As is known in the art, phased array radars have a number of advantages over other types of radar systems while having certain potential disadvantages, such as high cost and complexity. One persistent fundamental limitation to the design and operation of phased array antennas used in radars and communication systems is the scan loss, or the accumulated losses associated with scan to large spatial angles, typically sixty degrees or more from the aperture surface normal. Another intrinsic limitation arises from the production cost of modern phased array antenna systems, which is generally governed by the unit cost and quantity of radiators and the transmit (Tx) and or receive (Rx) modules used in the antenna array.
The present invention provides methods and apparatus for a super-element array radiator for phased array radar systems. The inventive radiator provides a significant advance over known super-element radiators in transmit and receive module count reduction, array production cost reduction, and enhanced scan angle response. While exemplary embodiments of the invention are shown and described in conjunction with certain array dimensions, operational frequency, and structures, it is understood that the invention is applicable to phase array radars in general in which cost reduction and optimal scan response are desirable.
In one aspect of the invention, a super-element radiator assembly comprises a ridged waveguide having a longitudinal axis aligned with a longitudinal axis of the super-element radiator assembly, a series of slot couplers formed in the waveguide, and a dielectric assembly adjacent the ridged waveguide disposed between opposing conductive walls defining a long slot along a length of the super-element radiator assembly, the dielectric assembly comprising a first resonant conductive strip and a second resonant conductive strip, a first dielectric foam layer adjacent the waveguide, a first dielectric layer adjacent the first dielectric foam layer, a second dielectric foam layer adjacent the first dielectric layer, and a second dielectric layer adjacent the second dielectric foam layer, the first and second resonant strips being aligned along the longitudinal axis of the super-element radiator assembly and separated by the second dielectric foam layer.
The assembly can further include one or more of the following features: the first resonant conductive strip is disposed on the first dielectric layer, the second resonant conductive strip is disposed on the second dielectric layer, the first and second dielectric foam layers are thicker than the first and second dielectric layers, the slot couplers are offset from the longitudinal axis of the waveguide, the offset varies over a length of the super-element assembly, the conductive walls are extruded aluminum, the super-element forms a part of an aperture of a planar and/or conformal phased array radar, a structure of the super-element assembly provides a mode-filter, the long slot provides single and multiple forms of polarization control, including single linear, dual linear, single circular, and dual circular polarizations, the super-element assembly includes below resonance and above resonance components to balance the frequency and scan dependent response of the assembly, the super-element assembly includes unit cells combined by a series-fed network to form a super-element for a scanned and fixed beam type, the series-fed network is reactive, the super-element forms a part of a system having a terminal VSWR is no greater than 1.05, and a total electrical loss is 1.8 dB or less for scan angles up to 65 degrees from an aperture surface normal when operated within S-Band frequencies over a 10% bandwidth.
In another aspect of the invention, a method comprises providing a super-element radiator assembly including a ridged waveguide having a longitudinal axis aligned with a longitudinal axis of the super-element radiator assembly, a series of slot couplers formed in the waveguide, and a dielectric assembly adjacent the ridged waveguide disposed between opposing conductive walls defining a long slot along a length of the super-element radiator assembly, the dielectric assembly comprising a first resonant conductive strip and a second resonant conductive strip, a first dielectric foam layer adjacent the waveguide, a first dielectric layer adjacent the first dielectric foam layer, a second dielectric foam layer adjacent the first dielectric layer, and a second dielectric layer adjacent the second dielectric foam layer, the first and second resonant strips being aligned along the longitudinal axis of the super-element radiator assembly and separated by the second dielectric foam layer.
The method can further include one or more of the following features: the first resonant conductive strip is disposed on the first dielectric layer, the second resonant conductive strip is disposed on the second dielectric layer, the first and second dielectric foam layers are thicker than the first and second dielectric layers, the slot couplers are offset from the longitudinal axis of the waveguide, the offset varies over a length of the super-element assembly, the conductive walls are extruded aluminum, the super-element forms a part of an aperture of a planar and/or conformal phased array radar, a structure of the super-element assembly provides a mode-filter, the long slot provides single and multiple forms of polarization control, including single linear, dual linear, single circular, and dual circular polarizations, the super-element assembly includes below resonance and above resonance components to balance the frequency and scan dependent response of the assembly, the super-element assembly includes unit cells combined by a series-fed network to form a super-element for a scanned and fixed beam type, the series-fed network is reactive, the super-element forms a part of a system having a terminal VSWR is no greater than 1.05, and a total electrical loss is 1.8 dB or less for scan angles up to 65 degrees from an aperture surface normal when operated within S-Band frequencies over a 10% bandwidth.
The foregoing features of this invention, as well as the invention itself, may be more fully understood from the following description of the drawings in which:
In an exemplary embodiment, the transmit aperture 102 and separate receive aperture 104 are sized to enable the radar system to track targets from 100 km to 42,000 km in altitude. In one particular embodiment, the system includes a transmit aperture of about 200 m by 14 m and a receive aperture of about 215 m by 27 m, both of which can be elliptical. The challenges associated with a phased array of this size in cost, module count, and complexity, will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art.
Before describing exemplary embodiments of the inventive super-element radiator, some information is provided. As is known in the art, a super-element radiator comprises a number of individual radiator elements coupled to a common transmission line. This can be realized in a number of topologies, including configurations of waveguides with slot radiators, configurations of radiators fed by stripline feeds, and configurations of oversized (>λ/2) waveguide radiators. Generally, the scan volume associated with super-element radiators is limited to a relatively narrow scan range located near the aperture surface normal or boresight. Exemplary embodiments of the invention provide a significant advance in the art by achieving very low scan loss at scan angles exceeding sixty degrees, reducing the production cost of the radiator by as much as an order of magnitude, and significantly reducing the number of transmit and/or receive modules used. The combination of the above factors can effectively reduce the array production cost by a factor of ten or more, representing a significant potential expansion for contemporary phased radar and communication systems.
As shown in
Functionally, the long slot has a resonant frequency of approximately zero Hertz, giving it broadband characteristics. The slot coupler 404 has a resonance occurring below the operating band, producing a dispersive effect. In an exemplary embodiment, the operating frequency of the radar is from about 3 GHz to about 4 GHz. It is understood that other operating frequencies can be used. Since the strip conductors 410, 412 are sized to produce a resonance considerably above the operating frequency band, the end result is a balanced resonance system. This means that the radiating element can operate over a large operating band (16% or greater) with relatively stable electrical performance over the operating frequency range and scan volume. Typically, it is these two domains, frequency and scan, that produce performance degradation in volumetric scan phased array radiators.
The long slot interface to space is essentially non-resonant because its resonance frequency is far away from the operating band. Because of its dimensions and boundary conditions, the long slot operates as a broadband impedance element and transition to free space. It essentially acts as a traveling wave component with radiation properties that are also largely scan invariant. The scan invariance arises from the traveling wave nature of the long slot interface, which is supported by the limited set of propagating modes allowed by the boundary conditions. The radiator integrates this long slot feature with the impedance strips 410, 412, slot coupler 404, and the single ridged waveguide 402 into a simple assembly that is readily produced by metal extrusion techniques. Using the inventive embodiments, most of the metal conductors needed to set up the necessary boundary conditions are produced in a simple and low cost process.
The inventive super-element radiator uses integrated design features to achieve very low scan losses including a zero-cutoff frequency long slot interface to free space, a balanced resonance system with multiple elements having resonant frequencies that are both above and below the operating frequency band; and a series-fed network with or without frequency scan characteristics.
These features form a set of boundary conditions that act as the transition for the super-element input port to the scan volume used in free-space. The radiator geometry produces a zero cut-off frequency, unlike many antenna types used for similar applications that often produce resonance within the operating band. In exemplary embodiments of the invention, the resonant frequency of the component directly connected with the free-space boundary condition has a resonance frequency at zero Hertz. The balanced resonance system uses components, such as the long slot or traveling wave radiator interface, the coupling aperture, and suspended strip conductors to balance the impedance resonances produced by the system. The strip conductors are also suspended with relatively thin but high dielectric materials. These act to control the unit cell mode impedance in conjunction with the strip conductors and the long slot boundary conditions. In addition, the series-fed network is one implementation that cascades many of the radiators into a single super-element with a common transmission line. Many related feed networks can be effectively used with the inventive design approach, producing similar benefits, including equal line length networks, corporate networks, as well as the illustrated series-fed network. In exemplary embodiments, the series-fed network is reactive.
The use of a balanced resonance system provides a wide operating band. In one implementation, the operating band is at least sixteen percent. The bandwidth of comparable conventional phased array radiators is considerably less, often five percent or less.
Low scan loss reduces the antenna system production cost. Since system operation is often governed by the maximum scan condition, the reduced scan loss is critically linked to a reduction in the antenna aperture size. For example, many radar systems are sized with a scan loss often represented by 10 log10(cos1.5 θ), where θ is the angle measured between the aperture surface normal and the main beam position at the maximum scan angle, as shown in
The inventive super-element radiator embodiments provide low loss capability for scan angles exceeding sixty degrees, representing additional scan dependent loss benefits. At 67.8 degrees scan, the radiator has an estimated total loss of 0.5 dB, in one implementation. This represents scan dependent losses and the generally scan independent Ohmic losses. Typical losses for similar conventional radar antennas are represented by 10 log10(cos1.5 θ), or 2.1 dB. To these, additional Ohmic losses of 0.75 dB are added, giving a total loss of to approximately 2.85 dB. The difference between the typical known radar antenna losses and the inventive radiator is as much as 2.35 dB for one-way transmission.
Inventive embodiments of the radiator also provide low cross-polarization. The radiator produces a single linear electric field polarization, even if dual linear, single circular, and dual circular polarizations are also possible. The long slot interface to space sets up boundary conditions that allow only Electric fields that are Transverse to the direction of propagation (TE) to exist. The radiator therefore effectively acts as a mode filter, preventing the propagation of propagating modes that produce cross-polarization. With the boundary condition restraint on these cross-polarized fields, the total cross-polarized field content is constrained to very low levels. As a result, the cross-polarized radiation content is generally 30 to 40 dB less than the co-polarized fields. These results are consistent, and generally held over much of the antenna scan volume. At large scan angles, cross-polarization of an ideal planar radiator is known to increase as the scan moves towards the diagonal planes, while in the principal planes the cross-polarization is very small. The subject invention is no exception to this intrinsic feature, and evidences a worst case cross-polarization magnitude of −16 dB at its maximum scan angles. Since the cross-polarized field content is low, the losses due to polarization mismatch are very low, in the order of 0.11 dB.
As noted above, a super-element includes a number of radiating elements connected together via a single transmission line to each transmit, receive or T/R module. Although this generally produces a limited antenna scan volume, objectives for space surveillance and horizon search radars can be met because of the invention's wide scan angle capability. An immediate advantage is a direct reduction in the module count. And, since module costs are a major fraction of the total antenna system costs, significant cost reductions become available. In one implementation, the super-element reduces the active module count by 130 in receive mode and 65 in transmit mode, for an average system hardware cost reduction of approximately 100:1.
Since super-elements have a limited scan volume due to the greater than 72 element spacing between phase control points, its effectiveness should be maximized. The inventive phased array radiator extends the scan volume to cover a wide angle surveillance fence while maintaining its high performance and low cost features.
The phased array antenna scan volume represents the angular reach of the antenna system within its performance requirements. Using the sine space method indicated above, this can be illustrated in a compact manner, as shown in
The resulting total scan volume represents a significant surveillance or coverage volume and is displaced from boresight (center) to avoid resonance effects at boresight scan. The combinations of operating frequency and phase scan are used to position the antenna beam as needed within the total scan volume.
Typical known volume scan radiating apertures have a significant reflection coefficient at their terminal ports because of frequency and scan dependent impedance mismatch. In general, antenna radiators that are scanned to up to sixty degrees from the aperture surface normal evidence a VSWR (voltage standing wave ratio) of 2:1, which means that the reflection coefficient is −9.5 dB. In systems with degraded performance, the VSWR and reflection coefficient can increase considerably. This effect degrades antenna performance in several ways including introducing losses, such as impedance mismatch loss, which is typically 0.51 dB for a 2:1 VSWR, and considerably more for degraded systems. A significant reflection coefficient also can degrade the system equivalent noise temperature, thus decreasing the system signal to noise ratio.
The inventive radiator is significantly different than typical phased array antennas because of the very low terminal VSWR, i.e., no greater than 1.05:1 under all scan and operating frequency conditions, e.g., S-band. This means that the reflection coefficient is approximately −32 dB or less and the impedance mismatch loss is less than an almost trivial 0.003 dB. This also means that the system noise effects induced by radiator impedance mismatch are limited to its Ohmic losses, since impedance mismatch losses are essentially non-existent.
There are few, if any good examples of known low manufacturing cost and high performance phased array radiators, because such systems have been mutually exclusive. Low cost radiators often do not cover a substantial scan volume or scan at all. Whereas, volumetric scan volume antennas often use multiple design features that make it difficult to achieve a low production cost. Dominant among these is the use of a single radiating element or unit cell at each transmit, receive, or T/R module interface, the use of many dielectric layers in a single or multiple assemblies, and the reliance on significant labor content for the radiator assembly.
In one implementation, a super-element radiator uses 130 elements or unit cells in a common assembly. The assembly uses metal extrusion and a simple two-layer dielectric assembly in order to minimize the parts count. And, final assembly is a short operation to attach the waveguide transitions and dielectric subassembly.
Electrical performance for an exemplary super-element radiator can be summarized graphically. The total loss estimate, aperture efficiency, and array sidelobe levels as a function of operating frequency and scan angle in an infinite array environment are shown in
The inventive super-element far field radiation patterns have several unique features of note, as shown in
Having described exemplary embodiments of the invention, it will now become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating their concepts may also be used. The embodiments contained herein should not be limited to disclosed embodiments but rather should be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims. All publications and references cited herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/605,390 filed on Sep. 6, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/635,916 filed on Dec. 11, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/163,262, filed Mar. 25, 2009, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3256520 | Blitz | Jun 1966 | A |
3564258 | Feingold | Feb 1971 | A |
3829862 | Young | Aug 1974 | A |
3995274 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4197540 | Riggs et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4216472 | Albanese | Aug 1980 | A |
3021521 | Hutchins | Feb 1982 | A |
4725842 | Mayberry | Feb 1988 | A |
4970519 | Minnis et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5646625 | Burrier | Jul 1997 | A |
5861837 | Richardson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5911692 | Hussain et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5966048 | Thompson | Oct 1999 | A |
5969667 | Farmer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6043791 | Kinsey | Mar 2000 | A |
6078289 | Manoogian et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6114997 | Lee et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6166701 | Park et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6218987 | Derneryd et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6252542 | Sikina et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6496158 | Ksienski et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6799014 | Rosen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801153 | Rauch et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6856284 | Cangiani | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6933878 | Molyneux-Berry | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6963312 | Schuneman et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6977621 | Kelly et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7180457 | Trott et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202812 | Krikorian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7250902 | Manoogian et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7289079 | Rupp et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7474262 | Alland | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7477921 | Shattil | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492313 | Ehret et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
20040080463 | Jeong | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050146477 | Kelly et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060273952 | Krikorian et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070085727 | Backes et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080204318 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080272959 | Meharry et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20120319900 | Johansson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Nguyen et al, Controlling Beamwidth of Slot Antenna by Using Parasitic Elements, Proceedings of ISAP'04, Sendai, Japan, pp. 917-920. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 16, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,066, 10 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Aug. 26, 2011, 6 pages. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Aug. 26, 2011, filed on Nov. 21, 2011, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 7, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893, 5 pages. |
RCE and Amendment filed Mar. 6, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893, 7 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Mar. 15, 2012, 6 pages. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Mar. 15, 2012, filed on Aug. 14, 2012, 4 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Oct. 10, 2012, 5 pages. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Oct. 10, 2012, filed on Apr. 9, 2013, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 dated Apr. 19, 2013, 6 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/730,533 dated Jun. 7, 2012, 6 pages. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/730,533 dated Jun. 7, 2012, filed Jul. 9, 2012, 1 page. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/730,533 dated Aug. 1, 2012, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/730,533, filed Mar. 24, 2010, Schuss et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893, filed Dec. 11, 2009, Schuss et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,641, filed Oct. 29, 2012, Schuss et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/945,197, filed Jul. 18, 2013, Schuss et al. |
P.W. Hannan, M.A. Balfour, Simulation of a Phased-Array Antenna in Waveguide, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, pp. 342-353, Mar. 11, 2009 downioaded from IEEE. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,893 filed on Dec. 11, 2009, 396 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/945,197 filed on Jul. 18, 2013, 180 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/730,533 filed on Mar. 24, 2010, 345 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,641 filed on Oct. 29, 2012, 130 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/329,682 Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2014, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61163262 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13605390 | Sep 2012 | US |
Child | 13826926 | US | |
Parent | 12635916 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13605390 | US |