The invention relates generally to determining presence and position in a surrounding space of objects that interact with propagating electromagnetic waves. More particularly, the present invention relates to non-scanning LiDAR systems using an array of emitter/detector sets to cover a given field of view that provides for reduced interference due to crosstalk among emitters within a given LiDAR unit and also among different LiDAR units.
LiDAR (light detection and ranging) uses laser technology to make precise distance measurements over short or long distances. LiDAR units have found widespread application in both industry and the research community.
The predecessor technology to current LiDAR units were object detection systems that could sense the presence or absence of objects within the field of view of one or more light beams based on phase shift analysis of the reflect light beam. Examples of these kinds of object detection systems in the field of vehicle “blind spot” warning systems include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,122,796, 5,418,359, 5,831,551, 6,150,956, and 6,377,167.
Current LiDAR units are typically scanning-type units that emit beams of light in rapid succession, scanning across the angular range of the unit in a fan-like pattern. Using a time of flight calculation applied to any reflections received, instead of just a phase shift analysis, the LiDAR unit can obtain range measurements and intensity values along the singular angular dimension of the scanned beam. LiDAR units typically create the scanning beam by reflecting a pulsed source of laser light from a rotating mirror. The mirror also reflects any incoming reflections to the receiving optics and detector(s).
Single-axis-scan LiDAR units will typically use a polygonal mirror and a pulsed laser source to emit a sequence of light pulses at varying angles throughout the linear field of view. Return signals are measured by a bandpass photoreceptor that detects the wavelength of light emitted by the laser. The field of view of the photoreceptor covers the entire one-dimensional scan area of the laser. Thus, each subsequent emitted pulse of laser light must occur only after the reflected signal has been received for the previous laser pulse. Dual-axis-scan LiDAR units produce distance-measured points in two dimensions by using, for instance, a pair of polygonal mirrors. The horizontal scan mirror rotates at a faster rate than the vertical scan mirror.
Flash LiDAR devices like those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,072,581 offer a way to acquire a 3D map of a scene via a solid state or mostly solid state approach. These devices illuminate an entire 2D field of view with a blanket of light and measure the return value time for each photoreceptor location in the field of view. These approaches are relegated to very close proximity applications due to the low incident laser power for each location in the field of view. For flash LiDAR at longer ranges, the usable field of view is typically too small for applications like autonomous vehicle navigation without the use of high performance cameras operating in the picosecond range for exposure times.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,969,558 describes a LiDAR device that uses multiple lasers and a 360-degree scan to create a 360-degree 3D point cloud for use in vehicle navigation. The disclosed system has two limitations. First, the rotating scan head makes the unit impractical for widespread use on autonomous vehicles and makes it unusable for inclusion in mobile devices like smart phones, wearable devices, smart glasses, etc. Second, multiple units cannot work effectively in the same relative physical space due to the potential of crosstalk.
Scanning LiDAR units typically utilize a single laser, or multiple lasers, all operating at the same wavelength. Care must be taken to ensure that signals received by the photoreceptor are reflected light from the desired emitted source. Two LiDAR units, call them A and B, operating with lasers at the same wavelength have the potential to experience crosstalk. Inbound signals at the A detector wavelength of, for example, 650 nm could be a reflected signal from an emitter for unit A, a reflected signal from unit B, or a signal directly from an emitter of unit B. In an application like autonomous vehicle navigation with multiple LiDAR sensors per vehicle on a busy roadway, the potential for crosstalk among pulsed-laser LiDAR units is quite high.
Crosstalk interference between individual LiDAR units can be reduced by utilizing time division synchronization between the units wherein the transmit times of one unit do not overlap with the transmit times of other units. This synchronization of individual units will lower the capture rate for each device and is impractical when the individual units are integrated with separate, independently-controlled systems.
The error mode for crosstalk interference among LiDAR units will typically be one or more distances being computed as lower than the actual distances or failure to find a signal, resulting in no value being reported for an individual point. For LiDAR units that utilize signal intensity from the target information, the recording intensity will typically be higher than the actual intensity of the returned signal.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,363,511 attempts to overcome the crosstalk interference problem in short range object detection systems by emitting and detecting a series of encoded pulses as part of the ultrasonic or microwave waves generated by the transducers. While this kind of encoding technique has the potential to reduce some occurrences of crosstalk interference, encoding techniques are still not sufficient for applications that may encounter an unknown and large numbers of devices that are simultaneously operating at the same or similar wavelength of emitter energy.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,830,532 also attempts to address the crosstalk interference problem in the context of short range object detection systems using infrared light for fixed location units such as garage door sensor detectors by various combinations of time division, frequency division, encoding and testing modes. While these kinds of solutions might work in the context of limited numbers of fixed object detection systems, they are not practical or effective in the context of current LiDAR technologies, especially when used in moving environments.
LiDAR units have the potential to be utilized extensively in applications like autonomous vehicle navigation, mobile computing and wearable devices. However, problems remain in developing effective LiDAR units that can address the interference challenges and operate reliably in an environment where hundreds or thousands of like devices are operating simultaneously.
LiDAR (light detection and ranging) systems in accordance with various embodiments of the invention use an array of emitter/detector sets to cover a given field of view where each emitter/detector set is configured to receive reflected light energy that is on a given coincident axis unique for that emitter/detector set and process time of flight information for that received light energy. The combination of an array of emitter/detector sets coupled with the on-coincident axis approach for each of the emitter/detector sets provides for reduced interference among emitters within a given LiDAR unit and also among different LiDAR units.
LiDAR systems in accordance with various embodiments of the invention may use a multi-bit sequence of emitter pulses for each emitter/detector cycle. The multi-bit sequence is locally unique to each emitter, wherein the bit sequence differs from the bit sequences for emitters whose coincident axis/vectors are in close proximity. By selecting locally unique bit patterns for each emitter, the interference from other emitters and other similar LiDAR devices is dramatically reduced. The use of multi-bit emitter sequences also results in reduced interference from non-LiDAR devices that are transmitting or reflecting energy at the target detector wavelength.
In various embodiments, the array comprises a non-scanning, solid-state device having a multitude of emitter/detector sets arranged on a generally planer surface. In some embodiments, each emitter/detector set is a single pair of an emitter and a detector. In other embodiments, a single emitter can be optically configured to provide on-coincident axis light energy to multiple different detectors, with each unique on-coincident axis combination of the single emitter and a different detector comprising a different emitter/detector set. In some embodiments, the number of emitter/detector sets can range from a 16×16 array of emitter/detector sets up to an array of 4096×4096 emitter/detector sets. In other embodiments, the number of emitter/detector sets and the configuration arrangement can be more or less, and can be planar or non-planar depending upon the specific application for which the LiDAR system is designed.
In various embodiments, a pulse generation controller is configured to transmit a sequence of pulses from each of the emitters and a control unit is configured to compute a time of flight measurement for radiation received at each of the corresponding on-coincident axis detectors. The control unit that is coupled to the detector output can be a software processing unit or a hardware circuitry for analyzing the light energy in order to extract information about objects within the field of view of the array-based LiDAR unit. In some embodiments, the output of the detector is coupled to a microprocessor unit (MPU) that is programmed to perform the analysis on the received light energy. In other embodiments, a pulse detection circuit is configured to analyze an output signal of the detector, such as an associated output signal of a detector shift register. While the timing of the sequence pulses is known within the LiDAR unit, coordination and advance knowledge of the timing and/or wavelength of emitted light energy from other LiDAR units is not required as in prior art LiDAR systems in order to reduce crosstalk and interference among different LiDAR units.
In various embodiments, the field of view of the LiDAR unit is predetermined based on the optic configuration associated with each of the sets of emitter/detectors for a unique on-coincident axis. In one embodiment, each emitter/detector set includes an optical waveguide through which the received light energy is directed for the on-coincident axis for that emitter/detector set. In another embodiment, each emitter/detector set in an array of emitter/detector sets includes a micro-lens through which the emitted light energy is directed for the on-coincident axis for that emitter/detector set. In some embodiments, an array of micro-lens optics includes a micro-lens unique for each emitter/detector set. In other embodiments, an array of micro-lens optics includes more than one micro-lens for each emitter. In other embodiments, a macro lens arrangement can be used to establish the unique on-coincident axis associated with each emitter/detector set. In some embodiments, such as the micro-lens array embodiment, the macro field of view of the LiDAR unit is effectively established upon fabrication of the micro-lens array together with the array of emitter/detector sets. In other embodiments, the macro field of view may be changed by a global lensing arrangement that is adjustable.
In various embodiments, each detector in the array-based LiDAR unit has a unique angle of coincidence relative to the optic configuration through which the reflected light energy is received. For purposes of the present invention, the angle of coincidence of a given detector is defined as the center of the area of the light beam received by the detector not including any modifications to the light beam due to optic elements internal to the LiDAR unit. In some embodiments, the light energy is emitted and received as collimated or coherent electromagnetic energy, such as common laser wavelengths of 650 nm, 905 nm or 1550 nm. In some embodiments, the light energy can be in the wavelength ranges of ultraviolet (UV)—100-400 nm, visible—400-700 nm, near infrared (NIR)—700-1400 nm, infrared (IR)—1400-8000 nm, long-wavelength IR (LWIR)—8 um-15 um, or far IR (FIR)—15 um-1000 um. The various embodiments of the present invention can provide reduction of interference at these various wavelengths not only among emitted and reflected light energy of LiDAR devices, but also emitted and reflected light energy from other ambient sources such as vehicle headlights and the sun that will also be sources of interference for typical LiDAR units.
Single-axis-scan LiDAR (light detection and ranging) units will typically use a polygonal mirror and a pulsed laser source to emit a sequence of light pulses at varying angles throughout the linear field of view. Return signals are measured by a bandpass photoreceptor that detects the wavelength of light emitted by the laser. The field of view of the photoreceptor covers the entire scan area of the laser. Thus, each subsequent emitted pulse of laser light must occur only after the reflected signal has been received for the previous laser pulse.
Dual-axis-scan LiDAR units produce distance-measured points in two dimensions by using, for instance, a pair of polygonal mirrors. The horizontal scan mirror rotates at a faster rate than the vertical scan mirror.
LiDAR units will utilize a single laser, or will utilize multiple lasers all operating at the same wavelength. Care must be taken to ensure that signals received by the photoreceptor are reflected light from the desired emitted source. Two LiDAR units, call them A and B, operating with lasers at the same wavelength have the potential to experience crosstalk. Inbound signals at the A detector wavelength of, for example, 650 nm could be a reflected signal from an emitter for unit A, a reflected signal from unit B, or a signal directly from an emitter of unit B. In an application like autonomous vehicle navigation with multiple LiDAR sensors per vehicle on a busy roadway, the potential for crosstalk interference among pulsed-laser LiDAR units is quite high. Crosstalk interference between individual units can be reduced by utilizing synchronization between the devices wherein the transmit times of one device do not overlap with the transmit times of other devices. This synchronization of individual units will lower the capture rate for each device and is impractical when the individual devices are integrated with separate, independently-controlled systems.
Referring to
For purposes of the present invention, the terminology “on-coincident axis” will be used to refer to the common known angle of both the emitted and reflected electromagnetic energy for a given set of emitter/detector elements. It will be understood that “on-coincident axis” includes energy emitted or reflected on the specific vectors that define the coincident axis, as well as energy emitted or reflected at angles that are relatively close to the same angle, such as angles within the surface area of the received light beam as defined by the edges of the light beam entering the LiDAR unit that will be received at the detector.
In embodiments, pulse generation circuit 22 can comprise a series of logic devices such as a sequence of shift registers configured to generate an output signal, such as pulse, to activate an emitter of emitter elements 100. Pulse generation circuit 22 utilizes at least one first clock signal generated by a timer 24 to initiate the propagation of data through each of the sequence of shift registers. In some embodiments, each individual emitter of emitter elements 100 has a dedicated shift register in the pulse generation circuit 22. In other embodiments, unique control signals, multiplexed control signals or control signals received over a parallel or serial bus connection may be used to initiate the propagation of the emitter elements.
In an embodiment, sampling circuit 12 can comprise an analog-to-digital converter and/or other electronic components such as transistors or capacitors to process an output signal from each of the plurality of detector elements 200. Each detector of detector elements 200 can be configured as a photoreceptor such as a photodiode or phototransistor which converts light into an electrical signal. The electrical signal is then converted to a discrete-time digital signal (i.e., sampled) by sampling circuit 12, whereby the sampled digital signals are accumulated (i.e., summed or averaged) and stored by detector shift register 14 or other type of digital memory element. Detector shift register 14 can utilize a second clock signal generated by timer 24 to trigger accumulation of the digital signals based on an oscillation event of the second clock signal. In embodiments, the frequency of the second clock signal generated by timer 24 for detector shift register 14 should be greater than twice the frequency of the first clock signal generated by timer 24 for the pulse generation circuit 22:
fdetector>2*femitter
where fdetector=the frequency of the detector shift register clock; and
In other embodiments, optoelectronic device 300 can further comprise a pulse detection unit 16 that can be configured to analyze the output signal of pulse generation circuit 22 in comparison to the output signal of detector shift register 14 to identify a match between the output signals. Pulse detection unit 16 utilizes a third clock signal generated by timer 24 to determine a time at which a match in the output signals is detected. In embodiments, pulse detection unit 16 can comprise computer readable media (not shown) such as RAM, ROM, or other storage devices to store the time at which a match was detected for each detector of detector elements 200. At the end of a sampling sequence the control unit 20 will read the match time for each detector of detector elements 200 and compute the distance to the reflected object based on a time of flight calculation. The distance for each emitter of emitter elements 100 and detector of detector elements 200 is stored in an image memory 18. Each emitter of emitter elements 100 has a vector associated with it that corresponds to the axis of the beam from the emitter of emitter elements 100 relative to the normal vector of the device. All emitter element 100 vectors are stored in a vector memory 26. All information is transferred to/from the device via the input/output (I/O) 28 connection.
Referring to
For a device where the angular spacing of successive emitter elements 100 is equivalent across the horizontal and vertical fields of view, each emitter of emitter elements 100 projection angle beam of light 110 is expressed as a emitter vector 120 utilizing uvw nomenclature, where u corresponds to the x-axis 130, v corresponds to the y-axis 132, and w corresponds to a z-axis 134:
uvwij=[tan(FOVhoriz*(½−m/(M−1))),tan(FOVvert*(½−n/(N−1))),1] (eq. 2)
where FOVhoriz is the horizontal field of view expressed in degrees
Referring to
The semiconductor laser comprises a substrate 50, a lower reflector 52, an active layer 54, a high-resistance region 56, an upper reflector 58 and an electrode 60 which are sequentially stacked on the substrate 50. In an embodiment, each of the lower reflector 52 and the upper reflector 58 is a distributed Bragg reflector which is formed by alternately stacking material layers having different refractive indexes and having opposite doping type.
The light emitted from a vertical semiconductor laser will be a diverging beam. An emitter lens 66 is fabricated on the top of the laser stack to create a collimated beam of light 68. A directional lens 70 directs the collimated beam of light 68 along a desired emitter vector 120.
For high-precision applications emitter vector 120 of each emitter of emitter elements 100 may require minute adjustments. In embodiments, emitter elements 100 can comprise directional lens electrodes 62, 64 to provide a voltage differential laterally across the directional lens 70. In a preferred embodiment each directional lens 70 will have an electrode pair in both the x-axis and y-axis, with each electrode pair controlling emitter vector 120 along the x-axis and y-axis. The directional lens electrodes 62, 64 values are addressable and are modified by the control unit 20.
One skilled in the art will understand that alternate constructions of micro-lenses are possible. In accordance with various embodiments of the invention, such alternate constructions should result in independently-controlled emitters that produce beams at known or characterizable vectors 120 relative to the device's normal vector 134. Constructions for adjustable emitter micro lenses can include, but are not limited to, electro-optic materials that change refractive index in response to an electric field, piezoelectric materials that experience a modification of their shape in response to an electric field, or transparent encapsulated liquid lenses.
Referring to
Emitter directional lens electrodes 86, 88 may be added to provide a voltage differential laterally across the macro lens 80. In an embodiment, the macro lens 80 will have an electrode pair in both the x-axis and y-axis, with each electrode pair controlling emitter vector (coincident axis) 120 along the x-axis and y-axis. The emitter directional lens electrodes 86, 88 values are addressable and are modified by the control unit 20.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In embodiments, macro detector lens 230 comprises detector directional lens electrodes 232, 234 positioned on the x-axis and y-axis, whereby the electrodes 232, 234 are configured to control a detector vector 220 along the x-axis and y-axis. The directional lens electrodes can be configured to provide a voltage differential laterally across macro detector lens 230. The directional lens electrode 232, 234 values are addressable and are modified by the control unit 20.
Referring to
Referring to
In other embodiments, each waveguide detector of detector elements 200 is “paired” with a designated emitter of emitter elements 100, whereby the pulse sequence transmitted by an emitter of emitter elements 100 will be sensed and detected only by its paired detector of detector elements 200. For global lens detectors the number of detector elements 200 will be typically 7 to 25 times the number of emitter elements 100, and the paired detector of detector elements 200 that corresponds to each emitter of emitter elements 100 will be determined during device 240 characterization. For embodiments that utilize waveguide detectors, the larger distances between emitter elements 100 and detector elements 200 will require slightly larger diverging waveguides according to eq. 3. Device circuitry is located in the electronic section 244 of the device 240.
Electronic section 242 and electro-optical sections 242, 246, 248 sections for device 240 in
Various methods exist for the selection and detection of pulse sequences that are locally distinct or differentiable and detectable relative to each detector's spatial neighbors. Bit encoding schemes that can be utilized include but are not limited to unordered list of primes, random numbers, pseudo-random numbers, random sequences and pseudo-random sequences. Bit generation schemes can include any encoding scheme which produces non-repeating, distinct values. Potential bit encryption schemes include but are not limited to one time pad, Hash, DES, MDS, and AES. One skilled in the art can select the bit encoding or bit encryption scheme that best fits the computational power of the device and the non-repetitiveness requirements.
The detector input signal 260 will be sampled at a frequency in accordance with eq. 1. In practice the sampling frequency will be considerably greater and will be a multiple of the emitter pulse frequency. In
Each detector has a dedicated shift register into which the sampled detector states are stored. A “one” is stored for each sampling time where the detector voltage is greater than a threshold value 262. At each sampling times 266 the bits in the shift register are transferred one location to the left according to the shift direction 284. The control unit clears all shift registers prior to the start of the emitter pulse sequence 264. The initial state of the shift register at t0 268 is shown with all bits being set to zero. At t0—when the emitter pulse sequence is initiated—the pulse compare circuitry will begin looking for a “match” between the emitter pulse sequence 264 and the sampled sequence. The values transmitted in the emitter pulse sequence 264 are stored by the control unit in the detector compare register 286 for use by the compare circuitry.
The compare circuitry performs a comparison at every sampling time. After eleven sampling periods the shift register at t11 270 contains sampled values from the first portion of the received waveform. At t76 the compare circuitry detects a match 274 for emitter bit 0, bit 7 and bit nine, but does not detect a match 276 for bit 4. Therefore, the sampled waveform does not correspond to the emitted waveform. At t90 the compare circuitry detects a match 280 at bit 0, bit 7 and bit 9 as well as a match 282 at bit 4. Since all of the “ones” from a compare register 272 have a corresponding match in the detector shift register 278, the compare circuitry will flag and record the time at which the match occurred.
The output bit of the pulse generation circuit 22 produces the voltage level that will drive an individual emitter of emitter elements 100. Once the emitter sequence has started, the detector circuitry begins collecting information from the detector of detector elements 200. The sampling circuit 12 produces a multi-bit value that is continuously compared to the value in the threshold register 30. For sampled values greater than the value in the threshold register 30, a threshold compare circuitry 32 produces a true value or “1” in a positive logic system. The output of the threshold compare circuitry 32 is the input value for the detector shift register 14. A new value is shifted into the detector shift register 14 on each transition of the detector clock. The detector counter 36 is set to zero at the start of the emitter pulse sequence and will increment its count on each detector clock pulse.
The detector compare register 35 contains the multi-bit value for the emitter pulse sequence. This register is typically a copy of the initial value loaded into the pulse generation circuit 22. A sequence detect circuitry 38 will continuously compare the results of the detector compare register 35 and the detector shift register 14. When the sequence detect circuitry 38 detects a match between its inputs, it signals a detector hit register 42 to record the value of the detector counter 36. This detector hit register 42 value signifies the number of detector clock pulses from the start of the emitter sequence to the sensing of a proper detection sequence.
Advanced LiDAR systems will sometimes measure secondary return signals. For example, light rays will typically reflect off a closer object—otherwise known as the foreground object—and a farther-away object—the background object—as a result of the same emitter pulse or series of pulses. An embodiment of the present invention provides multiple detector hit registers 42 to account for multiple return sequences. After the detector counter 36 value for the first return sequence has been stored, subsequent matches detected by the sequence detect circuitry 38 will be recorded in the next detector hit register 42 in the sequence.
The
In embodiments, the functional blocks in
Referring to
The detector counter will serve as the timing sequence throughout the detection cycle. The counter must be cleared prior to the start of the detector sequence. The clear detector counter signal 325 sets the all of the detector counter bits to zero. The detector hit registers will store the detector counter values at which the primary and any secondary detected pulses are sensed. A zero value in these registers signifies that a match sequence was not detected, so these registers must be cleared prior to the start of the detector sequence. The clear detector hit register signal 330 sets all of the bits in all of the detector hit registers to zero.
The output from each emitter 345 is enabled by a logic one appearing at the output of the pulse generation circuit 22 only when the emitter enable signal 335 is active. The detector enable signal 340 will activate at the same time as the emitter enable signal 335. The detector enable signal 340 will activate the detector counter, the detector shift register and the sequence detect circuitry.
Upon completion of the shifting of all of the sequence bits out of the pulse generation circuit 22, the emitter enable signal 335 is deactivated, signifying the end of the emitting portion of the emitter/detector sequence. At the end of the detector sequence the detector enable signal 340 will be deactivated, which in turn will discontinue the incrementing of the detector counter, disable the sequence detect circuitry, and disable any further capturing of data in the detector hit registers. The control unit will then activate the read detect hit register signal(s) 355 to process the flight time(s) for the detected pulse sequence(s).
The timing shown in
Upon completion of the emitter detector sequence and the reading of the detector hit registers for element m,n, the control unit will compute the time of flight for sequence m,n;
t(flight)m,n=λdetector*(km,n−Km,n)−temitter−tdetector (eq. 3)
where λdetector is the period of the detector clock
where vlight is the velocity of light in the medium (atmosphere, water, oceans, space, etc.)
where the device is used
LiDAR systems will utilize time of flight to determine the distance to the object that reflected the light. These systems will typically report a distance at a known angle for every data point. Advanced LiDAR systems will also report an intensity value for each data point, whereby the intensity value conveys information about the object creating the reflected signal.
Referring to
The output bit of the pulse generation circuit 22 produces the voltage level that will drive the individual emitter. Once the emitter sequence has started, the detector circuitry begins collecting information from the detector of detector elements 200. The sampling circuit 12 produces a multi-bit value that is captured in the intensity shift register 44. Each subsequent transition of the detector clock will capture a new value from the sampling circuit 12, with all previous values being shifted to the right by one location. For sampled values greater than the value in the threshold register 30, the threshold compare circuitry 32 produces a true value or “1” in a positive logic system. The output of the threshold compare circuitry 32 is the input value for the detector shift register 14. A new value is shifted into the detector shift register 14 on each transition of the detector clock. A detector counter 36 is set to zero at the start of the emitter pulse sequence and will increment its count on each detector clock pulse.
The detector compare register 35 contains the multi-bit value for the emitter pulse sequence. This register is typically a copy of the initial value loaded into the pulse generation circuit 2240. The sequence detect circuitry 38 will continuously compare the results of the detector compare register 35 and the detector shift register 14. When the sequence detect circuitry 38 detects a match between its inputs, it signals the detector hit register 42 to record the value of the detector counter 36. This detector hit register 42 value signifies the number of detector clock pulses from the start of the emitter sequence to the sensing of a proper detection sequence.
The functional blocks in
In
The input signal from each detector is digitized by an A/D converter 12 and the digitized signal is presented to the intensity shift register 44. Every intensity shift register 44 captures a new multi-bit intensity value on the leading edge of the detector clock. Values are shifted into the intensity shift registers 44 throughout the entire detection cycle. At the end of the detection cycle each MPU will begin processing the captured and presented information to determine the clock sequences at which valid reflected signals were received. All activated intensity shift registers 44 are clocked for the same number of clock cycles throughout the detection cycle.
The timer 24 will control the clocking of data into all of the intensity shift registers 44. Each element in the detector shift registers is a multi-bit value, and the number of required elements in each intensity shift register will depend on the range of the device, the desired accuracy of the distance measurements, the number of bits in each emitter sequence, and the rate multiplier of the detector clock to the emitter clock. The number of elements for each detector shift register elements is:
# of detector shift register elements>E*L+(2*R*femitter*L)/vlight (eq. 5)
where E is the number bits in each emitter shift register
The circuitry blocks for MPU m,n 450 are shown in
Many algorithms for signal analysis and detection utilize information from neighboring detectors and/or emitters. The detector bus 452 allows each MPU to access captured return signals from neighboring detectors. In addition, each MPU can access the detector compare register 456 for every detector via the detector bus to determine if an on-coincident axis emitter was activated for that detector during the previous emitter sequence. A null value in a neighboring detector compare register 456 will signify to other MPUs that an on-coincident axis emitter was not active during the previous emitter cycle.
The device MPUs are dedicated microcontroller units that have reduced instruction sets specifically tailored to signal processing. Each MPU contains a dedicated ALU (arithmetic logic unit), control store, processing registers, instruction memory, and configuration memory. Upon power up of the device, each MPU is configured to establish its associated on-coincident axis emitter. According to an embodiment, not every MPU will be associated with an on-coincident axis emitter.
High-speed applications require one MPU for each detector. One skilled in the art will understand that conventional multiplexing techniques can be applied to devise a system wherein one MPU could service multiple detectors. The functionality of all of the MPUs could be replaced by a controller 20 with sufficient resources.
Referring to
The grid 365 shown in
Referring to
In embodiments, detector elements in a first concentric ring surrounding a primary detector 292 are designated as secondary detectors 294. In some embodiments, secondary detectors 294 are adjacent neighboring detectors that form the first concentric ring. Each primary detector 292 in
In embodiments, each primary detector 292 in
Referring to
When the device 240 is enabled at 410, the control unit 20 determines the pulse patterns for each emitter of emitter elements 100 and will load shift registers of the pulse generation circuit 22 at 412, clear detector counters at 414 and enable emitter elements 100 and detector elements 200 at 416 that will be utilized in the ensuing emitter/detector sequence. At the completion of the detector sequence at 418, the resultant values are retrieved for each detector of detector elements 200 that was activated for the sequence. At 420, for devices that utilize hardware matches, the detector hit register 4 and intensity registers are read for each enabled detector. For devices that utilize software matches the intensity shift registers are read for each primary, secondary and tertiary shift register at 426.
Having collected the appropriate information for all enabled detectors, the control unit will compute flight times at 428, write the vectors at 430 to image memory, write a distance at 432 to image memory, and write the time stamp at 434 to image memory that marks the beginning of the emitter transmission for each emitter of emitter elements 100. Upon completion of the computations and storage for all detectors, the contents of image memory are transmitted via the I/O interface at 436 to the upstream control unit 20.
In various embodiments of the present invention the emitters are constructed using 650 nanometer lasers. One skilled in the art can utilize other wavelengths for emitter and detector construction as long as the emitted radiation maintains its directionality while transmitting though the medium and as long as the selected wavelength is not highly absorptive by the objects contained in the medium. In some embodiments, the light energy is emitted and received as collimated or coherent electromagnetic energy, such as common laser wavelengths of 650 nm, 905 nm or 1550 nm. In some embodiments, the light energy can be in the wavelength ranges of ultraviolet (UV)—100-400 nm, visible—400-700 nm, near infrared (NIR)—700-1400 nm, infrared (IR)—1400-8000 nm, long-wavelength IR (LWIR)—8 um-15 um, or far IR (FIR)—15 um-1000 um. The various embodiments of the present invention can provide reduction of interference at these various wavelengths not only among emitted and reflected light energy of LiDAR devices, but also emitted and reflected light energy from other ambient sources such as vehicle headlights and the sun that will also be sources of interference for typical LiDAR units.
Various embodiments of devices and methods have been described herein. These embodiments are given only by way of example and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. It should be appreciated, moreover, that the various features of the embodiments that have been described may be combined in various ways to produce numerous additional embodiments. Moreover, while various materials, dimensions, shapes, configurations and locations, etc. have been described for use with disclosed embodiments, others besides those disclosed may be utilized without exceeding the scope of the invention.
Persons of ordinary skill in the relevant arts will recognize that the invention may comprise fewer features than illustrated in any individual embodiment described above. The embodiments described herein are not meant to be an exhaustive presentation of the ways in which the various features of the invention may be combined. Accordingly, the embodiments are not mutually exclusive combinations of features; rather, the invention can comprise a combination of different individual features selected from different individual embodiments, as understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art. Moreover, elements described with respect to one embodiment can be implemented in other embodiments even when not described in such embodiments unless otherwise noted. Although a dependent claim may refer in the claims to a specific combination with one or more other claims, other embodiments can also include a combination of the dependent claim with the subject matter of each other dependent claim or a combination of one or more features with other dependent or independent claims. Such combinations are proposed herein unless it is stated that a specific combination is not intended. Furthermore, it is intended also to include features of a claim in any other independent claim even if this claim is not directly made dependent to the independent claim.
Any incorporation by reference of documents above is limited such that no subject matter is incorporated that is contrary to the explicit disclosure herein. Any incorporation by reference of documents above is further limited such that no claims included in the documents are incorporated by reference herein. Any incorporation by reference of documents above is yet further limited such that any definitions provided in the documents are not incorporated by reference herein unless expressly included herein.
For purposes of interpreting the claims for the present invention, it is expressly intended that the provisions of Section 112, sixth paragraph of 35 U.S.C. are not to be invoked unless the specific terms “means for” or “step for” are recited in a claim.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 16/272,822 filed Feb. 11, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,131,755 issued Sep. 28, 2021, which in turn is a continuation of application Ser. No. 14/078,001 filed Nov. 12, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,203,399 issued Feb. 12. 2019, each of which is hereby fully incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3971065 | Bayer | Jul 1976 | A |
4185891 | Kaestner | Jan 1980 | A |
4739398 | Thomas et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4935616 | Scott | Jun 1990 | A |
5006721 | Cameron et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5026156 | Bayston et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5054911 | Ohishi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5081530 | Medina | Jan 1992 | A |
5084895 | Shimada et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5090245 | Anderson | Feb 1992 | A |
5122796 | Beggs et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5212706 | Jain | May 1993 | A |
5400350 | Galvanauskas | Mar 1995 | A |
5418359 | Juds et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420722 | Bielak | May 1995 | A |
5446529 | Stettner et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5465142 | Krumes et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5485009 | Meyzonnetie et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497269 | Gal | Mar 1996 | A |
5619317 | Oishi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5675326 | Juds et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682229 | Wangler | Oct 1997 | A |
5793491 | Wangler et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805275 | Taylor | Sep 1998 | A |
5831551 | Geduld | Nov 1998 | A |
5870180 | Wangler | Feb 1999 | A |
5892575 | Marino | Apr 1999 | A |
5940170 | Berg et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6054927 | Brickell | Apr 2000 | A |
6057909 | Yahav et al. | May 2000 | A |
6118518 | Hobbs | Sep 2000 | A |
6133989 | Stettner et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150956 | Laufer | Nov 2000 | A |
6181463 | Galvanauskas et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212480 | Dunne | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6323942 | Bamji | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327090 | Rando et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6370291 | Mitchell | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373557 | Megel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377167 | Juds et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396397 | Bos et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6448572 | Tennant et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456368 | Seo | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6480265 | Maimon et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6512892 | Montgomery et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522396 | Halmos | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535275 | McCaffrey et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6619406 | Kacyra et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6646725 | Eichinger et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654401 | Cavalheiro Vieira et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665055 | Ohishi et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674878 | Retterath et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683727 | Göring et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6711280 | Stafsudd et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717972 | Steinle et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6774988 | Stam et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6828558 | Arnone et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6843416 | Swartz et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6873640 | Bradburn et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6881979 | Starikov et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6906302 | Drowley | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6967569 | Weber et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975251 | Pavicic | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6987447 | Baerenweiler et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7016519 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7148974 | Schmitt et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7149613 | Stam et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171037 | Mahon et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7224384 | Iddan et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7227459 | Bos et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236235 | Dimsdale | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248342 | Degnan | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7248344 | Morcom | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7294863 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7319777 | Morcom | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7348919 | Gounalis | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362419 | Kurihara et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7436494 | Kennedy et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7453553 | Dimsdale | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7474821 | Donlagic et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7521666 | Tsang | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7534984 | Gleckler | May 2009 | B2 |
7542499 | Jikutani | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7544945 | Tan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551771 | England, III | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7560680 | Sato et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7579593 | Onozawa et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7607509 | Schmiz et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7623248 | Laflamme | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7649654 | Shyu et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7663095 | Wong et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7689032 | Strassenburg-Kleciak | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697119 | Ikeno et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7733932 | Faybishenko | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7755743 | Kumahara et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7755809 | Fujita et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7787105 | Hipp | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787511 | Jikutani et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7830442 | Griffis et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7830532 | De Coi | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7873091 | Parent et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881355 | Sipes, Jr. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888159 | Venezia et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894725 | Holman et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7900736 | Breed | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7911617 | Padmanabhan et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7940825 | Jikutani | May 2011 | B2 |
7944548 | Eaton | May 2011 | B2 |
7945408 | Dimsdale et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7957448 | Willemin et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7957639 | Lee et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7960195 | Maeda et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7961328 | Austin et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7969558 | Hall | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979173 | Breed | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983817 | Breed | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7986461 | Bartoschewski | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991222 | Dimsdale et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7994465 | Bamji et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8027029 | Lu et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8045595 | Ma | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8054203 | Breed et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8054464 | Mathur et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072581 | Breiholz | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8072663 | O'Neill et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8077294 | Grund et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8089498 | Sato et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8094060 | Beard et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8098969 | Tolstikhin et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8102426 | Yahav et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8111452 | Butler et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8115158 | Buettgen | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8120754 | Kaehler | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8125367 | Ludwig | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8125620 | Lewis | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8139141 | Bamji et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8159598 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8194712 | Müller et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8198576 | Kennedy et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8199786 | Gaillard et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8212998 | Rindle | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8213479 | Doerfel et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8229663 | Zeng et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235416 | Breed et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8235605 | Kim | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8238393 | Iwasaki | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8242428 | Meyers et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8242476 | Memeault et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8249798 | Hawes et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8259003 | Song | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8280623 | Trepagnier et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301027 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8310654 | Weilkes et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8319949 | Cantin et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8325256 | Egawa | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8338900 | Venezia et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8340151 | Liu et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8354928 | Morcom | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8355117 | Niclass | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8363156 | Lo | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8363511 | Frank et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364334 | Au et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8368005 | Wang et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8368876 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8378287 | Schemmann et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8378885 | Cornic et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8380367 | Schultz et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8391336 | Chiskis | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401046 | Shveykin et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401049 | Sato et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8422148 | Langer et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8426797 | Aull et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8437584 | Matsuoka et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8442084 | Ungar | May 2013 | B2 |
8451432 | Crawford et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8451871 | Yankov | May 2013 | B2 |
8456517 | Spektor et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8477819 | Kitamura | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8487525 | Lee | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8494687 | Vanek et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8503888 | Takemoto et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8508567 | Sato et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8508720 | Kamiyama | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8508721 | Cates et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520713 | Joseph | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8531650 | Feldkhun et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8538636 | Breed | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8558993 | Newbury et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8570372 | Russell | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8587637 | Cryder et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8594455 | Meyers et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8599363 | Zeng | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8599367 | Canham | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8604932 | Breed et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8605262 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8619241 | Mimeault | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8633989 | Okuda | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8640182 | Bedingfield, Sr. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8655513 | Vanek | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8675184 | Schmitt et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8681255 | Katz et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8687172 | Faul et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8717417 | Sali et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8717492 | McMackin et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8723689 | Mimeault | May 2014 | B2 |
8724671 | Moore | May 2014 | B2 |
8736670 | Barbour et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8736818 | Weimer et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8742325 | Droz et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8743455 | Gusev et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8754829 | Lapstun | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8760499 | Russell | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8767190 | Hall | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8773642 | Eisele et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781790 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8797550 | Hays et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8804101 | Spagnolia et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8809758 | Molnar et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8810647 | Niclass et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8810796 | Hays et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8811720 | Seida | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8820782 | Breed et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8836921 | Feldkhun et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8836922 | Pennecot et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8854426 | Pellman et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8855849 | Ferguson et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8864655 | Ramamurthy et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8885152 | Wright | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8908157 | Eisele et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8908159 | Mimeault | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918831 | Meuninck et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8928865 | Rakuljic | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8933862 | Lapstun | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8934087 | Stobie et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8947647 | Halmos et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8963956 | Latta et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8988754 | Sun et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8995577 | Ullrich et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9032470 | Meuninck et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9066087 | Shpunt | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9069060 | Zbrozek et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9098931 | Shpunt et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9102220 | Breed | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9103715 | Demers et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9113155 | Wu et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9119670 | Yang et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9131136 | Shpunt et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9137463 | Gilboa et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9137511 | LeGrand, III et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9142019 | Lee | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9158375 | Maizels et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9185391 | Prechtl | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9186046 | Ramamurthy et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9186047 | Ramamurthy et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191582 | Wright et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9201501 | Maizels et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9204121 | Marason et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9228697 | Schneider et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9237333 | Lee et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9239264 | Demers | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9360554 | Retterath et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9612153 | Kawada et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9723233 | Grauer et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9866816 | Retterath | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10036801 | Retterath et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10203399 | Retterath et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10585175 | Retterath et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
11131755 | Retterath et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11226298 | Kappler et al. | Jan 2022 | B2 |
20020179708 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030043364 | Jamieson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063775 | Rafii | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030085867 | Grabert | May 2003 | A1 |
20030155513 | Remillard et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040133380 | Gounalis | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060132752 | Kane | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060157643 | Bamji et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060268265 | Chuang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060279630 | Aggarwal et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070182949 | Niclass | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070279615 | Degnan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080180650 | Lamesch | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090045359 | Kumahara et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076758 | Dimsdale | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090128802 | Treado et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090232355 | Minear et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100020306 | Hall | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100045966 | Cauquy et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046953 | Shaw et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100128109 | Banks | May 2010 | A1 |
20100231891 | Mase | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265386 | Raskar et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277713 | Mimeault | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100301195 | Thor et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007299 | Moench et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110037849 | Niclass et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110101206 | Buettgen | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131722 | Scott et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110134220 | Barbour et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110205521 | Mimeault et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110216304 | Hall | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110285980 | Newbury et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285981 | Justice et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285982 | Breed | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295469 | Rafii et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313722 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001463 | Breed et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120002007 | Meuninck et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120002025 | Bedingfield, Sr. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011546 | Meuninck et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023518 | Meuninck et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023540 | Meuninck et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120051383 | Stern | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062705 | Ovsiannikov et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120086781 | Iddan et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120098964 | Oggier et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120154784 | Kaufman et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120249998 | Eisele et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120261516 | Gilliland et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262696 | Eisele et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120274745 | Russell | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287417 | Mimeault | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120299344 | Breed et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130044129 | Latta et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060146 | Yang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070239 | Crawford et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076861 | Sternklar | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130083310 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130085330 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130085331 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130085333 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130085334 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130085382 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130085397 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130090528 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130090530 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130090552 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130188043 | Decoster | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130201288 | Billerbeck et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215235 | Russell | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130242283 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242285 | Zeng | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130278917 | Korekado et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130300740 | Snyder et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300838 | Borowski | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300840 | Borowski | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130321791 | Feldkhun et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140035959 | Lapstun | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140152971 | James | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140152975 | Ko | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140160461 | Van Der Tempel et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168362 | Hannuksela et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140211194 | Pacala et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140218473 | Hannuksela et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240464 | Lee | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240469 | Lee | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240809 | Lapstun | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140241614 | Lee | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253993 | Lapstun | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140292620 | Lapstun | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313339 | Diessner | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313376 | Van Nieuwenhove et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140340487 | Gilliland et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347676 | Velten et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350836 | Stettner et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150002734 | Lee | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150060673 | Zimdars | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150077764 | Braker et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150082353 | Meuninck et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150116528 | Lapstun | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150131080 | Retterath et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150145955 | Russell | May 2015 | A1 |
20150192677 | Yu et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150201176 | Graziosi et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150213576 | Meuninck et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150245017 | Di Censo et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150256767 | Schlechter | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150269736 | Hannuksela et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150292874 | Shpunt et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150293226 | Eisele et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150293228 | Retterath et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150296201 | Banks | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150304534 | Kadambi et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150304665 | Hannuksela et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150309154 | Lohbihler | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150319344 | Lapstun | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150319355 | Lapstun | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150319419 | Akin et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150319429 | Lapstun | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150319430 | Lapstun | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150378241 | Eldada | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150379362 | Calmes et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160003946 | Gilliland et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160007009 | Offenberg | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160047901 | Pacala et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160049765 | Eldada | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160161600 | Eldada et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160259038 | Retterath et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160356881 | Retterath et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170084176 | Nakamura | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170103271 | Kawagoe | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170176578 | Rae et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170257617 | Retterath | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170259753 | Meyhofer et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180131924 | Jung et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180295344 | Retterath | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190079165 | Retterath et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190285732 | Retterath et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200319317 | Retterath et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1764835 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1912078 | Apr 2008 | EP |
WO 1998010255 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 2013081984 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2013127975 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Harvey-Lynch, Inc., “Multibeam and Mobile LIDAR Solutions,” 2014, 2 pages. |
Hussman et al., “A Performance of 3D TOF Vision Systems in Comparison to Stereo Vision Systems,” Stereo Vision, 2008, 20 pages. |
Al-Khafaji et al., “Spectral-Spatial Scale Invariant Feature Transform for Hyperspectral Images,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 27, Issue 2, Feb. 2018, 14 pages. |
Krill et al., “Multifunction Array LIDAR Network for Intruder Detection, Tracking, and Identification,” IEEE ISSNIP, 2010, pp. 43-48. |
Levinson et al., “Unsupervised Calibration for Multi-Beam Lasers,” Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 2010, 8 pages. |
Ling et al., “Deformation Invariant Image Matching,” Center for Automation Research, Computer Science Department, University of Maryland, College Park, 2005, 8 pages. |
Lindeberg et al., “Scale Invariant Feature Transform,” Scholarpedia, 7(5):10491, May 2012, 19 pages. |
Webpage http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-titan/specifications, Jul. 2015, 2 pages. |
Webpage, 3D LADAR & LIDAR Focal Planes and Instruments, Voxtelopto, 2007-2015, 3 pages. |
ASC 3D Bringing 3D Alive!, Advanced Scientific Concepts, Inc., Feb. 9, 2010, 14 pages. |
Albota et al., “Three-Dimensional Imaging Laser Radar with a Photo-Counting Avalanch Photodiode Array and Microchip Laser,” Dec. 20, 2002, 8 pages. |
Brazzel et al., “FLASH LIDAR Based Relative Navigation,” 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2014, 11 pages. |
Love et al., “Active Probing of Cloud Multiple Scattering, Optical, Depth, Vertical Thickness, and Liquid Water Content Using Wide-Angle Imaging LIDAR,” 2002, 11 pages. |
Itzler, “Focal-Plane Arrays: Geiger-Mode Focal Plane Arrays Enable SWIR 3D Imaging,” 2011, 8 pages. |
Superior Signal-to-Noise Ratio of a New AA1 Sequence for Random-Modulation Continuous-Wave LIDAR, Optics Letters, 2004, vol. 29, No. 15. |
Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave LIDAR Using I/Q Modulator for Simplified Heterodyne Detection, Optics Letters, 2012, vol. 37, No. 11. |
Moller et al., “Robust 3D Measurement with PMD Sensors,” Proceedings of the First Range Imaging Research Day at ETH Zurich, 2005, 14 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220128663 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16272822 | Feb 2019 | US |
Child | 17488018 | US | |
Parent | 14078001 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 16272822 | US |