METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR THE PLANNING AND DELIVERY OF RADIATION TREATMENTS

Abstract
Methods and apparatus are provided for planning and delivering radiation treatments by modalities which involve moving a radiation source along a trajectory relative to a subject while delivering radiation to the subject. In some embodiments the radiation source is moved continuously along the trajectory while in some embodiments the radiation source is moved intermittently. Some embodiments involve the optimization of the radiation delivery plan to meet various optimization goals while meeting a number of constraints. For each of a number of control points along a trajectory, a radiation delivery plan may comprise: a set of motion axes parameters, a set of beam shape parameters and a beam intensity.
Description
Claims
  • 1-19. (canceled)
  • 20. A system for delivering radiation dose to a target area within a subject, the system comprising: a radiation source for emitting a radiation beam;a radiation beam positioning mechanism configured to move the radiation source and the radiation beam along a trajectory; anda control system configured to control the radiation beam positioning mechanism to deliver the radiation beam to the subject along an optimized trajectory;wherein the control system is configured to determine the optimized trajectory by: defining a set of one or more optimization goals, the set of one or more optimization goals comprising a desired dose distribution in the subject and optimization of a metric based on a radiobiological model;defining an initial trajectory for relative movement between the radiation source and the subject and an initial plurality of control points along the initial trajectory;iteratively optimizing a simulated dose distribution relative to the set of one or more optimization goals to determine one or more radiation delivery parameters associated with each of the control points;wherein the one or more radiation delivery parameters comprise a position of the radiation source relative to the subject and wherein iteratively optimizing the simulated dose distribution comprises defining an optimized trajectory for relative movement between the radiation source and the subject based on the one or more radiation delivery parameters;the control system being further configured to: effect relative movement between the radiation source and the subject along the optimized trajectory and, while effecting the relative movement between the radiation source and the subject along the optimized trajectory, control the delivery of the radiation beam from the radiation source to the subject according to a determined radiation delivery plan to impart a dose distribution on the subject.
  • 21. The system of claim 20, wherein optimization of a metric based on the radiobiological model comprises optimization of a metric measuring risk of a dose to non-diseased tissue.
  • 22. The system of claim 21, wherein optimization of the metric based on the radiobiological model comprises limiting the delivery of the radiation beam to critical structures outside of a target volume.
  • 23. The system of claim 22, wherein the initial trajectory comprises one or more arcs, each arc involving relative movement between the radiation source and the subject within a corresponding plane.
  • 24. The system of claim 23, wherein the initial trajectory comprises a plurality of arcs, and, between successive ones of a first one and a successive one of the plurality of arcs, the initial trajectory comprises inter-arc relative movement between the radiation source and the subject, the inter-arc relative movement comprising movement such that the corresponding planes associated with each arc intersect one another.
  • 25. The system of claim 23, wherein the initial trajectory comprises a plurality of arcs, and, between successive ones of a first one and a successive one of the plurality of arcs, the initial trajectory comprises inter-arc relative movement between the radiation source and the subject, the inter-arc relative movement comprising movement such that the corresponding planes associated with each arc are parallel with one another.
  • 26. The system of claim 20, wherein the determining of the optimized trajectory further comprises: reaching one or more initial termination conditions;adding one or more additional control points to obtain an increased plurality of control points;iteratively optimizing the simulated dose distribution relative to the set of one or more optimization goals to determine one or more radiation delivery parameters associated with each of the increased plurality of control points.
  • 27. The system of claim 26, wherein iteratively optimizing a simulated dose distribution relative to the set of one or more optimization goals to determine the one or more radiation delivery parameters associated with each of the control points comprises, for each iteration: varying one or more of the radiation delivery parameters associated with one or more of the initial plurality of control points;determining the simulated dose distribution based on the one or more varied radiation delivery parameters;determining, based on an optimization algorithm and the simulated dose distribution based on the one or more varied radiation delivery parameters, whether to accept or reject the one or more varied radiation delivery parameters; andwhen a determination is made to accept the one or more varied radiation delivery parameters, updating current radiation delivery parameters to include the one or more varied radiation delivery parameters.
  • 28. The system of claim 27, wherein varying one or more of the radiation delivery parameters associated with one or more of the plurality of control points is subject to one or more initial optimization constraints.
  • 29. The system of claim 28, wherein iteratively optimizing the simulated dose distribution to determine one or more radiation delivery parameters associated with each of the increased plurality of control points comprises, for each iteration: varying one or more of the radiation delivery parameters associated with one or more of the increased plurality of control points;determining the simulated dose distribution based on the one or more varied radiation delivery parameters;determining, on the basis of the optimization algorithm and the simulated dose distribution based on the one or more varied radiation delivery parameters, whether to accept or reject the one or more varied radiation delivery parameters; andwhen a determination is made to accept the one or more varied radiation delivery parameters, updating the current radiation delivery parameters to include the one or more varied radiation delivery parameters.
  • 30. The system of claim 29, wherein varying one or more of the radiation delivery parameters associated with one or more of the increased plurality of control points is subject to one or more subsequent optimization constraints.
  • 31. The system of claim 30, wherein the one or more radiation delivery parameters comprise one or more beam-shaping parameters.
  • 32. The system of claim 31, further comprising a multi-leaf collimator, and the one or more beam-shaping parameters comprise one or more configurations of the multi-leaf collimator.
  • 33. The system of claim 32, wherein the one or more initial and one or more subsequent optimization constraints comprise position limitations on one or more leaves of the multi-leaf collimator.
  • 34. The system of claim 30, wherein the one or more radiation delivery parameters comprise a beam intensity.
  • 35. The system of claim 30, wherein at least one of the one or more subsequent optimization constraints is different than a corresponding at least one of the one or more initial optimization constraints.
  • 36. The system of claim 35, wherein the at least one of the one or more subsequent optimization constraints is more restrictive than the corresponding at least one of the one or more initial optimization constraints.
  • 37. The system of claim 20, wherein the control system is further configured to effect: delivery of the radiation beam from the radiation source to the subject by varying an intensity of the radiation beam over at least a portion of the optimized trajectory,wherein the varying the intensity of the radiation beam over at least a portion of the optimized trajectory comprises varying a radiation output rate of the radiation source in accordance with the radiation delivery plan while effecting relative movement between the radiation source and the subject along the optimized trajectory.
  • 38. The system of claim 37, wherein delivering the treatment radiation beam from the radiation source comprises varying a shape of the treatment radiation beam in accordance with the radiation delivery plan over at least a portion of the optimized trajectory while effecting relative movement between the radiation source and the subject along the optimized trajectory.
  • 39. The system of claim 20, wherein effecting relative movement between the treatment radiation source and the subject along the optimized trajectory comprises effecting continuous relative movement between the treatment radiation source and the subject along the optimized trajectory.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60701974 Jul 2005 US
Continuations (7)
Number Date Country
Parent 16793962 Feb 2020 US
Child 18139430 US
Parent 15707931 Sep 2017 US
Child 16793962 US
Parent 15382469 Dec 2016 US
Child 15707931 US
Parent 14710485 May 2015 US
Child 15382469 US
Parent 14202305 Mar 2014 US
Child 14710485 US
Parent 12986420 Jan 2011 US
Child 14202305 US
Parent 12132597 Jun 2008 US
Child 12986420 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11996932 Jan 2008 US
Child 12132597 US