Method of utilizing an implant in a human breast

Abstract
A method for utilizing an implant in a human breast includes forming a breast cavity within the breast at a lumpectomy site, the breast cavity having surrounding tissue; forming a substantially radio-opaque implant constructed of biocompatible and biodegradable material configured to allow for in-growth of fibrous tissue into and replacing the biocompatible and biodegradable material, the biocompatible and biodegradable material being elastically compressible; sizing the substantially radio-opaque implant to occupy the breast cavity; and implanting within the breast cavity the substantially radio-opaque implant to support the tissue surrounding the breast cavity, the step of implanting including compressing the biocompatible and biodegradable material.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Radiation for breast cancer currently mainly consists of full breast radiation, which imparts radiotherapy to the full area of the breast. It necessarily involves surrounding structures such as, but not limited to the heart, lungs, esophagus, chest wall, ribs and other structures that are in close proximity to the breast. A new concept of partial breast radiation targeting the area of the breast involved by cancer is currently gaining popularity. Studies thus far indicate that it is as effective as full breast radiation and eliminates damage to the surrounding organs. Partial breast radiation is currently being delivered through temporarily implanted balloon catheters such as but not limited to the MAMMOSITE or the CONTURA. This process involves placing a radioactive seed or target down the catheter for a brief period of time, over three to five days. Unfortunately, this method of utilizing a catheter and radioactive seed has a number of drawbacks. Utilizing a concentrated dose of radiation over a short period of time in the form of a radioactive seed planted through means of the catheter or other surgical means creates a multitude of side effects such as fat necrosis, seromas, hematomas, infection and undesirable cosmetic outcomes. When a lumpectomy is performed, a temporary balloon catheter is put into place with the catheter extruding from the breast. This allows an opening into the cavity which increase the chance of infection. Furthermore, this method requires the physician to wait for the pathology report to indicate margins of the specimen to be free of cancer (as well as the absence of cancer from the lymph nodes) before the temporary balloon can be removed and a Mammosite, Contura or other external catheters can be implanted in preparation for partial breast radiation therapy. This sequence of procedures is preferred as soon as possible following lumpectomy. An additional drawback to the catheter methodology is the need to aspirate air from the lumpectomy cavity. Air in a lumpectomy cavity creates “hot spots” or high heat conditions within the cavity when subjected to radiation therapy, thereby causing burns and other undesirable side effects. Accordingly, it is desirable to aspirate or remove the air, most commonly with a syringe and needle. Unfortunately, the current method catheter may be punctured by the needle during aspiration, creating problems for its subsequent use and effectiveness in treatment. These problems are resolved by use of the proposed method. We propose the use of external beam radiation delivered through a multi-directional stereotactic radiation source such as but not limited to the CYBERKNIFE, the BRAIN LAB, and other external beam sources. However, external beam radiation requires a sufficiently identifiable target. Currently, external beam radiation is used on solid organs such as the liver that contains a tumor or the head of the pancreas that contains a tumor whereby a gold seed is implanted in these structures and acts as a guide for focusing the external stereotactic beam. The solid tissue of these organs provides a stable, non-shifting environment for placement of the seed which acts as a target for the external beam source. The use of the catheter in breast tissue has been previously necessary due to the presence of primarily fatty tissue in the breast, precluding a stable environment for placement of a small seed or target. In fatty tissue, a small seed or target would move from the intended target site, rendering the therapy ineffective. The breast is an external structure, constructed primarily of fatty tissue, unlike the other mentioned organs. Consequently, what is necessary then, is a means of stabilizing a seed or other target source within the fatty tissue of the breast, which seed or other target source may then be utilized as a target in a new method of partial breast radiation. The proposed invention addresses this problem. Being an external structure also, the breast is also capable of being more rigidly fixed for targeting in stereotactic radiation machines than the internal organs and is therefore a good candidate for utilizing partial irradiation through careful targeting of the internal implant and/or marker. U.S. Pat. No. 6,214,045, issued to the applicant, discloses a breast implant of resorbable material sized to replace excised tissue and allowing for in-growth of fibrous tissue to replace the implant. The implant may be elastic, compressible, and expandable and may further contain diagnostic substances. The specification of U.S. Pat. No. 6,214,045 is incorporated by reference herein. Certain diagnostic substances are identified in the '045 patent as “x-ray opaque or metallic material for identification of the area.” Many embodiments of the implants described in the '045 patent may act as appropriate targets for stereotactic radiation sources as radiopaque targets. Biodegradable materials such as, but not limited to, collagen and other suitably dense biocompatible materials, may be configured suitably radiopaque. The implants may alternatively be constructed of two or more different materials or contain large amounts of air, which will also aid in acquisition and targeting by a suitable stereotactic radiation source. The implant may be shaped spherical to keep the lumpectomy cavity open in a more uniform manner however this is not always necessary as the lumpectomy cavity created by a biopsy procedure can be allowed to partially collapse and conform to the size or shape of the implant. Consequently, the implant shape may guide the external beam source in order to allow a more specific area of the cavity to be radiated on one side or the other, or uniformly circumferentially in the event of utilizing a spherical implant. Particularly when compared with the previously disclosed catheter methodology, the ability to utilize variously shaped implants is superior to the catheter, which is spherically shaped, in the event it is necessary to construct a non-spherical lumpectomy cavity to obtain the desired margins upon removal of the cancer. The implant itself may act as the radio-opaque target or may have added to, more or less, the central portion of the implant, a tiny metallic marker such as but not limited to a gold seed or a titanium seed to further aid as a guide for the external beam. To conform with desired diagnostic needs and procedures, more than one marker may be utilized in a single implant or more than one implant, placed within the lumpectomy cavity. Different marker materials may be contained within a single implant or within more than one implant placed within the lumpectomy cavity. Any metallic material, suitably sterilized, or other relatively dense biocompatible material, may be utilized as a marker within the implant. Where the external beam radiation is utilized, it accomplishes local brachytherapy with its benefits and the beam can be configured over varying time periods so as to eliminate many of the complications associated with the current method of partial breast radiation, the balloon MammoSite or Contura. Use of the implants described in the '045 patent, addresses a multitude of the current problems known to the medical industry such as but not limited to cosmetic deformities, seromas, hematomas, infection and the like while simultaneously providing the stable target necessary for successful targeted radiation therapy. The 045 implants are configured to keep the cavity open and support the surrounding tissue. This is particularly important in radiation therapy as new tissue growth will be inhibited by the presence of radiation therapy. Accordingly, this method and use of the implant will enable the lumpectomy site to retain its configuration throughout radiation therapy and thereafter provide time for regeneration and in-growth of new tissue upon termination of radiation therapy. Once the external beam radiation is accomplished, the implant may biodegrade over a period of time allowing ingrowth of the patient's own natural tissues and, therefore reduce the risk of undesirable cosmetic changes to the overlying skin or the breast. It may also have added to the implant hemostatic agents to minimize bleeding, other metallic markers, oncologic agents, antibiotics and the like.


Another advantage in the use of the implant for targeted partial breast radiation therapy is that the biodegradable implant can be inserted into the breast at the time of the lumpectomy but radiation therapy my be delayed without presenting complications in the maintenance of the targeting means, treatment or to the patient. With the use of the catheter methodology, the externally extruding catheter and its prior discussed issues necessitates immediate radiation therapy treatment to minimize, to the extent possible, potential complications such as infection and discomfort to the patient. Immediate radiation therapy is not always preferred because the surgical wound is fresh and has not healed. The use of radation further retards healing and promotes seroma formation, infection, and cosmetic defects because of poor healing. The proposed methodology, utilizing the implant, allows the implant to be placed in the lumpectomy cavity and the wound surgically sealed. The patient may maintain a normal lifestyle and radiation therapy may be scheduled as appropriate in the particular case. The patient may undergoe chemotherapy and can delay radiation therapy up to about 120 days without decreasing the therapeutic effects of the radiation. The implant may degrade somewhat over a period of time while the breast is healing to allow the lumpectomy cavity to compress down upon the implant or scar down around the implant shrinking the cavity and stabilizing the target for future radiation. Future radiation therapy may be initiated many days or weeks after the lumpectomy. Radiation therapy may be discontinued, if necessary, and re-instituted as necessary, within the life of the biodegradable implant or, in the case of a marker, at any time thereafter. This accomplishes the prevention of hematomas or seromas, resulting in a better cosmetic outcome while maintaining a stable target for future therapy or diagnosis.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts one embodiment of an implant placed within a breast lumpectomy cavity to act as a target for radiation therapy emissions.



FIG. 2 depicts an alternative embodiment of an implant placed within a breast lumpectomy cavity and containing an internal marker to act as a target for radiation therapy emissions.



FIG. 3 depicts one example of an implant placed within a breast lumpectomy cavity and subjected to radiation therapy emissions.



FIG. 4 depicts an alternative embodiment of an implant containing an internal marker to act as a target for radiation therapy emissions.



FIGS. 5A and 5B depict implants of various shapes and configurations placed within breast lumpectomy cavities.



FIG. 6 depicts a partially re-absorbed implant within a shrinking breast lumpectomy cavity.



FIG. 7 depicts a partially re-absorbed implant containing a metallic marker within a shrinking breast lumpectomy cavity.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In FIG. 1, a substantially spherical implant (100) is composed of biodegradable material and is placed within a breast lumpectomy cavity (110) following a biopsy or other surgical procedure. The implant may be constructed of materials such as biodegradable foams, sponges, gels, liquids, or other biocompatible substances. The material is formed in such a way that it can support surrounding breast tissue, assisting in breast cosmesis by keeping the breast lumpectomy cavity from collapsing. The implant further functions as a radio-opaque target for external beam stereotactic partial breast radiotherapy. The implant can be constructed with varying pore sizes thus allowing for example, more air to be incorporated into the implant, rendering the implant more radio-opaque while preventing the collection of air pockets within the breast cavity which create unsuitable conditions for radiation therapy. The implant does not need to be the exact size of the lumpectomy cavity, however. Breast tissue will collapse around the implant, keeping the cavity open and relatively equal distance from the center of the implant. The implant is of a sufficient size and solid consistency to allow a stereotactic radiation source to be directed to the implant as a target for delivery of radiation therapy to the surrounding margins of the lumpectomy cavity in a precise configuration as determined by the radiotherapist.


In FIG. 2, the implant (100) of FIG. 1 further contains a gold seed, metallic seed, titanium clip or other suitably dense implant material (120) to aid in successful targeting of the implant area for a stereotactic radiation source. Since margins can vary from patient to patient, the use of an implant material can serve as a guide for programming the stereotactic radiation unit. The target material may be centrally located within the implant or located about the periphery of the implant. One or more implant materials may be concurrently used as necessary to conform the intended radiation therapy to the patient's breast cancer treatment. As the target material may or may not be biodegradable, the implant material may remain available for extended radiation therapy as necessary. Biodegradable material may have variable absorption rates.


In FIG. 3, an example of multi-directional (stereotactic) radiation therapy (160) targets a breast implant (100) in the breast lumpectomy cavity (110), partially irradiating the breast within targeted margins (170) around the lumpectomy cavity (110).


In FIG. 4, an example of multi-directional (stereotactic) radiation therapy (160) targets a breast implant (100) containing an internal marker (120), in the breast lumpectomy cavity (110), partially irradiating the breast within targeted margins (170) around the lumpectomy cavity (110).


In FIG. 5A and FIG. 5B, an implant (100) in the breast lumpectomy cavity (110) may be configured to conform to the lumpectomy cavity excised to create sufficient margins for excision of cancer or in accordance with good medical practice for the surgical procedure. The ability to conform the implant to the cavity allows appropriate margins to be maintained for following radiation treatment and supports the surrounding breast tissue without deformation.


In FIG. 6, the implant (100) has partially reabsorbed as a consequence of the passage of time. Unlike the prior art catheter, the implant can act as a target to the biopsy site for weeks or months after implantation, to allow for healing, chemotherapy or other issues necessitating a delay in radiation treatment. The surrounding breast tissue comprising the lumpectomy cavity collapses or generates growth as the implant resorbs, holding the implant in place and the geometry of the breast tissue in static relation.


In FIG. 7, the resorbing implant (100) also contains one or more markers (120) to aid in targeting. Again, the implant and marker allow the treating physician to delay radiation treatment pending healing, chemotherapy or other favorable reasons for delay.

Claims
  • 1. A method for utilizing an implant in a human breast, comprising: forming a breast cavity within the breast at a lumpectomy site, the breast cavity having surrounding tissue;forming a substantially radio-opaque implant constructed of biocompatible and biodegradable material configured to allow for in-growth of fibrous tissue into and replacing the biocompatible and biodegradable material, the biocompatible and biodegradable material being elastically compressible;sizing the substantially radio-opaque implant to occupy the breast cavity; andimplanting within the breast cavity the substantially radio-opaque implant to support the tissue surrounding the breast cavity, said implanting including compressing the biocompatible and biodegradable material.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: directing a radiation beam to said substantially radio-opaque implant serving as a target for delivery of radiation therapy to margins around the breast cavity, such that the radiation beam does not materially irradiate the whole of the breast.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the radiation therapy is delivery of a therapeutically effective dosage of radiation to said breast tissue surrounding the substantially radio-opaque implant via a stereotactic radiation machine.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the radiation therapy is delivery of multiple therapeutically effective dosages of radiation to said breast tissue surrounding the substantially radio-opaque implant in a single treatment.
  • 5. The method of claim 2, wherein the radiation therapy is delivery of therapeutically effective dosages of radiation to said breast tissue surrounding the substantially radio-opaque implant multiple times in a single treatment.
  • 6. The method of claim 2, wherein the radiation therapy is delivery of a therapeutically effective dosage of radiation to said breast tissue surrounding the substantially radio-opaque implant via multidirectional radiation therapy.
  • 7. The method of claim 2, wherein the radiation therapy is delivery of a therapeutically effective dosage of radiation to said breast tissue surrounding the substantially radio-opaque implant via image guided radiation therapy.
  • 8. The method of claim 2, wherein the radiation therapy is delivery of a therapeutically effective dosage of radiation to said breast tissue surrounding the substantially radio-opaque implant via 3-D conformal radiation therapy.
  • 9. The method of claim 2, wherein the radiation therapy is delivery of a therapeutically effective dosage of radiation to said breast tissue surrounding the substantially radio-opaque implant via intensity modulated radiation therapy.
  • 10. The method of claim 2 comprising initiating targeting of the radiation beam for delivery of the radiation therapy 1 to 120 days subsequent to the placement of the substantially radio-opaque implant in the breast cavity.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising aspirating air from the breast cavity at any time after implanting the substantially radio-opaque implant.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the substantially radio-opaque implant is constructed of a porous material.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein said substantially radio-opaque implant has a shape selected to guide delivery of radiation therapy to margins around the breast cavity.
  • 14. A method of partial breast radiation therapy, comprising: providing a substantially radio-opaque implant constructed of biocompatible and biodegradable material configured to allow for in-growth of fibrous tissue into and replacing the of biocompatible and biodegradable material, the biocompatible and biodegradable material being elastically compressible, the substantially radio-opaque implant being configured to support the tissue surrounding a breast cavity;implanting the substantially radio-opaque implant within the breast cavity to serve as a target for delivery of radiation therapy to margins around the breast cavity; anddirecting a therapeutically effective dosage of radiation to the substantially radio-opaque implant target such that the whole of the breast is not materially irradiated.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 further comprising initiating targeting of the delivery of the radiation therapy 1 to 120 days subsequent to the placement of the substantially radio-opaque implant in the breast cavity.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the substantially radio-opaque implant is constructed of a porous material.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, wherein said substantially radio-opaque implant has a shape selected to guide the delivery of radiation therapy to the margins around the breast cavity.
STATEMENT OF PRIORITY

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/567,303 filed Aug. 6, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,541,764, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/110,748 filed Apr. 28, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,288,745, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/108,785 filed on Apr. 19, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,637,948, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/627,718 filed Jul. 28, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,881,226, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/828,806 filed Apr. 10, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,638,308, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/169,351, filed Oct. 9, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,214,045, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/061,588, filed Oct. 10, 1997, U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/077,639 filed Mar. 11, 1998, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/091,306, filed Jun. 30, 1998, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (62)
Number Name Date Kind
4298998 Naficy Nov 1981 A
4428082 Naficy Jan 1984 A
4470160 Cavon Sep 1984 A
4574780 Manders Mar 1986 A
4682593 Johnson Jul 1987 A
4740208 Cavon Apr 1988 A
4795463 Gerow Jan 1989 A
4863470 Carter Sep 1989 A
4937323 Silver et al. Jun 1990 A
4950665 Floyd Aug 1990 A
4995882 Destouet et al. Feb 1991 A
5120802 Mares et al. Jun 1992 A
5147398 Lynn et al. Sep 1992 A
5192744 Bouck et al. Mar 1993 A
5199056 Darrah Mar 1993 A
5342283 Good Aug 1994 A
5451789 Wong et al. Sep 1995 A
5522896 Prescott Jun 1996 A
5534023 Henley Jul 1996 A
RE35391 Brauman Dec 1996 E
5626611 Liu et al. May 1997 A
5628781 Williams et al. May 1997 A
5692511 Grable Dec 1997 A
5766222 Petit Jun 1998 A
5824081 Knapp et al. Oct 1998 A
5851833 Atala Dec 1998 A
5869080 McGregor et al. Feb 1999 A
5922024 Janzen et al. Jul 1999 A
6015541 Greff et al. Jan 2000 A
6066325 Wallace et al. May 2000 A
6099457 Good Aug 2000 A
6161034 Burbank et al. Dec 2000 A
6214045 Corbitt, Jr. et al. Apr 2001 B1
6220248 Voegele et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228055 Feorster et al. May 2001 B1
6263880 Parker et al. Jul 2001 B1
6316522 Loomis et al. Nov 2001 B1
6356782 Sirimanne et al. Mar 2002 B1
6403758 Loomis Jun 2002 B1
6432138 Offray et al. Aug 2002 B1
6638308 Corbitt, Jr. et al. Oct 2003 B2
6881226 Corbitt, Jr. et al. Apr 2005 B2
7044957 Foerster et al. May 2006 B2
7229417 Foerster et al. Jun 2007 B2
7297725 Winterton et al. Nov 2007 B2
7534452 Chernomorsky et al. May 2009 B2
7637948 Corbitt et al. Dec 2009 B2
7871438 Corbitt, Jr. Jan 2011 B2
8288745 Corbitt et al. Oct 2012 B2
8541764 Corbitt et al. Sep 2013 B2
20020022883 Burg Feb 2002 A1
20030036803 McGhan Feb 2003 A1
20040236211 Burbank et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050059887 Mostafavi et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050059888 Sirimanne et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050080338 Sirimanne et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050101860 Patrick et al. May 2005 A1
20050175657 Hunter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050181007 Hunter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060079829 Fulton et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060155190 Burbank et al. Jul 2006 A1
20090024225 Stubbs Jan 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
0292630 Nov 1988 EP
0475077 Mar 1992 EP
08500274 Jan 1996 JP
09502371 Mar 1997 JP
9416647 Aug 1994 WO
9507057 Mar 1995 WO
9935966 Jul 1999 WO
0054689 Sep 2000 WO
2008077081 Jun 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Eiselt, P. et al, “Development of Technologies Aiding Large—Tissue Engineering”, Biotechnol. Prog., vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 134-140, 1998.
International Search Report of PCT/US2009/002551 mailed Jul. 10, 2009.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2009/002551 mailed Oct. 28, 2010.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140012376 A1 Jan 2014 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
60061588 Oct 1997 US
60077639 Mar 1998 US
60091306 Jun 1998 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09169351 Oct 1998 US
Child 09828806 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 13567303 Aug 2012 US
Child 14021271 US
Parent 12110748 Apr 2008 US
Child 13567303 US
Parent 09828806 Apr 2001 US
Child 10627718 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11108785 Apr 2005 US
Child 12110748 US
Parent 10627718 Jul 2003 US
Child 11108785 US