All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates generally to orthopedic medicine and surgery. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for forming pilot holes in bone for inserting fasteners and fixation of sheet-like materials, such as for treating tendons or like tissue of articulating joints, such as tendons in the rotator cuff of the shoulder.
The glenohumeral joint of the shoulder is found where the head of the humerus mates with a shallow depression in the scapula. This shallow depression is known as the glenoid fossa. Six muscles extend between the humerus and scapula and actuate the glenohumeral joint. These six muscles include the deltoid, the teres major, and the four rotator cuff muscles. The rotator cuff muscles are a complex of muscles. The muscles of the rotator cuff include the supraspinatus, the infraspinatus, the subscapularis, and the teres minor. The centering and stabilizing roles played by the rotator cuff muscles are critical to the proper function of the shoulder. The rotator cuff muscles provide a wide variety of moments to rotate the humerus and to oppose unwanted components of the deltoid and pectoral muscle forces.
The muscles of the rotator cuff arise from the scapula. The distal tendons of the rotator cuff muscles splay out and interdigitate to form a common continuous insertion on the humerus. The supraspinatus muscle arises from the supraspinatus fossa of the posterior scapula, passes beneath the acromion and the acromioclavicular joint, and attaches to the superior aspect of the greater tuberosity. The mechanics of the rotator cuff muscles are complex. The rotator cuff muscles rotate the humerus with respect to the scapula, compress the humeral head into the glenoid fossa providing a critical stabilizing mechanism to the shoulder (known as concavity compression), and provide muscular balance. The supraspinatus and deltoid muscles are equally responsible for producing torque about the shoulder joint in the functional planes of motion.
The rotator cuff muscles are critical elements of this shoulder muscle balance equation. The human shoulder has no fixed axis. In a specified position, activation of a muscle creates a unique set of rotational moments. For example, the anterior deltoid can exert moments in forward elevation, internal rotation, and cross-body movement. If forward elevation is to occur without rotation, the cross-body and internal rotation moments of this muscle must be neutralized by other muscles, such as the posterior deltoid and infraspinatus. The timing and magnitude of these balancing muscle effects must be precisely coordinated to avoid unwanted directions of humeral motion. Thus the simplified view of muscles as isolated motors, or as members of force couples must give way to an understanding that all shoulder muscles function together in a precisely coordinated way—opposing muscles canceling out undesired elements leaving only the net torque necessary to produce the desired action. Injury to any of these soft tissues can greatly inhibit ranges and types of motion of the arm.
With its complexity, range of motion and extensive use, a common soft tissue injury is damage to the rotator cuff or rotator cuff tendons. Damage to the rotator cuff is a potentially serious medical condition that may occur during hyperextension, from an acute traumatic tear or from overuse of the joint. With its critical role in abduction, rotational strength and torque production, the most common injury associated with the rotator cuff region is a strain or tear involving the supraspinatus tendon. A tear at the insertion site of the tendon with the humerus, may result in the detachment of the tendon from the bone. This detachment may be partial or full, depending upon the severity of the injury or damage. Additionally, the strain or tear can occur within the tendon itself. Injuries to the supraspinatus tendon and current modalities for treatment are defined by the type and degree of tear. The first type of tear is a full thickness tear, which as the term indicates, is a tear that extends through the thickness of the supraspinatus tendon regardless of whether it is completely torn laterally. The second type of tear is a partial thickness tear which is further classified based on how much of the thickness is torn, whether it is greater or less than about 50% of the thickness.
The accepted treatment for a full thickness tear or a partial thickness tear greater than 50% includes reconnecting the torn tendon via sutures. For the partial thickness tears greater than 50%, the tear is completed to a full thickness tear by cutting the tendon prior to reconnection. In some procedures, the surgeon will position a sheet-like patch over the sutured area to strengthen the repair and try to prevent the sutures from tearing through the tendon. The placement of the patch can be accomplished readily in an open surgical procedure, however, placement and attachment of the patch in an arthroscopic procedure has been shown to be very difficult.
In contrast to the treatment of a full thickness tear or a partial thickness tear of greater than 50%, the current standard treatment for a partial thickness tear less than 50% usually involves physical cessation from use of the tendon, i.e., rest. Specific exercises can also be prescribed to strengthen and loosen the shoulder area. In many instances, the shoulder does not heal, and the partial thickness tear can be the source of chronic pain and stiffness. Further, the pain and stiffness may cause restricted use of the limb which tends to result in further degeneration or atrophy in the shoulder. Surgical intervention may be required for a partial thickness tear of less than 50%, however, current treatment interventions do not include repair of the tendon, and rather the surgical procedure is directed to arthroscopic removal of bone to relieve points of impingement or create a larger tunnel between the tendon and bone that is believed to be causing tendon damage. As part of the treatment, degenerated tendon may also be removed using a debridement procedure in which tendon material is removed or ablated. Again, the tendon partial thickness tear is not repaired. Several authors have reported satisfactory early post-operative results from these procedures, but over time recurrent symptoms have been noted. In the event of recurrent symptoms, many times a patient will “live with the pain”. This may result in less use of the arm and shoulder which causes further degeneration of the tendon and may lead to more extensive damage. A tendon repair would then need to be done in a later procedure if the prescribed treatment for the partial tear was unsuccessful in relieving pain and stiffness or over time the tear propagated through injury or degeneration to a full thickness tear or a partial thickness tear greater than 50% with attendant pain and debilitation. A subsequent later procedure would include the more drastic procedure of completing the tear to full thickness and suturing the ends of the tendon back together. This procedure requires extensive rehabilitation, has relatively high failure rates and subjects the patient who first presented and was treated with a partial thickness tear less than 50% to a second surgical procedure.
As described above, adequate devices and methods for positioning sheet-like patches or implants during an arthroscopic procedure do not currently exist. It has been shown to be very difficult to properly position and attach a sheet-like implant unless the treatment site is accessed in an open procedure. Further, adequate procedures do not exist for repairing a partial thickness tear of less than 50% in the supraspinatus tendon. Current procedures attempt to alleviate impingement or make room for movement of the tendon to prevent further damage and relieve discomfort but do not repair or strengthen the tendon. Use of the still damaged tendon can lead to further damage or injury. Prior damage may result in degeneration that requires a second more drastic procedure to repair the tendon. Further, if the prior procedure was only partially successful in relieving pain and discomfort, a response may be to use the shoulder less which leads to degeneration and increased likelihood of further injury along with the need for more drastic surgery. Therefore, it would be beneficial to be able to position, deliver and attach a sheet-like implant to a treatment site in an arthroscopic procedure. It would also be beneficial to treat partial thickness tears greater than 50% without cutting the untorn portion of the tendon to complete the tear before suturing back together. There is a large need for surgical techniques and systems to position, deploy and attach implants during an arthroscopic procedure and to treat partial thickness tears and prevent future tendon damage by strengthening or repairing the native tendon having the partial thickness tear.
The disclosure is directed to an implant delivery system for accurately positioning and deploying or delivering a sheet-like implant. One embodiment provides an implant delivery system including an implant retainer assembly and an implant spreader assembly. The implant retainer assembly and the implant spreader assembly are provided proximate the distal end of a delivery shaft. The implant retainer assembly is configured to releasably couple a sheet-like implant thereto for positioning the sheet-like implant at a treatment site. The implant spreader assembly is configured to expand the sheet-like implant so that the sheet-like implant covers the treatment site.
The implant delivery system can include a distal guidewire port located proximate the distal end of the delivery system a fixed and known distance both laterally and longitudinally relative to an implant when it is loaded onto the implant retainer assembly. With this embodiment, the implant delivery system can be included in a kit that includes a guidewire or be used in conjunction with a guidewire that is provided separately from the implant delivery system. The guidewire can include a proximally extending length of wire that extends from a distal tissue retention member. The tissue retention member provides a temporary connection of the distal end of the guidewire to the bone or other tissue. The tissue retention member includes means for temporarily or reversibly fixing the distal end of the guidewire to tissue, such as bone. The means for affixing can include a K-wire (Kirshner wire) which can be a smooth stainless steel pin with a drill tip that cuts into bone when rotated. Alternatively, the means for fixing can include a screw that is threaded or a fine pin that is hammered into bone or other tissue. The fine pin can include barbs or other projections and/or surface texture that aid in temporarily fixing the distal end of the guidewire to the bone or other tissue. The proximally extending wire can be coupled to the tissue retention member via a strain relief that allows the wire to bend proximate the tissue retention member. The strain relief can include a spring or a coil.
The positional relationship (lateral and longitudinal) of a loaded implant relative to the distal guidewire port is advantageously used to position the implant delivery system relative to a first fixed point on the anatomy of the patient and assures the deployed implant will properly cover the treatment site. The first fixed point on the anatomy can be used as the location of the distal end of the guidewire as fixed to the bone or other tissue. The proximal end of the guidewire is fed through the distal guidewire port, and the delivery system is guided by the wire to abut the anatomy or the tissue retention member proximate the fixed point.
In one method of using the present system, a first fixed point is determined through observation and/or measurement of a treatment site or tissue to be covered by the implant relative to other anatomy. For example, in treating a rotator cuff injury, the surgeon can measure the supraspinatus tendon lateral width and observe the location of the line generally defining the point of insertion of the tendon into the humeral head. With these measurements known, along with the known size of implant to be used and the longitudinal/lateral location of the loaded implant relative to the guidewire port, a best location for the first fixed point can be selected and the guidewire fixed thereto.
Determining a first fixed point for the implant location, however, may not adequately position the implant as it can be rotated, at least to some degree, about that first fixed point. Therefore, in some embodiments, at least a second anatomical point or position is identified and/or marked to assure the implant is rotated to proper position on the first fixed point. In some embodiments a third anatomical point or position may also be identified and/or marked, in which embodiment the second and third point can define a line which is generally parallel to an edge of the implant when properly rotated about the first point. In treating the supraspinatus tendon, a marker can be placed through the skin and tendon while viewing the articular side of the supraspinatus tendon where the biceps tendon is also visible. The marker can be inserted adjacent the biceps tendon to delineate its location and assure the implant is rotated to generally parallel the biceps tendon and avoid any staples attaching to such tendon which may interfere with its function.
In some exemplary embodiments, the implant spreader assembly includes a first arm and a second arm each having a proximal and a distal end. The proximal end of each arm is pivotably connected proximate the distal end of the delivery shaft. The first and second arms are moveable between a closed position and an open position. When the first and second arms are in the closed position, the arms extend generally in the longitudinal direction. When pivoting to the open position the distal end of each arm travels in a generally transverse direction to spread an implant that has been positioned on the implant retainer assembly. When pivoting from the open position to the closed position, the first arm and the second arm may travel in different planes.
In some exemplary embodiments, a sheath is disposed about the implant spreader assembly. The sheath is slidable in a direction generally parallel to a longitudinal axis of the delivery shaft such that the sheath can be retracted proximally from around the implant spreader assembly. The sheath can include a bullet nose distal end to ease insertion into the shoulder space.
A sheet-like implant may be releasably coupled to the implant retainer assembly. When this is the case, the sheet-like implant may fit within the sheath when the implant spreader is in the closed position. The sheet-like implant may then be expanded to cover a treatment site when the sheath is retracted and the implant spreader is opened. In some useful embodiments, the sheet-like implant extends tautly between the arms of the implant spreader when the arms are in the open position. The sheet-like implant may assume a rolled configuration when the implant expander is in the closed position.
In some exemplary embodiments, the first arm and the second arm pivot transversely in different planes such that in the open position the sheet-like implant extending between the arms forms a generally curved surface to conform to a generally curved treatment site when placed thereon. In some instances, the first arm and the second arm pivot transversely in the same plane such that in the open position the sheet-like implant extending between the arms forms a generally flat surface.
In some embodiments, the implant retainer assembly comprises a center post disposed proximate the distal end of the delivery shaft. A mating surface having a longitudinally extending groove generally parallel and spaced from the center post cooperates with the center post to retain the implant when it is slidably disposed therebetween. The center post and mating surface define a slot that is dimensioned to receive the sheet-like implant.
Another embodiment provides an implant delivery system including a delivery shaft having a proximal end and a distal end defining a generally longitudinal direction. An implant spreader assembly is provided proximate the distal end of the delivery shaft. A sheet-like implant is coupled to the implant spreader such that the implant is folded when the arms of the implant spreader are in a closed position and unfolded when the arms of the implant spreader are in an open position. The implant spreader assembly may be used to unfold the sheet-like implant, for example, to spread the implant over a treatment site within the body. A hood that extends distally from the distal end of the shaft, generally parallel to the implant spreader assembly can be included. The hood is spaced radially from the implant retention assembly and retains the implant in folded configuration when unsheathed until deployment of the implant spreader.
A method of treating a site such as a rotator cuff of a shoulder may include the step of providing an implant delivery system as described above. The treatment site or shoulder of the patient may be inflated to create a cavity therein. The treatment site can be observed and/or measured using a probe or other instrument to identify the proper implant size and a first anatomical location for affixing the distal end of a guidewire such that abutment of the guidewire port proximate this location will place the implant at a desired location when deployed. A guide wire is affixed to the anatomical location selected, as for example, a point near the insertion of the supraspinatus tendon on the humeral head. Further, a second and/or third anatomical point can be identified that will give proper rotational position to the implant delivery system. These points can be identified and markers placed to provide a visual reference. The implant delivery system can be tracked over the guidewire to abut the first reference point. The implant and the implant spreader assembly may be unsheathed inside the cavity. The implant may be spread over a target tissue at the treatment site and rotated to align with the second and/or third reference points as marked. The implant may be affixed to the target tissue. The implant may be released from the implant delivery system. The implant spreader assembly may be removed from the cavity. In some cases, the implant spreader assembly is assuming the closed configuration while the implant spreader assembly is withdrawn from the cavity.
The following detailed description should be read with reference to the drawings in which similar elements in different drawings are numbered the same. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict illustrative embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The present disclosure is directed to an implant delivery system that is particularly useful for accurately positioning and deploying or delivering a sheet-like implant to a treatment Site. The delivery system is discussed in detail with respect to treatment of tendons in articulating joints, specifically the supraspinatus tendon of the rotator cuff in the shoulder. However, it is recognized that the delivery system and other components of a kit disclosed herein can be utilized in any areas of the body wherein it is desired to accurately position a sheet-like implant, especially during an arthroscopic procedure where access and visibility are limited.
The implant delivery system can be used in conjunction with a guidewire or be part of a kit that includes a guidewire. The guidewire is configured with a distal end that attaches to bone or other tissue at a first fixed point that is determined through observation and measurement of the treatment site. The first fixed point is determined based on knowledge of the size of the implant to be used, the known location of a distal guidewire port on the delivery system relative to an implant when it is loaded on the delivery system and the measured/observed anatomy of the treatment site. Once the guidewire is attached at the first fixed point, the delivery system can track over the wire to the proper position for delivering the implant. Details of the guidewire design are disclosed with respect to the discussion of
The delivery system of this disclosure can also be used in conjunction with other tissue position markers or included in a kit with tissue position markers. Identifying a first fixed point for attachment of the guidewire may not be sufficient in some applications to accurately position the implant as the delivery system can be rotated to some degree about the first point. By using visual observation and/or other measurement techniques a second, and if necessary a third, fixed point can be identified and marked with the markers to be used as a reference point or line for proper rotation or orientation of the implant as positioned over the wire. The markers are described in detail with respect to
Referring now to
As depicted in
A second button 109 is connected to longitudinal members that extend within the sheath to move arms of an implant spreader assembly 124 (see
With reference to
As best seen in
In the exemplary embodiment of
As also shown in greater detail in
As also indicated on
The relationship between the implant delivery system 60, the guidewire 172 and a sheet-like implant 50 mounted thereon for delivery can be better understood, in an exemplary embodiment, by reference to
Referring now to
As depicted in
Referring to
An alternative embodiment of a guidewire and guidewire delivery system is depicted in
As previously disclosed, embodiments of the implant delivery system disclosed herein can be used in conjunction with tissue markers that visually identify anatomical locations at or near a treatment site to assist in proper placement of the implant with the implant delivery system.
Referring first to
As previously disclosed, the systems and devices disclosed herein are used in procedures that can be performed arthroscopically. To better make use of these systems and devices a surgeon can observe, probe and measure features of a treatment site visually to best identify the right implant and fixed locations for placing both the guidewire and/or markers for accurate delivery of the implant. An exemplary probe and measuring tool 350 is depicted in
Next referring to
With reference to
The exemplary implant delivery system described herein may be used to position and deploy sheet-like implants to various target tissues throughout the body. The shoulder depicted in
As depicted in
With reference to
In
First cannula 80A is accessing a treatment site within shoulder 22 using a lateral approach in which first cannula 80A pierces the outer surface of right side 84 of body 82. The term lateral approach could also be used to describe situations in which an instrument pierces the outer surface of left side 86 of body 82. Second cannula 80B is accessing a treatment site within shoulder 22 using a posterior approach in which second cannula 80B pierces the outer surface of posterior portion 88 of body 82. Third cannula 80C is accessing a treatment site within shoulder 22 using an anterior approach in which third cannula 80C pierces the outer surface of anterior portion 92 of body 82.
Shoulder 22 of
Camera 56 may be used to visually inspect the tendons of shoulder 22 for damage. A tendon repair implant in accordance with this disclosure may be affixed to a bursal surface of the tendon regardless of whether there are visible signs of tendon damage. Applicants believe that the methods and apparatus of the present application and related devices may provide very beneficial therapeutic effect on a patient experiencing joint pain believed to be caused by internal microtears, but having no clear signs of tendon tears. By applying a tendon repair implant early before a full tear or other injury develops, the implant may cause the tendon to thicken and/or at least partially repair itself, thereby avoiding more extensive joint damage, pain, and the need for more extensive joint repair surgery.
An implant delivery system 60 can be seen extending from shoulder 22 in
A tendon repair implant is at least partially disposed in the lumen defined by the sheath of implant delivery system 60. Implant delivery system 60 can be used to place the tendon repair implant inside shoulder 22. In some embodiments, the tendon repair implant is folded into a compact configuration when inside the lumen of the sheath. When this is the case, implant delivery system 60 may be used to unfold the tendon repair implant into an expanded shape. Additionally, implant delivery system 60 can be used to hold the tendon repair implant against the tendon.
The tendon repair implant may be affixed to the tendon while it is held against the tendon by implant delivery system 60. Various attachment elements may be used to fix the tendon-repair implant to the tendon. Examples of attachment elements that may be suitable in some applications include sutures, tissue anchors, bone anchors, and staples. In the exemplary embodiment of
As previously stated, the implant delivery system 60 can be used to deliver any sheet-like implant. A tendon repair implant 50 may comprise, for example, various sheet-like structures without deviating from the spirit and scope of the present detailed description. In some useful embodiments, the sheet-like structure may comprise a plurality of fibers. The fibers may be interlinked with one another. When this is the case, the sheet-like structure may comprise a plurality of apertures comprising the interstitial spaces between fibers. Various processes may be used to interlink the fibers with one another. Examples of processes that may be suitable in some applications including weaving, knitting, and braiding. In some embodiments, the sheet-like structure may comprise a laminate including multiple layers of film with each layer of film defining a plurality of micro-machined or formed holes. The sheet-like structure of the tendon repair implant may also comprise a reconstituted collagen material having a porous structure. Additionally, the sheet-like structure of the tendon repair implant may also comprise a plurality of electro-spun nanofiber filaments forming a composite sheet. Additionally, the sheet-like structure may comprise a synthetic sponge material that defines a plurality of pores. The sheet-like structure may also comprise a reticulated foam material. Reticulated foam materials that may be suitable in some applications are available from Biomerix Corporation of Fremont, Calif. which identifies these materials using the trademark BIOMATERIAL™. The sheet-like structure may be circular, oval, oblong, square, rectangular, or other shape configured to suit the target anatomy. Various attachment elements may be used to fix tendon repair implant 50 to distal tendon 28 without deviating from the spirit and scope of this detailed description. Examples of attachment elements that may be suitable in some applications include sutures, tissue anchors, bone anchors, and staples. In the embodiment of
Referring to
Referring now to
In some methods, a second marker system 302 is used to mark a second point medial of first marker. This is illustrated in
A view of the bursal side of the supraspinatus tendon 28 with markers projecting therethrough is illustrated in
With the front edge location of the implant delineated, the next step in one method of the present disclosure is placement and attachment of the guidewire. As illustrated in
Referring now to
While exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, modifications may be made, and it is therefore intended in the appended claims and subsequently filed claims to cover all such changes and modifications which fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/939,517, filed on Nov. 12, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/889,757, filed on May 8, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/722,796, filed on Dec. 20, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/581,628 filed on Dec. 29, 2011, the disclosures of each incorporated herein by reference. The present disclosure is related to the following commonly assigned applications, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference: U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/443,169 filed on Feb. 15, 2011; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/581,629 filed on Dec. 29, 2011; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/581,631 filed on Dec. 29, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
511238 | Hieatzman et al. | Dec 1893 | A |
765793 | Ruckel | Jul 1904 | A |
1728316 | Von Wachenfeldt et al. | Sep 1929 | A |
1855546 | File | Apr 1932 | A |
1868100 | Goodstein | Jul 1932 | A |
1910688 | Goodstein | May 1933 | A |
1940351 | Howard | Dec 1933 | A |
2034785 | Wappler | Mar 1936 | A |
2075508 | Davidson | Mar 1937 | A |
2131321 | Hart | Sep 1938 | A |
2158242 | Maynard | May 1939 | A |
2199025 | Conn | Apr 1940 | A |
2201610 | Dawson, Jr. | May 1940 | A |
2254620 | Miller | Sep 1941 | A |
2277931 | Moe | Mar 1942 | A |
2283814 | La Place | May 1942 | A |
2316297 | Southerland et al. | Apr 1943 | A |
2421193 | Gardner | May 1947 | A |
2571813 | Austin | Oct 1951 | A |
2630316 | Foster | Mar 1953 | A |
2684070 | Kelsey | Jul 1954 | A |
2744251 | Vollmer | May 1956 | A |
2790341 | Keep et al. | Apr 1957 | A |
2817339 | Sullivan | Dec 1957 | A |
2825162 | Flood | Mar 1958 | A |
2881762 | Lowrie | Apr 1959 | A |
2910067 | White | Oct 1959 | A |
3068870 | Levin | Dec 1962 | A |
3077812 | Dietrich | Feb 1963 | A |
3103666 | Bone | Sep 1963 | A |
3123077 | Alcamo | Mar 1964 | A |
3209754 | Brown | Oct 1965 | A |
3221746 | Noble | Dec 1965 | A |
3470834 | Bone | Oct 1969 | A |
3527223 | Shein | Sep 1970 | A |
3570497 | Lemole | Mar 1971 | A |
3577837 | Bader, Jr. | May 1971 | A |
3579831 | Stevens et al. | May 1971 | A |
3643851 | Green et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3687138 | Jarvik | Aug 1972 | A |
3716058 | Tanner, Jr. | Feb 1973 | A |
3717294 | Green | Feb 1973 | A |
3757629 | Schneider | Sep 1973 | A |
3777538 | Weatherly et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3837555 | Green | Sep 1974 | A |
3845772 | Smith | Nov 1974 | A |
3875648 | Bone | Apr 1975 | A |
3960147 | Murray | Jun 1976 | A |
3976079 | Samuels et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4014492 | Rothfuss | Mar 1977 | A |
4127227 | Green | Nov 1978 | A |
4259959 | Walker | Apr 1981 | A |
4263903 | Griggs | Apr 1981 | A |
4265226 | Cassimally | May 1981 | A |
4317451 | Cerwin et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4400833 | Kurland | Aug 1983 | A |
4422567 | Haynes | Dec 1983 | A |
4454875 | Pratt et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4480641 | Failla et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4485816 | Krumme | Dec 1984 | A |
4526174 | Froehlich | Jul 1985 | A |
4549545 | Levy | Oct 1985 | A |
4570623 | Ellison et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4595007 | Mericle | Jun 1986 | A |
4624254 | McGarry et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4627437 | Bedi et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4632100 | Somers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4635637 | Schreiber | Jan 1987 | A |
4669473 | Richards et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4696300 | Anderson | Sep 1987 | A |
4719917 | Barrows et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4738255 | Goble et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4741330 | Hayhurst | May 1988 | A |
4762260 | Richards et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4799495 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4809695 | Gwathmey et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4851005 | Hunt et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4858608 | McQuilkin | Aug 1989 | A |
4884572 | Bays et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4887601 | Richards | Dec 1989 | A |
4924866 | Yoon | May 1990 | A |
4930674 | Barak | Jun 1990 | A |
4968315 | Gatturna | Nov 1990 | A |
4976715 | Bays et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4994073 | Green | Feb 1991 | A |
4997436 | Oberlander | Mar 1991 | A |
5002563 | Pyka et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5013316 | Goble et al. | May 1991 | A |
5015249 | Nakao et al. | May 1991 | A |
5037422 | Hayhurst et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5041129 | Hayhurst et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5046513 | Gatturna et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053047 | Yoon | Oct 1991 | A |
5059206 | Winters | Oct 1991 | A |
5062563 | Green et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5100417 | Cerier et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5102421 | Anspach, Jr. | Apr 1992 | A |
5116357 | Eberbach | May 1992 | A |
5122155 | Eberbach | Jun 1992 | A |
5123913 | Wilk et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
RE34021 | Mueller et al. | Aug 1992 | E |
5141515 | Eberbach | Aug 1992 | A |
5141520 | Goble et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5156609 | Nakao et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156616 | Meadows et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5167665 | McKinney | Dec 1992 | A |
5171259 | Inoue | Dec 1992 | A |
5174295 | Christian et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174487 | Rothfuss et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176682 | Chow | Jan 1993 | A |
5176692 | Wilk et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5203787 | Noblitt et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5217472 | Green et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5224946 | Hayhurst et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5242457 | Akopov et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5246441 | Ross et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5251642 | Handlos | Oct 1993 | A |
5261914 | Warren | Nov 1993 | A |
5269753 | Wilk | Dec 1993 | A |
5269783 | Sander | Dec 1993 | A |
5282829 | Hermes | Feb 1994 | A |
5289963 | McGarry et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5290217 | Campos | Mar 1994 | A |
5304187 | Green et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5333624 | Tovey | Aug 1994 | A |
5342396 | Cook | Aug 1994 | A |
5350400 | Esposito et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352229 | Goble et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354292 | Braeuer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364408 | Gordon | Nov 1994 | A |
5366460 | Eberbach | Nov 1994 | A |
5370650 | Tovey et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372604 | Trott | Dec 1994 | A |
5380334 | Torrie et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383477 | Dematteis | Jan 1995 | A |
5397332 | Kammerer et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403326 | Harrison et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405360 | Tovey | Apr 1995 | A |
5411522 | Trott | May 1995 | A |
5411523 | Goble | May 1995 | A |
5417691 | Hayhurst | May 1995 | A |
5417712 | Whittaker et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425490 | Goble et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5441502 | Bartlett | Aug 1995 | A |
5441508 | Gazielly et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5456720 | Schultz et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464403 | Kieturakis et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5478354 | Tovey et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486197 | Le et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497933 | DeFonzo et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500000 | Feagin et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501695 | Anspach, Jr. et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503623 | Tilton, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
5505735 | Li | Apr 1996 | A |
5507754 | Green et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5520700 | Beyar et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522817 | Sander et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5545180 | Le et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5560532 | DeFonzo et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562689 | Green et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569306 | Thal | Oct 1996 | A |
5582616 | Bolduc et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584835 | Greenfield | Dec 1996 | A |
5618314 | Harwin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5622257 | Deschenes et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628751 | Sander et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643319 | Green et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5643321 | McDevitt | Jul 1997 | A |
5647874 | Hayhurst | Jul 1997 | A |
5649963 | McDevitt | Jul 1997 | A |
5662683 | Kay | Sep 1997 | A |
5667513 | Torrie et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674245 | Ilgen | Oct 1997 | A |
5681342 | Benchetrit | Oct 1997 | A |
5702215 | Li | Dec 1997 | A |
5713903 | Sander et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720753 | Sander et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725541 | Anspach, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741282 | Anspach, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766246 | Mulhauser et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782864 | Lizardi | Jul 1998 | A |
5797909 | Michelson | Aug 1998 | A |
5797931 | Bito et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797963 | McDevitt | Aug 1998 | A |
5807403 | Beyar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830221 | Stein et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836961 | Kieturakis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5868762 | Cragg et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873891 | Sohn | Feb 1999 | A |
5885258 | Sachdeva et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885294 | Pedlick et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893856 | Jacob et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904696 | Rosenman | May 1999 | A |
5919184 | Tilton, Jr. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922026 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
5928244 | Tovey et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5948000 | Larsen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957939 | Heaven et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957953 | Dipoto et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968044 | Nicholson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980557 | Iserin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989265 | Bouquet De La Joliniere et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997552 | Person et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6063088 | Winslow | May 2000 | A |
6099518 | Adams et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6156045 | Ulbrich et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179840 | Bowman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193731 | Oppelt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193733 | Adams | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6245072 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6302885 | Essiger | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312442 | Kieturakis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315789 | Cragg | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318616 | Pasqualucci et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322563 | Cummings et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325805 | Ogilvie et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6387113 | Hawkins et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391333 | Li et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413274 | Pedros | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425900 | Knodel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436110 | Bowman et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6447522 | Gambale et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6447524 | Knodel et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478803 | Kapec et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482178 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482210 | Skiba et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506190 | Walshe | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511499 | Schmieding et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6517564 | Grafton et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524316 | Nicholson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527795 | Lizardi | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530933 | Yeung et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540769 | Miller, III | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551333 | Kuhns et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554852 | Oberlander | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6569186 | Winters et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575976 | Grafton | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6599289 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6620185 | Harvie et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629988 | Weadock | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638297 | Huitema | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648893 | Dudasik | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666872 | Barreiro et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673094 | McDevitt et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685728 | Sinnott et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692506 | Ory et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6723099 | Goshert | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726704 | Loshakove et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726705 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740100 | Demopulos et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6764500 | Van De Moer et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6770073 | McDevitt et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6779701 | Bailly et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6800081 | Parodi | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6835206 | Jackson | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6849078 | Durgin et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6887259 | Lizardi | May 2005 | B2 |
6926723 | Mulhauser et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6932834 | Lizardi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939365 | Fogarty et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6946003 | Wolowacz et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6949117 | Gambale et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964685 | Murray et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6966916 | Kumar | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972027 | Fallin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984241 | Lubbers et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991597 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7008435 | Cummins | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021316 | Leiboff | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025772 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033379 | Peterson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037324 | Martinek | May 2006 | B2 |
7048171 | Thornton et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063711 | Loshakove et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7083638 | Foerster | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087064 | Hyde | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7112214 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118581 | Friden | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144413 | Wilford et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7144414 | Harvie et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7150750 | Damarati | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153314 | Laufer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160314 | Sgro et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7160326 | Ball | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163551 | Anthony et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163563 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169157 | Kayan | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7189251 | Kay | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201754 | Stewart et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214232 | Bowman et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226469 | Benavitz et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229452 | Kayan | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7247164 | Ritchart et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7303577 | Dean | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7309337 | Colleran et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7320692 | Bender et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7320701 | Haut et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322935 | Palmer et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326231 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343920 | Toby et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7368124 | Chun et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377934 | Lin et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7381213 | Lizardi | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390329 | Westra et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7399304 | Gambale et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404824 | Webler et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7416554 | Lam et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7452368 | Liberatore et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460913 | Kuzma et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7463933 | Wahlstrom et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7465308 | Sikora et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7481832 | Meridew et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7485124 | Kuhns et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497854 | Gill et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7500972 | Voegele et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7500980 | Gill et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7500983 | Kaiser et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7503474 | Hillstead et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506791 | Omaits et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7559941 | Zannis et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7572276 | Lim et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7585311 | Green et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7766208 | Epperly et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771440 | Ortiz et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776057 | Laufer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780685 | Hunt et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785255 | Malkani | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7807192 | Li et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819880 | Zannis et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7918879 | Yeung et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8114101 | Criscuolo et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8197837 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20020077687 | Ahn | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090725 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020123767 | Prestel | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165559 | Grant et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030073979 | Naimark et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030125748 | Li et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030212456 | Lipchitz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040059416 | Murray et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040138705 | Heino et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167519 | Weiner et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050015021 | Shiber | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049618 | Masuda et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050051597 | Toledano | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059996 | Bauman et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060033 | Vacanti et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107807 | Nakao | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113736 | Orr et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050171569 | Girard et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187576 | Whitman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050240222 | Shipp | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050274768 | Cummins et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060074423 | Alleyne et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060178743 | Carter | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060235442 | Huitema | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060293760 | Dedeyne | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070078477 | Heneveld, Sr. et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083236 | Sikora et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112361 | Schonholz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070179531 | Thornes | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185506 | Jackson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070190108 | Datta et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219558 | Deutsch | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070270804 | Chudik | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288023 | Pellegrino et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080027470 | Hart et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051888 | Ratcliffe et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065153 | Allard et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080090936 | Fujimura et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080125869 | Paz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080135600 | Hiranuma et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080173691 | Mas et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188874 | Henderson | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188936 | Ball et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195119 | Ferree | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200949 | Hiles et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080241213 | Chun et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272173 | Coleman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306408 | Lo | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090001122 | Prommersberger et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012521 | Axelson, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030434 | Paz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090069806 | De La Mora Levy et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076541 | Chin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090105535 | Green et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112085 | Eby | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090134198 | Knodel et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090156986 | Trenhaile | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156997 | Trenhaile | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182245 | Zambelli | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090242609 | Kanner | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100145367 | Ratcliffe | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100147922 | Olson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163598 | Belzer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191332 | Euteneuer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100241227 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249801 | Sengun et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256675 | Romans | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274278 | Fleenor et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100292715 | Nering et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100292791 | Lu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312250 | Euteneuer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312275 | Euteneuer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327042 | Amid et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110000950 | Euteneuer et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110004221 | Euteneuer et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110011917 | Loulmet | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110034942 | Levin et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040310 | Levin et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040311 | Levin et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066166 | Levin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106154 | DiMatteo et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110114700 | Baxter, III et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110224702 | Van Kampen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264149 | Pappalardo et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120100200 | Belcheva et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120160893 | Harris et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120193391 | Michler et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209401 | Euteneuer et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120211543 | Euteneuer | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120248171 | Bailly et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120316608 | Foley | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130153627 | Euteneuer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130153628 | Euteneuer | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158554 | Euteneuer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158587 | Euteneuer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158661 | Euteneuer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172920 | Euteneuer et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130172997 | Euteneuer et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130184716 | Euteneuer et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130240598 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245627 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245682 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245683 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245706 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245707 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245762 | Van Kampen et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2390508 | May 2001 | CA |
0142225 | May 1985 | EP |
0298400 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0390613 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0543499 | May 1993 | EP |
0548998 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0557963 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0589306 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0908152 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1491157 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1559379 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2030576 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2154688 | Sep 1985 | GB |
2397240 | Jul 2004 | GB |
58-188442 | Nov 1983 | JP |
2005506122 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006515774 | Jun 2006 | JP |
8505025 | Nov 1985 | WO |
0176456 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0234140 | May 2002 | WO |
03105670 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004000138 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004093690 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005016389 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2006086679 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2007014910 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007030676 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007078978 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007082088 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2008111073 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008111078 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008139473 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009079211 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009143331 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2011095890 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011128903 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bahler et al.; “Trabecular Bypass Stents Decrease Intraocular Pressure in Cultured Himan Anterior Segments”, American Journal Opthalmology, vol. 138, No. 6, pp. 988-994, Dec. 2004. |
Chamay et al.; “Digital Contracture Deformity After Implantation of a Silicone Prosthesis: Light and Electron Microscopic Study”, The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 266-270, May 1978. |
D'Ermo et al.; “Our Results with the Operation of Ab Externo”, Ophthalmologica, vol. 168, pp. 347-355, (year of publication sufficiently earlier than effective U.S. filed and any foreign priority date), 1971. |
France et al.; “Biomechanical Evaluation of Rotator Cuff Fixation Methods”, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 176-181, Mar.-Apr. 1989. |
Goodship et al.; “An Assessment of Filamentous Carbon Fibre for the Treatment of Tendon Injury in the Horse”, Veterinary Record, vol. 106, pp. 217-221, Mar. 8, 1980. |
Hunter et al.; “Flexor-Tendon Reconstruction in Severely Damaged Hands”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume), vol. 53-A, No. 5, pp. 329-358, Jul. 1971. |
Johnstone et al.; “Microsurgery of Schlemm's Canal and the Human Aqueous Outflow System”, American Journal Opthalmology, vol. 76, No. 6, pp. 906-917, Dec. 1973. |
Kowalsky et al.; “Evaluation of Suture Abrasion Against Rotator Cuff Tendon and Proximal Humerus Bone”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 329-334, Mar. 2008. |
Lee et al.; Aqueous-Venous and Intraocular Pressure. Preliminary Report of Animal Studies, Investigative Ophthalmology, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 59-64, Feb. 1966. |
Maepea et al.; “The Pressures in the Episcleral Veins, Schlemm's Canal and the Trabecular Meshwork in Monkeys: Effects of Changes in Intraocular Pressure”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 49, pp. 645-663, Oct. 1989. |
Nicolle et al.; “A Silastic Tendon Prosthesis as an Adjunct to Flexor Tendon Grafting . . . ”, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 22(3-4), pp. 224-236, (year of publication sufficiently earlier than effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date), 1969. |
Rubin et al.; “The Use of Acellular Biologic Tissue Patches in Foot and Ankle Surgery”, Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, vol. 22, pp. 533-552, Oct. 2005. |
Schultz; “Canaloplasty Procedure Shows Promise for Open-Angle Glaucoma in European Study”, Ocular Surgery News, pp. 34-35, Mar. 1, 2007. |
Spiegel et al.; “Schlemm's Canal Implant: A New Method to Lower Intraocular Pressure in Patients with POAG”, Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 492-494, Jun. 1999. |
Stetson et al.; “Arthroscopic Treatment of Partial Rotator Cuff Tears”, Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 135-148, Apr. 2004. |
Valdez et al.; “Repair of Digital Flexor Tendon Lacerations in the Horse, Using Carbon Fiber Implants”, JAYMA, vol. 177, No. 5, pp. 427-435, Sep. 1, 1980. |
Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia; “Rotator Cuff Tear”, downloaded from <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotator_cuff_tear>, 14 pages, Dec. 6, 2012. |
Alexander et al., “Ligament and tendon repair with an absorbable polymer-coated carbon fiber stent,” Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease Orthopedic Institute, vol. 46(2), pp. 155-173, 1986. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160256258 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61581628 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14939517 | Nov 2015 | US |
Child | 15070928 | US | |
Parent | 13889757 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 14939517 | US | |
Parent | 13722796 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 13889757 | US |