Methods and apparatus to verify presentation of media content

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11778268
  • Patent Number
    11,778,268
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 25, 2021
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 3, 2023
    7 months ago
Abstract
Example methods and apparatus to verify presentation of media content are disclosed. A disclosed example apparatus for generating media presentation information includes a comparator to periodically output a value indicative of whether media selected via a set-top box is presented at a media presentation location by comparing a first audio signal associated with the media to ambient audio received in the media presentation location via an audio system associated with a media presentation device. The example apparatus also includes a privacy protector to facilitate operation of the comparator by periodically preventing the comparator from receiving of the ambient audio. The example apparatus also includes a metering module to record presentation of the media based on the output.
Description
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

This disclosure relates generally to media content and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus to verify presentation of media content.


BACKGROUND

In audience measurement applications, determining the media content being presented by a media presentation device (e.g., a television program being displayed on a television) can be accomplished by, for example, monitoring the audio emanating from the media presentation device. If the presented media content includes watermarks, codes, or other identifiers embedded in the content, then extracting the identifier(s) facilitates the detection of program information. An alternative to this “active” approach is a “passive” technique based on computed fingerprints or signatures. Signatures are unique or semi-unique representations of media content segments derived from one or more of the properties of the media content signal, such as its local frequency distribution. Signature methods require reference signatures for all possible media content of interest. By comparing signatures derived from media content presented by a media presentation device (e.g., a home television set) with the reference signatures, the media content (e.g., a television program) being presented by the media presentation device can be identified.


Persons subscribing to cable, Internet protocol (IP), wireless and/or satellite content distribution services often receive media content signals via, for example, a set top-box (STB) installed by a service provider and/or a user. An example STB can determine, log and/or report information about media content (e.g., channels) tuned to and/or selected via user controls, such as a remote control. This media content information may be transmitted back to the service provider and/or an audience measurement entity via a back channel. By analyzing such information from one or more customer premises, ratings information and/or media consumption statistics can be determined.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example home entertainment system.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example media content delivery system including a presentation verifier constructed in accordance with the teachings of this disclosure.



FIG. 3 illustrates an example manner of implementing the example presentation verifier and/or, more generally, the example STB of FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 illustrates an example standalone in-line presentation verification device that may be used to implement the example presentation verifier of FIG. 2.



FIG. 5 illustrates an example manner of implementing the example comparators of FIGS. 3 and 4.



FIG. 6 illustrates an example filter coefficient magnitude distribution.



FIG. 7 is a flowchart representative of example machine-accessible instructions that may be executed by, for example, a processor to implement the example presentation verifiers of FIGS. 2, 3 and/or 4.



FIG. 8 is a flowchart representative of example machine-accessible instructions that may be executed by, for example, a processor to implement the example metering module of FIGS. 2 and 3.



FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an example processor platform that may be used and/or programmed to carry out the example machine-accessible instructions of FIGS. 7 and 8, and/or to implement the example methods and apparatus to verify media content presentation described herein.





DESCRIPTION

Example methods and apparatus to verify presentation of media content are disclosed. A disclosed example apparatus for use with a set-top box (STB) and a media presentation device includes an audio input interface to receive a first audio signal associated with a program selected by a user via the STB, a microphone to receive a free-field radiating second audio signal output by at least one of the media presentation device or an audio system associated with the media presentation device, a comparator to compare the second audio signal to the first audio signal to form an output, and an output interface to provide a value indicative of whether the program selected by the user via the STB is presented at the media presentation device.


Another disclosed example apparatus for use with a STB and a media presentation device a transducer to receive a free-field radiating first audio signal output by at least one of the media presentation device or an audio system associated with the media presentation device, a filter having adaptive weights to receive a second audio signal associated with a program selected by a user from an audio output line of the STB, and to process the second audio signal to generate a delayed and attenuated third audio signal, a difference detector to subtract the third audio signal from the first audio signal to form a residual signal, and a comparator to form a value indicative of whether the program selected by the user via the STB is presented at the media presentation device.


A disclosed example method to verify presentation at a media presentation device of media content selected at a tuning device includes receiving a first audio signal associated with the media content received at the tuning device, receiving a free-field radiating second audio signal output by the media presentation device, comparing the second audio signal to the first audio signal to form an output, and providing a value indicative of whether the media content received by the tuning device was presented at the media presentation device.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example prior-art home entertainment system 100 that includes a STB 102, a digital versatile disk (DVD) player 104, a video game console 106, and a television 108. While a user may turn on the example STB 102 and select a particular media content channel and/or program, the television 108 may be set to display different media content output by the DVD player 104 and/or the video game console 106. Thus, even when the STB 102 is configured to tune and/or to receive a specific channel and/or media content, there is no guarantee that the television 108 connected to the STB 102 is set to actually use the STB 102 as its input source. Accordingly, the example STB 102 of FIG. 1 cannot determine and/or verify whether the television 108 is actually presenting the media content output by the STB 102.



FIG. 2 illustrates an example media content delivery system 200 that includes a presentation verifier 205 to verify the presentation of media content by and/or at any number and/or type(s) of media presentation devices, one of which is designated at reference numeral 210. While for discussion purposes, the example media presentation device 210 of FIG. 2 is a television, the methods and apparatus described herein may be used to verify media content presentation by and/or at any other number and/or type(s) of media presentation devices. As described below in connection with FIGS. 3 and 4, the example presentation verifier 205 of FIG. 2 can be implemented by and/or within a tuning device 215, such as a STB, and/or may be implemented as a standalone device 400 (FIG. 4) placed and/or installed in-line between the example STB 215 and the example television 210. Moreover, while a STB is depicted in FIG. 2, any other number and/or type(s) of devices (e.g., a personal computer, a game console, a smart phone, a cellular phone, etc.) may, additionally or alternatively, be used to implement the tuning device 215.


Media content (e.g., television programs, movies, radio programs, videos, games, audio, etc.) may be provided to the STB 215 by any number and/or type(s) of service providers, four of which are designated at reference numerals 220, 221, 222 and 223. Example service providers 220-223 include, but are not limited to, a cable television based service provider 220, a cellular and/or wireless based service provider 221, a satellite based service provider 222, and/or an Internet protocol (IP) television (IPTV) based service provider 223. Media content received at the STB 215 may be encoded and/or formatted in accordance with any past, present and/or future standard, specification, format and/or recommendation, such as a National Television Standards Committee (NTSC) television signal format, a high definition television (HDTV) signal format, an Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) television signal format, a phase alteration line (PAL) television signal format, a digital video broadcasting (DVB) television signal format, an Association of Radio Industries and Businesses (ARIB) television signal format, etc. Moreover, the example STB 215 of FIG. 2 may be communicatively coupled to the example service providers 220-223 via any number and/or type(s) of communication path(s), medium(s) and/or communication device(s). For example, the IPTV based service provider 223 may be communicatively coupled to the STB 215 via any public and/or private IP-based network, such as the Internet 225. The example cellular, wireless and/or satellite based service providers 221 and 222 may be communicatively coupled to the STB 215 via an antenna 230.


In the illustrated example of FIG. 2, the television 210 is located in a viewing area 235 within a customer premises occupied by one or more persons (also referred to herein as household member(s) 240), at least some of whom have agreed to participate in an audience measurement research study. The example viewing area 235 of FIG. 2 includes the area in which the television 210 is located and from which the television 210 may be viewed by the household member(s) 240 present in the viewing area 235.


To collect media content consumption, presentation and/or viewing information with respect to the household member(s) 240, the example STB 215 of FIG. 2 includes a metering module 245. The example metering module 245 of FIG. 2 provides collected media viewing, presentation and/or consumption information, as well as other tuning and/or demographic data, via, for example, the Internet 225 to a central data collection facility 280. The example data collection facility 280 of FIG. 2 processes and/or stores data received from the metering module 245, and/or similar devices in other viewing areas and/or at other customer premises, to produce ratings information and/or to develop meaningful content exposure statistics. For instance, the example data collection facility 280 can determine the overall effectiveness, reach and/or audience demographics of media content using any number and/or type(s) of statistical method(s). In some examples, the metering module 245 stores a log of audience measurement data and periodically (e.g., once a day) and/or aperiodically (e.g., upon occurrence of one or more events and/or conditions) sends the collected data to the data collection facility 280 for processing. Additionally or alternatively information associated with the presented media content and the household member(s) 240 may be provided to the data collection facility 280 in real-time or substantially real-time as the presentation of media content occurs.


The example metering module 245 of FIG. 2 interacts with any number and/or type(s) of tuners 305 (FIG. 3) implemented by and/or within the STB 215 to identify which media content is and/or has been received and/or tuned by the STB 215. Additionally or alternatively, the audience metering module 245 can identify the tuned and/or received media content from watermarks that have been embedded in the media content (e.g., any audio or video watermark) and/or based on computed and/or derived signatures (e.g., audio signatures, video signatures, etc.). However, as described above, such media content may not actually be presented by the television 210 even though tuned, received and/or output by the STB 215. For example, when the STB 215 is operating but the person 240 is playing a computer game via the television 210, media content received, tuned and/or output by the STB 215 is not actually presented to the person 240 and, thus, should not be recorded, logged and/or reported by the metering module 245 as having been presented.


To verify media content presentation, the example presentation verifier 205 of FIG. 2 compares audio data Xc output and/or provided by the example STB 215 to the example television 210 with a free-field radiating audio signal 255 output by a speaker of the television 210 and/or by an audio system associated with the television 210. When the example presentation verifier 205 determines that the audio data Xc output by the STB 215 substantially and/or sufficiently corresponds to the audio signal 255 presented by the audio equipment associated with the television 210, then the metering module 245 logs and/or reports the tuned and/or received media content as presented by the television 210. By verifying the presentation of media content, the accuracy of the audience measurement information reported and/or stored by the metering module 245 is improved and, accordingly, ratings information developed by the data collection facility 280 are more accurate and/or representative of actual audience behavior.


While the example components shown in FIG. 2 are depicted as separate structures within the media content delivery system 200, the functions performed by these components may be integrated within a single unit or may be implemented as two or more separate components. For example, although the television 210 and the STB 215 are depicted as separate devices, the television 210 and the STB 215 may be implemented in a single unit. In other examples, the STB 215, the metering module 245 and the presentation verifier 205 may be implemented as physically separate devices communicatively coupled via one or more cables. In still other examples, the television 210, the STB 215, the metering module 245, and the presentation verifier 205 are implemented in a single unit.



FIG. 3 illustrates an example manner of implementing the example presentation verifier 205 and/or, more generally, the example STB 215 of FIG. 2. In the example of FIG. 3, the tuner 305, the metering module 245 and the presentation verifier 205 are implemented in, by and/or together with the STB 215. The example tuner 305 of FIG. 3 receives media content signals from one or more of the example service providers 220-223 of FIG. 2. Based on user inputs, the example tuner 305 tunes to and/or otherwise obtains media content selected by a user of the STB 215, and outputs corresponding audio and/or video portions of the media content to the attached media content presentation device 210. As illustrated in FIG. 3, the audio portion of the media content is also provided to a comparator 325.


To receive the free-field radiating audio signal 255 output by a speaker of the example television 210 and/or by an audio system associated with the television 210, the example presentation verifier 205 of FIG. 3 includes any type of microphone 310 (e.g., a transducer), any type of pre-amplifier 315 and any type of analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 320. The example microphone 310 of FIG. 3 converts the free-field radiating sound waves 255 into an electrical signal that is amplified by the example pre-amplifier 315 and converted to a stream of digital samples Xd by the example ADC 320. In some examples, the microphone 310 is affixed to a side of the STB 215 and picks up audio 255 in the vicinity of the STB 215. Additionally or alternatively, the microphone 310 may be wired or wirelessly coupled to the STB 215 so that the microphone 310 can be placed in a desired location separate from the STB 215. In addition, the microphone 310 may be replaced by any other type of audio input. For example, the STB 215 may be attached to an audio output of the media presentation device 210, and/or a speaker and/or speaker wire of the media presentation device 210 or an audio system associated with the media presentation device 210. While not shown in FIG. 3, if the audio signal Xc output by the tuner 305 is an analog signal, the audio signal Xc is also converted to a stream of digital samples using an amplifier and ADC similar to the pre-amp 315 and the ADC 320, respectively. Accordingly, during the following discussion, Xc will be used to refer to a stream of digital samples corresponding to the audio output by the tuner 305.


To compare the audio signal Xc output by the tuner 305 to the digital representation Xd of the audio signal 255 output by the television 210 and/or an audio system associated with the television 210, the example presentation verifier 205 of FIG. 3 includes the comparator 325. The example comparator 325 of FIG. 3 compares the two audio signals Xd and Xc to determine whether they have similarities. The example comparator 325 determines whether the audio signal Xc received from the tuner 305 is present, albeit in a possibly modified form, in the audio signal Xd received via the microphone 310. In other words, the comparator 325 determines whether the media content presentation device 210 attached to the STB 215 is presenting the media content tuned to and/or received via the STB 215 so that the audio signal Xc associated with the media content is present in the ambient audio 255 at the location of the media content presentation device 210.


To compare the audio signals Xc and Xd, the example comparator 325 of FIG. 3 applies a filter 505 (FIG. 5), which compensates for delay and/or attenuation present between audio signal Xc and the audio signal Xd. When the coefficients of the filter 505 have been adapted to represent such delay and/or attenuation characteristics, the filtered audio signal Xc will substantially match the audio signal Xd. How closely the filtered audio signal Xc and the audio signal Xd match can be determined by, for example, subtracting the filtered audio signal Xc from the audio signal Xd to form a residual signal. When they are substantially similar, the residual signal will have a small magnitude and/or small signal strength. Thus, by comparing the magnitude of the residual signal to a threshold, the example comparator 325 of FIG. 3 can determine whether the media content received and/or tuned by the tuner 305 was presented at the media presentation device 210. Additionally or alternatively, as described below in connection with FIG. 6, the coefficients of the filter 505 can be analyzed to determine whether the media content was presented. An example filter structure, commonly referred to in the industry as an echo canceller, that can be used to implement the example comparator 325 is described below in connection with FIG. 5.


When the example comparator 325 of FIG. 3 determines that the signals Xd and Xc correspond to the same media content (e.g., when the residual signal of the comparator 325 has a small magnitude), the example comparator 325 provides an indication 330 having a first value (e.g., TRUE or one) to the metering module 245 that the media content received and/or tuned via the tuner 305 was presented by and/or at the media presentation device 210. Otherwise, the example comparator 325 outputs the indication 330 having a second value (e.g., FALSE or zero) to the metering module 245 that the media content received and/or tuned via the tuner 305 was not presented by and/or at the media presentation device 210.


Based on the indication 330, the example metering module 245 determines whether media presentation information for the media content corresponding to the audio signal Xc should be stored and/or provided to the data collection facility 280. The example metering module 245 may additionally store and/or transmit to the data collection facility 280 additional information about the currently tuned program. For example, the metering module 245 and/or the tuner 305 may extract metadata from the media content provider signal and/or metadata in a program guide and transmit the information together with an identification as to whether or not the media content presentation device 210 presented the media content. Accordingly, the STB 215 and/or the data collection facility 280 can determine what media content was tuned by the STB 215 and whether that media content was presented by the media content presentation device 210 attached to the STB 215. The STB 215 may associate the identification with a timestamp so that the information transmitted to the data collection facility 280 can be used to determine the time(s) that the media content was presented by the media content presentation device 210.


To protect the privacy of the household member(s) 240, the example presentation verifier 205 of FIG. 3 includes a timer 335. The example timer 335 periodically and/or aperiodically enables and disables the microphone 310, the pre-amp 315 and/or the ADC 320 such that the comparator 325 and/or, more generally, the example presentation verifier 205 operate in a burst mode. For example, the timer 335 may enable the microphone 310, for example, for three seconds to allow the comparator 325 to converge its filter coefficients and to make a determination whether the audio signal Xd corresponds to the audio signal Xc. The timer 335 may then disable the microphone 310 for several seconds, before re-enabling the microphone 310. How often the microphone 310 is enabled may be selected based on a desired granularity of media content presentation information to be reported by the example metering module 245.



FIG. 4 illustrates an example manner of implementing the example presentation verifier 205 of FIGS. 2 and 3 as a standalone in-line presentation verification device 400 that is user installable between the STB 215 and the television 210. That is, the example in-line presentation verification device 400 of FIG. 4 can be installed between the STB 215 and the television 210 at a time other than (e.g., after) when either the STB 215 or the television 210 were manufactured and/or assembled. Some components of the example in-line presentation verification device 400 of FIG. 4 are substantially similar or identical to those of FIG. 3. Accordingly, identical references numerals have been used in FIGS. 3 and 4 for identical components, and the interested reader is referred to the discussion presented above in connection with FIG. 3 for descriptions of the identically numbered components.


To allow the in-line presentation verification device 400 to be user and/or technician installed between the STB 215 and the media presentation device 210, the example in-line presentation verification device 400 of FIG. 4 includes connectors C1, C2 and C3. The example connector C1 of FIG. 1 is to electrically couple the audio signal Xc from an audio-out jack and/or connector of the STB 215 to the comparator 325 via a first cable. As shown in FIG. 4, the audio signal Xc received via the connector C1 is also passed through and output via the example connector C2. The example connector C2 of FIG. 4 is to electrically couple the audio signal Xc to an audio-in jack and/or connector of the media presentation device 210 via a second cable. As illustrated in FIG. 4, the in-line presentation verification device 400 of FIG. 4 may be installed in-line between the audio-out jack of the STB 215 and the audio-in jack of the media presentation device 210. Example connectors that may be used to implement the connectors C1 and C2 include, but are not limited to, an RCA connector, a high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI) connector, a tip-sleeve (TS) connector and/or a tip-ring-sleeve (TRS) connector.


The media content presentation verification indications 330 determined by the comparator 325 are provided to the metering module 245 via the example connector C3. In some examples, the example connector C3 of FIG. 4 is a universal serial bus (USB) connector and a USB protocol and/or data signal is used to transfer the indication 330 from the comparator 325 to the metering module 245 and/or, more generally, to the example STB 215.


While example manners of implementing the example presentation verifier 205 of FIG. 2 have been illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4, one or more of the interfaces, data structures, elements, processes and/or devices illustrated in FIGS. 3 and/or 4 may be combined, divided, re-arranged, omitted, eliminated and/or implemented in any other way. Further, the example tuner 305, the example metering module 245, the example presentation verifier 205, the example microphone 310, the example pre-amp 315, the example ADC 320, the example comparator 325, the example timer 335 and/or, more generally, the example STB 215 and the example in-line presentation verification device 400 of FIGS. 3 and 4, respectively, may be implemented by hardware, software, firmware and/or any combination of hardware, software and/or firmware. Thus, for example, any of the example tuner 305, the example metering module 245, the example presentation verifier 205, the example microphone 310, the example pre-amp 315, the example ADC 320, the example comparator 325, the example timer 335 and/or, more generally, the example STB 215 and the example in-line presentation verification device 400 may be implemented by one or more circuit(s), programmable processor(s), application-specific integrated circuit(s) (ASIC(s)), programmable logic device(s) (PLD(s)), field-programmable logic device(s) (FPLD(s)), and/or field-programmable gate array(s) (FPGA(s)), etc. When any claim of this patent incorporating one or more of these elements is read to cover a purely software and/or firmware implementation, at least one of the example tuner 305, the example metering module 245, the example presentation verifier 205, the example microphone 310, the example pre-amp 315, the example ADC 320, the example comparator 325, the example timer 335 and/or, more generally, the example STB 215 and the example in-line presentation verification device 400 are hereby expressly defined to include a tangible computer-readable medium. Example tangible computer-readable media include, but are not limited to, a flash memory, a compact disc (CD), a DVD, a floppy disk, a read-only memory (ROM), a random-access memory (RAM), a programmable ROM (PROM), an electronically-programmable ROM (EPROM), and/or an electronically-erasable PROM (EEPROM), an optical storage disk, an optical storage device, magnetic storage disk, a magnetic storage device, and/or any other tangible medium that can be used to store program code and/or instructions in the form of machine-readable instructions or data structures, and which can be accessed by a processor, a computer and/or other machine having a processor, such as the example processor platform P100 discussed below in connection with FIG. 9. Combinations of the above are also included within the scope of tangible computer-readable media. Further still, the example STB 215 and/or the example in-line presentation verification device 400 may include interfaces, data structures, elements, processes and/or devices instead of, or in addition to, those illustrated in FIGS. 3 and/or 4, and/or may include more than one of any or all of the illustrated interfaces, data structures, elements, processes and/or devices.



FIG. 5 illustrates an example manner of implementing the example comparator 325 of FIGS. 3 and 4. The example comparator 325 of FIG. 5 is configured as an echo canceller. Thus, the example comparator 325 operates to modify the audio signal Xc that corresponds to the audio signal Xd (if present) so that when the filtered version XT of the audio signal Xc is subtracted from the audio signal Xd, the residual signal Xc is minimized. Accordingly, when the audio signal Xc substantially comprises a modified version of the audio signal Xd, the residual signal X0 will be small.


To form the estimate XT of the audio signal Xd from the received audio signal Xc, the example comparator 325 of FIG. 5 includes a finite impulse response (FIR) filter 505. To compensate for audio propagation delays and/or multiple sound wave paths due to reflections off of walls and/or other objects in the viewing area 235, the example filter 505 includes a delay line 510 of M shift registers. To compensate for attenuation of the audio signal 255 during its propagation through the viewing area 235, the example filter 505 includes one or more filter coefficients 515. Filter coefficients may also be referred to as weights and/or filter taps. To adjust the audio signal Xc so that the portion of the audio signal Xc corresponds more closely with the audio signal Xd, the audio signal Xc has to be delayed and attenuated, as shown in FIG. 5. In the illustrated example of FIG. 5, the filter coefficient 515 with the largest magnitude corresponds to the delay that the audio Xc is subjected-to in order to align itself with the microphone 310 detected audio signal Xd. In some examples, the distribution of the filter coefficients 515 may be configured to ensure that the coefficient with the maximum magnitude is significantly larger than the other coefficients. Accordingly, as shown in FIG. 6, the other coefficients 515 in the vicinity of the coefficient 515 with the maximum magnitude exhibit a decay characteristic. For convenience, only the first 200 of 400 taps are shown in the graph of FIG. 6. The maximum filter coefficient magnitude (in this example 0.033) is an indicator of the extent of attenuation that the audio signal Xc has experienced between the internal tuner 305 and the microphone 310.


The output XT of the filter 505 is a summation of the weighted samples, which can be mathematically expressed as:











X
T

=




m
=
0


m
=

M
-
1






W
m



X
m




,




EQN






(
1
)









where Wm are the values of the filter coefficients 515. The values Xm correspond to the differently delayed samples of the audio signal Xc, formed by the example delay line 510 of FIG. 5. To compute the sum of the weighted samples, the example comparator 325 of FIG. 5 includes any type of summer 518.


To adapt the filter coefficients 515, the example comparator 325 of FIG. 5 includes a coefficient adapter 520. The example coefficient adapter 520 adjusts the filter coefficients 515 to minimize the difference X0 between the audio signal Xd and the filtered audio signal XT. That is, the coefficient adapter 520 operates to substantially minimize the residual signal X0. In some example, the initial values of the filter coefficients 515 are set to zero when the microphone 310 is enabled. Additionally or alternatively, the values of the filter coefficients 515 can be frozen, fixed and/or retained while the microphone 310 is disabled. The example coefficients adjustor 520 adjusts the filter coefficients 515 by applying the following equation:

wm(n+1)=Wm(n)+μX0Xm(n),  EQN (2)

where the index n is an iteration index denoting the time in sample counts at which the coefficient updates are made and μ is a learning factor, which is usually set to a low value such as 0.05. The application of EQN (2) gradually minimizes the least mean squared (LMS) value of the residual error signal X0.


To compute the error and/or residual signal X0, the example comparator 325 of FIG. 5 includes a subtractor 525. The example subtractor 525 generates the residual signal X0 by subtracting the filtered signal XT from the audio signal Xd.


An example implementation uses a 16 kHz sampling rate (any desired sampling rate may be used) and uses M=400 filter coefficients 515 W0 through WM-1, supporting a maximum time delay of 25 milliseconds between the audio signal Xc and the audio signal Xd. If the audio Xd picked up by the microphone 310 predominantly corresponds to the audio signal Xc, the filter weights 515 readily adapt themselves to substantially stationery values and the error signal X0 decreases to a low value in approximately one second. The extent to which the residual signal X0 is not zero may depend on any number and/or type(s) of factors, such as the presence of ambient noise in the viewing area 235, quantization noise, computation noise, finite-precision arithmetic effects, etc. When the audio Xd is different from the audio Xc, the adaptation process will not be able to substantially reduce and/or minimize the error signal X0. Therefore, by comparing the error signal X0 energy with a threshold (e.g., a predetermined threshold), the comparator 325 can determine whether the audio 255 emanating from the speakers matches the tuner audio Xc. When a good match is identified, the comparator 325 can also analyze the distribution of filter coefficients to determine whether one filter coefficient has a magnitude that is greater than all the other coefficients, as depicted in FIG. 6.


To compare the magnitude of the residual signal X0 to a threshold, the example comparator 325 includes a thresholder 530. When the magnitude of the residual signal X0 exceeds the threshold, the indication 330 has a first value (e.g., TRUE or one). When the magnitude of the residual signal X0 does not exceed the threshold, the indication 330 has a different value (e.g., FALSE or zero).


While an example manner of implementing the example comparators 325 of FIGS. 3 and 4 has been illustrated in FIG. 5, one or more of the interfaces, data structures, elements, processes and/or devices illustrated in FIG. 5 may be combined, divided, re-arranged, omitted, eliminated and/or implemented in any other way. For example, the subtractor 525 and the filter 505 may be implemented in the same or separate integrated circuits. Further, the example filter 505, the example delay line 510, the example filter coefficients 515, the example summer 518, the example coefficient adapter 520, the example subtractor 525, the example thresholder 530 and/or, more generally, the example comparator 325 of FIG. 5 may be implemented by hardware, software, firmware and/or any combination of hardware, software and/or firmware. Thus, for example, any of the example filter 505, the example delay line 510, the example filter coefficients 515, the example summer 518, the example coefficient adapter 520, the example subtractor 525, the example thresholder 530 and/or, more generally, the example comparator 325 may be implemented by one or more circuit(s), programmable processor(s), ASIC(s), PLD(s), FPLD(s), and/or FPGA(s), etc. When any claim of this patent incorporating one or more of these elements is read to cover a purely software and/or firmware implementation, at least one of the example filter 505, the example delay line 510, the example filter coefficients 515, the example summer 518, the example coefficient adapter 520, the example subtractor 525, the example thresholder 530 and/or, more generally, the example comparator 325 are hereby expressly defined to include a tangible computer-readable medium. Example tangible computer-readable media include, but are not limited to, a flash memory, a CD, a DVD, a floppy disk, a ROM, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM, and/or an EEPROM, an optical storage disk, an optical storage device, magnetic storage disk, a magnetic storage device, and/or any other tangible medium that can be used to store program code and/or instructions in the form of machine-readable instructions or data structures, and which can be accessed by a processor, a computer and/or other machine having a processor, such as the example processor platform P100 discussed below in connection with FIG. 9. Combinations of the above are also included within the scope of tangible computer-readable media. Further still, the example comparator 325 may include interfaces, data structures, elements, processes and/or devices instead of, or in addition to, those illustrated in FIG. 5, and/or may include more than one of any or all of the illustrated interfaces, data structures, elements, processes and/or devices.



FIG. 7 illustrates example machine-accessible instructions that may be executed to implement the example presentation verifier 205 of FIGS. 2-4. FIG. 8 illustrates example machine-accessible instructions that may be executed to implement the example metering module 245 of FIGS. 2 and 3. A processor, a controller and/or any other suitable processing device may be used and/or programmed to execute the example machine-accessible instructions of FIGS. 7 and 8. For example, the machine-accessible instructions of FIGS. 7 and 8 may be embodied in coded instructions stored on a tangible computer-readable medium such as a flash memory, a CD, a DVD, a floppy disk, a ROM, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM, and/or an EEPROM, an optical storage disk, an optical storage device, magnetic storage disk, a magnetic storage device, and/or any other tangible medium that can be used to store program code and/or instructions in the form of machine-readable instructions or data structures, and which can be accessed by a processor, a computer and/or other machine having a processor, such as the example processor platform P100 discussed below in connection with FIG. 9. Combinations of the above are also included within the scope of computer-readable media. Machine-readable instructions comprise, for example, instructions and data that cause a processor, a computer and/or a machine have a processor to perform one or more particular processes. Alternatively, some or all of the example machine-accessible instructions of FIGS. 7 and 8 may be implemented using any combination(s) of ASIC(s), PLD(s), FPLD(s), FPGA(s), discrete logic, hardware, firmware, etc. Also, some or all of the example processes of FIGS. 7 and 8 may be implemented manually or as any combination of any of the foregoing techniques, for example, any combination of firmware, software, discrete logic and/or hardware. Further, many other methods of implementing the example operations of FIGS. 7 and 8 may be employed. For example, the order of execution of the blocks may be changed, and/or one or more of the blocks described may be changed, eliminated, sub-divided, or combined. Additionally, any or all of the example machine-accessible instructions of FIGS. 7 and 8 may be carried out sequentially and/or carried out in parallel by, for example, separate processing threads, processors, devices, discrete logic, circuits, etc.


The example machine-accessible instructions of FIG. 7 begin with the example timer 335 of FIG. 3 initializing a first timer duration TIMER1 (block 705). When the first timer duration TIMER1 expires (block 710), the example timer 335 initializes a second timer duration TIMER2 (block 715) and enables the microphone 310 (block 717).


The example delay line 510 (FIG. 5) receives one or more samples of the audio signal Xc from the STB 215 (block 720). The example filter coefficients 515 are applied to the updated delay line 510 to form one or more updated samples of the estimate XT (block 725). The example subtractor 525 subtracts the updated estimates XT from one or more new samples of the audio signal Xd to form one or more new samples of the residual signal X0 (block 730). The example coefficient adapter 520 updates the filter coefficients 515 based on the new residual sample values X0 (block 735).


If the second timer duration TIMER2 has not yet expired (block 740), control returns to block 720 to continue processing samples of the audio signals Xc and Xd, and updating the filter coefficients 515.


When the second timer duration TIMER expires (block 740), the example thresholder 530 compares a magnitude of the residual signal X0 to a threshold (block 745). As described above, based on the comparison, the example comparator 325 sends an indication 330 representative of whether the media content corresponding to the audio signal Xc was presented at and/or by the media presentation device 210 (block 750). The timer 335 disables the microphone 310 (block 755) and control returns to block 705 to wait for the timer duration TIMER1 to expire again.


The example machine-accessible instructions of FIG. 8 begin with the example metering module 245 initializing a timer with a duration of TIMER (block 805). When the timer expires (block 810), the metering module 245 determines whether the indication 330 indicates that the media content corresponding to the audio signal Xc was presented at the media presentation device (block 815). If the indication 330 indicates that the media content corresponding to the audio signal Xc was presented at the media presentation device (block 815), the metering module 245 adds a log entry corresponding to the current media content being presented (block 820). A log entry may include any desired data such as a timestamp, a program identifier, an audio and/or video code that was embedded in the media signal, a signature of the media signal, a station identifier, metadata, etc. Control then returns to block 805.


If the indication 330 does not indicate that the media content corresponding to the audio signal Xc was presented at the media presentation device (block 815), control returns to block 805 without adding a log entry.



FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of an example processor platform P100 that may be used and/or programmed to implement any of the example apparatus and/or methods to verify presentation of media content disclosed herein. For example, one or more general-purpose processors, processor cores, microcontrollers, etc. can implement the processor platform P100.


The processor platform P100 of the example of FIG. 9 includes at least one programmable processor P105. The processor P105 executes coded instructions P110 and/or P112 present in main memory of the processor P105 (e.g., within a RAM P115 and/or a ROM P120). The processor P105 may be any type of processing unit, such as a processor core, a processor and/or a microcontroller. The processor P105 may execute, among other things, the example machine-accessible instructions of FIGS. 7 and 8 and/or, more generally, to implement the example presentation verifiers 205 and the example metering modules 245 described herein.


The processor P105 is in communication with any number and/or type(s) of tangible computer-readable storage media (including a ROM P120 and/or the RAM P115) via a bus P125. The RAM P115 may be implemented by dynamic random access memory (DRAM), synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM), and/or any other type of RAM device, and ROM may be implemented by flash memory and/or any other desired type of memory device. Access to the memory P115 and the memory P120 may be controlled by a memory controller (not shown).


The processor platform P100 also includes an interface circuit P130. Any type of interface standard, such as an external memory interface, serial port, general-purpose input/output, etc., may implement the interface circuit P130. One or more input devices P135 and one or more output devices P140 are connected to the interface circuit P130. The input devices P135 may be used to implement the example microphone 310, the example pre-amp 315 and the example ADC 320. The output devices P140 may be used to send the indication 330 to the metering module 245 and/or the STB 215.


Although certain example methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: at least one memory including instructions; andat least one processor to execute the instructions to: compare a first audio signal associated with media selected via a set-top box to a second audio signal from an audio system of a media presentation device, the second audio signal received by a transducer in a media presentation location;periodically prevent receipt of the second audio signal by the transducer for a first time period;enable the receipt of the second audio signal after the first time period expires;output, based on the comparison, a value indicative of whether the media is presented at the media presentation location; andprovide, based on the output, media presentation information associated with the media to a data collection facility, the media presentation information including a timestamp of the media.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is to execute the instructions to generate an estimate of the second audio signal by delaying and attenuating the second audio signal based on adaptive weights.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the at least one processor is to execute the instructions to set the adaptive weights to zero when the receipt of the second audio signal is enabled.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the at least one processor is to execute the instructions to subtract the estimate of the second audio signal from the second audio signal to form a residual signal.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the at least one processor is to execute the instructions to determine the output by comparing the residual signal to a threshold.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the at least one processor is to execute the instructions to adjust at least one of the adaptive weights to reduce a magnitude of the residual signal.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the value indicates a first logic state when the media is output via the media presentation device and indicates a second logic state when the media is not output via the media presentation device.
  • 8. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed, cause a processor to at least: compare a first audio signal associated with media selected via a set-top box to a second audio signal from an audio system of a media presentation device, the second audio signal received by a transducer in a media presentation location;periodically prevent receipt of the second audio signal by the transducer for a first time period;enable the receipt of the second audio signal after the first time period expires;output, based on the comparison, a value indicative of whether the media is presented at the media presentation location; andprovide, based on the output, media presentation information associated with the media to a data collection facility, the media presentation information including a timestamp of the media.
  • 9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8, wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to generate an estimate of the second audio signal by delaying and attenuating the second audio signal based on adaptive weights.
  • 10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to set the adaptive weights to zero when the receipt of the second audio signal is enabled.
  • 11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to subtract the estimate of the second audio signal from the second audio signal to form a residual signal.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11, wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to determine the output by comparing the residual signal to a threshold.
  • 13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11, wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to adjust at least one of the adaptive weights to reduce a magnitude of the residual signal.
  • 14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8, wherein the value indicates a first logic state when the media is output via the media presentation device and indicates a second logic state when the media is not output via the media presentation device.
  • 15. A method comprising: comparing a first audio signal associated with media selected via a set-top box to a second audio signal from an audio system of a media presentation device, the second audio signal received by a transducer in a media presentation location;periodically preventing receipt of the second audio signal by the transducer for a first time period;enabling the receipt of the second audio signal after the first time period expires;outputting, based on the comparison, a value indicative of whether the media is presented at the media presentation location; andproviding, based on the output, media presentation information associated with the media to a data collection facility, the media presentation information including a timestamp of the media.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, further including generating an estimate of the second audio signal by delaying and attenuating the second audio signal based on adaptive weights.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, further including setting the adaptive weights to zero when the receipt of the second audio signal is enabled.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, further including subtracting the estimate of the second audio signal from the second audio signal to form a residual signal.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, further including determining the output by comparing the residual signal to a threshold.
  • 20. The method of claim 18, further including adjusting at least one of the adaptive weights to reduce a magnitude of the residual signal.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/671,946, titled “Methods and Apparatus to Verify Presentation of Media Content,” filed Nov. 1, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/841,191, titled “Methods and Apparatus to Verify Presentation of Media Content,” filed Aug. 31, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/505,966, titled “Methods and Apparatus to Verify Presentation of Media Content,” filed Jul. 20, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/110,274, titled “Methods and Apparatus to Monitor Media Content,” and filed Oct. 31, 2008. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/671,946, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/841,191, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/505,966, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/110,274 are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (424)
Number Name Date Kind
2573279 Scherbatskoy Oct 1951 A
2903508 Hathaway Sep 1959 A
3004104 Hembrooke Oct 1961 A
3372233 Currey Mar 1968 A
3540003 Murphy Nov 1970 A
3594507 Clark Jul 1971 A
3810156 Goldman May 1974 A
3818458 Deese Jun 1974 A
3845391 Crosby Oct 1974 A
3879581 Schlosser et al. Apr 1975 A
3881153 Harzer Apr 1975 A
3906450 Prado, Jr. Sep 1975 A
3906454 Martin Sep 1975 A
3919479 Moon et al. Nov 1975 A
4025851 Haselwood et al. May 1977 A
4027332 Wu et al. May 1977 A
4052720 McGregor et al. Oct 1977 A
4060695 Suzuki et al. Nov 1977 A
4160875 Kahn Jul 1979 A
4230990 Lert, Jr. et al. Oct 1980 A
4283601 Nakajima et al. Aug 1981 A
4449189 Feix et al. May 1984 A
4455634 Efron et al. Jun 1984 A
4511917 Kohler et al. Apr 1985 A
4547804 Greenberg Oct 1985 A
4574304 Watanabe et al. Mar 1986 A
4590550 Eilert et al. May 1986 A
4595950 Lofberg Jun 1986 A
4599644 Fischer Jul 1986 A
4606069 Johnsen Aug 1986 A
4622583 Watanabe et al. Nov 1986 A
4630196 Bednar, Jr. et al. Dec 1986 A
4633302 Damoci Dec 1986 A
4639779 Greenberg Jan 1987 A
4644509 Kiewit et al. Feb 1987 A
4647974 Butler et al. Mar 1987 A
4654835 Feintuch Mar 1987 A
4677466 Lert, Jr. et al. Jun 1987 A
4696034 Wiedemer Sep 1987 A
4697209 Kiewit et al. Sep 1987 A
4703324 White Oct 1987 A
4712097 Hashimoto Dec 1987 A
4718005 Feigenbaum et al. Jan 1988 A
4718106 Weinblatt Jan 1988 A
4720782 Kovalcin Jan 1988 A
4723302 Fulmer et al. Feb 1988 A
4734865 Scullion et al. Mar 1988 A
4739398 Thomas et al. Apr 1988 A
4740890 William Apr 1988 A
4745468 Von Kohorn May 1988 A
4747139 Taaffe May 1988 A
4750034 Lem Jun 1988 A
4754262 Hackett et al. Jun 1988 A
4764808 Solar Aug 1988 A
4769697 Gilley et al. Sep 1988 A
4792864 Watanabe et al. Dec 1988 A
4816904 McKenna et al. Mar 1989 A
4821178 Levin et al. Apr 1989 A
4839919 Borges et al. Jun 1989 A
4843562 Kenyon et al. Jun 1989 A
4847685 Gall et al. Jul 1989 A
4856067 Yamada et al. Aug 1989 A
4858000 Lu Aug 1989 A
4876592 Von Kohorn Oct 1989 A
4876617 Best et al. Oct 1989 A
4885632 Mabey et al. Dec 1989 A
4907079 Turner et al. Mar 1990 A
4918730 Schulze Apr 1990 A
4926162 Pickell May 1990 A
4926255 Von Kohorn May 1990 A
4931871 Kramer Jun 1990 A
4943963 Waechter et al. Jul 1990 A
4945412 Kramer Jul 1990 A
4947436 Greaves et al. Aug 1990 A
4955070 Welsh et al. Sep 1990 A
4965825 Harvey et al. Oct 1990 A
4972503 Zurlinden Nov 1990 A
5003591 Kauffman et al. Mar 1991 A
5019899 Boles et al. May 1991 A
5023929 Call Jun 1991 A
5034807 Von Kohorn Jul 1991 A
5057915 Von Kohorn Oct 1991 A
5087977 Suizu Feb 1992 A
5103498 Lanier et al. Apr 1992 A
5113437 Best et al. May 1992 A
5128752 Von Kohorn Jul 1992 A
5138659 Kelkar et al. Aug 1992 A
5155762 Croquet et al. Oct 1992 A
5165069 Vitt et al. Nov 1992 A
5200822 Bronfin et al. Apr 1993 A
5229764 Matchett et al. Jul 1993 A
5250745 Tsumura Oct 1993 A
5251324 McMullan, Jr. Oct 1993 A
5267323 Kimura Nov 1993 A
5278988 Dejean et al. Jan 1994 A
5283734 Von Kohorn Feb 1994 A
5294977 Fisher et al. Mar 1994 A
5317635 Stirling et al. May 1994 A
5319453 Copriviza et al. Jun 1994 A
5341216 Hoffart Aug 1994 A
5343239 Lappington et al. Aug 1994 A
5355161 Bird et al. Oct 1994 A
5369440 Sussman Nov 1994 A
5373315 Dufresne et al. Dec 1994 A
5374951 Welsh Dec 1994 A
5379345 Greenberg Jan 1995 A
5388211 Hornbuckle Feb 1995 A
5404160 Schober et al. Apr 1995 A
5404161 Douglass et al. Apr 1995 A
5404377 Moses Apr 1995 A
5406269 Baran Apr 1995 A
5412738 Brunelli et al. May 1995 A
5425100 Thomas et al. Jun 1995 A
5436653 Ellis et al. Jul 1995 A
5437050 Lamb et al. Jul 1995 A
5450122 Keene Sep 1995 A
5450134 Legate Sep 1995 A
5450490 Jensen et al. Sep 1995 A
5457807 Weinblatt Oct 1995 A
5463616 Kruse et al. Oct 1995 A
5481294 Thomas et al. Jan 1996 A
5481296 Cragun et al. Jan 1996 A
5485518 Hunter et al. Jan 1996 A
5488408 Maduzia et al. Jan 1996 A
5488648 Womble Jan 1996 A
5495282 Mostafa et al. Feb 1996 A
5497185 Dufresne et al. Mar 1996 A
5497479 Hornbuckle Mar 1996 A
5504518 Ellis et al. Apr 1996 A
5508731 Kohorn Apr 1996 A
5512933 Wheatley et al. Apr 1996 A
5519433 Lappington et al. May 1996 A
5521631 Budow et al. May 1996 A
5526035 Lappington et al. Jun 1996 A
5526427 Thomas et al. Jun 1996 A
5532732 Yuen et al. Jul 1996 A
5533021 Branstad et al. Jul 1996 A
5535209 Glaser et al. Jul 1996 A
5539822 Lett Jul 1996 A
5543856 Rosser et al. Aug 1996 A
5544164 Baran Aug 1996 A
5557334 Legate Sep 1996 A
5559549 Hendricks et al. Sep 1996 A
5559808 Kostreski et al. Sep 1996 A
5561010 Hanyu et al. Oct 1996 A
5572246 Ellis et al. Nov 1996 A
5574962 Fardeau et al. Nov 1996 A
5579124 Aijala et al. Nov 1996 A
5581658 O'Hagan et al. Dec 1996 A
5581800 Fardeau et al. Dec 1996 A
5583784 Kapust et al. Dec 1996 A
5584025 Keithley et al. Dec 1996 A
5584050 Lyons Dec 1996 A
5592548 Sih Jan 1997 A
5594934 Lu et al. Jan 1997 A
5600364 Hendricks et al. Feb 1997 A
5606604 Rosenblatt et al. Feb 1997 A
5608445 Mischler Mar 1997 A
5610653 Abecassis Mar 1997 A
5610916 Kostreski et al. Mar 1997 A
5611019 Nakatoh et al. Mar 1997 A
5612729 Ellis et al. Mar 1997 A
5615296 Stanford et al. Mar 1997 A
5621395 Kiyaji et al. Apr 1997 A
5621454 Ellis et al. Apr 1997 A
5629739 Dougherty May 1997 A
5630203 Weinblatt May 1997 A
5636346 Saxe Jun 1997 A
5638113 Lappington et al. Jun 1997 A
5640192 Garfinkle Jun 1997 A
5646675 Copriviza et al. Jul 1997 A
5646942 Oliver et al. Jul 1997 A
5654748 Matthews, III Aug 1997 A
5659350 Hendricks et al. Aug 1997 A
5666365 Kostreski Sep 1997 A
5697844 Von Kohorn Dec 1997 A
5699276 Roos Dec 1997 A
5701582 DeBey Dec 1997 A
5713795 Kohorn Feb 1998 A
5724103 Batchelor Mar 1998 A
5724521 Dedrick Mar 1998 A
5726701 Needham Mar 1998 A
5729549 Kostreski et al. Mar 1998 A
5734413 Lappington et al. Mar 1998 A
5734444 Yoshinobu Mar 1998 A
5734720 Salganicoff Mar 1998 A
5736927 Stebbins et al. Apr 1998 A
5737025 Dougherty et al. Apr 1998 A
5751707 Voit et al. May 1998 A
5757414 Thorne May 1998 A
5758257 Herz et al. May 1998 A
5759101 Von Kohorn Jun 1998 A
5761606 Wolzien Jun 1998 A
5764275 Lappington et al. Jun 1998 A
5764763 Jensen et al. Jun 1998 A
5765130 Nguyen Jun 1998 A
5767893 Chen et al. Jun 1998 A
5768680 Thomas Jun 1998 A
5771307 Lu et al. Jun 1998 A
5774564 Eguchi et al. Jun 1998 A
5774664 Hidary et al. Jun 1998 A
5774859 Houser et al. Jun 1998 A
5787334 Fardeau et al. Jul 1998 A
5793410 Rao Aug 1998 A
5793414 Shaffer Aug 1998 A
5798785 Hendricks et al. Aug 1998 A
5799092 Kristol et al. Aug 1998 A
5802304 Stone Sep 1998 A
5809041 Shikakura et al. Sep 1998 A
5809160 Powell et al. Sep 1998 A
5812928 Watson, Jr. et al. Sep 1998 A
5815297 Ciciora Sep 1998 A
5815671 Morrison Sep 1998 A
5819156 Belmont Oct 1998 A
5826164 Weinblatt Oct 1998 A
5832223 Hara et al. Nov 1998 A
5833468 Guy et al. Nov 1998 A
5842010 Jain et al. Nov 1998 A
5850249 Massetti et al. Dec 1998 A
5870754 Dimitrova et al. Feb 1999 A
5872588 Aras et al. Feb 1999 A
5878384 Johnson et al. Mar 1999 A
5880789 Inaba Mar 1999 A
5881360 Fong Mar 1999 A
5887140 Itsumi et al. Mar 1999 A
5889548 Chan Mar 1999 A
5905713 Anderson et al. May 1999 A
5905865 Palmer et al. May 1999 A
5907366 Farmer et al. May 1999 A
5910988 Ballard Jun 1999 A
5914746 Matthews, III et al. Jun 1999 A
5945988 Williams et al. Aug 1999 A
5946050 Wolff Aug 1999 A
5951642 Onoe et al. Sep 1999 A
5956716 Kenner et al. Sep 1999 A
5966120 Arazi et al. Oct 1999 A
5973625 Nam Oct 1999 A
5973750 Ogawa et al. Oct 1999 A
5974299 Massetti Oct 1999 A
5982932 Prokoski Nov 1999 A
5990927 Hendricks et al. Nov 1999 A
5999689 Iggulden Dec 1999 A
5999912 Wodarz et al. Dec 1999 A
6002393 Hite et al. Dec 1999 A
6002443 Iggulden Dec 1999 A
6005561 Hawkins et al. Dec 1999 A
6006217 Lumsden Dec 1999 A
6025837 Matthews, III et al. Feb 2000 A
6029045 Picco et al. Feb 2000 A
6031577 Ozkan et al. Feb 2000 A
6035177 Moses et al. Mar 2000 A
6061082 Park May 2000 A
6061451 Muratani et al. May 2000 A
6061719 Bendinelli et al. May 2000 A
6085066 Fong Jul 2000 A
6088722 Herz et al. Jul 2000 A
6112053 Dunki-Jacobs et al. Aug 2000 A
6118873 Lotspiech et al. Sep 2000 A
6124877 Schmidt Sep 2000 A
6130726 Darbee et al. Oct 2000 A
6160570 Sitnik Dec 2000 A
6161090 Kanevsky et al. Dec 2000 A
6166730 Goode et al. Dec 2000 A
6169843 Lenihan et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184918 Goldschmidt Iki et al. Feb 2001 B1
6189008 Easty et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199206 Nishioka et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202210 Ludtke Mar 2001 B1
6216265 Roop et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226618 Downs et al. May 2001 B1
6259443 Williams, Jr. Jul 2001 B1
6286140 Ivanyi Sep 2001 B1
6289514 Link et al. Sep 2001 B1
6308327 Liu et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317881 Shah-Nazaroff et al. Nov 2001 B1
6345389 Dureau Feb 2002 B1
6356945 Shaw et al. Mar 2002 B1
6377682 Benesty et al. Apr 2002 B1
6405166 Huang et al. Jun 2002 B1
6421445 Jensen et al. Jul 2002 B1
6467089 Aust et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473903 Balakrishnan et al. Oct 2002 B2
6477707 King et al. Nov 2002 B1
6508709 Karmarkar Jan 2003 B1
6510557 Thrift Jan 2003 B1
6512796 Sherwood Jan 2003 B1
6513161 Wheeler et al. Jan 2003 B2
6523175 Chan Feb 2003 B1
6542869 Foote Apr 2003 B1
6560349 Rhoads May 2003 B1
6574594 Pitman et al. Jun 2003 B2
6647548 Lu et al. Nov 2003 B1
6651043 Ammicht et al. Nov 2003 B2
6675383 Wheeler et al. Jan 2004 B1
6735775 Massetti May 2004 B1
6738978 Hendricks et al. May 2004 B1
6983478 Grauch et al. Jan 2006 B1
7039932 Eldering May 2006 B2
7155159 Weinblatt et al. Dec 2006 B1
7206494 Engle et al. Apr 2007 B2
7239981 Kolessar et al. Jul 2007 B2
7316025 Aijala et al. Jan 2008 B1
7353171 Srinivasan Apr 2008 B2
7421723 Harkness et al. Sep 2008 B2
7440674 Plotnick et al. Oct 2008 B2
7454776 Walker et al. Nov 2008 B1
7523474 Herley Apr 2009 B2
7587728 Wheeler et al. Sep 2009 B2
7607147 Lu et al. Oct 2009 B1
7613310 Mao Nov 2009 B2
7644422 Lu et al. Jan 2010 B2
7725896 Pham May 2010 B2
7752042 Srinivasan Jul 2010 B2
7774807 Wheeler et al. Aug 2010 B2
7792540 Lee et al. Sep 2010 B2
7822194 Marton Oct 2010 B2
7958526 Wheeler et al. Jun 2011 B2
8434100 Wheeler et al. Apr 2013 B2
8565415 Schmidt et al. Oct 2013 B2
8671128 Dehghan et al. Mar 2014 B1
8732738 Lu et al. May 2014 B2
8763022 Ramaswamy Jun 2014 B2
8776103 Lu et al. Jul 2014 B2
9124769 Srinivasan et al. Sep 2015 B2
10469901 Srinivasan et al. Nov 2019 B2
11070874 Srinivasan et al. Jul 2021 B2
20010056405 Muyres Mar 2001 A1
20010023436 Srinivasan et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010028662 Hunt et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010044751 Pugliese, III et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047517 Christopoulos et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010056573 Kovac et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002488 Muyres et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010919 Lu et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020019769 Barritz et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026635 Wheeler et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020031224 Basawapatna et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032904 Lerner Mar 2002 A1
20020044225 Rakib Apr 2002 A1
20020053077 Shah-Nazaroff et al. May 2002 A1
20020053078 Holtz et al. May 2002 A1
20020056086 Yuen May 2002 A1
20020056087 Berezowski et al. May 2002 A1
20020059577 Lu et al. May 2002 A1
20020059637 Rakib May 2002 A1
20020065826 Bell et al. May 2002 A1
20020087969 Brunheroto et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020100055 Zeidman Jul 2002 A1
20020120925 Logan Aug 2002 A1
20020124246 Kaminsky et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129368 Schlack et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020144262 Plotnick et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020174425 Markel et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020190797 Deppe et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194586 Gutta et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194592 Tsuchida et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030001880 Holtz et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030005430 Kolessar Jan 2003 A1
20030005431 Shinohara Jan 2003 A1
20030028872 Milovanovic et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037333 Ghashghai et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030039465 Bjorgan et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030056208 Kamada et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030070167 Holtz et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030088674 Ullman et al. May 2003 A1
20030110485 Lu et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110503 Perkes Jun 2003 A1
20030112974 Levy Jun 2003 A1
20030126593 Mault Jul 2003 A1
20030149975 Eldering et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030149991 Reidhead et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030154128 Liga et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030208763 McElhatten et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030208767 Williamson et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220705 Ibey Nov 2003 A1
20040001137 Cutler et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019463 Kolessar et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019900 Knightbridge et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040039914 Barr et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040058675 Lu et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073916 Petrovic et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088721 Wheeler et al. May 2004 A1
20040132481 Sugaya Jul 2004 A1
20040192243 Siegel Sep 2004 A1
20050028189 Heine et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050033758 Baxter Feb 2005 A1
20050069106 Perepa et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071863 Matz et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050114141 Grody May 2005 A1
20050135614 Hollar et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149965 Neogi Jul 2005 A1
20050160258 O'Shea et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050181722 Kopra et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050216509 Kolessar et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050267750 Steuer et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060100868 Hetherington et al. May 2006 A1
20060195861 Lee Aug 2006 A1
20060200841 Ramaswamy et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060203105 Srinivasan Sep 2006 A1
20060224552 Riezler et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060247919 Specht et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271246 Bell et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070028273 Zanaty Feb 2007 A1
20070046808 Sagawa et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055987 Lu et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061830 Chang Mar 2007 A1
20070107020 Tavares May 2007 A1
20070162923 Silveira Da Motta Jul 2007 A1
20070162927 Ramaswamy et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070201639 Park et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070288476 Flanagan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080007658 Kodama Jan 2008 A1
20080013512 Yurugi Jan 2008 A1
20080126420 Wright et al. May 2008 A1
20090010445 Matsuo Jan 2009 A1
20090016540 Heningsen Nielsen et al. Jan 2009 A1
20100138770 Lu et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100268540 Arshi et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100268573 Jain et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100333126 Wheeler et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110224992 Chaoui et al. Sep 2011 A1
20120102518 Wheeler et al. Apr 2012 A1
20140250449 Ramaswamy Sep 2014 A1
20150373406 Srinivasan et al. Dec 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (87)
Number Date Country
2005251196 Dec 2005 AU
1318967 Jun 1993 CA
2306095 Jun 1999 CA
2539442 Apr 2005 CA
1230315 Sep 1999 CN
1253692 May 2000 CN
101262292 Sep 2008 CN
69736435 Dec 2006 DE
0161512 Nov 1985 EP
0195639 Sep 1986 EP
0210609 Feb 1987 EP
0245037 Nov 1987 EP
0283570 Sep 1988 EP
0309269 Mar 1989 EP
0325219 Jul 1989 EP
0358910 Mar 1990 EP
0598398 May 1994 EP
0598682 May 1994 EP
0687083 Dec 1995 EP
0703683 Mar 1996 EP
0744695 Nov 1996 EP
0817486 Jan 1998 EP
0840511 May 1998 EP
0944991 Sep 1999 EP
0956669 Nov 1999 EP
0985287 Mar 2000 EP
1089201 Apr 2001 EP
1089564 Apr 2001 EP
1166555 Jan 2002 EP
2555383 May 1985 FR
2717025 Sep 1995 FR
2138642 Oct 1984 GB
2170080 Jul 1986 GB
2176639 Dec 1986 GB
2294574 May 1996 GB
63084396 Apr 1988 JP
1177796 Jul 1989 JP
5327639 Dec 1993 JP
5347648 Dec 1993 JP
7255069 Oct 1995 JP
8508617 Sep 1996 JP
9083470 Mar 1997 JP
10145823 May 1998 JP
11275032 Oct 1999 JP
2002247610 Aug 2002 JP
4408453 Feb 2010 JP
930006665 Apr 1993 KR
200516467 May 2005 TW
8810540 Dec 1988 WO
8907868 Aug 1989 WO
9111062 Jul 1991 WO
WO9322875 Nov 1993 WO
WO9322878 Nov 1993 WO
9411989 May 1994 WO
9512278 May 1995 WO
9515653 Jun 1995 WO
9600950 Jan 1996 WO
9617467 Jun 1996 WO
9628904 Sep 1996 WO
9632815 Oct 1996 WO
9637983 Nov 1996 WO
9810539 Mar 1998 WO
9826529 Jun 1998 WO
9927668 Jun 1999 WO
9959275 Nov 1999 WO
9962260 Dec 1999 WO
0004662 Jan 2000 WO
0016552 Mar 2000 WO
0033565 Jun 2000 WO
0033578 Jun 2000 WO
0059223 Oct 2000 WO
0119088 Mar 2001 WO
0124027 Apr 2001 WO
0131497 May 2001 WO
0147257 Jun 2001 WO
0147273 Jun 2001 WO
0176248 Oct 2001 WO
02098029 Dec 2002 WO
03071737 Aug 2003 WO
03094499 Nov 2003 WO
2004051997 Jun 2004 WO
2005025217 Mar 2005 WO
2005034395 Apr 2005 WO
2005079501 Sep 2005 WO
2005119651 Dec 2005 WO
2007070789 Jun 2007 WO
2009084864 Jul 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (267)
Entry
Advanced Television Systems Committee T3/S8 Transport Specialist Group, “Annex G—An Overview of PSIP for Cable,” ATSC T3/S8, Doc. 268, Apr. 3, 1998 (5 pages).
Advanced Television Systems Committee, “Guide to the Use of the ATSC Digital Television Standard,” Doc. A/54, Oct. 4, 1995 (148 pages).
Advanced Television Systems Committee, “Program and System Information Protocol for Terrestrial Broadcast and Cable (Revision A) and Amendment No. 1,” Doc. A/65A, May 31, 2000 (140 pages).
Advanced Television Systems Committee, “Program/Episode/Version/Identification ATSC Standard,” Doc. A/57, Aug. 30, 1996 (16 pages).
Audio Media, “Digital Audio Watermarking,” Jan./Feb. 1998 (4 pages).
Balabanian et al., “An Introduction to Digital Storage Media—Command and Control (DSM-CC),” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Communications Magazine, Nov. 1996 (11 pages).
BBM, “Matching Pictures, Matching Expectations; The BBM PMT Validation Study Executive Summary Report,” Vancouver, Canada, Feb. 9, 1998 (10 pages).
BBM, “The M Files,” Picture Matching Technology Pt 2, The Department of Intergalactic Audience Measurement, Canada, Nov. 15, 2000 (2 pages).
Bow, Sing-Tze, “Pattern Recognition and Image Preprocessing; Chapter 2 Nonparametric Decision Theoretic Classification,” 1992 (16 pages).
Brownstein, Mark, “Streamlined and Ready for Action,” Netguide. 1996 (28 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,279,847, dated Jul. 20, 2009 (2 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,275,409, dated Oct. 11, 2005 (1 page).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,539,442, dated Nov. 21, 2012 (1 page).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,574,998, dated Aug. 10, 2010 (1 page).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,275,409, dated Jan. 6, 2005 (2 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,275,409, dated May 10, 2004 (3 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,289,519, dated Feb. 9, 2000 (3 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,289,519, dated Jun. 16, 2000 (2 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,539,442, dated Jan. 31, 2012 (3 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,574,998, dated Aug. 26, 2008 (4 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,574,998, dated Mar. 23, 2009 (5 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,574,998, dated Nov. 13, 2009 (10 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,633,577, dated Jul. 16, 2014 (2 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,633,577, dated Jul. 3, 2013 (3 pages).
Yeatts, Mark R., “Doing Business on the Internet: It's Not Just for the ‘Big Boys’,” Charlottesville Business Journal, vol. 7, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1996 (6 pages).
Chiat/Day, “The New Video Highway: What Will We Need to Know? How Will We Measure It?” Advertising Research Foundation, Jun. 29, 1994, (12 pages).
Cook et al., “Metering Television in the Digital Age” (4 pages).
Duda et al., “Chapter 2 Bayes Decision Theory,” Pattern Classification & Scene Analysis, 1973 (18 pages).
Frook, John Evan, “Net Tracking on the PC: NPD Takes New Approach to Measuring Site Traffic,” Electronic News, vol. 42, No. 2110, Apr. 1, 1996 (4 pages).
English Language Translation of the Allowed Claims issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2000-548980, dated Mar. 24, 2009 (4 pages).
English Language Translation of the Granted Claims issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 98806840.0, dated Oct. 17, 2003 (5 pages).
English, Erin, “The Meter's Running,” LAN Times, Mar. 27, 1995 (2 pages).
European Patent Office, “Decision to Grant,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 97926814.1, dated Aug. 21, 2008 (1 page).
European Patent Office, “Adjournment of Examination/Opposition Proceedings,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114272.8, mailed Apr. 11, 2006 (1 page).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 115(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114272.8, dated Aug. 14, 2003 (16 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) and Rule 51(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 98933309.1, dated Mar. 15, 2000 (4 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114271.0, dated Jan, 7, 2003 (4 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114271.0, dated Sep. 13, 2001 (4 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114272.8, dated Jun. 28, 2004 (4 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114272.8, dated Nov. 28, 2002 (3 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114272.8, dated Jul. 3, 2001 (3 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 98933309.1, dated Apr. 23, 2001 (5 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 98933309.1, dated Jan. 7, 2003 (6 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 98933309.1, dated Sep. 13, 2001 (3 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 98933309.1, dated Sep. 14, 2000 (4 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 97947628.0, dated Apr. 29, 2005 (3 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 97947628.0, dated Jul. 19, 2004 (3 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Under Rule 51(4) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 97947628.0, dated Feb. 7, 2006 (6 pages).
European Patent Office, “Decision to Grant,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114271.0, dated Apr. 21, 2005 (1 page).
European Patent Office, “Decision to Grant,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 97947628.0, dated Jul. 6, 2006 (1 page).
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114271.0, dated Oct. 16, 2000 (3 pages).
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114272.8, dated Oct. 16, 2000 (5 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 07017129.3, dated Feb. 9, 2011 (6 pages).
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 07017129.3, dated Oct. 1, 2012 (5 pages).
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 07017129.3, dated Apr, 9, 2009 (10 pages).
European Patent Office, “Intention to Grant,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114271.0, dated Nov. 24, 2004 (10 pages).
European Patent Office, “Intention to Grant,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114272.8, dated Mar. 15, 2007 (4 pages).
European Patent Office, “Intention to Grant,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 98933309.1, dated Nov. 17, 2004 (11 pages).
European Patent Office, “Provision of the Minutes in Accordance with Rule 76(4) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114271.0, mailed Nov. 10, 2004 (7 pages).
European Patent Office, “Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 71(1) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 00114271.0, mailed Mar. 11, 2004 (6 pages).
European Patent Office, “Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 98933309.1, mailed Mar. 12, 2004 (7 pages).
Fairhurst et al. “Some Economic Considerations in the Design of an Optimal N-Tuple Pattern Classifier,” Digital Processes, 3, Nov. 1, 1977 (5 pages).
Federal Public Service Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade National Institute of Industrial Property, “Notice of Allowance in Official Gazette,” issued in connection with Brazilian Patent Application No. PI9713896-7, dated Jun. 25, 2013 (1 page).
Federal Public Service Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade National Institute of Industrial Property, “Technical Examination Report,” issued in connection with Brazilian Patent Application No. PI9714323-5, dated Mar. 1, 2010 (6 pages).
Federal Public Service Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade National Institute of Industrial Property, “Technical Examination Report,” issued in connection with Brazilian Patent Application No. PI9714323-5, dated Mar. 23, 2012 (4 pages).
JMCT Media Research, “The Evolution of Research Problems on the Information Superhighway,” (7 pages).
Harvey, Bill, “Interactive Standards,” The Marketing Pulse, vol. XIV, Issue 12, Aug. 31, 1994 (6 pages).
Helinski, Paul, “Automating Web-Site Maintenance Part 2 Perl-Based Tools to Manage Your Website,” Web Techniques, vol. 1, No. 9, XP-002048313, Dec. 1996 (2 pages).
Hoffman et al., “How Big is the Internet?” Wired.com, Aug. 18, 1994, retrieved from <http://hotwired.com/Lib/Extras/how.big.html> (2 pages).
Indian Patent Office, “First Examination Report,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 1812/MAS/98, dated Dec. 30, 2004 (3 pages).
Infoseek Corporation, “Search Results for ‘NPD’,” retrieved from worldwide web on Jul. 1, 1996 (2 pages).
Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2012/006439, dated Sep. 11, 2013 (2 pages).
Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/015117, dated Apr. 22, 2014 (2 pages).
Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/015117, dated Feb. 6, 2014 (4 pages).
Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/007596, dated Feb. 14, 2012 (4 pages).
Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2004/008118, dated Jul. 2, 2007 (1 page).
Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2004/008118, dated Jan. 2, 2008 (1 page).
Interactive Marketing News, “PC-Meter Unveils Second Quarter Rankings of Most Visited Sites,” Jul. 5, 1996 (2 pages).
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Preliminary Examination of Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2004/28171, dated Apr. 7, 2006 (11 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2004/28171, dated Aug. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2004/28171, dated Aug. 24, 2005 (5 pages).
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Preliminary Examination Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US1997/021643, dated Mar. 30, 1999 (27 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US1997/021643, dated Nov. 12, 1998 (9 pages).
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US1997/021643, dated Feb. 24, 1999 (7 pages).
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Preliminary Examination Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US1997/09218, dated Apr. 21, 1999 (11 pages).
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US1997/009218, dated Mar. 8, 1999 (6 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US1997/009218, dated Jan. 26, 1998 (4 pages).
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/013765, dated Feb. 13, 2007 (4 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/13765, dated Jan. 26, 2007 (5 pages).
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/005271, dated Aug. 22, 2006 (4 pages).
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/005271, dated Mar. 23, 2006 (3 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/005271, dated Mar. 23, 2006 (1 page).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US1998/023558, dated Aug. 27, 1999 (4 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US1994/011795, dated Feb. 24, 1995 (1 page).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2000/003829, dated Aug. 18, 2000 (3 pages).
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Preliminary Examination Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2000/003829, dated Dec. 31, 2002 (2 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/026426, dated Aug. 18, 2006 (1 page).
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/026426, dated Aug. 18, 2006 (7 pages).
International Bureau, “Preliminary Examination of Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/026426, dated Feb. 1, 2007 (9 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2006/61917, dated Dec. 28, 2007 (2 pages).
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2006/61917, dated Dec. 28, 2007 (8 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application PCT/US1998/14286, dated Jan, 7, 1999 (3 pages).
“The Claims Defining the Invention,” which were allowed in connection with Australian Patent Application Serial No. 57830/01, Dec. 3, 2002 (4 pages).
“The Claims Defining the Invention,” which were allowed in connection with Australian Patent Application Serial No. 57831/01, Sep. 9, 2003 (1 page).
“The Claims Defining the Invention,” which were allowed in connection with Australian Patent Application Serial No. 57832/01, Oct. 27, 2003 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Examiner's First Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2003262297, dated Jul. 6, 2005 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Examiner's First Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 31489/97, dated Mar. 2, 2000 (1 page).
IP Australia, “Examiner's First Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 46028/01, dated Jun. 13, 2002 (1 page).
IP Australia, “Examiner's First Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 82980/98, dated Jul. 24, 2000 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Examiner's Second Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 31489/97, dated Mar. 21, 2001 (1 page).
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 31489/97, dated May 30, 2001 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 57828/01, dated Dec. 3, 2002 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 57830/01, dated Dec. 3, 2002 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 57831/01, dated Sep. 9, 2003 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 57832/01, dated Oct. 27, 2003 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Examiner's First Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2006325808, dated Apr. 29, 2010 (2 pages).
IP Australia,“Examiner's First Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 71524/00, dated May 21, 2002 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Examiner's First Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 71525/00, dated May 21, 2002 (1 page).
IP Australia, “Examiner's First Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 71526/00, dated May 21, 2002 (1 page).
IP Australia, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 52668/98, dated Feb. 11, 2000 (1 page).
IP Australia, “Examiner's First Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 71527/00, dated May 21, 2002 (1 pages).
IP Australia, “Examiner's Second Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2006325808, dated May 20, 2011 (3 pages).
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 52668/98, dated Jun. 27, 2000 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 71526/00, dated Sep. 9, 2003 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application Serial No. 57833/01, dated Dec. 3, 2002 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 71524/00, dated Sep. 9, 2003 (2 pages).
IP Australia, “Response to Applicant's Request Under Section 104 of the Patents Act 1990,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 71527/00, mailed Jan. 16, 2001 (1 page).
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2000-548980, dated Mar. 10, 2009 (2 pages).
Japan Patent Office, “Decision of Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. Hei10-534297, dated Sep. 30, 2003 (3 pages).
Japan Patent Office, “Decision of Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. Hei 10-526729, dated Apr. 7, 2009 (5 pages).
Japan Patent Office, “Final Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-292746, dated Nov. 22, 2005 (3 pages).
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. Hei 10-526729, dated Oct. 27, 2009 (5 pages).
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Grounds for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 10-534297, dated May 13, 2003 (6 pages).
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Grounds for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-292746, dated Mar. 22, 2005 (9 pages).
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Grounds of Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2000-548980, dated May 9, 2008 (6 pages).
Japan Patent Office, “Notice regarding Submission of Prior Art Document by an Anonymous Third Party,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2000-548980, on May 25, 2007 (3 pages).
Japan Patent Office, “Notification Document of Refusal Reasons,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 10-526729, dated Oct. 21, 2008 (8 pages).
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Grounds of Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2000-548980, dated Apr. 8, 2008 (6 pages).
Khare, Rohit, “Demographics,” Nov. 6, 1995, retrieved from <http://www.w3.org/pub/www/demographics>, retrieved on Oct. 4, 1996 (3 pages).
Kim et al., “Auditory Processing of Speech Signals for Robust Speech Recognition in Real-World Noisy Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 7, No. 1, Jan. 1999 (15 pages).
Marketing News, “1996 Business Report on the Marketing Research Industry,” Jun. 3, 1996 (37 pages).
Namba et al., “A Program Identification Code Transmission System Using Low-Frequency Audio Signals,” NHK Science and Technical Research Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan, Mar. 1985 (14 pages).
Next Century Media, Inc., “Preliminary Summary Overview of Studies of Interactivity for 4AS Casie Research Sub-Committee” (11 pages).
Purdye et al., “Matching Pictures, Matching Expectations: The BBM Validation Test of TN-AGB's Picture Matching Technology,” conducted in Vancouver, Canada, 1998 (11 pages).
SCTE DVS 136, “An Overview of PSIP for Cable,” ATSC T3/S8 Doc. 268, Apr. 3, 1998 (5 pages).
Steele et al., “Simultaneous Transmission of Speech and Data Using Code-Breaking Techniques,” pp. 2061-2105, vol. 60, No. 9, The Bell System Technical Journal, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, issued in Nov. 1981 (25 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Decision of Reexamination,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 97182123.2, dated Jul. 6, 2005 (2 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 97182123.2, dated Dec. 13, 2002 (11 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200810091335.3, dated Jul. 3, 2009 (7 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 97181455.4, dated Jun. 7, 2002 (6 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Notice of Acceptance of the Request for Reexamination,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 97182123.2, dated May 18, 2005 (2 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Notice of Completion of Formalities for Patent Registration,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 97182123.2, mailed Jan. 25, 2008 (5 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200680052652.3, dated Feb. 5, 2010 (33 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Fifth Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200680052652.3, dated Jan. 21, 2013 (7 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200310123387.1, dated Dec. 8, 2006 (8 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 98806840.0, dated Oct. 25, 2002 (9 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Fourth Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200680052652.3, dated Jun. 14, 2012 (4 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Notice of Decision of Granting Patent Right for Invention,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 97181455.4, dated May 21, 2004 (4 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right to Invention,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 98806840.0, dated Oct. 17, 2003 (5 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Rejection Decision,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200310123387.1, dated Apr. 4, 2008 (4 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200310123387.1, dated Aug. 3, 2007 (7 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 97181455.4, dated Apr. 25, 2003 (9 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 98806840.0, dated Apr. 25, 2003 (7 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 2006800526523, dated Jan. 26, 2011 (11 pages).
Video Research, Ltd., “English language translation of Information Statement,” submitted with the Japan Patent Office in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2000-548980, on May 25, 2007 (8 pages).
Wylie, Kenneth, “Special Report: Ad Age Dataplace: 100 Leading Research Companies: Events, New Interest Help Hard-Chargers Clear Hurdles, Jump 11.3% to $3.7 Billion” Advertising Age, May 20, 1996 (5 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,269, dated Feb. 25, 2009 (3 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,269, dated Nov. 26, 2008 (26 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,269, dated Feb. 15, 2008 (27 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/339,269, dated Jun. 8, 2009 (6 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Jun. 2, 2008 (3 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Oct. 17, 2003 (3 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/786,270, dated Dec. 11, 2000 (1 page).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/284,409, dated Aug. 19, 2009 (2 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/284,409, dated Jun. 3, 2008 (3 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision on Appeal,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/786,270, mailed Mar. 31, 2003 (18 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision on Appeal,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/076,517, mailed Sep. 26, 2006 (12 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Jan. 17, 2001 (17 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Election/Restriction Requirement,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Mar. 29, 1999 (4 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Election/Restrictions Requirement,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,549, dated Nov. 13, 2008 (6 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Examiner's Answer in response to the Appeal Brief filed Apr. 13, 2005,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/076,517, mailed Nov. 2, 2005 (14 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Examiner's Communication,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/786,270, dated Jul. 10, 2001 (2 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Apr. 6, 2006 (5 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Mar. 17, 2008 (13 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated May 15, 2003 (15 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Sep. 10, 2002 (14 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/076,517, dated Aug. 11, 2003 (14 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/076,517, dated Mar. 11, 2004 (15 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/909,224, dated Aug. 1, 2007 (24 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/909,224, dated Jun. 15, 2006 (20 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/909,224, dated Sep. 17, 2009 (30 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/949,938, dated Nov. 7, 2003 (9 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/284,409, dated Jun. 18, 2009 (9 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/284,409, dated Mar. 18, 2008 (11 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,549, dated Nov. 12, 2009 (12 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/786,270, dated Sep. 5, 2000 (8 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/088,798, dated Oct. 12, 2011 (11 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/088,798, dated Sep. 9, 2013 (22 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Aug. 19, 1999 (6 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Nov. 17, 2008 (12 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Nov. 27, 2002 (10 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Sep. 10, 2007 (12 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Sep. 11, 2001 (19 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/786,270, dated Jan. 20, 2000 (7 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/786,270, dated Jul. 28, 1999 (7 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Election/Restriction,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/786,270, dated Jun. 16, 1999 (5 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/076,517, dated Nov. 19, 2002 (11 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/076,517, dated Mar. 5, 2002 (8 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/859,764, dated May 22, 2002 (5 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/909,224, dated Feb. 6, 2009 (26 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/909,224, dated Mar. 22, 2007 (22 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/909,224, dated Oct. 19, 2005 (16 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/949,938, dated May 9, 2003 (7 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/949,938, dated Oct. 24, 2002 (5 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/284,409, dated Dec. 30, 2008 (10 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/284,409, dated Oct. 5, 2007 (9 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,549, dated Apr. 1, 2009 (11 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,117, dated Nov. 25, 2008 (5 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/631,538, dated Aug. 31, 2012 (10 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/631,538, dated Mar. 22, 2013 (11 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/631,538, dated Oct. 10, 2013 (7 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,828, dated Jun. 5, 2013 (16 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/024,559, dated Dec. 18, 2009 (12 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/088,798, dated Apr. 11, 2013 (24 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/088,798, dated Jan. 25, 2011 (9 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Examiner's Interview Summary,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Jun. 26, 2009 (7 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/763,750, dated Apr. 16, 2009 (4 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 08/786,270, dated Jul. 28, 2003 (5 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/859,764, dated Sep. 3, 2002 (4 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/284,409, dated Oct. 8, 2009 (4 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,549, dated Mar. 17, 2010 (8 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/631,538, dated Feb. 25, 2014 (5 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/823,374, dated Feb. 3, 2011 (8 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,355, dated Jan. 16, 2013 (13 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Examiner Initiated Summary,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,828, dated Jan. 2, 2014 (11 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/088,798, dated Feb. 14, 2014 (7 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Requirement for Restriction/Election,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,828, dated Mar. 4, 2013 (7 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/277,456, dated Dec. 24, 2014 (8 pages).
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2006/61917, dated Jun. 18, 2008 (8 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Decision of Rejection,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200680052652.3, dated Jul. 17, 2013 (7 pages).
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2006325808, dated Dec. 5, 2011 (3 pages).
Japan Patent Office, “Decision of Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2000-548980, dated Sep. 9, 2008 (4 pages).
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Decision of Rejection,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200810091335.3, dated Jan. 22, 2010 (3 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,279,847, dated May 12, 2010 (1 page).
European Patent Office, “Intention to Grant,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 07017129.3, dated May 7, 2012 (6 pages).
European Patent Office, “Intention to Grant,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 97926814.1, dated Apr. 7, 2008 (6 pages).
European Patent Office, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 97926814.1, dated Sep. 7, 2004 (2 pages).
European Patent Office, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 97926814.1, dated Jul. 25, 2006 (5 pages).
Marquis Security Cameras, “Overhead Speaker With Hidden Wireless Nanny Cam Inside,” Mar. 11, 2009 (3 pages).
Aun, Fred, The ClickZ Network, “Nielsen Pairs with Cable Co on Set Top Box Data,” Mar. 13, 2008 (1 page).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/375,648, dated Nov. 2, 2008 (3 pages).
Udrea et al., “Speech Enhancement Using Spectral Over-Subtraction and Residual Noise Reduction,” International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems, 2003. SCS 2003. vol. 1, Jul. 2003, pp. 165-168 (4 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/024,559, dated Mar. 29, 2010 (24 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/375,648, dated Nov. 2, 2007 (6 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/505,966, dated Oct. 6, 2011 (16 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/505,966, dated May 10, 2012 (15 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/505,966, dated Sep. 12, 2014 (20 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/505,966, dated Apr. 22, 2015 (9 pages).
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,633,577, dated Sep. 9, 2015 (1 page).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/841,191, dated Oct. 7, 2019 (12 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/841,191, dated Jun. 1, 2017 (27 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/841,191, dated Dec. 29, 2017 (37 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/841,191, dated Jun. 29, 2018 (24 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/841,191, dated Feb. 15, 2019 (7 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/841,191, dated Jun. 26, 2019 (8 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/671,946, dated Nov. 23, 2020 (14 pages).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/671,946, dated Mar. 16, 2021 (8 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210329334 A1 Oct 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61110274 Oct 2008 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 16671946 Nov 2019 US
Child 17359097 US
Parent 14841191 Aug 2015 US
Child 16671946 US
Parent 12505966 Jul 2009 US
Child 14841191 US