Be it known that I, Russell S. Bruner, a citizen of the United States residing at 726 Poplar Avenue, Mt. Juliet, Tenn. 37122 and I, David R. Morgan, a citizen of the United Slates residing at 9921 U.S. Highway 68 East, Benton, Ky. 42025, and I, Garry R. Kenny, a citizen of the United States residing at 6299 McDaniel Rd., College Grove, Tenn. 37046, and I, Paul G. Gaddis, a citizen of the United States residing at 2000 Alaska Way #156, Seattle, Wash. 98121, and I, David Lee, a citizen of the United States residing at 3614 North 30th Street, Tacoma, Wash. 98407, and I, James M. Roggow, a citizen of the United States residing at 14526 26th Avenue, Court East, Puyallup, Wash. 98374, have invented a new and useful “System and Method For Sensing White Paper.”“Method of Sorting Waste Paper.”
The present invention relates to a system and method for sorting mass recyclables and more particularly to a system for sensing and sorting white paper from other objects.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that society desires to recycle as much of its waste materials as possible. For example, aluminum cans, plastic bottles, and other items have been the source of mixed recyclable efforts in the past. The assignee of the present application, Magnetic Separation Systems, Inc. (MSS) is a world leader in mixed recyclables. MSS is also the owner of many patents disclosing technologies for sorting and concentrating aluminum and sorting plastics.
One other type of mixed recyclable is paper. In the past, recyclable efforts have been dominated by hand sorting of paper by type. One common effort is curbside recycling. Other efforts have been to sort paper from other types of materials. Unfortunately, as with any other procedure, any type of hand sorting requires an intensive use of labor that is not always efficient.
What is needed, then, is a method and system that can sort white paper from a stream of other paper. This needed system must also be capable of sorting a stream of material from white paper in case the stream is dominated by materials other than white paper. The system must decrease the amount of labor presently being used. The system must be economical. The system must be effective. The system is presently lacking in prior art.
The present invention discloses a method of sorting waste paper, comprising spreading waste paper out into a layer that is substantially one unit thick; detecting the presence or absence of a predetermined optical characteristic as the layer of paper is passed by a sensor; and controlling one or more actuators that direct a sheet of paper based on the presence or absence of the predetermined optical characteristic.
The present invention discloses a system and method for sorting white paper, and especially a type of white paper commonly referred to as bright white paper, from other objects. One reason that recycling of bright white paper is very desirable is that the fluorescent chemicals added to such papers are expensive plus the bright white paper tends to be a very high quality paper fiber. Thus, this is a premium paper fraction for recycling. The system may also sort other objects from white paper.
The present invention uses an energy source that is preferably an ultraviolet light light that is concentrated in some manner onto an object. The energy is focused on the paper. If the paper is bright white paper, the ultraviolet radiation will cause the brightening agents in the white paper to fluorescence into an energy having a different and longer wavelength. The fluorescence is then measured.
The system and method of the present invention is particularly adapted for use in sensing the presence of bright white paper that flows past the sensor on a conveyor. The conveyor is constantly illuminated with the ultraviolet light. Also, a second light source is provided which periodically illuminates an inspection zone of the conveyor with a second light which is in the visible light spectrum, and preferably in the blue-green portion of the visible light spectrum.
A sensor located above the inspection zone of the conveyor collects light from the inspection zone of the conveyor. The collected light includes both emitted fluorescence from bright white paper located in the inspection zone and reflected light from the second light source reflected off of objects in the inspection zone.
Periodically, the sensing system senses first and second parameters of the light collected from the inspection zone. The first parameter is the level of reflection of the second light source in order to determine whether any object is present on the conveyor in the inspection zone. The second parameter sensed is the level of fluorescent light to determine whether an object present in the inspection zone is bright white paper.
Thus, if the sensed level of the reflected light from the second light source is below a certain threshold, the system will determine that no object is present in the inspection zone on the conveyor. If the sensed level of reflected light from the second light source is above a threshold level, the system will sense that some object is present in the inspection zone on the conveyor, but the identification of that object will depend upon the sensed level of fluorescent energy coming from that object. If the sensed level of fluorescent energy from the object is below a threshold level, the system will determine that the object is something other than bright white paper. If the sensed level of fluorescent energy is above a predetermined threshold, the system will determine that the sensed object is bright white paper.
The system may then send control signals to an ejection means which will eject either the bright white paper fraction or the non-bright white paper fraction from the paper stream flowing across the conveyor.
Accordingly one object of the present invention is to provide a system and method for sensing and sorting bright white paper from other objects.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a system that allows someone to sort bright white paper from other objects that is not labor intensive.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a system that can sort both bright white paper from other objects and other objects from bright white paper.
Still a further object of the present invention is to provide an accurate system for sensing bright white paper.
And another object of the present invention is to provide improved methods of sorting waste paper.
Other and further objects features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the following disclosure when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring now the drawings, and particularly to
The system 10 is particularly designed to determine whether an object in the inspection zone 19 is bright white paper. Bright white paper is a common name for a type of high quality paper commonly used in offices for printers and copiers. Bright white paper is typically a high quality paper fiber which has been treated with brighteners which cause the paper to fluoresce in the presence of ultraviolet light. When ultraviolet light energy falls upon bright white paper, the brighteners in the object will fluoresce and will emit light energy having a wavelength in the range of from about 400 to about 550 nanometers, which is in the visible light spectrum. The fluorescent energy emitted from bright white paper when an ultraviolet light is shown on it is great when compared to the amount of fluorescent energy that will be emitted from objects other than bright white paper.
As will be further described below, the general purpose of the second light source 20 is to provide a means for detecting whether any object is present on the conveyor belt 100 within the inspection zone 19. The sensor 16 and its associated control apparatus will be calibrated so that when the reflected light 23 exceeds a certain threshold, it will provide a determination that some object other than the black conveyor belt 100 is located within the inspection zone 19. A second determination will then be made as to the level of fluorescent energy traveling upward along path 17 to the sensor 16. If an object is present in the inspection zone 19, but the level of fluorescent energy is below a predetermined threshold, the system 10 will determine that the object is not the desired bright white paper. On the other hand, if an object is determined to be present, and the amount of fluorescent energy 17 emitted by that object is above the predetermined threshold, the system 10 will determine that the object is bright white paper.
There is a peak at approximately 360 nanometers in
As previously noted, when ultraviolet light energy falls upon a piece of bright white paper containing fluorescing additives, the additives fluoresce, thus converting some of the ultraviolet light energy into visible light energy having a longer wavelength (and thus lower frequency). In
In order to isolate the fluorescent energy emitted from bright white paper, the sensor 16 preferably has a filtering means associated therewith. Preferably the filtering means is a band pass filter which will allow light energy only within the range of from 400 to 500 nanometers length to pass therethrough. The details of construction of this filtering means are further described below. In
The secondary light source 20 previously described operates at a wavelength of 480 nanometers, so that when the secondary light source reflects off of an object within the inspection zone 19 that reflected light 23 can pass through the filter means.
The first light source 12 is a light module 46 which includes four parallel elongated tubular ultraviolet light bulbs 48 which are seen in cross-section in FIG. 7. The light bulbs 48 extend transversally across the width of the conveyor 100 perpendicular to the direction of paper flow indicated by the arrow 110. The bulbs 48 are contained within a housing 52. Electronic starters 50 are associated with the bulbs 48 and cause the same to turn on and off when electrical power is directed thereto in a well known manner. A glass panel 54 covers the lower side of module 46.
Thus, most of the ultraviolet light energy from bulbs 48 is emitted laterally as along the paths 13 previously noted, where it falls upon the concentrators 14. The concentrators 14 are preferably curved reflectors formed in the shape of an arc of an ellipse so that all light falling thereon will be reflected toward a focal point 58 lying in the center of the inspection zone 19 on the conveyor 100. The ultraviolet light energy reflected from concentrators 14 follows paths generally designated as 15 to the focal point 58.
The geometric layout of the concentrator 14 is best illustrated in the schematic representation shown in FIG. 2. As indicated in
Referring now to
The lower end of the housing 60 of apparatus 10 is closed by a transparent glass shield 116 which allows the light energy to pass therethrough while preventing dirt, paper and debris from entering the apparatus 10.
The reflecting walls 24 and 25 may be generally described as an elliptical reflecting lens having focal point 58 within the inspection zone 19.
Referring now to
The sensor housing 124 has a plurality of lens cavities 42 and a plurality of secondary light source cavities 126 defined therein. An array of sensor elements are carried by housing 124.
The sensor housing is held in place by a bracket 56 as shown in FIG. 7.
Turning now to
A collimator tube 40 is received in each lens cavity 42 and held in place therein by set screws received through threaded holes 130 (See FIG. 6b). In one preferred embodiment each collimator tube is approximately 4″ long, 1″ outside diameter and ¾″ inside diameter. The collimator tube 40 may be an aluminum tube having a matte black finish. The collimator tube 40 ensures that the light being collected by the sensing element 128 is substantially only light traveling directly upward from an object immediately below sensing element 128 in the focal zone 19.
Located at the upper end of each collimator tube 40 is a semi-spherical lens 32. Plan and side elevation views of one lens 32 are shown in
Located immediately above the lens 32 is the filtering means 122 which includes first and second optical filter plates 34 and 36. The first optical filter plate is a high frequency pass filter 34, and the second optical filter plate 36 is a low frequency pass plate 36. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the filter plates 34 and 36 can be selected to determine the frequencies of light energy which really will not pass therethrough. Filter plates 34 and 36 are standard optical filters which are available from Edmund Scientific.
The light energy which passes through the lens 32 is focused within a cone having outer boundaries along the dashed arrows 132 and 134 which focuses that energy upon a photo electric detector 38. The photo electric detector 38 is a silicone photo diode.
Thus, the band pass filter means 122 will pass fluorescent energy having a wavelength longer than a lower limit of about 400 nanometers, which lower limit is longer than the wavelength of the ultraviolet light from source 12. The filtering means 122 will further block fluorescent energy having a wavelength longer than an upper limit, which in the illustrated embodiment is preferably about 500 nanometers. The range of light energy having wavelength from 400 to 500 nanometers can be described as being in the blue-green portion of the visible light spectrum.
As previously noted, the light emitted from second light source 20 has a wavelength of approximately 480 nanometers, which will be passed by the filtering means 122 when said light is reflected from an object in the inspection zone 19.
Referring now to
The conveyor 100, ejector system 70 and associated apparatus are shown in detail in an application of Michael R. Grubbs et al, entitled PAPER SORTING SYSTEM, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/301,992, filed Apr. 29, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,472 issued Jun. 26, 2001, and assigned to the assignee of the present invention. The details of construction of the system shown in the Grubbs et al. patent are incorporated herein by reference as if the same were fully set forth herein.
In the system shown in
Signals from the photo electric detector 38 are converted into digital signals which are directed to a microprocessor 140 which performs the measuring, sensing, comparing and evaluating functions. The microprocessor 140 will go through the evaluation steps described below, and at appropriate times will send a control signal to the ejector system 70 to direct compressed air to jet 80 so that the air jet 80 will be directed against an object which at that time is passing across the ejection gap 136. Any object impacted by an air jet as it crosses the gap 136 will be blown downward between the two conveyors 100 and 138 and will be part of an ejected paper stream fraction. Non-ejected paper will flow across the gap 136 and fall onto the conveyor 138 which will lake it to another location.
The microprocessor 140 may be a XYCOM model PCD1048 microprocessor available from XYCOM Automation, Inc. The microprocessor 140 preferably has touch screen operated control station 144 which allows system variables to be changed and the sort selection to be changed. The system provides the ability to perform a positive sort where non-bright white paper is ejected or a reverse sort where the bright white paper is ejected when the concentration of the targeted paper is less than that of the non-targeted paper.
The microprocessor 140 is connected by interface 146 to power supply ballasts 148 and then to the ultraviolet light source 12.
The microprocessor 140 is connected by a ribbon cable 150 to a rear receiver board 152 which is in turn connected by a ribbon cable 154 to the sensor unit 16 and the secondary light sources 20 contained in the sensor housing.
A power supply 156 is connected to the rear receiver board 152.
An LED power supply 158 is connected to the secondary light source 20.
The rear receiver board 152 includes amplifiers and analog to digital converters. Signals from the sensor 16 are communicated over cable 154 to the rear receiver board 152 where they are amplified and digitized before being passed over cable 150 to the microprocessor 140.
The microprocessor 140 also communicates over cable 160 to the ejector control system 70 which includes a plurality of solenoid driver boards 162 and an array of solenoid valves 164 which control the flow of air to the air jets 80. A solenoid power supply 166 is connected to the driver boards 162.
The methods of operation of the present invention will now be described with reference to
The system 10 provides an apparatus and method for sensing the presence of bright white paper on the conveyor 100 of the paper sorting system like that described in the Grubbs et al. application which has been incorporated herein by reference.
The conveyor 100 is directing a stream of waste paper from right to left as seen in
The ultraviolet light source 12 is constantly on and constantly illuminates the inspection zone 19 on the conveyor belt 100 immediately below the sensor 16. As previously described, that ultraviolet light energy is focused on the inspection zone 19 by means of the elliptical shaped walls 24 and 25.
When a piece of paper such as 102 passes through the inspection zone 19, if the paper 102 is bright white paper, it will fluoresce and will re-radiate fluorescent light energy from the bright white paper. As previously described with reference to
Throughout this process, the inspection zone 19 will also be periodically illuminated with light from the second light source 20, which as previously noted is preferably a blue light emitting diode. In a preferred embodiment, the secondary light source 20 illuminates the inspection zone 19 every 3 milliseconds.
Light from the inspection zone 19, including both reflected light and emitted fluorescent light, is collected by the collimator tube 40 and passes through the lens 32 and the filtering means 122 to the photo electric detector 38. The photo electric detector 38 will convert the light energy into an electrical signal, which, in turn, is converted into a digital electric signal which is directed to the microprocessor 140.
A first measuring step or sensing step is performed by microprocessor 12 when the secondary light source 20 is on. This first sensed parameter will thus indicate the level of reflected light from secondary source 20, and if that level of reflected secondary light exceeds a predetermined threshold, the microprocessor 140 will determine that some object is present in the inspection zone 19 on the conveyor 100. Then, when the secondary light source 20 is off, the microprocessor 140 will perform a second measuring or sensing step while only the ultraviolet light illuminates the inspection zone 19. In this second step, the sensed light energy will be compared to the predetermined threshold for fluorescent energy, and if that threshold is exceeded, the microprocessor 140 will determine that an object present in the inspection zone 19 is bright white paper.
The microprocessor 140 can be described as periodically sensing first and second parameters of the light collected by the sensing element. The first parameter is the level of reflection from the inspection zone 19 of light originating with the secondary light source 20. If this first parameter exceeds a certain threshold, an indication is generated indicating that some object is present in the inspection zone 19 other than the conveyor belt 100 itself.
The second parameter sensed by the microprocessor 14 is the level of fluorescent light energy which has been radiated from an object within the inspection zone 19. If this level of fluorescent light energy exceeds a predetermined threshold, this will generate an indication that an object which is present in the inspection zone 19 is, in fact, bright white paper.
If the first parameter indicates that an object is present, but the second parameter indicates that the object is not bright white paper, then it is known that the object is one which should be separated from the bright white paper.
Depending upon the signals generated by the microprocessor 140, a control signal is then sent to the ejection system 70 to direct compressed air to air jets 80 to eject a selected fraction of the stream of paper which is moving along the conveyor 100. It will be appreciated that the microprocessor 140 can be programmed to either eject the bright white paper or to eject the non-bright white paper. Preferably, whichever type of paper comprises the smaller portion of the stream of paper flowing across conveyor 100 will be ejected, whereas the major portion will be allowed to flow across to the product conveyor 138.
The periodic illumination by secondary source 100 is preferably performed approximately every 3 milliseconds. In general, it may be described as being performed in excess of 100 times per second. Preferably the microprocessor 140 periodically senses the light being collected from the inspection zone 19 at the same periodic rate at which the secondary light source 20 is illuminating the inspection zone 19.
The paper objects will be traveling on the conveyor 100 at a speed of approximately 1200 feet per minute or 20 feet per second, thus by strobing every 3 milliseconds, a piece of letter size paper, 8½″ wide would be strobed at least 10 times as it passed under the sensor 16.
The sensor 16 and associated microprocessor 140 can be described as an evaluating means for evaluating the level of fluorescent energy detected by each of the sensing elements to determine whether bright white paper is located below each sensing element.
As previously noted, there is preferably a linear array of sensing elements arranged across the width of the conveyor belt. For example, for a 48″ wide conveyor, there may be 32 sensor elements. Signals from each of the sensing elements are separately analyzed, and control signals are separately sent to an array of 32 air jets 80, so that there is an ejection air jet 80 associated with each of the sensing elements. Thus, a paper object may be located toward one edge of the conveyor belt and its location will be determined by the identification of the sensing elements which sense the presence of that object therebelow. Then the associated air jets can be activated at the proper time to blow the sensed object through the ejection gap 136 if desired.
Thus, it is seen that the apparatus and methods of the present invention readily achieve the ends and advantages mentioned, as well as those inherent therein. While certain preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described for purposes of the present disclosure, numerous changes in the arrangement and construction of parts and steps may be made by those skilled in the art, which changes are encompassed within the scope and spirit of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of our pending application Ser. No. 09/301,715 filed Apr. 29, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,369,882 B1.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1035345 | Heess | Aug 1912 | A |
1547743 | Fowler | Jul 1925 | A |
1847263 | Sandberg | Mar 1932 | A |
1847265 | Sandberg | Mar 1932 | A |
2897952 | Buccicone | Aug 1959 | A |
3101832 | Wyle et al. | Aug 1963 | A |
3185286 | Koplin | May 1965 | A |
3198352 | Puechberty | Aug 1965 | A |
3227263 | Kastenbein | Jan 1966 | A |
3352404 | Settembrini | Nov 1967 | A |
3471013 | Haver | Oct 1969 | A |
3606645 | Hardy | Sep 1971 | A |
3650369 | Vergobbi | Mar 1972 | A |
3747755 | Senturia et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3800936 | Anfossi | Apr 1974 | A |
3908814 | Hieronymus | Sep 1975 | A |
4069145 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4093062 | Sjögren | Jun 1978 | A |
4094772 | Hillekamp et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4102056 | Angelo et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4124168 | Bialski et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4131540 | Husome et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4176750 | Holmes | Dec 1979 | A |
4207177 | Block | Jun 1980 | A |
4225427 | Schnell | Sep 1980 | A |
4231526 | Ortner et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4352430 | Maier et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4440284 | DeWoolfson | Apr 1984 | A |
4505371 | Krueger et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4533053 | Kenny et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4533054 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4541530 | Kenny et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4542689 | Trolle | Sep 1985 | A |
4609108 | Hristozov et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4632320 | Holz et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4657144 | Martin et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4686371 | Birch et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4699510 | Alguard | Oct 1987 | A |
4718558 | Castaneda | Jan 1988 | A |
4718559 | Kenny et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4741042 | Throop et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4760925 | Stehle et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4830501 | Terashita | May 1989 | A |
4844351 | Holloway | Jul 1989 | A |
4909930 | Cole | Mar 1990 | A |
4919534 | Reed | Apr 1990 | A |
4929342 | Johnston | May 1990 | A |
4945253 | Frohardt | Jul 1990 | A |
5022644 | Burge | Jun 1991 | A |
5024335 | Lundell | Jun 1991 | A |
5048674 | Wilbur et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5060870 | Trezek et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5085325 | Jones et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5091077 | Williams | Feb 1992 | A |
5092526 | Takata | Mar 1992 | A |
5100005 | Noble et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100537 | Krause | Mar 1992 | A |
5101977 | Roman | Apr 1992 | A |
5111927 | Schulze, Jr. | May 1992 | A |
5115144 | Konishi et al. | May 1992 | A |
5115987 | Mithal | May 1992 | A |
5134291 | Ruhl, Jr. et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5139339 | Courtney et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5143308 | Hally et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5150307 | McCourt et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5165676 | Blessing et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5169588 | Estepp | Dec 1992 | A |
5183251 | Sardella | Feb 1993 | A |
5190165 | Garfield, Jr. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197678 | Trezek et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201921 | Luttermann et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5209355 | Mindermann | May 1993 | A |
5242059 | Low et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5257577 | Clark | Nov 1993 | A |
5260576 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5297667 | Hoffman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299693 | Ubaldi et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5301816 | Weber et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5314072 | Frankel et al. | May 1994 | A |
5315384 | Heffington et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318172 | Kenny et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5318173 | Datari | Jun 1994 | A |
5322152 | Tommila et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5333739 | Stelte | Aug 1994 | A |
5333797 | Becker et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5335791 | Eason | Aug 1994 | A |
5339962 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339963 | Tao | Aug 1994 | A |
5344026 | Booth et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5348136 | Kenny et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5348162 | Wroblewski | Sep 1994 | A |
5361913 | Melchionna | Nov 1994 | A |
5398818 | McGarvey | Mar 1995 | A |
5402264 | Wilbur et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5419438 | Squyres et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419498 | Rasmussen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423431 | Westin | Jun 1995 | A |
5440127 | Squyres | Aug 1995 | A |
5443164 | Walsh et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5460271 | Kenny et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464981 | Squyres et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469973 | Booth et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5481864 | Wright | Jan 1996 | A |
5497871 | Ciolkevich | Mar 1996 | A |
5501344 | Kaiser et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5512758 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5520290 | Kumar et al. | May 1996 | A |
5531331 | Barnett | Jul 1996 | A |
5533628 | Tao | Jul 1996 | A |
5555984 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5581353 | Taylor | Dec 1996 | A |
5615778 | Kaiser et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632381 | Thust et al. | May 1997 | A |
5675416 | Campbell et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676256 | Kumar et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689757 | Ferrante et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695035 | Fukushima et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5703784 | Pearson | Dec 1997 | A |
5770864 | Dlugos | Jun 1998 | A |
5789741 | Kinter et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794788 | Massen | Aug 1998 | A |
5797327 | Gieser et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799105 | Tao | Aug 1998 | A |
5799801 | Clark et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813542 | Cohn | Sep 1998 | A |
5813543 | Gesing et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5848706 | Harris | Dec 1998 | A |
5861919 | Perkins et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862919 | Eason | Jan 1999 | A |
5884775 | Campbell | Mar 1999 | A |
5900943 | Owen | May 1999 | A |
5901856 | Brantley, Jr. et al. | May 1999 | A |
5917585 | Roe et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5954206 | Mallon et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955741 | Kayani | Sep 1999 | A |
5960964 | Austin et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966217 | Roe et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979240 | Rix et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6022017 | Cummings et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6060677 | Ulrichsen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064056 | Doak | May 2000 | A |
6068106 | Brizzi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076684 | Bollegraaf | Jun 2000 | A |
6137074 | Doak | Oct 2000 | A |
6263291 | Shakespeare et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6303925 | Edmonds | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335501 | Khalfan | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353197 | Ulrichsen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369882 | Bruner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373575 | Takayama et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6509537 | Krieg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6778276 | Bruner et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7262380 | Ulrichsen et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
20020017445 | Mukai | Feb 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2109021 | Apr 1994 | CA |
2235665 | Oct 1998 | CA |
3615644A 1 | Nov 1987 | DE |
3828067 | Mar 1990 | DE |
3926641 | Feb 1991 | DE |
3926641 | Feb 1991 | DE |
4125045 | Feb 1993 | DE |
4135394 | Apr 1993 | DE |
4305006 | Sep 1993 | DE |
44 17 357 | Nov 1995 | DE |
PCTDE9500966 | Nov 1995 | DE |
4241990 | Feb 1997 | DE |
291 959 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0484221 | May 1992 | EP |
0873797 | Oct 1998 | EP |
873797 | Oct 1998 | EP |
9314070 | Dec 1997 | JP |
11-084745 | Mar 1999 | JP |
1411228 | Jul 1988 | RU |
1050992 | Oct 1983 | SU |
WO 9606690 | Mar 1996 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09301715 | Apr 1999 | US |
Child | 10004690 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10004690 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 11139005 | US |