Method of using a proxy network to normalize online connections by executing computer-executable instructions stored on a non-transitory computer-readable medium

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11606253
  • Patent Number
    11,606,253
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 5, 2021
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 14, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
A method of using a proxy network to normalize online connections uses a global proxy network (GPN) to manage connections between a plurality of local proxy clients and a destination server. First, an optimization process is executed for the overall network connection between each local proxy client and the destination server. The latency of each optimized connection are then examined to determine a normalization point, which corresponds to the highest latency among the optimized connections. The rest of the connections are then adjusted to conform to the normalization point by adding latency to the connections to match the latency of the normalization point.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to Internet connections. More particularly, the present invention relates to using a proxy network to normalize online connections.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Present day, with any website or online service, the service may be accessed by users from all around the world. The challenge that happens with access from users all around the world is that the connectivity of each user will be different. This will result in some users having a connection much stronger or faster than others.


In a competitive situation such as eSports or online gaming, this means that users with a better connection will have an advantage over their opponents. The success of eSports gamers is often dependent on the connection of the gamer, instead of the skill of the gamer. This is a challenge, as the gamers are not competing on a level playing field, especially when the competitors are geographically distributed. When competing for money, having a level playing field is very important for competitive fairness.


Another significant online technology where highly variant connections have a major impact are VOIP or online video communication. With multiple people communicating online, each with different connections, the user experience for each can vary greatly, resulting in unintended interruptions and poor communication. The further away the users are, the more significant the potential problem.


It is therefore an objective of the present invention to introduce a method and system device users can utilize to overcome such problems.


The proposed invention utilizes a global proxy network to help normalize online connections for users connecting to a central server to collaborate or compete. The goal is to provide optimal connections for everyone, but to also artificially slow down connections if necessary so all users are on a level playing field. This will ensure that all users are communicating at the same speed and make collaboration/competing easier.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a general overview of the functional components of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a general process overview of the present invention.



FIG. 3 describes the benefits of the present invention versus the prior art.



FIG. 4 is a conceptual overview and example of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a stepwise flow diagram of the steps in the general method of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a stepwise flow diagram depicting further ancillary steps in the method of the present invention.



FIG. 7 is a stepwise flow diagram depicting steps for normalizing connection speeds based on latency.





DETAIL DESCRIPTIONS OF THE INVENTION

All illustrations of the drawings are for the purpose of describing selected versions of the present invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. The present invention is to be described in detail and is provided in a manner that establishes a thorough understanding of the present invention. There may be aspects of the present invention that may be practiced without the implementation of some features as they are described. It should be understood that some details have not been described in detail in order to not unnecessarily obscure focus of the invention. Notably, software solutions may be implemented in a variety of ways while still fulfilling similar functionality.


The present invention is a method of using a proxy network to normalize online connections in a group so that all the connections in the group have the same or similar connection speeds. This is particularly applicable for online gaming in order to create a level playing field, where each user has the same connection speed and no one player has a distinct advantage due to having a fast connection in comparison with other players. The general components of the present invention include, but are not limited to: a set of local proxy clients, a global proxy network, a synchronization process, and a reporting and analytics process. FIG. 1 shows a general overview of the present invention. FIG. 2 shows the general process of the present invention. FIG. 3 shows the benefits of the present invention versus the prior art. FIG. 4 shows a conceptual overview and example of the present invention.


Referring to FIG. 5, in the general method of the present invention, a plurality of local proxy clients is provided (Step A). Each of the plurality of local proxy clients is a proxy software operating on a computing device. The local proxy clients are computer applications through which end users participate in online activities. For example, the local proxy clients are a gaming platform application through which end users play computer games against other end users. This local proxy client will hook relevant traffic and send it to a global proxy network for optimization and normalization. A global proxy network (GPN) is also provided (Step B). The function of the global proxy network is to control the traffic from end-to-end, ensuring optimal connections with minimum latency and low anomalies. The global proxy network does this by performing the synchronization process. A destination server is also provided (Step C). The destination server, or destination IP address is the server or IP address the end user ultimately wishes to electronically communicate with through the local proxy client. For example, the destination server may be a video game server that controls and manages online gaming events among multiple end users, or the destination server may be a server that facilitates electronic collaboration among multiple computing devices.


Initially, a client network connection is established between each local proxy client and the GPN (Step D). Next, a destination network connection is established between the GPN and the destination server for each of the local proxy clients (Step E). The GPN routes data traffic received from the local proxy clients through the client network connections to the destination server through the destination network connections. For each local proxy client, the client network connection and the destination network connection form an overall network connection between the local proxy client and the destination server. Each local proxy client is associated with at least one client network connection and at least one destination network connection in order to form an overall network connection.


Once the overall network connection is established, the overall network connection is analyzed for each local proxy client in order to measure a connection speed for each overall network connection between the local proxy clients and the destination server (Step F). Then, a connection optimization process is executed through the GPN on each overall network connection in order to produce an optimized network connection between each local proxy client and the destination server, so that each optimized network connection now operates at an optimized connection speed (Step G). It should be understood that the optimization process may be any relevant process for optimizing network connections, and is not the focus of the present invention and therefore not disclosed herein.


Once the optimization process is complete, the optimized connection speed of each of the optimized network connections is compared in order to determine a normalization point (Step H). The normalization point corresponds to a specific optimized network connection between a specific local proxy client and the GPN, and the connection speed of the specific optimized network connection is the slowest connection speed among the plurality of optimized network connections.


The main goal of the present invention is to ensure that all connections have the fastest speed possible while maintaining conformity among the connections, so in general each connection is normalized by being slowed to the speed of the slowest connection. High ping connections will be reduced as much as possible with the proxy network, while low ping connections may be artificially increased with the proxy network. A connection speed difference is calculated between the optimized connection speed of each of the optimized network connections and the normalization point (Step I). Finally, the optimized connection speed of each of the optimized network connections is adjusted by the connection speed difference in order to produce a normalized connection speed between each of the local proxy clients and the destination server (Step J).


Referring to FIG. 6, in one embodiment, steps F through J are continually executed in order to maintain a consistent normalization point and mitigate connection fluctuations. In one embodiment, a specific optimized connection may be excluded from step J, if the connection speed difference for the specific optimized connection exceeds a specified outlier threshold. If one of the connections is extremely slow, normalizing all the other connections to the extremely slow speed would be very detrimental to the group of connections as a whole.


Referring to FIG. 7, in one embodiment of the present invention, a latency value is measured as the optimized connection speed for each of the optimized network connections. In other embodiments, other metrics may be utilized as the optimized connections speed, such as, but not limited to, ping, bandwidth, throughput, uptime, or other metrics, alternatively or in addition to latency. The latency value of each of the optimized network connections is compared to find a highest latency value among the latency values of the optimized network connections as the normalization point. The connection speed difference is calculated for each of the optimized network connections as a latency differential between the latency value of each optimized network connection and the highest latency value. A normalized network connection is then produced between each of the local proxy clients and the destination server by adding the latency differential to the latency value for each optimized network connection.


An example of the synchronization process in a hypothetical situation with four users, described as follows. The example utilizes User 1 numbered through User 4. The example is illustrated in FIG. 4.


User 1 has a Normal Latency of 100 ms, and a GPN Optimized Latency of 70 ms.


User 2 has a Normal Latency of 200 ms, and a GPN Optimized Latency of 100 ms.


User 3 has a Normal Latency of 50 ms, and a GPN Optimized Latency of 40 ms.


User 4 has a Normal Latency of 150 ms, and a GPN Optimized Latency of 90 ms.


Notably, User 2 is used for the normalization baseline because they have the highest latency.


The global proxy network will aim to adjust the latency for all users so they match the lowest possible latency score for User 2. In this example, all users will be normalized to 100 ms, described as follows:


User 1 has 30 ms added to their latency.


User 2 has 0 ms added, because they are the normalization point in this example.


User 3 has 60 ms added to their latency.


User 4 has 10 ms added to their latency.


After all connections are normalized, the global proxy network sends the data onto the destination server. All four users have been normalized to a 100 ms connection to the destination server. This creates a level playing field for all users, without any one user having an unfair latency advantage. This would be vital in an eSports situation.


It is important to mention that one of the key differentiators between the present invention and the prior art, is that the present invention utilizes a third-party proxy network for optimizing and normalizing middle mile connections for any Internet technology. This is the aforementioned global proxy network.


Unlike the prior art, the present invention does not require collaboration with any service provider. The present invention is versatile and is capable of performing on a wide variety of services. Because the present invention optimizes the middle mile, the present invention's system also gives much greater control over the connection for all users, to ensure they are optimal, so less normalization is required.


This prior art requires a client/server solution, and the prior art can only normalize at the local server level, or at the local client level. The prior art provides no connection optimization, and therefore has to make much larger changes in order for the normalization to happen. Additionally, the connections will never be smooth, as it will always be polluted with flux, spikes, and loss in the middle mile.


The present invention's system is advantageous over the prior art, as it does not require collaboration with a service provider. The present invention optimizes the middle mile using a global proxy network, minimizing flux, spikes, loss and the average latency for all device connections. As a result, the normalization required for all connected devices with our system is far less than this prior art.


The preferred embodiment of the present invention further comprises a reporting and analytics process. This process, while desired, is optional in the present invention's overall system. In alternative or future embodiments of the invention, a report and ongoing connection statistics process may be provided. This process will show the normalization impact on all the user connections, and to confirm that all the user connections have in fact been normalized. Connection statistics are continually gathered for each of the plurality of optimized network connections.


In alternative or future embodiments of the invention additional statistics types not explicitly mentioned here may be tracked as well. Additionally, in alternative or future embodiments of the invention, the ability to export statistics and analytics to industry-standard or custom file formats may be included as well.


Herein follows a summary overview of the present invention's process, while describing the interaction of the major components and processes. Some of these descriptions may be redundant with preceding material; however, they are included in order of occurrence for the sake of clarity.


First, each user will use a local proxy client, which will hook relevant traffic and send it to a global proxy network for optimization and normalization. The plurality of local proxy clients forms the set of local proxy clients in the present invention.


The next step in the process takes place at the global proxy network. The global proxy network will control the traffic from end to end, ensuring optimal connections with minimum ping, maximal speed and low anomalies.


Next is the synchronization phase. Each user collaborating online will be involved in a brief syncing phase. A normalization point is determined for all connections.


The reporting and analytics process allows users to keep track of ongoing connections and related statistics. It will also allow users to confirm that all the user connections have been normalized.


Although the invention has been explained in relation to its preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that many other possible modifications and variations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed.

Claims
  • 1. A network system comprising: a network;a plurality of client computer devices comprising one or more processors and a memory, the plurality of client computer devices being configured to communicate with the network via a plurality of client network connections between the plurality of client computer devices and the network;a destination server computer comprising one or more processors and a memory, the destination server computer being configured to communicate with the network via a destination network connection between the network and the destination server computer,wherein each of the client network connections together with the destination network connection forms an overall network connection having a first network connection speed between each of the plurality of client computer devices and the destination server computer, andwherein the network is configured to: route data traffic received from each of the plurality of client computer devices through a corresponding one of the plurality of client network connections and through the destination network connection to the destination server computer,analyze the overall network connection for each of the plurality of client computer devices in order to measure the first network connection speed for each network connection between each of the plurality of client computer devices and the destination server computer,execute a connection optimization process on said each of the client network connections having the first network connection speed by controlling network traffic from end-to-end and rerouting data traffic to provide optimal overall network connection with minimum latency so as to produce a plurality of optimized network connections having a second network connection speed between each of the plurality of client computer devices and the destination server computer,each of the plurality of optimized network connections is configured to operate at the second network connection speed, the second network connection speed after executing the connection optimization process is greater than the first network connection speed,compare the second network connection speed of each of the plurality of optimized network connections to determine a slowest second network connection speed among the plurality of optimized network connections, wherein the slowest second network connection speed of the plurality of optimized network connections is determined to be a normalization point;calculate a network connection speed difference between a speed of each of the plurality of optimized network connections and the normalization point; andadjust the second network connection speed of each of the plurality of optimized network connections by the network connection speed difference to produce a normalized network connection speed between each of the plurality of client computer devices and the destination server computer.
  • 2. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the network is further configured to: measure the second network connection speed as a latency value for each of the optimized network connections; andcompare the latency value of each of the optimized network connections to find a highest latency value among the optimized network connections as the normalization point.
  • 3. The network system according to claim 2, wherein the network is further configured to: calculate the network connection speed difference for each of the optimized network connections as a latency difference between the latency value of each of the optimized network connections and the highest latency value.
  • 4. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the network is configured to exclude a specific optimized connection from adjusting the second network connection speed of each of the optimized network connections by the network connection speed difference, if the network connection speed difference for the specific optimized connection exceeds a specified outlier threshold.
  • 5. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the network is configured to adjust the second network connection speed of each of the optimized network connections by the network connection speed difference by reducing the second network connection speed of each of the optimized network connections by the network connection speed difference.
  • 6. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the network is configured to continually gather connection statistics for each of the plurality of optimized network connections.
  • 7. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the network is configured to increase the second network connection speed of at least one the plurality of optimized network connections.
  • 8. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the network is provided between the plurality of client computer devices and the destination server computer such that the network controls data transmitted from the plurality of client computer devices to the destination server computer.
  • 9. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the network is a third-party network external to the destination server computer.
  • 10. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of client computer devices are outside of the network.
  • 11. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the destination server computer includes a video game server computer configured to manage and control online gaming events among the plurality of client computer devices.
  • 12. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the network is further configured to: equalize network latency values of each overall connection from each of the plurality of client computer devices to the destination server computer, after adjusting the second network connection speed of each of the plurality of optimized network connections by the network connection speed difference.
  • 13. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the network is a proxy network, a global network, or both.
  • 14. A network, the network being configured to communicate with a plurality of client computer devices via a plurality of client network connections, and to communicate with a destination server computer via a destination network connection, wherein each of the plurality of client network connections together with the destination network connection forms an overall network connection having a first network connection speed between each of the plurality of client computer devices and the destination server computer, and wherein the network comprises a computer manager having one or more processors and a memory, the computer manager being in communication with the plurality of client computer devices and the destination server computer, the network being configured to: route data traffic received from each of the plurality of client computer devices through a corresponding one of the plurality of client network connections and through the destination network connection to the destination server computer,analyze the overall network connection for each of the plurality of clients in order to measure the first network connection speed for each network connection between each of the plurality of client computer devices and the destination server computer,execute a connection optimization process on said each network connection having the first network connection speed by controlling network traffic from end-to-end and rerouting data traffic to provide optimal overall network connection with minimum latency so as to produce a plurality of optimized network connections having a second network connection speed between each of the plurality of client computer devices and the destination server computer,each of the plurality of optimized network connections is configured to operate at the second network connection speed, the second network connection speed after executing the connection optimization process is greater than the first network connection speed,compare the second network connection speed of each of the plurality of optimized network connections to determine a slowest second network connection speed among the plurality of optimized network connections, wherein the slowest second network connection speed of the plurality of optimized network connections is determined to be a normalization point;calculate a network connection speed difference between a speed of each of the plurality of optimized network connections and the normalization point; andadjust the second network connection speed of each of the plurality of optimized network connections by the network connection speed difference to produce a normalized network connection speed between each of the plurality of client computer devices and the destination server computer.
  • 15. The network according to claim 14, wherein the network is further configured to: measure the second network connection speed as a latency value for each of the optimized network connections; andcompare the latency value of each of the optimized network connections to find a highest latency value among the optimized network connections as the normalization point.
  • 16. The network according to claim 15, wherein the network is further configured to: calculate the network connection speed difference for each of the optimized network connections as a latency difference between the latency value of each of the optimized network connections and the highest latency value.
  • 17. The network according to claim 14, wherein the network is configured to exclude a specific optimized connection from adjusting the second network connection speed of each of the optimized network connections by the network connection speed difference, if the network connection speed difference for the specific optimized connection exceeds a specified outlier threshold.
  • 18. The network according to claim 14, wherein the network is configured to adjust the second network connection speed of each of the optimized network connections by the network connection speed difference by reducing the second network connection speed of each of the optimized network connections by the network connection speed difference.
  • 19. The network according to claim 14, wherein the network is configured to continually gather connection statistics for each of the plurality of optimized network connections.
  • 20. The network according to claim 14, wherein the network is configured to increase the second network connection speed of at least one the plurality of optimized network connections.
  • 21. The network according to claim 14, wherein the network is further configured to: equalize network latency values of each overall connection from each of the plurality of client computer devices to the destination server computer, after adjusting the second network connection speed of each of the plurality of optimized network connections by the network connection speed difference.
  • 22. The network according to claim 14, wherein the network is a proxy network, a global network, or both.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This Application is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 15/335,308 filed on Oct. 26, 2016. Application Ser. No. 15/335,308 is a Continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 15/335,304 filed on Oct. 26, 2016, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,525,343 on Jan. 7, 2020. Application Ser. No. 15/335,304 claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/246,304 filed Oct. 26, 2015 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/246,397 filed Oct. 26, 2015. Application Ser. No. 15/335,304 is a Continuation-in- Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/047,678 filed Oct. 7, 2013, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/710,026 filed Oct. 5, 2012. Application Ser. No. 15/335,304 is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/066,277 filed Oct. 29, 2013, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,571,359 on Feb. 14, 2017, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/720,232 filed Oct. 30, 2012. Application Ser. No. 15/335,304 is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/731,286 filed Jun. 4, 2015, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,614,870 on Apr. 4, 2017, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/007,787 filed Jun. 4, 2014. Application Ser. No. 15/335,304 is Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application No. Ser. No. 14/812,968 filed Jul. 29, 2015, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,729,504 on Aug. 8, 2017, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/030,384 filed Jul. 29, 2014, the contents of which are incorporated herein in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (111)
Number Name Date Kind
5351239 Black et al. Sep 1994 A
6215789 Keenan et al. Apr 2001 B1
6707915 Jobst et al. Mar 2004 B1
6845453 Scheidt et al. Jan 2005 B2
6973037 Kahveci Dec 2005 B1
7159234 Murphy et al. Jan 2007 B1
7609671 Nuriyev et al. Oct 2009 B1
7633869 Morris et al. Dec 2009 B1
7673056 Inbaraj et al. Mar 2010 B1
7711846 Padmanabhan et al. May 2010 B2
7730157 Baratto et al. Jun 2010 B2
7925281 Cahn Apr 2011 B2
7937336 Maynard-Zhang et al. May 2011 B1
7973148 Dhar et al. Jul 2011 B2
7983148 Abramson et al. Jul 2011 B1
8131834 Augart Mar 2012 B1
8239510 Houri Aug 2012 B2
8589536 Karenos et al. Nov 2013 B2
8683609 Bravo et al. Mar 2014 B2
8739269 Dargis May 2014 B2
8788664 Guo et al. Jul 2014 B2
9026145 Duleba et al. May 2015 B1
9087183 Bartlett Jul 2015 B2
9160711 Sweet et al. Oct 2015 B1
9571359 Bartlett Feb 2017 B2
9614870 Bartlett et al. Apr 2017 B2
9729504 Bartlett Aug 2017 B2
9742646 Bartlett Aug 2017 B2
9985985 Bartlett et al. May 2018 B2
10525343 Bartlett et al. Jan 2020 B2
10917299 Bartlett et al. Feb 2021 B2
11050669 Bartlett et al. Jun 2021 B2
20010052008 Jacobus Dec 2001 A1
20020009079 Jungck et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020026321 Faris Feb 2002 A1
20020145974 Saidi et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147913 Lun Yip Oct 2002 A1
20030086425 Bearden et al. May 2003 A1
20030097442 Farhat et al. May 2003 A1
20030107990 Herschleb et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030128710 Fedyk et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040039847 Persson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040100953 Chen et al. May 2004 A1
20040148520 Talpade et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040165570 Lee Aug 2004 A1
20040172531 Little et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040187018 Owen et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040192256 Kuwajima Sep 2004 A1
20040221296 Ogielski et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050002335 Adamczyk et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015587 Stransky Jan 2005 A1
20050055708 Gould et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050108213 Riise et al. May 2005 A1
20050119996 Ohata et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050180416 Jayawardena et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050232193 Jorgensen Oct 2005 A1
20050234922 Parekh et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050270982 McBeath Dec 2005 A1
20060053021 Bystedt Mar 2006 A1
20060068799 Morton et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060130107 Gonder et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060153089 Silverman Jul 2006 A1
20060174160 Kim Aug 2006 A1
20060244818 Majors et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070016687 Agarwal et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070070914 Abigail Mar 2007 A1
20070086338 Robert et al. Apr 2007 A1
20080037567 Cho et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080056586 Cheng et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080092128 Corry et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080101368 Weinman May 2008 A1
20080125077 Velazquez et al. May 2008 A1
20080140817 Agarwal et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080144563 Hart Jun 2008 A1
20080279213 Tong et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080293494 Adiraju et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080313691 Cholas et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090067328 Morris et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090193057 Maes Jul 2009 A1
20090203375 Gisby et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090262741 Jungck et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090280908 Carroll et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090282127 Leblanc et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100036954 Sakata et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100046527 Li et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100125851 Singh et al. May 2010 A1
20100185961 Fisher et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100269044 Ivanyi et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100325309 Cicic et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110052008 Holsing et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110122812 Jeong May 2011 A1
20110197132 Escoda et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110202656 Gentile et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110236665 Roque et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110246665 Vange et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110296303 Duquene et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120069748 Van Den Bogaert Mar 2012 A1
20120190444 Fujisawa et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120311107 Van Der Merwe et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120314077 Clavenna, II et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130054763 Van der Merwe et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130079144 Ahmed et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130097349 Lu et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130279354 Ekman et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130298220 Yoon et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140098662 Jungck et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140259109 Houston et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140344331 Johns et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150341312 Ezell et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150373135 McKeown et al. Dec 2015 A1
20210281518 Bartlett et al. Sep 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2009084967 Jul 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (67)
Entry
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,308 dated Jan. 4, 2019 [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,308 dated May 21, 2019.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,308 dated Sep. 20, 2019.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,308 dated Mar. 20, 2020.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,308 dated Oct. 2, 2020.
Advisory Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,304 dated Jun. 25, 2018 [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,304 dated Jan. 9, 2019 [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,304 dated Aug. 14, 2019.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/812,968 dated Jun. 8, 2017.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/731,286 dated Jul. 15, 2016.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/731,286 dated Nov. 18, 2016.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,277 dated Nov. 23, 2015.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,277 dated Apr. 5, 2016.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,277 dated Aug. 12, 2016.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,277 dated Dec. 15, 2016.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678 dated Oct. 3, 2018 [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Advisory Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678 dated Nov. 26, 2018 [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678 dated May 16, 2019.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678 dated Nov. 26, 2019.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678 dated Apr. 20, 2020.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678 dated Oct. 15, 2020.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678 dated Nov. 9, 2020.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 15/825,849 dated Aug. 20, 2019.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/825,849 dated Feb. 18, 2020.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/825,849 dated Jul. 6, 2020.
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2015, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678; 47 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2016, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678; 51 pages [Provided in FW; Related Application].
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2016, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678; 55 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Final Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2017, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678; 52 pages [Provided in IFW Related Application].
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2018, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678; 41 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 24, 2021, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678; 9 pages [Provided in FW; Related Application].
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2018, directed to U.S. Re-Issue U.S. Appl. No. 15/604,182; 14 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Final Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2018, directed to U.S. Re-Issue U.S. Appl. No. 15/604,182; 10 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 12, 2019, directed to U.S. Re-Issue U.S. Appl. No. 15/604,182; 8 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2013, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,937; 16 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Final Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2014, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,937; 16 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Advisory Action dated Apr. 25, 2014, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,937; 4 pages [Provided in IFW Related Application].
Von-Final Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2014, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,937; 20 pages Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Notice of Allowance dated May 20, 2015, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,937; 13 pages [Provided in FW; Related Application].
Von-Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2017, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/439,677; 27 pages [Provided in FW; Related Application].
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 29, 2018, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/439,677; 18 pages [Provided n IFW; Related Application].
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 22, 2018, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/439,677; 14 pages [Provided n IFW; Related Application].
P. Giura et al., “The security cost of content distribution network architectures.” Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops, 2011. IEEE 35th Annual. IEEE, 2011 (pp. 128-135).
A.D. Keromytis et al., “SOS: An architecture for mitigating DDoS attacks.” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas of Communications 22.1 (2004): 176-188.
W.G. Morein et al., “Using graphic Turing tests to counter automated DDoS attacks against web servers.” Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on computerand communications security ACM, 2003 (pp. 8-19).
M.M. Aye, “A Queuing Analysis of Tolerating for Denial-of-Service (DoS) Attacks with a Proxy Network.” Computer Engineering and Technology, 2009. ICCET'09. International Conference on vol. 2 IEEE, 2009. (pp. 366-368).
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2017, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,308; 14 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Final Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2018, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,308; 15 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Advisory Action dated Jun. 5, 2018, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,308; 4 pages [Provided in IFW Related Application].
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2017, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,304; 20 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Final Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2018, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,304; 26 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 9, 2017, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/399,303; 13 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2017, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/439,677; 27 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 29, 2018, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/439,677; 18 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 22, 2018, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/439,677; 14 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Advisory Action dated May 5, 2020, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/825,849; 5 pages [Provided in IFW Related Application].
Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2021, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/825,849; 15 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Advisory Action dated Sep. 3, 2021, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/439,677; 6 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Kandula, S. et al., “What's Going On?: Learning Communication Rules in Edge Networks,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 38, No. 4. ACM, 2008. pp. 87-98.
Brinkmeier, M. et al., “Optimally DoS Resistant P2P Topologies for Live Multimedia Streaming,” in IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 831-844, Jun. 2009.
Krishnan, R. et al., “A failure and overload tolerance mechanism for continuous media servers,” Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, 1997. pp. 131-142.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,678 dated Nov. 9, 2020; 9 pages [Provided in IFW; Parent Application].
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/335,308 dated Jan. 23, 2018; 15 pages [Provided in IFW; Related Application].
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2022, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/141,944; 14 pages [Available in IFW].
Final Office Action dated May 2, 2022, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/141,944; 7 pages [Available in IFW].
Non-Final Office Action dated May 11, 2022, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 17/328,095; 43 pages [Available in IFW].
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 16, 2022, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/825,849; 8 pages [Available in IFW].
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210203546 A1 Jul 2021 US
Provisional Applications (6)
Number Date Country
62246397 Oct 2015 US
62246304 Oct 2015 US
62030384 Jul 2014 US
62007787 Jun 2014 US
61720232 Oct 2012 US
61710026 Oct 2012 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15335308 Oct 2016 US
Child 17141944 US
Continuation in Parts (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 15335304 Oct 2016 US
Child 15335308 US
Parent 14812968 Jul 2015 US
Child 15335304 US
Parent 14731286 Jun 2015 US
Child 14812968 US
Parent 14066277 Oct 2013 US
Child 14731286 US
Parent 14047678 Oct 2013 US
Child 14066277 US