1. Technical Field
The present invention relates in general to perpendicular recording media for hard disk drives and, in particular, to an improved system, method, and apparatus for fabricating soft magnetic film with preferred uniaxial anisotropy for perpendicular recording.
2. Description of the Related Art
In perpendicular recording media, the soft magnetic underlayer (SUL) film gets thinner as the write pole head gets smaller with increasing areal density. An anti-parallel (AP) coupled SUL structure (e.g., two SULs separated by an Ru spacer) is widely used in disk drives because of its remnant state of cancelled magnetic moments between the two SULs. Uniaxial anisotropy of the SUL is induced by a radial cathode magnetic field during sputter deposition. The cathode field strength should be higher than the AP exchange field, Hex, in order to induce radial anisotropy.
As for the second SUL deposited onto the Ru spacer, the initial deposited layer experiences a very high AP exchange field having a direction opposite to the cathode field direction. Moreover, its anisotropy direction (i.e., the magnetic easy axis) can be tilted out of the radial direction or rotated into a circumferential direction if the Hex is strong enough to exceed the radial cathode field. As the layer gets thicker, the Hex decreases sharply and then the cathode field can readily overcome the Hex to align the anisotropy to the radial direction. Inducing radial anisotropy in an AP-coupled SUL becomes an issue as the SUL thickness decreases.
As shown in
Embodiments of a system, method, and apparatus for fabricating AP-coupled SUL film with good radial anisotropy are disclosed. For example, one type of cathode design has a field direction that is parallel to the direction of the Hex of the second SUL with a magnetically-pinned first SUL. In addition, an SUL structure having a low AP exchange energy also is disclosed.
In one embodiment, the SUL structure combines the cathode field direction of the SUL2 with the pinned SUL1. The SUL1 is magnetically pinned to the pinning layer and the pinning direction is parallel to the direction of the cathode field applied during deposition of the SUL1. High Hc ferro-magnetic materials may be deposited onto a heated substrate that is magnetized along the radial direction by the cathode field. For an SUL thickness below 18 nm, the pinning field is higher than the cathode field, indicating that the cathode field during deposition of the SUL2 cannot disturb the magnetic state of the SUL1 pinned to pinning layer.
The cathode field direction of the SUL2 may be opposite to the cathode field direction of the SUL1. With this method, the cathode field direction is in the same direction as the AP exchange field. Applying Hex to the SUL2 results in strong uniaxial anisotropy along the radial direction during deposition of the SUL2 layer.
In another embodiment, an SUL structure reduces the AP exchange energy, Jex which results in lower Hex. With lower Jex, the Hex over a wide range of SUL thicknesses is decreased, resulting in the condition, H(cathode)>Hex, even at SUL thicknesses below 10 nm. The Hex may be significantly reduced, leading to the required condition, H(cathode)>Hex. By controlling Ru thickness at different SUL thickness, the Hex can be adjusted to satisfy the condition of H(cathode)>Hex.
In another embodiment, Jex is reduced to change and optimize the magnetization (Bs) of the SUL. Because of the interfacial nature of Jex, lower Bs of the SUL results in lower Jex. The Hex as well as Jex can be reduced by a factor of 2 as Bs changes from 1.2 T to 0.8 T. A low-Bs SUL can shift down the Hex at every SUL thickness level, which leads to the condition: H(cathode)>Hex. Moreover, by employing a low-Bs SUL only at the Ru interface (which reduces Jex but with a majority of high-Bs SUL in the SUL structure), average magnetization of the SUL can be maintained at a high level, but the Hex can be reduced to meet the requirement: H(cathode)>Hex. In this composite SUL structure, low-Bs at the Ru interface may be in the range of 0.3 to 0.8 T, and high-Bs may be in the range of 1.0 to 2.4 T.
The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in view of the following detailed description of the present invention, taken in conjunction with the appended claims and the accompanying drawings.
So that the manner in which the features and advantages of the present invention, which will become apparent, are attained and can be understood in more detail, more particular description of the invention briefly summarized above may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the appended drawings which form a part of this specification. It is to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only some embodiments of the invention and therefore are not to be considered limiting of its scope as the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
Referring to
In one embodiment (
Referring now to
As shown in
In another embodiment (
For example, the Jex may be reduced by one of two methods: (1) increasing Ru spacer thickness, or (2) decreasing magnetization (Bs) of the SUL. In addition, the Jex may be provided in a range of 0.01 to 0.1 erg/cm2. The change 71 in Hex with Ru spacer thickness is shown in
In another embodiment, Jex is reduced to decrease and optimize the magnetization (Bs) of the SUL. Because of the interfacial nature of Jex, lower Bs of the SUL results in lower Jex. As shown in
Moreover, by employing a low-Bs SUL only at the Ru interface (which reduces Jex but with a majority of high-Bs SUL in the SUL structure), average magnetization of the SUL can be maintained at a high level, but the Hex can be reduced to meet the requirement: H(cathode)>Hex. In this composite SUL structure (see, e.g., schematic example shown in
While the invention has been shown or described in only some of its forms, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that it is not so limited, but is susceptible to various changes without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, the invention also is suitable for magnetic media applications such as magnetic tape.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4103315 | Hempstead et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
5665465 | Gyorgy et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
6105237 | Gill | Aug 2000 | A |
6391483 | Zhu et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395413 | Ando | May 2002 | B1 |
6667118 | Chang et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6819533 | Noma et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7106539 | Aoyagi et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7153596 | Tanahashi et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7378164 | Lairson et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
20020028357 | Shukh et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020131219 | Mack et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020197514 | Tanahashi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040067391 | Hong et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040233565 | Arai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234818 | Tanahashi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050008902 | Bertero et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050117247 | Aoyagi | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050225907 | Hoshiya et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244679 | Arai et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060001996 | Aoyagi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060164759 | Okada et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070003795 | Oh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20090257147 | Ajan | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090162573 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |