This application is the national stage entry of International Appl. No. PCT/IB2014/063228, filed Jul. 18, 2014, which claims priority to Italian Patent Application No. BO2013A000381, filed Jul. 19, 2013. All claims of priority to such patent application(s) are hereby made, and all such application(s) are hereby incorporated in their entirety by reference.
The present patent application relates to a method, a tool and a device for profiling a finishing tool. In particular, the present invention relates to a method, a tool and a device for the profiling of a grinding worm.
It is known, for example from DE19910746, to revive the profile of a grinding worm by means of profiling disc tools, which have active cutting portions that are caused to slide in contact with the thread of the grinding worm itself. Different types of profiling tools which differ, one with respect to another, in the shape and dimensions of the respective cutting profiles and which are suited for profiling the grinding worm through a linear or localized contact i.e. in a small and circumscribed area are also known. The profiling operation with linear contact is relatively fast, however, it has the limitation of obtaining a profile along the flank of the thread equal to the profile of the disc profiling tool. While, with the profiling operation with localized contact variable profiles on the axial section of the thread can be obtained; however, the finishing operation with localized contact has the disadvantage of being relatively slow as the profiling tool must perform a large series of repeated passages in order to treat the entire profile of the grinding worm. Furthermore, the profiling operation with localized contact requires the machining of rectilinear sections with radiated portions of a tool consequently obtaining imperfect local machining.
It is well known to replace the profiling tool to obtain different profiling operations, for instance to obtain linear or pin-point profiling.
It is also known to use, selectively and depending on the specific purpose, profiling tools with differing cutting characteristics (model, size, distribution of the abrasive material, kind of binder, etc. . . . ). Profiling tools with different cutting characteristics are often used to shorten the profiling time or for profiling grinding worms having a greater hardness and that cause relatively fast wear on the profiling tool.
However, the costs of the profiling tool are high and replacement times of the same are relatively long.
Purpose of the present invention is to provide a method, a tool and a device for profiling finishing tools suitable for overcoming the drawbacks described above.
Furthermore, the purpose of the present invention is to provide a method, a profiling tool and a device suited to perform a plurality of different profiling operations (e.g.: roughing-out operation, finishing, profiling with linear contact or with localized contact) by the same profiling tool and suited to reduce the grinding worm profiling time.
In particular, an object of the present invention is to provide a method, a profiling tool and a device which allow to profile also grinding worms having greater hardness by using the same profiling tool and ensuring a longer service life than known types of profiling tools.
According to the present invention a method, a tool and a device as claimed in the appended Claims are provided.
The invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate a non-limiting embodiment, wherein:
In Figures, 1 refers as a whole to a device for profiling a finishing tool 2. In the Figures shown, the finishing tool is a grinding worm 2 which is installed on a vertical axes grinding machine (of a known type and not illustrated), which is movable in the space along three axes and is rotatable around an axis A. The grinding worm 2 comprises a thread 3, which is delimited axially by a flank 4 and by a flank 5 and has a plurality of coils S. Two adjacent coils S delimiting a compartment 6 of the thread 3.
As illustrated in
In the following the terms upper and lower, vertical and horizontal are used with reference to the support plane P.
As illustrated in
As shown in detail in
The turret 20 is attached to the plate 19 in a decentralized position with respect to axis B. The radial distance between the turret 20 and axis B is such to allow the alignment of profiling tool 9 with axis B itself, as will be explained in more detail below.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in the Figures, the profiling tool 9 has the shape of a disc rotatable around a rotation axis L. The profiling tool 9 has two additional axes M and N; the axes L, M, N are perpendicular to one another and correspondingly intersect one another at a rotation center R.
The profiling tool 9 has a double cone shape. In particular, profiling tool 9 has, in axial section, two cutting portions 30 and 31 which are divided from one another by the axis M perpendicular to the axis L. As illustrated in
Substantially, the profiling tool 9 has a biconical profile wherein adjacent cutting portions provide cutting properties differing from one another.
For instance, cutting portion 30 and cutting portion 31 are made of materials differing from one another, in particular being made of abrasive materials presenting different grits.
In particular, cutting portion 30 is suited to perform a roughing-out operation (of a known type and illustrated schematically). Whereas, cutting portion 31 is suited to perform a finishing operation (of a known type and illustrated schematically). In
According to the alternative embodiment illustrated in
The profiling tool 109 has in axial section and in correspondence of its free end thereof, a cutting portion 130A, a cutting portion 131A and a connecting portion 130B sandwiched between the cutting portion 130A and the cutting portion 131A. The profiling tool also has a support portion 131B adjacent to the cutting portion 131A.
The cutting portion 130A is suited to provide a relatively extended linear contact between the profiling tool 109 and the thread 3.
Cutting portion 131A is suited to perform a smaller linear contact with thread 3 as compared with that of cutting portion 130A. Cutting portion 131A is suited to perform a localized contact along the thread 3.
Cutting portion 130A is diamond. Cutting portion 131A is diamond.
The cutting portions 130B and 131B substantially define the retaining and positioning supports for the cutting portions 130A and 131A. The cutting portions 130A and 130B are inclined to one another. Similarly, the cutting portions 131A and 131B are angled to one another.
As clearly visible in
The angle β1 between the cutting profile 130A and the axis M is different from the angle β2 comprised between the cutting profile 131A and the axis M itself. The projection of the cutting portion 130A on the axis M is greater than the projection of the cutting projection 131A on the axis M.
The cutting portion 130A is suited to perform a different profiling operation with respect to cutting portion 131A.
In
The spindle 8 is suited to cause the axis N of the profiling tool 9 to coincide with the rotation axis B of the support 10. In other words, the spindle 8 is suited to arrange the rotation center R of the profiling tool 9 on the rotation axis B of the support 10. As illustrated in
The device 1 also comprises a control unit 35 (of a known type and illustrated schematically) that automatically adjusts the rotation of the support 10 by means of the actuating system 14 based on certain operating parameters. Preferably, the control unit 35 determines the automatic rotation of the support 10 around the axis B when the profiling tool 9 has finished the profiling of a longitudinal section determined by the grinding worm 2. The control unit 35 is connected to the grinding worm 2, to the spindle 8 and to the actuating system 14 in a known manner and illustrated schematically.
In use, the grinding worm 2 is inclined (
The grinding worm 2 is set in rotation around the axis A, the profiling tool 9 is set in rotation around the axis C.
The cutting portion 30 of the profiling tool 9 is made to contact, in a known manner, by actuating the grinding worm 2, with a flank 4 of the grinding worm 2 itself (
The grinding worm 2 is translated in a known manner causing the cutting portion 30 to slide in contact with the flank 4 of the thread 3 along a longitudinal section determined by the grinding worm 2 so as to profile it. By translations of a known type of the grinding worm 2, the cutting portion 30 is caused to slide in contact with the flank 4 for a number of runs sufficient for eliminating the required material.
Therefore, the grinding worm 2 is removed, in a known manner, from the profiling tool 9 so as to remove the cutting portion 30 from the thread 3, and in particular, so as to remove the profiling tool 9 away from the compartment 6 of the thread 3.
Subsequently, the support 10 is rotated around the axis B by at least 180°. The grinding worm 2 is moved nearer to the profiling tool 9 so as to put the cutting portion 30 in contact with the flank 5 of the thread 3 (
Finally, the grinding worm 2 is translated, in a known manner, to cause the cutting portion 30 to slide in contact with the flank 5 of the thread 3 for a longitudinal section determined by the grinding worm 2 so as to profile it.
By translations of the grinding worm 2 of a known type, the cutting portion 30 is caused to slide in contact with the flank 5 for a number of runs sufficient for eliminating the necessary material.
Preferably, the cutting portion 30 is suited to perform a roughing-out operation of the thread 3.
The steps described above are substantially repeated by bringing the cutting portion 31 in contact with flanks 4 and 5 of the thread 3. Therefore, the cutting portion 31 is arranged in contact, by actuating the grinding worm 2 in a known manner, with a flank 4 of the grinding worm 2 itself (
The grinding worm 2 is translated, in a known manner, to slide the cutting portion 31 in contact with the flank 4 of the thread 3 for a longitudinal section determined by the grinding worm 2 so as to profile it.
By translations of the grinding worm 2 of a known type, the cutting portion 31 is caused to slide in contact with the flank 4 for a number of runs sufficient to eliminate the necessary material.
Therefore, the grinding worm 2 is removed, in a known manner, from the profiling tool 9 so as to remove the cutting portion 31 from the thread 3, and in particular, so as to remove the profiling tool 9 from the compartment 6.
Subsequently, the support 10 is rotated around the axis B by at least 180°. The grinding worm 2 is arranged near to the profiling tool 9 so as to arrange the cutting portion 31 in contact with the flank 5 of the thread 3 (
Finally, the grinding worm 2 is translated, in a known manner, to slide the cutting portion 31 in contact with the flank 5 of the thread 3 for a longitudinal section determined by the grinding worm 2 so as to profile it.
By translations of the grinding worm 2 of a known type, the cutting portion 31 is caused to slide in contact with the flank 5 for a number of runs sufficient to eliminate the necessary material.
Preferably, the cutting portion 31 provides a finishing of the thread 3.
During the profiling steps the profiling tool 9 is kept fixed in a determined angular position with respect to the axis B.
According to an alternative embodiment not shown, during the profiling steps the support 10 and/or the base 7 are translated (in a known manner not shown) so as to relatively move and position one with respect to the other the spindle 8 and the grinding worm 2.
In the case of using a profiling tool 109 of the type illustrated in
According to what is illustrated in
During the rotation of the support 10 around the axis B, the rotation center R of the profiling tool 9 or 109 is maintained on the axis B.
From the above it therefore follows that by the use of a single profiling tool 9 or 109 it is possible to carry out different profiling operations, significantly reducing the profiling time and the cost for replacement of profiling tool 9 or 109 itself.
Furthermore, the ability to rotate the support 10 by over 180° allows to automatically obtain different profiling operations with the same tool 109 for example, roughing-out or finishing operations. In particular, by using the two different cutting portions 130A or, respectively, 131A of the profiling tool 109 it is possible to obtain different respective contact areas between the tool 109 and the thread 3.
Profiling tool 109 allows to considerably reduce the profiling time of the grinding worm 2; in fact, thanks to the cutting portion 130A it is also possible to profile with only one passage a large part (up to 90%) of the flank 4 or 5 of the grinding worm 2; while, with the cutting portion 131A it is only possible to profile the part of the grinding worm 2 which should be treated by a localized contact. In this way the profiling tool 109 allows to obtain finished grinding worms 2 with a reduced number of passages and, consequently, the finishing times with respect to the use of a profiling pin-point tool of a known type, through which the entire profile of the grinding worm 2 is treated with a localized contact, are substantially reduced.
Keeping the rotation center R of the profiling tool 9 or 109 aligned with the axis B the profiling activities are easier and faster and the optimization of space also allows the profiling of the entire grinding worm 2.
In addition, keeping the rotation center R of the profiling tool 9 or 109 aligned with the axis B eccentric positions of the cutting profiles 30, 31, 130A or 131A are avoided; therefore, geometric errors of the profile of the thread 3 are avoided and the space requirements for the threading of the grinding worm 2 are reduced.
Furthermore, the profiling tool 9 of the type described above has a longer service life compared to the profiling tools of a known type. In fact the profiling tool 9 has the advantage of being suitable for use for an extended time (hence without the need for frequent replacement of the profiling tool due to wear) also for profiling grinding worms of greater hardness; in particular, thanks to the cutting portion 30 (roughing-out operation) it is possible to eliminate most of the allowance of the grinding worm 2 to be profiled and by the cutting portion 31 (finishing operation) the removal of a final percentage of allowance is obtained, which is decidedly lower than the previous one. In this way, the cutting portion 31 (the more resistant and lasting in time) is used for the removal of most part of the allowance of the grinding worm 2, while the cutting portion 30 is used only for the true finishing and for the removal of lesser allowance. In this way the service life of the profiling tool 9 is clearly extended and the frequency of replacement of the profiling tool 9 is greatly reduced.
Finally, thanks to the method, the tool and the device described above it is possible, by using a single profiling tool 9 or 109, to obtain longitudinal portions of the grinding worm 2 with cutting properties suitable for the roughing-out operation and a successive portion with cutting properties suitable for the finishing operations.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
BO2013A0381 | Jul 2013 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2014/063228 | 7/18/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/008264 | 1/22/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4993194 | Cadisch | Feb 1991 | A |
5954568 | Wirz | Sep 1999 | A |
6077150 | Jankowski | Jun 2000 | A |
6234880 | Scacchi | May 2001 | B1 |
6491568 | Jankowski | Dec 2002 | B1 |
8147296 | Lopez | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8932105 | Heidelmann | Jan 2015 | B2 |
20070202774 | Yanase | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20100304642 | Mundt | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110159787 | Kobialka | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110268522 | Ochi | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20140308877 | Weppelmann | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199 10 746 | Sep 2000 | DE |
10 2006 061759 | Aug 2007 | DE |
10 2011 120449 | Jun 2013 | DE |
2 093 020 | Aug 2009 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, PCT/IB/2014/063228, Mar. 18, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160158862 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |