sufficiently low in concentration in the regions occupied by humans as to cause no damage to the humans, this system cannot be applied directly to the protection of buildings from termites as will be discussed in more detail below.
The performance of the delivery system therefore is the key to achieving effective control of termites. It has been found that in order to preserve the integrity of a building it is necessary to infuse the ground with a concentration of treatment agent which is sufficient to create a hostile environment without actually killing any termites. As a consequence the termites are unable to remain in the hostile environment and move away from it. Importantly, as they leave, they secrete a warning pheromone which acts as a deterrent to other termites, discouraging them from entering the protected region while it remains active. It is therefore not necessary to infuse the treatment agent into the protected region while their pheromone is active. Indeed, it has also been found that continuous, uninterrupted delivery of treatment agent such as ozone may even be counterproductive because it can mask the termites' own warning pheromone, and termites can get inured to the presence of the treatment agent and develop tactics to cope with its presence. One technique which has been observed is for termites to create tunnels from regurgitated cellulose obtained from wooden parts of the building's structure. The cellulose tunnels are impervious to ozone so that the termites are effectively screened from it and can consequently bore further into the timber weakening the structure despite the attempts to eradicate them. A prophylactic treatment thus requires a careful determination of the best concentration of treatment agent such as to cause the termites to vacate the protected region, rather than flooding the area and causing death without giving the insects an opportunity to escape since it is only upon escaping that they secrete their warning pheromone that is developed by the termites themselves to stick to the surfaces of their passageways and tunnels and warn other termites not to enter the protected region.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of protecting a building from damage by termites, comprising the steps of:
The present invention also comprehends a method of protecting a building from damage by termites, comprising the steps of:
a is an enlarged view of the pump unit of
b is an enlarged view of the pump unit of
The means for creating a region with properties inhospitable to the termites comprise means for delivering ozone at least in sufficient concentration to affect the reproductive or communicative behavior of said termites or other insects, in other words it is not sufficiently concentrated as to be lethal, but it causes termites to attempt to communicate by secreting warning pheromones as they leave the region.
The ozone is thus to be delivered at least in sufficient concentration to modify the pheromone chemistry of the termites.
The apparatus used for performing the method of the invention may further comprise means for generating a superatmospheric pressure field in the ground region below the building. A positive pressure field in this region will help to ensure that the termites are repelled from this field and therefore are discouraged from approaching the protected region.
The means for creating a superatmospheric pressure field may comprise a pump located within the building. Such a pump may provide sufficient pressure to create a superatmospheric pressure field in the region below the building.
The pump may be located within a habitable region of the building and may act to create forced ventilation thereof. By pumping air from the habitable region of the building to a region below the building, this creates a pressure differential between the two regions. The resultant sub-atmospheric pressure field created in the habitable region of the building encourages an inward movement of air from the exterior of the building thereby naturally ventilating the interior of the building. Further, because the pump is located within a habitable region of the building, access to the pump is made easier for the purpose of any repair and maintenance work that may be required.
The apparatus for performing the method of the invention may further comprise detecting means for monitoring the movement of termites as they approach the building from within the ground region below the building. The detecting means may be capable of communication with the means for delivery of the treatment agent into the region below the building, to allow the treatment agent to be delivered when required in response to the arrival of the termites. In this way, the treatment agent can be delivered to the protected region below the building In such a way as to maximize its effectiveness and moreover to trigger the termites themselves to generate a warning signal of long duration to keep other termites from approaching the building for a significant time period.
The apparatus may further comprise additional components to alter the form and/or potency of the treatment agent to be delivered. This may include, for example, means for ionizing air, for generating ozone or for generating oxides of nitrogen. Accordingly, the apparatus comprising the aforementioned means may act to ionize the air which passes through the apparatus. Further, the aforementioned means may also act to generate ozone and/or generate oxides of nitrogen from the air that passes through the apparatus. The ozone may be generated on site (i.e., in situ) or may be generated off site and stored in containers on site ready for delivery to the region below a building, whereby to produce an environment inhospitable to termites.
The method of the invention may further comprise the step of detecting the arrival or presence of termites below the building and in response using this information to initiate the delivery of the treatment agent. If the treatment agent is ozone the appropriate delivery rate to achieve the required concentration levels at the places where the termites are found can be determined in advance from tests conducted on the site, or may be conducted from tables drawn up as a result of previous tests on similar such buildings or under laboratory conditions so that when implementing the method of the invention further such tests are not required.
The delivery of the treatment agent to the region below the building may be continuous for a short time, sufficient to drive out all the termites, or may be continued until all the termites have vacated the protected region and no further termites are detected as being present. A controlled ventilation at a pre-set flow rate may also prevent wood decay in the lower regions of the buildings simply by improving the ventilation. The creation of an airflow at depth flooding through the ground under a building will produce a totally unnatural subsoil condition for termites, thereby acting as an invisible barrier. The effect will also be to remove track scenting, laid by such termites in their search for food and moisture; this will act as a disorientating and hostile environment to them. It is important therefore, that the delivery of treatment agent be discontinued once the termites have vacated the protected region, in order to avoid dissipating their warning pheromones, which would result in an earlier reinfestation.
The treatment agent may then be delivered at temporally spaced intervals. In this way the present invention may also be used as a backup insurance to a permanent passive barrier. The present invention may therefore remain in a dormant state until such a passive barrier has been breached. Accordingly, the treatment agent may then be delivered to the subterranean regions in the required amounts. The required amount may of course change over time depending on the nature of the ground and possibly the species of termites and therefore the temporally spaced intervals of the treatment agent delivery may also be varied to accommodate this change.
The delivery of the treatment agent may also additionally be randomly altered in terms of the concentration of the treatment agent or the length of the temporally spaced intervals. In this way, the termites are less likely to become resistant or tolerant to the arrangement of the irregular delivery of treatment agent, whether this be the concentration or the temporal intervals between the treatment agent applications.
In a further aspect, the present invention also envisages a method of protecting a subterranean region below a building from insects, such as termites, the method comprising the step of creating an environment having properties inhospitable to the said termites or other insects by the presence of ozone, the said ozone being present at least in sufficient concentration to cause said termites to vacate the region whereby to result in at least a depletion of the population thereof
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of protecting a subterranean region below a building from termites, the method comprising the step of creating an environment having properties inhospitable to the said termites or other insects by the presence of ozone, the said ozone being present at least in sufficient concentration to cause the termites to vacate the vicinity and to leave the pheromone warning signal to deter other termites from entering the region.
In a further aspect, the present invention encompasses the use of ozone to protect a subterranean region below a building from insects, such as termites, whereby to produce an environment inhospitable to the said termites without being lethal when present at least in sufficient concentration to affect the reproductive or communicative behavior of the said termites or other insects.
In another aspect, the present invention provides for the use of ozone in the manufacture of a composition for the treatment of a subterranean region below a building against infestation by insects, such as termites.
A pheromone is a volatile hormone or behavior-modifying agent. Ozone is a known, strongly oxidizing agent. Accordingly, it is believed that ozone may be used to modify the behavior of a termite, causing it to produce a pheromone, such that the communication between termites for example, is affected. This may, for example, have a disorientating effect on the termites.
Accordingly, ozone may have an alternative use for affecting the reproductive or communicative behavior, and/or modifying the pheromone chemistry of insects, such as termites.
Apparatus formed according to the present invention may comprise means for generating ozone in situ or on site, which may then be conveyed to the required regions. A method of producing ozone on site may include for example, reacting hydrocarbons with nitrogen oxides, particularly nitrogen dioxide, in the presence of sunlight or other source of ultra-violet light. This method is similar to the natural creation of ground level ozone. Other methods of generating ozone on site may include electrostatic or corona discharge techniques.
In use of an embodiment of the present invention, air comprising ozone is injected into a region below a building infested with termites or other insects. The ozone has the effect of creating an uncomfortable and hostile environment for the termites or other insects, and further is able to modify the pheromone chemistry thereof, thereby inhibiting the communication between the termites or other insects, which has the effect of disorientating them. Accordingly, such termites or other insects may either be reduced in numbers by evacuation or termination, or may simply be discouraged from approaching the building.
Insects, such as termites, feed on wood or other sources of cellulose. Although they lack specific cellulases for breaking down cellulose they are still able to digest it because of symbiotic relationships with flagellate protozoa, bacteria and fungi. For example, some protozoa digest wood particles by hydrolyzing cellulose anaerobically, which produces glucose that can be absorbed by an insect, such as a termite.
The cellulose which insects, such as termites, attack is broken down to carbon dioxide and water, causing timber to lose strength. The resultant increase in concentration of carbon dioxide during digestion of wood by termites, for example, provides an attractant scent indicating the presence of food for other termites. It is thought that the presence of ozone may reduce or eliminate the carbon dioxide residing in the environment of the termite or other insects, thereby affecting the pheromone chemistry of the termites or other insects. The ozone may provide an energized oxygen-rich atmosphere which may be inhospitable to termites or other insects.
To ensure that the ozone concentration does not have adverse effects on human health if the ozone were to escape from subterranean region below the building into the building itself, the concentration of the ozone in the air to be injected is preferably less than 0.1 ppm (parts per million). If a building is already infested with termites, then it may be desirable to inject a higher ozone concentration (higher than 0.1 ppm) for a short period to begin with, to increase the potency of the ozone/air mix, then reduce to a lower ozone concentration (lower than 0.1 ppm), which may be pumped continuously for an extended period, such as between a week and a month because it is below the safety threshold for humans. Alternatively, in houses under construction, it may be advantageous to inject a low ozone concentration (lower than 0.1 ppm) continuously during construction, for a preventative effect.
Referring first to
With reference to
The amount of ozone 31 to be delivered to the subterranean ground region below the building 10 while the system is active can be varied by controlling the opening of the control valve 32.
b illustrates the pump unit 12 of
Referring back to
With reference to
Referring back to
In the alternative embodiment, illustrated in
Thus, the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objectives and attain the ends and advantages mentioned above as well as those inherent therein. While presently preferred embodiments have been described for purposes of this disclosure, numerous changes and modifications will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such changes and modifications are encompassed within the spirit of this invention as defined by the claims.
This application is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/094,517 entitled “IMPROVED BUILDING PROTECTION APPARATUS,” filed May 21, 2008, which is a U.S. National Entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2006/004309, the contents of both of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2257541 | Smith | Sep 1941 | A |
3117832 | Thomas | Jan 1964 | A |
3294480 | Potapenko | Dec 1966 | A |
3322623 | Doakley | May 1967 | A |
4095115 | Orr et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4182663 | Vaseen | Jan 1980 | A |
4625474 | Peacock et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4805341 | Maeda | Feb 1989 | A |
4822563 | Joslyn | Apr 1989 | A |
5050338 | Doakley et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5349778 | Chu | Sep 1994 | A |
5378086 | Campbell et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5514345 | Garbutt et al. | May 1996 | A |
5566627 | Pryor | Oct 1996 | A |
5575105 | Otomo | Nov 1996 | A |
5592774 | Galyon | Jan 1997 | A |
5624635 | Pryor | Apr 1997 | A |
5788930 | McMurray | Aug 1998 | A |
5815090 | Su | Sep 1998 | A |
5877422 | Otomo | Mar 1999 | A |
5915949 | Johnson | Jun 1999 | A |
5983834 | Tai | Nov 1999 | A |
6052066 | Su | Apr 2000 | A |
6150944 | Martin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6223464 | Nekomoto et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6276304 | Tai | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6325971 | Hayes | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327812 | Hedman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349888 | Au et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6468433 | Tribelski | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6581324 | Creeger et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6596232 | Lin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6713027 | McNulty, Jr. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6810832 | Ford | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6892491 | Hedman | May 2005 | B2 |
6893610 | Barnes | May 2005 | B1 |
6955786 | Carman et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7036269 | Chen et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7146659 | Mattson et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7451568 | Hoshall | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468159 | Lin et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7690148 | Hedman | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7837932 | Hedman | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8620478 | Nichols | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20010004813 | Hedman | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020066223 | Hedman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030152481 | Birnecker | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030160699 | Trompen | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030192230 | Hoshall | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040028554 | Hedman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028583 | Hedman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040067178 | Molleker | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103579 | Nolen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050013727 | Hedman | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050220662 | Hedman | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246942 | Mueller et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060017577 | Broussard | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060042155 | Nolen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070084105 | Lindsay et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080014111 | Hedman | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031770 | Heselton et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080274012 | Cumberland et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090117016 | Decker et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090191091 | Danchenko et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090311134 | Iwashita et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100024280 | Reed et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100047116 | Garner | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100298981 | Chamorro et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300005 | Nichols | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110008264 | Negishi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20130164385 | Shannon et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130276357 | Shannon et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130305589 | Nichols | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
74032-74 | Aug 1976 | AU |
1570734 | Sep 2005 | EP |
2852201 | Sep 2004 | FR |
834004 | May 1960 | GB |
2373004 | Sep 2002 | GB |
2432375 | May 2007 | GB |
2454941 | May 2009 | GB |
01091732 | Apr 1989 | JP |
01304838 | Dec 1989 | JP |
05170610 | Jul 1993 | JP |
06327390 | Nov 1994 | JP |
06327390 | Nov 1994 | JP |
07008148 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07059497 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07213591 | Aug 1995 | JP |
10070949 | Mar 1998 | JP |
11036470 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11036470 | Feb 1999 | JP |
3071411 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001045957 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001258455 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001309744 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002058411 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002300840 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003010732 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003010732 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2005176641 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005221131 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2006055006 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006304638 | Nov 2006 | JP |
WO2005046743 | May 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120222346 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12094517 | US | |
Child | 13420765 | US |