This disclosure relates generally to media monitoring, and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus to detect spillover.
Audience measurement of media, such as television, music, movies, radio, Internet websites, streaming media, etc., is sometimes carried out by monitoring media exposure of panelists who are statistically selected to represent particular demographic groups. Using various statistical methods, the captured media exposure data is processed to determine the size and demographic composition of the audience(s) for programs of interest. The audience size and demographic information is valuable to advertisers, broadcasters and/or other entities. For example, audience size and demographic information is a factor in the placement of advertisements, as well as a factor in valuing commercial time slots during a particular program.
Examples disclosed herein may be used to improve the accuracy of crediting media exposure through detecting reverberation indicative of spillover. An audience measurement entity (AME) enlists persons to participate in measurement panels. Such persons (e.g., panelists) agree to allow the AME to measure their exposure to media (e.g., television programming, radio programming, Internet, advertising, signage, outdoor advertising, etc.). To associate media exposure data (i.e., data indicative of media presentation) with panelist demographics, the AME monitors media device(s) and/or panelist(s) using media monitoring meters. In some examples, meters (e.g., stationary meters) are placed with and/or near media presentation devices (e.g., televisions, stereos, speakers, computers, etc.) within a home or household. For example, a meter may be placed in a room with a television and another meter may be placed in a different room with another television. In some examples, personal portable metering devices (PPMs), which are also known as portable metering devices or portable personal (or people) meters, are used to monitor media exposure of panelists to media. A PPM is an electronic device that is typically worn (e.g., clipped to a belt or other apparel) or carried by a panelist. The term “meter” as used herein refers generally to stationary meters and/or portable meters.
A panelist home may present challenges to the meters that monitor presentation devices. For example, a panelist home often includes multiple media presentation devices, each configured to present media to specific viewing and/or listening areas (e.g., a family room, a bedroom, a kitchen, etc.) located within the home. Meters that are located in one of the viewing and/or listening areas are configured to detect any media being presented in the viewing and/or listening area and to credit the media as having been presented. Thus, meters operate on the premise that any media detected by the meter is media that was presented in that particular viewing and/or listening area. However, in some cases, a meter may detect media that is emitted by a media presentation device that is not located within the viewing or listening proximity of a panelist in the room with the meter thereby causing the detected media to be improperly credited to the panelist currently associated with the monitored area (via, for example, a people meter).
The ability of the meter to detect media being presented outside of the viewing and/or listening proximity of the panelist is referred to as “spillover” because the media being presented outside of the viewing and/or listening proximity of the panelist is “spilling over” into the area occupied by the media identifying meter and may not actually fall within the attention of the panelist. Spillover may occur, for example, when a television in a particular room is powered off, but a meter associated with that television detects media being presented on a media presentation device in a different room of the panelist home or of an adjacent home (e.g., a neighbor's condominium or apartment). In such an example, the meter improperly credits the media as being presented on the media presentation device it monitors, even though no such presentation occurred.
Another effect, referred to as “hijacking,” occurs when a meter detects different media being presented at multiple media presentation devices at the same time. For example, a meter in a kitchen may detect a particular media program being presented on a media presentation device in the kitchen, but the meter may also detect a different media program that is being presented on a different media presentation device in a living room. In such an example, the media presented by the media presentation device in the living room may, in some cases, have signals that overpower the signals associated with the media being presented by the media presentation device in the kitchen. As a result, the media identifying meter in the kitchen may be “hijacked” by the signals from the living room and the meter may inaccurately credit the media being presented in the living room and fail to credit the media being presented in the kitchen.
Example disclosed herein may be used to detect occurrences of spillover based on loudness and quietness characteristics of audio signal to more accurately credit media with exposure credits. An audio signal detected close to a media presentation device is characterized by short periods of relative loudness separated by short periods of relative quietness (e.g., periods of quiet between syllables in speech, etc.). As the audio signal from a media presentation device travels, reverberation is introduced into the audio signal as the audio signal propagates through the home of the panelist and reflects off some surfaces (e.g., walls, doors, etc.) and/or is absorbed by some surfaces (e.g., padded furniture, etc.). Characteristics of a room, such as open/closed doors, movement and/or placement of furniture, acoustic characteristics of room layouts, wall construction, floor coverings, ceiling heights, etc., affect quality of the audio signal. The reverberation reduces the detectability of the short periods of quietness because the reflections delay some audio components and add noise that may overlap with the periods of quietness. Thus, as an audio signal propagates through an environment and short periods of quietness are lost, and periods of loudness become longer.
In examples disclosed herein, a meter captures an audio signal of the media presentation through an audio capture device (e.g., a microphone). An example spillover manager of the meter detects periods of relative loudness and periods of relative quietness in the audio signal. To detect these periods, the spillover manager samples the audio signal at a sampling frequency (e.g., 2,000 samples per second, 8,000 samples per second, 40,000 samples per second, etc.). The example spillover manager determines a sample magnitude for each sample, where the sample magnitude is the absolute value of the amplitude of the audio signal at the sample.
Using the sample magnitude, the example spillover manager determines whether the corresponding sample is a loud sample or a quiet sample relative to previous sample values. If the previous sample (n−1) was a quiet sample, the example spillover manager determines that the current sample (n) is a loud sample if the difference between the value of the current sample (n) and the value of a pervious sample (n−1) satisfies (e.g., is greater than) a loud threshold. Otherwise, the example spillover manager determines that the current sample (n) is a quiet sample. If the previous sample (n−1) was a loud sample, the example spillover manager determines that the current sample (n) is a quiet sample if the sample value of the current sample (n) satisfies (e.g., is less than) a quiet threshold. Otherwise, the example spillover manager determines that the current sample (n) is a loud sample. The quiet threshold is set at a value below the sample value when the samples transitioned from a quiet sample to a loud sample. In this manner, when a next sample (n+1) is compared to the quiet threshold, the example spillover manager can detect relative periods of quietness even when the audio sample overall has a high amplitude (e.g., when the audio volume is loud). Alternatively, in some examples, the quiet threshold is set at a value below the highest sample value since the last transition from a quiet sample to a loud sample (e.g., the last peak value).
A period of loudness begins when the audio signal transitions from quiet to loud (e.g., the previous sample (n−1) is relatively quiet and the current sample (n) is relatively loud). In some examples, the period of loudness ends when the audio signal transitions from loud to quiet (e.g., the previous sample (n−1) is relatively loud and the current sample (n) is relatively quiet). Alternatively or additionally, in some examples, the period of loudness does not end until a threshold number of relatively quiet samples occur after the audio signal transitions from loud to quiet. For example, if after the audio signal transitions from loud to quiet, there are two relatively quiet samples followed by a relatively loud sample, the period of loudness may be considered not to have ended.
The period of loudness has a sample duration that is measured in the number of audio samples between the two transitions. For example, a period of loudness may have a sample duration of 1,837 samples. A time duration, in seconds, for a period of loudness depends on the sampling frequency of the audio signal. For example, if an audio signal is sampled at 8,000 samples per second, the period of loudness with a 1,837 sample duration has a 0.23 second duration. In some examples, the AME defines sample duration ranges (sometimes referred to as “sample duration buckets”). For example, duration ranges may be defined in 200 sample increments, (e.g., a 1-200 sample duration range, a 201-400 sample duration range, a 401-600 sample duration range, etc.). In such examples, the periods of loudness are assigned to a sample duration range based on the sample duration of the period of loudness. For example, a period of loudness with a 347 sample duration is assigned to a 201-400 sample duration range. In some such examples, a quantity of periods of loudness is tracked for each duration range. In some example, the samples of the audio signal and sample magnitudes corresponding to the period of loudness are discarded after assigning the period of loudness to a sample duration range.
The example spillover manager determines if spillover occurred for an interval of the audio signal (e.g., a one-second interval, a five-second interval, a ten-second interval, etc.). For example, the spillover manager may determine if spillover occurred in five-second intervals of the audio signal. For a particular interval, the example spillover manager identifies the periods of loudness in the interval, determines which of the periods of loudness have a short duration, and calculates a short loudness ratio (RSL) based on the number of detected periods of loudness with a short time or sample duration and the total number of detected periods of loudness in accordance with Equation 1 below.
In Equation 1 above, POLS is the quantity of periods of loudness with a short time or sample duration, and POLT is the total quantity of periods of loudness. The example spillover manager determines that a period of loudness has a short time or sample duration if the period of loudness has a time or sample duration below a time or sample duration threshold. In some examples, the time or sample duration threshold is selected so that in blocks of the audio signal where spillover did not occur, the short loudness ratio is greater than a loudness ratio threshold (e.g., 50%, 66%, etc.). For example, the sample duration threshold may be 1,800 samples. In such an example, the spillover manager designates periods of loudness with sample durations below 1,800 samples as having a short sample duration. For example, a five-second block of an audio sample may have 140 total periods of loudness and 76 periods of loudness with short sample durations. In such an example, the short loudness ratio is
In such an example, if the loudness ratio threshold is 50%, the spillover manager determines that spillover did not occur for that five second interval of the audio signal.
The example meters 102, 104, 106 process the detected media to extract codes and/or metadata, and/or to generate signatures for use in identifying the media and/or a station (e.g., a broadcaster) that provides the media. Identification codes, such as watermarks, ancillary codes, etc. may be embedded in or otherwise transmitted with media. Identification codes are data inserted into media to uniquely identify broadcasters and/or the media, and/or are provided with the media for other purposes such as tuning (e.g., packet identifier headers (“PIDs”) used for digital broadcasting).
Codes are typically extracted using a decoding operation. Signatures are a representation of one or more characteristic(s) of the media signal (e.g., a characteristic of the frequency spectrum of the signal). Codes, metadata, signatures, etc. collected and/or generated by the meters 102, 104, 106 for use in identifying the media and/or a station that transmits the media are part of media exposure data collected by the meters 102, 104, 106.
In the illustrated example, the meters 102, 104, 106 are communicatively coupled with a home processing system 114 via a wireless and/or a hardwired connection. In illustrated example, the home processing system 114, from time to time, collects media exposure data from the meter(s) in a panelist home and communicates the collected media exposure data to an audience measurement entity (AME) 118 via a network 119 (e.g., the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network, a cellular network, etc.) via wired and/or wireless connections (e.g., a cable/DSL/satellite modem, a cell tower, etc.). Additionally or alternatively, in some examples, the meters 102, 104, 106 may communicate the collected media exposure data to the AME 118 via the network 119 (e.g., via a cellular network, etc.).
In the illustrated example, the AME 118 includes an example monitoring database 120 and an example server 122. The example server 122 collects the media exposure data from the meters 102, 104, 106 and stores the collected media exposure data in the example monitoring database 120. The example server 122 processes the collected media exposure data by comparing the codes, metadata, and/or signatures in the collected media exposure data to reference codes and/or signatures in a reference database to identify the media and/or station(s) that transmit the media. Examples to process the codes and/or signatures in the collected media exposure data are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/473,670, filed on Aug. 29, 2014, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The example server 122 awards media exposure credits to media identified in the collected media exposure data. In some examples, the media exposure credits are associated with demographic information in the panelist database corresponding to a panelist 112 associated with the meters 102, 104, 106 that collected the media exposure data.
The example AME 118 maintains a panelist database to store panelist names, demographic information, and/or other information collected from panelists 112 during an enrollment process. During the enrollment process, the AME 118 of the illustrated example contracts and/or enlists panelists 112 to be part of the panelist database. Panelist 112 may be enrolled into the panelist database using any suitable technique (e.g., random selection, statistical selection, phone solicitations, Internet advertisements, surveys, advertisements in shopping malls, product packaging, etc.). Demographic information (e.g., gender, occupation, salary, race and/or ethnicity, marital status, highest completed education, current employment status, etc.) is obtained from the panelist 112 when the panelist 112 joins (e.g. enrolls in) a panel. Additionally, the demographic information may be obtained through various methods during the enrollment process (e.g., via a telephone interview, by having the panelist complete an online or paper survey, etc.).
In the example system 100 of
For example, if the audio signal 124 is captured (e.g., via a microphone, etc.) by the example meter 102 near the media presentation device 108, the spillover manger 107 does not detect the reverberation characteristics and determines that spillover did not occur. As another example, if the audio signal 124 is captured by a distantly located meter 104, 106 that is located relatively far (e.g., in another room) from the media presentation device 108, the spillover manager 107 detects the reverberation characteristics and determines that spillover did occur. Examples to detect the reverberation characteristics are described below in connection with
The example meter 200 includes an example media evaluator 206 and an example media exposure database 207. The example media evaluator 206 marks (e.g., set a flag, etc.) media exposure data collected by the collector 204 to indicate that the media exposure data is usable to award exposure credit to the media identified by the media exposure data. In the illustrated example, the media evaluator 206 marks (e.g., sets a flag, etc.) the exposure data as usable for awarding exposure credit based on instructions from the spillover manager 107. In some examples, if the media evaluator 206 does not receive instructions to mark the media exposure data from the spillover manager 107 as usable for awarding exposure credit, the media evaluator 206 discards the media exposure data. In some examples, the media evaluator 206 adds identifying information (e.g., a meter identifier, a panelist identifier, etc.) to the media exposure data marked as usable for awarding exposure credit. The example media exposure database 207 stores the media exposure data. In some examples, the media exposure database 207 stores media exposure data marked by the mediate evaluator 206 as usable for awarding exposure credit. Alternatively, in some examples, the media exposure database 207 stores media exposure data regardless of whether the media exposure data is marked by the mediate evaluator 206 as usable for awarding exposure credit.
The example meter 200 includes an example transmitter 208 to transmit the media exposure data to the AME 118. In the illustrated example, from time to time (e.g., hourly, daily, weekly, etc.), the transmitter 208 sends media exposure data stored in the media exposure database 207 to the AME 118. Alternatively or additionally, in some examples, the transmitter 208 sends media exposure data as it is marked by the media evaluator 206 (e.g., if there the meter 200 is connected to a network). The example transmitter 208 transmits the media exposure data via wired networks (e.g., Ethernet, phone line, etc.) and/or wireless networks (e.g., Wide Area networks, cellular networks, etc.). In some examples, the transmitter 208 transmits the media exposure data to a base station (e.g., a stationary meter 102, 104, a home computer, a home processing system 114, etc.) via a wireless connection (e.g., Bluetooth, Near Field Communication, Wi-Fi, etc.) or via a wired connection (e.g., Universal Serial Bus (USB), etc.) so that the base station can send the media exposure data to the AME 118. In some examples, the transmitter 208 transmits all of the media exposure data regardless of whether it is marked as usable to award exposure credit so that the AME 118 can further analyze all of the media exposure data collected by the meter 200. In other examples, the transmitter 208 transmits only the media exposure data that the media evaluator 206 marked as being usable to award exposure data.
In the illustrated example of
In the illustrated example of
In the illustrated example, the example reverberation analyzer 212 determines that a period of loudness starts when a previous sample (n−1) is determined to be relatively quiet and the current sample (n) is determined to be relatively loud. In some examples, the example reverberation analyzer 212 determines that the period of loudness ends when a previous sample (n−1) is determined to be relatively loud and the current sample (n) is determined to be relatively quiet. Alternatively or additionally, in some examples, the period of loudness does not end until a threshold number of relatively quiet samples occur after the audio signal transitions from loud to quiet.
The sample duration of a period of loudness is the number of samples between the beginning of the period of loudness and the end of the period of loudness. For example, if the reverberation analyzer 212 determines that the 257th sample in an audio block is relatively quiet and the 258th sample of the audio block is relatively loud, the reverberation analyzer 212 would determine that a period of loudness begins at the 258th sample. If, for example, the reverberation analyzer 212 determines that the 663rd sample in the same audio block is relatively loud and the 664th sample of the audio block is relatively quiet, the reverberation analyzer 212 determines that the period of loudness ends at the 663rd sample. In such an example, the reverberation analyzer 212 determines that the period of loudness begins at the 258th sample and ends at the 663th sample has a sample duration of 406 samples (664th sample−258th sample). In some examples, the reverberation analyzer 212 determines that the period of quiet ends after it detects a threshold number (e.g., three, five, ten, etc.) of quiet samples after the audio samples in the audio block transition from a relatively loud sample to a relatively quiet sample. For example, if the reverberation analyzer 212 determines that the 667th sample of the audio block is relatively loud, the reverberation analyzer 212 may determine that the period of loudness did not end because the number of relatively quiet samples do not satisfy (e.g., are not greater than) a threshold number of quiet samples.
The example reverberation analyzer 212 determines that a sample is loud if the previous sample (n−1) is relatively quiet and the magnitude of the current sample (n) satisfies (e.g., is greater than) a loud threshold. The example reverberation analyzer 212 determines the loud threshold based on the amplitude of the quiet sample when the audio signal 124 last transitioned from a relatively loud sample to a relatively quiet sample. Alternatively, in some examples, the example reverberation analyzer 212 determines the loud threshold based on the sample with the lowest magnitude since the current period of quietness began. In some examples, the loud threshold is a percentage above the lowest magnitude. For example, if the sample with the lowest magnitude since the current period of quietness began has a magnitude of 100 and the loud threshold is based on a 20% increase in magnitude, the reverberation analyzer 212 sets the loud threshold to 120.
The example reverberation analyzer 212 determines that a sample is quiet if the previous sample (n−1) is relatively loud and the magnitude of the current sample (n) satisfies (e.g., is less than) a quiet threshold. The example reverberation analyzer 212 determines the quiet threshold based on the amplitude of the loud sample when the audio signal 124 last transitioned from a relatively quiet sample to a relatively loud sample. Alternatively, in some examples, the example reverberation analyzer 212 determines the quiet threshold based on the sample with the highest magnitude since the most recent period of quiet ended. In some examples, the quiet threshold is a percentage less than the highest magnitude. For example, if the sample with the highest magnitude since the most recent period of quietness ended has a magnitude of 1000 and the quiet threshold is based on a 50% decrease in magnitude, the reverberation analyzer 212 sets the quiet threshold to 500.
In some examples, to track transitions between a relatively quiet samples and a relatively loud samples, the reverberation analyzer 212 maintains a loudness flag. In such examples, when a previous sample (n−1) is relatively quiet and the current sample (n) is relatively loud, the reverberation analyzer 212 sets the loudness flag to a loud-indicator value (e.g., a binary value representing the occurrence of a relatively loud sample). Additionally, in such examples, when a previous sample (n−1) is relatively loud and the current sample (n) is relatively quiet, the reverberation analyzer 212 set the loudness flag to a quiet-indicator value (e.g., a binary value representing the occurrence of a relatively quiet sample). In such examples, the reverberation analyzer 212 uses the loudness flag when determining whether the current sample (n) is loud or quiet instead of referring to the previous sample (n−1). For example, if the loudness flag is set to a loud-indicator value, the reverberation analyzer 212 compares the magnitude of the current sample (n) to the quiet threshold.
In some examples, the AME 118 defines sample or time duration ranges for the sample or time durations of the periods of loudness detected by the reverberation analyzer 212. A sample or time duration range encompasses a range of sample or time durations. For example, the AME 118 may define sample ranges in increments of 200 samples (e.g., a 1-200 sample duration range, a 201-400 sample duration range, etc.). The sample or time duration ranges are associated with a corresponding counter that the example reverberation analyzer 212 uses (e.g., increments) to track quantities of periods of loudness in an audio block that fit within the sample or time duration ranges. In such examples, when determining the duration of a period of loudness, the reverberation analyzer 212 increments the corresponding counter for the sample or time duration range in which the period of loudness fits. For example, if the reverberation analyzer 212 determines that a period of loudness has a sample duration of 406 samples, the reverberation analyzer 212 increments a counter corresponding to a 401-600 sample duration range. In such a manner, the reverberation analyzer 212 does not need to retain the specific durations of each period of loudness in the audio block. In such examples, the reverberation analyzer 212 calculates the short loudness ratio (RSL) by dividing the quantity of periods of loudness in the sample or time duration ranges that are below a sample or time duration threshold by the total quantity of periods of loudness identified using the counters corresponding to the duration ranges as shown in Equation 1 above. Table 1 below illustrates example sample duration ranges and corresponding counter values calculated by the reverberation analyzer 212 to determine how many period of loudness occurred in an audio block.
In the examples illustrated in Table 1 above, if the sample duration threshold is 1500 samples, the reverberation analyzer 212 calculates the short loudness ratio (RSL) for the audio block to be 56% ((14)/(25)) based on Equation 1 above.
In the illustrated example, the spillover detector 214 obtains the short loudness ratio (RSL) for the audio block calculated by the reverberation analyzer 212 to determine if spillover occurred in the portion of the audio signal 124 corresponding to the audio block and the media exposure data generated by the collector 204. To determine if spillover occurred, the example spillover detector 214 compares the short loudness ratio (RSL) obtained from the reverberation analyzer 212 with an example reverberation threshold. An example reverberation threshold is set (e.g., by the AME 118) so that it will be satisfied when the meter 200 receives an audio signal 124 from a media presentation device 108, 110 that is sufficiently near the meter 200 such that the audio signal 124 is detected by the meter 200 in the same room in which it is emitted by the media presentation device 108, 110 meaning that the detected audio signal is not spillover from another room. In some examples, a reverberation threshold of 50% is sufficient to distinguish between spillover audio and non-spillover audio. In such examples, a 50% reverberation threshold means that 50% of the detected periods of loudness in an audio block were determined to be short periods of loudness. If the example spillover detector 214 determines that spillover did not occur, the example spillover detector 214 instructs the example media evaluator 206 to mark the corresponding media exposure data as usable to award exposure credit to corresponding media. In some examples, if the spillover detector 214 determines that spillover did occur, the example spillover detector 214 instructs the media evaluator 206 to mark the corresponding media exposure data as invalid (e.g., as corresponding to spillover) or unusable to award exposure credit to corresponding media.
While an example manner of implementing the example meter 200 of
While an example manner of implementing the example spillover manager 107 of
The example audio sampler 210 samples the absolute magnitude audio signal 300 at a sampling frequency to create the audio block of the samples. In the illustrated example, to analyze the audio block, the example reverberation analyzer 212 compares the current sample (n) to either the quiet threshold or the amplitude of the pervious sample (n−1) based on the current state of the loudness flag 308. If the example loudness flag 308 is set to a quiet-indicator value (e.g., QUIET), the example reverberation analyzer 212 compares the amplitude of the current sample (n) to the amplitude of the previous sample (n−1). If the example loudness flag 308 is set to a loud-indicator value (e.g., LOUD), the example reverberation analyzer 212 compares the current sample (n) to a current quiet threshold 312.
In the illustrated example of
In the illustrated example, the quiet threshold 312 is a value relative to the amplitude of the sample when the loudness flag 308 was set to LOUD. For example, the quiet threshold 312 may be 80% of the amplitude of the sample when the loudness flag 308 was set to LOUD. An example is illustrated in box 314. In the example, the first sample 306a in the box 314 does not satisfy the quiet threshold 312. Therefore, the loudness flag 308 remains set at LOUD. In the example, the second sample 306b in the box 314 satisfies the quiet threshold 312 and the loudness flag 308 is set to QUIET. Therefore, the example reverberation analyzer 212 identifies the second sample 306b as a start of a period of quietness. In the example, the third sample 306c in the box 314 is compared to the loud threshold. Because the difference between the amplitude of the third sample 306c and the second sample 306b is not greater than the loud threshold, the loudness flag 308 remains set at QUIET.
In the illustrated example, when the loudness flag 308 transitions from the QUIET setting to the LOUD setting, the reverberation analyzer 212 counts the number of samples for which the loudness flag 308 is set to LOUD. The example reverberation analyzer 212 compares that number of samples to a long threshold (THL). If the loudness flag 308 transitions from the LOUD setting to the QUIET setting before the number of samples satisfies the long threshold (THL), the example reverberation analyzer 212 determines that the particular period of loudness is a short period of loudness 304. Otherwise, if the number of samples satisfies the long threshold (THL) before the loudness flag 308 transitions from the LOUD setting to the QUIET setting, the example reverberation analyzer 212 determines that the particular period of loudness is a long period of loudness 302.
In some examples, the example reverberation analyzer 212 determines whether, after the loudness flag 308 transitions from the LOUD setting to the QUIET setting, the loudness flag 308 transitions from the QUIET setting to the LOUD setting before a number of samples satisfies a quiet length threshold (THQ). If the loudness flag 308 transitions from the QUIET setting to the LOUD setting before the number of samples satisfies the quiet length threshold (THQ), example reverberation analyzer 212 determines that the particular period of loudness did not end and continues to count the number of samples for which the loudness flag 308 is set to LOUD. Otherwise, if the loudness flag 308 does not transition from the QUIET setting to the LOUD setting before the number of samples satisfies the quiet threshold (THQ), example reverberation analyzer 212 determines that the particular period of loudness did end.
The example audio sampler 210 samples the absolute magnitude audio signal 400 at a sampling frequency to create the audio block. In the illustrated example, to analyze the audio block, the example reverberation analyzer 212 either i) compares the amplitude of the current sample (n) to the quiet threshold 312, or (ii) compares the amplitude of the current sample (n) to the amplitude of a previous sample (n−1) based on the current state of a loudness flag 308. If the example loudness flag 308 is set to a quiet-indicator value (e.g., QUIET), the example reverberation analyzer 212 compares the difference between the amplitude of the current sample (n) and the amplitude of the previous sample (n−1) to the loud threshold. If the example loudness flag 308 is set to a loud-indicator value (e.g., LOUD), the example reverberation analyzer 212 compares the current sample (n) to a current quiet threshold 312. In the illustrated example of
A flowchart representative of example machine readable instructions for implementing the example meter 200 of
As mentioned above, the example processes of
At block 504, the example spillover manager 107 analyzes the time-based interval of the audio signal 124 analyzed by the collector 204 to detect whether spillover has occurred. Example methods to detect if spillover occurred are described below in connection with
At block 512, the media evaluator 206 marks the media exposure data as usable to award exposure credit to the corresponding media. At block 514, the example transmitter 208 transmits the media exposure data marked as usable to award exposure credit to the corresponding media to the AME 118. At block 516, the meter 200 determines whether to continue to monitor for media. For example, the meter 200 determines whether it can still detect the audio signal 124. If the meter 200 determines that it is to continue to monitor for media, program control returns to block 502; otherwise, example program 500 ends.
At block 610, the example spillover detector 214 determines whether the short loudness ratio (RSL) calculated at block 608 satisfies (e.g., is greater than) a loud threshold. If the example spillover detector 214 determines that the short loudness ratio (RSL) does not satisfy (e.g., is less than) the loud threshold, program control advances to block 612. Otherwise, if the example spillover detector 214 determines that the short loudness ratio (RSL) does satisfy (e.g., is greater than) the loud threshold, program control advances to block 614. At block 612, the spillover detector 214 indicates (e.g., sends an instruction to the media evaluator 206 of
At block 708, the example reverberation analyzer 212 determines whether the difference between the amplitude of the current sample (n) and the previous sample (n−1) satisfies (e.g., is greater than) the loud threshold. If the difference between the amplitude of the current sample (n) and the previous sample (n−1) satisfies the loud threshold, program control advances to block 710. Otherwise, if the difference between the amplitude of the current sample (n) and the previous sample (n−1) does not satisfy (e.g., is less than or equal to) the loud threshold, program control advances to block 714. At block 710, the example reverberation analyzer 212 sets the loudness flag to the loud-indicator value. At block 712, the example reverberation analyzer 212 determines the quiet threshold (e.g., the quiet threshold 312 of
At block 716, the example reverberation analyzer 212 determines whether the loudness flag 308 is set to the quiet-indicator value. If the loudness flag 308 is set to the quiet-indicator value, program control advances to block 734 (
At block 726, the example reverberation analyzer 212 determines whether the quiet length satisfies a quiet length threshold (THQ). If the quiet length satisfies the quiet length threshold (THQ), program control advances to block 728. Otherwise, if the quiet length does not satisfy the quiet length threshold (THQ), program control advances to block 734 (
At block 734 (
The processor platform 800 of the illustrated example includes a processor 812. The processor 812 of the illustrated example is hardware. For example, the processor 812 can be implemented by one or more integrated circuits, logic circuits, microprocessors or controllers from any desired family or manufacturer. In the illustrated example, the processor 812 includes an example audio sampler 210, an example reverberation analyzer 212, and an example spillover detector 214.
The processor 812 of the illustrated example includes a local memory 813 (e.g., a cache). The processor 812 of the illustrated example is in communication with a main memory including a volatile memory 814 and a non-volatile memory 816 via a bus 818. The volatile memory 814 may be implemented by Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), RAMBUS Dynamic Random Access Memory (RDRAM) and/or any other type of random access memory device. The non-volatile memory 816 may be implemented by flash memory and/or any other desired type of memory device. Access to the main memory 814, 816 is controlled by a memory controller.
The processor platform 800 of the illustrated example also includes an interface circuit 820. The interface circuit 820 may be implemented by any type of interface standard, such as an Ethernet interface, a universal serial bus (USB), and/or a PCI express interface.
In the illustrated example, one or more input devices 822 are connected to the interface circuit 820. The input device(s) 822 permit(s) a user to enter data and commands into the processor 812. The input device(s) can be implemented by, for example, an audio sensor, a microphone, a camera (still or video), a keyboard, a button, a mouse, a touchscreen, a track-pad, a trackball, isopoint and/or a voice recognition system.
One or more output devices 824 are also connected to the interface circuit 820 of the illustrated example. The output devices 824 can be implemented, for example, by display devices (e.g., a light emitting diode (LED), an organic light emitting diode (OLED), a liquid crystal display, a cathode ray tube display (CRT), a touchscreen, a tactile output device, a printer and/or speakers). The interface circuit 820 of the illustrated example, thus, typically includes a graphics driver card, a graphics driver chip or a graphics driver processor.
The interface circuit 820 of the illustrated example also includes a communication device such as a transmitter, a receiver, a transceiver, a modem and/or network interface card to facilitate exchange of data with external machines (e.g., computing devices of any kind) via a network 826 (e.g., an Ethernet connection, a digital subscriber line (DSL), a telephone line, coaxial cable, a cellular telephone system, etc.).
The processor platform 800 of the illustrated example also includes one or more mass storage devices 828 for storing software and/or data. Examples of such mass storage devices 828 include floppy disk drives, hard drive disks, compact disk drives, Blu-ray disk drives, RAID systems, and digital versatile disk (DVD) drives.
Coded instructions 832 of
From the foregoing, it will appreciate that examples have been disclosed which allow a meter 200 (
Although certain example methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture have been disclosed herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the claims of this patent.
This patent arises from a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/897,043 filed Jun. 9, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/373,353, filed Apr. 2, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,694,234, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/807,177, filed Nov. 8, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,264,301, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/920,314, filed Oct. 22, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,848,222, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/192,889, filed Jul. 15, 2015. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/897,043, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/373,353, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/807,177, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/920,314 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/192,889 are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/897,043, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/373,353, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/807,177, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/920,314 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/192,889 is claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2558754 | Horn et al. | Jul 1951 | A |
3056135 | Currey et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
3142820 | Daniels | Jul 1964 | A |
3351910 | Miller et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3742359 | Behymer | Jun 1973 | A |
4107734 | Percy et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4163212 | Buerger et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4382291 | Nakauchi | May 1983 | A |
4626904 | Lurie | Dec 1986 | A |
4677466 | Lert, Jr. et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4644509 | Kiewit et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4652915 | Heller, III | Mar 1987 | A |
4695879 | Weinblatt | Sep 1987 | A |
4697209 | Kiewit et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4718106 | Weinblatt | Jan 1988 | A |
4728930 | Grote et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4769697 | Gilley et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4779198 | Lurie | Oct 1988 | A |
4782401 | Faerber et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4885632 | Mabey et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4918516 | Freeman | Apr 1990 | A |
4930011 | Kiewit | May 1990 | A |
4955000 | Nastrom | Sep 1990 | A |
4972471 | Gross et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4972503 | Zurlinden | Nov 1990 | A |
4990892 | Guest et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5023929 | Call | Jun 1991 | A |
5040217 | Brandenburg et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5081680 | Bennett | Jan 1992 | A |
5119104 | Heller | Jun 1992 | A |
5146231 | Ghaem et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5151788 | Blum | Sep 1992 | A |
5226090 | Kimura | Jul 1993 | A |
5226177 | Nickerson | Jul 1993 | A |
5285498 | Johnston | Feb 1994 | A |
5333091 | Iggulden et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5343251 | Nafeh | Aug 1994 | A |
5382970 | Kieft | Jan 1995 | A |
5387993 | Heller et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5404377 | Moses | Apr 1995 | A |
5437050 | Lamb et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5442343 | Cato et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5457807 | Weinblatt | Oct 1995 | A |
5473631 | Moses | Dec 1995 | A |
5481294 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483276 | Brooks et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5550928 | Lu et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5564088 | Saitoh | Oct 1996 | A |
5574962 | Fardeau et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579124 | Aijala et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581800 | Fardeau et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583776 | Levi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594934 | Lu et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5629739 | Dougherty | May 1997 | A |
5630203 | Weinblatt | May 1997 | A |
5640144 | Russo et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646675 | Copriviza et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5692215 | Kutzik et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696866 | Iggulden et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5748263 | Ball | May 1998 | A |
5774876 | Woolley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5787334 | Fardeau et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793409 | Tetsumura | Aug 1998 | A |
5812930 | Zavrel | Sep 1998 | A |
5815114 | Speasl et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5826165 | Echeita et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5872588 | Aras et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884278 | Powell | Mar 1999 | A |
5893093 | Wills | Apr 1999 | A |
5896554 | Itoh et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5980246 | Ramsay et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982808 | Otto | Nov 1999 | A |
5987210 | Iggulden et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999689 | Iggulden | Dec 1999 | A |
6002443 | Iggulden | Dec 1999 | A |
6002918 | Heiman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6035177 | Moses et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6054950 | Fontana | Apr 2000 | A |
6078672 | Saunders et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091956 | Hollenberg | Jul 2000 | A |
6098048 | Dashefsky et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100941 | Dimitrova et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134279 | Soichi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6205174 | Fert et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208385 | Konishi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6243739 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252522 | Hampton et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6317854 | Watanabe | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327390 | Sun et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6359557 | Bilder | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6396413 | Hines et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6404977 | Iggulden | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424264 | Giraldin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430498 | Maruyama et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433689 | Hovind et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446261 | Rosser | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449392 | Divakaran et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459459 | Ratakonda | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467089 | Aust et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470264 | Bide | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6469749 | Dimitrova et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493649 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497658 | Roizen et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6563423 | Smith | May 2003 | B2 |
6563430 | Kemink et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577238 | Whitesmith et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6597405 | Iggulden | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614987 | Ismail et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621867 | Sazzad et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6647548 | Lu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654800 | Rieger, III | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6675174 | Bolle et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6697628 | Green et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6703918 | Kita | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6731942 | Nageli | May 2004 | B1 |
6748317 | Maruyama et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6766524 | Matheny et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771316 | Iggulden | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788704 | Lindsay | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6842877 | Robarts et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6862541 | Mizushima | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882837 | Fernandez et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888457 | Wilkinson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6890285 | Rahman et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898434 | Pradhan et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6917686 | Jot et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919803 | Breed | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928280 | Xanthos et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934508 | Ceresoli et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940403 | Kail, IV | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6958710 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967674 | Lausch | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970131 | Percy et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7038619 | Percy et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043746 | Ma | May 2006 | B2 |
7046162 | Dunstan | May 2006 | B2 |
7047548 | Bates et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7076441 | Hind et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080061 | Kabala | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7099676 | Law et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100181 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102615 | Marks | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126454 | Bulmer | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130797 | Beaucoup et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7148803 | Bandy et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155159 | Weinblatt et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7170566 | McGee et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171331 | Vock et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7222071 | Neuhauser et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224401 | Ackley et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7284255 | Apel et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7295108 | Corrado et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7295114 | Drzaic et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7343615 | Nelson et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7363028 | de Clerq et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7373820 | James | May 2008 | B1 |
7428310 | Park | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7460827 | Schuster et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7463143 | Forr et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471987 | Crystal et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7483975 | Kolessar et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7555766 | Kondo et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7587728 | Wheeler et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7587732 | Wright et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7627139 | Marks et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640141 | Kolessar et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7668188 | Chang et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680653 | Yeldener | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7739705 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760248 | Marks et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7792660 | Iyengar | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7793316 | Mears et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7796516 | Todd et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7880613 | Maeng | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7882514 | Nielsen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7962929 | Oddo et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7984462 | Deng | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8046798 | Schlack et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8065703 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8189748 | Susama et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8239887 | Gilboa et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8245249 | Lee | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260927 | Coronado et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8266644 | Randolph et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8295217 | Kone et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8345620 | Chen et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8526626 | Nielsen et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8549552 | Ramaswamy et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8699723 | Fried et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8738763 | Crystal et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8855101 | Chen | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8885842 | Chen | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8925024 | Wright et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9021516 | Nielsen | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9094710 | Lee et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9118960 | Nielsen | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9191704 | Nielsen | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9197930 | Lee | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9219969 | Nielsen | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9258607 | Chen | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9848222 | Lee | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10264301 | Lee | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10694234 | Lee | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20020010919 | Lu et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020166119 | Cristofalo | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020057893 | Wood et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059218 | August et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059577 | Lu et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068556 | Brown | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083440 | Dupuis et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020097855 | Neudeck | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097885 | Birchfield et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020144259 | Gutta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150387 | Kun, II et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152459 | Bates et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154885 | Covell et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174425 | Markel et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186768 | Dimitrova et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198762 | Donato | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030033600 | Cliff et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040272 | Lelievre et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030053538 | Katsavounidis et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030070182 | Pierre et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093784 | Dimitrova et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097302 | Overhultz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030122708 | Percy et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030123841 | Jeannin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126593 | Mault | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030136827 | Kaneko et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030146871 | Karr et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171833 | Crystal et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177488 | Smith et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030194004 | Srinivasan | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208754 | Sridhar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222819 | Karr et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030222820 | Karr et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003073 | Krzyzanowski et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019675 | Hebeler, Jr. et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025174 | Cerrato | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040027271 | Schuster et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039855 | Bohrer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040072577 | Myllymaki et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073615 | Darling | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073915 | Dureay | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040095276 | Krumm et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102247 | Smoot et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122679 | Neuhauser et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040198386 | Dupray | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218701 | Singh et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226035 | Hauser, Jr. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040266457 | Dupray | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268380 | Divakaran et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006466 | Overhultz et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013443 | Marumoto et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050035857 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060740 | Stecyk | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050108745 | Linzer | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129330 | Shyshkin | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141345 | Holm et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144632 | Mears et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050172311 | Hjelt et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050195334 | Yeh et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050200476 | Forr et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201826 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203798 | Jensen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204379 | Yamamori | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207592 | Sporer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216509 | Kolessar et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223403 | Suito et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234774 | Dupree | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243784 | Fitzgerald et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050244011 | Kim | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050244012 | Asada | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264430 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060053110 | McDonald et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056820 | Wu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075421 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060168613 | Wood et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174265 | Hauser, Jr. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060204012 | Marks et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070005301 | Iyengar | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011040 | Wright et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018708 | Yoo | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055987 | Lu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070250901 | Mcintire et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070266395 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288277 | Neuhauser et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288476 | Flanagan, III et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294057 | Crystal et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294132 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294705 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294706 | Neuhauser et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080059988 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091087 | Neuhauser et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101454 | Luff et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112574 | Brennan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080127244 | Zhang | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130906 | Goldstein et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080204273 | Crystal et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080300700 | Hammer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090037575 | Crystal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055170 | Nagahama | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090133058 | Kouritzin et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141908 | Jeong et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157826 | Stettner | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090169024 | Krug et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090265729 | Weinblatt | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090285409 | Yoshizawa et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090285551 | Berry | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290064 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296526 | Amada | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316918 | Niemisto et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100053442 | Kudo | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100169908 | Nielsen | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199296 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100268573 | Jain et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100303254 | Yoshizawa et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110019835 | Schmidt et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110061088 | Rieger et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110091055 | LeBlanc | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110531 | Klefenz et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110157475 | Wright et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110222373 | Lee | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110222528 | Chen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239253 | West et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110292291 | Deng | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311064 | Teutsch | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120020486 | Fried et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120120218 | Flaks et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124602 | Tan et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120148058 | Chen | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120148067 | Petersen et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169359 | Kim et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120219156 | Ramaswamy et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232912 | Tammi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130034138 | Lee et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130034244 | Van Raalte et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130121499 | Li et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130160042 | Stokes et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166050 | Duwenhorst | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130238276 | Vock et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140007153 | Nielsen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140126746 | Shin et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140150001 | McMillan | May 2014 | A1 |
20140250448 | Nielsen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140259039 | Nielsen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270195 | Nielsen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282640 | Nielsen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282663 | Lee | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282664 | Lee | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140380349 | Shankar et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150052541 | Chen | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150082332 | Wright et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150195592 | Nielsen | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150319491 | Nielsen | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150319492 | Lee et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160080805 | Lee | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20200374574 | Lee | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0161512 | Nov 1985 | EP |
1021042 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1133090 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1213860 | Jun 2002 | EP |
2341704 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2260246 | Apr 1993 | GB |
2292506 | Feb 1996 | GB |
2000224617 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000307530 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2003061027 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003125102 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003279400 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2005322262 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006194700 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006215774 | Aug 2006 | JP |
4219749 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2010257278 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2012507904 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2012095014 | May 2012 | JP |
2012242214 | Dec 2012 | JP |
20020000288 | Jan 2002 | KR |
100911679 | Aug 2009 | KR |
1020040004648 | Aug 2009 | KR |
1020100048330 | Dec 2011 | KR |
1020120067477 | Jun 2012 | KR |
20120131826 | Dec 2012 | KR |
8810540 | Dec 1988 | WO |
9111062 | Jul 1991 | WO |
9411989 | May 1994 | WO |
9731440 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9955057 | Oct 1999 | WO |
0131816 | May 2001 | WO |
0161892 | Aug 2001 | WO |
02093929 | Nov 2002 | WO |
02097791 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03077455 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2003077455 | Sep 2003 | WO |
03087871 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2004051303 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004051304 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2005104676 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005124583 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2005125198 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006020560 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006037014 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006096177 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2006121681 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2010049809 | May 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 14757286,1, dated Jul. 26, 2016, 1 page. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report No. 2,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204937, dated May 24, 2016, 2 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Extended Search Report,” issued in connection with Application No. 14763913,2, dated Jun. 17, 2016 12 pages. |
Reid et al., “Active Stereo Sound Localization,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, American Institute of Physics for the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 113, No. 1, Jan. 2003, 9 pages. |
Liu et al., “Acoustic Positioning Using Multiple Microphone Arrays,” Technical Report CS-2004-01, Jan. 23, 2004, retrieved from <http://www.cs.dal.ca/sites/default.files.technicalreports/CS-2004-01.pdf>, retrieved on Aug. 3, 2012, 76 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 05798935,2, dated May 22, 2012, 1 page. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 14757286,1, dated Jul. 8, 2016, 7 pages. |
Mijic et al., “Statistical Properties of Music Signals,” Audio Engineering Society, Convention Paper 7702, May 7-10, 2009, 10 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204937, dated Jun. 30, 2016, 2 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 14763913,2, dated Jul. 5, 2016, 1 page. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 05798935,2, dated May 17, 2016, 8 pages. |
“American Technology Corporation—Retailer Ads—AM & FM Sounds”, [online]., May 4, 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.woodynorris.com>. (3 pages). |
“Arbitron & Scarborough Unveil New Mall Shopper Audience Measurement”, [online]. Streamline Media Inc., Jun. 22, 2007 [retrieved in 2007], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.radioink.com>. (2 pages). |
“Arkon Sound Feeder II FM Transmitter”, [online]. Yahoo Shopping, 2002 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://store.yahoo.com/semsons-inc/arsoundfeedii.html>, (2 pages). |
“Cricket v2 User Manual,” Cricket Project, MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Cambridge, U.S.A,, Jan. 2005 (57 pages). |
“Discovery Spy Motion Tracking System”, [online]. Discovery Communications Inc., 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 14, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://shopping.discovery.com/stores/servlel/Produc! Display?catalogld=1OOOO&storeld=1 OOOQ&lanlan=-1 &productld=53867&partnumber=689638>. (3 pages). |
“Dust Networks—SmartMesh”, [online]. Dust Networks Inc., 2002 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.dustnetworks.com>, (2 pages). |
“Eltek GenII Radio Data Logging System”, [online]. Eltek Lid., 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.elteckdataloggers.co.uk>. (4 pages). |
Radio Shack, “FM Wireless Microphone Module Kits”, [online]. Horizon Industries, 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 30, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.horizonindustries.com/fm.htm>. (1 page). |
“New Sonitor Patent Combines Ultrasound and RFID”, [online]. Sonitor Technologies, Feb. 17, 2005 [retrieved on Jun. 13, 2005], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://sonitor.com/news/article.asp?id=73>. (1 page). |
“NIST Location System”, [online]. Wireless Communication Technologies Group, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Mar. 12, 2004 [retrieved in Nov. 1, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.antd.nisl.gov>. (2 pages). |
“The Nibble Location System”, [online]. UCLA, May 21, 2001 [retrieved on Nov. 2, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://mmsl.cs.ucla.edu/nibble/>. (13 pages). |
“UHF Radio Data Logging System—GenII Data Logger”, [online]. Amplicon, 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.amplicon.co.uk/dr-prod3.cfm/subsecid/10037/secid/l/groupid/11809.htm>. (3 pages). |
“University Library Navigation Enabled by Ekahau”, [online]. Directions Magazine, Jun. 12, 2003 [Aug. 3, 2007], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www/directionsmag.com/press.releases/index.php? duty=Show&id=7276&trv=1>. (3 pages). |
“Worlds Smallest Hands Free Radio,” [online]. Yahoo Shopping, 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://store.yahoo.com/latesttrends/worsmalhanfr.html>. (1 page). |
“X1 Button Radio—The World's Smallest Radio”, [online]. Exxun, 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.exxun.com>, (2 pages). |
Azondekon et al., “Service Selection in Networks Based on Proximity Confirmation Using Infrared”, http://www.scs.carleton.ca/-barbeau/Publications/2002/azondekon.pdf, International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT) Beijing, 2002 (5 Pages). |
Bahl et al., “A Software System for Locating Mobile Users: Design, Evaluation, and Lessons,” Technical Report MSR-TR-2000-12 Microsoft Research, [retrieved from internet, http://research.microsofl.com/-bahl/Papers/Pdf/radar.pdf] Feb. 2000 (13 pages). |
Battelle, Report: “Lexington Area Travel Data Collection Test; GPS for Personal Travel Surveys”, Final Report for Office of Highway Information Management, Office of Technology Application and Federal Highway Administration, Sep. 1997 (92 pages). |
Battiti et al. “Location-Aware Computing: a Neutral Network Model for Determining Location in Wireless LANS” University of Trento: Department of Information and Communication Technology, Technical Report #DIT-02-0083, Feb. 2002 (pp. 1-16). |
Bernstein et al., “An Introduction to Map Matching for Personal Navigation Assistants,” New Jersey TIDE Center, New Jersey Institute ofTechnology, Aug. 1996 (17 pages). |
Fang et al., “Design of a Wireless Assisted Pedestrian Dead Reckoning System—The NavMote Experience,” vol. 54, Issue 6, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Dec. 2005 (16 pages). |
Ferguson, Michael, “XTension Tech Notes,” [online]. Sand Hill Engineering Inc., Dec. 10, 1998 [retrieved in Jan. 12, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.shed.com/articles/TN.proximity.html >. (9 pages). |
Gentile et al., “Robust Location using System Dynamics and Motion Constraints,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Wireless Communication Technologies Group, Jun. 24, 2004 (5 pages). |
Handy et al., “Lessons Learned from Developing a Bluetooth Multiplayer-Game,” 2nd International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Workshop on Gaming, [retrieved from internet, http://www.ipsi.fraunhofer.de/ambiente/pervasivegaming/papers/Handy_Pervasive2004.pdf] (pp. 7). |
Holm, “Technology Presentation,” [online]. Sonitor Technologies, May 26, 2004 [retrieved on Oct. 13, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.sonitor.com/news/article.asp?id=62> (16 pages). |
Kanellos, “Dust Makes Mesh of Wireless Sensors,” [online]. CNETNews.com, Sep. 20, 2004 [retrieved on Sep. 29, 2004], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.news.com/Dust-makes-mesh-of-wireless-sensors/2100-1008_3-5374971,html?tag=item>. (2 pages). |
Kerschbaumer, “Who's Really Watching?” PricewaterhouseCoopers Global Entertainment and Medai Outlook 2004-2008, May 16, 2005 (4 pages). |
McCarthy et al., “RF Free Ultrasonic Positioning (Presentation),” 7th International Symposiom on Wearable Computers, Oct. 2003 (12 pages). |
McCarthy et al., “RF Free Ultrasonic Positioning,” Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, U.K., 2003 (7 pages). |
Schuman, “Smarter Smart Cart?” [online]. Storefront Backtalk, Feb. 16, 2005 [retrieved on Nov. 20, 2006], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.storefrontbacktalk.com>. (5 pages). |
Yeung et al., “A Comparative Study on Location Tracking Strategies in Cellular Mobile Radio Systems,” Global Telecommunications Conference, 1995. Globecom '95, IEEE, Nov. 14-26, 1995 (pp. 22-28 vol, 1). |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,304, dated Jun. 29, 2017, 14 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 14757286.1, dated Apr. 3, 2017, 6 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,304, dated Mar. 24, 2017, 11 pages. |
Mihajlovic et al., “Analysis of Parameters of the Speech Signal Loudness of Professional Television Announcers,” Audio Engineering Society Convention Paper 8410, Presented at the 130th Convention, May 13-16, 2011, 15 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “Notice of Decision of Granting Patent Right for Invention,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201480001408,9, dated Mar. 9, 2017, 2 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Office Action, issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201480001408,9, dated Aug. 22, 2016, 8 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,304, dated Aug. 23, 2016, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,755, dated Sep. 20, 2010 (9 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/692,087, dated Oct. 30, 2009 (14 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/692,087, dated Jan. 12, 2010 (8 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,755, dated Mar. 23, 2015 (9 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision on Appeal,” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,755, dated Dec. 17, 2014 (3 pages). |
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-121053, dated Feb. 14, 2013 (4 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/313,414, dated Mar. 13, 2015 (5 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office. “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,432, dated Apr. 10, 2015 (9 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/313,414, dated Jul. 17, 2015 (8 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,432, dated Jul. 9, 2014 (8 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,432 dated Mar. 18, 2014 (7 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/020337, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (4 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/500,443, dated May 28, 2015 (14 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/500,443, dated Sep. 30, 2015 (8 pages). |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,581,982, dated Jan. 14, 2013 (1 page). |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 05798935.2, dated May 3, 2012 (7 pages). |
Mexico Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2007/003680, dated Sep. 14, 2009 (5 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/692,087, dated May 13, 2009 (10 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,415, dated Apr. 18, 2013 (8 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,415, dated Dec. 19, 2013 (9 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,415, dated Jan. 3, 2013 (10 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,415, dated Sep. 6, 2013 (8 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,415, dated Jun. 30, 2014 (7 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,415, dated Sep. 11, 2014 (4 pages). |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 2,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204919, dated Aug. 30, 2015 (2 pages). |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,875,592, dated Mar. 30, 2015 (5 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/022704, dated Jun. 25, 2014 (3 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/022704, dated Jun. 25, 2014 (5 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US05/34743, dated Oct. 31, 2006 (4 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US05/34743, dated Oct. 31, 2006 (7 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,702, dated Jan. 5, 2015 (12 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,702, dated Jul. 23, 2014 (10 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,702, dated Jun. 11, 2015 (9 pages). |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204919, dated Aug. 27, 2014 (4 pages). |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,875,592, dated Dec. 14, 2015 (1 page). |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/022704, dated Sep. 15, 2015 (6 pages). |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,873,115, dated Dec. 18, 2014 (4 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/018921, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (5 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/ US2014/018921, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (6 pages). |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204263, dated Oct. 28, 2014 (3 pages). |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204263, dated Mar. 17, 2015 (3 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,895, dated Sep. 18, 2013 (21 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,895, dated Dec. 19, 2014 (5 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,895, dated May 22, 2014 (18 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/662,792, dated Jun. 30, 2015 (8 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/662,792, dated Dec. 10, 2015 (9 pages). |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,873,115, dated Jun. 8, 2015 (3 pages). |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/018921, dated Sep. 1, 2015 (7 pages). |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2015200081, dated Aug. 20, 2015 (2 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/796,5 84, dated Oct. 26, 2015 (6 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/796,584, dated Dec. 22, 2015 (7 pages). |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204911, dated Oct. 20, 2014 (4 pages). |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204911, dated Jan. 15, 2015 (2 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opnion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/020337, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (4 pages). |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/020337, dated Sep. 8, 2015 (5 pages). |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/028131,dated Sep. 15, 2015 (7 pages). |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1”, issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204937, dated Feb. 24, 2015 (5 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2014/028131, dated Jul. 11, 2014 (14 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Ex parte Quayle Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,441, dated May 5, 2015 (7 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,441, dated Jul. 23, 2015 (5 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Corrected Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,441, dated Oct. 29, 2015 (2 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International PatentApplication No. PCT/US2014/021986, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (4 pages). |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/021986, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (3 pages). |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1 ,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013205025, dated Aug. 11, 2014 (5 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,176, dated Apr. 9, 2015 (7 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,176, dated Aug. 12, 2015 (7 pages). |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/021986, dated Sep. 15, 2015 (6 pages). |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/34743, dated Mar. 27, 2007 (8 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Corrected Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/313,414, dated Nov. 16, 2015 (4 pages). |
Finding Your Way Around the T1-83+/84+ Graphing Calculator: Statistics 2, “Correlation Coefficient,” retrieved from http://mathbits.com/mathbits/tisection/statistics2/correlation.htm, retrieved on Nov. 30, 2010 (3 pages). |
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 09/076,517, filed May 12, 1998 (77 pages). |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2015200081, dated Jan. 12, 2016 (2 pages). |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013204919, dated Jan. 11, 2016, (2 pages). |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,875,356, dated Jan. 25, 2016 (5 pages). |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,875,374, dated Jan. 18, 2016 (5 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/879,544, dated Mar. 3, 2016 (9 pages). |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,722,750, dated Jan. 3, 2014, 2 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,722,750, dated Nov. 22, 2012, 2 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,722,750, dated Feb. 20, 2015, 3 page. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,901,078, dated Oct. 31, 2016, 1 page. |
Duan et al., “Segmentation, Categorization and Identification of Commercials from TV Streams Using Multimodal Analysis,” Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Oct. 2006, 10 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 10015577.9, dated Sep. 10, 2014, 4 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 10015577.9, dated Jul. 7, 2011, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 10015577.9, dated Oct. 12, 2016, 75 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 10015577.9, dated Mar. 24, 2016, 3 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 3,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2010241401, dated Jun. 10, 2014, 3 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 2,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2010241401, dated Apr. 9, 2014, 3 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2010241401, dated Sep. 12, 2012, 6 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 2,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013203872, dated Apr. 7, 2015, 3 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013203872, dated Feb. 19, 2016, 2 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 2,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013203753, dated Apr. 9, 2015, 3 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013203753, dated Jun. 6, 2014, 3 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,701, dated Oct. 27, 2014, 7 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,701, dated Dec. 31, 2013, 21 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,701, dated Apr. 11, 2012, 16 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,701, dated Aug. 12, 2014, 16 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,701, dated Dec. 18, 2012, 18 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,268, dated Jun. 27, 2016, 11 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,268, dated Oct. 24, 2016, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 14760693.3, dated Oct. 5, 2016, 1 page. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 14760693,3, dated Sep. 15, 2016, 8 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/920,314, dated Jan. 4, 2017, 47 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/920,314, dated Aug. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/920,314, dated Jul. 27, 2017, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” dated May 14, 2018 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/807,177 (13 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” dated Nov. 26, 2018 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/807,177 (7 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” dated Sep. 30, 2019 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/373,353, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” dated Feb. 14, 2020 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/373,353, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” dated Jul. 16, 2021 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/897,043, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC”, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 14760693.3 dated May 25, 2021, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC”, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 14760693.3 dated Apr. 23, 2018, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC”, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 14760693.3 dated Aug. 21, 2019, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220070512 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62192889 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16897043 | Jun 2020 | US |
Child | 17454778 | US | |
Parent | 16373353 | Apr 2019 | US |
Child | 16897043 | US | |
Parent | 15807177 | Nov 2017 | US |
Child | 16373353 | US | |
Parent | 14920314 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15807177 | US |