Patent Grant
12031126
The contents of the electronic sequence listing (B119570091US03-SEQ-TNG.xml; Size: 5,535,146535,119 bytes; and Date of Creation: Nov. 20, 2023) is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This U.S. Provisional Application also refers to and incorporates by reference the following applications, namely, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/820,813, filed Mar. 19, 2019, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/858,958, filed Jun. 7, 2019, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/889,996, filed Aug. 21, 2019, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/922,654, filed Aug. 21, 2019, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/913,553, filed Oct. 10, 2019, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/973,558, filed Oct. 10, 2019, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/931,195, filed Nov. 5, 2019, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/944,231, filed Dec. 5, 2019, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/974,537, filed Dec. 5, 2019, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/991,069, filed Mar. 17, 2020, and U.S. Provisional Application No. (63/100,548), filed Mar. 17, 2020. In addition, this U.S. Provisional Application refers to and incorporates by reference International PCT Application Nos.: PCT/US20/23721; PCT/US20/23730; PCT/US20/23713; PCT/US20/23712; PCT/US20/23727; PCT/US20/23724; PCT/US20/23725; PCT/US20/23728; PCT/US20/23732; PCT/US20/23723; PCT/US20/23553; and PCT/US20/23583, each filed on Mar. 19, 2020.
The contents of the electronic sequence listing (B119570091US02-SUBSEQ-TNG.xml; Size: 5,535,149 bytes; and Date of Creation: Oct. 13, 2023) is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Pathogenic single nucleotide mutations contribute to approximately 50% of human diseases for which there is a genetic component,7 according to some estimates. Unfortunately, treatment options for patients with these genetic disorders remain extremely limited, despite decades of gene therapy exploration8. Perhaps the most parsimonious solution to this therapeutic challenge is direct correction of single nucleotide mutations in patient genomes, which would address the root cause of disease and would likely provide lasting benefit. Although such a strategy was previously unthinkable, recent improvements in genome editing capabilities brought about by the advent of the CRISPR/Cas system9 have now brought this therapeutic approach within reach. By straightforward design of a guide RNA (gRNA) sequence that contains ˜20 nucleotides complementary to the target DNA sequence, nearly any conceivable genomic site can be specifically accessed by CRISPR associated (Cas) nucleases1,2. To date, several monomeric bacterial Cas nuclease systems have been identified and adapted for genome editing applications10. This natural diversity of Cas nucleases, along with a growing collection of engineered variants11-14, offers fertile ground for developing new genome editing technologies.
While gene disruption with CRISPR is now a mature technique, precision editing of single base pairs in the human genome remains a major challenge3. Homology directed repair (HDR) has long been used in human cells and other organisms to insert, correct, or exchange DNA sequences at sites of double strand breaks (DSBs) using donor DNA repair templates that encode the desired edits15. However, traditional HDR has very low efficiency in most human cell types, particularly in non-dividing cells, and competing non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) leads predominantly to insertion-deletion (indel) byproducts16. Other issues relate to the generation of DSBs, which can give rise to large chromosomal rearrangements and deletions at target loci17, or activate the p53 axis leading to growth arrest and apoptosis18,19.
Several approaches have been explored to address these drawbacks of HDR. For example, repair of single-stranded DNA breaks (nicks) with oligonucleotide donors has been shown to reduce indel formation, but yields of desired repair products remain low20. Other strategies attempt to bias repair toward HDR over NHEJ using small molecule and biologic reagents21-23. However, the effectiveness of these methods is likely cell-type dependent, and perturbation of the normal cell state could lead to undesirable and unforeseeable effects.
Recently, the inventors, led by Prof. David Liu et al., developed base editing as a technology that edits target nucleotides without creating DSBs or relying on HDR4-6,24-27. Direct modification of DNA bases by Cas-fused deaminase enzymes allows for C•G to T•A, or A•T to G•C, base pair conversions in a short target window (˜5-7 bases) with very high efficiency. As a result, base editors have been rapidly adopted by the scientific community. However, the following factors limit their generality for precision genome editing: (1) “bystander editing” of non-target C or A bases within the target window are observed; (2) target nucleotide product mixtures are observed; (3) target bases must be located 15±2 nucleotides upstream of a PAM sequence; and (5) repair of small insertion and deletion mutations is not possible.
Therefore, the development of programmable editors that are flexibly capable of introducing any desired single nucleotide change and/or which could install base pair insertions or deletions (e.g., at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, or more base pair insertions or deletions) and/or which could alter or modify the nucleotide sequence at a target site with high specificity and efficiency would substantially expand the scope and therapeutic potential of genome editing technologies based on CRISPR.
The present invention describes a new platform for genome editing called “multi-flap prime editing” (including, for example, “dual-flap prime editing” and “quadruple-flap prime editing”) and represents an innovative advancement of “prime editing” or “classical prime editing,” as described by the present inventors in Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149-157 (2019), which is incorporated herein by reference. Whereas classical prime editing in various embodiments polymerizes at a nick site a single 3′ flap which becomes integrated into the target nucleic acid on the same strand, the presently described multi-flap prime editing systems involve distinct constructs, systems, and methodologies that, in various embodiments, generate pairs or multiple pairs of 3′ flaps on different strands, which form duplexes comprising desired edits and which become incorporated into target nucleic acid molecules, e.g., at specific loci or edit sites in a genome. In various aspects, the pairs or multiple pairs of 3′ flaps form duplexes because they comprise reverse complementary sequences which anneal to one another once generated by the prime editors described herein. The duplexes become incorporated into the target site by cell-driven mechanisms that naturally replace the endogenous duplex sequences located between adjacent nick sites. In certain embodiments, the new duplex sequences may be introduced at one or more locations (e.g., at adjacent genomic loci or on two different chromosomal locations), and may comprise one or more sequences of interest, e.g., protein-encoding sequence, peptide-encoding sequence, or RNA-encoding sequence. In one embodiment, the new duplex sequences installed by the multi-flap prime editing systems may comprise a recombinase site, e.g., a Bxb1 recombinase attB (38 bp) and/or attP (50 bp) site, or a recombinase site recognized by Hin recombinase, Gin recombinase, Tn3 recombinase, β-six recombinase, CinH recombinase, ParA recombinase, γδ recombinase, ϕC31 recombinase, TP901 recombinase, TG1 recombinase, φBT1 recombinase, R4 recombinase, φRV1 recombinase, φFC1 recombinase, MR11 recombinase, A118 recombinase, U153 recombinase, and gp29 recombinase, Cre recombinase, FLP recombinase, R recombinase, Lambda recombinase, HK101 recombinase, HK022 recombinase, and pSAM2 recombinase.
The inventors recently developed prime editing which enables the insertion, deletion, or replacement of genomic DNA sequences without requiring error-prone double-strand DNA breaks. Prime editing uses an engineered Cas9 nickase-reverse transcriptase fusion protein (PE1 or PE2) paired with an engineered prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA) that both directs Cas9 to the target genomic site and encodes the information for installing the desired edit. Prime editing proceeds through a multi-step editing process: 1) the Cas9 domain binds and nicks the target genomic DNA site, which is specified by the pegRNA's spacer sequence; 2) the reverse transcriptase domain uses the nicked genomic DNA as a primer to initiate the synthesis of an edited DNA strand using an engineered extension on the pegRNA as a template for reverse transcription—this generates a single-stranded 3′ flap containing the edited DNA sequence; 3) cellular DNA repair resolves the 3′ flap intermediate by the displacement of a 5′ flap species that occurs via invasion by the edited 3′ flap, excision of the 5′ flap containing the original DNA sequence, and ligation of the new 3′ flap to incorporate the edited DNA strand, forming a heteroduplex of one edited and one unedited strand; and 4) cellular DNA repair replaces the unedited strand within the heteroduplex using the edited strand as a template for repair, completing the editing process.
Efficient incorporation of the desired edit requires that the newly synthesized 3′ flap contains a portion of sequence that is homologous to the genomic DNA site. This homology enables the edited 3′ flap to compete with the endogenous DNA strand (the corresponding 5′ flap) for incorporation into the DNA duplex. Because the edited 3′ flap will contain less sequence homology than the endogenous 5′ flap, the competition is expected to favor the 5′ flap strand. Thus, a potential limiting factor in the efficiency of prime editing may be the efficiency of the invasion of the 3′ flap of the endogenous DNA and the subsequent displacement and replacement of the 5′ flap strand. Moreover, successful 3′ flap invasion and removal of the 5′ flap only incorporates the edit on one strand of the double-stranded DNA genome. Permanent installation of the edit requires cellular DNA repair to replace the unedited complementary DNA strand using the edited strand as a template. While the cell can be made to favor replacement of the unedited strand over the edited strand (step 4 above) by the introduction of a nick in the unedited strand adjacent to the edit using a secondary sgRNA (the PE3 system), this process still relies on a second stage of DNA repair. These DNA repair steps may be particularly inefficient for edits which require equilibration of long 5′ and 3′ flap intermediates or contain long non-homologous regions, such as long insertions or long deletions. Further developments in prime editing would advance the art.
In various aspects, this Specification describes a multi-flap prime editing system (including, for example, dual prime editing systems and quadruple prime editing systems) that addresses the challenges associated with flap equilibration and subsequent incorporation of the edit into the non-edited complementary genomic DNA strand by simultaneously editing both DNA strands. In the dual-flap prime editing system, for example, two pegRNAs are used to target opposite strands of a genomic site and direct the synthesis of two complementary 3′ flaps containing edited DNA sequence (
Like classical prime editing, multi-flap prime editing is a versatile and precise genome editing method that directly writes new genetic information into a specified DNA site using a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (“napDNAbp”) working in association with a polymerase (i.e., in the form of a fusion protein or otherwise provided in trans with the napDNAbp), wherein the prime editing system is programmed with a prime editing (PE) guide RNA (“PEgRNA”) that both specifies the target site and templates the synthesis of the desired edit in the form of a replacement DNA strand by way of an extension (either DNA or RNA) engineered onto a guide RNA (e.g., at the 5′ or 3′ end, or at an internal portion of a guide RNA). The replacement strand containing the desired edit (e.g., a single nucleobase substitution) shares the same sequence as the endogenous strand of the target site to be edited (with the exception that it includes the desired edit). Through DNA repair and/or replication machinery, the endogenous strand of the target site is replaced by the newly synthesized replacement strand containing the desired edit. In some cases, prime editing may be thought of as a “search-and-replace” genome editing technology since the prime editors, as described herein, not only search and locate the desired target site to be edited, but at the same time, encode a replacement strand containing a desired edit, which is installed in place of the corresponding target site endogenous DNA strand.
The multi-flap prime editors of the present disclosure relate, in part, to the discovery that the mechanism of target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) or “prime editing” can be leveraged or adapted for conducting precision CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing with high efficiency and genetic flexibility (e.g., as depicted in various embodiments of
In classical prime editing, the newly synthesized strand (i.e., the replacement DNA strand containing the desired edit) that is formed by the herein disclosed prime editors would be homologous to the genomic target sequence (i.e., have the same sequence as) except for the inclusion of a desired nucleotide change (e.g., a single nucleotide change, a deletion, or an insertion, or a combination thereof). The newly synthesized (or replacement) strand of DNA may also be referred to as a single strand DNA flap, which would compete for hybridization with the complementary homologous endogenous DNA strand, thereby displacing the corresponding endogenous strand. In certain embodiments, the system can be combined with the use of an error-prone reverse transcriptase enzyme (e.g., provided as a fusion protein with the Cas9 domain, or provided in trans to the Cas9 domain). The error-prone reverse transcriptase enzyme can introduce alterations during synthesis of the single strand DNA flap. Thus, in certain embodiments, error-prone reverse transcriptase can be utilized to introduce nucleotide changes to the target DNA. Depending on the error-prone reverse transcriptase that is used with the system, the changes can be random or non-random.
In classical prime editing, resolution of the hybridized intermediate (comprising the single strand DNA flap synthesized by the reverse transcriptase hybridized to the endogenous DNA strand) can include removal of the resulting displaced flap of endogenous DNA (e.g., with a 5′ end DNA flap endonuclease, FEN1), ligation of the synthesized single strand DNA flap to the target DNA, and assimilation of the desired nucleotide change as a result of cellular DNA repair and/or replication processes. Because templated DNA synthesis offers single nucleotide precision for the modification of any nucleotide, including insertions and deletions, the scope of this approach is very broad and could foreseeably be used for myriad applications in basic science and therapeutics.
In some aspects, the specification provides a pair of prime editors, each comprising a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and a DNA polymerase. In some embodiments, each prime editor is capable of carrying out genome editing by target-primed reverse transcription in the presence of an extended guide RNA.
In some aspects, the specification provides a pair of prime editors, each comprising a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and a DNA polymerase, wherein the DNA polymerase is provided in trans with the napDNAbp. In various embodiments, each prime editor is capable of carrying out genome editing by target-primed reverse transcription in the presence of an extended guide RNA.
In some aspects, the specification provides a pair of prime editors, each comprising a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and a reverse transcriptase. In various embodiments, each prime editor is capable of carrying out genome editing by target-primed reverse transcription in the presence of an extended guide RNA.
In some aspects, the specification provides a pair of prime editors, each comprising a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and a reverse transcriptase, wherein the reverse transcriptase is provided in trans with the napDNAbp. In various embodiments, each prime editor is capable of carrying out genome editing by target-primed reverse transcription in the presence of an extended guide RNA.
In certain embodiments, the napDNAbp has a nickase activity. The napDNAbp may also be a Cas9 protein or functional equivalent thereof, such as a nuclease active Cas9, a nuclease inactive Cas9 (dCas9), or a Cas9 nickase (nCas9).
In certain embodiments, the napDNAbp is selected from the group consisting of: Cas9, Cas12e, Cas12d, Cas12a, Cas12b1, Cas13a, Cas12c, and Argonaute and optionally has a nickase activity.
In other embodiments, each prime editor of the dual prime editors, when complexed with an extended guide RNA, is capable of binding to a target DNA sequence.
In still other embodiments, the target DNA sequence comprises a target strand and a complementary non-target strand.
In other embodiments, the binding of the prime editor complexed to the extended guide RNA forms an R-loop. The R-loop can comprise (i) an RNA-DNA hybrid comprising the extended guide RNA and the target strand, and (ii) the complementary non-target strand.
In still other embodiments, the complementary non-target strand is nicked to form a reverse transcriptase priming sequence having a free 3′ end.
In various embodiments, the extended guide RNA comprises (a) a guide RNA and (b) an RNA extension at the 5′ or the 3′ end of the guide RNA, or at an intramolecular location in the guide RNA.
The RNA extension can comprise (i) a reverse transcription template sequence comprising a desired nucleotide change, (ii) a reverse transcription primer binding site, and (iii) optionally, a linker sequence.
In various embodiments, the reverse transcription template sequence may encode a single-strand DNA flap that is complementary to an endogenous DNA sequence adjacent to the nick site, wherein the single-strand DNA flap comprises the desired nucleotide change.
In various embodiments, the RNA extension is at least 5 nucleotides, at least 6 nucleotides, at least 7 nucleotides, at least 8 nucleotides, at least 9 nucleotides, at least 10 nucleotides, at least 11 nucleotides, at least 12 nucleotides, at least 13 nucleotides, at least 14 nucleotides, at least 15 nucleotides, at least 16 nucleotides, at least 17 nucleotides, at least 18 nucleotides, at least 19 nucleotides, at least 20 nucleotides, at least 21 nucleotides, at least 22 nucleotides, at least 23 nucleotides, at least 24 nucleotides, or at least 25 nucleotides in length.
In still other embodiments, the single-strand DNA flap may hybridize to the endogenous DNA sequence adjacent to the nick site, thereby installing the desired nucleotide change. In still other embodiments, the single-stranded DNA flap displaces the endogenous DNA sequence adjacent to the nick site and which has a free 5′ end. In certain embodiments, the displaced endogenous DNA having the 5′ end is excised by the cell.
In various embodiments, the cellular repair of the single-strand DNA flap results in installation of the desired nucleotide change, thereby forming a desired product.
In various other embodiments, the desired nucleotide change is installed in an editing window that is between about −4 to +10 of the PAM sequence.
In still other embodiments, the desired nucleotide change is installed in an editing window that is between about −5 to +5 of the nick site, or between about −10 to +10 of the nick site, or between about −20 to +20 of the nick site, or between about −30 to +30 of the nick site, or between about −40 to +40 of the nick site, or between about −50 to +50 of the nick site, or between about −60 to +60 of the nick site, or between about −70 to +70 of the nick site, or between about −80 to +80 of the nick site, or between about −90 to +90 of the nick site, or between about −100 to +100 of the nick site, or between about −200 to +200 of the nick site.
In various embodiments, the napDNAbp of the dual prime editors each comprise an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 18. In various other embodiments, the napDNAbp comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98%, or 99% identical to the amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 26-39, 42-61, 75-76, 126, 130, 137, 141, 147, 153, 157, 445, 460, 467, and 482-487 (Cas9); SEQ ID NO: 77-86 (CP-Cas9); SEQ ID NO: 18-25 and 87-88 (SpCas9); and SEQ ID NOs: 62-72(Cas12)
In other embodiments, the reverse transcriptase of the disclosed prime editors and/or compositions of the dual prime editors may comprise any one of the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 89-100, 105-122, 128-129, 132, 139, 143, 149, 154, 159, 235, 454, 471, 516, 662, 700-716, 739-742, and 766. In still other embodiments, the reverse transcriptase may comprise an amino acid sequence that is at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98%, or 99% identical to the amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 89-100, 105-122, 128-129, 132, 139, 143, 149, 154, 159, 235, 454, 471, 516, 662, 700-716, 739-742, and 766. These sequences may be naturally occurring reverse transcriptase sequences, e.g., from a retrovirus or a retrotransposon, of the sequences may be recombinant.
In various other embodiments, the prime editors of the dual prime editors herein disclosed may comprise various structural configurations. For example, in embodiments in which the prime editors are provided as a fusion protein, each of the dual prime editor fusion proteins may comprise the structure NH2-[napDNAbp]-[reverse transcriptase]-COOH; or NH2-[reverse transcriptase]-[napDNAbp]-COOH, wherein each instance of “]-[” indicates the presence of an optional linker sequence.
In various embodiments, the linker sequence comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 127, 165-176, 446, 453, and 767-769, or an amino acid sequence that this at least 80%, 85%, or 90%, or 95%, or 99% identical to any one of the linker amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 127, 165-176, 446, 453, and 767-769.
In various embodiments, the desired nucleotide change that is incorporated into the target DNA can be a single nucleotide change (e.g., a transition or transversion), an insertion of one or more nucleotides, or a deletion of one or more nucleotides.
In certain cases, the insertion is at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 30, at least 40, at least 50, at least 60, at least 70, at least 80, at least 90, at least 100, at least 200, at least 300, at least 400, or at least 500 nucleotides in length.
In certain other cases, the deletion is at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 30, at least 40, at least 50, at least 60, at least 70, at least 80, at least 90, at least 100, at least 200, at least 300, at least 400, or at least 500 nucleotides in length.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides an extended guide RNA comprising a guide RNA and at least one RNA extension. The RNA extension can be positioned at the 3′ end of the guide RNA. In other embodiments, the RNA extension can be positioned at the 5′ of the guide RNA. In still other embodiments, the RNA extension can be positioned at an intramolecular position within the guide RNA, however, preferable, the intramolecular positioning of the extended portion does not disrupt the functioning of the protospacer.
In various embodiments, the extended guide RNA is capable of binding to a napDNAbp and directing the napDNAbp to a target DNA sequence. The target DNA sequence can comprise a target strand and a complementary non-target strand, wherein the guide RNA hybridizes to the target strand to form an RNA-DNA hybrid and an R-loop.
In various embodiments of the extended guide RNA, the at least one RNA extension can comprise a reverse transcription template sequence. In various other embodiment, the RNA extension may further comprises a reverse transcription primer binding site. In still further embodiments, the RNA extension may comprise a linker or spacer sequence that joins the RNA extension to the guide RNA.
In various embodiments, the RNA extension can be at least 5 nucleotides, at least 6 nucleotides, at least 7 nucleotides, at least 8 nucleotides, at least 9 nucleotides, at least 10 nucleotides, at least 11 nucleotides, at least 12 nucleotides, at least 13 nucleotides, at least 14 nucleotides, at least 15 nucleotides, at least 16 nucleotides, at least 17 nucleotides, at least 18 nucleotides, at least 19 nucleotides, at least 20 nucleotides, at least 21 nucleotides, at least 22 nucleotides, at least 23 nucleotides, at least 24 nucleotides, at least 25 nucleotides, at least 30 nucleotides, at least 40 nucleotides, at least 50 nucleotides, at least 60 nucleotides, at least 70 nucleotides, at least 80 nucleotides, at least 90 nucleotides, at least 100 nucleotides, at least 150 nucleotides, at least 200 nucleotides, at least 300 nucleotides, at least 400 nucleotides, or at least 500 nucleotides in length.
In other embodiments, the reverse transcription template sequence is at least 3 nucleotides, at least 4 nucleotides, at least 5 nucleotides, at least 6 nucleotides, at least 7 nucleotides, at least 8 nucleotides, at least 9 nucleotides, at least 10 nucleotides, at least 11 nucleotides, at least 12 nucleotides, at least 13 nucleotides, at least 14 nucleotides, at least 15 nucleotides, at least 16 nucleotides, at least 17 nucleotides, at least 18 nucleotides, at least 19 nucleotides, at least 20 nucleotides, at least 30 nucleotides, at least 40 nucleotides, at least 50 nucleotides, at least 60 nucleotides, at least 70 nucleotides, at least 80 nucleotides, at least 90 nucleotides, at least 100 nucleotides, at least 200 nucleotides, at least 300 nucleotides, at least 400 nucleotides, or at least 500 nucleotides in length.
In still other embodiments, wherein the reverse transcription primer binding site sequence is at least 3 nucleotides, at least 4 nucleotides, at least 5 nucleotides, at least 6 nucleotides, at least 7 nucleotides, at least 8 nucleotides, at least 9 nucleotides, at least 10 nucleotides, at least 11 nucleotides, at least 12 nucleotides, at least 13 nucleotides, at least 14 nucleotides, at least 15 nucleotides, at least 16 nucleotides, at least 17 nucleotides, at least 18 nucleotides, at least 19 nucleotides, at least 20 nucleotides, at least 30 nucleotides, at least 40 nucleotides, at least 50 nucleotides, at least 60 nucleotides, at least 70 nucleotides, at least 80 nucleotides, at least 90 nucleotides, at least 100 nucleotides, at least 200 nucleotides, at least 300 nucleotides, at least 400 nucleotides, or at least 500 nucleotides in length.
In other embodiments, the optional linker or spacer sequence is at least 3 nucleotides, at least 4 nucleotides, at least 5 nucleotides, at least 6 nucleotides, at least 7 nucleotides, at least 8 nucleotides, at least 9 nucleotides, at least 10 nucleotides, at least 11 nucleotides, at least 12 nucleotides, at least 13 nucleotides, at least 14 nucleotides, at least 15 nucleotides, at least 16 nucleotides, at least 17 nucleotides, at least 18 nucleotides, at least 19 nucleotides, at least 20 nucleotides, at least 30 nucleotides, at least 40 nucleotides, at least 50 nucleotides, at least 60 nucleotides, at least 70 nucleotides, at least 80 nucleotides, at least 90 nucleotides, at least 100 nucleotides, at least 200 nucleotides, at least 300 nucleotides, at least 400 nucleotides, or at least 500 nucleotides in length.
In various embodiments of the extended guide RNAs, the reverse transcription template sequence may encode a single-strand DNA flap that is complementary to an endogenous DNA sequence adjacent to a nick site, wherein the single-strand DNA flap comprises a desired nucleotide change. The single-stranded DNA flap may displace an endogenous single-strand DNA at the nick site. The displaced endogenous single-strand DNA at the nick site can have a 5′ end and form an endogenous flap, which can be excised by the cell. In various embodiments, excision of the 5′ end endogenous flap can help drive product formation since removing the 5′ end endogenous flap encourages hybridization of the single-strand 3′ DNA flap to the corresponding complementary DNA strand, and the incorporation or assimilation of the desired nucleotide change carried by the single-strand 3′ DNA flap into the target DNA.
In various embodiments of the extended guide RNAs, the cellular repair of the single-strand DNA flap results in installation of the desired nucleotide change, thereby forming a desired product.
In certain embodiments, the PEgRNA comprises the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 101-104, 181-183, 223-234, 237-244, 277, 324-330, 332, 334, 336, 338, 340, 342, 344, 346, 348, 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 394, 429-442, 499-505, 641-649, 678-692, 735-736, 757-761, 776-777, 2997-3103, 3113-3121, 3305-3455, 3479-3493, 3522-3540, 3549-3556, 3628-3698, 3755-3810, 3874, 3890-3901, 3905-3911, 3913-3929, and 3972-3989 or a nucleotide sequence having at least 85%, or at least 90%, or at least 95%, or at least 98%, or at least 99% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: 101-104, 181-183, 223-234, 237-244, 277, 324-330, 332, 334, 336, 338, 340, 342, 344, 346, 348, 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 394, 429-442, 499-505, 641-649, 678-692, 735-736, 757-761, 776-777, 2997-3103, 3113-3121, 3305-3455, 3479-3493, 3522-3540, 3549-3556, 3628-3698, 3755-3810, 3874, 3890-3901, 3905-3911, 3913-3929, and 3972-3989.
In yet another aspect of the invention, the specification provides for complexes comprising a prime editor described herein and any extended guide RNA described above.
In still other aspects of the invention, the specification provides a complex comprising a napDNAbp and an extended guide RNA. The napDNAbp can be a Cas9 nickase, or can be an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 42-57 (Cas9 nickase) and 65 (AsCas12a nickase), or an amino acid sequence that is at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98%, or 99% identical to the amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 42-57 (Cas9 nickase) and 65 (AsCas12a nickase).
In various embodiments involving a complex, the extended guide RNA is capable of directing the napDNAbp to a target DNA sequence. In various embodiments, a reverse transcriptase may be provided in trans, i.e., provided from a different source than the complex itself. For example, a reverse transcriptase could be provided to the same cell having the complex by introducing a separate vector separately encoding the reverse transcriptase.
In another aspect, the disclosure provides a system comprising a first and a second prime editor complex, each complex comprising a prime editor and a prime editing guide RNA (PEgRNA). In some embodiments, each prime editor comprises a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and a polypeptide having an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity, and each PEgRNA comprises a spacer sequence, a gRNA core, a DNA synthesis template, and a primer binding site. In certain embodiments, each DNA synthesis template encodes a single-stranded DNA sequence comprising an edited portion. Two single-stranded DNA sequences encoded may by complementary to one another and form a duplex that integrates into the target site to be edited. In some embodiments, the two single-stranded DNA sequences encoded may comprise a region of complementarity to one another. In certain embodiments, the two single-stranded DNA sequences encoded may comprise a region of complementarity to one another that is at least 2 bp, at least 3 bp, at least 4 bp, at least 5 bp, at least 10 bp, at least 20 bp, at least 30 bp, at least 40 bp, at least 50 bp, at least 100 bp, at least 200 bp, at least 300 bp, at least 400 bp, at least 500 bp, at least 600 bp, at least 700 bp, at least 800 bp, at least 900 bp, or at least 1000 bp long. In some embodiments, the prime editor is provided as a fusion protein. In certain embodiments, the components of the prime editor (i.e., the napDNAbp and the polypeptide having an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity) are provided in trans.
In another aspect, the disclosure provides a system comprising a first, a second, a third, and a fourth prime editor complex, each complex comprising a prime editor and a prime editing guide RNA (PEgRNA). In some embodiments, each prime editor comprises a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and a polypeptide having an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity, and each PEgRNA comprises a spacer sequence, a gRNA core, a DNA synthesis template, and a primer binding site. In certain embodiments, each DNA synthesis template encodes a single-stranded DNA sequence comprising an edited portion. Two single-stranded DNA sequences encoded may by complementary to one another and form a duplex that integrates into the target site to be edited. In some embodiments, the two single-stranded DNA sequences encoded may comprise a region of complementarity to one another. In certain embodiments, the two single-stranded DNA sequences encoded may comprise a region of complementarity to one another that is at least 2 bp, at least 3 bp, at least 4 bp, at least 5 bp, at least 10 bp, at least 20 bp, at least 30 bp, at least 40 bp, at least 50 bp, at least 100 bp, at least 200 bp, at least 300 bp, at least 400 bp, at least 500 bp, at least 600 bp, at least 700 bp, at least 800 bp, at least 900 bp, or at least 1000 bp long. In some embodiments, the prime editor is provided as a fusion protein. In certain embodiments, the components of the prime editor (i.e., the napDNAbp and the polypeptide having an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity) are provided in trans.
In some embodiments, each napDNAbp is a Cas9 domain or variant thereof. In some embodiments, each napDNAbp is a nuclease active Cas9 domain, a nuclease inactive Cas9 domain, or a Cas9 nickase domain or a variant thereof. In certain embodiments, each napDNAbp is independently selected from the group consisting of: Cas9, Cas12e, Cas12d, Cas12a, Cas12b1, Cas13a, Cas12c, and Argonaute and optionally has a nickase activity. In various embodiments, each napDNAbp comprises an amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2-65, or an amino acid sequence at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 99% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2-65.
In some embodiments, the polypeptide comprising an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity is a reverse transcriptase. In certain embodiments, the polypeptide comprising an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity comprises an amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 37, 68-79, 82-98, 81, 98, and 110 or an amino acid sequence having at least an 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 99% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: 37, 68-79, 82-98, 81, 98, and 110.
In some embodiments, each prime editor may comprise a linker that joins the napDNAbp and the reverse transcriptase. In certain embodiments, the linker comprises an amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 119-128, or an amino acid sequence having at least an 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 99% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: 119-128. Each linker may be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, or 50 amino acids in length.
In some embodiments, each PEgRNA may independently comprise a nucleotide sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 192-203, or a nucleotide sequence having at least an 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 99% sequence identity with any one of SEQ ID NOs: 192-203.
In various embodiments, each spacer sequence of each PEgRNA may bind to a specific binding site of the double-stranded DNA sequence adjacent the target site to be edited. In some embodiments, the binding of a spacer sequence of one prime editor complex to one strand of the double-stranded DNA sequence and the binding of a spacer sequence of another prime editor complex to the opposite strand of the double-stranded DNA sequence results in the nicking of both DNA strands at a nick site proximal to the PAM sequences on each strand.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides polynucleotides. In some embodiments, the polynucleotides may encode any of the complexes described herein. In certain embodiments, the polynucleotides may encode any of the PEgRNAs described herein.
In yet another aspect, the specification provides polynucleotides. In certain embodiments, the polynucleotides may encode any of the prime editors disclosed herein. In certain other embodiments, the polynucleotides may encode any of the napDNAbps disclosed herein. In still further embodiments, the polynucleotides may encode any of the reverse transcriptases disclosed herein. In yet other embodiments, the polynucleotides may encode any of the extended guide RNAs disclosed herein, any of the reverse transcription template sequences, or any of the reverse transcription primer sites, or any of the optional linker sequences.
In still other aspects, the specification provides vectors comprising the polynucleotides described herein. Thus, in certain embodiments, the vectors comprise polynucleotides for encoding the prime editors comprising a napDNAbp and a reverse transcriptase (i.e., as fusion protein, or expressed in trans). In certain embodiments, the vectors comprise polynucleotides for encoding any of the complexes described herein. In other embodiments, the vectors comprise polynucleotides that separately encode a napDNAbp and reverse transcriptase. In still other embodiments, the vectors may comprise polynucleotides that encode the extended guide RNAs. In various embodiments, the vectors may comprise one or more polynucleotides that encode napDNAbps, reverse transcriptase, and extended guide RNAs on the same or separate vectors. In some embodiments, the vectors comprise polynucleotides for encoding any of the pegRNAs described herein.
In still other aspects, the specification provides cells comprising a prime editor as described herein and an extended guide RNA. The cells may be transformed with the vectors comprising the prime editors, napDNAbps, reverse transcriptase, and extended guide RNAs. These genetic elements may be comprised on the same vector or on different vectors. In some embodiments, the cells comprise any of the systems or complexes described herein. The cells may be transformed with polynucleotides encoding the any of the systems, complexes, and/or pegRNAs disclosed herein, or vectors comprising polynucleotides encoding the any of the systems, complexes, or pegRNAs disclosed herein.
In yet another aspect, the specification provides pharmaceutical compositions. In certain embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions comprise one or more of a napDNAbp, a prime editor, a reverse transcriptase, and an extended guide RNA. In certain embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions comprise any of the systems and/or complexes described herein. In certain embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions comprise any of the prime editors, systems, or complexes described herein and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient. In other embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions comprise any extend guide RNA described herein and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient. In still other embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions comprise any extend guide RNA described herein in combination with any prime editor described herein and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient. In yet other embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions comprise any polynucleotide sequence encoding one or more of a napDNAbp, a prime editor, a reverse transcriptase, and an extended guide RNA, or any of the vectors disclosed herein. In still other embodiments, the various components disclosed herein may be separated into one or more pharmaceutical compositions. For example, a first pharmaceutical composition may comprise a prime editor or a napDNAbp, a second pharmaceutical compositions may comprise a reverse transcriptase, and a third pharmaceutical composition may comprise an extended guide RNA.
In still a further aspect, the present disclosure provides kits. In one embodiment, the kit comprises one or more polynucleotides encoding one or more components, including a prime editor, a napDNAbp, a reverse transcriptase, and an extended guide RNA. The kits may also comprise vectors, cells, and isolated preparations of polypeptides, including any prime editor, napDNAbp, or reverse transcriptase disclosed herein.
In yet another aspect, the present disclosure provides for methods of using the disclosed compositions of matter, including methods of using any of the systems described herein for simultaneously editing both complementary strands of a double-stranded DNA sequence at a target site. In some embodiments, the method comprises contacting the double-stranded DNA sequence with any of the system disclosed herein.
In one aspect, the disclosure provides methods comprising contacting a double-stranded DNA sequence at a target site with a first and a second prime editor complex, each complex comprising a prime editor and a prime editing guide RNA (PEgRNA). In some embodiments, each prime editor comprises a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and a polypeptide having an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity, and each PEgRNA comprises a spacer sequence, a gRNA core, a DNA synthesis template, and a primer binding site. In some embodiments, each prime editor is provided as a fusion protein. In some embodiments, the components of the prime editor are provided in trans. In certain embodiments, each DNA synthesis template encodes a single-stranded DNA sequence comprising an edited portion. Two single-stranded DNA sequences encoded may be complementary to one another and form a duplex that integrates into the target site to be edited. The various elements of the prime editor complexes may comprise any of the embodiments of the systems disclosed herein.
In another aspect, the disclosure provides methods comprising contacting a double-stranded DNA sequence at a target site with a first, a second, a third, and a fourth prime editor complex, each complex comprising a prime editor and a prime editing guide RNA (PEgRNA). In some embodiments, each prime editor comprises a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and a polypeptide having an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity, and each PEgRNA comprises a spacer sequence, a gRNA core, a DNA synthesis template, and a primer binding site. In some embodiments, each prime editor is provided as a fusion protein. In some embodiments, the components of the prime editor are provided in trans. In certain embodiments, each DNA synthesis template encodes a single-stranded DNA sequence. Two single-stranded DNA sequences encoded may be complementary to one another and form a duplex that integrates into the target site to be edited. The various elements of the prime editor complexes may comprise any of the embodiments of the systems disclosed herein.
In some embodiments, the methods provided herein allow for inversion of a target DNA sequence. In some embodiments, the first single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the first DNA synthesis template and the second single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the second DNA synthesis template are on opposite ends of a target DNA sequence, and the third single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the third DNA synthesis template and the fourth single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the fourth DNA synthesis template are on opposite ends of the same target DNA sequence.
In some embodiments, the methods provided herein further comprise providing a circular DNA donor. In certain embodiments, the first single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the first DNA synthesis template and the third single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the third DNA synthesis template are on opposite ends of the target DNA sequence, and the second single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the second DNA synthesis template and the fourth single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the fourth DNA synthesis template are on the circular DNA donor. In some embodiments, the portion of the circular DNA donor between the second single-stranded DNA sequence and the fourth single-stranded DNA sequence replaces the target DNA sequence between the first single-stranded DNA sequence and the third single-stranded DNA sequence.
In some embodiments, the methods provided herein allow for translocation of a target DNA sequence from a first nucleic acid molecule (e.g., a first chromosome) to a second nucleic acid molecule (e.g., a second chromosome). In some embodiments, the first single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the first DNA synthesis template and the third single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the third single-stranded DNA synthesis template are on a first nucleic acid molecule, and the second single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the second DNA synthesis template and the fourth single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the fourth DNA synthesis template are on a second nucleic acid molecule. In certain embodiments, a portion of the first nucleic acid molecule between the first single-stranded DNA sequence and the third single-stranded DNA sequence is incorporated into the second nucleic acid molecule. In certain embodiments, a portion of the second nucleic acid molecule between the second single-stranded DNA sequence and the fourth single-stranded DNA sequence is incorporated into the first nucleic acid molecule.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a pair of PEgRNAs for use in multi-flap prime editing. In some embodiments, the pair comprises a first PEgRNA and a second PEgRNA, and each PEgRNA independently comprises a spacer sequence, a gRNA core, a DNA synthesis template, and a primer binding site. In certain embodiments, each DNA synthesis template encodes a single-stranded DNA sequence. In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors are used in connection with a pair of PEgRNAs which target separate prime editors to either side of a target site, wherein the pair of PEgRNA each encode 3′ nucleic acid flaps which comprise nucleic acid sequences which are reverse complements of each other. In various embodiments, the 3′ flaps comprising the reverse complement sequences may anneal to one another to form a duplex comprising the desired edit or nucleic acid sequence encoding by the PEgRNAs. The duplex then becomes integrated into the target site by replacement of the corresponding endogenous duplex positioned between adjacent nick sites.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a plurality of PEgRNAs for use in multi-flap prime editing. In some embodiments, the plurality comprises a first, a second, a third, and a fourth PEgRNA. In some embodiments, each of the four PEgRNA independently comprises a spacer sequence, a gRNA core, a DNA synthesis template, and a primer binding site. In certain embodiments, each DNA synthesis template encodes a single-stranded DNA sequence. Two single-stranded DNA sequences encoded may be complementary to one another.
In various aspects, the present disclosure provides polynucleotides encoding any of the pairs or pluralities of PEgRNAs described herein. In certain aspects, the present disclosure provides vectors encoding a polynucleotide encoding any of the pairs or pluralities of PEgRNAs described herein. In yet another aspect, the present disclosure provides cells comprising a vector encoding a polynucleotide encoding any of the pairs or pluralities of PEgRNAs described herein. In other aspects, the disclosure provides pharmaceutical compositions comprising any of the pairs or pluralities of PEgRNAs described herein, a vector encoding any of the pairs or pluralities of PEgRNAs described herein, or a cell comprising a vector encoding any of the pairs or pluralities of PEgRNAs described herein. In certain embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions comprise a pharmaceutical excipient.
In one embodiment, the methods relate to a method for installing a desired nucleotide change in a double-stranded DNA sequence. The method first comprises contacting the double-stranded DNA sequence with a complex comprising a prime editor and an extended guide RNA, wherein the prime editor comprises a napDNAbp and a reverse transcriptase and wherein the extended guide RNA comprises a reverse transcription template sequence comprising the desired nucleotide change. In some embodiments, each prime editor is provided as a fusion protein. In some embodiments, the components of the prime editor are provided in trans. Next, the method involves nicking the double-stranded DNA sequence on the non-target strand, thereby generating a free single-strand DNA having a 3′ end. The method then involves hybridizing the 3′ end of the free single-strand DNA to the reverse transcription template sequence, thereby priming the reverse transcriptase domain. The method then involves polymerizing a strand of DNA from the 3′ end, thereby generating a single-strand DNA flap comprising the desired nucleotide change. Then, the method involves replacing an endogenous DNA strand adjacent the cut site with the single-strand DNA flap, thereby installing the desired nucleotide change in the double-stranded DNA sequence.
In other embodiments, the disclosure provides for a method for introducing one or more changes in the nucleotide sequence of a DNA molecule at a target locus, comprising contacting the DNA molecule with a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and a guide RNA which targets the napDNAbp to the target locus, wherein the guide RNA comprises a reverse transcriptase (RT) template sequence comprising at least one desired nucleotide change. Next, the method involves forming an exposed 3′ end in a DNA strand at the target locus and then hybridizing the exposed 3′ end to the RT template sequence to prime reverse transcription. Next, a single strand DNA flap comprising the at least one desired nucleotide change based on the RT template sequence is synthesized or polymerized by reverse transcriptase. Lastly, the at least one desired nucleotide change is incorporated into the corresponding endogenous DNA, thereby introducing one or more changes in the nucleotide sequence of the DNA molecule at the target locus.
In still other embodiments, the disclosure provides a method for introducing one or more changes in the nucleotide sequence of a DNA molecule at a target locus by target-primed reverse transcription, the method comprising: (a) contacting the DNA molecule at the target locus with a (i) prime editor comprising a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and a reverse transcriptase and (ii) a guide RNA comprising an RT template comprising a desired nucleotide change; (b) conducting target-primed reverse transcription of the RT template to generate a single strand DNA comprising the desired nucleotide change; and (c) incorporating the desired nucleotide change into the DNA molecule at the target locus through a DNA repair and/or replication process.
In certain embodiments, the step of replacing the endogenous DNA strand comprises: (i) hybridizing the single-strand DNA flap to the endogenous DNA strand adjacent the cut site to create a sequence mismatch; (ii) excising the endogenous DNA strand; and (iii) repairing the mismatch to form the desired product comprising the desired nucleotide change in both strands of DNA.
In various embodiments, the desired nucleotide change can be a single nucleotide substitution (e.g., and transition or a transversion change), a deletion, or an insertion. For example, the desired nucleotide change can be (1) a G to T substitution, (2) a G to A substitution, (3) a G to C substitution, (4) a T to G substitution, (5) a T to A substitution, (6) a T to C substitution, (7) a C to G substitution, (8) a C to T substitution, (9) a C to A substitution, (10) an A to T substitution, (11) an A to G substitution, or (12) an A to C substitution.
In other embodiments, the desired nucleoid change can convert (1) a G:C basepair to a T:A basepair, (2) a G:C basepair to an A:T basepair, (3) a G:C basepair to C:G basepair, (4) a T:A basepair to a G:C basepair, (5) a T:A basepair to an A:T basepair, (6) a T:A basepair to a C:G basepair, (7) a C:G basepair to a G:C basepair, (8) a C:G basepair to a T:A basepair, (9) a C:G basepair to an A:T basepair, (10) an A:T basepair to a T:A basepair, (11) an A:T basepair to a G:C basepair, or (12) an A:T basepair to a C:G basepair.
In still other embodiments, the method introduces a desired nucleotide change that is an insertion. In certain cases, the insertion is at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 30, at least 40, at least 50, at least 60, at least 70, at least 80, at least 90, at least 100, at least 200, at least 300, at least 400, or at least 500 nucleotides in length.
In other embodiments, the method introduces a desired nucleotide change that is a deletion. In certain other cases, the deletion is at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 30, at least 40, at least 50, at least 60, at least 70, at least 80, at least 90, at least 100, at least 200, at least 300, at least 400, or at least 500 nucleotides in length.
In various embodiments, the desired nucleotide change corrects a disease-associated gene. The disease-associated gene can be associated with a monogenetic disorder selected from the group consisting of: Adenosine Deaminase (ADA) Deficiency; Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency; Cystic Fibrosis; Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy; Galactosemia; Hemochromatosis; Huntington's Disease; Maple Syrup Urine Disease; Marfan Syndrome; Neurofibromatosis Type 1; Pachyonychia Congenita; Phenylkeotnuria; Severe Combined Immunodeficiency; Sickle Cell Disease; Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome; and Tay-Sachs Disease. In other embodiments, the disease-associated gene can be associated with a polygenic disorder selected from the group consisting of: heart disease; high blood pressure; Alzheimer's disease; arthritis; diabetes; cancer; and obesity.
The methods disclosed herein may involve fusion proteins having a napDNAbp that is a nuclease dead Cas9 (dCas9), a Cas9 nickase (nCas9), or a nuclease active Cas9. In other embodiments, a napDNAbp and reverse transcriptase are not encoded as a single fusion protein, but rather can be provided in separate constructs. Thus, in some embodiments, the reverse transcriptase can be provided in trans relative to the napDNAbp (rather than by way of a fusion protein).
In various embodiments involving methods, the napDNAbp may comprise an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 26-61, 75-76, 126, 130, 137, 141, 147, 153, 157, 445, 460, 467, and 482-487 (Cas9); (SpCas9); SEQ ID NO: 77-86 (CP-Cas9); SEQ ID NO: 18-25 and 87-88 (SpCas9); and SEQ ID NOs: 62-72 (Cas12). The napDNAbp may also comprise an amino acid sequence that is at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98%, or 99% identical to the amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 26-61, 75-76, 126, 130, 137, 141, 147, 153, 157, 445, 460, 467, and 482-487 (Cas9); (SpCas9); SEQ ID NO: 77-86 (CP-Cas9); SEQ ID NO: 18-25 and 87-88 (SpCas9); and SEQ ID NOs: 62-72 (Cas12).
In various embodiments involving methods, the reverse transcriptase may comprise any one of the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 89-100, 105-122, 128-129, 132, 139, 143, 149, 154, 159, 235, 454, 471, 516, 662, 700-716, 739-742, and 766. The reverse transcriptase may also comprise an amino acid sequence that is at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98%, or 99% identical to the amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 89-100, 105-122, 128-129, 132, 139, 143, 149, 154, 159, 235, 454, 471, 516, 662, 700-716, 739-742, and 766.
The methods may involve the use of a PEgRNA comprising a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 101-104, 181-183, 223-234, 237-244, 277, 324-330, 332, 334, 336, 338, 340, 342, 344, 346, 348, 350, 352, 354, 356, 358, 360, 362, 364, 366, 368, 394, 429-442, 499-505, 641-649, 678-692, 735-736, 757-761, 776-777, 2997-3103, 3113-3121, 3305-3455, 3479-3493, 3522-3540, 3549-3556, 3628-3698, 3755-3810, 3874, 3890-3901, 3905-3911, 3913-3929, and 3972-3989, or a nucleotide sequence having at least 80%, or at least 85%, or at least 90%, or at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity thereto The methods may comprise the use of extended guide RNAs that comprise an RNA extension at the 3′ end, wherein the RNA extension comprises the reverse transcription template sequence.
The methods may comprise the use of extended guide RNAs that comprise an RNA extension at the 5′ end, wherein the RNA extension comprises the reverse transcription template sequence.
The methods may comprise the use of extended guide RNAs that comprise an RNA extension at an intramolecular location in the guide RNA, wherein the RNA extension comprises the reverse transcription template sequence.
The methods may comprise the use of extended guide RNAs having one or more RNA extensions that are at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 30, at least 40, at least 50, at least 60, at least 70, at least 80, at least 90, at least 100, at least 200, at least 300, at least 400, or at least 500 nucleotides in length.
It should be appreciated that the foregoing concepts, and additional concepts discussed below, may be arranged in any suitable combination, as the present disclosure is not limited in this respect. Further, other advantages and novel features of the present disclosure will become apparent from the following detailed description of various non-limiting embodiments when considered in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
The following drawings form part of the present specification and are included to further demonstrate certain aspects of the present disclosure, which can be better understood by reference to one or more of these drawings in combination with the detailed description of specific embodiments presented herein.
The embodiment of
The schematic of
DOI: 10.1021/ja017687n). The “sortagging” system employs bacterial sortase enzymes that covalently conjugate labeled peptide probes to proteins containing suitable peptide substrates (see ref: Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007 November; 3(11):707-8. DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.31). The FLAG-tag (DYKDDDDK (SEQ ID NO: 2)), V5-tag (GKPIPNPLLGLDST (SEQ ID NO: 3)), GCN4-tag (EELLSKNYHLENEVARLKK (SEQ ID NO: 4)), HA-tag (YPYDVPDYA (SEQ ID NO: 5)), and Myc-tag (EQKLISEEDL (SEQ ID NO: 6)) are commonly employed as epitope tags for immunoassays. The pi-clamp encodes a peptide sequence (FCPF (SEQ ID NO: 622)) that can by labeled with a pentafluoro-aromatic substrates (ref: Nat. Chem. 2016 February; 8(2):120-8. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2413).
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the meaning commonly understood by a person skilled in the art to which this invention belongs. The following references provide one of skill with a general definition of many of the terms used in this invention: Singleton et al., Dictionary of Microbiology and Molecular Biology (2nd ed. 1994); The Cambridge Dictionary of Science and Technology (Walker ed., 1988); The Glossary of Genetics, 5th Ed., R. Rieger et al. (eds.), Springer Verlag (1991); and Hale & Marham, The Harper Collins Dictionary of Biology (1991). As used herein, the following terms have the meanings ascribed to them unless specified otherwise.
Antisense Strand
In genetics, the “antisense” strand of a segment within double-stranded DNA is the template strand, and which is considered to run in the 3′ to 5′ orientation. By contrast, the “sense” strand is the segment within double-stranded DNA that runs from 5′ to 3′, and which is complementary to the antisense strand of DNA, or template strand, which runs from 3′ to 5′. In the case of a DNA segment that encodes a protein, the sense strand is the strand of DNA that has the same sequence as the mRNA, which takes the antisense strand as its template during transcription, and eventually undergoes (typically, not always) translation into a protein. The antisense strand is thus responsible for the RNA that is later translated to protein, while the sense strand possesses a nearly identical makeup to that of the mRNA. Note that for each segment of dsDNA, there will possibly be two sets of sense and antisense, depending on which direction one reads (since sense and antisense is relative to perspective). It is ultimately the gene product, or mRNA, that dictates which strand of one segment of dsDNA is referred to as sense or antisense.
Bi-Specific Ligand
The term “bi-specific ligand” or “bi-specific moiety,” as used herein, refers to a ligand that binds to two different ligand-binding domains. In certain embodiments, the ligand is a small molecule compound, or a peptide, or a polypeptide. In other embodiments, ligand-binding domain is a “dimerization domain,” which can be install as a peptide tag onto a protein. In various embodiments, two proteins each comprising the same or different dimerization domains can be induced to dimerize through the binding of each dimerization domain to the bi-specific ligand. As used herein, “bi-specific ligands” may be equivalently refer to “chemical inducers of dimerization” or “CIDs”.
Cas9
The term “Cas9” or “Cas9 nuclease” refers to an RNA-guided nuclease comprising a Cas9 domain, or a fragment thereof (e.g., a protein comprising an active or inactive DNA cleavage domain of Cas9, and/or the gRNA binding domain of Cas9). A “Cas9 domain” as used herein, is a protein fragment comprising an active or inactive cleavage domain of Cas9 and/or the gRNA binding domain of Cas9. A “Cas9 protein” is a full length Cas9 protein. A Cas9 nuclease is also referred to sometimes as a casn1 nuclease or a CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat)-associated nuclease. CRISPR is an adaptive immune system that provides protection against mobile genetic elements (viruses, transposable elements, and conjugative plasmids). CRISPR clusters contain spacers, sequences complementary to antecedent mobile elements, and target invading nucleic acids. CRISPR clusters are transcribed and processed into CRISPR RNA (crRNA). In type II CRISPR systems correct processing of pre-crRNA requires a trans-encoded small RNA (tracrRNA), endogenous ribonuclease 3 (rnc) and a Cas9 domain. The tracrRNA serves as a guide for ribonuclease 3-aided processing of pre-crRNA. Subsequently, Cas9/crRNA/tracrRNA endonucleolytically cleaves a linear or circular dsDNA target complementary to the spacer. The target strand not complementary to crRNA is first cut endonucleolytically, then trimmed 3′-5′ exonucleolytically. In nature, DNA-binding and cleavage typically requires protein and both RNAs. However, single guide RNAs (“sgRNA”, or simply “gNRA”) can be engineered to incorporate aspects of both the crRNA and tracrRNA into a single RNA species. See, e.g., Jinek M., Chylinski K., Fonfara I., Hauer M., Doudna J. A., Charpentier E. Science 337:816-821(2012), the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Cas9 recognizes a short motif in the CRISPR repeat sequences (the PAM or protospacer adjacent motif) to help distinguish self versus non-self. Cas9 nuclease sequences and structures are well known to those of skill in the art (see, e.g., “Complete genome sequence of an M1 strain of Streptococcus pyogenes.” Ferretti et al., J. J., McShan W. M., Ajdic D. J., Savic D. J., Savic G., Lyon K., Primeaux C., Sezate S., Suvorov A. N., Kenton S., Lai H. S., Lin S. P., Qian Y., Jia H. G., Najar F. Z., Ren Q., Zhu H., Song L., White J., Yuan X., Clifton S. W., Roe B. A., McLaughlin R. E., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:4658-4663(2001); “CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III.” Deltcheva E., Chylinski K., Sharma C. M., Gonzales K., Chao Y., Pirzada Z. A., Eckert M. R., Vogel J., Charpentier E., Nature 471:602-607(2011); and “A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity.” Jinek M., Chylinski K., Fonfara I., Hauer M., Doudna J. A., Charpentier E. Science 337:816-821(2012), the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference). Cas9 orthologs have been described in various species, including, but not limited to, S. pyogenes and S. thermophilus. Additional suitable Cas9 nucleases and sequences will be apparent to those of skill in the art based on this disclosure, and such Cas9 nucleases and sequences include Cas9 sequences from the organisms and loci disclosed in Chylinski, Rhun, and Charpentier, “The tracrRNA and Cas9 families of type II CRISPR-Cas immunity systems” (2013) RNA Biology 10:5, 726-737; the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. In some embodiments, a Cas9 nuclease comprises one or more mutations that partially impair or inactivate the DNA cleavage domain.
A nuclease-inactivated Cas9 domain may interchangeably be referred to as a “dCas9” protein (for nuclease-“dead” Cas9). Methods for generating a Cas9 domain (or a fragment thereof) having an inactive DNA cleavage domain are known (see, e.g., Jinek et al., Science. 337:816-821(2012); Qi et al., “Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression” (2013) Cell. 28; 152(5):1173-83, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference). For example, the DNA cleavage domain of Cas9 is known to include two subdomains, the HNH nuclease subdomain and the RuvC1 subdomain. The HNH subdomain cleaves the strand complementary to the gRNA, whereas the RuvC1 subdomain cleaves the non-complementary strand. Mutations within these subdomains can silence the nuclease activity of Cas9. For example, the mutations D10A and H840A completely inactivate the nuclease activity of S. pyogenes Cas9 (Jinek et al., Science. 337:816-821(2012); Qi et al., Cell. 28; 152(5):1173-83 (2013)). In some embodiments, proteins comprising fragments of Cas9 are provided. For example, in some embodiments, a protein comprises one of two Cas9 domains: (1) the gRNA binding domain of Cas9; or (2) the DNA cleavage domain of Cas9. In some embodiments, proteins comprising Cas9 or fragments thereof are referred to as “Cas9 variants.” A Cas9 variant shares homology to Cas9, or a fragment thereof. For example, a Cas9 variant is at least about 70% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 96% identical, at least about 97% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, at least about 99.5% identical, at least about 99.8% identical, or at least about 99.9% identical to wild type Cas9 (e.g., SpCas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18). In some embodiments, the Cas9 variant may have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, or more amino acid changes compared to wild type Cas9 (e.g., SpCas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18). In some embodiments, the Cas9 variant comprises a fragment of SEQ ID NO: 18 Cas9 (e.g., a gRNA binding domain or a DNA-cleavage domain), such that the fragment is at least about 70% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 96% identical, at least about 97% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, at least about 99.5% identical, or at least about 99.9% identical to the corresponding fragment of wild type Cas9 (e.g., SpCas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18). In some embodiments, the fragment is at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95% identical, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.5% of the amino acid length of a corresponding wild type Cas9 (e.g., SpCas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18).
cDNA
The term “cDNA” refers to a strand of DNA copied from an RNA template. cDNA is complementary to the RNA template.
Circular Permutant
As used herein, the term “circular permutant” refers to a protein or polypeptide (e.g., a Cas9) comprising a circular permutation, which is a change in the protein's structural configuration involving a change in the order of amino acids appearing in the protein's amino acid sequence. In other words, circular permutants are proteins that have altered N- and C-termini as compared to a wild-type counterpart, e.g., the wild-type C-terminal half of a protein becomes the new N-terminal half. Circular permutation (or CP) is essentially the topological rearrangement of a protein's primary sequence, connecting its N- and C-terminus, often with a peptide linker, while concurrently splitting its sequence at a different position to create new, adjacent N- and C-termini. The result is a protein structure with different connectivity, but which often can have the same overall similar three-dimensional (3D) shape, and possibly include improved or altered characteristics, including, reduced proteolytic susceptibility, improved catalytic activity, altered substrate or ligand binding, and/or improved thermostability. Circular permutant proteins can occur in nature (e.g., concanavalin A and lectin). In addition, circular permutation can occur as a result of posttranslational modifications or may be engineered using recombinant techniques.
Circularly Permuted Cas9
The term “circularly permuted Cas9” refers to any Cas9 protein, or variant thereof, that has been occurs as a circular permutant, whereby its N- and C-termini have been topically rearranged. Such circularly permuted Cas9 proteins (“CP-Cas9”), or variants thereof, retain the ability to bind DNA when complexed with a guide RNA (gRNA). See, Oakes et al., “Protein Engineering of Cas9 for enhanced function,” Methods Enzymol, 2014, 546: 491-511 and Oakes et al., “CRISPR-Cas9 Circular Permutants as Programmable Scaffolds for Genome Modification,” Cell, Jan. 10, 2019, 176: 254-267, each of which are incorporated herein by reference. The instant disclosure contemplates any previously known CP-Cas9 or use of a new CP-Cas9 so long as the resulting circularly permuted protein retains the ability to bind DNA when complexed with a guide RNA (gRNA). Exemplary CP-Cas9 proteins are SEQ ID NOs: 77-86.
CRISPR
CRISPR is a family of DNA sequences (i.e., CRISPR clusters) in bacteria and archaea that represent snippets of prior infections by a virus that have invaded the prokaryote. The snippets of DNA are used by the prokaryotic cell to detect and destroy DNA from subsequent attacks by similar viruses and effectively compose, along with an array of CRISPR-associated proteins (including Cas9 and homologs thereof) and CRISPR-associated RNA, a prokaryotic immune defense system. In nature, CRISPR clusters are transcribed and processed into CRISPR RNA (crRNA). In certain types of CRISPR systems (e.g., type II CRISPR systems), correct processing of pre-crRNA requires a trans-encoded small RNA (tracrRNA), endogenous ribonuclease 3 (rnc) and a Cas9 protein. The tracrRNA serves as a guide for ribonuclease 3-aided processing of pre-crRNA. Subsequently, Cas9/crRNA/tracrRNA endonucleolytically cleaves a linear or circular dsDNA target complementary to the RNA. Specifically, the target strand not complementary to crRNA is first cut endonucleolytically, then trimmed 3′-5′ exonucleolytically. In nature, DNA-binding and cleavage typically requires protein and both RNAs. However, single guide RNAs (“sgRNA”, or simply “gNRA”) can be engineered so as to incorporate aspects of both the crRNA and tracrRNA into a single RNA species—the guide RNA. See, e.g., Jinek M., Chylinski K., Fonfara I., Hauer M., Doudna J. A., Charpentier E. Science 337:816-821(2012), the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Cas9 recognizes a short motif in the CRISPR repeat sequences (the PAM or protospacer adjacent motif) to help distinguish self versus non-self. CRISPR biology, as well as Cas9 nuclease sequences and structures are well known to those of skill in the art (see, e.g., “Complete genome sequence of an M1 strain of Streptococcus pyogenes.” Ferretti et al., J. J., McShan W. M., Ajdic D. J., Savic D. J., Savic G., Lyon K., Primeaux C., Sezate S., Suvorov A. N., Kenton S., Lai H. S., Lin S. P., Qian Y., Jia H. G., Najar F. Z., Ren Q., Zhu H., Song L., White J., Yuan X., Clifton S. W., Roe B. A., McLaughlin R. E., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:4658-4663(2001); “CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III.” Deltcheva E., Chylinski K., Sharma C. M., Gonzales K., Chao Y., Pirzada Z. A., Eckert M. R., Vogel J., Charpentier E., Nature 471:602-607(2011); and “A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity.” Jinek M., Chylinski K., Fonfara I., Hauer M., Doudna J. A., Charpentier E. Science 337:816-821(2012), the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference). Cas9 orthologs have been described in various species, including, but not limited to, S. pyogenes and S. thermophilus. Additional suitable Cas9 nucleases and sequences will be apparent to those of skill in the art based on this disclosure, and such Cas9 nucleases and sequences include Cas9 sequences from the organisms and loci disclosed in Chylinski, Rhun, and Charpentier, “The tracrRNA and Cas9 families of type II CRISPR-Cas immunity systems” (2013) RNA Biology 10:5, 726-737; the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In certain types of CRISPR systems (e.g., type II CRISPR systems), correct processing of pre-crRNA requires a trans-encoded small RNA (tracrRNA), endogenous ribonuclease 3 (rnc), and a Cas9 protein. The tracrRNA serves as a guide for ribonuclease 3-aided processing of pre-crRNA. Subsequently, Cas9/crRNA/tracrRNA endonucleolytically cleaves a linear or circular nucleic acid target complementary to the RNA. Specifically, the target strand not complementary to crRNA is first cut endonucleolytically, then trimmed 3′-5′ exonucleolytically. In nature, DNA-binding and cleavage typically requires protein and both RNAs. However, single guide RNAs (“sgRNA”, or simply “gRNA”) can be engineered to incorporate embodiments of both the crRNA and tracrRNA into a single RNA species—the guide RNA.
In general, a “CRISPR system” refers collectively to transcripts and other elements involved in the expression of or directing the activity of CRISPR-associated (“Cas”) genes, including sequences encoding a Cas gene, a tracr (trans-activating CRISPR) sequence (e.g. tracrRNA or an active partial tracrRNA), a tracr mate sequence (encompassing a “direct repeat” and a tracrRNA-processed partial direct repeat in the context of an endogenous CRISPR system), a guide sequence (also referred to as a “spacer” in the context of an endogenous CRISPR system), or other sequences and transcripts from a CRISPR locus. The tracrRNA of the system is complementary (fully or partially) to the tracr mate sequence present on the guide RNA.
DNA Synthesis Template
As used herein, the term “DNA synthesis template” refers to the region or portion of the extension arm of a PEgRNA that is utilized as a template strand by a polymerase of a prime editor to encode a 3′ single-strand DNA flap that contains the desired edit and which then, through the mechanism of prime editing, replaces the corresponding endogenous strand of DNA at the target site. In various embodiments, the DNA synthesis template is shown in
In the case of trans prime editing (e.g.,
Dimerization Domain
The term “dimerization domain” refers to a ligand-binding domain that binds to a binding moiety of a bi-specific ligand. A “first” dimerization domain binds to a first binding moiety of a bi-specific ligand and a “second” dimerization domain binds to a second binding moiety of the same bi-specific ligand. When the first dimerization domain is fused to a first protein (e.g., via PE, as discussed herein) and the second dimerization domain (e.g., via PE, as discussed herein) is fused to a second protein, the first and second protein dimerize in the presence of a bi-specific ligand, wherein the bi-specific ligand has at least one moiety that binds to the first dimerization domain and at least another moiety that binds to the second dimerization domain.
Downstream
As used herein, the terms “upstream” and “downstream” are terms of relativity that define the linear position of at least two elements located in a nucleic acid molecule (whether single or double-stranded) that is orientated in a 5′-to-3′ direction. In particular, a first element is upstream of a second element in a nucleic acid molecule where the first element is positioned somewhere that is 5′ to the second element. For example, a SNP is upstream of a Cas9-induced nick site if the SNP is on the 5′ side of the nick site. Conversely, a first element is downstream of a second element in a nucleic acid molecule where the first element is positioned somewhere that is 3′ to the second element. For example, a SNP is downstream of a Cas9-induced nick site if the SNP is on the 3′ side of the nick site. The nucleic acid molecule can be a DNA (double or single stranded). RNA (double or single stranded), or a hybrid of DNA and RNA. The analysis is the same for single strand nucleic acid molecule and a double strand molecule since the terms upstream and downstream are in reference to only a single strand of a nucleic acid molecule, except that one needs to select which strand of the double stranded molecule is being considered. Often, the strand of a double stranded DNA which can be used to determine the positional relativity of at least two elements is the “sense” or “coding” strand. In genetics, a “sense” strand is the segment within double-stranded DNA that runs from 5′ to 3′, and which is complementary to the antisense strand of DNA, or template strand, which runs from 3′ to 5′. Thus, as an example, a SNP nucleobase is “downstream” of a promoter sequence in a genomic DNA (which is double-stranded) if the SNP nucleobase is on the 3′ side of the promoter on the sense or coding strand.
Edit Template
The term “edit template” refers to a portion of the extension arm that encodes the desired edit in the single strand 3′ DNA flap that is synthesized by the polymerase, e.g., a DNA-dependent DNA polymerase, RNA-dependent DNA polymerase (e.g., a reverse transcriptase). Certain embodiments described here (e.g.,
Effective Amount
The term “effective amount,” as used herein, refers to an amount of a biologically active agent that is sufficient to elicit a desired biological response. For example, in some embodiments, an effective amount of a prime editor (PE) may refer to the amount of the editor that is sufficient to edit a target site nucleotide sequence, e.g., a genome. In some embodiments, an effective amount of a prime editor (PE) provided herein, e.g., of a fusion protein comprising a nickase Cas9 domain and a reverse transcriptase may refer to the amount of the fusion protein that is sufficient to induce editing of a target site specifically bound and edited by the fusion protein. As will be appreciated by the skilled artisan, the effective amount of an agent, e.g., a fusion protein, a nuclease, a hybrid protein, a protein dimer, a complex of a protein (or protein dimer) and a polynucleotide, or a polynucleotide, may vary depending on various factors as, for example, on the desired biological response, e.g., on the specific allele, genome, or target site to be edited, on the cell or tissue being targeted, and on the agent being used.
Error-Prone Reverse Transcriptase
As used herein, the term “error-prone” reverse transcriptase (or more broadly, any polymerase) refers to a reverse transcriptase (or more broadly, any polymerase) that occurs naturally or which has been derived from another reverse transcriptase (e.g., a wild type M-MLV reverse transcriptase) which has an error rate that is less than the error rate of wild type M-MLV reverse transcriptase. The error rate of wild type M-MLV reverse transcriptase is reported to be in the range of one error in 15,000 (higher) to 27,000 (lower). An error rate of 1 in 15,000 corresponds with an error rate of 6.7×10−5. An error rate of 1 in 27,000 corresponds with an error rate of 3.7×10−5. See Boutabout et al. (2001) “DNA synthesis fidelity by the reverse transcriptase of the yeast retrotransposon Ty1,” Nucleic Acids Res 29(11):2217-2222, which is incorporated herein by reference. Thus, for purposes of this application, the term “error prone” refers to those RT that have an error rate that is greater than one error in 15,000 nucleobase incorporation (6.7×10−5 or higher), e.g., 1 error in 14,000 nucleobases (7.14×10−5 or higher), 1 error in 13,000 nucleobases or fewer (7.7×10−5 or higher), 1 error in 12,000 nucleobases or fewer (7.7×10−5 or higher), 1 error in 11,000 nucleobases or fewer (9.1×10−5 or higher), 1 error in 10,000 nucleobases or fewer (1×10−4 or 0.0001 or higher), 1 error in 9,000 nucleobases or fewer (0.00011 or higher), 1 error in 8,000 nucleobases or fewer (0.00013 or higher) 1 error in 7,000 nucleobases or fewer (0.00014 or higher), 1 error in 6,000 nucleobases or fewer (0.00016 or higher), 1 error in 5,000 nucleobases or fewer (0.0002 or higher), 1 error in 4,000 nucleobases or fewer (0.00025 or higher), 1 error in 3,000 nucleobases or fewer (0.00033 or higher), 1 error in 2,000 nucleobase or fewer (0.00050 or higher), or 1 error in 1,000 nucleobases or fewer (0.001 or higher), or 1 error in 500 nucleobases or fewer (0.002 or higher), or 1 error in 250 nucleobases or fewer (0.004 or higher).
Extein
The term “extein,” as used herein, refers to an polypeptide sequence that is flanked by an intein and is ligated to another extein during the process of protein splicing to form a mature, spliced protein. Typically, an intein is flanked by two extein sequences that are ligated together when the intein catalyzes its own excision. Exteins, accordingly, are the protein analog to exons found in mRNA. For example, a polypeptide comprising an intein may be of the structure extein(N)-intein-extein(C). After excision of the intein and splicing of the two exteins, the resulting structures are extein(N)-extein(C) and a free intein. In various configurations, the exteins may be separate proteins (e.g., half of a Cas9 or PE fusion protein), each fused to a split-intein, wherein the excision of the split inteins causes the splicing together of the extein sequences.
Extension Arm
The term “extension arm” refers to a nucleotide sequence component of a PEgRNA which provides several functions, including a primer binding site and an edit template for reverse transcriptase. In some embodiments, e.g.,
The extension arm may also be described as comprising generally two regions: a primer binding site (PBS) and a DNA synthesis template, as shown in
Flap Endonuclease (e.g., FEN)
As used herein, the term “flap endonuclease” refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the removal of 5′ single strand DNA flaps. These are naturally occurring enzymes that process the removal of 5′ flaps formed during cellular processes, including DNA replication. The prime editing methods herein described may utilize endogenously supplied flap endonucleases or those provided in trans to remove the 5′ flap of endogenous DNA formed at the target site during prime editing. Flap endonucleases are known in the art and can be found described in Patel et al., “Flap endonucleases pass 5′-flaps through a flexible arch using a disorder-thread-order mechanism to confer specificity for free 5′-ends,” Nucleic Acids Research, 2012, 40(10): 4507-4519, Tsutakawa et al., “Human flap endonuclease structures, DNA double-base flipping, and a unified understanding of the FEN1 superfamily,” Cell, 2011, 145(2): 198-211, and Balakrishnan et al., “Flap Endonuclease 1,” Annu Rev Biochem, 2013, Vol 82: 119-138 (each of which are incorporated herein by reference). An exemplary flap endonuclease is FEN1, which can be represented by the following amino acid sequence:
Functional Equivalent
The term “functional equivalent” refers to a second biomolecule that is equivalent in function, but not necessarily equivalent in structure to a first biomolecule. For example, a “Cas9 equivalent” refers to a protein that has the same or substantially the same functions as Cas9, but not necessarily the same amino acid sequence. In the context of the disclosure, the specification refers throughout to “a protein X, or a functional equivalent thereof.” In this context, a “functional equivalent” of protein X embraces any homolog, paralog, fragment, naturally occurring, engineered, mutated, or synthetic version of protein X which bears an equivalent function.
Fusion Protein
The term “fusion protein” as used herein refers to a hybrid polypeptide which comprises protein domains from at least two different proteins. One protein may be located at the amino-terminal (N-terminal) portion of the fusion protein or at the carboxy-terminal (C-terminal) protein thus forming an “amino-terminal fusion protein” or a “carboxy-terminal fusion protein,” respectively. A protein may comprise different domains, for example, a nucleic acid binding domain (e.g., the gRNA binding domain of Cas9 that directs the binding of the protein to a target site) and a nucleic acid cleavage domain or a catalytic domain of a nucleic-acid editing protein. Another example includes a Cas9 or equivalent thereof to a reverse transcriptase. Any of the proteins provided herein may be produced by any method known in the art. For example, the proteins provided herein may be produced via recombinant protein expression and purification, which is especially suited for fusion proteins comprising a peptide linker. Methods for recombinant protein expression and purification are well known, and include those described by Green and Sambrook, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (4th ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (2012)), the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Gene of Interest (GOI)
The term “gene of interest” or “GOI” refers to a gene that encodes a biomolecule of interest (e.g., a protein or an RNA molecule). A protein of interest can include any intracellular protein, membrane protein, or extracellular protein, e.g., a nuclear protein, transcription factor, nuclear membrane transporter, intracellular organelle associated protein, a membrane receptor, a catalytic protein, and enzyme, a therapeutic protein, a membrane protein, a membrane transport protein, a signal transduction protein, or an immunological protein (e.g., an IgG or other antibody protein), etc. The gene of interest may also encode an RNA molecule, including, but not limited to, messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), small nuclear RNA (snRNA), antisense RNA, guide RNA, microRNA (miRNA), small interfering RNA (siRNA), and cell-free RNA (cfRNA).
Guide RNA (“gRNA”)
As used herein, the term “guide RNA” is a particular type of guide nucleic acid which is mostly commonly associated with a Cas protein of a CRISPR-Cas9 and which associates with Cas9, directing the Cas9 protein to a specific sequence in a DNA molecule that includes complementarity to the protospacer sequence of the guide RNA. However, this term also embraces the equivalent guide nucleic acid molecules that associate with Cas9 equivalents, homologs, orthologs, or paralogs, whether naturally occurring or non-naturally occurring (e.g., engineered or recombinant), and which otherwise program the Cas9 equivalent to localize to a specific target nucleotide sequence. The Cas9 equivalents may include other napDNAbp from any type of CRISPR system (e.g., type II, V, VI), including Cpf1 (a type-V CRISPR-Cas systems), C2c1 (a type V CRISPR-Cas system), C2c2 (a type VI CRISPR-Cas system) and C2c3 (a type V CRISPR-Cas system). Further Cas-equivalents are described in Makarova et al., “C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector,” Science 2016; 353(6299), the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Exemplary sequences are and structures of guide RNAs are provided herein. In addition, methods for designing appropriate guide RNA sequences are provided herein. As used herein, the “guide RNA” may also be referred to as a “traditional guide RNA” to contrast it with the modified forms of guide RNA termed “prime editing guide RNAs” (or “PEgRNAs”) which have been invented for the prime editing methods and composition disclosed herein.
Guide RNAs or PEgRNAs may comprise various structural elements that include, but are not limited to:
Spacer sequence—the sequence in the guide RNA or PEgRNA (having about 20 nts in length) which binds to the protospacer in the target DNA.
gRNA core (or gRNA scaffold or backbone sequence)—refers to the sequence within the gRNA that is responsible for Cas9 binding, it does not include the 20 bp spacer/targeting sequence that is used to guide Cas9 to target DNA.
Extension arm—a single strand extension at the 3′ end or the 5′ end of the PEgRNA which comprises a primer binding site and a DNA synthesis template sequence that encodes via a polymerase (e.g., a reverse transcriptase) a single stranded DNA flap containing the genetic change of interest, which then integrates into the endogenous DNA by replacing the corresponding endogenous strand, thereby installing the desired genetic change.
Transcription terminator—the guide RNA or PEgRNA may comprise a transcriptional termination sequence at the 3′ of the molecule.
Homology Arm
The term “homology arm” refers to a portion of the extension arm that encodes a portion of the resulting reverse transcriptase-encoded single strand DNA flap that is to be integrated into the target DNA site by replacing the endogenous strand. The portion of the single strand DNA flap encoded by the homology arm is complementary to the non-edited strand of the target DNA sequence, which facilitates the displacement of the endogenous strand and annealing of the single strand DNA flap in its place, thereby installing the edit. This component is further defined elsewhere. The homology arm is part of the DNA synthesis template since it is by definition encoded by the polymerase of the prime editors described herein.
Host Cell
The term “host cell,” as used herein, refers to a cell that can host, replicate, and express a vector described herein, e.g., a vector comprising a nucleic acid molecule encoding a fusion protein comprising a Cas9 or Cas9 equivalent and a reverse transcriptase.
Inteins
As used herein, the term “intein” refers to auto-processing polypeptide domains found in organisms from all domains of life. An intein (intervening protein) carries out a unique auto-processing event known as protein splicing in which it excises itself out from a larger precursor polypeptide through the cleavage of two peptide bonds and, in the process, ligates the flanking extein (external protein) sequences through the formation of a new peptide bond. This rearrangement occurs post-translationally (or possibly co-translationally), as intein genes are found embedded in frame within other protein-coding genes. Furthermore, intein-mediated protein splicing is spontaneous; it requires no external factor or energy source, only the folding of the intein domain. This process is also known as cis-protein splicing, as opposed to the natural process of trans-protein splicing with “split inteins.” Inteins are the protein equivalent of the self-splicing RNA introns (see Perler et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1125-1127 (1994)), which catalyze their own excision from a precursor protein with the concomitant fusion of the flanking protein sequences, known as exteins (reviewed in Perler et al., Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1:292-299 (1997); Perler, F. B. Cell 92(1):1-4 (1998); Xu et al., EMBO J. 15(19):5146-5153 (1996)).
As used herein, the term “protein splicing” refers to a process in which an interior region of a precursor protein (an intein) is excised and the flanking regions of the protein (exteins) are ligated to form the mature protein. This natural process has been observed in numerous proteins from both prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Perler, F. B., Xu, M. Q., Paulus, H. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 1997, 1, 292-299; Perler, F. B. Nucleic Acids Research 1999, 27, 346-347). The intein unit contains the necessary components needed to catalyze protein splicing and often contains an endonuclease domain that participates in intein mobility (Perler, F. B., Davis, E. O., Dean, G. E., Gimble, F. S., Jack, W. E., Neff, N., Noren, C. J., Thomer, J., Belfort, M. Nucleic Acids Research 1994, 22, 1127-1127). The resulting proteins are linked, however, not expressed as separate proteins. Protein splicing may also be conducted in trans with split inteins expressed on separate polypeptides spontaneously combine to form a single intein which then undergoes the protein splicing process to join to separate proteins.
The elucidation of the mechanism of protein splicing has led to a number of intein-based applications (Comb, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,496,714; Comb, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,834,247; Camarero and Muir, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 121:5597-5598 (1999); Chong, et al., Gene, 192:271-281 (1997), Chong, et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 26:5109-5115 (1998); Chong, et al., J. Biol. Chem., 273:10567-10577 (1998); Cotton, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121:1100-1101 (1999); Evans, et al., J. Biol. Chem., 274:18359-18363 (1999); Evans, et al., J. Biol. Chem., 274:3923-3926 (1999); Evans, et al., Protein Sci., 7:2256-2264 (1998); Evans, et al., J. Biol. Chem., 275:9091-9094 (2000); Iwai and Pluckthun, FEBS Lett. 459:166-172 (1999); Mathys, et al., Gene, 231:1-13 (1999); Mills, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3543-3548 (1998); Muir, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:6705-6710 (1998); Otomo, et al., Biochemistry 38:16040-16044 (1999); Otomo, et al., J. Biolmol. NMR 14:105-114 (1999); Scott, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:13638-13643 (1999); Severinov and Muir, J. Biol. Chem., 273:16205-16209 (1998); Shingledecker, et al., Gene, 207:187-195 (1998); Southworth, et al., EMBO J. 17:918-926 (1998); Southworth, et al., Biotechniques, 27:110-120 (1999); Wood, et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 17:889-892 (1999); Wu, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:9226-9231 (1998a); Wu, et al., Biochim Biophys Acta 1387:422-432 (1998b); Xu, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:388-393 (1999); Yamazaki, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120:5591-5592 (1998)). Each reference is incorporated herein by reference.
Ligand-Dependent Intein
The term “ligand-dependent intein,” as used herein refers to an intein that comprises a ligand-binding domain. Typically, the ligand-binding domain is inserted into the amino acid sequence of the intein, resulting in a structure intein (N)-ligand-binding domain-intein (C). Typically, ligand-dependent inteins exhibit no or only minimal protein splicing activity in the absence of an appropriate ligand, and a marked increase of protein splicing activity in the presence of the ligand. In some embodiments, the ligand-dependent intein does not exhibit observable splicing activity in the absence of ligand but does exhibit splicing activity in the presence of the ligand. In some embodiments, the ligand-dependent intein exhibits an observable protein splicing activity in the absence of the ligand, and a protein splicing activity in the presence of an appropriate ligand that is at least 5 times, at least 10 times, at least 50 times, at least 100 times, at least 150 times, at least 200 times, at least 250 times, at least 500 times, at least 1000 times, at least 1500 times, at least 2000 times, at least 2500 times, at least 5000 times, at least 10000 times, at least 20000 times, at least 25000 times, at least 50000 times, at least 100000 times, at least 500000 times, or at least 1000000 times greater than the activity observed in the absence of the ligand. In some embodiments, the increase in activity is dose dependent over at least 1 order of magnitude, at least 2 orders of magnitude, at least 3 orders of magnitude, at least 4 orders of magnitude, or at least 5 orders of magnitude, allowing for fine-tuning of intein activity by adjusting the concentration of the ligand. Suitable ligand-dependent inteins are known in the art, and in include those provided below and those described in published U.S. Patent Application U.S. 2014/0065711 A1; Mootz et al., “Protein splicing triggered by a small molecule.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124, 9044-9045; Mootz et al., “Conditional protein splicing: a new tool to control protein structure and function in vitro and in vivo.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125, 10561-10569; Buskirk et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004; 101, 10505-10510); Skretas & Wood, “Regulation of protein activity with small-molecule-controlled inteins.” Protein Sci. 2005; 14, 523-532; Schwartz, et al., “Post-translational enzyme activation in an animal via optimized conditional protein splicing.” Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007; 3, 50-54; Peck et al., Chem. Biol. 2011; 18 (5), 619-630; the entire contents of each are hereby incorporated by reference. Exemplary sequences are as follows:
Linker
The term “linker,” as used herein, refers to a molecule linking two other molecules or moieties. The linker can be an amino acid sequence in the case of a linker joining two fusion proteins. For example, a Cas9 can be fused to a reverse transcriptase by an amino acid linker sequence. The linker can also be a nucleotide sequence in the case of joining two nucleotide sequences together. For example, in the instant case, the traditional guide RNA is linked via a spacer or linker nucleotide sequence to the RNA extension of a prime editing guide RNA which may comprise a RT template sequence and an RT primer binding site. In other embodiments, the linker is an organic molecule, group, polymer, or chemical moiety. In some embodiments, the linker is 5-100 amino acids in length, for example, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 30-35, 35-40, 40-45, 45-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, 80-90, 90-100, 100-150, or 150-200 amino acids in length. Longer or shorter linkers are also contemplated.
Isolated
“Isolated” means altered or removed from the natural state. For example, a nucleic 20 acid or a peptide naturally present in a living animal is not “isolated,” but the same nucleic acid or peptide partially or completely separated from the coexisting materials of its natural state is “isolated.” An isolated nucleic acid or protein can exist in substantially purified form, or can exist in a non-native environment such as, for example, a host cell.
In some embodiments, a gene of interest is encoded by an isolated nucleic acid. As used herein, the term “isolated,” refers to the characteristic of a material as provided herein being removed from its original or native environment (e.g., the natural environment if it is naturally occurring). Therefore, a naturally-occurring polynucleotide or protein or polypeptide present in a living animal is not isolated, but the same polynucleotide or polypeptide, separated by human intervention from some or all of the coexisting materials in the natural system, is isolated. An artificial or engineered material, for example, a non-naturally occurring nucleic acid construct, such as the expression constructs and vectors described herein, are, accordingly, also referred to as isolated. A material does not have to be purified in order to be isolated. Accordingly, a material may be part of a vector and/or part of a composition, and still be isolated in that such vector or composition is not part of the environment in which the material is found in nature.
MS2 Tagging Technique
In various embodiments (e.g., as depicted in the embodiments of
The prime editors described herein may incorporate as an aspect any known RNA-protein interaction domain to recruit or “co-localize” specific functions of interest to a prime editor complex. A review of other modular RNA-protein interaction domains are described in the art, for example, in Johansson et al., “RNA recognition by the MS2 phage coat protein,” Sem Virol., 1997, Vol. 8(3): 176-185; Delebecque et al., “Organization of intracellular reactions with rationally designed RNA assemblies,” Science, 2011, Vol. 333: 470-474; Mali et al., “Cas9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering,” Nat. Biotechnol., 2013, Vol. 31: 833-838; and Zalatan et al., “Engineering complex synthetic transcriptional programs with CRISPR RNA scaffolds,” Cell, 2015, Vol. 160: 339-350, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Other systems include the PP7 hairpin, which specifically recruits the PCP protein, and the “com” hairpin, which specifically recruits the Com protein. See Zalatan et al.
The nucleotide sequence of the MS2 hairpin (or equivalently referred to as the “MS2 aptamer”) is: GCCAACATGAGGATCACCCATGTCTGCAGGGCC (SEQ ID NO: 763).
The amino acid sequence of the MCP or MS2cp is: GSASNFTQFVLVDNGGTGDVTVAPSNFANGVAEWISSNSRSQAYKVTCSVRQSSAQNRKYTIKV EVPKVATQTVGGEELPVAGWRSYLNMELTIPIFATNSDCELIVKAMQGLLKDGNPIPSAIAANSGI Y (SEQ ID NO: 764).
The MS2 hairpin (or “MS2 aptamer”) may also be referred to as a type of “RNA effector recruitment domain” (or equivalently as “RNA-binding protein recruitment domain” or simply as “recruitment domain”) since it is a physical structure (e.g., a hairpin) that is installed into a PEgRNA or tPERT that effectively recruits other effector functions (e.g., RNA-binding proteins having various functions, such as DNA polymerases or other DNA-modifying enzymes) to the PEgRNA or rPERT that is so modified, and thus, co-localizing effector functions in trans to the prime editing machinery. This application is not intended to be limited in any way to any particular RNA effector recruitment domains and may include any available such domain, including the MS2 hairpin. Example 19 and
napDNAbp
As used herein, the term “nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein” or “napDNAbp,” of which Cas9 is an example, refer to proteins that use RNA:DNA hybridization to target and bind to specific sequences in a DNA molecule. Each napDNAbp is associated with at least one guide nucleic acid (e.g., guide RNA), which localizes the napDNAbp to a DNA sequence that comprises a DNA strand (i.e., a target strand) that is complementary to the guide nucleic acid, or a portion thereof (e.g., the protospacer of a guide RNA). In other words, the guide nucleic-acid “programs” the napDNAbp (e.g., Cas9 or equivalent) to localize and bind to a complementary sequence.
Without being bound by theory, the binding mechanism of a napDNAbp—guide RNA complex, in general, includes the step of forming an R-loop whereby the napDNAbp induces the unwinding of a double-strand DNA target, thereby separating the strands in the region bound by the napDNAbp. The guide RNA protospacer then hybridizes to the “target strand.” This displaces a “non-target strand” that is complementary to the target strand, which forms the single strand region of the R-loop. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp includes one or more nuclease activities, which then cut the DNA, leaving various types of lesions. For example, the napDNAbp may comprise a nuclease activity that cuts the non-target strand at a first location, and/or cuts the target strand at a second location. Depending on the nuclease activity, the target DNA can be cut to form a “double-stranded break” whereby both strands are cut. In other embodiments, the target DNA can be cut at only a single site, i.e., the DNA is “nicked” on one strand. Exemplary napDNAbp with different nuclease activities include “Cas9 nickase” (“nCas9”) and a deactivated Cas9 having no nuclease activities (“dead Cas9” or “dCas9”). Exemplary sequences for these and other napDNAbp are provided herein.
Nickase
The term “nickase” refers to a Cas9 with one of the two nuclease domains inactivated. This enzyme is capable of cleaving only one strand of a target DNA.
Nuclear Localization Sequence (NLS)
The term “nuclear localization sequence” or “NLS” refers to an amino acid sequence that promotes import of a protein into the cell nucleus, for example, by nuclear transport. Nuclear localization sequences are known in the art and would be apparent to the skilled artisan. For example, NLS sequences are described in Plank et al., international PCT application, PCT/EP2000/011690, filed Nov. 23, 2000, published as WO/2001/038547 on May 31, 2001, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference for its disclosure of exemplary nuclear localization sequences. In some embodiments, a NLS comprises the amino acid sequence PKKKRKV (SEQ ID NO: 16) or MDSLLMNRRKFLYQFKNVRWAKGRRETYLC (SEQ ID NO: 17).
Nucleic Acid Molecule
The term “nucleic acid,” as used herein, refers to a polymer of nucleotides. The polymer may include natural nucleosides (i.e., adenosine, thymidine, guanosine, cytidine, uridine, deoxyadenosine, deoxythymidine, deoxyguanosine, and deoxycytidine), nucleoside analogs (e.g., 2-aminoadenosine, 2-thiothymidine, inosine, pyrrolo-pyrimidine, 3-methyl adenosine, 5-methylcytidine, C5 bromouridine, C5 fluorouridine, C5 iodouridine, C5 propynyl uridine, C5 propynyl cytidine, C5 methylcytidine, 7 deazaadenosine, 7 deazaguanosine, 8 oxoadenosine, 8 oxoguanosine, 0(6) methylguanine, 4-acetylcytidine, 5-(carboxyhydroxymethyl)uridine, dihydrouridine, methylpseudouridine, 1-methyl adenosine, 1-methyl guanosine, N6-methyl adenosine, and 2-thiocytidine), chemically modified bases, biologically modified bases (e.g., methylated bases), intercalated bases, modified sugars (e.g., 2′-fluororibose, ribose, 2′-deoxyribose, 2′-O-methylcytidine, arabinose, and hexose), or modified phosphate groups (e.g., phosphorothioates and 5′ N phosphoramidite linkages).
PEgRNA
As used herein, the terms “prime editing guide RNA” or “PEgRNA” or “extended guide RNA” refer to a specialized form of a guide RNA that has been modified to include one or more additional sequences for implementing the prime editing methods and compositions described herein. As described herein, the prime editing guide RNA comprise one or more “extended regions” of nucleic acid sequence. The extended regions may comprise, but are not limited to, single-stranded RNA or DNA. Further, the extended regions may occur at the 3′ end of a traditional guide RNA. In other arrangements, the extended regions may occur at the 5′ end of a traditional guide RNA. In still other arrangements, the extended region may occur at an intramolecular region of the traditional guide RNA, for example, in the gRNA core region which associates and/or binds to the napDNAbp. The extended region comprises a “DNA synthesis template” which encodes (by the polymerase of the prime editor) a single-stranded DNA which, in turn, has been designed to be (a) homologous with the endogenous target DNA to be edited, and (b) which comprises at least one desired nucleotide change (e.g., a transition, a transversion, a deletion, or an insertion) to be introduced or integrated into the endogenous target DNA. The extended region may also comprise other functional sequence elements, such as, but not limited to, a “primer binding site” and a “spacer or linker” sequence, or other structural elements, such as, but not limited to aptamers, stem loops, hairpins, toe loops (e.g., a 3′ toeloop), or an RNA-protein recruitment domain (e.g., MS2 hairpin). As used herein the “primer binding site” comprises a sequence that hybridizes to a single-strand DNA sequence having a 3′ end generated from the nicked DNA of the R-loop.
In certain embodiments, the PEgRNAs are represented by
In certain other embodiments, the PEgRNAs are represented by
In still other embodiments, the PEgRNAs are represented by
In still other embodiments, the PEgRNAs are represented by
PE1
As used herein, “PE1” refers to a PE complex comprising a fusion protein comprising Cas9(H840A) and a wild type MMLV RT having the following structure: [NLS]-[Cas9(H840A)]-[linker]-[MMLV_RT(wt)]+a desired PEgRNA, wherein the PE fusion has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 123, which is shown as follows;
MKRTADGSEFESPKKKRKV
DKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVPSKKFKVLGNTDRHSIK
KNLIGALLFDSGETAEATRLKRTARRRYTRRKNRICYLQEIFSNEMAKVDDSFFHRLEESFL
VEEDKKHERHPIFGNIVDEVAYHEKYPTIYHLRKKLVDSTDKADLRLIYLALAHMIKFRGHF
LIEGDLNPDNSDVDKLFIQLVQTYNQLFEENPINASGVDAKAILSARLSKSRRLENLIAQLPG
EKKNGLFGNLIALSLGLTPNFKSNFDLAEDAKLQLSKDTYDDDLDNLLAQIGDQYADLFLA
AKNLSDAILLSDILRVNTEITKAPLSASMIKRYDEHHQDLTLLKALVRQQLPEKYKEIFFDQS
KNGYAGYIDGGASQEEFYKFIKPILEKMDGTEELLVKLNREDLLRKQRTFDNGSIPHQIHLG
ELHAILRRQEDFYPFLKDNREKIEKILTFRIPYYVGPLARGNSRFAWMTRKSEETITPWNFEE
VVDKGASAQSFIERMTNFDKNLPNEKVLPKHSLLYEYFTVYNELTKVKYVTEGMRKPAFLS
GEQKKAIVDLLFKTNRKVTVKQLKEDYFKKIECFDSVEISGVEDRFNASLGTYHDLLKIIKD
KDFLDNEENEDILEDIVLTLTLFEDREMIEERLKTYAHLFDDKVMKQLKRRRYTGWGRLSR
KLINGIRDKQSGKTILDFLKSDGFANRNFMQLIHDDSLTFKEDIQKAQVSGQGDSLHEHIAN
LAGSPAIKKGILQTVKVVDELVKVMGRHKPENIVIEMARENQTTQKGQKNSRERMKRIEE
GIKELGSQILKEHPVENTQLQNEKLYLYYLQNGRDMYVDQELDINRLSDYDVDAIVPQSFL
KDDSIDNKVLTRSDKNRGKSDNVPSEEVVKKMKNYWRQLLNAKLITQRKFDNLTKAERGG
LSELDKAGFIKRQLVETRQITKHVAQILDSRMNTKYDENDKLIREVKVITLKSKLVSDFRKD
FQFYKVREINNYHHAHDAYLNAVVGTALIKKYPKLESEFVYGDYKVYDVRKMIAKSEQEIG
KATAKYFFYSNIMNFFKTEITLANGEIRKRPLIETNGETGEIVWDKGRDFATVRKVLSMPQV
NIVKKTEVQTGGFSKESILPKRNSDKLIARKKDWDPKKYGGFDSPTVAYSVLVVAKVEKGK
SKKLKSVKELLGITIMERSSFEKNPIDFLEAKGYKEVKKDLIIKLPKYSLFELENGRKRMLA
SAGELQKGNELALPSKYVNFLYLASHYEKLKGSPEDNEQKQLFVEQHKHYLDEIIEQISEFS
KRVILADANLDKVLSAYNKHRDKPIREQAENIIHLFTLTNLGAPAAFKYFDTTIDRKRYTSTK
EVLDATLIHQSITGLYETRIDLSQLGGD
SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATPESSGGSSGGSS
TLNI
EDEYRLHETSKEPDVSLGSTWLSDFPQAWAETGGMGLAVRQAPLIIPLKATSTPVSIKQYPMSQEARLGI
KPHIQRLLDQGILVPCQSPWNTPLLPVKKPGTNDYRPVQDLREVNKRVEDIHPTVPNPYNLLSGLPPSH
QWYTVLDLKDAFFCLRLHPTSQPLFAFEWRDPEMGISGQLTWTRLPQGFKNSPTLFDEALHRDLADF
RIQHPDLILLQYVDDLLLAATSELDCQQGTRALLQTLGNLGYRASAKKAQICQKQVKYLGYLLKEGQR
WLTEARKETVMGQPTPKTPRQLREFLGTAGFCRLWIPGFAEMAAPLYPLTKTGTLFNWGPDQQKAYQ
EIKQALLTAPALGLPDLTKPFELFVDEKQGYAKGVLTQKLGPWRRPVAYLSKKLDPVAAGWPPCLRMV
LLPLPEEGLQHNCLDILAEAHGTRPDLTDQPLPDADHTWYTDGSSLLQEGQRKAGAAVFFETEVIWAK
ALPAGTSAQRAELIALTQALKMAEGKKLNVYTDSRYAFATAHIHGEIYRRRGLLTSEGKEIKNKDEILALL
KALFLPKRLSIIHCPGHQKGHSAEARGNRMADQAARKAAITETPDTSTLLIENSSP
SGGSKRTADGSEF
EPKKKRKV
KEY:
NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SEQUENCE (NLS) TOP:(SEQ ID NO: 124), BOTTOM: (SEQ ID NO: 133)
CAS9(H840A) (SEQ ID NO: 126)
33-AMINO ACID LINKER (SEQ ID NO: 127)
M-MLV reverse transcriptase (SEQ ID NO: 128).
PE2
As used herein, “PE2” refers to a PE complex comprising a fusion protein comprising Cas9(H840A) and a variant MMLV RT having the following structure: [NLS]-[Cas9(H840A)]-[linker]-[MMLV_RT(D200N)(T330P)(L603W)(T306K)(W313F)]+a desired PEgRNA, wherein the PE fusion has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 134, which is shown as follows:
MKRTADGSEFESPKKKRKV
DKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVPSKKFKVLGNTDRHSIK
KNLIGALLFDSGETAEATRLKRTARRRYTRRKNRICYLQEIFSNEMAKVDDSFFHRLEESFL
VEEDKKHERHPIFGNIVDEVAYHEKYPTIYHLRKKLVDSTDKADLRLIYLALAHMIKFRGHF
LIEGDLNPDNSDVDKLFIQLVQTYNQLFEENPINASGVDAKAILSARLSKSRRLENLIAQLPG
EKKNGLFGNLIALSLGLTPNFKSNFDLAEDAKLQLSKDTYDDDLDNLLAQIGDQYADLFLA
AKNLSDAILLSDILRVNTEITKAPLSASMIKRYDEHHQDLTLLKALVRQQLPEKYKEIFFDQS
KNGYAGYIDGGASQEEFYKFIKPILEKMDGTEELLVKLNREDLLRKQRTFDNGSIPHQIHLG
ELHAILRRQEDFYPFLKDNREKIEKILTFRIPYYVGPLARGNSRFAWMTRKSEETITPWNFEE
VVDKGASAQSFIERMTNFDKNLPNEKVLPKHSLLYEYFTVYNELTKVKYVTEGMRKPAFLS
GEQKKAIVDLLFKTNRKVTVKQLKEDYFKKIECFDSVEISGVEDRFNASLGTYHDLLKIIKD
KDFLDNEENEDILEDIVLTLTLFEDREMIEERLKTYAHLFDDKVMKQLKRRRYTGWGRLSR
KLINGIRDKQSGKTILDFLKSDGFANRNFMQLIHDDSLTFKEDIQKAQVSGQGDSLHEHIAN
LAGSPAIKKGILQTVKVVDELVKVMGRHKPENIVIEMARENQTTQKGQKNSRERMKRIEE
GIKELGSQILKEHPVENTQLQNEKLYLYYLQNGRDMYVDQELDINRLSDYDVDAIVPQSFL
KDDSIDNKVLTRSDKNRGKSDNVPSEEVVKKMKNYWRQLLNAKLITQRKFDNLTKAERGG
LSELDKAGFIKRQLVETRQITKHVAQILDSRMNTKYDENDKLIREVKVITLKSKLVSDFRKD
FQFYKVREINNYHHAHDAYLNAVVGTALIKKYPKLESEFVYGDYKVYDVRKMIAKSEQEIG
KATAKYFFYSNIMNFFKTEITLANGEIRKRPLIETNGETGEIVWDKGRDFATVRKVLSMPQV
NIVKKTEVQTGGFSKESILPKRNSDKLIARKKDWDPKKYGGFDSPTVAYSVLVVAKVEKGK
SKKLKSVKELLGITIMERSSFEKNPIDFLEAKGYKEVKKDLIIKLPKYSLFELENGRKRMLA
SAGELQKGNELALPSKYVNFLYLASHYEKLKGSPEDNEQKQLFVEQHKHYLDEIIEQISEFS
KRVILADANLDKVLSAYNKHRDKPIREQAENIIHLFTLTNLGAPAAFKYFDTTIDRKRYTSTK
EVLDATLIHQSITGLYETRIDLSQLGGD
SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATPESSGGSSGGSS
TLNI
EDEYRLHETSKEPDVSLGSTWLSDFPQAWAETGGMGLAVRQAPLnPLKATSTPVSIKQYPMSQEARLGI
KPHIQRLLDQGILVPCQSPWNTPLLPVKKPGTNDYRPVQDLREVNKRVEDIHPTVPNPYNLLSGLPPSH
QWYTVLDLKDAFFCLRLHPTSQPLFAFEWRDPEMGISGQLTWTRLPQGFKNSPTLFNEALHRDLADF
RIQHPDLILLQYVDDLLLAATSELDCQQGTRALLQTLGNLGYRASAKKAQICQKQVKYLGYLLKEGQR
WLTEARKETVMGQPTPKTPRQLREFLGKAGFCRLFIPGFAEMAAPLYPLTKPGTLFNWGPDQQKAYQ
EIKQALLTAPALGLPDLTKPFELFVDEKQGYAKGVLTQKLGPWRRPVAYLSKKLDPVAAGWPPCLRMV
AAIAVLTKDAGKLTMGQPLVILAPHAVEALVKQPPDRWLSNARMTHYQALLLDTDRVQFGPWALNPAT
LLPLPEEGLQHNCLDILAEAHGTRPDLTDQPLPDADHTWYTDGSSLLQEGQRKAGAAVFTETEVIWAK
ALPAGTSAQRAELIALTQALKMAEGKKLNVYTDSRYAFATAHIHGEIYRRRGWLTSEGKEIKNKDEILALL
KALFLPKRLSIIHCPGHQKGHSAEARGNRMADQAARKAAITETPDTSTLLIENSSP
SGGSKRTADGSEF
EPKKKRKV
KEY:
NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SEQUENCE (NLS) TOP:(SEQ ID NO: 124), BOTTOM: (SEQ ID NO: 133)
CAS9(H840A) (SEQ ID NO: 137)
33-AMINO ACID LINKER (SEQ ID NO: 127)
M-MLV reverse transcriptase (SEQ ID NO: 139).
PE3
As used herein, “PE3” refers to PE2 plus a second-strand nicking guide RNA that complexes with the PE2 and introduces a nick in the non-edited DNA strand in order to induce preferential replacement of the edited strand.
PE3b
As used herein, “PE3b” refers to PE3 but wherein the second-strand nicking guide RNA is designed for temporal control such that the second strand nick is not introduced until after the installation of the desired edit. This is achieved by designing a gRNA with a spacer sequence that matches only the edited strand, but not the original allele. Using this strategy, referred to hereafter as PE3b, mismatches between the protospacer and the unedited allele should disfavor nicking by the sgRNA until after the editing event on the PAM strand takes place.
PE-Short
As used herein, “PE-short” refers to a PE construct that is fused to a C-terminally truncated reverse transcriptase, and has the following amino acid sequence:
MKRTADGSEFESPKKKRKV
DKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVPSKKFKVLGNTDRHSIK
KNLIGALLFDSGETAEATRLKRTARRRYTRRKNRICYLQEIFSNEMAKVDDSFFHRLEESFL
VEEDKKHERHPIFGNIVDEVAYHEKYPTIYHLRKKLVDSTDKADLRLIYLALAHMIKFRGH
FLIEGDLNPDNSDVDKLFIQLVQTYNQLFEENPINASGVDAKAILSARLSKSRRLENLIAQLP
GEKKNGLFGNLIALSLGLTPNFKSNFDLAEDAKLQLSKDTYDDDLDNLLAQIGDQYADLFL
AAKNLSDAILLSDILRVNTEITKAPLSASMIKRYDEHHQDLTLLKALVRQQLPEKYKEIFFD
QSKNGYAGYIDGGASQEEFYKFIKPILEKMDGTEELLVKLNREDLLRKQRTFDNGSIPHQIH
LGELHAILRRQEDFYPFLKDNREKIEKILTFRIPYYVGPLARGNSRFAWMTRKSEETITPWN
FEEVVDKGASAQSFIERMTNFDKNLPNEKVLPKHSLLYEYFTVYNELTKVKYVTEGMRKP
AFLSGEQKKAIVDLLFKTNRKVTVKQLKEDYFKKIECFDSVEISGVEDRFNASLGTYHDLL
KIIKDKDFLDNEENEDILEDIVLTLTLFEDREMIEERLKTYAHLFDDKVMKQLKRRRYTGW
GRLSRKLINGIRDKQSGKTILDFLKSDGFANRNFMQLIHDDSLTFKEDIQKAQVSGQGDSLH
EHIANLAGSPAIKKGILQTVKVVDELVKVMGRHKPENIVIEMARENQTTQKGQKNSRERM
KRIEEGIKELGSQILKEHPVENTQLQNEKLYLYYLQNGRDMYVDQELDINRLSDYDVDAIV
PQSFLKDDSIDNKVLTRSDKNRGKSDNVPSEEVVKKMKNYWRQLLNAKLITQRKFDNLTK
AERGGLSELDKAGFIKRQLVETRQITKHVAQILDSRMNTKYDENDKLIREVKVITLKSKLVS
DFRKDFQFYKVREINNYHHAHDAYLNAVVGTALIKKYPKLESEFVYGDYKVYDVRKMIAK
SEQEIGKATAKYFFYSNIMNFFKTEITLANGEIRKRPLIETNGETGEIVWDKGRDFATVRKV
LSMPQVNIVKKTEVQTGGFSKESILPKRNSDKLIARKKDWDPKKYGGFDSPTVAYSVLVVA
KVEKGKSKKLKSVKELLGITIMERSSFEKNPIDFLEAKGYKEVKKDLIIKLPKYSLFELENG
RKRMLASAGELQKGNELALPSKYVNFLYLASHYEKLKGSPEDNEQKQLFVEQHKHYLDEI
lEQISEFSKRVILADANLDKVLSAYNKHRDKPIREQAENIIHLFTLTNLGAPAAFKYFDTTIDR
KRYTSTKEVLDATLIHOSITGLYETRIDLSOLGGD
SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATPESSGGSS
MSQEARLGIKPHIQRLLDQGILVPCQSPWNTPLLPVKKPGTNDYRPVQDLREVNKRVEDIHPTVPNPY
NLLSGLPPSHQWYTVLDLKDAFFCLRLHPTSQPLFAFEWRDPEMGISGQLTWTRLPQGFKNSPTLFNE
ALHRDLADFRIQHPDLILLQYVDDLLLAATSELDCQQGTRALLQTLGNLGYRASAKKAQICQKQVKYL
GYLLKEGQRWLTEARKETVMGQPTPKTPRQLREFLGKAGFCRLFIPGFAEMAAPLYPLTKPGTLFNW
GPDQQKAYQEIKQALLTAPALGLPDLTKPFELFVDEKQGYAKGVLTQKLGPWRRPVAYLSKKLDPVA
AGWPPCLRMVAAIAVLTKDAGKLTMGQPLVILAPHAVEALVKQPPDRWLSNARMTHYQALLLDTDRV
QFGPWALNPATLLPLPEEGLQHNCLDNSRLIN
SGGSKRTADGSEFEPKKKRKV
KEY:
NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SEQUENCE (NLS) TOP:(SEQ ID NO: 124), BOTTOM: (SEQ ID NO: 133)
CAS9(H840A) (SEQ ID NO: 157)
33-AMINO ACID LINKER 1 (SEQ ID NO: 127)
M-MLV TRUNCATED REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE
(SEQ ID NO: 766)
Peptide Tag
The term “peptide tag” refers to a peptide amino acid sequence that is genetically fused to a protein sequence to impart one or more functions onto the proteins that facilitate the manipulation of the protein for various purposes, such as, visualization, purification, solubilization, and separation, etc. Peptide tags can include various types of tags categorized by purpose or function, which may include “affinity tags” (to facilitate protein purification), “solubilization tags” (to assist in proper folding of proteins), “chromatography tags” (to alter chromatographic properties of proteins), “epitope tags” (to bind to high affinity antibodies), “fluorescence tags” (to facilitate visualization of proteins in a cell or in vitro).
Polymerase
As used herein, the term “polymerase” refers to an enzyme that synthesizes a nucleotide strand and that may be used in connection with the prime editor systems described herein. The polymerase can be a “template-dependent” polymerase (i.e., a polymerase that synthesizes a nucleotide strand based on the order of nucleotide bases of a template strand). The polymerase can also be a “template-independent” polymerase (i.e., a polymerase that synthesizes a nucleotide strand without the requirement of a template strand). A polymerase may also be further categorized as a “DNA polymerase” or an “RNA polymerase.” In various embodiments, the prime editor system comprises a DNA polymerase. In various embodiments, the DNA polymerase can be a “DNA-dependent DNA polymerase” (i.e., whereby the template molecule is a strand of DNA). In such cases, the DNA template molecule can be a PEgRNA, wherein the extension arm comprises a strand of DNA. In such cases, the PEgRNA may be referred to as a chimeric or hybrid PEgRNA which comprises an RNA portion (i.e., the guide RNA components, including the spacer and the gRNA core) and a DNA portion (i.e., the extension arm). In various other embodiments, the DNA polymerase can be an “RNA-dependent DNA polymerase” (i.e., whereby the template molecule is a strand of RNA). In such cases, the PEgRNA is RNA, i.e., including an RNA extension. The term “polymerase” may also refer to an enzyme that catalyzes the polymerization of nucleotide (i.e., the polymerase activity). Generally, the enzyme will initiate synthesis at the 3-end of a primer annealed to a polynucleotide template sequence (e.g., such as a primer sequence annealed to the primer binding site of a PEgRNA) and will proceed toward the 5′ end of the template strand. A “DNA polymerase” catalyzes the polymerization of deoxynucleotides. As used herein in reference to a DNA polymerase, the term DNA polymerase includes a “functional fragment thereof”. A “functional fragment thereof” refers to any portion of a wild-type or mutant DNA polymerase that encompasses less than the entire amino acid sequence of the polymerase and which retains the ability, under at least one set of conditions, to catalyze the polymerization of a polynucleotide. Such a functional fragment may exist as a separate entity, or it may be a constituent of a larger polypeptide, such as a fusion protein.
Prime Editing and Multi-Flap Prime Editing
As used herein, the term “prime editing” or “classical prime editing” refers to an approach for gene editing using napDNAbps, a polymerase (e.g., a reverse transcriptase), and specialized guide RNAs that include a DNA synthesis template for encoding desired new genetic information (or deleting genetic information) that is then incorporated into a target DNA sequence. Certain embodiments of prime editing are described in the embodiments of
Prime editing represents a platform for genome editing that is a versatile and precise genome editing method that directly writes new genetic information into a specified DNA site using a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (“napDNAbp”) working in association with a polymerase (i.e., in the form of a fusion protein or otherwise provided in trans with the napDNAbp), wherein the prime editing system is programmed with a prime editing (PE) guide RNA (“PEgRNA”) that both specifies the target site and templates the synthesis of the desired edit in the form of a replacement DNA strand by way of an extension (either DNA or RNA) engineered onto a guide RNA (e.g., at the 5′ or 3′ end, or at an internal portion of a guide RNA). The replacement strand containing the desired edit (e.g., a single nucleobase substitution) shares the same (or is homologous to) sequence as the endogenous strand (immediately downstream of the nick site) of the target site to be edited (with the exception that it includes the desired edit). Through DNA repair and/or replication machinery, the endogenous strand downstream of the nick site is replaced by the newly synthesized replacement strand containing the desired edit. In some cases, prime editing may be thought of as a “search-and-replace” genome editing technology since the prime editors, as described herein, not only search and locate the desired target site to be edited, but at the same time, encode a replacement strand containing a desired edit which is installed in place of the corresponding target site endogenous DNA strand. The prime editors of the present disclosure relate, in part, to the discovery that the mechanism of target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) or “prime editing” can be leveraged or adapted for conducting precision CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing with high efficiency and genetic flexibility (e.g., as depicted in various embodiments of
In various embodiments, prime editing operates by contacting a target DNA molecule (for which a change in the nucleotide sequence is desired to be introduced) with a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) complexed with a prime editing guide RNA (PEgRNA). In reference to
The term “prime editor (PE) system” or “prime editor (PE)” or “PE system” or “PE editing system” refers the compositions involved in the method of genome editing using target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) describe herein, including, but not limited to the napDNAbps, reverse transcriptases, fusion proteins (e.g., comprising napDNAbps and reverse transcriptases), prime editing guide RNAs, and complexes comprising fusion proteins and prime editing guide RNAs, as well as accessory elements, such as second strand nicking components (e.g., second strand sgRNAs) and 5′ endogenous DNA flap removal endonucleases (e.g., FEN1) for helping to drive the prime editing process towards the edited product formation.
Although in the embodiments described thus far the PEgRNA constitutes a single molecule comprising a guide RNA (which itself comprises a spacer sequence and a gRNA core or scaffold) and a 5′ or 3′ extension arm comprising the primer binding site and a DNA synthesis template (e.g., see
In the “dual-flap prime editing system”, two pegRNAs are used to target opposite strands of a genomic site and direct the synthesis of two complementary 3′ flaps containing edited DNA sequence (
Like classical prime editing, multi-flap prime editing (including dual-flap and quadruple-flap prime editing) is a versatile and precise genome editing method that directly writes new genetic information into a specified DNA site using a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (“napDNAbp”) working in association with a polymerase (i.e., in the form of a fusion protein or otherwise provided in trans with the napDNAbp), wherein the prime editing system is programmed with a prime editing (PE) guide RNA (“PEgRNA”) that both specifies the target site and templates the synthesis of the desired edit in the form of a replacement DNA strand by way of an extension (either DNA or RNA) engineered onto a guide RNA (e.g., at the 5′ or 3′ end, or at an internal portion of a guide RNA). The replacement strand containing the desired edit (e.g., a single nucleobase substitution) shares the same sequence as the endogenous strand of the target site to be edited (with the exception that it includes the desired edit). Through DNA repair and/or replication machinery, the endogenous strand of the target site is replaced by the newly synthesized replacement strand containing the desired edit. In some cases, prime editing may be thought of as a “search-and-replace” genome editing technology since the prime editors, as described herein, not only search and locate the desired target site to be edited, but at the same time, encode a replacement strand containing a desired edit which is installed in place of the corresponding target site endogenous DNA strand.
Prime Editor
The dual prime editing system described herein comprises a pair of prime editors. The term “prime editor” refers to the herein described fusion constructs comprising a napDNAbp (e.g., Cas9 nickase) and a reverse transcriptase and is capable of carrying out prime editing on a target nucleotide sequence in the presence of a PEgRNA (or “extended guide RNA”). The term “prime editor” may refer to the fusion protein or to the fusion protein complexed with a PEgRNA, and/or further complexed with a second-strand nicking sgRNA. In some embodiments, the prime editor may also refer to the complex comprising a fusion protein (reverse transcriptase fused to a napDNAbp), a PEgRNA, and a regular guide RNA capable of directing the second-site nicking step of the non-edited strand as described herein. In other embodiments, the reverse transcriptase component of the “primer editor” may be provided in trans.
The dual-flap prime editing system described herein comprises a pair of prime editors. The quadruple-flap prime editing system described herein comprises four prime editors.
Primer Binding Site
The term “primer binding site” or “the PBS” refers to the nucleotide sequence located on a PEgRNA as a component of the extension arm (typically at the 3′ end of the extension arm) and serves to bind to the primer sequence that is formed after Cas9 nicking of the target sequence by the prime editor. As detailed elsewhere, when the Cas9 nickase component of a prime editor nicks one strand of the target DNA sequence, a 3′-ended ssDNA flap is formed, which serves a primer sequence that anneals to the primer binding site on the PEgRNA to prime reverse transcription.
Promoter
The term “promoter” is art-recognized and refers to a nucleic acid molecule with a sequence recognized by the cellular transcription machinery and able to initiate transcription of a downstream gene. A promoter can be constitutively active, meaning that the promoter is always active in a given cellular context, or conditionally active, meaning that the promoter is only active in the presence of a specific condition. For example, a conditional promoter may only be active in the presence of a specific protein that connects a protein associated with a regulatory element in the promoter to the basic transcriptional machinery, or only in the absence of an inhibitory molecule. A subclass of conditionally active promoters are inducible promoters that require the presence of a small molecule “inducer” for activity. Examples of inducible promoters include, but are not limited to, arabinose-inducible promoters, Tet-on promoters, and tamoxifen-inducible promoters. A variety of constitutive, conditional, and inducible promoters are well known to the skilled artisan, and the skilled artisan will be able to ascertain a variety of such promoters useful in carrying out the instant invention, which is not limited in this respect.
Protospacer
As used herein, the term “protospacer” refers to the sequence (˜20 bp) in DNA adjacent to the PAM (protospacer adjacent motif) sequence. The protospacer shares the same sequence as the spacer sequence of the guide RNA. The guide RNA anneals to the complement of the protospacer sequence on the target DNA (specifically, one strand thereof, i.e., the “target strand” versus the “non-target strand” of the target DNA sequence). In order for Cas9 to function it also requires a specific protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) that varies depending on the bacterial species of the Cas9 gene. The most commonly used Cas9 nuclease, derived from S. pyogenes, recognizes a PAM sequence of NGG that is found directly downstream of the target sequence in the genomic DNA, on the non-target strand. The skilled person will appreciate that the literature in the state of the art sometimes refers to the “protospacer” as the ˜20-nt target-specific guide sequence on the guide RNA itself, rather than referring to it as a “spacer.” Thus, in some cases, the term “protospacer” as used herein may be used interchangeably with the term “spacer.” The context of the description surrounding the appearance of either “protospacer” or “spacer” will help inform the reader as to whether the term is in reference to the gRNA or the DNA target.
Protospacer Adjacent Motif (PAM)
As used herein, the term “protospacer adjacent sequence” or “PAM” refers to an approximately 2-6 base pair DNA sequence that is an important targeting component of a Cas9 nuclease. Typically, the PAM sequence is on either strand, and is downstream in the 5′ to 3′ direction of the Cas9 cut site. The canonical PAM sequence (i.e., the PAM sequence that is associated with the Cas9 nuclease of Streptococcus pyogenes or SpCas9) is 5′-NGG-3′ wherein “N” is any nucleobase followed by two guanine (“G”) nucleobases. Different PAM sequences can be associated with different Cas9 nucleases or equivalent proteins from different organisms. In addition, any given Cas9 nuclease, e.g., SpCas9, may be modified to alter the PAM specificity of the nuclease such that the nuclease recognizes alternative PAM sequence.
For example, with reference to the canonical SpCas9 amino acid sequence is SEQ ID NO: 18, the PAM sequence can be modified by introducing one or more mutations, including (a) D1135V, R1335Q, and T1337R “the VQR variant”, which alters the PAM specificity to NGAN or NGNG, (b) D1135E, R1335Q, and T1337R “the EQR variant”, which alters the PAM specificity to NGAG, and (c) D1135V, G1218R, R1335E, and T1337R “the VRER variant”, which alters the PAM specificity to NGCG. In addition, the D1135E variant of canonical SpCas9 still recognizes NGG, but it is more selective compared to the wild type SpCas9 protein.
It will also be appreciated that Cas9 enzymes from different bacterial species (i.e., Cas9 orthologs) can have varying PAM specificities. For example, Cas9 from Staphylococcus aureus (SaCas9) recognizes NGRRT or NGRRN. In addition, Cas9 from Neisseria meningitis (NmCas) recognizes NNNNGATT. In another example, Cas9 from Streptococcus thermophilis (StCas9) recognizes NNAGAAW. In still another example, Cas9 from Treponema denticola (TdCas) recognizes NAAAAC. These are examples and are not meant to be limiting. It will be further appreciated that non-SpCas9s bind a variety of PAM sequences, which makes them useful when no suitable SpCas9 PAM sequence is present at the desired target cut site. Furthermore, non-SpCas9s may have other characteristics that make them more useful than SpCas9. For example, Cas9 from Staphylococcus aureus (SaCas9) is about 1 kilobase smaller than SpCas9, so it can be packaged into adeno-associated virus (AAV). Further reference may be made to Shah et al., “Protospacer recognition motifs: mixed identities and functional diversity,” RNA Biology, 10(5): 891-899 (which is incorporated herein by reference).
Recombinase
The term “recombinase,” as used herein, refers to a site-specific enzyme that mediates the recombination of DNA between recombinase recognition sequences, which results in the excision, integration, inversion, or exchange (e.g., translocation) of DNA fragments between the recombinase recognition sequences. Recombinases can be classified into two distinct families: serine recombinases (e.g., resolvases and invertases) and tyrosine recombinases (e.g., integrases). Examples of serine recombinases include, without limitation, Hin, Gin, Tn3, β-six, CinH, ParA, γδ, Bxb1, ϕC31, TP901, TG1, φBT1, R4, φRV1, φFC1, MR11, A118, U153, and gp29. Examples of tyrosine recombinases include, without limitation, Cre, FLP, R, Lambda, HK101, HK022, and pSAM2. The serine and tyrosine recombinase names stem from the conserved nucleophilic amino acid residue that the recombinase uses to attack the DNA and which becomes covalently linked to the DNA during strand exchange. Recombinases have numerous applications, including the creation of gene knockouts/knock-ins and gene therapy applications. See, e.g., Brown et al., “Serine recombinases as tools for genome engineering.” Methods. 2011; 53(4):372-9; Hirano et al., “Site-specific recombinases as tools for heterologous gene integration.” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011; 92(2):227-39; Chavez and Calos, “Therapeutic applications of the ΦC31 integrase system.” Curr. Gene Ther. 2011; 11(5):375-81; Turan and Bode, “Site-specific recombinases: from tag-and-target- to tag-and-exchange-based genomic modifications.” FASEB J. 2011; 25(12):4088-107; Venken and Bellen, “Genome-wide manipulations of Drosophila melanogaster with transposons, Flp recombinase, and ΦC31 integrase.” Methods Mol. Biol. 2012; 859:203-28; Murphy, “Phage recombinases and their applications.” Adv. Virus Res. 2012; 83:367-414; Zhang et al., “Conditional gene manipulation: Cre-ating a new biological era.” J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 2012; 13(7):511-24; Karpenshif and Bernstein, “From yeast to mammals: recent advances in genetic control of homologous recombination.” DNA Repair (Amst). 2012; 1; 11(10):781-8; the entire contents of each are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. The recombinases provided herein are not meant to be exclusive examples of recombinases that can be used in embodiments of the invention. The methods and compositions of the invention can be expanded by mining databases for new orthogonal recombinases or designing synthetic recombinases with defined DNA specificities (See, e.g., Groth et al., “Phage integrases: biology and applications.” J. Mol. Biol. 2004; 335, 667-678; Gordley et al., “Synthesis of programmable integrases.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009; 106, 5053-5058; the entire contents of each are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety). Other examples of recombinases that are useful in the methods and compositions described herein are known to those of skill in the art, and any new recombinase that is discovered or generated is expected to be able to be used in the different embodiments of the invention. In some embodiments, the catalytic domains of a recombinase are fused to a nuclease-inactivated RNA-programmable nuclease (e.g., dCas9, or a fragment thereof), such that the recombinase domain does not comprise a nucleic acid binding domain or is unable to bind to a target nucleic acid (e.g., the recombinase domain is engineered such that it does not have specific DNA binding activity). Recombinases lacking DNA binding activity and methods for engineering such are known, and include those described by Klippel et al., “Isolation and characterisation of unusual gin mutants.” Embo J. 1988; 7: 3983-3989: Burke et al., “Activating mutations of Tn3 resolvase marking interfaces important in recombination catalysis and its regulation. Mol Microbiol. 2004; 51: 937-948; Olorunniji et al., “Synapsis and catalysis by activated Tn3 resolvase mutants.” Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36: 7181-7191; Rowland et al., “Regulatory mutations in Sin recombinase support a structure-based model of the synaptosome.” Mol Microbiol. 2009; 74: 282-298; Akopian et al., “Chimeric recombinases with designed DNA sequence recognition.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 8688-8691; Gordley et al., “Evolution of programmable zinc finger-recombinases with activity in human cells. J Mol Biol. 2007; 367: 802-813; Gordley et al., “Synthesis of programmable integrases.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 5053-5058; Arnold et al., “Mutants of Tn3 resolvase which do not require accessory binding sites for recombination activity.” EMBO J. 1999; 18: 1407-1414; Gaj et al., “Structure-guided reprogramming of serine recombinase DNA sequence specificity.” Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108(2):498-503; and Proudfoot et al., “Zinc finger recombinases with adaptable DNA sequence specificity.” PLoS One. 2011; 6(4):e19537; the entire contents of each are hereby incorporated by reference. For example, serine recombinases of the resolvase-invertase group, e.g., Tn3 and γδ resolvases and the Hin and Gin invertases, have modular structures with autonomous catalytic and DNA-binding domains (See, e.g., Grindley et al., “Mechanism of site-specific recombination.” Ann Rev Biochem. 2006; 75: 567-605, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference). The catalytic domains of these recombinases are thus amenable to being recombined with nuclease-inactivated RNA-programmable nucleases (e.g., dCas9, or a fragment thereof) as described herein, e.g., following the isolation of ‘activated’ recombinase mutants which do not require any accessory factors (e.g., DNA binding activities) (See, e.g., Klippel et al., “Isolation and characterisation of unusual gin mutants.” EMBO J. 1988; 7: 3983-3989: Burke et al., “Activating mutations of Tn3 resolvase marking interfaces important in recombination catalysis and its regulation. Mol Microbiol. 2004; 51: 937-948; Olorunniji et al., “Synapsis and catalysis by activated Tn3 resolvase mutants.” Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36: 7181-7191; Rowland et al., “Regulatory mutations in Sin recombinase support a structure-based model of the synaptosome.” Mol Microbiol. 2009; 74: 282-298; Akopian et al., “Chimeric recombinases with designed DNA sequence recognition.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 8688-8691). Additionally, many other natural serine recombinases having an N-terminal catalytic domain and a C-terminal DNA binding domain are known (e.g., phiC31 integrase, TnpX transposase, IS607 transposase), and their catalytic domains can be co-opted to engineer programmable site-specific recombinases as described herein (See, e.g., Smith et al., “Diversity in the serine recombinases.” Mol Microbiol. 2002; 44: 299-307, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference). Similarly, the core catalytic domains of tyrosine recombinases (e.g., Cre, λ integrase) are known, and can be similarly co-opted to engineer programmable site-specific recombinases as described herein (See, e.g., Guo et al., “Structure of Cre recombinase complexed with DNA in a site-specific recombination synapse.” Nature. 1997; 389:40-46; Hartung et al., “Cre mutants with altered DNA binding properties.” J Biol Chem 1998; 273:22884-22891; Shaikh et al., “Chimeras of the Flp and Cre recombinases: Tests of the mode of cleavage by Flp and Cre. J Mol Biol. 2000; 302:27-48; Rongrong et al., “Effect of deletion mutation on the recombination activity of Cre recombinase.” Acta Biochim Pol. 2005; 52:541-544; Kilbride et al., “Determinants of product topology in a hybrid Cre-Tn3 resolvase site-specific recombination system.” J Mol Biol. 2006; 355:185-195; Warren et al., “A chimeric cre recombinase with regulated directionality.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008 105:18278-18283; Van Duyne, “Teaching Cre to follow directions.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009 Jan. 6; 106(1):4-5; Numrych et al., “A comparison of the effects of single-base and triple-base changes in the integrase arm-type binding sites on the site-specific recombination of bacteriophage λ.” Nucleic Acids Res. 1990; 18:3953-3959; Tirumalai et al., “The recognition of core-type DNA sites by λ integrase.” J Mol Biol. 1998; 279:513-527; Aihara et al., “A conformational switch controls the DNA cleavage activity of λ integrase.” Mol Cell. 2003; 12:187-198; Biswas et al., “A structural basis for allosteric control of DNA recombination by λ integrase.” Nature. 2005; 435:1059-1066; and Warren et al., “Mutations in the amino-terminal domain of λ-integrase have differential effects on integrative and excisive recombination.” Mol Microbiol. 2005; 55:1104-1112; the entire contents of each are incorporated by reference).
Recombinase Recognition Sequence
The term “recombinase recognition sequence”, or equivalently as “RRS” or “recombinase target sequence” or “recombinase site,” as used herein, refers to a nucleotide sequence target recognized by a recombinase and which undergoes strand exchange with another DNA molecule having a the RRS that results in excision, integration, inversion, or exchange of DNA fragments between the recombinase recognition sequences. In various embodiments, the multi-strand prime editors may install one or more recombinase sites in a target sequence, or in more than one target sequence. When more than one recombinase site is installed by a multi-strand prime editor, the recombinase sites can be installed at adjacent target sites or non-adjacent target sites (e.g., separate chromosomes). In various embodiments, single installed recombinase sites can be used as “landing sites” for a recombinase-mediated reaction between the genomic recombinase site and a second recombinase site within an exogenously supplied nucleic acid molecule, e.g., a plasmid. This enables the targeted integration of a desired nucleic acid molecule. In other embodiments, where two recombinase sites are inserted in adjacent regions of DNA (e.g., separated by 25-50 bp, 50-100 bp, 100-200 bp, 200-300 bp, 300-400 bp, 400-500 bp, 500-600 bp, 600-700 bp, 700-800 bp, 800-900 bp, 900-1000 bp, 1000-2000 bp, 2000-3000 bp, 3000-4000 bp, 4000-5000 bp, or more), the recombinase sites can be used for recombinase-mediated excision or inversion of the intervening sequence, or for recombinase-mediated cassette exchange with exogenous DNA having the same recombinase sites. When the two or more recombinase sites are installed by multi-flap prime editors on two different chromosomes, translocation of the intervening sequence can occur from a first chromosomal location to the second.
Recombine or Recombination
The term “recombine,” or “recombination,” in the context of a nucleic acid modification (e.g., a genomic modification), is used to refer to the process by which two or more nucleic acid molecules, or two or more regions of a single nucleic acid molecule, are modified by the action of a recombinase protein (e.g., an inventive recombinase fusion protein provided herein). Recombination can result in, inter alia, the insertion, inversion, excision, or translocation of nucleic acids, e.g., in or between one or more nucleic acid molecules.
Reverse Transcriptase
The term “reverse transcriptase” describes a class of polymerases characterized as RNA-dependent DNA polymerases. All known reverse transcriptases require a primer to synthesize a DNA transcript from an RNA template. Historically, reverse transcriptase has been used primarily to transcribe mRNA into cDNA which can then be cloned into a vector for further manipulation. Avian myoblastosis virus (AMV) reverse transcriptase was the first widely used RNA-dependent DNA polymerase (Verma, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 473:1 (1977)). The enzyme has 5′-3′ RNA-directed DNA polymerase activity, 5′-3′ DNA-directed DNA polymerase activity, and RNase H activity. RNase H is a processive 5′ and 3′ ribonuclease specific for the RNA strand for RNA-DNA hybrids (Perbal, A Practical Guide to Molecular Cloning, New York: Wiley & Sons (1984)). Errors in transcription cannot be corrected by reverse transcriptase because known viral reverse transcriptases lack the 3′-5′ exonuclease activity necessary for proofreading (Saunders and Saunders, Microbial Genetics Applied to Biotechnology, London: Croom Helm (1987)). A detailed study of the activity of AMV reverse transcriptase and its associated RNase H activity has been presented by Berger et al., Biochemistry 22:2365-2372 (1983). Another reverse transcriptase which is used extensively in molecular biology is reverse transcriptase originating from Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV). See, e.g., Gerard, G. R., DNA 5:271-279 (1986) and Kotewicz, M. L., et al., Gene 35:249-258 (1985). M-MLV reverse transcriptase substantially lacking in RNase H activity has also been described. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,244,797. The invention contemplates the use of any such reverse transcriptases, or variants or mutants thereof.
In addition, the invention contemplates the use of reverse transcriptases that are error-prone, i.e., that may be referred to as error-prone reverse transcriptases or reverse transcriptases that do not support high fidelity incorporation of nucleotides during polymerization. During synthesis of the single-strand DNA flap based on the RT template integrated with the guide RNA, the error-prone reverse transcriptase can introduce one or more nucleotides which are mismatched with the RT template sequence, thereby introducing changes to the nucleotide sequence through erroneous polymerization of the single-strand DNA flap. These errors introduced during synthesis of the single strand DNA flap then become integrated into the double strand molecule through hybridization to the corresponding endogenous target strand, removal of the endogenous displaced strand, ligation, and then through one more round of endogenous DNA repair and/or sequencing processes.
Reverse Transcription
As used herein, the term “reverse transcription” indicates the capability of an enzyme to synthesize a DNA strand (that is, complementary DNA or cDNA) using RNA as a template. In some embodiments, the reverse transcription can be “error-prone reverse transcription,” which refers to the properties of certain reverse transcriptase enzymes which are error-prone in their DNA polymerization activity.
PACE
The term “phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE),” as used herein, refers to continuous evolution that employs phage as viral vectors. The general concept of PACE technology has been described, for example, in International PCT Application, PCT/US2009/056194, filed Sep. 8, 2009, published as WO 2010/028347 on Mar. 11, 2010; International PCT Application, PCT/US2011/066747, filed Dec. 22, 2011, published as WO 2012/088381 on Jun. 28, 2012; U.S. Application, U.S. Pat. No. 9,023,594, issued May 5, 2015, International PCT Application, PCT/US2015/012022, filed Jan. 20, 2015, published as WO 2015/134121 on Sep. 11, 2015, and International PCT Application, PCT/US2016/027795, filed Apr. 15, 2016, published as WO 2016/168631 on Oct. 20, 2016, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Phage
The term “phage,” as used herein interchangeably with the term “bacteriophage,” refers to a virus that infects bacterial cells. Typically, phages consist of an outer protein capsid enclosing genetic material. The genetic material can be ssRNA, dsRNA, ssDNA, or dsDNA, in either linear or circular form. Phages and phage vectors are well known to those of skill in the art and non-limiting examples of phages that are useful for carrying out the PACE methods provided herein are λ (Lysogen), T2, T4, T7, T12, R17, M13, MS2, G4, P1, P2, P4, Phi X174, N4, Φ6, and Φ29. In certain embodiments, the phage utilized in the present invention is M13. Additional suitable phages and host cells will be apparent to those of skill in the art and the invention is not limited in this aspect. For an exemplary description of additional suitable phages and host cells, see Elizabeth Kutter and Alexander Sulakvelidze: Bacteriophages: Biology and Applications. CRC Press; 1st edition (December 2004), ISBN: 0849313368; Martha R. J. Clokie and Andrew M. Kropinski: Bacteriophages: Methods and Protocols, Volume 1: Isolation, Characterization, and Interactions (Methods in Molecular Biology) Humana Press; 1st edition (December, 2008), ISBN: 1588296822; Martha R. J. Clokie and Andrew M. Kropinski: Bacteriophages: Methods and Protocols, Volume 2: Molecular and Applied Aspects (Methods in Molecular Biology) Humana Press; 1st edition (December 2008), ISBN: 1603275649; all of which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference for disclosure of suitable phages and host cells as well as methods and protocols for isolation, culture, and manipulation of such phages).
Protein, Peptide, and Polypeptide
The terms “protein,” “peptide,” and “polypeptide” are used interchangeably herein, and refer to a polymer of amino acid residues linked together by peptide (amide) bonds. The terms refer to a protein, peptide, or polypeptide of any size, structure, or function. Typically, a protein, peptide, or polypeptide will be at least three amino acids long. A protein, peptide, or polypeptide may refer to an individual protein or a collection of proteins. One or more of the amino acids in a protein, peptide, or polypeptide may be modified, for example, by the addition of a chemical entity such as a carbohydrate group, a hydroxyl group, a phosphate group, a farnesyl group, an isofarnesyl group, a fatty acid group, a linker for conjugation, functionalization, or other modification, etc. A protein, peptide, or polypeptide may also be a single molecule or may be a multi-molecular complex. A protein, peptide, or polypeptide may be just a fragment of a naturally occurring protein or peptide. A protein, peptide, or polypeptide may be naturally occurring, recombinant, or synthetic, or any combination thereof. Any of the proteins provided herein may be produced by any method known in the art. For example, the proteins provided herein may be produced via recombinant protein expression and purification, which is especially suited for fusion proteins comprising a peptide linker. Methods for recombinant protein expression and purification are well known, and include those described by Green and Sambrook, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (4th ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (2012)), the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Protein Splicing
The term “protein splicing,” as used herein, refers to a process in which a sequence, an intein (or split inteins, as the case may be), is excised from within an amino acid sequence, and the remaining fragments of the amino acid sequence, the exteins, are ligated via an amide bond to form a continuous amino acid sequence. The term “trans” protein splicing refers to the specific case where the inteins are split inteins and they are located on different proteins.
Second-Strand Nicking
The resolution of heteroduplex DNA (i.e., containing one edited and one non-edited strand) formed as a result of prime editing determines long-term editing outcomes. In words, a goal of prime editing is to resolve the heteroduplex DNA (the edited strand paired with the endogenous non-edited strand) formed as an intermediate of PE by permanently integrating the edited strand into the complement, endogenous strand. The approach of “second-strand nicking” can be used herein to help drive the resolution of heteroduplex DNA in favor of permanent integration of the edited strand into the DNA molecule. As used herein, the concept of “second-strand nicking” refers to the introduction of a second nick at a location downstream of the first nick (i.e., the initial nick site that provides the free 3′ end for use in priming of the reverse transcriptase on the extended portion of the guide RNA), preferably on the unedited strand. In certain embodiments, the first nick and the second nick are on opposite strands. In other embodiments, the first nick and the second nick are on opposite strands. In yet another embodiment, the first nick is on the non-target strand (i.e., the strand that forms the single strand portion of the R-loop), and the second nick is on the target strand. In still other embodiments, the first nick is on the edited strand, and the second nick is on the unedited strand. The second nick can be positioned at least 5 nucleotides downstream of the first nick, or at least 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, or 150 or more nucleotides downstream of the first nick. The second nick, in certain embodiments, can be introduced between about 5-150 nucleotides on the unedited strand away from the site of the PEgRNA-induced nick, or between about 5-140, or between about 5-130, or between about 5-120, or between about 5-110, or between about 5-100, or between about 5-90, or between about 5-80, or between about 5-70, or between about 5-60, or between about 5-50, or between about 5-40, or between about 5-30, or between about 5-20, or between about 5-10. In one embodiment, the second nick is introduced between 14-116 nucleotides away from the PEgRNA-induced nick. Without being bound by theory, the second nick induces the cell's endogenous DNA repair and replication processes towards replacement or editing of the unedited strand, thereby permanently installing the edited sequence on both strands and resolving the heteroduplex that is formed as a result of PE. In some embodiments, the edited strand is the non-target strand and the unedited strand is the target strand. In other embodiments, the edited strand is the target strand, and the unedited strand is the non-target strand.
Sense Strand
In genetics, a “sense” strand is the segment within double-stranded DNA that runs from 5′ to 3′, and which is complementary to the antisense strand of DNA, or template strand, which runs from 3′ to 5′.
In the case of a DNA segment that encodes a protein, the sense strand is the strand of DNA that has the same sequence as the mRNA, which takes the antisense strand as its template during transcription, and eventually undergoes (typically, not always) translation into a protein. The antisense strand is thus responsible for the RNA that is later translated to protein, while the sense strand possesses a nearly identical makeup to that of the mRNA. Note that for each segment of dsDNA, there will possibly be two sets of sense and antisense, depending on which direction one reads (since sense and antisense is relative to perspective). It is ultimately the gene product, or mRNA, that dictates which strand of one segment of dsDNA is referred to as sense or antisense.
In the context of a PEgRNA, the first step is the synthesis of a single-strand complementary DNA (i.e., the 3′ ssDNA flap, which becomes incorporated) oriented in the 5′ to 3′ direction which is templated off of the PEgRNA extension arm. Whether the 3′ ssDNA flap should be regarded as a sense or antisense strand depends on the direction of transcription since it well accepted that both strands of DNA may serve as a template for transcription (but not at the same time). Thus, in some embodiments, the 3′ ssDNA flap (which overall runs in the 5′ to 3′ direction) will serve as the sense strand because it is the coding strand. In other embodiments, the 3′ ssDNA flap (which overall runs in the 5′ to 3′ direction) will serve as the antisense strand and thus, the template for transcription.
Sequence Homology
A “homologous sequence” or a sequence exhibiting “homology” to another sequence means a sequence of a nucleic acid molecule exhibiting at least about 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, or 90% sequence identity to another nucleic acid molecule. In other embodiments, a “homologous sequence” of nucleic acids may exhibit 93%, 95% or 98% sequence identity to the reference nucleic acid.
When a percentage of sequence homology or identity is specified, in the context of two nucleic acid sequences or two polypeptide sequences, the percentage of homology or identity generally refers to the alignment of two or more sequences across a portion of their length when, compared and aligned for maximum correspondence. Unless stated otherwise, sequence homology or identity is assessed over the specified length of the nucleic acid, polypeptide, or portion thereof. In some embodiments, the homology or identity is assessed over a functional portion or specified portion of the length.
Alignment of sequences for assessment of sequence homology can be conducted by algorithms known in the art, such as the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) algorithm, which is described in Altschul et al, J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410, 1990. A publicly available internet interface for performing BLAST analyses is accessible through the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Additional known algorithms include those published in: Smith & Waterman, “Comparison of Biosequences”, Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482, 1981; Needleman & Wunsch, “A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins” J. Mol. Biol. 48:443, 1970; Pearson & Lipman “Improved tools for biological sequence comparison”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2444, 1988; or by automated implementation of these or similar algorithms. Global alignment programs may also be used to align similar sequences of roughly equal size. Examples of global alignment programs include NEEDLE (available at www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/psa/emboss_needle/) which is part of the EMBOSS package (Rice P et al., Trends Genet., 2000; 16: 276-277), and the GGSEARCH program fasta.bioch. Virginia. edu/fasta_www2/fasta_www.cgi?rm=compare&pgm=gnw), which is part of the FASTA package (Pearson W and Lipman D, 1988, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85: 2444-2448). Both of these programs are based on the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm which is used to find the optimum alignment (including gaps) of two sequences along their entire length. A detailed discussion of sequence analysis can also be found in Unit 19.3 of Ausubel et al (“Current Protocols in Molecular Biology” John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1994-1998, Chapter 15, 1998).
Spacer Sequence
As used herein, the term “spacer sequence” in connection with a guide RNA or a PEgRNA refers to the portion of the guide RNA or PEgRNA of about 20 nucleotides which contains a nucleotide sequence that shares the same sequence as the protospacer sequence in the target DNA sequence. The spacer sequence anneals to the complement of the protospacer sequence to form a ssRNA/ssDNA hybrid structure at the target site and a corresponding R loop ssDNA structure of the endogenous DNA strand.
Subject
The term “subject,” as used herein, refers to an individual organism, for example, an individual mammal. In some embodiments, the subject is a human. In some embodiments, the subject is a non-human mammal. In some embodiments, the subject is a non-human primate. In some embodiments, the subject is a rodent. In some embodiments, the subject is a sheep, a goat, a cattle, a cat, or a dog. In some embodiments, the subject is a vertebrate, an amphibian, a reptile, a fish, an insect, a fly, or a nematode. In some embodiments, the subject is a research animal. In some embodiments, the subject is genetically engineered, e.g., a genetically engineered non-human subject. The subject may be of either sex and at any stage of development.
Split Intein
Although inteins are most frequently found as a contiguous domain, some exist in a naturally split form. In this case, the two fragments are expressed as separate polypeptides and must associate before splicing takes place, so-called protein trans-splicing.
An exemplary split intein is the Ssp DnaE intein, which comprises two subunits, namely, DnaE-N and DnaE-C. The two different subunits are encoded by separate genes, namely dnaE-n and dnaE-c, which encode the DnaE-N and DnaE-C subunits, respectively. DnaE is a naturally occurring split intein in Synechocytis sp. PCC6803 and is capable of directing trans-splicing of two separate proteins, each comprising a fusion with either DnaE-N or DnaE-C.
Additional naturally occurring or engineered split-intein sequences are known in the or can be made from whole-intein sequences described herein or those available in the art. Examples of split-intein sequences can be found in Stevens et al., “A promiscuous split intein with expanded protein engineering applications,” PNAS, 2017, Vol. 114: 8538-8543; Iwai et al., “Highly efficient protein trans-splicing by a naturally split DnaE intein from Nostc punctiforme, FEBS Lett, 580: 1853-1858, each of which are incorporated herein by reference. Additional split intein sequences can be found, for example, in WO 2013/045632, WO 2014/055782, WO 2016/069774, and EP2877490, the contents each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In addition, protein splicing in trans has been described in vivo and in vitro (Shingledecker, et al., Gene 207:187 (1998), Southworth, et al., EMBO J. 17:918 (1998); Mills, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95:3543-3548 (1998); Lew, et al., J. Biol. Chem., 273:15887-15890 (1998); Wu, et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 35732:1 (1998b), Yamazaki, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120:5591 (1998), Evans, et al., J. Biol. Chem. 275:9091 (2000); Otomo, et al., Biochemistry 38:16040-16044 (1999); Otomo, et al., J. Biolmol. NMR 14:105-114 (1999); Scott, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:13638-13643 (1999)) and provides the opportunity to express a protein as to two inactive fragments that subsequently undergo ligation to form a functional product, e.g., as shown in
Target Site
The term “target site” refers to a sequence within a nucleic acid molecule that is edited by a prime editor (PE) disclosed herein. The target site further refers to the sequence within a nucleic acid molecule to which a complex of the prime editor (PE) and gRNA binds.
tPERT
See definition for “trans prime editor RNA template (tPERT).”
Temporal Second-Strand Nicking
As used herein, the term “temporal second-strand nicking” refers to a variant of second strand nicking whereby the installation of the second nick in the unedited strand occurs only after the desired edit is installed in the edited strand. This avoids concurrent nicks on both strands that could lead to double-stranded DNA breaks. The second-strand nicking guide RNA is designed for temporal control such that the second strand nick is not introduced until after the installation of the desired edit. This is achieved by designing a gRNA with a spacer sequence that matches only the edited strand, but not the original allele. Using this strategy, mismatches between the protospacer and the unedited allele should disfavor nicking by the sgRNA until after the editing event on the PAM strand takes place.
Trans Prime Editing
As used herein, the term “trans prime editing” or similarly, “trans dual prime editing,” refers to a modified form of prime editing or dual prime editing that utilizes a split PEgRNA, i.e., wherein the PEgRNA is separated into two separate molecules: an sgRNA and a trans prime editing RNA template (tPERT). The sgRNA serves to target the prime editor (or more generally, to target the napDNAbp component of the prime editor) to the desired genomic target site, while the tPERT is used by the polymerase (e.g., a reverse transcriptase) to write new DNA sequence into the target locus once the tPERT is recruited in trans to the prime editor by the interaction of binding domains located on the prime editor and on the tPERT. In one embodiment, the binding domains can include RNA-protein recruitment moieties, such as a MS2 aptamer located on the tPERT and an MS2cp protein fused to the prime editor. An advantage of trans prime editing is that by separating the DNA synthesis template from the guide RNA, one can potentially use longer length templates.
An embodiment of trans prime editing is shown in
While the tPERT is shown in
Trans Prime Editor RNA Template (tPERT)
As used herein, a “trans prime editor RNA template (tPERT)” refers to a component used in trans prime editing or trans dual prime editing, a modified version of prime editing which operates by separating the PEgRNA into two distinct molecules: a guide RNA and a tPERT molecule. The tPERT molecule is programmed to co-localize with the prime editor complex at a target DNA site, bringing the primer binding site and the DNA synthesis template to the prime editor in trans. For example, see
Transitions
As used herein, “transitions” refer to the interchange of purine nucleobases (A H G) or the interchange of pyrimidine nucleobases (C H T). This class of interchanges involves nucleobases of similar shape. The compositions and methods disclosed herein are capable of inducing one or more transitions in a target DNA molecule. The compositions and methods disclosed herein are also capable of inducing both transitions and transversion in the same target DNA molecule. These changes involve A↔G, G↔A, C↔T, or T↔C. In the context of a double-strand DNA with Watson-Crick paired nucleobases, transversions refer to the following base pair exchanges: A:T↔G:C, G:G↔A:T, C:G↔T:A, or T:A↔C:G. The compositions and methods disclosed herein are capable of inducing one or more transitions in a target DNA molecule. The compositions and methods disclosed herein are also capable of inducing both transitions and transversion in the same target DNA molecule, as well as other nucleotide changes, including deletions and insertions.
Transversions
As used herein, “transversions” refer to the interchange of purine nucleobases for pyrimidine nucleobases, or in the reverse and thus, involve the interchange of nucleobases with dissimilar shape. These changes involve T↔A, T↔G, C↔G, C↔A, A↔T, A↔C, G↔C, and G↔T. In the context of a double-strand DNA with Watson-Crick paired nucleobases, transversions refer to the following base pair exchanges: T:A↔A:T, T:A↔G:C, C:G↔G:C, C:G↔A:T, A:T↔T:A, A:T↔C:G, G:C↔C:G, and G:C↔T:A. The compositions and methods disclosed herein are capable of inducing one or more transversions in a target DNA molecule. The compositions and methods disclosed herein are also capable of inducing both transitions and transversion in the same target DNA molecule, as well as other nucleotide changes, including deletions and insertions.
Treatment
The terms “treatment,” “treat,” and “treating,” refer to a clinical intervention aimed to reverse, alleviate, delay the onset of, or inhibit the progress of a disease or disorder, or one or more symptoms thereof, as described herein. As used herein, the terms “treatment,” “treat,” and “treating” refer to a clinical intervention aimed to reverse, alleviate, delay the onset of, or inhibit the progress of a disease or disorder, or one or more symptoms thereof, as described herein. In some embodiments, treatment may be administered after one or more symptoms have developed and/or after a disease has been diagnosed. In other embodiments, treatment may be administered in the absence of symptoms, e.g., to prevent or delay onset of a symptom or inhibit onset or progression of a disease. For example, treatment may be administered to a susceptible individual prior to the onset of symptoms (e.g., in light of a history of symptoms and/or in light of genetic or other susceptibility factors). Treatment may also be continued after symptoms have resolved, for example, to prevent or delay their recurrence.
Trinucleotide Repeat Disorder
As used herein, a “trinucleotide repeat disorder” (or alternatively, “expansion repeat disorder” or “repeat expansion disorder”) refers to a set of genetic disorders which are cause by “trinucleotide repeat expansion,” which is a kind of mutation where a certain trinucleotide repeats in certain genes or introns. Trinucleotide repeats were once thought to be commonplace iterations in the genome, but the 1990s clarified these disorders. These apparently ‘benign’ stretches of DNA can sometimes expand and cause disease. Several defining features are shared amongst disorders caused by trinucleotide repeat expansions. First, the mutant repeats show both somatic and germline instability and, more frequently, they expand rather than contract in successive transmissions. Secondly, an earlier age of onset and increasing severity of phenotype in subsequent generations (anticipation) generally are correlated with larger repeat length. Finally, the parental origin of the disease allele can often influence anticipation, with paternal transmissions carrying a greater risk of expansion for many of these disorders.
Triplet expansion is thought to be caused by slippage during DNA replication. Due to the repetitive nature of the DNA sequence in these regions ‘loop out’ structures may form during DNA replication while maintaining complementary base pairing between the parent strand and daughter strand being synthesized. If the loop out structure is formed from sequence on the daughter strand this will result in an increase in the number of repeats. However, if the loop out structure is formed on the parent strand a decrease in the number of repeats occurs. It appears that expansion of these repeats is more common than reduction. Generally the larger the expansion the more likely they are to cause disease or increase the severity of disease. This property results in the characteristic of anticipation seen in trinucleotide repeat disorders. Anticipation describes the tendency of age of onset to decrease and severity of symptoms to increase through successive generations of an affected family due to the expansion of these repeats.
Nucleotide repeat disorders may include those in which the triplet repeat occurs in a non-coding region (i.e., a non-coding trinucleotide repeat disorder) or in a coding region
The prime editor (PE) system described herein may use to treat nucleotide repeat disorders, which may include fragile X syndrome (FRAXA), fragile XE MR (FRAXE), Freidreich ataxia (FRDA), myotonic dystrophy (DM), spinocerebellar ataxia type 8 (SCA8), and spinocerebellar ataxia type 12 (SCA12), among others.
Upstream
As used herein, the terms “upstream” and “downstream” are terms of relativity that define the linear position of at least two elements located in a nucleic acid molecule (whether single or double-stranded) that is orientated in a 5′-to-3′ direction. In particular, a first element is upstream of a second element in a nucleic acid molecule where the first element is positioned somewhere that is 5′ to the second element. For example, a SNP is upstream of a Cas9-induced nick site if the SNP is on the 5′ side of the nick site. Conversely, a first element is downstream of a second element in a nucleic acid molecule where the first element is positioned somewhere that is 3′ to the second element. For example, a SNP is downstream of a Cas9-induced nick site if the SNP is on the 3′ side of the nick site. The nucleic acid molecule can be a DNA (double or single stranded). RNA (double or single stranded), or a hybrid of DNA and RNA. The analysis is the same for single strand nucleic acid molecule and a double strand molecule since the terms upstream and downstream are in reference to only a single strand of a nucleic acid molecule, except that one needs to select which strand of the double stranded molecule is being considered. Often, the strand of a double stranded DNA which can be used to determine the positional relativity of at least two elements is the “sense” or “coding” strand. In genetics, a “sense” strand is the segment within double-stranded DNA that runs from 5′ to 3′, and which is complementary to the antisense strand of DNA, or template strand, which runs from 3′ to 5′. Thus, as an example, a SNP nucleobase is “downstream” of a promoter sequence in a genomic DNA (which is double-stranded) if the SNP nucleobase is on the 3′ side of the promoter on the sense or coding strand.
Variant
As used herein the term “variant” should be taken to mean the exhibition of qualities that have a pattern that deviates from what occurs in nature, e.g., a variant Cas9 is a Cas9 comprising one or more changes in amino acid residues as compared to a wild type Cas9 amino acid sequence. The term “variant” encompasses homologous proteins having at least 75%, or at least 80%, or at least 85%, or at least 90%, or at least 95%, or at least 99% percent identity with a reference sequence and having the same or substantially the same functional activity or activities as the reference sequence. The term also encompasses mutants, truncations, or domains of a reference sequence, and which display the same or substantially the same functional activity or activities as the reference sequence.
Vector
The term “vector,” as used herein, refers to a nucleic acid that can be modified to encode a gene of interest and that is able to enter into a host cell, mutate and replicate within the host cell, and then transfer a replicated form of the vector into another host cell. Exemplary suitable vectors include viral vectors, such as retroviral vectors or bacteriophages and filamentous phage, and conjugative plasmids. Additional suitable vectors will be apparent to those of skill in the art based on the instant disclosure.
Wild Type
As used herein the term “wild type” is a term of the art understood by skilled persons and means the typical form of an organism, strain, gene or characteristic as it occurs in nature as distinguished from mutant or variant forms.
5′ Endogenous DNA Flap
As used herein, the term “5′ endogenous DNA flap” refers to the strand of DNA situated immediately downstream of the PE-induced nick site in the target DNA. The nicking of the target DNA strand by PE exposes a 3′ hydroxyl group on the upstream side of the nick site and a 5′ hydroxyl group on the downstream side of the nick site. The endogenous strand ending in the 3′ hydroxyl group is used to prime the DNA polymerase of the prime editor (e.g., wherein the DNA polymerase is a reverse transcriptase). The endogenous strand on the downstream side of the nick site and which begins with the exposed 5′ hydroxyl group is referred to as the “5′ endogenous DNA flap” and is ultimately removed and replaced by the newly synthesized replacement strand (i.e., “3′ replacement DNA flap”) the encoded by the extension of the PEgRNA.
5′ Endogenous DNA Flap Removal
As used herein, the term “5′ endogenous DNA flap removal” or “5′ flap removal” refers to the removal of the 5′ endogenous DNA flap that forms when the RT-synthesized single-strand DNA flap competitively invades and hybridizes to the endogenous DNA, displacing the endogenous strand in the process. Removing this endogenous displaced strand can drive the reaction towards the formation of the desired product comprising the desired nucleotide change. The cell's own DNA repair enzymes may catalyze the removal or excision of the 5′ endogenous flap (e.g., a flap endonuclease, such as EXO1 or FEN1). Also, host cells may be transformed to express one or more enzymes that catalyze the removal of said 5′ endogenous flaps, thereby driving the process toward product formation (e.g., a flap endonuclease). Flap endonucleases are known in the art and can be found described in Patel et al., “Flap endonucleases pass 5′-flaps through a flexible arch using a disorder-thread-order mechanism to confer specificity for free 5′-ends,” Nucleic Acids Research, 2012, 40(10): 4507-4519 and Tsutakawa et al., “Human flap endonuclease structures, DNA double-base flipping, and a unified understanding of the FEN1 superfamily,” Cell, 2011, 145(2): 198-211 (each of which are incorporated herein by reference).
3′ Replacement DNA Flap
As used herein, the term “3′ replacement DNA flap” or simply, “replacement DNA flap,” refers to the strand of DNA that is synthesized by the prime editor and which is encoded by the extension arm of the prime editor PEgRNA. More in particular, the 3′ replacement DNA flap is encoded by the polymerase template of the PEgRNA. The 3′ replacement DNA flap comprises the same sequence as the 5′ endogenous DNA flap except that it also contains the edited sequence (e.g., single nucleotide change). The 3′ replacement DNA flap anneals to the target DNA, displacing or replacing the 5′ endogenous DNA flap (which can be excised, for example, by a 5′ flap endonuclease, such as FEN1 or EXO1) and then is ligated to join the 3′ end of the 3′ replacement DNA flap to the exposed 5′ hydoxyl end of endogenous DNA (exposed after excision of the 5′ endogenous DNA flap, thereby reforming a phosophodiester bond and installing the 3′ replacement DNA flap to form a heteroduplex DNA containing one edited strand and one unedited strand. DNA repair processes resolve the heteroduplex by copying the information in the edited strand to the complementary strand permanently installs the edit in to the DNA. This resolution process can be driven further to completion by nicking the unedited strand, i.e., by way of “second-strand nicking,” as described herein.
Adoption of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) system for genome editing has revolutionized the life sciences1-3. Although gene disruption using CRISPR is now routine, the precise installation of single nucleotide edits remains a major challenge, despite being necessary for studying or correcting a large number of disease-causative mutations. Homology directed repair (HDR) is capable of achieving such edits, but suffers from low efficiency (often <5%), a requirement for donor DNA repair templates, and deleterious effects of double-stranded DNA break (DSB) formation. Recently, Prof. David Liu et al.'s laboratory developed base editing, which achieves efficient single nucleotide editing without DSBs. Base editors (BEs) combine the CRISPR system with base-modifying deaminase enzymes to convert target C•G or A•T base pairs to A•T or G•C, respectively4-6. Although already widely used by researchers worldwide, current BEs enable only four of the twelve possible base pair conversions and are unable to correct small insertions or deletions. Moreover, the targeting scope of base editing is limited by the editing of non-target C or A bases adjacent to the target base (“bystander editing”) and by the requirement that a PAM sequence exist 15±2 bp from the target base. Overcoming these limitations would therefore greatly broaden the basic research and therapeutic applications of genome editing.
New precision editing approaches (e.g., classical prime editing) have been developed that offer many of the benefits of base editing—namely, avoidance of double strand breaks and donor DNA repair templates—while overcoming its major limitations. The proposed approach described herein achieves the direct installation of edited DNA strands at target genomic sites using target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT). In the design discussed herein, CRISPR guide RNA (gRNA) will be engineered to carry a reverse transcriptase (RT) template sequence encoding a single-stranded DNA comprising a desired nucleotide change. The CRISPR nuclease (Cas9)-nicked target site DNA will serve as the primer for reverse transcription of the template sequence on the modified gRNA, allowing for direct incorporation of any desired nucleotide edit.
The mechanism of target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) can be leveraged or adapted for conducting precision CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing with high efficiency and genetic flexibility (e.g., as depicted in various embodiments of
The present invention describes a new platform for genome editing called “multi-flap prime editing” (including, for example, “dual-flap prime editing” and “quadruple-flap prime editing”) and represents an innovative advancement of “prime editing” or “classical prime editing,” as described by the present inventors in Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149-157 (2019), which is incorporated herein by reference. Whereas classical prime editing in various embodiments polymerizes at a nick site a single 3′ flap which becomes integrated into the target nucleic acid on the same strand, the presently described multi-flap prime editing systems involve distinct constructs, systems, and methodologies that, in various embodiments, generate pairs or multiple pairs of 3′ flaps on different strands, which form duplexes comprising desired edits and which become incorporated into target nucleic acid molecules, e.g., at specific loci or edit sites in a genome. In various aspects, the pairs or multiple pairs of 3′ flaps form duplexes because they comprise reverse complementary sequences which anneal to one another once generated by the prime editors described herein. The duplexes become incorporated into the target site by cell-driven mechanisms that naturally replace the endogenous duplex sequences located between adjacent nick sites. In certain embodiments, the new duplex sequences may be introduced at one or more locations (e.g., at adjacent genomic loci or on two different chromosomal locations), and may comprise one or more sequences of interest, e.g., protein-encoding sequence, peptide-encoding sequence, or RNA-encoding sequence. In one embodiment, the new duplex sequences installed by the multi-flap prime editing systems may comprise a recombinase site, e.g., a Bxb1 recombinase attB (38 bp) and/or attP (50 bp) site, or a recombinase site recognized by Hin recombinase, Gin recombinase, Tn3 recombinase, R-six recombinase, CinH recombinase, ParA recombinase, γδ recombinase, ϕC31 recombinase, TP901 recombinase, TG1 recombinase, φBT1 recombinase, R4 recombinase, φRV1 recombinase, φFC1 recombinase, MR11 recombinase, A118 recombinase, U153 recombinase, and gp29 recombinase, Cre recombinase, FLP recombinase, R recombinase, Lambda recombinase, HK101 recombinase, HK022 recombinase, and pSAM2 recombinase.
In various aspects, this Specification describes a multi-flap prime editing system (including, for example, dual prime editing systems and quadruple prime editing systems) that addresses the challenges associated with flap equilibration and subsequent incorporation of the edit into the non-edited complementary genomic DNA strand by simultaneously editing both DNA strands. In the dual-flap prime editing system, for example, two PEgRNAs are used to target opposite strands of a genomic site and direct the synthesis of two complementary 3′ flaps containing edited DNA sequence (
[1] napDNAbp
The multi-flap prime editors described herein may comprise a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp).
In one aspect, a napDNAbp can be associated with or complexed with at least one guide nucleic acid (e.g., guide RNA or a PEgRNA), which localizes the napDNAbp to a DNA sequence that comprises a DNA strand (i.e., a target strand) that is complementary to the guide nucleic acid, or a portion thereof (e.g., the spacer of a guide RNA which anneals to the protospacer of the DNA target). In other words, the guide nucleic-acid “programs” the napDNAbp (e.g., Cas9 or equivalent) to localize and bind to complementary sequence of the protospacer in the DNA.
Any suitable napDNAbp may be used in the multi-flap prime editors described herein. In various embodiments, the napDNAbp may be any Class 2 CRISPR-Cas system, including any type II, type V, or type VI CRISPR-Cas enzyme. Given the rapid development of CRISPR-Cas as a tool for genome editing, there have been constant developments in the nomenclature used to describe and/or identify CRISPR-Cas enzymes, such as Cas9 and Cas9 orthologs. This application references CRISPR-Cas enzymes with nomenclature that may be old and/or new. The skilled person will be able to identify the specific CRISPR-Cas enzyme being referenced in this Application based on the nomenclature that is used, whether it is old (i.e., “legacy”) or new nomenclature. CRISPR-Cas nomenclature is extensively discussed in Makarova et al., “Classification and Nomenclature of CRISPR-Cas Systems: Where from Here?,” The CRISPR Journal, Vol. 1. No. 5, 2018, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. The particular CRISPR-Cas nomenclature used in any given instance in this Application is not limiting in any way and the skilled person will be able to identify which CRISPR-Cas enzyme is being referenced.
For example, the following type II, type V, and type VI Class 2 CRISPR-Cas enzymes have the following art-recognized old (i.e., legacy) and new names. Each of these enzymes, and/or variants thereof, may be used with the multi-flap prime editors described herein:
Without being bound by theory, the mechanism of action of certain napDNAbp contemplated herein includes the step of forming an R-loop whereby the napDNAbp induces the unwinding of a double-strand DNA target, thereby separating the strands in the region bound by the napDNAbp. The guide RNA spacer then hybridizes to the “target strand” at the protospacer sequence. This displaces a “non-target strand” that is complementary to the target strand, which forms the single strand region of the R-loop. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp includes one or more nuclease activities, which then cut the DNA leaving various types of lesions. For example, the napDNAbp may comprises a nuclease activity that cuts the non-target strand at a first location, and/or cuts the target strand at a second location. Depending on the nuclease activity, the target DNA can be cut to form a “double-stranded break” whereby both strands are cut. In other embodiments, the target DNA can be cut at only a single site, i.e., the DNA is “nicked” on one strand. Exemplary napDNAbp with different nuclease activities include “Cas9 nickase” (“nCas9”) and a deactivated Cas9 having no nuclease activities (“dead Cas9” or “dCas9”).
The below description of various napDNAbps which can be used in connection with the presently disclosed multi-flap prime editors is not meant to be limiting in any way. The multi-flap prime editors may comprise the canonical SpCas9, or any ortholog Cas9 protein, or any variant Cas9 protein—including any naturally occurring variant, mutant, or otherwise engineered version of Cas9—that is known or that can be made or evolved through a directed evolutionary or otherwise mutagenic process. In various embodiments, the Cas9 or Cas9 variants have a nickase activity, i.e., only cleave one strand of the target DNA sequence. In other embodiments, the Cas9 or Cas9 variants have inactive nucleases, i.e., are “dead” Cas9 proteins. Other variant Cas9 proteins that may be used are those having a smaller molecular weight than the canonical SpCas9 (e.g., for easier delivery) or having modified or rearranged primary amino acid structure (e.g., the circular permutant formats).
The multi-flap prime editors described herein may also comprise Cas9 equivalents, including Cas12a (Cpf1) and Cas12b1 proteins which are the result of convergent evolution. The napDNAbps used herein (e.g., SpCas9, Cas9 variant, or Cas9 equivalents) may also contain various modifications that alter/enhance their PAM specifities. Lastly, the application contemplates any Cas9, Cas9 variant, or Cas9 equivalent which has at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.9% sequence identity to a reference Cas9 sequence, such as a reference SpCas9 canonical sequence or a reference Cas9 equivalent (e.g., Cas12a (Cpf1)).
The napDNAbp can be a CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)-associated nuclease. As outlined above, CRISPR is an adaptive immune system that provides protection against mobile genetic elements (viruses, transposable elements and conjugative plasmids). CRISPR clusters contain spacers, sequences complementary to antecedent mobile elements, and target invading nucleic acids. CRISPR clusters are transcribed and processed into CRISPR RNA (crRNA). In type II CRISPR systems, correct processing of pre-crRNA requires a trans-encoded small RNA (tracrRNA), endogenous ribonuclease 3 (rnc), and a Cas9 protein. The tracrRNA serves as a guide for ribonuclease 3-aided processing of pre-crRNA. Subsequently, Cas9/crRNA/tracrRNA endonucleolytically cleaves a linear or circular dsDNA target complementary to the spacer. The target strand not complementary to crRNA is first cut endonucleolytically, then trimmed 3′-5′ exonucleolytically. In nature, DNA-binding and cleavage typically requires protein and both RNAs. However, single guide RNAs (“sgRNA”, or simply “gRNA”) can be engineered so as to incorporate aspects of both the crRNA and tracrRNA into a single RNA species. See, e.g., Jinek M. et al., Science 337:816-821(2012), the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In some embodiments, the napDNAbp directs cleavage of one or both strands at the location of a target sequence, such as within the target sequence and/or within the complement of the target sequence. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp directs cleavage of one or both strands within about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25, 50, 100, 200, 500, or more base pairs from the first or last nucleotide of a target sequence. In some embodiments, a vector encodes a napDNAbp that is mutated to with respect to a corresponding wild-type enzyme such that the mutated napDNAbp lacks the ability to cleave one or both strands of a target polynucleotide containing a target sequence. For example, an aspartate-to-alanine substitution (D10A) in the RuvC I catalytic domain of Cas9 from S. pyogenes converts Cas9 from a nuclease that cleaves both strands to a nickase (cleaves a single strand). Other examples of mutations that render Cas9 a nickase include, without limitation, H840A, N854A, and N863A in reference to the canonical SpCas9 sequence, or to equivalent amino acid positions in other Cas9 variants or Cas9 equivalents.
As used herein, the term “Cas protein” refers to a full-length Cas protein obtained from nature, a recombinant Cas protein having a sequences that differs from a naturally occurring Cas protein, or any fragment of a Cas protein that nevertheless retains all or a significant amount of the requisite basic functions needed for the disclosed methods, i.e., (i) possession of nucleic-acid programmable binding of the Cas protein to a target DNA, and (ii) ability to nick the target DNA sequence on one strand. The Cas proteins contemplated herein embrace CRISPR Cas 9 proteins, as well as Cas9 equivalents, variants (e.g., Cas9 nickase (nCas9) or nuclease inactive Cas9 (dCas9)) homologs, orthologs, or paralogs, whether naturally occurring or non-naturally occurring (e.g., engineered or recombinant), and may include a Cas9 equivalent from any Class 2 CRISPR system (e.g., type II, V, VI), including Cas12a (Cpf1), Cas12e (CasX), Cas12b1 (C2c1), Cas12b2, Cas12c (C2c3), C2c4, C2c8, C2c5, C2c10, C2c9 Cas13a (C2c2), Cas13d, Cas13c (C2c7), Cas13b (C2c6), and Cas13b. Further Cas-equivalents are described in Makarova et al., “C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector,” Science 2016; 353(6299) and Makarova et al., “Classification and Nomenclature of CRISPR-Cas Systems: Where from Here?,” The CRISPR Journal, Vol. 1. No. 5, 2018, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The terms “Cas9” or “Cas9 nuclease” or “Cas9 moiety” or “Cas9 domain” embrace any naturally occurring Cas9 from any organism, any naturally-occurring Cas9 equivalent or functional fragment thereof, any Cas9 homolog, ortholog, or paralog from any organism, and any mutant or variant of a Cas9, naturally-occurring or engineered. The term Cas9 is not meant to be particularly limiting and may be referred to as a “Cas9 or equivalent.” Exemplary Cas9 proteins are further described herein and/or are described in the art and are incorporated herein by reference. The present disclosure is unlimited with regard to the particular Cas9 that is employed in the multi-flap prime editors described herein.
As noted herein, Cas9 nuclease sequences and structures are well known to those of skill in the art (see, e.g., “Complete genome sequence of an M1 strain of Streptococcus pyogenes.” Ferretti et al., J. J., McShan W. M., Ajdic D. J., Savic D. J., Savic G., Lyon K., Primeaux C., Sezate S., Suvorov A. N., Kenton S., Lai H. S., Lin S. P., Qian Y., Jia H. G., Najar F. Z., Ren Q., Zhu H., Song L., White J., Yuan X., Clifton S. W., Roe B. A., McLaughlin R. E., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:4658-4663(2001); “CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III.” Deltcheva E., Chylinski K., Sharma C. M., Gonzales K., Chao Y., Pirzada Z. A., Eckert M. R., Vogel J., Charpentier E., Nature 471:602-607(2011); and “A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity.” Jinek M., Chylinski K., Fonfara I., Hauer M., Doudna J. A., Charpentier E. Science 337:816-821(2012), the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference).
Examples of Cas9 and Cas9 equivalents are provided as follows; however, these specific examples are not meant to be limiting. The multi-flap prime editors of the present disclosure may use any suitable napDNAbp, including any suitable Cas9 or Cas9 equivalent.
A. Wild Type Canonical SpCas9
In one embodiment, the multi-flap prime editor constructs described herein may comprise the “canonical SpCas9” nuclease from S. pyogenes, which has been widely used as a tool for genome engineering and is categorized as the type II subgroup of enzymes of the Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems. This Cas9 protein is a large, multi-domain protein containing two distinct nuclease domains. Point mutations can be introduced into Cas9 to abolish one or both nuclease activities, resulting in a nickase Cas9 (nCas9) or dead Cas9 (dCas9), respectively, that still retains its ability to bind DNA in a sgRNA-programmed manner. In principle, when fused to another protein or domain, Cas9, or a variant thereof (e.g., nCas9) can target that protein to virtually any DNA sequence simply by co-expression with an appropriate sgRNA. As used herein, the canonical SpCas9 protein refers to the wild type protein from Streptococcus pyogenes having the following amino acid sequence:
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
The multi-flap prime editors described herein may include canonical SpCas9, or any variant thereof having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity with a wild type Cas9 sequence provided above. These variants may include SpCas9 variants containing one or more mutations, including any known mutation reported with the SwissProt Accession No. Q99ZW2 (SEQ ID NO: 18) entry, which include:
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes wild
Streptococcus
Streptococcus
pyogenes
pyogenes
The multi-flap prime editors described herein may include any of the above SpCas9 sequences, or any variant thereof having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity thereto.
B. Wild Type Cas9 Orthologs
In other embodiments, the Cas9 protein can be a wild type Cas9 ortholog from another bacterial species different from the canonical Cas9 from S. pyogenes. For example, the following Cas9 orthologs can be used in connection with the multi-flap prime editor constructs described in this specification. In addition, any variant Cas9 orthologs having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity to any of the below orthologs may also be used with the multi-flap present prime editors.
Lactobacillus
fermentum
Staphylococcus
aureus
Staphylococcus
aureus
Streptococcus
thermophilus
Lactobacillus
crispatus
Pedicoccus
Fusobaterium
nucleatum
Enterococcus
cecorum
Anaerostipes
hadrus
Kandleria
vitulina
Enterococcus
faecalis
Staphylococcus
aureus
Geobacillus
thermo-
denitrificans
S. canis
The multi-flap prime editors described herein may include any of the above Cas9 ortholog sequences, or any variants thereof having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity thereto.
The napDNAbp may include any suitable homologs and/or orthologs or naturally occurring enzymes, such as, Cas9. Cas9 homologs and/or orthologs have been described in various species, including, but not limited to, S. pyogenes and S. thermophilus. Preferably, the Cas moiety is configured (e.g., mutagenized, recombinantly engineered, or otherwise obtained from nature) as a nickase, i.e., capable of cleaving only a single strand of the target double-stranded DNA. Additional suitable Cas9 nucleases and sequences will be apparent to those of skill in the art based on this disclosure, and such Cas9 nucleases and sequences include Cas9 sequences from the organisms and loci disclosed in Chylinski, Rhun, and Charpentier, “The tracrRNA and Cas9 families of type II CRISPR-Cas immunity systems” (2013) RNA Biology 10:5, 726-737; the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. In some embodiments, a Cas9 nuclease has an inactive (e.g., an inactivated) DNA cleavage domain; that is, the Cas9 is a nickase. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 80% identical to the amino acid sequence of a Cas9 protein as provided by any one of the variants of Table 3. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 92%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.5% identical to the amino acid sequence of a Cas9 protein as provided by any one of the Cas9 orthologs in the above tables.
C. Dead Cas9 Variant
In certain embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein may include a dead Cas9, e.g., dead SpCas9, which has no nuclease activity due to one or more mutations that inactive both nuclease domains of Cas9, namely the RuvC domain (which cleaves the non-protospacer DNA strand) and HNH domain (which cleaves the protospacer DNA strand). The nuclease inactivation may be due to one or mutations that result in one or more substitutions and/or deletions in the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein, or any variants thereof having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity thereto.
As used herein, the term “dCas9” refers to a nuclease-inactive Cas9 or nuclease-dead Cas9, or a functional fragment thereof, and embraces any naturally occurring dCas9 from any organism, any naturally-occurring dCas9 equivalent or functional fragment thereof, any dCas9 homolog, ortholog, or paralog from any organism, and any mutant or variant of a dCas9, naturally-occurring or engineered. The term dCas9 is not meant to be particularly limiting and may be referred to as a “dCas9 or equivalent.” Exemplary dCas9 proteins and method for making dCas9 proteins are further described herein and/or are described in the art and are incorporated herein by reference.
In other embodiments, dCas9 corresponds to, or comprises in part or in whole, a Cas9 amino acid sequence having one or more mutations that inactivate the Cas9 nuclease activity. In other embodiments, Cas9 variants having mutations other than D10A and H840A are provided which may result in the full or partial inactivation of the endogeneous Cas9 nuclease activity (e.g., nCas9 or dCas9, respectively). Such mutations, by way of example, include other amino acid substitutions at D10 and H840, or other substitutions within the nuclease domains of Cas9 (e.g., substitutions in the HNH nuclease subdomain and/or the RuvC1 subdomain) with reference to a wild type sequence such as Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_017053.1). In some embodiments, variants or homologues of Cas9 (e.g., variants of Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_017053.1 (SEQ ID NO: 20))) are provided which are at least about 70% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, at least about 99.5% identical, or at least about 99.9% identical to NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_017053.1. In some embodiments, variants of dCas9 (e.g., variants of NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_017053.1 (SEQ ID NO: 20)) are provided having amino acid sequences which are shorter, or longer than NC_017053.1 (SEQ ID NO: 20) by about 5 amino acids, by about 10 amino acids, by about 15 amino acids, by about 20 amino acids, by about 25 amino acids, by about 30 amino acids, by about 40 amino acids, by about 50 amino acids, by about 75 amino acids, by about 100 amino acids or more.
In one embodiment, the dead Cas9 may be based on the canonical SpCas9 sequence of Q99ZW2 and may have the following sequence, which comprises a DIOX and an H810X, wherein X may be any amino acid, substitutions (underlined and bolded), or a variant be variant of SEQ ID NO: 40 having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity thereto.
In one embodiment, the dead Cas9 may be based on the canonical SpCas9 sequence of Q99ZW2 and may have the following sequence, which comprises a D10A and an H810A substitutions (underlined and bolded), or be a variant of SEQ ID NO: 41 having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity thereto.
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
D. Cas9 Nickase Variant
In one embodiment, the multi-flap prime editors described herein comprise a Cas9 nickase. The term “Cas9 nickase” or “nCas9” refers to a variant of Cas9 which is capable of introducing a single-strand break in a double strand DNA molecule target. In some embodiments, the Cas9 nickase comprises only a single functioning nuclease domain. The wild type Cas9 (e.g., the canonical SpCas9) comprises two separate nuclease domains, namely, the RuvC domain (which cleaves the non-protospacer DNA strand) and HNH domain (which cleaves the protospacer DNA strand). In one embodiment, the Cas9 nickase comprises a mutation in the RuvC domain which inactivates the RuvC nuclease activity. For example, mutations in aspartate (D) 10, histidine (H) 983, aspartate (D) 986, or glutamate (E) 762, have been reported as loss-of-function mutations of the RuvC nuclease domain and the creation of a functional Cas9 nickase (e.g., Nishimasu et al., “Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA,” Cell 156(5), 935-949, which is incorporated herein by reference). Thus, nickase mutations in the RuvC domain could include DIOX, H983X, D986X, or E762X, wherein X is any amino acid other than the wild type amino acid. In certain embodiments, the nickase could be D10A, H983A, D986A, or E762A, or a combination thereof.
In various embodiments, the Cas9 nickase can have a mutation in the RuvC nuclease domain and have one of the following amino acid sequences, or a variant thereof having an amino acid sequence that has at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity thereto.
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
In another embodiment, the Cas9 nickase comprises a mutation in the HNH domain which inactivates the HNH nuclease activity. For example, mutations in histidine (H) 840 or asparagine (R) 863 have been reported as loss-of-function mutations of the HNH nuclease domain and the creation of a functional Cas9 nickase (e.g., Nishimasu et al., “Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA,” Cell 156(5), 935-949, which is incorporated herein by reference). Thus, nickase mutations in the HNH domain could include H840X and R863X, wherein X is any amino acid other than the wild type amino acid. In certain embodiments, the nickase could be H840A or R863A or a combination thereof.
In various embodiments, the Cas9 nickase can have a mutation in the HNH nuclease domain and have one of the following amino acid sequences, or a variant thereof having an amino acid sequence that has at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity thereto.
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
In some embodiments, the N-terminal methionine is removed from a Cas9 nickase, or from any Cas9 variant, ortholog, or equivalent disclosed or contemplated herein. For example, methionine-minus Cas9 nickases include the following sequences, or a variant thereof having an amino acid sequence that has at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity thereto.
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
Streptococcus
pyogenes
E. Other Cas9 Variants
Besides dead Cas9 and Cas9 nickase variants, the Cas9 proteins used herein may also include other “Cas9 variants” having at least about 70% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 96% identical, at least about 97% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, at least about 99.5% identical, or at least about 99.9% identical to any reference Cas9 protein, including any wild type Cas9, or mutant Cas9 (e.g., a dead Cas9 or Cas9 nickase), or fragment Cas9, or circular permutant Cas9, or other variant of Cas9 disclosed herein or known in the art. In some embodiments, a Cas9 variant may have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 or more amino acid changes compared to a reference Cas9. In some embodiments, the Cas9 variant comprises a fragment of a reference Cas9 (e.g., a gRNA binding domain or a DNA-cleavage domain), such that the fragment is at least about 70% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 96% identical, at least about 97% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, at least about 99.5% identical, or at least about 99.9% identical to the corresponding fragment of wild type Cas9. In some embodiments, the fragment is at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95% identical, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.5% of the amino acid length of a corresponding wild type Cas9 (e.g., SEQ ID NO: 18).
In some embodiments, the disclosure also may utilize Cas9 fragments that retain their functionality and that are fragments of any herein disclosed Cas9 protein. In some embodiments, the Cas9 fragment is at least 100 amino acids in length. In some embodiments, the fragment is at least 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, 1050, 1100, 1150, 1200, 1250, or at least 1300 amino acids in length.
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors disclosed herein may comprise one of the Cas9 variants described as follows, or a Cas9 variant thereof having at least about 70% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 96% identical, at least about 97% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, at least about 99.5% identical, or at least about 99.9% identical to any reference Cas9 variants.
F. Small-Sized Cas9 Variants
In some embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors contemplated herein can include a Cas9 protein that is of smaller molecular weight than the canonical SpCas9 sequence. In some embodiments, the smaller-sized Cas9 variants may facilitate delivery to cells, e.g., by an expression vector, nanoparticle, or other means of delivery. In certain embodiments, the smaller-sized Cas9 variants can include enzymes categorized as type II enzymes of the Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems. In some embodiments, the smaller-sized Cas9 variants can include enzymes categorized as type V enzymes of the Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems. In other embodiments, the smaller-sized Cas9 variants can include enzymes categorized as type VI enzymes of the Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems.
The canonical SpCas9 protein is 1368 amino acids in length and has a predicted molecular weight of 158 kilodaltons. The term “small-sized Cas9 variant”, as used herein, refers to any Cas9 variant—naturally occurring, engineered, or otherwise—that is less than at least 1300 amino acids, or at least less than 1290 amino acids, or than less than 1280 amino acids, or less than 1270 amino acid, or less than 1260 amino acid, or less than 1250 amino acids, or less than 1240 amino acids, or less than 1230 amino acids, or less than 1220 amino acids, or less than 1210 amino acids, or less than 1200 amino acids, or less than 1190 amino acids, or less than 1180 amino acids, or less than 1170 amino acids, or less than 1160 amino acids, or less than 1150 amino acids, or less than 1140 amino acids, or less than 1130 amino acids, or less than 1120 amino acids, or less than 1110 amino acids, or less than 1100 amino acids, or less than 1050 amino acids, or less than 1000 amino acids, or less than 950 amino acids, or less than 900 amino acids, or less than 850 amino acids, or less than 800 amino acids, or less than 750 amino acids, or less than 700 amino acids, or less than 650 amino acids, or less than 600 amino acids, or less than 550 amino acids, or less than 500 amino acids, but at least larger than about 400 amino acids and retaining the required functions of the Cas9 protein. The Cas9 variants can include those categorized as type II, type V, or type VI enzymes of the Class 2 CRISPR-Cas system.
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors disclosed herein may comprise one of the small-sized Cas9 variants described as follows, or a Cas9 variant thereof having at least about 70% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 96% identical, at least about 97% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, at least about 99.5% identical, or at least about 99.9% identical to any reference small-sized Cas9 protein.
Staphylococcus
aureus
N. meningitidis
C. jejuni
G.
stearo-
thermophilus
L. bacterium
B. hisashii
G. Cas9 Equivalents
In some embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein can include any Cas9 equivalent. As used herein, the term “Cas9 equivalent” is a broad term that encompasses any napDNAbp protein that serves the same function as Cas9 in the present multi-flap prime editors despite that its amino acid primary sequence and/or its three-dimensional structure may be different and/or unrelated from an evolutionary standpoint. Thus, while Cas9 equivalents include any Cas9 ortholog, homolog, mutant, or variant described or embraced herein that are evolutionarily related, the Cas9 equivalents also embrace proteins that may have evolved through convergent evolution processes to have the same or similar function as Cas9, but that do not necessarily have any similarity with regard to amino acid sequence and/or three-dimensional structure. The multi-flapprime editors described here embrace any Cas9 equivalent that would provide the same or similar function as Cas9 despite that the Cas9 equivalent may be based on a protein that arose through convergent evolution. For instance, if Cas9 refers to a type II enzyme of the CRISPR-Cas system, a Cas9 equivalent can refer to a type V or type VI enzyme of the CRISPR-Cas system.
For example, Cas12e (CasX) is a Cas9 equivalent that reportedly has the same function as Cas9 but which evolved through convergent evolution. Thus, the Cas12e (CasX) protein described in Liu et al., “CasX enzymes comprises a distinct family of RNA-guided genome editors,” Nature, 2019, Vol. 566: 218-223, is contemplated to be used with the multi-flap prime editors described herein. In addition, any variant or modification of Cas12e (CasX) is conceivable and within the scope of the present disclosure.
Cas9 is a bacterial enzyme that evolved in a wide variety of species. However, the Cas9 equivalents contemplated herein may also be obtained from archaea, which constitute a domain and kingdom of single-celled prokaryotic microbes different from bacteria.
In some embodiments, Cas9 equivalents may refer to Cas12e (CasX) or Cas12d (CasY), which have been described in, for example, Burstein et al., “New CRISPR-Cas systems from uncultivated microbes.” Cell Res. 2017 Feb. 21. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.21, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Using genome-resolved metagenomics, a number of CRISPR-Cas systems were identified, including the first reported Cas9 in the archaeal domain of life. This divergent Cas9 protein was found in little-studied nanoarchaea as part of an active CRISPR-Cas system. In bacteria, two previously unknown systems were discovered, CRISPR-Cas12e and CRISPR-Cas12d, which are among the most compact systems yet discovered. In some embodiments, Cas9 refers to Cas12e, or a variant of Cas12e. In some embodiments, Cas9 refers to a Cas12d, or a variant of Cas12d. It should be appreciated that other RNA-guided DNA binding proteins may be used as a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and are within the scope of this disclosure. Also see Liu et al., “CasX enzymes comprises a distinct family of RNA-guided genome editors,” Nature, 2019, Vol. 566: 218-223. Any of these Cas9 equivalents are contemplated.
In some embodiments, the Cas9 equivalent comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.5% identical to a naturally-occurring Cas12e (CasX) or Cas12d (CasY) protein. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp is a naturally-occurring Cas12e (CasX) or Cas12d (CasY) protein. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.5% identical to a wild-type Cas moiety or any Cas moiety provided herein.
In various embodiments, the nucleic acid programmable DNA binding proteins include, without limitation, Cas9 (e.g., dCas9 and nCas9), Cas12e (CasX), Cas12d (CasY), Cas12a (Cpf1), Cas12b1 (C2c1), Cas13a (C2c2), Cas12c (C2c3), Argonaute, and Cas12b1. One example of a nucleic acid programmable DNA-binding protein that has different PAM specificity than Cas9 is Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats from Prevotella and Francisella 1 (i.e., Cas12a (Cpf1)). Similar to Cas9, Cas12a (Cpf1) is also a Class 2 CRISPR effector, but it is a member of type V subgroup of enzymes, rather than the type II subgroup. It has been shown that Cas12a (Cpf1) mediates robust DNA interference with features distinct from Cas9. Cas12a (Cpf1) is a single RNA-guided endonuclease lacking tracrRNA, and it utilizes a T-rich protospacer-adjacent motif (TTN, TTTN, or YTN). Moreover, Cpf1 cleaves DNA via a staggered DNA double-stranded break. Out of 16 Cpf1-family proteins, two enzymes from Acidaminococcus and Lachnospiraceae are shown to have efficient genome-editing activity in human cells. Cpf1 proteins are known in the art and have been described previously, for example Yamano et al., “Crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA.” Cell (165) 2016, p. 949-962; the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In still other embodiments, the Cas protein may include any CRISPR associated protein, including but not limited to, Cas12a, Cas12b1, Cas1, Cas1B, Cas2, Cas3, Cas4, Cas5, Cas6, Cas7, Cas8, Cas9 (also known as Csn1 and Csx12), Cas10, Csy1, Csy2, Csy3, Cse1, Cse2, Csc1, Csc2, Csa5, Csn2, Csm2, Csm3, Csm4, Csm5, Csm6, Cmr1, Cmr3, Cmr4, Cmr5, Cmr6, Csb1, Csb2, Csb3, Csx17, Csx14, Csx10, Csx16, CsaX, Csx3, Csx1, Csx15, Csf1, Csf2, Csf3, Csf4, homologs thereof, or modified versions thereof, and preferably comprising a nickase mutation (e.g., a mutation corresponding to the D10A mutation of the wild type Cas9 polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 18).
In various other embodiments, the napDNAbp can be any of the following proteins: a Cas9, a Cas12a (Cpf), a Cas12e (CasX), a Cas12d (CasY), a Cas2b1 (C2c1), a Cas13a (C2c2), a Cas12c (C2c3), a GeoCas9, a CjCas9, a Cas12g, a Cas12h, a Cas12i, a Cas13b, a Cas13c, a Cas13d, a Cas14, a Csn2, an xCas9, an SpCas9-NG, a circularly permuted Cas9, or an Argonaute (Ago) domain, or a variant thereof.
Exemplary Cas9 equivalent protein sequences can include the following:
Acidaminococcus
Lachnospiraceae
bacterium
Prevotella
copri
Eubacterium
rectale
Clostridium
Bacillus
hisashii
Thermomonas
hydrothermalis
Laceyella
sacchari
Dsulfonatronum
thiodismutans
The multi-flap prime editors described herein may also comprise Cas12a (Cpf1) (dCpf1) variants that may be used as a guide nucleotide sequence-programmable DNA-binding protein domain. The Cas12a (Cpf1) protein has a RuvC-like endonuclease domain that is similar to the RuvC domain of Cas9 but does not have a HNH endonuclease domain, and the N-terminal of Cas12a (Cpf1) does not have the alfa-helical recognition lobe of Cas9. It was shown in Zetsche et al., Cell, 163, 759-771, 2015 (which is incorporated herein by reference) that, the RuvC-like domain of Cas12a (Cpf1) is responsible for cleaving both DNA strands and inactivation of the RuvC-like domain inactivates Cas12a (Cpf1) nuclease activity.
In some embodiments, the napDNAbp is a single effector of a microbial CRISPR-Cas system. Single effectors of microbial CRISPR-Cas systems include, without limitation, Cas9, Cas12a (Cpf1), Cas12b1 (C2c1), Cas13a (C2c2), and Cas12c (C2c3). Typically, microbial CRISPR-Cas systems are divided into Class 1 and Class 2 systems. Class 1 systems have multi-subunit effector complexes, while Class 2 systems have a single protein effector. For example, Cas9 and Cas12a (Cpf1) are Class 2 effectors. In addition to Cas9 and Cas12a (Cpf1), three distinct Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems (Cas12b1, Cas13a, and Cas12c) have been described by Shmakov et al., “Discovery and Functional Characterization of Diverse Class 2 CRISPR Cas Systems”, Mol. Cell, 2015 Nov. 5; 60(3): 385-397, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Effectors of two of the systems, Cas12b1 and Cas12c, contain RuvC-like endonuclease domains related to Cas12a. A third system, Cas13a contains an effector with two predicted HEPN RNase domains. Production of mature CRISPR RNA is tracrRNA-independent, unlike production of CRISPR RNA by Cas12b1. Cas12b1 depends on both CRISPR RNA and tracrRNA for DNA cleavage. Bacterial Cas13a has been shown to possess a unique RNase activity for CRISPR RNA maturation distinct from its RNA-activated single-stranded RNA degradation activity. These RNase functions are different from each other and from the CRISPR RNA-processing behavior of Cas12a. See, e.g., East-Seletsky, et al., “Two distinct RNase activities of CRISPR-Cas13a enable guide-RNA processing and RNA detection”, Nature, 2016 Oct. 13; 538(7624):270-273, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. In vitro biochemical analysis of Cas13a in Leptotrichia shahii has shown that Cas13a is guided by a single CRISPR RNA and can be programed to cleave ssRNA targets carrying complementary protospacers. Catalytic residues in the two conserved HEPN domains mediate cleavage. Mutations in the catalytic residues generate catalytically inactive RNA-binding proteins. See e.g., Abudayyeh et al., “C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector”, Science, 2016 Aug. 5; 353(6299), the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The crystal structure of Alicyclobaccillus acidoterrastris Cas12b1 (AacC2c1) has been reported in complex with a chimeric single-molecule guide RNA (sgRNA). See e.g., Liu et al., “C2c1-sgRNA Complex Structure Reveals RNA-Guided DNA Cleavage Mechanism”, Mol. Cell, 2017 Jan. 19; 65(2):310-322, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The crystal structure has also been reported in Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris C2c1 bound to target DNAs as ternary complexes. See e.g., Yang et al., “PAM-dependent Target DNA Recognition and Cleavage by C2C1 CRISPR-Cas endonuclease”, Cell, 2016 Dec. 15; 167(7):1814-1828, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Catalytically competent conformations of AacC2c1, both with target and non-target DNA strands, have been captured independently positioned within a single RuvC catalytic pocket, with C2c1-mediated cleavage resulting in a staggered seven-nucleotide break of target DNA. Structural comparisons between C2c1 ternary complexes and previously identified Cas9 and Cpf1 counterparts demonstrate the diversity of mechanisms used by CRISPR-Cas9 systems.
In some embodiments, the napDNAbp may be a C2c1, a C2c2, or a C2c3 protein. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp is a C2c1 protein. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp is a Cas13a protein. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp is a Cas12c protein. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.5% identical to a naturally-occurring Cas12b1 (C2c1), Cas13a (C2c2), or Cas12c (C2c3) protein. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp is a naturally-occurring Cas12b1 (C2c1), Cas13a (C2c2), or Cas12c (C2c3) protein.
H. Cas9 Circular Permutants
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors disclosed herein may comprise a circular permutant of Cas9.
The term “circularly permuted Cas9” or “circular permutant” of Cas9 or “CP-Cas9”) refers to any Cas9 protein, or variant thereof, that occurs or has been modify to engineered as a circular permutant variant, which means the N-terminus and the C-terminus of a Cas9 protein (e.g., a wild type Cas9 protein) have been topically rearranged. Such circularly permuted Cas9 proteins, or variants thereof, retain the ability to bind DNA when complexed with a guide RNA (gRNA). See, Oakes et al., “Protein Engineering of Cas9 for enhanced function,” Methods Enzymol, 2014, 546: 491-511 and Oakes et al., “CRISPR-Cas9 Circular Permutants as Programmable Scaffolds for Genome Modification,” Cell, Jan. 10, 2019, 176: 254-267, each of are incorporated herein by reference. The instant disclosure contemplates any previously known CP-Cas9 or use a new CP-Cas9 so long as the resulting circularly permuted protein retains the ability to bind DNA when complexed with a guide RNA (gRNA).
Any of the Cas9 proteins described herein, including any variant, ortholog, or naturally occurring Cas9 or equivalent thereof, may be reconfigured as a circular permutant variant.
In various embodiments, the circular permutants of Cas9 may have the following structure: N-terminus-[original C-terminus]-[optional linker]-[original N-terminus]-C-terminus.
As an example, the present disclosure contemplates the following circular permutants of canonical S. pyogenes Cas9 (1368 amino acids of UniProtKB-Q99ZW2 (CAS9_STRP1) (numbering is based on the amino acid position in SEQ ID NO: 18)):
In particular embodiments, the circular permuant Cas9 has the following structure (based on S. pyogenes Cas9 (1368 amino acids of UniProtKB-Q99ZW2 (CAS9_STRP1) (numbering is based on the amino acid position in SEQ ID NO: 18):
In still other embodiments, the circular permuant Cas9 has the following structure (based on S. pyogenes Cas9 (1368 amino acids of UniProtKB-Q99ZW2 (CAS9_STRP1) (numbering is based on the amino acid position in SEQ ID NO: 18):
In some embodiments, the circular permutant can be formed by linking a C-terminal fragment of a Cas9 to an N-terminal fragment of a Cas9, either directly or by using a linker, such as an amino acid linker. In some embodiments, The C-terminal fragment may correspond to the C-terminal 95% or more of the amino acids of a Cas9 (e.g., amino acids about 1300-1368), or the C-terminal 90%, 85%, 80%, 75%, 70%, 65%, 60%, 55%, 50%, 45%, 40%, 35%, 30%, 25%, 20%, 15%, 10%, or 5% or more of a Cas9 (e.g., any one of SEQ ID NOs: 77-86). The N-terminal portion may correspond to the N-terminal 95% or more of the amino acids of a Cas9 (e.g., amino acids about 1-1300), or the N-terminal 90%, 85%, 80%, 75%, 70%, 65%, 60%, 55%, 50%, 45%, 40%, 35%, 30%, 25%, 20%, 15%, 10%, or 5% or more of a Cas9 (e.g., of SEQ ID NO: 18).
In some embodiments, the circular permutant can be formed by linking a C-terminal fragment of a Cas9 to an N-terminal fragment of a Cas9, either directly or by using a linker, such as an amino acid linker. In some embodiments, the C-terminal fragment that is rearranged to the N-terminus includes or corresponds to the C-terminal 30% or less of the amino acids of a Cas9 (e.g., amino acids 1012-1368 of SEQ ID NO: 18). In some embodiments, the C-terminal fragment that is rearranged to the N-terminus, includes or corresponds to the C-terminal 30%, 29%, 28%, 27%, 26%, 25%, 24%, 23%, 22%, 21%, 20%, 19%, 18%, 17%, 16%, 15%, 14%, 13%, 12%, 11%, 10%, 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, or 1% of the amino acids of a Cas9 (e.g., the Cas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18). In some embodiments, the C-terminal fragment that is rearranged to the N-terminus, includes or corresponds to the C-terminal 410 residues or less of a Cas9 (e.g., the Cas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18). In some embodiments, the C-terminal portion that is rearranged to the N-terminus, includes or corresponds to the C-terminal 410, 400, 390, 380, 370, 360, 350, 340, 330, 320, 310, 300, 290, 280, 270, 260, 250, 240, 230, 220, 210, 200, 190, 180, 170, 160, 150, 140, 130, 120, 110, 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, or 10 residues of a Cas9 (e.g., the Cas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18). In some embodiments, the C-terminal portion that is rearranged to the N-terminus includes or corresponds to the C-terminal 357, 341, 328, 120, or 69 residues of a Cas9 (e.g., the Cas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18).
In other embodiments, circular permutant Cas9 variants may be defined as a topological rearrangement of a Cas9 primary structure based on the following method, which is based on S. pyogenes Cas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18: (a) selecting a circular permutant (CP) site corresponding to an internal amino acid residue of the Cas9 primary structure, which dissects the original protein into two halves: an N-terminal region and a C-terminal region; (b) modifying the Cas9 protein sequence (e.g., by genetic engineering techniques) by moving the original C-terminal region (comprising the CP site amino acid) to precede the original N-terminal region, thereby forming a new N-terminus of the Cas9 protein that now begins with the CP site amino acid residue. The CP site can be located in any domain of the Cas9 protein, including, for example, the helical-II domain, the RuvCIII domain, or the CTD domain. For example, the CP site may be located (relative the S. pyogenes Cas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18) at original amino acid residue 181, 199, 230, 270, 310, 1010, 1016, 1023, 1029, 1041, 1247, 1249, or 1282. Thus, once relocated to the N-terminus, original amino acid 181, 199, 230, 270, 310, 1010, 1016, 1023, 1029, 1041, 1247, 1249, or 1282 would become the new N-terminal amino acid. Nomenclature of these CP-Cas9 proteins may be referred to as Cas9-CP181, Cas9-CP199, Cas9-CP230, Cas9-CP270, Cas9-CP310, Cas9-CP1010, Cas9-CP1016, Cas9-CP1023, Cas9-CP1029, Cas9-CP1041, Cas9-CP1247, Cas9-CP1249, and Cas9-CP1282, respectively. This description is not meant to be limited to making CP variants from SEQ ID NO: 18, but may be implemented to make CP variants in any Cas9 sequence, either at CP sites that correspond to these positions, or at other CP sites entirely. This description is not meant to limit the specific CP sites in any way. Virtually any CP site may be used to form a CP-Cas9 variant.
Exemplary CP-Cas9 amino acid sequences, based on the Cas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18, are provided below in which linker sequences are indicated by underlining and optional methionine (M) residues are indicated in bold. It should be appreciated that the disclosure provides CP-Cas9 sequences that do not include a linker sequence or that include different linker sequences. It should be appreciated that CP-Cas9 sequences may be based on Cas9 sequences other than that of SEQ ID NO: 18 and any examples provided herein are not meant to be limiting. Exemplary CP-Cas9 sequences are as follows:
SGGSGGSGGSGGSGGDKKYSIGLAIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKV
GSGGSGGSGGSGG
MDKKYSIGLAIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKV
GSGGDKKYSIGLAIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVPSKKFKVLGNT
The Cas9 circular permutants may be useful in the multi-flap prime editing constructs described herein. Exemplary C-terminal fragments of Cas9, based on the Cas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18, which may be rearranged to an N-terminus of Cas9, are provided below. It should be appreciated that such C-terminal fragments of Cas9 are exemplary and are not meant to be limiting. These exemplary CP-Cas9 fragments have the following sequences:
I. Cas9 Variants with Modified PAM Specificities
The multi-flap prime editors of the present disclosure may also comprise Cas9 variants with modified PAM specificities. Some aspects of this disclosure provide Cas9 proteins that exhibit activity on a target sequence that does not comprise the canonical PAM (5′-NGG-3′, where N is A, C, G, or T) at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NGG-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NNG-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NNA-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NNC-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NNT-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NGT-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NGA-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NGC-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NAA-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NAC-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NAT-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In still other embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NAG-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end.
It should be appreciated that any of the amino acid mutations described herein, (e.g., A262T) from a first amino acid residue (e.g., A) to a second amino acid residue (e.g., T) may also include mutations from the first amino acid residue to an amino acid residue that is similar to (e.g., conserved) the second amino acid residue. For example, mutation of an amino acid with a hydrophobic side chain (e.g., alanine, valine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, or tryptophan) may be a mutation to a second amino acid with a different hydrophobic side chain (e.g., alanine, valine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, or tryptophan). For example, a mutation of an alanine to a threonine (e.g., a A262T mutation) may also be a mutation from an alanine to an amino acid that is similar in size and chemical properties to a threonine, for example, serine. As another example, mutation of an amino acid with a positively charged side chain (e.g., arginine, histidine, or lysine) may be a mutation to a second amino acid with a different positively charged side chain (e.g., arginine, histidine, or lysine). As another example, mutation of an amino acid with a polar side chain (e.g., serine, threonine, asparagine, or glutamine) may be a mutation to a second amino acid with a different polar side chain (e.g., serine, threonine, asparagine, or glutamine). Additional similar amino acid pairs include, but are not limited to, the following: phenylalanine and tyrosine; asparagine and glutamine; methionine and cysteine; aspartic acid and glutamic acid; and arginine and lysine. The skilled artisan would recognize that such conservative amino acid substitutions will likely have minor effects on protein structure and are likely to be well tolerated without compromising function. In some embodiments, any amino of the amino acid mutations provided herein from one amino acid to a threonine may be an amino acid mutation to a serine. In some embodiments, any amino of the amino acid mutations provided herein from one amino acid to an arginine may be an amino acid mutation to a lysine. In some embodiments, any amino of the amino acid mutations provided herein from one amino acid to an isoleucine, may be an amino acid mutation to an alanine, valine, methionine, or leucine. In some embodiments, any amino of the amino acid mutations provided herein from one amino acid to a lysine may be an amino acid mutation to an arginine. In some embodiments, any amino of the amino acid mutations provided herein from one amino acid to an aspartic acid may be an amino acid mutation to a glutamic acid or asparagine. In some embodiments, any amino of the amino acid mutations provided herein from one amino acid to a valine may be an amino acid mutation to an alanine, isoleucine, methionine, or leucine. In some embodiments, any amino of the amino acid mutations provided herein from one amino acid to a glycine may be an amino acid mutation to an alanine. It should be appreciated, however, that additional conserved amino acid residues would be recognized by the skilled artisan and any of the amino acid mutations to other conserved amino acid residues are also within the scope of this disclosure.
In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein comprises a combination of mutations that exhibit activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NAA-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the combination of mutations are present in any one of the clones listed in Table 1. In some embodiments, the combination of mutations are conservative mutations of the clones listed in Table 1. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein comprises the combination of mutations of any one of the Cas9 clones listed in Table 1.
Table 1: NAA PAM Clones
In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 80% identical to the amino acid sequence of a Cas9 protein as provided by any one of the variants of Table 1. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 92%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.5% identical to the amino acid sequence of a Cas9 protein as provided by any one of the variants of Table 1.
In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits an increased activity on a target sequence that does not comprise the canonical PAM (5′-NGG-3′) at its 3′ end as compared to Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 as provided by SEQ ID NO: 18. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits an activity on a target sequence having a 3′ end that is not directly adjacent to the canonical PAM sequence (5′-NGG-3′) that is at least 5-fold increased as compared to the activity of Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 as provided by SEQ ID NO: 18 on the same target sequence. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits an activity on a target sequence that is not directly adjacent to the canonical PAM sequence (5′-NGG-3′) that is at least 10-fold, at least 50-fold, at least 100-fold, at least 500-fold, at least 1,000-fold, at least 5,000-fold, at least 10,000-fold, at least 50,000-fold, at least 100,000-fold, at least 500,000-fold, or at least 1,000,000-fold increased as compared to the activity of Streptococcus pyogenes as provided by SEQ ID NO: 18 on the same target sequence. In some embodiments, the 3′ end of the target sequence is directly adjacent to an AAA, GAA, CAA, or TAA sequence. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein comprises a combination of mutations that exhibit activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NAC-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the combination of mutations are present in any one of the clones listed in Table 2. In some embodiments, the combination of mutations are conservative mutations of the clones listed in Table 2. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein comprises the combination of mutations of any one of the Cas9 clones listed in Table 2.
Table 2: NAC PAM Clones
In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 80% identical to the amino acid sequence of a Cas9 protein as provided by any one of the variants of Table 2. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein comprises an amino acid sequence that is at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 92%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.5% identical to the amino acid sequence of a Cas9 protein as provided by any one of the variants of Table 2.
In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits an increased activity on a target sequence that does not comprise the canonical PAM (5′-NGG-3′) at its 3′ end as compared to Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 as provided by SEQ ID NO: 18. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits an activity on a target sequence having a 3′ end that is not directly adjacent to the canonical PAM sequence (5′-NGG-3′) that is at least 5-fold increased as compared to the activity of Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 as provided by SEQ ID NO: 18 on the same target sequence. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein exhibits an activity on a target sequence that is not directly adjacent to the canonical PAM sequence (5′-NGG-3′) that is at least 10-fold, at least 50-fold, at least 100-fold, at least 500-fold, at least 1,000-fold, at least 5,000-fold, at least 10,000-fold, at least 50,000-fold, at least 100,000-fold, at least 500,000-fold, or at least 1,000,000-fold increased as compared to the activity of Streptococcus pyogenes as provided by SEQ ID NO: 18 on the same target sequence. In some embodiments, the 3′ end of the target sequence is directly adjacent to an AAC, GAC, CAC, or TAC sequence.
In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein comprises a combination of mutations that exhibit activity on a target sequence comprising a 5′-NAT-3′ PAM sequence at its 3′-end. In some embodiments, the combination of mutations are present in any one of the clones listed in Table 3. In some embodiments, the combination of mutations are conservative mutations of the clones listed in Table 3. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein comprises the combination of mutations of any one of the Cas9 clones listed in Table 3.
Table 3: NAT PAM Clones
The above description of various napDNAbps which can be used in connection with the presently disclosed multi-flap prime editors is not meant to be limiting in any way. The multi-flap prime editors may comprise the canonical SpCas9, or any ortholog Cas9 protein, or any variant Cas9 protein—including any naturally occurring variant, mutant, or otherwise engineered version of Cas9—that is known or which can be made or evolved through a directed evolutionary or otherwise mutagenic process. In various embodiments, the Cas9 or Cas9 variants have a nickase activity, i.e., only cleave of strand of the target DNA sequence. In other embodiments, the Cas9 or Cas9 variants have inactive nucleases, i.e., are “dead” Cas9 proteins. Other variant Cas9 proteins that may be used are those having a smaller molecular weight than the canonical SpCas9 (e.g., for easier delivery) or having modified or rearranged primary amino acid structure (e.g., the circular permutant formats). The multi-flap prime editors described herein may also comprise Cas9 equivalents, including Cas12a/Cpf1 and Cas12b proteins which are the result of convergent evolution. The napDNAbps used herein (e.g., SpCas9, Cas9 variant, or Cas9 equivalents) may also contain various modifications that alter/enhance their PAM specifities. Lastly, the application contemplates any Cas9, Cas9 variant, or Cas9 equivalent which has at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.9% sequence identity to a reference Cas9 sequence, such as a references SpCas9 canonical sequences or a reference Cas9 equivalent (e.g., Cas12a/Cpf1).
In a particular embodiment, the Cas9 variant having expanded PAM capabilities is SpCas9 (H840A) VRQR (SEQ ID NO: 87), which has the following amino acid sequence (with the V, R, Q, R substitutions relative to the SpCas9 (H840A) of SEQ ID NO: 51 being show in bold underline. In addition, the methionine residue in SpCas9 (H840) was removed for SpCas9 (H840A) VRQR):
In another particular embodiment, the Cas9 variant having expanded PAM capabilities is SpCas9 (H840A) VRER, which has the following amino acid sequence (with the V, R, E, R substitutions relative to the SpCas9 (H840A) of SEQ ID NO: 51 being shown in bold underline. In addition, the methionine residue in SpCas9 (H840) was removed for SpCas9 (H840A) VRER):
In some embodiments, the napDNAbp that functions with a non-canonical PAM sequence is an Argonaute protein. One example of such a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein is an Argonaute protein from Natronobacterium gregoryi (NgAgo). NgAgo is a ssDNA-guided endonuclease. NgAgo binds 5′ phosphorylated ssDNA of ˜24 nucleotides (gDNA) to guide it to its target site and will make DNA double-strand breaks at the gDNA site. In contrast to Cas9, the NgAgo-gDNA system does not require a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM). Using a nuclease inactive NgAgo (dNgAgo) can greatly expand the bases that may be targeted. The characterization and use of NgAgo have been described in Gao et al., Nat Biotechnol., 2016 July; 34(7):768-73. PubMed PMID: 27136078; Swarts et al., Nature. 507(7491) (2014):258-61; and Swarts et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 43(10) (2015):5120-9, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In some embodiments, the napDNAbp is a prokaryotic homolog of an Argonaute protein. Prokaryotic homologs of Argonaute proteins are known and have been described, for example, in Makarova K., et al., “Prokaryotic homologs of Argonaute proteins are predicted to function as key components of a novel system of defense against mobile genetic elements”, Biol Direct. 2009 Aug. 25; 4:29. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-4-29, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp is a Marinitoga piezophila Argunaute (MpAgo) protein. The CRISPR-associated Marinitoga piezophila Argunaute (MpAgo) protein cleaves single-stranded target sequences using 5′-phosphorylated guides. The 5′ guides are used by all known Argonautes. The crystal structure of an MpAgo-RNA complex shows a guide strand binding site comprising residues that block 5′ phosphate interactions. This data suggests the evolution of an Argonaute subclass with noncanonical specificity for a 5′-hydroxylated guide. See, e.g., Kaya et al., “A bacterial Argonaute with noncanonical guide RNA specificity”, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016 Apr. 12; 113(15):4057-62, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference). It should be appreciated that other argonaute proteins may be used, and are within the scope of this disclosure.
Some aspects of the disclosure provide Cas9 domains that have different PAM specificities. Typically, Cas9 proteins, such as Cas9 from S. pyogenes (spCas9), require a canonical NGG PAM sequence to bind a particular nucleic acid region. This may limit the ability to edit desired bases within a genome. In some embodiments, the base editing fusion proteins provided herein may need to be placed at a precise location, for example where a target base is placed within a 4 base region (e.g., a “editing window”), which is approximately 15 bases upstream of the PAM. See Komor, A. C., et al., “Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage” Nature 533, 420-424 (2016), the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Accordingly, in some embodiments, any of the fusion proteins provided herein may contain a Cas9 domain that is capable of binding a nucleotide sequence that does not contain a canonical (e.g., NGG) PAM sequence. Cas9 domains that bind to non-canonical PAM sequences have been described in the art and would be apparent to the skilled artisan. For example, Cas9 domains that bind non-canonical PAM sequences have been described in Kleinstiver, B. P., et al., “Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities” Nature 523, 481-485 (2015); and Kleinstiver, B. P., et al., “Broadening the targeting range of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR-Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition” Nature Biotechnology 33, 1293-1298 (2015); the entire contents of each are hereby incorporated by reference.
For example, a napDNAbp domain with altered PAM specificity, such as a domain with at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity with wild type Francisella novicida Cpf1 (D917, E1006, and D1255) (SEQ ID NO: 74), which has the following amino acid sequence:
An additional napDNAbp domain with altered PAM specificity, such as a domain having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity with wild type Geobacillus thermodenitrificans Cas9 (SEQ ID NO: 75), which has the following amino acid sequence:
In some embodiments, the nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) is a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein that does not require a canonical (NGG) PAM sequence. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp is an argonaute protein. One example of such a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein is an Argonaute protein from Natronobacterium gregoryi (NgAgo). NgAgo is a ssDNA-guided endonuclease. NgAgo binds 5′ phosphorylated ssDNA of ˜24 nucleotides (gDNA) to guide it to its target site and will make DNA double-strand breaks at the gDNA site. In contrast to Cas9, the NgAgo-gDNA system does not require a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM). Using a nuclease inactive NgAgo (dNgAgo) can greatly expand the bases that may be targeted. The characterization and use of NgAgo have been described in Gao et al., Nat Biotechnol., 34(7): 768-73 (2016), PubMed PMID: 27136078; Swarts et al., Nature, 507(7491): 258-61 (2014); and Swarts et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 43(10) (2015): 5120-9, each of which is incorporated herein by reference. The sequence of Natronobacterium gregoryi Argonaute is provided in SEQ ID NO: 76.
The disclosed fusion proteins may comprise a napDNAbp domain having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity with wild type Natronobacterium gregoryi Argonaute (SEQ ID NO: 76), which has the following amino acid sequence:
In addition, any available methods may be utilized to obtain or construct a variant or mutant Cas9 protein. The term “mutation,” as used herein, refers to a substitution of a residue within a sequence, e.g., a nucleic acid or amino acid sequence, with another residue, or a deletion or insertion of one or more residues within a sequence. Mutations are typically described herein by identifying the original residue followed by the position of the residue within the sequence and by the identity of the newly substituted residue. Various methods for making the amino acid substitutions (mutations) provided herein are well known in the art, and are provided by, for example, Green and Sambrook, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (4th ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (2012)). Mutations can include a variety of categories, such as single base polymorphisms, microduplication regions, indel, and inversions, and is not meant to be limiting in any way. Mutations can include “loss-of-function” mutations which is the normal result of a mutation that reduces or abolishes a protein activity. Most loss-of-function mutations are recessive, because in a heterozygote the second chromosome copy carries an unmutated version of the gene coding for a fully functional protein whose presence compensates for the effect of the mutation. Mutations also embrace “gain-of-function” mutations, which is one which confers an abnormal activity on a protein or cell that is otherwise not present in a normal condition. Many gain-of-function mutations are in regulatory sequences rather than in coding regions, and can therefore have a number of consequences. For example, a mutation might lead to one or more genes being expressed in the wrong tissues, these tissues gaining functions that they normally lack. Because of their nature, gain-of-function mutations are usually dominant.
Mutations can be introduced into a reference Cas9 protein using site-directed mutagenesis. Older methods of site-directed mutagenesis known in the art rely on sub-cloning of the sequence to be mutated into a vector, such as an M13 bacteriophage vector, that allows the isolation of single-stranded DNA template. In these methods, one anneals a mutagenic primer (i.e., a primer capable of annealing to the site to be mutated but bearing one or more mismatched nucleotides at the site to be mutated) to the single-stranded template and then polymerizes the complement of the template starting from the 3′ end of the mutagenic primer. The resulting duplexes are then transformed into host bacteria and plaques are screened for the desired mutation. More recently, site-directed mutagenesis has employed PCR methodologies, which have the advantage of not requiring a single-stranded template. In addition, methods have been developed that do not require sub-cloning. Several issues must be considered when PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis is performed. First, in these methods it is desirable to reduce the number of PCR cycles to prevent expansion of undesired mutations introduced by the polymerase. Second, a selection must be employed in order to reduce the number of non-mutated parental molecules persisting in the reaction. Third, an extended-length PCR method is preferred in order to allow the use of a single PCR primer set. And fourth, because of the non-template-dependent terminal extension activity of some thermostable polymerases it is often necessary to incorporate an end-polishing step into the procedure prior to blunt-end ligation of the PCR-generated mutant product.
Mutations may also be introduced by directed evolution processes, such as phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE) or phage-assisted noncontinuous evolution (PANCE). The term “phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE),” as used herein, refers to continuous evolution that employs phage as viral vectors. The general concept of PACE technology has been described, for example, in International PCT Application, PCT/US2009/056194, filed Sep. 8, 2009, published as WO 2010/028347 on Mar. 11, 2010; International PCT Application, PCT/US2011/066747, filed Dec. 22, 2011, published as WO 2012/088381 on Jun. 28, 2012; U.S. Application, U.S. Pat. No. 9,023,594, issued May 5, 2015, International PCT Application, PCT/US2015/012022, filed Jan. 20, 2015, published as WO 2015/134121 on Sep. 11, 2015, and International PCT Application, PCT/US2016/027795, filed Apr. 15, 2016, published as WO 2016/168631 on Oct. 20, 2016, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference. Variant Cas9s may also be obtain by phage-assisted non-continuous evolution (PANCE),” which as used herein, refers to non-continuous evolution that employs phage as viral vectors. PANCE is a simplified technique for rapid in vivo directed evolution using serial flask transfers of evolving ‘selection phage’ (SP), which contain a gene of interest to be evolved, across fresh E. coli host cells, thereby allowing genes inside the host E. coli to be held constant while genes contained in the SP continuously evolve. Serial flask transfers have long served as a widely-accessible approach for laboratory evolution of microbes, and, more recently, analogous approaches have been developed for bacteriophage evolution. The PANCE system features lower stringency than the PACE system.
Any of the references noted above which relate to Cas9 or Cas9 equivalents are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties, if not already stated so.
J. Divided napDNAbp Domains for Split PE Delivery
In various embodiments, the prime editors described herein may be delivered to cells as two or more fragments which become assembled inside the cell (either by passive assembly, or by active assembly, such as using split intein sequences) into a reconstituted prime editor. In some cases, the self assembly may be passive whereby the two or more prime editor fragments associate inside the cell covalently or non-covalently to reconstitute the prime editor. In other cases, the self-assembly may be catalyzed by dimerization domains installed on each of the fragments. Examples of dimerization domains are described herein. In still other cases, the self-assembly may be catalyzed by split intein sequences installed on each of the prime editor fragments.
Split PE delivery may be advantageous to address various size constraints of different delivery approaches. For example, delivery approaches may include virus-based delivery methods, messenger RNA-based delivery methods, or RNP-based delivery (ribonucleoprotein-based delivery). And, each of these methods of delivery may be more efficient and/or effective by dividing up the prime editor into smaller pieces. Once inside the cell, the smaller pieces can assemble into a functional prime editor. Depending on the means of splitting, the divided prime editor fragments can be reassembled in a non-covalent manner or a covalent manner to reform the prime editor. In one embodiment, the prime editor can be split at one or more split sites into two or more fragments. The fragments can be unmodified (other than being split). Once the fragments are delivered to the cell (e.g., by direct delivery of a ribonucleoprotein complex or by nucleic delivery—e.g., mRNA delivery or virus vector based delivery), the fragments can reassociate covalently or non-covalently to reconstitute the prime editor. In another embodiment, the prime editor can be split at one or more split sites into two or more fragments. Each of the fragments can be modified to comprise a dimerization domain, whereby each fragment that is formed is coupled to a dimerization domain. Once delivered or expressed within a cell, the dimerization domains of the different fragments associate and bind to one another, bringing the different prime editor fragments together to reform a functional prime editor. In yet another embodiment, the prime editor fragment may be modified to comprise a split intein. Once delivered or expressed within a cell, the split intein domains of the different fragments associate and bind to one another, and then undergo trans-splicing, which results in the excision of the split-intein domains from each of the fragments, and a concomitant formation of a peptide bond between the fragments, thereby restoring the prime editor.
In one embodiment, the prime editor can be delivered using a split-intein approach.
The location of the split site can be positioned between any one or more pair of residues in the prime editor and in any domains therein, including within the napDNAbp domain, the polymerase domain (e.g., RT domain), linker domain that joins the napDNAbp domain and the polymerase domain.
In one embodiment, depicted in
In certain embodiments, the napDNAbp is a canonical SpCas9 polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 18, as follows:
Streptococcus
pyogenes
In certain embodiments, the SpCas9 is split into two fragments at a split site located between residues 1 and 2, or 2 and 3, or 3 and 4, or 4 and 5, or 5 and 6, or 6 and 7, or 7 and 8, or 8 and 9, or 9 and 10, or between any two pair of residues located anywhere between residues 1-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, 80-90, 90-100, 100-200, 200-300, 300-400, 400-500, 500-600, 600-700, 700-800, 800-900, 1000-1100, 1100-1200, 1200-1300, or 1300-1368 of canonical SpCas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18.
In certain embodiments, a napDNAbp is split into two fragments at a split site that is located at a pair of residue that corresponds to any two pair of residues located anywhere between positions 1-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, 80-90, 90-100, 100-200, 200-300, 300-400, 400-500, 500-600, 600-700, 700-800, 800-900, 1000-1100, 1100-1200, 1200-1300, or 1300-1368 of canonical SpCas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18.
In certain embodiments, the SpCas9 is split into two fragments at a split site located between residues 1 and 2, or 2 and 3, or 3 and 4, or 4 and 5, or 5 and 6, or 6 and 7, or 7 and 8, or 8 and 9, or 9 and 10, or between any two pair of residues located anywhere between residues 1-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, 80-90, 90-100, 100-200, 200-300, 300-400, 400-500, 500-600, 600-700, 700-800, 800-900, 1000-1100, 1100-1200, 1200-1300, or 1300-1368 of canonical SpCas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18. In certain embodiments, the split site is located one or more polypeptide bond sites (i.e., a “split site or split-intein split site”), fused to a split intein, and then delivered to cells as separately-encoded fusion proteins. Once the split-intein fusion proteins (i.e., protein halves) are expressed within a cell, the proteins undergo trans-splicing to form a complete or whole PE with the concomitant removal of the joined split-intein sequences.
For example, as shown in
To take advantage of a split-PE delivery strategy using split-inteins, the prime editor needs to be divided at one or more split sites to create at least two separate halves of a prime editor, each of which may be rejoined inside a cell if each half is fused to a split-intein sequence.
In certain embodiments, the prime editor is split at a single split site. In certain other embodiments, the prime editor is split at two split sites, or three split sites, or four split sites, or more.
In a preferred embodiment, the prime editor is split at a single split site to create two separate halves of a prime editor, each of which can be fused to a split intein sequence
An exemplary split intein is the Ssp DnaE intein, which comprises two subunits, namely, DnaE-N and DnaE-C. The two different subunits are encoded by separate genes, namely dnaE-n and dnaE-c, which encode the DnaE-N and DnaE-C subunits, respectively. DnaE is a naturally occurring split intein in Synechocytis sp. PCC6803 and is capable of directing trans-splicing of two separate proteins, each comprising a fusion with either DnaE-N or DnaE-C.
Additional naturally occurring or engineered split-intein sequences are known in the or can be made from whole-intein sequences described herein or those available in the art. Examples of split-intein sequences can be found in Stevens et al., “A promiscuous split intein with expanded protein engineering applications,” PNAS, 2017, Vol. 114: 8538-8543; Iwai et al., “Highly efficient protein trans-splicing by a naturally split DnaE intein from Nostc punctiforme, FEBS Lett, 580: 1853-1858, each of which are incorporated herein by reference. Additional split intein sequences can be found, for example, in WO 2013/045632, WO 2014/055782, WO 2016/069774, and EP2877490, the contents each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In addition, protein splicing in trans has been described in vivo and in vitro (Shingledecker, et al., Gene 207:187 (1998), Southworth, et al., EMBO J. 17:918 (1998); Mills, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95:3543-3548 (1998); Lew, et al., J. Biol. Chem., 273:15887-15890 (1998); Wu, et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 35732:1 (1998b), Yamazaki, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120:5591 (1998), Evans, et al., J. Biol. Chem. 275:9091 (2000); Otomo, et al., Biochemistry 38:16040-16044 (1999); Otomo, et al., J. Biolmol. NMR 14:105-114 (1999); Scott, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:13638-13643 (1999)) and provides the opportunity to express a protein as to two inactive fragments that subsequently undergo ligation to form a functional product, e.g., as shown in
In various embodiments described herein, the continuous evolution methods (e.g., PACE) may be used to evolve a first portion of a base editor. A first portion could include a single component or domain, e.g., a Cas9 domain, a deaminase domain, or a UGI domain. The separately evolved component or domain can be then fused to the remaining portions of the base editor within a cell by separately express both the evolved portion and the remaining non-evolved portions with split-intein polypeptide domains. The first portion could more broadly include any first amino acid portion of a base editor that is desired to be evolved using a continuous evolution method described herein. The second portion would in this embodiment refer to the remaining amino acid portion of the base editor that is not evolved using the herein methods. The evolved first portion and the second portion of the base editor could each be expressed with split-intein polypeptide domains in a cell. The natural protein splicing mechanisms of the cell would reassemble the evolved first portion and the non-evolved second portion to form a single fusion protein evolved base editor. The evolved first portion may comprise either the N- or C-terminal part of the single fusion protein. In an analogous manner, use of a second orthogonal trans-splicing intein pair could allow the evolved first portion to comprise an internal part of the single fusion protein.
Thus, any of the evolved and non-evolved components of the base editors herein described may be expressed with split-intein tags in order to facilitate the formation of a complete base editor comprising the evolved and non-evolved component within a cell.
The mechanism of the protein splicing process has been studied in great detail (Chong, et al., J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 22159-22168; Xu, M-Q & Perler, F. B. EMBO Journal, 1996, 15, 5146-5153) and conserved amino acids have been found at the intein and extein splicing points (Xu, et al., EMBO Journal, 1994, 13 5517-522). The constructs described herein contain an intein sequence fused to the 5′-terminus of the first gene (e.g., the evolved portion of the base editor). Suitable intein sequences can be selected from any of the proteins known to contain protein splicing elements. A database containing all known inteins can be found on the World Wide Web (Perler, F. B. Nucleic Acids Research, 1999, 27, 346-347). The intein sequence is fused at the 3′ end to the 5′ end of a second gene. For targeting of this gene to a certain organelle, a peptide signal can be fused to the coding sequence of the gene. After the second gene, the intein-gene sequence can be repeated as often as desired for expression of multiple proteins in the same cell. For multi-intein containing constructs, it may be useful to use intein elements from different sources. After the sequence of the last gene to be expressed, a transcription termination sequence must be inserted. In one embodiment, a modified intein splicing unit is designed so that it can both catalyze excision of the exteins from the inteins as well as prevent ligation of the exteins. Mutagenesis of the C-terminal extein junction in the Pyrococcus species GB-D DNA polymerase was found to produce an altered splicing element that induces cleavage of exteins and inteins but prevents subsequent ligation of the exteins (Xu, M-Q & Perler, F. B. EMBO Journal, 1996, 15, 5146-5153). Mutation of serine 538 to either an alanine or glycine induced cleavage but prevented ligation. Mutation of equivalent residues in other intein splicing units should also prevent extein ligation due to the conservation of amino acids at the C-terminal extein junction to the intein. A preferred intein not containing an endonuclease domain is the Mycobacterium xenopi GyrA protein (Telenti, et al. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 6378-6382). Others have been found in nature or have been created artificially by removing the endonuclease domains from endonuclease containing inteins (Chong, et al. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 15587-15590). In a preferred embodiment, the intein is selected so that it consists of the minimal number of amino acids needed to perform the splicing function, such as the intein from the Mycobacterium xenopi GyrA protein (Telenti, A., et al., J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 6378-6382). In an alternative embodiment, an intein without endonuclease activity is selected, such as the intein from the Mycobacterium xenopi GyrA protein or the Saccharaomyces cerevisiae VMA intein that has been modified to remove endonuclease domains (Chong, 1997).Further modification of the intein splicing unit may allow the reaction rate of the cleavage reaction to be altered allowing protein dosage to be controlled by simply modifying the gene sequence of the splicing unit.
Inteins can also exist as two fragments encoded by two separately transcribed and translated genes. These so-called split inteins self-associate and catalyze protein-splicing activity in trans. Split inteins have been identified in diverse cyanobacteria and archaea (Caspi et al, Mol Microbiol. 50: 1569-1577 (2003); Choi J. et al, J Mol Biol. 556: 1093-1106 (2006); Dassa B. et al, Biochemistry. 46:322-330 (2007); Liu X. and Yang J., J Biol Chem. 275:26315-26318 (2003); Wu H. et al.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. £5:9226-9231 (1998); and Zettler J. et al, FEBS Letters. 553:909-914 (2009)), but have not been found in eukaryotes thus far. Recently, a bioinformatic analysis of environmental metagenomic data revealed 26 different loci with a novel genomic arrangement. At each locus, a conserved enzyme coding region is interrupted by a split intein, with a freestanding endonuclease gene inserted between the sections coding for intein subdomains. Among them, five loci were completely assembled: DNA helicases (gp41-1, gp41-8); Inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH-1); and Ribonucleotide reductase catalytic subunits (NrdA-2 and NrdJ-1). This fractured gene organization appears to be present mainly in phages (Dassa et al, Nucleic Acids Research. 57:2560-2573 (2009)).
The split intein Npu DnaE was characterized as having the highest rate reported for the protein trans-splicing reaction. In addition, the Npu DnaE protein splicing reaction is considered robust and high-yielding with respect to different extein sequences, temperatures from 6 to 37° C., and the presence of up to 6M Urea (Zettler J. et al, FEBS Letters. 553:909-914 (2009); Iwai I. et al, FEBS Letters 550: 1853-1858 (2006)). As expected, when the Cysl Ala mutation at the N-domain of these inteins was introduced, the initial N to S-acyl shift and therefore protein splicing was blocked. Unfortunately, the C-terminal cleavage reaction was also almost completely inhibited. The dependence of the asparagine cyclization at the C-terminal splice junction on the acyl shift at the N-terminal scissile peptide bond seems to be a unique property common to the naturally split DnaE intein alleles (Zettler J. et al. FEBS Letters. 555:909-914 (2009)).
The mechanism of protein splicing typically has four steps [29-30]: 1) an N—S or N—O acyl shift at the intein N-terminus, which breaks the upstream peptide bond and forms an ester bond between the N-extein and the side chain of the intein's first amino acid (Cys or Ser); 2) a transesterification relocating the N-extein to the intein C-terminus, forming a new ester bond linking the N-extein to the side chain of the C-extein's first amino acid (Cys, Ser, or Thr); 3) Asn cyclization breaking the peptide bond between the intein and the C-extein; and 4) a S—N or O—N acyl shift that replaces the ester bond with a peptide bond between the N-extein and C-extein.
Protein trans-splicing, catalyzed by split inteins, provides an entirely enzymatic method for protein ligation [31]. A split-intein is essentially a contiguous intein (e.g. a mini-intein) split into two pieces named N-intein and C-intein, respectively. The N-intein and C-intein of a split intein can associate non-covalently to form an active intein and catalyze the splicing reaction essentially in same way as a contiguous intein does. Split inteins have been found in nature and also engineered in laboratories [31-35]. As used herein, the term “split intein” refers to any intein in which one or more peptide bond breaks exists between the N-terminal and C-terminal amino acid sequences such that the N-terminal and C-terminal sequences become separate molecules that can non-covalently reassociate, or reconstitute, into an intein that is functional for trans-splicing reactions. Any catalytically active intein, or fragment thereof, may be used to derive a split intein for use in the methods of the invention. For example, in one aspect the split intein may be derived from a eukaryotic intein. In another aspect, the split intein may be derived from a bacterial intein. In another aspect, the split intein may be derived from an archaeal intein. Preferably, the split intein so-derived will possess only the amino acid sequences essential for catalyzing trans-splicing reactions.
As used herein, the “N-terminal split intein (In)” refers to any intein sequence that comprises an N-terminal amino acid sequence that is functional for trans-splicing reactions. An In thus also comprises a sequence that is spliced out when trans-splicing occurs. An In can comprise a sequence that is a modification of the N-terminal portion of a naturally occurring intein sequence. For example, an In can comprise additional amino acid residues and/or mutated residues so long as the inclusion of such additional and/or mutated residues does not render the In non-functional in trans-splicing. Preferably, the inclusion of the additional and/or mutated residues improves or enhances the trans-splicing activity of the In.
As used herein, the “C-terminal split intein (Ic)” refers to any intein sequence that comprises a C-terminal amino acid sequence that is functional for trans-splicing reactions. In one aspect, the Ic comprises 4 to 7 contiguous amino acid residues, at least 4 amino acids of which are from the last β-strand of the intein from which it was derived. An Ic thus also comprises a sequence that is spliced out when trans-splicing occurs. An Ic can comprise a sequence that is a modification of the C-terminal portion of a naturally occurring intein sequence. For example, an Ic can comprise additional amino acid residues and/or mutated residues so long as the inclusion of such additional and/or mutated residues does not render the In non-functional in trans-splicing. Preferably, the inclusion of the additional and/or mutated residues improves or enhances the trans-splicing activity of the Ic.
In some embodiments of the invention, a peptide linked to an Ic or an In can comprise an additional chemical moiety including, among others, fluorescence groups, biotin, polyethylene glycol (PEG), amino acid analogs, unnatural amino acids, phosphate groups, glycosyl groups, radioisotope labels, and pharmaceutical molecules. In other embodiments, a peptide linked to an Ic can comprise one or more chemically reactive groups including, among others, ketone, aldehyde, Cys residues and Lys residues. The N-intein and C-intein of a split intein can associate non-covalently to form an active intein and catalyze the splicing reaction when an “intein-splicing polypeptide (ISP)” is present. As used herein, “intein-splicing polypeptide (ISP)” refers to the portion of the amino acid sequence of a split intein that remains when the Ic, In, or both, are removed from the split intein. In certain embodiments, the In comprises the ISP. In another embodiment, the Ic comprises the ISP. In yet another embodiment, the ISP is a separate peptide that is not covalently linked to In nor to Ic.
Split inteins may be created from contiguous inteins by engineering one or more split sites in the unstructured loop or intervening amino acid sequence between the −12 conserved beta-strands found in the structure of mini-inteins [25-28]. Some flexibility in the position of the split site within regions between the beta-strands may exist, provided that creation of the split will not disrupt the structure of the intein, the structured beta-strands in particular, to a sufficient degree that protein splicing activity is lost.
In protein trans-splicing, one precursor protein consists of an N-extein part followed by the N-intein, another precursor protein consists of the C-intein followed by a C-extein part, and a trans-splicing reaction (catalyzed by the N- and C-inteins together) excises the two intein sequences and links the two extein sequences with a peptide bond. Protein trans-splicing, being an enzymatic reaction, can work with very low (e.g. micromolar) concentrations of proteins and can be carried out under physiological conditions.
[2] Other Programmable Nucleases
In various embodiments described herein, the multi-flap prime editors comprise a napDNAbp, such as a Cas9 protein. These proteins are “programmable” by way of their becoming complexed with a guide RNA (or a PEgRNA, as the case may be), which guides the Cas9 protein to a target site on the DNA which possess a sequence that is complementary to the spacer portion of the gRNA (or PEgRNA) and also which possesses the required PAM sequence. However, in certain embodiment envisioned here, the napDNAbp may be substituted with a different type of programmable protein, such as a zinc finger nuclease or a transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN).
Suitable alternative programmable nucleases are well known in the art which may be used in place of a napDNAbp:gRNA complex to construct an alternative prime editor system that can be programmed to selectively bind a target site of DNA, and which can be further modified in the manner described above to co-localize a polymerase and an RNA or DNA extension arm comprising a primer binding site and a DNA synthesis template to specific nick site. For example, and as represented in
As represented in
[3] Polymerases (e.g., Reverse Transcriptases)
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editor system disclosed herein includes a polymerase (e.g., DNA-dependent DNA polymerase or RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, such as, reverse transcriptase), or a variant thereof, which can be provided as a fusion protein with a napDNAbp or other programmable nuclease, or provide in trans.
Any polymerase may be used in the multi-flap prime editors disclosed herein. The polymerases may be wild type polymerases, functional fragments, mutants, variants, or truncated variants, and the like. The polymerases may include wild type polymerases from eukaryotic, prokaryotic, archael, or viral organisms, and/or the polymerases may be modified by genetic engineering, mutagenesis, directed evolution-based processes. The polymerases may include T7 DNA polymerase, T5 DNA polymerase, T4 DNA polymerase, Klenow fragment DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase III and the like. The polymerases may also be thermostable, and may include Taq, Tne, Tma, Pfu, Tfl, Tth, Stoffel fragment, VENT® and DEEPVENT® DNA polymerases, KOD, Tgo, JDF3, and mutants, variants and derivatives thereof (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,436,149; 4,889,818; 4,965,185; 5,079,352; 5,614,365; 5,374,553; 5,270,179; 5,047,342; 5,512,462; WO 92/06188; WO 92/06200; WO 96/10640; Barnes, W. M., Gene 112:29-35 (1992); Lawyer, F. C., et al., PCR Meth. Appl. 2:275-287 (1993); Flaman, J.-M, et al., Nuc. Acids Res. 22(15):3259-3260 (1994), each of which are incorporated by reference). For synthesis of longer nucleic acid molecules (e.g., nucleic acid molecules longer than about 3-5 Kb in length), at least two DNA polymerases can be employed. In certain embodiments, one of the polymerases can be substantially lacking a 3′ exonuclease activity and the other may have a 3′ exonuclease activity. Such pairings may include polymerases that are the same or different. Examples of DNA polymerases substantially lacking in 3′ exonuclease activity include, but are not limited to, Taq, Tne(exo-), Tma(exo-), Pfu(exo-), Pwo(exo-), exo-KOD and Tth DNA polymerases, and mutants, variants and derivatives thereof.
Preferably, the polymerase usable in the multi-flap prime editors disclosed herein are “template-dependent” polymerase (since the polymerases are intended to rely on the DNA synthesis template to specify the sequence of the DNA strand under synthesis during prime editing. As used herein, the term “template DNA molecule” refers to that strand of a nucleic acid from which a complementary nucleic acid strand is synthesized by a DNA polymerase, for example, in a primer extension reaction of the DNA synthesis template of a PEgRNA.
As used herein, the term “template dependent manner” is intended to refer to a process that involves the template dependent extension of a primer molecule (e.g., DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase). The term “template dependent manner” refers to polynucleotide synthesis of RNA or DNA wherein the sequence of the newly synthesized strand of polynucleotide is dictated by the well-known rules of complementary base pairing (see, for example, Watson, J. D. et al., In: Molecular Biology of the Gene, 4th Ed., W. A. Benjamin, Inc., Menlo Park, Calif. (1987)). The term “complementary” refers to the broad concept of sequence complementarity between regions of two polynucleotide strands or between two nucleotides through base-pairing. It is known that an adenine nucleotide is capable of forming specific hydrogen bonds (“base pairing”) with a nucleotide which is thymine or uracil. Similarly, it is known that a cytosine nucleotide is capable of base pairing with a guanine nucleotide. As such, in the case of prime editing, it can be said that the single strand of DNA synthesized by the polymerase of the prime editor against the DNA synthesis template is said to be “complementary” to the sequence of the DNA synthesis template.
A. Exemplary Polymerases
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein comprise a polymerase. The disclosure contemplates any wild type polymerase obtained from any naturally-occurring organism or virus, or obtained from a commercial or non-commercial source. In addition, the polymerases usable in the multi-flap prime editors of the disclosure can include any naturally-occurring mutant polymerase, engineered mutant polymerase, or other variant polymerase, including truncated variants that retain function. The polymerases usable herein may also be engineered to contain specific amino acid substitutions, such as those specifically disclosed herein. In certain preferred embodiments, the polymerases usable in the multi-flap prime editors of the disclosure are template-based polymerases, i.e., they synthesize nucleotide sequences in a template-dependent manner.
A polymerase is an enzyme that synthesizes a nucleotide strand and which may be used in connection with the multi-flap prime editor systems described herein. The polymerases are preferrably “template-dependent” polymerases (i.e., a polymerase which synthesizes a nucleotide strand based on the order of nucleotide bases of a template strand). In certain configurations, the polymerases can also be a “template-independent” (i.e., a polymerase which synthesizes a nucleotide strand without the requirement of a template strand). A polymerase may also be further categorized as a “DNA polymerase” or an “RNA polymerase.” In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editor systems comprise a DNA polymerase. In various embodiments, the DNA polymerase can be a “DNA-dependent DNA polymerase” (i.e., whereby the template molecule is a strand of DNA). In such cases, the DNA template molecule can be a PEgRNA, wherein the extension arm comprises a strand of DNA. In such cases, the PEgRNA may be referred to as a chimeric or hybrid PEgRNA which comprises an RNA portion (i.e., the guide RNA components, including the spacer and the gRNA core) and a DNA portion (i.e., the extension arm). In various other embodiments, the DNA polymerase can be an “RNA-dependent DNA polymerase” (i.e., whereby the template molecule is a strand of RNA). In such cases, the PEgRNA is RNA, i.e., including an RNA extension. The term “polymerase” may also refer to an enzyme that catalyzes the polymerization of nucleotide (i.e., the polymerase activity). Generally, the enzyme will initiate synthesis at the 3′-end of a primer annealed to a polynucleotide template sequence (e.g., such as a primer sequence annealed to the primer binding site of a PEgRNA), and will proceed toward the 5′ end of the template strand. A “DNA polymerase” catalyzes the polymerization of deoxynucleotides. As used herein in reference to a DNA polymerase, the term DNA polymerase includes a “functional fragment thereof”. A “functional fragment thereof” refers to any portion of a wild-type or mutant DNA polymerase that encompasses less than the entire amino acid sequence of the polymerase and which retains the ability, under at least one set of conditions, to catalyze the polymerization of a polynucleotide. Such a functional fragment may exist as a separate entity, or it may be a constituent of a larger polypeptide, such as a fusion protein.
In some embodiments, the polymerases can be from bacteriophage. Bacteriophage DNA polymerases are generally devoid of 5′ to 3′ exonuclease activity, as this activity is encoded by a separate polypeptide. Examples of suitable DNA polymerases are T4, T7, and phi29 DNA polymerase. The enzymes available commercially are: T4 (available from many sources e.g., Epicentre) and T7 (available from many sources, e.g. Epicentre for unmodified and USB for 3′ to 5′ exo T7 “Sequenase” DNA polymerase).
The other embodiments, the polymerases are archaeal polymerases. There are 2 different classes of DNA polymerases which have been identified in archaea: 1. Family B/pol I type (homologs of Pfu from Pyrococcus furiosus) and 2. pol II type (homologs of P. furiosus DP1/DP2 2-subunit polymerase). DNA polymerases from both classes have been shown to naturally lack an associated 5′ to 3′ exonuclease activity and to possess 3′ to 5′ exonuclease (proofreading) activity. Suitable DNA polymerases (pol I or pol II) can be derived from archaea with optimal growth temperatures that are similar to the desired assay temperatures.
Thermostable archaeal DNA polymerases are isolated from Pyrococcus species (furiosus, species GB-D, woesii, abysii, horikoshii), Thermococcus species (kodakaraensis KOD1, litoralis, species 9 degrees North-7, species JDF-3, gorgonarius), Pyrodictium occultum, and Archaeoglobus fulgidus.
Polymerases may also be from eubacterial species. There are 3 classes of eubacterial DNA polymerases, pol I, II, and III. Enzymes in the Pol I DNA polymerase family possess 5′ to 3′ exonuclease activity, and certain members also exhibit 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity. Pol II DNA polymerases naturally lack 5′ to 3′ exonuclease activity, but do exhibit 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity. Pol III DNA polymerases represent the major replicative DNA polymerase of the cell and are composed of multiple subunits. The pol III catalytic subunit lacks 5′ to 3′ exonuclease activity, but in some cases 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity is located in the same polypeptide.
There are a variety of commercially available Pol I DNA polymerases, some of which have been modified to reduce or abolish 5′ to 3′ exonuclease activity.
Suitable thermostable pol I DNA polymerases can be isolated from a variety of thermophilic eubacteria, including Thermus species and Thermotoga maritima such as Thermus aquaticus (Taq), Thermus thermophilus (Tth) and Thermotoga maritima (Tma UlTma).
Additional eubacteria related to those listed above are described in Thermophilic Bacteria (Kristjansson, J. K., ed.) CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla., 1992.
The invention further provides for chimeric or non-chimeric DNA polymerases that are chemically modified according to methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,677,152, 6,479,264 and 6,183,998, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Additional archaea DNA polymerases related to those listed above are described in the following references: Archaea: A Laboratory Manual (Robb, F. T. and Place, A. R., eds.), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1995 and Thermophilic Bacteria (Kristjansson, J. K., ed.) CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla., 1992.
B. Exemplarily Reverse Transcriptases
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein comprise a reverse transcriptase as the polymerase. The disclosure contemplates any wild type reverse transcriptase obtained from any naturally-occurring organism or virus, or obtained from a commercial or non-commercial source. In addition, the reverse transcriptases usable in the multi-flap prime editors of the disclosure can include any naturally-occurring mutant RT, engineered mutant RT, or other variant RT, including truncated variants that retain function. The RTs may also be engineered to contain specific amino acid substitutions, such as those specifically disclosed herein.
Reverse transcriptases are multi-functional enzymes typically with three enzymatic activities including RNA- and DNA-dependent DNA polymerization activity, and an RNaseH activity that catalyzes the cleavage of RNA in RNA-DNA hybrids. Some mutants of reverse transcriptases have disabled the RNaseH moiety to prevent unintended damage to the mRNA. These enzymes that synthesize complementary DNA (cDNA) using mRNA as a template were first identified in RNA viruses. Subsequently, reverse transcriptases were isolated and purified directly from virus particles, cells or tissues. (e.g., see Kacian et al., 1971, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 46: 365-83; Yang et al., 1972, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 47: 505-11; Gerard et al., 1975, J. Virol. 15: 785-97; Liu et al., 1977, Arch. Virol. 55 187-200; Kato et al., 1984, J. Virol. Methods 9: 325-39; Luke et al., 1990, Biochem. 29: 1764-69 and Le Grice et al., 1991, J. Virol. 65: 7004-07, each of which are incorporated by reference). More recently, mutants and fusion proteins have been created in the quest for improved properties such as thermostability, fidelity and activity. Any of the wild type, variant, and/or mutant forms of reverse transcriptase which are known in the art or which can be made using methods known in the art are contemplated herein.
The reverse transcriptase (RT) gene (or the genetic information contained therein) can be obtained from a number of different sources. For instance, the gene may be obtained from eukaryotic cells which are infected with retrovirus, or from a number of plasmids which contain either a portion of or the entire retrovirus genome. In addition, messenger RNA-like RNA which contains the RT gene can be obtained from retroviruses. Examples of sources for RT include, but are not limited to, Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV or MLVRT); human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1); bovine leukemia virus (BLV); Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV); human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); yeast, including Saccharomyces, Neurospora, Drosophila; primates; and rodents. See, for example, Weiss, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,663,290 (1987); Gerard, G. R., DNA:271-79 (1986); Kotewicz, M. L., et al., Gene 35:249-58 (1985); Tanese, N., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA):4944-48 (1985); Roth, M. J., at al., J. Biol. Chem. 260:9326-35 (1985); Michel, F., et al., Nature 316:641-43 (1985); Akins, R. A., et al., Cell 47:505-16 (1986), EMBO J. 4:1267-75 (1985); and Fawcett, D. F., Cell 47:1007-15 (1986) (each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties).
Wild Type RTs
Exemplary enzymes for use with the herein disclosed multi-flap prime editors can include, but are not limited to, M-MLV reverse transcriptase and RSV reverse transcriptase. Enzymes having reverse transcriptase activity are commercially available. In certain embodiments, the reverse transcriptase provided in trans to the other components of the multi-flap prime editor (PE) system. That is, the reverse transcriptase is expressed or otherwise provided as an individual component, i.e., not as a fusion protein with a napDNAbp.
A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that wild type reverse transcriptases, including but not limited to, Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (M-MLV); Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase and avian Sarcoma-Leukosis Virus (ASLV) reverse transcriptase, which includes but is not limited to Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) reverse transcriptase, Avian Myeloblastosis Virus (AMV) reverse transcriptase, Avian Erythroblastosis Virus (AEV) Helper Virus MCAV reverse transcriptase, Avian Myelocytomatosis Virus MC29 Helper Virus MCAV reverse transcriptase, Avian Reticuloendotheliosis Virus (REV-T) Helper Virus REV-A reverse transcriptase, Avian Sarcoma Virus UR2 Helper Virus UR2AV reverse transcriptase, Avian Sarcoma Virus Y73 Helper Virus YAV reverse transcriptase, Rous Associated Virus (RAV) reverse transcriptase, and Myeloblastosis Associated Virus (MAV) reverse transcriptase may be suitably used in the subject methods and composition described herein.
Exemplary wild type RT enzymes are as follows:
ESCHERICHIA COLI
BACILLUS SUBTILIS
EUBACTERIUM
GEOBACILLUS
STEAROTHERMOPHIL
Variant and Error-Prone RTs
Reverse transcriptases are essential for synthesizing complementary DNA (cDNA) strands from RNA templates. Reverse transcriptases are enzymes composed of distinct domains that exhibit different biochemical activities. The enzymes catalyze the synthesis of DNA from an RNA template, as follows: In the presence of an annealed primer, reverse transcriptase binds to an RNA template and initiates the polymerization reaction. RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity synthesizes the complementary DNA (cDNA) strand, incorporating dNTPs. RNase H activity degrades the RNA template of the DNA:RNA complex. Thus, reverse transcriptases comprise (a) a binding activity that recognizes and binds to a RNA/DNA hybrid, (b) an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity, and (c) an RNase H activity. In addition, reverse transcriptases generally are regarded as having various attributes, including their thermostability, processivity (rate of dNTP incorporation), and fidelity (or error-rate). The reverse transcriptase variants contemplated herein may include any mutations to reverse transcriptase that impacts or changes any one or more of these enzymatic activities (e.g., RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity, RNase H activity, or DNA/RNA hybrid-binding activity) or enzyme properties (e.g., thermostability, processivity, or fidelity). Such variants may be available in the art in the public domain, available commercially, or may be made using known methods of mutagenesis, including directed evolutionary processes (e.g., PACE or PANCE).
In various embodiments, the reverse transcriptase may be a variant reverse transcriptase. As used herein, a “variant reverse transcriptase” includes any naturally occurring or genetically engineered variant comprising one or more mutations (including singular mutations, inversions, deletions, insertions, and rearrangements) relative to a reference sequences (e.g., a reference wild type sequence). RT naturally have several activities, including an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity, ribonuclease H activity, and DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity. Collectively, these activities enable the enzyme to convert single-stranded RNA into double-stranded cDNA. In retroviruses and retrotransposons, this cDNA can then integrate into the host genome, from which new RNA copies can be made via host-cell transcription. Variant RT's may comprise a mutation which impacts one or more of these activities (either which reduces or increases these activities, or which eliminates these activities all together). In addition, variant RTs may comprise one or more mutations which render the RT more or less stable, less prone to aggregation, and facilitates purification and/or detection, and/or other the modification of properties or characteristics.
A person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that variant reverse transcriptases derived from other reverse transcriptases, including but not limited to Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (M-MLV); Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase and avian Sarcoma-Leukosis Virus (ASLV) reverse transcriptase, which includes but is not limited to Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) reverse transcriptase, Avian Myeloblastosis Virus (AMV) reverse transcriptase, Avian Erythroblastosis Virus (AEV) Helper Virus MCAV reverse transcriptase, Avian Myelocytomatosis Virus MC29 Helper Virus MCAV reverse transcriptase, Avian Reticuloendotheliosis Virus (REV-T) Helper Virus REV-A reverse transcriptase, Avian Sarcoma Virus UR2 Helper Virus UR2AV reverse transcriptase, Avian Sarcoma Virus Y73 Helper Virus YAV reverse transcriptase, Rous Associated Virus (RAV) reverse transcriptase, and Myeloblastosis Associated Virus (MAV) reverse transcriptase may be suitably used in the subject methods and composition described herein.
One method of preparing variant RTs is by genetic modification (e.g., by modifying the DNA sequence of a wild-type reverse transcriptase). A number of methods are known in the art that permit the random as well as targeted mutation of DNA sequences (see for example, Ausubel et. al. Short Protocols in Molecular Biology (1995) 3.sup.rd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). In addition, there are a number of commercially available kits for site-directed mutagenesis, including both conventional and PCR-based methods. Examples include the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kits (AGILENT®), the Q5® Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (NEW ENGLAND BIOLABS®), and GeneArt™ Site-Directed Mutagenesis System (THERMOFISHER SCIENTIFIC®).
In addition, mutant reverse transcriptases may be generated by insertional mutation or truncation (N-terminal, internal, or C-terminal insertions or truncations) according to methodologies known to one skilled in the art. The term “mutation,” as used herein, refers to a substitution of a residue within a sequence, e.g., a nucleic acid or amino acid sequence, with another residue, or a deletion or insertion of one or more residues within a sequence. Mutations are typically described herein by identifying the original residue followed by the position of the residue within the sequence and by the identity of the newly substituted residue. Various methods for making the amino acid substitutions (mutations) provided herein are well known in the art, and are provided by, for example, Green and Sambrook, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (4th ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (2012)). Mutations can include a variety of categories, such as single base polymorphisms, microduplication regions, indel, and inversions, and is not meant to be limiting in any way. Mutations can include “loss-of-function” mutations which is the normal result of a mutation that reduces or abolishes a protein activity. Most loss-of-function mutations are recessive, because in a heterozygote the second chromosome copy carries an unmutated version of the gene coding for a fully functional protein whose presence compensates for the effect of the mutation. Mutations also embrace “gain-of-function” mutations, which is one which confers an abnormal activity on a protein or cell that is otherwise not present in a normal condition. Many gain-of-function mutations are in regulatory sequences rather than in coding regions, and can therefore have a number of consequences. For example, a mutation might lead to one or more genes being expressed in the wrong tissues, these tissues gaining functions that they normally lack. Because of their nature, gain-of-function mutations are usually dominant.
Older methods of site-directed mutagenesis known in the art rely on sub-cloning of the sequence to be mutated into a vector, such as an M13 bacteriophage vector, that allows the isolation of single-stranded DNA template. In these methods, one anneals a mutagenic primer (i.e., a primer capable of annealing to the site to be mutated but bearing one or more mismatched nucleotides at the site to be mutated) to the single-stranded template and then polymerizes the complement of the template starting from the 3′ end of the mutagenic primer. The resulting duplexes are then transformed into host bacteria and plaques are screened for the desired mutation.
More recently, site-directed mutagenesis has employed PCR methodologies, which have the advantage of not requiring a single-stranded template. In addition, methods have been developed that do not require sub-cloning. Several issues must be considered when PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis is performed. First, in these methods it is desirable to reduce the number of PCR cycles to prevent expansion of undesired mutations introduced by the polymerase. Second, a selection must be employed in order to reduce the number of non-mutated parental molecules persisting in the reaction. Third, an extended-length PCR method is preferred in order to allow the use of a single PCR primer set. And fourth, because of the non-template-dependent terminal extension activity of some thermostable polymerases it is often necessary to incorporate an end-polishing step into the procedure prior to blunt-end ligation of the PCR-generated mutant product.
Methods of random mutagenesis, which will result in a panel of mutants bearing one or more randomly situated mutations, exist in the art. Such a panel of mutants may then be screened for those exhibiting the desired properties, for example, increased stability, relative to a wild-type reverse transcriptase.
An example of a method for random mutagenesis is the so-called “error-prone PCR method.” As the name implies, the method amplifies a given sequence under conditions in which the DNA polymerase does not support high fidelity incorporation. Although the conditions encouraging error-prone incorporation for different DNA polymerases vary, one skilled in the art may determine such conditions for a given enzyme. A key variable for many DNA polymerases in the fidelity of amplification is, for example, the type and concentration of divalent metal ion in the buffer. The use of manganese ion and/or variation of the magnesium or manganese ion concentration may therefore be applied to influence the error rate of the polymerase.
In various aspects, the RT of the multi-flap prime editors may be an “error-prone” reverse transcriptase variant. Error-prone reverse transcriptases that are known and/or available in the art may be used. It will be appreciated that reverse transcriptases naturally do not have any proofreading function; thus the error rate of reverse transcriptase is generally higher than DNA polymerases comprising a proofreading activity. The error-rate of any particular reverse transcriptase is a property of the enzyme's “fidelity,” which represents the accuracy of template-directed polymerization of DNA against its RNA template. An RT with high fidelity has a low-error rate. Conversely, an RT with low fidelity has a high-error rate. The fidelity of M-MLV-based reverse transcriptases are reported to have an error rate in the range of one error in 15,000 to 27,000 nucleotides synthesized. See Boutabout et al., “DNA synthesis fidelity by the reverse transcriptase of the yeast retrotransposon Ty1,” Nucleic Acids Res, 2001, 29: 2217-2222, which is incorporated by reference. Thus, for purposes of this application, those reverse transcriptases considered to be “error-prone” or which are considered to have an “error-prone fidelity” are those having an error rate that is less than one error in 15,000 nucleotides synthesized.
Error-prone reverse transcriptase also may be created through mutagenesis of a starting RT enzyme (e.g., a wild type M-MLV RT). The method of mutagenesis is not limited and may include directed evolution processes, such as phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE) or phage-assisted noncontinuous evolution (PANCE). The term “phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE),” as used herein, refers to continuous evolution that employs phage as viral vectors. The general concept of PACE technology has been described, for example, in International PCT Application, PCT/US2009/056194, filed Sep. 8, 2009, published as WO 2010/028347 on Mar. 11, 2010; International PCT Application, PCT/US2011/066747, filed Dec. 22, 2011, published as WO 2012/088381 on Jun. 28, 2012; U.S. Application, U.S. Pat. No. 9,023,594, issued May 5, 2015, International PCT Application, PCT/US2015/012022, filed Jan. 20, 2015, published as WO 2015/134121 on Sep. 11, 2015, and International PCT Application, PCT/US2016/027795, filed Apr. 15, 2016, published as WO 2016/168631 on Oct. 20, 2016, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Error-prone reverse transcriptases may also be obtain by phage-assisted non-continuous evolution (PANCE),” which as used herein, refers to non-continuous evolution that employs phage as viral vectors. PANCE is a simplified technique for rapid in vivo directed evolution using serial flask transfers of evolving ‘selection phage’ (SP), which contain a gene of interest to be evolved, across fresh E. coli host cells, thereby allowing genes inside the host E. coli to be held constant while genes contained in the SP continuously evolve. Serial flask transfers have long served as a widely-accessible approach for laboratory evolution of microbes, and, more recently, analogous approaches have been developed for bacteriophage evolution. The PANCE system features lower stringency than the PACE system.
Other error-prone reverse transcriptases have been described in the literature, each of which are contemplated for use in the herein methods and compositions. For example, error-prone reverse transcriptases have been described in Bebenek et al., “Error-prone Polymerization by HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase,” J Biol Chem, 1993, Vol. 268: 10324-10334 and Sebastian-Martin et al., “Transcriptional inaccuracy threshold attenuates differences in RNA-dependent DNA synthesis fidelity between retroviral reverse transcriptases,” Scientific Reports, 2018, Vol. 8: 627, each of which are incorporated by reference. Still further, reverse transcriptases, including error-prone reverse transcriptases can be obtained from a commercial supplier, including ProtoScript® (II) Reverse Transcriptase, AMV Reverse Transcriptase, WarmStart® Reverse Transcriptase, and M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase, all from NEW ENGLAND BIOLABS®, or AMV Reverse Transcriptase XL, SMARTScribe Reverse Transcriptase, GPR ultra-pure MMLV Reverse Transcriptase, all from TAKARA BIO USA, INC. (formerly CLONTECH).
The herein disclosure also contemplates reverse transcriptases having mutations in RNaseH domain. As mentioned above, one of the intrinsic properties of reverse transcriptases is the RNase H activity, which cleaves the RNA template of the RNA:cDNA hybrid concurrently with polymerization. The RNase H activity can be undesirable for synthesis of long cDNAs because the RNA template may be degraded before completion of full-length reverse transcription. The RNase H activity may also lower reverse transcription efficiency, presumably due to its competition with the polymerase activity of the enzyme. Thus, the present disclosure contemplates any reverse transcriptase variants that comprise a modified RNaseH activity.
The herein disclosure also contemplates reverse transcriptases having mutations in the RNA-dependent DNA polymerase domain. As mentioned above, one of the intrinsic properties of reverse transcriptases is the RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity, which incorporates the nucleobases into the nascent cDNA strand as coded by the template RNA strand of the RNA:cDNA hybrid. The RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity can be increased or decreased (i.e., in terms of its rate of incorporation) to either increase or decrease the processivity of the enzyme. Thus, the present disclosure contemplates any reverse transcriptase variants that comprise a modified RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity such that the processivity of the enzyme of either increased or decreased relative to an unmodified version.
Also contemplated herein are reverse transcriptase variants that have altered thermostability characteristics. The ability of a reverse transcriptase to withstand high temperatures is an important aspect of cDNA synthesis. Elevated reaction temperatures help denature RNA with strong secondary structures and/or high GC content, allowing reverse transcriptases to read through the sequence. As a result, reverse transcription at higher temperatures enables full-length cDNA synthesis and higher yields, which can lead to an improved generation of the 3′ flap ssDNA as a result of the multi-flap prime editing process. Wild type M-MLV reverse transcriptase typically has an optimal temperature in the range of 37-48° C.; however, mutations may be introduced that allow for the reverse transcription activity at higher temperatures of over 48° C., including 49° C., 50° C., 51° C., 52° C., 53° C., 54° C., 55° C., 56° C., 57° C., 58° C., 59° C., 60° C., 61° C., 62° C., 63° C., 64° C., 65° C., 66° C., and higher.
The variant reverse transcriptases contemplated herein, including error-prone RTs, thermostable RTs, increase-processivity RTs, can be engineered by various routine strategies, including mutagenesis or evolutionary processes. In some cases, the variants can be produced by introducing a single mutation. In other cases, the variants may require more than one mutation. For those mutants comprising more than one mutation, the effect of a given mutation may be evaluated by introduction of the identified mutation to the wild-type gene by site-directed mutagenesis in isolation from the other mutations borne by the particular mutant. Screening assays of the single mutant thus produced will then allow the determination of the effect of that mutation alone.
Variant RT enzymes used herein may also include other “RT variants” having at least about 70% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 96% identical, at least about 97% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, at least about 99.5% identical, or at least about 99.9% identical to any reference RT protein, including any wild type RT, or mutant RT, or fragment RT, or other variant of RT disclosed or contemplated herein or known in the art.
In some embodiments, an RT variant may have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, or up to 100, or up to 200, or up to 300, or up to 400, or up to 500 or more amino acid changes compared to a reference RT. In some embodiments, the RT variant comprises a fragment of a reference RT, such that the fragment is at least about 70% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 96% identical, at least about 97% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, at least about 99.5% identical, or at least about 99.9% identical to the corresponding fragment of the reference RT. In some embodiments, the fragment is at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95% identical, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.5% of the amino acid length of a corresponding wild type RT (M-MLV reverse transcriptase) (e.g., SEQ ID NO: 89) or to any of the reverse transcriptases of SEQ ID NOs: 90-100.
In some embodiments, the disclosure also may utilize RT fragments which retain their functionality and which are fragments of any herein disclosed RT proteins. In some embodiments, the RT fragment is at least 100 amino acids in length. In some embodiments, the fragment is at least 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, or up to 600 or more amino acids in length.
In still other embodiments, the disclosure also may utilize RT variants which are truncated at the N-terminus or the C-terminus, or both, by a certain number of amino acids which results in a truncated variant which still retains sufficient polymerase function. In some embodiments, the RT truncated variant has a truncation of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 21, at least 22, at least 23, at least 24, at least 25, at least 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 180, 190, 200, 210, 220, 230, 240, or 250 amino acids at the N-terminal end of the protein. In other embodiments, the RT truncated variant has a truncation of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 21, at least 22, at least 23, at least 24, at least 25, at least 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 180, 190, 200, 210, 220, 230, 240, or 250 amino acids at the C-terminal end of the protein. In still other embodiments, the RT truncated variant has a trunction at the N-terminal and the C-terminal end which are the same or different lengths.
For example, the multi-flap prime editors disclosed herein may include a truncated version of M-MLV reverse transcriptase. In this embodiment, the reverse transcriptase contains 4 mutations (D200N, T306K, W313F, T330P; noting that the L603W mutation present in PE2 is no longer present due to the truncation). The DNA sequence encoding this truncated editor is 522 bp smaller than PE2, and therefore makes its potentially useful for applications where delivery of the DNA sequence is challenging due to its size (i.e., adeno-associated virus and lentivirus delivery). This embodiment is referred to as MMLV-RT(trunc) and has the following amino acid sequence:
TLNIEDEYRLHETSKEPDVSLGSTWLSDFPQAWAETGGMGLAVRQAPLIIP
LKATSTPVSIKQYPMSQEARLGIKPHIQRLLDQGILVPCQSPWNTPLLPVK
KPGTNDYRPVQDLREVNKRVEDIHPTVPNPYNLLSGLPPSHQWYTVLDLK
DAFFCLRLHPTSQPLFAFEWRDPEMGISGQLTWTRLPQGFKNSPTLFNEA
LHRDLADFRIQHPDLILLQYVDDLLLAATSELDCQQGTRALLQTLGNLGY
RASAKKAQICQKQVKYLGYLLKEGQRWLTEARKETVMGQPTPKTPRQLR
EFLGKAGFCRLFIPGFAEMAAPLYPLTKPGTLFNWGPDQQKAYQEIKQA
LLTAPALGLPDLTKPFELFVDEKQGYAKGVLTQKLGPWRRPVAYLSKKLD
PVAAGWPPCLRMVAAIAVLTKDAGKLTMGQPLVILAPHAVEALVKQPPD
RWLSNARMTHYQALLLDTDRVQFGPWALNPATLLPLPEEGLQHNCLDN
SRLIN (SEQ ID NO: 766)
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors disclosed herein may comprise one of the RT variants described herein, or a RT variant thereof having at least about 70% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 96% identical, at least about 97% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, at least about 99.5% identical, or at least about 99.9% identical to any reference Cas9 variants.
In still other embodiments, the present methods and compositions may utilize a DNA polymerase that has been evolved into a reverse transcriptase, as described in Effefson et al., “Synthetic evolutionary origin of a proofreading reverse transcriptase,” Science, Jun. 24, 2016, Vol. 352: 1590-1593, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In certain other embodiments, the reverse transcriptase is provided as a component of a fusion protein also comprising a napDNAbp. In other words, in some embodiments, the reverse transcriptase is fused to a napDNAbp as a fusion protein.
In various embodiments, variant reverse transcriptases can be engineered from wild type M-MLV reverse transcriptase as represented by SEQ ID NO: 89.
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising one or more of the following mutations: P51L, S67K, E69K, L139P, T197A, D200N, H204R, F209N, E302K, E302R, T306K, F309N, W313F, T330P, L345G, L435G, N454K, D524G, E562Q, D583N, H594Q, L603W, E607K, or D653N in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence.
Some exemplary reverse transcriptases that can be fused to napDNAbp proteins or provided as individual proteins according to various embodiments of this disclosure are provided below. Exemplary reverse transcriptases include variants with at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99% sequence identity to the following wild-type enzymes or partial enzymes:
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising one or more of the following mutations: P51X, S67X, E69X, L139X, T197X, D200X, H204X, F209X, E302X, T306X, F309X, W313X, T330X, L345X, L435X, N454X, D524X, E562X, D583X, H594X, L603X, E607X, or D653X in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a P51X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is L.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a S67X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is K.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a E69X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is K.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a L139X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is P.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a T197X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is A.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a D200X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is N.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a H204X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is R.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a F209X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is N.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a E302X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is K.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a E302X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is R.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a T306X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is K.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a F309X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is N.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a W313X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is F.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a T330X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is P.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a L345X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is G.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a L435X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is G.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a N454X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is K.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a D524X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is G.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a E562X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is Q.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a D583X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is N.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a H594X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is Q.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a L603X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is W.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a E607X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is K.
In various other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein (with RT provided as either a fusion partner or in trans) can include a variant RT comprising a D653X mutation in the wild type M-MLV RT of SEQ ID NO: 89 or at a corresponding amino acid position in another wild type RT polypeptide sequence, wherein “X” can be any amino acid. In certain embodiments, X is N.
Some exemplary reverse transcriptases that can be fused to napDNAbp proteins or provided as individual proteins according to various embodiments of this disclosure are provided below. Exemplary reverse transcriptases include variants with at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95% or at least 99% sequence identity to the following wild-type enzymes or partial enzymes:
The multi-flap prime editor system described here contemplates any publicly-available reverse transcriptase described or disclosed in any of the following U.S. patents (each of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties): U.S. Pat. Nos. 10,202,658; 10,189,831; 10,150,955; 9,932,567; 9,783,791; 9,580,698; 9,534,201; and 9,458,484, and any variant thereof that can be made using known methods for installing mutations, or known methods for evolving proteins. The following references describe reverse transcriptases in art. Each of their disclosures are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Any of the references noted above which relate to reverse transriptases are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties, if not already stated so.
[4] Prime Editors
The disclosure provides systems comprising prime editors. In one aspect, this disclosure provides systems for simultaneously editing both strands of a double-stranded DNA sequence at a target site to be edited comprising a first prime editor complex and a second prime editor complex, wherein each of the first and second prime editor complexes comprises (1) a prime editor comprising (i) a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp), and (ii) a polypeptide having an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity; and (2) a pegRNA comprising a spacer sequence, gRNA core, a DNA synthesis template, and a primer binding site, wherein the DNA synthesis template of the pegRNA of the first prime editor complex encodes a first single-stranded DNA sequence and the DNA synthesis template of the pegRNA of the second prime editor complex encodes a second single-stranded DNA sequence, wherein the first single-stranded DNA sequence and the second single-stranded DNA sequence each comprises a region of complementarity to the other, and wherein the first single-stranded DNA sequence and the second single-stranded DNA sequence form a duplex comprising an edited portion as compared to the DNA sequence at the target site to be edited, which integrates into the target site to be edited.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides systems for editing one or more double-stranded DNA sequences, the system comprising:
In some embodiments, the prime editors used in the systems described herein (e.g., the first prime editor, second prime editor, third prime editor, and/or fourth prime editor in the systems described above) are provided as fusion proteins. In some embodiments, the prime editor fusion proteins comprise a napDNAbp and a polymerase (e.g., DNA-dependent DNA polymerase or RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, such as, reverse transcriptase). In some embodiments, the napDNAbp and the polymerase are optionally joined by linker to form the fusion protein. Various configurations of the prime editor fusion proteins and additional domains of the fusion proteins are described further herein. In various embodiments, the systems and methods provided by the present disclosure contemplate the use of any of the prime editor fusion proteins described herein.
In some embodiments, the prime editor complexes used in the systems described herein comprise a prime editor (e.g., the first prime editor, second prime editor, third prime editor, and/or fourth prime editor in the systems described above) where the components of one or more of the prime editors are provided in trans, as is described in additional detail throughout the present specification. In some embodiments, the prime editor comprises a napDNAbp and a polymerase expressed in trans. In some embodiments, the napDNAbp and the polymerase are expressed from one or more vectors (e.g., both components are expressed from the same vector, or each component is expressed from a different vector). In certain embodiments, the prime editors comprise additional components as described herein expressed in trans. In some embodiments, the prime editors used in the systems described herein may comprise both one or more prime editors provided as fusion proteins and one or more prime editors whose components are provided in trans.
In some embodiments, the multi-flap prime editor systems described herein contemplate fusion proteins comprising a napDNAbp and a polymerase (e.g., DNA-dependent DNA polymerase or RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, such as, reverse transcriptase), and optionally joined by a linker. The application contemplates any suitable napDNAbp and polymerase (e.g., DNA-dependent DNA polymerase or RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, such as, reverse transcriptase) to be combined in a single fusion protein. Examples of napDNAbps and polymerases (e.g., DNA-dependent DNA polymerase or RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, such as, reverse transcriptase) are each defined herein. Since polymerases are well-known in the art, and the amino acid sequences are readily available, this disclosure is not meant in any way to be limited to those specific polymerases identified herein.
In various embodiments, the fusion proteins may comprise any suitable structural configuration. For example, the fusion protein may comprise from the N-terminus to the C-terminus direction, a napDNAbp fused to a polymerase (e.g., DNA-dependent DNA polymerase or RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, such as, reverse transcriptase). In other embodiments, the fusion protein may comprise from the N-terminus to the C-terminus direction, a polymerase (e.g., a reverse transcriptase) fused to a napDNAbp. The fused domain may optionally be joined by a linker, e.g., an amino acid sequence. In other embodiments, the fusion proteins may comprise the structure NH2-[napDNAbp]-[polymerase]-COOH; or NH2-[polymerase]-[napDNAbp]-COOH, wherein each instance of “]-[” indicates the presence of an optional linker sequence. In embodiments wherein the polymerase is a reverse transcriptase, the fusion proteins may comprise the structure NH2-[napDNAbp]-[RT]-COOH; or NH2-[RT]-[napDNAbp]-COOH, wherein each instance of “]-[” indicates the presence of an optional linker sequence.
An exemplary fusion protein is depicted in
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editor fusion protein may have the following amino acid sequence (referred to herein as “PE1”), which includes a Cas9 variant comprising an H840A mutation (i.e., a Cas9 nickase) and an M-MLV RT wild type, as well as an N-terminal NLS sequence (19 amino acids) and an amino acid linker (32 amino acids) that joins the C-terminus of the Cas9 nickase domain to the N-terminus of the RT domain. The PE1 fusion protein has the following structure: [NLS]-[Cas9(H840A)]-[linker]-[MMLV_RT(wt)]. The amino acid sequence of PE1 and its individual components are as follows:
MKRTADGSEFESPKKKRKV
DKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVPSKKFK
VLGNTDRHSIKKNLIGALLFDSGETAEATRLKRTARRRYTRRKNRICYLQ
EIFSNEMAKYDDSFFHRLEESFLVEEDKKHERHPIFGNIVDEVAYHEKYPT
IYHLRKKLVDSTDKADLRLIYLALAHMIKFRGHFLIEGDLNPDNSDVDKL
FIQLVQTYNQLFEENPINASGVDAKAILSARLSKSRRLENLIAQLPGEKKN
GLFGNLIALSLGLTPNFKSNFDLAEDAKLQLSKDTYDDDLDNLLAQIGDQ
YADLFLAAKNLSDAILLSDILRVNTEITKAPLSASMIKRYDEHHQDLTLLK
ALVRQQLPEKYKEIFFDQSKNGYAGYIDGGASQEEFYKFIKPILEKMDGT
EELLVKLNREDLLRKQRTFDNGSIPHQIHLGELHAILRRQEDFYPFLKDN
REKIEKILTFRIPYYVGPLARGNSRFAWMTRKSEETITPWNFEEVVDKGAS
AQSFIERMTNFDKNLPNEKVLPKHSLLYEYFTVYNELTKVKYVTEGMRK
PAFLSGEQKKAIVDLLFKTNRKVTVKQLKEDYFKKIECFDSVEISGVEDR
FNASLGTYHDLLKIIKDKDFLDNEENEDILEDIVLTLTLFEDREMIEERLKT
YAHLFDDKVMKQLKRRRYTGWGRLSRKLINGIRDKQSGKTILDFLKSDG
FANRNFMQLIHDDSLTFKEDIQKAQVSGQGDSLHEHIANLAGSPAIKKGIL
QTVKVVDELVKVMGRHKPENIVIEMARENQTTQKGQKNSRERMKRIEE
GIKELGSQILKEHPVENTQLQNEKLYLYYLQNGRDMYVDQELDINRLSDY
DVDAIVPQSFLKDDSIDNKVLTRSDKNRGKSDNVPSEEVVKKMKNYWRQ
LLNAKLITQRKFDNLTKAERGGLSELDKAGFIKRQLVETRQITKHVAQIL
DSRMNTKYDENDKLIREVKVITLKSKLVSDFRKDFQFYKVREINNYHHAH
DAYLNAVVGTALIKKYPKLESEFVYGDYKVYDVRKMIAKSEQEIGKATAK
YFFYSNIMNFFKTEITLANGEIRKRPLIETNGETGEIVWDKGRDFATVRKV
LSMPQVNIVKKTEVQTGGFSKESILPKRNSDKLIARKKDWDPKKYGGFD
SPTVAYSVLVVAKVEKGKSKKLKSVKELLGITIMERSSFEKNPIDFLEAKG
YKEVKKDLIIKLPKYSLFELENGRKRMLASAGELQKGNELALPSKYVNFL
YLASHYEKLKGSPEDNEQKQLFVEQHKHYLDEIIEQISEFSKRVILADANL
DKVLSAYNKHRDKPIREQAENIIHLFTLTNLGAPAAFKYFDTTIDRKRYTS
TKEVLDATLIHOSITGLYETRIDLSQLGGD
SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATP
ESSGGSSGGSS
TLNIEDEYRLHETSKEPDVSLGSTWLSDFPQAWAETGGMGLAVR
QAPLIIPLKATSTPVSIKQYPMSQEARLGIKPHIQRLLDQGILVPCQSPWNTPLLPVK
KPGTNDYRPVQDLREVNKRVEDIHPTVPNPYNLLSGLPPSHQWYTVLDLKDAFFC
LRLHPTSQPLFAFEWRDPEMGISGQLTWTRLPQGFKNSPTLFDEALHRDLADFRI
QHPDLILLQYVDDLLLAATSELDCQQGTRALLQTLGNLGYRASAKKAQICQKQVKY
LGYLLKEGQRWLTEARKETVMGQPTPKTPRQLREFLGTAGFCRLWIPGFAEMAAP
LYPLTKTGTLFNWGPDQQKAYQEIKQALLTAPALGLPDLTKPFELFVDEKQGYAK
GVLTQKLGPWRRPVAYLSKKLDPVAAGWPPCLRMVAAIAVLTKDAGKLTMGQPLV
ILAPHAVEALVKQPPDRWLSNARMTHYQALLLDTDRVQFGPWALNPATLLPLPEE
GLQHNCLDILAEAHGTRPDLTDQPLPDADHTWYTDGSSLLQEGQRKAGAAVTTET
EVIWAKALPAGTSAQRAELIALTQALKMAEGKKLNVYTDSRYAFATAHIHGEIYRRRG
LLTSEGKEIKNKDEILALLKALFLPKRLSHHCPGHQKGHSAEARGNRMADQAARK
AAITETPDTSTLLIENSSP
SGGSKRTADGSEFEPKKKRKV (SEQ ID NO: 123)
In another embodiment, the multi-flap prime editor fusion protein may have the following amino acid sequence (referred to herein as “PE2”), which includes a Cas9 variant comprising an H840A mutation (i.e., a Cas9 nickase) and an M-MLV RT comprising mutations D200N, T330P, L603W, T306K, and W313F, as well as an N-terminal NLS sequence (19 amino acids) and an amino acid linker (33 amino acids) that joins the C-terminus of the Cas9 nickase domain to the N-terminus of the RT domain. The PE2 fusion protein has the following structure: [NLS]-[Cas9(H840A)]-[linker]-[MMLV_RT(D200N)(T330P)(L603W)(T306K)(W313F)]. The amino acid sequence of PE2 is as follows:
MKRTADGSEFESPKKKRKV
DKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVPSKKFK
VLGNTDRHSIKKNLIGALLFDSGETAEATRLKRTARRRYTRRKNRICYLQ
EIFSNEMAKVDDSFFHRLEESFLVEEDKKHERHPIFGNIVDEVAYHEKYPT
IYHLRKKLVDSTDKADLRLIYLALAHMIKFRGHFLIEGDLNPDNSDVDKL
FIQLVQTYNQLFEENPINASGVDAKAILSARLSKSRRLENLIAQLPGEKKN
GLFGNLIALSLGLTPNFKSNFDLAEDAKLQLSKDTYDDDLDNLLAQIGDQ
YADLFLAAKNLSDAILLSDILRVNTEITKAPLSASMIKRYDEHHQDLTLLK
ALVRQQLPEKYKEIFFDQSKNGYAGYIDGGASQEEFYKFIKPILEKMDGT
EELLVKLNREDLLRKQRTFDNGSIPHQIHLGELHAILRRQEDFYPFLKDN
REKIEKILTFRIPYYVGPLARGNSRFAWMTRKSEETITPWNFEEVVDKGAS
AQSFIERMTNFDKNLPNEKVLPKHSLLYEYFTVYNELTKVKYVTEGMRK
PAFLSGEQKKAIVDLLFKTNRKVTVKQLKEDYFKKIECFDSVEISGVEDR
FNASLGTYHDLLKIIKDKDFLDNEENEDILEDIVLTLTLFEDREMIEERLKT
YAHLFDDKVMKQLKRRRYTGWGRLSRKLINGIRDKQSGKTILDFLKSDG
FANRNFMQLIHDDSLTFKEDIQKAQVSGQGDSLHEHIANLAGSPAIKKGIL
QTVKVVDELVKVMGRHKPENIVIEMARENQTTQKGQKNSRERMKRIEE
GIKELGSQILKEHPVENTQLQNEKLYLYYLQNGRDMYVDQELDINRLSDY
DVDAIVPQSFLKDDSIDNKVLTRSDKNRGKSDNVPSEEVVKKMKNYWRQ
LLNAKLITQRKFDNLTKAERGGLSELDKAGFIKRQLVETRQITKHVAQIL
DSRMNTKYDENDKLIREVKVITLKSKLVSDFRKDFQFYKVREINNYHHAH
DAYLNAVVGTALIKKYPKLESEFVYGDYKVYDVRKMIAKSEQEIGKATAK
YFFYSNIMNFFKTEITLANGEIRKRPLIETNGETGEIVWDKGRDFATVRKV
LSMPQVNIVKKTEVQTGGFSKESILPKRNSDKLIARKKDWDPKKYGGFD
SPTVAYSVLVVAKVEKGKSKKLKSVKELLGITIMERSSFEKNPIDFLEAKG
YKEVKKDLIIKLPKYSLFELENGRKRMLASAGELQKGNELALPSKYVNFL
YLASHYEKLKGSPEDNEQKQLFVEQHKHYLDEIIEQISEFSKRVILADANL
DKVLSAYNKHRDKPIREQAENIIHLFTLTNLGAPAAFKYFDTTIDRKRYTS
TKEVLDATLIHOSITGLYETRIDLSQLGGD
SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATP
ESSGGSSGGSS
TLNIEDEYRLHETSKEPDVSLGSTWLSDFPQAWAETGGMGLAVRQ
APLIIPLKATSTPVSIKQYPMSQEARLGIKPHIQRLLDQGILVPCQSPWNTPLLPV
KKPGTNDYRPVQDLREVNKRVEDIHPTVPNPYNLLSGLPPSHQWYTVLDLKDAFFC
LRLHPTSQPLFAFEWRDPEMGISGQLTWTRLPQGFKNSPTLFNEALHRDLADFRI
QHPDLILLQYVDDLLLAATSELDCQQGTRALLQTLGNLGYRASAKKAQICQKQVKY
LGYLLKEGQRWLTEARKETVMGQPTPKTPRQLREFLGKAGFCRLFIPGFAEMAAP
LYPLTKPGTLFNWGPDQQKAYQEIKQALLTAPALGLPDLTKPFELFVDEKQGYAK
GVLTQKLGPWRRPVAYLSKKLDPVAAGWPPCLRMVAAIAVLTKDAGKLTMGQPLV
ILAPHAVEALVKQPPDRWLSNARMTHYQALLLDTDRVQFGPWALNPATLLPLPEEG
LQHNCLDILAEAHGTRPDLTDQPLPDADHTWYTDGSSLLQEGQRKAGAAVTTETEV
IWAKALPAGTSAQRAELIALTQALKMAEGKKLNVYTDSRYAFATAHIHGEIYRRRG
WLTSEGKEIKNKDEILALLKALFLPKRLSIIHCPGHQKGHSAEARGNRMADQAARK
AAITETPDTSTLLIENSSP
SGGSKRTADGSEFEPKKKRKV (SEQ ID NO: 134)
In still other embodiments, the prime editor fusion protein may have the following amino acid sequences:
MKRYADGSEEESPKKKRKV
TLNIEDEYRLHETSKEPDVSLGSTWLSDFPQAWAETG
GMGLAVRQAPLIIPLKATSTPVSIKQYPMSQEARLGIKPHIQRLLDQGILVPCQSP
WNTPLLPVKKPGTNDYRPVQDLREVNKRVEDIHPTVPNPYNLLSGLPPSHQWYTV
LDLKDAFFCLRLHPTSQPLFAFEWRDPEMGISGQLTWTRLPQGFKNSPTLFDEAL
HRDLADFRIQHPDLILLQYVDDLLLAATSELDCQQGTRALLQTLGNLGYRASAKKA
QICQKQVKYLGYLLKEGQRWLTEARKETVMGQPTPKTPRQLREFLGTAGFCRLWI
PGFAEMAAPLYPLTKTGTLFNWGPDQQKAYQEIKQALLTAPALGLPDLTKPFELFV
DEKQGYAKGVLTQKLGPWRRPVAYLSKKLDPVAAGWPPCLRMVAAIAVLTKDAGK
LTMGQPLVILAPHAVEALVKQPPDRWLSNARMTHYQALLLDTDRVQFGPWALNP
ATLLPLPEEGLQHNCLDILAEAHGTRPDLTDQPLPDADHTWYTDGSSLLQEGQRKA
GAAVTTETEVIWAKALPAGTSAQRAELIALTQALKMAEGKKLNVYTDSRYAFATAHI
HGEIYRRRGLLTSEGKEIKNKDEILALLKALFLPKRLSHHCPGHQKGHSAEARGNR
MADQAARKAAITETPDTSTLLIENSSP
SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATPESSGGS
SGGSS
DKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVPSKKFKVLGNTDRHSIKKNL
IGALLFDSGETAEATRLKRTARRRYTRRKNRICYLQEIFSNEMAKVDDSFF
HRLEESFLVEEDKKHERHPIFGNIVDEVAYHEKYPTIYHLRKKLVDSTDKA
DLRLIYLALAHMIKFRGHFLIEGDLNPDNSDVDKLFIQLVQTYNQLFEENP
INASGVDAKAILSARLSKSRRLENLIAQLPGEKKNGLFGNLIALSLGLTPN
FKSNFDLAEDAKLQLSKDTYDDDLDNLLAQIGDQYADLFLAAKNLSDAIL
LSDILRYNTEITKAPLSASMIKRYDEHHQDLTLLKALVRQQLPEKYKEIFF
DQSKNGYAGYIDGGASQEEFYKFIKPILEKMDGTEELLVKLNREDLLRKQ
RTFDNGSIPHQIHLGELHAILRRQEDFYPFLKDNREKIEKILTFRIPYYVGP
LARGNSRFAWMTRKSEETITPWNFEEVVDKGASAQSFIERMTNFDKNLP
NEKVLPKHSLLYEYFTVYNELTKVKYVTEGMRKPAFLSGEQKKAIVDLLF
KTNRKVTVKQLKEDYFKKIECFDSVEISGVEDRFNASLGTYHDLLKIIKD
KDFLDNEENEDILEDIVLTLTLFEDREMIEERLKTYAHLFDDKVMKQLKR
RRYTGWGRLSRKLINGIRDKQSGKTILDFLKSDGFANRNFMQLIHDDSLT
FKEDIQKAQVSGQGDSLHEHIANLAGSPAIKKGILQTVKVVDELVKVMGR
HKPENIVIEMARENQTTQKGQKNSRERMKRIEEGIKELGSQILKEHPVEN
TQLQNEKLYLYYLQNGRDMYVDQELDINRLSDYDVDAIVPQSFLKDDSID
NKVLTRSDKNRGKSDNVPSEEVVKKMKNYWRQLLNAKLITQRKFDNLT
KAERGGLSELDKAGFIKRQLVETRQITKHVAQILDSRMNTKYDENDKLIR
EVKVITLKSKLVSDFRKDFQFYKVREINNYHHAHDAYLNAVVGTALIKKY
PKLESEFVYGDYKVYDVRKMIAKSEQEIGKATAKYFFYSNIMNFFKTEITL
ANGEIRKRPLIETNGETGEIVWDKGRDFATVRKVLSMPQVNIVKKTEVQT
GGFSKESILPKRNSDKLIARKKDWDPKKYGGFDSPTVAYSVLVVAKVEKG
KSKKLKSVKELLGITIMERSSFEKNPIDFLEAKGYKEVKKDLIIKLPKYSL
FELENGRKRMLASAGELQKGNELALPSKYVNFLYLASHYEKLKGSPEDN
EQKQLFVEQHKHYLDEIIEQISEFSKRVILADANLDKVLSAYNKHRDKPIR
EQAENIIHLFTLTNLGAPAAFKYFDTTIDRKRYTSTKEVLDATLIHQSITGL
YETRIDLSQLGGD
SGGSKRTADGSEFEPKKKRKV (SEQ ID NO: 145)
MKRTADGSEEESPKKKRKV
TLNIEDEYRLHETSKEPDVSLGSTWLSDFPQAWAET
GGMGLAVRQAPLIIPLKATSTPVSIKQYPMSQEARLGIKPHIQRLLDQGILVPCQSP
WNTPLLPVKKPGTNDYRPVQDLREVNKRVEDIHPTVPNPYNLLSGLPPSHQWYTV
LDLKDAFFCLRLHPTSQPLFAFEWRDPEMGISGQLTWTRLPQGFKNSPTLFDEAL
HRDLADFRIQHPDLILLQYVDDLLLAATSELDCQQGTRALLQTLGNLGYRASAKKA
QICQKQVKYLGYLLKEGQRWLTEARKETVMGQPTPKTPRQLREFLGTAGFCRLWI
PGFAEMAAPLYPLTKTGTLFNWGPDQQKAYQEIKQALLTAPALGLPDLTKPFELFV
DEKQGYAKGVLTQKLGPWRRPVAYLSKKLDPVAAGWPPCLRMVAAIAVLTKDAGK
LTMGQPLVILAPHAVEALVKQPPDRWLSNARMTHYQALLLDTDRVQFGPWALNP
ATLLPLPEEGLQHNCLDILAEAHGTRPDLTDQPLPDADHTWYTDGSSLLQEGQRKA
GAAVTTETEVIWAKALPAGTSAQRAELIALTQALKMAEGKKLNVYTDSRYAFATAHI
HGEIYRRRGLLTSEGKEIKNKDEILALLKALFLPKRLSHHCPGHQKGHSAEARGNR
MADQAARKAAITETPDTSTLLIENSSPS
GGSSGGSSGSETVGTSESATVESAGSN
PYDVPDYAGSAAPAAKKKKLDGSGSGGSSGGS
DKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWA
VITDEYKVPSKKFKVLGNTDRHSIKKNLIGALLFDSGETAEATRLKRTARR
RYTRRKNRICYLQEIFSNEMAKVDDSFFHRLEESFLVEEDKKHERHPIFG
NIVDEVAYHEKYPTIYHLRKKLVDSTDKADLRLIYLALAHMIKFRGHFLIE
GDLNPDNSDVDKLFIQLVQTYNQLFEENPINASGVDAKAILSARLSKSRRL
ENLIAQLPGEKKNGLFGNLIALSLGLTPNFKSNFDLAEDAKLQLSKDTYD
DDLDNLLAQIGDQYADLFLAAKNLSDAILLSDILRVNTEITKAPLSASMIK
RYDEHHQDLTLLKALVRQQLPEKYKEIFFDQSKNGYAGYIDGGASQEEFY
KFIKPILEKMDGTEELLVKLNREDLLRKQRTFDNGSIPHQIHLGELHAILR
RQEDFYPFLKDNREKIEKILTFRIPYYVGPLARGNSRFAWMTRKSEETITP
WNFEEVVDKGASAQSFIERMTNFDKNLPNEKVLPKHSLLYEYFTVYNELT
KVKYVTEGMRKPAFLSGEQKKAIVDLLFKTNRKVTVKQLKEDYFKKIEC
FDSVEISGVEDRFNASLGTYHDLLKIIKDKDFLDNEENEDILEDIVLTLTLF
EDREMIEERLKTYAHLFDDKVMKQLKRRRYTGWGRLSRKLINGIRDKQS
GKTILDFLKSDGFANRNFMQLIHDDSLTFKEDIQKAQVSGQGDSLHEHIA
NLAGSPAIKKGILQTVKVVDELVKVMGRHKPENIVIEMARENQTTQKGQ
KNSRERMKRIEEGIKELGSQILKEHPVENTQLQNEKLYLYYLQNGRDMY
VDQELDINRLSDYDVDAIVPQSFLKDDSIDNKVLTRSDKNRGKSDNVPSEE
VVKKMKNYWRQLLNAKLITQRKFDNLTKAERGGLSELDKAGFIKRQLV
ETRQITKHVAQILDSRMNTKYDENDKLIREVKVITLKSKLVSDFRKDFQF
YKVREINNYHHAHDAYLNAVVGTALIKKYPKLESEFVYGDYKVYDVRKM
IAKSEQEIGKATAKYFFYSNIMNFFKTEITLANGEIRKRPLIETNGETGEIV
WDKGRDFATVRKVLSMPQVNIVKKTEVQTGGFSKESILPKRNSDKLIARK
KDWDPKKYGGFDSPTVAYSVLVVAKVEKGKSKKLKSVKELLGITIMERSS
FEKNPIDFLEAKGYKEVKKDLIIKLPKYSLFELENGRKRMLASAGELQKG
NELALPSKYVNFLYLASHYEKLKGSPEDNEQKQLFVEQHKHYLDEIIEQIS
EFSKRVILADANLDKVLSAYNKHRDKPIREQAENIIHLFTLTNLGAPAAFK
YFDTTIDRKRYTSTKEVLDATLIHQSITGLYETRIDLSQLGGD
SGGSKRTAD
GSEFEPKKKRKV (SEQ ID NO: 150)
MKRTADGSEFESPKKKRKV
DKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVPSKKFK
VLGNTDRHSIKKNLIGALLFDSGETAEATRLKRTARRRYTRRKNRICYLQ
EIFSNEMAKYDDSFFHRLEESFLVEEDKKHERHPIFGNIVDEVAYHEKYPT
IYHLRKKLVDSTDKADLRLIYLALAHMIKFRGHFLIEGDLNPDNSDVDKL
FIQLVQTYNQLFEENPINASGVDAKAILSARLSKSRRLENLIAQLPGEKKN
GLFGNLIALSLGLTPNFKSNFDLAEDAKLQLSKDTYDDDLDNLLAQIGDQ
YADLFLAAKNLSDAILLSDILRVNTEITKAPLSASMIKRYDEHHQDLTLLK
ALVRQQLPEKYKEIFFDQSKNGYAGYIDGGASQEEFYKFIKPILEKMDGT
EELLVKLNREDLLRKQRTFDNGSIPHQIHLGELHAILRRQEDFYPFLKDN
REKIEKILTFRIPYYVGPLARGNSRFAWMTRKSEETITPWNFEEVVDKGAS
AQSFIERMTNFDKNLPNEKVLPKHSLLYEYFTVYNELTKVKYVTEGMRK
PAFLSGEQKKAIVDLLFKTNRKVTVKQLKEDYFKKIECFDSVEISGVEDR
FNASLGTYHDLLKIIKDKDFLDNEENEDILEDIVLTLTLFEDREMIEERLKT
YAHLFDDKVMKQLKRRRYTGWGRLSRKLINGIRDKQSGKTILDFLKSDG
FANRNFMQLIHDDSLTFKEDIQKAQVSGQGDSLHEHIANLAGSPAIKKGIL
QTVKVVDELVKVMGRHKPENIVIEMARENQTTQKGQKNSRERMKRIEE
GIKELGSQILKEHPVENTQLQNEKLYLYYLQNGRDMYVDQELDINRLSDY
DVDAIVPQSFLKDDSIDNKVLTRSDKNRGKSDNVPSEEVVKKMKNYWRQ
LLNAKLITQRKFDNLTKAERGGLSELDKAGFIKRQLVETRQITKHVAQIL
DSRMNTKYDENDKLIREVKVITLKSKLVSDFRKDFQFYKVREINNYHHAH
DAYLNAVVGTALIKKYPKLESEFVYGDYKVYDVRKMIAKSEQEIGKATAK
YFFYSNIMNFFKTEITLANGEIRKRPLIETNGETGEIVWDKGRDFATVRKV
LSMPQVNIVKKTEVQTGGFSKESILPKRNSDKLIARKKDWDPKKYGGFD
SPTVAYSVLVVAKVEKGKSKKLKSVKELLGITIMERSSFEKNPIDFLEAKG
YKEVKKDLIIKLPKYSLFELENGRKRMLASAGELQKGNELALPSKYVNFL
YLASHYEKLKGSPEDNEQKQLFVEQHKHYLDEIIEQISEFSKRVILADANL
DKVLSAYNKHRDKPIREQAENIIHLFTLTNLGAPAAFKYFDTTIDRKRYTS
TKEVLDATLIHQSITGLYETRIDLSQLGGD
SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATP
ESSGGSSGGSS
GIOGLAKLIADVAPSAIRENDIKSYFGRKVAIDASMSIYQFLIA
TLNIEDEYRLHETSKEPDVSLGSTWLSDFPQAWAETGGMGLAVRQAPLIIPLKATST
PVSIKQYPMSQEARLGIKPHIQRLLDQGILVPCQSPWNTPLLPVKKPGTNDYRPVQ
DLREVNKRVEDIHPTVPNPYNLLSGLPPSHQWYTVLDLKDAFFCLRLHPTSQPLFA
FEWRDPEMGISGQLTWTRLPQGFKNSPTLFNEALHRDLADFRIQHPDLILLQYVD
DLLLAATSELDCQQGTRALLQTLGNLGYRASAKKAQICQKQVKYLGYLLKEGQRW
LTEARKETVMGQPTPKTPRQLREFLGKAGFCRLFIPGFAEMAAPLYPLTKPGTLFN
WGPDQQKAYQEIKQALLTAPALGLPDLTKPFELFVDEKQGYAKGVLTQKLGPWRR
PVAYLSKKLDPVAAGWPPCLRMVAAIAVLTKDAGKLTMGQPLVILAPHAVEALVKQ
PPDRWLSNARMTHYQALLLDTDRVQFGPWALNPATLLPLPEEGLQHNCLDILAEA
HGTRPDLTDQPLPDADHTWYTDGSSLLQEGQRKAGAAVTTETEVIWAKALPAGTSA
QRAELIALTQALKMAEGKKLNVYTDSRYAFATAHIHGEIYRRRGWLTSEGKEIKNK
DEILALLKALFLPKRLSHHCPGHQKGHSAEARGNRMADQAARKAAITETPDTSTLL
IENSSP
SGGSKRTADGSEFEPKKKRKV (SEQIDNO: 154)
In other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editor fusion proteins can be based on SaCas9 or on SpCas9 nickases with altered PAM specificities, such as the following exemplary sequences:
In yet other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editor fusion proteins contemplated herein may include a Cas9 nickase (e.g., Cas9 (H840A)) fused to a truncated version of M-MLV reverse transcriptase. In this embodiment, the reverse transcriptase also contains 4 mutations (D200N, T306K, W313F, T330P; noting that the L603W mutation present in PE2 is no longer present due to the truncation). The DNA sequence encoding this truncated editor is 522 bp smaller than PE2, and therefore makes its potentially useful for applications where delivery of the DNA sequence is challenging due to its size (i.e. adeno-associated virus and lentivirus delivery). This embodiment is referred to as Cas9(H840A)-MMLV-RT(trunc) or “PE2-short” or “PE2-trunc” and has the following amino acid sequence:
MKRTADGSEFESPKKKRKVDKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVP
GTSESATPESSGGSSGGSSTLNIEDEYRLHETSKEPDVSLGSTWLSDFPQ
See
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editor fusion proteins contemplated herein may also include any variants of the above-disclosed sequences having an amino acid sequence that is at least about 70% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 96% identical, at least about 97% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, at least about 99.5% identical, or at least about 99.9% identical to PE1, PE2, or any of the above indicated prime editor fusion sequences.
In certain embodiments, linkers may be used to link any of the peptides or peptide domains or moieties of the invention (e.g., a napDNAbp linked or fused to a reverse transcriptase).
[5] Linkers and Other Domains
The PE fusion proteins may comprise various other domains besides the napDNAbp (e.g., Cas9 domain) and the polymerase domain (e.g., RT domain). For example, in the case where the napDNAbp is a Cas9 and the polymerase is a RT, the PE fusion proteins may comprise one or more linkers that join the Cas9 domain with the RT domain. The linkers may also join other functional domains, such as nuclear localization sequences (NLS) or a FEN1 (or other flap endonuclease) to the PE fusion proteins or a domain thereof.
In addition, in embodiments involving trans prime editing, linkers may be used to link tPERT recruitment protein to a prime editor, e.g., between the tPERt recruitment protein and the napDNAbp. See e.g.,
A. Linkers
As defined above, the term “linker,” as used herein, refers to a chemical group or a molecule linking two molecules or moieties, e.g., a binding domain and a cleavage domain of a nuclease. In some embodiments, a linker joins a gRNA binding domain of an RNA-programmable nuclease and the catalytic domain of a polymerase (e.g., a reverse transcriptase). In some embodiments, a linker joins a dCas9 and reverse transcriptase. Typically, the linker is positioned between, or flanked by, two groups, molecules, or other moieties and connected to each one via a covalent bond, thus connecting the two. In some embodiments, the linker is an amino acid or a plurality of amino acids (e.g., a peptide or protein). In some embodiments, the linker is an organic molecule, group, polymer, or chemical moiety. In some embodiments, the linker is 5-100 amino acids in length, for example, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 30-35, 35-40, 40-45, 45-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, 80-90, 90-100, 100-150, or 150-200 amino acids in length. Longer or shorter linkers are also contemplated.
The linker may be as simple as a covalent bond, or it may be a polymeric linker many atoms in length. In certain embodiments, the linker is a polpeptide or based on amino acids. In other embodiments, the linker is not peptide-like. In certain embodiments, the linker is a covalent bond (e.g., a carbon-carbon bond, disulfide bond, carbon-heteroatom bond, etc.). In certain embodiments, the linker is a carbon-nitrogen bond of an amide linkage. In certain embodiments, the linker is a cyclic or acyclic, substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranched aliphatic or heteroaliphatic linker. In certain embodiments, the linker is polymeric (e.g., polyethylene, polyethylene glycol, polyamide, polyester, etc.). In certain embodiments, the linker comprises a monomer, dimer, or polymer of aminoalkanoic acid. In certain embodiments, the linker comprises an aminoalkanoic acid (e.g., glycine, ethanoic acid, alanine, beta-alanine, 3-aminopropanoic acid, 4-aminobutanoic acid, 5-pentanoic acid, etc.). In certain embodiments, the linker comprises a monomer, dimer, or polymer of aminohexanoic acid (Ahx). In certain embodiments, the linker is based on a carbocyclic moiety (e.g., cyclopentane, cyclohexane). In other embodiments, the linker comprises a polyethylene glycol moiety (PEG). In other embodiments, the linker comprises amino acids. In certain embodiments, the linker comprises a peptide. In certain embodiments, the linker comprises an aryl or heteroaryl moiety. In certain embodiments, the linker is based on a phenyl ring. The linker may included funtionalized moieties to facilitate attachment of a nucleophile (e.g., thiol, amino) from the peptide to the linker. Any electrophile may be used as part of the linker. Exemplary electrophiles include, but are not limited to, activated esters, activated amides, Michael acceptors, alkyl halides, aryl halides, acyl halides, and isothiocyanates.
In some other embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence (GGGGS)n (SEQ ID NO: 165), (G)n (SEQ ID NO: 166), (EAAAK)n (SEQ ID NO: 167), (GGS)n (SEQ ID NO: 168), (SGGS)n(SEQ ID NO: 169), (XP)n (SEQ ID NO: 170), or any combination thereof, wherein n is independently an integer between 1 and 30, and wherein X is any amino acid. In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence (GGS)N(SEQ ID NO: 176), wherein n is 1, 3, or 7. In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGSETPGTSESATPES (SEQ ID NO: 171). In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATPESSGGSSGGS (SEQ ID NO: 172). In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGGSGGSGGS (SEQ ID NO: 173). In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGGS (SEQ ID NO: 174). In other embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATPESAGSYPYDVPDYAGSAAPAAKKKKLDGSGSGGSSGGS (SEQ ID NO: 175, 60AA).
In certain embodiments, linkers may be used to link any of the peptides or peptide domains or moieties of the invention (e.g., a napDNAbp linked or fused to a reverse transcriptase).
As defined above, the term “linker,” as used herein, refers to a chemical group or a molecule linking two molecules or moieties, e.g., a binding domain and a cleavage domain of a nuclease. In some embodiments, a linker joins a gRNA binding domain of an RNA-programmable nuclease and the catalytic domain of a recombinase. In some embodiments, a linker joins a dCas9 and reverse transcriptase. Typically, the linker is positioned between, or flanked by, two groups, molecules, or other moieties and connected to each one via a covalent bond, thus connecting the two. In some embodiments, the linker is an amino acid or a plurality of amino acids (e.g., a peptide or protein). In some embodiments, the linker is an organic molecule, group, polymer, or chemical moiety. In some embodiments, the linker is 5-100 amino acids in length, for example, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 30-35, 35-40, 40-45, 45-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, 80-90, 90-100, 100-150, or 150-200 amino acids in length. Longer or shorter linkers are also contemplated.
The linker may be as simple as a covalent bond, or it may be a polymeric linker many atoms in length. In certain embodiments, the linker is a polypeptide or based on amino acids. In other embodiments, the linker is not peptide-like. In certain embodiments, the linker is a covalent bond (e.g., a carbon-carbon bond, disulfide bond, carbon-heteroatom bond, etc.). In certain embodiments, the linker is a carbon-nitrogen bond of an amide linkage. In certain embodiments, the linker is a cyclic or acyclic, substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranched aliphatic or heteroaliphatic linker. In certain embodiments, the linker is polymeric (e.g., polyethylene, polyethylene glycol, polyamide, polyester, etc.). In certain embodiments, the linker comprises a monomer, dimer, or polymer of aminoalkanoic acid. In certain embodiments, the linker comprises an aminoalkanoic acid (e.g., glycine, ethanoic acid, alanine, beta-alanine, 3-aminopropanoic acid, 4-aminobutanoic acid, 5-pentanoic acid, etc.). In certain embodiments, the linker comprises a monomer, dimer, or polymer of aminoHEXAnoic acid (Ahx). In certain embodiments, the linker is based on a carbocyclic moiety (e.g., cyclopentane, cycloHEXAne). In other embodiments, the linker comprises a polyethylene glycol moiety (PEG). In other embodiments, the linker comprises amino acids. In certain embodiments, the linker comprises a peptide. In certain embodiments, the linker comprises an aryl or heteroaryl moiety. In certain embodiments, the linker is based on a phenyl ring. The linker may included funtionalized moieties to facilitate attachment of a nucleophile (e.g., thiol, amino) from the peptide to the linker. Any electrophile may be used as part of the linker. Exemplary electrophiles include, but are not limited to, activated esters, activated amides, Michael acceptors, alkyl halides, aryl halides, acyl halides, and isothiocyanates.
In some other embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence (GGGGS)n (SEQ ID NO: 165), (G)n (SEQ ID NO: 166), (EAAAK)n (SEQ ID NO: 167), (GGS)n (SEQ ID NO: 168), (SGGS)n (SEQ ID NO: 169), (XP)n (SEQ ID NO: 170), or any combination thereof, wherein n is independently an integer between 1 and 30, and wherein X is any amino acid. In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence (GGS)N(SEQ ID NO: 176), wherein n is 1, 3, or 7. In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGSETPGTSESATPES (SEQ ID NO: 171). In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATPESSGGSSGGS (SEQ ID NO: 172). In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGGSGGSGGS (SEQ ID NO: 173). In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGGS (SEQ ID NO: 174).
In particular, the following linkers can be used in various embodiments to join prime editor domains with one another:
B. Nuclear Localization Sequence (NLS)
In various embodiments, the PE fusion proteins may comprise one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLS), which help promote translocation of a protein into the cell nucleus. Such sequences are well-known in the art and can include the following examples:
The NLS examples above are non-limiting. The PE fusion proteins may comprise any known NLS sequence, including any of those described in Cokol et al., “Finding nuclear localization signals,” EMBO Rep., 2000, 1(5): 411-415 and Freitas et al., “Mechanisms and Signals for the Nuclear Import of Proteins,” Current Genomics, 2009, 10(8): 550-7, each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors and constructs encoding the prime editors disclosed herein further comprise one or more, preferably, at least two nuclear localization signals. In certain embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors comprise at least two NLSs. In embodiments with at least two NLSs, the NLSs can be the same NLSs or they can be different NLSs. In addition, the NLSs may be expressed as part of a fusion protein with the remaining portions of the multi-flap prime editors. In some embodiments, one or more of the NLSs are bipartite NLSs (“bpNLS”). In certain embodiments, the disclosed fusion proteins comprise two bipartite NLSs. In some embodiments, the disclosed fusion proteins comprise more than two bipartite NLSs.
The location of the NLS fusion can be at the N-terminus, the C-terminus, or within a sequence of a prime editor (e.g., inserted between the encoded napDNAbp component (e.g., Cas9) and a polymerase domain (e.g., a reverse transcriptase domain).
The NLSs may be any known NLS sequence in the art. The NLSs may also be any future-discovered NLSs for nuclear localization. The NLSs also may be any naturally-occurring NLS, or any non-naturally occurring NLS (e.g., an NLS with one or more desired mutations).
The term “nuclear localization sequence” or “NLS” refers to an amino acid sequence that promotes import of a protein into the cell nucleus, for example, by nuclear transport. Nuclear localization sequences are known in the art and would be apparent to the skilled artisan. For example, NLS sequences are described in Plank et al., International PCT application PCT/EP2000/011690, filed Nov. 23, 2000, published as WO/2001/038547 on May 31, 2001, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. In some embodiments, an NLS comprises the amino acid sequence PKKKRKV (SEQ ID NO: 16), MDSLLMNRRKFLYQFKNVRWAKGRRETYLC (SEQ ID NO: 17), KRTADGSEFESPKKKRKV (SEQ ID NO: 3864), or KRTADGSEFEPKKKRKV (SEQ ID NO: 125). In other embodiments, NLS comprises the amino acid sequences NLSKRPAAIKKAGQAKKKK (SEQ ID NO: 136), PAAKRVKLD (SEQ ID NO: 192), RQRRNELKRSF (SEQ ID NO: 3934), NQSSNFGPMKGGNFGGRSSGPYGGGGQYFAKPRNQGGY (SEQ ID NO: 3935).
In one aspect of the disclosure, a multi-flap prime editor may be modified with one or more nuclear localization signals (NLS), preferably at least two NLSs. In certain embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors are modified with two or more NLSs. The disclosure contemplates the use of any nuclear localization signal known in the art at the time of the disclosure, or any nuclear localization signal that is identified or otherwise made available in the state of the art after the time of the instant filing. A representative nuclear localization signal is a peptide sequence that directs the protein to the nucleus of the cell in which the sequence is expressed. A nuclear localization signal is predominantly basic, can be positioned almost anywhere in a protein's amino acid sequence, generally comprises a short sequence of four amino acids (Autieri & Agrawal, (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273: 14731-37, incorporated herein by reference) to eight amino acids, and is typically rich in lysine and arginine residues (Magin et al., (2000) Virology 274: 11-16, incorporated herein by reference). Nuclear localization signals often comprise proline residues. A variety of nuclear localization signals have been identified and have been used to effect transport of biological molecules from the cytoplasm to the nucleus of a cell. See, e.g., Tinland et al., (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89:7442-46; Moede et al., (1999) FEBS Lett. 461:229-34, which is incorporated by reference. Translocation is currently thought to involve nuclear pore proteins.
Most NLSs can be classified in three general groups: (i) a monopartite NLS exemplified by the SV40 large T antigen NLS (PKKKRKV (SEQ ID NO: 16)); (ii) a bipartite motif consisting of two basic domains separated by a variable number of spacer amino acids and exemplified by the Xenopus nucleoplasmin NLS (KRXXXXXXXXXXKKKL (SEQ ID NO: 3936))); and (iii) noncanonical sequences such as M9 of the hnRNP A1 protein, the influenza virus nucleoprotein NLS, and the yeast Gal4 protein NLS (Dingwall and Laskey 1991).
Nuclear localization signals appear at various points in the amino acid sequences of proteins. NLS's have been identified at the N-terminus, the C-terminus, and in the central region of proteins. Thus, the disclosure provides multi-flap prime editors that may be modified with one or more NLSs at the C-terminus, the N-terminus, as well as at an internal region of the multi-flap prime editor. The residues of a longer sequence that do not function as component NLS residues should be selected so as not to interfere, for example tonically or sterically, with the nuclear localization signal itself. Therefore, although there are no strict limits on the composition of an NLS-comprising sequence, in practice, such a sequence can be functionally limited in length and composition.
The present disclosure contemplates any suitable means by which to modify a multi-flap prime editor to include one or more NLSs. In one aspect, the multi-flap prime editors may be engineered to express a prime editor protein that is translationally fused at its N-terminus or its C-terminus (or both) to one or more NLSs, i.e., to form a prime editor-NLS fusion construct. In other embodiments, the prime editor-encoding nucleotide sequence may be genetically modified to incorporate a reading frame that encodes one or more NLSs in an internal region of the encoded prime editor. In addition, the NLSs may include various amino acid linkers or spacer regions encoded between the prime editor and the N-terminally, C-terminally, or internally-attached NLS amino acid sequence, e.g., and in the central region of proteins. Thus, the present disclosure also provides for nucleotide constructs, vectors, and host cells for expressing fusion proteins that comprise a prime editor and one or more NLSs.
The multi-flap prime editors described herein may also comprise nuclear localization signals which are linked to a prime editor through one or more linkers, e.g., and polymeric, amino acid, nucleic acid, polysaccharide, chemical, or nucleic acid linker element. The linkers within the contemplated scope of the disclosure are not intended to have any limitations and can be any suitable type of molecule (e.g., polymer, amino acid, polysaccharide, nucleic acid, lipid, or any synthetic chemical linker domain) and be joined to the prime editor by any suitable strategy that effectuates forming a bond (e.g., covalent linkage, hydrogen bonding) between the prime editor and the one or more NLSs.
C. Flap Endonucleases (e.g., FEN1)
In various embodiments, the PE fusion proteins may comprise one or more flap endonulceases (e.g., FEN1), which refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the removal of 5′ single strand DNA flaps. These are naturally occurring enzymes that process the removal of 5′ flaps formed during cellular processes, including DNA replication. The multi-flap prime editing methods herein described may utilize endogenously supplied flap endonucleases or those provided in trans to remove the 5′ flap of endogenouse DNA formed at the target site during multi-flap prime editing. Flap endonucleases are known in the art and can be found described in Patel et al., “Flap endonucleases pass 5′-flaps through a flexible arch using a disorder-thread-order mechanism to confer specificity for free 5′-ends,” Nucleic Acids Research, 2012, 40(10): 4507-4519 and Tsutakawa et al., “Human flap endonuclease structures, DNA double-base flipping, and a unified understanding of the FEN1 superfamily,” Cell, 2011, 145(2): 198-211 (each of which are incorporated herein by reference). An exemplary flap endonuclease is FEN1, which can be represented by the following amino acid sequence:
The flap endonucleases may also include any FEN1 variant, mutant, or other flap endonuclease ortholog, homolog, or variant. Non-limiting FEN1 variant examples are as follows:
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editor fusion proteins contemplated herein may include any flap endonulcease variant of the above-disclosed sequences having an amino acid sequence that is at least about 70% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 96% identical, at least about 97% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, at least about 99.5% identical, or at least about 99.9% identical to any of the above sequences.
Other endonucleases that may be utilized by the instant methods to facilitate removal of the 5′ end single strand DNA flap include, but are not limited to (1) trex 2, (2) exo1 endonuclease (e.g., Keijzers et al., Biosci Rep. 2015, 35(3): e00206)
Trex 2
3′ three prime repair exonuclease 2 (TREX2)-human
Accession No. NM_080701
3′ three prime repair exonuclease 2 (TREX2)-mouse
Accession No. NM_011907
3′ three prime repair exonuclease 2 (TREX2)-rat
Accession No. NM_001107580
ExoI
Human exonuclease 1 (EXO1) has been implicated in many different DNA metabolic processes, including DNA mismatch repair (MMR), micro-mediated end-joining, homologous recombination (HR), and replication. Human EXO1 belongs to a family of eukaryotic nucleases, Rad2/XPG, which also include FEN1 and GEN1. The Rad2/XPG family is conserved in the nuclease domain through species from phage to human. The EXO1 gene product exhibits both 5′ exonuclease and 5′ flap activity. Additionally, EXO1 contains an intrinsic 5′ RNase H activity. Human EXO1 has a high affinity for processing double stranded DNA (dsDNA), nicks, gaps, pseudo Y structures and can resolve Holliday junctions using its inherit flap activity. Human EXO1 is implicated in MMR and contain conserved binding domains interacting directly with MLH1 and MSH2. EXO1 nucleolytic activity is positively stimulated by PCNA, MutSα (MSH2/MSH6 complex), 14-3-3, MRN and 9-1-1 complex.
exonuclease 1 (EXO1) Accession No. NM_003686 (Homo sapiens exonuclease 1 (EXO1), transcript variant 3)-isoform A
exonuclease 1 (EXO1) Accession No. NM_006027 (Homo sapiens exonuclease 1 (EXO1), transcript variant 3)-isoform B
exonuclease 1 (EXO1) Accession No. NM_001319224 (Homo sapiens exonuclease 1 (EXO1), transcript variant 4)-isoform C
D. Inteins and Split-Inteins
It will be understood that in some embodiments (e.g., delivery of a multi-flap prime editor in vivo using AAV particles), it may be advantageous to split a polypeptide (e.g., a deaminase or a napDNAbp) or a fusion protein (e.g., a multi-flap prime editor) into an N-terminal half and a C-terminal half, delivery them separately, and then allow their colocalization to reform the complete protein (or fusion protein as the case may be) within the cell. Separate halves of a protein or a fusion protein may each comprise a split-intein tag to facilitate the reformation of the complete protein or fusion protein by the mechanism of protein trans splicing.
Protein trans-splicing, catalyzed by split inteins, provides an entirely enzymatic method for protein ligation. A split-intein is essentially a contiguous intein (e.g. a mini-intein) split into two pieces named N-intein and C-intein, respectively. The N-intein and C-intein of a split intein can associate non-covalently to form an active intein and catalyze the splicing reaction essentially in same way as a contiguous intein does. Split inteins have been found in nature and also engineered in laboratories. As used herein, the term “split intein” refers to any intein in which one or more peptide bond breaks exists between the N-terminal and C-terminal amino acid sequences such that the N-terminal and C-terminal sequences become separate molecules that can non-covalently reassociate, or reconstitute, into an intein that is functional for trans-splicing reactions. Any catalytically active intein, or fragment thereof, may be used to derive a split intein for use in the methods of the invention. For example, in one aspect the split intein may be derived from a eukaryotic intein. In another aspect, the split intein may be derived from a bacterial intein. In another aspect, the split intein may be derived from an archaeal intein. Preferably, the split intein so-derived will possess only the amino acid sequences essential for catalyzing trans-splicing reactions.
As used herein, the “N-terminal split intein (In)” refers to any intein sequence that comprises an N-terminal amino acid sequence that is functional for trans-splicing reactions. An In thus also comprises a sequence that is spliced out when trans-splicing occurs. An In can comprise a sequence that is a modification of the N-terminal portion of a naturally occurring intein sequence. For example, an In can comprise additional amino acid residues and/or mutated residues so long as the inclusion of such additional and/or mutated residues does not render the In non-functional in trans-splicing. Preferably, the inclusion of the additional and/or mutated residues improves or enhances the trans-splicing activity of the In.
As used herein, the “C-terminal split intein (Ic)” refers to any intein sequence that comprises a C-terminal amino acid sequence that is functional for trans-splicing reactions. In one aspect, the Ic comprises 4 to 7 contiguous amino acid residues, at least 4 amino acids of which are from the last β-strand of the intein from which it was derived. An Ic thus also comprises a sequence that is spliced out when trans-splicing occurs. An Ic can comprise a sequence that is a modification of the C-terminal portion of a naturally occurring intein sequence. For example, an Ic can comprise additional amino acid residues and/or mutated residues so long as the inclusion of such additional and/or mutated residues does not render the In non-functional in trans-splicing. Preferably, the inclusion of the additional and/or mutated residues improves or enhances the trans-splicing activity of the Ic.
In some embodiments of the invention, a peptide linked to an Ic or an In can comprise an additional chemical moiety including, among others, fluorescence groups, biotin, polyethylene glycol (PEG), amino acid analogs, unnatural amino acids, phosphate groups, glycosyl groups, radioisotope labels, and pharmaceutical molecules. In other embodiments, a peptide linked to an Ic can comprise one or more chemically reactive groups including, among others, ketone, aldehyde, Cys residues and Lys residues. The N-intein and C-intein of a split intein can associate non-covalently to form an active intein and catalyze the splicing reaction when an “intein-splicing polypeptide (ISP)” is present. As used herein, “intein-splicing polypeptide (ISP)” refers to the portion of the amino acid sequence of a split intein that remains when the Ic, In, or both, are removed from the split intein. In certain embodiments, the In comprises the ISP. In another embodiment, the Ic comprises the ISP. In yet another embodiment, the ISP is a separate peptide that is not covalently linked to In nor to Ic.
Split inteins may be created from contiguous inteins by engineering one or more split sites in the unstructured loop or intervening amino acid sequence between the −12 conserved beta-strands found in the structure of mini-inteins. Some flexibility in the position of the split site within regions between the beta-strands may exist, provided that creation of the split will not disrupt the structure of the intein, the structured beta-strands in particular, to a sufficient degree that protein splicing activity is lost.
In protein trans-splicing, one precursor protein consists of an N-extein part followed by the N-intein, another precursor protein consists of the C-intein followed by a C-extein part, and a trans-splicing reaction (catalyzed by the N- and C-inteins together) excises the two intein sequences and links the two extein sequences with a peptide bond. Protein trans-splicing, being an enzymatic reaction, can work with very low (e.g. micromolar) concentrations of proteins and can be carried out under physiological conditions.
Exemplary sequences are as follows:
Although inteins are most frequently found as a contiguous domain, some exist in a naturally split form. In this case, the two fragments are expressed as separate polypeptides and must associate before splicing takes place, so-called protein trans-splicing.
An exemplary split intein is the Ssp DnaE intein, which comprises two subunits, namely, DnaE-N and DnaE-C. The two different subunits are encoded by separate genes, namely dnaE-n and dnaE-c, which encode the DnaE-N and DnaE-C subunits, respectively. DnaE is a naturally occurring split intein in Synechocytis sp. PCC6803 and is capable of directing trans-splicing of two separate proteins, each comprising a fusion with either DnaE-N or DnaE-C.
Additional naturally occurring or engineered split-intein sequences are known in the or can be made from whole-intein sequences described herein or those available in the art. Examples of split-intein sequences can be found in Stevens et al., “A promiscuous split intein with expanded protein engineering applications,” PNAS, 2017, Vol. 114: 8538-8543; Iwai et al., “Highly efficient protein trans-splicing by a naturally split DnaE intein from Nostc punctiforme, FEBS Lett, 580: 1853-1858, each of which are incorporated herein by reference. Additional split intein sequences can be found, for example, in WO 2013/045632, WO 2014/055782, WO 2016/069774, and EP2877490, the contents each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In addition, protein splicing in trans has been described in vivo and in vitro (Shingledecker, et al., Gene 207:187 (1998), Southworth, et al., EMBO J. 17:918 (1998); Mills, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95:3543-3548 (1998); Lew, et al., J. Biol. Chem., 273:15887-15890 (1998); Wu, et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 35732:1 (1998b), Yamazaki, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120:5591 (1998), Evans, et al., J. Biol. Chem. 275:9091 (2000); Otomo, et al., Biochemistry 38:16040-16044 (1999); Otomo, et al., J. Biolmol. NMR 14:105-114 (1999); Scott, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:13638-13643 (1999)) and provides the opportunity to express a protein as to two inactive fragments that subsequently undergo ligation to form a functional product, e.g., as shown in
E. RNA-Protein Interaction Domain
In various embodiments, two separate protein domains (e.g., a Cas9 domain and a polymerase domain) may be colocalized to one another to form a functional complex (akin to the function of a fusion protein comprising the two separate protein domains) by using an “RNA-protein recruitment system,” such as the “MS2 tagging technique.” Such systems generally tag one protein domain with an “RNA-protein interaction domain” (aka “RNA-protein recruitment domain”) and the other with an “RNA-binding protein” that specifically recognizes and binds to the RNA-protein interaction domain, e.g., a specific hairpin structure. These types of systems can be leveraged to colocalize the domains of a multi-flap prime editor, as well as to recruitment additional functionalities to a multi-flap prime editor, such as a UGI domain. In one example, the MS2 tagging technique is based on the natural interaction of the MS2 bacteriophage coat protein (“MCP” or “MS2cp”) with a stem-loop or hairpin structure present in the genome of the phage, i.e., the “MS2 hairpin.” In the case of the MS2 hairpin, it is recognized and bound by the MS2 bacteriophage coat protein (MCP). Thus, in one exemplarily scenario a deaminase-MS2 fusion can recruit a Cas9-MCP fusion.
A review of other modular RNA-protein interaction domains are described in the art, for example, in Johansson et al., “RNA recognition by the MS2 phage coat protein,” Sem Virol., 1997, Vol. 8(3): 176-185; Delebecque et al., “Organization of intracellular reactions with rationally designed RNA assemblies,” Science, 2011, Vol. 333: 470-474; Mali et al., “Cas9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering,” Nat. Biotechnol., 2013, Vol. 31: 833-838; and Zalatan et al., “Engineering complex synthetic transcriptional programs with CRISPR RNA scaffolds,” Cell, 2015, Vol. 160: 339-350, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Other systems include the PP7 hairpin, which specifically recruits the PCP protein, and the “com” hairpin, which specifically recruits the Com protein. See Zalatan et al.
The nucleotide sequence of the MS2 hairpin (or equivalently referred to as the “MS2 aptamer”) is: GCCAACATGAGGATCACCCATGTCTGCAGGGCC (SEQ ID NO: 763).
The amino acid sequence of the MCP or MS2cp is: GSASNFTQFVLVDNGGTGDVTVAPSNFANGVAEWISSNSRSQAYKVTCSVRQSSAQNRKYTIKV EVPKVATQTVGGEELPVAGWRSYLNMELTIPIFATNSDCELIVKAMQGLLKDGNPIPSAIAANSGI Y (SEQ ID NO: 764).
F. UGI Domain
In other embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein may comprise one or more uracil glycosylase inhibitor domains. The term “uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI)” or “UGI domain,” as used herein, refers to a protein that is capable of inhibiting a uracil-DNA glycosylase base-excision repair enzyme. In some embodiments, a UGI domain comprises a wild-type UGI or a UGI as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3873. In some embodiments, the UGI proteins provided herein include fragments of UGI and proteins homologous to a UGI or a UGI fragment. For example, in some embodiments, a UGI domain comprises a fragment of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3873. In some embodiments, a UGI fragment comprises an amino acid sequence that comprises at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.5% of the amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3873. In some embodiments, a UGI comprises an amino acid sequence homologous to the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3873, or an amino acid sequence homologous to a fragment of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3873. In some embodiments, proteins comprising UGI or fragments of UGI or homologs of UGI or UGI fragments are referred to as “UGI variants.” A UGI variant shares homology to UGI, or a fragment thereof. For example a UGI variant is at least 70% identical, at least 75% identical, at least 80% identical, at least 85% identical, at least 90% identical, at least 95% identical, at least 96% identical, at least 97% identical, at least 98% identical, at least 99% identical, at least 99.5% identical, or at least 99.9% identical to a wild type UGI or a UGI as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3873. In some embodiments, the UGI variant comprises a fragment of UGI, such that the fragment is at least 70% identical, at least 80% identical, at least 90% identical, at least 95% identical, at least 96% identical, at least 97% identical, at least 98% identical, at least 99% identical, at least 99.5% identical, or at least 99.9% to the corresponding fragment of wild-type UGI or a UGI as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3873. In some embodiments, the UGI comprises the following amino acid sequence:
Uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor:
>sp|P14739|UNGI_BPPB2 MTNLSDIIEKETGKQLVIQESILMLPEEVEEVIGNKPESDILVHTAYDESTDENVMLLTSDAPEYKP WALVIQDSNGENKIKML (SEQ ID NO: 3873).
The multi-flap prime editors described herein may comprise more than one UGI domain, which may be separated by one or more linkers as described herein.
G. Additional PE Elements
In certain embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors described herein may comprise an inhibitor of base repair. The term “inhibitor of base repair” or “IBR” refers to a protein that is capable in inhibiting the activity of a nucleic acid repair enzyme, for example a base excision repair enzyme. In some embodiments, the IBR is an inhibitor of OGG base excision repair. In some embodiments, the IBR is an inhibitor of base excision repair (“iBER”). Exemplary inhibitors of base excision repair include inhibitors of APE1, Endo III, Endo IV, Endo V, Endo VIII, Fpg, hOGG1, hNEIL1, T7 EndoI, T4PDG, UDG, hSMUG1, and hAAG. In some embodiments, the IBR is an inhibitor of Endo V or hAAG. In some embodiments, the IBR is an iBER that may be a catalytically inactive glycosylase or catalytically inactive dioxygenase or a small molecule or peptide inhibitor of an oxidase, or variants thereof. In some embodiments, the IBR is an iBER that may be a TDG inhibitor, MBD4 inhibitor or an inhibitor of an AlkBH enzyme. In some embodiments, the IBR is an iBER that comprises a catalytically inactive TDG or catalytically inactive MBD4. An exemplary catalytically inactive TDG is an N140A mutant of SEQ ID NO: 3872 (human TDG).
Some exemplary glycosylases are provided below. The catalytically inactivated variants of any of these glycosylase domains are iBERs that may be fused to the napDNAbp or polymerase domain of the multi-flap prime editors provided in this disclosure.
OGG (Human)
MPG (Human)
MBD4 (Human)
TDG (Human)
In some embodiments, the fusion proteins described herein may comprise one or more heterologous protein domains (e.g., about or more than about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more domains in addition to the prime editor components). A fusion protein may comprise any additional protein sequence, and optionally a linker sequence between any two domains. Other exemplary features that may be present are localization sequences, such as cytoplasmic localization sequences, export sequences, such as nuclear export sequences, or other localization sequences, as well as sequence tags that are useful for solubilization, purification, or detection of the fusion proteins.
Examples of protein domains that may be fused to a multi-flap prime editor or component thereof (e.g., the napDNAbp domain, the polymerase domain, or the NLS domain) include, without limitation, epitope tags, and reporter gene sequences. Non-limiting examples of epitope tags include histidine (His) tags, V5 tags, FLAG tags, influenza hemagglutinin (HA) tags, Myc tags, VSV-G tags, and thioredoxin (Trx) tags. Examples of reporter genes include, but are not limited to, glutathione-5-transferase (GST), horseradish peroxidase (HRP), chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), beta-galactosidase, beta-glucuronidase, luciferase, green fluorescent protein (GFP), HcRed, DsRed, cyan fluorescent protein (CFP), yellow fluorescent protein (YFP), and autofluorescent proteins including blue fluorescent protein (BFP). A multi-flap prime editor may be fused to a gene sequence encoding a protein or a fragment of a protein that bind DNA molecules or bind other cellular molecules, including, but not limited to, maltose binding protein (MBP), S-tag, Lex A DNA binding domain (DBD) fusions, GAL4 DNA binding domain fusions, and herpes simplex virus (HSV) BP16 protein fusions. Additional domains that may form part of a prime editor are described in US Patent Publication No. 2011/0059502, published Mar. 10, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In an aspect of the disclosure, a reporter gene which includes, but is not limited to, glutathione-5-transferase (GST), horseradish peroxidase (HRP), chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) beta-galactosidase, beta-glucuronidase, luciferase, green fluorescent protein (GFP), HcRed, DsRed, cyan fluorescent protein (CFP), yellow fluorescent protein (YFP), and autofluorescent proteins including blue fluorescent protein (BFP), may be introduced into a cell to encode a gene product which serves as a marker by which to measure the alteration or modification of expression of the gene product. In certain embodiments of the disclosure the gene product is luciferase. In a further embodiment of the disclosure the expression of the gene product is decreased.
Suitable protein tags provided herein include, but are not limited to, biotin carboxylase carrier protein (BCCP) tags, myc-tags, calmodulin-tags, FLAG-tags, hemagglutinin (HA)-tags, polyhistidine tags, also referred to as histidine tags or His-tags, maltose binding protein (MBP)-tags, nus-tags, glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-tags, green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tags, thioredoxin-tags, S-tags, Softags (e.g., Softag 1, Softag 3), strep-tags, biotin ligase tags, FlAsH tags, V5 tags, and SBP-tags. Additional suitable sequences will be apparent to those of skill in the art. In some embodiments, the fusion protein comprises one or more His tags.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the activity of the multi-flap prime editing system may be temporally regulated by adjusting the residence time, the amount, and/or the activity of the expressed components of the PE system. For example, as described herein, the PE may be fused with a protein domain that is capable of modifying the intracellular half-life of the PE. In certain embodiments involving two or more vectors (e.g., a vector system in which the components described herein are encoded on two or more separate vectors), the activity of the PE system may be temporally regulated by controlling the timing in which the vectors are delivered. For example, in some embodiments a vector encoding the nuclease system may deliver the PE prior to the vector encoding the template. In other embodiments, the vector encoding the PEgRNA may deliver the guide prior to the vector encoding the PE system. In some embodiments, the vectors encoding the PE system and PEgRNA are delivered simultaneously. In certain embodiments, the simultaneously delivered vectors temporally deliver, e.g., the PE, PEgRNA, and/or second strand guide RNA components. In further embodiments, the RNA (such as, e.g., the nuclease transcript) transcribed from the coding sequence on the vectors may further comprise at least one element that is capable of modifying the intracellular half-life of the RNA and/or modulating translational control. In some embodiments, the half-life of the RNA may be increased. In some embodiments, the half-life of the RNA may be decreased. In some embodiments, the element may be capable of increasing the stability of the RNA. In some embodiments, the element may be capable of decreasing the stability of the RNA. In some embodiments, the element may be within the 3′ UTR of the RNA. In some embodiments, the element may include a polyadenylation signal (PA). In some embodiments, the element may include a cap, e.g., an upstream mRNA or PEgRNA end. In some embodiments, the RNA may comprise no PA such that it is subject to quicker degradation in the cell after transcription. In some embodiments, the element may include at least one AU-rich element (ARE). The AREs may be bound by ARE binding proteins (ARE-BPs) in a manner that is dependent upon tissue type, cell type, timing, cellular localization, and environment. In some embodiments the destabilizing element may promote RNA decay, affect RNA stability, or activate translation. In some embodiments, the ARE may comprise 50 to 150 nucleotides in length. In some embodiments, the ARE may comprise at least one copy of the sequence AUUUA. In some embodiments, at least one ARE may be added to the 3′ UTR of the RNA. In some embodiments, the element may be a Woodchuck Hepatitis Virus (WHP).
Posttranscriptional Regulatory Element (WPRE), which creates a tertiary structure to enhance expression from the transcript. In further embodiments, the element is a modified and/or truncated WPRE sequence that is capable of enhancing expression from the transcript, as described, for example in Zufferey et al., J Virol, 73(4): 2886-92 (1999) and Flajolet et al., J Virol, 72(7): 6175-80 (1998). In some embodiments, the WPRE or equivalent may be added to the 3′ UTR of the RNA. In some embodiments, the element may be selected from other RNA sequence motifs that are enriched in either fast- or slow-decaying transcripts.
In some embodiments, the vector encoding the PE or the PEgRNA may be self-destroyed via cleavage of a target sequence present on the vector by the PE system. The cleavage may prevent continued transcription of a PE or a PEgRNA from the vector. Although transcription may occur on the linearized vector for some amount of time, the expressed transcripts or proteins subject to intracellular degradation will have less time to produce off-target effects without continued supply from expression of the encoding vectors.
[6] PEgRNAs
The multi-flap prime editing system described herein contemplates the use of any suitable PEgRNAs. The mechanism of target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) can be leveraged or adapted for conducting precision and versatile CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing through the use of a specially configured guide RNA comprising a reverse transcription (RT) template sequence that codes for the desired nucleotide change. The application refers to this specially configured guide RNA as an “extended guide RNA” or a “PEgRNA” since the RT template sequence can be provided as an extension of a standard or traditional guide RNA molecule. The application contemplates any suitable configuration or arrangement for the extended guide RNAs for use in dual-flap and quadruple-flap prime editing.
The general designs of pegRNAs used for dual-flap and multi-flap prime editing are shown in
PE2RNA Architecture
In one embodiment, the position of the intermolecular RNA extension is not in the protospacer sequence of the guide RNA. In another embodiment, the position of the intermolecular RNA extension in the gRNA core. In still another embodiment, the position of the intermolecular RNA extension is any with the guide RNA molecule except within the protospacer sequence, or at a position which disrupts the protospacer sequence.
In one embodiment, the intermolecular RNA extension is inserted downstream from the 3′ end of the protospacer sequence. In another embodiment, the intermolecular RNA extension is inserted at least 1 nucleotide, at least 2 nucleotides, at least 3 nucleotides, at least 4 nucleotides, at least 5 nucleotides, at least 6 nucleotides, at least 7 nucleotides, at least 8 nucleotides, at least 9 nucleotides, at least 10 nucleotides, at least 11 nucleotides, at least 12 nucleotides, at least 13 nucleotides, at least 14 nucleotides, at least 15 nucleotides, at least 16 nucleotides, at least 17 nucleotides, at least 18 nucleotides, at least 19 nucleotides, at least 20 nucleotides, at least 21 nucleotides, at least 22 nucleotides, at least 23 nucleotides, at least 24 nucleotides, at least 25 nucleotides downstream of the 3′ end of the protospacer sequence.
In other embodiments, the intermolecular RNA extension is inserted into the gRNA, which refers to the portion of the guide RNA corresponding or comprising the tracrRNA, which binds and/or interacts with the Cas9 protein or equivalent thereof (i.e., a different napDNAbp). Preferably the insertion of the intermolecular RNA extension does not disrupt or minimally disrupts the interaction between the tracrRNA portion and the napDNAbp.
The length of the RNA extension (which includes at least the RT template and primer binding site, e.g., see
The RT template sequence can also be any suitable length. For example, the RT template sequence can be at least 3 nucleotides, at least 4 nucleotides, at least 5 nucleotides, at least 6 nucleotides, at least 7 nucleotides, at least 8 nucleotides, at least 9 nucleotides, at least 10 nucleotides, at least 11 nucleotides, at least 12 nucleotides, at least 13 nucleotides, at least 14 nucleotides, at least 15 nucleotides, at least 16 nucleotides, at least 17 nucleotides, at least 18 nucleotides, at least 19 nucleotides, at least 20 nucleotides, at least 30 nucleotides, at least 40 nucleotides, at least 50 nucleotides, at least 60 nucleotides, at least 70 nucleotides, at least 80 nucleotides, at least 90 nucleotides, at least 100 nucleotides, at least 200 nucleotides, at least 300 nucleotides, at least 400 nucleotides, or at least 500 nucleotides in length.
In still other embodiments, wherein the reverse transcription primer binding site sequence is at least 3 nucleotides, at least 4 nucleotides, at least 5 nucleotides, at least 6 nucleotides, at least 7 nucleotides, at least 8 nucleotides, at least 9 nucleotides, at least 10 nucleotides, at least 11 nucleotides, at least 12 nucleotides, at least 13 nucleotides, at least 14 nucleotides, at least 15 nucleotides, at least 16 nucleotides, at least 17 nucleotides, at least 18 nucleotides, at least 19 nucleotides, at least 20 nucleotides, at least 30 nucleotides, at least 40 nucleotides, at least 50 nucleotides, at least 60 nucleotides, at least 70 nucleotides, at least 80 nucleotides, at least 90 nucleotides, at least 100 nucleotides, at least 200 nucleotides, at least 300 nucleotides, at least 400 nucleotides, or at least 500 nucleotides in length.
In other embodiments, the optional linker or spacer sequence is at least 3 nucleotides, at least 4 nucleotides, at least 5 nucleotides, at least 6 nucleotides, at least 7 nucleotides, at least 8 nucleotides, at least 9 nucleotides, at least 10 nucleotides, at least 11 nucleotides, at least 12 nucleotides, at least 13 nucleotides, at least 14 nucleotides, at least 15 nucleotides, at least 16 nucleotides, at least 17 nucleotides, at least 18 nucleotides, at least 19 nucleotides, at least 20 nucleotides, at least 30 nucleotides, at least 40 nucleotides, at least 50 nucleotides, at least 60 nucleotides, at least 70 nucleotides, at least 80 nucleotides, at least 90 nucleotides, at least 100 nucleotides, at least 200 nucleotides, at least 300 nucleotides, at least 400 nucleotides, or at least 500 nucleotides in length.
The RT template sequence, in certain embodiments, encodes a single-stranded DNA molecule which is homologous to the non-target strand (and thus, complementary to the corresponding site of the target strand) but includes one or more nucleotide changes. The least one nucleotide change may include one or more single-base nucleotide changes, one or more deletions, and one or more insertions.
As depicted in
In various embodiments, the nucleotide sequence of the RT template sequence corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of the non-target strand which becomes displaced as the 5′ flap species and which overlaps with the site to be edited.
In various embodiments of the extended guide RNAs, the reverse transcription template sequence may encode a single-strand DNA flap that is complementary to an endogenous DNA sequence adjacent to a nick site, wherein the single-strand DNA flap comprises a desired nucleotide change. The single-stranded DNA flap may displace an endogenous single-strand DNA at the nick site. The displaced endogenous single-strand DNA at the nick site can have a 5′ end and form an endogenous flap, which can be excised by the cell. In various embodiments, excision of the 5′ end endogenous flap can help drive product formation since removing the 5′ end endogenous flap encourages hybridization of the single-strand 3′ DNA flap to the corresponding complementary DNA strand, and the incorporation or assimilation of the desired nucleotide change carried by the single-strand 3′ DNA flap into the target DNA.
In various embodiments of the extended guide RNAs, the cellular repair of the single-strand DNA flap results in installation of the desired nucleotide change, thereby forming a desired product.
In still other embodiments, the desired nucleotide change is installed in an editing window that is between about −5 to +5 of the nick site, or between about −10 to +10 of the nick site, or between about −20 to +20 of the nick site, or between about −30 to +30 of the nick site, or between about −40 to +40 of the nick site, or between about −50 to +50 of the nick site, or between about −60 to +60 of the nick site, or between about −70 to +70 of the nick site, or between about −80 to +80 of the nick site, or between about −90 to +90 of the nick site, or between about −100 to +100 of the nick site, or between about −200 to +200 of the nick site. In other embodiments, the desired nucleotide change is installed in an editing window that is between about +1 to +2 from the nick site, or about +1 to +3, +1 to +4, +1 to +5, +1 to +6, +1 to +7, +1 to +8, +1 to +9, +1 to +10, +1 to +11, +1 to +12, +1 to +13, +1 to +14, +1 to +15, +1 to +16, +1 to +17, +1 to +18, +1 to +19, +1 to +20, +1 to +21, +1 to +22, +1 to +23, +1 to +24, +1 to +25, +1 to +26, +1 to +27, +1 to +28, +1 to +29, +1 to +30, +1 to +31, +1 to +32, +1 to +33, +1 to +34, +1 to +35, +1 to +36, +1 to +37, +1 to +38, +1 to +39, +1 to +40, +1 to +41, +1 to +42, +1 to +43, +1 to +44, +1 to +45, +1 to +46, +1 to +47, +1 to +48, +1 to +49, +1 to +50, +1 to +51, +1 to +52, +1 to +53, +1 to +54, +1 to +55, +1 to +56, +1 to +57, +1 to +58, +1 to +59, +1 to +60, +1 to +61, +1 to +62, +1 to +63, +1 to +64, +1 to +65, +1 to +66, +1 to +67, +1 to +68, +1 to +69, +1 to +70, +1 to +71, +1 to +72, +1 to +73, +1 to +74, +1 to +75, +1 to +76, +1 to +77, +1 to +78, +1 to +79, +1 to +80, +1 to +81, +1 to +82, +1 to +83, +1 to +84, +1 to +85, +1 to +86, +1 to +87, +1 to +88, +1 to +89, +1 to +90, +1 to +90, +1 to +91, +1 to +92, +1 to +93, +1 to +94, +1 to +95, +1 to +96, +1 to +97, +1 to +98, +1 to +99, +1 to +100, +1 to +101, +1 to +102, +1 to +103, +1 to +104, +1 to +105, +1 to +106, +1 to +107, +1 to +108, +1 to +109, +1 to +110, +1 to +111, +1 to +112, +1 to +113, +1 to +114, +1 to +115, +1 to +116, +1 to +117, +1 to +118, +1 to +119, +1 to +120, +1 to +121, +1 to +122, +1 to +123, +1 to +124, or +1 to +125 from the nick site.
In still other embodiments, the desired nucleotide change is installed in an editing window that is between about +1 to +2 from the nick site, or about +1 to +5, +1 to +10, +1 to +15, +1 to +20, +1 to +25, +1 to +30, +1 to +35, +1 to +40, +1 to +45, +1 to +50, +1 to +55, +1 to +100, +1 to +105, +1 to +110, +1 to +115, +1 to +120, +1 to +125, +1 to +130, +1 to +135, +1 to +140, +1 to +145, +1 to +150, +1 to +155, +1 to +160, +1 to +165, +1 to +170, +1 to +175, +1 to +180, +1 to +185, +1 to +190, +1 to +195, or +1 to +200, from the nick site.
In various aspects, the extended guide RNAs are modified versions of a guide RNA. Guide RNAs maybe naturally occurring, expressed from an encoding nucleic acid, or synthesized chemically. Methods are well known in the art for obtaining or otherwise synthesizing guide RNAs and for determining the appropriate sequence of the guide RNA, including the protospacer sequence which interacts and hybridizes with the target strand of a genomic target site of interest.
In various embodiments, the particular design aspects of a guide RNA sequence will depend upon the nucleotide sequence of a genomic target site of interest (i.e., the desired site to be edited) and the type of napDNAbp (e.g., Cas9 protein) present in the multi-flap prime editing systems described herein, among other factors, such as PAM sequence locations, percent G/C content in the target sequence, the degree of microhomology regions, secondary structures, etc.
In general, a guide sequence is any polynucleotide sequence having sufficient complementarity with a target polynucleotide sequence to hybridize with the target sequence and direct sequence-specific binding of a napDNAbp (e.g., a Cas9, Cas9 homolog, or Cas9 variant) to the target sequence. In some embodiments, the degree of complementarity between a guide sequence and its corresponding target sequence, when optimally aligned using a suitable alignment algorithm, is about or more than about 50%, 60%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97.5%, 99%, or more. Optimal alignment may be determined with the use of any suitable algorithm for aligning sequences, non-limiting example of which include the Smith-Waterman algorithm, the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm, algorithms based on the Burrows-Wheeler Transform (e.g., the Burrows Wheeler Aligner), ClustalW, Clustal X, BLAT, Novoalign (Novocraft Technologies, ELAND (Illumina, San Diego, Calif.), SOAP (available at soap.genomics.org.cn), and Maq (available at maq.sourceforge.net). In some embodiments, a guide sequence is about or more than about 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 75, or more nucleotides in length.
In some embodiments, a guide sequence is less than about 75, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 12, or fewer nucleotides in length. The ability of a guide sequence to direct sequence-specific binding of a multi-flap prime editor to a target sequence may be assessed by any suitable assay. For example, the components of a multi-flap prime editor, including the guide sequence to be tested, may be provided to a host cell having the corresponding target sequence, such as by transfection with vectors encoding the components of a multi-flap prime editor disclosed herein, followed by an assessment of preferential cleavage within the target sequence, such as by Surveyor assay as described herein. Similarly, cleavage of a target polynucleotide sequence may be evaluated in a test tube by providing the target sequence, components of a multi-flap prime editor, including the guide sequence to be tested and a control guide sequence different from the test guide sequence, and comparing binding or rate of cleavage at the target sequence between the test and control guide sequence reactions. Other assays are possible, and will occur to those skilled in the art.
A guide sequence may be selected to target any target sequence. In some embodiments, the target sequence is a sequence within a genome of a cell. Exemplary target sequences include those that are unique in the target genome. For example, for the S. pyogenes Cas9, a unique target sequence in a genome may include a Cas9 target site of the form MMMMMMMMNNNNNNNNNNNNXGG (SEQ ID NO: 204) where NNNNNNNNNNNNXGG (SEQ ID NO: 205) (N is A, G, T, or C; and X can be anything). A unique target sequence in a genome may include an S. pyogenes Cas9 target site of the form MMMMMMMMMNNNNNNNNNNNXGG (SEQ ID NO: 206) where NNNNNNNNNNNXGG (SEQ ID NO: 207) (N is A, G, T, or C; and X can be anything). For the S. thermophilus CRISPR1Cas9, a unique target sequence in a genome may include a Cas9 target site of the form MMMMMMMMNNNNNNNNNNNNXXAGAAW (SEQ ID NO: 208) where NNNNNNNNNNNNXXAGAAW (SEQ ID NO: 209) (N is A, G, T, or C; X can be anything; and W is A or T). A unique target sequence in a genome may include an S. thermophilus CRISPR 1 Cas9 target site of the form MMMMMMMMMNNNNNNNNNNNXXAGAAW (SEQ ID NO: 210) where NNNNNNNNNNNXXAGAAW (SEQ ID NO: 211) (N is A, G, T, or C; X can be anything; and W is A or T). For the S. pyogenes Cas9, a unique target sequence in a genome may include a Cas9 target site of the form MMMMMMMMNNNNNNNNNNNNXGGXG (SEQ ID NO: 212) where NNNNNNNNNNNNXGGXG (SEQ ID NO: 213) (N is A, G, T, or C; and X can be anything). A unique target sequence in a genome may include an S. pyogenes Cas9 target site of the form MMMMMMMMMNNNNNNNNNNNXGGXG (SEQ ID NO: 214) where NNNNNNNNNNNXGGXG (SEQ ID NO: 215) (N is A, G, T, or C; and X can be anything). In each of these sequences “M” may be A, G, T, or C, and need not be considered in identifying a sequence as unique.
As used herein in a PEgRNA or guide RNA sequence, unless indicated otherwise, it should be appreciated that the letter “T” or “thymine” indicates a nucleobase in a DNA sequence that encodes the PEgRNA or guide RNA sequence, and is intended to refer to a uracil (U) nucleobase of the PEgRNA or guide RNA or any chemically modified uracil nucleobase known in the art, such as 5-methoxyuracil.
In some embodiments, a guide sequence is selected to reduce the degree of secondary structure within the guide sequence. Secondary structure may be determined by any suitable polynucleotide folding algorithm. Some programs are based on calculating the minimal Gibbs free energy. An example of one such algorithm is mFold, as described by Zuker and Stiegler (Nucleic Acids Res. 9 (1981), 133-148).
Another example folding algorithm is the online webserver RNAfold, developed at Institute for Theoretical Chemistry at the University of Vienna, using the centroid structure prediction algorithm (see e.g. A. R. Gruber et al., 2008, Cell 106(1): 23-24; and PA Carr and GM Church, 2009, Nature Biotechnology 27(12): 1151-62). Further algorithms may be found in U.S. application Ser. No. 61/836,080; Broad Reference BI-2013/004A); incorporated herein by reference. In general, a tracr mate sequence includes any sequence that has sufficient complementarity with a tracr sequence to promote one or more of: (1) excision of a guide sequence flanked by tracr mate sequences in a cell containing the corresponding tracr sequence; and (2) formation of a complex at a target sequence, wherein the complex comprises the tracr mate sequence hybridized to the tracr sequence. In general, degree of complementarity is with reference to the optimal alignment of the tracr mate sequence and tracr sequence, along the length of the shorter of the two sequences. Optimal alignment may be determined by any suitable alignment algorithm, and may further account for secondary structures, such as self-complementarity within either the tracr sequence or tracr mate sequence. In some embodiments, the degree of complementarity between the tracr sequence and tracr mate sequence along the length of the shorter of the two when optimally aligned is about or more than about 25%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 97.5%, 99%, or higher. In some embodiments, the tracr sequence is about or more than about 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, or more nucleotides in length. In some embodiments, the tracr sequence and tracr mate sequence are contained within a single transcript, such that hybridization between the two produces a transcript having a secondary structure, such as a hairpin. Preferred loop forming sequences for use in hairpin structures are four nucleotides in length, and most preferably have the sequence GAAA. However, longer or shorter loop sequences may be used, as may alternative sequences. The sequences preferably include a nucleotide triplet (for example, AAA), and an additional nucleotide (for example C or G). Examples of loop forming sequences include CAAA and AAAG. In an embodiment of the invention, the transcript or transcribed polynucleotide sequence has at least two or more hairpins. In preferred embodiments, the transcript has two, three, four or five hairpins. In a further embodiment of the invention, the transcript has at most five hairpins. In some embodiments, the single transcript further includes a transcription termination sequence; preferably this is a polyT sequence, for example six T nucleotides. Further non-limiting examples of single polynucleotides comprising a guide sequence, a tracr mate sequence, and a tracr sequence are as follows (listed 5′ to 3′), where “N” represents a base of a guide sequence, the first block of lower case letters represent the tracr mate sequence, and the second block of lower case letters represent the tracr sequence, and the final poly-T sequence represents the transcription terminator:
In some embodiments, sequences (1) to (3) are used in combination with Cas9 from S. thermophilus CRISPR1. In some embodiments, sequences (4) to (6) are used in combination with Cas9 from S. pyogenes. In some embodiments, the tracr sequence is a separate transcript from a transcript comprising the tracr mate sequence.
It will be apparent to those of skill in the art that in order to target any of the fusion proteins comprising a Cas9 domain and a single-stranded DNA binding protein, as disclosed herein, to a target site, e.g., a site comprising a point mutation to be edited, it is typically necessary to co-express the fusion protein together with a guide RNA, e.g., an sgRNA. As explained in more detail elsewhere herein, a guide RNA typically comprises a tracrRNA framework allowing for Cas9 binding, and a guide sequence, which confers sequence specificity to the Cas9:nucleic acid editing enzyme/domain fusion protein.
In some embodiments, the guide RNA comprises a structure 5′-[guide sequence]-GUUUUAGAGCUAGAAAUAGCAAGUUAAAAUAAAGGCUAGUCCGUUAUCAACUUGAAAAA GUGGCACCGAGUCGGUGCUUUUU-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 222), wherein the guide sequence comprises a sequence that is complementary to the target sequence. The guide sequence is typically 20 nucleotides long. The sequences of suitable guide RNAs for targeting Cas9:nucleic acid editing enzyme/domain fusion proteins to specific genomic target sites will be apparent to those of skill in the art based on the instant disclosure. Such suitable guide RNA sequences typically comprise guide sequences that are complementary to a nucleic sequence within 50 nucleotides upstream or downstream of the target nucleotide to be edited. Some exemplary guide RNA sequences suitable for targeting any of the provided fusion proteins to specific target sequences are provided herein. Additional guide sequences are well known in the art and can be used with the multi-flap prime editor described herein.
In other embodiments, the PEgRNAs include those depicted in
In still other embodiments, the PEgRNAs may include those depicted in
PEgRNA Improvements
The PEgRNAs may also include additional design improvements that may modify the properties and/or characteristics of PEgRNAs thereby improving the efficacy of multi-flap prime editing. In various embodiments, these improvements may belong to one or more of a number of different categories, including but not limited to: (1) designs to enable efficient expression of functional PEgRNAs from non-polymerase III (pol III) promoters, which would enable the expression of longer PEgRNAs without burdensome sequence requirements; (2) improvements to the core, Cas9-binding PEgRNA scaffold, which could improve efficacy; (3) modifications to the PEgRNA to improve RT processivity, enabling the insertion of longer sequences at targeted genomic loci; and (4) addition of RNA motifs to the 5′ or 3′ termini of the PEgRNA that improve PEgRNA stability, enhance RT processivity, prevent misfolding of the PEgRNA, or recruit additional factors important for genome editing.
In one embodiment, PEgRNA could be designed with pol III promoters to improve the expression of longer-length PEgRNA with larger extension arms. sgRNAs are typically expressed from the U6 snRNA promoter. This promoter recruits pol III to express the associated RNA and is useful for expression of short RNAs that are retained within the nucleus. However, pol III is not highly processive and is unable to express RNAs longer than a few hundred nucleotides in length at the levels required for efficient genome editing. Additionally, pol III can stall or terminate at stretches of U's, potentially limiting the sequence diversity that could be inserted using a PEgRNA. Other promoters that recruit polymerase II (such as pCMV) or polymerase I (such as the U1 snRNA promoter) have been examined for their ability to express longer sgRNAs. However, these promoters are typically partially transcribed, which would result in extra sequence 5′ of the spacer in the expressed PEgRNA, which has been shown to result in markedly reduced Cas9:sgRNA activity in a site-dependent manner. Additionally, while pol III-transcribed PEgRNAs can simply terminate in a run of 6-7 U's, PEgRNAs transcribed from pol II or pol I would require a different termination signal. Often such signals also result in polyadenylation, which would result in undesired transport of the PEgRNA from the nucleus. Similarly, RNAs expressed from pol II promoters such as pCMV are typically 5′-capped, also resulting in their nuclear export.
Previously, Rinn and coworkers screened a variety of expression platforms for the production of long-noncoding RNA-(lncRNA) tagged sgRNAs183. These platforms include RNAs expressed from pCMV and that terminate in the ENE element from the MALAT1 ncRNA from humans184, the PAN ENE element from KSHV185, or the 3′ box from U1 snRNA186. Notably, the MALAT1 ncRNA and PAN ENEs form triple helices protecting the polyA-tail184,187. These constructs could also enhance RNA stability. It is contemplated that these expression systems will also enable the expression of longer PEgRNAs.
In addition, a series of methods have been designed for the cleavage of the portion of the pol II promoter that would be transcribed as part of the PEgRNA, adding either a self-cleaving ribozyme such as the hammerhead188, pistol189, hatchet189, hairpin190, VS191, twister192, or twister sister192 ribozymes, or other self-cleaving elements to process the transcribed guide, or a hairpin that is recognized by Csy4193 and also leads to processing of the guide. Also, it is hypothesized that incorporation of multiple ENE motifs could lead to improved PEgRNA expression and stability, as previously demonstrated for the KSHV PAN RNA and element185. It is also anticipated that circularizing the PEgRNA in the form of a circular intronic RNA (ciRNA) could also lead to enhanced RNA expression and stability, as well as nuclear localization194.
In various embodiments, the PEgRNA may include various above elements, as exemplified by the following sequence.
Non-limiting example 1-PEgRNA expression platform consisting of pCMV, Csy4 hairpin, the PEgRNA, and MALAT1 ENE
Non-limiting example 2-PEgRNA expression platform consisting of pCMV, Csy4 hairing, the PEgRNA, and PAN ENE
Non-limiting example 3-PEgRNA expression platform consisting of pCMV, Csy4 hairing, the PEgRNA, and 3×PAN ENE
Non-limiting example 4—PEgRNA expression platform consisting of pCMV, Csy4 hairing, the PEgRNA, and 3′ box
Non-limiting example 5—PEgRNA expression platform consisting of pU1, Csy4 hairing, the PEgRNA, and 3′ box
In various other embodiments, the PEgRNA may be improved by introducing improvements to the scaffold or core sequences. This can be done by introducing known
The core, Cas9-binding PEgRNA scaffold can likely be improved to enhance PE activity. Several such approaches have already been demonstrated. For instance, the first pairing element of the scaffold (P1) contains a GTTTT-AAAAC (SEQ ID NO: 3939) pairing element. Such runs of Ts have been shown to result in pol III pausing and premature termination of the RNA transcript. Rational mutation of one of the T-A pairs to a G-C pair in this portion of P1 has been shown to enhance sgRNA activity, suggesting this approach would also be feasible for PEgRNAs195. Additionally, increasing the length of P1 has also been shown to enhance sgRNA folding and lead to improved activity195, suggesting it as another avenue for the improvement of PEgRNA activity. Example improvements to the core can include:
PEgRNA Containing a 6 nt Extension to P1
PEgRNA Containing a T-A to G-C Mutation within P1
In various other embodiments, the PEgRNA may be improved by introducing modifications to the edit template region. As the size of the insertion templated by the PEgRNA increases, it is more likely to be degraded by endonucleases, undergo spontaneous hydrolysis, or fold into secondary structures unable to be reverse-transcribed by the RT or that disrupt folding of the PEgRNA scaffold and subsequent Cas9-RT binding. Accordingly, it is likely that modification to the template of the PEgRNA might be necessary to affect large insertions, such as the insertion of whole genes. Some strategies to do so include the incorporation of modified nucleotides within a synthetic or semi-synthetic PEgRNA that render the RNA more resistant to degradation or hydrolysis or less likely to adopt inhibitory secondary structures196. Such modifications could include 8-aza-7-deazaguanosine, which would reduce RNA secondary structure in G-rich sequences; locked-nucleic acids (LNA) that reduce degradation and enhance certain kinds of RNA secondary structure; 2′-O-methyl, 2′-fluoro, or 2′-O-methoxyethoxy modifications that enhance RNA stability. Such modifications could also be included elsewhere in the PEgRNA to enhance stability and activity. Alternatively or additionally, the template of the PEgRNA could be designed such that it both encodes for a desired protein product and is also more likely to adopt simple secondary structures that are able to be unfolded by the RT. Such simple structures would act as a thermodynamic sink, making it less likely that more complicated structures that would prevent reverse transcription would occur. Finally, one could also split the template into two, separate PEgRNAs. In such a design, a PE would be used to initiate transcription and also recruit a separate template RNA to the targeted site via an RNA-binding protein fused to Cas9 or an RNA recognition element on the PEgRNA itself such as the MS2 aptamer. The RT could either directly bind to this separate template RNA, or initiate reverse transcription on the original PEgRNA before swapping to the second template. Such an approach could enable long insertions by both preventing misfolding of the PEgRNA upon addition of the long template and also by not requiring dissociation of Cas9 from the genome for long insertions to occur, which could possibly be inhibiting PE-based long insertions.
In still other embodiments, the PEgRNA may be improved by introducing additional RNA motifs at the 5′ and 3′ termini of the PEgRNAs, or even at positions therein between (e.g., in the gRNA core region, or the spacer). Several such motifs—such as the PAN ENE from KSHV and the ENE from MALAT1 were discussed above as possible means to terminate expression of longer PEgRNAs from non-pol III promoters. These elements form RNA triple helices that engulf the polyA tail, resulting in their being retained within the nucleus184, 187. However, by forming complex structures at the 3′ terminus of the PEgRNA that occlude the terminal nucleotide, these structures would also likely help prevent exonuclease-mediated degradation of PEgRNAs.
Other structural elements inserted at the 3′ terminus could also enhance RNA stability, albeit without enabling termination from non-pol III promoters. Such motifs could include hairpins or RNA quadruplexes that would occlude the 3′ terminus197, or self-cleaving ribozymes such as HDV that would result in the formation of a 2′-3′-cyclic phosphate at the 3′ terminus and also potentially render the PEgRNA less likely to be degraded by exonucleases198. Inducing the PEgRNA to cyclize via incomplete splicing—to form a ciRNA—could also increase PEgRNA stability and result in the PEgRNA being retained within the nucleus194.
Additional RNA motifs could also improve RT processivity or enhance PEgRNA activity by enhancing RT binding to the DNA-RNA duplex. Addition of the native sequence bound by the RT in its cognate retroviral genome could enhance RT activity199. This could include the native primer binding site (PBS), polypurine tract (PPT), or kissing loops involved in retroviral genome dimerization and initiation of transcription199.
Addition of dimerization motifs—such as kissing loops or a GNRA tetraloop/tetraloop receptor pair200-at the 5′ and 3′ termini of the PEgRNA could also result in effective circularization of the PEgRNA, improving stability. Additionally, it is envisioned that addition of these motifs could enable the physical separation of the PEgRNA spacer and primer, prevention occlusion of the spacer which would hinder PE activity. Short 5′ extensions or 3′ extensions to the PEgRNA that form a small toehold hairpin in the spacer region or along the primer binding site could also compete favorably against the annealing of intracomplementary regions along the length of the PEgRNA, e.g., the interaction between the spacer and the primer binding site that can occur. Finally, kissing loops could also be used to recruit other template RNAs to the genomic site and enable swapping of RT activity from one RNA to the other. As exemplary embodiments of various secondary structures, the PEgRNA depicted in
Example improvements include, but are not limited to:
PEgRNA-HDV Fusion
PEgRNA-MMLV Kissing Loop
PEgRNA-VS Ribozyme Kissing Loop
PEgRNA-GNRA Tetraloop/Tetraloop Receptor
PEgRNA Template Switching Secondary RNA-HDV Fusion
PEgRNA scaffolds could be further improved via directed evolution, in an analogous fashion to how SpCas9 and prime editors (PE) have been improved. Directed evolution could enhance PEgRNA recognition by Cas9 or evolved Cas9 variants. Additionally, it is likely that different PEgRNA scaffold sequences would be optimal at different genomic loci, either enhancing PE activity at the site in question, reducing off-target activities, or both. Finally, evolution of PEgRNA scaffolds to which other RNA motifs have been added would almost certainly improve the activity of the fused PEgRNA relative to the unevolved, fusion RNA. For instance, evolution of allosteric ribozymes composed of c-di-GMP-I aptamers and hammerhead ribozymes led to dramatically improved activity202, suggesting that evolution would improve the activity of hammerhead-PEgRNA fusions as well. In addition, while Cas9 currently does not generally tolerate 5′ extension of the sgRNA, directed evolution will likely generate enabling mutations that mitigate this intolerance, allowing additional RNA motifs to be utilized.
The present disclosure contemplates any such ways to further improve the efficacy of the multi-flap prime editing systems disclosed here.
In various embodiments, it may be advantageous to limit the appearance of consecutive sequence of Ts from the extension arm as consecutive series of T's may limit the capacity of the PEgRNA to be transcribed. For example, strings of at least consecutive three T's, at least consecutive four T's, at least consecutive five T's, at least consecutive six T's, at least consecutive seven T's, at least consecutive eight T's, at least consecutive nine T's, at least consecutive ten T's, at least consecutive elevent T's, at least consecutive twelve T's, at least consecutive thirteen T's, at least consecutive fourteen T's, or at least consecutive fifteen T's should be avoided when designing the PEgRNA, or should be at least removed from the final designed sequence. In one embodiment, one can avoid the includes of unwanted strings of consecutive T's in PEgRNA extension arms but avoiding target sites that are rich in consecutive A:T nucleobase pairs.
Split PEgRNA Designs for Trans Prime Editing
The instant disclosure also contemplates trans prime editing, which refers to a modified version of prime editing which operates by separating the PEgRNA into two distinct molecules: a guide RNA and a tPERT molecule. The tPERT molecule is programmed to co-localize with the prime editor complex at a target DNA site, bringing the primer binding site and the DNA synthesis template to the prime editor in trans. For example, see
A key feature of trans prime editing is the ability of the trans prime editor to recruit the tPERT to the site of DNA editing, thereby effectively co-localizing all of the functions of a PEgRNA at the site of prime editing. Recruitment can be achieve by installing an RNA-protein recruitment domain, such as a MS2 aptamer, into the tPERT and fusing a corresponding recruiting protein to the prime editor (e.g., via a linker to the napDNAbp or via a linker to the polymerase) that is capable of specifically binding to the RNA-protein recruitment domain, thereby recruiting the tPERT molecule to the prime editor complex. As depicted in the process described in
While the tPERT is shown in
PEgRNA Design Method
The present disclosure also relates to methods for designing PEgRNAs.
In one aspect of design, the design approach can take into account the particular application for which prime editing is being used. For instance, and as exemplified and discussed herein, prime editing can be used, without limitation, to (a) install mutation-correcting changes to a nucleotide sequence, (b) install protein and RNA tags, (c) install immunoepitopes on proteins of interest, (d) install inducible dimerization domains in proteins, (e) install or remove sequences to alter that activity of a biomolecule, (f) install recombinase target sites to direct specific genetic changes, and (g) mutagenesis of a target sequence by using an error-prone RT. In addition to these methods which, in general, insert, change, or delete nucleotide sequences at target sites of interest, prime editors can also be used to construct highly programmable libraries, as well as to conduct cell data recording and lineage tracing studies. In these various uses, there may be as described herein particular design aspects pertaining to the preparation of a PEgRNA that is particularly useful for any given of these applications.
When designing a PEgRNA for any particular application or use of prime editing, a number of considerations may be taken into account, which include, but are not limited to:
The instant disclosure discusses these aspects above.
In one embodiment, an approach to designing a suitable PEgRNA, and optionally a nicking-sgRNA design guide for second-site nicking, is hereby provided. This embodiment provides a step-by-step set of instructions for designing PEgRNAs and nicking-sgRNAs for prime editing which takes into account one or more of the above considerations. The steps reference the examples shown in
The above step-by-step process for designing a suitable PEgRNA and a second-site nicking sgRNA is not meant to be limiting in any way. The disclosure contemplates variations of the above-described step-by-step process which would be derivable therefrom by a person of ordinary skill in the art.
[7] Applications Utilizing Multi-Flap Prime Editing
Dual-flap and quadruple-flap prime editing (i.e., multi-flap prime editing) have many potential applications, such as installing peptide tags, RNA tags, immunoepitopes, dimerization domains, and recombinase target sites. One such application of dual-flap prime editing is the installation of recombinase or integrase sequences at user-specified locations in the genome.
Dual-flap prime editing can be used to introduce one or two recombinase sites at targeted positions in the human genome. If single recombinase sites are inserted, these can be used as landing sites for a recombinase-mediated reaction between the genomic recombinase site and a second recombinase site within an exogenously supplied DNA, such as a plasmid. This enables the targeted integration of DNA cargo. If two recombinase sites are inserted in adjacent regions of DNA, depending on the orientation of the recombinase sites, these can be used for recombinase-mediated excision or inversion of the intervening sequence, or for recombinase-mediated cassette exchange with exogenous DNA for cargo integration. Integration of compatible recombinase sites on different chromosomes enables targeted and directional chromosomal translocation. Dual-flap prime editing can be used to efficiently introduce recombinase sites at a number of loci in the human genome (
The multi-flap prime editors (e.g., the embodiment depicted in
For example, and as exemplified and discussed herein, dual prime editing can be used to (a) install mutation-correcting changes to a nucleotide sequence, (b) install protein and RNA tags, (c) installation of immunoepitopes on proteins of interest, (d) install inducible dimerization domains in proteins, (e) install recombinase target sites to direct specific genetic changes. In addition to these methods which, in general, insert, change, or delete nucleotide sequences at target sites of interest, dual prime editors can also be used to construct highly programmable libraries, as well as to conduct cell data recording and lineage tracing studies.
These specific exemplary uses of dual prime editing are in no way intended to be limiting. The present Application contemplates any use for dual prime editing which involves, in general, some form of the installation, deletion, and/or replacement of one or more nucleobases at a target site in a nucleotide sequence, e.g., a genomic DNA.
For any of the exemplified uses for dual prime editing, one may use any prime editor disclosed herein, including PE1, PE2, PE3, and PE3b, or PE-short.
A. Prime Editing Versus Multi-Flap Prime Editing
Classical Prime Editing
In various embodiments, prime editing (or “prime editing”) operates by contacting a target DNA molecule (for which a change in the nucleotide sequence is desired to be introduced) with a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) complexed with an extended guide RNA. In reference to
The process of prime editing may introduce at least one or more of the following genetic changes: transversions, transitions, deletions, and insertions. In addition, prime editing may be implemented for specific applications. For example, and as exemplied and discussed herein, prime editing can be used to (a) install mutation-correcting changes to a nucleotide sequence, (b) install protein and RNA tags, (c) intallation of immunoepitopes on proteins of interest, (d) install inducible dimerization domains in proteins, (e) install or remove sequences to alter that activity of a biomolecule, (f) install recombinase target sites to direct specific genetic changes, and (g) mutagenesis of a target sequence by using an error-prone RT. In addition to these methods which, in general, insert, change, or delete nucleotide sequences at target sites of interest, prime editors can also be used to construct highly programmable libraries, as well as to conduct cell data recording and lineage tracing studies. The inventors have also contemplated additional design features of PEgRNAs that are aimed to improve the efficacy of prime editing. Still further, the inventors have conceived of methods for successfully delivering prime editors using vector delivery systems and which involve splitting the napDNAbp using intein domains.
The term “prime editing system” or “prime editor (PE)” refers the compositions involved in the method of genome editing using target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) describe herein, including, but not limited to the napDNAbps, reverse transcriptases, fusion proteins (e.g., comprising napDNAbps and reverse transcriptases), extended guide RNAs, and complexes comprising fusion proteins and extended guide RNAs, as well as accessory elements, such as second strand nicking components and 5′ endogenous DNA flap removal endonucleases (e.g., FEN1) for helping to drive the prime editing process towards the edited product formation.
In another embodiment, the schematic of
This application of prime editing can be further described in Example 1.
Dual Prime Editing
This Specification describes a dual prime editing system (or a dual-flap prime editing system) that addresses the challenges associated with flap equilibration and subsequent incorporation of the edit into the non-edited complementary genomic DNA strand by simultaneously editing both DNA strands. In the dual-flap prime editing system, two pegRNAs are used to target opposite strands of a genomic site and direct the synthesis of two complementary 3′ flaps containing edited DNA sequence (
B. Use of Dual Prime Editing for Peptide Tagging
In another aspect, the disclosure provides a method of using the herein described dual prime editors for genetically grafting one or more peptide tags onto a protein using prime editing (such as the embodiment shown in
In other embodiments, the disclosure provides a method for making a fusion protein comprising a peptide of interest and one or more peptide tags, the method comprising: contacting a target nucleotide sequence encoding the protein with a prime editor configured to insert therein a second nucleotide sequence encoding the one or more peptide tags to result in a recombinant nucleotide sequence that encodes the fusion protein comprising the protein fused to the protein tag.
In various embodiments, the target nucleotide sequence is a specific gene of interest in a genomic DNA. The gene of interest may encode a protein of interest (e.g., a receptor, an enzyme, a therapeutic protein, a membrane protein, a transport protein, a signal transduction protein, or an immunological protein, etc.). The gene of interest may also encode an RNA molecule, including, but not limited to, messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), small nuclear RNA (snRNA), antisense RNA, guide RNA, microRNA (miRNA), small interfering RNA (siRNA), and cell-free RNA (cfRNA).
The peptide tag may be any peptide tag or variant thereof which imparts one or more functions onto a protein for purposes such as separation, purification, visualization, solubilization, or detection. The peptides tags can include “affinity tags” (to facilitate protein purification), “solubilization tags” (to assist in proper folding of proteins), “chromatography tags” (to alter chromatographic properties of proteins), “epitope tags” (to bind to high affinity antibodies), and “fluorescence tags” (to facilitate visualization of proteins in a cell or in vitro). Examples of peptide tags include, but are not limited to the following tags:
Peptide tags may also be the following affinity tags (for separation and/or purification of proteins) (as described in Table 9.9.1 of Kimple et al., “Overview of Affinity Tags for Protein Purification,” Curr Protoc Protein Sci, 2013, 73:Unit-9.9, which is incorporated herein by reference).
In particular embodiments, the peptide tags may include a His6 tag, FLAG-tag, V5-tag, GCN4-tag, HA-tag, Myc-Tag, FIAsH/ReAsH-tag, Sortase substrate, pi-clamp.
In various embodiments, the peptide tags may be used for applications that include protein fluorescent labeling, immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry, protein recruitment, inducible protein degrons, and genome-wide screening.
In various other embodiments, the peptide tag may include an intein sequence to install protein self-splicing function. As used herein, the term “intein” refers to auto-processing polypeptide domains found in organisms from all domains of life. An intein (intervening protein) carries out a unique auto-processing event known as protein splicing in which it excises itself out from a larger precursor polypeptide through the cleavage of two peptide bonds and, in the process, ligates the flanking extein (external protein) sequences through the formation of a new peptide bond. This rearrangement occurs post-translationally (or possibly co-translationally), as intein genes are found embedded in frame within other protein-coding genes. Furthermore, intein-mediated protein splicing is spontaneous; it requires no external factor or energy source, only the folding of the intein domain. This process is also known as cis-protein splicing, as opposed to the natural process of trans-protein splicing with “split inteins.” Inteins are the protein equivalent of the self-splicing RNA introns (see Perler et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1125-1127 (1994)), which catalyze their own excision from a precursor protein with the concomitant fusion of the flanking protein sequences, known as exteins (reviewed in Perler et al., Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1:292-299 (1997); Perler, F. B. Cell 92(1):1-4 (1998); Xu et al., EMBO J. 15(19):5146-5153 (1996)).
The mechanism of the protein splicing process has been studied in great detail (Chong, et al., J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 22159-22168; Xu, M-Q & Perler, F. B. EMBO Journal, 1996, 15, 5146-5153) and conserved amino acids have been found at the intein and extein splicing points (Xu, et al., EMBO Journal, 1994, 13 5517-522).
Inteins can also exist as two fragments encoded by two separately transcribed and translated genes. These so-called split inteins self-associate and catalyze protein-splicing activity in trans. Split inteins have been identified in diverse cyanobacteria and archaea (Caspi et al, Mol Microbiol. 50: 1569-1577 (2003); Choi J. et al, J Mol Biol. 556: 1093-1106 (2006); Dassa B. et al, Biochemistry. 46:322-330 (2007); Liu X. and Yang J., J Biol Chem. 275:26315-26318 (2003); Wu H. et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. £5:9226-9231 (1998); and Zettler J. et al, FEBS Letters. 553:909-914 (2009)), but have not been found in eukaryotes thus far. Recently, a bioinformatic analysis of environmental metagenomic data revealed 26 different loci with a novel genomic arrangement. At each locus, a conserved enzyme coding region is interrupted by a split intein, with a freestanding endonuclease gene inserted between the sections coding for intein subdomains. Among them, five loci were completely assembled: DNA helicases (gp41-1, gp41-8); Inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH-1); and Ribonucleotide reductase catalytic subunits (NrdA-2 and NrdJ-1). This fractured gene organization appears to be present mainly in phages (Dassa et al, Nucleic Acids Research. 57:2560-2573 (2009)).
In certain embodiments, the prime editors described herein can be used to insert split-intein tags in two different proteins, causing their intracellular ligation when co-expressed to form a fusion protein. In protein trans-splicing, one precursor protein consists of an N-extein part followed by the N-intein, another precursor protein consists of the C-intein followed by a C-extein part, and a trans-splicing reaction (catalyzed by the N- and C-inteins together) excises the two intein sequences and links the two extein sequences with a peptide bond. Protein trans-splicing, being an enzymatic reaction, can work with very low (e.g., micromolar) concentrations of proteins and can be carried out under physiological conditions.
The split intein Npu DnaE was characterized as having the highest rate reported for the protein trans-splicing reaction. In addition, the Npu DnaE protein splicing reaction is considered robust and high-yielding with respect to different extein sequences, temperatures from 6 to 37° C., and the presence of up to 6M Urea (Zettler J. et al, FEBS Letters. 553:909-914 (2009); Iwai I. et al, FEBS Letters 550: 1853-1858 (2006)). As expected, when the Cysl Ala mutation at the N-domain of these inteins was introduced, the initial N to S-acyl shift and therefore protein splicing was blocked. Unfortunately, the C-terminal cleavage reaction was also almost completely inhibited. The dependence of the asparagine cyclization at the C-terminal splice junction on the acyl shift at the N-terminal scissile peptide bond seems to be a unique property common to the naturally split DnaE intein alleles (Zettler J. et al. FEBS Letters. 555:909-914 (2009)).
Protein trans-splicing, catalyzed by split inteins, provides an entirely enzymatic method for protein ligation. A split-intein is essentially a contiguous intein (e.g. a mini-intein) split into two pieces named N-intein and C-intein, respectively. The N-intein and C-intein of a split intein can associate non-covalently to form an active intein and catalyze the splicing reaction essentially in same way as a contiguous intein does. Split inteins have been found in nature and also engineered in laboratories. As used herein, the term “split intein” refers to any intein in which one or more peptide bond breaks exists between the N-terminal and C-terminal amino acid sequences such that the N-terminal and C-terminal sequences become separate molecules that can non-covalently reassociate, or reconstitute, into an intein that is functional for trans-splicing reactions. Any catalytically active intein, or fragment thereof, may be used to derive a split intein for use in the methods of the invention. For example, in one aspect the split intein may be derived from a eukaryotic intein. In another aspect, the split intein may be derived from a bacterial intein. In another aspect, the split intein may be derived from an archaeal intein. Preferably, the split intein so-derived will possess only the amino acid sequences essential for catalyzing trans-splicing reactions.
Split inteins may be created from contiguous inteins by engineering one or more split sites in the unstructured loop or intervening amino acid sequence between the −12 conserved beta-strands found in the structure of mini-inteins. Some flexibility in the position of the split site within regions between the beta-strands may exist, provided that creation of the split will not disrupt the structure of the intein, the structured beta-strands in particular, to a sufficient degree that protein splicing activity is lost.
The prime editors described herein may incorporate peptide tags (including inteins) into the C-terminal end of a protein of interest. In other embodiments, the peptide tags (including inteins) may be incorporated into the N-terminal end of a protein of interest. The peptide tags may also be incorporated into the interior of a protein of interest. The resulting fusion proteins created by the herein described prime editors may have the following structures:
The principles of guide RNA design for use in peptide tagging throughout may be applied to peptide tagging. For example, in one embodiment, the PEgRNA structure for peptide tagging may have the following structure: 5′-[spacer sequence]-[gRNA core or scaffold]-[extension arm]-3′, wherein the extension arm comprises in the 5′ to 3′ direction, a homology arm, edit template (comprising the sequence that encodes the peptide tag), and a primer binding site. This configuration is depicted in
In another embodiment, the PEgRNA structure for peptide tagging may have the following structure: 5′-[extension arm]-[spacer sequence]-[gRNA core or scaffold]-3′, wherein the extension arm comprises in the 5′ to 3′ direction, a homology arm, edit template (comprising the sequence that encodes the peptide tag), and a primer binding site. This configuration is depicted in
Embodiments of peptide tagging using prime editing is depicted in
C. Use of Dual Prime Editing for RNA Tagging
Dual prime editing may also be used to manipulate, alter, and otherwise modify the sequences of DNA encoding RNA functions through RNA tagging, and in this way provides a means to indirectly modify the structure and function of RNA. For example, dual PE can be used to insert motifs that are functional at the RNA level (hereafter RNA motifs) to tag or otherwise manipulate non-coding RNAs or mRNAs. These motifs could serve to increase gene expression, decrease gene expression, alter splicing, change post-transcriptional modification, affect the sub-cellular location of the RNA, enable isolation or determination of the intra- or extra-cellular location of the RNA (using, for instance, fluorescent RNA aptamers such as Spinach, Spinach2, Baby Spinach, or Broccoli), recruit endogenous or exogenous protein or RNA binders, introduce sgRNAs, or induce processing of the RNA, by either self-cleavage or RNAses (see
The following RNA tags or motifs may be inserted into a gene of interest using dual prime editing (e.g., with the dual PE methodology of
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
TAAGATACA
TTGATGAGTTTGGA
CAAACCACAACTAG
AATGCAGTGAAAAA
AATGCTTTATTTGTG
AAATTTGTGATGCTA
TTGCTTTATTTGTAA
CCATTATAAGCTGCA
ATAAACAAGTTCTAT
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
GAGATCCA
GACATGATAAGATAC
ATTGATGAGTTTGG
ACAAACCACAACTA
GAATGCAGTGAAAA
AAATGCTTTATTTGT
GAAATTTGTGATGC
TATTGCTTTATTTGT
AACCATTATAAGCTG
CAATAAACAAGTTG
GGCCATGGCTATGGC
CCTGACTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
GCAGATCC
AGACATGATAAGATA
CATTGATGAGTTTG
GACAAACCACAACT
AGAATGCAGTGAAA
AAAATGCTTTATTTG
TGAAATTTGTGATG
CTATTGCTTTATTTG
TAACCATTATAAGCT
GCAATAAACAAGTT
AACAACAACAATTG
CATTCATTTTATGTT
TCAGGTTCAGGGGG
AGGTGTGGAGGTTT
TTTAAAGCAAGTAA
ACCTCTACAGATGT
GATATGGCTTGATTA
TGATCACTATGGCCC
TGACTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
AAGGACAG
GGAAGGGAGCAGT
GGTTCACGCCTGTA
ATCCCAGCAATTTG
GGAGGCCAAGGTG
GGTAGATCACCTGA
GATTAGGAGTTGGA
GACCAGCCTGGCCA
ATATGGTGAAACCC
CGTCTCTACCAAAA
AAACAAAAATTAGC
TGAGCCTGGTCATG
CATGCCTGGAATCC
CAACAACTCGGGAG
GCTGAGGCAGGAGA
ATCGCTTGAACCCA
GGAGGCGGAGATTG
CAGTGAGCCAAGAT
TGTGCCACTGCACT
CCAGCTTGGTTCCC
AATAGACCCCGCAG
GCCCTACAGGTTGT
CTTCCCAACTTGCC
CCTTGCTCCATACC
ACCCCCCTCCACCC
CATAATATTATAGAA
GGACACCTAGTCAG
ACAAAATGATGCAA
CTTAATTTTATTAGG
ACAAGGCTGGTGGG
CACTGGAGTGGCAA
CTTCCAGGGCCAGG
AGAGGCACTGGGGA
GGGGTCACAGGGAT
GCCACCCGTCTATGG
CCCTGACTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
CCATAGAGC
CCACCGCATCCCCA
GCATGCCTGCTATT
GTCTTCCCAATCCT
CCCCCTTGCTGTCC
TGCCCCACCCCACC
CCCCAGAATAGAAT
GACACCTACTCAGA
CAATGCGATGCAAT
TTCCTCATTTTATTA
GGAAAGGACAGTGG
GAGTGGCACCTTCC
AGGGTCAAGGAAGG
CACGGGGGAGGGG
CAAACAACAGATGG
CTGGCAACTAGAAG
GCACAGTCGCTATG
GCCCTGACTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
GATCTCCAT
AAGAGAAGAGGGAC
AGCTATGACTGGGA
GTAGTCAGGAGAGG
AGGAAAAATCTGGC
TAGTAAAACATGTAA
GGAAAATTTTAGGG
ATGTTAAAGAAAAA
AATAACACAAAACA
AAATATAAAAAAAAT
CTAACCTCAAGTCA
AGGCTTTTCTATGG
AATAAGGAATGGAC
AGCAGGGGGCTGTT
TCATATACTGATGAC
CTCTTTATAGCCAAC
CTTTGTTCATGGCA
GCCAGCATATGGGC
ATATGTTGCCAAACT
CTAAACCAAATACTC
ATTCTGATGTTTTAA
ATGATTTGCCCTCC
CATATGTCCTTCCGA
GTGAGAGACACAAA
AAATTCCAACACAC
TATTGCAATGAAAAT
AAATTTCCTTTATTA
GCCAGAAGTCAGAT
GCTCAAGGGGCTTC
ATGATGTCCCCATAA
TTTTTGGCAGAGGG
AAAAAGATCTCAGT
GGTATTTGTGAGCC
AGGGCATTGGCCAC
ACCAGCCACCACCT
TCTGATAGGCAGCC
TGCACCTGAGGAGT
GAACTATGGCCCTGA
CTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
CTATGGCAG
GGCCTGCCGCCCCG
ACGTTGGCTGCGAG
CCCTGGGCCTTCAC
CCGAACTTGGGGGG
TGGGGTGGGGAAAA
GGAAGAAACGCGG
GCGTATTGGCCCCA
ATGGGGTCTCGGTG
GGGTATCGACAGAG
TGCCAGCCCTGGGA
CCGAACCCCGCGTT
TATGAACAAACGAC
CCAACACCCGTGCG
TTTTATTCTGTCTTT
TTATTGCCGTCATAG
CGCGGGTTCCTTCC
GGTATTGTCTCCTTC
CGTGTTTCAGTTAG
CCTCCCCCCTATGGC
CCTGACTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
AGTCAAAG
CAAAGACGCCGCAG
GGATTTGAACCCCG
TCCTGGAAACCAGG
AGTGCCAACCACCA
GCATCTTTTGCTTTT
TTTTTTTTTAAGCTA
GAAAAAGGCCAAAA
AGCAAAACCTGAGA
AAACAATACGTGTT
GTTTTCTCAGGAAA
AGAAAAACCTTCAT
GACCCTACTATGGCC
CTGACTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
TTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTATGGA
TTAAACATTGACCTT
TATTTATGTTGTAAG
TTGCATTACGTTATG
GTATTAGTTTAATTT
GAGCTCTAGGCACG
TTAAATTGTCAAAA
GTATAACATGTTTTT
CCAATATACACTGG
GATAAAAACCTTGC
CGTCTGGTCACTGG
AGGTGTCCGGTGCG
AACAAGGAAAAACC
CAGCCAAAACACTAT
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
TTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTATGGA
TTAAACATTGACCTT
TATTTATGTTGTAAG
TTGCATTACGTTATG
GTATTAGTTTAATTT
GAGCTCTAGGCACG
TTAAATTGTCAAAA
GTATAACATGTTTTT
CCAATATACACTGG
GATAAAAACCTTGC
CGTCTGGTCACTGG
AGGTGTCCGGTGCG
AACAAGGAAAAACC
CAGCCAAAACAGAG
AGATTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTATGGATTA
AACATTGACCTTTAT
TTATGTTGTAAGTTG
CATTACGTTATGGTA
TTAGTTTAATTTGAG
CTCTAGGCACGTTA
AATTGTCAAAAGTAT
AACATGTTTTTCCA
ATATACACTGGGATA
AAAACCTTGCCGTC
TGGTCACTGGAGGT
GTCCGGTGCGAACA
AGGAAAAACCCAGC
CAAAACAGTGTGTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTATGGATTAAACA
TTGACCTTTATTTAT
GTTGTAAGTTGCAT
TACGTTATGGTATTA
GTTTAATTTGAGCTC
TAGGCACGTTAAAT
TGTCAAAAGTATAA
CATGTTTTTCCAATA
TACACTGGGATAAA
AACCTTGCCGTCTG
GTCACTGGAGGTGT
CCGGTGCGAACAAG
GAAAAACCCAGCCA
AAACACTATGGCCCT
GACTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
TTTAAGACG
CCAACCAAGACACA
AACCAAACAAAAAA
AGATATGACCCTTA
GCGTACAGTCTACT
TTTGAAACTCCAGA
AAGTGGGTGCACCG
TTCCTGGAGGTACT
GCAATACCAGGTCG
ATGCGTGGAGTGGA
CGGAGCAAGCTCCT
ATTCCATCTCCCTGC
TCCAAAAATCCAGC
AAGTTCAGATTTCT
CTGAACTTGCTGCT
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
TTTAAGACG
CCAACCAAGACACA
AACCAAACAAAAAA
AGATATGACCCTTA
GCGTACAGTCTACT
TTTGAAACCTATGGC
CCTGACTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
CGCCCAACGTGGGG
CTCGAACCCACGAC
CCTGAGATTAAGAG
TCTCATGCTCTACC
GACTGAGCTAGCCG
GGCCTATGGCCCTGA
CTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
GAGCCCAC
ACTCTACTCGACAG
ATACGAATATCTGGA
CCCGACCGTCTCCT
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
GACGCGAC
TAGTTACGGAGCTC
ACACTCTACTCAAC
AAGCTGCACTGCCG
AAGCAGCCACACCT
GGACCCGTCCTTCA
CCATTTCATTCAGTT
GCGTCCTATGGCCCT
GACTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
GATGTAACT
AGTTACGGAGCTCA
CACTCTACTCAACA
AGTAGGCTGCCGAA
GCAGCCTACTGGAC
CCGTCCTTCACCAT
TTCATTCAGTTACAT
CCTATGGCCCTGACTG
GAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
GCACGTAC
TCTCCTCTCCGCAC
CGTCCCTTCGTACG
TGCCCTATGGCCCTG
ACTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
GTCCCATTC
GCCATGCCGAAGCA
TGTTGCCCAGCCGG
CGCCAGCGAGGAG
GCTGGGACCATGCC
GGCCCTATGGCCCTG
ACTGGAA
TAGAAATAGCAAGTT
TAAATAAGGCTAGTC
CGTTATCAACTTGAA
AAAGTGGGACCGAG
TCGGTCC
ACCTGAACC
GTATATC
AGTCCAAA
GTCCAGTCCTAGAG
TCCCTATGGCCCTGA
CTGGAA
The PEgRNAs of the above table are designed to site-specifically insert examples of the above motifs into the HEXA gene (defective in Tay-Sachs disease) (e.g., GenBank No. KR710351.1 (SEQ ID NO: 369), however, this is only for purposes of illustration. The use of prime editing in RNA tagging is not limited to the HEXA gene and indeed may be any. The HEXA mRNA has the following nucleotide sequence:
The corresponding HEXA protein has the following amino acid sequence:
Notably, the resulting RNA motifs would be included within the translated region of the HEXA gene, disrupting the function of the protein coding gene. Inserted polyadenylation motifs would result in premature transcript termination. This site is merely illustratrative of the potential PEgRNAs that could result in insertion of the listed RNA motifs of the above table within a genomic site that is transcribed and thus which would produce an RNA product.
PEgRNAs for use with PE for RNA tagging could be expressed from a U6 promoter (in which case a single guanosine would be added to the 5′ end of the PEgRNA for guides that include protospacers that do not begin with a G and 6-7 thymine would be added to the 3′ end) or a pol II promoter such as pCMV (in which case it might be necessary to remove the intrinsically transcribed sequence of this promoter from the 5′ end of the RNA via a self-cleaving element or Csy4 motif, and a termination motif would need to be added to the 3′ end of the RNA that does not result in export of the RNA from the nucleus, such as the 3′ box motif listed above. Note that this motif would not be inserted into the genome as a result of PE, as it would be 3′ of the annealing region). The core PEgRNA scaffold is underlined, the homology and annealing regions are italicized, and the inserted sequence is bolded. Note that the sequence inserted is the reverse complement of the above examples—as described below and therefore these PEgRNAs would need to be targeted to the coding strand.
Also, note that self-cleaving ribozymes other than HDV need in some embodiments to be tailored to the given target site; that is, while HDV cleaves the encoded transcript immediately 5′ to itself, the cut sites for all other self-cleaving ribozymes are within the ribozyme itself. Therefore, the first and last roughly 5-10 nucleotides (and in some instances potentially more than 10) would actually be a part of the encoded sequence. As an example, to cleave the sequence 5′NNNNNTCATCCTGATAAACTGCAAA3′ (SEQ ID NO: 371) after the 5 Ns, where N is any nucleotide, using a hammerhead self-cleaving ribozyme, the following sequence would be inserted, where the underlined sequences form an imperfect RNA pairing element.
There is significant flexibility in terms of the length and nature of this pairing element, and this would be true for any of the non-HDV self-cleaving ribozymes listed in the original submission. To install a hammerhead ribozyme to cleave the hexA mRNA using a PEgRNA with the same protospacer as the above listed constructs, the following PEgRNA sequence could be used (labels same as above):
GGCTAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGGACCGAGTCGGTCCACCTGA
GGATATACGGTTCAGGTCTATGGCCCTGACTGGAA-3′
(wherein the core PEgRNA scaffold is underlined, the homology and annealing regions are italicized, and the inserted sequence is bolded) (SEQ ID NO: 373).
Designing other PEgRNA for insertion of RNA motifs may follow the general principle described herein. However, it is noted that many of RNA motifs are potentially highly structured, which could make it difficult for them to be reverse-transcribed and inserted into the genome. Although for some RNA sequences, such as simple hairpins, both the RNA sequence itself and its complement are structured. However, that is unlikely to be true for the sequences noted above. Therefore, when inserting these motifs, it would most likely be best for the PEgRNA to encode the reverse complement of these sequences, resulting in the insertion of the DNA sequence actually encoding the motif into the genome. Similarly, inclusion of a self-cleaving ribozyme in the PEgRNA template region would result in processing and inefficient activity, while inclusion of its reverse complement would not. Thus, these PEgRNAs will likely have to target the coding strand, whereas PEgRNAs encoding other types of insertions (such as therapeutic correction) would be able to theoretically target either strand.
Also, note that for many of the inserted motifs, the resulting PEgRNA might not be able to be transcribed from the U6 promoter, necessitating use of other promoters, such as pCMV. Similarly, longer PEgRNAs could also be less stable. Shorter motifs, such as m6A markers, would not have this challenge.
D. Use of Dual Prime Editing for Insertion of Immunoepitopes
Dual prime editing (e.g., such as the embodiment shown in
The key concept of the invention is the use of dual prime editors to insert a nucleotide sequence containing previously described immunogenicity epitopes into endogenous or foreign genomic DNA for the downregulation and/or destruction of their protein products and/or expressing cell types. Nucleotide sequences for immunogenic epitope insertion would be targeted to genes in a manner to produce fusion proteins of the targeted gene's coded protein and the inserted immunogenic epitope's corresponding protein translation. Patient's immune systems will have been previously trained to recognize these epitopes as a result of standard prior immunization from routine vaccination against, for example, tetanus or diphtheria or measles. As a result of the immunogenic nature of the fused epitopes, patient's immune systems would be expected to recognize and disable the prime edited protein (not just the inserted epitope) and potentially the cells from which it was expressed.
Precise genome targeting technologies using the CRISPR/Cas system have recently been explored in a wide range of applications, including the insertion of engineered DNA sequences into targeted genomic loci. Previously, homology-directed repair (HDR) has been used for this application, requiring an ssDNA donor template and repair initiation by means of a double-stranded DNA break (DSB). This strategy offers the broadest range of possible changes to be made in cells and is the only method available to insert large DNA sequences into mammalian cells. However, HDR is hampered by undesired cellular side effects stemming from its initiating DSB, such as high levels of indel formation, DNA translocations, large deletions, and P53 activation. In addition to these drawbacks, HDR is limited by low efficiency in many cell types (T cells are a notable exception to this observation). Recent efforts to overcome these drawbacks include fusing human Rad51 mutants to a Cas9 D10A nickase (RDN), resulting in a DSB-free HDR system that features improved HDR product:indel ratios and lower off target editing, but is still hampered by cell-type dependencies and only modest HDR editing efficiency.
Recently developed fusions of Cas9 to reverse transcriptases (“Prime editors”) coupled with PEgRNAs represent a novel genome editing technology that offers a number of advantages over existing genome editing methods, including the ability to install any single nucleotide substitution, and to insert or delete any short stretch of nucleotides (up to at least several dozen bases) in a site-specific manner. Notably, PE edits are achieved with generally low rates of unintended indels. As such, PE enables targeted insertion-based editing applications that have been previously impossible or impractical.
This particular aspect describes a method for using prime editing as a means to insert known immunogenicity epitopes into endogenous or foreign genomic DNA, resulting in modification of the corresponding proteins for therapeutic or biotechnological applications (see
The key concept of this aspect is the use of prime editors to insert a nucleotide sequence containing previously described immunogenicity epitopes into endogenous or foreign genomic DNA for the downregulation and/or destruction of their protein products and/or expressing cell types. Nucleotide sequences for immunogenic epitope insertion would be targeted to genes in a manner to produce fusion proteins of the targeted gene's coded protein and the inserted immunogenic epitope's corresponding protein translation. Patient's immune systems will have been previously trained to recognize these epitopes as a result of standard prior immunization from routine vaccination against, for example, tetanus or diphtheria or measles. As a result of the immunogenic nature of the fused epitopes, patient's immune systems would be expected to recognize and disable the prime edited protein (not just the inserted epitope) and potentially the cells from which it was expressed.
Fusions to targeted genes would be engineered as needed to ensure the inserted epitope protein translation is exposed for immune system recognition. This could include targeted nucleotide insertions resulting in protein translations yielding C-terminal fusions of immunogenicity epitopes to targeted genes, N-terminal fusions of immunogenicity epitopes to targeted genes, or the insertion of nucleotides into genes so that immunogenicity epitopes are coded within surfaced-exposed regions of protein structure.
Protein linkers encoded as nucleotides inserted between the target gene sequence and the inserted immunogenicity epitope nucleotide sequence may need to be engineered as part of this invention to facilitate immune system recognition, cellular trafficking, protein function, or protein folding of the targeted gene. These inserted nucleotide-encoded protein linkers may include (but are not limited to) variable lengths and sequences of the XTEN linker or variable lengths and sequences of Glycine-Serine linkers. These engineered linkers have been previous used to successfully facilitate protein fusions. Exemplary linkers may include any of those described herein, including the amino acid sequence (GGGGS)n (SEQ ID NO: 165), (G)n (SEQ ID NO: 166), (EAAAK)n (SEQ ID NO: 167), (GGS)n (SEQ ID NO: 168), (SGGS)n (SEQ ID NO: 169), (XP)n (SEQ ID NO: 170), or any combination thereof, wherein n is independently an integer between 1 and 30, and wherein X is any amino acid. In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence (GGS)n (SEQ ID NO: 176), wherein n is 1, 3, or 7. In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGSETPGTSESATPES (SEQ ID NO: 171). In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATPESSGGSSGGS (SEQ ID NO: 172). In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGGSGGSGGS (SEQ ID NO: 173). In some embodiments, the linker comprises the amino acid sequence SGGS (SEQ ID NO: 174).
Distinguishing features of this aspect include the ability to use previously acquired immune responses to specific amino acid sequences as a means to induce an immune response against otherwise non-immunogenic proteins. Another distinguishing feature is the ability to insert the nucleotide sequences of these immunogenic epitopes in a targets manner that does not induce high levels of unwanted indels as a by-product editing and is efficient in its insertion. This specific application of PE has the ability to combine cell type-specific delivery methods (such as AAV serotypes) to insert epitopes in cell types that are of interest to trigger an immune response to.
Prime editing as a means of inserting immunogenic epitopes into pathogenic genes could be used to program the patient's immune system to fight a wide variety of diseases (not limited to cancer as with immuno-oncology strategies). An immediately relevant use of this technology would be as a cancer therapeutic as it could undermine a tumor's immune escape mechanism by causing an immune response to a relevant oncogene like HER2 or growth factors like EGFR. Such an approach could seem similar to T-cell engineering, but one novel advance of this approach is that it can be utilized in many cell types and for diseases beyond cancer, without needed to generate and introduce engineered T-cells into patients.
Using PE to insert an immunogenicity epitope which most people are already vaccinated against (tetanus, pertussis, diphtheria, measles, mumps, rubella, etc.) into a foreign or endogenous gene that drives a disease, so the patient's immune system learns to disable that protein.
Diseases that stand to have a potential therapeutic benefit from the aforementioned strategy include those caused by aggregation of toxic proteins, such as in fatal familial insomnia. Other diseases that could benefit include those caused by pathogenic overexpression of an otherwise nontoxic endogenous protein, and those caused by foreign pathogens.
Primary therapeutic indications include those mentioned above such as therapeutics for cancer, prion and other neurodegenerative diseases, infectious diseases, and preventative medicine. Secondary therapeutic indications may include preventative care for patients with late-onset genetic diseases. It is expected that current standard of care medicines may be used in conjunction with prime editing for some diseases, like particularly aggressive cancers, or in cases where medications help alleviate disease symptoms until the disease completely cured. Below are examples of immunoepitopes that may be inserted into genes by the herein disclosed prime editors:
Additional immunoepitopes may also be installed which are known in the art. Any of the immunoepitopes available from the Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (iedb.org/epitopedetails_v3.php) (the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference) may be installed by the prime editors disclosed herein.
In some embodiments, the immunoepitopes which may be installed by the prime editors disclosed herein may include any of the following epitopes:
E. Delivery of Multi-Flap Prime Editors
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides for the delivery of multi-flap prime editors in vitro and in vivo using various strategies, including on separate vectors using split inteins and as well as direct delivery strategies of the ribonucleoprotein complex (i.e., the prime editor complexed to the PEgRNA and/or the second-site gRNA) using techniques such as electroporation, use of cationic lipid-mediated formulations, and induced endocytosis methods using receptor ligands fused to the ribonucleotprotein complexes. Any such methods are contemplated herein.
Overview of Delivery Options
In some aspects, the invention provides methods comprising delivering one or more multi-flap prime editor-encoding polynucleotides, such as or one or more vectors as described herein encoding one or more components of the multi-flap prime editing system described herein, one or more transcripts thereof, and/or one or proteins transcribed therefrom, to a host cell. In some aspects, the invention further provides cells produced by such methods, and organisms (such as animals, plants, or fungi) comprising or produced from such cells. In some embodiments, a multi-flap prime editor as described herein in combination with (and optionally complexed with) a guide sequence is delivered to a cell. Conventional viral and non-viral based gene transfer methods can be used to introduce nucleic acids in mammalian cells or target tissues. Such methods can be used to administer nucleic acids encoding components of a multi-flap prime editor system to cells in culture, or in a host organism. Non-viral vector delivery systems include DNA plasmids, RNA (e.g. a transcript of a vector described herein), naked nucleic acid, and nucleic acid complexed with a delivery vehicle, such as a liposome. Viral vector delivery systems include DNA and RNA viruses, which have either episomal or integrated genomes after delivery to the cell. For a review of gene therapy procedures, see Anderson, Science 256:808-813 (1992); Nabel & Felgner, TIBTECH 11:211-217 (1993); Mitani & Caskey, TIBTECH 11:162-166 (1993); Dillon, TIBTECH 11:167-175 (1993); Miller, Nature 357:455-460 (1992); Van Brunt, Biotechnology 6(10):1149-1154 (1988); Vigne, Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 8:35-36 (1995); Kremer & Perricaudet, British Medical Bulletin 51(1):31-44 (1995); Haddada et al., in Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology Doerfler and Bihm (eds) (1995); and Yu et al., Gene Therapy 1:13-26 (1994).
Methods of non-viral delivery of nucleic acids include lipofection, nucleofection, microinjection, biolistics, virosomes, liposomes, immunoliposomes, polycation or lipid:nucleic acid conjugates, naked DNA, artificial virions, and agent-enhanced uptake of DNA. Lipofection is described in e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,049,386, 4,946,787; and 4,897,355) and lipofection reagents are sold commercially (e.g., Transfectam™ and Lipofectin™). Cationic and neutral lipids that are suitable for efficient receptor-recognition lipofection of polynucleotides include those of Feigner, WO 91/17424; WO 91/16024. Delivery can be to cells (e.g. in vitro or ex vivo administration) or target tissues (e.g. in vivo administration).
The preparation of lipid:nucleic acid complexes, including targeted liposomes such as immunolipid complexes, is well known to one of skill in the art (see, e.g., Crystal, Science 270:404-410 (1995); Blaese et al., Cancer Gene Ther. 2:291-297 (1995); Behr et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 5:382-389 (1994); Remy et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 5:647-654 (1994); Gao et al., Gene Therapy 2:710-722 (1995); Ahmad et al., Cancer Res. 52:4817-4820 (1992); U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,186,183, 4,217,344, 4,235,871, 4,261,975, 4,485,054, 4,501,728, 4,774,085, 4,837,028, and 4,946,787).
The use of RNA or DNA viral based systems for the delivery of nucleic acids take advantage of highly evolved processes for targeting a virus to specific cells in the body and trafficking the viral payload to the nucleus. Viral vectors can be administered directly to patients (in vivo) or they can be used to treat cells in vitro, and the modified cells may optionally be administered to patients (ex vivo). Conventional viral based systems could include retroviral, lentivirus, adenoviral, adeno-associated and herpes simplex virus vectors for gene transfer. Integration in the host genome is possible with the retrovirus, lentivirus, and adeno-associated virus gene transfer methods, often resulting in long term expression of the inserted transgene. Additionally, high transduction efficiencies have been observed in many different cell types and target tissues.
The tropism of a viruses can be altered by incorporating foreign envelope proteins, expanding the potential target population of target cells. Lentiviral vectors are retroviral vectors that are able to transduce or infect non-dividing cells and typically produce high viral titers. Selection of a retroviral gene transfer system would therefore depend on the target tissue. Retroviral vectors are comprised of cis-acting long terminal repeats with packaging capacity for up to 6-10 kb of foreign sequence. The minimum cis-acting LTRs are sufficient for replication and packaging of the vectors, which are then used to integrate the therapeutic gene into the target cell to provide permanent transgene expression. Widely used retroviral vectors include those based upon murine leukemia virus (MuLV), gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV), Simian Immuno deficiency virus (SIV), human immuno deficiency virus (HIV), and combinations thereof (see, e.g., Buchscher et al., J. Virol. 66:2731-2739 (1992); Johann et al., J. Virol. 66:1635-1640 (1992); Sommnerfelt et al., Virol. 176:58-59 (1990); Wilson et al., J. Virol. 63:2374-2378 (1989); Miller et al., J. Virol. 65:2220-2224 (1991); PCT/US94/05700). In applications where transient expression is preferred, adenoviral based systems may be used. Adenoviral based vectors are capable of very high transduction efficiency in many cell types and do not require cell division. With such vectors, high titer and levels of expression have been obtained. This vector can be produced in large quantities in a relatively simple system. Adeno-associated virus (“AAV”) vectors may also be used to transduce cells with target nucleic acids, e.g., in the in vitro production of nucleic acids and peptides, and for in vivo and ex vivo gene therapy procedures (see, e.g., West et al., Virology 160:38-47 (1987); U.S. Pat. No. 4,797,368; WO 93/24641; Kotin, Human Gene Therapy 5:793-801 (1994); Muzyczka, J. Clin. Invest. 94:1351 (1994). Construction of recombinant AAV vectors are described in a number of publications, including U.S. Pat. No. 5,173,414; Tratschin et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:3251-3260 (1985); Tratschin, et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:2072-2081 (1984); Hermonat & Muzyczka, PNAS 81:6466-6470 (1984); and Samulski et al., J. Virol. 63:03822-3828 (1989).
Packaging cells are typically used to form virus particles that are capable of infecting a host cell. Such cells include 293 cells, which package adenovirus, and ψ2 cells or PA317 cells, which package retrovirus. Viral vectors used in gene therapy are usually generated by producing a cell line that packages a nucleic acid vector into a viral particle. The vectors typically contain the minimal viral sequences required for packaging and subsequent integration into a host, other viral sequences being replaced by an expression cassette for the polynucleotide(s) to be expressed. The missing viral functions are typically supplied in trans by the packaging cell line. For example, AAV vectors used in gene therapy typically only possess ITR sequences from the AAV genome which are required for packaging and integration into the host genome. Viral DNA is packaged in a cell line, which contains a helper plasmid encoding the other AAV genes, namely rep and cap, but lacking ITR sequences. The cell line may also be infected with adenovirus as a helper. The helper virus promotes replication of the AAV vector and expression of AAV genes from the helper plasmid. The helper plasmid is not packaged in significant amounts due to a lack of ITR sequences. Contamination with adenovirus can be reduced by, e.g., heat treatment to which adenovirus is more sensitive than AAV. Additional methods for the delivery of nucleic acids to cells are known to those skilled in the art. See, for example, US20030087817, incorporated herein by reference.
In various embodiments, the dual PE constructs (including, the split-constructs) may be engineered for delivery in one or more rAAV vectors. An rAAV as related to any of the methods and compositions provided herein may be of any serotype including any derivative or pseudotype (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 2/1, 2/5, 2/8, 2/9, 3/1, 3/5, 3/8, or 3/9). An rAAV may comprise a genetic load (i.e., a recombinant nucleic acid vector that expresses a gene of interest, such as a whole or split PE fusion protein that is carried by the rAAV into a cell) that is to be delivered to a cell. An rAAV may be chimeric.
As used herein, the serotype of an rAAV refers to the serotype of the capsid proteins of the recombinant virus. Non-limiting examples of derivatives and pseudotypes include rAAV2/1, rAAV2/5, rAAV2/8, rAAV2/9, AAV2-AAV3 hybrid, AAVrh.10, AAVhu.14, AAV3a/3b, AAVrh32.33, AAV-HSC15, AAV-HSC17, AAVhu.37, AAVrh.8, CHt-P6, AAV2.5, AAV6.2, AAV2i8, AAV-HSC15/17, AAVM41, AAV9.45, AAV6(Y445F/Y731F), AAV2.5T, AAV-HAE1/2, AAV clone 32/83, AAVShH10, AAV2 (Y→F), AAV8 (Y733F), AAV2.15, AAV2.4, AAVM41, and AAVr3.45. A non-limiting example of derivatives and pseudotypes that have chimeric VP1 proteins is rAAV2/5-1VP1u, which has the genome of AAV2, capsid backbone of AAV5 and VP1u of AAV1. Other non-limiting example of derivatives and pseudotypes that have chimeric VP1 proteins are rAAV2/5-8VP1u, rAAV2/9-1VP1u, and rAAV2/9-8VP1u.
AAV derivatives/pseudotypes, and methods of producing such derivatives/pseudotypes are known in the art (see, e.g., Mol Ther. 2012 April; 20(4):699-708. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.287. Epub 2012 Jan. 24. The AAV vector toolkit: poised at the clinical crossroads. Asokan A1, Schaffer D V, Samulski R J). Methods for producing and using pseudotyped rAAV vectors are known in the art (see, e.g., Duan et al., J. Virol., 75:7662-7671, 2001; Halbert et al., J. Virol., 74:1524-1532, 2000; Zolotukhin et al., Methods, 28:158-167, 2002; and Auricchio et al., Hum. Molec. Genet., 10:3075-3081, 2001).
Methods of making or packaging rAAV particles are known in the art and reagents are commercially available (see, e.g., Zolotukhin et al. Production and purification of serotype 1, 2, and 5 recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors. Methods 28 (2002) 158-167; and U.S. Patent Publication Numbers US20070015238 and US20120322861, which are incorporated herein by reference; and plasmids and kits available from ATCC and Cell Biolabs, Inc.). For example, a plasmid comprising a gene of interest may be combined with one or more helper plasmids, e.g., that contain a rep gene (e.g., encoding Rep78, Rep68, Rep52 and Rep40) and a cap gene (encoding VP1, VP2, and VP3, including a modified VP2 region as described herein), and transfected into a recombinant cells such that the rAAV particle can be packaged and subsequently purified.
Recombinant AAV may comprise a nucleic acid vector, which may comprise at a minimum: (a) one or more heterologous nucleic acid regions comprising a sequence encoding a protein or polypeptide of interest or an RNA of interest (e.g., a siRNA or microRNA), and (b) one or more regions comprising inverted terminal repeat (ITR) sequences (e.g., wild-type ITR sequences or engineered ITR sequences) flanking the one or more nucleic acid regions (e.g., heterologous nucleic acid regions). Herein, heterologous nucleic acid regions comprising a sequence encoding a protein of interest or RNA of interest are referred to as genes of interest.
Any one of the rAAV particles provided herein may have capsid proteins that have amino acids of different serotypes outside of the VP1u region. In some embodiments, the serotype of the backbone of the VP1 protein is different from the serotype of the ITRs and/or the Rep gene. In some embodiments, the serotype of the backbone of the VP1 capsid protein of a particle is the same as the serotype of the ITRs. In some embodiments, the serotype of the backbone of the VP1 capsid protein of a particle is the same as the serotype of the Rep gene. In some embodiments, capsid proteins of rAAV particles comprise amino acid mutations that result in improved transduction efficiency.
In some embodiments, the nucleic acid vector comprises one or more regions comprising a sequence that facilitates expression of the nucleic acid (e.g., the heterologous nucleic acid), e.g., expression control sequences operatively linked to the nucleic acid. Numerous such sequences are known in the art. Non-limiting examples of expression control sequences include promoters, insulators, silencers, response elements, introns, enhancers, initiation sites, termination signals, and poly(A) tails. Any combination of such control sequences is contemplated herein (e.g., a promoter and an enhancer).
Final AAV constructs may incorporate a sequence encoding the PEgRNA. In other embodiments, the AAV constructs may incorporate a sequence encoding the second-site nicking guide RNA. In still other embodiments, the AAV constructs may incorporate a sequence encoding the second-site nicking guide RNA and a sequence encoding the PEgRNA.
In various embodiments, the PEgRNAs and the second-site nicking guide RNAs can be expressed from an appropriate promoter, such as a human U6 (hU6) promoter, a mouse U6 (mU6) promoter, or other appropriate promoter. The PEgRNAs and the second-site nicking guide RNAs can be driven by the same promoters or different promoters.
In some embodiments, a rAAV constructs or the herein compositions are administered to a subject enterally. In some embodiments, a rAAV constructs or the herein compositions are administered to the subject parenterally. In some embodiments, a rAAV particle or the herein compositions are administered to a subject subcutaneously, intraocularly, intravitreally, subretinally, intravenously (IV), intracerebro-ventricularly, intramuscularly, intrathecally (IT), intracisternally, intraperitoneally, via inhalation, topically, or by direct injection to one or more cells, tissues, or organs. In some embodiments, a rAAV particle or the herein compositions are administered to the subject by injection into the hepatic artery or portal vein.
Split Multi-Flap PE Vector-Based Strategies
In this aspect, the multi-flap prime editors can be divided at a split site and provided as two halves of a whole/complete prime editor. The two halves can be delivered to cells (e.g., as expressed proteins or on separate expression vectors) and once in contact inside the cell, the two halves form the complete prime editor through the self-splicing action of the inteins on each prime editor half. Split intein sequences can be engineered into each of the halves of the encoded prime editor to facilitate their transplicing inside the cell and the concomitant restoration of the complete, functioning PE.
These split intein-based methods overcome several barriers to in vivo delivery. For example, the DNA encoding prime editors is larger than the rAAV packaging limit, and so requires special solutions. One such solution is formulating the editor fused to split intein pairs that are packaged into two separate rAAV particles that, when co-delivered to a cell, reconstitute the functional editor protein. Several other special considerations to account for the unique features of multi-flap prime editing are described, including the optimization of second-site nicking targets and properly packaging multi-flap prime editors into virus vectors, including lentiviruses and rAAV.
In this aspect, the multi-flap prime editors can be divided at a split site and provided as two halves of a whole/complete prime editor. The two halves can be delivered to cells (e.g., as expressed proteins or on separate expression vectors) and once in contact inside the cell, the two halves form the complete prime editor through the self-splicing action of the inteins on each prime editor half. Split intein sequences can be engineered into each of the halves of the encoded prime editor to facilitate their transplicing inside the cell and the concomitant restoration of the complete, functioning PE.
In various embodiments, the multi-flap prime editors may be engineered as two half proteins (i.e., a PE N-terminal half and a PE C-terminal half) by “splitting” the whole prime editor as a “split site.” The “split site” refers to the location of insertion of split intein sequences (i.e., the N intein and the C intein) between two adjacent amino acid residues in the prime editor. More specifically, the “split site” refers to the location of dividing the whole prime editor into two separate halves, wherein in each halve is fused at the split site to either the N intein or the C intein motifs. The split site can be at any suitable location in the prime editor fusion protein, but preferably the split site is located at a position that allows for the formation of two half proteins which are appropriately sized for delivery (e.g., by expression vector) and wherein the inteins, which are fused to each half protein at the split site termini, are available to sufficiently interact with one another when one half protein contacts the other half protein inside the cell.
In some embodiments, the split site is located in the napDNAbp domain. In other embodiments, the split site is located in the RT domain. In other embodiments, the split site is located in a linker that joins the napDNAbp domain and the RT domain.
In various embodiments, split site design requires finding sites to split and insert an N- and C-terminal intein that are both structurally permissive for purposes of packaging the two half prime editor domains into two different AAV genomes. Additionally, intein residues necessary for trans splicing can be incorporated by mutating residues at the N terminus of the C terminal extein or inserting residues that will leave an intein “scar.”
Exemplary split configurations of split multi-flap (e.g., dual flap or quadruple flap) prime editors comprising either the SpCas9 nickase or the SaCas9 nickase are as follows.
S. PYOGENES PE, SPLIT AT LINKER, N TERMINAL PORTION
MKRTADGSEFESPKKKRKV
DKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVPSKKFKVLGNTDRHSI
KKNLIGALLFDSGETAEATRLKRTARRRYTRRKNRICYLQEIFSNEMAKVDDSFFHRLEES
FLVEEDKKHERHPIFGNIVDEVAYHEKYPTIYHLRKKLVDSTDKADLRLIYLALAHMIKFR
GHFLIEGDLNPDNSDVDKLFIQLVQTYNQLFEENPINASGVDAKAILSARLSKSRRLENLIA
QLPGEKKNGLFGNLIALSLGLTPNFKSNFDLAEDAKLQLSKDTYDDDLDNLLAQIGDQYA
DLFLAAKNLSDAILLSDILRVNTEITKAPLSASMIKRYDEHHQDLTLLKALVRQQLPEKYK
EIFFDQSKNGYAGYIDGGASQEEFYKFIKPILEKMDGTEELLVKLNREDLLRKQRTFDNG
SIPHQIHLGELHAILRRQEDFYPFLKDNREKIEKILTFRIPYYVGPLARGNSRFAWMTRKS
EETITPWNFEEVVDKGASAQSFIERMTNFDKNLPNEKVLPKHSLLYEYFTVYNELTKVKY
VTEGMRKPAFLSGEQKKAIVDLLFKTNRKVTVKQLKEDYFKKIECFDSVEISGVEDRFNA
SLGTYHDLLKIIKDKDFLDNEENEDILEDIVLTLTLFEDREMIEERLKTYAHLFDDKVMKQ
LKRRRYTGWGRLSRKLINGIRDKQSGKTILDFLKSDGFANRNFMQLIHDDSLTFKEDIQK
AQVSGQGDSLHEHIANLAGSPAIKKGILQTVKVVDELVKVMGRHKPENIVIEMARENQTT
QKGQKNSRERMKRIEEGIKELGSQILKEHPVENTQLQNEKLYLYYLQNGRDMYVDQEL
DINRLSDYDVDAIVPQSFLKDDSIDNKVLTRSDKNRGKSDNVPSEEVVKKMKNYWRQLL
NAKLITQRKFDNLTKAERGGLSELDKAGFIKRQLVETRQITKHVAQILDSRMNTKYDEND
KLIREVKVITLKSKLVSDFRKDFQFYKVREINNYHHAHDAYLNAVVGTALIKKYPKLESEF
VYGDYKYYDVRKMIAKSEQEIGKATAKYFFYSNIMNFFKTEITLANGEIRKRPLIETNGET
GEIVWDKGRDFATVRKVLSMPQVNIVKKTEVQTGGFSKESILPKRNSDKLIARKKDWDP
KKYGGFDSPTVAYSVLVVAKVEKGKSKKLKSVKELLGITIMERSSFEKNPIDFLEAKGYKE
VKKDLIIKLPKYSLFELENGRKRMLASAGELQKGNELALPSKYVNFLYLASHYEKLKGSP
EDNEQKQLFVEQHKHYLDEIIEQISEFSKRVILADANLDKVLSAYNKHRDKPIREQAENII
HLFTLTNLGAPAAFKYFDTTIDRKRYTSTKEVLDATLIHQSITGLYETRIDLSQLGGD
SGGS
SGGS
CLSYETEILTVEYGLLPIGKIVEKRIECTVYSVDNNGNIYTQPVAQWHDRGEQEVFEYCL
NLS (SEQ ID NO: 124, 125)
LINKER
(SEQ ID NO: 446)
S. PYOGENES PE, SPLIT AT LINKER, C TERMINAL PORTION
MKRTADGSEFESPKKKRKV
IKIATRKYLGKQNVYDIGVERDHNFALKNGFIASN
CFNSGSETPGTS
ESATPESSGGSSGGSS
TLNIEDEYRLHETSKEPDVSLGSTWLSDFPQAWAETGGMGLAVRQAPLIIP
LKATSTPVSIKQYPMSQEARLGIKPHIQRLLDQGILVPCQSPWNTPLLPVKKPGTNDYRPVQDLREV
NKRVEDIHPTVPNPYNLLSGLPPSHQWYTVLDLKDAFFCLRLHPTSQPLFAFEWRDPEMGISGQLT
WTRLPQGFKNSPTLFDEALHRDLADFRIQHPDLILLQYVDDLLLAATSELDCQQGTRALLQTLGNL
GYRASAKKAQICQKQVKYLGYLLKEGQRWLTEARKETVMGQPTPKTPRQLREFLGTAGFCRLWIPG
FAEMAAPLYPLTKTGTLFNWGPDQQKAYQEIKQALLTAPALGLPDLTKPFELFVDEKQGYAKGVLTQ
KLGPWRRPVAYLSKKLDPVAAGWPPCLRMVAAIAVLTKDAGKLTMGQPLVILAPHAVEALVKQPPDR
WLSNARMTHYQALLLDTDRVQFGPWALNPATLLPLPEEGLQHNCLDILAEAHGTRPDLTDQPLPD
ADHTWYTDGSSLLQEGQRKAGAAVFPETEVIWAKALPAGTSAQRAELIALTQALKMAEGKKLNVYTD
SRYAFATAHIHGEIYRRRGLLTSEGKEIKNKDEILALLKALFLPKRLSIIHCPGHQKGHSAEARGNRMA
DQAARKAAITETPDTSTLLIENSSP
SGGSKRYADGSEFEPKKKRKV
NLS (SEQ ID NO: 124, 125)
LINKER 1
(SEQ ID NO: 453)
LINKER 2
(SEQ ID NO: 174)
NPUC INTEIN (SEQ ID NO: 452)
RT
(SEQ ID NO: 454)
S. AUREUS PE, SPLIT BETWEEN RESIDUES 740/741, N TERMINAL PORTION
MKRTADGSEFESPKKKRKV
GKRNYILGLAIGITSVGYGIIDYETRDVIDAGVRLFKEANVEN
NEGRRSKRGARRLKRRRRHRIQRVKKLLFDYNLLTDHSELSGINPYEARVKGLSQKLSEE
EFSAALLHLAKRRGVHNVNEVEEDTGNELSTKEQISRNSKALEEKYVAELQLERLKKDG
EVRGSINRFKTSDYVKEAKQLLKVQKAYHQLDQSFIDTYIDLLETRRTYYEGPGEGSPFG
WKDIKEWYEMLMGHCTYFPEELRSVKYAYNADLYNALNDLNNLVITRDENEKLEYYEK
FQIIENVFKQKKKPTLKQIAKEILVNEEDIKGYRVTSTGKPEFTNLKVYHDIKDITARKEII
ENAELLDQIAKILTIYQSSEDIQEELTNLNSELTQEEIEQISNLKGYTGTHNLSLKAINLILD
ELWHTNDNQIAIFNRLKLVPKKVDLSQQKEIPTTLVDDFILSPVVKRSFIQSIKVINAIIKKY
GLPNDIIIELAREKNSKDAQKMINEMQKRNRQTNERIEEIIRTTGKENAKYLIEKIKLHDM
QEGKCLYSLEAIPLEDLLNNPFNYEVDHIIPRSVSFDNSFNNKVLVKQEENSKKGNRTPFQ
YLSSSDSKISYETFKKHILNLAKGKGRISKTKKEYLLEERDINRFSVQKDFINRNLVDTRYA
TRGLMNLLRSYFRVNNLDVKVKSINGGFTSFLRRKWKFKKERNKGYKHHAEDALIIANA
DFIFKEWKKLDKAKKVMENQMFEEKQAECLSYETEILTVEYGLLPIGKIVEKRIECTVYSVD
NLS (SEQ ID NO: 124, 125)
CAS9 (SEQ ID NO: 460)
LINKER
(SEQ ID NO: 174)
S. AUREUS PE, SPLIT BETWEEN RESIDUES 740/741, C TERMINAL PORTION
MKRTADGSEFESPKKKRKV
IKIATRKYLGKQNVYDIGVERDHNFALKNGFIASN
CFN
EIETEQEY
KEIFITPHQIKHIKDFKDYKYSHRVDKKPNRKLINDTLYSTRKDDKGNTLIVNNLNGLYDK
DNDKLKKLINKSPEKLLMYHHDPQTYQKLKLIMEQYGDEKNPLYKYYEETGNYLTKYS
KKDNGPVIKKIKYYGNKLNAHLDITDDYPNSRNKVVKLSLKPYRFDVYLDNGVYKFVTV
KNLDVIKKENYYEVNSKCYEEAKKLKKISNQAEFIASFYKNDLIKINGELYRVIGVNNDLL
NRIEVNMIDITYREYLENMNDKRPPHIIKTIASKTQSIKKYSTDILGNLYEVKSKKHPQIIK
KG
SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATPFSSGGSSGGSS
TLNIEDEYRLHETSKEPDVSLGSTWLSDFP
QAWAETGGMGLAVRQAPLIIPLKATSTPVSIKQYPMSQEARLGIKPHIQRLLDQGILVPCQSPWNTPL
LPVKKPGTNDYRPVQDLREVNKRVEDIHPTVPNPYNLLSGLPPSHQWYTVLDLKDAFFCLRLHPTS
QPLFAFEWRDPEMGISGQLTWTRLPQGFKNSPTLFDEALHRDLADFRIQHPDLILLQYVDDLLLAAT
SELDCQQGTRALLQTLGNLGYRASAKKAQICQKQVKYLGYLLKEGQRWLTEARKETVMGQPTPKTP
RQLREFLGTAGFCRLWIPGFAEMAAPLYPLTKTGTLFNWGPDQQKAYQEIKQALLTAPALGLPDLTK
PFELFVDEKQGYAKGVLTQKLGPWRRPVAYLSKKLDPVAAGWPPCLRMVAAIAVLTKDAGKLTMGQ
PLVILAPHAVEALVKQPPDRWLSNARMTHYQALLLDTDRVQFGPWALNPATLLPLPEEGLQHNCLD
ILAEAHGTRPDLTDQPLPDADHTWYTDGSSLLQEGQRKAGAAVTTETEVIWAKALPAGTSAQRAELI
ALTQALKMAEGKKLNVYTDSRYAFATAHIHGEIYRRRGLLTSEGKEIKNKDEILALLKALFLPKRLSIIH
CPGHQKGHSAEARGNRMADQAARKAAITETPDTSTLLIENSSP
SGGSKRTADGSEFEPKKKRKV
NLS (SEQ ID NO: 124, 125)
CAS9 (SEQ ID NO: 467)
LINKER 1
(SEQ ID NO: 127)
LINKER 2
(SEQ ID NO: 174)
NPUC INTEIN (SEQ ID NO: 452)
RT
(SEQ ID NO: 471)
In various embodiments, using SpCas9 nickase (SEQ ID NO: 18, 1368 amino acids) as an example, the split can between any two amino acids between 1 and 1368. Preferred splits, however, will be located between the central region of the protein, e.g., from amino acids 50-1250, or from 100-1200, or from 150-1150, or from 200-1100, or from 250-1050, or from 300-1000, or from 350-950, or from 400-900, or from 450-850, or from 500-800, or from 550-750, or from 600-700 of SEQ ID NO: 18. In specific exemplary embodiments, the split site may be between 740/741, or 801/802, or 1010/1011, or 1041/1042. In other embodiments the split site may be between 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 4/5, 5/6, 6/7, 7/8, 8/9, 9/10, 10/11, 12/13, 14/15, 15/16, 17/18, 19/20, 20/21, 21/22, 22/23, 23/24, 24/25, 25/26, 26/27, 27/28, 28/29, 29/30, 30/31, 31/32, 32/33, 33/34, 34/35, 35/36, 36/37, 38/39, 39/40, 41/42, 42/43, 43/44, 44/45, 45/46, 46/47, 47/48, 48/49, 49/50, 51/52, 52/53, 53/54, 54/55, 55/56, 56/57, 57/58, 58/59, 59/60, 61/62, 62/63, 63/64, 64/65, 65/66, 66/67, 67/68, 68/69, 69/70, 71/72, 72/73, 73/74, 74/75, 75/76, 76/77, 77/78, 78/79, 79/80, 81/82, 82/83, 83/84, 84/85, 85/86, 86/87, 87/88, 88/89, 89/90, or between any two pairs of adjacent residues between 90-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-250, 250-300, 300-350, 350-400, 450-500, 500-550, 550-600, 600-650, 650-700, 700-750, 750-800, 800-850, 850-900, 900-950, 950-1000, 1000-1050, 1050-1100, 1100-1150, 1150-1200, 1200-1250, 1250-1300, 1300-1350, and 1350-1368, relative to SpCas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18, at between any two corresponding residues in an amino acid sequence having at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98%, 99%, or 99.9% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 18, or between any two corresponding residues in a variant or equivalent of SpCas9 of any of amino acid sequences SEQ ID NOs. 19-88, or an amino acid sequence having at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98%, 99%, or 99.9% sequence identity with any of SEQ ID NOs: 19-88.
In various embodiments, the split intein sequences can be engineered by from the following intein sequences.
In various other embodiments, the split intein sequences can be used as follows:
In various embodiments, the split inteins can be used to separately deliver separate portions of a complete PE fusion protein to a cell, which upon expression in a cell, become reconstituted as a complete PE fusion protein through the trans splicing.
In some embodiments, the disclosure provides a method of delivering a PE fusion protein to a cell, comprising:
The split site in some embodiments can be anywhere in the prime editor fusion, including the napDNAbp domain, the linker, or the reverse transcriptase domain.
In other embodiments, the split site is in the napDNAbp domain.
In still other embodiments, the split site is in the reverse transcriptase or polymerase domain.
In yet other embodiments, the split site is in the linker.
In various embodiments, the present disclosure provides multi-flap prime editors comprising a napDNAbp (e.g., a Cas9 domain) and a reverse transcriptase wherein one or both of the napDNAbp and/or the reverse transcriptase comprise an intein, for example, a ligand-dependent intein. Typically the intein is a ligand-dependent intein which exhibits no or minimal protein splicing activity in the absence of ligand (e.g., small molecules such as 4-hydroxytamoxifen, peptides, proteins, polynucleotides, amino acids, and nucleotides). Ligand-dependent inteins are known, and include those described in U.S. patent application U.S. Ser. No. 14/004,280, published as U.S. 2014/0065711 A1, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. In addition, use of split-Cas9 architecture In some embodiments, the intein comprises an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 8-15, 447, 452, 462, and 472-479.
In various embodiments, the napDNAbp domains are smaller-sized napDNAbp domains as compared to the canonical SpCas9 domain of SEQ ID NO: 18.
The canonical SpCas9 protein is 1368 amino acids in length and has a predicted molecular weight of 158 kilodaltons. The term “small-sized Cas9 variant”, as used herein, refers to any Cas9 variant—naturally occurring, engineered, or otherwise—that is less than at least 1300 amino acids, or at least less than 1290 amino acids, or than less than 1280 amino acids, or less than 1270 amino acid, or less than 1260 amino acid, or less than 1250 amino acids, or less than 1240 amino acids, or less than 1230 amino acids, or less than 1220 amino acids, or less than 1210 amino acids, or less than 1200 amino acids, or less than 1190 amino acids, or less than 1180 amino acids, or less than 1170 amino acids, or less than 1160 amino acids, or less than 1150 amino acids, or less than 1140 amino acids, or less than 1130 amino acids, or less than 1120 amino acids, or less than 1110 amino acids, or less than 1100 amino acids, or less than 1050 amino acids, or less than 1000 amino acids, or less than 950 amino acids, or less than 900 amino acids, or less than 850 amino acids, or less than 800 amino acids, or less than 750 amino acids, or less than 700 amino acids, or less than 650 amino acids, or less than 600 amino acids, or less than 550 amino acids, or less than 500 amino acids, but at least larger than about 400 amino acids and retaining the required functions of the Cas9 protein.
In one embodiment, as depicted in Example 20, the specification embraces the following split-intein PE constructs, which are split between residues 1024 and 1025 of the canonical SpCas9 (SEQ ID NO: 18) (or which may be referred to as residues 1023 and 1024, respectively, relative to a Met-minus SEQ ID NO: 18).
First, the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 18 is shown as follows, indicating the location of the split site between 1024 (“K”) and 1025 (“S”) residues:
M
DKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVPSKKFKVLGNTDR
Streptococcus
pyogenes
In this configuration, the amino acid sequence of N-terminal half (amino acids 1-1024) is as follows:
In this configuration, the amino acid sequence of N-terminal half (amino acids 1-1023) (where the protein is Met-minus at position 1) is as follows:
In this configuration, the amino acid sequence of C-terminal half (amino acids 1024-1368 (or counted as amino acids 1023-1367 in a Met-minus Cas9) is as follows:
S
EQEIGKATAKYFFYSNIMNFFKTEITLANGEIRKRPLIETNGETGEIVW
As shown in Example 20, the PE2 (which is based on SpCas9 of SEQ ID NO: 18) construct was split at position 1023/1024 (relative to a Met-minus SEQ ID NO: 18) into two separate constructs, as follows:
MKRTADGSEFESPKKKRKVDKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVPSKKFKVLGNTDRH
DFPQAWAETGGMGLAVRQAPLIIPLKATSTPVSIKQYPMSQEARLGIKPHIQRLLDQGILVP
CQSPWNTPLLPVKKPGTNDYRPVQDLREVNKRVEDIHPTVPNPYNLLSGLPPSHQWYTVLD
LKDAFFCLRLHPTSQPLFAFEWRDPEMGISGQLTWTRLPQGFKNSPTLFNEALHRDLADFR
IQHPDLILLQYVDDLLLAATSELDCQQGTRALLQTLGNLGYRASAKKAQICQKQVKYLGY
LLKEGQRWLTEARKETVMGQPTPKTPRQLREFLGKAGFCRLFIPGFAEMAAPLYPLTKPG
TLFNWGPDQQKAYQEIKQALLTAPALGLPDLTKPFELFVDEKQGYAKGVLTQKLGPWRR
PVAYLSKKLDPVAAGWPPCLRMVAAIAVLTKDAGKLTMGQPLVILAPHAVEALVKQPPDR
WLSNARMTHYQALLLDTDRVQFGPVVALNPATLLPLPEEGLQHNCLDILAEAHGTRPDLT
DQPLPDADHTWYTDGSSLLQEGQRKAGAAVTTETEVIWAKALPAGTSAQRAELIALTQAL
KMAEGKKLNVYTDSRYAFATAHIHGEIYRRRGWLTSEGKEIKNKDEILALLKALFLPKRLS
KRK
The present disclosure also contemplates methods of delivering split-intein multi-flap prime editors to cells and/or treating cells with split-intein multi-flap prime editors.
In some embodiments, the disclosure provides a method of delivering a PE fusion protein to a cell, comprising:
In certain embodiments, the N-terminal fragment of the PE fusion protein fused to a first split intein sequence is SEQ ID NO: 3875, or an amino acid sequence having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98%, or at least 99.9% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 3875.
In other embodiments, the C-terminal fragment of the PE fusion protein fused to a first split intein sequence is SEQ ID NO: 3876, or an amino acid sequence having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98%, or at least 99.9% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 3876.
In other embodiments, the disclosure provides a method of editing a target DNA sequence within a cell, comprising:
In certain embodiments, the N-terminal fragment of the PE fusion protein fused to a first split intein sequence is SEQ ID NO: 3875, or an amino acid sequence having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98%, or at least 99.9% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 3875.
In other embodiments, the C-terminal fragment of the PE fusion protein fused to a first split intein sequence is SEQ ID NO: 3876, or an amino acid sequence having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98%, or at least 99.9% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 3876.
Delivery of PE Ribonucleoprotein Complexes
In this aspect, the multi-flap prime editors may be delivered by non-viral delivery strategies involving delivery of a multi-flap prime editor complexed with PEgRNA (i.e., a PE ribonucleoprotein complex) by various methods, including electroporation and lipid nanoparticles. Methods of non-viral delivery of nucleic acids include lipofection, nucleofection, microinjection, biolistics, virosomes, liposomes, immunoliposomes, polycation or lipid:nucleic acid conjugates, naked DNA, artificial virions, and agent-enhanced uptake of DNA. Lipofection is described in e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,049,386, 4,946,787; and 4,897,355) and lipofection reagents are sold commercially (e.g., Transfectam™ and Lipofectin™) Cationic and neutral lipids that are suitable for efficient receptor-recognition lipofection of polynucleotides include those of Feigner, WO 91/17424; WO 91/16024. Delivery can be to cells (e.g. in vitro or ex vivo administration) or target tissues (e.g. in vivo administration).
The preparation of lipid:nucleic acid complexes, including targeted liposomes such as immunolipid complexes, is well known to one of skill in the art (see, e.g., Crystal, Science 270:404-410 (1995); Blaese et al., Cancer Gene Ther. 2:291-297 (1995); Behr et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 5:382-389 (1994); Remy et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 5:647-654 (1994); Gao et al., Gene Therapy 2:710-722 (1995); Ahmad et al., Cancer Res. 52:4817-4820 (1992); U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,186,183, 4,217,344, 4,235,871, 4,261,975, 4,485,054, 4,501,728, 4,774,085, 4,837,028, and 4,946,787).
Additional reference may be made to the following references that discuss approaches for non-viral delivery of ribonucleoprotein complexes, each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Delivery of PE by mRNA
Another method that may be employed to deliver multi-flap prime editors and/or PEgRNAs to cells in which multi-flap prime editing-based genome editing is desired is by employing the use of messenger RNA (mRNA) delivery methods and technologies. Examples of mRNA delivery methods and compositions that may be utilized in the present disclosure including, for example, PCT/US2014/028330, U.S. Pat. No. 8,822,663B2, NZ700688A, ES2740248T3, EP2755693A4, EP2755986A4, WO2014152940A1, EP3450553B1, BR112016030852A2, and EP3362461A1, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Additional disclosure hereby incorporated by reference can be found in Kowalski et al., “Delivering the Messenger: Advances in Technologies for Therapeutic mRNA Delivery,” Mol Therap., 2019; 27(4): 710-728.
In contrast to DNA vector encoding multi-flap prime editors, the use of RNA as a delivery agent for multi-flap prime editors has the advantage that the genetic material does not have to enter the nucleus to perform its function. The delivered mRNA may be directly translated in the cytoplasm into the desired protein (e.g., prime editor fusion protein) and nucleic acid products (e.g., PEgRNA). However, in order to be more stable (e.g., resist RNA-degrading enzymes in the cytoplasm), it is in some embodiments necessary to stabilize the mRNA to improve delivery efficiency. Certain delivery carriers such as cationic lipids or polymeric delivery carriers can also help protect the transfected mRNA from endogenous RNase enzymes that might otherwise degrade the therapeutic mRNA encoding the desired prime editor fusion proteins. In addition, despite the increased stability of modified mRNA, delivery of mRNA, particularly mRNA encoding full-length protein, to cells in vivo in a manner that allows therapeutic levels of protein production remains a challenge.
With some exceptions, the intracellular delivery of mRNA is generally more challenging than that of small oligonucleotides, and it requires encapsulation into a delivery nanoparticle, in part due to the significantly larger size of mRNA molecules (300-5,000 kDa, ˜1-15 kb) as compared to other types of RNAs (small interfering RNAs [siRNAs], ˜14 kDa; antisense oligonucleotides [ASOs], 4-10 kDa).
mRNA must cross the cell membrane in order to reach the cytoplasm. The cell membrane is a dynamic and formidable barrier to intracellular delivery. It is made up primarily of a lipid bilayer of zwitterionic and negatively charged phospholipids, where the polar heads of the phospholipids point toward the aqueous environment and the hydrophobic tails form a hydrophobic core.
In some embodiments, the mRNA compositions of the disclosure comprise mRNA (encoding a prime editor and/or PEgRNA), a transport vehicle, and optionally an agent that facilitates contact with the target cell and subsequent transfection.
In some embodiments, the mRNA can include one or more modifications that confer stability to the mRNA (eg, compared to the wild-type or native version of the mRNA) and is involved in the associated abnormal expression of the protein. One or more modifications to the wild type that correct the defect may also be included. For example, the nucleic acids of the invention can include modifications of one or both of a 5′ untranslated region or a 3′ untranslated region. Such modifications may include the inclusion of sequences encoding a partial sequence of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate early 1 (IE1) gene, poly A tail, Cap1 structure, or human growth hormone (hGH). In some embodiments, the mRNA is modified to reduce mRNA immunogenicity.
In one embodiment, the multi-flap prime editor mRNA in the composition of the invention can be formulated in a liposome transfer vehicle to facilitate delivery to target cells. Contemplated transfer vehicles can include one or more cationic lipids, non-cationic lipids, and/or PEG-modified lipids. For example, the transfer vehicle can include at least one of the following cationic lipids: C12-200, DLin-KC2-DMA, DODAP, HGT4003, ICE, HGT5000, or HGT5001. In embodiments, the transfer vehicle comprises cholesterol (chol) and/or PEG modified lipids. In some embodiments, the transfer vehicle comprises DMG-PEG2K. In certain embodiments, the transfer vehicle has the following lipid formulation: C12-200, DOPE, chol, DMG-PEG2K; DODAP, DOPE, cholesterol, DMG-PEG2K; HGT5000, DOPE, chol, DMG-PEG2K, HGT5001, DOPE, chol, one of DMG-PEG2K.
The present disclosure also provides compositions and methods useful for facilitating transfection of target cells with one or more PE-encoding mRNA molecules. For example, the compositions and methods of the present invention contemplate the use of targeting ligands that can increase the affinity of the composition for one or more target cells. In one embodiment, the targeting ligand is apolipoprotein B or apolipoprotein E, and the corresponding target cells express low density lipoprotein receptors and thus promote recognition of the targeting ligand. A vast number of target cells can be preferentially targeted using the methods and compositions of the present disclosure. For example, contemplated target cells include hepatocytes, epithelial cells, hematopoietic cells, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, lung cells, bone cells, stem cells, mesenchymal cells, nerve cells, heart cells, adipocytes, vascular smooth muscle Includes cells, cardiomyocytes, skeletal muscle cells, beta cells, pituitary cells, synovial lining cells, ovarian cells, testis cells, fibroblasts, B cells, T cells, reticulocytes, leukocytes, granulocytes, and tumor cells However, it is not limited to these.
In some embodiments, the PE-encoding mRNA may optionally have chemical or biological modifications which, for example, improve the stability and/or half-life of such mRNA or which improve or otherwise facilitate protein production. Upon transfection, a natural mRNA in the compositions of the invention may decay with a half-life of between 30 minutes and several days. The mRNAs in the compositions of the disclosure may retain at least some ability to be translated, thereby producing a functional protein or enzyme. Accordingly, the invention provides compositions comprising and methods of administering a stabilized mRNA. In some embodiments, the activity of the mRNA is prolonged over an extended period of time. For example, the activity of the mRNA may be prolonged such that the compositions of the present disclosure are administered to a subject on a semi-weekly or bi-weekly basis, or more preferably on a monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly or an annual basis. The extended or prolonged activity of the mRNA of the present invention is directly related to the quantity of protein or enzyme produced from such mRNA. Similarly, the activity of the compositions of the present disclosure may be further extended or prolonged by modifications made to improve or enhance translation of the mRNA. Furthermore, the quantity of functional protein or enzyme produced by the target cell is a function of the quantity of mRNA delivered to the target cells and the stability of such mRNA. To the extent that the stability of the mRNA of the present invention may be improved or enhanced, the half-life, the activity of the produced protein or enzyme and the dosing frequency of the composition may be further extended.
Accordingly, in some embodiments, the mRNA in the compositions of the disclosure comprise at least one modification which confers increased or enhanced stability to the nucleic acid, including, for example, improved resistance to nuclease digestion in vivo. As used herein, the terms “modification” and “modified” as such terms relate to the nucleic acids provided herein, include at least one alteration which preferably enhances stability and renders the mRNA more stable (e.g., resistant to nuclease digestion) than the wild-type or naturally occurring version of the mRNA. As used herein, the terms “stable” and “stability” as such terms relate to the nucleic acids of the present invention, and particularly with respect to the mRNA, refer to increased or enhanced resistance to degradation by, for example nucleases (i.e., endonucleases or exonucleases) which are normally capable of degrading such mRNA. Increased stability can include, for example, less sensitivity to hydrolysis or other destruction by endogenous enzymes (e.g., endonucleases or exonucleases) or conditions within the target cell or tissue, thereby increasing or enhancing the residence of such mRNA in the target cell, tissue, subject and/or cytoplasm. The stabilized mRNA molecules provided herein demonstrate longer half-lives relative to their naturally occurring, unmodified counterparts (e.g. the wild-type version of the mRNA). Also contemplated by the terms “modification” and “modified” as such terms related to the mRNA of the present invention are alterations which improve or enhance translation of mRNA nucleic acids, including for example, the inclusion of sequences which function in the initiation of protein translation (e.g., the Kozak consensus sequence). (Kozak, M., Nucleic Acids Res 15 (20): 8125-48 (1987)).
In some embodiments, the mRNAs used in the compositions of the disclosure have undergone a chemical or biological modification to render them more stable. Exemplary modifications to an mRNA include the depletion of a base (e.g., by deletion or by the substitution of one nucleotide for another) or modification of a base, for example, the chemical modification of a base. The phrase “chemical modifications” as used herein, includes modifications which introduce chemistries which differ from those seen in naturally occurring mRNA, for example, covalent modifications such as the introduction of modified nucleotides, (e.g., nucleotide analogs, or the inclusion of pendant groups which are not naturally found in such mRNA molecules).
Other suitable polynucleotide modifications that may be incorporated into the PE-encoding mRNA used in the compositions of the disclosure include, but are not limited to, 4′-thio-modified bases: 4′-thio-adenosine, 4′-thio-guanosine, 4′-thio-cytidine, 4′-thio-uridine, 4′-thio-5-methyl-cytidine, 4′-thio-pseudouridine, and 4′-thio-2-thiouridine, pyridin-4-one ribonucleoside, 5-aza-uridine, 2-thio-5-aza-uridine, 2-thiouridine, 4-thio-pseudouridine, 2-thio-pseudouridine, 5-hydroxyuridine, 3-methyluridine, 5-carboxymethyl-uridine, 1-carboxymethyl-pseudouridine, 5-propynyl-uridine, 1-propynyl-pseudouridine, 5-taurinomethyluridine, 1-taurinomethyl-pseudouridine, 5-taurinomethyl-2-thio-uridine, 1-taurinomethyl-4-thio-uridine, 5-methyl-uridine, 1-methyl-pseudouridine, 4-thio-1-methyl-pseudouridine, 2-thio-1-methyl-pseudouridine, 1-methyl-1-deaza-pseudouridine, 2-thio-1-methyl-1-deaza-pseudouridine, dihydrouridine, dihydropseudouridine, 2-thio-dihydrouridine, 2-thio-dihydropseudouridine, 2-methoxyuridine, 2-methoxy-4-thio-uridine, 4-methoxy-pseudouridine, 4-methoxy-2-thio-pseudouridine, 5-aza-cytidine, pseudoisocytidine, 3-methyl-cytidine, N4-acetylcytidine, 5-formylcytidine, N4-methylcytidine, 5-hydroxymethylcytidine, 1-methyl-pseudoisocytidine, pyrrolo-cytidine, pyrrolo-pseudoisocytidine, 2-thio-cytidine, 2-thio-5-methyl-cytidine, 4-thio-pseudoisocytidine, 4-thio-1-methyl-pseudoisocytidine, 4-thio-1-methyl-1-deaza-pseudoisocytidine, 1-methyl-1-deaza-pseudoisocytidine, zebularine, 5-aza-zebularine, 5-methyl-zebularine, 5-aza-2-thio-zebularine, 2-thio-zebularine, 2-methoxy-cytidine, 2-methoxy-5-methyl-cytidine, 4-methoxy-pseudoisocytidine, 4-methoxy-1-methyl-pseudoisocytidine, 2-aminopurine, 2,6-diaminopurine, 7-deaza-adenine, 7-deaza-8-aza-adenine, 7-deaza-2-aminopurine, 7-deaza-8-aza-2-aminopurine, 7-deaza-2,6-diaminopurine, 7-deaza-8-aza-2,6-diaminopurine, 1-methyladenosine, N6-methyladenosine, N6-isopentenyladenosine, N6-(cis-hydroxyisopentenyl)adenosine, 2-methylthio-N6-(cis-hydroxyisopentenyl)adenosine, N6-glycinylcarbamoyladenosine, N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine, 2-methylthio-N6-threonyl carbamoyladenosine, N6,N6-dimethyladenosine, 7-methyladenine, 2-methylthio-adenine, and 2-methoxy-adenine, inosine, 1-methyl-inosine, wyosine, wybutosine, 7-deaza-guanosine, 7-deaza-8-aza-guanosine, 6-thio-guanosine, 6-thio-7-deaza-guanosine, 6-thio-7-deaza-8-aza-guanosine, 7-methyl-guanosine, 6-thio-7-methyl-guanosine, 7-methylinosine, 6-methoxy-guanosine, 1-methylguanosine, N2-methylguanosine, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, 8-oxo-guanosine, 7-methyl-8-oxo-guanosine, 1-methyl-6-thio-guanosine, N2-methyl-6-thio-guanosine, and N2,N2-dimethyl-6-thio-guanosine, and combinations thereof. The term modification also includes, for example, the incorporation of non-nucleotide linkages or modified nucleotides into the mRNA sequences of the present invention (e.g., modifications to one or both of the 3′ and 5′ ends of an mRNA molecule encoding a functional protein or enzyme). Such modifications include the addition of bases to an mRNA sequence (e.g., the inclusion of a poly A tail or a longer poly A tail), the alteration of the 3′ UTR or the 5′ UTR, complexing the mRNA with an agent (e.g., a protein or a complementary nucleic acid molecule), and inclusion of elements which change the structure of an mRNA molecule (e.g., which form secondary structures).
In some embodiments, PE-encoding mRNAs include a 5′ cap structure. A 5′ cap is typically added as follows: first, an RNA terminal phosphatase removes one of the terminal phosphate groups from the 5′ nucleotide, leaving two terminal phosphates; guanosine triphosphate (GTP) is then added to the terminal phosphates via a guanylyl transferase, producing a 5′5′5 triphosphate linkage; and the 7-nitrogen of guanine is then methylated by a methyltransferase. Examples of cap structures include, but are not limited to, m7G(5′)ppp (5′(A,G(5′)ppp(5′)A and G(5′)ppp(5′)G. Naturally occurring cap structures comprise a 7-methyl guanosine that is linked via a triphosphate bridge to the 5′-end of the first transcribed nucleotide, resulting in a dinucleotide cap of m7G(5′)ppp(5′)N, where N is any nucleoside. In vivo, the cap is added enzymatically. The cap is added in the nucleus and is catalyzed by the enzyme guanylyl transferase. The addition of the cap to the 5′ terminal end of RNA occurs immediately after initiation of transcription. The terminal nucleoside is typically a guanosine, and is in the reverse orientation to all the other nucleotides, i.e., G(5′)ppp(5′)GpNpNp.
Additional cap analogs include, but are not limited to, a chemical structures selected from the group consisting of m7GpppG, m7GpppA, m7GpppC; unmethylated cap analogs (e.g., GpppG); dimethylated cap analog (e.g., m2,7GpppG), trimethylated cap analog (e.g., m2,2,7GpppG), dimethylated symmetrical cap analogs (e.g., m7Gpppm7G), or anti reverse cap analogs (e.g., ARCA; m7,2′OmeGpppG, m72′dGpppG, m7,3′OmeGpppG, m7,3′dGpppG and their tetraphosphate derivatives) (see, e.g., Jemielity, J. et al., “Novel ‘anti-reverse’ cap analogs with superior translational properties”, RNA, 9: 1108-1122 (2003)).
Typically, the presence of a “tail” serves to protect the mRNA from exonuclease degradation. A poly A or poly U tail is thought to stabilize natural messengers and synthetic sense RNA. Therefore, in certain embodiments a long poly A or poly U tail can be added to an mRNA molecule thus rendering the RNA more stable. Poly A or poly U tails can be added using a variety of art-recognized techniques. For example, long poly A tails can be added to synthetic or in vitro transcribed RNA using poly A polymerase (Yokoe, et al. Nature Biotechnology. 1996; 14: 1252-1256). A transcription vector can also encode long poly A tails. In addition, poly A tails can be added by transcription directly from PCR products. Poly A may also be ligated to the 3′ end of a sense RNA with RNA ligase (see, e.g., Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., ed. by Sambrook, Fritsch and Maniatis (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: 1991 edition)).
Typically, the length of a poly A or poly U tail can be at least about 10, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400 at least 500 nucleotides. In some embodiments, a poly-A tail on the 3′ terminus of mRNA typically includes about 10 to 300 adenosine nucleotides (e.g., about 10 to 200 adenosine nucleotides, about 10 to 150 adenosine nucleotides, about 10 to 100 adenosine nucleotides, about 20 to 70 adenosine nucleotides, or about 20 to 60 adenosine nucleotides). In some embodiments, mRNAs include a 3′ poly(C) tail structure. A suitable poly-C tail on the 3′ terminus of mRNA typically include about 10 to 200 cytosine nucleotides (e.g., about 10 to 150 cytosine nucleotides, about 10 to 100 cytosine nucleotides, about 20 to 70 cytosine nucleotides, about 20 to 60 cytosine nucleotides, or about 10 to 40 cytosine nucleotides). The poly-C tail may be added to the poly-A or poly U tail or may substitute the poly-A or poly U tail.
PE-encoding mRNAs according to the present disclosure may be synthesized according to any of a variety of known methods. For example, mRNAs according to the present invention may be synthesized via in vitro transcription (IVT). Briefly, IVT is typically performed with a linear or circular DNA template containing a promoter, a pool of ribonucleotide triphosphates, a buffer system that may include DTT and magnesium ions, and an appropriate RNA polymerase (e.g., T3, T7 or SP6 RNA polymerase), DNAse I, pyrophosphatase, and/or RNAse inhibitor. The exact conditions will vary according to the specific application.
In embodiments involving mRNA delivery, the ratio of the mRNA encoding the PE fusion protein to the PEgRNA may be important for efficient editing. In certain embodiments, the weight ratio of mRNA (encoding the PE fusion protein) to PEgRNA is 1:1. In certain other embodiments, the weight ratio of mRNA (encoding the PE fusion protein) to PEgRNA is 2:1. In still other embodiments, the weight ratio of mRNA (encoding the PE fusion protein) to PEgRNA is 1:2. In still further embodiments, the weight ratio of mRNA (encoding the PE fusion protein) to PEgRNA is selected from the group consisting of about 1:1000, 1:900; 1:800; 1:700; 1:600; 1:500; 1:400; 1:300; 1:200; 1:100; 1:90; 1:80; 1:70; 1:60; 1:50; 1:40; 1:30; 1:20; 1:10; and 1:1. In other embodiments, the weight ratio of mRNA (encoding the PE fusion protein) to PEgRNA is selected from the group consisting of about 1:1000, 1:900; 800:1; 700:1; 600:1; 500:1; 400:1; 300:1; 200:1; 100:1; 90:1; 80:1; 70:1; 60:1; 50:1; 40:1; 30:1; 20:1; 10:1; and 1:1.
F. Use of Multi-Flap Prime Editing for Insertion of Inducible Dimerization Domains
The multi-flap prime editors (as represented by
As used herein, the term “dimerization domain” refers to a ligand-binding domain that binds to a binding moiety of a bi-specific ligand. A “first” dimerization domain binds to a first binding moiety of a bi-specific ligand and a “second” dimerization domain binds to a second binding moiety of the same bi-specific ligand. When the first dimerization domain is fused to a first protein (e.g., via PE, as discussed herein) and the second dimerization domain (e.g., via PE, as discussed herein) is fused to a second protein, the first and second protein dimerize in the presence of a bi-specific ligand, wherein the bi-specific ligand has at least one moeity that binds to the first dimerization domain and at least another moiety that binds to the second dimerization domain.
The term “bi-specific ligand” or “bi-specific moiety,” as used herein, refers to a ligand that binds to two different ligand-binding domains. In various embodiments, the bi-specific moiety itself is a dimer of two of same or two different chemical moieties, wherein each moiety specifically and tightly binds to a dimerization domain. In certain embodiments, the ligand is a small molecule compound, or a peptide, or a polypeptide. In other embodiments, ligand-binding domain is a “dimerization domain,” which can be install as a peptide tag onto a protein. In various embodiments, two proteins each comprising the same or different dimerization domains can be induced to dimerize through the binding of each dimerization domain to the bi-specific ligand. These molecules may also be referred to as “chemical inducers of dimerization” or CIDs. In addition, the bi-specific ligands may be prepared by coupling (e.g., through standardize chemical linkages) two of the same moieties together, or two different moieties together, wherein each moiety tightly and specifically binds to a dimerization domain.
In various aspects, the dimerization domains installed by multi-flap PE can be the same or different.
For example, the dimerization domains can be FKBP12, which has the following amino acid sequence:
In another example, the dimerization domain can be a mutant of FKBP12 referred to as FKBP12-F36V, a mutant of FKBP12 with an engineered hole that binds a synthetic bumped FK506 mimic (2,
In another example, the dimerization domain can be cyclophilin, as follows:
In various embodiments, the amino acid sequences of these dimerization domains may be altered in order to optimize binding or to improve binding orthogonality to native targets. The nucleic acid sequences of the genes encoding small-molecule binding proteins may be altered in order to optimize the efficiency of the PE process, such as by reducing PEgRNA secondary structure.
Other examples of suitable dimerization domains and a cognate small molecule compound which binds thereto are provided as follows. Note that the cognate small molecule compound could be coupled (e.g., via a chemical linker) to a second small molecule compound (either the same compound or a different compound) in order to form a bi-specific ligand that may bind two dimerization domains. In some cases, such as FK506 and cyclosporin A, dimerization of each (e.g., FK506-FK506 or cyclosporin A-cyclosporin A) reduces or eliminates immunosuppressive activity of the monomeric compounds.
FK-506 FKBP12 Kd 0.4 nM PNAS 1990, 87, 9231. TARGETS: FKBP12 + CALCINEURIN
TARGETS: CYCLOPHILIN + CALCINEURIN
AP1867 FK-506 mimic FKBP12 F36V Kd 94 pM FKBP12 Kd 67 nM PNAS 1998, 95, 10437. TARGET(S): FKBP12
methotrexate Human DHFR Kd <10 nM J. Blol. Chem. 1988, 263, 10304. E. coli DHFR Kd 9.5 nM PNAS 2002, 99, 13481. TARGET(S): DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE
trimethoprim E. coli DHFR Kl 1.3 nM Biochemistry 1982, 21, 5068. TARGET(S): DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE
dexamethasone Human GR Kd 4.6 nM Mol. Endocrin. 1999, 13, 1855.
RAPAMYCIN
Other examples of naturally occurring bifunctional molecules and their dual target receptors are as follows. Prime editing may be used to install the dual target receptors into different proteins. Once the different proteins are modified by PE to contain a bifunctional molecule receptor, the bifunctional molecules may be introduced, thereby causing the dimerization of the proteins modified to comprise the different dimerization domains. Examples of pairings of (1) a biofunctional molecule and (2) their dual target receptors are as follows:
methyl jasmonate
Sanglifehrin A (SFA)
Examples of other bifunctional molecules that can be used with this aspect of prime editing are as follows:
Synstab A:
Paclitaxel:
Discodermolide:
GNE-0011
ARV-825 and
dBET1
Synstab A, paclitaxel, and discodermolide are microtubule stabilizers. Thus, these compounds could be used to dimerize proteins modified by PE to comprise microtubule proteins. GNE-0011, ARV-825, and dBET1 comprise a BRD4 binding motif and a CRBN binding motif. Thus, these compounds could be used to dimerize proteins modified by PE to comprise these targeting domains.
The PEgRNAs for installing dimerization domains may comprising the following structures (in reference to
In one example, the PEgRNA for insertion of the FKBP12 dimerization domain at the C-terminal end of human insulin receptor (spacer underlined, gRNA core plain, flap homology bold, FKBP12 insertion in italics, annealing region bold italics):
CACGGUAGGCACUGUUAGGAGUUUUAGAG
C
GGAGUGCAGGUGGAAACCAUCUCCCCAGGA
GACGGGCGCACCUUCCCCAAGCGCGGCCAGA
CCUGCGUGGUGCACUACACCGGGAUGCUUG
AAGAUGGAAAGAAAUUUGAUUCCUCCCGGGA
CAGAAACAAGCCCUUUAAGUUUAUGCUAGGC
AAGCAGGAGGUGAUCCGAGGCUGGGAAGAAG
GGGUUGCCCAGAUGAGUGUGGGUCAGAGAG
CCAAACUGACUAUAUCUCCAGAUUAUGCCUA
UGGUGCCACUGGGCACCCAGGCAUCAUCCCA
CCACAUGCCACUCUCGUCUUCGAUGUGGAG
CUUCUAAAACUGGAA
UAACAGUGCCUACC
In another example, the PEgRNA for insertion of the FKBP12 dimerization domain at the HEK3 locus (for optimization):
The target proteins for installing dimerization domains are not particularly limited; however, it is advantageous their dimerization (once modified by PE) in the presence of a bi-specific ligand produces some advantageous biological effect, e.g., a signaling pathway, decreased immunoresponsiveness, etc. In various aspects, the target proteins that are to be dimerized through the PE-dependent installation of dimerization domains can be the same protein or different proteins. Preferably, the proteins, when dimerized, trigger one or more downstream biological cascades, e.g., a signal transduction cascade, phorsphorylation, etc. Exemplary target proteins into which PE may be used to install dimerization domains, include, but are not limited to:
SCIENCE 262, 1019-24
CHEM. BIOL. 1, 163-172
CHEM. BIOL. 3, 731-738
CURR. BIOL. 8, 11-18
CURR. BIOL. 8, 11-18
PROC. NATL. ACAD. SCI. 94,
In one aspect, the multi-flap prime editor systems described herein may be used to install sequences encoding dimerization domains into one or more genes encoding target proteins of interest in a living cell or patient. This may be referred to as the “multi-flap prime editing-CID system,” wherein the CID is the bi-specific ligand that induced dimerization of target proteins, each fused to a dimerization domain installed by multi-flap PE. This edit alone should have no physiological effect. Upon administration of a bi-specific ligand, which typically is a dimeric small molecule that can simultaneously bind to two dimerization domains, each of which is fused to a copy of the target protein, the bi-specific ligand causes dimerization of the targeted protein. This target protein dimerization event then induces a biological signaling event, such as erythropoiesis or insulin signaling. A new method to place dimerization-induced biological processes, such as receptor signaling, under control of a convenient small-molecule drug (i.e., the bi-specific ligand) by the genomic integration of genes encoding small-molecule binding proteins (i.e., the dimerization domains) with multi-flap prime editing is described herein.
Protein dimerization is a ubiquitous biological process. Notably, homodimerization of many membrane-bound receptors is known to initiate signaling cascades, often with profound biological consequences. A number of small-molecule natural products approved for use as drugs act as chemical inducers of protein dimerization as part of their mechanism of action.92 For example, FK506 binds tightly to FKBP12, and the resulting small molecule-protein complex then binds the phosphatase calcineurin, thereby inhibiting a step in T cell receptor signaling.93 Likewise, cyclosporin A induces dimerization of cyclophilin and calcineurin, and rapamycin induces dimerization of FKBP and mTOR.93,94
In one embodiment, leveraging the selective, high-affinity binding of the FK506:FKBP12 and cyclosporin A:cyclophilin small molecule:protein binding interaction, synthetic chemical inducers of dimerization have also been developed. In an example, a small molecule comprised of two units of FK506, termed FK1012, was shown to effect signal transduction when the cytoplasmic domains of signaling receptors were tagged with FKBP12.A Chemical inducers of dimerization (CIDs) have since been used to control a number of signaling pathways.96-103
While useful tools for studying biological processes, one challenge facing synthetic CIDs for therapeutic applications is that introduction of the FKBP12- or cyclophilin-target protein chimeras into patients is challenging.
The present disclosure brings together multiple concepts to create a previously inaccessible therapeutic process. The first concept is multi-flap prime editing (e.g., dual flap or quadruple flap prime editing), described herein, which allows for precise genome editing, including targeted insertions, in living cells. The second concept is chemical-induced dimerization, a powerful tool that has enabled small-molecule control over signaling and oligomerization processes in cell culture.
Specific cases in which chemical control over protein dimerization may have had a beneficial therapeutic effect have been identified.
The insulin receptor is a heterotetrameric transmembrane protein that responds to insulin binding to the extracellular domain by phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic kinase domain.104 An engineered chimeric protein composed of a membrane-localization component, the C-terminal kinase domain of the insulin receptor, and three copies of FKBP12 responds to FK1012 and initiates the insulin response in cell culture.99 Similarly, it is expected that the fusion of FKBP12 to the C-terminal end of the kinase domain of the native insulin receptor in patient cells should allow for FK1012-dependent phosphorylation and initiation of the insulin signaling cascade. This system could replace or complement insulin use in patients who cannot make insulin (e.g., type-1 diabetics), or who respond weakly to insulin (e.g., type-2 diabetics).
Additionally, erythropoietin stimulates erythrocyte proliferation by binding to the erythropoietin receptor (EpoR), either inducing dimerization or a conformational change in a preformed receptor dimer which results in activation of the Jak/STAT signaling cascade.105 It has been demonstrated that FK1012-induced oligomerization of the membrane-anchored cytoplasmic domain of EpoR tagged with FKBP12 is sufficient to initiate the Jak/STAT signaling cascade and promote cell proliferation.106 It is anticipated that fusing FKBP12 to native EpoR by prime editing in patient cells will allow for FK1012-induced control over erythrocyte proliferation (erythropoiesis). This system could be used to trigger red blood cell growth in anemic patients. FK1012-inducible EpoR could also be employed as an in vivo selectable marker for blood cells that have undergone ex vivo engineering.
In principle, any receptor tyrosine kinase could be viable target for a multi-flap prime editing-CID therapeutic. The table below includes a list of all receptor tyrosine kinases in the human genome.110
There are numerous advantages to the multi-flap prime editing-CID system. One such advantage is that it can replace endogenous ligands, which are typically proteins that pose complications in manufacturing, cost, delivery, production, or storage, with drug-like small-molecules that can be orally administered instead of administered by IV or injection, are readily prepared from FDA-approved drugs (or are themselves already drugs), and do not incur special production or storage costs typically associated with protein drugs. Another advantage is that the edit alone should have no physiological effect. The amount of target protein dimerization can be controlled by dosing the small-molecule CID. Further, target protein dimerization is readily and rapidly reversible by adding the monomeric form of the CID. Yet another advantage is that in instances where a single ligand targets multiple receptors, selectivity can be achieved by prime-editing only one receptor. Finally, depending on the delivery method used for prime editing, it may also be possible to restrict editing to a localized tissue or organ, allowing for inducible receptor activation only in specific areas.
If editing efficiencies are high enough with multi-flap prime editing that two separate editing events could occur at high levels, it would also be possible to tag two proteins of interest with different small-molecule binding domains (such as FKBP and cyclophilin) and induce heterodimerizations with small molecule heterodimers (such as an FK506-cyclosporin A dimer).
The fusion of FKBP12 or other small-molecule binding proteins to native proteins has been accomplished, generally by overexpression from plasmid in tissue culture. Subsequent chemical-induced dimerization has been demonstrated to induce phenotypic changes to cells producing the fusion proteins.
The following references are cited in the above section and are incorporated herein by reference.
G. Use of Multi-Flap Prime Editing for Inserting Recombinase Target Sites
In another aspect, multi-flap prime editing (e.g., as represented by
The mechanism of installing a recombinase site into the genome is analogous to installing other sequences, such as peptide/protein and RNA tags, into the genome. A schematic exemplifying the installation of a recombinase target sequence is shows in
In various aspects, the present disclosure provides for the use of a multi-flap PE to introduce recombinase recognition sequences at high-value loci in human or other genomes, which, after exposure to site-specific recombinase(s), will direct precise and efficient genomic modifications (
Multi-flap PE-mediated introduction of recombinase recognition sequences could be particularly useful for the treatment of genetic diseases which are caused by large-scale genomic defects, such as gene loss, inversion, or duplication, or chromosomal translocation1-7 (Table 6). For example, Williams-Beuren syndrome is a developmental disorder caused by a deletion of 24 in chromosome 721. No technology exists currently for the efficient and targeted insertion of multiple entire genes in living cells (the potential of PE to do such a full-length gene insertion is currently being explored but has not yet been established); however, recombinase-mediated integration at a target inserted by PE offers one approach towards a permanent cure for this and other diseases. In addition, targeted introduction of recombinase recognition sequences could be highly enabling for applications including generation of transgenic plants, animal research models, bioproduction cell lines, or other custom eukaryotic cell lines. For example, recombinase-mediated genomic rearrangement in transgenic plants at multi-flap PE-specific targets could overcome one of the bottlenecks to generating agricultural crops with improved properties8,9.
Table 6. Examples of genetic diseases linked to large-scale genomic modifications that could be repaired through multi-flap PE-based installation of recombinase recognition sequences.
A number of SSR family members have been characterized and their recombinase recognition sequences described, including natural and engineered tyrosine recombinases (Table 7), large serine integrases (Table 8), serine resolvases (Table 9), and tyrosine integrases (Table 10). Modified target sequences that demonstrate enhanced rates of genomic integration have also been described for several SSRs22-30. In addition to natural recombinases, programmable recombinases with distinct specificities have been developed31-40. Using PE, one or more of these recognition sequences could be introduced into the genomic at a specified location, such as a safe harbor locus41-43, depending on the desired application.
For example, introduction of a single recombinase recognition sequence in the genome by prime editing would result in integrative recombination with a DNA donor template (
Additionally, introduction of two recombinase recognition sequences could result in deletion of the intervening sequence, inversion of the intervening sequence, chromosomal translocation, or cassette exchange, depending on the identity and orientation of the targets (
Finally, several recombinases have been demonstrated to integrate into human or eukaryotic genomes at natively occurring pseudosites46-64. Multi-flap prime editing could be used to modify these loci to enhance rates of integration at these natural pseudosites, or alternatively, to eliminate pseudosites that may serve as unwanted off-target sequences.
This disclosure describes a general methodology for introducing recombinase target sequences in eukaryotic genomes using multi-flap PE, the applications of which are nearly limitless. The genome editing reactions are intended for use with “prime editors,” a chimeric fusion of a CRISPR/Cas9 protein and a reverse-transcriptase domain, which utilizes a custom prime editing guide RNA (PEgRNA). By extension, Cas9 tools and homology-directed repair (HDR) pathways may also be exploited to introduce recombinase recognition sequences through DNA templates by lowering the rates of indels using several techniques65-67. A proof-of-concept experiment in human cell culture is shown in
The following several tables are cited in the above description relating to PE-directed installation of recombinase recognition sequences and provide a listing of exemplary recombinases that may be used, and their cognate recombinase recognition sequences that may be installed by multi-flap PE.
In various other aspects, the present disclosure relates to methods of using multi-flap PE to install one or more recombinase recognition sequences and their use in site-specific recombination.
In some embodiments, the site-specific recombination may effecuate a variety of recombination outcomes, such as, excision, integration, inversion, or exchange of DNA fragments.
In some embodiments, the methods are useful for inducing recombination of or between two or more regions of two or more nucleic acid (e.g., DNA) molecules. In other embodiments, the methods are useful for inducing recombination of or between two or more regions in a single nucleic acid molecule (e.g., DNA).
In some embodiments, the disclosure provides a method for integrating a donor DNA template by site-specific recombination, comprising: (a) installing a recombinase recognition sequence at a genomic locus by multi-flap prime editing; (b) contacting the genomic locus with a DNA donor template that also comprises the recombinase recognition sequence in the presence of a recombinase.
In other embodiments, the disclosure provides a method for deleting a genomic region by site-specific recombination, comprising: (a) installing a pair of recombinase recognition sequences at a genomic locus by multi-flap prime editing; (b) contacting the genomic locus with a recombinase, thereby catalyzing the deletion of the genomic region between the pair of recombinase recognition sequences.
In yet other embodiments, the disclosure provides a method for inverting a genomic region by site-specific recombination, comprising: (a) installing a pair of recombinase recognition sequences at a genomic locus by multi-flap prime editing; (b) contacting the genomic locus with a recombinase, thereby catalyzing the inversion of the genomic region between the pair of recombinase recognition sequences.
In still other embodiments, the disclosure provides a method for inducing chromosomal translocation between a first genomic site and a second genomic site, comprising: (a) installing a first recombinase recognition sequence at a first genomic locus by prime editing; (b) installing a second recombinase recognition sequence at a second genomic locus by multi-flap prime editing; (c) contacting the first and the second genomic loci with a recombinase, thereby catalyzing the chromosomal translocation of the first and second genomic loci.
In other embodiments, the disclosure provides a method for inducing cassette exchange between a genomic locus and a donor DNA comprising a cassette, comprising: (a) installing a first recombinase recognition sequence at a first genomic locus by multi-flap prime editing; (b) installing a second recombinase recognition sequence at a second genomic locus by multi-flap prime editing; (c) contacting the first and the second genomic loci with a donor DNA comprising a cassette that is flanked by the first and second recombinase recognition sequences and a recombinase, thereby catalyzing the exchange of the flanked genomic locus and the cassette in the DNA donor.
In various embodiments involving the insertion of more than one recombinase recognition sequences in the genome, the recombinase recognition sequences can be the same or different. In some embodiments, the recombinase recognition sequences are the same. In other embodiments, that recombinase recognition sequences are different.
In various embodiments, the recombinase can be a tyrosine recombinase, such as Cre, Dre, Vcre, Scre, Flp, B2, B3, Kw, R, TD1-40, Vika, Nigri, Panto, Kd, Fre, Cre(ALSHG), Tre, Brec1, or Cre-R3M3, as shown in Table 7. In such embodiments, the recombinase recognition sequence may be an RRS of Table 7 that corresponds to the recombinase under use.
In various other embodiments, the recombinase can be a large serine recombinase, such as Bxb1, PhiC31, R4, phiBT1, MJ1, MR11, TP901-1, A118, V153, phiRV1, phi370.1, TG1, WB, BL3, SprA, phiJoe, phiK38, Int2, Int3, Int4, Int7, Int8, Int9, Int10, Int11, Int12, Int13, L1, peaches, Bxz2, or SV1, as shown in Table 8. In such embodiments, the recombinase recognition sequence may be an RRS of Table 8 that corresponds to the recombinase under use.
In still other embodiments, the recombinase can be a serine recombinase, such as Bxb1, PhiC31, R4, phiBT1, MJ1, MR11, TP901-1, A118, V153, phiRV1, phi370.1, TG1, WB, BL3, SprA, phiJoe, phiK38, Int2, Int3, Int4, Int7, Int8, Int9, Int10, Int11, Int12, Int13, L1, peaches, Bxz2, or SV1, as shown in Table 8. In such embodiments, the recombinase recognition sequence may be an RRS of Table 8 that corresponds to the recombinase under use.
In other embodiments, the recombinase can be a serine resolvase, such as Gin, Cin, Hin, Min, or Sin, as shown in Table 9. In such embodiments, the recombinase recognition sequence may be an RRS of Table 9 that corresponds to the recombinase under use.
In various other embodiments, the recombinase can be a tyrosine integrase, such as HK022, P22, or L5, as shown in Table 10. In such embodiments, the recombinase recognition sequence may be an RRS of Table 10 that corresponds to the recombinase under use.
In some embodiments, any of the methods for site-specific recombination with multi-flap PE can be performed in vivo or in vitro. In some embodiments, any of the methods for site-specific recombination are performed in a cell (e.g., recombine genomic DNA in a cell). The cell can be prokaryotic or eukaryotic. The cell, such as a eukaryotic cell, can be in an individual, such as a subject, as described herein (e.g., a human subject). The methods described herein are useful for the genetic modification of cells in vitro and in vivo, for example, in the context of the generation of transgenic cells, cell lines, or animals, or in the alteration of genomic sequence, e.g., the correction of a genetic defect, in a cell in a subject.
[8] Embodiments of the Multi-Flap Prime Editors Described Herein
The following non-limiting embodiments describe aspects of the dual prime editors and their use as described in this application.
In one aspect, the present disclosure provides methods for simultaneously editing a first and a second complementary strands of a double-stranded DNA sequence at a target site, said method comprising contacting the double-stranded DNA sequence with a pair of prime editor complexes, said pair comprising:
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides methods for simultaneously editing first and second complementary strands of a double-stranded DNA sequence at a target site, the method comprising contacting the double-stranded DNA sequence with a pair of prime editor complexes, the pair comprising:
This Specification describes multi-flap prime editing systems (including, for example, a dual-flap prime editing system and a quadruple-flap prime editing system) that address the challenges associated with flap equilibration and subsequent incorporation of the edit into the non-edited complementary genomic DNA strand by simultaneously editing both DNA strands. In the dual-flap prime editing system, two PEgRNAs are used to target opposite strands of a genomic site and direct the synthesis of two complementary 3′ flaps containing edited DNA sequence (
Like classical prime editing, multi-flap prime editing is a versatile and precise genome editing method that directly writes new genetic information into a specified DNA site using a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (“napDNAbp”) working in association with a polymerase (i.e., in the form of a fusion protein or otherwise provided in trans with the napDNAbp), wherein the prime editing system is programmed with a prime editing (PE) guide RNA (“PEgRNA”) that both specifies the target site and templates the synthesis of the desired edit in the form of a replacement DNA strand by way of an extension (either DNA or RNA) engineered onto a guide RNA (e.g., at the 5′ or 3′ end, or at an internal portion of a guide RNA). The replacement strand containing the desired edit (e.g., a single nucleobase substitution) shares the same sequence as the endogenous strand of the target site to be edited (with the exception that it includes the desired edit). Through DNA repair and/or replication machinery, the endogenous strand of the target site is replaced by the newly synthesized replacement strand containing the desired edit. In some cases, prime editing may be thought of as a “search-and-replace” genome editing technology since the dual prime editors, as described herein, not only search and locate the desired target site to be edited, but at the same time, encode a replacement strand containing a desired edit which is installed in place of the corresponding target site endogenous DNA strand.
In dual-flap prime editing, a double-stranded DNA sequence is contacted at a target site with a first and a second prime editor complex. Each complex comprises a fusion protein and a PEgRNA. In some embodiments, each fusion protein comprises a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and a polypeptide having an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity (e.g., a reverse transcriptase), and each PEgRNA comprises a spacer sequence, a gRNA core, a DNA synthesis template, and a primer binding site. Each DNA synthesis template can encode a single-stranded DNA sequence, which may comprise an edited portion of one or more nucleotides. The two single-stranded DNA sequences encoded may be complementary to one another and form a duplex, which can integrate into the target site to be edited. The various elements of the prime editor complexes (e.g., fusion proteins, napDNAbp, polymerase, PEgRNAs, etc.) may comprise any of the embodiments of the systems disclosed herein.
In quadruple-flap prime editing, a double-stranded DNA sequence is contacted at a target site with a first, a second, a third, and a fourth prime editor complex. Each complex comprises a fusion protein and a PEgRNA. In some embodiments, each fusion protein comprises a nucleic acid programmable DNA binding protein (napDNAbp) and a polypeptide having an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity (e.g., a reverse transcriptase), and each PEgRNA comprises a spacer sequence, a gRNA core, a DNA synthesis template, and a primer binding site. Each DNA synthesis template encodes a single-stranded DNA sequence. The two single-stranded DNA sequences encoded may be complementary to one another and form a duplex, which can integrate into the target site to be edited. The various elements of the prime editor complexes (e.g., fusion proteins, napDNAbp, polymerase, PEgRNAs, etc.) may comprise any of the embodiments of the systems disclosed herein.
The methods for multi-flap prime editing provided herein can be used for numerous applications. For example, they can be used to facilitate the inversion of a target DNA sequence. In this application, a first single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the DNA synthesis template of the first PEgRNA and a second single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the DNA synthesis template of the second PEgRNA are on opposite ends of a target DNA sequence, and a third single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the DNA synthesis template of the third PEgRNA and a fourth single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the DNA synthesis template of a fourth PEgRNA are on opposite ends of the same target DNA sequence.
In some embodiments, the methods for multi-flap prime editing provided herein further comprise providing a circular DNA donor, part of which can be integrated into a double-stranded nucleic acid at a target site. In this application, a first single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the DNA synthesis template of the first PEgRNA and a third single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the DNA synthesis template of the third PEgRNA are on opposite ends of the target DNA sequence, and a second single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the DNA synthesis template of the second PEgRNA and a fourth single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the DNA synthesis template of the fourth PEgRNA are on the circular DNA donor. The portion of the circular DNA donor between the second single-stranded DNA sequence and the fourth single-stranded DNA sequence can form a duplex, which replaces the target DNA sequence between the first single-stranded DNA sequence and the third single-stranded DNA sequence.
In another application, the methods for multi-flap prime editing provided herein allow for translocation of a target DNA sequence from a first nucleic acid molecule (e.g., a first chromosome) to a second nucleic acid molecule (e.g., a second chromosome). In this application, a first single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the DNA synthesis template of the first PEgRNA and a third single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the DNA synthesis template of the third PEgRNA are on a first nucleic acid molecule, and a second single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the DNA synthesis template of the second PEgRNA and a fourth single-stranded DNA sequence encoded by the DNA synthesis template of the fourth PEgRNA are on a second nucleic acid molecule. The portion of the first nucleic acid molecule between the first single-stranded DNA sequence and the third single-stranded DNA sequence can be incorporated into the second nucleic acid molecule, and the portion of the second nucleic acid molecule between the second single-stranded DNA sequence and the fourth single-stranded DNA sequence is incorporated into the first nucleic acid molecule.
Other Methods
The instant disclosure provides methods for the treatment of a subject diagnosed with a disease associated with or caused by a point mutation, or other mutations (e.g., deletion, insertion, inversion, duplication, etc.) that can be corrected by the multi-flap prime editing system provided herein, as exemplified, but not limited to prion disease (e.g., Example 5 herein), trinucleotide repeat expansion disease (e.g., Example 3 herein), or CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder (CDD) (e.g., Example 23 herein).
Virtually any disease-causing genetic defect may be repaired by using multi-flap prime editing, which includes the selection of an appropriate prime editor fusion protein (including a napDNAbp and a polymerase (e.g., a reverse transcriptase), and designing of an appropriate PEgRNA designed to (a) target the appropriate target DNA containing an edit site, and (b) provide a template for the synthesis of a single strand of DNA from the 3′ end of the nick site that includes the desired edit which displaces and replaces the endogenous strand immediately downstream of the nick site. Multi-flap prime editing can be used, without limitation, to (a) install mutation-correcting changes to a nucleotide sequence, (b) install protein and RNA tags, (c) install immunoepitopes on proteins of interest, (d) install inducible dimerization domains in proteins, (e) install or remove sequences to alter that activity of a biomolecule, (f) install recombinase target sites to direct specific genetic changes, and (g) mutagenesis of a target sequence by using an error-prone RT.
The method of treating a disorder can involve as an early step the design of an appropriate PEgRNA and prime editor fusion protein in accordance with the methods described herein, which include a number of considerations that may be taken into account, such as:
A suitable PEgRNA, and optionally a nicking-sgRNA design guide for second-site nicking, can be designed by way of the following exemplarily step-by-step set of instructions which takes into account one or more of the above considerations. The steps reference the examples shown in
The above step-by-step process for designing a suitable PEgRNA and a second-site nicking sgRNA is not meant to be limiting in any way. The disclosure contemplates variations of the above-described step-by-step process which would be derivable therefrom by a person of ordinary skill in the art.
Once a suitable PEgRNA and PE fusion protein are selected/designed, they may be administered by a suitable methodology, such as by vector-based transfection (in which one or more vectors comprising DNA encoding the PEgRNA and the PE fusion protein and which are expressed within a cell upon transfection with the vectors), direct delivery of the PE fusion protein complexed with the PEgRNA (e.g., RNP delivery) in a delivery format (e.g., lipid particles, nanoparticles), or by a mRNA-based delivery system. Such methods are described herein in the present disclosure and any know method may be utilized.
The PEgRNA and PE fusion protein (or together, referred to as the PE complex) can be delivered to a cell in a therapeutically effective amount such that upon contacting the target DNA of interest, the desired edit becomes installed therein.
Any disease is conceivably treatable by such methods so long as delivery to the appropriate cells is feasible. The person having ordinary skill in the art will be able to choose and/or select a PE delivery methodology to suit the intended purpose and the intended target cells.
For example, in some embodiments, a method is provided that comprises administering to a subject having such a disease, e.g., a cancer associated with a point mutation as described above, an effective amount of the multi-flap prime editing system described herein that corrects the point mutation or introduces a deactivating mutation into a disease-associated gene as mediated by homology-directed repair in the presence of a donor DNA molecule comprising desired genetic change. In some embodiments, a method is provided that comprises administering to a subject having such a disease, e.g., a cancer associated with a point mutation as described above, an effective amount of the multi-flap prime editing system described herein that corrects the point mutation or introduces a deactivating mutation into a disease-associated gene. In some embodiments, the disease is a proliferative disease. In some embodiments, the disease is a genetic disease. In some embodiments, the disease is a neoplastic disease. In some embodiments, the disease is a metabolic disease. In some embodiments, the disease is a lysosomal storage disease. Other diseases that can be treated by correcting a point mutation or introducing a deactivating mutation into a disease-associated gene will be known to those of skill in the art, and the disclosure is not limited in this respect.
The instant disclosure provides methods for the treatment of additional diseases or disorders, e.g., diseases or disorders that are associated or caused by a point mutation that can be corrected by TPRT-mediated gene editing. Some such diseases are described herein, and additional suitable diseases that can be treated with the strategies and fusion proteins provided herein will be apparent to those of skill in the art based on the instant disclosure. Exemplary suitable diseases and disorders are listed below. It will be understood that the numbering of the specific positions or residues in the respective sequences depends on the particular protein and numbering scheme used. Numbering might be different, e.g., in precursors of a mature protein and the mature protein itself, and differences in sequences from species to species may affect numbering. One of skill in the art will be able to identify the respective residue in any homologous protein and in the respective encoding nucleic acid by methods well known in the art, e.g., by sequence alignment and determination of homologous residues. Exemplary suitable diseases and disorders include, without limitation: 2-methyl-3-hydroxybutyric aciduria; 3 beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency; 3-Methylglutaconic aciduria; 3-Oxo-5 alpha-steroid delta 4-dehydrogenase deficiency; 46,XY sex reversal, type 1, 3, and 5; 5-Oxoprolinase deficiency; 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin synthase deficiency; Aarskog syndrome; Aase syndrome; Achondrogenesis type 2; Achromatopsia 2 and 7; Acquired long QT syndrome; Acrocallosal syndrome, Schinzel type; Acrocapitofemoral dysplasia; Acrodysostosis 2, with or without hormone resistance; Acroerythrokeratoderma; Acromicric dysplasia; Acth-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia 2; Activated PI3K-delta syndrome; Acute intermittent porphyria; deficiency of Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 9; Adams-Oliver syndrome 5 and 6; Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency; Adenylate kinase deficiency; hemolytic anemia due to Adenylosuccinate lyase deficiency; Adolescent nephronophthisis; Renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia; Meckel syndrome type 7; Adrenoleukodystrophy; Adult junctional epidermolysis bullosa; Epidermolysis bullosa, junctional, localisata variant; Adult neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis; Adult neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis; Adult onset ataxia with oculomotor apraxia; ADULT syndrome; Afibrinogenemia and congenital Afibrinogenemia; autosomal recessive Agammaglobulinemia 2; Age-related macular degeneration 3, 6, 11, and 12; Aicardi Goutieres syndromes 1, 4, and 5; Chilbain lupus 1; Alagille syndromes 1 and 2; Alexander disease; Alkaptonuria; Allan-Herndon-Dudley syndrome; Alopecia universalis congenital; Alpers encephalopathy; Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency; autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked recessive Alport syndromes; Alzheimer disease, familial, 3, with spastic paraparesis and apraxia; Alzheimer disease, types, 1, 3, and 4; hypocalcification type and hypomaturation type, IIA1 Amelogenesis imperfecta; Aminoacylase 1 deficiency; Amish infantile epilepsy syndrome; Amyloidogenic transthyretin amyloidosis; Amyloid Cardiomyopathy, Transthyretin-related; Cardiomyopathy; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis types 1, 6, 15 (with or without frontotemporal dementia), 22 (with or without frontotemporal dementia), and 10; Frontotemporal dementia with TDP43 inclusions, TARDBP-related; Andermann syndrome; Andersen Tawil syndrome; Congenital long QT syndrome; Anemia, nonspherocytic hemolytic, due to G6PD deficiency; Angelman syndrome; Severe neonatal-onset encephalopathy with microcephaly; susceptibility to Autism, X-linked 3; Angiopathy, hereditary, with nephropathy, aneurysms, and muscle cramps; Angiotensin i-converting enzyme, benign serum increase; Aniridia, cerebellar ataxia, and mental retardation; Anonychia; Antithrombin III deficiency; Antley-Bixler syndrome with genital anomalies and disordered steroidogenesis; Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 4, 6, and 9; Thoracic aortic aneurysms and aortic dissections; Multisystemic smooth muscle dysfunction syndrome; Moyamoya disease 5; Aplastic anemia; Apparent mineralocorticoid excess; Arginase deficiency; Argininosuccinate lyase deficiency; Aromatase deficiency; Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy types 5, 8, and 10; Primary familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, distal, X-linked; Arthrogryposis renal dysfunction cholestasis syndrome; Arthrogryposis, renal dysfunction, and cholestasis 2; Asparagine synthetase deficiency; Abnormality of neuronal migration; Ataxia with vitamin E deficiency; Ataxia, sensory, autosomal dominant; Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome; Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome; Atransferrinemia; Atrial fibrillation, familial, 11, 12, 13, and 16; Atrial septal defects 2, 4, and 7 (with or without atrioventricular conduction defects); Atrial standstill 2; Atrioventricular septal defect 4; Atrophia bulborum hereditaria; ATR-X syndrome; Auriculocondylar syndrome 2; Autoimmune disease, multisystem, infantile-onset; Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, type 1a; Autosomal dominant hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia; Autosomal dominant progressive external ophthalmoplegia with mitochondrial DNA deletions 1 and 3; Autosomal dominant torsion dystonia 4; Autosomal recessive centronuclear myopathy; Autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis 1, 2, 3, 4A, and 4B; Autosomal recessive cutis laxa type IA and 1B; Autosomal recessive hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia syndrome; Ectodermal dysplasia 11b; hypohidrotic/hair/tooth type, autosomal recessive; Autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic bone disease; Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome type 3; Bainbridge-Ropers syndrome; Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome; PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome; Baraitser-Winter syndromes 1 and 2; Barakat syndrome; Bardet-Biedl syndromes 1, 11, 16, and 19; Bare lymphocyte syndrome type 2, complementation group E; Bartter syndrome antenatal type 2; Bartter syndrome types 3, 3 with hypocalciuria, and 4; Basal ganglia calcification, idiopathic, 4; Beaded hair; Benign familial hematuria; Benign familial neonatal seizures 1 and 2; Seizures, benign familial neonatal, 1, and/or myokymia; Seizures, Early infantile epileptic encephalopathy 7; Benign familial neonatal-infantile seizures; Benign hereditary chorea; Benign scapuloperoneal muscular dystrophy with cardiomyopathy; Bernard-Soulier syndrome, types A1 and A2 (autosomal dominant); Bestrophinopathy, autosomal recessive; beta Thalassemia; Bethlem myopathy and Bethlem myopathy 2; Bietti crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy; Bile acid synthesis defect, congenital, 2; Biotinidase deficiency; Birk Barel mental retardation dysmorphism syndrome; Blepharophimosis, ptosis, and epicanthus inversus; Bloom syndrome; Borjeson-Forssman-Lehmann syndrome; Boucher Neuhauser syndrome; Brachydactyly types A1 and A2; Brachydactyly with hypertension; Brain small vessel disease with hemorrhage; Branched-chain ketoacid dehydrogenase kinase deficiency; Branchiootic syndromes 2 and 3; Breast cancer, early-onset; Breast-ovarian cancer, familial 1, 2, and 4; Brittle cornea syndrome 2; Brody myopathy; Bronchiectasis with or without elevated sweat chloride 3; Brown-Vialetto-Van laere syndrome and Brown-Vialetto-Van Laere syndrome 2; Brugada syndrome; Brugada syndrome 1; Ventricular fibrillation; Paroxysmal familial ventricular fibrillation; Brugada syndrome and Brugada syndrome 4; Long QT syndrome; Sudden cardiac death; Bull eye macular dystrophy; Stargardt disease 4; Cone-rod dystrophy 12; Bullous ichthyosiform erythroderma; Burn-Mckeown syndrome; Candidiasis, familial, 2, 5, 6, and 8; Carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome type I and II; Carbonic anhydrase VA deficiency, hyperammonemia due to; Carcinoma of colon; Cardiac arrhythmia; Long QT syndrome, LQT1 subtype; Cardioencephalomyopathy, fatal infantile, due to cytochrome c oxidase deficiency; Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome; Cardiomyopathy; Danon disease; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy; Carnevale syndrome; Carney complex, type 1; Carnitine acylcarnitine translocase deficiency; Carnitine palmitoyltransferase I, II, II (late onset), and II (infantile) deficiency; Cataract 1, 4, autosomal dominant, autosomal dominant, multiple types, with microcornea, coppock-like, juvenile, with microcornea and glucosuria, and nuclear diffuse nonprogressive; Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia; Caudal regression syndrome; Cd8 deficiency, familial; Central core disease; Centromeric instability of chromosomes 1,9 and 16 and immunodeficiency; Cerebellar ataxia infantile with progressive external ophthalmoplegi and Cerebellar ataxia, mental retardation, and dysequilibrium syndrome 2; Cerebral amyloid angiopathy, APP-related; Cerebral autosomal dominant and recessive arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy; Cerebral cavernous malformations 2; Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 2; Cerebro-oculo-facio-skeletal syndrome; Cerebroretinal microangiopathy with calcifications and cysts; Ceroid lipofuscinosis neuronal 2, 6, 7, and 10; Ch\xc3\xa9diak-Higashi syndrome, Chediak-Higashi syndrome, adult type; Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease types 1B, 2B2, 2C, 2F, 2I, 2U (axonal), 1C (demyelinating), dominant intermediate C, recessive intermediate A, 2A2, 4C, 4D, 4H, IF, IVF, and X; Scapuloperoneal spinal muscular atrophy; Distal spinal muscular atrophy, congenital nonprogressive; Spinal muscular atrophy, distal, autosomal recessive, 5; CHARGE association; Childhood hypophosphatasia; Adult hypophosphatasia; Cholecystitis; Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis 3; Cholestasis, intrahepatic, of pregnancy 3; Cholestanol storage disease; Cholesterol monooxygenase (side-chain cleaving) deficiency; Chondrodysplasia Blomstrand type; Chondrodysplasia punctata 1, X-linked recessive and 2 X-linked dominant; CHOPS syndrome; Chronic granulomatous disease, autosomal recessive cytochrome b-positive, types 1 and 2; Chudley-McCullough syndrome; Ciliary dyskinesia, primary, 7, 11, 15, 20 and 22; Citrullinemia type I; Citrullinemia type I and II; Cleidocranial dysostosis; C-like syndrome; Cockayne syndrome type A; Coenzyme Q10 deficiency, primary 1, 4, and 7; Coffin Siris/Intellectual Disability; Coffin-Lowry syndrome; Cohen syndrome; Cold-induced sweating syndrome 1; COLE-CARPENTER SYNDROME 2; Combined cellular and humoral immune defects with granulomas; Combined d-2- and 1-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria; Combined malonic and methylmalonic aciduria; Combined oxidative phosphorylation deficiencies 1, 3, 4, 12, 15, and 25; Combined partial and complete 17-alpha-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase deficiency; Common variable immunodeficiency 9; Complement component 4, partial deficiency of, due to dysfunctional c1 inhibitor; Complement factor B deficiency; Cone monochromatism; Cone-rod dystrophy 2 and 6; Cone-rod dystrophy amelogenesis imperfecta; Congenital adrenal hyperplasia and Congenital adrenal hypoplasia, X-linked; Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia; Congenital aniridia; Congenital central hypoventilation; Hirschsprung disease 3; Congenital contractural arachnodactyly; Congenital contractures of the limbs and face, hypotonia, and developmental delay; Congenital disorder of glycosylation types 1B, 1D, 1G, 1H, 1J, 1K, 1N, 1P, 2C, 2J, 2K, IIm; Congenital dyserythropoietic anemia, type I and II; Congenital ectodermal dysplasia of face; Congenital erythropoietic porphyria; Congenital generalized lipodystrophy type 2; Congenital heart disease, multiple types, 2; Congenital heart disease; Interrupted aortic arch; Congenital lipomatous overgrowth, vascular malformations, and epidermal nevi; Non-small cell lung cancer; Neoplasm of ovary; Cardiac conduction defect, nonspecific; Congenital microvillous atrophy; Congenital muscular dystrophy; Congenital muscular dystrophy due to partial LAMA2 deficiency; Congenital muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy with brain and eye anomalies, types A2, A7, A8, A11, and A14; Congenital muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy with mental retardation, types B2, B3, B5, and B15; Congenital muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy without mental retardation, type B5; Congenital muscular hypertrophy-cerebral syndrome; Congenital myasthenic syndrome, acetazolamide-responsive; Congenital myopathy with fiber type disproportion; Congenital ocular coloboma; Congenital stationary night blindness, type 1A, 1B, 1C, 1E, 1F, and 2A; Coproporphyria; Cornea plana 2; Corneal dystrophy, Fuchs endothelial, 4; Corneal endothelial dystrophy type 2; Corneal fragility keratoglobus, blue sclerae and joint hypermobility; Cornelia de Lange syndromes 1 and 5; Coronary artery disease, autosomal dominant 2; Coronary heart disease; Hyperalphalipoproteinemia 2; Cortical dysplasia, complex, with other brain malformations 5 and 6; Cortical malformations, occipital; Corticosteroid-binding globulin deficiency; Corticosterone methyloxidase type 2 deficiency; Costello syndrome; Cowden syndrome 1; Coxa plana; Craniodiaphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant; Craniosynostosis 1 and 4; Craniosynostosis and dental anomalies; Creatine deficiency, X-linked; Crouzon syndrome; Cryptophthalmos syndrome; Cryptorchidism, unilateral or bilateral; Cushing symphalangism; Cutaneous malignant melanoma 1; Cutis laxa with osteodystrophy and with severe pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and urinary abnormalities; Cyanosis, transient neonatal and atypical nephropathic; Cystic fibrosis; Cystinuria; Cytochrome c oxidase i deficiency; Cytochrome-c oxidase deficiency; D-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria 2; Darier disease, segmental; Deafness with labyrinthine aplasia microtia and microdontia (LAMM); Deafness, autosomal dominant 3a, 4, 12, 13, 15, autosomal dominant nonsyndromic sensorineural 17, 20, and 65; Deafness, autosomal recessive 1A, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 12, 15, 16, 18b, 22, 28, 31, 44, 49, 63, 77, 86, and 89; Deafness, cochlear, with myopia and intellectual impairment, without vestibular involvement, autosomal dominant, X-linked 2; Deficiency of 2-methylbutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase; Deficiency of 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase; Deficiency of alpha-mannosidase; Deficiency of aromatic-L-amino-acid decarboxylase; Deficiency of bisphosphoglycerate mutase; Deficiency of butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase; Deficiency of ferroxidase; Deficiency of galactokinase; Deficiency of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase; Deficiency of hyaluronoglucosaminidase; Deficiency of ribose-5-phosphate isomerase; Deficiency of steroid 11-beta-monooxygenase; Deficiency of UDPglucose-hexose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase; Deficiency of xanthine oxidase; Dejerine-Sottas disease; Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, types ID and IVF; Dejerine-Sottas syndrome, autosomal dominant; Dendritic cell, monocyte, B lymphocyte, and natural killer lymphocyte deficiency; Desbuquois dysplasia 2; Desbuquois syndrome; DFNA 2 Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss; Diabetes mellitus and insipidus with optic atrophy and deafness; Diabetes mellitus, type 2, and insulin-dependent, 20; Diamond-Blackfan anemia 1, 5, 8, and 10; Diarrhea 3 (secretory sodium, congenital, syndromic) and 5 (with tufting enteropathy, congenital); Dicarboxylic aminoaciduria; Diffuse palmoplantar keratoderma, Bothnian type; Digitorenocerebral syndrome; Dihydropteridine reductase deficiency; Dilated cardiomyopathy 1A, 1AA, 1C, 1G, 1BB, 1DD, 1FF, 1HH, 1I, 1KK, 1N, 1S, 1Y, and 3B; Left ventricular noncompaction 3; Disordered steroidogenesis due to cytochrome p450 oxidoreductase deficiency; Distal arthrogryposis type 2B; Distal hereditary motor neuronopathy type 2B; Distal myopathy Markesbery-Griggs type; Distal spinal muscular atrophy, X-linked 3; Distichiasis-lymphedema syndrome; Dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa with absence of skin; Dominant hereditary optic atrophy; Donnai Barrow syndrome; Dopamine beta hydroxylase deficiency; Dopamine receptor d2, reduced brain density of; Dowling-degos disease 4; Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy; Malattia leventinese; Duane syndrome type 2; Dubin-Johnson syndrome; Duchenne muscular dystrophy; Becker muscular dystrophy; Dysfibrinogenemia; Dyskeratosis congenita autosomal dominant and autosomal dominant, 3; Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal recessive, 1, 3, 4, and 5; Dyskeratosis congenita X-linked; Dyskinesia, familial, with facial myokymia; Dysplasminogenemia; Dystonia 2 (torsion, autosomal recessive), 3 (torsion, X-linked), 5 (Dopa-responsive type), 10, 12, 16, 25, 26 (Myoclonic); Seizures, benign familial infantile, 2; Early infantile epileptic encephalopathy 2, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 14; Atypical Rett syndrome; Early T cell progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Ectodermal dysplasia skin fragility syndrome; Ectodermal dysplasia-syndactyly syndrome 1; Ectopia lentis, isolated autosomal recessive and dominant; Ectrodactyly, ectodermal dysplasia, and cleft lip/palate syndrome 3; Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 7 (autosomal recessive), classic type, type 2 (progeroid), hydroxylysine-deficient, type 4, type 4 variant, and due to tenascin-X deficiency; Eichsfeld type congenital muscular dystrophy; Endocrine-cerebroosteodysplasia; Enhanced s-cone syndrome; Enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome; Enterokinase deficiency; Epidermodysplasia verruciformis; Epidermolysa bullosa simplex and limb girdle muscular dystrophy, simplex with mottled pigmentation, simplex with pyloric atresia, simplex, autosomal recessive, and with pyloric atresia; Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma; Familial febrile seizures 8; Epilepsy, childhood absence 2, 12 (idiopathic generalized, susceptibility to) 5 (nocturnal frontal lobe), nocturnal frontal lobe type 1, partial, with variable foci, progressive myoclonic 3, and X-linked, with variable learning disabilities and behavior disorders; Epileptic encephalopathy, childhood-onset, early infantile, 1, 19, 23, 25, 30, and 32; Epiphyseal dysplasia, multiple, with myopia and conductive deafness; Episodic ataxia type 2; Episodic pain syndrome, familial, 3; Epstein syndrome; Fechtner syndrome; Erythropoietic protoporphyria; Estrogen resistance; Exudative vitreoretinopathy 6; Fabry disease and Fabry disease, cardiac variant; Factor H, VII, X, v and factor viii, combined deficiency of 2, xiii, a subunit, deficiency; Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 and 3; Familial amyloid nephropathy with urticaria and deafness; Familial cold urticarial; Familial aplasia of the vermis; Familial benign pemphigus; Familial cancer of breast; Breast cancer, susceptibility to; Osteosarcoma; Pancreatic cancer 3; Familial cardiomyopathy; Familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome 2; Familial colorectal cancer; Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy, X-linked; Familial hemiplegic migraine types 1 and 2; Familial hypercholesterolemia; Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 23 and 24; Familial hypokalemia-hypomagnesemia; Familial hypoplastic, glomerulocystic kidney; Familial infantile myasthenia; Familial juvenile gout; Familial Mediterranean fever and Familial mediterranean fever, autosomal dominant; Familial porencephaly; Familial porphyria cutanea tarda; Familial pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis; Familial renal glucosuria; Familial renal hypouricemia; Familial restrictive cardiomyopathy 1; Familial type 1 and 3 hyperlipoproteinemia; Fanconi anemia, complementation group E, I, N, and O; Fanconi-Bickel syndrome; Favism, susceptibility to; Febrile seizures, familial, 11; Feingold syndrome 1; Fetal hemoglobin quantitative trait locus 1; FG syndrome and FG syndrome 4; Fibrosis of extraocular muscles, congenital, 1, 2, 3a (with or without extraocular involvement), 3b; Fish-eye disease; Fleck corneal dystrophy; Floating-Harbor syndrome; Focal epilepsy with speech disorder with or without mental retardation; Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5; Forebrain defects; Frank Ter Haar syndrome; Borrone Di Rocco Crovato syndrome; Frasier syndrome; Wilms tumor 1; Freeman-Sheldon syndrome; Frontometaphyseal dysplasia land 3; Frontotemporal dementia; Frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 3 and 4; Frontotemporal Dementia Chromosome 3-Linked and Frontotemporal dementia ubiquitin-positive; Fructose-biphosphatase deficiency; Fuhrmann syndrome; Gamma-aminobutyric acid transaminase deficiency; Gamstorp-Wohlfart syndrome; Gaucher disease type 1 and Subacute neuronopathic; Gaze palsy, familial horizontal, with progressive scoliosis; Generalized dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa; Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus 3, type 1, type 2; Epileptic encephalopathy Lennox-Gastaut type; Giant axonal neuropathy; Glanzmann thrombasthenia; Glaucoma 1, open angle, e, F, and G; Glaucoma 3, primary congenital, d; Glaucoma, congenital and Glaucoma, congenital, Coloboma; Glaucoma, primary open angle, juvenile-onset; Glioma susceptibility 1; Glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome; Glucose-6-phosphate transport defect; GLUT1 deficiency syndrome 2; Epilepsy, idiopathic generalized, susceptibility to, 12; Glutamate formiminotransferase deficiency; Glutaric acidemia IIA and IIB; Glutaric aciduria, type 1; Gluthathione synthetase deficiency; Glycogen storage disease 0 (muscle), II (adult form), IXa2, IXc, type 1A; type II, type IV, IV (combined hepatic and myopathic), type V, and type VI; Goldmann-Favre syndrome; Gordon syndrome; Gorlin syndrome; Holoprosencephaly sequence; Holoprosencephaly 7; Granulomatous disease, chronic, X-linked, variant; Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary; Gray platelet syndrome; Griscelli syndrome type 3; Groenouw corneal dystrophy type I; Growth and mental retardation, mandibulofacial dysostosis, microcephaly, and cleft palate; Growth hormone deficiency with pituitary anomalies; Growth hormone insensitivity with immunodeficiency; GTP cyclohydrolase I deficiency; Hajdu-Cheney syndrome; Hand foot uterus syndrome; Hearing impairment; Hemangioma, capillary infantile; Hematologic neoplasm; Hemochromatosis type 1, 2B, and 3; Microvascular complications of diabetes 7; Transferrin serum level quantitative trait locus 2; Hemoglobin H disease, nondeletional; Hemolytic anemia, nonspherocytic, due to glucose phosphate isomerase deficiency; Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, familial, 2; Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, familial, 3; Heparin cofactor II deficiency; Hereditary acrodermatitis enteropathica; Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome; Ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder; Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer; Hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with spheroids; Hereditary factors II, IX, VIII deficiency disease; Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia type 2; Hereditary insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis; Hereditary lymphedema type I; Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy with optic atrophy; Hereditary myopathy with early respiratory failure; Hereditary neuralgic amyotrophy; Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Neoplasms; Lynch syndrome I and II; Hereditary pancreatitis; Pancreatitis, chronic, susceptibility to; Hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type IIB and IIA; Hereditary sideroblastic anemia; Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 1, 3, 4, and 6; Heterotaxy, visceral, 2, 4, and 6, autosomal; Heterotaxy, visceral, X-linked; Heterotopia; Histiocytic medullary reticulosis; Histiocytosis-lymphadenopathy plus syndrome; Holocarboxylase synthetase deficiency; Holoprosencephaly 2, 3,7, and 9; Holt-Oram syndrome; Homocysteinemia due to MTHFR deficiency, CBS deficiency, and Homocystinuria, pyridoxine-responsive; Homocystinuria-Megaloblastic anemia due to defect in cobalamin metabolism, cblE complementation type; Howel-Evans syndrome; Hurler syndrome; Hutchinson-Gilford syndrome; Hydrocephalus; Hyperammonemia, type III; Hypercholesterolaemia and Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal recessive; Hyperekplexia 2 and Hyperekplexia hereditary; Hyperferritinemia cataract syndrome; Hyperglycinuria; Hyperimmunoglobulin D with periodic fever; Mevalonic aciduria; Hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome; Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia familial 3, 4, and 5; Hyperinsulinism-hyperammonemia syndrome; Hyperlysinemia; Hypermanganesemia with dystonia, polycythemia and cirrhosis; Hyperornithinemia-hyperammonemia-homocitrullinuria syndrome; Hyperparathyroidism 1 and 2; Hyperparathyroidism, neonatal severe; Hyperphenylalaninemia, bh4-deficient, a, due to partial pts deficiency, BH4-deficient, D, and non-pku; Hyperphosphatasia with mental retardation syndrome 2, 3, and 4; Hypertrichotic osteochondrodysplasia; Hypobetalipoproteinemia, familial, associated with apob32; Hypocalcemia, autosomal dominant 1; Hypocalciuric hypercalcemia, familial, types 1 and 3; Hypochondrogenesis; Hypochromic microcytic anemia with iron overload; Hypoglycemia with deficiency of glycogen synthetase in the liver; Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 11 with or without anosmia; Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia with immune deficiency; Hypohidrotic X-linked ectodermal dysplasia; Hypokalemic periodic paralysis 1 and 2; Hypomagnesemia 1, intestinal; Hypomagnesemia, seizures, and mental retardation; Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 7; Hypoplastic left heart syndrome; Atrioventricular septal defect and common atrioventricular junction; Hypospadias 1 and 2, X-linked; Hypothyroidism, congenital, nongoitrous, 1; Hypotrichosis 8 and 12; Hypotrichosis-lymphedema-telangiectasia syndrome; I blood group system; Ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens; Ichthyosis exfoliativa; Ichthyosis prematurity syndrome; Idiopathic basal ganglia calcification 5; Idiopathic fibrosing alveolitis, chronic form; Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant, 2 and 5; Idiopathic hypercalcemia of infancy; Immune dysfunction with T-cell inactivation due to calcium entry defect 2; Immunodeficiency 15, 16, 19, 30, 31C, 38, 40, 8, due to defect in cd3-zeta, with hyper IgM type 1 and 2, and X-Linked, with magnesium defect, Epstein-Barr virus infection, and neoplasia; Immunodeficiency-centromeric instability-facial anomalies syndrome 2; Inclusion body myopathy 2 and 3; Nonaka myopathy; Infantile convulsions and paroxysmal choreoathetosis, familial; Infantile cortical hyperostosis; Infantile GM1 gangliosidosis; Infantile hypophosphatasia; Infantile nephronophthisis; Infantile nystagmus, X-linked; Infantile Parkinsonism-dystonia; Infertility associated with multi-tailed spermatozoa and excessive DNA; Insulin resistance; Insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus and acanthosis nigricans; Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus secretory diarrhea syndrome; Interstitial nephritis, karyomegalic; Intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, and genital anomalies; Iodotyrosyl coupling defect; IRAK4 deficiency; Iridogoniodysgenesis dominant type and type 1; Iron accumulation in brain; Ischiopatellar dysplasia; Islet cell hyperplasia; Isolated 17,20-lyase deficiency; Isolated lutropin deficiency; Isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency; Jankovic Rivera syndrome; Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome 2; Joubert syndrome 1, 6, 7, 9/15 (digenic), 14, 16, and 17, and Orofaciodigital syndrome xiv; Junctional epidermolysis bullosa gravis of Herlitz; Juvenile GM>1<gangliosidosis; Juvenile polyposis syndrome; Juvenile polyposis/hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia syndrome; Juvenile retinoschisis; Kabuki make-up syndrome; Kallmann syndrome 1, 2, and 6; Delayed puberty; Kanzaki disease; Karak syndrome; Kartagener syndrome; Kenny-Caffey syndrome type 2; Keppen-Lubinsky syndrome; Keratoconus 1; Keratosis follicularis; Keratosis palmoplantaris striata 1; Kindler syndrome; L-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria; Larsen syndrome, dominant type; Lattice corneal dystrophy Type III; Leber amaurosis; Zellweger syndrome; Peroxisome biogenesis disorders; Zellweger syndrome spectrum; Leber congenital amaurosis 11, 12, 13, 16, 4, 7, and 9; Leber optic atrophy; Aminoglycoside-induced deafness; Deafness, nonsyndromic sensorineural, mitochondrial; Left ventricular noncompaction 5; Left-right axis malformations; Leigh disease; Mitochondrial short-chain Enoyl-CoA Hydratase 1 deficiency; Leigh syndrome due to mitochondrial complex I deficiency; Leiner disease; Leri Weill dyschondrosteosis; Lethal congenital contracture syndrome 6; Leukocyte adhesion deficiency type I and III; Leukodystrophy, Hypomyelinating, 11 and 6; Leukoencephalopathy with ataxia, with Brainstem and Spinal Cord Involvement and Lactate Elevation, with vanishing white matter, and progressive, with ovarian failure; Leukonychia totalis; Lewy body dementia; Lichtenstein-Knorr Syndrome; Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1; Lig4 syndrome; Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, type 1B, 2A, 2B, 2D, C1, C5, C9, C14; Congenital muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy with brain and eye anomalies, type A14 and B14; Lipase deficiency combined; Lipid proteinosis; Lipodystrophy, familial partial, type 2 and 3; Lissencephaly 1, 2 (X-linked), 3, 6 (with microcephaly), X-linked; Subcortical laminar heterotopia, X-linked; Liver failure acute infantile; Loeys-Dietz syndrome 1, 2, 3; Long QT syndrome 1, 2, 2/9, 2/5, (digenic), 3, 5 and 5, acquired, susceptibility to; Lung cancer; Lymphedema, hereditary, id; Lymphedema, primary, with myelodysplasia; Lymphoproliferative syndrome 1, 1 (X-linked), and 2; Lysosomal acid lipase deficiency; Macrocephaly, macrosomia, facial dysmorphism syndrome; Macular dystrophy, vitelliform, adult-onset; Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility type 1; Malignant lymphoma, non-Hodgkin; Malignant melanoma; Malignant tumor of prostate; Mandibuloacral dysostosis; Mandibuloacral dysplasia with type A or B lipodystrophy, atypical; Mandibulofacial dysostosis, Treacher Collins type, autosomal recessive; Mannose-binding protein deficiency; Maple syrup urine disease type 1A and type 3; Marden Walker like syndrome; Marfan syndrome; Marinesco-Sj\xc3\xb6gren syndrome; Martsolf syndrome; Maturity-onset diabetes of the young, type 1, type 2, type 11, type 3, and type 9; May-Hegglin anomaly; MYH9 related disorders; Sebastian syndrome; McCune-Albright syndrome; Somatotroph adenoma; Sex cord-stromal tumor; Cushing syndrome; McKusick Kaufman syndrome; McLeod neuroacanthocytosis syndrome; Meckel-Gruber syndrome; Medium-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency; Medulloblastoma; Megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy with subcortical cysts land 2a; Megalencephaly cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenital; PIK3CA Related Overgrowth Spectrum; Megalencephaly-polymicrogyria-polydactyly-hydrocephalus syndrome 2; Megaloblastic anemia, thiamine-responsive, with diabetes mellitus and sensorineural deafness; Meier-Gorlin syndromes land 4; Melnick-Needles syndrome; Meningioma; Mental retardation, X-linked, 3, 21, 30, and 72; Mental retardation and microcephaly with pontine and cerebellar hypoplasia; Mental retardation X-linked syndromic 5; Mental retardation, anterior maxillary protrusion, and strabismus; Mental retardation, autosomal dominant 12, 13, 15, 24, 3, 30, 4, 5, 6,and 9; Mental retardation, autosomal recessive 15, 44, 46, and 5; Mental retardation, stereotypic movements, epilepsy, and/or cerebral malformations; Mental retardation, syndromic, Claes-Jensen type, X-linked; Mental retardation, X-linked, nonspecific, syndromic, Hedera type, and syndromic, wu type; Merosin deficient congenital muscular dystrophy; Metachromatic leukodystrophy juvenile, late infantile, and adult types; Metachromatic leukodystrophy; Metatrophic dysplasia; Methemoglobinemia types I and 2; Methionine adenosyltransferase deficiency, autosomal dominant; Methylmalonic acidemia with homocystinuria; Methylmalonic aciduria cblB type; Methylmalonic aciduria due to methylmalonyl-CoA mutase deficiency; METHYLMALONIC ACIDURIA, mut(0) TYPE; Microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type 2; Microcephaly with or without chorioretinopathy, lymphedema, or mental retardation; Microcephaly, hiatal hernia and nephrotic syndrome; Microcephaly; Hypoplasia of the corpus callosum; Spastic paraplegia 50, autosomal recessive; Global developmental delay; CNS hypomyelination; Brain atrophy; Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency; Microcephaly-capillary malformation syndrome; Microcytic anemia; Microphthalmia syndromic 5, 7, and 9; Microphthalmia, isolated 3, 5, 6, 8, and with coloboma 6; Microspherophakia; Migraine, familial basilar; Miller syndrome; Minicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia; Myopathy, congenital with cores; Mitchell-Riley syndrome; mitochondrial 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase deficiency; Mitochondrial complex I, II, III, III (nuclear type 2, 4, or 8) deficiency; Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 11, 12 (cardiomyopathic type), 2, 4B (MNGIE type), 8B (MNGIE type); Mitochondrial DNA-depletion syndrome 3 and 7, hepatocerebral types, and 13 (encephalomyopathic type); Mitochondrial phosphate carrier and pyruvate carrier deficiency; Mitochondrial trifunctional protein deficiency; Long-chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency; Miyoshi muscular dystrophy 1; Myopathy, distal, with anterior tibial onset; Mohr-Tranebjaerg syndrome; Molybdenum cofactor deficiency, complementation group A; Mowat-Wilson syndrome; Mucolipidosis III Gamma; Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI, type VI (severe), and type VII; Mucopolysaccharidosis, MPS-I-H/S, MPS-II, MPS-III-A, MPS-III-B, MPS-III-C, MPS-IV-A, MPS-IV-B; Retinitis Pigmentosa 73; Gangliosidosis GM1 type1 (with cardiac involvement) 3; Multicentric osteolysis nephropathy; Multicentric osteolysis, nodulosis and arthropathy; Multiple congenital anomalies; Atrial septal defect 2; Multiple congenital anomalies-hypotonia-seizures syndrome 3; Multiple Cutaneous and Mucosal Venous Malformations; Multiple endocrine neoplasia, types 1 and 4; Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia 5 or Dominant; Multiple gastrointestinal atresias; Multiple pterygium syndrome Escobar type; Multiple sulfatase deficiency; Multiple synostoses syndrome 3; Muscle AMP guanine oxidase deficiency; Muscle eye brain disease; Muscular dystrophy, congenital, megaconial type; Myasthenia, familial infantile, 1; Myasthenic Syndrome, Congenital, 11, associated with acetylcholine receptor deficiency; Myasthenic Syndrome, Congenital, 17, 2A (slow-channel), 4B (fast-channel), and without tubular aggregates; Myeloperoxidase deficiency; MYH-associated polyposis; Endometrial carcinoma; Myocardial infarction 1; Myoclonic dystonia; Myoclonic-Atonic Epilepsy; Myoclonus with epilepsy with ragged red fibers; Myofibrillar myopathy 1 and ZASP-related; Myoglobinuria, acute recurrent, autosomal recessive; Myoneural gastrointestinal encephalopathy syndrome; Cerebellar ataxia infantile with progressive external ophthalmoplegia; Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 4B, MNGIE type; Myopathy, centronuclear, 1, congenital, with excess of muscle spindles, distal, 1, lactic acidosis, and sideroblastic anemia 1, mitochondrial progressive with congenital cataract, hearing loss, and developmental delay, and tubular aggregate, 2; Myopia 6; Myosclerosis, autosomal recessive; Myotonia congenital; Congenital myotonia, autosomal dominant and recessive forms; Nail-patella syndrome; Nance-Horan syndrome; Nanophthalmos 2; Navajo neurohepatopathy; Nemaline myopathy 3 and 9; Neonatal hypotonia; Intellectual disability; Seizures; Delayed speech and language development; Mental retardation, autosomal dominant 31; Neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency; Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, X-linked; Nephrolithiasis/osteoporosis, hypophosphatemic, 2; Nephronophthisis 13, 15 and 4; Infertility; Cerebello-oculo-renal syndrome (nephronophthisis, oculomotor apraxia and cerebellar abnormalities); Nephrotic syndrome, type 3, type 5, with or without ocular abnormalities, type 7, and type 9; Nestor-Guillermo progeria syndrome; Neu-Laxova syndrome 1; Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation 4 and 6; Neuroferritinopathy; Neurofibromatosis, type land type 2; Neurofibrosarcoma; Neurohypophyseal diabetes insipidus; Neuropathy, Hereditary Sensory, Type IC; Neutral 1 amino acid transport defect; Neutral lipid storage disease with myopathy; Neutrophil immunodeficiency syndrome; Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome; Niemann-Pick disease type C1, C2, type A, and type C1, adult form; Non-ketotic hyperglycinemia; Noonan syndrome 1 and 4, LEOPARD syndrome 1; Noonan syndrome-like disorder with or without juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia; Normokalemic periodic paralysis, potassium-sensitive; Norum disease; Epilepsy, Hearing Loss, And Mental Retardation Syndrome; Mental Retardation, X-Linked 102 and syndromic 13; Obesity; Ocular albinism, type I; Oculocutaneous albinism type 1B, type 3, and type 4; Oculodentodigital dysplasia; Odontohypophosphatasia; Odontotrichomelic syndrome; Oguchi disease; Oligodontia-colorectal cancer syndrome; Opitz G/BBB syndrome; Optic atrophy 9; Oral-facial-digital syndrome; Ornithine aminotransferase deficiency; Orofacial cleft 11 and 7, Cleft lip/palate-ectodermal dysplasia syndrome; Orstavik Lindemann Solberg syndrome; Osteoarthritis with mild chondrodysplasia; Osteochondritis dissecans; Osteogenesis imperfecta type 12, type 5, type 7, type 8, type I, type III, with normal sclerae, dominant form, recessive perinatal lethal; Osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis; Osteopetrosis autosomal dominant type 1 and 2, recessive 4, recessive 1, recessive 6; Osteoporosis with pseudoglioma; Oto-palato-digital syndrome, types I and II; Ovarian dysgenesis 1; Ovarioleukodystrophy; Pachyonychia congenita 4 and type 2; Paget disease of bone, familial; Pallister-Hall syndrome; Palmoplantar keratoderma, nonepidermolytic, focal or diffuse; Pancreatic agenesis and congenital heart disease; Papillon-Lefxc3xa8vre syndrome; Paragangliomas 3; Paramyotonia congenita of von Eulenburg; Parathyroid carcinoma; Parkinson disease 14, 15, 19 (juvenile-onset), 2, 20 (early-onset), 6, (autosomal recessive early-onset, and 9; Partial albinism; Partial hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency; Patterned dystrophy of retinal pigment epithelium; PC-K6a; Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease; Pendred syndrome; Peripheral demyelinating neuropathy, central dysmyelination; Hirschsprung disease; Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus; Diabetes mellitus, permanent neonatal, with neurologic features; Neonatal insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; Maturity-onset diabetes of the young, type 2; Peroxisome biogenesis disorder 14B, 2A, 4A, 5B, 6A, 7A, and 7B; Perrault syndrome 4; Perry syndrome; Persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy; familial hyperinsulinism; Phenotypes; Phenylketonuria; Pheochromocytoma; Hereditary Paraganglioma-Pheochromocytoma Syndromes; Paragangliomas 1; Carcinoid tumor of intestine; Cowden syndrome 3; Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase deficiency; Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 deficiency; Photosensitive trichothiodystrophy; Phytanic acid storage disease; Pick disease; Pierson syndrome; Pigmentary retinal dystrophy; Pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease, primary, 1; Pilomatrixoma; Pitt-Hopkins syndrome; Pituitary dependent hypercortisolism; Pituitary hormone deficiency, combined 1, 2, 3, and 4; Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 deficiency; Plasminogen deficiency, type I; Platelet-type bleeding disorder 15 and 8; Poikiloderma, hereditary fibrosing, with tendon contractures, myopathy, and pulmonary fibrosis; Polycystic kidney disease 2, adult type, and infantile type; Polycystic lipomembranous osteodysplasia with sclerosing leukoencephalopathy; Polyglucosan body myopathy 1 with or without immunodeficiency; Polymicrogyria, asymmetric, bilateral frontoparietal; Polyneuropathy, hearing loss, ataxia, retinitis pigmentosa, and cataract; Pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 4; Popliteal pterygium syndrome; Porencephaly 2; Porokeratosis 8, disseminated superficial actinic type; Porphobilinogen synthase deficiency; Porphyria cutanea tarda; Posterior column ataxia with retinitis pigmentosa; Posterior polar cataract type 2; Prader-Willi-like syndrome; Premature ovarian failure 4, 5, 7, and 9; Primary autosomal recessive microcephaly 10, 2, 3, and 5; Primary ciliary dyskinesia 24; Primary dilated cardiomyopathy; Left ventricular noncompaction 6; 4, Left ventricular noncompaction 10; Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; Primary hyperoxaluria, type I, type, and type III; Primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy, autosomal recessive 2; Primary hypomagnesemia; Primary open angle glaucoma juvenile onset 1; Primary pulmonary hypertension; Primrose syndrome; Progressive familial heart block type 1B; Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis 2 and 3; Progressive intrahepatic cholestasis; Progressive myoclonus epilepsy with ataxia; Progressive pseudorheumatoid dysplasia; Progressive sclerosing poliodystrophy; Prolidase deficiency; Proline dehydrogenase deficiency; Schizophrenia 4; Properdin deficiency, X-linked; Propionic academia; Proprotein convertase 1/3 deficiency; Prostate cancer, hereditary, 2; Protan defect; Proteinuria; Finnish congenital nephrotic syndrome; Proteus syndrome; Breast adenocarcinoma; Pseudoachondroplastic spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia syndrome; Pseudohypoaldosteronism type 1 autosomal dominant and recessive and type 2; Pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1A, Pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism; Pseudoneonatal adrenoleukodystrophy; Pseudoprimary hyperaldosteronism; Pseudoxanthoma elasticum; Generalized arterial calcification of infancy 2; Pseudoxanthoma elasticum-like disorder with multiple coagulation factor deficiency; Psoriasis susceptibility 2; PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome; Pulmonary arterial hypertension related to hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia; Pulmonary Fibrosis And/Or Bone Marrow Failure, Telomere-Related, 1 and 3; Pulmonary hypertension, primary, 1, with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia; Purine-nucleoside phosphorylase deficiency; Pyruvate carboxylase deficiency; Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1-alpha deficiency; Pyruvate kinase deficiency of red cells; Raine syndrome; Rasopathy; Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa; Nail disorder, nonsyndromic congenital, 8; Reifenstein syndrome; Renal adysplasia; Renal carnitine transport defect; Renal coloboma syndrome; Renal dysplasia; Renal dysplasia, retinal pigmentary dystrophy, cerebellar ataxia and skeletal dysplasia; Renal tubular acidosis, distal, autosomal recessive, with late-onset sensorineural hearing loss, or with hemolytic anemia; Renal tubular acidosis, proximal, with ocular abnormalities and mental retardation; Retinal cone dystrophy 3B; Retinitis pigmentosa; Retinitis pigmentosa 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, and 19; Retinitis pigmentosa 2, 20, 25, 35, 36, 38, 39, 4, 40, 43, 45, 48, 66, 7, 70, 72; Retinoblastoma; Rett disorder; Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 2; Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, autosomal dominant; Rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata type 2 and type 3; Roberts-SC phocomelia syndrome; Robinow Sorauf syndrome; Robinow syndrome, autosomal recessive, autosomal recessive, with brachy-synpolydactyly; Rothmund-Thomson syndrome; Rapadilino syndrome; RRM2B-related mitochondrial disease; Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome; Salla disease; Sandhoff disease, adult and infantil types; Sarcoidosis, early-onset; Blau syndrome; Schindler disease, type 1; Schizencephaly; Schizophrenia 15; Schneckenbecken dysplasia; Schwannomatosis 2; Schwartz Jampel syndrome type 1; Sclerocornea, autosomal recessive; Sclerosteosis; Secondary hypothyroidism; Segawa syndrome, autosomal recessive; Senior-Loken syndrome 4 and 5; Sensory ataxic neuropathy, dysarthria, and ophthalmoparesis; Sepiapterin reductase deficiency; SeSAME syndrome; Severe combined immunodeficiency due to ADA deficiency, with microcephaly, growth retardation, and sensitivity to ionizing radiation, atypical, autosomal recessive, T cell-negative, B cell-positive, NK cell-negative of NK-positive; Severe congenital neutropenia; Severe congenital neutropenia 3, autosomal recessive or dominant; Severe congenital neutropenia and 6, autosomal recessive; Severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy; Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, types 1 and 2; Severe X-linked myotubular myopathy; Short QT syndrome 3; Short stature with nonspecific skeletal abnormalities; Short stature, auditory canal atresia, mandibular hypoplasia, skeletal abnormalities; Short stature, onychodysplasia, facial dysmorphism, and hypotrichosis; Primordial dwarfism; Short-rib thoracic dysplasia 11 or 3 with or without polydactyly; Sialidosis type I and II; Silver spastic paraplegia syndrome; Slowed nerve conduction velocity, autosomal dominant; Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome; Snyder Robinson syndrome; Somatotroph adenoma; Prolactinoma; familial, Pituitary adenoma predisposition; Sotos syndrome 1 or 2; Spastic ataxia 5, autosomal recessive, Charlevoix-Saguenay type, 1,10, or 11, autosomal recessive; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 5; Spastic paraplegia 15, 2, 3, 35, 39, 4, autosomal dominant, 55, autosomal recessive, and 5A; Bile acid synthesis defect, congenital, 3; Spermatogenic failure 11, 3, and 8; Spherocytosis types 4 and 5; Spheroid body myopathy; Spinal muscular atrophy, lower extremity predominant 2, autosomal dominant; Spinal muscular atrophy, type II; Spinocerebellar ataxia 14, 21, 35, 40,and 6; Spinocerebellar ataxia autosomal recessive 1 and 16; Splenic hypoplasia; Spondylocarpotarsal synostosis syndrome; Spondylocheirodysplasia, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome-like, with immune dysregulation, Aggrecan type, with congenital joint dislocations, short limb-hand type, Sedaghatian type, with cone-rod dystrophy, and Kozlowski type; Parastremmatic dwarfism; Stargardt disease 1; Cone-rod dystrophy 3; Stickler syndrome type 1; Kniest dysplasia; Stickler syndrome, types 1(nonsyndromic ocular) and 4; Sting-associated vasculopathy, infantile-onset; Stormorken syndrome; Sturge-Weber syndrome, Capillary malformations, congenital, 1; Succinyl-CoA acetoacetate transferase deficiency; Sucrase-isomaltase deficiency; Sudden infant death syndrome; Sulfite oxidase deficiency, isolated; Supravalvar aortic stenosis; Surfactant metabolism dysfunction, pulmonary, 2 and 3; Symphalangism, proximal, 1b; Syndactyly Cenani Lenz type; Syndactyly type 3; Syndromic X-linked mental retardation 16; Talipes equinovarus; Tangier disease; TARP syndrome; Tay-Sachs disease, B1 variant, Gm2-gangliosidosis (adult), Gm2-gangliosidosis (adult-onset); Temtamy syndrome; Tenorio Syndrome; Terminal osseous dysplasia; Testosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase deficiency; Tetraamelia, autosomal recessive; Tetralogy of Fallot; Hypoplastic left heart syndrome 2; Truncus arteriosus; Malformation of the heart and great vessels; Ventricular septal defect 1; Thiel-Behnke corneal dystrophy; Thoracic aortic aneurysms and aortic dissections; Marfanoid habitus; Three M syndrome 2; Thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction, hemolysis, and imbalanced globin synthesis; Thrombocytopenia, X-linked; Thrombophilia, hereditary, due to protein C deficiency, autosomal dominant and recessive; Thyroid agenesis; Thyroid cancer, follicular; Thyroid hormone metabolism, abnormal; Thyroid hormone resistance, generalized, autosomal dominant; Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis and Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis 2; Thyrotropin-releasing hormone resistance, generalized; Timothy syndrome; TNF receptor-associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS); Tooth agenesis, selective, 3 and 4; Torsades de pointes; Townes-Brocks-branchiootorenal-like syndrome; Transient bullous dermolysis of the newborn; Treacher collins syndrome 1; Trichomegaly with mental retardation, dwarfism and pigmentary degeneration of retina; Trichorhinophalangeal dysplasia type I; Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 3; Trimethylaminuria; Tuberous sclerosis syndrome; Lymphangiomyomatosis; Tuberous sclerosis 1 and 2; Tyrosinase-negative oculocutaneous albinism; Tyrosinase-positive oculocutaneous albinism; Tyrosinemia type I; UDPglucose-4-epimerase deficiency; Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy; Ulna and fibula absence of with severe limb deficiency; Upshaw-Schulman syndrome; Urocanate hydratase deficiency; Usher syndrome, types 1, 1B, 1D, 1G, 2A, 2C, and 2D; Retinitis pigmentosa 39; UV-sensitive syndrome; Van der Woude syndrome; Van Maldergem syndrome 2; Hennekam lymphangiectasia-lymphedema syndrome 2; Variegate porphyria; Ventriculomegaly with cystic kidney disease; Verheij syndrome; Very long chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency; Vesicoureteral reflux 8; Visceral heterotaxy 5, autosomal; Visceral myopathy; Vitamin D-dependent rickets, types 1 and 2; Vitelliform dystrophy; von Willebrand disease type 2M and type 3; Waardenburg syndrome type 1, 4C, and 2E (with neurologic involvement); Klein-Waardenberg syndrome; Walker-Warburg congenital muscular dystrophy; Warburg micro syndrome 2 and 4; Warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis; Weaver syndrome; Weill-Marchesani syndrome 1 and 3; Weill-Marchesani-like syndrome; Weissenbacher-Zweymuller syndrome; Werdnig-Hoffmann disease; Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease; Werner syndrome; WFS1-Related Disorders; Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome; Wilson disease; Wolfram-like syndrome, autosomal dominant; Worth disease; Van Buchem disease type 2; Xeroderma pigmentosum, complementation group b, group D, group E, and group G; X-linked agammaglobulinemia; X-linked hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy; X-linked ichthyosis with steryl-sulfatase deficiency; X-linked periventricular heterotopia; Oto-palato-digital syndrome, type I; X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency; Zimmermann-Laband syndrome and Zimmermann-Laband syndrome 2; and Zonular pulverulent cataract 3.
The target nucleotide sequence may comprise a target sequence (e.g., a point mutation) associated with a disease, disorder, or condition. The target sequence may comprise a T to C (or A to G) point mutation associated with a disease, disorder, or condition, and wherein the deamination of the mutant C base results in mismatch repair-mediated correction to a sequence that is not associated with a disease, disorder, or condition. The target sequence may comprise a G to A (or C to T) point mutation associated with a disease, disorder, or condition, and wherein the deamination of the mutant A base results in mismatch repair-mediated correction to a sequence that is not associated with a disease, disorder, or condition. The target sequence may encode a protein, and where the point mutation is in a codon and results in a change in the amino acid encoded by the mutant codon as compared to a wild-type codon. The target sequence may also be at a splice site, and the point mutation results in a change in the splicing of an mRNA transcript as compared to a wild-type transcript. In addition, the target may be at a non-coding sequence of a gene, such as a promoter, and the point mutation results in increased or decreased expression of the gene.
Thus, in some aspects, the deamination of a mutant C results in a change of the amino acid encoded by the mutant codon, which in some cases can result in the expression of a wild-type amino acid. In other aspects, the deamination of a mutant A results in a change of the amino acid encoded by the mutant codon, which in some cases can result in the expression of a wild-type amino acid.
The methods described herein involving contacting a cell with a composition or rAAV particle can occur in vitro, ex vivo, or in vivo. In certain embodiments, the step of contacting occurs in a subject. In certain embodiments, the subject has been diagnosed with a disease, disorder, or condition.
In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein involve contacting a mammalian cell with a composition or rAAV particle. In particular embodiments, the methods involve contacting a retinal cell, cortical cell or cerebellar cell.
The split Cas9 protein or split prime editor delivered using the methods described herein preferably have comparable activity compared to the original Cas9 protein or prime editor (i.e., unsplit protein delivered to a cell or expressed in a cell as a whole). For example, the split Cas9 protein or split prime editor retains at least 50% (e.g., at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100%) of the activity of the original Cas9 protein or prime editor. In some embodiments, the split Cas9 protein or split prime editor is more active (e.g., 2-fold, 5-fold, 10-fold, 100-fold, 1000-fold, or more) than that of an original Cas9 protein or prime editor.
The compositions described herein may be administered to a subject in need thereof in a therapeutically effective amount to treat and/or prevent a disease or disorder the subject is suffering from. Any disease or disorder that maybe treated and/or prevented using CRISPR/Cas9-based genome-editing technology may be treated by the split Cas9 protein or the split multi-flap prime editor described herein. It is to be understood that, if the nucleotide sequences encoding the split Cas9 protein or the multi-flap prime editor does not further encode a gRNA, a separate nucleic acid vector encoding the gRNA may be administered together with the compositions described herein.
Exemplary suitable diseases, disorders or conditions include, without limitation the disease or disorder is selected from the group consisting of: cystic fibrosis, phenylketonuria, epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EHK), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Charcot-Marie-Toot disease type 4J, neuroblastoma (NB), von Willebrand disease (vWD), myotonia congenital, hereditary renal amyloidosis, dilated cardiomyopathy, hereditary lymphedema, familial Alzheimer's disease, prion disease, chronic infantile neurologic cutaneous articular syndrome (CINCA), congenital deafness, Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) disease, and desmin-related myopathy (DRM). In particular embodiments, the disease or condition is Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) disease.
In some embodiments, the disease, disorder or condition is associated with a point mutation in an NPC gene, a DNMT1 gene, a PCSK9 gene, or a TMC1 gene. In certain embodiments, the point mutation is a T3182C mutation in NPC, which results in an I1061T amino acid substitution.
In certain embodiments, the point mutation is an A545G mutation in TMC1, which results in a Y182C amino acid substitution. TMC1 encodes a protein that forms mechanosensitive ion channels in sensory hair cells of the inner ear and is required for normal auditory function. The Y182C amino acid substitution is associated with congenital deafness.
In some embodiments, the disease, disorder or condition is associated with a point mutation that generates a stop codon, for example, a premature stop codon within the coding region of a gene.
Additional exemplary diseases, disorders and conditions include cystic fibrosis (see, e.g., Schwank et al., Functional repair of CFTR by CRISPR/Cas9 in intestinal stem cell organoids of cystic fibrosis patients. Cell stem cell. 2013; 13: 653-658; and Wu et. al., Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell stem cell. 2013; 13: 659-662, neither of which uses a deaminase fusion protein to correct the genetic defect); phenylketonuria—e.g., phenylalanine to serine mutation at position 835 (mouse) or 240 (human) or a homologous residue in phenylalanine hydroxylase gene (T>C mutation)—see, e.g., McDonald et al., Genomics. 1997; 39:402-405; Bernard-Soulier syndrome (BSS)—e.g., phenylalanine to serine mutation at position 55 or a homologous residue, or cysteine to arginine at residue 24 or a homologous residue in the platelet membrane glycoprotein IX (T>C mutation)—see, e.g., Noris et al., British Journal of Haematology. 1997; 97: 312-320, and Ali et al., Hematol. 2014; 93: 381-384; epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EHK)—e.g., leucine to proline mutation at position 160 or 161 (if counting the initiator methionine) or a homologous residue in keratin 1 (T>C mutation)—see, e.g., Chipev et al., Cell. 1992; 70: 821-828, see also accession number P04264 in the UNIPROT database at www[dot]uniprot[dot]org; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)—e.g., leucine to proline mutation at position 54 or 55 (if counting the initiator methionine) or a homologous residue in the processed form of α1-antitrypsin or residue 78 in the unprocessed form or a homologous residue (T>C mutation)—see, e.g., Poller et al., Genomics. 1993; 17: 740-743, see also accession number P01011 in the UNIPROT database; Charcot-Marie-Toot disease type 4J—e.g., isoleucine to threonine mutation at position 41 or a homologous residue in
Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion Disease
Trinucleotide repeat expansion is associated with a number of human diseases, including Huntington's Disease, Fragile X syndrome, and Friedreich's ataxia. The most common trinucleotide repeat contains CAG triplets, though GAA triplets (Friedreich's ataxia) and CGG triplets (Fragile X syndrome) also occur. Inheriting a predisposition to expansion, or acquiring an already expanded parental allele, increases the likelihood of acquiring the disease. Pathogenic expansions of trinucleotide repeats could hypothetically be corrected using multi-flap prime editing.
A region upstream of the repeat region can be nicked by an RNA-guided nuclease, then used to prime synthesis of a new DNA strand that contains a healthy number of repeats (which depends on the particular gene and disease), in accordance with the general mechanism outlined in
The multi-flap prime editing systems (e.g., dual-flap and quadruple-flap prime editing systems) described herein may be used to contract trinucleotide repeat mutations (or “triplet expansion diseases”) to treating conditions such as Huntington's disease and other trinucleotide repeat disorders. Trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders are complex, progressive disorders that involve developmental neurobiology and often affect cognition as well as sensori-motor functions. The disorders show genetic anticipation (i.e. increased severity with each generation). The DNA expansions or contractions usually happen meiotically (i.e. during the time of gametogenesis, or early in embryonic development), and often have sex-bias meaning that some genes expand only when inherited through the female, others only through the male. In humans, trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders can cause gene silencing at either the transcriptional or translational level, which essentially knocks out gene function. Alternatively, trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders can cause altered proteins generated with large repetitive amino acid sequences that either abrogate or change protein function, often in a dominant-negative manner (e.g. poly-glutamine diseases).
Without wishing to be bound by theory, triplet expansion is caused by slippage during DNA replication or during DNA repair synthesis. Because the tandem repeats have identical sequence to one another, base pairing between two DNA strands can take place at multiple points along the sequence. This may lead to the formation of “loop out” structures during DNA replication or DNA repair synthesis. This may lead to repeated copying of the repeated sequence, expanding the number of repeats. Additional mechanisms involving hybrid RNA:DNA intermediates have been proposed. Multi-flap prime editing may be used to reduce or eliminate these triplet expansion regions by deletion one or more or the offending repeat codon triplets. In an embodiment of this use,
Multi-flap prime editing may be implemented to contract triplet expansion regions by nicking a region upstream of the triplet repeat region with the prime editor comprising a PEgRNA appropriated targeted to the cut site. The prime editor then synthesizes a new DNA strand (ssDNA flap) based on the PEgRNA as a template (i.e., the edit template thereof) that codes for a healthy number of triplet repeats (which depends on the particular gene and disease). The newly synthesized ssDNA strand comprising the healthy triplet repeat sequence also is synthesized to include a short stretch of homology (i.e., the homology arm) that matches the sequence adjacent to the other end of the repeat (red strand). Invasion of the newly synthesized strand, and subsequent replacement of the endogenous DNA with the newly synthesized ssDNA flap, leads to a contracted repeat allele.
Depending on the particular trinucleotide expansion disorder, the defect-inducing triplet expansions may occur in “trinucleotide repeat expansion proteins.” Trinucleotide repeat expansion proteins are a diverse set of proteins associated with susceptibility for developing a trinucleotide repeat expansion disorder, the presence of a trinucleotide repeat expansion disorder, the severity of a trinucleotide repeat expansion disorder or any combination thereof. Trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders are divided into two categories determined by the type of repeat. The most common repeat is the triplet CAG, which, when present in the coding region of a gene, codes for the amino acid glutamine (Q). Therefore, these disorders are referred to as the polyglutamine (polyQ) disorders and comprise the following diseases: Huntington Disease (HD); Spinobulbar Muscular Atrophy (SBMA); Spinocerebellar Ataxias (SCA types 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 17); and Dentatorubro-Pallidoluysian Atrophy (DRPLA). The remaining trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders either do not involve the CAG triplet or the CAG triplet is not in the coding region of the gene and are, therefore, referred to as the non-polyglutamine disorders. The non-polyglutamine disorders comprise Fragile X Syndrome (FRAXA); Fragile XE Mental Retardation (FRAXE); Friedreich Ataxia (FRDA); Myotonic Dystrophy (DM); and Spinocerebellar Ataxias (SCA types 8, and 12).
The proteins associated with trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders can be selected based on an experimental association of the protein associated with a trinucleotide repeat expansion disorder to a trinucleotide repeat expansion disorder. For example, the production rate or circulating concentration of a protein associated with a trinucleotide repeat expansion disorder may be elevated or depressed in a population having a trinucleotide repeat expansion disorder relative to a population lacking the trinucleotide repeat expansion disorder. Differences in protein levels may be assessed using proteomic techniques including but not limited to Western blot, immunohistochemical staining, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and mass spectrometry. Alternatively, the proteins associated with trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders may be identified by obtaining gene expression profiles of the genes encoding the proteins using genomic techniques including but not limited to DNA microarray analysis, serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE), and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR).
Non-limiting examples of proteins associated with trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders which can be corrected by multi-flap prime editing include AR (androgen receptor), FMR1 (fragile X mental retardation 1), HTT (huntingtin), DMPK (dystrophia myotonica-protein kinase), FXN (frataxin), ATXN2 (ataxin 2), ATN1 (atrophin 1), FEN1 (flap structure-specific endonuclease 1), TNRC6A (trinucleotide repeat containing 6A), PABPN1 (poly(A) binding protein, nuclear 1), JPH3 (junctophilin 3), MED15 (mediator complex subunit 15), ATXN1 (ataxin 1), ATXN3 (ataxin 3), TBP (TATA box binding protein), CACNA1A (calcium channel, voltage-dependent, P/Q type, alpha 1A subunit), ATXN80S (ATXN8 opposite strand (non-protein coding)), PPP2R2B (protein phosphatase 2, regulatory subunit B, beta), ATXN7 (ataxin 7), TNRC6B (trinucleotide repeat containing 6B), TNRC6C (trinucleotide repeat containing 6C), CELF3 (CUGBP, Elav-like family member 3), MAB21L1 (mab-21-like 1 (C. elegans)), MSH2 (mutS homolog 2, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 1 (E. coli)), TMEM185A (transmembrane protein 185A), SIX5 (SIX homeobox 5), CNPY3 (canopy 3 homolog (zebrafish)), FRAXE (fragile site, folic acid type, rare, fra(X)(q28) E), GNB2 (guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), beta polypeptide 2), RPL14 (ribosomal protein L14), ATXN8 (ataxin 8), INSR (insulin receptor), TTR (transthyretin), EP400 (E1A binding protein p400), GIGYF2 (GRB10 interacting GYF protein 2), OGG1 (8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase), STC1 (stanniocalcin 1), CNDP1 (carnosine dipeptidase 1 (metallopeptidase M20 family)), C10orf2 (chromosome 10 open reading frame 2), MAML3 mastermind-like 3 (Drosophila), DKC1 (dyskeratosis congenita 1, dyskerin), PAXIP1 (PAX interacting (with transcription-activation domain) protein 1), CASK (calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase (MAGUK family)), MAPT (microtubule-associated protein tau), SP1 (Sp1 transcription factor), POLG (polymerase (DNA directed), gamma), AFF2 (AF4/FMR2 family, member 2), THBS1 (thrombospondin 1), TP53 (tumor protein p53), ESR1 (estrogen receptor 1), CGGBP1 (CGG triplet repeat binding protein 1), ABT1 (activator of basal transcription 1), KLK3 (kallikrein-related peptidase 3), PRNP (prion protein), JUN (jun oncogene), KCNN3 (potassium intermediate/small conductance calcium-activated channel, subfamily N, member 3), BAX (BCL2-associated X protein), FRAXA (fragile site, folic acid type, rare, fra(X)(q27.3) A (macroorchidism, mental retardation)), KBTBD10 (kelch repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 10), MBNL1 (muscleblind-like (Drosophila)), RAD51 (RAD51 homolog (RecA homolog, E. coli) (S. cerevisiae)), NCOA3 (nuclear receptor coactivator 3), ERDA1 (expanded repeat domain, CAG/CTG 1), TSC1 (tuberous sclerosis 1), COMP (cartilage oligomeric matrix protein), GCLC (glutamate-cysteine ligase, catalytic subunit), RRAD (Ras-related associated with diabetes), MSH3 (mutS homolog 3 (E. coli)), DRD2 (dopamine receptor D2), CD44 (CD44 molecule (Indian blood group)), CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor (zinc finger protein)), CCND1 (cyclin D1), CLSPN (claspin homolog (Xenopus laevis)), MEF2A (myocyte enhancer factor 2A), PTPRU (protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, U), GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), TRIM22 (tripartite motif-containing 22), WT1 (Wilms tumor 1), AHR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor), GPX1 (glutathione peroxidase 1), TPMT (thiopurine S-methyltransferase), NDP (Norrie disease (pseudoglioma)), ARX (aristaless related homeobox), MUS81 (MUS81 endonuclease homolog (S. cerevisiae)), TYR (tyrosinase (oculocutaneous albinism IA)), EGR1 (early growth response 1), UNG (uracil-DNA glycosylase), NUMBL (numb homolog (Drosophila)-like), FABP2 (fatty acid binding protein 2, intestinal), EN2 (engrailed homeobox 2), CRYGC (crystallin, gamma C), SRP14 (signal recognition particle 14 kDa (homologous Alu RNA binding protein)), CRYGB (crystallin, gamma B), PDCD1 (programmed cell death 1), HOXA1 (homeobox A1), ATXN2L (ataxin 2-like), PMS2 (PMS2 postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (S. cerevisiae)), GLA (galactosidase, alpha), CBL (Cas-Br-M (murine) ecotropic retroviral transforming sequence), FTH1 (ferritin, heavy polypeptide 1), IL12RB2 (interleukin 12 receptor, beta 2), OTX2 (orthodenticle homeobox 2), HOXA5 (homeobox A5), POLG2 (polymerase (DNA directed), gamma 2, accessory subunit), DLX2 (distal-less homeobox 2), SIRPA (signal-regulatory protein alpha), OTX1 (orthodenticle homeobox 1), AHRR (aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor), MANF (mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor), TMEM158 (transmembrane protein 158 (gene/pseudogene)), and ENSG00000078687.
In a particular aspect, the instant disclosure provides TPRT-based methods for the treatment of a subject diagnosed with an expansion repeat disorder (also known as a repeat expansion disorder or a trinucleotide repeat disorder). Expansion repeat disorders occur when microsatellite repeats expand beyond a threshold length. Currently, at least 30 genetic diseases are believed to be caused by repeat expansions. Scientific understanding of this diverse group of disorders came to lights in the early 1990's with the discovery that trinucleotide repeats underlie several major inherited conditions, including Fragile X, Spinal and Bulbar Muscular Atrophy, Myotonic Dystrophy, and Huntington's disease (Nelson et al, “The unstable repeats—three evolving faces of neurological disease,” Neuron, Mar. 6, 2013, Vol. 77; 825-843, which is incorporated herein by reference), as well as Haw River Syndrome, Jacobsen Syndrome, Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA), Machado-Joseph disease, Synpolydactyly (SPD II), Hand-foot genital syndrome (HFGS), Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD), Holoprosencephaly disorder (HPE), Congenital central hypventilation syndrome (CCHS), ARX-nonsyndromic X-linked mental retardation (XLMR), and Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) (see. Microsatellite repeat instability was found to be a hallmark of these conditions, as was anticipation—the phenomenon in which repeat expansion can occur with each successive generation, which leads to a more severe phenotype and earlier age of onset in the offspring. Repeat expansions are believed to cause diseases via several different mechanisms. Namely, expansions may interfere with cellular functioning at the level of the gene, the mRNA transcript, and/or the encoded protein. In some conditions, mutations act via a loss-of-function mechanism by silencing repeat-containing genes. In others, disease results from gain-of-function mechanisms, whereby either the mRNA transcript or protein takes on new, aberrant functions.
In one embodiment, a method of treating a trinucleotide repeat disorder is depicted in
Prion Disease
Multi-flap prime editing can also be used to prevent or halt the progression of prion disease through the installation of one or more protective mutations into prion proteins (PRNP) which become misfolded during the course of disease. Prion diseases or transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) are a family of rare progressive neurodegenerative disorders that affect both humans and animals. They are distinguished by long incubation periods, characteristic spongiform changes associated with neuronal loss, and a failure to induce inflammatory response.
In humans, prion disease includes Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD), Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD), Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker Syndrome, Fatal Familial Insomnia, and Kuru. In animals, prion disease includes Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE or “mad cow disease”), Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD), Scrapie, Transmissible Mink Encephalopathy, Feline Spongiform Encephalopathy, and Ungulate Spongiform Encephalopathy. Multi-flap prime editing may be used to install protective point mutations into a prion protein in order to prevent or halt the progression of any one of these prion diseases.
Classic CJD is a human prion disease. It is a neurodegenerative disorder with characteristic clinical and diagnostic features. This disease is rapidly progressive and always fatal. Infection with this disease leads to death usually within 1 year of onset of illness. CJD is a rapidly progressive, invariably fatal neurodegenerative disorder believed to be caused by an abnormal isoform of a cellular glycoprotein known as the prion protein. CJD occurs worldwide and the estimated annual incidence in many countries, including the United States, has been reported to be about one case per million population. The vast majority of CJD patients usually die within 1 year of illness onset. CJD is classified as a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) along with other prion diseases that occur in humans and animals. In about 85% of patients, CJD occurs as a sporadic disease with no recognizable pattern of transmission. A smaller proportion of patients (5 to 15%) develop CJD because of inherited mutations of the prion protein gene. These inherited forms include Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker syndrome and fatal familial insomnia. No treatment is currently known for CJD.
Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) is a prion disease that was first described in 1996 in the United Kingdom. There is now strong scientific evidence that the agent responsible for the outbreak of prion disease in cows, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE or ‘mad cow’ disease), is the same agent responsible for the outbreak of vCJD in humans. Variant CJD (vCJD) is not the same disease as classic CJD (often simply called CJD). It has different clinical and pathologic characteristics from classic CJD. Each disease also has a particular genetic profile of the prion protein gene. Both disorders are invariably fatal brain diseases with unusually long incubation periods measured in years, and are caused by an unconventional transmissible agent called a prion. No treatment is currently known for vCJD.
BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy or “mad cow disease”) is a progressive neurological disorder of cattle that results from infection by an unusual transmissible agent called a prion. The nature of the transmissible agent is not well understood. Currently, the most accepted theory is that the agent is a modified form of a normal protein known as prion protein. For reasons that are not yet understood, the normal prion protein changes into a pathogenic (harmful) form that then damages the central nervous system of cattle. There is increasing evidence that there are different strains of BSE: the typical or classic BSE strain responsible for the outbreak in the United Kingdom and two atypical strains (H and L strains). No treatment is currently known for BSE.
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a prion disease that affects deer, elk, reindeer, sika deer and moose. It has been found in some areas of North America, including Canada and the United States, Norway and South Korea. It may take over a year before an infected animal develops symptoms, which can include drastic weight loss (wasting), stumbling, listlessness and other neurologic symptoms. CWD can affect animals of all ages and some infected animals may die without ever developing the disease. CWD is fatal to animals and there are no treatments or vaccines.
The causative agents of TSEs are believed to be prions. The term “prions” refers to abnormal, pathogenic agents that are transmissible and are able to induce abnormal folding of specific normal cellular proteins called prion proteins that are found most abundantly in the brain. The functions of these normal prion proteins are still not completely understood. The abnormal folding of the prion proteins leads to brain damage and the characteristic signs and symptoms of the disease. Prion diseases are usually rapidly progressive and always fatal.
As used herein, the term “prion” shall mean an infectious particle known to cause diseases (spongiform encephalopathies) in humans and animals. The term “prion” is a contraction of the words “protein” and “infection” and the particles are comprised largely if not exclusively of PRNPSc molecules encoded by a PRNP gene which expresses PRNPC which changes conformation to become PRNPSc. Prions are distinct from bacteria, viruses and viroids. Known prions include those which infect animals to cause scrapie, a transmissible, degenerative disease of the nervous system of sheep and goats as well as bovine spongiform encephalopathies (BSE) or mad cow disease and feline spongiform encephalopathies of cats. Four prion diseases, as discussed above, known to affect humans are (1) kuru, (2) Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD), (3) Gerstmann-Strassler-Scheinker Disease (GSS), and (4) fatal familial insomnia (FFI). As used herein prion includes all forms of prions causing all or any of these diseases or others in any animals used—and in particular in humans and in domesticated farm animals.
In general, and without wishing to be bound by theory, prior diseases are caused by misfolding of prion proteins. Such diseases—often called deposition diseases—the misfolding of the prion proteins can be accounted for as follows. If A is the normally synthesized gene product that carries out an intended physiologic role in a monomeric or oligomeric state, A* is a conformationally activated form of A that is competent to undergo a dramatic conformational change, B is the conformationally altered state that prefers multimeric assemblies (i.e., the misfolded form which forms depositions) and Bn is the multimeric material that is pathogenic and relatively difficult to recycle. For the prion diseases, PRNPC and PRNPSc correspond to states A and Bn where A is largely helical and monomeric and Bn is β-rich and multimeric.
It is known that certain mutations in prion proteins can be associated with increased risk of prior disease. Conversely, certain mutations in prion proteins can be protective in nature. See Bagynszky et al., “Characterization of mutations in PRNP (prion) gene and their possible roles in neurodegenerative diseases,” Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat., 2018; 14: 2067-2085, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
PRNP (NCBI RefSeq No. NP_000302.1 (SEQ ID NO: 291))—the human prion protein—is encoded by a 16 kb long gene, located on chromosome 20 (4686151-4701588). It contains two exons, and the exon 2 carries the open reading frame which encodes the 253 amino acid (AA) long PrP protein. Exon 1 is a noncoding exon, which may serve as transcriptional initiation site. The post-translational modifications result in the removal of the first 22 AA N-terminal fragment (NTF) and the last 23 AA C-terminal fragment (CTF). The NTF is cleaved after PrP transport to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), while the CTF (glycosylphosphatidylinositol [GPI] signal peptide [GPI-SP]) is cleaved by the GPI anchor. GPI anchor could be involved in PrP protein transport. It may also play a role of attachment of prion protein into the outer surface of cell membrane. Normal PrP is composed of a long N-terminal loop (which contains the octapeptide repeat region), two short β sheets, three a helices, and a C-terminal region (which contains the GPI anchor). Cleavage of PrP results in a 208 AA long glyocoprotein, anchored in the cell membrane.
The 253 amino acid sequence of PRNP (NP_000302.1) is as follows:
The 253 amino acid sequence of PRNP (NP_000302.1) is encoded by the following nucleotide sequence (NCBI Ref. Seq No. NM_000311.5, “Homo sapiens prion protein (PRNP), transcript variant 1, mRNA), is as follows:
Mutation sites relative to PRNP (NP_000302.1) which are linked to CJD and FFI are reported are as follows. These mutations can be removed or installed using the multi-flap prime editors disclosed herein.
Mutation sites relative to PRNP (NP_000302.1) (SEQ ID NO: 291) which are linked to GSS are reported, as follows:
Mutation sites relative to PRNP (NP_000302.1) (SEQ ID NO: 291) which are linked to a possible protective nature against prion disease, as follows:
Thus, in various embodiments, multi-flap prime editing may be used to remove a mutation in PRNP that is linked to prion disease or install a mutation in PRNP that is considered to be protective against prion disease. For example, multi-flap prime editing may be use to remove or restore a D178N, V180I, T188K, E196K, E196A, E200K, E200G, V2031, R208H, V2101, E211Q, 1215V, or M232R mutation in the PRNP protein (relative to PRNP of NP_000302.1) (SEQ ID NO: 291). In other embodiments, multi-flap prime editing may be use to remove or restore a P102L, P105L, A117V, G131V, V176G, H187R, F198S, D202N, Q212P, Q217R, or M232T mutation in the PRNP protein (relative to PRNP of NP_000302.1) (SEQ ID NO: 291). By removing or correcting for the presence of such mutations in PRNP using prime editing, the risk of prion disease may be reduced or eliminated.
In other embodiments, multi-flap prime editing may be used to install a protective mutation in PRNP that is linked to a protective effect against one or more prion diseases. For example, multi-flap prime editing may be used to install a G127S, G127V, M129V, D167G, D167N, N171S, E219K, or P238S protective mutation in PRNP (relative to PRNP of NP_000302.1) (SEQ ID NO: 291). In still other embodiments, the protective mutation may be any alternate amino acid installed at G127, G127, M129, D167, D167, N171, E219, or P238 in PRNP (relative to PRNP of NP_000302.1) (SEQ ID NO: 291).
In particular embodiments, multi-flap prime editing may be used to install a G127V protective mutation in PRNP, as illustrated in
In another embodiment, prime editing may be used to install an E219K protective mutation in PRNP.
The PRNP protein and the protective mutation site are conserved in mammals, so in addition to treating human disease it could also be used to generate cows and sheep that are immune to prion disease, or even help cure wild populations of animals that are suffering from prion disease. Prime editing has already been used to achieve ˜25% installation of a naturally occurring protective allele in human cells, and previous mouse experiments indicate that this level of installation is sufficient to cause immunity from most prion diseases. This method is the first and potentially only current way to install this allele with such high efficiency in most cell types. Another possible strategy for treatment is to use prime editing or multi-flap prime editing to reduce or eliminate the expression of PRNP by installing an early stop codon in the gene.
Using the principles described herein for PEgRNA design, appropriate PEgRNAs may be designed for installing desired protective mutations, or for removing prion disease-associated mutations from PRNP. For example, the below list of PEgRNAs can be used to install the G127V protective allele and the E219K protective allele in human PRNP, as well as the G127V protective allele in PRNP of various animals.
[10] Pharmaceutical Compositions
Other aspects of the present disclosure relate to pharmaceutical compositions comprising any of the various components of the multi-flap prime editing system described herein (e.g., including, but not limited to, the napDNAbps, reverse transcriptases, fusion proteins (e.g., comprising napDNAbps and reverse transcriptases), extended guide RNAs, and complexes comprising fusion proteins and extended guide RNAs, as well as accessory elements, such as second strand nicking components and 5′ endogenous DNA flap removal endonucleases for helping to drive the multi-flap prime editing process towards the edited product formation).
The term “pharmaceutical composition”, as used herein, refers to a composition formulated for pharmaceutical use. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition comprises additional agents (e.g. for specific delivery, increasing half-life, or other therapeutic compounds).
As used here, the term “pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier” means a pharmaceutically-acceptable material, composition or vehicle, such as a liquid or solid filler, diluent, excipient, manufacturing aid (e.g., lubricant, talc magnesium, calcium or zinc stearate, or steric acid), or solvent encapsulating material, involved in carrying or transporting the compound from one site (e.g., the delivery site) of the body, to another site (e.g., organ, tissue or portion of the body). A pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is “acceptable” in the sense of being compatible with the other ingredients of the formulation and not injurious to the tissue of the subject (e.g., physiologically compatible, sterile, physiologic pH, etc.). Some examples of materials which can serve as pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers include: (1) sugars, such as lactose, glucose and sucrose; (2) starches, such as corn starch and potato starch; (3) cellulose, and its derivatives, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, methylcellulose, ethyl cellulose, microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose acetate; (4) powdered tragacanth; (5) malt; (6) gelatin; (7) lubricating agents, such as magnesium stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate and talc; (8) excipients, such as cocoa butter and suppository waxes; (9) oils, such as peanut oil, cottonseed oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, olive oil, corn oil and soybean oil; (10) glycols, such as propylene glycol; (11) polyols, such as glycerin, sorbitol, mannitol and polyethylene glycol (PEG); (12) esters, such as ethyl oleate and ethyl laurate; (13) agar; (14) buffering agents, such as magnesium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide; (15) alginic acid; (16) pyrogen-free water; (17) isotonic saline; (18) Ringer's solution; (19) ethyl alcohol; (20) pH buffered solutions; (21) polyesters, polycarbonates and/or polyanhydrides; (22) bulking agents, such as polypeptides and amino acids (23) serum component, such as serum albumin, HDL and LDL; (22) C2-C12 alcohols, such as ethanol; and (23) other non-toxic compatible substances employed in pharmaceutical formulations. Wetting agents, coloring agents, release agents, coating agents, sweetening agents, flavoring agents, perfuming agents, preservative and antioxidants can also be present in the formulation. The terms such as “excipient”, “carrier”, “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” or the like are used interchangeably herein.
In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for delivery to a subject, e.g., for gene editing. Suitable routes of administrating the pharmaceutical composition described herein include, without limitation: topical, subcutaneous, transdermal, intradermal, intralesional, intraarticular, intraperitoneal, intravesical, transmucosal, gingival, intradental, intracochlear, transtympanic, intraorgan, epidural, intrathecal, intramuscular, intravenous, intravascular, intraosseus, periocular, intratumoral, intracerebral, and intracerebroventricular administration.
In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition described herein is administered locally to a diseased site (e.g., tumor site). In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition described herein is administered to a subject by injection, by means of a catheter, by means of a suppository, or by means of an implant, the implant being of a porous, non-porous, or gelatinous material, including a membrane, such as a sialastic membrane, or a fiber.
In other embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition described herein is delivered in a controlled release system. In one embodiment, a pump may be used (see, e.g., Langer, 1990, Science 249:1527-1533; Sefton, 1989, CRC Crit. Ref. Biomed. Eng. 14:201; Buchwald et al., 1980, Surgery 88:507; Saudek et al., 1989, N. Engl. J. Med. 321:574). In another embodiment, polymeric materials can be used. (See, e.g., Medical Applications of Controlled Release (Langer and Wise eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1974); Controlled Drug Bioavailability, Drug Product Design and Performance (Smolen and Ball eds., Wiley, New York, 1984); Ranger and Peppas, 1983, Macromol. Sci. Rev. Macromol. Chem. 23:61. See also Levy et al., 1985, Science 228:190; During et al., 1989, Ann. Neurol. 25:351; Howard et al., 1989, J. Neurosurg. 71:105). Other controlled release systems are discussed, for example, in Langer, supra.
In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated in accordance with routine procedures as a composition adapted for intravenous or subcutaneous administration to a subject, e.g., a human. In some embodiments, pharmaceutical composition for administration by injection are solutions in sterile isotonic aqueous buffer. Where necessary, the pharmaceutical can also include a solubilizing agent and a local anesthetic such as lignocaine to ease pain at the site of the injection. Generally, the ingredients are supplied either separately or mixed together in unit dosage form, for example, as a dry lyophilized powder or water free concentrate in a hermetically sealed container such as an ampoule or sachette indicating the quantity of active agent. Where the pharmaceutical is to be administered by infusion, it can be dispensed with an infusion bottle containing sterile pharmaceutical grade water or saline. Where the pharmaceutical composition is administered by injection, an ampoule of sterile water for injection or saline can be provided so that the ingredients can be mixed prior to administration.
A pharmaceutical composition for systemic administration may be a liquid, e.g., sterile saline, lactated Ringer's or Hank's solution. In addition, the pharmaceutical composition can be in solid forms and re-dissolved or suspended immediately prior to use. Lyophilized forms are also contemplated.
The pharmaceutical composition can be contained within a lipid particle or vesicle, such as a liposome or microcrystal, which is also suitable for parenteral administration. The particles can be of any suitable structure, such as unilamellar or plurilamellar, so long as compositions are contained therein. Compounds can be entrapped in “stabilized plasmid-lipid particles” (SPLP) containing the fusogenic lipid dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE), low levels (5-10 mol %) of cationic lipid, and stabilized by a polyethyleneglycol (PEG) coating (Zhang Y. P. et al., Gene Ther. 1999, 6:1438-47). Positively charged lipids such as N-[1-(2,3-dioleoyloxi)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethyl-amoniummethylsulfate, or “DOTAP,” are particularly preferred for such particles and vesicles. The preparation of such lipid particles is well known. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,880,635; 4,906,477; 4,911,928; 4,917,951; 4,920,016; and 4,921,757; each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The pharmaceutical composition described herein may be administered or packaged as a unit dose, for example. The term “unit dose” when used in reference to a pharmaceutical composition of the present disclosure refers to physically discrete units suitable as unitary dosage for the subject, each unit containing a predetermined quantity of active material calculated to produce the desired therapeutic effect in association with the required diluent; i.e., carrier, or vehicle.
Further, the pharmaceutical composition can be provided as a pharmaceutical kit comprising (a) a container containing a compound of the invention in lyophilized form and (b) a second container containing a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent (e.g., sterile water) for injection. The pharmaceutically acceptable diluent can be used for reconstitution or dilution of the lyophilized compound of the invention. Optionally associated with such container(s) can be a notice in the form prescribed by a governmental agency regulating the manufacture, use or sale of pharmaceuticals or biological products, which notice reflects approval by the agency of manufacture, use or sale for human administration.
In another aspect, an article of manufacture containing materials useful for the treatment of the diseases described above is included. In some embodiments, the article of manufacture comprises a container and a label. Suitable containers include, for example, bottles, vials, syringes, and test tubes. The containers may be formed from a variety of materials such as glass or plastic. In some embodiments, the container holds a composition that is effective for treating a disease described herein and may have a sterile access port. For example, the container may be an intravenous solution bag or a vial having a stopper pierce-able by a hypodermic injection needle. The active agent in the composition is a compound of the invention. In some embodiments, the label on or associated with the container indicates that the composition is used for treating the disease of choice. The article of manufacture may further comprise a second container comprising a pharmaceutically-acceptable buffer, such as phosphate-buffered saline, Ringer's solution, or dextrose solution. It may further include other materials desirable from a commercial and user standpoint, including other buffers, diluents, filters, needles, syringes, and package inserts with instructions for use.
[11] Kits, Cells, Vectors, and Delivery
Kits
The compositions of the present disclosure may be assembled into kits. In some embodiments, the kit comprises nucleic acid vectors for the expression of the multi-flap prime editors described herein. In other embodiments, the kit further comprises appropriate guide nucleotide sequences (e.g., PEgRNAs and second-site gRNAs) or nucleic acid vectors for the expression of such guide nucleotide sequences, to target the Cas9 protein or prime editor to the desired target sequence.
The kit described herein may include one or more containers housing components for performing the methods described herein and optionally instructions for use. Any of the kit described herein may further comprise components needed for performing the assay methods. Each component of the kits, where applicable, may be provided in liquid form (e.g., in solution) or in solid form, (e.g., a dry powder). In certain cases, some of the components may be reconstitutable or otherwise processible (e.g., to an active form), for example, by the addition of a suitable solvent or other species (for example, water), which may or may not be provided with the kit.
In some embodiments, the kits may optionally include instructions and/or promotion for use of the components provided. As used herein, “instructions” can define a component of instruction and/or promotion, and typically involve written instructions on or associated with packaging of the disclosure. Instructions also can include any oral or electronic instructions provided in any manner such that a user will clearly recognize that the instructions are to be associated with the kit, for example, audiovisual (e.g., videotape, DVD, etc.), Internet, and/or web-based communications, etc. The written instructions may be in a form prescribed by a governmental agency regulating the manufacture, use, or sale of pharmaceuticals or biological products, which can also reflect approval by the agency of manufacture, use or sale for animal administration. As used herein, “promoted” includes all methods of doing business including methods of education, hospital and other clinical instruction, scientific inquiry, drug discovery or development, academic research, pharmaceutical industry activity including pharmaceutical sales, and any advertising or other promotional activity including written, oral and electronic communication of any form, associated with the disclosure. Additionally, the kits may include other components depending on the specific application, as described herein.
The kits may contain any one or more of the components described herein in one or more containers. The components may be prepared sterilely, packaged in a syringe and shipped refrigerated. Alternatively, it may be housed in a vial or other container for storage. A second container may have other components prepared sterilely. Alternatively, the kits may include the active agents premixed and shipped in a vial, tube, or other container.
The kits may have a variety of forms, such as a blister pouch, a shrink-wrapped pouch, a vacuum sealable pouch, a sealable thermoformed tray, or a similar pouch or tray form, with the accessories loosely packed within the pouch, one or more tubes, containers, a box or a bag. The kits may be sterilized after the accessories are added, thereby allowing the individual accessories in the container to be otherwise unwrapped. The kits can be sterilized using any appropriate sterilization techniques, such as radiation sterilization, heat sterilization, or other sterilization methods known in the art. The kits may also include other components, depending on the specific application, for example, containers, cell media, salts, buffers, reagents, syringes, needles, a fabric, such as gauze, for applying or removing a disinfecting agent, disposable gloves, a support for the agents prior to administration, etc. Some aspects of this disclosure provide kits comprising a nucleic acid construct comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding the various components of the multi-flap prime editing systems (e.g., dual prime editing and quadruple prime editing systems) described herein (e.g., including, but not limited to, the napDNAbps, reverse transcriptases, polymerases, fusion proteins (e.g., comprising napDNAbps and reverse transcriptases (or more broadly, polymerases), extended guide RNAs, and complexes comprising fusion proteins and extended guide RNAs, as well as accessory elements, such as second strand nicking components (e.g., second strand nicking gRNA) and 5′ endogenous DNA flap removal endonucleases for helping to drive the multi-flap prime editing process towards the edited product formation). In some embodiments, the nucleotide sequence(s) comprises a heterologous promoter (or more than a single promoter) that drives expression of the multi-flap prime editing system components.
Other aspects of this disclosure provide kits comprising one or more nucleic acid constructs encoding the various components of the multi-flap prime editing systems described herein, e.g., comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding the components of the multi-flap prime editing system capable of modifying a target DNA sequence. In some embodiments, the nucleotide sequence comprises a heterologous promoter that drives expression of the multi-flap prime editing system components.
Some aspects of this disclosure provide kits comprising a nucleic acid construct, comprising (a) a nucleotide sequence encoding a napDNAbp (e.g., a Cas9 domain) fused to a reverse transcriptase and (b) a heterologous promoter that drives expression of the sequence of (a).
Cells
Cells that may contain any of the compositions described herein include prokaryotic cells and eukaryotic cells. The methods described herein are used to deliver a Cas9 protein or a multi-flap prime editor into a eukaryotic cell (e.g., a mammalian cell, such as a human cell). In some embodiments, the cell is in vitro (e.g., cultured cell. In some embodiments, the cell is in vivo (e.g., in a subject such as a human subject). In some embodiments, the cell is ex vivo (e.g., isolated from a subject and may be administered back to the same or a different subject).
Mammalian cells of the present disclosure include human cells, primate cells (e.g., vero cells), rat cells (e.g., GH3 cells, OC23 cells) or mouse cells (e.g., MC3T3 cells). There are a variety of human cell lines, including, without limitation, human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells, HeLa cells, cancer cells from the National Cancer Institute's 60 cancer cell lines (NCI60), DU145 (prostate cancer) cells, Lncap (prostate cancer) cells, MCF-7 (breast cancer) cells, MDA-MB-438 (breast cancer) cells, PC3 (prostate cancer) cells, T47D (breast cancer) cells, THP-1 (acute myeloid leukemia) cells, U87 (glioblastoma) cells, SHSY5Y human neuroblastoma cells (cloned from a myeloma) and Saos-2 (bone cancer) cells. In some embodiments, rAAV vectors are delivered into human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells (e.g., HEK 293 or HEK 293T cells). In some embodiments, rAAV vectors are delivered into stem cells (e.g., human stem cells) such as, for example, pluripotent stem cells (e.g., human pluripotent stem cells including human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)). A stem cell refers to a cell with the ability to divide for indefinite periods in culture and to give rise to specialized cells. A pluripotent stem cell refers to a type of stem cell that is capable of differentiating into all tissues of an organism, but not alone capable of sustaining full organismal development. A human induced pluripotent stem cell refers to a somatic (e.g., mature or adult) cell that has been reprogrammed to an embryonic stem cell-like state by being forced to express genes and factors important for maintaining the defining properties of embryonic stem cells (see, e.g., Takahashi and Yamanaka, Cell 126 (4): 663-76, 2006, incorporated by reference herein). Human induced pluripotent stem cell cells express stem cell markers and are capable of generating cells characteristic of all three germ layers (ectoderm, endoderm, mesoderm).
Additional non-limiting examples of cell lines that may be used in accordance with the present disclosure include 293-T, 293-T, 3T3, 4T1, 721, 9L, A-549, A172, A20, A253, A2780, A2780ADR, A2780cis, A431, ALC, B16, B35, BCP-1, BEAS-2B, bEnd.3, BHK-21, BR 293, BxPC3, C2C12, C3H-10T1/2, C6, C6/36, Cal-27, CGR8, CHO, CML T1, CMT, COR-L23, COR-L23/5010, COR-L23/CPR, COR-L23/R23, COS-7, COV-434, CT26, D17, DH82, DU145, DuCaP, E14Tg2a, EL4, EM2, EM3, EMT6/AR1, EMT6/AR10.0, FM3, H1299, H69, HB54, HB55, HCA2, Hepa1c1c7, High Five cells, HL-60, HMEC, HT-29, HUVEC, J558L cells, Jurkat, JY cells, K562 cells, KCL22, KG1, Ku812, KYO1, LNCap, Ma-Mel 1, 2, 3 . . . 48, MC-38, MCF-10A, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435, MDA-MB-468, MDCK II, MG63, MONO-MAC 6, MOR/0.2R, MRC5, MTD-1A, MyEnd, NALM-1, NCI-H69/CPR, NCI-H69/LX10, NCI-H69/LX20, NCI-H69/LX4, NIH-3T3, NW-145, OPCN/OPCT Peer, PNT-1A/PNT 2, PTK2, Raji, RBL cells, RenCa, RIN-5F, RMA/RMAS, S2, Saos-2 cells, Sf21, Sf9, SiHa, SKBR3, SKOV-3, T-47D, T2, T84, THP1, U373, U87, U937, VCaP, WM39, WT-49, X63, YAC-1 and YAR cells.
Some aspects of this disclosure provide cells comprising any of the constructs disclosed herein. In some embodiments, a host cell is transiently or non-transiently transfected with one or more vectors described herein. In some embodiments, a cell is transfected as it naturally occurs in a subject. In some embodiments, a cell that is transfected is taken from a subject. In some embodiments, the cell is derived from cells taken from a subject, such as a cell line. A wide variety of cell lines for tissue culture are known in the art. Examples of cell lines include, but are not limited to, C8161, CCRF-CEM, MOLT, mIMCD-3, NHDF, HeLa-S3, Huh1, Huh4, Huh7, HUVEC, HASMC, HEKn, HEKa, MiaPaCell, Panc1, PC-3, TF1, CTLL-2, C1R, Rat6, CV1, RPTE, A10, T24, J82, A375, ARH-77, Calu1, SW480, SW620, SKOV3, SK-UT, CaCo2, P388D1, SEM-K2, WEHI-231, HB56, TIB55, Jurkat, J45.01, LRMB, Bcl-1, BC-3, IC21, DLD2, Raw264.7, NRK, NRK-52E, MRC5, MEF, Hep G2, HeLa B, HeLa T4, COS, COS-1, COS-6, COS-M6A, BS-C-1 monkey kidney epithelial, BALB/3T3 mouse embryo fibroblast, 3T3 Swiss, 3T3-L1, 132-d5 human fetal fibroblasts; 10.1 mouse fibroblasts, 293-T, 3T3, 721, 9L, A2780, A2780ADR, A2780cis, A 172, A20, A253, A431, A-549, ALC, B16, B35, BCP-1 cells, BEAS-2B, bEnd.3, BHK-21, BR 293. BxPC3. C3H-10T1/2, C6/36, Cal-27, CHO, CHO-7, CHO-IR, CHO-K1, CHO-K2, CHO-T, CHO Dhfr−/−, COR-L23, COR-L23/CPR, COR-L23/5010, COR-L23/R23, COS-7, COV-434, CML T1, CMT, CT26, D17, DH82, DU145, DuCaP, EL4, EM2, EM3, EMT6/AR1, EMT6/AR10.0, FM3, H1299, H69, HB54, HB55, HCA2, HEK-293, HeLa, Hepa1c1c7, HL-60, HMEC, HT-29, Jurkat, JY cells, K562 cells, Ku812, KCL22, KG1, KYO1, LNCap, Ma-Mel 1-48, MC-38, MCF-7, MCF-10A, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-435, MDCK II, MDCK 11, MOR/0.2R, MONO-MAC 6, MTD-1A, MyEnd, NCI-H69/CPR, NCI-H69/LX10, NCI-H69/LX20, NCI-H69/LX4, NIH-3T3, NALM-1, NW-145, OPCN/OPCT cell lines, Peer, PNT-1A/PNT 2, RenCa, RIN-5F, RMA/RMAS, Saos-2 cells, Sf-9, SkBr3, T2, T-47D, T84, THP1 cell line, U373, U87, U937, VCaP, Vero cells, WM39, WT-49, X63, YAC-1, YAR, and transgenic varieties thereof.
Cell lines are available from a variety of sources known to those with skill in the art (see, e.g., the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, Va.)). In some embodiments, a cell transfected with one or more vectors described herein is used to establish a new cell line comprising one or more vector-derived sequences. In some embodiments, a cell transiently transfected with the components of a CRISPR system as described herein (such as by transient transfection of one or more vectors, or transfection with RNA), and modified through the activity of a CRISPR complex, is used to establish a new cell line comprising cells containing the modification but lacking any other exogenous sequence. In some embodiments, cells transiently or non-transiently transfected with one or more vectors described herein, or cell lines derived from such cells are used in assessing one or more test compounds.
Vectors
Some aspects of the present disclosure relate to using recombinant virus vectors (e.g., adeno-associated virus vectors, adenovirus vectors, or herpes simplex virus vectors) for the delivery of the multi-flap prime editors or components thereof described herein, e.g., the split Cas9 protein or a split nucleobase multi-flap prime editors, into a cell. In the case of a split-PE approach, the N-terminal portion of a PE fusion protein and the C-terminal portion of a PE fusion are delivered by separate recombinant virus vectors (e.g., adeno-associated virus vectors, adenovirus vectors, or herpes simplex virus vectors) into the same cell, since the full-length Cas9 protein or multi-flap prime editors exceeds the packaging limit of various virus vectors, e.g., rAAV (˜4.9 kb).
Thus, in one embodiment, the disclosure contemplates vectors capable of delivering split multi-flap prime editor fusion proteins, or split components thereof. In some embodiments, a composition for delivering the split Cas9 protein or split prime editor into a cell (e.g., a mammalian cell, a human cell) is provided. In some embodiments, the composition of the present disclosure comprises: (i) a first recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) particle comprising a first nucleotide sequence encoding a N-terminal portion of a Cas9 protein or prime editor fused at its C-terminus to an intein-N; and (ii) a second recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) particle comprising a second nucleotide sequence encoding an intein-C fused to the N-terminus of a C-terminal portion of the Cas9 protein or prime editor. The rAAV particles of the present disclosure comprise a rAAV vector (i.e., a recombinant genome of the rAAV) encapsidated in the viral capsid proteins.
In some embodiments, the rAAV vector comprises: (1) a heterologous nucleic acid region comprising the first or second nucleotide sequence encoding the N-terminal portion or C-terminal portion of a split Cas9 protein or a split multi-flap prime editor in any form as described herein, (2) one or more nucleotide sequences comprising a sequence that facilitates expression of the heterologous nucleic acid region (e.g., a promoter), and (3) one or more nucleic acid regions comprising a sequence that facilitate integration of the heterologous nucleic acid region (optionally with the one or more nucleic acid regions comprising a sequence that facilitates expression) into the genome of a cell. In some embodiments, viral sequences that facilitate integration comprise Inverted Terminal Repeat (ITR) sequences. In some embodiments, the first or second nucleotide sequence encoding the N-terminal portion or C-terminal portion of a split Cas9 protein or a split multi-flap prime editor is flanked on each side by an ITR sequence. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid vector further comprises a region encoding an AAV Rep protein as described herein, either contained within the region flanked by ITRs or outside the region. The ITR sequences can be derived from any AAV serotype (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10) or can be derived from more than one serotype. In some embodiments, the ITR sequences are derived from AAV2 or AAV6.
Thus, in some embodiments, the rAAV particles disclosed herein comprise at least one rAAV2 particle, rAAV6 particle, rAAV8 particle, rPHP.B particle, rPHP.eB particle, or rAAV9 particle, or a variant thereof. In particular embodiments, the disclosed rAAV particles are rPHP.B particles, rPHP.eB particles, rAAV9 particles.
ITR sequences and plasmids containing ITR sequences are known in the art and commercially available (see, e.g., products and services available from Vector Biolabs, Philadelphia, PA; Cellbiolabs, San Diego, CA; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, Ca; and Addgene, Cambridge, MA; and Gene delivery to skeletal muscle results in sustained expression and systemic delivery of a therapeutic protein. Kessler P D, Podsakoff G M, Chen X, McQuiston S A, Colosi P C, Matelis L A, Kurtzman G J, Byrne B J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996 Nov. 26; 93(24):14082-7; and Curtis A. Machida. Methods in Molecular Medicine™. Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy Methods and Protocols. 10.1385/1-59259-304-6:201 © Humana Press Inc. 2003. Chapter 10. Targeted Integration by Adeno-Associated Virus. Matthew D. Weitzman, Samuel M. Young Jr., Toni Cathomen and Richard Jude Samulski; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,139,941 and 5,962,313, all of which are incorporated herein by reference).
In some embodiments, the rAAV vector of the present disclosure comprises one or more regulatory elements to control the expression of the heterologous nucleic acid region (e.g., promoters, transcriptional terminators, and/or other regulatory elements). In some embodiments, the first and/or second nucleotide sequence is operably linked to one or more (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or more) transcriptional terminators. Non-limiting examples of transcriptional terminators that may be used in accordance with the present disclosure include transcription terminators of the bovine growth hormone gene (bGH), human growth hormone gene (hGH), SV40, CW3, ϕ, or combinations thereof. The efficiencies of several transcriptional terminators have been tested to determine their respective effects in the expression level of the split Cas9 protein or the split multi-flap prime editor. In some embodiments, the transcriptional terminator used in the present disclosure is a bGH transcriptional terminator. In some embodiments, the rAAV vector further comprises a Woodchuck Hepatitis Virus Posttranscriptional Regulatory Element (WPRE). In certain embodiments, the WPRE is a truncated WPRE sequence, such as “W3.” In some embodiments, the WPRE is inserted 5′ of the transcriptional terminator. Such sequences, when transcribed, create a tertiary structure which enhances expression, in particular, from viral vectors.
In some embodiments, the vectors used herein may encode the PE fusion proteins, or any of the components thereof (e.g., napDNAbp, linkers, or polymerases). In addition, the vectors used herein may encode the PEgRNAs, and/or the accessory gRNA for second strand nicking. The vectors may be capable of driving expression of one or more coding sequences in a cell. In some embodiments, the cell may be a prokaryotic cell, such as, e.g., a bacterial cell. In some embodiments, the cell may be a eukaryotic cell, such as, e.g., a yeast, plant, insect, or mammalian cell. In some embodiments, the eukaryotic cell may be a mammalian cell. In some embodiments, the eukaryotic cell may be a rodent cell. In some embodiments, the eukaryotic cell may be a human cell. Suitable promoters to drive expression in different types of cells are known in the art. In some embodiments, the promoter may be wild-type. In other embodiments, the promoter may be modified for more efficient or efficacious expression. In yet other embodiments, the promoter may be truncated yet retain its function. For example, the promoter may have a normal size or a reduced size that is suitable for proper packaging of the vector into a virus.
In some embodiments, the promoters that may be used in the prime editor vectors may be constitutive, inducible, or tissue-specific. In some embodiments, the promoters may be a constitutive promoters. Non-limiting exemplary constitutive promoters include cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter (CMV), simian virus (SV40) promoter, adenovirus major late (MLP) promoter, Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) promoter, mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter, phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) promoter, elongation factor-alpha (EF1a) promoter, ubiquitin promoters, actin promoters, tubulin promoters, immunoglobulin promoters, a functional fragment thereof, or a combination of any of the foregoing. In some embodiments, the promoter may be a CMV promoter. In some embodiments, the promoter may be a truncated CMV promoter. In other embodiments, the promoter may be an EF1a promoter. In some embodiments, the promoter may be an inducible promoter. Non-limiting exemplary inducible promoters include those inducible by heat shock, light, chemicals, peptides, metals, steroids, antibiotics, or alcohol. In some embodiments, the inducible promoter may be one that has a low basal (non-induced) expression level, such as, e.g., the Tet-On® promoter (Clontech). In some embodiments, the promoter may be a tissue-specific promoter. In some embodiments, the tissue-specific promoter is exclusively or predominantly expressed in liver tissue. Non-limiting exemplary tissue-specific promoters include B29 promoter, CD14 promoter, CD43 promoter, CD45 promoter, CD68 promoter, desmin promoter, elastase-1 promoter, endoglin promoter, fibronectin promoter, Flt-1 promoter, GFAP promoter, GPIIb promoter, ICAM-2 promoter, INF-β promoter, Mb promoter, Nphsl promoter, OG-2 promoter, SP-B promoter, SYN1 promoter, and WASP promoter.
In some embodiments, the prime editor vectors (e.g., including any vectors encoding the prime editor fusion protein and/or the PEgRNAs, and/or the accessory second strand nicking gRNAs) may comprise inducible promoters to start expression only after it is delivered to a target cell. Non-limiting exemplary inducible promoters include those inducible by heat shock, light, chemicals, peptides, metals, steroids, antibiotics, or alcohol. In some embodiments, the inducible promoter may be one that has a low basal (non-induced) expression level, such as, e.g., the Tet-On® promoter (Clontech).
In additional embodiments, the prime editor vectors (e.g., including any vectors encoding the prime editor fusion protein and/or the PEgRNAs, and/or the accessory second strand nicking gRNAs) may comprise tissue-specific promoters to start expression only after it is delivered into a specific tissue. Non-limiting exemplary tissue-specific promoters include B29 promoter, CD14 promoter, CD43 promoter, CD45 promoter, CD68 promoter, desmin promoter, elastase-1 promoter, endoglin promoter, fibronectin promoter, Flt-1 promoter, GFAP promoter, GPIIb promoter, ICAM-2 promoter, INF-β promoter, Mb promoter, Nphsl promoter, OG-2 promoter, SP-B promoter, SYN1 promoter, and WASP promoter.
In some embodiments, the nucleotide sequence encoding the PEgRNA (or any guide RNAs used in connection with multi-flap prime editing) may be operably linked to at least one transcriptional or translational control sequence. In some embodiments, the nucleotide sequence encoding the guide RNA may be operably linked to at least one promoter. In some embodiments, the promoter may be recognized by RNA polymerase III (Pol III). Non-limiting examples of Pol III promoters include U6, HI and tRNA promoters. In some embodiments, the nucleotide sequence encoding the guide RNA may be operably linked to a mouse or human U6 promoter. In other embodiments, the nucleotide sequence encoding the guide RNA may be operably linked to a mouse or human HI promoter. In some embodiments, the nucleotide sequence encoding the guide RNA may be operably linked to a mouse or human tRNA promoter. In embodiments with more than one guide RNA, the promoters used to drive expression may be the same or different. In some embodiments, the nucleotide encoding the crRNA of the guide RNA and the nucleotide encoding the tracr RNA of the guide RNA may be provided on the same vector. In some embodiments, the nucleotide encoding the crRNA and the nucleotide encoding the tracr RNA may be driven by the same promoter. In some embodiments, the crRNA and tracr RNA may be transcribed into a single transcript. For example, the crRNA and tracr RNA may be processed from the single transcript to form a double-molecule guide RNA. Alternatively, the crRNA and tracr RNA may be transcribed into a single-molecule guide RNA.
In some embodiments, the nucleotide sequence encoding the guide RNA may be located on the same vector comprising the nucleotide sequence encoding the PE fusion protein. In some embodiments, expression of the guide RNA and of the PE fusion protein may be driven by their corresponding promoters. In some embodiments, expression of the guide RNA may be driven by the same promoter that drives expression of the PE fusion protein. In some embodiments, the guide RNA and the PE fusion protein transcript may be contained within a single transcript. For example, the guide RNA may be within an untranslated region (UTR) of the Cas9 protein transcript. In some embodiments, the guide RNA may be within the 5′ UTR of the PE fusion protein transcript. In other embodiments, the guide RNA may be within the 3′ UTR of the PE fusion protein transcript. In some embodiments, the intracellular half-life of the PE fusion protein transcript may be reduced by containing the guide RNA within its 3′ UTR and thereby shortening the length of its 3′ UTR. In additional embodiments, the guide RNA may be within an intron of the PE fusion protein transcript. In some embodiments, suitable splice sites may be added at the intron within which the guide RNA is located such that the guide RNA is properly spliced out of the transcript. In some embodiments, expression of the Cas9 protein and the guide RNA in close proximity on the same vector may facilitate more efficient formation of the CRISPR complex.
The multi-flap prime editor vector system may comprise one vector, or two vectors, or three vectors, or four vectors, or five vector, or more. In some embodiments, the vector system may comprise one single vector, which encodes both the PE fusion protein and PEgRNA. In other embodiments, the vector system may comprise two vectors, wherein one vector encodes the PE fusion protein and the other encodes the PEgRNA. In additional embodiments, the vector system may comprise three vectors, wherein the third vector encodes the second strand nicking gRNA used in the herein methods.
In some embodiments, the composition comprising the rAAV particle (in any form contemplated herein) further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In some embodiments, the composition is formulated in appropriate pharmaceutical vehicles for administration to human or animal subjects.
Some examples of materials which can serve as pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers include: (1) sugars, such as lactose, glucose and sucrose; (2) starches, such as corn starch and potato starch; (3) cellulose, and its derivatives, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, methylcellulose, ethyl cellulose, microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose acetate; (4) powdered tragacanth; (5) malt; (6) gelatin; (7) lubricating agents, such as magnesium stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate and talc; (8) excipients, such as cocoa butter and suppository waxes; (9) oils, such as peanut oil, cottonseed oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, olive oil, corn oil and soybean oil; (10) glycols, such as propylene glycol; (11) polyols, such as glycerin, sorbitol, mannitol and polyethylene glycol (PEG); (12) esters, such as ethyl oleate and ethyl laurate; (13) agar; (14) buffering agents, such as magnesium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide; (15) alginic acid; (16) pyrogen-free water; (17) isotonic saline; (18) Ringer's solution; (19) ethyl alcohol; (20) pH buffered solutions; (21) polyesters, polycarbonates and/or polyanhydrides; (22) bulking agents, such as polypeptides and amino acids (23) serum component, such as serum albumin, HDL and LDL; (22) C2-C12 alcohols, such as ethanol; and (23) other non-toxic compatible substances employed in pharmaceutical formulations. Wetting agents, coloring agents, release agents, coating agents, sweetening agents, flavoring agents, perfuming agents, preservative and antioxidants can also be present in the formulation. The terms such as “excipient”, “carrier”, “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” or the like are used interchangeably herein.
Delivery Methods
In some aspects, the invention provides methods comprising delivering one or more polynucleotides encoding the various components of the multi-flap prime editors described herein, such as or one or more vectors as described herein, one or more transcripts thereof, and/or one or proteins transcribed therefrom, to a host cell. In some aspects, the invention further provides cells produced by such methods, and organisms (such as animals, plants, or fungi) comprising or produced from such cells. In some embodiments, a base editor as described herein in combination with (and optionally complexed with) a guide sequence is delivered to a cell.
Exemplary delivery strategies are described herein elsewhere, which include vector-based strategies, PE ribonucleoprotein complex delivery, and delivery of PE by mRNA methods.
In some embodiments, the method of delivery provided comprises nucleofection, microinjection, biolistics, virosomes, liposomes, immunoliposomes, polycation or lipid:nucleic acid conjugates, naked DNA, artificial virions, and agent-enhanced uptake of DNA.
Exemplary methods of delivery of nucleic acids include lipofection, nucleofection, electroporation, stable genome integration (e.g., piggybac), microinjection, biolistics, virosomes, liposomes, immunoliposomes, polycation or lipid:nucleic acid conjugates, naked DNA, artificial virions, and agent-enhanced uptake of DNA. Lipofection is described in e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,049,386, 4,946,787; and 4,897,355) and lipofection reagents are sold commercially (e.g., Transfectam™, Lipofectin™ and SF Cell Line 4D-Nucleofector X Kit™ (Lonza)). Cationic and neutral lipids that are suitable for efficient receptor-recognition lipofection of polynucleotides include those of Feigner, WO 91/17424; WO 91/16024. Delivery may be to cells (e.g. in vitro or ex vivo administration) or target tissues (e.g. in vivo administration). Delivery may be achieved through the use of RNP complexes.
The preparation of lipid:nucleic acid complexes, including targeted liposomes such as immunolipid complexes, is well known to one of skill in the art (see, e.g., Crystal, Science 270:404-410 (1995); Blaese et al., Cancer Gene Ther. 2:291-297 (1995); Behr et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 5:382-389 (1994); Remy et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 5:647-654 (1994); Gao et al., Gene Therapy 2:710-722 (1995); Ahmad et al., Cancer Res. 52:4817-4820 (1992); U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,186,183, 4,217,344, 4,235,871, 4,261,975, 4,485,054, 4,501,728, 4,774,085, 4,837,028, and 4,946,787).
In other embodiments, the method of delivery and vector provided herein is an RNP complex. RNP delivery of fusion proteins markedly increases the DNA specificity of base editing. RNP delivery of fusion proteins leads to decoupling of on- and off-target DNA editing. RNP delivery ablates off-target editing at non-repetitive sites while maintaining on-target editing comparable to plasmid delivery, and greatly reduces off-target DNA editing even at the highly repetitive VEGFA site 2. See Rees, H. A. et al., Improving the DNA specificity and applicability of base editing through protein engineering and protein delivery, Nat. Commun. 8, 15790 (2017), U.S. Pat. No. 9,526,784, issued Dec. 27, 2016, and U.S. Pat. No. 9,737,604, issued Aug. 22, 2017, each of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Additional methods for the delivery of nucleic acids to cells are known to those skilled in the art. See, for example, US 2003/0087817, incorporated herein by reference.
Other aspects of the present disclosure provide methods of delivering the multi-flap prime editor constructs into a cell to form a complete and functional prime editor within a cell. For example, in some embodiments, a cell is contacted with a composition described herein (e.g., compositions comprising nucleotide sequences encoding the split Cas9 or the split prime editor or AAV particles containing nucleic acid vectors comprising such nucleotide sequences). In some embodiments, the contacting results in the delivery of such nucleotide sequences into a cell, wherein the N-terminal portion of the Cas9 protein or the prime editor and the C-terminal portion of the Cas9 protein or the prime editor are expressed in the cell and are joined to form a complete Cas9 protein or a complete prime editor.
It should be appreciated that any rAAV particle, nucleic acid molecule or composition provided herein may be introduced into the cell in any suitable way, either stably or transiently. In some embodiments, the disclosed proteins may be transfected into the cell. In some embodiments, the cell may be transduced or transfected with a nucleic acid molecule. For example, a cell may be transduced (e.g., with a virus encoding a split protein), or transfected (e.g., with a plasmid encoding a split protein) with a nucleic acid molecule that encodes a split protein, or an rAAV particle containing a viral genome encoding one or more nucleic acid molecules. Such transduction may be a stable or transient transduction. In some embodiments, cells expressing a split protein or containing a split protein may be transduced or transfected with one or more guide RNA sequences, for example in delivery of a split Cas9 (e.g., nCas9) protein. In some embodiments, a plasmid expressing a split protein may be introduced into cells through electroporation, transient (e.g., lipofection) and stable genome integration (e.g., piggybac) and viral transduction or other methods known to those of skill in the art.
In certain embodiments, the compositions provided herein comprise a lipid and/or polymer. In certain embodiments, the lipid and/or polymer is cationic. The preparation of such lipid particles is well known. See, e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,880,635; 4,906,477; 4,911,928; 4,917,951; 4,920,016; 4,921,757; and 9,737,604, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The guide RNA sequence may be 15-100 nucleotides in length and comprise a sequence of at least 10, at least 15, or at least 20 contiguous nucleotides that is complementary to a target nucleotide sequence. The guide RNA may comprise a sequence of 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, or 40 contiguous nucleotides that is complementary to a target nucleotide sequence. The guide RNA may be 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, or 50 nucleotides in length.
In some embodiments, the target nucleotide sequence is a DNA sequence in a genome, e.g. a eukaryotic genome. In certain embodiments, the target nucleotide sequence is in a mammalian (e.g. a human) genome.
The compositions of this disclosure may be administered or packaged as a unit dose, for example. The term “unit dose” when used in reference to a pharmaceutical composition of the present disclosure refers to physically discrete units suitable as unitary dosage for the subject, each unit containing a predetermined quantity of active material calculated to produce the desired therapeutic effect in association with the required diluent, i.e., a carrier or vehicle.
Treatment of a disease or disorder includes delaying the development or progression of the disease, or reducing disease severity. Treating the disease does not necessarily require curative results.
As used therein, “delaying” the development of a disease means to defer, hinder, slow, retard, stabilize, and/or postpone progression of the disease. This delay can be of varying lengths of time, depending on the history of the disease and/or individuals being treated. A method that “delays” or alleviates the development of a disease, or delays the onset of the disease, is a method that reduces probability of developing one or more symptoms of the disease in a given time frame and/or reduces extent of the symptoms in a given time frame, when compared to not using the method. Such comparisons are typically based on clinical studies, using a number of subjects sufficient to give a statistically significant result.
“Development” or “progression” of a disease means initial manifestations and/or ensuing progression of the disease. Development of the disease can be detectable and assessed using standard clinical techniques as well known in the art. However, development also refers to progression that may be undetectable. For purpose of this disclosure, development or progression refers to the biological course of the symptoms. “Development” includes occurrence, recurrence, and onset.
As used herein “onset” or “occurrence” of a disease includes initial onset and/or recurrence. Conventional methods, known to those of ordinary skill in the art of medicine, can be used to administer the isolated polypeptide or pharmaceutical composition to the subject, depending upon the type of disease to be treated or the site of the disease.
Without further elaboration, it is believed that one skilled in the art can, based on the above description, utilize the present disclosure to its fullest extent. The following specific embodiments are, therefore, to be construed as merely illustrative, and not limitative of the remainder of the disclosure in any way whatsoever. All publications cited herein are incorporated by reference for the purposes or subject matter referenced herein.
The objective is to develop a transformative genome editing technology for precise and general installation of single nucleotide changes in mammalian genomes. This technology would allow investigators to study the effects of single nucleotide variations in virtually any mammalian gene, and potentially enable therapeutic interventions for correcting pathogenic point mutations in human patients.
Adoption of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) system for genome editing has revolutionized the life sciences1-3. Although gene disruption using CRISPR is now routine, the precise installation of single nucleotide edits remains a major challenge, despite being necessary for studying or correcting a large number of disease-causative mutations. Homology directed repair (HDR) is capable of achieving such edits, but suffers from low efficiency (often <5%), a requirement for donor DNA repair templates, and deleterious effects of double-stranded DNA break (DSB) formation. Recently, the Liu laboratory developed base editing, which achieves efficient single nucleotide editing without DSBs. Base editors (BEs) combine the CRISPR system with base-modifying deaminase enzymes to convert target C•G or A•T base pairs to A•T or G•C, respectively4-6. Although already widely used by researchers worldwide (>5,000 Liu lab BE constructs distributed by Addgene), current BEs enable only four of the twelve possible base pair conversions and are unable to correct small insertions or deletions. Moreover, the targeting scope of base editing is limited by the editing of non-target C or A bases adjacent to the target base (“bystander editing”) and by the requirement that a PAM sequence exist 15±2 bp from the target base. Overcoming these limitations would therefore greatly broaden the basic research and therapeutic applications of genome editing.
Here, it is proposed to develop a new precision editing approach that offers many of the benefits of base editing—namely, avoidance of double strand breaks and donor DNA repair templates—while overcoming its major limitations. To achieve this ambitious goal, it is aimed to directly install edited DNA strands at target genomic sites using target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT). In the design discussed herein, CRISPR guide RNA (gRNA) will be engineered to carry a template encoding mutagenic DNA strand synthesis, to be executed by an associated reverse transcriptase (RT) enzyme. The CRISPR nuclease (Cas9)-nicked target site DNA will serve as the primer for reverse transcription, allowing for direct incorporation of any desired nucleotide edit.
Section 1
Establish guide RNA-templated reverse transcription of mutagenic DNA strands. Prior studies have shown that, following DNA cleavage but prior to complex dissociation, Cas9 releases the non-target DNA strand to expose a free 3′ terminus. It is hypothesized that this DNA strand is accessible to extension by polymerase enzymes, and that gRNAs can be engineered through extension of their 5′ or 3′ terminus to serve as templates for DNA synthesis. In preliminary in vitro studies, it was established that nicked DNA strands within Cas9:gRNA-bound complexes can indeed prime reverse transcription using the bound gRNA as a template (RT enzyme in trans). Next, different gRNA linkers, primer binding sites, and synthesis templates will be explored to determine optimal design rules in vitro. Then, different RT enzymes, acting in trans or as fusions to Cas9, will be evaluated in vitro. Finally, engineered gRNA designs will be identified that retain efficient binding and cutting activity in cells. Successful demonstration of this aim will provide a foundation for carrying out mutagenic strand synthesis in cells.
Section 2
Establish prime editing in human cells. Based on DNA processing and repair mechanisms, it is hypothesized that mutagenic DNA strands (single stranded flaps) can be used to direct specific and efficient editing of target nucleotides. In encouraging preliminary studies, feasibility for this strategy was established by demonstrating editing with model plasmid substrates containing mutagenic flaps. Concurrent with Aim 1, repair outcomes will be further evaluated by systematically varying the mutagenic flap's length, sequence composition, target nucleotide identity, and 3′ terminus. Small 1 to 3 nucleotide insertions and deletions will also be tested. In parallel, and building from Aim 1, Cas9-RT architectures will be evaluated, including fusion proteins and non-covalent recruitment strategies. Cas9-RT architectures and extended gRNAs will be assayed for cellular editing at multiple target sites in the human genome, and will then be optimized for high efficiency. If successful, this aim would immediately establish TPRT genome editing (i.e., prime editing) for basic science applications.
Section 3
Achieve site-specific editing of pathogenic mutations in cultured human cells. The potential generality of this technology could enable editing of transversion mutations and indels that are not currently correctable by BEs. Guided by the results of Aim 1 and Aim 2, pathogenic transversion mutations will be targeted in cultured human cells, including the sickle cell disease founder mutation in beta globin (requires an A•T to T•A transversion to correct) and the most prevalent Wilson's disease mutation in ATP7B (requires a G•C to T•A transversion to correct). The correction of small insertion and deletion mutations will also be examined, including the 3-nucleotide ΔF508 deletion in CFTR that causes cystic fibrosis. If successful, this would lay the foundation for developing powerful therapeutic approaches that address these important human diseases.
Approach
The objective is to develop a genome editing strategy that directly installs point mutations at targeted genomic sites. In the technology development phase, efforts will focus on protein and RNA engineering to incorporate TPRT functionality into the CRISPR/Cas system. In vitro assays will be used to carefully probe the function of each step of TPRT, building from the ground up (Aim 1). The second focus area will evaluate editing outcomes in mammalian cells using a combination of model substrates and engineered CRISPR/Cas systems (Aim 2). Finally, the application phase will use the technology to correct mutations that have been intractable to genome editing by other methods (Aim 3).
The general editing design is shown in
Current genome editing methods can disrupt, delete, or insert target genes with accompanying byproducts of double-stranded DNA breaks using programmable nucleases, and install the four transition point mutations at target loci using base editors. Small insertions, small deletions, and the eight transversion point mutations, however, collectively represent most pathogenic genetic variants but cannot be corrected efficiently and without an excess of byproducts in most cell types. Described herein is prime editing, a highly versatile and precise genome editing method that directly writes new genetic information into a specified DNA site using a catalytically impaired Cas9 fused to an engineered reverse transcriptase, programmed with an engineered prime editing guide RNA (PEgRNA) that both specifies the target site and encodes the desired edit. Greater than 175 distinct edits in human cells were performed to establish that prime editing can make targeted insertions, deletions, all 12 possible types of point mutations, and combinations thereof efficiently (typically 20-60%, up to 77% in unsorted cells) and with low byproducts (typically 1-10%), without requiring double-stranded breaks or donor DNA templates. Prime editing was applied in human cells to correct the primary genetic causes of sickle cell disease (requiring an A•T-to-T•A transversion in HBB) and Tay-Sachs disease (requiring a 4-base deletion in HEXA), in both cases efficiently reverting the pathogenic genomic alleles to wild-type with minimal byproducts. Prime editing was also used to create human cell lines with these pathogenic HBB transversion and HEXA insertion mutations, to install the G127V mutation in PRNP that confers resistance to prion disease (requiring a G•C-to-T•A transversion), and to efficiently insert a His6 tag, a FLAG epitope tag, and an extended LoxP site into target loci in human cells. Prime editing offers efficiency and product purity advantages over HDR, and complementary strengths and weaknesses compared to base editing. Consistent with its search-and-replace mechanism, which requires three distinct base-pairing events, prime editing is much less prone to off-target DNA modification at known Cas9 off-target sites than Cas9. Prime editing substantially expands the scope and capabilities of genome editing, and in principle can correct ˜89% of known pathogenic human genetic variants.
The ability to make virtually any targeted change in the genome of any living cell or organism is a longstanding aspiration of the life sciences. Despite rapid advances in genome editing technologies, the majority of the >75,000 known human genetic variants associated with diseases111 cannot be corrected or installed in most therapeutically relevant cells (
Base editing can efficiently install or correct the four types of transition mutations (C to T, G to A, A to G, and T to C) without requiring DSBs in a wide variety of cell types and organisms, including mammals128-131, but cannot currently achieve any of the eight transversion mutations (C to A, C to G, G to C, G to T, A to C, A to T, T to A, and T to G), such as the T•A-to-A•T mutation needed to directly correct the most common cause of sickle cell disease (HBB E6V)132. In addition, no DSB-free method has been reported to perform target deletions, such as the removal of the 4-base duplication that causes Tay-Sachs disease (HEXA 1278+TATC)133, or targeted insertions, such as the precise 3-base insertion required to directly correct the most common cause of cystic fibrosis (CFTR ΔF508)134. Targeted transversion point mutations, insertions, and deletions thus are difficult to install or correct efficiently and without excess byproducts in most cell types, even though they collectively account for most known pathogenic alleles (
Described herein is the development of prime editing, a new “search-and-replace” genome editing technology that mediates targeted insertions, deletions, and all 12 possible base-to-base conversions at targeted loci in human cells without requiring double-stranded DNA breaks, or donor DNA templates. Prime editors, initially exemplified by PE1, use a reverse transcriptase fused to a programmable nickase and a prime editing extended guide RNA (PEgRNA) to directly copy genetic information from the extension on the PEgRNA into the target genomic locus. A second-generation prime editor (PE2) uses an engineered reverse transcriptase to substantially increase editing efficiencies with minimal (typically <2%) indel formation, while a third-generation PE3 system adds a second guide RNA to nick the non-edited strand, thereby favoring replacement of the non-edited strand and further increasing editing efficiency, typically, to about 20-50% in human cells with about 1-10% indel formation. PE3 offers far fewer byproducts and higher or similar efficiency compared to optimized Cas9 nuclease-initiated HDR, and offers complementary strengths and weaknesses compared to current-generation base editors.
PE3 was applied at genomic loci in human HEK293T cells to achieve efficient conversion of HBB E6V to wild-type HBB, deletion of the inserted TATC to restore HEXA 1278+TATC to wild-type HEXA, installation in PRNP of the G127V mutation that confers resistance to prion disease135 (requiring a G•C-to-T•A transversion), and targeted insertion of a His6 tag (18 bp), FLAG epitope tag (24 bp), and extended LoxP site for Cre-mediated recombination (44 bp). Prime editing was also successful in three other human cell lines, as well as in post-mitotic primary mouse cortical neurons, with varying efficiencies. Due to a high degree of flexibility in the distance between the initial nick and location of the edit, prime editing is not substantially constrained by the PAM requirement of Cas9 and in principle can target the vast majority of genomic loci. Off-target prime editing is much rarer than off-target Cas9 editing at known Cas9 off-target loci, likely due to the requirement of three distinct DNA base pairing events in order for productive prime editing to take place. By enabling precise targeted insertions, deletions, and all 12 possible classes of point mutations at a wide variety of genomic loci without the need for DSBs or donor DNA templates, prime editing has the potential to advance the study and correction of many gene variants.
Results
Strategy for Transferring Information from an Extended Guide RNA into a Target DNA Locus
Cas9 targets DNA using a guide RNA containing a spacer sequence that hybridizes to the target DNA site112-114,136,137 The aim was to engineer guide RNAs to both specify the DNA target as in natural CRISPR systems138,139, and also to contain new genetic information that replaces the corresponding DNA nucleotides at the target locus. The direct transfer of genetic information from an extended guide RNA into a specified DNA site, followed by replacement of the original unedited DNA, in principle could provide a general means of installing targeted DNA sequence changes in living cells, without dependence on DSBs or donor DNA templates. To achieve this direct information transfer, the aim was to use genomic DNA, nicked at the target site to expose a 3′-hydroxyl group, to prime the reverse transcription of the genetic information from an extension on the engineered guide RNA (hereafter referred to as the prime editing guide RNA, or PEgRNA) directly into the target site (
These initial steps of nicking and reverse transcription, which resemble mechanisms used by some natural mobile genetic elements140, result in a branched intermediate with two redundant single-stranded DNA flaps on one strand: a 5′ flap that contains the unedited DNA sequence, and a 3′ flap that contains the edited sequence copied from the PEgRNA (
Permanent installation of the edit could arise from subsequent DNA repair that resolves the mismatch between the two DNA strands in a manner that copies the information in the edited strand to the complementary DNA strand (
Validation of Prime Editing Steps In Vitro and in Yeast Cells
Following cleavage of the PAM-containing DNA strand by the RuvC nuclease domain of Cas9, the PAM-distal fragment of this strand can dissociate from otherwise stable Cas9:sgRNA:DNA complexes143. It was hypothesized that the 3′ end of this liberated strand might be sufficiently accessible to prime DNA polymerization. Guide RNA engineering efforts144-146 and crystal structures of Cas9:sgRNA:DNA complexes147-149 suggest that the 5′ and 3′ termini of the sgRNA can be extended without abolishing Cas9:sgRNA activity. PEgRNAs were designed by extending sgRNAs to include two critical components: a primer binding site (PBS) that allows the 3′ end of the nicked DNA strand to hybridize to the PEgRNA, and a reverse transcriptase (RT) template containing the desired edit that would be directly copied into the genomic DNA site as the 3′ end of the nicked DNA strand is extended across the RNA template by a polymerase (
These hypotheses were tested in vitro using purified S. pyogenes Cas9 protein. A series of PEgRNA candidates were constructed by extending sgRNAs on either terminus with a PBS sequence (5 to 6 nucleotides, nt) and an RT template (7 to 22 nt). It was confirmed that 5′-extended PEgRNAs direct Cas9 binding to target DNA, and that both 5′-extended PEgRNAs and 3′-extended PEgRNAs support Cas9-mediated target nicking in vitro and DNA cleavage activities in mammalian cells (
Next, non-nicked dsDNA substrates were tested with a Cas9 nickase (H840A mutant) that exclusively nicks the PAM-containing strand112. In these reactions, 5′-extended PEgRNAs generated reverse transcription products inefficiently, possibly due to impaired Cas9 nickase activity (
To evaluate the eukaryotic cell DNA repair outcomes of 3′ flaps produced by PEgRNA-programmed reverse transcription in vitro, DNA nicking and reverse transcription using PEgRNAs, Cas9 nickase, and RT in vitro on reporter plasmid substrates were performed, and the reaction products were then transformed into yeast (S. cerevisiae) cells (
Design of Prime Editor 1 (PE1)
Encouraged by the results in vitro and in yeast, a prime editing system with a minimum number of components capable of editing genomic DNA in mammalian cells was sought for development. It was hypothesized that 3′-extended PEgRNAs (hereafter referred to simply as PEgRNAs,
Extension of the PBS in the PEgRNA to 8-15 bases (
The ability of PE1 to precisely introduce transversion point mutations at four additional genomic target sites specified by the PEgRNA (
Design of Prime Editor 2 (PE2)
While PE1 can install a variety of edits at several loci in HEK293T cells, editing efficiencies were generally low (typically ≤5%) (
First, a series of M-MLV RT variants that previously emerged from laboratory evolution for their ability to support reverse transcription at elevated temperatures150 were investigated. Successive introduction of three of these amino acid substitutions (D200N, L603W, and T330P) into M-MLV RT, hereafter referred to as M3, led to a 6.8-fold average increase in transversion and insertion editing efficiency across five genomic loci in HEK293T cells compared to that of PE1 (
Next, in combination with M3, additional reverse transcriptase mutations that were previously shown to enhance binding to template:PBS complex, enzyme processivity, and thermostability152 were tested. Among the 14 additional mutants analyzed, a variant with T306K and W313F substitutions, in addition to the M3 mutations, improved editing efficiency an additional 1.3-fold to 3.0-fold compared to M3 for six transversion or insertion edits across five genomic sites in human cells (
PE2 installs single-nucleotide transversion, insertion, and deletion mutations with substantially higher efficiency than PE1 (
Optimization of PEgRNA Features
The relationship between PEgRNA architecture and prime editing efficiency was systematically probed at five genomic loci in HEK293T cells with PE2 (
Next, the performance determinants of the RT template portion of the PEgRNA were studied. PEgRNAs with RT templates ranging from 10-20 nt in length were systemically evaluated at five genomic target sites using PE2 (
Importantly, RT templates that place a C as the nucleotide adjacent to the terminal hairpin of the sgRNA scaffold generally resulted in lower editing efficiency compared to other PEgRNAs with RT templates of similar length (
Design of Prime Editor 3 Systems (PE3 and PE3b)
While PE2 can transfer genetic information from the PEgRNA to the target locus more efficiently than PE1, the manner in which the cell resolves the resulting heteroduplex DNA created by one edited strand and one unedited strand determines if the edit is durable. A previous development of base editing faced a similar challenge since the initial product of cytosine or adenine deamination is heteroduplex DNA containing one edited and one non-edited strand. To increase the efficiency of base editing, a Cas9 D10A nickase was used to introduce a nick into the non-edited strand and to direct DNA repair to that strand, using the edited strand as a template129,130,142. To exploit this principle to enhance prime editing efficiencies, a similar strategy of nicking the non-edited strand using the Cas9 H840A nickase already present in PE2 and a simple sgRNA to induce preferential replacement of the non-edited strand by the cell (
This PE3 strategy was first tested at five genomic sites in HEK293T cells by screening sgRNAs that induce nicks located 14 to 116 bases from the site of the PEgRNA-induced nick, either 5′ or 3′ of the PAM. In four of the five sites tested, nicking the non-edited strand increased the amount of indel-free prime editing products compared to the PE2 system by 1.5- to 4.2-fold, to as high as 55% (
This model for how complementary strand nicking improved prime editing efficiency (
Together, these findings established that PE3 systems (Cas9 nickase-optimized reverse transcriptase+PEgRNA+sgRNA) improved editing efficiencies ˜3-fold compared with PE2 (
To demonstrate the targeting scope and versatility of prime editing with PE3, the installation of all possible single nucleotide substitutions across the +1 to +8 positions (counting the first base 3′ of the PEgRNA-induced nick as position +1) of the HEK3 target site using PE3 and PEgRNAs with 10-nucleotide RT templates (
Importantly, long-distance RT templates could also give rise to efficient prime editing with PE3. For example, using PE3 with a 34-nt RT template, point mutations were installed at positions +12, +14, +17, +20, +23, +24, +26, +30, and +33 (12 to 33 bases from the PEgRNA-induced nick) in the HEK3 locus with an average of 36±8.7% efficiency and 8.6±2.0% indels (
To further test the scope and limitations of the PE3 system for introducing transition and transversion point mutations, 72 additional edits covering all 12 possible types of point mutations across six additional genomic target sites (
Next, 14 targeted small insertions and 14 targeted small deletions at seven genomic sites using PE3 (
PE3 was also tested for its ability to mediate larger precise deletions of 5 bp to 80 bp at the HEK3 site (
Finally, the ability of PE3 to mediate 12 combinations of multiple edits at the same target locus consisting of insertions and deletions, insertions and point mutations, deletions and point mutations, or two point mutations across three genomic sites was tested. These combination edits were very efficient, averaging 55% of the target edit with 6.4% indels (
Together, the examples in
Prime Editing Compared with Base Editing
Current-generation cytidine base editors (CBEs) and adenine base editors (ABEs) can install C•G-to-T•A transition mutations and A•T-to-G•C transition mutations with high efficiency and low indels129,130,142. The application of base editing can be limited by the presence of multiple cytidine or adenine bases within the base editing activity window (typically ˜5-bp wide), which gives rise to unwanted bystander edits129,130,142,155 or by the absence of a PAM positioned approximately 15±2 nt from the target nucleotide142,156. It was anticipated that prime editing could be particularly useful for precise installation of transitions mutations without bystander edits, or when the lack of suitably positioned PAMs precludes favorable positioning the target nucleotide within the CBE or ABE activity window.
Prime editing and cytosine base editing was compared by editing three genomic loci that contain multiple target cytidines in the canonical base editing window (protospacer positions 4-8, counting the PAM as positions 21-23) using optimized CBEs157 without nickase activity (BE2max) or with nickase activity (BE4max), or using the analogous PE2 and PE3 prime editing systems. Among the nine total target cytosines within the base editing windows of the three sites, BE4max yielded 2.2-fold higher average total C•G-to-T•A conversion than PE3 for bases in the center of the base editing window (protospacer positions 5-7,
When comparing the efficiency of base editing to prime editing for installation of precise C•G-to-T•A edits (without any bystander editing), the efficiency of prime editing greatly exceeded that of base editing at the above sites, which like most genomic DNA sites, contain multiple cytosines within the ˜5-bp base editing window (
A•T-to-G•C editing was compared at two genomic loci by an optimized non-nicking ABE (ABEmax152 with a dCas9 instead of a Cas9 nickase, hereafter referred to as ABEdmax) versus PE2, and by the optimized nicking adenine base editor ABEmax versus PE3. At a site that contains two target adenines in the base editing window (HEK3), ABEs were more efficient than PE2 or PE3 for conversion of A5, but PE3 was more efficient for conversion of A8, which lies at the edge of the ABEmax editing window (
Collectively, these results indicate that base editing and prime editing offer complementary strengths and weaknesses for making targeted transition mutations. For cases in which a single target nucleotide is present within the base editing window, or when bystander edits are acceptable, current base editors are typically more efficient and result in fewer indels than prime editors. When multiple cytosines or adenines are present and bystander edits are undesirable, or when target bases are poorly positioned for base editing relative to available PAMs, prime editors offer substantial advantages.
Off-Target Prime Editing
To result in productive editing, prime editing requires target locus:PEgRNA spacer complementary for the Cas9 domain to bind, target locus:PEgRNA PBS complementarity for PEgRNA-primed reverse transcription to initiate, and target locus:reverse transcriptase product complementarity for flap resolution. It was hypothesized that these three distinct DNA hybridization requirements may minimize off-target prime editing compared to that of other genome editing methods. To test this possibility, HEK293T cells were treated with PE3 or PE2 and 16 total PEgRNAs designed to target four on-target genomic loci, with Cas9 and the four corresponding sgRNAs targeting the same protospacers, or with Cas9 and the same 16 PEgRNAs. These four target loci were chosen because each has at least four well-characterized off-target sites for which Cas9 and the corresponding on-target sgRNA in HEK293T cells is known to cause substantial off-target DNA modification118,159. Following treatment, the four on-target loci and the top four known Cas9 off-target sites for each on-target spacer, were sequenced, for a total of 16 off-target sites (Table 1).
Consistent with previous studies118, Cas9 and the four target sgRNAs modified all 16 of the previously reported off-target loci (
Strikingly, PE3 or PE2 with the same 16 tested PEgRNAs containing these four target spacers resulted in much lower off-target editing (
Reverse transcription of 3′-extended PEgRNAs in principle can proceed into the guide RNA scaffold. If the resulting 3′ flap, despite a lack of complementary at its 3′ end with the unedited DNA strand, is incorporated into the target locus, the outcome is insertion of PEgRNA scaffold nucleotides that contributes to indel frequency. We analyzed sequencing data from 66 PE3-mediated editing experiments at four loci in HEK293T cells and observed PEgRNA scaffold insertion at a low frequency, averaging 1.7±1.5% total insertion of any number of PEgRNA scaffold nucleotides (
Deaminases in some base editors can act in a Cas9-independent manner, resulting in low-level but widespread off-target DNA editing among first-generation CBEs (but not ABEs)160-162 and off-target RNA editing among first-generation CBEs and ABEs163-165, although newer CBE and ABE variants with engineered deaminases greatly reduce Cas9-independent off-target DNA and RNA editing163-165. Prime editors lack base-modification enzymes such as deaminases, and therefore have no inherent ability to modify DNA or RNA bases in a Cas9-independent manner.
While the reverse transcriptase domain in prime editors in principle could process properly primed RNA or DNA templates in cells, it was noted that retrotransposons such as those in the LINE-1 family166 endogenous retroviruses167,168, and human telomerase all provided active endogenous human reverse transcriptases. Their natural presence in human cells suggests that reverse transcriptase activity itself is not substantially toxic. Indeed, no PE3-dependent differences were observed in HEK293T cell viability compared to that of controls expressing dCas9, Cas9 H840A nickase, or PE2 with R110S+K103L (PE2-dRT) mutations that inactivate the reverse transcriptase169 (
The above data and analyses notwithstanding, additional studies are needed to assess off-target prime editing in an unbiased, genome-wide manner, as well as to characterize the extent to which the reverse transcriptase variants in prime editors, or prime editing intermediates, may affect cells.
Prime editing pathogenic transversion, insertion, and deletion mutations in human cells
The ability of PE3 to directly install or correct in human cells transversion, small insertion, and small deletion mutations that cause genetic diseases, was tested. Sickle cell disease is most commonly caused by an A•T-to-T•A transversion mutation in HBB, resulting in the mutation of Glu6→Val in beta-globin. Treatment of hematopoietic stem cells ex vivo with Cas9 nuclease and a donor DNA template for HDR, followed by enrichment of edited cells, transplantation, and engraftment is a promising potential strategy for the treatment of sickle-cell disease170. However, this approach still generates many indel-containing byproducts in addition to the correctly edited HBB allele170-171. While base editors generally produce far fewer indels, they cannot currently make the T•A-to-A•T transversion mutation needed to directly restore the normal sequence of HBB.
PE3 was used to install the HBB E6V mutation in HEK293T cells with 44% efficiency and 4.8% indels (
Tay-Sachs disease is most often caused by a 4-bp insertion into the HEXA gene (HEXA 1278+TATC)136. PE3 was used to install this 4-bp insertion into HEK293T cells with 31% efficiency and 0.8% indels (
Finally, the installation of a protective SNP into PRNP, the gene encoding the human prion protein (PrP), was tested. PrP misfolding causes progressive and fatal neurodegenerative prion disease that can arise spontaneously, through inherited dominant mutations in the PRNP gene, or through exposure to misfolded PrP172. A naturally occurring PRNP G127V mutant allele confers resistance to prion disease in humans138 and mice173. PE3 was used to install G127V into the human PRNP allele in HEK293T cells, which requires a G•C-to-T•A transversion. Four PEgRNAs and three nicking sgRNAs were evaluated with the PE3 system. After three days of exposure to the most effective PE3 and PEgRNA, DNA sequencing revealed 53±11% efficiency of installing the G127V mutation and indel levels of 1.7±0.7% (
Prime Editing in Various Human Cell Lines and Primary Mouse Neurons
Next, prime editing was tested for its ability to edit endogenous sites in three additional human cell lines. In K562 (leukemic bone marrow) cells, PE3 was used to perform transversion edits in the HEK3, EMX1, and FANCF sites, as well as the 18-bp insertion of a 6×His tag in HEK3. An average editing efficiency of 15-30% was observed for each of these four PE3-mediated edits, with indels averaging 0.85-2.2% (
To determine if prime editing is possible in post-mitotic, terminally differentiated primary cells, primary cortical neurons harvested from E18.5 mice were transduced with a dual split-PE3 lentiviral delivery system in which split-intein splicing203 reconstitutes PE2 protein from N-terminal and C-terminal halves, each delivered from a separate virus. To restrict editing to post-mitotic neurons, the human synapsin promoter, which is highly specific for mature neurons204, was used to drive expression of both PE2 protein components. GFP was fused through a self-cleaving P2A peptide205 to the N-terminal half of PE2. Nuclei from neurons were isolated two weeks following dual viral transduction and were sequenced directly, or sorted for GFP expression before sequencing. A 7.1±1.2% average prime editing to install a transversion at the DNMT1 locus with 0.58±0.14% average indels in sorted nuclei (
Prime Editing Compared with Cas9-Initiated HDR
The performance of PE3 was compared with that of optimized Cas9-initiated HDR128,125 in mitotic cell lines that support HDR128. HEK293T, HeLa, K562 and U2OS cells were treated with Cas9 nuclease, a sgRNA, and an ssDNA donor oligonucleotide template designed to install a variety of transversion and insertion edits (
Comparisons between PE3 and HDR in human cell lines other than HEK293T showed similar results, although with lower PE3 editing efficiencies. For example, in K562 cells, PE3-mediated 3-bp insertion into HEK3 proceeded with 25% efficiency and 2.8% indels, compared with 17% editing and 72% indels for Cas9-initiated HDR, a 40-fold editing:indel ratio advantage favoring PE3 (
Discussion and Future Directions
The ability to insert DNA sequences with single-nucleotide precision is an especially enabling prime editing capability. For example, PE3 was used to precisely insert into the HEK3 locus in HEK293T cells a His6tag (18 bp, 65% average efficiency), a FLAG epitope tag (24 bp, 18% average efficiency), and an extended LoxP site (44 bp, 23% average efficiency) that is the native substrate for Cre recombinase. Average indels ranged between 3.0% and 5.9% for these examples (
Collectively, the prime editing experiments described herein installed 18 insertions up to 44 bp, 22 deletions up to 80 bp, 113 point mutations including 77 transversions, and 18 combination edits, across 12 endogenous loci in the human and mouse genomes at locations ranging from 3 bp upstream to 29 bp downstream of the start of a PAM without making explicit double-stranded DNA breaks. These results establish prime editing as a remarkably versatile genome editing method. Because the overwhelming majority (85-99%) of insertions, deletions, indels, and duplications in ClinVar are ≤30 bp (
Importantly, for any desired edit the flexibility of prime editing offers many possible choices of PEgRNA-induced nick locations, sgRNA-induced second nick locations, PBS lengths, RT template lengths, and which strand to edit first, as demonstrated extensively herein. This flexibility, which contrasts with more limited options typically available for other precision genome editing methods125,142,154, allows editing efficiency, product purity, DNA specificity, or other parameters to be optimized to suit the needs of a given application, as shown in
Much additional research is needed to further understand and improve prime editing. Additional modifications of prime editor systems may be required to expand their compatibility to include other cell types, such as post-mitotic cells. Interfacing prime editing with viral and non-viral in vitro and in vivo delivery strategies is needed to fully explore the potential of prime editing to enable a wide range of applications including the study and treatment of genetic diseases. By enabling highly precise targeted transitions, transversions, small insertions, and small deletions in the genomes of mammalian cells without requiring double-stranded breaks or HDR, however, prime editing provides a new “search-and-replace” capability that substantially expands the scope of genome editing.
Methods
General Methods
DNA amplification was conducted by PCR using Phusion U Green Multiplex PCR Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific) or Q5 Hot Start High-Fidelity 2× Master Mix (New England BioLabs) unless otherwise noted. DNA oligonucleotides, including Cy5-labeled DNA oligonucleotides, dCas9 protein, and Cas9 H840A protein were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies. Yeast reporter plasmids were derived from previously described plasmids64 and cloned by the Gibson assembly method. All mammalian editor plasmids used herein were assembled using the USER cloning method as previously described175. Plasmids expressing sgRNAs were constructed by ligation of annealed oligonucleotides into BsmBI-digested acceptor vector. Plasmids expressing PEgRNAs were constructed by Gibson assembly or Golden Gate assembly using a custom acceptor plasmid (see supplemental ‘Golden Gate assembly’ outline). Sequences of sgRNA and PEgRNA constructs used herein are listed in Tables 2A-2C and Tables 3A-3R. All vectors for mammalian cell experiments were purified using Plasmid Plus Midiprep kits (Qiagen) or PureYield plasmid miniprep kits (Promega), which include endotoxin removal steps. All experiments using live animals were approved by the Broad Institute Institutional and Animal Care and Use Committees. Wild-type C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Charles River (#027).
In Vitro Biochemical Assays
PEgRNAs and sgRNAs were transcribed in vitro using the HiScribe T7 in vitro transcription kit (New England Biolabs) from PCR-amplified templates containing a T7 promoter sequence. RNA was purified by denaturing urea PAGE and quality-confirmed by an analytical gel prior to use. 5′-Cy5-labeled DNA duplex substrates were annealed using two oligonucleotides (Cy5-AVA024 and AVA025; 1:1.1 ratio) for the non-nicked substrate or three oligonucleotides (Cy5-AVA023, AVA025 and AVA026; 1:1.1:1.1) for the pre-nicked substrate by heating to 95° C. for 3 minutes followed by slowly cooling to room temperature (Tables 2A-2C). Cas9 cleavage and reverse transcription reactions were carried out in 1×cleavage buffer205 supplemented with dNTPs (20 mM HEPES-K, pH 7.5; 100 mM KCl; 5% glycerol; 0.2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0; 3 mM MgCl2; 0.5 mM dNTP mix; 5 mM DTT). dCas9 or Cas9 H840A (5 μM final) and the sgRNA or PEgRNA (5 μM final) were pre-incubated at room temperature in a 5 μL reaction mixture for 10 minutes prior to the addition of duplex DNA substrate (400 nM final), followed by the addition of Superscript III reverse transcriptase (ThermoFisher Scientific), an undisclosed M-MLV RT variant, when applicable. Reactions were carried out at 37° C. for 1 hour, then diluted to a volume of 10 μL with water, treated with 0.2 μL of proteinase K solution (20 mg/mL, ThermoFisher Scientific), and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. Following heat inactivation at 95° C. for 10 minutes, reaction products were combined with 2×formamide gel loading buffer (90% formamide; 10% glycerol; 0.01% bromophenol blue), denatured at 95° C. for 5 minutes, and separated by denaturing urea-PAGE gel (15% TBE-urea, 55° C., 200V). DNA products were visualized by Cy5 fluorescence signal using a Typhoon FLA 7000 biomolecular imager.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were carried out in 1×binding buffer (1×cleavage buffer+10 μg/mL heparin) using pre-incubated dCas9:sgRNA or dCas9:PEgRNA complexes (concentration range between 5 nM and 1 μM final) and Cy5-labeled duplex DNA (Cy5-AVA024 and AVA025; 20 nM final). After 15 minutes of incubation at 37° C., the samples were analyzed by native PAGE gel (10% TBE) and imaged for Cy5 fluorescence.
For DNA sequencing of reverse transcription products, fluorescent bands were excised and purified from urea-PAGE gels, then 3′ tailed with terminal transferase (TdT; New England Biolabs) in the presence of dGTP or dATP according to the manufacturer's protocol. Tailed DNA products were diluted 10-fold with binding buffer (40% saturated aqueous guanidinium chloride+60% isopropanol) and purified by QIAquick spin column (Qiagen), then used as templates for primer extension by Klenow fragment (New England Biolabs) using primer AVA134 (A-tailed products) or AVA135 (G-tailed products) (Tables 2A-2C). Extension were amplified by PCR for 10 cycles using primers AVA110 and AVA122, then sequenced with AVA037 using the Sanger method (Tables 2A-2C).
Yeast Fluorescent Reporter Assays
Dual fluorescent reporter plasmids containing an in-frame stop codon, a +1 frameshift, or a −1 frameshift were subjected to 5′-extended PEgRNA or 3′-extended PEgRNA prime editing reactions in vitro as described above. Following incubation at 37° C. for 1 hour, the reactions were diluted with water and plasmid DNA was precipitated with 0.3 M sodium acetate and 70% ethanol. Resuspended DNA was transformed into S. cerevisiae by electroporation as previously described67 and plated on synthetic complete media without leucine (SC(glucose), L-). GFP and mCherry fluorescence signals were visualized from colonies with the Typhoon FLA 7000 biomolecular imager.
General Mammalian Cell Culture Conditions
HEK293T (ATCC CRL-3216), U20S (ATTC HTB-96), K562 (CCL-243), and HeLa (CCL-2) cells were purchased from ATCC and cultured and passaged in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) plus GlutaMAX (ThermoFisher Scientific), McCoy's 5A Medium (Gibco), RPMI Medium 1640 plus GlutaMAX (Gibco), or Eagle's Minimal Essential Medium (EMEM, ATCC), respectively, each supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco, qualified) and 1×Penicillin Streptomycin (Corning). All cell types were incubated, maintained, and cultured at 37° C. with 5% CO2. Cell lines were authenticated by their respective suppliers and tested negative for mycoplasma.
HEK293T Tissue Culture Transfection Protocol and Genomic DNA Preparation
HEK293T cells grown were seeded on 48-well poly-D-lysine coated plates (Corning). 16 to 24 hours post-seeding, cells were transfected at approximately 60% confluency with 1 μL of Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's protocols and 750 ng of PE plasmid, 250 ng of PEgRNA plasmid, and 83 ng of sgRNA plasmid (for PE3 and PE3b). Unless otherwise stated, cells were cultured 3 days following transfection, after which the media was removed, the cells were washed with 1×PBS solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and genomic DNA was extracted by the addition of 150 μL of freshly prepared lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 0.05% SDS; 25 μg/mL Proteinase K (ThermoFisher Scientific)) directly into each well of the tissue culture plate. The genomic DNA mixture was incubated at 37° C. for 1 to 2 hours, followed by an 80° C. enzyme inactivation step for 30 minutes. Primers used for mammalian cell genomic DNA amplification are listed in Table 4. For HDR experiments in HEK293T cells, 231 ng of nuclease-expression plasmid, 69 ng of sgRNA expression plasmid, 50 ng (1.51 pmol) 100-nt ssDNA donor template (PAGE-purified; Integrated DNA Technologies) was lipofected using 1.4 μL Lipofectamine 2000 (ThermoFisher) per well. Genomic DNA from all HDR experiments was purified using the Agencourt DNAdvance Kit (Beckman Coulter), according to the manufacturer's protocol.
High-Throughput DNA Sequencing of Genomic DNA Samples
Genomic sites of interest were amplified from genomic DNA samples and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq as previously described with the following modifications129,130. Briefly, amplification primers containing Illumina forward and reverse adapters (Table 4) were used for a first round of PCR (PCR 1) amplifying the genomic region of interest. 25 μL PCR 1 reactions were performed with 0.5 μM of each forward and reverse primer, 1 μL of genomic DNA extract and 12.5 μL of Phusion U Green Multiplex PCR Master Mix. PCR reactions were carried out as follows: 98° C. for 2 minutes, then 30 cycles of [98° C. for 10 seconds, 61° C. for 20 seconds, and 72° C. for 30 seconds], followed by a final 72° C. extension for 2 minutes. Unique Illumina barcoding primer pairs were added to each sample in a secondary PCR reaction (PCR 2). Specifically, 25 μL of a given PCR 2 reaction contained 0.5 μM of each unique forward and reverse illumina barcoding primer pair, 1 μL of unpurified PCR 1 reaction mixture, and 12.5 μL of Phusion U Green Multiplex PCR 2×Master Mix. The barcoding PCR 2 reactions were carried out as follows: 98° C. for 2 minutes, then 12 cycles of [98° C. for 10 seconds, 61° C. for 20 seconds, and 72° C. for 30 seconds], followed by a final 72° C. extension for 2 minutes. PCR products were evaluated analytically by electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel. PCR 2 products (pooled by common amplicons) were purified by electrophoresis with a 1.5% agarose gel using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen), eluting with 40 μL of water. DNA concentration was measured by fluorometric quantification (Qubit, ThermoFisher Scientific) or qPCR (KAPA Library Quantification Kit-Illumina, KAPA Biosystems) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument according to the manufacturer's protocols.
Sequencing reads were demultiplexed using MiSeq Reporter (Illumina). Alignment of amplicon sequences to a reference sequence was performed using CRISPResso2178. For quantification of point mutation editing, CRISPResso2 was run in standard mode with “discard_indel_reads” on. Editing efficiency was calculated as: (frequency of specified point mutation in non-discarded reads)×(# of non-discarded reads)+total reads. For insertion or deletion edits, CRISPResso2 was run in HDR mode using the desired allele as the expected allele (e flag), and with “discard_indel_reads” ON. Editing yield was calculated as the number of HDR aligned reads divided by total reads. For all edits, indel yields were calculated as the number of discarded reads divided by total reads.
Nucleofection of U2OS, K562, and HeLa Cells
Nucleofection was performed in all experiments using K562, HeLa, and U20S cells. For PE conditions in these cell types, 800 ng prime editor-expression plasmid, 200 ng PEgRNA-expression plasmid, and 83 ng nicking plasmid was nucleofected in a final volume of 20 μL in a 16-well nucleocuvette strip (Lonza). For HDR conditions in these three cell types, 350 ng nuclease-expression plasmid, 150 ng sgRNA-expression plasmid and 200 pmol (6.6 μg) 100-nt ssDNA donor template (PAGE-purified; Integrated DNA Technologies) was nucleofected in a final volume of 20 μL per sample in a 16-well Nucleocuvette strip (Lonza). K562 cells were nucleofected using the SF Cell Line 4D-Nucleofector X Kit (Lonza) with 5×105 cells per sample (program FF-120), according to the manufacturers protocol. U20S cells were nucleofected using the SE Cell Line 4D-Nucleofector X Kit (Lonza) with 3-4×105 cells per sample (program DN-100), according to the manufacturers protocol. HeLa cells were nucleofected using the SE Cell Line 4D-Nucleofector X Kit (Lonza) with 2×105 cells per sample (program CN-114), according to the manufacturers protocol. Cells were harvested 72 hours after nucleofection for genomic DNA extraction.
Genomic DNA Extraction for HDR Experiments
Genomic DNA from all HDR comparison experiments in HEK293T, HEK293T HBB E6V, K562, U2OS, and HeLa cells was purified using the Agencourt DNAdvance Kit (Beckman Coulter), according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Comparison Between PE2, PE3, BE2, BE4max, ABEdmax, and ABEmax
HEK293T cells were seeded on 48-well poly-D-lysine coated plates (Corning). After 16 to 24 hours, cells were transfected at approximately 60% confluency. For base editing with CBE or ABE constructs, cells were transfected with 750 ng of base editor plasmid, 250 ng of sgRNA expression plasmid, and 1 μL of Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). PE transfections were performed as described above. Genomic DNA extraction for PE and BE was performed as described above.
Determination of PE3 Activity at Known Cas9 Off-Target Sites
To evaluate PE3 off-target editing activity at known Cas9 off-target sites, genomic DNA extracted from HEK293T cells 3 days after transfection with PE3 was used as template for PCR amplification of 16 previously reported Cas9 off-target genomic sites118,159 (the top four off-target sites each for the HEK3, EMX1, FANCF, and HEK4 spacers; primer sequences are listed in Table 4). These genomic DNA samples were identical to those used for quantifying on-target PE3 editing activities shown in
HTS data analysis was performed using CRISPResso2178. The editing efficiencies of Cas9 nuclease, Cas9 H840A nickase, and dCas9 were quantified as the percent of total sequencing reads containing indels. For quantification of PE3 and PE3-dRT off-targets, aligned sequencing reads were examined for point mutations, insertions, or deletions that were consistent with the anticipated product of PEgRNA reverse transcription initiated at the Cas9 nick site. Single nucleotide variations occurring at <0.1% overall frequency among total reads within a sample were excluded from analysis. For reads containing single nucleotide variations that both occurred at frequencies ≥0.1% and were partially consistent with the PEgRNA-encoded edit, t-tests (unpaired, one-tailed, α=0.5) were used to determine if the variants occurred at significantly higher levels compared to samples treated with PEgRNAs that contained the same spacer but encoded different edits. To avoid differences in sequencing errors, comparisons were made between samples that were sequenced simultaneously within the same MiSeq run. Variants that did not meet the criteria of p-value>0.05 were excluded. Off-target PE3 editing activity was then calculated as the percentage of total sequencing reads that met the above criteria.
Generation of a HEK293T cell line containing the HBB E6V mutation using Cas9-initiated HDR
HEK293T cells were seeded in a 48-well plate and transfected at approximately 60% confluency with 1.5 μL of Lipofectamine 2000, 300 ng of Cas9 D10A nickase plasmid, 100 ng of sgRNA plasmid, and 200 ng of 100-mer ssDNA donor template (Table 5). Three days after transfection, media was exchanged for fresh media. Four days after transfection, cells were dissociated using 30 μL of TrypLE solution and suspended in 1.5 mL of media. Single cells were isolated into individual wells of two 96-well plates by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Beckman-Coulter Astrios). See
Generation of a HEK293T cell line containing the HBB E6V mutation using PE3
2.5×104 HEK293T cells grown in the absence of antibiotic were seeded on 48-well poly-D-lysine coated plates (Corning). 16 to 24 hours post-seeding, cells were transfected at approximately 70% confluency with 1 μL of Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's protocols and 750 ng of PE2-P2A-GFP plasmid, 250 ng of PEgRNA plasmid, and 83 ng of sgRNA plasmid. After 3 days post transfection, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (Gibco) and dissociated using TrypLE Express (Gibco). Cells were then diluted with DMEM plus GlutaMax (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS (Gibco) and passed through a 35-μm cell strainer (Corning) prior to sorting. Flow cytometry was carried out on a LE-MA900 cell sorter (Sony). Cells were treated with 3 nM DAPI (BioLegend) 15 minutes prior to sorting. After gating for doublet exclusion, single DAPI-negative cells with GFP fluorescence above that of a GFP-negative control cell population were sorted into 96-well flat-bottom cell culture plates (Corning) filled with pre-chilled DMEM with GlutaMax supplemented with 10% FBS. See
Generation of a HEK293T Cell Line Containing the HEXA 1278+TATC Insertion Using PE3
HEK293T cells containing the HEXA 1278+TATC allele were generated following the protocol described above for creation of the HBB E6V cell line; PEgRNA and sgRNA sequences are listed in Tables 2A-2C under the
Cell Viability Assays
HEK293T cells were seeded in 48-well plates and transfected at approximately 70% confluency with 750 ng of editor plasmid (PE3, PE3 R110S K103L, Cas9 H840A nickase, or dCas9), 250 ng of HEK3-targeting PEgRNA plasmid, and 1 μL of Lipofectamine 2000, as described above. Cell viability was measured every 24 hours post-transfection for 3 days using the CellTiter-Glo 2.0 assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Luminescence was measured in 96-well flat-bottomed polystyrene microplates (Corning) using a M1000 Pro microplate reader (Tecan) with a 1-second integration time.
Lentivirus Production
Lentivirus was produced as previously described206. T-75 flasks of rapidly dividing HEK293T cells (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA) were transfected with lentivirus production helper plasmids pVSV-G and psPAX2 in combination with modified lentiCRISPR_v2 genomes carrying intein-split PE2 editor using FuGENE HD (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's directions. Four split-intein editor constructs were designed: 1) a viral genome encoding a U6-PEgRNA expression cassette and the N-terminal portion (1-573) of Cas9 H840A nickase fused to the Npu N-intein, a self-cleaving P2A peptide, and GFP-KASH; 2) a viral genome encoding the Npu C-intein fused to the C-terminal remainder of PE2; 3) a viral genome encoding the Npu C-intein fused to the C-terminal remainder of Cas9 for the Cas9 control; and 4) a nicking sgRNA for DNMT1. The split-intein mediates trans splicing to join the two halves of PE2 or Cas9, while the P2A GFP-KASH enables co-translational production of a nuclear membrane-localized GFP. After 48 hours, supernatant was collected, centrifuged at 500 g for 5 minutes to remove cellular debris, and filtered using a 0.45 μm filter. Filtered supernatant was concentrated using the PEG-it Virus Precipitation Solution (System Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's directions. The resulting pellet was resuspended in Opti-MEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using 1% of the original media volume. Resuspended pellet was flash-frozen and stored at −80° C. until use.
Mouse Primary Cortical Neuron Dissection and Culture
E18.5 dissociated cortical cultures were harvested from timed-pregnant C57BL/6 mice (Charles River). Embryos were harvested from pregnant mice after euthanasia by CO2 followed by decapitation. Cortical caps were dissected in ice-cold Hibernate-E supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies). Following a rinse with ice-cold Hibernate-E, tissue was digested at 37° C. for 8 minutes in papain/DNase (Worthington/Sigma). Tissue was triturated in NBActiv4 (BrainBits) supplemented with DNase. Cells were counted and plated in 24-well plates at 100,000 cells per well. Half of the media was changed twice per week.
Prime Editing in Primary Neurons and Nuclei Isolation
At DIV 1, 15 μL of lentivirus was added at 10:10:1 ratio of N-terminal:C-terminal:nicking sgRNA. At DIV 14, neuronal nuclei were isolated using the EZ-PREP buffer (Sigma D8938) following the manufacturer's protocol. All steps were performed on ice or at 4° C. Media was removed from dissociated cultures, and cultures were washed with ice-cold PBS. PBS was aspirated and replaced with 200 μL EZ-PREP solution. Following a 5-minute incubation on ice, EZ-PREP was pipetted across the surface of the well to dislodge remaining cells. The sample was centrifuged at 500 g for 5 minutes, and the supernatant removed. Samples were washed with 200 μL EZ-PREP and centrifuged again at 500 g for 5 minutes. Samples were resuspended with gentle pipetting in 200 μL ice-cold Nuclei Suspension Buffer (NSB) consisting of 100 μg/mL BSA and 3.33 μM Vybrant DyeCycle Ruby (Thermo Fisher) in 1×PBS, then centrifuged at 500 g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was removed and nuclei were resuspended in 100 μL NSB and sorted into 100 μL Agencourt DNAdvance lysis buffer using a MoFlo Astrios (Beckman Coulter) at the Broad Institute flow cytometry facility. Genomic DNA was purified according to the manufacturer's Agencourt DNAdvance instructions.
RNA-Sequencing and Data Analysis
HEK293T cells were co-transfected with PRNP-targeting or HEXA-targeting PEgRNAs and PE2, PE2-dRT, or Cas9 H840A nickase. 72 hours following transfection, total RNA was harvested from cells using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher) and purified with RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) including on-column DNaseI treatment. Ribosomes were depleted from total RNA using the rRNA removal protocol of the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA library prep kit (Illumina) and subsequently washed with RNAClean XP beads (Beckman Coulter). Sequencing libraries were prepared using ribo-depleted RNA on a SMARTer PrepX Apollo NGS library prep system (Takara) following the manufacturer's protocol. Resulting libraries were visualized on a 2200 TapeStation (Agilent Technologies), normalized using a Qubit dsDNA HS assay (Thermo Fisher), and sequenced on a NextSeq 550 using high output v2 flow cell (Illumina) as 75-bp paired-end reads. Fastq files were generated with bcl2fastq2 version 2.20 and trimmed using TrimGalore version 0.6.2 (github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore) to remove low-quality bases, unpaired sequences, and adaptor sequences. Trimmed reads were aligned to a Homo sapiens genome assembly GRCh148 with a custom Cas9 H840A gene entry using RSEM version 1.3.1207. The limma-voom208 package was used to normalize gene expression levels and perform differential expression analysis with batch effect correction. Differentially expressed genes were called with FDR-corrected p-value<0.05 and fold-change>2 cutoffs, and results were visualized in R.
ClinVar Analysis
The ClinVar variant summary was downloaded from NCBI (accessed Jul. 15, 2019), and the information contained therein was used for all downstream analysis. The list of all reported variants was filtered by allele ID in order to remove duplicates and by clinical significance in order to restrict the analysis to pathogenic variants. The list of pathogenic variants was filtered sequentially by variant type in order to calculate the fraction of pathogenic variants that are insertions, deletions, etc. Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were separated into two categories (transitions and transversions) based on the reported reference and alternate alleles. SNVs that did not report reference or alternate alleles were excluded from the analysis.
The lengths of reported insertions, deletions, and duplications were calculated using reference/alternate alleles, variant start/stop positions, or appropriate identifying information in the variant name. Variants that did not report any of the above information were excluded from the analysis. The lengths of reported indels (single variants that include both insertions and deletions relative to the reference genome) were calculated by determining the number of mismatches or gaps in the best pairwise alignment between the reference and alternate alleles. Frequency distributions of variant lengths were calculated using GraphPad Prism 8.
Data Availability
High-throughput sequencing data are deposited to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database. Plasmids Encoding PE1, PE2/PE3, and PEgRNA Expression Vectors Will be Available from Addgene.
Code Availability
The script used to quantify PEgRNA scaffold insertion is provided in
Table 1: Activities of prime editors, Cas9 nuclease, Cas9 H840A nickase, and PE2-dRT at HEK3, HEK4, EMX1, and FANCF on-target and off-target sites. PE2/PE3 editing is shown as % prime editing alongside % indels (in parentheses). % indels are shown for Cas9, Cas9 H840A nickase (nCas9), and PE2-dRT at the top four previously characterized off-target sites179,180. sgRNA and PEgRNA sequences can be found in Tables 3A-3R, under the
Tables 2A-2C: Sequences of DNA oligonucleotides, PEgRNAs, and sgRNAs used for in vitro experiments.
Tables 3A-3R: Sequences of PEgRNAs and sgRNAs used in mammalian cell experiments. All sequences are shown in 5′ to 3′ orientation. To construct PEgRNAs, spacer sequences listed below were added to the 5′ end of the sgRNA scaffold and the 3′ extensions listed below containing the primer binding site and RT template were added to the 3′ end of the sgRNA scaffold. The sgRNA scaffold sequence is
Additional Sequences
Sequences of yeast dual fluorescent reporter plasmids used herein
p425-GFP_stop_mCherry:
TGAGATTTAAAGTTCATATGGAAGGTTCAGTTAATGGTCATGAATTTGAAATTGAAGGTGAAGGTGAA
GGTAGACCATATGAAGGTACTCAAACTGCTAAATTGAAAGTTACTAAAGGTGGTCCATTACCATTTGC
TTGGGATATTTTGTCACCACAATTTATGTATGGTTCAAAAGCTTATGTTAAACATCCAGCTGATATTCCA
GATTATTTAAAATTGTCATTTCCAGAAGGTTTTAAATGGGAAAGAGTTATGAATTTTGAAGATGGTGGT
GTTGTTACTGTTACTCAAGATTCATCATTACAAGATGGTGAATTTATTTATAAAGTTAAATTGAGAGGTA
CTAATTTTCCATCAGATGGTCCAGTTATGCAAAAAAAAACTATGGGTTGGGAAGCTTCATCAGAAAGA
ATGTATCCAGAAGATGGTGCTTTAAAAGGTGAAATTAAACAAAGATTGAAATTAAAAGATGGTGGTCA
TTATGATGCTGAAGTTAAAACTACTTATAAAGCTAAAAAACCAGTTCAATTACCAGGTGCTTATAATGTT
AATATTAAATTGGATATTACTTCACATAATGAAGATTATACTATTGTTGAACAATATGAAAGAGCTGAAG
GTAGACATTCAACTGGTGGTATGGATGAATTATATAAAGGTACCGCTCGAGCAGCTGTGATTGATTGA
p425-GFP_+1fs_mCherry:
GCAGAGCACAGGAGACGTCATGGTTTCAAAAGGTGAAGAAGATAATATGGCTATTATTAAAGAATTT
ATGAGATTTAAAGTTCATATGGAAGGTTCAGTTAATGGTCATGAATTTGAAATTGAAGGTGAAGGTGA
AGGTAGACCATATGAAGGTACTCAAACTGCTAAATTGAAAGTTACTAAAGGTGGTCCATTACCATTTG
CTTGGGATATTTTGTCACCACAATTTATGTATGGTTCAAAAGCTTATGTTAAACATCCAGCTGATATTCC
AGATTATTTAAAATTGTCATTTCCAGAAGGTTTTAAATGGGAAAGAGTTATGAATTTTGAAGATGGTGG
TGTTGTTACTGTTACTCAAGATTCATCATTACAAGATGGTGAATTTATTTATAAAGTTAAATTGAGAGGT
ACTAATTTTCCATCAGATGGTCCAGTTATGCAAAAAAAAACTATGGGTTGGGAAGCTTCATCAGAAAG
AATGTATCCAGAAGATGGTGCTTTAAAAGGTGAAATTAAACAAAGATTGAAATTAAAAGATGGTGGTC
ATTATGATGCTGAAGTTAAAACTACTTATAAAGCTAAAAAACCAGTTCAATTACCAGGTGCTTATAATGT
TAATATTAAATTGGATATTACTTCACATAATGAAGATTATACTATTGTTGAACAATATGAAAGAGCTGAAG
GTAGACATTCAACTGGTGGTATGGATGAATTATATAAAGGTACCGCTCGAGCAGCTGTGATTGATTGA
p425-GFP_-1fs_mCherry:
GCAGAGCACAGGACGTCATGGTTTCAAAAGGTGAAGAAGATAATATGGCTATTATTAAAGAATTTAT
GAGATTTAAAGTTCATATGGAAGGTTCAGTTAATGGTCATGAATTTGAAATTGAAGGTGAAGGTGAAG
GTAGACCATATGAAGGTACTCAAACTGCTAAATTGAAAGTTACTAAAGGTGGTCCATTACCATTTGCTT
GGGATATTTTGTCACCACAATTTATGTATGGTTCAAAAGCTTATGTTAAACATCCAGCTGATATTCCAG
ATTATTTAAAATTGTCATTTCCAGAAGGTTTTAAATGGGAAAGAGTTATGAATTTTGAAGATGGTGGTG
TTGTTACTGTTACTCAAGATTCATCATTACAAGATGGTGAATTTATTTATAAAGTTAAATTGAGAGGTAC
TAATTTTCCATCAGATGGTCCAGTTATGCAAAAAAAAACTATGGGTTGGGAAGCTTCATCAGAAAGAA
TGTATCCAGAAGATGGTGCTTTAAAAGGTGAAATTAAACAAAGATTGAAATTAAAAGATGGTGGTCAT
TATGATGCTGAAGTTAAAACTACTTATAAAGCTAAAAAACCAGTTCAATTACCAGGTGCTTATAATGTTA
ATATTAAATTGGATATTACTTCACATAATGAAGATTATACTATTGTTGAACAATATGAAAGAGCTGAAGG
TAGACATTCAACTGGTGGTATGGATGAATTATATAAAGGTACCGCTCGAGCAGCTGTGATTGATTGAG
KEY:
GFP open reading frame
Linker containing stop codon +1 frameshift, or −1 frameshift
mCherry open reading frame
Plasmid backbone (containing the GPD promoter, Leu2 marker, and AmpR)
Protospacer (Underlined)
PAM (boldfaced)
DNA sequences of mammalian prime editor plasmids and example PEgRNA plasmid pCMV-PE1:
CAGGAACAAGCGAGTCAGCAACACCAGAGAGCAGTGGCGGCAGCAGCGGCGGCAGCAGC
ACCC
TAAATATAGAAGATGAGTATCGGCTACATGAGACCTCAAAAGAGCCAGATGTTTCTCTAG
GGTCCACATGGCTGTCTGATTTTCCTCAGGCCTGGGCGGAAACCGGGGGCATGGGACT
GGCAGTTCGCCAAGCTCCTCTGATCATACCTCTGAAAGCAACCTCTACCCCCGTGTCCA
TAAAACAATACCCCATGTCACAAGAAGCCAGACTGGGGATCAAGCCCCACATACAGAGA
CTGTTGGACCAGGGAATACTGGTACCCTGCCAGTCCCCCTGGAACACGCCCCTGCTACC
CGTTAAGAAACCAGGGACTAATGATTATAGGCCTGTCCAGGATCTGAGAGAAGTCAACA
AGCGGGTGGAAGACATCCACCCCACCGTGCCCAACCCTTACAACCTCTTGAGCGGGCT
CCCACCGTCCCACCAGTGGTACACTGTGCTTGATTTAAAGGATGCCTTTTTCTGCCTGA
GACTCCACCCCACCAGTCAGCCTCTCTTCGCCTTTGAGTGGAGAGATCCAGAGATGGG
AATCTCAGGACAATTGACCTGGACCAGACTCCCACAGGGTTTCAAAAACAGTCCCACCC
TGTTTGATGAGGCACTGCACAGAGACCTAGCAGACTTCCGGATCCAGCACCCAGACTT
GATCCTGCTACAGTACGTGGATGACTTACTGCTGGCCGCCACTTCTGAGCTAGACTGCC
AACAAGGTACTCGGGCCCTGTTACAAACCCTAGGGAACCTCGGGTATCGGGCCTCGGC
CAAGAAAGCCCAAATTTGCCAGAAACAGGTCAAGTATCTGGGGTATCTTCTAAAAGAGG
GTCAGAGATGGCTGACTGAGGCCAGAAAAGAGACTGTGATGGGGCAGCCTACTCCGAA
GACCCCTCGACAACTAAGGGAGTTCCTAGGGACGGCAGGCTTCTGTCGCCTCTGGATC
CCTGGGTTTGCAGAAATGGCAGCCCCCCTGTACCCTCTCACCAAAACGGGGACTCTGTT
TAATTGGGGCCCAGACCAACAAAAGGCCTATCAAGAAATCAAGCAAGCTCTTCTAACTG
CCCCAGCCCTGGGGTTGCCAGATTTGACTAAGCCCTTTGAACTCTTTGTCGACGAGAAG
CAGGGCTACGCCAAAGGTGTCCTAACGCAAAAACTGGGACCTTGGCGTCGGCCGGTGG
CCTACCTGTCCAAAAAGCTAGACCCAGTAGCAGCTGGGTGGCCCCCTTGCCTACGGATG
GTAGCAGCCATTGCCGTACTGACAAAGGATGCAGGCAAGCTAACCATGGGACAGCCAC
TAGTCATTCTGGCCCCCCATGCAGTAGAGGCACTAGTCAAACAACCCCCCGACCGCTGG
CTTTCCAACGCCCGGATGACTCACTATCAGGCCTTGCTTTTGGACACGGACCGGGTCCA
GTTCGGACCGGTGGTAGCCCTGAACCCGGCTACGCTGCTCCCACTGCCTGAGGAAGGG
CTGCAACACAACTGCCTTGATATCCTGGCCGAAGCCCACGGAACCCGACCCGACCTAAC
GGACCAGCCGCTCCCAGACGCCGACCACACCTGGTACACGGATGGAAGCAGTCTCTTA
CAAGAGGGACAGCGTAAGGCGGGAGCTGCGGTGACCACCGAGACCGAGGTAATCTGG
GCTAAAGCCCTGCCAGCCGGGACATCCGCTCAGCGGGCTGAACTGATAGCACTCACCC
AGGCCCTAAAGATGGCAGAAGGTAAGAAGCTAAATGTTTATACTGATAGCCGTTATGCTT
TTGCTACTGCCCATATCCATGGAGAAATATACAGAAGGCGTGGGTTGCTCACATCAGAA
GGCAAAGAGATCAAAAATAAAGACGAGATCTTGGCCCTACTAAAAGCCCTCTTTCTGCC
CAAAAGACTTAGCATAATCCATTGTCCAGGACATCAAAAGGGACACAGCGCCGAGGCTA
GAGGCAACCGGATGGCTGACCAAGCGGCCCGAAAGGCAGCCATCACAGAGACTCCAGA
CACCTCTACCCTCCTCATAGAAAATTCATCACCCTCTGGCGGCTCAAAAAGAACCGCCG
ACGGCAGCGAATTCGAGCCCAAGAAGAAGAGGAAAGTCTAA
CCGGTCATCATCACCATCA
pCMV-PE2:
N-terminal NLS+Cas9 H840A
Flexible linker
M-MLV reverse transcriptase+C-terminal NLS
Plasmid backbone (containing CMV promoter and AmpR)
pU6-HEK3_PEgRNA_CTTins:
TGAGCACGTGA
GTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAAATAAGGCTAGTCCGTTATCAACTTG
U6 Promoter sequence
Spacer Sequence
sgRNA scaffold
3′ Extension (Contains PBS and RT Template)
Backbone (contains AmpR)
pLenti-hSyn-N-PE2-NpuN-P2A-GFP-KASH_U6-DNMT1-PEgRNA:
CATATTTGCATATACGATACAAGGCTGTTAGAGAGATAATTAGAATTAATTTGACTGTAAACACAAAG
ATATTAGTACAAAATACGTGACGTAGAAAGTAATAATTTCTTGGGTAGTTTGCAGTTTTAAAATTATG
TTTTAAAATGGACTATCATATGCTTACCGTAACTTGAAAGTATTTCGATTTCTTGGCTTTATATATCTTG
TGGAAAGGACGAAACACC
GCGGGCTGGAGCTGTTCGCGCGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAG
TTAAAATAAGGCTAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGCACCGAGTCGGTGCAAGATGCAA
GCGCGAACAGCTCCAG
TTTTTTTGAATTC
AGTGCAAGTGGGTTTTAGGACCAGGATGAGGCGGGG
TGGGGGTGCCTACCTGACGACCGACCCCGACCCACTGGACAAGCACCCAACCCCCATTCCCCAAATTGC
GCATCCCCTATCAGAGAGGGGGAGGGGAAACAGGATGCGGCGAGGCGCGTGCGCACTGCCAGCTTCA
GCACCGCGGACAGTGCCTTCGCCCCCGCCTGGCGGCGCGCGCCACCGCCGCCTCAGCACTGAAGGCG
CGCTGACGTCACTCGCCGGTCCCCCGCAAACTCCCCTTCCCGGCCACCTTGGTCGCGTCCGCGCCGCC
GCCGGCCCAGCCGGACCGCACCACGCGAGGCGCGAGATAGGGGGGCACGGGCGCGACCATCTGCGC
TGCGGCGCCGGCGACTCAGCGCTGCCTCAGTCTGCGGTGGGCAGCGGAGGAGTCGTGTCGTGCCTGA
GAGCGCAG
TCGAGAATCTAGAGCGCTGCCACC
ATGAAACGGACAGCCGACGGAAGCGAGTTCGAG
GAGATCCTGACAGTGGAGTATGGCCTGCTGCCAATCGGCAAGATCGTGGAGAAGAGGATCGAGTGTACC
GTGTACTCTGTGGATAACAATGGCAACATCTATACACAGCCCGTGGCACAGTGGCACGATAGGGGAGAGC
AGGAGGTGTTCGAGTATTGCCTGGAGGACGGCAGCCTGATCAGGGCAACCAAGGACCACAAGTTCATGA
CAGTGGATGGCCAGATGCTGCCCATCGACGAGATTTTCGAGCGGGAGCTGGACCTGATGAGAGTGGATA
ACCTGCCTAAT
AGCGGAGGCAGTAAAAGAACAGCAGACGGGAGTGAGTTTGAGCCCAAGAAAAAGA
GAAAGGTGGGATCCGGCGCAACAAACTTCTCTCTGCTGAAACAAGCCGGAGATGTCGAAGAGAATC
CTGGACCGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAGCTGTTCACCGGGGTGGTGCCCATCCTGGTCGAGCTGGAC
GGCGACGTAAACGGCCACAAGTTCAGCGTGTCCGGCGAGGGCGAGGGCGATGCCACCTACGGCAA
GCTGACCCTGAAGTTCATCTGCACCACCGGCAAGCTGCCCGTGCCCTGGCCCACCCTCGTGACCAC
CCTGACCTACGGCGTGCAGTGCTTCAGCCGCTACCCCGACCACATGAAGCAGCACGACTTCTTCAAG
TCCGCCATGCCCGAAGGCTACGTCCAGGAGCGCACCATCTTCTTCAAGGACGACGGCAACTACAAGA
CCCGCGCCGAGGTGAAGTTCGAGGGCGACACCCTGGTGAACCGCATCGAGCTGAAGGGCATCGACT
TCAAGGAGGACGGCAACATCCTGGGGCACAAGCTGGAGTACAACTACAACAGCCACAACGTCTATAT
CATGGCCGACAAGCAGAAGAACGGCATCAAGGTGAACTTCAAGATCCGCCACAACATCGAGGACGG
CAGCGTGCAGCTCGCCGACCACTACCAGCAGAACACCCCCATCGGCGACGGCCCCGTGCTGCTGCC
CGACAACCACTACCTGAGCACCCAGTCCGCCCTGAGCAAAGACCCCAACGAGAAGCGCGATCACAT
GGTCCTGCTGGAGTTCGTGACCGCCGCCGGGATCACTCTCGGCATGGACGAGCTGTACAAGTCCGG
ACTCAGATCTCGAGAGGAGGAGGAGGAGACAGACAGCAGGATGCCCCACCTCGACAGCCCCGGCA
GCTCCCAGCCGAGACGCTCCTTCCTCTCAAGGGTGATCAGGGCAGCGCTACCGTTGCAGCTGCTTCT
GCTGCTGCTGCTGCTCCTGGCCTGCCTGCTACCTGCCTCTGAAGATGACTACAGCTGCACCCAGGCC
AACAACTTTGCCCGATCCTTCTACCCCATGCTGCGGTACACCAACGGGCCACCTCCCACCTAA
ACGC
U6promoter
PEgRNA
hSynpromoter
N-termPE2
N-termNpu
P2A-GFP-KASH
pLenti-hSyn-C-PE2-NpuC:
GGGTGCCTACCTGACGACCGACCCCGACCCACTGGACAAGCACCCAACCCCCATTCCCCAAATTGC
GCATCCCCTATCAGAGAGGGGGAGGGGAAACAGGATGCGGCGAGGCGCGTGCGCACTGCCAGCTT
CAGCACCGCGGACAGTGCCTTCGCCCCCGCCTGGCGGCGCGCGCCACCGCCGCCTCAGCACTGAA
GGCGCGCTGACGTCACTCGCCGGTCCCCCGCAAACTCCCCTTCCCGGCCACCTTGGTCGCGTCCGC
GCCGCCGCCGGCCCAGCCGGACCGCACCACGCGAGGCGCGAGATAGGGGGGCACGGGCGCGACC
ATCTGCGCTGCGGCGCCGGCGACTCAGCGCTGCCTCAGTCTGCGGTGGGCAGCGGAGGAGTCGTG
TCGTGCCTGAGAGCGCAG
TCGAGAATCTAGAGCGCTGCCACCATGAAACGGACAGCCGACGGAAGCG
AGTTCGAGTCACCAAAGAAGAAGCGGAAAGTC
ATCAAGATTGCTACACGGAAATACCTGGGAAAGCAGAA
CGTGTACGACATCGGCGTGGAGCGGGATCACAACTTCGCCCTGAAGAATGGCTTTATCGCCAGCAAT
TG
CTTCGACTCCGTGGAAATCTCCGGCGTGGAAGATCGGTTCAACGCCTCCCTGGGCACATACC
ACGATCTGCTGAAAATTATCAAGGACAAGGACTTCCTGGACAATGAGGAAAACGAGGACATT
CTGGAAGATATCGTGCTGACCCTGACACTGTTTGAGGACAGAGAGATGATCGAGGAACGGC
TGAAAACCTATGCCCACCTGTTCGACGACAAAGTGATGAAGCAGCTGAAGCGGCGGAGATA
CACCGGCTGGGGCAGGCTGAGCCGGAAGCTGATCAACGGCATCCGGGACAAGCAGTCCGG
CAAGACAATCCTGGATTTCCTGAAGTCCGACGGCTTCGCCAACAGAAACTTCATGCAGCTGA
TCCACGACGACAGCCTGACCTTTAAAGAGGACATCCAGAAAGCCCAGGTGTCCGGCCAGGG
CGATAGCCTGCACGAGCACATTGCCAATCTGGCCGGCAGCCCCGCCATTAAGAAGGGCATCC
TGCAGACAGTGAAGGTGGTGGACGAGCTCGTGAAAGTGATGGGCCGGCACAAGCCCGAGA
ACATCGTGATCGAAATGGCCAGAGAGAACCAGACCACCCAGAAGGGACAGAAGAACAGCCG
CGAGAGAATGAAGCGGATCGAAGAGGGCATCAAAGAGCTGGGCAGCCAGATCCTGAAAGAA
CACCCCGTGGAAAACACCCAGCTGCAGAACGAGAAGCTGTACCTGTACTACCTGCAGAATG
GGCGGGATATGTACGTGGACCAGGAACTGGACATCAACCGGCTGTCCGACTACGATGTGGA
CCATATCGTGCCTCAGAGCTTTCTGAAGGACGACTCCATCGACAACAAGGTGCTGACCAGAA
GCGACAAGAACCGGGGCAAGAGCGACAACGTGCCCTCCGAAGAGGTCGTGAAGAAGATGA
AGAACTACTGGCGGCAGCTGCTGAACGCCAAGCTGATTACCCAGAGAAAGTTCGACAATCTG
ACCAAGGCCGAGAGAGGCGGCCTGAGCGAACTGGATAAGGCCGGCTTCATCAAGAGACAGC
TGGTGGAAACCCGGCAGATCACAAAGCACGTGGCACAGATCCTGGACTCCCGGATGAACAC
TAAGTACGACGAGAATGACAAGCTGATCCGGGAAGTGAAAGTGATCACCCTGAAGTCCAAG
CTGGTGTCCGATTTCCGGAAGGATTTCCAGTTTTACAAAGTGCGCGAGATCAACAACTACCA
CCACGCCCACGACGCCTACCTGAACGCCGTCGTGGGAACCGCCCTGATCAAAAAGTACCCTA
AGCTGGAAAGCGAGTTCGTGTACGGCGACTACAAGGTGTACGACGTGCGGAAGATGATCGC
CAAGAGCGAGCAGGAAATCGGCAAGGCTACCGCCAAGTACTTCTTCTACAGCAACATCATGA
ACTTTTTCAAGACCGAGATTACCCTGGCCAACGGCGAGATCCGGAAGCGGCCTCTGATCGAG
ACAAACGGCGAAACCGGGGAGATCGTGTGGGATAAGGGCCGGGATTTTGCCACCGTGCGGA
AAGTGCTGAGCATGCCCCAAGTGAATATCGTGAAAAAGACCGAGGTGCAGACAGGCGGCTT
CAGCAAAGAGTCTATCCTGCCCAAGAGGAACAGCGATAAGCTGATCGCCAGAAAGAAGGAC
TGGGACCCTAAGAAGTACGGCGGCTTCGACAGCCCCACCGTGGCCTATTCTGTGCTGGTGG
TGGCCAAAGTGGAAAAGGGCAAGTCCAAGAAACTGAAGAGTGTGAAAGAGCTGCTGGGGAT
CACCATCATGGAAAGAAGCAGCTTCGAGAAGAATCCCATCGACTTTCTGGAAGCCAAGGGCT
ACAAAGAAGTGAAAAAGGACCTGATCATCAAGCTGCCTAAGTACTCCCTGTTCGAGCTGGAA
AACGGCCGGAAGAGAATGCTGGCCTCTGCCGGCGAACTGCAGAAGGGAAACGAACTGGCC
CTGCCCTCCAAATATGTGAACTTCCTGTACCTGGCCAGCCACTATGAGAAGCTGAAGGGCTC
CCCCGAGGATAATGAGCAGAAACAGCTGTTTGTGGAACAGCACAAGCACTACCTGGACGAG
ATCATCGAGCAGATCAGCGAGTTCTCCAAGAGAGTGATCCTGGCCGACGCTAATCTGGACAA
AGTGCTGTCCGCCTACAACAAGCACCGGGATAAGCCCATCAGAGAGCAGGCCGAGAATATCA
TCCACCTGTTTACCCTGACCAATCTGGGAGCCCCTGCCGCCTTCAAGTACTTTGACACCACC
ATCGACCGGAAGAGGTACACCAGCACCAAAGAGGTGCTGGACGCCACCCTGATCCACCAGA
GCATCACCGGCCTGTACGAGACACGGATCGACCTGTCTCAGCTGGGAGGTGACTCTGGCGG
CTCAAAAAGAACCGCCGACGGCAGCGAATTCGAGCCCAAGAAGAAGAGGAAAGTCTAA
ACG
hSynpromoter
C-termNpu
C-termwtCas9
pLenti-U6-DNMT1_nicking_sgRNA:
AAGGCTGTTAGAGAGATAATTAGAATTAATTTGACTGTAAACACAAAGATATTAGTACAAAATACGTGACGTA
GAAAGTAATAATTTCTTGGGTAGTTTGCAGTTTTAAAATTATGTTTTAAAATGGACTATCATATGCTTACCGTA
ACTTGAAAGTATTTCGATTTCTTGGCTTTATATATCTTGTGGAAAGGACGAAACACC
GCCGCGCGCGCGAA
AAAGCCGGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAAATAAGGCTAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTG
GCACCGAGTCGGTGC
TTTTTTAAGCTTGGCGTAACTAGATCTTGAGACAAATGGCAGTATTCATCCA
U6promoter
sgRNA
Amino acid sequences of Maloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (M-MLV RT) variants used herein.
PE1 M-MLV RT:
M3 M-MLV RT (D200N, T330P, L603W) (see Baranauskas et al.182):
PE2 M-MLV RT (D200N, T306K, W313F, T330P, L603W):
M3-deadRT M-MLV RT:
Each of the following references are cited in Example 12, each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Background and Rationale
In the proposed genome editing strategy, the Cas9-nicked non-target DNA strand (PAM-containing strand that forms the R-loop) acts as the primer for DNA synthesis. It is hypothesized that this is possible based on several pieces of biochemical and structural data. Nuclease protection experiments32, crystallographic studies33, and base editing windows4,24 have demonstrated a large degree of flexibility and disorder for the non-target strand nucleotides −20 through −10 within the so-called R-loop of the Cas9-bound complex (numbering indicates distance 5′ from first PAM nucleotide). Moreover, the PAM-distal portion of the cleaved non-target strand can be displaced from tightly bound ternary complexes when complementary ssDNA is added in trans20. These studies support that the non-target strand is highly flexible, is accessible to enzymes, and that after nicking, the 3′ terminus of the PAM-distal fragment is released prior to Cas9 dissociation. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that gRNAs can be extended to template DNA synthesis. Prior studies have shown that gRNAs for SpCas9, SaCas9, and LbCas12a (formerly Cpf1) tolerate gRNA extensions with RNA aptamers34, ligand-inducible self-cleaving ribozymes35, and long non-coding RNAs36. This literature establishes precedent for two major features that will be exploited. In assessing this strategy, several CRISPR-Cas systems will be evaluated in conjunction with 5′ and 3′ extended gRNA designs using a combination of in vitro and cellular assays (
Designs for engineered gRNAs for TRT editing are shown in
Preliminary Results
Cas9 nicked DNA primes reverse transcription of gRNA templates. To evaluate the accessibility of the nicked non-target DNA strand, in vitro biochemical assays were performed using the Cas9 nuclease from S. pyogenes (SpCas9) and Cy5 fluorescently labeled duplex DNA substrates (51 base pairs). First, a series of gRNAs containing 5′ extensions with varying synthesis template lengths were prepared by in vitro transcription (overall design shown in
Next, non-nicked dsDNA substrates were evaluated using the Cas9(H840A) mutant, which nicks the non-target DNA strand. First, to test Cas9(H840A) nickase activity with 5′-extended gRNAs, in vitro cleavage assays were performed as previously described37. Although nicking was impaired by comparison to the standard gRNA, appreciable cleavage products were formed (
Finally, 3′ gRNA extensions were evaluated for Cas9(H840A) nicking and TPRT. By comparison to 5′-extended gRNAs, DNA cleavage by 3′-extended gRNAs was not impaired to any detectable extent compared to the standard gRNA. Significantly, 3′-extended gRNA templates also supported efficient reverse transcription with both pre-nicked and intact duplex DNA substrates when M-MLV RT was supplied in trans (
Cas9-TPRT uses nicked DNA and gRNA in cis. Dual color experiments were used to determine if the RT reaction preferentially occurs with the gRNA in cis (bound in the same complex) (see
Testing TPRT with Other Cas Systems
Similar experiments to those presented in the previous sections will be carried out using other Cas systems, including Cas9 from S. aureus and Cas12a from L. bacterium (see
Testing TPRT with RT-Cas9 Fusion Proteins
A series of commercially available or purifiable RT enzymes will first be evaluated in trans for TPRT activity. In addition to the already tested RT from M-MLV, the RT from Avian Myeloblastosis Virus (AMV), the Geobacillus stearothermophilus Group II Intron (GsI-IIC)41,42, and the Eubacterium rectale group II intron (Eu.re.I2)43,44 will be evaluated. Significantly, the latter two RTs perform TPRT in their natural biological contexts. Where relevant, RNAse inactivating mutations and other potentially beneficial RT enzyme modifications will be tested. Once functional RTs are identified when supplied in trans, each will be evaluated as a fusion protein to Cas9 variants. Both N-terminus and C-terminus fusion orientations will be tested, along with various linker lengths and architectures. Kinetic time course experiments will be used to determine whether TPRT can occur using the RT enzyme in cis. If an RT-Cas9 fusion architecture can be constructed that allows for efficient TPRT chemistry, this will greatly increase the likelihood of functional editing in the context of a cell.
Cas9 Targeting with Engineered gRNAs in Cells
Candidate engineered gRNAs developed in the previous sub-aims will be evaluated in human cell culture experiments (HEK293) to confirm Cas9 targeting efficiency. Using established indel formation assays employing wild type SpCas945, engineered gRNAs will be compared side-by-side with standard gRNAs across 5 or more sites in the human genome. Genome editing efficiency will be characterized by amplicon sequencing in multiplex using the Illumina MiSeq platform housed in the laboratory. It is anticipated that results from this and the preceding sections will generate insights that inform subsequent iterations of the design-build-test cycle, where gRNAs can be optimized for both templating reverse transcription and efficient Cas9 targeting in cells.
Results of in vitro validations are shown in
Potential Difficulties and Alternatives
(1) RT does not function as a fusion: molecular crowding and/or unfavorable geometries could encumber polymerase extension by Cas9-fused RT enzymes. First, linker optimization can be tested. Circularly permutated variants of Cas9, which could re-orient the spatial relationship between the DNA primer, gRNA, and RT enzyme, will be evaluated. Non-covalent RT recruitment strategies as detailed in Aim 2 can be tested. (2) Decreased Cas targeting efficiency by extended gRNA variants: this is most likely to be an issue for 5′-extended gRNAs. Based on structural data24, Cas9 mutants can be designed and screened to identify variants with greater tolerance to gRNA extension. In addition, gRNA libraries could be screened in cells for linkers that improve targeting activity.
Significance
These preliminary results establish that Cas9 nickases and extended gRNAs can initiate target-primed reverse transcription on bound DNA targets using a reverse transcriptase supplied in trans. Importantly, Cas9 binding was found to be critically important for product formation. Though perhaps not an absolute requirement for genome editing in cells, further development of the system that incorporates RT enzyme function in cis would significantly increase the likelihood of success in cell-based applications. Achievement of the remaining aspects of this Aim would provide a molecular foundation for carrying out precision genome editing in the context of the human genome.
2. Establish Prime Editing in Human Cells.
Background and Rationale
In the proposed strategy, an engineered RT-Cas9:gRNA complex will introduce mutagenic 3′ DNA flaps at genomic target sites. It is hypothesized that mutagenic 3′ flaps containing a single mismatch will be incorporated by the DNA repair machinery through energetically accessible equilibration with adjacent 5′ flaps, which would be preferentially removed (
Preliminary Result
DNA flaps induce site-specific mutagenesis in plasmid model substrates in yeast and HEK cells. To test the proposed editing strategy, studies were initiated with model plasmid substrates containing mutagenic 3′ flaps that resemble the product of TPRT. A dual fluorescent protein reporter was created that encodes a stop codon between GFP and mCherry. Mutagenic flaps encode a correction to the stop codon (
Systematic Studies with Model Flap Substrates
Based on the preliminary results described above, a broader spectrum of flap substrates will be evaluated in HEK cells to infer principles of efficient editing. 3′ ssDNA flaps will be systematically varied to determine the influence of mismatch pairings, the location of the mutagenic nucleotide along the flap, and the identity of the terminal nucleotide (
In vitro TPRT on plasmid substrates leads to efficient editing outcomes. TPRT reactions developed in Aim 1 were used to induce mutagenesis within a plasmid substrate. The reaction was carried out on circular DNA plasmid substrates (see
This result establishes that long double stranded substrates can undergo TPRT, and that TPRT products induce editing in eukaryotic cells.
Another experiment similar to the foregoing prime editing experiment was carried out, but instead of installing a point mutation in the stop codon, TRT editing installs a single nucleotide insertion (left) or deletion (right) that repairs a frameshift mutation and allows for synthesis of downstream mCherry (see
Establish Prime Editing in HEK Cells Using RT-Cas9 Architectures
The optimized constructs from previous aims will be adapted for mammalian expression and editing at targeted sites in the human genome. Multiple RT enzymes and fusion architectures will be tested, in addition to adjacent targeting with secondary gRNAs (truncated to prevent nicking). Non-covalent RT recruitment will also be evaluated using the Sun-Tag system52 and MS2 aptamer system53. Indel formation assays will be used to evaluate targeting efficiency with standard gRNAs and RT-Cas9 fusions (as above). Then, for each genomic site, extended gRNAs and RT-Cas9 pairs will be assayed for single nucleotide editing. Editing outcomes will be evaluated with MiSeq.
Initial experiments in HEK cells were performed using Cas9-RT fusions. Editing by components expressed within cells requires a Cas9(H840A) nickase, a reverse transcriptase (expressed as a fusion or supplied in trans), and an engineered gRNA with a 3′ extension (see
Optimize Prime Editing Parameters in HEK Cells
After identifying Cas9-RT architectures that can perform prime editing in cells, the components and design will be optimized to achieve high efficiency editing. The location and nucleotide identity of the encoded point mutation, and the total length of the newly synthesized DNA strand, will be varied to evaluate editing scope and potential limitations. Short insertion and deletion mutations will also be evaluated. Protein expression constructs will be codon optimized. If successful, this would establish efficient prime editing in mammalian cells.
Preliminary Result. Additional gRNAs were designed to bring the RT enzyme to a higher local concentration at the editing locus, in the event that intramolecular reverse transcription by the fused RT enzyme were not possible. These auxiliary guides are truncated at the 5′ end (14-15 nt spacer), which has previously been shown to prevent Cas9 cutting but retain binding (see
Potential Difficulties and Alternatives
1) gRNA degradation in cells: if extended gRNA termini are truncated in cells, stabilizing secondary structures could be installed, or synthetic gRNAs with stabilizing modifications could be tested. (2) No observed editing in human cells: additional strategies will be explored, including secondary targeting of RT-Cas9 fusions to adjacent genomic sites54. In addition, potential directed evolution strategies in E. coli or S. cerevisiae could be explored.
Significance
If prime editing could be established in experimental cell lines, this would have an immediate impact for basic biomedical research by enabling the rapid generation and characterization of a large number of point mutations in human genes. The generality of the method, and its orthogonal editing window with respect to base editors, would provide an approach to installing many currently inaccessible mutations. Moreover, if prime editing could be optimized for high efficiency and product purity, its potential applicability to correcting disease mutations in other human cell types would be significant.
3. Achieve Site-Specific Editing of Pathogenic Mutations in Cultured Human Cells.
Background and Rationale.
A large number of pathogenic mutations cannot be corrected by current base editors due to PAM restrictions, or a need for transversion or indel mutation correction. With prime editing, all transitions and transversions are theoretically possible, as may be small insertions and deletions. Moreover, in relation to the PAM, the prime editing window (anticipated −3 to +4) is distinct from that of base editors (−18 to −12) (
Preliminary Results.
T to a Editing in HEK3 Cells is not Achievable by Current Base Editing but is Achievable by TRPT Editing (See
T to a Editing at HEK3 Site by TRPT Editing Results Displays High Purity.
MLV RT Mutants Improve Editing.
Mutant reverse transcriptases, described in Baranauskas, et al (doi:10.1093/protein/gzs034), were tested as C-terminal fusions to the Cas9(H840A) nickase for target nucleotide editing in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells. Cas9-RT editor plasmid was co-transfected with a plasmid encoding a 3′-prime editing guide RNA that templates reverse transcription. Editing efficiency at the target nucleotide (blue bars) is shown alongside indel rates (orange bars) in
Complementary Strand Nicking with a Second gRNA Improves Editing.
This experiment evaluates editing efficiency of the target nucleotide when a single strand nick is introduced in the complementary DNA strand in proximity to the target nucleotide, with the hypothesis being that this would direct mismatch repair to preferentially remove the original nucleotide and convert the base pair to the desired edit. The Cas9(H840A)-RT editing construct was co-transfected with two guide RNA encoding plasmids, one of which templates the reverse transcription reaction, while the other targets the complementary DNA strand for nicking. Nicking at various distances from the target nucleotide was tested (orange triangles) (see
Scope. The potential scope for the new editing technology is shown in
The new prime editing technology could theoretically install any nucleotide and base pair conversion, and potentially small insertion and deletion edits as well. With respect to the PAM, prime editing windows start at the site of DNA nicking (3 bases upstream of the PAM) and end at an as-of-yet undetermined position downstream of the PAM. Of note, this editing window is distinct from that of deaminase base editors. Because the TPRT systems performs editing using DNA polymerase enzymes, it potentially has all of their benefits including generality, precision, and fidelity.
Correct Pathogenic Mutations in Patient-Derived Cell Lines.
Cell lines harboring the relevant mutations (sickle cell disease: CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells; Wilson's disease: cultured fibroblasts; cystic fibrosis: cultured bronchial epithelia) will be obtained from ATCC, the Coriell Biobank, or collaborating Harvard/Broad affiliate laboratories. Editing efficiency will be evaluated by high throughput sequencing, and the efficacy of the corrected genotype will be tested using phenotypic assays (hemoglobin HPLC, ATP7B immunostaining, and CFTR membrane potential assays).
Characterize Off-Target Editing Activity.
Potential off-target editing will be screened with established methods such as GUIDE-seq55 and CIRCLE-seq56 using target gRNAs paired with wild type Cas9. If potential off-targets are identified, these loci will be probed in TPRT edited cells to identify true off-target editing events.
Potential Difficulties and Alternatives.
(1) Low editing efficiency: prime editor (PE)s may require optimization for each target. In this case, gRNA libraries can be tested to identify the highest functioning variants for specific applications. RT-Cas fusion expression and nuclear localization can be optimized. Liposomal RNP delivery could be used to limit off-target editing.
Upcoming Experiments.
Optimization of gRNA designs can be achieved by further exploration of the primer binding site length and extension of synthesis template. Testing scope and generality will include different nucleotide conversions, small insertions and deletions, as well as, different editing positions with respect to PAM, and multiple sites in the human genome. Optimization of RT component will include exploring mutations in MLV RT to enhance activity (Rnase H inactivation, increase primer-template binding affinity, adjustments to processivity), and new RT enzymes (group II intro RTs, other retroviral RTs).
Significance.
Myriad genetic disorders result from single nucleotide changes in individual genes. Developing the genome editing technology described here, and applying it in disease-relevant cell types, would establish a foundation for translation to the clinic. For some diseases, such as Sickle Cell Disease, a single point mutation represents the dominant genotype throughout the population. However, for many other genetic disorders, a large heterogeneity of different point mutations within a single gene is observed throughout the patient population, each of which gives rise to a similar disease phenotype. Therefore, as a general genome editing method that could in theory target a large number of such mutations, this technology could provide enormous potential benefit to many of these patients and their families. If proof of principle for these applications could be established in cells, it would establish the foundation to studies in animal models of disease.
Advantages
Precision: the desired edit is encoded directed in nucleic acid sequence. Generality: in theory, could be possible to make any base pair conversion, including transversion edits, as well as small insertions or deletions. There is a distinct editing window from that of base editors with respect to Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence. This method achieves many of the editing capabilities of homology-directed repair (HDR), but without the major limitations of HDR (inefficient in most cell types, and is usually accompanied by an excess of undesired byproducts such as indels). Also, it does not make double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs, so few indels, translocations, large deletions, p53 activation, etc.
The prime editing systems (i.e., PE systems) described herein may also be used to introduce various peptide tags into protein coding genes. Such tags can include HEXAhistidine tags, FLAG-tag, V5-tag, GCN4-tag, HA-tag, Myc-tag and others. This approach may be useful in applications such as protein fluorescent labeling, immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry, protein recruitment, inducible protein degrons, and genome-wide screening. Embodiments are depicted in
DOI: 10.1021/ja017687n). The “sortagging” system employs bacterial sortase enzymes that covalently conjugate labeled peptide probes to proteins containing suitable peptide substrates (see ref: Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007 November; 3(11):707-8. DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.31). The FLAG-tag (DYKDDDDK (SEQ ID NO: 2)), V5-tag (GKPIPNPLLGLDST (SEQ ID NO: 3)), GCN4-tag (EELLSKNYHLENEVARLKK (SEQ ID NO: 4)), HA-tag (YPYDVPDYA (SEQ ID NO: 5)), and Myc-tag (EQKLISEEDL (SEQ ID NO: 6)) are commonly employed as epitope tags for immunoassays. The pi-clamp encodes a peptide sequence (FCPF) (SEQ ID NO: 622) that can by labeled with a pentafluoro-aromatic substrates (ref: Nat. Chem. 2016 February; 8(2):120-8. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2413).
A new method for the insertion of motifs into genetic sequences that tag or otherwise manipulate RNA within mammalian, eukaryotic, and bacterial cells is described herein. While it is estimated that only 1% of the human genome encodes proteins, virtually all of the genome is transcribed at some level. It is an open question how much of the resulting non-coding RNA (ncRNA) plays a functional role, let alone what the roles of most of these putative RNAs are. “Tagging” of these RNA molecules via the insertion of a novel RNA-encoding sequence with a useful property into genes of interest is a useful method for studying the biological functions of RNA molecules in cells. It can also be useful install tags onto protein-encoding mRNAs as a means to perturb and thus better understand how mRNA modifications can affect cellular function. For instance, a ubiquitous natural RNA tag—polyadenylation—is used by cells to affect transport of mRNA into the cytoplasm. Different types of polyadenylation signals result in different transport rates and different mRNA lifespans and—thus—differences in the levels to which the encoded protein is expressed.
A common approach for expressing tagged RNAs within cells is to exogenously introduce a synthetic construct using either (i) transient plasmid transfection that produces a short-term burst of gene expression, often at supraphysiologic levels; or (ii) permanent integration of the tagged RNA gene into the genome (at random sites) using lentiviral integration or transposons, which enables prolonged expression. Both of these approaches are limited by production of altered expression levels, and by the absence of natural mechanisms that regulate the expression or activity of the gene. An alternative strategy is to directly tag a gene of interest at its endogenous locus using homology-directed repair (HDR) of double-stranded DNA breaks induced by Cas9 or other targeted DNA nucleases. While this approach enables the generation of a wide range of endogenously tagged genes, HDR is markedly inefficient and so requires significant screening to identify the desired clonal population of cells that have been successfully tagged. Moreover, HDR is typically very inefficient or entirely inactive in a large number of cell types, most notably in post-mitotic cells. The low efficiency of HDR is further complicated by the generation of undesired indel products, would could be especially problematic in the case of RNA genes as they might lead to the production of an RNA whose activities interfere with the function of normal alleles. Finally, researchers often need to screen various tagging positions within an RNA molecule to achieve optimal performance. Combined, these drawbacks make HDR a less desirable method for installation of tags in RNA.
Prime editing is a new genome editing technology that enables targeted editing of genomic loci via the transfer of genetic information from RNA to DNA. Using prime editing, RNA genes could be tagged with a variety of components such as RNA aptamers, ribozymes, or other RNA motifs. Prime editing has the potential to be faster, cheaper, and effective in a greater variety of cell types by comparison to HDR strategies. As such, the described invention represents a novel, useful, and non-obvious tool for investigating the biology of RNA genes in health and disease. A new method for the insertion of RNA motifs into genetic sequences that tag or otherwise manipulate RNA using prime editors (PEs) is described herein. PEs are capable of site-specifically inserting, mutating, and/or deleting multiple nucleotides at a desired genomic locus that is targetable by a CRISPR/Cas system. PEs are composed of fusions between Cas9 nuclease domains and reverse transcriptase domains. They are guided to their genomic target by engineered PEgRNAs (prime editing guide RNAs), which contain a guide spacer portion for DNA targeting, as well as a template for reverse transcription that encodes the desired genome edit (see
Gene expression could be affected by encoding a 3′ untranslated region (UTR) that results in changes in nuclear transport or retention or mRNA lifespan. For instance, the polyA tail from polyomavirus simian virus 40 (SV40) has additional helper sequences that enable efficient transcription termination and can increase gene expression relative to other 3′ UTRs57-58. Example sequence of SV40 polyA tail:
Post-translational modification signals, besides polyadenylation signals, could also be encoded by PE. These include signals incorporate N6-methyladenosine, N1-methyladenosine, 5-methylcytosine, and pseudouridine modifications59. By using PE to include sequences bound by enzymes that write or remove these modifications within an RNA transcript, it would be possible to induce their writing or erasing. This could be used as a tool to study the effects of these markers, to induce cellular differentiation, affect stress responses, or, given the function of these markers are as yet underexplored, affect targeted cells in other fashions.
PE could encode mutations that affect subcellular localization. For instance, incorporation of tRNA-Lys within an mRNA can theoretically result in transport to the mitochondria60, while various 3′ UTRs can result in nuclear retention or transport61.
SV40 polyA signal results in transport.
U1 snRNA 3′ box results in retention.
Determining the sub-cellular localization of endogenous RNA can be challenging and requires the addition of exogenous, fluorescently-tagged nucleotide probes, as in the case of FISH, or time-consuming and potentially inaccurate cell fractionation followed by RNA detection. Encoding a probe within the endogenous RNA would obviate many of these issues. One example would be to encode a fluorescent RNA aptamer, such as Spinach62 or Broccoli within an endogenous RNA, thereby visualizing the presence of that RNA via addition of a small molecule proto-fluorophore.
Broccoli Aptamer:
PE could insert or remove sequences that encode RNA that are recognized by RNA binding proteins, affecting RNA stability, expression, localization, or modification (for instance, see proteins listed63).
PE could insert sequences that encode sgRNAs within the genome, as a viral or cancer defense mechanism. Similarly, it could be used to insert microRNAs (e.g., pre-microRNAs) to direct silencing of targeted genes.
PE could insert sequences resulting in processing of the RNA, either by itself, or by external factors, either as a therapy or tool for studying the function of various portions of the RNA. For instance, the HDV ribozyme64, when included within an RNA sequence, results in processing of the RNA immediately 5′ of the ribozyme, while the hammerhead ribozyme cleaves prior to the third stem within the ribozyme65. Other self-cleaving ribozymes include pistol66, hatchet66, hairpin67, Neuropora Varkud satellite68, glmS69, twister70, and twister sister66. These sequences could include wild-type or engineered or evolved versions of ribozymes. The majority of these ribozymes could have different sequences depending on the region of RNA into which they were associated, depending on where the ribozyme cut site is located. Sequences that would direct the processing of the RNA by external factors, such as sequence specific RNAses71, RNAses that recognize specific structures72—such as Dicer73 and Drosha74, could also be achieved.
HDV Ribozyme:
The following references are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Precise genome targeting technologies using the CRISPR/Cas system have recently been explored in a wide range of applications, including the insertion of engineered DNA sequences into targeted genomic loci. Previously, homology-directed repair (HDR) has been used for this application, requiring an ssDNA donor template and repair initiation by means of a double-stranded DNA break (DSB). This strategy offers the broadest range of possible changes to be made in cells and is the only method available to insert large DNA sequences into mammalian cells. However, HDR is hampered by undesired cellular side effects stemming from its initiating DSB, such as high levels of indel formation, DNA translocations, large deletions, and P53 activation. In addition to these drawbacks, HDR is limited by low efficiency in many cell types (T cells are a notable exception to this observation). Recent efforts to overcome these drawbacks include fusing human Rad51 mutants to a Cas9 D10A nickase (RDN), resulting in a DSB-free HDR system that features improved HDR product:indel ratios and lower off target editing, but is still hampered by cell-type dependencies and only modest HDR editing efficiency.
Recently developed fusions of Cas9 to reverse transcriptases (“Prime editors”) coupled with PEgRNAs represent a novel genome editing technology that offers a number of advantages over existing genome editing methods, including the ability to install any single nucleotide substitution, and to insert or delete any short stretch of nucleotides (up to at least several dozen bases) in a site-specific manner. Notably, PE edits are achieved with generally low rates of unintended indels. As such, PE enables targeted insertion-based editing applications that have been previously impossible or impractical.
This particular invention describes a method for using prime editing as a means to insert known immunogenicity epitopes into endogenous or foreign genomic DNA, resulting in modification of the corresponding proteins for therapeutic or biotechnological applications (see
The key concept of the invention is the use of prime editors to insert a nucleotide sequence containing previously described immunogenicity epitopes into endogenous or foreign genomic DNA for the downregulation and/or destruction of their protein products and/or expressing cell types. Nucleotide sequences for immunogenic epitope insertion would be targeted to genes in a manner to produce fusion proteins of the targeted gene's coded protein and the inserted immunogenic epitope's corresponding protein translation. Patient's immune systems will have been previously trained to recognize these epitopes as a result of standard prior immunization from routine vaccination against, for example, tetanus or diphtheria or measles. As a result of the immunogenic nature of the fused epitopes, patient's immune systems would be expected to recognize and disable the prime edited protein (not just the inserted epitope) and potentially the cells from which it was expressed.
Fusions to targeted genes would be engineered as needed to ensure the inserted epitope protein translation is exposed for immune system recognition. This could include targeted nucleotide insertions resulting in protein translations yielding C-terminal fusions of immunogenicity epitopes to targeted genes, N-terminal fusions of immunogenicity epitopes to targeted genes, or the insertion of nucleotides into genes so that immunogenicity epitopes are coded within surfaced-exposed regions of protein structure.
Protein linkers encoded as nucleotides inserted between the target gene sequence and the inserted immunogenicity epitope nucleotide sequence may need to be engineered as part of this invention to facilitate immune system recognition, cellular trafficking, protein function, or protein folding of the targeted gene. These inserted nucleotide-encoded protein linkers may include (but are not limited to) variable lengths and sequences of the XTEN linker or variable lengths and sequences of Glycine-Serine linkers. These engineered linkers have been previous used to successfully facilitate protein fusions.
Distinguishing features of this invention include the ability to use previously acquired immune responses to specific amino acid sequences as a means to induce an immune response against otherwise non-immunogenic proteins. Another distinguishing feature is the ability to insert the nucleotide sequences of these immunogenic epitopes in a targets manner that does not induce high levels of unwanted indels as a by-product editing and is efficient in its insertion. The invention discussed herein also has the ability to combine cell type-specific delivery methods (such as AAV serotypes) to insert epitopes in cell types that are of interest to trigger an immune response to.
Prime editing as a means of inserting immunogenic epitopes into pathogenic genes could be used to program the patient's immune system to fight a wide variety of diseases (not limited to cancer as with immuno-oncology strategies). An immediately relevant use of this technology would be as a cancer therapeutic as it could undermine a tumor's immune escape mechanism by causing an immune response to a relevant oncogene like HER2 or growth factors like EGFR. Such an approach could seem similar to T-cell engineering, but one novel advance of this approach is that it can be utilized in many cell types and for diseases beyond cancer, without needed to generate and introduce engineered T-cells into patients.
Using PE to insert an immunogenicity epitope which most people are already vaccinated against (tetanus, pertussis, diphtheria, measles, mumps, rubella, etc.) into a foreign or endogenous gene that drives a disease, so the patient's immune system learns to disable that protein.
Diseases that stand to have a potential therapeutic benefit from the aforementioned strategy include those caused by aggregation of toxic proteins, such as in fatal familial insomnia. Other diseases that could benefit include those caused by pathogenic overexpression of an otherwise nontoxic endogenous protein, and those caused by foreign pathogens.
Primary therapeutic indications include those mentioned above such as therapeutics for cancer, prion and other neurodegenerative diseases, infectious diseases, and preventative medicine. Secondary therapeutic indications may include preventative care for patients with late-onset genetic diseases. It is expected that current standard of care medicines may be used in conjunction with prime editing for some diseases, like particularly aggressive cancers, or in cases where medications help alleviate disease symptoms until the disease completely cured.
Below are examples of immunogenic epitopes that can by inserted by prime editing can be used to achieve:
Below are additional examples of epitopes that may be integrated into a target gene for immunoepitope taggin:
The following references are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
The prime editors described herein may also be used to place dimerization-induced biological processes, such as receptor signaling, under control of a convenient small-molecule drug by the genomic integration of genes encoding small-molecule binding proteins with prime editing is described herein. Using the prime editors described herein, the gene sequence encoding a small-molecule binding protein may be inserted within a gene encoding a target protein of interest in a living cell or patient. This edit alone should have no physiological effect. Upon administration of the small-molecule drug, which typically is a dimeric small molecule that can simultaneously bind to two drug-binding protein domains each of which is fused to a copy of the target protein, the small-molecule induces dimerization of the targeted protein. This target protein dimerization event then induces a biological signaling event, such as erythropoiesis or insulin signaling.
This Example describes the use of multi-flap prime editing, specifically using dual prime editors, for the precise insertion of new DNA sequence, the precise deletion of endogenous genomic DNA sequence, or the replacement of an endogenous genomic DNA sequence with a new DNA sequence. See
Previously, homology directed repair (HDR) of nuclease-induced double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) has been used to insert, delete, or replace DNA sequences in the genomes of living cells. While versatile, the low efficiency of HDR limits its application in many mammalian cell types, especially therapeutically relevant human cell types1-4. Moreover, the generation of DSBs leads to preferential repair by error-prone end-joining mechanisms that produce insertion and deletion (indel) repair products which cannot be subsequently converted to the desired edited DNA sequence5-10. As a result, indels typically represent the majority of modified genomic DNA products when nucleases are used in mammalian cells. Moreover, DSBs generated by nucleases can lead to undesired genomic changes such as large deletions and chromosomal translocations11, and the activation of p5312,13. Structural variants (SVs) can also be generated or corrected using programmable nucleases without relying on homologous recombination, though nuclease-based strategies suffer similar drawbacks for these applications. For example, dual-cutting strategies can be used to invert a targeted genomic DNA sequence, but most product alleles contain large deletions between the cut sites instead of the desired inverted sequence, or indels at the individual cut sites.
Prime editing is a recently reported genome editing technology that enables the insertion, deletion, or replacement of genomic DNA sequences without requiring error-prone double-strand DNA breaks14. Prime editing uses an engineered Cas9 nickase-reverse transcriptase fusion protein (PE1 or PE2) paired with an engineered prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA) that both directs Cas9 to the target genomic site and encodes the information for installing the desired edit. Prime editing proceeds through a multi-step editing process: 1) the Cas9 domain binds and nicks the target genomic DNA site, which is specified by the pegRNA's spacer sequence; 2) the reverse transcriptase domain uses the nicked genomic DNA as a primer to initiate the synthesis of an edited DNA strand using an engineered extension on the pegRNA as a template for reverse transcription—this generates a single-stranded 3′ flap containing the edited DNA sequence; 3) cellular DNA repair resolves the 3′ flap intermediate by the displacement of a 5′ flap species that occurs via invasion by the edited 3′ flap, excision of the 5′ flap containing the original DNA sequence, and ligation of the new 3′ flap to incorporate the edited DNA strand, forming a heteroduplex of one edited and one unedited strand; and 4) cellular DNA repair replaces the unedited strand within the heteroduplex using the edited strand as a template for repair, completing the editing process.
Efficient incorporation of the desired edit requires that the newly synthesized 3′ flap contains a portion of sequence that is homologous to the genomic DNA site. This homology enables the edited 3′ flap to compete with the endogenous DNA strand (the corresponding 5′ flap) for incorporation into the DNA duplex. Because the edited 3′ flap will contain less sequence homology than the endogenous 5′ flap, the competition is expected to favor the 5′ flap strand. Thus, the 3′ flap, which contains the edit, may fail to effectively invade and displace the 5′ flap strand. Moreover, successful 3′ flap invasion and removal of the 5′ flap only incorporates the edit on one strand of the double-stranded DNA genome. Permanent installation of the edit requires cellular DNA repair to replace the unedited complementary DNA strand using the edited strand as a template. While the cell can be made to favor replacement of the unedited strand over the edited strand (step 4 above) by the introduction of a nick in the unedited strand adjacent to the edit using a secondary sgRNA (the PE3 system), this process still relies on a second stage of DNA repair. These DNA repair steps may be particularly inefficient for edits which require equilibration of long 5′ and 3′ flap intermediates or contain long non-homologous regions, such as long insertions or long deletions.
This Example describes a dual prime editing system (or a dual-flap prime editing system) that addresses the challenges associated with flap equilibration and subsequent incorporation of the edit into the non-edited complementary genomic DNA strand by simultaneously editing both DNA strands. In the dual-flap prime editing system, two pegRNAs are used to target opposite strands of a genomic site and direct the synthesis of two complementary 3′ flaps containing edited DNA sequence (
Depending on the orientation of the staggered DNA nicks generated by dual prime editors, the system can either replace the sequence between the two nicks with a new desired sequence (5′ overhang staggered orientation), or insert new DNA sequence with concomitant target site duplication (3′ overhang staggered orientation).
Dual-Flap Prime Editing at the HEK293 Site 3 Locus
Dual-flap prime editing at the HEK293 site 3 locus in human cells (HEK293T) was used to achieve highly efficient introduction of heterologous DNA sequences. For example, replacement of a 90-bp sequence in the locus with a new 22-bp sequence that encodes a 6×His tag occurred with greater than 80% efficiency (
Dual-Flap Prime Editing pegRNAs
The general designs of pegRNAs used for dual-flap prime editing are shown in
Use of Dual-Flap Prime Editing to Install Recombination Sites
Dual-flap prime editing has many potential applications, such as installing peptide tags, RNA tags, immunoepitopes, dimerization domains, and recombinase target sites.
One such application is the installation of recombinase or integrase sequences at user-specified locations in the genome.
Dual-flap prime editing can be used to introduce one or two recombinase sites at targeted positions in the human genome. If single recombinase sites are inserted, these can be used as landing sites for a recombinase-mediated reaction between the genomic recombinase site and a second recombinase site within an exogenously supplied DNA, such as a plasmid. This enables the targeted integration of DNA cargo. If two recombinase sites are inserted in adjacent regions of DNA, depending on the orientation of the recombinase sites, these can be used for recombinase-mediated excision or inversion of the intervening sequence, or for recombinase-mediated cassette exchange with exogenous DNA for cargo integration. Integration of compatible recombinase sites on different chromosomes enables targeted and directional chromosomal translocation. Dual-flap prime editing can be used to efficiently introduce recombinase sites at a number of loci in the human genome (
This Example describes the use of multi-flap prime editing, specifically quadruple-flap prime editing, for targeted insertion, deletion, duplication, and replacement of endogenous genomic DNA sequences, and for targeted genomic DNA sequence inversion, targeted chromosomal translocation, and targeted integration of exogenous DNA. This technology has the potential to address long-standing objectives in genome engineering: the programmable installation or correction of structural variants (generally defined as >50 bp of genomic sequence change, often represented by large deletions, insertions/duplications, inversion, and translocations), and the targeted integration of DNA cargo at a specific location in the human genome. The latter could enable gene augmentation therapeutic strategies and other biotechnology applications. This technology could potentially be applied to modify or edit the genome of any living cell for research, therapeutic, or industrial applications.
This invention describes a multi-flap prime editing system that addresses the challenges associated with flap equilibration and subsequent incorporation of the edit into the non-edited complementary genomic DNA strand by simultaneously editing both DNA strands. It also expands upon the capabilities of traditional prime editing by allowing the newly synthesized 3′ flaps to direct larger sequence rearrangements.
A quadruple-flap prime editing approach was developed that can directly carry out desired sequence alterations without the need for a recombinase enzyme (as in dual-flap prime editing) but with similar versatility. In quadruple-flap prime editing, four different pegRNA sequences are delivered to cells along with the PE2 editor. One pair of pegRNAs template the synthesis of complementary DNA flaps, as with dual-flap prime editing, while the other pair of pegRNAs template the synthesis of an orthogonal pair of complementary DNA flaps. The location of these flaps, their relative orientation, and the pairing of complementarity dictates which class of rearrangement will occur. The junctions of the rearranged DNA contain the sequence encoded by the pegRNA-templated 3′ flaps, which direct the orientation of the rearrangement and can serve as useful DNA sequence for downstream processes. Targeted genomic sequence inversion was performed with the quadruple-flap prime editing strategy (
Targeted integration of exogenous DNA plasmids was also achieved with quadruple-flap prime editing. In this approach, two pegRNAs target the endogenous genomic DNA site while two pegRNAs target a region on the cargo plasmid. 3′ DNA flaps are synthesized on both the genomic DNA and plasmid DNA so that the plasmid and genomic DNA will be bridged by hybridized 3′ flaps (
A plasmid encoding the expression of a H2B-GFP fusion protein was integrated at the AAVS1 locus in HEK293T cells using quadruple-flap prime editing. This resulted in 1.6% of cells obtaining long-lasting, nuclear localized GFP fluorescence, as assessed by flow cytometry. PCR of a predicted junction showed the expected product containing the pegRNA-templated BxB1 attP sequence (
Chromosomal translocations were also performed using quadruple flap prime editing (
Dual flap prime editing at the IDS locus was performed with 12 pairs of pegRNAs and PE2. HEK293T cells were transfected with PE2 and different pairs of pegRNAs (e.g., in the first column pegRNA A1_a and pegRNA B2_a with templates for installing attP site in the forward direction). The efficiency was measured by HTS. This data showed that dual-flap editing can successfully insert the sequence of interest to the IDS locus with an efficiency up to ˜80% (
Dual-flap-mediated duplication was also performed at the AAVS1 locus in 293T cells (
Multi-flap prime editing induced translocation of MYC-CCR5 was also performed (
Dual-flap and quadruple-flap prime editing were also performed in other human cell lines (
Inversion efficiency was also measured by HTS at the CCR5 locus (
Next, HEK293T cells were transfected with the plasmids that express Exo1, Fen1, Red Fluorescence Protein (control), DNA2, Mlh1 neg, and P53 inhibitor with pegRNA and PE2 (
Dual-flap-mediated sequence duplication was also performed at the AAVS1 locus (
Targeted IDS genomic sequence inversion was also performed with quadruple-flap prime editing (
It was also found that PegRNA 3′ motif modification improves dual-flap editing efficiency at the IDS locus (
The targeted deletion, replacement, integration, or inversion of DNA sequences at specified locations in the genome can in principle be used to study or treat many human genetic diseases. However, it remains challenging to precisely and efficiently carry out these DNA sequence transformations in the context of a mammalian cell genome. Presented herein is twin prime editing (twinPE), a method for the programmable replacement or excision of DNA sequence at endogenous human genomic sites without requiring double-strand DNA breaks. twinPE employs a prime editor (PE) protein and two prime editing guide RNAs (pegRNAs) that template the synthesis of complementary DNA flaps on opposing strands of genomic DNA, resulting in the replacement of endogenous DNA sequence between the PE-induced nick sites with pegRNA-encoded sequences. It is shown herein that twinPE can perform precise deletions of up to 780 bp and precise replacements of genomic DNA sequence with new sequences of up to 108 bp. By combining single or multiplexed twinPE with site-specific serine recombinases, it is demonstrated that targeted integration of gene-sized DNA plasmids at safe-harbor loci including AAVS1, CCR5, and ALB, and further, a 39-kb inversion at IDS that could be used to correct a common Hunter syndrome allele is also demonstrated. TwinPE substantially expands genome editing capabilities without requiring double-strand DNA breaks and, in combination with other genome editing tools, enables the correction or complementation of complex pathogenic allele variants in human cells.
Disease-associated human genetic variants arise through a variety of sequence changes, ranging from single-base pair substitutions to mega base-scale deletions and rearrangements. Genome editing approaches that can install, correct, or complement these pathogenic variants in human cells have the potential to advance understanding of human genetic disease and could lead to the development of novel therapeutics. Recently, several genome editing approaches based on CRISPR-Cas systems have been developed for genome editing, including nucleases, base editors, and prime editors. CRISPR-Cas nucleases, when used with one guide RNA, can be used to disrupt genes through the generation of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) that lead to stochastic indels. Base editors can be used to precisely install C•G-to-T•A or A•T-to-G•C transition base pair edits, or C•G-to-G•C base pair edits. Prime editors can precisely install of any one of the twelve base pair substitution edits as well as small to medium-sized insertions and deletions. However, these strategies alone are not directly applicable for making more substantial genome edits, such as large deletions, insertions, replacements, or inversions.
Previously, paired Cas9 nuclease strategies have been developed for the targeted deletion of genomic DNA sequences ranging from ˜50 to >100,000 base pairs in length. Moreover, by providing a linear donor DNA sequence, targeted insertion of new DNA sequences can be performed at single cut sites or between paired cut sites through end-joining or homology-directed DNA repair processes. While versatile in many ways, single-nuclease and paired-nuclease approaches are accompanied by several drawbacks. First, the use of paired nucleases for deletions can generate multiple on-target byproducts, including the desired deletion with indels, indels at individual DSB sites without the desired deletion, undesired inversion of the DNA sequence between DSB sites, and unintended integration of exogenous DNA sequence at DSB sites. Furthermore, the precise location of the deletions is restricted by PAM availability and the corresponding cut sites generated by the nuclease. Similar restrictions and byproducts exist for DNA donor knock-in, which often occurs without control of sequence orientation when homology-independent approaches are used. Finally, the simultaneous generation of multiple DSBs at on-target and off-target sites, which becomes more likely with additional guide RNAs, can lead to off-target genome modification, chromosomal rearrangements, or chromothripsis. Therefore, considerable challenges exist relating to product control and purity when applying nuclease-based editing strategies for the excision, replacement, or insertion of larger DNA sequences.
Prime editing has been shown to be capable of making precise insertions of up to ˜40 bp and deletions of up to ˜80 bp in human cells with high desired product to byproduct ratios. In principle, prime editing could be used to circumvent many of the challenges associated with nucleases by avoiding the generation of DSBs. However, prime editing has not yet been shown to mediate larger insertions and deletions of the size of typical gene coding sequences, and the presumed mechanism of simple prime editing reactions makes these larger DNA changes difficult by requiring long pegRNA reverse transcription templates. Site-specific DNA recombinase enzymes have the ability to perform several DNA transformations, including excision, inversion, integration, or exchange of large DNA sequences. However, challenges with reprogramming site-specific recombinases currently makes it challenging to apply for genome engineering and editing applications.
Presented herein is the development of twin prime editing (twinPE), which enables the deletion, substitution, or insertion of DNA sequence at endogenous genomic sites with high efficiencies in human cells. In addition to these changes, it is shown that twinPE can be used to integrate one or more recombinase recognition sites with high efficiency at targeted sites in the human genome, which can subsequently be used as substrates for site-specific serine recombinase enzymes that enable the targeted integration of genetic cargo or the targeted inversion of genomic DNA sequence.
Results
Prime editing uses a prime editor protein comprising a fusion of a catalytically impaired Cas9 nickase and a wild-type (PE1) or engineered (PE2) MMLV reverse transcriptase enzyme, and a prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA) that both specifies the target genomic site and encodes the desired edit. Upon target site recognition, PE•pegRNA complexes nick the PAM-containing DNA strand and directly reverse transcribe the pegRNA's RT template into genomic DNA using the nicked strand as a primer. Following reverse transcription, the newly synthesized 3′ flap invades the adjacent DNA, to which it is largely homologous, to replace the redundant 5′ flap sequence. The opposing nonedited strand is then repaired using the edited DNA strand as a template. This proposed editing pathway therefore presents two opportunities at which cellular DNA repair can reject the desired edit and revert the DNA sequence to its original form.
It was predicted that bypassing potentially disfavored steps in DNA repair could allow prime editing to occur with increased efficiency and enable distinct classes of genome edits. Furthermore, a twin prime editing (twinPE) strategy that uses a pair of pegRNAs, each of which targets one or the other DNA strand and templates the synthesis of a 3′ flap DNA sequence that is complementary to the sequence templated by the other pegRNA was envisioned (
To evaluate the twinPE strategy, the HEK site 3 locus (previously referred to as HEK3) in HEK293T was targeted to replace 90 bp of endogenous sequence with a 38-bp Bxb1 attB attachment sequence (
Next, twinPE was tested to determine if it could support the insertion of DNA sequences larger than that which has been demonstrated using the PE2 or PE3 systems. First, PE3-mediated insertions of FKBP12 coding sequence fragments ranging from 12 to 321 bp were examined. Targeting the HEK site 3 locus with PE3, modest efficiencies were achieved for the shorter 12-bp and 36-bp insertions (31.8% and 17.3%, respectively), but very little desired product was observed for the 108-bp insertion (0.8%) and no full-length product for the 321-bp insertion (
One potential application of the twinPE strategy is the replacement of exonic coding sequence with recoded DNA sequence that maintains the protein sequence and has the potential to correct any mutation between target twinPE-induced nick sites. To test this approach, the PAH gene was targeted, mutations in which cause the genetic metabolic disorder phenylketonuria (PKU). Recoding of portions of exon 4 and exon 7 was tested in PAH of wild type HEK293T cells, where corrective editing is detectable. By testing different flap overlap lengths and with the addition of evoPreQ1 motifs to the 3′ end of the pegRNAs, the desired sequence recoding was achieved with modest efficiencies reaching up to 9.4% average efficiency for a 64-bp recoding in exon 4, up to 22.7% average efficiency for a 46-bp recoding in exon 7, and up to 27.4% average efficiency for a 64-bp recoding in exon 7 (
In addition to insertion and replacement of DNA sequences, twinPE should also be able to make precise deletion edits. Paired-nuclease deletion strategies generate deletions that span the two DSB sites and are thus restricted by PAM availability, and desired deletions are often accompanied by undesired indel byproducts. By contrast, twinPE has the potential to make deletions with greater flexibility and precision due to the lack of DSB generation and the ability to write in additional DNA sequence at the twinPE-induced nick sites. To assess twinPE for precise deletions, three strategies using paired pegRNAs were compared: a “single-anchor” twinPE strategy, a “hybrid-anchor” twinPE strategy, and the recently reported “PrimeDel” strategy (
Using the single-anchor strategy, 13-nt complementary flaps were used to delete 77 bp of sequence adjacent to one of the pegRNA-induced nick sites with 14.8% efficiency, and 34-nt complementary flaps were used to precisely excise 56 bp of sequence with 18.8% efficiency (
Lastly, a therapeutically relevant locus, DMD, was targeted to apply twinPE for larger deletions. Pathogenic DMD alleles, which are responsible for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, commonly contain large deletions in regions containing exons that result in frameshifted mRNA transcripts. Because production of full-length dystrophin protein without replacement of deleted exons can lead to partial rescue of protein function, disruption of a second exon that restores the reading frame has been proposed as a potential therapeutic strategy. Three twinPE deletion strategies were examined along with a previously reported Cas9 nuclease deletion strategy for excising exon 51 in DMD. Using single-anchor twinPE deletion approaches, 14.4% to 24% efficiency was observed for the deletion of a 780-bp sequence containing exon 51 in DMD (
Targeted DNA Integration at Safe Harbor Loci with twinPE and Bxb1 Integrase
Although twinPE is able to perform larger insertion edits than PE3, the upper limits of sequence insertion size were still not sufficient to support the integration of gene-sized DNA fragments. Therefore, having successfully inserted Bxb1 attachment sequences into endogenous human genomic sites with high efficiency using twinPE, twinPE was combined with serine recombinases for the site-specific integration of DNA cargo. To identify locations for DNA cargo integration, the twinPE-mediated insertion of Bxb1 attB and attP attachment sequences at established safe harbor loci in HEK293T cells. 32 spacer pairs targeting the AAVS1 locus were screened for insertion of the 50-bp Bxb1 attP sequence (data not shown). Of the evaluated spacer pairs, optimal pegRNAs for 18 out of 32 spacer combinations achieved >50% correct insertion efficiency by amplicon sequencing (
Next, twinPE-incorporated Bxb1 attB and attP sequences were examined to determine if they could serve as target sites for the integration of plasmid DNA cargo harboring partner Bxb1 attachment sites. First, twinPE was used to generate single-cell clones bearing homozygous attB site insertions at the CCR5 locus (data not shown). Transfection of this clonal cell line with a plasmid expressing Bxb1 recombinase and a 5.6-kB attP-containing donor DNA plasmid yielded 12-17% knock-in at the target site as measured by ddPCR (
In an effort to improve the “one-pot” knock-in efficiency, the twinPE-mediated incorporation of either attB or attP attachment sites, the canonical (GT) Bxb1 core sequence, an alternative (GA) Bxb1 core sequence, and varying flap overlap lengths were tested. It was found that the incorporation of the attB site with twinPE performed better than the incorporation of the attP site for one-pot knock-in transfections (3.3% vs. 0.5% knock-in,
Next, donor integration was evaluated at the ALB locus, which can be coopted for therapeutic protein secretion from hepatocytes. Albumin is actively secreted by the liver and constitutes approximately 60% of human plasma proteins. Therefore, therapeutic transgene integration at the ALB locus in a relatively small percentage of hepatocytes could achieve therapeutic levels of protein expression for many diseases. A strategy targeting intron 1 of ALB was devised, wherein Bxb1 would mediate the integration of circular DNA containing a splice acceptor sequence followed by the cDNA for a protein of interest. Integration would in principle allow for splicing of the albumin secretion signal, encoded in exon 1, to the therapeutic transgene coding sequence. First, pegRNA pairs were screened for the insertion of the Bxb1 attB sequence within intron 1 of ALB. After screening pegRNA pairs, a spacer combination that achieved 43% correct insertion of the attB sequence by amplicon sequencing was identified (
Multiplex Editing and Recombinase-Mediated Inversion
Large structural variants are found in many human pathogenic alleles, such as the large 0.6-Mb inversion at the F8 locus that causes ˜50% of severe hemophilia A cases. Inspired by the high efficiency of recombinase attachments site insertions using twinPE, it was reasoned that multiplexing the insertion of both attB and attP Bxb1 attachment sites could be used to correct more complex genetic variants by unidirectional deletion or inversion of the intervening DNA sequence. To test this approach on a therapeutically relevant locus, a 39-kb inversion between IDS and its pseudogene IDS2 was attempted. Inversions between these sites have been observed in ˜13% of Hunter syndrome cases, and characterization of the breakpoints in pathogenic alleles has revealed that the inversion often occurs within a recombination hotspot of intron 7 that is present in both IDS and IDS2. Therefore, regions flanking these recombination hotspots were targeted to insert Bxb1 attP and attB attachment sequences, which when oriented in opposite directions, could be used as substrated for unidirectional inversion by Bxb1 for the correction of the pathogenic allele sequence in patient cells (
Next, multiplexing twinPE-mediated insertion of both attP and attB attachment sites were explored with Bxb1 recombinase-mediated inversion of the 39-kb sequence in IDS and IDS2. Initially, sequential DNA transfections were explored with twinPE components followed by Bxb1 recombinase. A first set of pegRNAs (set 1) was tested that installs a forward-oriented attP sequence in intron 3 of IDS2 and a reverse-oriented attB sequence in intron 7 of IDS. In addition, a second set of pegRNAs (set 2) was used to install a reverse-oriented attP sequence in IDS2 and a forward-oriented attB sequence in IDS in a first transfection. 52.3% or 54.5% attP sequence insertion and 27.6% or 30.9% attB sequence insertion was observed for multiplex editing with pegRNA set 1 and set 2, respectively (
To carry out one-pot twinPE and Bxb1-mediated inversion and circumvent unwanted recombination between pegRNA plasmid DNA, all-RNA components comprising PE2 mRNA, synthetic pegRNAs from set 1, and Bxb1 mRNA were nucleofected. Using amplicon sequencing, the expected inverted allele junctions containing attR and attL sequences were captured. Furthermore, to quantify the inversion efficiency, a reverse primer that can bind to an identical sequence in both the non-inverted and inverted alleles and therefore amplify both edits using the same primer pair was designed (
As presented herein, a twin prime editing approach that can be used to delete, replace, or insert DNA sequences at targeted location in the genomes of human cells was developed. When combined with site-specific serine recombinase enzymes, twinPE can also support the integration of DNA cargo, or the inversion of DNA sequence.
Methods
General Methods
DNA amplification was conducted by PCR using Phusion U Green Multiplex PCR Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific) or Q5 Hot Start High-Fidelity 2× Master Mix (New England BioLabs) unless otherwise noted. DNA oligonucleotides were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies. Plasmids expressing sgRNAs were constructed by ligation of annealed oligonucleotides into BsmBI-digested acceptor vector. Plasmids expressing pegRNAs were constructed by Gibson assembly or Golden Gate assembly as previously described. Sequences of sgRNA and pegRNA constructs used in this Example are listed in Tables 11-12.
All vectors for mammalian cell experiments were purified using Plasmid Plus Midiprep kits (Qiagen) or PureYield plasmid miniprep kits (Promega), or QIAprep Spin Miniprep kits.
General Mammalian Cell Culture Conditions
HEK293T (ATCC CRL-3216), U20S (ATTC HTB-96), K562 (CCL-243), and HeLa (CCL-2) cells were purchased from ATCC and cultured and passaged in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) plus GlutaMAX (ThermoFisher Scientific), McCoy's 5A Medium (Gibco), RPMI Medium 1640 plus GlutaMAX (Gibco), or Eagle's Minimal Essential Medium (EMEM, ATCC), respectively, each supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco, qualified) and 1×Penicillin Streptomycin (Corning). All cell types were incubated, maintained, and cultured at 37° C. with 5% CO2. Cell lines were authenticated by their respective suppliers and tested negative for mycoplasma.
HEK293T, HeLa, and Huh7 Tissue Culture Transfection Protocol and Genomic DNA Preparation
HEK293T cells grown were seeded on 48-well poly-D-lysine coated plates (Corning). 16-24 h post-seeding, cells were transfected at approximately 60% confluency with 1 μL of Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's protocols and either: 750 ng of PE2 plasmid, 125 ng of pegRNA 1, and 125 ng of pegRNA 2 (for twinPE transfections); 750 ng of PE2 plasmid, 250 ng of pegRNA plasmid, and 83 ng of sgRNA plasmid (for PE3 transfections); or, 750 ng of Cas9 and 125 ng of sgRNA 1, and 125 ng of sgRNA 2 (for paired Cas9 nuclease transfections). Unless otherwise stated, cells were cultured 3 days following transfection, after which the media was removed, the cells were washed with 1×PBS solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and genomic DNA was extracted by the addition of 150 μL of freshly prepared lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 0.05% SDS; 25 μg/mL Proteinase K (ThermoFisher Scientific)) directly into each well of the tissue culture plate. The genomic DNA mixture was incubated at 37° C. for 1-2 hrs, followed by an 80° C. enzyme inactivation step for 30 min. Primers used for mammalian cell genomic DNA amplification are listed in Table 13.
For HeLa cells, they were grown and seeded with a density similar to HEK293T cells and each well of cells were transfected with 190 ng PE2_P2A_Blast (blasticidin resistence gene), 31.5 ng of pegRNA1, and 31.5 ng of pegRNA 2 (for twinPE transfections) with 0.75 uL of HeLa monster reagent (Mirus). Cells were then treated with 10 ug/mL for the selection 24h after transfection. The rest of genomic DNA collection steps are identical to HEK293T cells. Huh7 cells were seeded 150 k/well on 24-well poly-D-lysine coated plates (Corning). 16-24 h post-seeding, cells were transfected at high confluency with 2 μL of Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's protocols and up to 800 ng of plasmid DNA. Genomic DNA collection proceeded as above for HEK293T.
High-Throughput DNA Sequencing of Genomic DNA Samples
Genomic sites of interest were amplified from genomic DNA samples and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq as previously described with the following modifications. Briefly, amplification primers containing Illumina forward and reverse adapters (Table 13) were used for a first round of PCR (PCR 1) amplifying the genomic region of interest. 25-μL PCR 1 reactions were performed with 0.5 μM of each forward and reverse primer, 1 μL of genomic DNA extract and 12.5 μL of Phusion U Green Multiplex PCR Master Mix. PCR reactions were carried out as follows: 98° C. for 2 min, then 30 cycles of [98° C. for 10 s, 61° C. for 20 s, and 72° C. for 30 s], followed by a final 72° C. extension for 2 min. Unique Illumina barcoding primer pairs were added to each sample in a secondary PCR reaction (PCR 2). Specifically, 25 μL of a given PCR 2 reaction contained 0.5 μM of each unique forward and reverse Illumina barcoding primer pair, 1 μL of unpurified PCR 1 reaction mixture, and 12.5 μL of Phusion U Green Multiplex PCR 2×Master Mix. The barcoding PCR 2 reactions were carried out as follows: 98° C. for 2 min, then 12 cycles of [98° C. for 10 s, 61° C. for 20 s, and 72° C. for 30 s], followed by a final 72° C. extension for 2 min. PCR products were evaluated analytically by electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel. PCR 2 products (pooled by common amplicons) were purified by electrophoresis with a 1.5% agarose gel using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen), eluting with 40 μL of water. DNA concentration was measured by fluorometric quantification (Qubit, ThermoFisher Scientific) or qPCR (KAPA Library Quantification Kit-Illumina, KAPA Biosystems) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument according to the manufacturer's protocols.
Sequencing reads were demultiplexed using MiSeq Reporter (Illumina). Alignment of amplicon sequences to a reference sequence was performed using CRISPResso2. For all prime editing yield quantification, prime editing efficiency was calculated as: % of [# of reads with the desired edit that do not contain indels]÷[# of total reads]. For quantification of point mutation editing, CRISPResso2 was run in standard mode with “discard_indel_reads” on. Prime editing for installation of point mutations was then explicitly calculated as: [frequency of specified point mutation in non-discarded reads]×[# of non-discarded reads]÷[total reads]. For quantification of editing, CRISPResso2 was run in HDR mode using the desired allele as the expected allele (e flag), and with “discard_indel_reads” on. Editing yield was calculated as: [# of non-discarded HDR aligned reads]÷[total reads]. Indel yields were calculated as: [# of indel-containing discarded reads]÷[total reads]. Unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) were applied to quantify the deletion efficiency and assess PCR bias in this three-step PCR protocol. Briefly, in the first step of linear amplification, 1 uL of genomic DNA extract was linearly amplified by 0.1 uM of single forward UMI primer that contains 15-bp or 16-bp unique molecular identifiers and 12.5 uL Phusion U Green Multiplex PCR Master Mix in a 25-uL reaction. The PCR products were then purified by 1.6×AmPure beads (Beckman Coulter) and eluted in 20 uL QIAGEN elution buffer. In the second step, 1 or 2 uL of linearly amplified PCR eluents were then amplified for 30 cycles with 0.5 uM of each forward and reverse primer, Phusion U Green Multiplex PCR mix in a 25-uL reaction. In this case, the forward primer anneals to the P5 Illumina adaptor sequence that locates at the 5′ of the UMI primer and upstream of UMI. The PCR products were purified by 1×ampure beads and eluted in 25 uL elution buffer. In the third step, 1 uL eluent was amplified for 12 cycles as mentioned above for adding unique Illumina barcoding. To assess the large deletion at DMD locus, the top band (unedited large amplicon) and bottom band (edited amplicons with deletions) were excised separately from the 1.5% agarose and the final library (60 μM of top bands v.s. 20 pM of bottom bands) was loaded into two separate Miseq kits to avoid weak clustering of large amplicons (˜1 kb) compared to short ones (˜300 bp)
Raw sequencing reads were UMI deduplicated using AmpUMI. For paired-end reads, SeqKit was used to concatenate (merge without overlap) R1s with the reverse complement of R2s. The concatenated R1+R2s were UMI deduplicated using the UMI at the 5′ end of R1. UMI-deduplicated R1s or concatenated R1+R2s were analyzed using CRISPResso2. For analyzing concatenated R1+R2s, an appropriate concatenated reference amplicon sequence was provided to minimize sequencing alignment artifacts due to the concatenation.
Nucleofection of U2OS and K562
Nucleofection was performed in all experiments using K562 and U20S cells. 200,000 cells were used per nucleofection. Counted cells were spun down and washed with PBS and then resuspended in nucleofection solution following the recommendation of Lonza SE Cell Line 4D-Nucleofector Kit. After nucleofection cells in the device, the cells were allowed to incubate in the cuvette at room temperature for 10 minutes. The contents of the cuvette were transferred to a 48 well plate filled with pre-warmed media. Genomic DNA was extracted and prepared for Illumina Miseq preparation as mentioned above.
One-Pot twinPE and BxbI-Mediated Cargo Knock-In and Large Inversion:
For the one-pot mediated large inversion experiment, sequential plasmid transfection and one-pot mRNA nucleofection were performed. In the sequential plasmid transfection experiment, HEK293T cells were transfected with 750 ng PE2, 62.5 ng of each pegRNA (four in total) using Lipofectamine 2000 as mentioned above. After three days, cells were trypsinized and plated into 24-well plate and passaged for about seven days. 20K cells were then seeded again and transfected with 500 ng BxBI plasmid. Genomic DNA was extracted and prepared for Illumina Miseq preparation as mentioned above. In the one-pot mRNA nucleofection experiment, 200,000 cells were nucleofected with 1 ug PE2 mRNA, 30 pmol each synthetic pegRNA (4 pegRNAs in total), and 750 ng BxBI mRNA. Synthetic pegRNAs were order from IDT and mRNA transcripts were in vitro transcribed following the published protocol. 20 uL mixture of Lonza buffer and cells were electroporated with program CM-130 and recovered with 80 uL warmed media for five minutes. 25 uL samples from the cuvette was then added to each well of the 48-well plate and incubated at 37° C. for 72 hours.
The following references are each incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
In the articles such as “a,” “an,” and “the” may mean one or more than one unless indicated to the contrary or otherwise evident from the context. Embodiments or descriptions that include “or” between one or more members of a group are considered satisfied if one, more than one, or all of the group members are present in, employed in, or otherwise relevant to a given product or process unless indicated to the contrary or otherwise evident from the context. The invention includes embodiments in which exactly one member of the group is present in, employed in, or otherwise relevant to a given product or process. The invention includes embodiments in which more than one, or all of the group members are present in, employed in, or otherwise relevant to a given product or process.
Furthermore, the disclosure encompasses all variations, combinations, and permutations in which one or more limitations, elements, clauses, and descriptive terms from one or more of the listed claims is introduced into another claim. For example, any claim that is dependent on another claim can be modified to include one or more limitations found in any other claims that is dependent on the same base claim. Where elements are presented as lists, e.g., in Markush group format, each subgroup of the elements is also disclosed, and any element(s) can be removed from the group. It should it be understood that, in general, where the invention, or aspects of the invention, is/are referred to as comprising particular elements and/or features, certain embodiments of the disclosure or aspects of the disclosure consist, or consist essentially of, such elements and/or features. For purposes of simplicity, those embodiments have not been specifically set forth in haec verba herein. It is also noted that the terms “comprising” and “containing” are intended to be open and permits the inclusion of additional elements or steps. Where ranges are given, endpoints are included. Furthermore, unless otherwise indicated or otherwise evident from the context and understanding of one of ordinary skill in the art, values that are expressed as ranges can assume any specific value or sub-range within the stated ranges in different embodiments of the invention, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit of the range, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
This application refers to various issued patents, published patent applications, journal articles, and other publications, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. If there is a conflict between any of the incorporated references and the instant specification, the specification shall control. In addition, any particular embodiment of the present invention that falls within the prior art may be explicitly excluded from any one or more of the embodiments. Because such embodiments are deemed to be known to one of ordinary skill in the art, they may be excluded even if the exclusion is not set forth explicitly herein. Any particular embodiment of the invention can be excluded from any embodiment, for any reason, whether or not related to the existence of prior art.
Those skilled in the art will recognize or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation many equivalents to the specific embodiments described herein. The scope of the present embodiments described herein is not intended to be limited to the above Description, but rather is as set forth in the appended embodiments. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various changes and modifications to this description may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention, as defined in the following embodiments.
This application is a divisional of and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to U.S. patent application, U.S. Ser. No. 18/053,269, filed Nov. 7, 2022, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §§ 120 and 365(c) to and is a continuation of international PCT Application, PCT/US2021/031439, filed May 7, 2021, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application, U.S. Ser. No. 63/022,397, filed May 8, 2020, and U.S. Provisional Application, U.S. Ser. No. 63/116,785, filed Nov. 20, 2020, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was made with government support under grant numbers U01AI142756, RM1HG009490, R01EB022376, and R35GM118062 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4182449 | Kozlow | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4186183 | Steck et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4217344 | Vanlerberghe et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4235871 | Papahadjopoulos et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4261975 | Fullerton et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4485054 | Mezei et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4501728 | Geho et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4663290 | Weis et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4737323 | Martin et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4774085 | Fidler | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4797368 | Carter et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4837028 | Allen | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4873316 | Meade et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4880635 | Janoff et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4889818 | Gelfand et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4897355 | Eppstein et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4906477 | Kurono et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4911928 | Wallach | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4917951 | Wallach | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4920016 | Allen et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4921757 | Wheatley et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4946787 | Eppstein et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4965185 | Grischenko et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5017492 | Kotewicz et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5047342 | Chatterjee | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5049386 | Eppstein et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5079352 | Gelfand et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5139941 | Muzyczka et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5173414 | Lebkowski et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5223409 | Ladner et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5244797 | Kotewicz et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5270179 | Chatterjee | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5374553 | Gelfand et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5405776 | Kotewicz et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5436149 | Barnes | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5449639 | Wei et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5496714 | Comb et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5512462 | Cheng | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5580737 | Polisky et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5614365 | Tabor et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5652094 | Usman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658727 | Barbas et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5668005 | Kotewicz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5677152 | Birch et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5767099 | Harris et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5780053 | Ashley et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5830430 | Unger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5834247 | Comb et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835699 | Kimura | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5844075 | Kawakami et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5849548 | Haseloff et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5851548 | Dattagupta et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5855910 | Ashley et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5856463 | Blankenborg et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5962313 | Podsakoff et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5981182 | Jacobs, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6015794 | Haseloff et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6057153 | George et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6063608 | Kotewicz et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6077705 | Duan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6156509 | Schellenberger | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6183998 | Ivanov et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6355415 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6429298 | Ellington et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6453242 | Eisenberg et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6479264 | Louwrier | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6503717 | Case et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6534261 | Cox, III et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6589768 | Kotewicz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6599692 | Case et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6607882 | Cox, III et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6610522 | Kotewicz et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6689558 | Case et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6716973 | Baskerville et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6824978 | Cox, III et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6933113 | Case et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6979539 | Cox, III et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7013219 | Case et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7045337 | Schultz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7067650 | Tanaka | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7070928 | Liu et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7078208 | Smith et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7083970 | Schultz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7163824 | Cox, III et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7192739 | Liu et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7223545 | Liu et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7354761 | Schultz et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7368275 | Schultz et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7442160 | Liu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7476500 | Liu et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7476734 | Liu | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7479573 | Chu et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7491494 | Liu et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7541450 | Liu et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7557068 | Liu et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7595179 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7638300 | Schultz et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7670807 | Lampson et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7678554 | Liu et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7713721 | Schultz et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7771935 | Liu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7794931 | Breaker et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7807408 | Liu et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7851658 | Liu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7915025 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7919277 | Russell et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7993672 | Huang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7998904 | Liu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8012739 | Schultz et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8017323 | Liu et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8017755 | Liu et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8030074 | Schultz et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8067556 | Hogrefe et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8114648 | Schultz et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8173364 | Schultz et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8173392 | Schultz et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8183012 | Schultz et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8183178 | Liu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8206914 | Liu et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8361725 | Russell et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8394604 | Liu et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8440431 | Voytas et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8440432 | Voytas et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8450471 | Voytas et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8492082 | De Franciscis et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8546553 | Terns et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8569256 | Heyes et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8586363 | Voytas et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8680069 | de Fougerolles et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8691729 | Liu et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8691750 | Constien et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8697359 | Zhang | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8697853 | Voytas et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8709466 | Coady et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8728526 | Heller | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8748667 | Budzik et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8758810 | Okada et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8759103 | Kim et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8759104 | Unciti-Broceta et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8771728 | Huang et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8790664 | Pitard et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8795965 | Zhang | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8822663 | Schrum et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8835148 | Janulaitis et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8846578 | McCray et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8871445 | Cong et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8889418 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8900814 | Yasukawa et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8945839 | Zhang | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8975232 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8993233 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8999641 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9023594 | Liu et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9023649 | Mali et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9068179 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9150626 | Liu et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9163271 | Schultz et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9163284 | Liu et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9181535 | Liu et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9200045 | Liu et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9221886 | Liu et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9228207 | Liu et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9234213 | Wu | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9243038 | Liu et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9267127 | Liu et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9322006 | Liu et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9322037 | Liu et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9340799 | Liu et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9340800 | Liu et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9359599 | Liu et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9388430 | Liu et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9394537 | Liu et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9434774 | Liu et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9458484 | Ma et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9512446 | Joung et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
| 9526784 | Liu et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9534210 | Park et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9580698 | Xu et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
| 9610322 | Liu et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9637739 | Siksnys et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9663770 | Rogers et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9737604 | Jin et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9738693 | Telford et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9753340 | Saitou | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9771574 | Liu et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9783791 | Hogrefe et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9816093 | Donohoue et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
| 9840538 | Telford et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9840690 | Karli et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9840699 | Liu et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9840702 | Collingwood et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9850521 | Braman et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9873907 | Zeiner et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9879270 | Hittinger et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9914939 | Church et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9932567 | Xu et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
| 9938288 | Kishi et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
| 9944933 | Storici et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9982279 | Gill et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
| 9999671 | Liu et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10011868 | Liu et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10053725 | Liu et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10059940 | Zhong | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10077453 | Liu et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10113163 | Liu et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10150955 | Lambowitz et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10167457 | Liu et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10179911 | Liu et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10189831 | Arrington et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10202593 | Liu et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10202658 | Parkin et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10227581 | Liu et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10323236 | Liu et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10336997 | Liu et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10358670 | Janulaitis et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10392674 | Liu et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10407474 | Liu et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10407697 | Doudna et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10465176 | Liu et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10508298 | Liu et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10583201 | Chen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10597679 | Liu et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10612011 | Liu et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10640767 | Maianti et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10682410 | Liu et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10704062 | Liu et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
| 10745677 | Maianti et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10858639 | Liu et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10912833 | Liu et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10930367 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10947530 | Liu et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10954548 | Liu et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 11046948 | Liu et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11053481 | Liu et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11124782 | Liu et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
| 11214780 | Liu et al. | Jan 2022 | B2 |
| 11268082 | Liu et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
| 11299755 | Liu et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
| 11306324 | Liu et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
| 11319532 | Liu et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
| 11447770 | Liu et al. | Sep 2022 | B1 |
| 11542496 | Liu et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
| 11542509 | Maianti et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
| 11560566 | Liu et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
| 11578343 | Liu et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
| 11643652 | Liu et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
| 11661590 | Liu et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
| 11702651 | Liu et al. | Jul 2023 | B2 |
| 11732274 | Liu et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
| 11795443 | Liu et al. | Oct 2023 | B2 |
| 11795452 | Liu et al. | Oct 2023 | B2 |
| 11820969 | Maianti et al. | Nov 2023 | B2 |
| 11898179 | Maianti et al. | Feb 2024 | B2 |
| 11912985 | Liu et al. | Feb 2024 | B2 |
| 20030082575 | Schultz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030087817 | Cox et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030096337 | Hillman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108885 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119764 | Loeb et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167533 | Yadav et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030203480 | Kovesdi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040003420 | Kuhn et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040115184 | Smith et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040197892 | Moore et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040203109 | Lal et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050136429 | Guarente et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222030 | Allison | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050260626 | Lorens et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060088864 | Smolke et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060104984 | Littlefield et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060246568 | Honjo et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070015238 | Snyder et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070264692 | Liu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070269817 | Shapero | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080008697 | Mintier et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051317 | Church et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080124725 | Barrangou et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080182254 | Hall et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080220502 | Schellenberger et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080241917 | Akita et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080268516 | Perreault et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090111119 | Doyon et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090130718 | Short | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090215878 | Tan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234109 | Han et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100076057 | Sontheimer et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100093617 | Barrangou et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100104690 | Barrangou et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100273857 | Thakker et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100305197 | Che | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100316643 | Eckert et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110016540 | Weinstein et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110059160 | Essner et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110059502 | Chalasani | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110104787 | Church et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110177495 | Liu et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110189775 | Ainley et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110189776 | Terns et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110217739 | Terns et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301073 | Gregory et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120129759 | Liu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120141523 | Castado et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120244601 | Bertozzi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120270273 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120322861 | Byrne et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130022980 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130059931 | Petersen-Mahrt et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117869 | Duchateau et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130130248 | Haurwitz et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130158245 | Russell et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130165389 | Schellenberger et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130212725 | Kuhn et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130309720 | Schultz et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130344117 | Mirosevich et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130345064 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140004280 | Loomis | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140005269 | Ngwuluka et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140017214 | Cost | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140018404 | Chen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140044793 | Goll et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140065711 | Liu et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140068797 | Doudna et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140127752 | Zhou et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140128449 | Liu et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140141094 | Smyth et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140141487 | Feldman et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140179770 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140186843 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140186958 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201858 | Ostertag et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140234289 | Liu et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140248702 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140273037 | Wu | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140273226 | Wu | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140273230 | Chen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140273234 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140283156 | Zador et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140295556 | Joung et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140295557 | Joung et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140342456 | Mali et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140342457 | Mali et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140342458 | Mali et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140349400 | Jakimo et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140356867 | Peter et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140356956 | Church et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140356958 | Mali et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140356959 | Church et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140357523 | Zeiner et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140377868 | Joung et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150010526 | Liu et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150031089 | Lindstrom | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150031132 | Church et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150031133 | Church et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150044191 | Liu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150044192 | Liu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150044772 | Zhao | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150050699 | Siksnys et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150056177 | Liu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150056629 | Guthrie-Honea | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150064138 | Lu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150064789 | Paschon et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150071898 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150071899 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150071900 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150071901 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150071902 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150071903 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150071906 | Liu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150079680 | Bradley et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150079681 | Zhang | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150098954 | Hyde et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150118216 | Liu et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150128300 | Warming et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150132269 | Orkin et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150140664 | Byrne et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150159172 | Miller et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150165054 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150166980 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150166981 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150166982 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150166983 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150166984 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150166985 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150191744 | Wolfe et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150197759 | Xu et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150211058 | Carstens | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150218573 | Loque et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150225773 | Farmer et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150252358 | Maeder et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150275202 | Liu et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150291965 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150307889 | Petolino et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150315252 | Haugwitz et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150344549 | Muir et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160017393 | Jacobson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160017396 | Cann et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160032292 | Storici et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160032353 | Braman et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160040155 | Maizels et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160046952 | Hittinger et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160046961 | Jinek et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160046962 | May et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160053272 | Wurtzel et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160053304 | Wurtzel et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160074535 | Ranganathan et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160076093 | Shendure et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160090603 | Carnes et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160090622 | Liu et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160115488 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160138046 | Wu | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160153003 | Joung et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160186214 | Brouns et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160200779 | Liu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160201040 | Liu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160201089 | Gersbach et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206566 | Lu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160208243 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160208288 | Liu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160215275 | Zhong | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160215276 | Liu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160215300 | May et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160244784 | Jacobson et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160244829 | Bang et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160264934 | Giallourakis et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160272593 | Ritter et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160272965 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160281072 | Zhang | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160298136 | Chen et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160304846 | Liu et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160304855 | Stark et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160312304 | Sorrentino et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160319262 | Doudna et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160333389 | Liu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160340622 | Abdou | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160340662 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160345578 | Barrangou et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160346360 | Quake et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160346361 | Quake et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160346362 | Quake et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160348074 | Quake et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160348096 | Liu et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160350476 | Quake et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160355796 | Davidson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160369262 | Reik et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170009224 | Liu et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170009242 | McKinley et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170014449 | Bangera et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170020922 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170022251 | Rammensee et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170037432 | Donohoue et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170044520 | Liu et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170044592 | Peter et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170053729 | Kotani et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170058271 | Joung et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170058272 | Carter et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170058298 | Kennedy et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170073663 | Wang et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170073670 | Nishida et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170087224 | Quake | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170087225 | Quake | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170088587 | Quake | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170088828 | Quake | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170107536 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170107560 | Peter et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170114367 | Hu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170121693 | Liu et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170145394 | Yeo et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170145405 | Tang et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170145438 | Kantor | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170152528 | Zhang | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170152787 | Kubo et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170159033 | Kamtekar et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170166928 | Vyas et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170175104 | Doudna et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170175142 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170191047 | Terns et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170191078 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170198269 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170198277 | Kmiec et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170198302 | Feng et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170224843 | Deglon et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170226522 | Hu et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170233703 | Xie et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170233708 | Liu et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170233756 | Begemann et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170247671 | Yung et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170247703 | Sloan et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170268022 | Liu et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170275648 | Barrangou et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170275665 | Silas et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170283797 | Robb et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170283831 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170306306 | Potter et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170314016 | Kim et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170362635 | Chamberlain et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180023062 | Lamb et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180064077 | Dunham et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180066258 | Powell | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180068062 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180073012 | Liu et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180080051 | Sheikh et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180087046 | Badran et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180100147 | Yates et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180105867 | Xiao et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180119118 | Lu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180127759 | Lu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180127780 | Liu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180155708 | Church et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180155720 | Donohoue et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180163213 | Aneja et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180170984 | Harris et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180179503 | Maianti et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180179547 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180201921 | Malcolm | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180230464 | Zhong | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180230471 | Storici et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180236081 | Liu et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180237787 | Maianti et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180245066 | Yao et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180245075 | Khalil et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180258418 | Kim | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180265864 | Li et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180273939 | Yu et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180282722 | Jakimo et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180298391 | Jakimo et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180305688 | Zhong | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180305704 | Zhang | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180312822 | Lee et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180312825 | Liu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180312828 | Liu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180312835 | Yao et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180327756 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180346927 | Doudna et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180371497 | Gill et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190010481 | Joung et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190055543 | Tran et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190055549 | Capurso et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190062734 | Cotta-Ramusino et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190093099 | Liu et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190185883 | Liu et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190218547 | Lee et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190225955 | Liu et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190233847 | Savage et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190241633 | Fotin-Mleczek et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190256842 | Liu et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190264202 | Church et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190276816 | Liu et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190309290 | Neuteboom et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190322992 | Liu et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190330619 | Smith et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190352632 | Liu et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190367891 | Liu et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20200010818 | Liu et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200010835 | Maianti et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200056206 | Tremblay et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200063127 | Lu et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200071722 | Liu et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200109398 | Rubens et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200172931 | Liu et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200181619 | Tang et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200190493 | Liu et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200216833 | Liu et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200255868 | Liu et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200277587 | Liu et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200318116 | Freier | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200323984 | Liu et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200399619 | Maianti et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20200399626 | Liu et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20210054416 | Liu et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210115428 | Maianti et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210130835 | Watts et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210196809 | Maianti et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210198330 | Liu et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210214698 | Liu et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210230577 | Liu et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210254127 | Liu et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
| 20210315994 | Liu et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
| 20210317440 | Liu et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
| 20210380955 | Bryson et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
| 20220033785 | Liu et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
| 20220098593 | Gaudelli et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
| 20220119785 | Liu et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
| 20220170013 | Liu et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| 20220177877 | Church et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| 20220186216 | Dokshin et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| 20220204975 | Liu et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| 20220213507 | Liu et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220220462 | Liu et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220238182 | Shen et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220249697 | Liu et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
| 20220282275 | Liu et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
| 20220290115 | Liu et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
| 20220307001 | Liu et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
| 20220307003 | Liu et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
| 20220315906 | Liu et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
| 20220356469 | Liu et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
| 20220380740 | Liu et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
| 20220389395 | Liu et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
| 20230002745 | Liu et al. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
| 20230021641 | Liu et al. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
| 20230056852 | Liu et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
| 20230058176 | Liu et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
| 20230078265 | Liu et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
| 20230086199 | Liu et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
| 20230090221 | Liu et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
| 20230108687 | Liu et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
| 20230123669 | Liu et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
| 20230127008 | Liu et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
| 20230159913 | Liu et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
| 20230193295 | Maianti et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
| 20230220374 | Liu et al. | Jul 2023 | A1 |
| 20230272425 | Liu et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
| 20230279443 | Liu et al. | Sep 2023 | A1 |
| 20230332144 | Liu et al. | Oct 2023 | A1 |
| 20230340465 | Liu et al. | Oct 2023 | A1 |
| 20230340466 | Liu et al. | Oct 2023 | A1 |
| 20230340467 | Liu et al. | Oct 2023 | A1 |
| 20230348883 | Liu et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
| 20230357766 | Liu et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
| 20230383289 | Liu et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
| 20240035017 | Liu et al. | Feb 2024 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2012244264 | Nov 2012 | AU |
| 2015252023 | Nov 2015 | AU |
| 2015101792 | Jan 2016 | AU |
| 2012354062 | Sep 2017 | AU |
| 112015013786 | Jul 2017 | BR |
| 2894668 | Jun 2014 | CA |
| 2894681 | Jun 2014 | CA |
| 2894684 | Jun 2014 | CA |
| 2852593 | Nov 2015 | CA |
| 3193022 | Mar 2022 | CA |
| 2865578 | Jan 2023 | CA |
| 1069962 | Mar 1993 | CN |
| 101460619 | Jun 2009 | CN |
| 101873862 | Oct 2010 | CN |
| 102892777 | Jan 2013 | CN |
| 103224947 | Jul 2013 | CN |
| 103233028 | Aug 2013 | CN |
| 103388006 | Nov 2013 | CN |
| 103614415 | Mar 2014 | CN |
| 103642836 | Mar 2014 | CN |
| 103668472 | Mar 2014 | CN |
| 103820441 | May 2014 | CN |
| 103820454 | May 2014 | CN |
| 103911376 | Jul 2014 | CN |
| 103923911 | Jul 2014 | CN |
| 103088008 | Aug 2014 | CN |
| 103981211 | Aug 2014 | CN |
| 103981212 | Aug 2014 | CN |
| 104004778 | Aug 2014 | CN |
| 104004782 | Aug 2014 | CN |
| 104017821 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 104109687 | Oct 2014 | CN |
| 104178461 | Dec 2014 | CN |
| 104342457 | Feb 2015 | CN |
| 104404036 | Mar 2015 | CN |
| 104450774 | Mar 2015 | CN |
| 104480144 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 104498493 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 104504304 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 104531704 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 104531705 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 104560864 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 104561095 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 104593418 | May 2015 | CN |
| 104593422 | May 2015 | CN |
| 104611370 | May 2015 | CN |
| 104651398 | May 2015 | CN |
| 104651399 | May 2015 | CN |
| 104651401 | May 2015 | CN |
| 1046541392 | May 2015 | CN |
| 104673816 | Jun 2015 | CN |
| 104725626 | Jun 2015 | CN |
| 104726449 | Jun 2015 | CN |
| 104726494 | Jun 2015 | CN |
| 104745626 | Jul 2015 | CN |
| 104762321 | Jul 2015 | CN |
| 104805078 | Jul 2015 | CN |
| 104805099 | Jul 2015 | CN |
| 104805118 | Jul 2015 | CN |
| 104846010 | Aug 2015 | CN |
| 104894068 | Sep 2015 | CN |
| 104894075 | Sep 2015 | CN |
| 104928321 | Sep 2015 | CN |
| 105039339 | Nov 2015 | CN |
| 105039399 | Nov 2015 | CN |
| 105063061 | Nov 2015 | CN |
| 105087620 | Nov 2015 | CN |
| 105112422 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 105112445 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 105112519 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 105121648 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 105132427 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 105132451 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 105177038 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 105177126 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 105210981 | Jan 2016 | CN |
| 105219799 | Jan 2016 | CN |
| 105238806 | Jan 2016 | CN |
| 105255937 | Jan 2016 | CN |
| 105274144 | Jan 2016 | CN |
| 105296518 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 105296537 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 105316324 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 105316327 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 105316337 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 105331607 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 105331608 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 105331609 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 105331627 | Feb 2016 | CN |
| 105400773 | Mar 2016 | CN |
| 105400779 | Mar 2016 | CN |
| 105400810 | Mar 2016 | CN |
| 105441451 | Mar 2016 | CN |
| 105462968 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105463003 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105463027 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105492608 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105492609 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105505976 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105505979 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105518134 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105518135 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105518137 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105518138 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105518139 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105518140 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 105543228 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105543266 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105543270 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105567688 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105567689 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105567734 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105567735 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105567738 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105593367 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105594664 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105602987 | May 2016 | CN |
| 105624146 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 105624187 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 105646719 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 105647922 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 105647962 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 105647968 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 105647969 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 105671070 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 105671083 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 105695485 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 105779448 | Jul 2016 | CN |
| 105779449 | Jul 2016 | CN |
| 105802980 | Jul 2016 | CN |
| 105821039 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105821040 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105821049 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105821072 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105821075 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105821116 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105838733 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105861547 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105861552 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105861554 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105886498 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105886534 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105886616 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105907758 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105907785 | Aug 2016 | CN |
| 105925608 | Sep 2016 | CN |
| 105934516 | Sep 2016 | CN |
| 105950560 | Sep 2016 | CN |
| 105950626 | Sep 2016 | CN |
| 105950633 | Sep 2016 | CN |
| 105950639 | Sep 2016 | CN |
| 105985985 | Oct 2016 | CN |
| 106011104 | Oct 2016 | CN |
| 106011150 | Oct 2016 | CN |
| 106011167 | Oct 2016 | CN |
| 106011171 | Oct 2016 | CN |
| 106032540 | Oct 2016 | CN |
| 106047803 | Oct 2016 | CN |
| 106047877 | Oct 2016 | CN |
| 106047930 | Oct 2016 | CN |
| 106086008 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106086028 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106086061 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106086062 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106109417 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106119275 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106119283 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106148286 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106148370 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106148416 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106167525 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106167808 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106167810 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106167821 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106172238 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106190903 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106191057 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106191061 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106191062 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106191064 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106191071 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106191099 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106191107 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106191113 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106191114 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106191116 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106191124 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106222177 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106222193 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106222203 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106244555 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106244557 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106244591 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106244609 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 106282241 | Jan 2017 | CN |
| 106318934 | Jan 2017 | CN |
| 106318973 | Jan 2017 | CN |
| 106350540 | Jan 2017 | CN |
| 106367435 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106399306 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106399311 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106399360 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106399367 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106399375 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106399377 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106434651 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106434663 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106434688 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106434737 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106434748 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106434752 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106434782 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106446600 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 106479985 | Mar 2017 | CN |
| 106480027 | Mar 2017 | CN |
| 106480036 | Mar 2017 | CN |
| 106480067 | Mar 2017 | CN |
| 106480080 | Mar 2017 | CN |
| 106480083 | Mar 2017 | CN |
| 106480097 | Mar 2017 | CN |
| 106544351 | Mar 2017 | CN |
| 106544353 | Mar 2017 | CN |
| 106544357 | Mar 2017 | CN |
| 106554969 | Apr 2017 | CN |
| 106566838 | Apr 2017 | CN |
| 106701763 | May 2017 | CN |
| 106701808 | May 2017 | CN |
| 106701818 | May 2017 | CN |
| 106701823 | May 2017 | CN |
| 106701830 | May 2017 | CN |
| 106754912 | May 2017 | CN |
| 106755026 | May 2017 | CN |
| 106755077 | May 2017 | CN |
| 106755088 | May 2017 | CN |
| 106755091 | May 2017 | CN |
| 106755097 | May 2017 | CN |
| 106755424 | May 2017 | CN |
| 106801056 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| 106834323 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| 106834341 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| 106834347 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| 106845151 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| 106868008 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| 106868031 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| 106906240 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| 106906242 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| 106916820 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106916852 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106939303 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106947750 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106947780 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106957830 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106957831 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106957844 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106957855 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106957858 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106967697 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106967726 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106978428 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106987570 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 106987757 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 107012164 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107012174 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107012213 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107012250 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107022562 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107034188 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107034218 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107034229 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107043775 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107043779 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107043787 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107058320 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107058328 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107058358 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107058372 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107083392 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107099533 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107099850 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 107119053 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107119071 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107129999 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107130000 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107142272 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107142282 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107177591 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107177595 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107177625 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107177631 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107190006 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107190008 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107217042 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107217075 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107227307 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107227352 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107236737 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107236739 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107236741 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107245502 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107254485 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107266541 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107267515 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107287245 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107298701 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107299114 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107304435 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107312785 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107312793 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107312795 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107312798 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107326042 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107326046 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107354156 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107354173 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107356793 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107362372 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107365786 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107365804 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107384894 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107384922 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107384926 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107400677 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 107418974 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107435051 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107435069 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107446922 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107446923 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107446924 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107446932 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107446951 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107446954 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107460196 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107474129 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107475300 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107488649 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107502608 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107502618 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107513531 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107519492 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107523567 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107523583 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 107541525 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107557373 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107557378 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107557381 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107557390 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107557393 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107557394 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107557455 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107574179 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107586777 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107586779 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107604003 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107619829 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107619837 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107630006 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107630041 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107630042 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107630043 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107641631 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 107653256 | Feb 2018 | CN |
| 107686848 | Feb 2018 | CN |
| 206970581 | Feb 2018 | CN |
| 107760652 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107760663 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107760684 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107760715 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107784200 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107794272 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107794276 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107815463 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107828738 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107828794 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107828826 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107828874 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107858346 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107858373 | Mar 2018 | CN |
| 107880132 | Apr 2018 | CN |
| 107881184 | Apr 2018 | CN |
| 107893074 | Apr 2018 | CN |
| 107893075 | Apr 2018 | CN |
| 107893076 | Apr 2018 | CN |
| 107893080 | Apr 2018 | CN |
| 107893086 | Apr 2018 | CN |
| 107904261 | Apr 2018 | CN |
| 107937427 | Apr 2018 | CN |
| 107937432 | Apr 2018 | CN |
| 107937501 | Apr 2018 | CN |
| 107974466 | May 2018 | CN |
| 107988229 | May 2018 | CN |
| 107988246 | May 2018 | CN |
| 107988256 | May 2018 | CN |
| 107988268 | May 2018 | CN |
| 108018316 | May 2018 | CN |
| 108034656 | May 2018 | CN |
| 108048466 | May 2018 | CN |
| 108102940 | Jun 2018 | CN |
| 108103090 | Jun 2018 | CN |
| 108103092 | Jun 2018 | CN |
| 108103098 | Jun 2018 | CN |
| 108103586 | Jun 2018 | CN |
| 108148835 | Jun 2018 | CN |
| 108148837 | Jun 2018 | CN |
| 108148873 | Jun 2018 | CN |
| 108192956 | Jun 2018 | CN |
| 108251423 | Jul 2018 | CN |
| 108251451 | Jul 2018 | CN |
| 108251452 | Jul 2018 | CN |
| 108342480 | Jul 2018 | CN |
| 108359691 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 108359712 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 108384784 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 108396027 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 108410877 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 108410906 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 108410907 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 108410911 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 108424931 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 108441519 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 108441520 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 108486108 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108486111 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108486145 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108486146 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108486154 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108486159 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108486234 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108504657 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108504685 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108504693 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108546712 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108546717 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108546718 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108559730 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108559732 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108559745 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108559760 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108570479 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108588071 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108588123 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108588128 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108588182 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 108610399 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108611364 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108624622 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108642053 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108642055 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108642077 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108642078 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108642090 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108690844 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108707604 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108707620 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108707621 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108707628 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108707629 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108715850 | Oct 2018 | CN |
| 108728476 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108728486 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108753772 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108753783 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108753813 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108753817 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108753832 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108753835 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108753836 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108795902 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108822217 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108823248 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108823249 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108823291 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108841845 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108853133 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108866093 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108893529 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108913664 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108913691 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108913714 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 108913717 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 208034188 | Nov 2018 | CN |
| 109517841 | Mar 2019 | CN |
| 0264166 | Apr 1988 | EP |
| 321201 | Jun 1989 | EP |
| 519463 | Dec 1992 | EP |
| 2604255 | Jun 2013 | EP |
| 2840140 | Feb 2015 | EP |
| 2877490 | Jun 2015 | EP |
| 2966170 | Jan 2016 | EP |
| 3009511 | Apr 2016 | EP |
| 3031921 | Jun 2016 | EP |
| 3045537 | Jul 2016 | EP |
| 3115457 | Jan 2017 | EP |
| 3144390 | Mar 2017 | EP |
| 3199632 | Aug 2017 | EP |
| 3216867 | Sep 2017 | EP |
| 3252160 | Dec 2017 | EP |
| 3450553 | Dec 2019 | EP |
| 3177726 | Jan 2021 | EP |
| 3856898 | Aug 2021 | EP |
| 2740248 | Feb 2020 | ES |
| 2528177 | Jan 2016 | GB |
| 2531454 | Apr 2016 | GB |
| 2542653 | Mar 2017 | GB |
| 1208045 | Feb 2016 | HK |
| 2007-501626 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2008-515405 | May 2008 | JP |
| 2010-033344 | Feb 2010 | JP |
| 2010-535744 | Nov 2010 | JP |
| 2010-539929 | Dec 2010 | JP |
| 2011-081011 | Apr 2011 | JP |
| 2011-523353 | Aug 2011 | JP |
| 2012-525146 | Oct 2012 | JP |
| 2012-210172 | Nov 2012 | JP |
| 2012-531909 | Dec 2012 | JP |
| 2015-523856 | Aug 2015 | JP |
| 2015-532654 | Nov 2015 | JP |
| 2016-525888 | Sep 2016 | JP |
| 2016-534132 | Nov 2016 | JP |
| 2017-500035 | Jan 2017 | JP |
| 2018-521045 | Aug 2018 | JP |
| 6629734 | Jan 2020 | JP |
| 6633524 | Jan 2020 | JP |
| 101584933 | Jan 2016 | KR |
| 2016-0050069 | May 2016 | KR |
| 20160133380 | Nov 2016 | KR |
| 20170037025 | Apr 2017 | KR |
| 20170037028 | Apr 2017 | KR |
| 101748575 | Jun 2017 | KR |
| 20170128137 | Nov 2017 | KR |
| 2018-0022465 | Mar 2018 | KR |
| 2016104674 | Aug 2017 | RU |
| 2634395 | Oct 2017 | RU |
| 2652899 | May 2018 | RU |
| 2015128057 | Mar 2019 | RU |
| 2015128098 | Mar 2019 | RU |
| 2687451 | May 2019 | RU |
| 2019112514 | Jun 2019 | RU |
| 2019127300 | Sep 2019 | RU |
| 2701850 | Oct 2019 | RU |
| 10201707569 | Oct 2017 | SG |
| 10201710486 | Jan 2018 | SG |
| 10201710487 | Jan 2018 | SG |
| 10201710488 | Jan 2018 | SG |
| I608100 | Dec 2017 | TW |
| 2018-29773 | Aug 2018 | TW |
| WO 1990002809 | Mar 1990 | WO |
| WO 1991003162 | Mar 1991 | WO |
| WO 1991016024 | Oct 1991 | WO |
| WO 1991017271 | Nov 1991 | WO |
| WO 1991017424 | Nov 1991 | WO |
| WO 1992006188 | Apr 1992 | WO |
| WO 1992006200 | Apr 1992 | WO |
| WO 1992007065 | Apr 1992 | WO |
| WO 1993015187 | Aug 1993 | WO |
| WO 1993024641 | Dec 1993 | WO |
| WO 1994018316 | Aug 1994 | WO |
| WO 1994026877 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| WO 1996004403 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO 1996010640 | Apr 1996 | WO |
| WO 1998032845 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO 2001036452 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001038547 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 2002059296 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002068676 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002103028 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO 2004007684 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005014791 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005019415 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006002547 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006042112 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007025097 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007037444 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007066923 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007136815 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007143574 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008005529 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008108989 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009002418 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009098290 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009134808 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010011961 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010012902 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010028347 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010054108 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010054154 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010068289 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010075424 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010102257 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010104749 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010129019 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010129023 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010132092 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010144150 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011002503 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011017293 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| WO 2018051347 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011053868 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011053982 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011068810 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011075627 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011091311 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011091396 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011109031 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011143124 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011147590 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011159369 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012054726 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012065043 | May 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012088381 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012125445 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012138927 | Oct 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012149470 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012158985 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012158986 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012164565 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012170930 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013012674 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013013105 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013039857 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013039861 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013045632 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013047844 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013066438 | May 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013086441 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013086444 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013098244 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013119602 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013126794 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013130824 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013141680 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013142578 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013152359 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013160230 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013166315 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013169398 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013169802 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013176772 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013176915 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013176916 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013181440 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013186754 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013188037 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013188522 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013188638 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013192278 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013142378 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014004336 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014005042 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014011237 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014011901 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014018423 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014020608 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014022120 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014022702 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014036219 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014039513 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014039523 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014039585 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014039684 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014039692 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014039702 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014039872 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014039970 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014041327 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014043143 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014047103 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014055782 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014059173 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014059255 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014065596 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014066505 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014068346 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014070887 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014071006 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014071219 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014071235 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014072941 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014081729 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014081730 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014081855 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014082644 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014085261 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014085593 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014085830 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014089212 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014089290 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014089348 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014089513 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014089533 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014089541 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093479 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093595 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093622 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093635 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093655 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093661 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093694 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093701 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093709 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093712 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093718 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093736 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093768 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014093852 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014096972 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014099744 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014099750 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014104878 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014110006 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014110552 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014113493 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014123967 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014124226 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014125668 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014127287 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014128324 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014128659 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014130706 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014130955 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014131833 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014138379 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014143381 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014144094 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014144155 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014144288 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014144592 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014144761 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014144951 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014145599 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014145736 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014150624 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014152432 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014152940 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014153118 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014153470 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014158593 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014161821 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014164466 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014165177 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014165349 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014165612 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014165707 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014165825 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014172458 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014172470 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014172489 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014173955 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014182700 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014183071 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014184143 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014184741 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014184744 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014186585 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014186686 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014190181 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014191128 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014191518 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014191521 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014191525 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014191527 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014193583 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014194190 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014197568 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014197748 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014199358 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014200659 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014201015 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014204578 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014204723 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014204724 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014204725 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014204726 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014204727 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014204728 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014204729 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014205192 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014207043 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015002780 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015004241 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015006290 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015006294 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015006437 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015006498 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015006747 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015007194 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015010114 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015011483 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015013583 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015017866 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015018503 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015021353 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015021426 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015021990 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015024017 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015024986 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015026883 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015026885 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015026886 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015026887 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015027134 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015028969 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015030881 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015031619 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015031775 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015032494 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015033293 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015034872 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015034885 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015035136 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015035139 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015035162 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015040075 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015040402 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015042393 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015042585 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015048577 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015048690 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015048707 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015048801 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015049897 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015051191 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015052133 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015052231 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015052335 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015053995 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015054253 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015054315 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015057671 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015057834 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015057852 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015057976 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015057980 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015059265 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015065964 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015066119 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015066634 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015066636 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015066637 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015066638 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015066643 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015069682 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015070083 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015070193 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015070212 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015071474 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015073683 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015073867 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015073990 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015075056 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015075154 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015075175 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015075195 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015075557 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015077058 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015077290 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015077318 | May 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015079056 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015079057 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015086795 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015086798 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015088643 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089046 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089077 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089277 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089351 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089354 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089364 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089406 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089419 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089427 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089462 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089465 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089473 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015089486 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015095804 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015099850 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015100929 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015103057 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015103153 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015105928 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015108993 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015109752 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015110474 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015112790 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015112896 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015113063 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015114365 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015115903 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015116686 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015116969 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015117021 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015117041 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015117081 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015118156 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015119941 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015121454 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015122967 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015123339 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015124715 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015124718 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015126927 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015127428 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015127439 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015129686 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015131101 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015133554 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015134121 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015134812 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015136001 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015138510 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015138739 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015138855 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015138870 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015139008 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015139139 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015143046 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015143177 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015145417 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015148431 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015148670 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015148680 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015148761 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015148860 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015148863 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015153760 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015153780 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015153789 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015153791 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015153889 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015153940 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015155341 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015155686 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015157070 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015157534 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015159068 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015159086 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015159087 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015160683 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015161276 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015163733 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015164740 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015164748 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015165274 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015165275 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015165276 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015166272 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015167766 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015167956 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015168125 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015168158 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015168404 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015168547 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015168800 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015171603 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015171894 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015171932 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015172128 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015173436 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015175642 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015179540 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015183025 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015183026 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015183885 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015184259 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015184262 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015184268 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015188056 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015188065 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015188094 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015188109 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015188132 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015188135 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015188191 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015189693 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015191693 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015191899 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015191911 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015193858 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015195547 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015195621 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015195798 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015198020 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015200334 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015200378 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015200555 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015200805 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2016001978 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016004010 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016004318 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016007347 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016007604 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016007948 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016011080 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016011210 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016011428 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016012544 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016012552 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016014409 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016014565 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016014794 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016014837 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016016119 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016016358 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016019144 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016020399 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016021972 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016021973 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016022363 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016022866 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016022931 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016025131 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016025469 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016025759 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016026444 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016028682 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016028843 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016028887 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016033088 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016033230 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016033246 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016033298 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016035044 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016036754 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016037157 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016040030 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016040594 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016044182 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016044416 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016046635 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016049024 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016049163 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016049230 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016049251 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016049258 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016053397 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016054326 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016057061 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016057821 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016057835 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016057850 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016057951 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016057961 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016061073 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016061374 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016061481 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016061523 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016064894 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016065364 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016069282 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016069283 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016069591 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016069774 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016069910 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016069912 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016070037 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016070070 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016070129 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016072399 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016072936 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016073433 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016073559 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016073990 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016075662 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016076672 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016077273 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016077350 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016080097 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016080795 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016081923 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016081924 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016082135 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016083811 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016084084 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016084088 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016086177 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016089433 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016089866 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016089883 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016090385 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016094679 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016094845 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016094867 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016094872 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016094874 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016094880 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016094888 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016097212 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016097231 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016097751 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016099887 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016100272 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016100389 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016100568 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016100571 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016100951 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016100955 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016100974 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016103233 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016104716 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016106236 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016106239 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016106244 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016106338 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016108926 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016109255 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016109840 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016110214 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016110453 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016110511 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016110512 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016111546 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016112242 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016112351 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016112963 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016113357 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016114972 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016115179 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016115326 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016115355 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016116032 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016120480 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016123071 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016123230 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016123243 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016123578 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016126747 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016130600 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016130697 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016131009 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016132122 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016133165 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016135507 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016135557 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016135558 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016135559 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016137774 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016137949 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016141224 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016141893 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016142719 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016145150 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016148994 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016149484 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016149547 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016150336 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016150855 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016154016 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016154579 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016154596 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016155482 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016161004 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016161207 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016161260 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016161380 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016161446 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016164356 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016164797 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016166340 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016167300 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016168631 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016170484 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016172359 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016172727 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016174056 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016174151 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016174250 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016176191 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016176404 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016176690 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016177682 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016178207 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016179038 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016179112 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016181357 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016182893 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016182917 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016182959 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016183236 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016183298 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016183345 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016183402 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016183438 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016183448 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016184955 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016184989 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016185411 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016186745 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016186772 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016186946 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016186953 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016187717 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016187904 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016191684 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016191869 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016196273 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016196282 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016196308 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016196361 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016196499 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016196539 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016196655 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016196805 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016196887 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016197132 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016197133 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016197354 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016197355 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016197356 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016197357 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016197358 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016197359 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016197360 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016197361 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016197362 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016198361 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016198500 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016200263 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016201047 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016201138 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016201152 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016201153 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016201155 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016205276 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016205613 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016205623 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016205680 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016205688 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016205703 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016205711 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016205728 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016205745 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016205749 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016205759 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016205764 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO 2017001572 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017001988 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017004261 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017004279 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017004616 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017005807 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017009399 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017010556 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017011519 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017011721 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017011804 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017015015 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017015101 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017015545 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017015567 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017015637 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017017016 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017019867 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017019895 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017023803 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017023974 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017024047 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017024319 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017024343 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017024602 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017025323 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017027423 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017028768 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017029664 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017031360 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017031483 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017035416 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017040348 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017040511 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017040709 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017040786 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017040793 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017040813 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017043573 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017043656 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017044419 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017044776 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017044857 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017048390 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017049129 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017050963 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017053312 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017053431 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017053713 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017053729 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017053753 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017053762 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017053879 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017054721 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017058658 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017059241 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017062605 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017062723 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017062754 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017062855 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017062886 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017062983 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017064439 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017064546 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017064566 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017066175 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017066497 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017066588 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017066707 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017066781 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017068077 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017068377 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017069829 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017070029 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017070032 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017070169 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017070284 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017070598 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017070605 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017070632 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017070633 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017072590 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017074526 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017074962 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017075261 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017075335 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017075475 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017077135 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017077329 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017078751 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017079400 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017079428 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017079673 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017079724 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017081097 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017081288 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017083368 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017083722 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017083766 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017087395 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017090724 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017091510 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017091630 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017092201 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017093370 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017093969 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017095111 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017096041 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017096237 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017100158 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017100431 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017104404 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017105251 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017105350 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017105991 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017106414 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017106528 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017106537 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017106569 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017106616 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017106657 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017106767 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017109134 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017109757 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017112620 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017115268 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017117395 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017118598 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017118720 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017123609 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017123910 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017124086 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017124100 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017124652 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017126987 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017127807 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017131237 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017132112 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017132580 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017136520 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017136629 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017136794 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017139264 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017139505 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017141173 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017142835 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017142923 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017142999 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017143042 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017147056 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017147278 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017147432 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017147446 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017147555 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017151444 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017151719 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017152015 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017155717 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017157422 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017158153 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017160689 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017160752 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017160890 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017161068 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017165826 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017165862 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017167712 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017172644 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017172645 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017172860 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017173004 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017173054 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017173092 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017174329 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017176529 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017176806 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017178590 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017180694 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017180711 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017180915 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017180926 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017181107 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017181735 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017182468 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017184334 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017184768 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017184786 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017186550 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017189308 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017189336 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017190041 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017190257 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017190664 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017191210 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017191274 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017192172 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017192512 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017192544 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017192573 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017193029 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017193053 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017196768 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017197038 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017197238 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017197301 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017201476 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017205290 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017205423 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017207589 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017208247 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017209809 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017213896 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017213898 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017214460 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017216392 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017216771 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017218185 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017219027 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017219033 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017220751 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017222370 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017222773 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017222834 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017223107 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017223330 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2018000657 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018002719 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018005117 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018005289 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018005691 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018005782 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018005873 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 201806693 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018009520 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018009562 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018009822 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018013821 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018013932 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018013990 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018014384 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018015444 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018015936 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018017754 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018018979 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018020248 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018021878 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018022480 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018022634 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018025206 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018026723 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018026976 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018027078 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018030608 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018031683 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018035250 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018035300 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018035423 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018035503 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018039145 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018039438 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018039440 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018039448 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018045630 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018048827 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018049073 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018049168 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018058064 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018062866 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018064352 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018064371 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018064516 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018067546 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018067846 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018068053 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018069474 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018071623 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018071663 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018071868 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018071892 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018074979 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018079134 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018080573 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018081504 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018081535 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018081728 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018083128 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018083606 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018085288 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018085414 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018086623 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018089664 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018093990 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018098383 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018098480 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018098587 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018099256 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018103686 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018106268 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018107028 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018107103 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018107129 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018108272 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018109101 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018111946 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018111947 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018112336 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018112446 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018119354 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018119359 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018120283 | Jul 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018130830 | Jul 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018135838 | Jul 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018136396 | Jul 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018138385 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018142364 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018148246 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018148256 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018148647 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018149418 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018149888 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018149915 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018152197 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018152418 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018154380 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018154387 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018154412 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018154413 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018154418 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018154439 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018154459 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018154462 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018156372 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018156824 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018161009 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018165504 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018165629 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018170015 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018170340 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018175502 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018176009 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018179578 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018183403 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018189184 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018191388 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018195402 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018195545 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018195555 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018177351 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018197020 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018197495 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018202800 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018204493 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018208755 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018208998 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018209158 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018209320 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018213351 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018213708 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018213726 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018213771 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018213791 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018217852 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018217981 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018218166 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018218188 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018218206 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018226855 | Dec 2018 | WO |
| WO 2019005884 | Jan 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019005886 | Jan 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019010384 | Jan 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019023680 | Jan 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019042284 | Mar 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019051097 | Mar 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019075357 | Apr 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019079347 | Apr 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019084062 | May 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019090367 | May 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019092042 | May 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019118935 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019118949 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019123430 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019139645 | Jul 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019139951 | Jul 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019147014 | Aug 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019161251 | Aug 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019168953 | Sep 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019183641 | Sep 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019204369 | Oct 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019217942 | Nov 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019226593 | Nov 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019226953 | Nov 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019236566 | Dec 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019241649 | Dec 2019 | WO |
| WO 2020014261 | Jan 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020028555 | Feb 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020028823 | Feb 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020041751 | Feb 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020047124 | Mar 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020051360 | Mar 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020081568 | Apr 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020086908 | Apr 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020092453 | May 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020102659 | May 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020102709 | May 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020154500 | Jul 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020157008 | Aug 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020160071 | Aug 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020160517 | Aug 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020180975 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020181178 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020181180 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020181193 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020181195 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020181202 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020191153 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020191171 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020191233 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020191234 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020191239 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020191241 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020191242 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020191243 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020191245 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020191246 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020191248 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020191249 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020210751 | Oct 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020214842 | Oct 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020236982 | Nov 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020247587 | Dec 2020 | WO |
| WO 2021022043 | Feb 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021025750 | Feb 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021030344 | Feb 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021030666 | Feb 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021042047 | Mar 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021042062 | Mar 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021072328 | Apr 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021080922 | Apr 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021081264 | Apr 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021087182 | May 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021108717 | Jun 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021138469 | Jul 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021155065 | Aug 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021158921 | Aug 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021158995 | Aug 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021158999 | Aug 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021178709 | Sep 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021178717 | Sep 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021178720 | Sep 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021178898 | Sep 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021222318 | Nov 2021 | WO |
| WO 2021226558 | Nov 2021 | WO |
| WO 2022051250 | Mar 2022 | WO |
| WO 2022067130 | Mar 2022 | WO |
| WO 2022075813 | Apr 2022 | WO |
| WO 2022075816 | Apr 2022 | WO |
| WO 2022092317 | May 2022 | WO |
| WO 2022203905 | Sep 2022 | WO |
| WO 2022204543 | Sep 2022 | WO |
| WO 2022212926 | Oct 2022 | WO |
| WO 2022256714 | Dec 2022 | WO |
| WO 2023004439 | Jan 2023 | WO |
| WO 2023283092 | Jan 2023 | WO |
| WO 2023288332 | Jan 2023 | WO |
| WO 2023039440 | Mar 2023 | WO |
| WO 2023039447 | Mar 2023 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| [No Author Listed], “Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD): Occurrence” CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Last accessed online Apr. 28, 2021 via https://www.cdc.gov/prions/cwd/occurrence.html. |
| Avidan et al., Expression and characterization of a recombinant novel reverse transcriptase of a porcine endogenous retrovirus. Virology. Mar. 15, 2003;307(2):341-57. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6822(02)00131-9. |
| Baños-Sanz et al., Crystal structure and functional insights into uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibition by phage Φ29 DNA mimic protein p56. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 2013;41(13):6761-73. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt395. Epub May 13, 2013. |
| Ekman et al., CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing Increases Lifespan and Improves Motor Deficits in a Huntington's Disease Mouse Model. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. Sep. 6, 2019;17:829-839. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.07.009. Epub Jul. 26, 2019. |
| Fields et al., Gene targeting techniques for Huntington's disease. Ageing Res Rev. Sep. 2021;70:101385. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101385. Epub Jun. 5, 2021. |
| Fikes et al., Design of multi-epitope, analogue-based cancer vaccines. Expert Opin Biol Ther. Sep. 2003;3(6):985-93. doi: 10.1517/14712598.3.6.985. |
| Guo et al., Precision modeling of mitochondrial diseases in zebrafish via DdCBE-mediated mtDNA base editing. Cell Discov. Sep. 3, 2021;7(1):78. doi: 10.1038/s41421-021-00307-9. |
| Hizi et al., Retroviral reverse transcriptases (other than those of HIV-1 and murine leukemia virus): a comparison of their molecular and biochemical properties. Virus Res. Jun. 2008;134(1-2):203-20. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2007.12.008. Epub Mar. 3, 2008. |
| Hwang et al., Heritable and precise zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR-Cas system. PLoS One. Jul. 9, 2013;8(7):e68708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068708. |
| Kang et al., Chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA editing in plants. Nat Plants. Jul. 2021;7(7):899-905. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00943-9. Epub Jul. 1, 2021. |
| Karimian et al., CRISPR/Cas9 novel therapeutic road for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Life Sci. Oct. 15, 2020;259:118165. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118165. Epub Jul. 29, 2020. |
| Kirshenboim et al., Expression and characterization of a novel reverse transcriptase of the LTR retrotransposon Tf1. Virology. Sep. 30, 2007;366(2):263-76. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.04.002. Epub May 23, 2007. |
| Knipping et al., Disruption of HIV-1 co-receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 in primary human T cells and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using base editing. Mol Ther. Jan. 5, 2022;30(1):130-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.10.026. Epub Nov. 2, 2021. |
| Lee et al., Mitochondrial DNA editing in mice with DddA-TALE fusion deaminases. Nat Commun. Feb. 19, 2021;12(1):1190. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21464-1. |
| Misra et al., An enzymatically active chimeric HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) with the RNase-H domain of murine leukemia virus RT exists as a monomer. J Biol Chem. Apr. 17, 1998;273(16):9785-9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.16.9785. |
| Nowak et al., Ty3 reverse transcriptase complexed with an RNA-DNA hybrid shows structural and functional asymmetry. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Apr. 2014;21(4):389-96. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2785. Epub Mar. 9, 2014. Author Manuscript, 22 pages. |
| Raaijmakers et al., CRISPR/Cas Applications in Myotonic Dystrophy: Expanding Opportunities. Int J Mol Sci. Jul. 27, 2019;20(15):3689. doi: 10.3390/ijms20153689. |
| Shalaby et al., Tissue-Specific Delivery of CRISPR Therapeutics: Strategies and Mechanisms of Non-Viral Vectors. Int J Mol Sci. Oct. 5, 2020;21(19):7353. doi: 10.3390/ijms21197353. |
| Simon et al., Retrons and their applications in genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Res. Dec. 2, 2019;47(21):11007-11019. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz865. |
| Studebaker et al., Depletion of uracil-DNA glycosylase activity is associated with decreased cell proliferation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Aug. 26, 2005;334(2):509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.06.118. |
| Toro et al., Comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of bacterial reverse transcriptases. PLoS One. Nov. 25, 2014;9(11):e114083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114083. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/716,256, filed Oct. 19, 2012, Jinek et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/717,324, filed Oct. 23, 2012, Cho et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/734,256, filed Dec. 6, 2012, Chen et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/758,624, filed Jan. 30, 2013, Chen et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/761,046, filed Feb. 5, 2013, Knight et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/794,422, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Knight et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/803,599, filed Mar. 20, 2013, Kim et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/837,481, filed Jun. 20, 2013, Cho et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/838,178, filed Jun. 21, 2013, Joung et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/874,682, filed Sep. 6, 2013, Liu et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/874,746, filed Sep. 6, 2013, Liu et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/288,661, filed Jan. 29, 2016, Muir et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/357,332, filed Jun. 30, 2016, Liu et al. |
| Anonymous Third Party Observations for Application No. PCT/US2022/031439, mailed Sep. 8, 2022. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2021/031439, mailed Sep. 22, 2021. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2021/031439, mailed Nov. 17, 2022. |
| [No Author Listed] “Nucleic Acids Sizes and Molecular Weights.” Printed Mar. 19, 2021. 2 pages. |
| [No Author Listed] “Zinc Finger Nuclease” from Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zinc_finger_nuclease&oldid=1007053318. Page last edited Feb. 16, 2021. Printed on Mar. 19, 2021. |
| [No Author Listed] Beast2: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. http://www.beast2.org/ Last accessed Apr. 28, 2021. |
| [No Author Listed] HyPhy—Hypothesis testing using Phylogenies. Last modified Apr. 21, 2017. Accessed online via http://hyphy.org/w/index.php/Main_Page on Apr. 28, 2021. |
| [No Author Listed] NCBI Accession No. XP_015843220.1. C ->U editing enzyme APOBEC-1 [Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii], XP002793540. Mar. 21, 2016. |
| [No Author Listed] NCBI Accession No. XP_021505673.1. C ->U editing enzyme APOBEC-1 [Meriones unguiculatus], XP002793541. Jun. 27, 2017. |
| [No Author Listed] NCBI Reference Sequence: WP_001516895.1. Mar. 13, 2021. 2 pages. |
| [No Author Listed] NCBI Reference Sequence: WP_087959824.1. Oct. 9, 2019. 2 pages. |
| [No Author Listed] Nucleic Acid Data from New England Biolabs. Printed Sep. 28, 2021. 1 page. |
| [No Author Listed] Score result for SEQ 355 to W02017032580. Muir et al. 2016. |
| [No Author Listed] Theoretical Biochemistry Group. Institute for Theoretical Chemistry. The ViennaRNA Package. Universitat Wien. https://www.tbi.univie.ac.at/RNA/. Last accessed Apr. 28, 2021. |
| [No Author Listed] Transcription activator-like effector nuclease. Wikipedia. Last edited Sep. 27, 2021. Accessed via https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transcription_activator-like_effector_nuclease&oldid=1046813325 on Sep. 28, 2021. 9 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], “Enediyne” from Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Enediyne&oldid=1114086576. Page last edited Oct. 4, 2022. Printed on Oct. 7, 2022. 8 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], “FokI” from New England Biolabs Inc. Last accessed online via https://www.neb.com/products/r0109-foki#Product%20Information on Mar. 19, 2021. 1 page. |
| [No Author Listed], “Human genome.” Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Brittanica, Inc. Published Feb. 15, 2019. Last accessed online via https://www.britannica.com/science/human-genome on Mar. 19, 2021. 2 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], “Lambda DNA” from Catalog & Technical Reference. New England Biolabs Inc. 2002/2003. pp. 133 and 270-273. |
| [No Author Listed], Adenine deaminase polypeptide SEQ: 49. EBI Acc. No. BJG44493. Jun. 1, 20210. 1 page. |
| [No Author Listed], Cas14al protein-N terminal adenine deaminase. EBI Acc. No. BKX98589, Seq. ID 265. May 26, 2022. 3 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], EMBL Accession No. Q99ZW2. Nov. 2012. 2 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], Gag-Pol polyprotein. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot No. P03355.5. Sep. 18, 2019. 18 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], Homo sapiens signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), transcript variant 1, mRNA. NCBI Ref Seq No. NM_139276.2. Retrived from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/nm_139276.2. Feb. 26, 2020. 8 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], Homo sapiens survival of motor neuron 2, centromeric (SMN2), RefSeqGene (LRG_677) on chromosome 5. NCBI Ref Seq No. NG_008728.1. Aug. 21, 2022. Accessible at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NG_008728.1/. 14 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], Invitrogen Lipofectamine™ 2000 product sheets, 2002. 2 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], Invitrogen Lipofectamine™ 2000 product sheets, 2005. 3 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], Invitrogen Lipofectamine™ LTX product sheets, 2011. 4 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], Multispecies: tRNA adenosine(34) deaminase TadA [Enterobacteriaceae]. NCBI Ref Seq No. WP_001297409.1. Feb. 28, 2022. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/WP_001297409.1/. 2 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], Mus musculus (Mouse). UniProtKB Accession No. P51908 (ABEC1_MOUSE). Oct. 1, 1996. 10 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], MutL homolog 1. UniProtKB Acc. No. F1MPG0. May 3, 2011. Accessible at https://rest.uniprot.org/unisave/F1MPG0?format=txt&versions=1. 1 page. |
| [No Author Listed], Nav1.7 (SCN9A) (NM_002977) Human Tagged ORF Clone. OriGene. Retrieved from https://www.origene.com/catalog/cdna-clones/expression-plasmids/rc22488/nav17-scn9a-nm_002977-human-tagged-orf-clone on Feb. 13, 2023. 6 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], RecName: Full=DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1; AltName: Full=MutL protein homolog 1. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot Acc. No. P97679.1. May 3, 2023. Accessible at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/p97679. 3 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 isoform 1 [Homo sapiens]. NCBI Ref Seq No. NP_644805.1. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/NP_644805.1/. Nov. 27, 2022. 5 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 protein. EBI Acc. No. BIR16744. Jan. 21, 2021. 1 page. |
| [No Author Listed], Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 protein. EBI Acc. No. BIR16747. Jan. 21, 2021. 1 page. |
| [No Author Listed], Thermo Fisher Scientific—How Cationic Lipid Mediated Transfection Works, retrieved from the internet Aug. 27, 2015. 2 pages. |
| [No Author Listed], tumor-specific antigen. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/tumor-specific-antigen. Retrieved on Oct. 7, 2022. 1 page. |
| Abremski et al., Bacteriophage P1 site-specific recombination. Purification and properties of the Cre recombinase protein. J Biol Chem. Feb. 10, 1984;259(3):1509-14. |
| Abudayyeh et al., A cytosine deaminase for programmable single-base RNA editing. Science. Jul. 26, 2019;365(6451):382-386. doi: 10.1126/science.aax7063. Epub Jul. 11, 2019. |
| Abudayyeh et al., C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector. Science. Aug. 5, 2016;353(6299):aaf5573. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5573. Epub Jun. 2, 2016. |
| Abudayyeh et al., RNA targeting with CRISPR-Cas13. Nature. Oct. 12, 2017;550(7675):280-284. doi: 10.1038/nature24049. Epub Oct. 4, 2017. |
| Acharya et al., hMSH2 forms specific mispair-binding complexes with hMSH3 and hMSH6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 26, 1996;93(24):13629-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13629. |
| Ada et al., Carbohydrate-protein conjugate vaccines. Clin Microbiol Infect. Feb. 2003;9(2):79-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00530.x. |
| Adamala et al., Programmable RNA-binding protein composed of repeats of a single modular unit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 10, 2016;113(19):E2579-88. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519368113. Epub Apr. 26, 2016. |
| Adams et al., New biarsenical ligands and tetracysteine motifs for protein labeling in vitro and in vivo: synthesis and biological applications. J Am Chem Soc. May 29, 2002;124(21):6063-76. doi: 10.1021/ja017687n. |
| Addgene Plasmid # 44246. pdCas9-humanized, 2017, Stanley Qi. |
| Addgene Plasmid # 73021. PCMV-BE3, 2017, David Liu. |
| Addgene Plasmid # 79620. pcDNA3.1_pCMV-nCas-PmCDA1-ugi pH1-gRNA(HPRT), 2017, Akihiko Kondo. |
| Adli, The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat Commun. May 15, 2018;9(1):1911. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04252-2. |
| Aguilo et al., Coordination of m(6)A mRNA Methylation and Gene Transcription by ZFP217 Regulates Pluripotency and Reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell. Dec. 3, 2015;17(6):689-704. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.09.005. Epub Oct. 29, 2015. |
| Ahmad et al., Antibody-mediated specific binding and cytotoxicity of liposome-entrapped doxorubicin to lung cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Res. Sep. 1, 1992;52(17):4817-20. |
| Ai et al., C-terminal Loop Mutations Determine Folding and Secretion Properties of PCSK9. iMedPub J: Biochem Mol Biol J. Nov. 5, 2016;2(3):17. doi: 10.21767/2471-8084.100026. 12 pages. |
| Aida et al., Prime editing primarily incudes undesired outcomes in mice. bioRxiv preprint and Supplemental Information. Aug. 6, 2020. Retrieved from www.biorxiv.org. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.06.239723. 40 pages. |
| Aihara et al., A conformational switch controls the DNA cleavage activity of lambda integrase. Mol Cell. Jul. 2003;12(1):187-98. |
| Aik et al., Structure of human RNA N6-methyladenine demethylase ALKBH5 provides insights into its mechanisms of nucleic acid recognition and demethylation. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 2014;42(7):4741-54. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku085. Epub Jan. 30, 2014. |
| Aird et al., Increasing Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair efficiency through covalent tethering of DNA repair template. Commun Biol. May 31, 2018;1:54. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0054-2. |
| Akcakaya et al., In vivo CRISPR editing with no detectable genome-wide off-target mutations. Nature. Sep. 2018;561(7723):416-419. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0500-9. Epub Sep. 12, 2018. PMID: 30209390; PMCID: PMC6194229. |
| Akins et al., Mitochondrial plasmids of Neurospora: integration into mitochondrial DNA and evidence for reverse transcription in mitochondria. Cell. Nov. 21, 1986;47(4):505-16. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90615-x. |
| Akinsheye et al., Fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia. Blood. Jul. 7, 2011;118(1):19-27. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-325258. Epub Apr. 13, 2011. |
| Akopian et al., Chimeric recombinases with designed DNA sequence recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 22, 2003;100(15):8688-91. Epub Jul. 1, 2003. |
| Alarcón et al., HNRNPA2B1 Is a Mediator of m(6)A-Dependent Nuclear RNA Processing Events. Cell. Sep. 10, 2015;162(6):1299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.011. Epub Aug. 27, 2015. |
| Alarcón et al., N6-methyladenosine marks primary microRNAs for processing. Nature. Mar. 26, 2015;519(7544):482-5. doi: 10.1038/nature14281. Epub Mar. 18, 2015. |
| Alexander, HFE-associated hereditary hemochromatosis. Genet Med. May 2009;11(5):307-13. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31819d30f2. |
| Alexandrov et al., Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature. Aug. 22, 2013;500(7463):415-21. doi: 10.1038/nature12477. Epub Aug. 14, 2013. |
| Ali et al., Novel genetic abnormalities in Bernard-Soulier syndrome in India. Ann Hematol. Mar. 2014;93(3):381-4. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1895-x. Epub Sep. 1, 2013. |
| Alizadeh et al., HR9: An Important Cell Penetrating Peptide for Delivery of HCV NS3 DNA into HEK-293T Cells. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. Jan.-Mar. 2020;12(1):44-51. |
| Altschul et al., Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. Oct. 5, 1990;215(3):403-10. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. |
| Amato et al., Interpreting elevated fetal hemoglobin in pathology and health at the basic laboratory level: new and known Υ-gene mutations associated with hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin. Int J Lab Hematol. Feb. 2014;36(1):13-9. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12094. Epub Apr. 29, 2013. |
| Ames et al., A eubacterial riboswitch class that senses the coenzyme tetrahydrofolate. Chem Biol. Jul. 30, 2010;17(7):681-5. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.05.020. |
| Amrann et al., Tightly regulated tac promoter vectors useful for the expression of unfused and fused proteins in Escherichia coli. Gene. Sep. 30, 1988;69(2):301-15. |
| Anders et al., Chapter One: In Vitro Enzymology of Cas9. in Methods in Enzymology, eds Doudna et al. 2014: 546:1-20. |
| Anders et al., Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature. Sep. 25, 2014;513(7519):569-73. doi: 10.1038/nature13579. Epub Jul. 27, 2014. |
| Anderson, Human gene therapy. Science. May 8, 1992;256(5058):808-13. doi: 10.1126/science.1589762. |
| André et al., Axotomy-induced expression of calcium-activated chloride current in subpopulations of mouse dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurophysiol. Dec. 2003;90(6):3764-73. doi: 10.1152/jn.00449.2003. Epub Aug. 27, 2003. |
| Anzalone et al., Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 2020;38(7):824-844. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9. Epub Jun. 22, 2020. |
| Anzalone et al., Reprogramming eukaryotic translation with ligand-responsive synthetic RNA switches. Nat Methods. May 2016;13(5):453-8. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3807. Epub Mar. 21, 2016. |
| Anzalone et al., Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature. Dec. 2019;576(7785):149-157 and Suppl Info. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4. Epub Oct. 21, 2019. 72 pages. |
| Anzalone et al., Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature. Dec. 2019;576(7785):149-157. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4. Epub Oct. 21, 2019. |
| Aplan, Causes of oncogenic chromosomal translocation. Trends Genet. Jan. 2006;22(1):46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.10.002. Epub Oct. 28, 2005. |
| Arakawa et al., A method to convert mRNA into a gRNA library for CRISPR/Cas9 editing of any organism. Sci Adv. Aug. 24, 2016;2(8):e1600699. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600699. |
| Araki et al., Comparative analysis of right element mutant lox sites on recombination efficiency in embryonic stem cells. BMC Biotechnol. Mar. 31, 2010;10:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-10-29. |
| Araki et al., Site-specific recombinase, R, encoded by yeast plasmid pSR1. J Mol Biol. May 5, 1992;225(1):25-37. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)91023-i. |
| Araki et al., Targeted integration of DNA using mutant lox sites in embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Feb. 15, 1997;25(4):868-72. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.4.868. |
| Arambula et al., Surface display of a massively variable lipoprotein by a Legionella diversity-generating retroelement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 14, 2013;110(20):8212-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301366110. Epub Apr. 30, 2013. |
| Arazoe et al., Targeted Nucleotide Editing Technologies for Microbial Metabolic Engineering. Biotechnol J. Sep. 2018;13(9):e1700596. doi: 10.1002/biot.201700596. Epub Jun. 19, 2018. |
| Arbab et al., Cloning-free CRISPR. Stem Cell Reports. Nov. 10, 2015;5(5):908-917. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.09.022. Epub Oct. 29, 2015. |
| Arbab et al., Determinants of Base Editing Outcomes from Target Library Analysis and Machine Learning. Cell. Jul. 23, 2020;182(2):463-480.e30. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.037. Epub Jun. 12, 2020. |
| Arezi et al., Novel mutations in Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus reverse transcriptase increase thermostability through tighter binding to template-primer. Nucleic Acids Res. Feb. 2009;37(2):473-81. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn952. Epub Dec. 4, 2008. |
| Arnold et al., Mutants of Tn3 resolvase which do not require accessory binding sites for recombination activity. EMBO J. Mar. 1, 1999;18(5):1407-14. |
| Asante et al., A naturally occurring variant of the human prion protein completely prevents prion disease. Nature. Jun. 25, 2015;522(7557):478-81. doi: 10.1038/nature14510. Epub Jun. 10, 2015. |
| Asokan et al., The AAV vector toolkit: poised at the clinical crossroads. Mol Ther. Apr. 2012;20(4):699-708. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.287. Epub Jan. 24, 2012. |
| Atkins et al., Ribosomal frameshifting and transcriptional slippage: From genetic steganography and cryptography to adventitious use. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep. 6, 2016;44(15):7007-78. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw530. Epub Jul. 19, 2016. |
| Auer et al., Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in in zebrafish by homology-independent DNA repair. Genome Res. Jan. 2014;24(1):142-53. doi: 10.1101/gr.161638.113. Epub Oct. 31, 2013. |
| Auricchio et al., Exchange of surface proteins impacts on viral vector cellular specificity and transduction characteristics: the retina as a model. Hum Mol Genet. Dec. 15, 2001;10(26):3075-81. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.26.3075. |
| Autieri et al., IRT-1, a novel interferon-gamma-responsive transcript encoding a growth-suppressing basic leucine zipper protein. J Biol Chem. Jun. 12, 1998;273(24):14731-7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.24.14731. |
| Avidan et al., The processivity and fidelity of DNA synthesis exhibited by the reverse transcriptase of bovine leukemia virus. Eur J Biochem. Feb. 2002;269(3):859-67. doi: 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02719.x. |
| Baba et al., Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:2006.0008. doi: 10.1038/msb4100050. Epub Feb. 21, 2006. |
| Babacic et al., CRISPR-cas gene-editing as plausible treatment of neuromuscular and nucleotide-repeat-expansion diseases: A systematic review. PLoS One. Feb. 22, 2019;14(2):e0212198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212198. |
| Bacman et al., Specific elimination of mutant mitochondrial genomes in patient-derived cells by mitoTALENs. Nat Med. Sep. 2013;19(9):1111-3. doi: 10.1038/nm.3261. Epub Aug. 4, 2013. |
| Badran et al., Continuous evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins overcomes insect resistance. Nature. May 5, 2016;533(7601):58-63. doi: 10.1038/nature17938. Epub Apr. 27, 2016. |
| Badran et al., Development of potent in vivo mutagenesis plasmids with broad mutational spectra. Nat Commun. Oct. 7, 2015;6:8425. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9425. |
| Badran et al., In vivo continuous directed evolution. Curr Opin Chem Biol. Feb. 2015;24:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.09.040. Epub Nov. 7, 2014. |
| Bae et al., Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics. May 15, 2014;30(10):1473-5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu048. Epub Jan. 24, 2014. |
| Bae et al., Heteroclitic CD33 peptide with enhanced anti-acute myeloid leukemic immunogenicity. Clin Cancer Res. Oct. 15, 2004;10(20):7043-52. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0322. |
| Bae et al., Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites. Nat Methods. Jul. 2014;11(7):705-6. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3015. |
| Bagal et al., Recent progress in sodium channel modulators for pain. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. Aug. 15, 2014;24(16):3690-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.06.038. Epub Jun. 21, 2014. |
| Bagyinszky et al., Characterization of mutations in PRNP (prion) gene and their possible roles in neurodegenerative diseases. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. Aug. 14, 2018;14:2067-2085. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S165445. |
| Balakrishnan et al., Flap endonuclease 1. Annu Rev Biochem. 2013;82:119-38. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-072511-122603. Epub Feb. 28, 2013. |
| Baldari et al., A novel leader peptide which allows efficient secretion of a fragment of human interleukin 1 beta in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Embo J. Jan. 1987;6(1):229-34. |
| Banerjee et al., Cadmium inhibits mismatch repair by blocking the ATPase activity of the MSH2-MSH6 complex [published correction appears in Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(5):1738]. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(4):1410-1419. Published Mar. 3, 2005. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki291. |
| Banerji et al., A lymphocyte-specific cellular enhancer is located downstream of the joining region in immunoglobulin heavy chain genes. Cell. Jul. 1983;33(3):729-40. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90015-6. |
| Bannert et al., Retroelements and the human genome: new perspectives on an old relation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 5, 2004;101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):14572-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404838101. Epub Aug. 13, 2004. |
| Banno et al., Deaminase-mediated multiplex genome editing in Escherichia coli. Nat Microbiol. Apr. 2018;3(4):423-429. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0102-6. Epub Feb. 5, 2018. |
| Banskota et al., Engineered virus-like particles for efficient in vivo delivery of therapeutic proteins. Cell. Jan. 20, 2022;185(2):250-265.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.021. Epub Jan. 11, 2022. |
| Baranauskas et al., Generation and characterization of new highly thermostable and processive M-MuLV reverse transcriptase variants. Protein Eng Des Sel. Oct. 2012;25(10):657-68. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzs034. Epub Jun. 12, 2012. |
| Barmania et al., C—C chemokine receptor type five (CCR5): An emerging target for the control of HIV infection. Appl Transl Genom. May 26, 2013;2:3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2013.05.004. |
| Barnes et al., Repair and genetic consequences of endogenous DNA base damage in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:445-76. |
| Barnes et al., The fidelity of Taq polymerase catalyzing PCR is improved by an N-terminal deletion. Gene. Mar. 1, 1992;112(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90299-5. |
| Barrangou et al., CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science. Mar. 23, 2007;315(5819):1709-12. |
| Barrangou, RNA-mediated programmable DNA cleavage. Nat Biotechnol. Sep. 2012;30(9):836-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2357. |
| Barrera-Paez et al., Mitochondrial genome engineering coming-of-age. Trends Genet. Aug. 2022;38(8):869-880. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.04.011. Epub May 19, 2022. Erratum in: Trends Genet. Aug. 26, 2022. |
| Bartlett et al., Efficient expression of protein coding genes from the murine U1 small nuclear RNA promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 20, 1996;93(17):8852-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.17.8852. |
| Bartosovic et al., N6-methyladenosine demethylase FTO targets pre-mRNAs and regulates alternative splicing and 3′-end processing. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 2, 2017;45(19):11356-11370. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx778. |
| Basha et al., Influence of cationic lipid composition on gene silencing properties of lipid nanoparticle formulations of siRNA in antigen-presenting cells. Mol Ther. Dec. 2011;19(12):2186-200. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.190. Epub Oct. 4, 2011. |
| Basila et al., Minimal 2′-O-methyl phosphorothioate linkage modification pattern of synthetic guide RNAs for increased stability and efficient CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing avoiding cellular toxicity. PLoS One. Nov. 27, 2017;12(11):e0188593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188593. |
| Bass, B.L., RNA editing by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002;71:817-46. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135501. Epub Nov. 9, 2001. |
| Basturea et al., Substrate specificity and properties of the Escherichia coli 16S rRNA methyltransferase, RsmE. RNA. Nov. 2007;13(11):1969-76. doi: 10.1261/rna.700507. Epub Sep. 13, 2007. |
| Batey et al., Structure of a natural guanine-responsive riboswitch complexed with the metabolite hypoxanthine. Nature. Nov. 18, 2004;432(7015):411-5. |
| Beale et al., Comparison of the differential context-dependence of DNA deamination by APOBEC enzymes: correlation with mutation spectra in vivo. J Mol Biol. Mar. 26, 2004;337(3):585-96. |
| Beaudry et al., Directed evolution of an RNA enzyme. Science. Jul. 31, 1992;257(5070):635-41. doi: 10.1126/science.1496376. |
| Bebenek et al., Error-prone polymerization by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Contribution of template-primer misalignment, miscoding, and termination probability to mutational hot spots. J Biol Chem. May 15, 1993;268(14):10324-34. |
| Bedell et al., In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system. Nature. Nov. 1, 2012;491(7422):114-8. DOI: 10.1038/nature11537. Epub Sep. 23, 2012. |
| Begley, Scientists unveil the ‘most clever CRISPR gadget’ so far. STAT, Apr. 20, 2016. https://www.statnews.com/2016/04/20/clever-crispr-advance-unveiled/. |
| Behr, Gene transfer with synthetic cationic amphiphiles: prospects for gene therapy. Bioconjug Chem. Sep.-Oct. 1994;5(5):382-9. doi: 10.1021/bc00029a002. |
| Bell et al., Ribozyme-catalyzed excision of targeted sequences from within RNAs. Biochemistry. Dec. 24, 2002;41(51):15327-33. doi: 10.1021/bi0267386. |
| Belshaw et al., Controlling programmed cell death with a cyclophilin-cyclosporin-based chemical inducer of dimerization. Chem Biol. Sep. 1996;3(9):731-8. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(96)90249-5. |
| Belshaw et al., Controlling protein association and subcellular localization with a synthetic ligand that induces heterodimerization of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 14, 1996;93(10):4604-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.10.4604. |
| Benarroch, HCN channels: function and clinical implications. Neurology. Jan. 15, 2013;80(3):304-10. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827dec42. |
| Bennett et al., Painful and painless channelopathies. Lancet Neurol. Jun. 2014;13(6):587-99. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70024-9. Epub May 6, 2014. |
| Bentin, T., A ribozyme transcribed by a ribozyme. Artif DNA PNA XNA. Apr. 2011;2(2):40-42. doi: 10.4161/adna.2.2.16852. |
| Berger et al., Reverse transcriptase and its associated ribonuclease H: interplay of two enzyme activities controls the yield of single-stranded complementary deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry. May 10, 1983;22(10):2365-72. doi: 10.1021/bi00279a010. |
| Berges et al., Transduction of brain by herpes simplex virus vectors. Mol Ther. Jan. 2007;15(1):20-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300018. |
| Berkhout et al., Identification of an active reverse transcriptase enzyme encoded by a human endogenous HERV-K retrovirus. J Virol. Mar. 1999;73(3):2365-75. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.3.2365-2375.1999. |
| Bernhart et al., Local RNA base pairing probabilities in large sequences. Bioinformatics. Mar. 1, 2006;22(5):614-5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btk014. Epub Dec. 20, 2005. |
| Bernstein et al., Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature. Jan. 18, 2001;409(6818):363-6. doi: 10.1038/35053110. |
| Bershtein et al., Advances in laboratory evolution of enzymes. Curr Opin; Chem Biol. Apr. 2008;12(2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.01.027. Epub Mar. 7, 2008. Review. |
| Bertolotti et al., Toward genosafe endonuclease-boosted gene targeting using breakthrough CRISP/Cas9 for next generation stem cell gene therapy culminating in efficient ex VIVO in VIVO gene repair/genomic editing. Molecular Therapy. May 2015;23(Suppl1):S139. Abstract 350. 18th Ann Meeting of the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy. ASGCT 2015. New Orleans, LA. May 13, 2015-May 16, 2015. |
| Bertrand et al., Localization of ASHI mRNA particles in living yeast. Mol Cell. Oct. 1998;2(4):437-45. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80143-4. |
| Bertsimas et al., Simulated annealing. Statistical Science. Feb. 1993;8(1):10-15. doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011077. |
| Bessen et al., High-resolution specificity profiling and off-target prediction for site-specific DNA recombinases. Nat Commun. Apr. 26, 2019;10(1):1937. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09987-0. |
| Beumer et al., Efficient gene targeting in Drosophila with zinc-finger nucleases. Genetics. Apr. 2006;172(4):2391-403. Epub Feb. 1, 2006. |
| Bhagwat, DNA-cytosine deaminases: from antibody maturation to antiviral defense. DNA Repair (Amst). Jan. 5, 2004;3(1):85-9. |
| Bi et al., Pseudo attP sites in favor of transgene integration and expression in cultured porcine cells identified by Streptomyces phage phiC31 integrase. BMC Mol Biol. Sep. 8, 2013;14:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-14-20. |
| Bibb et al., Integration and excision by the large serine recombinase phiRv1 integrase. Mol Microbiol. Mar. 2005;55(6):1896-910. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04517.x. |
| Bibikova et al., Targeted chromosomal cleavage and mutagenesis in Drosophila using zinc-finger nucleases. Genetics. Jul. 2002;161(3):1169-75. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.3.1169. |
| Biehs et al., DNA Double-Strand Break Resection Occurs during Non-homologous End Joining in G1 but Is Distinct from Resection during Homologous Recombination. Mol Cell. Feb. 16, 2017;65(4):671-684.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.016. Epub Jan. 26, 2017. |
| Billon et al., CRISPR-Mediated Base Editing Enables Efficient Disruption of Eukaryotic Genes through Induction of STOP Codons. Mol Cell. Sep. 21, 2017;67(6):1068-1079.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.008. Epub Sep. 7, 2017. |
| Birling et al., Site-specific recombinases for manipulation of the mouse genome. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;561:245-63. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-019-9_16. |
| Biswas et al., A structural basis for allosteric control of DNA recombination by lambda integrase. Nature. Jun. 23, 2005;435(7045):1059-66. doi: 10.1038/nature03657. |
| Bitinaite et al., FokI dimerization is required for DNA cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 1, 1998;95(18):10570-5. |
| Blaese et al., Vectors in cancer therapy: how will they deliver? Cancer Gene Ther. Dec. 1995;2(4):291-7. |
| Blain et al., Nuclease activities of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase. Mutants with altered substrate specificities. J Biol Chem. Nov. 5, 1993;268(31):23585-92. |
| Blaisonneau et al., A circular plasmid from the yeast Torulaspora delbrueckii. Plasmid. 1997;38(3):202-9. doi: 10.1006/plas.1997.1315. |
| Blau et al., A proliferation switch for genetically modified cells. PNAS Apr. 1, 1997 94 (7) 3076-3081; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.7.3076. |
| Blauw et al., SMN1 gene duplications are associated with sporadic ALS. Neurology. Mar. 13, 2012;78(11):776-80. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318249f697. Epub Feb. 8, 2012. |
| Bloom et al., Evolving strategies for enzyme engineering. Curr Opin Struct Biol. Aug. 2005;15(4):447-52. |
| Boch, TALEs of genome targeting. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2011;29(2):135-6. Doi: 10.1038/nbt.1767. |
| Bodi et al., Yeast m6A Methylated mRNAs Are Enriched on Translating Ribosomes during Meiosis, and under Rapamycin Treatment. PLoS One. Jul. 17, 2015;10(7):e0132090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132090. |
| Boeckle et al., Melittin analogs with high lytic activity at endosomal pH enhance transfection with purified targeted PEI polyplexes. J Control Release. May 15, 2006;112(2):240-8. Epub Mar. 20, 2006. |
| Boersma et al., Selection strategies for improved biocatalysts. FEBS J. May 2007;274(9):2181-95. |
| Bogdanove et al., Engineering altered protein-DNA recognition specificity. Nucleic Acids Res. Jun. 1, 2018;46(10):4845-4871. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky289. |
| Bogdanove et al., TAL effectors: customizable proteins for DNA targeting. Science. Sep. 30, 2011;333(6051):1843-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1204094. |
| Bohlke et al., Sense codon emancipation for proteome-wide incorporation of noncanonical amino acids: rare isoleucine codon AUA as a target for genetic code expansion. FEMS Microbiol Lett. Feb. 2014;351(2):133-44. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12371. Epub Jan. 27, 2014. |
| Bolotin et al., Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology. Aug. 2005;151(Pt 8):2551-61. |
| Bolusani et al., Evolution of variants of yeast site-specific recombinase Flp that utilize native genomic sequences as recombination target sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(18):5259-69. Epub Sep. 26, 2006. |
| Bondeson et al., Inversion of the IDS gene resulting from recombination with IDS-related sequences is a common cause of the Hunter syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. Apr. 1995;4(4):615-21. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.4.615. |
| Borchardt et al., Controlling mRNA stability and translation with the CRISPR endoribonuclease Csy4. RNA. Nov. 2015;21(11):1921-30. doi: 10.1261/rna.051227.115. Epub Sep. 9, 2015. |
| Borman, Improved route to single-base genome editing. Chemical & Engineering News, Apr. 25, 2016;94(17)p5. http://cen.acs.org/articles/94/i17/Improved-route-single-base-genome.html. |
| Bosch et al., Precise genome engineering in Drosophila using prime editing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jan. 5, 2021;118(1):e2021996118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021996118. |
| Bothmer et al., Characterization of the interplay between DNA repair and CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA lesions at an endogenous locus. Nat Commun. Jan. 9, 2017;8:13905. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13905. |
| Bourinet et al., Silencing of the Cav3.2 T-type calcium channel gene in sensory neurons demonstrates its major role in nociception. EMBO J. Jan. 26, 2005;24(2):315-24. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600515. Epub Dec. 16, 2004. |
| Boutabout et al., DNA synthesis fidelity by the reverse transcriptase of the yeast retrotransposon Ty1. Nucleic Acids Res. Jun. 1, 2001;29(11):2217-22. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.11.2217. |
| Box et al., A multi-domain protein system based on the HC fragment of tetanus toxin for targeting DNA to neuronal cells. J Drug Target. Jul. 2003;11(6):333-43. doi: 10.1080/1061186310001634667. |
| Branden and Tooze, Introduction to Protein Structure. 1999; 2nd edition. Garland Science Publisher: 3-12. |
| Braun et al., Immunogenic duplex nucleic acids are nuclease resistant. J Immunol. Sep. 15, 1988;141(6):2084-9. |
| Brierley et al., Viral RNA pseudoknots: versatile motifs in gene expression and replication. Nat Rev Microbiol. Aug. 2007;5(8):598-610. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1704. |
| Briner et al., Guide RNA functional modules direct Cas9 activity and orthogonality. Mol Cell. Oct. 23, 2014;56(2):333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.019. |
| Britt et al., Re-engineering plant gene targeting. Trends Plant Sci. Feb. 2003;8(2):90-5. |
| Brouns et al., Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science. Aug. 15, 2008;321(5891):960-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1159689. |
| Brown et al., A mammalian protein targeted by G1-arresting rapamycin-receptor complex. Nature. Jun. 30, 1994;369(6483):756-8. doi: 10.1038/369756a0. |
| Brown et al., Characterization of the genetic elements required for site-specific integration of plasmid pSE211 in Saccharopolyspora erythraea. J Bacteriol. Apr. 1990;172(4):1877-88. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.4.1877-1888.1990. |
| Brown et al., Serine recombinases as tools for genome engineering. Methods. Apr. 2011;53(4):372-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.12.031. Epub Dec. 30, 2010. |
| Brown et al., Structural insights into the stabilization of MALATI noncoding RNA by a bipartite triple helix. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Jul. 2014;21(7):633-40. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2844. Epub Jun. 22, 2014. |
| Brusse et al., Spinocerebellar ataxia associated with a mutation in the fibroblast growth factor 14 gene (SCA27): A new phenotype. Mov Disord. Mar. 2006;21(3):396-401. |
| Brutlag et al., Improved sensitivity of biological sequence database searches. Comput Appl Biosci. Jul. 1990;6(3):237-45. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/6.3.237. |
| Brzezicha et al., Identification of human tRNA:m5C methyltransferase catalysing intron-dependent m5C formation in the first position of the anticodon of the pre-tRNA Leu (CAA). Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(20):6034-43. doi: 10.1093/nar/gk1765. Epub Oct. 27, 2006. |
| Buchholz et al., Alteration of Cre recombinase site specificity by substrate-linked protein evolution. Nat Biotechnol. Nov. 2001;19(11):1047-52. |
| Buchschacher et al., Human immunodeficiency virus vectors for inducible expression of foreign genes. J Virol. May 1992;66(5):2731-9. doi: 10.1128/JVI.66.5.2731-2739.1992. |
| Buchwald et al., Long-term, continuous intravenous heparin administration by an implantable infusion pump in ambulatory patients with recurrent venous thrombosis. Surgery. Oct. 1980;88(4):507-16. |
| Buckley et al., Targeting the von Hippel-Lindau E3 ubiquitin ligase using small molecules to disrupt the VHL/HIF-1α interaction. J Am Chem Soc. Mar. 14, 2012;134(10):4465-8. doi: 10.1021/ja209924v. Epub Feb. 27, 2012. |
| Budisa et al., Residue-specific bioincorporation of non-natural, biologically active amino acids into proteins as possible drug carriers: structure and stability of the per-thiaproline mutant of annexin V. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jan. 20, 1998;95(2):455-9. |
| Budker et al., Protein/amphipathic polyamine complexes enable highly efficient transfection with minimal toxicity. Biotechniques. Jul. 1997;23(1):139, 142-7. doi: 10.2144/97231rr02. |
| Budworth et al., A brief history of triplet repeat diseases. Methods Mol Biol. 2013; 1010:3-17. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-411-1_1. |
| Bulow et al., Multienzyme systems obtained by gene fusion. Trends Biotechnol. Jul. 1991;9(7):226-31. |
| Burke et al., Activating mutations of Tn3 resolvase marking interfaces important in recombination catalysis and its regulation. Mol Microbiol. Feb. 2004;51(4):937-48. |
| Burke et al., RNA Aptamers to the Adenosine Moiety of S-adenosyl Methionine: Structural Inferences From Variations on a Theme and the Reproducibility of SELEX. Nucleic Acids Res. May 15, 1997;25(10):2020-4. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.10.2020. |
| Burstein et al., New CRISPR-Cas systems from uncultivated microbes. Nature Feb. 2017;542(7640):237-240. |
| Burton et al., Gene delivery using herpes simplex virus vectors. DNA Cell Biol. Dec. 2002;21(12):915-36. doi: 10.1089/104454902762053864. |
| Buskirk et al., Directed evolution of ligand dependence: small-molecule-activated protein splicing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 20, 2004;101(29):10505-10. Epub Jul. 9, 2004. |
| Buskirk et al., In vivo evolution of an RNA-based transcriptional activator. Chem Biol. Jun. 2003; 10(6):533-40. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(03)00109-1. |
| Butt et al., Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing Using a Chimeric Single-Guide RNA Molecule. Front Plant Sci. Aug. 24, 2017;8:1441(1-8). doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01441. |
| Byrne et al., Multiplex gene regulation: a two-tiered approach to transgene regulation in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 1989;86(14):5473-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.14.5473. |
| Böck et al., Selenocysteine: the 21st amino acid. Mol Microbiol. Mar. 1991;5(3):515-20. |
| Cade et al., Highly efficient generation of heritable zebrafish gene mutations using homo- and heterodimeric TALENs. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep. 2012;40(16):8001-10. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gks518. Epub Jun. 7, 2012. |
| Cadwell et al., Randomization of genes by PCR mutagenesis. PCR Methods Appl. Aug. 1992;2(1):28-33. doi: 10.1101/gr.2.1.28. |
| Cai et al., Reconstruction of ancestral protein sequences and its applications. BMC Evol Biol. Sep. 17, 2004;4:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-4-33. |
| Calame et al., Transcriptional controlling elements in the immunoglobulin and T cell receptor loci. Adv Immunol. 1988;43:235-75. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60367-3. |
| Caldecott et al., Single-strand break repair and genetic disease. Nat Rev Genet. Aug. 2008;9(8):619-31. doi: 10.1038/nrg2380. |
| Camarero et al., Biosynthesis of a Head-to-Tail Cyclized Protein with Improved Biological Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. May 29, 1999; 121(23):5597-5598. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja990929n. |
| Cameron, Recent advances in transgenic technology. Mol Biotechnol. Jun. 1997;7(3):253-65. |
| Camper et al., Postnatal repression of the alpha-fetoprotein gene is enhancer independent. Genes Dev. Apr. 1989;3(4):537-46. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.4.537. |
| Camps et al., Targeted gene evolution in Escherichia coli using a highly error-prone DNA polymerase I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 19, 2003;100(17):9727-32. Epub Aug. 8, 2003. |
| Canchaya et al., Genome analysis of an inducible prophage and prophage remnants integrated in the Streptococcus pyogenes strain SF370. Virology. Oct. 25, 2002;302(2):245-58. doi: 10.1006/viro.2002.1570. |
| Canny et al., Inhibition of 53BP1 Favors Homology-Dependent DNA Repair and Increases CRISPR-Cas9 Genome-Editing Efficiency. Nat Biotechnol. Jan. 2018;36(1):95-102. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4021. Epub Nov. 27, 2017. |
| Canver et al., Customizing the genome as therapy for the β-hemoglobinopathies. Blood. May 26, 2016;127(21):2536-45. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-678128. Epub Apr. 6, 2016. |
| Cao et al., Rapamycin reverses cellular phenotypes and enhances mutant protein clearance in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome cells. Sci Transl Med. Jun. 29, 2011;3(89):89ra58. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002346. |
| Cargill et al., Characterization of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in coding regions of human genes. Nat Genet. Jul. 1999;22(3):231-8. |
| Carlier et al., Burkholderia cenocepacia H111 Rhy-family protein. Apr. 16, 2015. Retrieved from the Internet via https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/api/embl/CDN65395.1?lineLimit=1000. Last retrieved Apr. 26, 2021. |
| Carlier et al., Genome Sequence of Burkholderia cenocepacia H111, a Cystic Fibrosis Airway Isolate. Genome Announc. Apr. 10, 2014;2(2):e00298-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00298-14. |
| Carlson et al., Negative selection and stringency modulation in phage-assisted continuous evolution. Nat Chem Biol. Mar. 2014; 10(3):216-22. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1453. Epub Feb. 2, 2014. With Supplementary Results. |
| Caron et al., Intracellular delivery of a Tat-eGFP fusion protein into muscle cells. Mol Ther. Mar. 2001;3(3):310-8. |
| Carr et al., Genome engineering. Nat Biotechnol. Dec. 2009;27(12):1151-62. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1590. |
| Carroll et al., Gene targeting in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans with zinc-finger nucleases. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;435:63-77. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-232-8_5. |
| Carroll et al., Progress and prospects: zinc-finger nucleases as gene therapy agents. Gene Ther. Nov. 2008;15(22):1463-8. doi: 10.1038/gt.2008.145. Epub Sep. 11, 2008. |
| Carroll, A CRISPR approach to gene targeting. Mol Ther. Sep. 2012;20(9):1658-60. doi: 10.1038/mt.2012.171. |
| Carroll, Genome engineering with zinc-finger nucleases. Genetics. Aug. 2011;188(4):773-82. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.131433. Review. |
| Cartegni et al., Determinants of exon 7 splicing in the spinal muscular atrophy genes, SMN1 and SMN2. Am J Hum Genet. Jan. 2006;78(1):63-77. doi: 10.1086/498853. Epub Nov. 16, 2005. |
| Carvalho et al., Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Genomic disorders: a window into human gene and genome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jan. 26, 2010;107 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1765-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906222107. Epub Jan. 13, 2010. |
| Caspi et al., Distribution of split DnaE inteins in cyanobacteria. Mol Microbiol. Dec. 2003;50(5):1569-77. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03825.x. |
| Cattaneo et al., SELIL affects human pancreatic cancer cell cycle and invasiveness through modulation of PTEN and genes related to cell-matrix interactions. Neoplasia. 2005;7(11):1030-1038. |
| Ceccaldi et al., Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break. Trends Cell Biol. Jan. 2016;26(1):52-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.009. Epub Oct. 1, 2015. |
| Cermak et al., Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 2011;39(12):e82. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr218. Epub Apr. 14, 2011. |
| Chadalavada et al., Wild-type is the optimal sequence of the HDV ribozyme under cotranscriptional conditions. RNA. Dec. 2007;13(12):2189-201. doi: 10.1261/rna.778107. Epub Oct. 23, 2007. |
| Chadwick et al., In Vivo Base Editing of PCSK9 (Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9) as a Therapeutic Alternative to Genome Editing. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. Sep. 2017;37(9):1741-1747. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309881. Epub Jul. 27, 2017. |
| Chaikind et al., A programmable Cas9-serine recombinase fusion protein that operates on DNA sequences in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 16, 2016;44(20):9758-9770. Epub Aug. 11, 2016. |
| Chalberg et al., Integration specificity of phage phiC31 integrase in the human genome. J Mol Biol. Mar. 17, 2006;357(1):28-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.098. Epub Dec. 22, 2005. |
| Chalberg et al., phiC31 integrase confers genomic integration and long-term transgene expression in rat retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Jun. 2005;46(6):2140-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1252. |
| Chan et al., Molecular recording of mammalian embryogenesis. Nature. Jun. 2019;570(7759):77-82. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1184-5. Epub May 13, 2019. |
| Chan et al., Novel selection methods for DNA-encoded chemical libraries. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2015;26:55-61. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.02.010. |
| Chan et al., The choice of nucleotide inserted opposite abasic sites formed within chromosomal DNA reveals the polymerase activities participating in translesion DNA synthesis. DNA Repair (Amst). Nov. 2013;12(11):878-89. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.07.008. Epub Aug. 26, 2013. |
| Chang et al., Degradation of survival motor neuron (SMN) protein is mediated via the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. Neurochem Int. Dec. 2004;45(7):1107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2004.04.005. |
| Chapman et al., Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol Cell. Aug. 24, 2012;47(4):497-510. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.029. |
| Chari et al., Unraveling CRISPR-Cas9 genome engineering parameters via a library-on-library approach. Nat Methods. Sep. 2015;12(9):823-6. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3473. Epub Jul. 13, 2015. |
| Charpentier et al., Biotechnology: Rewriting a genome. Nature. Mar. 7, 2013;495(7439):50-1. doi: 10.1038/495050a. |
| Chatterjee et al., A Cas9 with PAM recognition for adenine dinucleotides. Nat Commun. May 18, 2020;11(1):2474. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16117-8. |
| Chatterjee et al., Robust Genome Editing of Single-Base PAM Targets; with Engineered ScCas9 Variants. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/620351. Posted Apr. 26, 2019. |
| Chaturvedi et al., Stabilization of triple-stranded oligonucleotide complexes: use of probes containing alternating phosphodiester and stereo-uniform cationic phosphoramidate linkages. Nucleic Acids Res. Jun. 15, 1996;24(12):2318-23. |
| Chavez et al., Highly efficient Cas9-mediated transcriptional programming. Nat Methods. Apr. 2015;12(4):326-8. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3312. Epub Mar. 2, 2015. |
| Chavez et al., Precise Cas9 targeting enables genomic mutation prevention. bioRxiv. Jun. 14, 2016; http://dx/doi.oreg/10.1101/058974. 6 pages. bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jun. 14, 2016. |
| Chavez et al., Therapeutic applications of the ΦC31 integrase system. Curr Gene Ther. Oct. 2011; 11(5):375-81. Review. |
| Chawla et al., An atlas of RNA base pairs involving modified nucleobases with optimal geometries and accurate energies. Nucleic Acids Res. Aug. 18, 2015;43(14):6714-29. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv606. Epub Jun. 27, 2015. |
| Chelico et al., Biochemical basis of immunological and retroviral responses to DNA-targeted cytosine deamination by activation-induced cytidine deaminase and APOBEC3G. J Biol Chem. Oct. 9, 2009;284(41):27761-5. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R109.052449. Epub Aug. 13, 2009. |
| Chelico et al., Stochastic properties of processive cytidine DNA deaminases AID and APOBEC3G. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. Mar. 12, 2009;364(1517):583-93. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0195. |
| Chen et al., A general strategy for the evolution of bond-forming enzymes using yeast display. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 12, 2011;108(28):11399-404. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101046108. Epub Jun. 22, 2011. |
| Chen et al., Alterations in PMS2, MSH2 and MLH1 expression in human prostate cancer. Int J Oncol. May 2003;22(5):1033-43. |
| Chen et al., Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell. Dec. 19, 2013;155(7):1479-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.001. Erratum in: Cell. Jan. 16, 2014;156(1-2):373. |
| Chen et al., Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell. Oct. 28, 2021;184(22):5635-5652.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.018. Epub Oct. 14, 2021. |
| Chen et al., Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR-Cas9 targeting accuracy. Nature. Oct. 19, 2017;550(7676):407-410. doi: 10.1038/nature24268. Epub Sep. 20, 2017. |
| Chen et al., Fusion protein linkers: property, design and functionality. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. Oct. 2013;65(10):1357-69. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.039. Epub Sep. 29, 2012. |
| Chen et al., Genome-wide CRISPR screen in a mouse model of tumor growth and metastasis. Cell. Mar. 12, 2015;160(6):1246-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.038. Epub Mar. 5, 2015. |
| Chen et al., Highly Efficient Mouse Genome Editing by CRISPR Ribonucleoprotein Electroporation of Zygotes. J Biol Chem. Jul. 8, 2016;291(28):14457-67. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.733154. Epub May 5, 2016. |
| Chen et al., m(6)A RNA methylation is regulated by microRNAs and promotes reprogramming to pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell. Mar. 5, 2015;16(3):289-301. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.01.016. Epub Feb. 12, 2015. |
| Chen et al., Prime editing for precise and highly versatile genome manipulation. Nat Rev Genet. Mar. 2023;24(3):161-177 and Supplemental Info. doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00541-1. Epub Nov. 7, 2022. 47 pages. |
| Chen et al., Structure of the DNA deaminase domain of the HIV-1 restriction factor APOBEC3G. Nature. Mar. 6, 2008;452(7183):116-9. doi: 10.1038/nature06638. Epub Feb. 20, 2008. |
| Chen et al., Targeting genomic rearrangements in tumor cells through Cas9-mediated insertion of a suicide gene. Nat Biotechnol. Jun. 2017;35(6):543-550. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3843. Epub May 1, 2017. |
| Cheng et al., [Cloning,expression and activity identification of human innate immune protein apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 3A(APOBEC3A)]. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. Chinese Journal of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Feb. 2017;33(2):179-84. Chinese. |
| Cheng et al., Multiplexed activation of endogenous genes by CRISPR-on, an RNA-guided transcriptional activator system. Cell Res. Oct. 2013;23(10):1163-71. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.122. Epub Aug. 27, 2013. |
| Chesnoy et al., Structure and function of lipid-DNA complexes for gene delivery. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2000;29:27-47. |
| Chester et al., The apolipoprotein B mRNA editing complex performs a multifunctional cycle and suppresses nonsense-mediated decay. EMBO J. Aug. 1, 2003;22(15):3971-82. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg369. |
| Chew et al., A multifunctional AAV-CRISPR-Cas9 and its host response. Nat Methods. Oct. 2016;13(10):868-74. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3993. Epub Sep. 5, 2016. |
| Chew et al., A multifunctional AAV-CRISPR-Cas9 and its host response. Nat Methods. Oct. 2016;13(10):868-74. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3993. Epub Sep. 5, 2016. Supplementary Information. |
| Chichili et al., Linkers in the structural biology of protein-protein interactions. Protein Science. 2013;22:153-67. |
| Chin, Expanding and reprogramming the genetic code of cells and animals. Annu Rev Biochem. 2014;83:379-408. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035737. Epub Feb. 10, 2014. |
| Chipev et al., A leucine----proline mutation in the H1 subdomain of keratin 1 causes epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. Cell. Sep. 4, 1992;70(5):821-8. |
| Cho et al., A degron created by SMN2 exon 7 skipping is a principal contributor to spinal muscular atrophy severity. Genes Dev. Mar. 1, 2010;24(5):438-42. doi: 10.1101/gad.1884910. |
| Cho et al., Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases. Genome Res. Jan. 2014;24(1):132-41. doi: 10.1101/gr.162339.113. Epub Nov. 19, 2013. |
| Cho et al., Site-specific recombination of bacteriophage P22 does not require integration host factor. J Bacteriol. Jul. 1999;181(14):4245-9. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.14.4245-4249.1999. |
| Cho et al., Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol. Mar. 2013;31(3):230-2. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2507. Epub Jan. 29, 2013. |
| Cho et al., The calcium-activated chloride channel anoctamin 1 acts as a heat sensor in nociceptive neurons. Nat Neurosci. May 27, 2012;15(7):1015-21. doi: 10.1038/nn.3111. |
| Choe et al., Forging Ahead through Darkness: PCNA, Still the Principal Conductor at the Replication Fork. Mol Cell. Feb. 2, 2017;65(3):380-392. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.020. |
| Choi et al., N(6)-methyladenosine in mRNA disrupts tRNA selection and translation-elongation dynamics. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Feb. 2016;23(2):110-5. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3148. Epub Jan. 11, 2016. |
| Choi et al., Protein trans-splicing and characterization of a split family B-type DNA polymerase from the hyperthermophilic archaeal parasite Nanoarchaeum equitans. J Mol Biol. Mar. 10, 2006;356(5):1093-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.12.036. Epub Dec. 27, 2005. |
| Choi et al., Translesion synthesis across abasic lesions by human B-family and Y-family DNA polymerases α, δ, η, ι, κ, and REV1. J Mol Biol. Nov. 19, 2010;404(1):34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.015. Epub Oct. 1, 2010. |
| Chong et al., Modulation of protein splicing of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae vacuolar membrane ATPase intein. J Biol Chem. Apr. 24, 1998;273(17):10567-77. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.17.10567. |
| Chong et al., Protein splicing involving the Saccharomyces cerevisiae VMA intein. The steps in the splicing pathway, side reactions leading to protein cleavage, and establishment of an in vitro splicing system. J Biol Chem. Sep. 6, 1996;271(36):22159-68. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.36.22159. |
| Chong et al., Protein splicing of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae VMA intein without the endonuclease motifs. J Biol Chem. Jun. 20, 1997;272(25):15587-90. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.25.15587. |
| Chong et al., Single-column purification of free recombinant proteins using a self-cleavable affinity tag derived from a protein splicing element. Gene. Jun. 19, 1997;192(2):271-81. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00105-4. |
| Chong et al., Utilizing the C-terminal cleavage activity of a protein splicing element to purify recombinant proteins in a single chromatographic step. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 15, 1998;26(22):5109-15. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.22.5109. |
| Choudhury et al., CRISPR-dCas9 mediated TET1 targeting for selective DNA demethylation at BRCA1 promoter. Oncotarget. Jul. 19, 2016;7(29):46545-46556. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10234. |
| Choudhury et al., CRISPR/Cas9 recombineering-mediated deep mutational scanning of essential genes in Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol. Mar. 2020;16(3):e9265. doi: 10.15252/msb.20199265. |
| Choudhury et al., Engineering RNA endonucleases with customized sequence specificities. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1147. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2154. |
| Choulika et al., Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. Apr. 1995; 15(4):1968-73. doi: 10.1128/MCB.15.4.1968. |
| Christian et al., Targeting G with TAL effectors: a comparison of activities of TALENs constructed with NN and NK repeat variable di-residues. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045383. Epub Sep. 24, 2012. |
| Christian et al., Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics. Oct. 2010;186(2):757-61. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.120717. Epub Jul. 26, 2010. |
| Christiansen et al., Characterization of the lactococcal temperate phage TP901-1 and its site-specific integration. J Bacteriol. Feb. 1994;176(4):1069-76. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.4.1069-1076.1994. |
| Chu et al., Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells. Nat Biotech. Feb. 13, 2015;33:543-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3198. Epub Mar. 24, 2015. |
| Chuai et al., DeepCRISPR: optimized CRISPR guide RNA design by deep learning. Genome Biol. Jun. 26, 2018;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1459-4. |
| Chuai et al., In Silico Meets In Vivo: Towards Computational CRISPR-Based sgRNA Design. Trends Biotechnol. Jan. 2017;35(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.06.008. Epub Jul. 11, 2016. |
| Chuang et al., Novel Heterotypic Rox Sites for Combinatorial Dre Recombination Strategies. G3 (Bethesda). Dec. 29, 2015;6(3):559-71. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.025841. |
| Chujo et al., Trmt61B is a methyltransferase responsible for 1-methyladenosine at position 58 of human mitochondrial tRNAs. RNA. Dec. 2012;18(12):2269-76. doi: 10.1261/rna.035600.112. Epub Oct. 24, 2012. |
| Chung-Il et al., Artificial control of gene expression in mammalian cells by modulating RNA interference through aptamer-small molecule interaction. RNA. May 2006;12(5):710-6. Epub Apr. 10, 2006. |
| Chylinski et al., The tracrRNA and Cas9 families of type II CRISPR-Cas immunity systems. RNA Biol. May 2013;10(5):726-37. doi: 10.4161/rna.24321. Epub Apr. 5, 2013. |
| Clackson et al., Redesigning an FKBP-ligand interface to generate chemical dimerizers with novel specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 1, 1998;95(18):10437-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10437. |
| Clement et al., CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat Biotechnol. Mar. 2019;37(3):224-226. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0032-3. |
| Cobb et al., Directed evolution as a powerful synthetic biology tool. Methods. Mar. 15, 2013;60(1):81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.03.009. Epub Mar. 23, 2012. |
| Coffey et al., The Economic Impact of BSE on the U.S. Beef Industry: Product Value Losses, Regulatory Costs, and Consumer Reactions. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. MF-2678. May 2005. 68 pages. Accessed via https://bookstore.ksre.ksu.edu/pubs/MF2678.pdf. |
| Cokol et al., Finding nuclear localization signals. EMBO Rep. Nov. 2000;1(5):411-5. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvd092. |
| Cole et al., Reconstructing evolutionary adaptive paths for protein engineering. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;978:115-25. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-293-3_8. |
| Cole-Strauss et al., Correction of the mutation responsible for sickle cell anemia by an RNA-DNA oligonucleotide. Science. Sep. 6, 1996;273(5280):1386-9. |
| Collinge, Prion diseases of humans and animals: their causes and molecular basis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:519-50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.519. |
| Cong et al., Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. Feb. 15, 2013;339(6121):819-23. doi: 10.1126/science.1231143. Epub Jan. 3, 2013. |
| Conrad et al., A Kaposi's sarcoma virus RNA element that increases the nuclear abundance of intronless transcripts. EMBO J. May 18, 2005;24(10):1831-41. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600662. Epub Apr. 28, 2005. |
| Conticello, The AID/APOBEC family of nucleic acid mutators. Genome Biol. 2008;9(6):229. doi: 10.1186/GB-2008-9-6-229. Epub Jun. 17, 2008. |
| Corcia et al., The importance of the SMN genes in the genetics of sporadic ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. Oct.-Dec. 2009;10(5-6):436-40. doi: 10.3109/17482960902759162. |
| Cornu et al., Refining strategies to translate genome editing to the clinic. Nat Med. Apr. 3, 2017;23(4):415-423. doi: 10.1038/nm.4313. |
| Corti et al., Genetic correction of human induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with spinal muscular atrophy. Sci Transl Med. Dec. 19, 2012;4(165):165ra162. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004108. |
| Costa et al., Frequent use of the same tertiary motif by self-folding RNAs. EMBO J. Mar. 15, 1995;14(6):1276-85. |
| Cotton et al., Insertion of a Synthetic Peptide into a Recombinant Protein Framework: A Protein Biosensor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. Jan. 22, 1999; 121(5):1100-1. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja983804b. |
| Covino et al., The CCL2/CCR2 Axis in the Pathogenesis of HIV-1 Infection: A New Cellular Target for Therapy? Current Drug Targets Dec. 2016;17(1):76-110. DOI : 10.2174/138945011701151217110917. |
| Cox et al., An SCN9A channelopathy causes congenital inability to experience pain. Nature. Dec. 14, 2006;444(7121):894-8. doi: 10.1038/nature05413. |
| Cox et al., Conditional gene expression in the mouse inner ear using Cre-loxP. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. Jun. 2012;13(3):295-322. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0324-5. Epub Apr. 24, 2012. |
| Cox et al., Congenital insensitivity to pain: novel SCN9A missense and in-frame deletion mutations. Hum Mutat. Sep. 2010;31(9):E1670-86. doi: 10.1002/humu.21325. |
| Cox et al., RNA editing with CRISPR-Cas13. Science. Nov. 24, 2017;358(6366):1019-1027. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0180. Epub Oct. 25, 2017. |
| Cox et al., Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges. Nat Med. Feb. 2015;21(2):121-31. doi: 10.1038/nm.3793. |
| Cox, Proteins pinpoint double strand breaks. Elife. Oct. 29, 2013;2:e01561. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01561. |
| Crabtree et al., Three-part inventions: intracellular signaling and induced proximity. Trends Biochem Sci. Nov. 1996;21(11):418-22. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(96)20027-1. |
| Cradick et al., CRISPR/Cas9 systems targeting ?- globin and CCR5 genes have substantial off-target activity. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 1, 2013;41(20):9584-92. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt714. Epub Aug. 11, 2013. |
| Cradick et al., ZFN-site searches genomes for zinc finger nuclease target sites and off-target sites. BMC Bioinformatics. May 13, 2011;12:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-152. |
| Cradick et al., Zinc-finger nucleases as a novel therapeutic strategy for targeting hepatitis B virus DNAs. Mol Ther. May 2010;18(5):947-54. Doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.20. Epub Feb. 16, 2010. |
| Crick, On protein synthesis. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1958;12:138-63. |
| Cronican et al., A class of human proteins that deliver functional proteins into mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo. Chem Biol. Jul. 29, 2011;18(7):833-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.07.003. |
| Cronican et al., Potent delivery of functional proteins into Mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo using a supercharged protein. ACS Chem Biol. Aug. 20, 2010;5(8):747-52. doi:10.1021/cb1001153. |
| Crystal, Transfer of genes to humans: early lessons and obstacles to success. Science. Oct. 20, 1995;270(5235):404-10. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5235.404. |
| Cucchiarini et al., Enhanced expression of the central survival of motor neuron (SMN) protein during the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. J Cell Mol Med. Jan. 2014;18(1):115-24. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12170. Epub Nov. 17, 2013. |
| Cui et al., Consequences of Cas9 cleavage in the chromosome of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. May 19, 2016;44(9):4243-51. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw223. Epub Apr. 8, 2016. |
| Cui et al., m6A RNA Methylation Regulates the Self-Renewal and Tumorigenesis of Glioblastoma Stem Cells. Cell Rep. Mar. 14, 2017;18(11):2622-2634. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.059. |
| Cui et al., Review of CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA Design Tools. Interdiscip Sci. Jun. 2018;10(2):455-465. doi: 10.1007/s12539-018-0298-z. Epub Apr. 11, 2018. |
| Cui et al., Targeted integration in rat and mouse embryos with zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. Jan. 2011;29(1):64-7. Doi: 10.1038/nbt.1731. Epub Dec. 12, 2010. |
| Cunningham et al., Ensembl 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 2015;43(Database issue):D662-9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1010. Epub Oct. 28, 2014. |
| Cupples et al., A set of lacZ mutations in Escherichia coli that allow rapid detection of each of the six base substitutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 1989;86(14):5345-9. |
| D'Adda di Fagagna et al., The Gam protein of bacteriophage Mu is an orthologue of eukaryotic Ku. EMBO Rep. Jan. 2003;4(1):47-52. |
| D'Ydewalle et al., The Antisense Transcript SMN-AS1 Regulates SMN Expression and Is a Novel Therapeutic Target for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Neuron. Jan. 4, 2017;93(1):66-79 and Supplemental Information. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.033. Epub Dec. 22, 2016. |
| Dahlem et al., Simple methods for generating and detecting locus-specific mutations induced with TALENs in the zebrafish genome. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(8):e1002861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002861. Epub Aug. 16, 2012. |
| Dahlgren et al., A novel mutation in ribosomal protein S4 that affects the function of a mutated RF1. Biochimie. Aug. 2000;82(8):683-91. |
| Dahlman et al., Orthogonal gene knockout and activation with a catalytically active Cas9 nuclease. Nat Biotechnol. Nov. 2015;33(11):1159-61. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3390. |
| Damdindorj et al., A comparative analysis of constitutive promoters located in adeno-associated viral vectors. PLoS One. Aug. 29, 2014;9(8):e106472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106472. |
| Dandage et al., beditor: A Computational Workflow for Designing Libraries of Guide RNAs for CRISPR-Mediated Base Editing. Genetics. Jun. 2019;212(2):377-385. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.302089. Epub Apr. 1, 2019. |
| Dang et al., Optimizing sgRNA structure to improve CRISPR-Cas9 knockout efficiency. Genome Biol. Dec. 15, 2015;16:280. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0846-3. |
| Das et al., The crystal structure of the monomeric reverse transcriptase from Moloney murine leukemia virus. Structure. May 2004;12(5):819-29. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2004.02.032. |
| Dassa et al., Fractured genes: a novel genomic arrangement involving new split inteins and a new homing endonuclease family. Nucleic Acids Res. May 2009;37(8):2560-73. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp095. Epub Mar. 5, 2009. |
| Dassa et al., Trans protein splicing of cyanobacterial split inteins in endogenous and exogenous combinations. Biochemistry. Jan. 9, 2007;46(1):322-30. doi: 10.1021/bi0611762. |
| Database EBI Accession No. ADE34233 Jan. 29, 2004. |
| Database EBI Accession No. BFF09785. May 31, 2018. 2 pages. |
| Database EBI Accession No. BGE38086. Jul. 25, 2019. 2 pages. |
| Database UniProt Accession No. G8I3E0. Jan. 14, 2012. |
| Datsenko et al., One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 6, 2000;97(12):6640-5. |
| Davidson et al., Viral vectors for gene delivery to the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. May 2003;4(5):353-64. doi: 10.1038/nrn1104. |
| Davis et al., Assaying Repair at DNA Nicks. Methods Enzymol. 2018;601:71-89. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2017.12.001. Epub Feb. 1, 2018. |
| Davis et al., DNA double strand break repair via non-homologous end-joining. Transl Cancer Res. Jun. 2013;2(3):130-143. |
| Davis et al., Efficient in vivo base editing via single adeno-associated viruses with size-optimized genomes encoding compact adenine base editors. Nat Biomed Eng. Nov. 2022;6(11):1272-1283. doi: 10.1038/s41551-022-00911-4. Epub Jul. 28, 2022. Erratum in: Nat Biomed Eng. Aug. 5, 2022. |
| Davis et al., Homology-directed repair of DNA nicks via pathways distinct from canonical double-strand break repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 11, 2014;111(10):E924-32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400236111. Epub Feb. 20, 2014. |
| Davis et al., Small molecule-triggered Cas9 protein with improved genome-editing specificity. Nat Chem Biol. May 2015;11(5):316-8. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1793. Epub Apr. 6, 2015. |
| Davis et al., Two Distinct Pathways Support Gene Correction by Single-Stranded Donors at DNA Nicks. Cell Rep. Nov. 8, 2016;17(7):1872-1881. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.049. |
| De Felipe et al., Co-translational, intraribosomal cleavage of polypeptides by the foot-and-mouth disease virus 2A peptide. J Biol Chem. Mar. 28, 2003;278(13):11441-8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211644200. Epub Jan. 8, 2003. |
| De La Peña et al., The Hammerhead Ribozyme: A Long History for a Short RNA. Molecules. Jan. 4, 2017;22(1):78. doi: 10.3390/molecules22010078. |
| De Sandre-Giovannoli et al., Lamin a truncation in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria. Science. Jun. 27, 2003;300(5628):2055. doi: 10.1126/science.1084125. Epub Apr. 17, 2003. |
| De Souza, Primer: genome editing with engineered nucleases. Nat Methods. Jan. 2012;9(1):27. |
| De Wit et al., The Human CD4+ T Cell Response against Mumps Virus Targets a Broadly Recognized Nucleoprotein Epitope. J Virol. Mar. 5, 2019;93(6):e01883-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01883-18. |
| Dean et al., Genetic restriction of HIV-1 infection and progression to AIDS by a deletion allele of the CKR5 structural gene. Hemophilia Growth and Development Study, Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study, San Francisco City Cohort, ALIVE Study. Science. Sep. 27, 1996;273(5283):1856-62. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5283.1856. |
| Dekosky et al., Large-scale sequence and structural comparisons of human naive and antigen-experienced antibody repertoires. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 10, 2016;113(19):E2636-45. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525510113. Epub Apr. 25, 2016. |
| Delebecque et al., Organization of intracellular reactions with rationally designed RNA assemblies. Science. Jul. 22, 2011;333(6041):470-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1206938. Epub Jun. 23, 2011. |
| Deltcheva et al., CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature. Mar. 31, 2011;471(7340):602-7. doi: 10.1038/nature09886. |
| Deng et al., Widespread occurrence of N6-methyladenosine in bacterial mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 27, 2015;43(13):6557-67. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv596. Epub Jun. 11, 2015. |
| Denizio et al., Harnessing natural DNA modifying activities for editing of the genome and epigenome. Curr Opin Chem Biol. Aug. 2018;45:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.01.016. Epub Feb. 13, 2018. |
| Deriano et al., Modernizing the nonhomologous end-joining repertoire: alternative and classical NHEJ share the stage. Annu Rev Genet. 2013;47:433-55. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155540. Epub Sep. 11, 2013. |
| Deussing, Targeted mutagenesis tools for modelling psychiatric disorders. Cell Tissue Res. Oct. 2013;354(1):9-25. doi: 10.1007/s00441-013-1708-5. Epub Sep. 10, 2013. |
| Dever et al., CRISPR/Cas9 β-globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. Nov. 17, 2016;539(7629):384-389. doi: 10.1038/nature20134. Epub Nov. 7, 2016. |
| Deverman et al., Cre-dependent selection yields AAV variants for widespread gene transfer to the adult brain. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2016;34(2):204-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3440. Epub Feb. 1, 2016. |
| Devigili et al., Paroxysmal itch caused by gain-of-function Nav1.7 mutation. Pain. Sep. 2014;155(9):1702-1707. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.006. Epub May 10, 2014. |
| Dianov et al., Mammalian base excision repair: the forgotten archangel. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 1, 2013;41(6):3483-90. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt076. Epub Feb. 13, 2013. |
| Dicarlo et al., Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 2013;41(7):4336-43. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt135. Epub Mar. 4, 2013. |
| Dicarlo et al., Safeguarding CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives in yeast. Nat Biotechnol. Dec. 2015;33(12):1250-1255. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3412. Epub Nov. 16, 2015. |
| Dickey et al., Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins: multiple domains for multiple functions. Structure. Jul. 2, 2013;21(7):1074-84. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.05.013. |
| Dickinson et al., A system for the continuous directed evolution of proteases rapidly reveals drug-resistance mutations. Nat Commun. Oct. 30, 2014;5:5352. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6352. |
| Dickinson et al., Experimental interrogation of the path dependence and stochasticity of protein evolution using phage-assisted continuous evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. May 2013;110(22):9007-12. |
| Dillon, Regulating gene expression in gene therapy. Trends Biotechnol. May 1993;11(5):167-73. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(93)90109-M. |
| Ding et al., A TALEN genome-editing system for generating human stem cell-based disease models. Cell Stem Cell. Feb. 7, 2013;12(2):238-51. Doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.11.011. Epub Dec. 13, 2012. |
| Ding et al., Gene therapy for cardiovascular disease. Journal of Shanghai University (Natural Science Edition) . 2016;3:270-9 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2861.2016.03.013. |
| Ding et al., Permanent alteration of PCSK9 with in vivo CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Circ Res. Aug. 15, 2014;115(5):488-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.304351. Epub Jun. 10, 2014. |
| Dingwall et al., Nuclear targeting sequences—a consensus? Trends Biochem Sci. Dec. 1991;16(12):478-81. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(91)90184-w. |
| Diver et al., Single-Step Synthesis of Cell-Permeable Protein Dimerizers That Activate Signal Transduction and Gene Expression. J. Am. Chem. Soc. Jun. 4, 1997;119(22):5106-5109. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja963891c. |
| Dixon et al., Reengineering orthogonally selective riboswitches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 16, 2010;107(7):2830-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911209107. Epub Jan. 26, 2010. |
| Doench et al., Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2016;34(2):184-191. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3437. |
| Doench et al., Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat Biotechnol. Dec. 2014;32(12):1262-7. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3026. Epub Sep. 3, 2014. |
| Dolan et al., Trans-splicing with the group I intron ribozyme from Azoarcus. RNA. Feb. 2014;20(2):202-13. doi: 10.1261/rna.041012.113. Epub Dec. 16, 2013. |
| Doman et al., Designing and executing prime editing experiments in mammalian cells. Nat Protoc. Nov. 2022;17(11):2431-2468. doi: 10.1038/s41596-022-00724-4. Epub Aug. 8, 2022. |
| Doman et al., Evaluation and minimization of Cas9-independent off-target DNA editing by cytosine base editors. Nat Biotechnol. May 2020;38(5):620-628. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0414- 6. Epub Feb. 10, 2020. |
| Dominissini et al., Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature. Apr. 29, 2012;485(7397):201-6. doi: 10.1038/nature11112. |
| Dorgan et al., An enzyme-coupled continuous spectrophotometric assay for S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferases. Anal Biochem. Mar. 15, 2006;350(2):249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.01.004. Epub Feb. 7, 2006. |
| Dormiani et al., Long-term and efficient expression of human β-globin gene in a hematopoietic cell line using a new site-specific integrating non-viral system. Gene Ther. Aug. 2015;22(8):663-74. doi: 10.1038/gt.2015.30. Epub Apr. 1, 2015. |
| Dorr et al., Reprogramming the specificity of sortase enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 16, 2014;111(37):13343-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1411179111. Epub Sep. 3, 2014. |
| Doudna et al., Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. Nov. 28, 2014;346(6213):1258096. doi: 10.1126/science.1258096. |
| Doudna, The promise and challenge of therapeutic genome editing. Nature. Feb. 2020;578(7794):229-236. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1978-5. Epub Feb. 12, 2020. |
| Dove et al., Conversion of the omega subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase into a transcriptional activator or an activation target. Genes Dev. Mar. 1, 1998;12(5):745-54. |
| Doyon et al., Directed evolution and substrate specificity profile of homing endonuclease I-SceI. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 22, 2006;128(7):2477-84. |
| Doyon et al., Heritable targeted gene disruption in zebrafish using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. Jun. 2008;26(6):702-8. Doi: 10.1038/nbt1409. Epub May 25, 2008. |
| Drake, A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Aug. 15, 1991;88(16):7160-4. |
| Drenth et al., Mutations in sodium-channel gene SCN9A cause a spectrum of human genetic pain disorders. J Clin Invest. Dec. 2007;117(12):3603-9. doi: 10.1172/JCI33297. |
| Drost et al., Inactivation of DNA mismatch repair by variants of uncertain significance in the PMS2 gene. Hum Mutat. Nov. 2013;34(11):1477-80. doi: 10.1002/humu.22426. Epub Sep. 11, 2013. |
| Duan et al., Enhancement of muscle gene delivery with pseudotyped adeno-associated virus type 5 correlates with myoblast differentiation. J Virol. Aug. 2001;75(16):7662-71. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7662-7671.2001. |
| Dubois et al., Retroviral RNA Dimerization: From Structure to Functions. Front Microbiol. Mar. 22, 2018;9:527. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00527. |
| Dugar et al., CRISPR RNA-Dependent Binding and Cleavage of Endogenous RNAs by the Campylobacter jejuni Cas9. Mol Cell. Mar. 1, 2018;69(5):893-905.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.032. |
| Dumas et al., Designing logical codon reassignment—Expanding the chemistry in biology. Chem Sci. Jan. 1, 2015;6(1):50-69. doi: 10.1039/c4sc01534g. Epub Jul. 14, 2014. Review. |
| Dunaime, Breakthrough method means CRISPR just got a lot more relevant to human health. The Verge. Apr. 20, 2016. http://www.theverge.com/2016/4/20/11450262/crispr-base-editing-single-nucleotides-dna-gene-liu-harvard. |
| Dunbar et al., Gene therapy comes of age. Science. Jan. 12, 2018;359(6372):eaan4672. doi: 10.1126/science.aan4672. |
| Dupuy et al., Le syndrome de De La Chapelle [De La Chapelle syndrome]. Presse Med. Mar. 3, 2001;30(8):369-72. French. |
| Durai et al., A bacterial one-hybrid selection system for interrogating zinc finger-DNA interactions. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. May 2006;9(4):301-11. |
| Durai et al., Zinc finger nucleases: custom-designed molecular scissors for genome engineering of plant and mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Oct. 26, 2005;33(18):5978-90. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki912. |
| During et al., Controlled release of dopamine from a polymeric brain implant: in vivo characterization. Ann Neurol. Apr. 1989;25(4):351-6. |
| East-Seletsky et al., Two distinct RNase activities of CRISPR-C2c2 enable guide-RNA processing and RNA detection. Nature Oct. 2016;538(7624):270-3. |
| Edlund et al., Cell-specific expression of the rat insulin gene: evidence for role of two distinct 5′ flanking elements. Science. Nov. 22, 1985;230(4728):912-6. doi: 10.1126/science.3904002. |
| Edraki et al., A Compact, High-Accuracy Cas9 with a Dinucleotide PAM for In Vivo Genome Editing. Mol Cell. Feb. 21, 2019;73(4):714-726.e4 and Supplemental Info. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.12.003. Epub Dec. 20, 2018. |
| Edwards et al., An Escherichia coli tyrosine transfer RNA is a leucine-specific transfer RNA in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 15, 1991;88(4):1153-6. |
| Edwards et al., Crystal structures of the thi-box riboswitch bound to thiamine pyrophosphate analogs reveal adaptive RNA-small molecule recognition. Structure. Sep. 2006;14(9):1459-68. |
| Eick et al., Robustness of Reconstructed Ancestral Protein Functions to Statistical Uncertainty. Mol Biol Evol. Feb. 1, 2017;34(2):247-261. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw223. |
| Eiler et al., Structural Basis for the Fast Self-Cleavage Reaction Catalyzed by the Twister Ribozyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 9, 2014;111(36):13028-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414571111. Epub Aug. 25, 2014. |
| Eisenberg et al., A-to-I RNA editing—immune protector and transcriptome diversifier. Nat Rev Genet. Aug. 2018;19(8):473-490. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0006-1. |
| Ekstrand et al., Frequent alterations of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Fam Cancer. Jun. 2010;9(2):125-9. doi: 10.1007/s10689-009-9293-1. |
| Eltoukhy et al., Nucleic acid-mediated intracellular protein delivery by lipid-like nanoparticles. Biomaterials. Aug. 2014;35(24):6454-61. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.014. Epub May 13, 2014. |
| Emery et al., HCN2 ion channels play a central role in inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Science. Sep. 9, 2011;333(6048):1462-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1206243. |
| Endo et al., Toward establishing an efficient and versatile gene targeting system in higher plants. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 2014;3,(1):2-6. |
| Engel et al., The emerging role of mRNA methylation in normal and pathological behavior. Genes Brain Behav. Mar. 2018;17(3):e12428. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12428. Epub Nov. 17, 2017. |
| Engelward et al., Base excision repair deficient mice lacking the Aag alkyladenine DNA glycosylase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 25, 1997;94(24):13087-92. |
| England, Unnatural amino acid mutagenesis: a precise tool for probing; protein structure and function. Biochemistry. Sep. 21, 2004;43(37):11623-9. |
| Entin-Meer et al., The role of phenylalanine-119 of the reverse transcriptase of mouse mammary tumour virus in DNA synthesis, ribose selection and drug resistance. Biochem J. Oct. 15, 2002;367(Pt 2):381-91. doi: 10.1042/BJ20020712. |
| Enyeart et al., Biotechnological applications of mobile group II introns and their reverse transcriptases: gene targeting, RNA-seq, and non-coding RNA analysis. Mobile DNA 5, 2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1759-8753-5-2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1759-8753-5-2. |
| Epstein, HSV-1-based amplicon vectors: design and applications. Gene Ther. Oct. 2005;12 Suppl 1:S154-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302617. |
| Eriksson et al., Recurrent de novo point mutations in lamin A cause Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Nature. May 15, 2003;423(6937):293-8. doi: 10.1038/nature01629. Epub Apr. 25, 2003. |
| Estacion et al., A sodium channel gene SCN9A polymorphism that increases nociceptor excitability. Ann Neurol. Dec. 2009;66(6):862-6. doi: 10.1002/ana.21895. |
| Esvelt et al., A system for the continuous directed evolution of biomolecules. Nature. Apr. 28, 2011;472(7344):499-503. doi: 10.1038/nature09929. Epub Apr. 10, 2011. |
| Esvelt et al., Genome-scale engineering for systems and synthetic biology. Mol Syst Biol. 2013;9:641. doi: 10.1038/msb.2012.66. |
| Esvelt et al., Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing. Nat Methods. Nov. 2013;10(11):1116-21. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2681. Epub Sep. 29, 2013. |
| Evans et al., Protein trans-splicing and cyclization by a naturally split intein from the dnaE gene of Synechocystis species PCC6803. J Biol Chem. Mar. 31, 2000;275(13):9091-4. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.13.9091. |
| Evans et al., Semisynthesis of cytotoxic proteins using a modified protein splicing element. Protein Sci. Nov. 1998;7(11):2256-64. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560071103. |
| Evans et al., The cyclization and polymerization of bacterially expressed proteins using modified self-splicing inteins. J Biol Chem. Jun. 25, 1999;274(26):18359-63. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.26.18359. |
| Evans et al., The in vitro ligation of bacterially expressed proteins using an intein from Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. J Biol Chem. Feb. 12, 1999;274(7):3923-6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.7.3923. |
| Evers et al., CRISPR knockout screening outperforms shRNA and CRISPRi in identifying essential genes. Nat Biotechnol. Jun. 2016;34(6):631-3. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3536. Epub Apr. 25, 2016. |
| Fagerlund et al., The Cpf1 CRISPR-Cas protein expands genome-editing tools. Genome Biology Nov. 17, 2015;16:251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0824-9. |
| Falnes et al., DNA repair by bacterial AlkB proteins. Res Microbiol. Oct. 2003;154(8):531-8. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00150-5. |
| Falnes et al., Repair of methyl lesions in DNA and RNA by oxidative demethylation. Neuroscience. Apr. 14, 2007;145(4):1222-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.11.018. Epub Dec. 18, 2006. |
| Fang et al., Human strand-specific mismatch repair occurs by a bidirectional mechanism similar to that of the bacterial reaction. J Biol Chem. Jun. 5, 1993;268(16):11838-44. |
| Fang et al., Synthetic Studies Towards Halichondrins: Synthesis of the Left Halves of Norhalichondrins and Homohalichondrins. Tetrahedron Letters 1992;33(12):1557-1560. |
| Fang et al., The Menu of Features that Define Primary MicroRNAs and Enable De Novo Design of MicroRNA Genes. Mol Cell. Oct. 1, 2015;60(1):131-45. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.08.015. Epub Sep. 24, 2015. |
| Farboud et al., Dramatic enhancement of genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9 through improved guide RNA design. Genetics. Apr. 2015;199(4):959-71. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.175166. Epub Feb. 18, 2015. |
| Farhood et al., Codelivery to mammalian cells of a transcriptional factor with cis-acting element using cationic liposomes. Anal Biochem. Feb. 10, 1995;225(1):89-93. |
| Fawcett et al., Transposable elements controlling I-R hybrid dysgenesis in D. melanogaster are similar to mammalian LINEs. Cell. Dec. 26, 1986;47(6):1007-15. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90815-9. |
| Feldstein et al., Two sequences participating in the autolytic processing of satellite tobacco ringspot virus complementary RNA. Gene. Oct. 15, 1989;82(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90029-2. |
| Felletti et al., Twister Ribozymes as Highly Versatile Expression Platforms for Artificial Riboswitches. Nat Commun. Sep. 27, 2016;7:12834. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12834. |
| Feng et al., Crystal structures of the human RNA demethylase Alkbh5 reveal basis for substrate recognition. J Biol Chem. Apr. 25, 2014;289(17):11571-11583. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.546168. Epub Mar. 10, 2014. |
| Feng et al., Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res. Oct. 2013;23(10):1229-32. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.114. Epub Aug. 20, 2013. |
| Feng et al., Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition. Cell. Nov. 29, 1996;87(5):905-16. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81997-2. |
| Ferreira Da Silva et al., Prime editing efficiency and fidelity are enhanced in the absence of mismatch repair. Nat Commun. Feb. 9, 2022;13(1):760. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28442-1. |
| Ferretti et al., Complete genome sequence of an M1 strain of Streptococcus pyogenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 10, 2001;98(8):4658-63. |
| Ferry et al., Rational design of inducible CRISPR guide RNAs for de novo assembly of transcriptional programs. Nat Commun. Mar. 3, 2017;8:14633. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14633. |
| Feuk, Inversion variants in the human genome: role in disease and genome architecture. Genome Med. Feb. 12, 2010;2(2):11. doi: 10.1186/gm132. |
| Filippov et al., A novel type of RNase III family proteins in eukaryotes. Gene. Mar. 7, 2000;245(1):213-21. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00571-5. |
| Filippova et al., Guide RNA modification as a way to improve CRISPR/Cas9-based genome-editing systems. Biochimie. Dec. 2019;167:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2019.09.003. Epub Sep. 4, 2019. |
| Fine et al., Trans-spliced Cas9 allows cleavage of HBB and CCR5 genes in human cells using compact expression cassettes. Scientific Reports 2015;5(1):Article No. 10777. doi:10.1038/srep10777. With Supplementary Information. |
| Fire et al., Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. Feb. 19, 1998;391(6669):806-11. doi: 10.1038/35888. |
| Fischbach et al., Directed evolution can rapidly improve the activity of chimeric assembly-line enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 17, 2007;104(29):11951-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705348104. Epub Jul. 9, 2007. |
| Fischer et al., Cryptic epitopes induce high-titer humoral immune response in patients with cancer. J Immunol. Sep. 1, 2010;185(5):3095-102. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902166. Epub Jul. 26, 2010. |
| Fishel et al., The human mutator gene homolog MSH2 and its association with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cell. Dec. 3, 1993;75(5):1027-38. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90546-3. Erratum in: Cell. Apr. 8, 1994;77(1):1 p following 166. |
| Fitzjohn, Diversitree: comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R. Methods in Evology and Evolution. Dec. 2012;3(6):1084-92 .doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00234.x. |
| Flajolet et al., Woodchuck hepatitis virus enhancer I and enhancer II are both involved in N-myc2 activation in woodchuck liver tumors. J Virol. Jul. 1998;72(7):6175-80. doi: 10.1128/JVI.72.7.6175-6180.1998. |
| Flaman et al., A rapid PCR fidelity assay. Nucleic Acids Res. Aug. 11, 1994;22(15):3259-60. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.15.3259. |
| Flynn et al., CRISPR-mediated genotypic and phenotypic correction of a chronic granulomatous disease mutation in human iPS cells. Exp Hematol. Oct. 2015;43(10):838-848.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2015.06.002. Epub Jun. 19, 2015. Including supplementary figures and data. |
| Fogg et al., Genome Integration and Excision by a New Streptomyces Bacteriophage, ϕJoe. Appl Environ Microbiol. Feb. 15, 2017;83(5):e02767-16. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02767-16. |
| Fogg et al., New applications for phage integrases. J Mol Biol. Jul. 29, 2014;426(15):2703-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.05.014. Epub May 22, 2014. |
| Fonfara et al., Phylogeny of Cas9 determines functional exchangeability of dual-RNA and Cas9 among orthologous type II CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. Feb. 2014;42(4):2577-90. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1074. Epub Nov. 22, 2013. Including Supplementary Information. |
| Forster et al., Self-cleavage of virusoid RNA is performed by the proposed 55-nucleotide active site. Cell. Jul. 3, 1987;50(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90657-x. |
| Fortini et al., Different DNA polymerases are involved in the short- and long-patch base excision repair in mammalian cells. Biochemistry. Mar. 17, 1998;37(11):3575-80. doi: 10.1021/bi972999h. |
| Fouts et al., Sequencing Bacillus anthracis typing phages gamma and cherry reveals a common ancestry. J Bacteriol. May 2006;188(9):3402-8. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.9.3402-3408.2006. |
| Freitas et al., Mechanisms and signals for the nuclear import of proteins. Curr Genomics. Dec. 2009;10(8):550-7. doi: 10.2174/138920209789503941. |
| Freshney, Culture of Animal Cells. A Manual of Basic Technique. Alan R. Liss, Inc. New York. 1983;4. |
| Friedman, J. H., Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann. Statist. Oct. 2001;29(5):1189-232. doi: 10.1214/aos/1013203451. |
| Fu et al., High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. Sep. 2013;31(9):822-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2623. Epub Jun. 23, 2013. |
| Fu et al., Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat Biotechnol. Mar. 2014;32(3):279-84. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2808. Epub Jan. 26, 2014. |
| Fu et al., Promises and Pitfalls of Intracellular Delivery of Proteins. Bioconjugate Chemistry. Aug. 2014;25:1602-8. |
| Fu et al., Targeted genome editing in human cells using CRISPR/Cas nucleases and truncated guide RNAs. Methods Enzymol. 2014;546:21-45. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.00002-7. |
| Fuchs et al., Polyarginine as a multifunctional fusion tag. Protein Sci. Jun. 2005;14(6):1538-44. |
| Fujisawa et al., Disease-associated mutations in CIAS1 induce cathepsin B-dependent rapid cell death of human THP-1 monocytic cells. Blood. Apr. 1, 2007;109(7):2903-11. |
| Fukui et al., DNA Mismatch Repair in Eukaryotes and Bacteria. J Nucleic Acids. Jul. 27, 2010;2010. pii: 260512. doi: 10.4061/2010/260512. |
| Fung et al., Repair at single targeted DNA double-strand breaks in pluripotent and differentiated human cells. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020514. Epub May 25, 2011. |
| Furukawa et al., In vitro selection of allosteric ribozymes that sense the bacterial second messenger c-di-GMP. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1111:209-20. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-755-6_15. |
| Fusi et al., In Silico Predictive Modeling of CRISPR/Cas9 guide efficiency. Jun. 26, 2015; bioRxiv. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/021568. |
| Gaj et al., 3rd. Genome engineering with custom recombinases. Methods Enzymol. 2014;546:79-91. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.00004-0. |
| Gaj et al., A comprehensive approach to zinc-finger recombinase customization enables genomic targeting in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Feb. 6, 2013;41(6):3937-46. |
| Gaj et al., Enhancing the specificity of recombinase-mediated genome engineering through dimer interface redesign. J Am Chem Soc. Apr. 2, 2014;136(13):5047-56. doi: 10.1021/ja4130059. Epub Mar. 20, 2014. |
| Gaj et al., Expanding the scope of site-specific recombinases for genetic and metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng. Jan. 2014;111(1):1-15. doi: 10.1002/bit.25096. Epub Sep. 13, 2013. |
| Gaj et al., Structure-guided reprogramming of serine recombinase DNA sequence specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jan. 11, 2011;108(2):498-503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014214108. Epub Dec. 27, 2010. |
| Gaj et al., ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. Jul. 2013;31(7):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004. Epub May 9, 2013. |
| Gajula, Designing an Elusive C•G→G•C CRISPR Base Editor. Trends Biochem Sci. Feb. 2019;44(2):91-94. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.10.004. Epub Nov. 13, 2018. |
| Gallo et al., A novel pathogenic PSEN1 mutation in a family with Alzheimer's disease: phenotypical and neuropathological features. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;25(3):425-31. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-110185. |
| Gangopadhyay et al., Precision Control of CRISPR-Cas9 Using Small Molecules and Light. Biochemistry. Jan. 29, 2019;58(4):234-244. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01202. Epub Jan. 22, 2019. |
| Gao et al., Cationic liposome-mediated gene transfer. Gene Ther. Dec. 1995;2(10):710-22. |
| Gao et al., DNA-guided genome editing using the Natronobacterium gregoryi Argonaute. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 2016;34(7):768-73. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3547. Epub May 2, 2016. |
| Gao et al., Prime editing in mice reveals the essentiality of a single base in driving tissue-specific gene expression. Genome Biol. Mar. 16, 2021;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02304-3. |
| Gao et al., Self-processing of ribozyme-flanked RNAs into guide RNAs in vitro and in vivo for CRISPR-mediated genome editing. J Integr Plant Biol. Apr. 2014;56(4):343-9. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12152. Epub Mar. 6, 2014. |
| Gao et al., Treatment of autosomal dominant hearing loss by in vivo delivery of genome editing agents. Nature. Jan. 11, 2018;553(7687):217-221. doi: 10.1038/nature25164. Epub Dec. 20, 2017. |
| Gapinske et al., CRISPR-SKIP: programmable gene splicing with single base editors. Genome Biol. Aug. 15, 2018;19(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1482-5. |
| Garcia et al., Transglycosylation: a mechanism for RNA modification (and editing?). Bioorg Chem. Jun. 2005;33(3):229-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2005.01.001. Epub Feb. 23, 2005. |
| Gardlik et al., Vectors and delivery systems in gene therapy. Med Sci Monit. Apr. 2005;11(4):RA110-21. Epub Mar. 24, 2005. |
| Garibyan et al., Use of the rpoB gene to determine the specificity of base substitution mutations on the Escherichia coli chromosome. DNA Repair (Amst). May 13, 2003;2(5):593-608. |
| Garneau et al., The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature. Nov. 4, 2010;468(7320):67-71. doi: 10.1038/nature09523. |
| Gasiunas et al., Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 25, 2012;109(39):E2579-86. Epub Sep. 4, 2012. Supplementary materials included. |
| Gasiunas et al., RNA-dependent DNA endonuclease Cas9 of the CRISPR system: Holy Grail of genome editing? Trends Microbiol. Nov. 2013;21(11):562-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.09.001. Epub Oct. 1, 2013. |
| Gaudelli et al., Directed evolution of adenine base editors with increased activity and therapeutic application. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 2020;38(7):892-900. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0491-6. Epub Apr. 13, 2020. |
| Gaudelli et al., Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature. Nov. 23, 2017;551(7681):464-471. doi: 10.1038/nature24644. Epub Oct. 25, 2017. Erratum in: Nature. May 2, 2018. |
| Gearing, Addgene blog. CRISPR 101: Cas9 nickase design and homology directed repair. 2018. pp. 1-12. https://blog.addgene.org/crispr-101-cas9-nickase-design-and-homlogy-directed-repair. Last retrieved online Jun. 25, 2021. |
| Gehrke et al., An APOBEC3A-Cas9 base editor with minimized bystander and off-target activities. Nat Biotechnol. Nov. 2018;36(10):977-982. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4199. Epub Jul. 30, 2018. |
| Geisberg et al., Global analysis of mRNA isoform half-lives reveals stabilizing and destabilizing elements in yeast. Cell. Feb. 13, 2014;156(4):812-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.026. |
| GenBank Accession No. J01600.1. Brooks et al., E. coli dam gene coding for DNA adenine methylase. Apr. 26, 1993. |
| GenBank Accession No. U07651.1. Lu, Escherichia coli K12 negative regulator of replication initiation (seqA) gene, complete cds. Jul. 19, 1994. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI Accession No. 4UN5_B. Anders et al., Jul. 23, 2014. 5 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI Accession No. NM_001319224.2. Umar et al., Apr. 21, 2021. 7 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI Accession No. NM_006027.4. Umar et al., Apr. 10, 2021. 7 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. AAA66622.1. Martinelli et al., May 18, 1995. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. AGT42196. Farzadfar et al., Nov. 2, 2013. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. AIT42264.1. Hyun et al., Oct. 15, 2014. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. AKA60242.1. Tong et al., Apr. 5, 2015. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. AKQ21048.1. Gilles et al., Jul. 19, 2015. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. AKS40380.1. Nodvig et al., Aug. 2, 2015. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. APG80656.1. Burstein et al., Dec. 10, 2016. 1 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. AYD60528.1. Ram et al., Oct. 2, 2018. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. BDB43378. Zhang et al., Aug. 11, 2016. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. J04623. Kita et al., Apr. 26, 1993. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. KR710351.1. Sahni et al., Jun. 1, 2015. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC 002737.2. Nasser et al., Feb. 7, 2021. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_000001.11. Gregory et al., Jun. 6, 2016. 3 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_002737.1. Ferretti et al., Jun. 27, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_015683.1. Trost et al., Jul. 6, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_016782.1. Trost et al., Jun. 11, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_016786.1. Trost et al., Aug. 28, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_017053.1. Fittipaldi et al., Jul. 6, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_017317.1. Trost et al., Jun. 11, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_017861.1. Heidelberg et al., Jun. 11, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_018010.1. Lucas et al., Jun. 11, 2013. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_018721.1. Feng et al., Jun. 11, 2013. 1 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_021284.1. Ku et al., Jul. 12, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_021314.1. Zhang et al., Jul. 15, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NC_021846.1. Lo et al., Jul. 22, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NG_008692.2. McClintock et al., Aug. 27, 2018. 33 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NM_000311.5. Alves et al., Mar. 7, 2021. 5 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NM_001319224. Umar et al., Apr. 21, 2021. 7 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NM_002945.3. Weiser et al., Sep. 3, 2017. 5 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NM_002946.5. Kavli et al., Jun. 26, 2021. 5 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NM_002947.4. Xiao et al., May 1, 2019. 4 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NM_003686. Umar et al., Apr. 9, 2021. 7 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NM_003686.4. Umar et al., Apr. 9, 2021. 7 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NM_006027. Umar et al., Apr. 10, 2021. 7 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NM_174936. Guo et al., Oct. 28, 2015. 6 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NM_206933.2. Khalaileh et al., Sep. 16, 2018. 12 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_000302.1. Alves et al., Mar. 7, 2021. 4 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_001075493.1. Schiaffella et al., Jun. 24, 2018. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_001157741.1. Zeng et al., Sep. 17, 2018. 3 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_001157742.1. Zeng et al., Oct. 21, 2018. 3 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_001243439.1. Lee et al., Jul. 26, 2021. 4 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_033040.2. Liu et al., Jun. 23, 2018. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_060228.2. Bi et al., Dec. 21, 2005. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_062826.2. Bokar et al., Sep. 18, 2004. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_066012.1. Ota et al., Apr. 3, 2005. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_076161.2. Wade et al., Jun. 20, 2021. 4 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_358988.1. Hoskins et al., Jan. 11, 2017. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_391970.1. Borriss et al., Feb. 12, 2021. 3 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_472073.1. Glaser et al., Jun. 27, 2013. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_628093.1. Hsiao et al., Aug. 3, 2016. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_955579.1. Chen et al., Aug. 13, 2018. 5 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. NP_996816.2. Fu et al., Sep. 22, 2019. 9 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. P42212. Prasher et al., Mar. 19, 2014. 7 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. QBJ66766. Duan et al. Aug. 12, 2020. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. RFF81513.1. Zhou et al., Aug. 21, 2018. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. SNX31424.1. Weckx, S., Feb. 16, 2018. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. TGH57013. Xu et al., Apr. 9, 2019. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_002989955.1. No Author Listed, May 6, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_010922251.1. No Author Listed, May 15, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_011054416.1. No Author Listed, May 15, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_011284745.1. No Author Listed, May 16, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_011285506.1. No Author Listed, May 16, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_011527619.1. No Author Listed, May 16, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_012560673.1. No Author Listed, May 17, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_014407541.1. No Author Listed, May 18, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_016631044.1. Haft et al., Sep. 22, 2020. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_020905136.1. No Author Listed, Jul. 25, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_023080005.1. No Author Listed, Oct. 27, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_023610282.1. No Author Listed, Nov. 27, 2013. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_030125963.1. No Author Listed, Jul. 9, 2014. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_030126706.1. No Author Listed, Jul. 9, 2014. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_031386437.1. No Author Listed., Sep. 23, 2019. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_031488318.1. No Author Listed., Aug. 5, 2014. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_031589969.1. Haft et al., Oct. 9, 2019. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_032460140.1. No Author Listed, Oct. 4, 2014. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_032461047.1. No Author Listed, Oct. 4, 2014. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_032462016.1. Haft et al., Oct. 4, 2014. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_032462936.1. No Author Listed, Oct. 4, 2014. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_032464890.1. No Author Listed, Oct. 4, 2014. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_038431314.1. No Author Listed, Dec. 26, 2014. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_038432938.1. No Author Listed, Dec. 26, 2014. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_038434062.1. No Author Listed, Dec. 26, 2014. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_042518169.1. No Author, Feb. 10, 2015. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_044924278.1. Haft et al., Oct. 9, 2019. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_047338501.1. Haft et al., Oct. 9, 2019. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_048327215.1. No Author Listed, Jun. 26, 2015. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_049519324.1. No Author Listed, Jul. 20, 2015. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_060798984.1. Haft et al., Oct. 9, 2019. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_062913273.1. Haft et al., Oct. 9, 2019, 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_072754838. No Author Listed., Sep. 23, 2019. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_095142515.1. No Author Listed., Sep. 23, 2019. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_118538418.1. No Author Listed., Oct. 13, 2019. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_119223642.1. No Author Listed., Oct. 13, 2019. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_119227726.1. No Author Listed., Oct. 13, 2019. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_119623382.1. No Author Listed., Oct. 13, 2019. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_132221894.1. No Author Listed., Sep. 23, 2019. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. WP_133478044.1. Haft et al., Oct. 9, 2019. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. XP_003314669.1. No Author Listed, Mar. 20, 2018. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. XP_026671085.1. No Author Listed, Oct. 17, 2018. 1 page. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. YP_002004532.1. Villegas et al., Oct. 11, 2021. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. YP_002342100.1. Bernardini et al., Jun. 10, 2013. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. YP_002344900.1. Gundogdu et al., Mar. 19, 2014. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. YP_006589943.1. Lynch et al., Oct. 15, 2021. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. YP_009137104.1. Davison, Aug. 13, 2018. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. YP_009283008.1. Bernardini et al., Sep. 23, 2016. 2 pages. |
| GenBank Submission; NIH/NCBI, Accession No. YP_820832.1. Makarova et al., Aug. 27, 2013. 2 pages. |
| Geng et al., In vitro studies of DNA mismatch repair proteins. Anal Biochem. Jun. 15, 2011;413(2):179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.02.017. Epub Feb. 15, 2011. |
| Genschel et al., Human exonuclease I is required for 5′ and 3′ mismatch repair. J Biol Chem. Apr. 12, 2002;277(15):13302-11. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111854200. Epub Jan. 24, 2002. |
| Genschel et al., Isolation of MutSbeta from human cells and comparison of the mismatch repair specificities of MutSbeta and MutSalpha. J Biol Chem. Jul. 31, 1998;273(31):19895-901. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.31.19895. Erratum in: J Biol Chem Oct. 9, 1998;273(41):27034. |
| George et al., Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA, RNA editing, and interferon action. J Interferon Cytokine Res. Jan. 2011;31(1):99-117. doi: 10.1089/jir.2010.0097. Epub Dec. 23, 2010. PMID: 21182352; PMCID: PMC3034097. |
| Gerard et al., Influence on stability in Escherichia coli of the carboxy-terminal structure of cloned Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase. DNA. Aug. 1986;5(4):271-9. doi: 10.1089/dna.1986.5.271. |
| Gerard et al., Purification and characterization of the DNA polymerase and RNase H activities in Moloney murine sarcoma-leukemia virus. J Virol. Apr. 1975;15(4):785-97. doi: 10.1128/JVI.15.4.785-797.1975. |
| Gerard et al., The role of template-primer in protection of reverse transcriptase from thermal inactivation. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 15, 2002;30(14):3118-29. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf417. |
| Gerber et al., An adenosine deaminase that generates inosine at the wobble position of tRNAs. Science. Nov. 5, 1999;286(5442):1146-9. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5442.1146. |
| Gerber et al., RNA editing by base deamination: more enzymes, more targets, new mysteries. Trends Biochem Sci. Jun. 2001;26(6):376-84. |
| Gersbach et al., Directed evolution of recombinase specificity by split gene reassembly. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 2010;38(12):4198-206. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq125. Epub Mar. 1, 2010. |
| Gersbach et al., Targeted plasmid integration into the human genome by an engineered zinc-finger recombinase. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep. 1, 2011;39(17):7868-78. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr421. Epub Jun. 7, 2011. |
| Gete et al., Mechanisms of angiogenic incompetence in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria via downregulation of endothelial NOS. Aging Cell. Jul. 2021;20(7):e13388. doi: 10.1111/acel.13388. Epub Jun. 4, 2021. |
| Ghahfarokhi et al., Blastocyst Formation Rate and Transgene Expression are Associated with Gene Insertion into Safe and Non-Safe Harbors in the Cattle Genome. Sci Rep. Nov. 13, 2017;7(1):15432. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15648-3. |
| Gibson et al., Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods. May 2009;6(5):343-5. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318. Epub Apr. 12, 2009. |
| Gil, Position-dependent sequence elements downstream of AAUAAA are required for efficient rabbit beta-globin mRNA 3′ end formation. Cell. May 8, 1987;49(3):399-406. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90292-3. |
| Gilbert et al., CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell. 2013 154(2):442-51. |
| Gilleron et al., Image-based analysis of lipid nanoparticle-mediated siRNA delivery, intracellular trafficking and endosomal escape. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 2013;31(7):638-46. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2612. Epub Jun. 23, 2013. |
| Glasgow et al.,DNA-binding properties of the Hin recombinase. J Biol Chem. Jun. 15, 1989;264(17):10072-82. |
| Glassner et al., Generation of a strong mutator phenotype in yeast by imbalanced base excision repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 18, 1998;95(17):9997-10002. |
| Goldberg et al., Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape. Cell. Feb. 23, 2007;128(4):635-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.006. |
| Goldberg et al., Loss-of-function mutations in the Nav1.7 gene underlie congenital indifference to pain in multiple human populations. Clin Genet. Apr. 2007;71(4):311-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00790.x. |
| Gong et al., Active DNA demethylation by oxidation and repair. Cell Res. Dec. 2011;21(12):1649-51. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.140. Epub Aug. 23, 2011. |
| Gonzalez et al., An iCRISPR platform for rapid, multiplexable, and inducible genome editing in human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. Aug. 7, 2014;15(2):215-26. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.05.018. Epub Jun. 12, 2014. |
| Goodnough et al., Development of a delivery vehicle for intracellular transport of botulinum neurotoxin antagonists. FEBS Lett. Feb. 27, 2002;513(2-3):163-8. |
| Gordley et al., Synthesis of programmable integrases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 31, 2009;106(13):5053-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812502106. Epub Mar. 12, 2009. |
| Gordley et al., Evolution of programmable zinc finger-recombinases with activity in human cells. J Mol Biol. Mar. 30, 2007;367(3):802-13. Epub Jan. 12, 2007. |
| Gou et al., Designing single guide RNA for CIRSPR-Cas9 base editor by deep learning. Peer reviewed Thesis/Dissertation. UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Jan. 1, 2019. Retrieved from the Internet via https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7vf9z54t. Last accessed on Apr. 29, 2021. |
| Grainge et al., The integrase family of recombinase: organization and function of the active site. Mol Microbiol. Aug. 1999;33(3):449-56. |
| Grati et al., Localization of PDZD7 to the stereocilia ankle-link associates this scaffolding protein with the Usher syndrome protein network. J Neurosci. Oct. 10, 2012;32(41):14288-93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3071-12.2012. |
| Green et al., Characterization of the mechanical unfolding of RNA pseudoknots. J Mol Biol. Jan. 11, 2008;375(2):511-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.058. Epub May 26, 2007. |
| Gregory et al., Integration site for Streptomyces phage phiBT1 and development of site-specific integrating vectors. J Bacteriol. Sep. 2003;185(17):5320-3. doi: 10.1128/jb.185.17.5320-5323.2003. |
| Griffiths, Endogenous retroviruses in the human genome sequence. Genome Biol. 2001;2(6):REVIEWS1017. doi: 10.1186/GB-2001-2-6-reviews1017. Epub Jun. 5, 2001. |
| Grindley et al., Mechanisms of site-specific recombination. Annu Rev Biochem. 2006;75:567-605. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073908. |
| Grishok et al., Genes and Mechanisms Related to RNA Interference Regulate Expression of the Small Temporal RNAs that Control C. elegans Developmental Timing. Jul. 13, 2001:106(1):P23-4. |
| Groher et al., Synthetic riboswitches—A tool comes of age. Biochim Biophys Acta. Oct. 2014;1839(10):964-973. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.05.005. Epub May 17, 2014. |
| Groth et al., Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage phiC31. Genetics. Apr. 2004;166(4):1775-82. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1775. |
| Groth et al., Phage integrases: biology and applications. J Mol Biol. Jan. 16, 2004;335(3):667-78. |
| Gruber et al., Strategies for measuring evolutionary conservation of RNA secondary structures. BMC Bioinformatics. Feb. 26, 2008;9:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-122. |
| Gruber et al., The Vienna RNA websuite. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 1, 2008;36(Web Server issue):W70-4. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn188. Epub Apr. 19, 2008. |
| Grunebaum et al., Recent advances in understanding and managing adenosine deaminase and purine nucleoside phosphorylase deficiencies. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. Dec. 2013;13(6):630-8. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000006. |
| Grünewald et al., Transcriptome-wide off-target RNA editing induced by CRISPR-guided DNA base editors. Nature. May 2019;569(7756):433-437. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1161-z. Epub Apr. 17, 2019. |
| Guedon et al., Current gene therapy using viral vectors for chronic pain. Mol Pain. May 13, 2015;11:27. doi: 10.1186/s12990-015-0018-1. |
| Gueneau et al., Structure of the MutLα C-terminal domain reveals how Mlh1 contributes to Pms1 endonuclease site. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Apr. 2013;20(4):461-8. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2511. Epub Feb. 24, 2013. |
| Guerrette et al., The interaction of the human MutL homologues in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. J Biol Chem. Mar. 5, 1999;274(10):6336-41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.10.6336. |
| Guilinger et al., Broad specificity profiling of TALENs results in engineered nucleases with improved DNA-cleavage specificity. Nat Methods. Apr. 2014;11(4):429-35. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2845. Epub Feb. 16, 2014. |
| Guilinger et al., Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to FokI nuclease improves the specificity of genome modification. Nat Biotechnol. Jun. 2014;32(6):577-82. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2909. Epub Apr. 25, 2014. |
| Gumulya et al., Exploring the past and the future of protein evolution with ancestral sequence reconstruction: the ‘retro’ approach to protein engineering. Biochem J. Jan. 1, 2017;474(1):1-19. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160507. |
| Guo et al., Evolution of Tetrahymena ribozyme mutants with increased structural stability. Nat Struct Biol. Nov. 2002;9(11):855-61. doi: 10.1038/nsb850. |
| Guo et al., Facile functionalization of FK506 for biological studies by the thiol-ene ‘click’ reaction. RSC Advances. 2014;22:11400-3. |
| Guo et al., Protein tolerance to random amino acid change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 22, 2004;101(25):9205-10. Epub Jun. 14, 2004. |
| Guo et al., Structure of Cre recombinase complexed with DNA in a site-specific recombination synapse. Nature. Sep. 4, 1997;389(6646):40-6. |
| Gupta et al., Cross-talk between cognate and noncognate RpoE sigma factors and Zn(2+)-binding anti-sigma factors regulates photooxidative stress response in Azospirillum brasilense. Antioxid Redox Signal. Jan. 1, 2014;20(1):42-59. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5314. Epub Jul. 19, 2013. |
| Gupta et al., Mechanism of mismatch recognition revealed by human MutSβ bound to unpaired DNA loops. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Dec. 18, 2011;19(1):72-8. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2175. |
| Gupta et al., Sequences in attB that affect the ability of phiC31 integrase to synapse and to activate DNA cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(10):3407-19. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm206. Epub May 3, 2007. |
| Gutschner et al., Post-translational Regulation of Cas9 during G1 Enhances Homology-Directed Repair. Cell Rep. Feb. 16, 2016;14(6):1555-1566. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.019. Epub Feb. 4, 2016. |
| Guzman et al., Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J Bacteriol. 1995;177(14):4121-4130. |
| Haapaniemi et al., CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces a p53-mediated DNA damage response. Nat Med. Jul. 2018;24(7):927-930. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0049-z. Epub Jun. 11, 2018. |
| Haddada et al., Gene therapy using adenovirus vectors. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995;199 ( Pt 3):297-306. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-79586-2_14. |
| Haeussler et al., Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biol. Jul. 5, 2016;17(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1012-2. |
| Hagen et al., A high rate of polymerization during synthesis of mouse mammary tumor virus DNA alleviates hypermutation by APOBEC3 proteins. PLoS Pathog. Feb. 15, 2019;15(2):e1007533. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007533. |
| Halbert et al., Repeat transduction in the mouse lung by using adeno-associated virus vectors with different serotypes. J Virol. Feb. 2000;74(3):1524-32. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.3.1524-1532.2000. |
| Hale et al., RNA-guided RNA cleavage by a CRISPR RNA-Cas protein complex. Cell. Nov. 25, 2009;139(5):945-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.040. |
| Halmai et al., Targeted CRIPSR/dCas9-mediated reactivation of epigenetically silenced genes suggests limited escape from the inactive X chromosome. 2nd Intl Conf on Epigenetics and Bioengineering. Oct. 4, 2018; Retrieved from the Internet: https://aiche.confex.com/aiche/epibiol8/webprogram/paper544785.html. Retrieved Jun. 29, 2020. |
| Halperin et al., CRISPR-guided DNA polymerases enable diversification of all nucleotides in a tunable window. Nature. Aug. 2018;560(7717):248-252. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0384-8. Epub Aug. 1, 2018. |
| Halvas et al., Role of murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate-binding site in retroviral replication and in vivo fidelity. J Virol. Nov. 2000;74(22):10349-58. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.22.10349-10358.2000. |
| Hamano-Takaku et al., A mutant Escherichia coli tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase utilizes the unnatural amino acid azatyrosine more efficiently than tyrosine. J Biol Chem. Dec. 22, 2000;275(51):40324-8. |
| Hamilton et al., Targeted delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 and transgenes enables complex immune cell engineering. Cell Rep. Jun. 1, 2021;35(9):109207 and Suppl Info. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109207. |
| Han, New CRISPR/Cas9-based Tech Edits Single Nucleotides Without Breaking DNA. Genome Web, Apr. 20, 2016. https://www.genomeweb.com/gene-silencinggene-editing/new-crisprcas9-based-tech-edits-single-nucleotides-without-breaking-dna. |
| Handa et al., Template-assisted synthesis of adenine-mutagenized cDNA by a retroelement protein complex. Nucleic Acids Res. Oct. 12, 2018;46(18):9711-9725. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky620. |
| Hanna et al., Massively parallel assessment of human variants with base editor screens. Cell. Feb. 18, 2021;184(4):1064-1080.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.012. |
| Hanson et al., Codon optimality, bias and usage in translation and mRNA decay. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. Jan. 2018;19(1):20-30. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.91. Epub Oct. 11, 2017. |
| Hardt et al.,Missense variants in hMLH1 identified in patients from the German HNPCC consortium and functional studies. Fam Cancer. Jun. 2011;10(2):273-84. doi: 10.1007/s10689-011-9431-4. |
| Harms et al., Evolutionary biochemistry: revealing the historical and physical causes of protein properties. Nat Rev Genet. Aug. 2013;14(8):559-71. doi: 10.1038/nrg3540. |
| Harmsen et al., DNA mismatch repair and oligonucleotide end-protection promote base-pair substitution distal from a CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA break. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 6, 2018;46(6):2945-2955. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky076. |
| Harrington et al., A thermostable Cas9 with increased lifetime in human plasma. Nat Commun. Nov. 10, 2017;8(1):1424. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01408-4. Posted May 16, 2017 as bioRxiv preprint. Doi.org/10.1101/138867. |
| Harrington et al., Programmed DNA destruction by miniature CRISPR-Cas14 enzymes. Science. Nov. 16, 2018;362(6416):839-842. doi: 10.1126/science.aav4294. Epub Oct. 18, 2018. |
| Harris et al., RNA Editing Enzyme APOBEC1 and Some of Its Homologs Can Act as DNA Mutators. Mol Cell. Nov. 2002; 10(5):1247-53. |
| Hart et al., High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities. Cell. Dec. 3, 2015;163(6):1515-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.015. Epub Nov. 25, 2015. |
| Hartung et al., Correction of metabolic, craniofacial, and neurologic abnormalities in MPS I mice treated at birth with adeno-associated virus vector transducing the human alpha-L-iduronidase gene. Mol Ther. Jun. 2004;9(6):866-75. |
| Hartung et al., Cre mutants with altered DNA binding properties. J Biol Chem. Sep. 4, 1998;273(36):22884-91. |
| Hasadsri et al., Functional protein delivery into neurons using polymeric nanoparticles. J Biol Chem. Mar. 13, 2009;284(11):6972-81. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805956200. Epub Jan. 7, 2009. |
| Hasegawa et al., Spontaneous mutagenesis associated with nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. Genes Cells. May 2008;13(5):459-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2008.01185.x. |
| Hawley-Nelson et al., Transfection of Cultured Eukaryotic Cells Using Cationic Lipid Reagents. Curr Prot Mol Biol. Jan. 2008;9.4.1-9.4.17. doi: 10.102/0471142727.mb0904s81. 17 pages. |
| Hayes et al., Stop codons preceded by rare arginine codons are efficient determinants of SsrA tagging in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 19, 2002;99(6):3440-5. Epub Mar. 12, 2002. |
| Hector et al., CDKL5 variants: Improving our understanding of a rare neurologic disorder. Neurol Genet. Dec. 15, 2017;3(6):e200. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000200. |
| Heidenreich et al., Non-homologous end joining as an important mutagenic process in cell cycle-arrested cells. EMBO J. May 1, 2003;22(9):2274-83. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg203. |
| Held et al., In vivo correction of murine hereditary tyrosinemia type I by phiC31 integrase-mediated gene delivery. Mol Ther. Mar. 2005;11(3):399-408. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.11.001. |
| Heller et al., Replisome assembly and the direct restart of stalled replication forks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. Dec. 2006;7(12):932-43. Epub Nov. 8, 2006. |
| Hendel et al., Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells. Nat Biotechnol. Sep. 2015;33(9):985-989. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3290. Epub Jun. 29, 2015. Author Manuscript. 14 pages. |
| Hendricks et al., The S. cerevisiae Mag1 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase modulates susceptibility to homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst). 2002;1(8):645-659. |
| Hermonat et al., Use of adeno-associated virus as a mammalian DNA cloning vector: transduction of neomycin resistance into mammalian tissue culture cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 1984;81(20):6466-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.20.6466. |
| Herschhorn et al., Retroviral reverse transcriptases. Cell Mol Life Sci. Aug. 2010;67(16):2717-47. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0346-2. Epub Apr. 1, 2010. |
| Herzig et al., A Novel Leu92 Mutant of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase with a Selective Deficiency in Strand Transfer Causes a Loss of Viral Replication. J Virol. Aug. 2015;89(16):8119-29. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00809-15. Epub May 20, 2015. |
| Hess et al., Directed evolution using dCas9-targeted somatic hypermutation in mammalian cells. Nat Methods. Dec. 2016;13(12):1036-1042. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4038. Epub Oct. 31, 2016. |
| Heyer et al., Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet. 2010;44:113-39. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955. Author Manuscript. 33 pages. |
| Hickford et al., Antitumour polyether macrolides: four new halichondrins from the New Zealand deep-water marine sponge Lissodendoryx sp. Bioorg Med Chem. Mar. 15, 2009;17(6):2199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.10.093. Epub Nov. 19, 2008. |
| Hida et al., Directed evolution for drug and nucleic acid; delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. Dec. 22, 2007;59(15):1562-78. Epub Aug. 28, 2007.; Review. |
| Higgs et al., Genetic complexity in sickle cell disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 19, 2008;105(33):11595-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806633105. Epub Aug. 11, 2008. |
| Hilbers et al., New developments in structure determination of pseudoknots. Biopolymers. 1998;48(2-3):137-53. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(1998)48:2<137::AID-BIP4>3.0.CO;2-H. |
| Hill et al., Functional analysis of conserved histidines in ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase from Escherichia coli.Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Mar. 17, 1998;244(2):573-7. |
| Hille et al., The Biology of CRISPR-Cas: Backward and Forward. Cell. Mar. 8, 2018;172(6):1239-1259. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.032. |
| Hilton et al., Enabling functional genomics with genome engineering. Genome Res. Oct. 2015;25(10):1442-55. doi: 10.1101/gr.190124.115. |
| Hirano et al., Site-specific recombinases as tools for heterologous gene integration. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. Oct. 2011;92(2):227-39. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3519-5. Epub Aug. 7, 2011. Review. |
| Hirano et al., Structural Basis for the Altered PAM Specificities of Engineered CRISPR-Cas9. Mol Cell. Mar. 17, 2016;61(6):886-94. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.018. |
| Hoang et al., UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation. Mol Biol Evol. Feb. 1, 2018;35(2):518-522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281. |
| Hockemeyer et al., Efficient targeting of expressed and silent genes in human ESCs and iPSCs using zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. Sep. 2009;27(9):851-7. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1562. Epub Aug. 13, 2009. |
| Hockemeyer et al., Genetic engineering of human pluripotent cells using TALE nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 7, 2011;29(8):731-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1927. |
| Hoernes et al., Translating the epitranscriptome. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. Jan. 2017;8(1):e1375. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1375. Epub Jun. 27, 2016. |
| Hoess et al., DNA specificity of the Cre recombinase resides in the 25 kDa carboxyl domain of the protein. J Mol Biol. Dec. 20, 1990;216(4):873-82. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(99)80007-2. |
| Holden et al., Crystal structure of the anti-viral APOBEC3G catalytic domain and functional implications. Nature. Nov. 6, 2008;456(7218):121-4. doi: 10.1038/nature07357. Epub Oct. 12, 2008. |
| Hollis et al., Phage integrases for the construction and manipulation of transgenic mammals. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. Nov. 7, 2003;1:79. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-1-79. |
| Holsinger et al., Signal transduction in T lymphocytes using a conditional allele of Sos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 10, 1995;92(21):9810-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.21.9810. |
| Holt et al., Human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells modified by zinc-finger nucleases targeted to CCR5 control HIV-1 in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. Aug. 2010;28(8):839-47. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1663. Epub Jul. 2, 2010. |
| Hondares et al., Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor α (PPARα) Induces PPARγ Coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) Gene Expression and Contributes to Thermogenic Activation of Brown Fat. J Biol. Chem Oct. 2011;286(50):43112-22. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.252775. |
| Hoogenboom et al., Natural and designer binding sites made by phage display technology. Immunol Today. Aug. 2000;21(8):371-8. |
| Horvath et al., CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science. Jan. 8, 2010;327(5962):167-70. doi: 10.1126/science.1179555. |
| Horvath et al., Diversity, Activity, and Evolution of CRISPR Loci in Streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol. Feb. 2008;190(4):1401-12. doi: 10.1128/JB.01415-07. Epub Dec. 7, 2007. |
| Hotta et al., [Neurotropic viruses—classification, structure and characteristics]. Nihon Rinsho. Apr. 1997;55(4):777-82. Japanese. |
| Hou et al., Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 24, 2013;110(39):15644-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313587110. Epub Aug. 12, 2013. |
| Houck-Loomis et al., An equilibrium-dependent retroviral mRNA switch regulates translational recoding. Nature. Nov. 27, 2011;480(7378):561-4. doi: 10.1038/nature10657. |
| Houdebine, The methods to generate transgenic animals and to control transgene expression. J Biotechnol. Sep. 25, 2002;98(2-3):145-60. |
| Houghton et al., Immunological validation of the EpitOptimizer program for streamlined design of heteroclitic epitopes. Vaccine. Jul. 20, 2007;25(29):5330-42. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.05.008. Epub Jun. 4, 2007. |
| Housden et al., Identification of potential drug targets for tuberous sclerosis complex by synthetic screens combining CRISPR-based knockouts with RNAi. Sci Signal. Sep. 8, 2015;8(393):rs9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aab3729. |
| Houseley et al., The many pathways of RNA degradation. Cell. Feb. 20, 2009;136(4):763-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.019. |
| Howard et al., Intracerebral drug delivery in rats with lesion-induced memory deficits. J Neurosurg. Jul. 1989;71(1):105-12. |
| Hower et al., Shape-based peak identification for ChIP-Seq. BMC Bioinformatics. Jan. 12, 2011;12:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-15. |
| Hsu et al., DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. Sep. 2013;31(9):827-32. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2647. Epub Jul. 21, 2013. |
| Hsu et al., DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. Sep. 2013;31(9):827-32. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2647. Epub Jul. 21, 2013. Supplementary Information. 27 pages. |
| Hsu et al., PrimeDesign software for rapid and simplified design of prime editing guide RNAs. Nat Commun. Feb. 15, 2021;12(1):1034. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21337-7. |
| Hu et al., Chemical Biology Approaches to Genome Editing: Understanding, Controlling, and Delivering Programmable Nucleases. Cell Chem Biol. Jan. 21, 2016;23(1):57-73. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.12.009. |
| Hu et al., Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity. Nature. Apr. 5, 2018;556(7699):57-63 and Extended/Supplementary Data. doi: 10.1038/nature26155. Epub Feb. 28, 2018. 21 pages. |
| Hu et al., Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity. Nature. Apr. 5, 2018;556(7699):57-63. doi: 10.1038/nature26155. Epub Feb. 28, 2018. |
| Hua et al., Expanding the base editing scope in rice by using Cas9 variants. Plant Biotechnol J. Feb. 2019;17(2):499-504. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12993. Epub Oct. 5, 2018. |
| Hua et al., Precise A⋅T to G⋅C Base Editing in the Rice Genome. Mol Plant. Apr. 2, 2018;11(4):627-630. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.007. Epub Feb. 21, 2018. |
| Huang et al., Circularly permuted and PAM-modified Cas9 variants broaden the targeting scope of base editors. Nat Biotechnol. Jun. 2019;37(6):626-631. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0134-y. Epub May 20, 2019. Including Supplementary Information. |
| Huang et al., Gain-of-function mutations in sodium channel Na(v)1.9 in painful neuropathy. Brain. Jun. 2014;137(Pt 6):1627-42. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu079. Epub Apr. 27, 2014. |
| Huang et al., Heritable gene targeting in zebrafish using customized TALENs. Nat Biotechnol. Aug. 5, 2011;29(8):699-700. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1939. |
| Huang et al., Precision genome editing using cytosine and adenine base editors in mammalian cells. Nat Protoc. Feb. 2021;16(2):1089-1128. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-00450-9. Epub Jan. 18, 2021. |
| Huggins et al., Flap endonuclease 1 efficiently cleaves base excision repair and DNA replication intermediates assembled into nucleosomes. Mol Cell. Nov. 2002;10(5):1201-11. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00736-0. |
| Humbel et al., Maximizing lentiviral vector gene transfer in the CNS. Gene Ther. Feb. 2021;28(1-2):75-88. doi: 10.1038/s41434-020-0172-6. Epub Jul. 6, 2020. Erratum in: Gene Ther. May 2022;29(5):312. |
| Humbert et al., Targeted gene therapies: tools, applications, optimization. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. May-Jun. 2012;47(3):264-81. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2012.658112. |
| Hung et al., Protein localization in disease and therapy. J Cell Sci. Oct. 15, 2011;124(Pt 20):3381-92. doi: 10.1242/jcs.089110. |
| Hurt et al., Highly specific zinc finger proteins obtained by directed domain shuffling and cell-based selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 14, 2003;100(21):12271-6. Epub Oct. 3, 2003. |
| Husimi, Selection and evolution of bacteriophages in cellstat. Adv Biophys. ; 1989;25:1-43. Review. |
| Hussman et al., Mapping the genetic landscape of DNA double-strand break repair. Cell. Oct. 28, 2021;184(22):5653-5669.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.002. Epub Oct. 20, 2021. |
| Hwang et al., Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol. Mar. 2013;31(3):227-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2501. Epub Jan. 29, 2013. |
| Hwang et al., Efficient In Vivo Genome Editing Using RNA-Guided Nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. Mar. 2013; 31(3): 227-229. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2501. Epub Jan. 29, 2013. |
| Hwang et al., Web-based design and analysis tools for CRISPR base editing. BMC Bioinformatics. Dec. 27, 2018;19(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2585-4. |
| Hänsel-Hertsch et al., DNA G-quadruplexes in the human genome: detection, functions and therapeutic potential. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. May 2017;18(5):279-284. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.3. Epub Feb. 22, 2017. |
| Iaccarino et al., hMSH2 and hMSH6 play distinct roles in mismatch binding and contribute differently to the ATPase activity of hMutSalpha. EMBO J. May 1, 1998;17(9):2677-86. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.9.2677. |
| Ibba et al., Relaxing the substrate specificity of an aminoacyl-tRNA; synthetase allows in vitro and in vivo synthesis of proteins containing unnatural amino acids. FEBS Lett. May 15, 1995;364(3):272-5. |
| Ibba et al., Substrate specificity is determined by amino acid binding pocket size in Escherichia coli phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase. Biochemistry. Jun. 14, 1994;33(23):7107-12. |
| Ibrahim et al., RNA recognition by 3′-to-5′ exonucleases: the substrate perspective. Biochim Biophys Acta. Apr. 2008;1779(4):256-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2007.11.004. Epub Dec. 3, 2007. |
| Ihry et al., p53 inhibits CRISPR-Cas9 engineering in human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Med. Jul. 2018;24(7):939-946. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0050-6. Epub Jun. 11, 2018. |
| Iida et al., A site-specific, conservative recombination system carried by bacteriophage P1. Mapping the recombinase gene cin and the cross-over sites cix for the inversion of the C segment. EMBO J. 1982;1(11):1445-53. |
| Iida et al., The Min DNA inversion enzyme of plasmid p15B of Escherichia coli 15T-: a new member of the Din family of site-specific recombinases. Mol Microbiol. Jun. 1990;4(6):991-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00671.x. |
| Ikediobi et al., Mutation analysis of 24 known cancer genes in the NCI-60 cell line set. Mol Cancer Ther. Nov. 2006;5(11):2606-12. Epub Nov. 6, 2006. |
| Imanishi et al., Detection of N6-methyladenosine based on the methyl-sensitivity of MazF RNA endonuclease. Chem Commun (Camb). Nov. 30, 2017;53(96):12930-12933. doi: 10.1039/c7cc07699a. |
| Imburgio et al., Studies of promoter recognition and start site selection by T7 RNA polymerase using a comprehensive collection of promoter variants. Biochemistry. Aug. 29, 2000;39(34):10419-30. |
| Ingram, A specific chemical difference between the globins of normal human and sickle-cell anaemia haemoglobin. Nature. Oct. 13, 1956;178(4537):792-4. doi: 10.1038/178792a0. |
| Irion et al., Identification and targeting of the ROSA26 locus in human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. Dec. 2007;25(12):1477-82. doi: 10.1038/nbt1362. Epub Nov. 25, 2007. |
| Irrthum et al., Congenital hereditary lymphedema caused by a mutation that inactivates VEGFR3 tyrosine kinase. Am J Hum Genet. Aug. 2000;67(2):295-301. Epub Jun. 9, 2000. |
| Isaacs et al., Engineered riboregulators enable post-transcriptional control of gene expression. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 2004;22(7):841-7. doi: 10.1038/nbt986. Epub Jun. 20, 2004. |
| Ishino et al., Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. J Bacteriol. Dec. 1987;169(12):5429-33. |
| Ishizuka et al., Loss of ADAR1 in tumours overcomes resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Nature. Jan. 2019;565(7737):43-48. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0768-9. Epub Dec. 17, 2018. |
| Iwai et al., Circular beta-lactamase: stability enhancement by cyclizing the backbone. FEBS Lett. Oct. 8, 1999;459(2):166-72. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01220-x. |
| Iwai et al., Highly efficient protein trans-splicing by a naturally split DnaE intein from Nostoc punctiforme. FEBS Lett. Mar. 20, 2006;580(7):1853-8. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.02.045. Epub Feb. 24, 2006. |
| Iyama et al., DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells. DNA Repair (Amst). Aug. 2013;12(8):620-36. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.04.015. Epub May 16, 2013. |
| Iyer et al., DNA mismatch repair: functions and mechanisms. Chem Rev. Feb. 2006;106(2):302-23. doi: 10.1021/cr0404794. |
| Jaffrey et al., Emerging links between m6A and misregulated mRNA methylation in cancer. Genome Med. Jan. 12, 2017;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0395-8. |
| Jakimo et al., A Cas9 with Complete PAM Recognition for Adenine Dinucleotides. bioRxiv preprint. Sep. 27, 2018. doi.org/10.1101/429654. 29 pages. |
| Jamieson et al., Drug discovery with engineered zinc-finger proteins. Nat Rev Drug Discov. May 2003;2(5):361-8. |
| Jansen et al., Backbone and nucleobase contacts to glucosamine-6-phosphate in the glmS ribozyme. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Jun. 2006;13(6):517-23. Epub May 14, 2006. |
| Jansen et al., Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol Microbiol. Mar. 2002;43(6):1565-75. |
| Jardine et al., HIV-1 Vaccines. Priming a broadly neutralizing antibody response to HIV-1 using a germline-targeting immunogen. Science. Jul. 10, 2015;349(6244):156-61. doi: 10.1126/science.aac5894. Epub Jun. 18, 2015. |
| Jasin et al., Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. Nov. 1, 2013;5(11):a012740. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012740. |
| Jeggo, DNA breakage and repair. Adv Genet. 1998;38:185-218. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60144-3. |
| Jemielity et al., Novel “anti-reverse” cap analogs with superior translational properties. RNA. Sep. 2003;9(9):1108-22. doi: 10.1261/rna.5430403. |
| Jenkins et al., Comparison of a preQ1 riboswitch aptamer in metabolite-bound and free states with implications for gene regulation. J Biol Chem. Jul. 15, 2011;286(28):24626-37. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.230375. Epub May 18, 2011. |
| Jeong et al., Measurement of deoxyinosine adduct: Can it be a reliable tool to assess oxidative or nitrosative DNA damage? Toxicol Lett. Oct. 17, 2012;214(2):226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.08.013. Epub Aug. 23, 2012. |
| Jia et al., The MLH1 ATPase domain is needed for suppressing aberrant formation of interstitial telomeric sequences. DNA Repair (Amst). May 2018;65:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.03.002. Epub Mar. 7, 2018. |
| Jiang et al., Chemical modifications of adenine base editor mRNA and guide RNA expand its application scope. Nat Commun. Apr. 24, 2020;11(1):1979. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15892-8. |
| Jiang et al., CRISPR-Cas9 Structures and Mechanisms. Annu Rev Biophys. May 22, 2017;46:505-529. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-010822. Epub Mar. 30, 2017. |
| Jiang et al., Prime editing efficiently generates W542L and S621I double mutations in two ALS genes of maize. bioRxiv preprint. Jul. 6, 2020. Retrieved from www.biorxiv.org. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.06.188896. 15 pages. |
| Jiang et al., RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol. Mar. 2013;31(3):233-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2508. Epub Jan. 29, 2013. |
| Jiang et al., Structural Biology. A Cas9-guide RNA Complex Preorganized for Target DNA Recognition. Science. Jun. 26, 2015;348(6242):1477-81. doi: 10.1126/science.aab1452. |
| Jiang et al., Structures of a CRISPR-Cas9 R-loop complex primed for DNA cleavage. Science. Feb. 19, 2016;351(6275):867-71. doi: 10.1126/science.aad8282. Epub Jan. 14, 2016. |
| Jiao et al., Random-PE: an efficient integration of random sequences into mammalian genome by prime editing. Mol Biomed. Nov. 18, 2021;2(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s43556-021-00057-w. |
| Jin et al., Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice. Science. Apr. 19, 2019;364(6437):292-295. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw7166. Epub Feb. 28, 2019. |
| Jinek et al., A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. Aug. 17, 2012;337(6096):816-21. doi: 10.1126/science.1225829. Epub Jun. 28, 2012. |
| Jinek et al., RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. Elife. Jan. 29, 2013;2:e00471. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00471. |
| Jinek et al., Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation. Science. Mar. 14, 2014;343(6176):1247997. doi: 10.1126/science.1247997. Epub Feb. 6, 2014. |
| Jiricny, The multifaceted mismatch-repair system. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. May 2006;7(5):335-46. doi: 10.1038/nrm1907. |
| Johann et al., GLVR1, a receptor for gibbon ape leukemia virus, is homologous to a phosphate permease of Neurospora crassa and is expressed at high levels in the brain and thymus. J Virol. Mar. 1992;66(3):1635-40. doi: 10.1128/JVI.66.3.1635-1640.1992. |
| Johansson et al., RNA Recognition by the MS2 Phage Coat Protein. Seminars in Virology. 1997;8(3): 176-85. https://doi.org/10.1006/smvy.1997.0120. |
| Johansson et al., Selenocysteine in proteins-properties and biotechnological use. Biochim Biophys Acta. Oct. 30, 2005;1726(1):1-13. Epub Jun. 1, 2005. |
| Johns et al., The promise and peril of continuous in vitro evolution. J Mol Evol. Aug. 2005;61(2):253-63. Epub Jun. 27, 2005. |
| Johnson et al., Trans insertion-splicing: ribozyme-catalyzed insertion of targeted sequences into RNAs. Biochemistry. Aug. 9, 2005;44(31):10702-10. doi: 10.1021/bi0504815. |
| Joho et al., Identification of a region of the bacteriophage T3 and T7 RNA polymerases that determines promoter specificity. J Mol Biol. Sep. 5, 1990;215(1):31-9. |
| Jore et al., Structural basis for CRISPR RNA-guided DNA recognition by Cascade. Nat Struct Mol Biol. May 2011;18(5):529-36. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2019. Epub Apr. 3, 2011. |
| Jost et al., Titrating gene expression using libraries of systematically attenuated CRISPR guide RNAs. Nat Biotechnol. Mar. 2020;38(3):355-364. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0387-5. Epub Jan. 13, 2020. |
| Joung et al., TALENs: a widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. Jan. 2013;14(1):49-55. doi: 10.1038/nrm3486. Epub Nov. 21, 2012. |
| Joyce et al., Amplification, mutation and selection of catalytic RNA. Gene. Oct. 15, 1989;82(1):83-7. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90033-4. |
| Jusiak et al., Comparison of Integrases Identifies Bxb1-GA Mutant as the Most Efficient Site-Specific Integrase System in Mammalian Cells. ACS Synth Biol. Jan. 18, 2019;8(1):16-24. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00089. Epub Jan. 9, 2019. |
| Jyothy et al., Translocation Down syndrome. Indian J Med Sci. Mar. 2002;56(3):122-6. |
| Kacian et al., Purification of the DNA polymerase of avian myeloblastosis virus. Biochim Biophys Acta. Sep. 24, 1971;246(3):365-83. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(71)90773-8. |
| Kaczmarczyk et al., Manipulating the Prion Protein Gene Sequence and Expression Levels with CRISPR/Cas9. PLoS One. Apr. 29, 2016;11(4):e0154604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154604. |
| Kadoch et al., Reversible disruption of mSWI/SNF (BAF) complexes by the SS18-SSX oncogenic fusion in synovial sarcoma. Cell. Mar. 28, 2013;153(1):71-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.036. |
| Kadyrov et al., Endonucleolytic function of MutLalpha in human mismatch repair. Cell. Jul. 28, 2006;126(2):297-308. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.039. |
| Kahmann et al., G inversion in bacteriophage Mu DNA is stimulated by a site within the invertase gene and a host factor. Cell. Jul. 1985;41(3):771-80. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80058-1. |
| Kaiser et al., Gene therapy. Putting the fingers on gene repair. Science. Dec. 23, 2005;310(5756):1894-6. |
| Kakiyama et al., A peptide release system using a photo-cleavable linker in a cell array format for cell-toxicity analysis. Polymer J. Feb. 27, 2013;45:535-9. |
| Kalyaanamoorthy et al., ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. Jun. 2017;14(6):587-589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. Epub May 8, 2017. |
| Kan et al., Mechanisms of precise genome editing using oligonucleotide donors. Genome Res. Jul. 2017;27(7):1099-1111. doi: 10.1101/gr.214775.116. Epub Mar. 29, 2017. |
| Kandavelou et al., Targeted manipulation of mammalian genomes using designed zinc finger nucleases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Oct. 9, 2009;388(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.07.112. Epub Jul. 25, 2009. |
| Kang et al., Structural Insights into riboswitch control of the biosynthesis of queuosine, a modified nucleotide found in the anticodon of tRNA. Mol Cell. Mar. 27, 2009;33(6):784-90. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.019. Epub Mar. 12, 2009. |
| Kang et al., Precision genome engineering through adenine base editing in plants. Nat Plants. Jul. 2018;4(7):427-431. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0178-x. Epub Jun. 4, 2018. Erratum in: Nat Plants. Sep. 2018;4(9):730. |
| Kao et al., Cleavage specificity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae flap endonuclease 1 suggests a double-flap structure as the cellular substrate. J Biol Chem. Apr. 26, 2002;277(17):14379-89. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110662200. Epub Feb. 1, 2002. |
| Kappel et al., Regulating gene expression in transgenic animals.Curr Opin Biotechnol. Oct. 1992;3(5):548-53. |
| Karimova et al., Discovery of Nigri/nox and Panto/pox site-specific recombinase systems facilitates advanced genome engineering. Sci Rep. Jul. 22, 2016;6:30130. doi: 10.1038/srep30130. |
| Karimova et al., Vika/vox, a novel efficient and specific Cre/loxP-like site-specific recombination system. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 2013;41(2):e37. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1037. Epub Nov. 9, 2012. |
| Karpenshif et al., From yeast to mammals: recent advances in genetic control of homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst). Oct. 1, 2012;11(10):781-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.07.001. Epub Aug. 11, 2012. Review. |
| Karpinsky et al., Directed evolution of a recombinase that excises the provirus of most HIV-1 primary isolates with high specificity. Nat Biotechnol. Apr. 2016;34(4):401-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3467. Epub Feb. 22, 2016. |
| Katafuchi et al., DNA polymerases involved in the incorporation of oxidized nucleotides into DNA: their efficiency and template base preference. Mutat Res. Nov. 28, 2010;703(1):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.06.004. Epub Jun. 11, 2010. |
| Kato et al., Improved purification and enzymatic properties of three forms of reverse transcriptase from avian myeloblastosis virus. J Virol Methods. Dec. 1984;9(4):325-39. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(84)90058-2. |
| Katoh et al., MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. Apr. 2013;30(4):772-80. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. Epub Jan. 16, 2013. |
| Kaufman et al., Translational efficiency of polycistronic mRNAs and their utilization to express heterologous genes in mammalian cells. EMBO J. Jan. 1987;6(1):187-93. |
| Kavli et al., Excision of cytosine and thymine from DNA by mutants of human uracil-DNA glycosylase. EMBO J. Jul. 1, 1996;15(13):3442-7. |
| Kawarasaki et al., Enhanced crossover Scratchy: construction and high-throughput screening of a combinatorial library containing multiple non-homologous crossovers. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 1, 2003;31(21):e126. |
| Kay et al., Viral vectors for gene therapy: the art of turning infectious agents into vehicles of therapeutics. Nat Med. Jan. 2001;7(1):33-40. |
| Kaya et al., A bacterial Argonaute with noncanonical guide RNA specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Apr. 2016;113(15):4057-62. |
| Keijzers et al., Human exonuclease 1 (EXO1) activity characterization and its function on flap structures. Biosci Rep. Apr. 25, 2015;35(3):e00206. doi: 10.1042/BSR20150058. |
| Kellendonk et al., Regulation of Cre recombinase activity by the synthetic steroid RU 486. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 15, 1996;24(8):1404-11. |
| Kelman, PCNA: structure, functions and interactions. Oncogene. Feb. 13, 1997;14(6):629-40. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1200886. |
| Keravala et al., A diversity of serine phage integrases mediate site-specific recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Genet Genomics. Aug. 2006;276(2):135-46. doi: 10.1007/s00438-006-0129-5. Epub May 13, 2006. |
| Kessel et al., Murine developmental control genes. Science. Jul. 27, 1990;249(4967):374-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1974085. |
| Kessler et al., Gene delivery to skeletal muscle results in sustained expression and systemic delivery of a therapeutic protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 26, 1996;93(24):14082-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.14082. |
| Ketha et al., Application of bioinformatics-coupled experimental analysis reveals a new transport-competent nuclear localization signal in the nucleoprotein of Influenza A virus strain. BMC Cell Biol. Apr. 28, 2008; 9:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2121-9-22. |
| Kiga et al., An engineered Escherichia coli tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase for site-specific incorporation of an unnatural amino acid into proteins in eukaryotic translation and its application in a wheat germ cell-free system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 23, 2002;99(15):9715-20. Epub Jul. 3, 2002. |
| Kilbride et al., Determinants of product topology in a hybrid Cre-Tn3 resolvase site-specific recombination system. J Mol Biol. Jan. 13, 2006;355(2):185-95. Epub Nov. 9, 2005. |
| Kilcher et al., Brochothrix thermosphacta bacteriophages feature heterogeneous and highly mosaic genomes and utilize unique prophage insertion sites. J Bacteriol. Oct. 2010;192(20):5441-53. doi: 10.1128/JB.00709-10. Epub Aug. 13, 2010. |
| Kim et al., DJ-1, a novel regulator of the tumor suppressor PTEN. Cancer Cell. 2005;7(3):263-273. |
| Kim et al., Genome-wide target specificity of CRISPR RNA-guided adenine base editors. Nat Biotechnol. Apr. 2019;37(4):430-435. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0050-1. Epub Mar. 4, 2019. |
| Kim et al., A library of TAL effector nucleases spanning the human genome. Nat Biotechnol. Mar. 2013;31(3):251-8. Doi: 10.1038/nbt.2517. Epub Feb. 17, 2013. |
| Kim et al., AAV-deliverable hypercompact adenine base editors based on transposase B guided by engineered RNA. Research Square. Apr. 12, 2022. DOI: 10.21203/r9.3.rs-1326630/v1. Retrieved from https://www.researchsquare.com/articleIrs-1326630/v1 on Aug. 1, 2023. 20 pages. |
| Kim et al., Adenine base editors catalyze cytosine conversions in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. Oct. 2019;37(10):1145-1148. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0254-4. Epub Sep. 23, 2019. |
| Kim et al., An anionic human protein mediates cationic liposome delivery of genome editing proteins into mammalian cells. Nat Commun. Jul. 2, 2019;10(1):2905. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10828-3. |
| Kim et al., Evaluating and Enhancing Target Specificity of Gene-Editing Nucleases and Deaminases. Annu Rev Biochem. Jun. 20, 2019;88:191-220. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111730. Epub Mar. 18, 2019. |
| Kim et al., Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR RNA-guided programmable deaminases. Nat Biotechnol. May 2017;35(5):475-480. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3852. Epub Apr. 10, 2017. |
| Kim et al., High cleavage efficiency of a 2A peptide derived from porcine teschovirus-1 in human cell lines, zebrafish and mice. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018556. Epub Apr. 29, 2011. |
| Kim et al., High-throughput analysis of the activities of xCas9, SpCas9-NG and SpCas9 at matched and mismatched target sequences in human cells. Nat Biomed Eng. Jan. 2020;4(1):111-124. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0505-1. Epub Jan. 14, 2020. |
| Kim et al., Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in mouse embryos. Nat Biotechnol. May 2017;35(5):435-437. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3816. Epub Feb. 27, 2017. |
| Kim et al., Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res. Jun. 2014;24(6):1012-9. doi: 10.1101/gr.171322.113. Epub Apr. 2, 2014. |
| Kim et al., In vivo genome editing with a small Cas9 orthologue derived from Campylobacter jejuni. Nat Commun. Feb. 21, 2017;8:14500. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14500. PMID: 28220790; PMCID: PMC5473640. |
| Kim et al., In vivo high-throughput profiling of CRISPR-Cpf1 activity. Nat Methods. Feb. 2017;14(2):153-159. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4104. Epub Dec. 19, 2016. |
| Kim et al., Increasing the genome-targeting scope and precision of base editing with engineered Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusions. Nat Biotechnol. Apr. 2017;35(4):371-376. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3803. Epub Feb. 13, 2017. |
| Kim et al., Mycobacteriophage Bxb1 integrates into the Mycobacterium smegmatis groEL1 gene. Mol Microbiol. Oct. 2003;50(2):463-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03723.x. |
| Kim et al., Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2021;39(2):198-206. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0677-y. Epub Sep. 21, 2020. |
| Kim et al., RAD51 mutants cause replication defects and chromosomal instability. Mol Cell Biol. Sep. 2012;32(18):3663-80. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00406-12. Epub Jul. 9, 2012. |
| Kim et al., Rescue of high-specificity Cas9 variants using sgRNAs with matched 5′ nucleotides. Genome Biol. Nov. 15, 2017;18(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1355-3. |
| Kim et al., Structural and kinetic characterization of Escherichia coli TadA, the wobble-specific tRNA deaminase. Biochemistry. May 23, 2006;45(20):6407-16. doi: 10.1021/bi0522394. PMID: 16700551. |
| Kim et al., TALENs and ZFNs are associated with different mutationsignatures. Nat Methods. Mar. 2013;10(3):185. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2364. Epub Feb. 10, 2013. |
| Kim et al., Targeted genome editing in human cells with zinc finger nucleases constructed via modular assembly. Genome Res. Jul. 2009; 19(7):1279-88. doi: 10.1101/gr.089417.108. Epub May 21, 2009. |
| Kim et al., The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. Aug. 13, 2009;63(3):287-303. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.026. |
| Kim et al., Transcriptional repression by zinc finger peptides. Exploring the potential for applications in gene therapy. J Biol Chem. Nov. 21, 1997;272(47):29795-800. |
| King et al., No gain, no pain: NaV1.7 as an analgesic target. ACS Chem Neurosci. Sep. 17, 2014;5(9):749-51. doi: 10.1021/cn500171p. Epub Aug. 11, 2014. |
| Kitamura et al., Uracil DNA glycosylase counteracts APOBEC3G-induced hypermutation of hepatitis B viral genomes: excision repair of covalently closed circular DNA. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(5):e1003361. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003361. Epub May 16, 2013. |
| Klapacz et al., Frameshift mutagenesis and microsatellite instability induced by human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase. Mol Cell. Mar. 26, 2010;37(6):843-53. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.038. |
| Klauser et al., An engineered small RNA-mediated genetic switch based on a ribozyme expression platform. Nucleic Acids Res. May 1, 2013;41(10):5542-52. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt253. Epub Apr. 12, 2013. |
| Klein et al., Cocrystal structure of a class I preQ1 riboswitch reveals a pseudoknot recognizing an essential hypermodified nucleobase. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Mar. 2009;16(3):343-4. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1563.Epub Feb. 22, 2009. |
| Kleiner et al., In vitro selection of a DNA-templated small-molecule library reveals a class of macrocyclic kinase inhibitors. J Am Chem Soc. Aug. 25, 2010;132(33):11779-91. doi: 10.1021/ja104903x. |
| Kleinstiver et al., Broadening the targeting range of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR-Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition. Nat Biotechnol. Dec. 2015;33(12):1293-1298. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3404. Epub Nov. 2, 2015. |
| Kleinstiver et al., Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature. Jul. 23, 2015;523(7561):481-5 and Supplementary Materials. doi: 10.1038/nature14592. Epub Jun. 22, 2015. 27 pages. |
| Kleinstiver et al., Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature. Jul. 23, 2015;523(7561):481-5. doi: 10.1038/nature14592. Epub Jun. 22, 2015. |
| Kleinstiver et al., High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature. Jan. 28, 2016;529(7587):490-5. doi: 10.1038/nature16526. Epub Jan. 6, 2016. |
| Kleinstiver et al., Monomeric site-specific nucleases for genome editing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 22, 2012;109(21):8061-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117984109. Epub May 7, 2012. |
| Klement et al., Discrimination between bacteriophage T3 and T7 promoters by the T3 and T7 RNA polymerases depends primarily upon a three base-pair region located 10 to 12 base-pairs upstream from the start site. J Mol Biol. Sep. 5, 1990;215(1):21-9. |
| Klippel et al., Isolation and characterization of unusual gin mutants. EMBO J. Dec. 1, 1988;7(12):3983-9. |
| Klippel et al., The DNA invertase Gin of phage Mu: formation of a covalent complex with DNA via a phosphoserine at amino acid position 9. EMBO J. Apr. 1988;7(4):1229-37. |
| Klompe et al., Transposon-encoded CRISPR-Cas systems direct RNA-guided DNA integration. Nature. Jul. 2019;571(7764):219-225. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1323-z. Epub Jun. 12, 2019. |
| Kluesner et al., CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine and adenosine base editing of splice-sites mediates highly-efficient disruption of proteins in primary and immortalized cells. Nat Commun. Apr. 23, 2021;12(1):2437. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22009-2. |
| Knott et al., CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering. Science. Aug. 31, 2018;361(6405):866-869. doi: 10.1126/science.aat5011. |
| Knott et al., Guide-bound structures of an RNA-targeting A-cleaving CRISPR-Cas13a enzyme. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Oct. 2017;24(10):825-833. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3466. Epub Sep. 11, 2017. |
| Koblan et al., Efficient C•G-to-G•C base editors developed using CRISPRi screens, target-library analysis, and machine learning. Nat Biotechnol. Nov. 2021;39(11):1414-1425. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00938-z. Epub Jun. 28, 2021. |
| Koblan et al., Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction. Nat Biotechnol. Oct. 2018;36(9):843-846. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4172. Epub May 29, 2018. |
| Koblan et al., In vivo base editing rescues Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome in mice. Nature. Jan. 2021;589(7843):608-614. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03086-7. Epub Jan. 6, 2021. |
| Kobori et al., Deep Sequencing Analysis of Aptazyme Variants Based on a Pistol Ribozyme. ACS Synth Biol. Jul. 21, 2017;6(7):1283-1288. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00057. Epub Apr. 14, 2017. |
| Kohli et al., A portable hot spot recognition loop transfers sequence preferences from APOBEC family members to activation-induced cytidine deaminase. J Biol Chem. Aug. 21, 2009;284(34):22898-904. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.025536. Epub Jun. 26, 2009. |
| Kohli et al., Local sequence targeting in the AID/APOBEC family differentially impacts retroviral restriction and antibody diversification. J Biol Chem. Dec. 24, 2010;285(52):40956-64. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.177402. Epub Oct. 6, 2010. |
| Koike-Yusa et al., Genome-wide recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library. Nat Biotechnol. Mar. 2014;32(3):267-73. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2800. Epub Dec. 23, 2013. |
| Kolot et al., Site promiscuity of coliphage HK022 integrase as a tool for gene therapy. Gene Ther. Jul. 2015;22(7):521-7. doi: 10.1038/gt.2015.9. Epub Mar. 12, 2015. |
| Kolot et al., Site-specific recombination in mammalian cells expressing the Int recombinase of bacteriophage HK022. Mol Biol Rep. Aug. 1999;26(3):207-13. doi: 10.1023/a:1007096701720. |
| Komor et al., CRISPR-Based Technologies for the Manipulation of Eukaryotic Genomes. Cell. Jan. 12, 2017;168(1-2):20-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.044. |
| Komor et al., Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity. Sci Adv. Aug. 30, 2017;3(8):eaao4774. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao4774. eCollection Aug. 2017. |
| Komor et al., Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature. Apr. 20, 2016;533(7603):420-4. doi: 10.1038/nature17946. |
| Komor, Editing the Genome Without Double-Stranded DNA Breaks. ACS Chem Biol. Feb. 16, 2018;13(2):383-388. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00710. Epub Oct. 9, 2017. |
| Konermann et al., Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex. Nature. Jan. 29, 2015;517(7536):583-8. doi: 10.1038/nature14136. Epub Dec. 10, 2014. |
| Konishi et al., Amino acid substitutions away from the RNase H catalytic site increase the thermal stability of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase through RNase H inactivation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Nov. 14, 2014;454(2):269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.10.044. Epub Oct. 17, 2014. |
| Koonin et al., Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;37:67-78. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.008. |
| Kosicki et al., Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR-Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat Biotechnol. Sep. 2018;36(8):765-771. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4192. Epub Jul. 16, 2018. |
| Kotewicz et al., Cloning and overexpression of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1985;35(3):249-58. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90003-4. |
| Kotewicz et al., Isolation of cloned Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase lacking ribonuclease H activity. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 11, 1988;16(1):265-77. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.1.265. |
| Kotin, Prospects for the use of adeno-associated virus as a vector for human gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther. Jul. 1994;5(7):793-801. doi: 10.1089/hum.1994.5.7-793. |
| Kouzminova et al., Patterns of chromosomal fragmentation due to uracil-DNA incorporation reveal a novel mechanism of replication-dependent double-stranded breaks. Mol Microbiol. Apr. 2008;68(1):202-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06149.x. |
| Kowal et al., Exploiting unassigned codons in Micrococcus luteus for tRNA-based amino acid mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 15, 1997;25(22):4685-9. |
| Kowalski et al., Delivering the Messenger: Advances in Technologies for Therapeutic mRNA Delivery. Mol Ther. Apr. 10, 2019;27(4):710-728. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.02.012. Epub Feb. 19, 2019. |
| Kozak, An analysis of 5′-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. Oct. 26, 1987;15(20):8125-48. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.20.8125. |
| Kraft et al., Deletions, Inversions, Duplications: Engineering of Structural Variants using CRISPR/Cas in Mice. Cell Rep. Feb. 10, 2015;10(5):833-839. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.016. Epub Feb. 7, 2015. |
| Kremer et al., Adenovirus and adeno-associated virus mediated gene transfer. Br Med Bull. Jan. 1995;51(1):31-44. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072951. |
| Krokan et al., Uracil in DNA—occurrence, consequences and repair. Oncogene. Dec. 16, 2002;21(58):8935-48. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205996. |
| Krokan et al., Base excision repair. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. Apr. 1, 2013;5(4):a012583. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012583. |
| Krzywkowski et al., Limited reverse transcriptase activity of phi29 DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 20, 2018;46(7):3625-3632. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky190. |
| Ku et al., Nucleic Acid Aptamers: An Emerging Tool for Biotechnology and Biomedical Sensing. Sensors (Basel). Jul. 6, 2015;15(7):16281-313. doi: 10.3390/s150716281. |
| Kuan et al., A systematic evaluation of nucleotide properties for CRISPR sgRNA design. BMC Bioinformatics. Jun. 6, 2017;18(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1697-6. |
| Kumar et al., Gene therapy for chronic neuropathic pain: how does it work and where do we stand today? Pain Med. May 2011;12(5):808-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01120.x. |
| Kumar et al., Structural and functional consequences of the mutation of a conserved arginine residue in alphaA and alphaB crystallins. J Biol Chem. Aug. 20, 1999;274(34):24137-41. |
| Kundu et al., Leucine to proline substitution by SNP at position 197 in Caspase-9 gene expression leads to neuroblastoma: a bioinformatics analysis. 3 Biotech. 2013; 3:225-34. |
| Kunkel et al., DNA mismatch repair. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:681-710. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133243. |
| Kunkel et al., Eukaryotic Mismatch Repair in Relation to DNA Replication. Annu Rev Genet. 2015;49:291-313. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-054722. |
| Kunz et al., DNA Repair in mammalian cells: Mismatched repair: variations on a theme. Cell Mol Life Sci. Mar. 2009;66(6):1021-38. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-8739-9. |
| Kurjan et al., Structure of a yeast pheromone gene (MF alpha): a putative alpha-factor precursor contains four tandem copies of mature alpha-factor. Cell. Oct. 1982;30(3):933-43. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90298-7. |
| Kury et al., De Novo Disruption of the Proteasome Regulatory Subunit PSMD12 Causes a Syndromic Neurodevelopmental Disorder. Am J Hum Genet. Feb. 2, 2017;100(2):352-363. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.003. Epub Jan. 26, 2017. |
| Kuscu et al., CRISPR-Cas9-AID base editor is a powerful gain-of-function screening tool. Nat Methods. Nov. 29, 2016;13(12):983-984. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4076. |
| Kuscu et al., CRISPR-STOP: gene silencing through base-editing-induced nonsense mutations. Nat Methods. Jul. 2017;14(7):710-712. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4327. Epub Jun. 5, 2017. |
| Kuscu et al., Genome-wide analysis reveals characteristics of off-target sites bound by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 2014;32(7):677-83. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2916. Epub May 18, 2014. |
| Kwart et al., Precise and efficient scarless genome editing in stem cells using Correct. Nat Protoc. Feb. 2017;12(2):329-354. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.171. Epub Jan. 19, 2017. |
| Kweon et al., A CRISPR-based base-editing screen for the functional assessment of BRCA1 variants. Oncogene. Jan. 2020;39(1):30-35. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0968-2. Epub Aug. 29, 2019. |
| Kweon et al., Fusion guide RNAs for orthogonal gene manipulation with Cas9 and Cpf1. Nat Commun. Nov. 23, 2017;8(1):1723. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01650-w. Erratum in: Nat Commun. Jan. 16, 2018;9(1):303. |
| Kwok et al., G-Quadruplexes: Prediction, Characterization, and Biological Application. Trends Biotechnol. Oct. 2017;35(10):997-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.06.012. Epub Jul. 26, 2017. |
| Kwon et al., Chemical basis of glycine riboswitch cooperativity. RNA. Jan. 2008;14(1):25-34. Epub Nov. 27, 2007. |
| Kwon et al., Precision targeting tumor cells using cancer-specific InDel mutations with CRISPR-Cas9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 1, 2022;119(9):e2103532119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2103532119. |
| Köhrer et al., A possible approach to site-specific insertion of two different unnatural amino acids into proteins in mammalian cells via nonsense suppression. Chem Biol. Nov. 2003;10(11):1095-102. |
| Köhrer et al., Complete set of orthogonal 21st aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase-amber, ochre and opal suppressor tRNA pairs: concomitant suppression of three different termination codons in an mRNA in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Dec. 1, 2004;32(21):6200-11. Print 2004. |
| Kügler et al., Human synapsin 1 gene promoter confers highly neuron-specific long-term transgene expression from an adenoviral vector in the adult rat brain depending on the transduced area. Gene Ther. Feb. 2003;10(4):337-47. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301905. |
| Lada et al., Mutator effects and mutation signatures of editing deaminases produced in bacteria and yeast. Biochemistry (Mosc). Jan. 2011;76(1):131-46. |
| Lahue et al., DNA mismatch correction in a defined system. Science. Jul. 14, 1989;245(4914):160-4. doi: 10.1126/science.2665076. |
| Lakich et al., Inversions disrupting the factor VIII gene are a common cause of severe haemophilia A. Nat Genet. Nov. 1993;5(3):236-41. doi: 10.1038/ng1193-236. |
| Lancaster et al., Limited trafficking of a neurotropic virus through inefficient retrograde axonal transport and the type I interferon response. PLoS Pathog. Mar. 5, 2010;6(3):e1000791. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000791. |
| Landrum et al., ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 4, 2016;44(D1):D862-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1222. Epub Nov. 17, 2015. |
| Landrum et al., ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 2014;42(Database issue):D980-5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1113. Epub Nov. 14, 2013. |
| Langer et al., Chemical and Physical Structure of Polymers as Carriers for Controlled Release of Bioactive Agents: A Review. J Macromol Sci, Part C, 1983;23(1):61-126. doi: 10.1080/07366578308079439. |
| Langer et al., Chemical and Physical Structure of Polymers as Carriers for Controlled Release of Bioactive Agents: A Review. Journal of Macromolecular Science, 2006;23(1):61-126. DOI: 10.1080/07366578308079439. |
| Langer et al., New methods of drug delivery. Science. Sep. 28, 1990;249(4976):1527-33. |
| Lapinaite et al., DNA capture by a CRISPR-Cas9-guided adenine base editor. Science. Jul. 31, 2020;369(6503):566-571. doi: 10.1126/science.abb1390. |
| Larson et al., CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Nat Protoc. Nov. 2013;8(11):2180-96. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.132. Epub Oct. 17, 2013. |
| Lau et al., Molecular basis for discriminating between normal and damaged bases by the human alkyladenine glycosylase, AAG. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 5, 2000;97(25):13573-8. |
| Lauer et al., Construction, characterization, and use of two Listeria monocytogenes site-specific phage integration vectors. J Bacteriol. Aug. 2002; 184(15):4177-86. doi: 10.1128/jb.184.15.4177-4186.2002. |
| Lavergne et al., Defects in type IIA von Willebrand disease: a cysteine 509 to arginine substitution in the mature von Willebrand factor disrupts a disulphide loop involved in the interaction with platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX. Br J Haematol. Sep. 1992;82(1):66-72. |
| Lawrence et al., Supercharging proteins can impart unusual resilience. J Am Chem Soc. Aug. 22, 2007;129(33):10110-2. Epub Aug. 1, 2007. |
| Lawyer et al., High-level expression, purification, and enzymatic characterization of full-length Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase and a truncated form deficient in 5′ to 3′ exonuclease activity. PCR Methods Appl. May 1993;2(4):275-87. doi: 10.1101/gr.2.4.275. |
| Lazar et al., Transforming growth factor alpha: mutation of aspartic acid 47 and leucine 48 results in different biological activities. Mol Cell Biol. Mar. 1988;8(3):1247-52. |
| Lazarevic et al., Nucleotide sequence of the Bacillus subtilis temperate bacteriophage SPbetac2. Microbiology (Reading). May 1999;145 ( Pt 5): 1055-1067. doi: 10.1099/13500872-145-5-1055. |
| Le et al., SMNDelta7, the major product of the centromeric survival motor neuron (SMN2) gene, extends survival in mice with spinal muscular atrophy and associates with full-length SMN. Hum Mol Genet. Mar. 15, 2005;14(6):845-57. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi078. Epub Feb. 9, 2005. |
| Le Grice et al., Purification and characterization of recombinant equine infectious anemia virus reverse transcriptase. J Virol. Dec. 1991;65(12):7004-7. doi: 10.1128/JVI.65.12.7004-7007.1991. |
| Leach et al., Mutations of a mutS homolog in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cell. Dec. 17, 1993;75(6):1215-25. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90330-s. |
| Leaver-Fay et al., ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol. 2011;487:545-74. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6. |
| Leconte et al., A population-based experimental model for protein evolution: effects of mutation rate and selection stringency on evolutionary outcomes. Biochemistry. Feb. 26, 2013;52(8):1490-9. doi: 10.1021/bi3016185. Epub Feb. 14, 2013. |
| Ledford, Gene-editing hack yields pinpoint precision. Nature, Apr. 20, 2016. http://www.nature.com/news/gene-editing-hack-yields-pinpoint-precision-1.19773. |
| Lee et al., A chimeric thyroid hormone receptor constitutively bound to DNA requires retinoid X receptor for hormone-dependent transcriptional activation in yeast. Mol Endocrinol. Sep. 1994;8(9):1245-52. |
| Lee et al., A monoclonal antibody that targets a NaV1.7 channel voltage sensor for pain and itch relief. Cell. Jun. 5, 2014;157(6):1393-1404. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.064. Epub May 22, 2014. Retraction in: Cell. Jun. 25, 2020;181(7):1695. |
| Lee et al., An allosteric self-splicing ribozyme triggered by a bacterial second messenger. Science. Aug. 13, 2010;329(5993):845-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1190713. |
| Lee et al., Failure to detect DNA-guided genome editing using Natronobacterium gregoryi Argonaute. Nat Biotechnol. Nov. 28, 2016;35(1):17-18. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3753. |
| Lee et al., Group I Intron-Based Therapeutics Through Trans-Splicing Reaction. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2018;159:79-100. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2018.07.001. Epub Aug. 9, 2018. |
| Lee et al., PIK3CA gene is frequently mutated in breast carcinomas and hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncogene. Feb. 17, 2005;24(8):1477-80. |
| Lee et al., Recognition of liposomes by cells: in vitro binding and endocytosis mediated by specific lipid headgroups and surface charge density. Biochim Biophys Acta. Jan. 31, 1992;1103(2):185-97. |
| Lee et al., Ribozyme Mediated gRNA Generation for In Vitro and In Vivo CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenesis. PLoS One. Nov. 10, 2016;11(11):e0166020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166020. eCollection 2016. |
| Lee et al., Simultaneous targeting of linked loci in mouse embryos using base editing. Sci Rep. Feb. 7, 2019;9(1):1662. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33533-5. |
| Lee et al., Single C-to-T substitution using engineered APOBEC3G-nCas9 base editors with minimum genome- and transcriptome-wide off-target effects. Sci Adv. Jul. 15, 2020;6(29):eaba1773. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1773. |
| Lee et al., Single C-to-T substitution using engineered APOBEC3G-nCas9 base editors with minimum genome- and transcriptome-wide off-target effects. Sci Adv. Jul. 15, 2020;6(29):eaba1773. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1773. 13 pages. |
| Lee et al., Site-specific integration of mycobacteriophage L5: integration-proficient vectors for Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and bacille Calmette-Guérin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 15, 1991;88(8):3111-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3111. |
| Lee et al., Synthetically modified guide RNA and donor DNA are a versatile platform for CRISPR-Cas9 engineering. Elife. May 2, 2017;6:e25312. doi: 10.7554/eLife.25312. |
| Lee et al., Targeted chromosomal deletions in human cells using zinc finger nucleases. Genome Res. Jan. 20, 2010: 81-89; Published in Advance Dec. 1, 2009, doi:10.1101/gr.099747.109. |
| Lee et al., Targeting fidelity of adenine and cytosine base editors in mouse embryos. Nat Commun. Nov. 15, 2018;9(1):4804. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07322-7. |
| Lee et al., Transcriptional regulation and its misregulation in disease. Cell. Mar. 14, 2013;152(6):1237-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.014. |
| Lefebvre et al., Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell. Jan. 13, 1995;80(1):155-65. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90460-3. |
| Lei et al., Efficient targeted gene disruption in Xenopus embryos using engineered transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 23, 2012;109(43):17484-9. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215421109. Epub Oct. 8, 2012. |
| Lei et al., Site-specificity of serine integrase demonstrated by the attB sequence preference of ΦBT1 integrase. FEBS Lett. Apr. 2018;592(8):1389-1399. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13023. Epub Mar. 25, 2018. |
| Leipold et al., A de novo gain-of-function mutation in SCN11A causes loss of pain perception. Nat Genet. Nov. 2013;45(11):1399-404. doi: 10.1038/ng.2767. Epub Sep. 15, 2013. |
| Lemos et al., CRISPR/Cas9 cleavages in budding yeast reveal templated insertions and strand-specific insertion/deletion profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 27, 2018;115(9):E2040-E2047. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716855115. Epub Feb. 13, 2018. |
| Lenk et al., Pathogenic mechanism of the FIG4 mutation responsible for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease CMT4J. PLoS Genet. Jun. 2011;7(6):e1002104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002104. Epub Jun. 2, 2011. |
| Lesinski et al., The potential for targeting the STAT3 pathway as a novel therapy for melanoma. Future Oncol. Jul. 2013;9(7):925-7. doi: 10.2217/fon.13.83. Author Manuscript. 4 pages. |
| Levy et al., Cytosine and adenine base editing of the brain, liver, retina, heart and skeletal muscle of mice via adeno-associated viruses. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4(1):97-110. doi:10.1038/s41551-019-0501-5. |
| Levy et al., Inhibition of calcification of bioprosthetic heart valves by local controlled-release diphosphonate. Science. Apr. 12, 1985;228(4696):190-2. |
| Levy et al., Membrane-associated guanylate kinase dynamics reveal regional and developmental specificity of synapse stability. J Physiol. Mar. 1, 2017;595(5):1699-1709. doi: 10.1113/JP273147. Epub Jan. 18, 2017. |
| Lew et al., Protein splicing in vitro with a semisynthetic two-component minimal intein. J Biol Chem. Jun. 26, 1998;273(26):15887-90. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.26.15887. |
| Lewis et al., A serum-resistant cytofectin for cellular delivery of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides and plasmid DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 16, 1996;93(8):3176- 81. |
| Lewis et al., Building the Class 2 CRISPR-Cas Arsenal. Mol Cell 2017;65(3);377-379. |
| Lewis et al., Codon 129 polymorphism of the human prion protein influences the kinetics of amyloid formation. J Gen Virol. Aug. 2006;87(Pt 8):2443-9. |
| Lewis et al., Cytosine deamination and the precipitous decline of spontaneous mutation during Earth's history. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 19, 2016;113(29):8194-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607580113. Epub Jul. 5, 2016. |
| Lewis et al., RNA modifications and structures cooperate to guide RNA-protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. Mar. 2017;18(3):202-210. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.163. Epub Feb. 1, 2017. |
| Li et al., A Radioactivity-Based Assay for Screening Human m6A-RNA Methyltransferase, METTL3-METTL14 Complex, and Demethylase ALKBH5. J Biomol Screen. Mar. 2016;21(3):290-7. doi: 10.1177/1087057115623264. Epub Dec. 23, 2015. |
| Li et al., Base editing with a Cpf1-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol. Apr. 2018;36(4):324-327. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4102. Epub Mar. 19, 2018. |
| Li et al., Current approaches for engineering proteins with diverse biological properties. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;620:18-33. |
| Li et al., Disruption of splicing-regulatory elements using CRISPR/Cas9 to rescue spinal muscular atrophy in human iPSCs and mice. National Science Review. Jan. 1, 2020:92-101. DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwz131. Retrieved from the Internet via https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article-pdf/7/1/92/33321439/nwz131.pdf. Last accessed Apr. 28, 2021. |
| Li et al., Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. Jul. 15, 2009;25(14):1754-60. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. Epub May 18, 2009. |
| Li et al., Generation of Targeted Point Mutations in Rice by a Modified CRISPR/Cas9 System. Mol Plant. Mar. 6, 2017;10(3):526-529. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.12.001. Epub Dec. 8, 2016. |
| Li et al., Highly efficient and precise base editing in discarded human tripronuclear embryos. Protein Cell. Aug. 19, 2017. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0458-7. [Epub ahead of print]. |
| Li et al., Lagging strand DNA synthesis at the eukaryotic replication fork involves binding and stimulation of FEN-1 by proliferating cell nuclear antigen. J Biol Chem. Sep. 22, 1995;270(38):22109-12. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.38.22109. |
| Li et al., Loss of post-translational modification sites in disease. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2010:337-47. doi: 10.1142/9789814295291_0036. |
| Li et al., Modularly assembled designer TAL effector nucleases for targeted gene knockout and gene replacement in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. Aug. 2011;39(14):6315-25. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr188. Epub Mar. 31, 2011. |
| Li et al., Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat Biotechnol. Aug. 2013;31(8):688-91. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2654. |
| Li et al., Precise Modifications of Both Exogenous and Endogenous Genes in Rice by Prime Editing. Mol Plant. May 4, 2020;13(5):671-674. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.03.011. Epub Mar. 25, 2020. |
| Li et al., Programmable Single and Multiplex Base-Editing in Bombyx mori Using RNA-Guided Cytidine Deaminases. G3 (Bethesda). May 4, 2018;8(5):1701-1709. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200134. |
| Li et al., Protein trans-splicing as a means for viral vector-mediated in vivo gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther. Sep. 2008;19(9):958-64. doi: 10.1089/hum.2008.009. |
| Li et al., RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. Aug. 4, 2011;12:323. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323. |
| Li et al., TAL nucleases (TALNs): hybrid proteins composed of TAL effectors and FokI DNA-cleavage domain. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 2011;39(1):359-72. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq704. Epub Aug. 10, 2010. |
| Li, Mechanisms and functions of DNA mismatch repair. Cell Res. Jan. 2008;18(1):85-98. doi: 10.1038/cr.2007.115. |
| Liang et al., Correction of β-thalassemia mutant by base editor in human embryos. Protein Cell. Nov. 2017;8(11):811-822. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0475-6. Epub Sep. 23, 2017. |
| Liang et al., Homology-directed repair is a major double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 28, 1998;95(9):5172-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5172. |
| Liang et al., Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection. Send to; J Biotechnol. Aug. 20, 2015;208:44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.04.024. |
| Liao et al., One-step assembly of large CRISPR arrays enables multi-functional targeting and reveals constraints on array design. bioRxiv. May 2, 2018. doi: 10.1101/312421. 45 pages. |
| Lieber et al., Mechanism and regulation of human non-homologous DNA end-joining. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. Sep. 2003;4(9):712-20. |
| Liefke et al., The oxidative demethylase ALKBH3 marks hyperactive gene promoters in human cancer cells. Genome Med. Jun. 30, 2015;7(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13073-015-0180-0. |
| Lienert et al., Two- and three-input TALE-based AND logic computation in embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 2013;41(21):9967-75. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt758. Epub Aug. 27, 2013. |
| Lilley, D.M. The Varkud Satellite Ribozyme. RNA. Feb. 2004;10(2):151-8.doi: 10.1261/rna.5217104. |
| Lim et al., Crystal structure of the moloney murine leukemia virus RNase H domain. J Virol. Sep. 2006;80(17):8379-89. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00750-06. |
| Lim et al., Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA editing in human cells with zinc finger deaminases. Nat Commun. Jan. 18, 2022;13(1):366. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-27962-0. |
| Lim et al., Viral vectors for neurotrophic factor delivery: a gene therapy approach for neurodegenerative diseases of the CNS. Pharmacol Res. Jan. 2010;61(1):14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2009.10.002. Epub Oct. 17, 2009. |
| Lin et al., [Construction and evaluation of DnaB split intein high expression vector and a six amino acids cyclic peptide library]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. Nov. 2008;24(11):1924-30. Chinese. |
| Lin et al., Base editing-mediated splicing correction therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. Cell Res. Jun. 2020;30(6):548-550. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0304-y. Epub Mar. 24, 2020. |
| Lin et al., Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. Elife. Dec. 15, 2014;3:e04766. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04766. |
| Lin et al., High-efficiency prime editing with optimized, paired pegRNAs in plants. Nat Biotechnol. Aug. 2021;39(8):923-927. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00868-w. Epub Mar. 25, 2021. |
| Lin et al., Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat Biotechnol. May 2020;38(5):582-585 and Supplemental Info. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0455-x. Epub Mar. 16, 2020. 8 pages. |
| Lin et al., Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat Biotechnol. May 2020;38(5):582-585. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0455-x. Epub Mar. 16, 2020. |
| Lin et al., The human REV1 gene codes for a DNA template-dependent dCMP transferase. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 15, 1999;27(22):4468-75. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.22.4468. |
| Lindahl, T., Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature. Apr. 22, 1993;362(6422):709-15. doi: 10.1038/362709a0. |
| Link et al., Engineering ligand-responsive gene-control elements: lessons learned from natural riboswitches. Gene Ther. Oct. 2009;16(10):1189-201. doi: 10.1038/gt.2009.81. Epub Jul. 9, 2009. Review. |
| Liu et al., A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat Chem Biol. Feb. 2014;10(2):93-5. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1432. Epub Dec. 6, 2013. |
| Liu et al., Adding new chemistries to the genetic code. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:413-44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.105824. |
| Liu et al., Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: risk, mechanisms and therapy. Nat Rev Neurol. Feb. 2013;9(2):106-18. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.263. Epub Jan. 8, 2013. |
| Liu et al., Balancing AID and DNA repair during somatic hypermutation. Trends Immunol. Apr. 2009;30(4):173-81. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2009.01.007. |
| Liu et al., C2c1-sgRNA Complex Structure Reveals RNA-Guided DNA Cleavage Mechanism. Molecular Cell Jan. 2017;65(2):310-22. |
| Liu et al., Calcineurin is a common target of cyclophilin-cyclosporin A and FKBP-FK506 complexes. Cell. Aug. 23, 1991;66(4):807-15. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90124-h. |
| Liu et al., CasX enzymes comprise a distinct family of RNA-guided genome editors. Nature. Feb. 2019;566(7743):218-223. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0908-x. Epub Feb. 4, 2019. Author manuscript entitled CRISPR-CasX is an RNA-dominated enzyme active for human genome editing. |
| Liu et al., Cell-penetrating peptide-mediated delivery of TALEN proteins via bioconjugation for genome engineering. PLoS One. Jan. 20, 2014;9(1):e85755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085755. eCollection 2014. |
| Liu et al., Computational approaches for effective CRISPR guide RNA design and evaluation. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. Nov. 29, 2019;18:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.11.006. |
| Liu et al., Design of polydactyl zinc-finger proteins for unique addressing within complex genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 27, 1997;94(11):5525-30. |
| Liu et al., Direct Promoter Repression by BCL11A Controls the Fetal to Adult Hemoglobin Switch. Cell. Apr. 5, 2018;173(2):430-442.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.016. Epub Mar. 29, 2019. |
| Liu et al., Distance determination by GIY-YIG intron endonucleases: discrimination between repression and cleavage functions. Nucleic Acids Res. Mar. 31, 2006;34(6):1755-64. Print 2006. |
| Liu et al., Editing DNA Methylation in the Mammalian Genome. Cell. Sep. 22, 2016;167(1):233-247.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.056. |
| Liu et al., Engineering a tRNA and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase for the site-specific incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 16, 1997;94(19):10092-7. |
| Liu et al., Fast Colorimetric Sensing of Adenosine and Cocaine Based on a General Sensor Design Involving Aptamers and Nanoparticles. Angew Chem. Dec. 16, 2006;45(1):90-4. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502589. |
| Liu et al., Fast Colorimetric Sensing of Adenosine and Cocaine Based on a General Sensor Design Involving Aptamers and Nanoparticles. Angew Chem. 2006;118(1):96-100. |
| Liu et al., Flap endonuclease 1: a central component of DNA metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:589-615. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.012803.092453. |
| Liu et al., Functional Nucleic Acid Sensors. Chem Rev. May 2009;109(5):1948-98. doi: 10.1021/cr030183i. |
| Liu et al., Genetic incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins in mammalian cells. Nat Methods. Mar. 2007;4(3):239-44. Epub Feb. 25, 2007. |
| Liu et al., Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in rabbit. Nat Commun. Jul. 13, 2018;9(1):2717. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05232-2. |
| Liu et al., Human BRCA2 protein promotes RAD51 filament formation on RPA-covered single-stranded DNA. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Oct. 2010;17(10):1260-2. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1904. Epub Aug. 22, 2010. |
| Liu et al., Improving Editing Efficiency for the Sequences with NGH PAM Using xCas9-Derived Base Editors. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. Sep. 6, 2019;17:626-635. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.06.024. Epub Jul. 12, 2019. |
| Liu et al., Intrinsic Nucleotide Preference of Diversifying Base Editors Guides Antibody Ex Vivo Affinity Maturation. Cell Rep. Oct. 23, 2018;25(4):884-892.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.090. |
| Liu et al., N(6)-methyladenosine-dependent RNA structural switches regulate RNA-protein interactions. Nature. Feb. 26, 2015;518(7540):560-4. doi: 10.1038/nature14234. |
| Liu et al., Probing N6-methyladenosine RNA modification status at single nucleotide resolution in mRNA and long noncoding RNA. RNA. Dec. 2013;19(12):1848-56. doi: 10.1261/rna.041178.113. Epub Oct. 18, 2013. |
| Liu et al., Reverse transcriptase of foamy virus. Purification of the enzymes and immunological identification. Arch Virol. 1977;55(3):187-200. doi: 10.1007/BF01319905. |
| Liu et al., Reverse transcriptase-mediated tropism switching in Bordetella bacteriophage. Science. Mar. 15, 2002;295(5562):2091-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1067467. |
| Liu et al., Saccharomyces cerevisiae flap endonuclease 1 uses flap equilibration to maintain triplet repeat stability. Mol Cell Biol. May 2004;24(9):4049-64. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.9.4049-4064.2004. |
| Liu et al., Split dnaE genes encoding multiple novel inteins in Trichodesmium erythraeum. J Biol Chem. Jul. 18, 2003;278(29):26315-8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C300202200. Epub May 24, 2003. |
| Liu et al., The Molecular Architecture for RNA-Guided RNA Cleavage by Cas13a. Cell. Aug. 10, 2017;170(4):714-726.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.050. Epub Jul. 27, 2017. |
| Liu et al., Usherin is required for maintenance of retinal photoreceptors and normal development of cochlear hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 13, 2007;104(11):4413-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610950104. Epub Mar. 5, 2007. |
| Loessner et al., Complete nucleotide sequence, molecular analysis and genome structure of bacteriophage A118 of Listeria monocytogenes: implications for phage evolution. Mol Microbiol. Jan. 2000;35(2):324-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01720.x. |
| Lombardo et al., Gene editing in human stem cells using zinc finger nucleases and integrase-defective lentiviral vector delivery. Nat Biotechnol. Nov. 2007;25(11):1298-306. Epub Oct. 28, 2007. |
| Long et al., Postnatal genome editing partially restores dystrophin expression in a mouse model of muscular dystrophy. Science. Jan. 22, 2016;351(6271):400-3. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5725. Epub Dec. 31, 2015. |
| Longsworth, Expanding the Enzymatic Activity of the Programmable Endonuclease Cas9 in Zebrafish. Thesis. Rice University. Houston, TX. May 17, 2019. 41 pages. |
| Lopez-Girona et al., Cereblon is a direct protein target for immunomodulatory and antiproliferative activities of lenalidomide and pomalidomide. Leukemia. Nov. 2012;26(11):2326-35. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.119. Epub May 3, 2012. |
| Lorenz et al., ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithms Mol Biol. Nov. 24, 2011;6:26. doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-6-26. |
| Lorson et al., A single nucleotide in the SMN gene regulates splicing and is responsible for spinal muscular atrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 25, 1999;96(11):6307-11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6307. |
| Losey et al., Crystal structure of Staphylococcus sureus tRNA adenosine deaminase tadA in complex with RNA. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. Feb. 2006;13(2):153-9. |
| Lu et al., Precise Editing of a Target Base in the Rice Genome Using a Modified CRISPR/Cas9 System. Mol Plant. Mar. 6, 2017;10(3):523-525. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.11.013. Epub Dec. 6, 2016. |
| Luan et al., Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: a mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition. Cell. Feb. 26, 1993;72(4):595-605. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90078-5. |
| Luckow et al., High level expression of nonfused foreign genes with Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus expression vectors. Virology. May 1989;170(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90348-6. |
| Lujan et al., Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition. Genome Res. Nov. 2014;24(11):1751-64. doi: 10.1101/gr.178335.114. Epub Sep. 12, 2014. |
| Lukacsovich et al., Repair of a specific double-strand break generated within a mammalian chromosome by yeast endonuclease I-SceI. Nucleic Acids Res. Dec. 25, 1994;22(25):5649-57. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.25.5649. |
| Lundberg et al., Delivery of short interfering RNA using endosomolytic cell-penetrating peptides. FASEB J. Sep. 2007;21(11):2664-71. Epub Apr. 26, 2007. |
| Lundquist et al., Site-directed mutagenesis and characterization of uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor protein. Role of specific carboxylic amino acids in complex formation with Escherichia coli uracil-DNA glycosylase. J Biol Chem. Aug. 22, 1997;272(34):21408-19. |
| Lutz et al., Postsymptomatic restoration of SMN rescues the disease phenotype in a mouse model of severe spinal muscular atrophy. J Clin Invest. Aug. 2011;121(8):3029-41. doi: 10.1172/JCI57291. Epub Jul. 25, 2011. |
| Lynch, Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet. Aug. 2010;26(8):345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.05.003. Epub Jun. 30, 2010. |
| Lyons et al., Efficient Recognition of an Unpaired Lesion by a DNA Repair Glycosylase. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009;131(49):17742-3. DOI: 10.1021/ja908378y. |
| Lyu et al., Virus-Like Particle Mediated CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery for Efficient and Safe Genome Editing. Life (Basel). Dec. 21, 2020;10(12):366. doi: 10.3390/life10120366. |
| Lüke et al., Partial purification and characterization of the reverse transcriptase of the simian immunodeficiency virus TYO-7 isolated from an African green monkey. Biochemistry. Feb. 20, 1990;29(7):1764-9. doi: 10.1021/bi00459a015. |
| Ma et al., Human RAD52 interactions with replication protein A and the RAD51 presynaptic complex. J Biol Chem. Jul. 14, 2017;292(28):11702-11713. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.794545. Epub May 27, 2017. |
| Ma et al., Identification of pseudo attP sites for phage phiC31 integrase in bovine genome. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Jul. 7, 2006;345(3):984-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.145. Epub May 3, 2006. |
| Ma et al., In vitro protein engineering using synthetic tRNA(Ala) with different anticodons. Biochemistry. Aug. 10, 1993;32(31):7939-45. |
| Ma et al., PhiC31 integrase induces efficient site-specific recombination in the Capra hircus genome. DNA Cell Biol. Aug. 2014;33(8):484-91. doi: 10.1089/dna.2013.2124. Epub Apr. 22, 2014. |
| Ma et al., Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes. Mol Cell. Nov. 5, 2015;60(3):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.030. |
| Ma et al., Targeted AID-mediated mutagenesis (TAM) enables efficient genomic diversification in mammalian cells. Nature Methods. Oct. 2016; 13:1029-35. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4027. |
| Maas et al., Identification and characterization of a human tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase related to the ADAR family of pre-mRNA editing enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 3, 1999;96(16):8895-900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.8895. |
| Macbeth et al., Inositol hexakisphosphate is bound in the ADAR2 core and required for RNA editing. Science. Sep. 2, 2005;309(5740):1534-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1113150. |
| MacFadden et al., Mechanism and structural diversity of exoribonuclease-resistant RNA structures in flaviviral RNAs. Nat Commun. Jan. 9, 2018;9(1):119. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02604-y. |
| Macrae et al., Ribonuclease revisited: structural insights into ribonuclease III family enzymes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. Feb. 2007;17(1):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.12.002. Epub Dec. 27, 2006. |
| Madura et al., Structural basis for ineffective T-cell responses to MHC anchor residue-improved “heteroclitic” peptides. Eur J Immunol. Feb. 2015;45(2):584-91. doi: 10.1002/eji.201445114. Epub Dec. 28, 2014. |
| Maeder et al., CRISPR RNA-guided activation of endogenous human genes. Nat Methods. Oct. 2013;10(10):977-9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2598. Epub Jul. 25, 2013. |
| Maeder et al., Rapid “open-source” engineering of customized zinc-finger nucleases for highly efficient gene modification. Mol Cell. Jul. 25, 2008 ;31(2):294-301. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.06.016. |
| Maeder et al., Robust, synergistic regulation of human gene expression using TALE activators. Nat Methods. Mar. 2013;10(3):243-5. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2366. Epub Feb. 10, 2013. |
| Maerker et al., A novel Usher protein network at the periciliary reloading point between molecular transport machineries in vertebrate photoreceptor cells. Hum Mol Genet. Jan. 1, 2008;17(1):71-86. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm285. Epub Sep. 28, 2007. |
| Magin et al., Corf, the Rev/Rex homologue of HTDV/HERV-K, encodes an arginine-rich nuclear localization signal that exerts a trans-dominant phenotype when mutated. Virology. Aug. 15, 2000;274(1):11-6. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0438. |
| Mahfouz et al., De novo-engineered transcription activator-like effector (TALE) hybrid nuclease with novel DNA binding specificity creates double-strand breaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 8, 2011;108(6):2623-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019533108. Epub Jan. 24, 2011. |
| Mahoney et al., The Next Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors: PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade in Melanoma. Clin Ther. Apr. 1, 2015;37(4):764-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.018. Epub Mar. 29, 2015. |
| Maizels et al., Initiation of homologous recombination at DNA nicks. Nucleic Acids Res. Aug. 21, 2018;46(14):6962-6973. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky588. |
| Maji et al., A High-Throughput Platform to Identify Small-Molecule Inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell. May 2, 2019;177(4):1067-1079.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.009. |
| Makarova et al., An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. Nov. 2015;13(11):722-36. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3569. Epub Sep. 28, 2015. |
| Makarova et al., Classification and Nomenclature of CRISPR-Cas Systems: Where from Here? CRISPR J. Oct. 2018; 1(5):325-336. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2018.0033. |
| Makarova et al., Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. Jun. 2011;9(6):467-77. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2577. Epub May 9, 2011. |
| Makarova et al., Prokaryotic homologs of Argonaute proteins are predicted to function as key components of a novel system of defense against mobile genetic elements. Biology Direct 2009;4:29. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-4-29. |
| Makeyev et al., Evolutionary potential of an RNA virus. J Virol. Feb. 2004;78(4):2114-20. |
| Malashkevich et al., Crystal structure of tRNA adenosine deaminase TadA from Escherichia coli. Deposited: Mar. 10, 2005 Released: Feb. 21, 2006 doi:10.2210/pdb1z3a/pdb (2006). |
| Mali et al., Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineeringbiology. Nat Methods. Oct. 2013; 10(10):957-63. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2649. |
| Mali et al., CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nat Biotechnol. Sep. 2013;31(9):833-8, Supplemental Info. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2675. Epub Aug. 1, 2013. |
| Mali et al., RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. Feb. 15, 2013;339(6121):823-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1232033. Epub Jan. 3, 2013. |
| Malito et al., Structural basis for lack of toxicity of the diphtheria toxin mutant CRM197. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 3, 2012;109(14):5229-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201964109. Epub Mar. 19, 2012. |
| Mandal et al., Efficient ablation of genes in human hematopoietic stem and effector cells using CRISPR/Cas9. Cell Stem Cell. Nov. 6, 2014;15(5):643-52. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.10.004. Epub Nov. 6, 2014. |
| Mandal et al., Riboswitches Control Fundamental Biochemical Pathways in Bacillus Subtilis and Other Bacteria. Cell. May 30, 2003;113(5):577-86. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00391-x. |
| Mangeot et al., Genome editing in primary cells and in vivo using viral-derived Nanoblades loaded with Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoproteins. Nat Commun. Jan. 3, 2019;10(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07845-z. |
| Mani et al., Design, engineering, and characterization of zinc finger nucleases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Sep. 23, 2005;335(2):447-57. |
| Marceau, Functions of single-strand DNA-binding proteins in DNA replication, recombination, and repair. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;922:1-21. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-032-8_1. |
| Marcovitz et al., Frustration in protein-DNA binding influences conformational switching and target search kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 1, 2011;108(44):17957-62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109594108. Epub Oct. 14, 2011. |
| Maresca et al., Obligate ligation-gated recombination (ObLiGaRe): custom-designed nuclease-mediated targeted integration through nonhomologous end joining. Genome Res. Mar. 2013;23(3):539-46. Doi: 10.1101/gr.145441.112. Epub Nov. 14, 2012. |
| Marioni et al., DNA methylation age of blood predicts all-cause mortality in later life. Genome Biol. Jan. 30, 2015;16:25. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0584-6. |
| Marquart et al., Predicting base editing outcomes with an attention-based deep learning algorithm trained on high-throughput target library screeen. bioRxiv. Jul. 5, 2020. DOI:10.1101/2020.07.05.186544. Retrieved from the Internet via https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.05.186544v1.full.pdf lased accessed on Apr. 28, 2021. |
| Marraffini et al., CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA. Science. Dec. 19, 2008;322(5909):1843-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1165771. |
| Marsden et al., The Tumor-Associated Variant RAD51 G151D Induces a Hyper-Recombination Phenotype. PLoS Genet. Aug. 11, 2016;12(8):e1006208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006208. |
| Martinez et al., Hypermutagenesis of RNA using human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase and biased dNTP concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 6, 1994;91(25):11787-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.11787. |
| Martsolf et al., Complete trisomy 17p a relatively new syndrome. Ann Genet. 1988;31(3):172-4. |
| Martz, L., Nav-i-gating antibodies for pain. Science-Business eXchange. Jun. 12, 2014;7(662):1-2. doi: 10.1038/scibx.2014.662. |
| Maruyama et al., Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining. Nat Biotechnol. May 2015;33(5):538-42. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3190. Epub Mar. 23, 2015. |
| Marzec et al., Prime Editing: A New Way for Genome Editing. Trends Cell Biol. Apr. 2020;30(4):257-259. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.01.004. Epub Jan. 27, 2020. |
| Mascola et al., HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies: understanding nature's pathways. Immunol Rev. Jul. 2013;254(1):225-44. doi: 10.1111/imr.12075. |
| Mason et al., Non-enzymatic roles of human RAD51 at stalled replication forks. bioRxiv. Jul. 31, 2019; doi.org/10.1101/359380. 36 pages. bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jul. 31, 2019. |
| Mathys et al., Characterization of a self-splicing mini-intein and its conversion into autocatalytic N- and C-terminal cleavage elements: facile production of protein building blocks for protein ligation. Gene. Apr. 29, 1999;231(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00103-1. |
| Matsuura et al., A gene essential for the site-specific excision of actinophage r4 prophage genome from the chromosome of a lysogen. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 1995;41(1):53-61. |
| Matthews, Structures of human ADAR2 bound to dsRNA reveal base-flipping mechanism and basis for site selectivity. Nat Struct Mol Biol. May 2016;23(5):426-33. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3203. Epub Apr. 11, 2016. |
| May et al., Emergent lineages of mumps virus suggest the need for a polyvalent vaccine. Int J Infect Dis. Jan. 2018;66:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.09.024. Epub Oct. 4, 2017. |
| McCarroll et al., Copy-number variation and association studies of human disease. Nat Genet. Jul. 2007;39(7 Suppl):S37-42. doi: 10.1038/ng2080. |
| McDonald et al., Characterization of mutations at the mouse phenylalanine hydroxylase locus. Genomics. Feb. 1, 1997;39(3):402-5. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.4508. |
| McInerney et al., Error Rate Comparison during Polymerase Chain Reaction by DNA Polymerase. Mol Biol Int. 2014;2014:287430. doi: 10.1155/2014/287430. Epub Aug. 17, 2014. |
| McKenna et al., Recording development with single cell dynamic lineage tracing. Development. Jun. 27, 2019;146(12):dev169730. doi: 10.1242/dev.169730. |
| McKenna et al., Whole-organism lineage tracing by combinatorial and cumulative genome editing. Science. Jul. 29, 2016;353(6298):aaf7907. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7907. Epub May 26, 2016. |
| McNaughton et al., Mammalian cell penetration, siRNA transfection, and DNA transfection by supercharged proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 14, 2009;106(15):6111-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807883106. Epub Mar. 23, 2009. |
| McVey et al., MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends Genet. Nov. 2008;24(11):529-38. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.08.007. Epub Sep. 21, 2008. |
| Mead et al., A novel protective prion protein variant that colocalizes with kuru exposure. N Engl J Med. Nov. 19, 2009;361(21):2056-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809716. |
| Mei et al., Recent Progress in CRISPR/Cas9 Technology. J Genet Genomics. Feb. 20, 2016;43(2):63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.01.001. Epub Jan. 18, 2016. |
| Meinke et al., Cre Recombinase and Other Tyrosine Recombinases. Chem Rev. Oct. 26, 2016;116(20):12785-12820. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00077. Epub May 10, 2016. |
| Mendell et al., Single-Dose Gene-Replacement Therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med. Nov. 2, 2017;377(18):1713-1722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706198. |
| Meng et al., Targeted gene inactivation in zebrafish using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. Jun. 2008;26(6):695-701. doi: 10.1038/nbt1398. Epub May 25, 2008. |
| Menéndez-Arias, Mutation rates and intrinsic fidelity of retroviral reverse transcriptases. Viruses. Dec. 2009;1(3):1137-65. doi: 10.3390/v1031137. Epub Dec. 4, 2009. |
| Mercer et al., Chimeric TALE recombinases with programmable DNA sequence specificity. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 2012;40(21):11163-72. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks875. Epub Sep. 26, 2012. |
| Mertens et al., Site-specific recombination in bacteriophage Mu: characterization of binding sites for the DNA invertase Gin. EMBO J. Apr. 1988;7(4):1219-27. |
| Meyer et al., Breathing life into polycations: functionalization with pH-responsive endosomolytic peptides and polyethylene glycol enables siRNA delivery. J Am Chem Soc. Mar. 19, 2008;130(11):3272-3. doi: 10.1021/ja710344v. Epub Feb. 21, 2008. |
| Meyer et al., Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell. Jun. 22, 2012;149(7):1635-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.003. Epub May 17, 2012. |
| Meyer et al., Confirmation of a second natural preQ1 aptamer class in Streptococcaceae bacteria. RNA. Apr. 2008;14(4):685-95. doi: 10.1261/rna.937308. Epub Feb. 27, 2008. |
| Meyer et al., Library generation by gene shuffling. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. Jan. 6, 2014;105: Unit 15.12.. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb1512s105. |
| Meyer et al., Ribosome biogenesis factor Tsr3 is the aminocarboxypropyl transferase responsible for 18S rRNA hypermodification in yeast and humans. Nucleic Acids Res. May 19, 2016;44(9):4304-16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw244. Epub Apr. 15, 2016. |
| Meyer et al., The dynamic epitranscriptome: N6-methyladenosine and gene expression control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. May 2014;15(5):313-26. doi: 10.1038/nrm3785. Epub Apr. 9, 2014. |
| Michel et al., Mitochondrial class II introns encode proteins related to the reverse transcriptases of retroviruses. Nature. Aug. 15-21, 1985;316(6029):641-3. doi: 10.1038/316641a0. |
| Micozzi et al., Human cytidine deaminase: a biochemical characterization of its naturally occurring variants. Int J Biol Macromol. Feb. 2014;63:64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.10.029. Epub Oct. 29, 2013. Erratum in: Int J Biol Macromol. Feb. 2014;63:262. |
| Midoux et al., Chemical vectors for gene delivery: a current review on polymers, peptides and lipids containing histidine or imidazole as nucleic acids carriers. Br J Pharmacol. May 2009;157(2):166-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00288.x. |
| Mihai et al., PTEN inhibition improves wound healing in lung epithelia through changes in cellular mechanics that enhance migration. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012;302(3):L287-L299. |
| Mijakovic et al., Bacterial single-stranded DNA-binding proteins are phosphorylated on tyrosine. Nucleic Acids Res. Mar. 20, 2006;34(5):1588-96. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj514. |
| Miller et al., A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2011;29(2):143-8. doi:10.1038/nbt.1755. Epub Dec. 22, 2010. |
| Miller et al., An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 2007;25(7):778-85. Epub Jul. 1, 2007. |
| Miller et al., Construction and properties of retrovirus packaging cells based on gibbon ape leukemia virus. J Virol. May 1991;65(5):2220-4. doi: 10.1128/JVI.65.5.2220-2224.1991. |
| Miller et al., Continuous evolution of SpCas9 variants compatible with non-G PAMs. Nat Biotechnol. Apr. 2020;38(4):471-481. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0412-8. Epub Feb. 10, 2020. |
| Miller et al., Phage-assisted continuous and non-continuous evolution. Nat Protoc. Dec. 2020;15(12):4101-4127. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-00410-3. Epub Nov. 16, 2020. |
| Miller, Human gene therapy comes of age. Nature. Jun. 11, 1992;357(6378):455-60. doi: 10.1038/357455a0. |
| Millevoi et al., G-quadruplexes in RNA biology. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. Jul.-Aug. 2012;3(4):495-507. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1113. Epub Apr. 4, 2012. |
| Mills et al., Protein splicing in trans by purified N- and C-terminal fragments of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecA intein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 31, 1998;95(7):3543-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3543. |
| Min et al., Deep learning in bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform. Sep. 1, 2017;18(5):851-869. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbw068. |
| Minoche et al., Evaluation of genomic high-throughput sequencing data generated on Illumina HiSeq and genome analyzer systems. Genome Biol. Nov. 8, 2011;12(11):R112. doi: 10.1186/GB-2011-12-11-r112. |
| Minoretti et al., A W148R mutation in the human FOXD4 gene segregating with dilated cardiomyopathy, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and suicidality. Int J Mol Med. Mar. 2007;19(3):369-72. |
| Mir et al., Two Active Site Divalent Ions in the Crystal Structure of the Hammerhead Ribozyme Bound to a Transition State Analogue. Biochemistry. Feb. 2, 2016;55(4):633-6. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01139. Epub Jan. 19, 2016. |
| Mir et al., Type II-C CRISPR-Cas9 Biology, Mechanism, and Application. ACS Chem Biol. Feb. 16, 2018;13(2):357-365. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00855. Epub Dec. 20, 2017. |
| Mishina et al., Conditional gene targeting on the pure C57BL/6 genetic background. Neurosci Res. Jun. 2007;58(2):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2007.01.004. Epub Jan. 18, 2007. |
| Mitani et al., Delivering therapeutic genes—matching approach and application. Trends Biotechnol. May 1993;11(5):162-6. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(93)90108-L. |
| Mitton-Fry et al., Poly(A) tail recognition by a viral RNA element through assembly of a triple helix. Science. Nov. 26, 2010;330(6008):1244-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1195858. |
| Miyaoka et al., Systematic quantification of HDR and NHEJ reveals effects of locus, nuclease, and cell type on genome-editing. Sci Rep. Mar. 31, 2016;6:23549. doi: 10.1038/srep23549. |
| Moede et al., Identification of a nuclear localization signal, RRMKWKK, in the homeodomain transcription factor PDX-1. FEBS Lett. Nov. 19, 1999;461(3):229-34. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01446-5. |
| Mohr et al., A Reverse Transcriptase-Cas1 Fusion Protein Contains a Cas6 Domain Required for Both CRISPR RNA Biogenesis and RNA Spacer Acquisition. Mol Cell. Nov. 15, 2018;72(4):700-714.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.09.013. Epub Oct. 18, 2018. Including Supplemental Information. |
| Mohr et al., Thermostable group II intron reverse transcriptase fusion proteins and their use in cDNA synthesis and next-generation RNA sequencing. RNA. Jul. 2013;19(7):958-70. doi: 10.1261/rna.039743.113. Epub May 22, 2013. |
| Mojica et al., Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. J Mol Evol. Feb. 2005;60(2):174-82. |
| Mok et al., A bacterial cytidine deaminase toxin enables CRISPR-free mitochondrial base editing. Nature. Jul. 2020;583(7817):631-637. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2477-4. Epub Jul. 8, 2020. |
| Mol et al., Crystal structure and mutational analysis of human uracil-DNA glycosylase: structural basis for specificity and catalysis. Cell. Mar. 24, 1995;80(6):869-78. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90290-2. |
| Mol et al., Crystal structure of human uracil-DNA glycosylase in complex with a protein inhibitor: protein mimicry of DNA. Cell. Sep. 8, 1995;82(5):701-8. |
| Molla et al., CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Base Editing: Technical Considerations and Practical Applications. Trends Biotechnol. Oct. 2019;37(10):1121-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.03.008. Epub Apr. 14, 2019. |
| Monahan et al., Site-specific incorporation of unnatural amino acids into receptors expressed in Mammalian cells. Chem Biol. Jun. 2003; 10(6):573-80. |
| Monani et al., A single nucleotide difference that alters splicing patterns distinguishes the SMA gene SMN1 from the copy gene SMN2. Hum Mol Genet. Jul. 1999;8(7):1177-83. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.7.1177. |
| Monot et al., The specificity and flexibility of 11 reverse transcription priming at imperfect T-tracts. PLoS Genet. May 2013;9(5):e1003499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003499. Epub May 9, 2013. |
| Montange et al., Structure of the S-adenosylmethionine riboswitch regulatory mRNA element. Nature. Jun. 29, 2006;441(7097):1172-5. |
| Moore et al., Improved somatic mutagenesis in zebrafish using transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs). PloS One. 2012;7(5):e37877. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037877. Epub May 24, 2012. |
| Mootz et al., Conditional protein splicing: a new tool to control protein structure and function in vitro and in vivo. J Am Chem Soc. Sep. 3, 2003;125(35):10561-9. |
| Mootz et al., Protein splicing triggered by a small molecule. J Am Chem Soc. Aug. 7, 2002;124(31):9044-5 and Supporting Information. doi: 10.1021/ja0267690. 4 pages. |
| Mootz et al., Protein splicing triggered by a small molecule. J Am Chem Soc. Aug. 7, 2002;124(31):9044-5. |
| Morbitzer et al., Assembly of custom TALE-type DNA binding domains by modular cloning. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 2011;39(13):5790-9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr151. Epub Mar. 18, 2011. |
| Moreno-Mateos et al., CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo. Nat Methods. Oct. 2015;12(10):982-8. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3543. Epub Aug. 31, 2015. |
| Morita et al., The site-specific recombination system of actinophage TG1. FEMS Microbiol Lett. Aug. 2009;297(2):234-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01683.x. |
| Morris et al., A peptide carrier for the delivery of biologically active proteins into mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol. Dec. 2001;19(12):1173-6. |
| Moscou et al., A simple cipher governs DNA recognition by TAL effectors. Science. Dec. 11, 2009;326(5959):1501. doi: 10.1126/science.1178817. |
| Mougiakos et al., Characterizing a thermostable Cas9 for bacterial genome editing and silencing. Nat Commun. Nov. 21, 2017;8(1):1647. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01591-4. |
| Muir et al., Expressed protein ligation: a general method for protein engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 9, 1998;95(12):6705-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6705. |
| Muller et al., Nucleotide exchange and excision technology (NExT) DNA shuffling: a robust method for DNA fragmentation and directed evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. Aug. 1, 2005;33(13):e117. doi: 10.1093/nar/gni116. PMID: 16061932; PMCID: PMC1182171. |
| Muller, U.F., Design and Experimental Evolution of trans-Splicing Group I Intron Ribozymes. Molecules. Jan. 2, 2017;22(1):75. doi: 10.3390/molecules22010075. |
| Mullins et al., Transgenesis in nonmurine species. Hypertension. Oct. 1993;22(4):630-3. |
| Mumtsidu et al., Structural features of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein of Epstein-Barr virus. J Struct Biol. Feb. 2008;161(2):172-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.10.014. Epub Nov. 1, 2007. |
| Murphy, Phage recombinases and their applications. Adv Virus Res. 2012;83:367-414. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394438-2.00008-6. Review. |
| Murray et al., Selective vulnerability of motor neurons and dissociation of pre- and post-synaptic pathology at the neuromuscular junction in mouse models of spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Mol Genet. Apr. 1, 2008;17(7):949-62. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm367. Epub Dec. 8, 2007. |
| Murugan et al., The Revolution Continues: Newly Discovered Systems Expand the CRISPR-Cas Toolkit. Mol Cell. Oct. 5, 2017;68(1):15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.007. |
| Mussolino et al., A novel TALE nuclease scaffold enables high genome editing activity in combination with low toxicity. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 2011;39(21):9283-93. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr597. Epub Aug. 3, 2011. |
| Mussolino et al., TALE nucleases: tailored genome engineering made easy. Curr Opin Biotechnol. Oct. 2012;23(5):644-50. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.01.013. Epub Feb. 17, 2012. |
| Muzyczka et al., Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors: will they work? J Clin Invest. Oct. 1994;94(4):1351. doi: 10.1172/JCI117468. |
| Myerowitz et al., The major defect in Ashkenazi Jews with Tay-Sachs disease is an insertion in the gene for the alpha-chain of beta-hexosaminidase. J Biol Chem. Dec. 15, 1988;263(35):18587-9. |
| Myers et al., Insulin signal transduction and the IRS proteins. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1996;36:615-58. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.36.040196.003151. |
| Nabel et al., Direct gene transfer for immunotherapy and immunization. Trends Biotechnol. May 1993;11(5):211-5. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(93)90117-R. |
| Nahar et al., A G-quadruplex motif at the 3′ end of sgRNAs improves CRISPR-Cas9 based genome editing efficiency. Chem Commun (Camb). Mar. 7, 2018;54(19):2377-2380. doi: 10.1039/c7cc08893k. Epub Feb. 16, 2018. |
| Nahvi et al., Coenzyme B12 riboswitches are widespread genetic control elements in prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 2, 2004;32(1):143-50. |
| Nakade et al., Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9. Nat Commun. Nov. 20, 2014;5:5560. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6560. |
| Nakamura et al., Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 1, 2000;28(1):292. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.292. |
| Naorem et al., DGR mutagenic transposition occurs via hypermutagenic reverse transcription primed by nicked template RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 21, 2017;114(47):E10187-E10195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715952114. Epub Nov. 6, 2017. |
| Narayanan et al., Clamping down on weak terminal base pairs: oligonucleotides with molecular caps as fidelity-enhancing elements at the 5′- and 3′-terminal residues. Nucleic Acids Res. May 20, 2004;32(9):2901-11. Print 2004. |
| Navaratnam et al., An overview of cytidine deaminases. Int J Hematol. Apr. 2006;83(3):195-200. |
| NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_002427.3. Wu et al., May 3, 2014. 5 pages. |
| Neel et al., Riboswitches: Classification, function and in silico approach, International Journal of Pharma Sciences and Research. 2010;1(9):409-420. |
| Nelson et al., Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency. Nat Biotechnol. Oct. 4, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01039-7. Epub ahead of print. Erratum in: Nat Biotechnol. Dec. 8, 2021. 14 pages. |
| Nelson et al., Filamentous phage DNA cloning vectors: a noninfective mutant with a nonpolar deletion in gene III. Virology. 1981; 108(2): 338-50. |
| Nelson et al., In vivo genome editing improves muscle function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Science. Jan. 22, 2016;351(6271):403-7. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5143. Epub Dec. 31, 2015. |
| Nelson et al., The unstable repeats—three evolving faces of neurological disease. Neuron. Mar. 6, 2013;77(5):825-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.022. |
| Nern et al., Multiple new site-specific recombinases for use in manipulating animal genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 23, 2011;108(34):14198-203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111704108. Epub Aug. 9, 2011. |
| Newby et al., Base editing of haematopoietic stem cells rescues sickle cell disease in mice. Nature. Jun. 21, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03609-w. Epub ahead of print. |
| Newby et al., In vivo somatic cell base editing and prime editing. Mol Ther. Nov. 3, 2021;29(11):3107-3124. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.09.002. Epub Sep. 10, 2021. |
| Nguyen et al., Evolutionary drivers of thermoadaptation in enzyme catalysis. Science. Jan. 20, 2017;355(6322):289-294. doi: 10.1126/science.aah3717. Epub Dec. 22, 2016. |
| Nguyen et al., IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. Jan. 2015;32(1):268-74. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. Epub Nov. 3, 2014. |
| Nguyen Tran et al., Engineering domain-inlaid SaCas9 adenine base editors with reduced RNA off-targets and increased on-target DNA editing. Nat Commun. Sep. 25, 2020;11(1):4871. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18715-y. |
| Ni et al., A PCSK9-binding antibody that structurally mimics the EGF(A) domain of LDL-receptor reduces LDL cholesterol in vivo. J Lipid Res. 2011;52:76-86. |
| Ni et al., Nucleic acid aptamers: clinical applications and promising new horizons. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(27):4206-14. Review. |
| Niemeyer, C.M., Semisynthetic DNA-protein conjugates for biosensing and nanofabrication. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Feb. 8, 2010;49(7):1200-16. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904930. |
| Nishida et al., Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science. Sep. 16, 2016;353(6305):1248. pii: aaf8729. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8729. Epub Aug. 4, 2016. |
| Nishikura, Functions and regulation of RNA editing by ADAR deaminases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:321-349. doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060208-105251. |
| Nishimasu et al., Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell. Feb. 27, 2014;156(5):935-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001. Epub Feb. 13, 2014. |
| Nishimasu et al., Crystal Structure of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Cell. Aug. 27, 2015;162(5):1113-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.007. |
| Nishimasu et al., Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space. Science. Sep. 21, 2018;361(6408):1259-1262. doi: 10.1126/science.aas9129. Epub Aug. 30, 2018. |
| Noack et al., Epitranscriptomics: A New Regulatory Mechanism of Brain Development and Function. Front Neurosci. Feb. 20, 2018;12:85. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00085. 9 pages. |
| Nomura et al., Controlling Mammalian Gene Expression by Allosteric Hepatitis Delta Virus Ribozymes. ACS Synth Biol. Dec. 20, 2013;2(12):684-9. doi: 10.1021/sb400037a. Epub May 22, 2013. |
| Nomura et al., Synthetic mammalian riboswitches based on guanine aptazyme. Chem Commun (Camb). Jul. 21, 2012;48(57):7215-7. doi: 10.1039/c2cc33140c. Epub Jun. 13, 2012. |
| Noris et al., A phenylalanine-55 to serine amino-acid substitution in the human glycoprotein IX leucine-rich repeat is associated with Bernard-Soulier syndrome. Br J Haematol. May 1997;97(2):312-20. |
| Nottingham et al., RNA-seq of human reference RNA samples using a thermostable group II intron reverse transcriptase. RNA. Apr. 2016;22(4):597-613. doi: 10.1261/rna.055558.115. Epub Jan. 29, 2016. |
| Nowak et al., Characterization of single-stranded DNA-binding proteins from the psychrophilic bacteria Desulfotalea psychrophila, Flavobacterium psychrophilum, Psychrobacter arcticus, Psychrobacter cryohalolentis, Psychromonas ingrahamii, Psychroflexus torquis, and Photobacterium profundum. BMC Microbiol. Apr. 14, 2014;14:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-91. |
| Nowak et al., Guide RNA Engineering for Versatile Cas9 Functionality. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 16, 2016;44(20):9555-9564. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw908. Epub Oct. 12, 2016. |
| Nowak et al., Structural analysis of monomeric retroviral reverse transcriptase in complex with an RNA/DNA hybrid. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 1, 2013;41(6):3874-87. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt053. Epub Feb. 4, 2013. |
| Numrych et al., A comparison of the effects of single-base and triple-base changes in the integrase arm-type binding sites on the site-specific recombination of bacteriophage lambda. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 11, 1990;18(13):3953-9. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.13.3953. |
| Nyerges et al., A highly precise and portable genome engineering method allows comparison of mutational effects across bacterial species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 1, 2016;113(9):2502-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520040113. Epub Feb. 16, 2016. |
| O'Connell et al., Programmable RNA recognition and cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9. Nature. Dec. 11, 2014;516(7530):263-6. doi: 10.1038/nature13769. Epub Sep. 28, 2014. |
| O'Maille et al., Structure-based combinatorial protein engineering (Scope). J Mol Biol. Aug. 23, 2002;321(4):677-91. |
| Oakes et al., CRISPR-Cas9 Circular Permutants as Programmable Scaffolds for Genome Modification. Cell. Jan. 10, 2019;176(1-2):254-267.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.052. |
| Oakes et al., Profiling of engineering hotspots identifies an allosteric CRISPR-Cas9 switch. Nat Biotechnol. Jun. 2016;34(6):646-51. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3528. Epub May 2, 2016. |
| Oakes et al., Protein engineering of Cas9 for enhanced function. Methods Enzymol. 2014;546:491-511. |
| Odsbu et al., Specific N-terminal interactions of the Escherichia coli SeqA protein are required to form multimers that restrain negative supercoils and form foci. Genes Cells. Nov. 2005;10(11):1039-49. |
| Oeemig et al., Solution structure of DnaE intein from Nostoc punctiforme: structural basis for the design of a new split intein suitable for site-specific chemical modification. FEBS Lett. May 6, 2009;583(9):1451-6. |
| Offord, Advances in Genome Editing. The Scientist, Apr. 20, 2016. http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/45903/title/Advances-in-Genome-Editing/. |
| Oh et al., Positional cloning of a gene for Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome, a disorder of cytoplasmic organelles. Nat Genet. Nov. 1996;14(3):300-6. doi: 10.1038/ng1196-300. |
| Ohe et al., Purification and properties of xanthine dehydrogenase from Streptomyces cyanogenus. J Biochem. Jul. 1979;86(1):45-53. |
| Olivares et al., Site-specific genomic integration produces therapeutic Factor IX levels in mice. Nat Biotechnol. Nov. 2002;20(11):1124-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt753. Epub Oct. 15, 2002. |
| Olorunniji et al., Purification and In Vitro Characterization of Zinc Finger Recombinases. Methods Mol Biol. 2017; 1642:229-245. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7169-5_15. |
| Olorunniji et al., Site-specific recombinases: molecular machines for the Genetic Revolution. Biochem J. Mar. 15, 2016;473(6):673-84. doi: 10.1042/BJ20151112. |
| Olorunniji et al., Synapsis and catalysis by activated Tn3 resolvase mutants. Nucleic Acids Res. Dec. 2008;36(22):7181-91. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn885. Epub Nov. 10, 2008. |
| Orlando et al., Zinc-finger nuclease-driven targeted integration into mammalian genomes using donors with limited chromosomal homology. Nucleic Acids Res. Aug. 2010;38(15):e152. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq512. Epub Jun. 8, 2010. |
| Orthwein et al., A mechanism for the suppression of homologous recombination in G1 cells. Nature. Dec. 17, 2015;528(7582):422-6. doi: 10.1038/nature16142. Epub Dec. 9, 2015. |
| Ortiz-Urda et al., Stable nonviral genetic correction of inherited human skin disease. Nat Med. Oct. 2002;8(10):1166-70. doi: 10.1038/nm766. Epub Sep. 16, 2002. Erratum in: Nat Med. Feb. 2003;9(2):237. |
| Osborn et al., Base Editor Correction of COL7A1 in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Patient-Derived Fibroblasts and iPSCs. J Invest Dermatol. Feb. 2020;140(2):338-347.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.07.701. Epub Aug. 19, 2019. |
| Osborn et al., TALEN-based gene correction for epidermolysis bullosa. Mol Ther. Jun. 2013;21(6):1151-9. doi: 10.1038/mt.2013.56. Epub Apr. 2, 2013. |
| Ostermeier et al., A combinatorial approach to hybrid enzymes independent of DNA homology. Nat Biotechnol. Dec. 1999;17(12):1205-9. |
| Ostertag et al., Biology of mammalian L1 retrotransposons. Annu Rev Genet. 2001;35:501-38. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.091032. |
| Otomo et al., Improved segmental isotope labeling of proteins and application to a larger protein. J Biomol NMR. Jun. 1999;14(2):105-14. doi: 10.1023/a:1008308128050. |
| Otomo et al., NMR observation of selected segments in a larger protein: central-segment isotope labeling through intein-mediated ligation. Biochemistry. Dec. 7, 1999;38(49):16040-4. doi: 10.1021/bi991902j. |
| Ottesen, ISS-N1 makes the First FDA-approved Drug for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Transl Neurosci. Jan. 26, 2017;8:1-6. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2017-0001. |
| Otto et al., The probability of fixation in populations of changing size. Genetics. Jun. 1997;146(2):723-33. |
| Ousterout et al., Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing for correction of dystrophin mutations that cause Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat Commun. Feb. 18, 2015;6:6244. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7244. |
| Packer et al., Methods for the directed evolution of proteins. Nat Rev Genet. Jul. 2015;16(7):379-94. doi: 10.1038/nrg3927. Epub Jun. 9, 2015. |
| Packer et al., Phage-assisted continuous evolution of proteases with altered substrate specificity. Nat Commun. Oct. 16, 2017;8(1):956. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01055-9. |
| Paige et al., RNA mimics of green fluorescent protein. Science. Jul. 29, 2011;333(6042):642-6. doi:10.1126/science.1207339. |
| Paiva et al., Targeted protein degradation: elements of PROTAC design. Curr Opin Chem Biol. Jun. 2019;50:111-119. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.02.022. Epub Apr. 17, 2019. |
| Pan et al., Biological and biomedical applications of engineered nucleases. Mol Biotechnol. Sep. 2013;55(1):54-62. doi: 10.1007/s12033-012-9613-9. |
| Pandey et al., Effect of loops and G-quartets on the stability of RNA G-quadruplexes. J Phys Chem B. Jun. 13, 2013;117(23):6896-905. doi: 10.1021/jp401739m. Epub May 29, 2013. Supplementary Information, 21 pages. |
| Paquet et al., Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9. Nature. May 5, 2016;533(7601):125-9. doi: 10.1038/nature17664. Epub Apr. 27, 2016. |
| Parente et al., Advances in spinal muscular atrophy therapeutics. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. Feb. 5, 2018;11:1756285618754501. doi: 10.1177/1756285618754501. 13 pages. |
| Park et al., Digenome-seq web tool for profiling CRISPR specificity. Nat Methods. May 30, 2017;14(6):548-549. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4262. |
| Park et al., Highly efficient editing of the β-globin gene in patient-derived hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells to treat sickle cell disease. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep. 5, 2019;47(15):7955-7972. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz475. |
| Park et al., Sendai virus, an RNA virus with no risk of genomic integration, delivers CRISPR/Cas9 for efficient gene editing. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. Aug. 24, 2016;3:16057. doi: 10.1038/mtm.2016.57. |
| Parker et al., Admixture mapping identifies a quantitative trait locus associated with FEV1/FVC in the COPDGene Study. Genet Epidemiol. Nov. 2014;38(7):652-9. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21847. Epub Aug. 11, 2014. |
| Parsons et al., Hypermutability and mismatch repair deficiency in RER+ tumor cells. Cell. Dec. 17, 1993;75(6):1227-36. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90331-j. |
| Passini et al., Antisense oligonucleotides delivered to the mouse CNS ameliorate symptoms of severe spinal muscular atrophy. Sci Transl Med. Mar. 2, 2011;3(72):72ra18. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001777. |
| Patel et al., Flap endonucleases pass 5′-flaps through a flexible arch using a disorder-thread-order mechanism to confer specificity for free 5′-ends. Nucleic Acids Res. May 2012;40(10):4507-19. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks051. Epub Feb. 8, 2012. |
| Pattanayak et al., Determining the specificities of TALENs, Cas9, and other genome-editing enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 2014;546:47-78. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.00003-9. |
| Pattanayak et al., High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA- programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol. Sep. 2013;31(9):839-43. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2673. Epub Aug. 11, 2013. |
| Pattanayak et al., Revealing off-target cleavage specificities of zinc-finger nucleases by in vitro selection. Nat Methods. Aug. 7, 2011;8(9):765-70. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1670. |
| Pavletich et al., Zinc finger-DNA recognition: crystal structure of a Zif268-DNA complex at 2.1 A. Science. May 10, 1991;252(5007):809-17. |
| Pawson et al., Protein phosphorylation in signaling—50 years and counting. Trends Biochem Sci. Jun. 2005;30(6):286-90. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.04.013. |
| Pearl, Structure and function in the uracil-DNA glycosylase superfamily. Mutat Res. Aug. 30, 2000;460(3-4):165-81. |
| Peck et al., Directed evolution of a small-molecule-triggered intein with improved splicing properties in mammalian cells. Chem Biol. May 27, 2011;18(5):619-30. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.02.014. |
| Pellegrini et al., Insights into DNA recombination from the structure of a RAD51-BRCA2 complex. Nature. Nov. 21, 2002;420(6913):287-93. doi: 10.1038/nature01230. Epub Nov. 10, 2002. |
| Pellenz et al., New human chromosomal safe harbor sites for genome engineering with CRISPR/Cas9, TAL effector and homing endonucleases. Aug. 20, 2018. bioRxiv doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/396390. |
| Pelletier, CRISPR-Cas systems for the study of the immune function. Nov. 15, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0026896. |
| Pendse et al., Exon 13-skipped USH2A protein retains functional integrity in mice, suggesting an exo-skipping therapeutic approach to treat USH2A-associated disease. bioRxiv preprint. Feb. 4, 2020. Retrieved from www.biorxiv.org. doi: 10.1101/2020.02.04.934240. 34 pages. |
| Pendse et al., In Vivo Assessment of Potential Therapeutic Approaches for USH2A-Associated Diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1185:91-96. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-27378-1_15. |
| Pennisi et al., The CRISPR craze. Science. Aug. 23, 2013;341(6148):833-6. doi: 10.1126/science.341.6148.833. |
| Pennisi et al., The tale of the TALEs. Science. Dec. 14, 2012;338(6113):1408-11. doi: 10.1126/science.338.6113.1408. |
| Perach et al., Catalytic features of the recombinant reverse transcriptase of bovine leukemia virus expressed in bacteria. Virology. Jun. 20, 1999;259(1):176-89. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.9761. |
| Perez et al., Establishment of HIV-1 resistance in CD4+ T cells by genome editing using zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 2008;26(7):808-16. Doi: 10.1038/nbt1410. Epub Jun. 29, 2008. |
| Perez-Palma et al., Simple ClinVar: an interactive web server to explore and retrieve gene and disease variants aggregated in ClinVar database. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 2, 2019;47(W1):W99-W105. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz411. |
| Perez-Pinera et al., Advances in targeted genome editing. Curr Opin Chem Biol. Aug. 2012;16(3-4):268-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.06.007. Epub Jul. 20, 2012. |
| Perez-Pinera et al., RNA-guided gene activation by CRISPR-Cas9-based transcription factors. Nat Methods. Oct. 2013;10(10):973-6. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2600. Epub Jul. 25, 2013. |
| Perler et al., Protein splicing and autoproteolysis mechanisms. Curr Opin Chem Biol. Oct. 1997;1(3):292-9. doi: 10.1016/s1367-5931(97)80065-8. |
| Perler et al., Protein splicing elements: inteins and exteins—a definition of terms and recommended nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 11, 1994;22(7):1125-7. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.7.1125. |
| Perler, InBase, the New England Biolabs Intein Database. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 1, 1999;27(1):346-7. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.1.346. |
| Perler, Protein splicing of inteins and hedgehog autoproteolysis: structure, function, and evolution. Cell. Jan. 9, 1998;92(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80892-2. |
| Perreault et al., Mixed deoxyribo- and ribo-oligonucleotides with catalytic activity. Nature. Apr. 5, 1990;344(6266):565-7. doi: 10.1038/344565a0. |
| Petek et al., Frequent endonuclease cleavage at off-target locations in vivo. Mol Ther. May 2010;18(5):983-6. Doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.35. Epub Mar. 9, 2010. |
| Petersen-Mahrt et al., AID mutates E. coli suggesting a DNA deamination mechanism for antibody diversification. Nature. Jul. 4, 2002;418(6893):99-103. |
| Petit et al., Powerful mutators lurking in the genome. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. Mar. 12, 2009;364(1517):705-15. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0272. |
| Petolino et al., Editing Plant Genomes: a new era of crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol J. Feb. 2016;14(2):435-6. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12542. |
| Petri et al., CRISPR prime editing with ribonucleoprotein complexes in zebrafish and primary human cells. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2022;40(2):189-193. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00901-y. Epub Apr. 29, 2021. Erratum in: Nat Biotechnol. May 13, 2021. |
| Peyrottes et al., Oligodeoxynucleoside phosphoramidates (P-NH2): synthesis and thermal stability of duplexes with DNA and RNA targets. Nucleic Acids Res. May 15, 1996;24(10):1841-8. |
| Pfeiffer et al., Mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair and their potential to induce chromosomal aberrations. Mutagenesis. Jul. 2000;15(4):289-302. doi: 10.1093/mutage/15.4.289. |
| Phillips, The challenge of gene therapy and DNA delivery. J Pharm Pharmacol. Sep. 2001;53(9):1169-74. |
| Pickart et al., Ubiquitin: structures, functions, mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. Nov. 29, 2004;1695(1-3):55-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.09.019. |
| Pieken et al., Kinetic characterization of ribonuclease-resistant 2′-modified hammerhead ribozymes. Science. Jul. 19, 1991;253(5017):314-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1857967. |
| Pijlman et al., A highly structured, nuclease-resistant, noncoding RNA produced by flaviviruses is required for pathogenicity. Cell Host Microbe. Dec. 11, 2008;4(6):579-91. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.10.007. |
| Pinkert et al., An albumin enhancer located 10 kb upstream functions along with its promoter to direct efficient, liver-specific expression in transgenic mice. Genes Dev. May 1987;1(3):268-76. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.3.268. |
| Piotukh et al., Directed evolution of sortase A mutants with altered substrate selectivity profiles. J Am Chem Soc. Nov. 9, 2011;133(44):17536-9. doi: 10.1021/ja205630g. Epub Oct. 13, 2011. |
| Pirakitikulr et al., PCRless library mutagenesis via oligonucleotide recombination in yeast. Protein Sci. Dec. 2010;19(12):2336-46. doi: 10.1002/pro.513. |
| Plasterk et al., DNA inversions in the chromosome of Escherichia coli and in bacteriophage Mu: relationship to other site-specific recombination systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 1983;80(17):5355-8. |
| Plosky et al., CRISPR-Mediated Base Editing without DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Mol Cell. May 19, 2016;62(4):477-8. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.006. |
| Plotz et al., N-terminus of hMLH1 confers interaction of hMutLalpha and hMutLbeta with hMutSalpha. Nucleic Acids Res. Jun. 15, 2003;31(12):3217-26. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg420. |
| Pluciennik et al., PCNA function in the activation and strand direction of MutLα endonuclease in mismatch repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 14, 2010;107(37):16066-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010662107. Epub Aug. 16, 2010. |
| Podracky et al., Laboratory evolution of a sortase enzyme that modifies amyloid-β protein. Nat Chem Biol. Mar. 2021;17(3):317-325. doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-00706-1. Epub Jan. 11, 2021. |
| Poller et al., A leucine-to-proline substitution causes a defective alpha 1-antichymotrypsin allele associated with familial obstructive lung disease. Genomics. Sep. 1993;17(3):740-3. |
| Popp et al., Sortagging: a versatile method for protein labeling. Nat Chem Biol. Nov. 2007;3(11):707-8. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.31. Epub Sep. 23, 2007. |
| Porensky et al., A single administration of morpholino antisense oligomer rescues spinal muscular atrophy in mouse. Hum Mol Genet. Apr. 1, 2012;21(7):1625-38. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr600. Epub Dec. 20, 2011. |
| Porteus, Design and testing of zinc finger nucleases for use in mammalian cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;435:47-61. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-232-8_4. |
| Posnick et al., Imbalanced base excision repair increases spontaneous mutation and alkylation sensitivity in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. Nov. 1999;181(21):6763-71. |
| Pospísilová et al., Hydrolytic cleavage of N6-substituted adenine derivatives by eukaryotic adenine and adenosine deaminases. Biosci Rep. 2008;28(6):335-347. doi:10.1042/BSR20080081. |
| Pourcel et al., CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies. Microbiology. Mar. 2005;151(Pt 3):653-63. |
| Prasad et al., Rev1 is a base excision repair enzyme with 5′-deoxyribose phosphate lyase activity. Nucleic Acids Res. Dec. 15, 2016;44(22):10824-10833. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw869. Epub Sep. 28, 2016. |
| Prasad et al., Visualizing the assembly of human Rad51 filaments on double-stranded DNA. J Mol Biol. Oct. 27, 2006;363(3):713-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.046. Epub Aug. 22, 2006. |
| Prashant et al., CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nature Biotechnology 2013;31(9):833-8. |
| Prorocic et al., Zinc-finger recombinase activities in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 2011;39(21):9316-28. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr652. Epub Aug. 17, 2011. |
| Proudfoot et al., Zinc finger recombinases with adaptable DNA sequence specificity. PLoS One. Apr. 29, 2011;6(4):e19537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019537. |
| Pruschy et al., Mechanistic studies of a signaling pathway activated by the organic dimerizer FK1012. Chem Biol. Nov. 1994;1(3):163-72. doi: 10.1016/1074-5521(94)90006-x. |
| Prykhozhij et al., CRISPR multitargeter: a web tool to find common and unique CRISPR single guide RNA targets in a set of similar sequences. PLOS One. Mar. 5, 2015;10(3):e0119372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119372. eCollection 2015. |
| Pu et al., Evolution of a split RNA polymerase as a versatile biosensor platform. Nat Chem Biol. Apr. 2017;13(4):432-438. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2299. Epub Feb. 13, 2017. |
| Putnam et al., Protein mimicry of DNA from crystal structures of the uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor protein and its complex with Escherichia coli uracil-DNA glycosylase. J Mol Biol. Mar. 26, 1999;287(2):331-46. |
| Qi et al., Engineering naturally occurring trans-acting non-coding RNAs to sense molecular signals. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 2012;40(12):5775-86. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks168. Epub Mar. 1, 2012. |
| Qi et al., Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell. Feb. 28, 2013;152(5):1173-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022. |
| Qu et al., Global mapping of binding sites for phic31 integrase in transgenic maden-darby bovine kidney cells using ChIP-seq. Hereditas. Jan. 14, 2019;156:3. doi: 10.1186/s41065-018-0079-z. |
| Queen et al., Immunoglobulin gene transcription is activated by downstream sequence elements. Cell. Jul. 1983;33(3):741-8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90016-8. |
| Radany et al., Increased spontaneous mutation frequency in human cells expressing the phage PBS2-encoded inhibitor of uracil-DNA glycosylase. Mutat Res. Sep. 15, 2000;461(1):41-58. doi: 10.1016/s0921-8777(00)00040-9. |
| Raghavan et al., Abstract 27: Therapeutic Targeting of Human Lipid Genes with in vivo CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing. Oral Abstract Presentations: Lipoprotein Metabolism and Therapeutic Targets. Arterioscler THromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(Suppl. 1):Abstract 27. 5 pages. |
| Raillard et al., Targeting sites within HIV-1 cDNA with a DNA-cleaving ribozyme. Biochemistry. Sep. 10, 1996;35(36):11693-701. doi: 10.1021/bi960845g. |
| Raina et al., PROTAC-induced BET protein degradation as a therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 28, 2016;113(26):7124-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521738113. Epub Jun. 6, 2016. |
| Rajagopal et al., High-throughput mapping of regulatory DNA. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2016;34(2):167-74. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3468. Epub Jan. 25, 2016. |
| Rakonjac et al., Roles of PIII in filamentous phage assembly. J Mol Biol. 1998; 282(1)25-41. |
| Rallapalli et al., The Design and Application of DNA-Editing Enzymes as Base Editors. Annu Rev Biochem. Jun. 20, 2023;92:43-79. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-052521-013938. Epub Apr. 5, 2023. |
| Ramakrishna et al., Gene disruption by cell-penetrating peptide-mediated delivery of Cas9 protein and guide RNA. Genome Res. Jun. 2014;24(6):1020-7. doi: 10.1101/gr.171264.113. Epub Apr. 2, 2014. |
| Ramamurthy et al., Identification of immunogenic B-cell epitope peptides of rubella virus E1 glycoprotein towards development of highly specific immunoassays and/or vaccine. Conference Abstract. 2019. |
| Ramirez et al., Engineered zinc finger nickases induce homology-directed repair with reduced mutagenic effects. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 2012;40(12):5560-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks179. Epub Feb. 28, 2012. |
| Ramirez et al., Unexpected failure rates for modular assembly of engineered zinc fingers. Nat Methods. May 2008;5(5):374-5. Doi: 10.1038/nmeth0508-374. |
| Ramos et al., Age-dependent SMN expression in disease-relevant tissue and implications for SMA treatment. J Clin Invest. Nov. 1, 2019;129(11):4817-4831. doi: 10.1172/JCI124120. |
| Ran et al., Double Nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for Enhanced Genome Editing Specificity. Cell. Sep. 12, 2013;154(6):1380-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021. Epub Aug. 29, 2013. |
| Ran et al., Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc. Nov. 2013;8(11):2281-308. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.143. Epub Oct. 24, 2013. |
| Ran et al., In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature. Apr. 9, 2015;520(7546):186-91. doi: 10.1038/nature14299. Epub Apr. 1, 2015. |
| Ranzau et al., Genome, Epigenome, and Transcriptome Editing via Chemical Modification of Nucleobases in Living Cells. Biochemistry. Feb. 5, 2019;58(5):330-335. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00958. Epub Dec. 12, 2018. |
| Rashel et al., A novel site-specific recombination system derived from bacteriophage phiMR11. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Apr. 4, 2008;368(2):192-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.01.045. Epub Jan. 22, 2008. |
| Rasila et al., Critical evaluation of random mutagenesis by error-prone polymerase chain reaction protocols, Escherichia coli mutator strain, and hydroxylamine treatment. Anal Biochem. May 1, 2009;388(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.02.008. Epub Feb. 10, 2009. |
| Raskin et al., Substitution of a single bacteriophage T3 residue in bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase at position 748 results in a switch in promoter specificity. J Mol Biol. Nov. 20, 1992;228(2):506-15. |
| Raskin et al., T7 RNA polymerase mutants with altered promoter specificities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 15, 1993;90(8):3147-51. |
| Rath et al., Fidelity of end joining in mammalian episomes and the impact of Metnase on joint processing. BMC Mol Biol. Mar. 22, 2014;15:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-15-6. |
| Rauch et al., Programmable RNA Binding Proteins for Imaging and Therapeutics. Biochemistry. Jan. 30, 2018;57(4):363-364. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01101. Epub Nov. 17, 2017. |
| Ravishankar et al., X-ray analysis of a complex of Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase (EcUDG) with a proteinaceous inhibitor. The structure elucidation of a prokaryotic UDG. Nuclei Acids Res. 26 (21): 4880-4887 (1998). |
| Ray et al., A compendium of RNA-binding motifs for decoding gene regulation. Nature. Jul. 11, 2013;499(7457):172-7. doi: 10.1038/nature12311. |
| Ray et al., Homologous recombination: ends as the means. Trends Plant Sci. Oct. 2002;7(10):435-40. |
| Rebar et al., Phage display methods for selecting zinc finger proteins with novel DNA-binding specificities. Methods Enzymol. 1996;267:129-49. |
| Rebuzzini et al., New mammalian cellular systems to study mutations introduced at the break site by non-homologous end-joining. DNA Repair (Amst). May 2, 2005;4(5):546-55. |
| Rees et al., Analysis and minimization of cellular RNA editing by DNA adenine base editors. Sci Adv. May 8, 2019;5(5):eaax5717. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5717. |
| Rees et al., Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells. Nat Rev Genet. Dec. 2018;19(12):770-788. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0059-1. |
| Rees et al., Development of hRad51-Cas9 nickase fusions that mediate HDR without double-stranded breaks. Nat Commun. May 17, 2019;10(1):2212. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09983-4. |
| Rees et al., Improving the DNA specificity and applicability of base editing through protein engineering and protein delivery. Nat Commun. Jun. 6, 2017;8:15790. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15790. |
| Reiners et al., Scaffold protein harmonin (USH1C) provides molecular links between Usher syndrome type 1 and type 2. Hum Mol Genet. Dec. 15, 2005;14(24):3933-43. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi417. Epub Nov. 21, 2005. |
| Relph et al., Recent developments and current status of gene therapy using viral vectors in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 2004;329(7470):839-842. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7470.839. |
| Remy et al., Gene transfer with a series of lipophilic DNA-binding molecules. Bioconjug Chem. Nov.-Dec. 1994;5(6):647-54. doi: 10.1021/bc00030a021. |
| Ren et al., In-line Alignment and Mg2+ Coordination at the Cleavage Site of the env22 Twister Ribozyme. Nat Commun. Nov. 20, 2014;5:5534. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6534. |
| Ren et al., Pistol Ribozyme Adopts a Pseudoknot Fold Facilitating Site-Specific In-Line Cleavage. Nat Chem Biol. Sep. 2016;12(9):702-8. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2125. Epub Jul. 11, 2016. |
| Reynaud et al., What role for AID: mutator, or assembler of the immunoglobulin mutasome? Nat Immunol. Jul. 2003;4(7):631-8. |
| Reyon et al., FLASH assembly of TALENs for high-throughput genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. May 2012;30(5):460-5. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2170. |
| Ribeiro et al., Protein Engineering Strategies to Expand CRISPR-Cas9 Applications. Int J Genomics. Aug. 2, 2018;2018:1652567. doi: 10.1155/2018/1652567. |
| Richardson et al., CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in human cells occurs via the Fanconi anemia pathway. Nat Genet. Aug. 2018;50(8):1132-1139. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0174-0. Epub Jul. 27, 2018. |
| Richardson et al., Enhancing homology-directed genome editing by catalytically active and inactive CRISPR-Cas9 using asymmetric donor DNA. Nat Biotechnol. Mar. 2016;34(3):339-44. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3481. Epub Jan. 20, 2016. |
| Richardson et al., Frequent chromosomal translocations induced by DNA double-strand breaks. Nature. Jun. 8, 2000;405(6787):697-700. doi: 10.1038/35015097. |
| Richter et al., Function and regulation of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) / CRISPR associated (Cas) systems. Viruses. Oct. 19, 2012;4(10):2291-311. doi: 10.3390/v4102291. |
| Richter et al., Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 2020;38(7):883-891. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0453-z. Epub Mar. 16, 2020. |
| Riechmann et al., The C-terminal domain of TolA is the coreceptor for filamentous phage infection of E. coli. Cell. 1997; 90(2):351-60. PMID:9244308. |
| Ringrose et al., The Kw recombinase, an integrase from Kluyveromyces waltii. Eur J Biochem. Sep. 15, 1997;248(3):903-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00903.x. |
| Risso et al., Hyperstability and substrate promiscuity in laboratory resurrections of Precambrian β-lactamases. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 27, 2013;135(8):2899-902. doi: 10.1021/ja311630a. Epub Feb. 14, 2013. |
| Ritchie et al., limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 20, 2015;43(7):e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. Epub Jan. 20, 2015. |
| Robert et al., Virus-Like Particles Derived from HIV-1 for Delivery of Nuclear Proteins: Improvement of Production and Activity by Protein Engineering. Mol Biotechnol. Jan. 2017;59(1):9-23. doi: 10.1007/s12033-016-9987-1. |
| Robertson et al., DNA repair in mammalian cells: Base excision repair: the long and short of it. Cell Mol Life Sci. Mar. 2009;66(6):981-93. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-8736-z. |
| Robertson et al., Selection in vitro of an RNA enzyme that specifically cleaves single-stranded DNA. Nature. Mar. 29, 1990;344(6265):467-8. doi: 10.1038/344467a0. |
| Robinson et al., The protein tyrosine kinase family of the human genome. Oncogene. Nov. 20, 2000;19(49):5548-57. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203957. |
| Rodriguez-Muela et al., Single-Cell Analysis of SMN Reveals Its Broader Role in Neuromuscular Disease. Cell Rep. Feb. 7, 2017;18(6):1484-1498 and Supplemental Information. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.035. |
| Rogozin et al., Evolution and diversification of lamprey antigen receptors: evidence for involvement of an AID-APOBEC family cytosine deaminase. Nat Immunol. Jun. 2007;8(6):647-56. doi: 10.1038/ni1463. Epub Apr. 29, 2007. |
| Rong et al., Homologous recombination in human embryonic stem cells using CRISPR/Cas9 nickase and a long DNA donor template. Protein Cell. Apr. 2014;5(4):258-60. doi: 10.1007/s13238-014-0032-5. |
| Rongrong et al., Effect of deletion mutation on the recombination activity of Cre recombinase. Acta Biochim Pol. 2005;52(2):541-4. Epub May 15, 2005. |
| Roth et al., A widespread self-cleaving ribozyme class is revealed by bioinformatics. Nat Chem Biol. Jan. 2014;10(1):56-60. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1386. Epub Nov. 17, 2013. |
| Roth et al., Purification and characterization of murine retroviral reverse transcriptase expressed in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. Aug. 5, 1985;260(16):9326-35. |
| Rouet et al., Expression of a site-specific endonuclease stimulates homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 21, 1994;91(13):6064-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.13.6064. |
| Rouet et al., Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease. Mol Cell Biol. Dec. 1994;14(12):8096-106. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.12.8096. |
| Rouet et al., Receptor-Mediated Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 Endonuclease for Cell-Type-Specific Gene Editing. J Am Chem Soc. May 30, 2018;140(21):6596-6603. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b01551. Epub May 18, 2018. |
| Roundtree et al., YTHDC1 mediates nuclear export of N6-methyladenosine methylated mRNAs. Elife. Oct. 6, 2017;6:e31311. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31311. |
| Rowland et al., Regulatory mutations in Sin recombinase support a structure-based model of the synaptosome. Mol Microbiol. Oct. 2009;74(2):282-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06756.x. Epub Jun. 8, 2009. |
| Rowland et al., Sin recombinase from Staphylococcus aureus: synaptic complex architecture and transposon targeting. Mol Microbiol. May 2002;44(3):607-19. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02897.x. |
| Rowley, Chromosome translocations: dangerous liaisons revisited. Nat Rev Cancer. Dec. 2001;1(3):245-50. doi: 10.1038/35106108. |
| Rubio et al., An adenosine-to-inosine tRNA-editing enzyme that can perform C-to-U deamination of DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 8, 2007;104(19):7821-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702394104. Epub May 1, 2007. PMID: 17483465; PMCID: PMC1876531. |
| Rubio et al., Transfer RNA travels from the cytoplasm to organelles. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. Nov.-Dec. 2011;2(6):802-17. doi: 10.1002/wrna.93. Epub Jul. 11, 2011. |
| Rudolph et al., Synthetic riboswitches for the conditional control of gene expression in Streptomyces coelicolor. Microbiology. Jul. 2013;159(Pt 7):1416-22. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.067322-0. Epub May 15, 2013. |
| Rutherford et al., Attachment site recognition and regulation of directionality by the serine integrases. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep. 2013;41(17):8341-56. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt580. Epub Jul. 2, 2013. |
| Ryu et al., Adenine base editing in mouse embryos and an adult mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 2018;36(6):536-539. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4148. Epub Apr. 27, 2018. |
| Räschle et al., Mutations within the hMLH1 and hPMS2 subunits of the human MutLalpha mismatch repair factor affect its ATPase activity, but not its ability to interact with hMutSalpha. J Biol Chem. Jun. 14, 2002;277(24):21810-20. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108787200. Epub Apr. 10, 2002. |
| Rüfer et al., Non-contact positions impose site selectivity on Cre recombinase. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 1, 2002;30(13):2764-71. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf399. |
| Saayman et al., The therapeutic application of CRISPR/Cas9 technologies for HIV. Expert Opin Biol Ther. Jun. 2015;15(6):819-30. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2015.1036736. Epub Apr. 12, 2015. |
| Sadelain et al., Safe harbours for the integration of new DNA in the human genome. Nat Rev Cancer. Dec. 1, 2011;12(1):51-8. doi: 10.1038/nrc3179. |
| Sadowski et al., The sequence-structure relationship and protein function prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol. Jun. 2009;19(3):357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.03.008. Epub May 4, 2009. |
| Sadowski, The Flp recombinase of the 2-microns plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1995;51:53-91. |
| Safari et al., CRISPR Cpf1 proteins: structure, function and implications for genome editing. Cell Biosci. May 9, 2019;9:36. doi: 10.1186/s13578-019-0298-7. |
| Sage et al., Proliferation of functional hair cells in vivo in the absence of the retinoblastoma protein. Science. Feb. 18, 2005;307(5712):1114-8. Epub Jan. 13, 2005. |
| Saha et al., The NIH Somatic Cell Genome Editing program. Nature. Apr. 2021;592(7853):195-204. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03191-1. Epub Apr. 7, 2021. |
| Sakuma et al., MMEJ-assisted gene knock-in using TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 with the PITCh systems. Nat Protoc. Jan. 2016;11(1):118-33. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.140. Epub Dec. 17, 2015. |
| Sale et al., Y-family DNA polymerases and their role in tolerance of cellular DNA damage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. Feb. 23, 2012;13(3):141-52. doi: 10.1038/nrm3289. |
| Saleh-Gohari et al., Conservative homologous recombination preferentially repairs DNA double-strand breaks in the S phase of the cell cycle in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 13, 2004;32(12):3683-8. Print 2004. |
| Samal et al., Cationic polymers and their therapeutic potential. Chem Soc Rev. Nov. 7, 2012;41(21):7147-94. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35094g. Epub Aug. 10, 2012. |
| Samanta et al., A reverse transcriptase ribozyme. Elife. Sep. 26, 2017;6:e31153. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31153. |
| Samulski et al., Helper-free stocks of recombinant adeno-associated viruses: normal integration does not require viral gene expression. J Virol. Sep. 1989;63(9):3822-8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.63.9.3822-3828.1989. |
| San Filippo et al., Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008;77:229-57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.125255. |
| Sander et al., CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat Biotechnol. Apr. 2014;32(4):347-55. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2842. Epub Mar. 2, 2014. |
| Sander et al., In silico abstraction of zinc finger nuclease cleavage profiles reveals an expanded landscape of off-target sites. Nucleic Acids Res. Oct. 2013;41(19):e181. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt716. Epub Aug. 14, 2013. |
| Sander et al., Targeted gene disruption in somatic zebrafish cells using engineered TALENs. Nat Biotechnol. Aug. 5, 2011;29(8):697-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1934. |
| Sang et al., A unique uracil-DNA binding protein of the uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep. 30, 2015;43(17):8452-63. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv854. Epub Aug. 24, 2015. |
| Sang, Prospects for transgenesis in the chick. Mech Dev. Sep. 2004;121(9):1179-86. |
| Sanjana et al., A transcription activator-like effector toolbox for genome engineering. Nat Protoc. Jan. 5, 2012;7(1):171-92. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.431. |
| Sanjurjo-Soriano et al., Genome Editing in Patient iPSCs Corrects the Most Prevalent USH2A Mutations and Reveals Intriguing Mutant mRNA Expression Profiles. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. Nov. 27, 2019;17:156-173. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2019.11.016. |
| Santiago et al., Targeted gene knockout in mammalian cells by using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 15, 2008;105(15):5809-14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800940105. Epub Mar. 21, 2008. |
| Santoro et al., Directed evolution of the site specificity of Cre recombinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 2, 2002;99(7):4185-90. Epub Mar. 19, 2002. |
| Saparbaev et al., Excision of hypoxanthine from DNA containing dIMP residues by the Escherichia coli, yeast, rat, and human alkylpurine DNA glycosylases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 21, 1994;91(13):5873-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.13.5873. |
| Sapranauskas et al., The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR/Cas system provides immunity in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 2011;39(21):9275-82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr606. Epub Aug. 3, 2011. |
| Sapunar et al., Dorsal root ganglion—a potential new therapeutic target for neuropathic pain. J Pain Res. 2012;5:31-8. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S26603. Epub Feb. 16, 2012. |
| Saraconi et al., The RNA editing enzyme APOBEC1 induces somatic mutations and a compatible mutational signature is present in esophageal adenocarcinomas. Genome Biol. Jul. 31, 2014;15(7):417. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0417-z. |
| Sarkar et al., HIV-1 proviral DNA excision using an evolved recombinase. Science. Jun. 29, 2007;316(5833):1912-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1141453. |
| Sashital et al., Mechanism of foreign DNA selection in a bacterial adaptive immune system. Mol Cell. Jun. 8, 2012;46(5):606-15. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.020. Epub Apr. 19, 2012. |
| Sasidharan et al., The selection of acceptable protein mutations. PNAS; Jun. 12, 2007;104(24):10080-5. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073.pnas.0703737104. |
| Satomura et al., Precise genome-wide base editing by the CRISPR Nickase system in yeast. Sci Rep. May 18, 2017;7(1):2095. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02013-7. |
| Saudek et al., A preliminary trial of the programmable implantable medication system for insulin delivery. N Engl J Med. Aug. 31, 1989;321(9):574-9. |
| Sauer et al., DNA recombination with a heterospecific Cre homolog identified from comparison of the pac-c1 regions of P1-related phages. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 18, 2004;32(20):6086-95. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh941. |
| Savic et al., Covalent linkage of the DNA repair template to the CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease enhances homology-directed repair. Elife. May 29, 2018;7:e33761. doi: 10.7554/eLife.33761. |
| Saville et al., A site-specific self-cleavage reaction performed by a novel RNA in Neurospora mitochondria. Cell. May 18, 1990;61(4):685-96. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90480-3. |
| Savva et al., The structural basis of specific base-excision repair by uracil-DNA glycosylase. Nature. Feb. 9, 1995;373(6514):487-93. doi: 10.1038/373487a0. |
| Schaaper et al., Base selection, proofreading, and mismatch repair during DNA replication in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. Nov. 15, 1993;268(32):23762-5. |
| Schaaper et al., Spectra of spontaneous mutations in Escherichia coli strains defective in mismatch correction: the nature of in vivo DNA replication errors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 1987;84(17):6220-4. |
| Schaefer et al., Understanding RNA modifications: the promises and technological bottlenecks of the ‘epitranscriptome’. Open Biol. May 2017;7(5):170077. doi: 10.1098/rsob.170077. |
| Schechner et al., Multiplexable, locus-specific targeting of long RNAs with CRISPR-Display. Nat Methods. Jul. 2015;12(7):664-70. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3433. Epub Jun. 1, 2015. Author manuscript entitled CRISPR Display: A modular method for locus-specific targeting of long noncoding RNAs and synthetic RNA devices in vivo. |
| Schek et al., Definition of the upstream efficiency element of the simian virus 40 late polyadenylation signal by using in vitro analyses. Mol Cell Biol. Dec. 1992;12(12):5386-93. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.12.5386. |
| Schenk et al., MPDU1 mutations underlie a novel human congenital disorder of glycosylation, designated type If. J Clin Invest. Dec. 2001;108(11):1687-95. doi: 10.1172/JCI13419. |
| Schlacher et al., Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11. Cell. May 13, 2011;145(4):529-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.041. Erratum in: Cell. Jun. 10, 2011;145(6):993. |
| Schmitz et al., Behavioral abnormalities in prion protein knockout mice and the potential relevance of PrP(C) for the cytoskeleton. Prion. 2014;8(6):381-6. doi: 10.4161/19336896.2014.983746. |
| Schrank et al., Inactivation of the survival motor neuron gene, a candidate gene for human spinal muscular atrophy, leads to massive cell death in early mouse embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 2, 1997;94(18):9920-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9920. |
| Schriefer et al., Low pressure DNA shearing: a method for random DNA sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. Dec. 25, 1990;18(24):7455-6. |
| Schultz et al., Expression and secretion in yeast of a 400-kDa envelope glycoprotein derived from Epstein-Barr virus. Gene. 1987;54(1):113-23. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90353-2. |
| Schultz et al., Oligo-2′-fluoro-2′-deoxynucleotide N3′-->P5′ phosphoramidates: synthesis and properties. Nucleic Acids Res. Aug. 1, 1996;24(15):2966-73. |
| Schwank et al., Functional repair of CFTR by CRISPR/Cas9 in intestinal stem cell organoids of cystic fibrosis patients. Cell Stem Cell. Dec. 5, 2013;13(6):653-8. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.002. |
| Schwartz et al., Post-translational enzyme activation in an animal via optimized conditional protein splicing. Nat Chem Biol. Jan. 2007;3(1):50-4. Epub Nov. 26, 2006. |
| Schwarze et al., In vivo protein transduction: delivery of a biologically active protein into the mouse. Science. Sep. 3, 1999;285(5433):1569-72. |
| Schöller et al., Interactions, localization, and phosphorylation of the m6A generating METTL3-METTL14-WTAP complex. RNA. Apr. 2018;24(4):499-512. doi: 10.1261/rna.064063.117. Epub Jan. 18, 2018. |
| Sclimenti et al., Directed evolution of a recombinase for improved genomic integration at a native human sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. Dec. 15, 2001;29(24):5044-51. |
| Score Results for Luetticken et al., Complete genome sequence of a Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. RT equisimilis strain possessing Lancefield's group A antigen. RL Submitted to the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases. May 2012. 3 pages. |
| Score Results for Okumura et al., Evolutionary paths of streptococcal and staphylococcal superantigens. RL BMC Genomics. 2012;13:404-404. 3 pages. |
| Score Results for Shimomura et al., Complete Genome Sequencing and Analysis of a Lancefield Group G RT Streptococcus dysagalactiae Subsp. Equisimilis Strain Causing Streptococcal RT Toxic Shock Syndrome (STSS). RL BMC Genomics. 2011;12:17-17. 3 pages. |
| Scott et al., Production of cyclic peptides and proteins in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 23, 1999;96(24):13638-43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13638. |
| Sebastían-Martín et al., Transcriptional inaccuracy threshold attenuates differences in RNA-dependent DNA synthesis fidelity between retroviral reverse transcriptases. Sci Rep. Jan. 12, 2018;8(1):627. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18974-8. |
| Seed, An LFA-3 cDNA encodes a phospholipid-linked membrane protein homologous to its receptor CD2. Nature. Oct. 29-Nov. 4, 1987;329(6142):840-2. doi: 10.1038/329840a0. |
| Seffernick et al., Melamine deaminase and atrazine chlorohydrolase: 98 percent identical but functionally different. J Bacteriol. Apr. 2001;183(8):2405-10. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.8.2405-2410.2001. |
| Sefton et al., Implantable pumps. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1987;14(3):201-40. |
| Segal et al., Toward controlling gene expression at will: selection and design of zinc finger domains recognizing each of the 5′-GNN-3′ DNA target sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 16, 1999;96(6):2758-63. |
| Sells et al., Delivery of protein into cells using polycationic liposomes. Biotechniques. Jul. 1995;19(1):72-6, 78. |
| Semenova et al., Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 21, 2011;108(25):10098-103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104144108. Epub Jun. 6, 2011. |
| Semple et al., Rational design of cationic lipids for siRNA delivery. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2010;28(2):172-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1602. Epub Jan. 17, 2010. |
| Serganov et al., Coenzyme recognition and gene regulation by a flavin mononucleotide riboswitch. Nature. Mar. 12, 2009;458(7235):233-7. doi: 10.1038/nature07642. Epub Jan. 25, 2009. |
| Serganov et al., Structural basis for discriminative regulation of gene expression by adenine- and guanine-sensing mRNAs. Chem Biol. Dec. 2004;11(12):1729-41. |
| Serganov et al., Structural basis for gene regulation by a thiamine pyrophosphate-sensing riboswitch. Nature. Jun. 29, 2006;441(7097):1167-71. Epub May 21, 2006. |
| Seripa et al., The missing ApoE allele. Ann Hum Genet. Jul. 2007;71(Pt 4):496-500. Epub Jan. 22, 2007. |
| Serrano-Heras et al., Protein p56 from the Bacillus subtilis phage phi29 inhibits DNA-binding ability of uracil-DNA glycosylase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(16):5393-401. Epub Aug. 13, 2007. |
| Setten et al., The current state and future directions of RNAi-based therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. Jun. 2019;18(6):421-446. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0017-4. |
| Severinov et al., Expressed protein ligation, a novel method for studying protein-protein interactions in transcription. J Biol Chem. Jun. 26, 1998;273(26):16205-9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.26.16205. |
| Sha et al., Monobodies and other synthetic binding proteins for expanding protein science. Protein Sci. May 2017;26(5):910-924. doi: 10.1002/pro.3148. Epub Mar. 24, 2017. |
| Shah et al., Inteins: nature's gift to protein chemists. Chem Sci. 2014;5(1):446-461. |
| Shah et al., Kinetic control of one-pot trans-splicing reactions by using a wild-type and designed split intein. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Jul. 11, 2011;50(29):6511-5. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102909. Epub Jun. 8, 2011. |
| Shah et al., Protospacer recognition motifs: mixed identities and functional diversity. RNA Biol. May 2013;10(5):891-9. doi: 10.4161/rna.23764. Epub Feb. 12, 2013. |
| Shah et al., Target-specific variants of Flp recombinase mediate genome engineering reactions in mammalian cells. FEBS J. Sep. 2015;282(17):3323-33. doi: 10.1111/febs.13345. Epub Jul. 1, 2015. |
| Shaikh et al., Chimeras of the Flp and Cre recombinases: tests of the mode of cleavage by Flp and Cre. J Mol Biol. Sep. 8, 2000;302(1):27-48. |
| Shalem et al., Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science. Jan. 3, 2014;343(6166):84-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1247005. Epub Dec. 12, 2013. |
| Shalem et al., High-throughput functional genomics using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Rev Genet. May 2015;16(5):299-311. doi: 10.1038/nrg3899. Epub Apr. 9, 2015. |
| Sharbeen et al., Ectopic restriction of DNA repair reveals that UNG2 excises AID-induced uracils predominantly or exclusively during G1 phase. J Exp Med. May 7, 2012;209(5):965-74. doi: 10.1084/jem.20112379. Epub Apr. 23, 2012. |
| Sharer et al., The ARF-like 2 (ARL2)-binding protein, BART. Purification, cloning, and initial characterization. J Biol Chem. Sep. 24, 1999;274(39):27553-61. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.39.27553. |
| Sharma et al., Efficient introduction of aryl bromide functionality into proteins in vivo. FEBS Lett. Feb. 4, 2000;467(1):37-40. |
| Sharma et al., Identification of novel methyltransferases, Bmt5 and Bmt6, responsible for the m3U methylations of 25S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. Mar. 2014;42(5):3246-60. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1281. Epub Dec. 11, 2013. |
| Sharon et al., Functional Genetic Variants Revealed by Massively Parallel Precise Genome Editing. Cell. Oct. 4, 2018;175(2):544-557.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.057. Epub Sep. 20, 2018. |
| Shaw et al., Implications of human genome architecture for rearrangement-based disorders: the genomic basis of disease. Hum Mol Genet. Apr. 1, 2004;13 Spec No. 1:R57-64. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh073. Epub Feb. 5, 2004. |
| Shcherbakova et al., Mutator phenotypes conferred by MLH1 overexpression and by heterozygosity for mlh1 mutations. Mol Cell Biol. Apr. 1999;19(4):3177-83. doi: 10.1128/MCB.19.4.3177. |
| Shcherbakova et al., Near-infrared fluorescent proteins for multicolor in vivo imaging. Nat Methods. Aug. 2013;10(8):751-4. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2521. Epub Jun. 16, 2013. |
| Shechner et al., Multiplexable, locus-specific targeting of long RNAs with CRISPR-Display. Nat Methods. Jul. 2015; 12(7):664-70. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3433. Epub Jun. 1, 2015. |
| Shee et al., Engineered proteins detect spontaneous DNA breakage in human and bacterial cells. Elife. Oct. 29, 2013;2:e01222. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01222. |
| Shen et al., Efficient genome modification by CRISPR-Cas9 nickase with minimal off-target effects. Nat Methods. Apr. 2014;11(4):399-402. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2857. Epub Mar. 2, 2014. |
| Shen et al., Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) for cancer treatment. Cancer Gene Ther. Nov. 2006;13(11):975-92. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700946. Epub Apr. 7, 2006. |
| Shen et al., Predictable and precise template-free CRISPR editing of pathogenic variants. Nature. Nov. 2018;563(7733):646-651. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0686-x. Epub Nov. 7, 2018. |
| Shen, Data processing, Modeling and Analysis scripts for CRISPR-inDelphi. GitHub—maxwshen/indelphi-dataprocessinganalysis at 6b68e3cec73c9358fef6e5f178a935f3c2a4118f. Apr. 10, 2018. Retrieved online via https://github.com/maxwshen/indelphi-sataprocessinganalysis/tree/6b68e3cec73c9358fef6e5f178a935f3c2a4118f Last retrieved on Jul. 26, 2021. 2 pages. |
| Sheridan, First CRISPR-Cas patent opens race to stake out intellectual property. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(7):599-601. |
| Sheridan, Gene therapy finds its niche. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2011;29(2):121-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1769. |
| Sherwood et al., Discovery of directional and nondirectional pioneer transcription factors by modeling DNase profile magnitude and shape. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2014;32(2):171-178. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2798. Epub Jan. 19, 2014. |
| Shi et al., Structural basis for targeted DNA cytosine deamination and mutagenesis by APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Feb. 2017;24(2):131-139. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3344. Epub Dec. 19, 2016. |
| Shi et al., YTHDF3 facilitates translation and decay of N6-methyladenosine-modified RNA. Cell Res. Mar. 2017;27(3):315-328. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.15. Epub Jan. 20, 2017. |
| Shimantani et al., Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol. May 2017;35(5):441-443. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3833. Epub Mar. 27, 2017. |
| Shimojima et al., Spinocerebellar ataxias type 27 derived from a disruption of the fibroblast growth factor 14 gene with mimicking phenotype of paroxysmal non-kinesigenic dyskinesia. Brain Dev. Mar. 2012;34(3):230-3. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2011.04.014. Epub May 19, 2011. |
| Shin et al., CRISPR/Cas9 targeting events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse genome. Nat Commun. May 31, 2017;8:15464. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15464. |
| Shindo et al., A Comparison of Two Single-Stranded DNA Binding Models by Mutational Analysis of APOBEC3G. Biology (Basel). Aug. 2, 2012;1(2):260-76. doi: 10.3390/biology1020260. |
| Shingledecker et al., Molecular dissection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecA intein: design of a minimal intein and of a trans-splicing system involving two intein fragments. Gene. Jan. 30, 1998;207(2):187-95. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00624-0. |
| Shmakov et al., Discovery and Functional Characterization of Diverse Class 2 CRISPR Cas Systems. Molecular Cell Nov. 2015;60(3):385-97. |
| Shmakov et al., Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. Mar. 2017;15(3):169-182. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.184. Epub Jan. 23, 2017. |
| Shultz et al., A genome-wide analysis of FRT-like sequences in the human genome. PLoS One. Mar. 23, 2011;6(3):e18077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018077. |
| Siebert et al., An improved PCR method for walking in uncloned genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. Mar. 25, 1995;23(6):1087-8. |
| Silas et al., Direct CRISPR spacer acquisition from RNA by a natural reverse transcriptase-Cas1 fusion protein. Science. Feb. 26, 2016;351(6276):aad4234. doi: 10.1126/science.aad4234. |
| Silva et al., Selective disruption of the DNA polymerase III α-β complex by the umuD gene products. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 2012;40(12):5511-22. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks229. Epub Mar. 9, 2012. |
| Simonelli et al., Base excision repair intermediates are mutagenic in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Aug. 2, 2005;33(14):4404-11. Print 2005. |
| Singh et al., Cross-talk between diverse serine integrases. J Mol Biol. Jan. 23, 2014;426(2):318- 31. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.10.013. Epub Oct. 22, 2013. |
| Singh et al., Protein Engineering Approaches in the Post-Genomic Era. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2018;19(1):5-15. doi: 10.2174/1389203718666161117114243. |
| Singh et al., Real-time observation of DNA recognition and rejection by the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nat Commun. Sep. 14, 2016;7:12778. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12778. |
| Singh et al., Real-time observation of DNA target interrogation and product release by the RNA-guided endonuclease CRISPR Cpf1 (Cas12a). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 22, 2018;115(21):5444-5449. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718686115. Epub May 7, 2018. |
| Singh et al., Splicing of a critical exon of human Survival Motor Neuron is regulated by a unique silencer element located in the last intron. Mol Cell Biol. Feb. 2006;26(4):1333-46. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.4.1333-1346.2006. |
| Sirk et al., Expanding the zinc-finger recombinase repertoire: directed evolution and mutational analysis of serine recombinase specificity determinants. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 2014;42(7):4755-66. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1389. Epub Jan. 21, 2014. |
| Siu et al., Riboregulated toehold-gated gRNA for programmable CRISPR-Cas9 function. Nat Chem Biol. Mar. 2019;15(3):217-220. doi: 10.1038/s41589-018-0186-1. Epub Dec. 10, 2018. |
| Sivalingam et al., Biosafety assessment of site-directed transgene integration in human umbilical cord-lining cells. Mol Ther. Jul. 2010;18(7):1346-56. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.61. Epub Apr. 27, 2010. |
| Sjoblom et al., The consensus coding sequences of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science. Oct. 13, 2006;314(5797):268-74. Epub Sep. 7, 2006. |
| Skretas et al., Regulation of protein activity with small-molecule-controlled inteins. Protein Sci. Feb. 2005;14(2):523-32. Epub Jan. 4, 2005. |
| Slaymaker et al., Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science. Jan. 1, 2016;351(6268):84-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5227. Epub Dec. 1, 2015. |
| Sledz et al., Structural insights into the molecular mechanism of the m(6)A writer complex. Elife. Sep. 14, 2016;5:e18434. doi: 10.7554/eLife.18434. |
| Slupphaug et al., A nucleotide-flipping mechanism from the structure of human uracil-DNA glycosylase bound to DNA. Nature. Nov. 7, 1996;384(6604):87-92. doi: 10.1038/384087a0. |
| Smargon et al., Cas13b Is a Type VI-B CRISPR-Associated RNA-Guided RNase Differentially Regulated by Accessory Proteins Csx27 and Csx28. Mol Cell. Feb. 16, 2017;65(4):618-630.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.023. Epub Jan. 5, 2017. |
| Smith et al., Diversity in the serine recombinases. Mol Microbiol. Apr. 2002;44(2):299-307. Review. |
| Smith et al., Expression of a dominant negative retinoic acid receptor y in Xenopus embryos leads to partial resistance to retinoic acid. Roux Arch Dev Biol. Mar. 1994;203(5):254-265. doi: 10.1007/BF00360521. |
| Smith et al., Herpesvirus transport to the nervous system and back again. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:153-76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150051. Epub Jun. 15, 2012. |
| Smith et al., Production of human beta interferon in insect cells infected with a baculovirus expression vector. Mol Cell Biol. Dec. 1983;3(12):2156-65. doi: 10.1128/mcb.3.12.2156. |
| Smith et al., Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene. Jul. 15, 1988;67(1):31-40. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90005-4. |
| Smith, Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. Science. Jun. 15, 1985;228(4705):1315-7. |
| Smith, Phage-encoded Serine Integrases and Other Large Serine Recombinases. Microbiol Spectr. Aug. 2015;3(4). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0059-2014. |
| Somanathan et al., AAV vectors expressing LDLR gain-of-function variants demonstrate increased efficacy in mouse models of familial hypercholesterolemia. Circ Res. Aug. 29, 2014;115(6):591-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.304008. Epub Jul. 14, 2014. |
| Sommerfelt et al., Receptor interference groups of 20 retroviruses plating on human cells. Virology. May 1990;176(1):58-69. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(90)90230-o. |
| Song et al., Adenine base editing in an adult mouse model of tyrosinaemia. Nat Biomed Eng. Jan. 2020;4(1):125-130. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0357-8. Epub Feb. 25, 2019. |
| Song et al., Delivery of CRISPR/Cas systems for cancer gene therapy and immunotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. Jan. 2021;168:158-180. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.04.010. Epub May 1, 2020. |
| Song et al., RS-1 enhances CRISPR/Cas9- and TALEN-mediated knock-in efficiency. Nat Commun. Jan. 28, 2016;7:10548. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10548. |
| Sorusch et al., Characterization of the ternary Usher syndrome SANS/ush2a/whirlin protein complex. Hum Mol Genet. Mar. 15, 2017;26(6):1157-1172. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx027. |
| Southworth et al., Control of protein splicing by intein fragment reassembly. EMBO J. Feb. 16, 1998;17(4):918-26. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.4.918. |
| Southworth et al., Purification of proteins fused to either the amino or carboxy terminus of the Mycobacterium xenopi gyrase A intein. Biotechniques. Jul. 1999;27(1):110-4, 116, 118-20. doi: 10.2144/99271st04. |
| Spencer et al., A general strategy for producing conditional alleles of Src-like tyrosine kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 10, 1995;92(21):9805-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.21.9805. |
| Spencer et al., Controlling signal transduction with synthetic ligands. Science. Nov. 12, 1993;262(5136):1019-24. doi: 10.1126/science.7694365. |
| Spencer et al., Functional analysis of Fas signaling in vivo using synthetic inducers of dimerization. Curr Biol. Jul. 1, 1996;6(7):839-47. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00607-3. |
| Srivastava et al., An inhibitor of nonhomologous end-joining abrogates double-strand break repair and impedes cancer progression. Cell. Dec. 21, 2012;151(7):1474-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.054. |
| Stadtman, Selenocysteine. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:83-100. |
| Stamos et al., Structure of a Thermostable Group II Intron Reverse Transcriptase with Template-Primer and Its Functional and Evolutionary Implications. Mol Cell. Dec. 7, 2017;68(5):926-939.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.024. Epub Nov. 16, 2017. |
| Stark et al., ATP hydrolysis by mammalian RAD51 has a key role during homology-directed DNA repair. J Biol Chem. Jun. 7, 2002;277(23):20185-94. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112132200. Epub Mar. 28, 2002. |
| Steckelberg et al., A folded viral noncoding RNA blocks host cell exoribonucleases through a conformationally dynamic RNA structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 19, 2018;115(25):6404-6409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802429115. Epub Jun. 4, 2018. |
| Steele et al., The prion protein knockout mouse: a phenotype under challenge. Prion. Apr.-Jun. 2007;1(2):83-93. doi: 10.4161/pri.1.2.4346. Epub Apr. 25, 2007. |
| Steiner et al., The neurotropic herpes viruses: herpes simplex and varicella-zoster. Lancet Neurol. Nov. 2007;6(11):1015-28. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70267-3. |
| Stella et al., Structure of the Cpf1 endonuclease R-loop complex after target DNA cleavage. Nature. Jun. 22, 2017;546(7659):559-563. doi: 10.1038/nature22398. Epub May 31, 2017. |
| Stenglein et al., APOBEC3 proteins mediate the clearance of foreign DNA from human cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Feb. 2010; 17(2):222-9. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1744. Epub Jan. 10, 2010. |
| Stenson et al., The Human Gene Mutation Database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies. Hum Genet. Jun. 2017;136(6):665-677. doi: 10.1007/s00439-017-1779-6. Epub Mar. 27, 2017. |
| Stephens et al., The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer. Nature Jun. 2012;486:400-404. doi: 10.1038/nature11017. |
| Sternberg et al., Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9. Nature. Nov. 5, 2015;527(7576):110-3. doi: 10.1038/nature15544. Epub Oct. 28, 2015. |
| Sternberg et al., DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature. Mar. 6, 2014;507(7490):62-7. doi: 10.1038/nature13011. Epub Jan. 29, 2014. |
| Sterne-Weiler et al., Exon identity crisis: disease-causing mutations that disrupt the splicing code. Genome Biol. Jan. 23, 2014;15(1):201. doi: 10.1186/gb4150. |
| Stevens et al., A promiscuous split intein with expanded protein engineering applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 8, 2017;114(32):8538-8543. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701083114. Epub Jul. 24, 2017. |
| Stevens et al., Design of a Split Intein with Exceptional Protein-Splicing Activity. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 24, 2016;138(7):2162-5. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b13528. Epub Feb. 8, 2016. |
| Stockwell et al., Probing the role of homomeric and heteromeric receptor interactions in TGF-beta signaling using small molecule dimerizers. Curr Biol. Jun. 18, 1998;8(13):761-70. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70299-4. |
| Strand et al., Destabilization of tracts of simple repetitive DNA in yeast by mutations affecting DNA mismatch repair. Nature. Sep. 16, 1993;365(6443):274-6. doi: 10.1038/365274a0. Erratum in: Nature Apr. 7, 1994;368(6471);569. |
| Strecker et al., Engineering of CRISPR-Cas12b for human genome editing. Nat Commun. Jan. 22, 2019;10(1):212. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08224-4. |
| Strecker et al., RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases. Science. Jul. 5, 2019;365(6448):48-53. doi: 10.1126/science.aax9181. Epub Jun. 6, 2019. |
| Strutt et al., RNA-dependent RNA targeting by CRISPR-Cas9. Elife. Jan. 5, 2018;7:e32724. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32724. |
| Su et al., Human DNA polymerase n has reverse transcriptase activity in cellular environments. J Biol Chem. Apr. 12, 2019;294(15):6073-6081. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007925. Epub Mar. 6, 2019. |
| Su et al., Mispair specificity of methyl-directed DNA mismatch correction in vitro. J Biol Chem. May 15, 1988;263(14):6829-35. Erratum in: J Biol Chem Aug. 5, 1988;263(22):11015. |
| Sudarsan et al., An mRNA structure in bacteria that controls gene expression by binding lysine. Genes Dev. Nov. 1, 2003;17(21):2688-97. |
| Sudarsan et al., Riboswitches in eubacteria sense the second messenger cyclic di-GMP. Science. Jul. 18, 2008;321(5887):411-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1159519. |
| Suess et al., A theophylline responsive riboswitch based on helix slipping controls gene expression in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. Mar. 5, 2004;32(4):1610-4. |
| Sugawara et al., Heteroduplex rejection during single-strand annealing requires Sgs1 helicase and mismatch repair proteins Msh2 and Msh6 but not Pms1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 22, 2004;101(25):9315-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0305749101. Epub Jun. 15, 2004. |
| Suh et al., Restoration of visual function in adult mice with an inherited retinal disease via adenine base editing. Nat Biomed Eng. Feb. 2021;5(2):169-178. doi: 10.1038/s41551-020-00632-6. Epub Oct. 19, 2020. |
| Sullenger et al., Ribozyme-mediated repair of defective mRNA by targeted, trans-splicing. Nature. Oct. 13, 1994;371(6498):619-22. doi: 10.1038/371619a0. |
| Sumner et al., Two breakthrough gene-targeted treatments for spinal muscular atrophy: challenges remain. J Clin Invest. Aug. 1, 2018;128(8):3219-3227. doi: 10.1172/JCI121658. Epub Jul. 9, 2018. |
| Sun et al., Optimized TAL effector nucleases (TALENs) for use in treatment of sickle cell disease. Mol Biosyst. Apr. 2012;8(4):1255-63. doi: 10.1039/c2mb05461b. Epub Feb. 3, 2012. |
| Sun et al., The CRISPR/Cas9 system for gene editing and its potential application in pain research. Transl Periop & Pain Med. Aug. 3, 2016;1(3):22-33. |
| Supek et al., Differential DNA mismatch repair underlies mutation rate variation across the human genome. Nature. May 7, 2015;521(7550):81-4. doi: 10.1038/nature14173. Epub Feb. 23, 2015. |
| Surun et al., High Efficiency Gene Correction in Hematopoietic Cells by Donor-Template-Free CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. Mar. 2, 2018;10:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2017.11.001. Epub Nov. 10, 2017. |
| Suzuki et al., Crystal structures reveal an elusive functional domain of pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase. Nat Chem Biol. Dec. 2017;13(12):1261-1266. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2497. Epub Oct. 16, 2017. |
| Suzuki et al., In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration. Nature. Dec. 1, 2016;540(7631):144-149. doi: 10.1038/nature20565. Epub Nov. 16, 2016. |
| Suzuki et al., VCre/VloxP and SCre/SloxP: new site-specific recombination systems for genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 2011;39(8):e49. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1280. Epub Feb. 1, 2011. |
| Svitashev et al., Targeted Mutagenesis, Precise Gene Editing, and Site-Specific Gene Insertion in Maize Using Cas9 and Guide RNA. Plant Physiol. Oct. 2015;169(2):931-45. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00793. Epub Aug. 12, 2015. |
| Swarts et al., Argonaute of the archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus is a DNA-guided nuclease that targets cognate DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. May 26, 2015;43(10):5120-9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv415. Epub Apr. 29, 2015. |
| Swarts et al., DNA-guided DNA interference by a prokaryotic Argonaute. Nature. Mar. 13, 2014;507(7491):258-61. doi: 10.1038/nature12971. Epub Feb. 16, 2014. |
| Swarts et al., The evolutionary journey of Argonaute proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Sep. 2014;21(9):743-53. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2879. |
| Szczepek et al., Structure-based redesign of the dimerization interface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 2007;25(7):786-93. Epub Jul. 1, 2007. |
| Tabebordbar et al., In vivo gene editing in dystrophic mouse muscle and muscle stem cells. Science. Jan. 22, 2016;351(6271):407-411. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5177. Epub Dec. 31, 2015. |
| Tagalakis et al., Lack of RNA-DNA oligonucleotide (chimeraplast) mutagenic activity in mouse embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. Jun. 2005;71(2):140-4. |
| Tahara et al., Potent and Selective Inhibitors of 8-Oxoguanine DNA Glycosylase. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 14, 2018;140(6):2105-2114. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b09316. Epub Feb. 5, 2018. |
| Tajiri et al., Functional cooperation of MutT, MutM and MutY proteins in preventing mutations caused by spontaneous oxidation of guanine nucleotide in Escherichia coli. Mutat Res. May 1995;336(3):257-67. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(94)00062-b. |
| Takimoto et al., Stereochemical basis for engineered; pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase and the efficient in vivo incorporation of; structurally divergent non-native amino acids. ACS Chem Biol. Jul. 2011; 15;6(7):733-43. doi: 10.1021/cb200057a. Epub May 5, 2011. |
| Talbot et al., Spinal muscular atrophy. Semin Neurol. Jun. 2001;21(2):189-97. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15264. |
| Tambunan et al., Vaccine Design for H5N1 Based on B- and T-cell Epitope Predictions. Bioinform Biol Insights. Apr. 28, 2016;10:27-35. doi: 10.4137/BBI.S38378. |
| Tan et al., Engineering of high-precision base editors for site-specific single nucleotide replacement. Nat Commun. Jan. 25, 2019;10(1):439. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08034-8. Erratum in: Nat Commun. May 1, 2019;10(1):2019. |
| Tanenbaum et al., A protein-tagging system for signal amplification in gene expression and fluorescence imaging. Cell. Oct. 23, 2014;159(3):635-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.039. Epub Oct. 9, 2014. |
| Tanese et al., Expression of enzymatically active reverse transcriptase in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 1985;82(15):4944-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.15.4944. |
| Tang et al., Aptazyme-embedded guide RNAs enable ligand-responsive genome editing and transcriptional activation. Nat Commun. Jun. 28, 2017;8:15939. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15939. |
| Tang et al., Evaluation of Bioinformatic Programmes for the Analysis of Variants within Splice Site Consensus Regions. Adv Bioinformatics. 2016;2016:5614058. doi: 10.1155/2016/5614058. Epub May 24, 2016. |
| Tang et al., Identification of Dehalobacter reductive dehalogenases that catalyse dechlorination of chloroform, 1,1,1-trichloroethane and 1,1-dichloroethane. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. Mar. 11, 2013;368(1616):20120318. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0318. |
| Tang et al., Rewritable multi-event analog recording in bacterial and mammalian cells. Science. Apr. 13, 2018;360(6385):eaap8992. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8992. Epub Feb. 15, 2018. |
| Tassabehji, Williams-Beuren syndrome: a challenge for genotype-phenotype correlations. Hum Mol Genet. Oct. 15, 2003;12 Spec No. 2:R229-37. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg299. Epub Sep. 2, 2003. |
| Taube et al., Reverse transcriptase of mouse mammary tumour virus: expression in bacteria, purification and biochemical characterization. Biochem J. Feb. 1, 1998;329 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):579-87. doi: 10.1042/bj3290579. Erratum in: Biochem J Jun. 15, 1998;332(Pt 3):808. |
| Tebas et al., Gene editing of CCR5 in autologous CD4 T cells of persons infected with HIV. N Engl J Med. Mar. 6, 2014;370(10):901-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300662. |
| Tee et al., Polishing the craft of genetic diversity creation in directed evolution. Biotechnol Adv. Dec. 2013;31(8):1707-21. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.08.021. Epub Sep. 6, 2013. |
| Telenti et al., The Mycobacterium xenopi GyrA protein splicing element: characterization of a minimal intein. J Bacteriol. Oct. 1997;179(20):6378-82. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.20.6378-6382.1997. |
| Telesnitsky et al., RNase H domain mutations affect the interaction between Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and its primer-template. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 15, 1993;90(4):1276-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1276. |
| Teng et al., Mutational analysis of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme (APOBEC1). structure-function relationships of RNA editing and dimerization. J Lipid Res. Apr. 1999;40(4):623-35. |
| Tessarollo et al., Targeted mutation in the neurotrophin-3 gene results in loss of muscle sensory neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 6, 1994;91(25):11844-8. |
| Tesson et al., Knockout rats generated by embryo microinjection of TALENs. Nat Biotechnol. Aug. 5, 2011;29(8):695-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1940. |
| Thomas et al., Heteroduplex repair in extracts of human HeLa cells. J Biol Chem. Feb. 25, 1991;266(6):3744-51. |
| Thompson et al., Cellular uptake mechanisms and endosomal trafficking of supercharged proteins. Chem Biol. Jul. 27, 2012;19(7):831-43. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.06.014. |
| Thompson et al., Engineering and identifying supercharged proteins for macromolecule delivery into mammalian cells. Methods Enzymol. 2012;503:293-319. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-396962-0.00012-4. |
| Thompson et al., The Future of Multiplexed Eukaryotic Genome Engineering. ACS Chem Biol. Feb. 16, 2018;13(2):313-325. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00842. Epub Dec. 28, 2017. |
| Thomson et al., Mutational analysis of loxP sites for efficient Cre-mediated insertion into genomic DNA. Genesis. Jul. 2003;36(3):162-7. doi: 10.1002/gene.10211. |
| Thorpe et al., Functional correction of episomal mutations with short DNA fragments and RNA-DNA oligonucleotides. J Gene Med. Mar.-Apr. 2002;4(2):195-204. |
| Thuronyi et al., Continuous evolution of base editors with expanded target compatibility and improved activity. Nat Biotechnol. Sep. 2019;37(9):1070-1079. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0193-0. Epub Jul. 22, 2019. |
| Thyagarajan et al., Creation of engineered human embryonic stem cell lines using phiC31 integrase. Stem Cells. Jan. 2008;26(1):119-26. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0283. Epub Oct. 25, 2007. |
| Thyagarajan et al., Mammalian genomes contain active recombinase recognition sites. Gene. Feb. 22, 2000;244(1-2):47-54. |
| Thyagarajan et al., Site-specific genomic integration in mammalian cells mediated by phage phiC31 integrase. Mol Cell Biol. Jun. 2001;21(12):3926-34. |
| Tinland et al., The T-DNA-linked VirD2 protein contains two distinct functional nuclear localization signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 15, 1992;89(16):7442-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7442. |
| Tirumalai et al., Recognition of core-type DNA sites by lambda integrase. J Mol Biol. Jun. 12, 1998;279(3):513-27. |
| Tom et al., Mechanism whereby proliferating cell nuclear antigen stimulates flap endonuclease 1. J Biol Chem. Apr. 7, 2000;275(14):10498-505. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.14.10498. |
| Tomer et al., Contribution of human mlh1 and pms2 ATPase activities to DNA mismatch repair. J Biol Chem. Jun. 14, 2002;277(24):21801-9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111342200. Epub Mar. 15, 2002. |
| Tone et al., Single-stranded DNA binding protein Gp5 of Bacillus subtilis phage Φ29 is required for viral DNA replication in growth-temperature dependent fashion. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2012;76(12):2351-3. doi: 10.1271/bbb.120587. Epub Dec. 7, 2012. |
| Toor et al., Crystal structure of a self-spliced group II intron. Science. Apr. 4, 2008;320(5872):77-82. doi: 10.1126/science.1153803. |
| Toro et al., On the Origin and Evolutionary Relationships of the Reverse Transcriptases Associated With Type III CRISPR-Cas Systems. Front Microbiol. Jun. 15, 2018;9:1317. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01317. |
| Toro et al., The Reverse Transcriptases Associated with CRISPR-Cas Systems. Sci Rep. Aug. 2, 2017;7(1):7089. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07828-y. |
| Torres et al., Non-integrative lentivirus drives high-frequency cre-mediated cassette exchange in human cells. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019794. Epub May 23, 2011. |
| Tourdot et al., A general strategy to enhance immunogenicity of low-affinity HLA-A2. 1-associated peptides: implication in the identification of cryptic tumor epitopes. Eur J Immunol. Dec. 2000;30(12):3411-21. |
| Townsend et al., Role of HFE in iron metabolism, hereditary haemochromatosis, anaemia of chronic disease, and secondary iron overload. Lancet. Mar. 2, 2002;359(9308):786-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07885-6. |
| Tracewell et al., Directed enzyme evolution: climbing fitness peaks one amino acid at a time. Curr Opin Chem Biol. Feb. 2009;13(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.01.017. Epub Feb. 25, 2009. |
| Tran et al., Hypermutability of homonucleotide runs in mismatch repair and DNA polymerase proofreading yeast mutants. Mol Cell Biol. May 1997;17(5):2859-65. doi: 10.1128/MCB.17.5.2859. |
| Tratschin et al., A human parvovirus, adeno-associated virus, as a eucaryotic vector: transient expression and encapsidation of the procaryotic gene for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. Mol Cell Biol. Oct. 1984;4(10):2072-81. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.10.2072. |
| Tratschin et al., Adeno-associated virus vector for high-frequency integration, expression, and rescue of genes in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. Nov. 1985;5(11):3251-60. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.11.3251. |
| Trausch et al., The structure of a tetrahydrofolate-sensing riboswitch reveals two ligand binding sites in a single aptamer. Structure. Oct. 12, 2011;19(10):1413-23. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.06.019. Epub Sep. 8, 2011. |
| Traxler et al., A genome-editing strategy to treat β-hemoglobinopathies that recapitulates a mutation associated with a benign genetic condition. Nat Med. Sep. 2016;22(9):987-90. doi: 10.1038/nm.4170. Epub Aug. 15, 2016. |
| Trojan et al., Functional analysis of hMLH1 variants and HNPCC-related mutations using a human expression system. Gastroenterology. Jan. 2002;122(1):211-9. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.30296. |
| Trudeau et al., On the Potential Origins of the High Stability of Reconstructed Ancestral Proteins. Mol Biol Evol. Oct. 2016;33(10):2633-41. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw138. Epub Jul. 12, 2016. |
| Truong et al., Development of an intein-mediated split-Cas9 system for gene therapy. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 27, 2015;43(13):6450-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv601. Epub Jun. 16, 2015. With Supplementary Data. |
| Tsai et al., CIRCLE-seq: a highly sensitive in vitro screen for genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease off-targets. Nat Methods. Jun. 2017;14(6):607-614. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4278. Epub May 1, 2017. |
| Tsai et al., Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided FokI nucleases for highly specific genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. Jun. 2014;32(6):569-76. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2908. Epub Apr. 25, 2014. |
| Tsai et al., GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2015;33(2):187-97. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3117. Epub Dec. 16, 2014. |
| Tsang et al., Specialization of the DNA-cleaving activity of a group I ribozyme through in vitro evolution. J Mol Biol. Sep. 13, 1996;262(1):31-42. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0496. |
| Tsutakawa et al., Human flap endonuclease structures, DNA double-base flipping, and a unified understanding of the FEN1 superfamily. Cell. Apr. 15, 2011;145(2):198-211. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.004. |
| Turan et al., Recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE)—a rapidly-expanding toolbox for targeted genomic modifications. Gene. Feb. 15, 2013;515(1):1-27. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.11.016. Epub Nov. 29, 2012. |
| Turan et al., Recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE): traditional concepts and current challenges. J Mol Biol. Mar. 25, 2011;407(2):193-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.01.004. Epub Jan. 15, 2011. |
| Turan et al., Site-specific recombinases: from tag-and-target- to tag-and-exchange-based genomic modifications. FASEB J. Dec. 2011;25(12):4088-107. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-186940. Epub Sep. 2, 2011. Review. |
| Tycko et al., Pairwise library screen systematically interrogates Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 specificity in human cells. bioRxiv. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/269399 Posted Feb. 22, 2018. |
| Umar et al., DNA loop repair by human cell extracts. Science. Nov. 4, 1994;266(5186):814-6. doi: 10.1126/science.7973637. |
| UniProt Consortium, UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. Mar. 16, 2018;46(5):2699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky092. Erratum for: Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 4, 2017;45(D1):D158-D169. |
| UniProt Submission; UniProt, Accession No. P01011. Last modified Jun. 11, 2014, version 2. 15 pages. |
| UniProt Submission; UniProt, Accession No. P01011. Last modified Sep. 18, 2013, version 2. 15 pages. |
| UniProt Submission; UniProt, Accession No. P04264. Last modified Jun. 11, 2014, version 6. 15 pages. |
| UniProt Submission; UniProt, Accession No. P04275. Last modified Jul. 9, 2014, version 107. 29 pages. |
| UniProtein A0A1V6. Dec. 11, 2019. |
| UniProtKB Submission; Accession No. FONH53. May 3, 2011. 4 pages. |
| UniProtKB Submission; Accession No. FONN87. May 3, 2011. 4 pages. |
| UniProtKB Submission; Accession No. G3ECR1.2. No Author Listed., Aug. 12, 2020, 8 pages. |
| UniProtKB Submission; Accession No. P04264. No Author Listed., Apr. 7, 2021. 12 pages. |
| UniProtKB Submission; Accession No. PODOC6. No Author Listed., Oct. 5, 2016. 5 pages. |
| UniProtKB Submission; Accession No. TOD7A2. Oct. 16, 2013. 10 pages. |
| UniProtKB Submission; Accession No. U2UMQ6. No Author Listed., Apr. 7, 2021, 11 pages. |
| Urasaki et al., Functional dissection of the Tol2 transposable element identified the minimal cis-sequence and a highly repetitive sequence in the subterminal region essential for transposition. Genetics. Oct. 2006;174(2):639-49. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.060244. Epub Sep. 7, 2006. |
| Urnov et al., Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nat Rev Genet. Sep. 2010;11(9):636-46. doi: 10.1038/nrg2842. |
| Urnov et al., Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nature. Jun. 2, 2005;435(7042):646-51. Epub Apr. 3, 2005. |
| Usman et al., Exploiting the chemical synthesis of RNA. Trends Biochem Sci. Sep. 1992;17(9):334-9. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(92)90306-t. |
| Vagner et al., Efficiency of homologous DNA recombination varies along the Bacillus subtilis chromosome. J Bacteriol. Sep. 1988;170(9):3978-82. |
| Vakulskas et al., A high-fidelity Cas9 mutant delivered as a ribonucleoprotein complex enables efficient gene editing in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Nat Med. Aug. 2018;24(8):1216-1224. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0137-0. Epub Aug. 6, 2018. |
| Van Brunt et al., Genetically Encoded Azide Containing Amino Acid in Mammalian Cells Enables Site-Specific Antibody-Drug Conjugates Using Click Cycloaddition Chemistry. Bioconjug Chem. Nov. 18, 2015;26(11):2249-60. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00359. Epub Sep. 11, 2015. |
| Van Brunt et al., Molecular Farming: Transgenic Animals as Bioreactors. Biotechnology (NY). 1988;6(10):1149-1154. doi: 10.1038/nbt1088-1149. |
| Van Den Oord et al., Pixel Recurrent Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research. Aug. 19, 2016. vol. 48. 11 pages. |
| Van Duyne et al., Teaching Cre to follow directions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jan. 6, 2009;106(1):4-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811624106. Epub Dec. 31, 2008. |
| Van Overbeek et al., DNA Repair Profiling Reveals Nonrandom Outcomes at Cas9-Mediated Breaks. Mol Cell. Aug. 18, 2016;63(4):633-646. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.037. Epub Aug. 4, 2016. |
| Van Swieten et al., A mutation in the fibroblast growth factor 14 gene is associated with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia [corrected]. Am J Hum Genet. Jan. 2003;72(1):191-9. Epub Dec. 13, 2002. |
| Van Wijk et al., Identification of 51 novel exons of the Usher syndrome type 2A (USH2A) gene that encode multiple conserved functional domains and that are mutated in patients with Usher syndrome type II. Am J Hum Genet. Apr. 2004;74(4):738-44. doi: 10.1086/383096. Epub Mar. 10, 2004. |
| Vanamee et al., FokI requires two specific DNA sites for cleavage. J Mol Biol. May 25, 2001;309(1):69-78. |
| Varga et al., Progressive vascular smooth muscle cell defects in a mouse model of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 28, 2006;103(9):3250-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600012103. Epub Feb. 21, 2006. |
| Varshney et al., The regulation and functions of DNA and RNA G-quadruplexes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. Aug. 2020;21(8):459-474. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0236-x. Epub Apr. 20, 2020. |
| Vellore et al., A group II intron-type open reading frame from the thermophile Bacillus (Geobacillus) stearothermophilus encodes a heat-stable reverse transcriptase. Appl Environ Microbiol. Dec. 2004;70(12):7140-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.12.7140-7147.2004. |
| Venken et al., Genome-wide manipulations of Drosophila melanogaster with transposons, Flp recombinase, and ΦC31 integrase. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;859:203-28. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-603-6_12. |
| Verma, The reverse transcriptase. Biochim Biophys Acta. Mar. 21, 1977;473(1):1-38. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(77)90005-1. |
| Vidal et al., Yeast forward and reverse ‘n’-hybrid systems. Nucleic Acids Res. Feb. 15, 1999;27(4):919-29. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.4.919. |
| Vigne et al., Third-generation adenovectors for gene therapy. Restor Neurol Neurosci. Jan. 1, 1995;8(1):35-6. doi: 10.3233/RNN-1995-81208. |
| Vik et al., Endonuclease V cleaves at inosines in RNA. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2271. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3271. |
| Vilenchik et al., Endogenous DNA double-strand breaks: production, fidelity of repair, and induction of cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 28, 2003;100(22):12871-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2135498100. Epub Oct. 17, 2003. |
| Villiger et al., Treatment of a metabolic liver disease by in vivo genome base editing in adult mice. Nat Med. Oct. 2018;24(10):1519-1525. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0209-1. Epub Oct. 8, 2018. |
| Vitreschak et al., Regulation of the vitamin B12 metabolism and transport in bacteria by a conserved RNA structural element. RNA. Sep. 2003;9(9):1084-97. |
| Voigt et al., Rational evolutionary design: the theory of in vitro protein evolution. Adv Protein Chem. 2000;55:79-160. |
| Vriend et al., Nick-initiated homologous recombination: Protecting the genome, one strand at a time. DNA Repair (Amst). Feb. 2017;50:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.12.005. Epub Dec. 29, 2016. |
| Wacey et al., Disentangling the perturbational effects of amino acid substitutions in the DNA-binding domain of p53. Hum Genet. Jan. 1999;104(1):15-22. |
| Wadia et al., Modulation of cellular function by TAT mediated transduction of full length proteins. Curr Protein Pept Sci. Apr. 2003;4(2):97-104. |
| Wadia et al., Transducible TAT-HA fusogenic peptide enhances escape of TAT-fusion proteins after lipid raft macropinocytosis. Nat Med. Mar. 2004;10(3):310-5. Epub Feb. 8, 2004. |
| Wah et al., Structure of FokI has implications for DNA cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 1, 1998;95(18):10564-9. |
| Wals et al., Unnatural amino acid incorporation in E. coli: current and future applications in the design of therapeutic proteins. Front Chem. Apr. 1, 2014;2:15. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00015. eCollection 2014. |
| Walton et al., Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants. Science. Apr. 17, 2020;368(6488):290-296. doi: 10.1126/science.aba8853. Epub Mar. 26, 2020. |
| Wan et al., Material solutions for delivery of CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing tools: Current status and future outlook. Materials Today. Jun. 2019;26:40-66. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.12.003. |
| Wang et al. CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Assisted Cytidine Deaminase Enable Precise and Efficient Genome Editing in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84(23):e01834-18. Published Nov. 15, 2018. doi:10.1128/AEM.01834-18. |
| Wang et al., AID upmutants isolated using a high-throughput screen highlight the immunity/cancer balance limiting DNA deaminase activity. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Jul. 2009;16(7):769-76. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1623. Epub Jun. 21, 2009. |
| Wang et al., Continuous directed evolutions of proteins with improved soluble expression. Nature Chemical Biology. Nat Publishing Group. Aug. 20, 2018; 14(10):972-980. |
| Wang et al., CRISPR-Cas9 Targeting of PCSK9 in Human Hepatocytes In Vivo-Brief Report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. May 2016;36(5):783-6. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307227. Epub Mar. 3, 2016. |
| Wang et al., Efficient delivery of genome-editing proteins using bioreducible lipid nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 29, 2016. pii: 201520244. [Epub ahead of print]. |
| Wang et al., Enhanced base editing by co-expression of free uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor. Cell Res. Oct. 2017;27(1):1289-92. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.111. Epub Aug. 29, 2017. |
| Wang et al., Evolution of new nonantibody proteins via iterative somatic hypermutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 30, 2004;101(48):16745-9. Epub Nov. 19, 2004. |
| Wang et al., Expanding the genetic code. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol; Struct. 2006;35:225-49. Review. |
| Wang et al., Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science. Jan. 3, 2014;343(6166):80-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1246981. Epub Dec. 12, 2013. |
| Wang et al., Highly efficient CRISPR/HDR-mediated knock-in for mouse embryonic stem cells and zygotes. Biotechniques. 2015:59,201-2;204;206-8. |
| Wang et al., N(6)-methyladenosine Modulates Messenger RNA Translation Efficiency. Cell. Jun. 4, 2015;161(6):1388-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.014. |
| Wang et al., N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature. Jan. 2, 2014;505(7481):117-20. doi: 10.1038/nature12730. Epub Nov. 27, 2013. |
| Wang et al., Nucleation, propagation and cleavage of target RNAs in Ago silencing complexes. Nature. Oct. 8, 2009;461(7265):754-61. doi: 10.1038/nature08434. |
| Wang et al., One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell. May 9, 2013;153(4):910-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025. Epub May 2, 2013. |
| Wang et al., Optimized paired-sgRNA/Cas9 cloning and expression cassette triggers high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in kiwifruit. Plant Biotechnol J. Aug. 2018;16(8):1424-1433. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12884. Epub Feb. 6, 2018. |
| Wang et al., Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature. Aug. 13, 2009;460(7257):894-8. Epub Jul. 26, 2009. |
| Wang et al., Reading RNA methylation codes through methyl-specific binding proteins. RNA Biol. 2014;11(6):669-72. doi: 10.4161/rna.28829. Epub Apr. 24, 2014. |
| Wang et al., Recombinase technology: applications and possibilities. Plant Cell Rep. Mar. 2011;30(3):267-85. doi: 10.1007/s00299-010-0938-1. Epub Oct. 24, 2010. |
| Wang et al., Riboswitches that sense S-adenosylhomocysteine and activate genes involved in coenzyme recycling. Mol Cell. Mar. 28, 2008;29(6):691-702. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.012. |
| Wang et al., Staphylococcus aureus protein SAUGI acts as a uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 2014;42(2):1354-64. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt964. Epub Oct. 22, 2013. |
| Wang et al., Structural basis of N(6)-adenosine methylation by the METTL3-METTL14 complex. Nature. Jun. 23, 2016;534(7608):575-8. doi: 10.1038/nature18298. Epub May 25, 2016. |
| Wang et al., Targeted gene addition to a predetermined site in the human genome using a ZFN-based nicking enzyme. Genome Res. Jul. 2012;22(7):1316-26. doi: 10.1101/gr.122879.111. Epub Mar. 20, 2012. |
| Wang et al., Uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor gene of bacteriophage PBS2 encodes a binding protein specific for uracil-DNA glycosylase. J Biol Chem. Jan. 15, 1989;264(2):1163-71. |
| Warren et al., A chimeric Cre recombinase with regulated directionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Nov. 25, 2008;105(47):18278-83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809949105. Epub Nov. 14, 2008. |
| Warren et al., Mutations in the amino-terminal domain of lambda-integrase have differential effects on integrative and excisive recombination. Mol Microbiol. Feb. 2005;55(4):1104-12. |
| Warren et al., Structure of the human MutSalpha DNA lesion recognition complex. Mol Cell. May 25, 2007;26(4):579-92. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.04.018. |
| Watowich, The erythropoietin receptor: molecular structure and hematopoietic signaling pathways. J Investig Med. Oct. 2011;59(7):1067-72. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e31820fb28c. |
| Waxman et al., Regulating excitability of peripheral afferents: emerging ion channel targets. Nat Neurosci. Feb. 2014;17(2):153-63. doi: 10.1038/nn.3602. Epub Jan. 28, 2014. |
| Weber et al., Assembly of designer TAL effectors by Golden Gate cloning. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019722. Epub May 19, 2011. |
| Weill et al., DNA polymerases in adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. Apr. 2008;8(4):302-12. doi: 10.1038/nri2281. Epub Mar. 14, 2008. |
| Weinberg et al., New Classes of Self-Cleaving Ribozymes Revealed by Comparative Genomics Analysis. Nat Chem Biol. Aug. 2015;11(8):606-10. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1846. Epub Jul. 13, 2015. |
| Weinberg et al., The aptamer core of SAM-IV riboswitches mimics the ligand-binding site of SAM-I riboswitches. RNA. May 2008;14(5):822-8. doi: 10.1261/rna.988608. Epub Mar. 27, 2008. |
| Weinberger et al., Disease-causing mutations C277R and C277Y modify gating of human CIC-1 chloride channels in myotonia congenita. J Physiol. Aug. 1, 2012;590(Pt 15):3449-64. doi: 0.1113/jphysiol.2012.232785. Epub May 28, 2012. |
| Weinert et al., Unbiased detection of CRISPR off-targets in vivo using Discover-Seq. Science. Apr. 19, 2019;364(6437):286-289. doi: 10.1126/science.aav9023. Epub Apr. 18, 2019. |
| Weiss et al., Loss-of-function mutations in sodium channel Nav1.7 cause anosmia. Nature. Apr. 14, 2011;472(7342):186-90. doi: 10.1038/nature09975. Epub Mar. 23, 2011. |
| Wen et al., Inclusion of a universal tetanus toxoid CD4(+) T cell epitope P2 significantly enhanced the immunogenicity of recombinant rotavirus ΔVP8* subunit parenteral vaccines. Vaccine. Jul. 31, 2014;32(35):4420-4427. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.06.060. Epub Jun. 21, 2014. |
| West et al., Gene expression in adeno-associated virus vectors: the effects of chimeric mRNA structure, helper virus, and adenovirus VA1 RNA. Virology. Sep. 1987;160(1):38-47. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90041-9. |
| Wharton et al., A new-specificity mutant of 434 repressor that defines an amino acid-base pair contact. Nature. Apr. 30-May 6, 1987;326(6116):888-91. |
| Wharton et al., Changing the binding specificity of a repressor by redesigning an alpha-helix. Nature. Aug. 15-21, 1985;316(6029):601-5. |
| Wheeler et al., The thermostability and specificity of ancient proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. Jun. 2016;38:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.05.015. Epub Jun. 9, 2016. |
| Wiedenheft et al., RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature. Feb. 15, 2012;482(7385):331-8. doi: 10.1038/nature10886. Review. |
| Wienert et al., KLF1 drives the expression of fetal hemoglobin in British HPFH. Blood. Aug. 10, 2017;130(6):803-807. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-02-767400. Epub Jun. 28, 2017. |
| Wijesinghe et al., Efficient deamination of 5-methylcytosines in DNA by human APOBEC3A, but not by AID or APOBEC3G. Nucleic Acids Res. Oct. 2012;40(18):9206-17. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks685. Epub Jul. 13, 2012. |
| Wijnker et al., Managing meiotic recombination in plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci. Dec. 2008; 13(12):640-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.09.004. Epub Oct. 22, 2008. |
| Williams et al., Assessing the accuracy of ancestral protein reconstruction methods. PLoS Comput Biol. Jun. 23, 2006;2(6):e69. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020069. Epub Jun. 23, 2006. |
| Willis et al., Compact zinc finger base editors that edit mitochondrial or nuclear DNA in vitro and in vivo. Nat Commun. Nov. 23, 2022;13(1):7204. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34784-7. |
| Wills et al., Pseudoknot-dependent read-through of retroviral gag termination codons: importance of sequences in the spacer and loop 2. EMBO J. Sep. 1, 1994;13(17):4137-44. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06731.x. |
| Wilson et al., Assessing annotation transfer for genomics: quantifying the relations between protein sequence, structure and function through traditional and probabilistic scores. J Mol Biol 2000;297:233-49. |
| Wilson et al., Formation of infectious hybrid virions with gibbon ape leukemia virus and human T-cell leukemia virus retroviral envelope glycoproteins and the gag and pol proteins of Moloney murine leukemia virus. J Virol. May 1989;63(5):2374-8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.63.5.23742378.1989. |
| Wilson et al., In Vitro Selection of Functional Nucleic Acids. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:611-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.611. |
| Wilson et al., Kinase dynamics. Using ancient protein kinases to unravel a modern cancer drug's mechanism. Science. Feb. 20, 2015;347(6224):882-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1823. |
| Wilson et al., Programmable m6A modification of cellular RNAs with a Cas13-directed methyltransferase. Nat Biotechnol. Dec. 2020;38(12):1431-1440. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0572-6. Epub Jun. 29, 2020. |
| Winkler et al., An mRNA structure that controls gene expression by binding FMN. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 10, 2002;99(25):15908-13. Epub Nov. 27, 2002. |
| Winkler et al., Control of gene expression by a natural metabolite-responsive ribozyme. Nature. Mar. 18, 2004;428(6980):281-6. |
| Winkler et al., Thiamine derivatives bind messenger RNAs directly to regulate bacterial gene expression. Nature. Oct. 31, 2002;419(6910):952-6. Epub Oct. 16, 2002. |
| Winoto et al., A novel, inducible and T cell-specific enhancer located at the 3′ end of the T cell receptor alpha locus. Embo J. Mar. 1989;8(3):729-33. |
| Winter et al., Drug Development. Phthalimide conjugation as a strategy for in vivo target protein degradation. Science. Jun. 19, 2015;348(6241):1376-81. doi:; 10.1126/science.aab1433. Epub May 21, 2015. |
| Winter et al., Targeted exon skipping with AAV-mediated split adenine base editors. Cell Discov. Aug. 20, 2019;5:41. doi: 10.1038/s41421-019-0109-7. |
| Wirth et al., Mildly affected patients with spinal muscular atrophy are partially protected by an increased SMN2 copy number. Hum Genet. May 2006;119(4):422-8. doi: 10.1007/s00439-006-0156-7. Epub Mar. 1, 2006. |
| Witkowski et al., Conversion of a beta-ketoacyl synthase to a malonyl decarboxylase by replacement of the active-site cysteine with glutamine. Biochemistry. Sep. 7, 1999;38(36):11643-50. doi: 10.1021/bi990993h. |
| Wold, Replication protein A: a heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem. 1997;66:61-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.61. |
| Wolf et al., tadA, an essential tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase from Escherichia coli. EMBO J. Jul. 15, 2002;21(14):3841-51. |
| Wolfe et al., Analysis of zinc fingers optimized via phage display: evaluating the utility of a recognition code. J Mol Biol. Feb. 5, 1999;285(5):1917-34. |
| Wong et al., A statistical analysis of random mutagenesis methods used for directed protein evolution. J Mol Biol. Jan. 27, 2006;355(4):858-71. Epub Nov. 17, 2005. |
| Wong et al., The Diversity Challenge in Directed Protein Evolution. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. May 2006;9(4):271-88. |
| Woo et al., Gene activation of SMN by selective disruption of IncRNA-mediated recruitment of PRC2 for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 21, 2017;114(8):E1509-E1518. doi:10.1073/pnas.1616521114. Epub Feb. 13, 2017. |
| Wood et al., A genetic system yields self-cleaving inteins for bioseparations. Nat Biotechnol. Sep. 1999;17(9):889-92. doi: 10.1038/12879. |
| Wood et al., Targeted genome editing across species using ZFNs and TALENs. Science. Jul. 15, 2011;333(6040):307. doi: 10.1126/science.1207773. Epub Jun. 23, 2011. |
| Woods et al., The phenotype of congenital insensitivity to pain due to the NaV1.9 variant p.L811P. Eur J Hum Genet. May 2015;23(5):561-3. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.166. Epub Aug. 13, 2014. |
| Wright et al., Continuous in vitro evolution of catalytic function. Science. Apr. 25, 1997;276(5312):614-7. |
| Wright et al., Rational design of a split-Cas9 enzyme complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar. 10, 2015;112(10):2984-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501698112. Epub Feb. 23, 2015. |
| Wu et al., A novel SCN9A mutation responsible for primary erythromelalgia and is resistant to the treatment of sodium channel blockers. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055212. Epub Jan. 31, 2013. 15 pages. |
| Wu et al., Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell Stem Cell. Dec. 5, 2013;13(6):659-62. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.10.016. |
| Wu et al., Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol. Jul. 2014;32(7):670-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2889. Epub Apr. 20, 2014. |
| Wu et al., Human single-stranded DNA binding proteins: guardians of genome stability. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). Jul. 2016;48(7):671-7. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmw044. Epub May 23, 2016. |
| Wu et al., MLV based viral-like-particles for delivery of toxic proteins and nuclear transcription factors. Biomaterials. Sep. 2014;35(29):8416-26. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.006. Epub Jul. 3, 2014. |
| Wu et al., Protein trans-splicing and functional mini-inteins of a cyanobacterial dnaB intein. Biochim Biophys Acta. Sep. 8, 1998;1387(1-2):422-32. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(98)00157-5. |
| Wu et al., Protein trans-splicing by a split intein encoded in a split DnaE gene of Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 4, 1998;95(16):9226-31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9226. |
| Wu et al., Readers, writers and erasers of N6-methylated adenosine modification. Curr Opin Struct Biol. Dec. 2017;47:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.05.011. Epub Jun. 16, 2017. |
| Wu et al., Widespread Influence of 3′-End Structures on Mammalian mRNA Processing and Stability. Cell. May 18, 2017;169(5):905-917.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.036. |
| Xi et al., C-terminal Loop Mutations Determine Folding and Secretion Properties of PCSK9. Biochem Mol Biol J. 2016;2(3):17. doi: 10.21767/2471-8084.100026. 12 pages. |
| Xiang et al., RNA m6A methylation regulates the ultraviolet-induced DNA damage response. Nature. Mar. 23, 2017;543(7646):573-576. doi: 10.1038/nature21671. Epub Mar. 15, 2017. |
| Xiao et al., Genetic incorporation of multiple unnatural amino acids into proteins in mammalian cells. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Dec. 23, 2013;52(52):14080-3. doi: 10.1002/anie.201308137. Epub Nov. 8, 2013. |
| Xiao et al., Nuclear m(6)A Reader YTHDC1 Regulates mRNA Splicing. Mol Cell. Feb. 18, 2016;61(4):507-519. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.012. Epub Feb. 11, 2016. |
| Xie et al., Adjusting the attB site in donor plasmid improves the efficiency of ΦC31 integrase system. DNA Cell Biol. Jul. 2012;31(7):1335-40. doi: 10.1089/dna.2011.1590. Epub Apr. 10, 2012. |
| Xiong et al., Origin and evolution of retroelements based upon their reverse transcriptase sequences. Embo J. Oct. 1990;9(10):3353-62. |
| Xu et al., Accuracy and efficiency define Bxb1 integrase as the best of fifteen candidate serine recombinases for the integration of DNA into the human genome. BMC Biotechnol. Oct. 20, 2013;13:87. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-13-87. |
| Xu et al., Chemical ligation of folded recombinant proteins: segmental isotopic labeling of domains for NMR studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jan. 19, 1999;96(2):388-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.388. |
| Xu et al., Multiplex nucleotide editing by high-fidelity Cas9 variants with improved efficiency in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):511. Published Nov. 21, 2019. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2131-1. Includes supplementary data and materials. |
| Xu et al., Protein splicing: an analysis of the branched intermediate and its resolution by succinimide formation. Embo J. Dec. 1, 1994;13(23):5517-22. |
| Xu et al., Ptmd: A Database of Human Disease-associated Post-translational Modifications. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. Aug. 2018;16(4):244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2018.06.004. Epub Sep. 21, 2018. |
| Xu et al., Sequence determinants of improved CRISPR sgRNA design. Genome Res. Aug. 2015;25(8):1147-57. doi: 10.1101/gr.191452.115. Epub Jun. 10, 2015. |
| Xu et al., Structures of human ALKBH5 demethylase reveal a unique binding mode for specific single-stranded N6-methyladenosine RNA demethylation. J Biol Chem. Jun. 20, 2014;289(25):17299-311. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.550350. Epub Apr. 28, 2014. |
| Xu et al., The mechanism of protein splicing and its modulation by mutation. EMBO J. Oct. 1, 1996;15(19):5146-53. |
| Yahata et al., Unified, Efficient, and Scalable Synthesis of Halichondrins: Zirconium/Nickel-Mediated One-Pot Ketone Synthesis as the Final Coupling Reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Aug. 28, 2017;56(36):10796-10800. doi: 10.1002/anie.201705523. Epub Jul. 28, 2017. |
| Yamada et al., Crystal Structure of the Minimal Cas9 from Campylobacter jejuni Reveals the Molecular Diversity in the CRISPR-Cas9 Systems. Mol Cell. Mar. 16, 2017;65(6):P1109-1121. /doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.007. |
| Yamamoto et al., The ons and offs of inducible transgenic technology: a review. Neurobiol Dis. Dec. 2001;8(6):923-32. |
| Yamamoto et al., Virological and immunological bases for HIV-1 vaccine design. Uirusu 2007;57(2):133-139. https://doi.org/10.2222/jsv.57.133. |
| Yamane et al., Deep-sequencing identification of the genomic targets of the cytidine deaminase AID and its cofactor RPA in B lymphocytes. Nat Immunol. Jan. 2011;12(1):62-9. doi: 10.1038/ni.1964. Epub Nov. 28, 2010. |
| Yamano et al., Crystal Structure of Cpf1 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA. Cell. May 5, 2016;165(4):949-62 and Supplemental Info. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.003. Epub Apr. 21, 2016. |
| Yamano et al., Crystal Structure of Cpf1 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA. Cell. May 5, 2016;165(4):949-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.003. Epub Apr. 21, 2016. |
| Yamazaki et al., Segmental Isotope Labeling for Protein NMR Using Peptide Splicing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. May 22, 1998; 120(22):5591-2. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9807760. |
| Yan et al., Cas13d Is a Compact RNA-Targeting Type VI CRISPR Effector Positively Modulated by a WYL-Domain-Containing Accessory Protein. Mol Cell. Apr. 19, 2018;70(2):327-339.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.028. Epub Mar. 15, 2018. |
| Yan et al., Functionally diverse type V CRISPR-Cas systems. Science. Jan. 4, 2019;363(6422):88-91. doi: 10.1126/science.aav7271. Epub Dec. 6, 2018. |
| Yan et al., Highly Efficient A⋅T to G⋅C Base Editing by Cas9n-Guided tRNA Adenosine Deaminase in Rice. Mol Plant. Apr. 2, 2018;11(4):631-634. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.008. Epub Feb. 22, 2018. |
| Yang et al., A Tale of Two Moieties: Rapidly Evolving CRISPR/Cas-Based Genome Editing. Trends Biochem Sci. Oct. 2020;45(10):874-888. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2020.06.003. Epub Jun. 30, 2020. |
| Yang et al., APOBEC: From mutator to editor. J Genet Genomics. Sep. 20, 2017;44(9):423-437. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2017.04.009. Epub Aug. 7, 2017. |
| Yang et al., BRCA2 function in DNA binding and recombination from a BRCA2-DSS1-ssDNA structure. Science. Sep. 13, 2002;297(5588):1837-48. doi: 10.1126/science.297.5588.1837. |
| Yang et al., Construction of an integration-proficient vector based on the site-specific recombination mechanism of enterococcal temperate phage phiFC1. J Bacteriol. Apr. 2002;184(7):1859-64. doi: 10.1128/jb.184.7.1859-1864.2002. |
| Yang et al., Engineering and optimising deaminase fusions for genome editing. Nat Commun. Nov. 2, 2016;7:13330. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13330. |
| Yang et al., Genome editing with targeted deaminases. BioRxiv. Preprint. First posted online Jul. 28, 2016. |
| Yang et al., Genome-wide inactivation of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). Science. Nov. 27, 2015;350(6264):1101-4. doi: 10.1126/science.aad1191. Epub Oct. 11, 2015. |
| Yang et al., Increasing targeting scope of adenosine base editors in mouse and rat embryos through fusion of TadA deaminase with Cas9 variants. Protein Cell. Sep. 2018;9(9):814-819. doi: 10.1007/s13238-018-0568-x. |
| Yang et al., Mutations in SCN9A, encoding a sodium channel alpha subunit, in patients with primary erythermalgia. J Med Genet. Mar. 2004;41(3):171-4. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.012153. |
| Yang et al., New CRISPR-Cas systems discovered. Cell Res. Mar. 2017;27(3):313-314. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.21. Epub Feb. 21, 2017. |
| Yang et al., One Prime for All Editing. Cell. Dec. 12, 2019;179(7):1448-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.030. |
| Yang et al., One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell. Sep. 12, 2013;154(6):1370-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.022. Epub Aug. 29, 2013. |
| Yang et al., PAM-dependent Target DNA Recognition and Cleavage by C2C1 CRISPR-Cas endonuclease. Cell Dec. 2016;167(7):1814-28. |
| Yang et al., Permanent genetic memory with >1-byte capacity. Nat Methods. Dec. 2014;11(12):1261-6. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3147. Epub Oct. 26, 2014. |
| Yang et al., Preparation of RNA-directed DNA polymerase from spleens of Balb-c mice infected with Rauscher leukemia virus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Apr. 28, 1972;47(2):505-11. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(72)90743-7. |
| Yang et al., Small-molecule control of insulin and PDGF receptor signaling and the role of membrane attachment. Curr Biol. Jan. 1, 1998;8(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70015-6. |
| Yang et al., The BRCA2 homologue Brh2 nucleates RAD51 filament formation at a dsDNA-ssDNA junction. Nature. Feb. 10, 2005;433(7026):653-7. doi: 10.1038/nature03234. |
| Yang, Development of Human Genome Editing Tools for the Study of Genetic Variations and Gene Therapies. Doctoral Dissertation. Harvard University. 2013. Accessible via nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11181072. 277 pages. |
| Yang, Nucleases: diversity of structure, function and mechanism. Q Rev Biophys. Feb. 2011;44(1):1-93. doi: 10.1017/S0033583510000181. Epub Sep. 21, 2010. |
| Yang, PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. Aug. 2007;24(8):1586-91. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm088. Epub May 4, 2007. |
| Yang, Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (PAML). //abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/paml.html Last accessed Apr. 28, 2021. |
| Yanover et al., Extensive protein and DNA backbone sampling improves structure-based specificity prediction for C2H2 zinc fingers. Nucleic Acids Res. Jun. 2011;39(11):4564-76. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr048. Epub Feb. 22, 2011. |
| Yasui et al., Miscoding Properties of 2′-Deoxyinosine, a Nitric Oxide-Derived DNA Adduct, during Translesion Synthesis Catalyzed by Human DNA Polymerases. J Molec Biol. Apr. 4, 2008;377(4):1015-23. |
| Yasui, Alternative excision repair pathways. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. Jun. 1, 2013;5(6):a012617. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012617. |
| Yasukawa et al., Characterization of Moloney murine leukaemia virus/avian myeloblastosis virus chimeric reverse transcriptases. J Biochem. Mar. 2009;145(3):315-24. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvn166. Epub Dec. 6, 2008. |
| Yazaki et al., Hereditary systemic amyloidosis associated with a new apolipoprotein AII stop codon mutation Stop78Arg. Kidney Int. Jul. 2003;64(1):11-6. |
| Yeh et al., In vivo base editing of post-mitotic sensory cells. Nat Commun. Jun. 5, 2018;9(1):2184. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04580-3. |
| Yeh et al., In vivo base editing restores sensory transduction and transiently improves auditory function in a mouse model of recessive deafness. Sci Transl Med. Jun. 3, 2020;12(546):eaay9101. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay9101. |
| Yi et al., Engineering of TEV protease variants by yeast ER sequestration screening (YESS) of combinatorial libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 30, 2013;110(18):7229-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215994110. Epub Apr. 15, 2013. |
| Yin et al., Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype. Nat Biotechnol. Jun. 2014;32(6):551-3. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2884. Epub Mar. 30, 2014. |
| Yokoe et al., Spatial dynamics of GFP-tagged proteins investigated by local fluorescence enhancement. Nat Biotechnol. Oct. 1996;14(10):1252-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt1096-1252. |
| Young et al., Beyond the canonical 20 amino acids: expanding the genetic lexicon. J Biol Chem. Apr. 9, 2010;285(15):11039-44. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R109.091306. Epub Feb. 10, 2010. |
| Yu et al., Circular permutation: a different way to engineer enzyme structure and function. Trends Biotechnol. Jan. 2011;29(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.10.004. Epub Nov. 17, 2010. |
| Yu et al., Cytosine base editors with minimized unguided DNA and RNA off-target events and high on-target activity. Nat Commun. Apr. 28, 2020;11(1):2052. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15887-5. |
| Yu et al., Dynamic control of Rad51 recombinase by self-association and interaction with BRCA2. Mol Cell. Oct. 2003;12(4):1029-41. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00394-0. |
| Yu et al., Liposome-mediated in vivo E1A gene transfer suppressed dissemination of ovarian cancer cells that overexpress HER-2/neu. Oncogene. Oct. 5, 1995;11(7):1383-8. |
| Yu et al., Progress towards gene therapy for HIV infection. Gene Ther. Jan. 1994;1(1):13-26. |
| Yu et al., Small molecules enhance CRISPR genome editing in pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. Feb. 5, 2015;16(2):142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.01.003. |
| Yu et al., Synthesis-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining accounts for multiple types of repair junctions. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep. 2010;38(17):5706-17. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq379. Epub May 11, 2010. |
| Yuan et al., Laboratory-directed protein evolution. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2005; 69(3):373-92. PMID: 16148303. |
| Yuan et al., Tetrameric structure of a serine integrase catalytic domain. Structure. Aug. 6, 2008;16(8):1275-86. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2008.04.018. |
| Yuen et al., Control of transcription factor activity and osteoblast differentiation in mammalian cells using an evolved small-molecule-dependent intein. J Am Chem Soc. Jul. 12, 2006;128(27):8939-46. |
| Zakas et al., Enhancing the pharmaceutical properties of protein drugs by ancestral sequence reconstruction. Nat Biotechnol. Jan. 2017;35(1):35-37. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3677. Epub Sep. 26, 2016. |
| Zalatan et al., Engineering complex synthetic transcriptional programs with CRISPR RNA scaffolds. Cell. Jan. 15, 2015;160(1-2):339-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.052. Epub Dec. 18, 2014. |
| Zelphati et al., Intracellular delivery of proteins with a new lipid-mediated delivery system. J Biol Chem. Sep. 14, 2001;276(37):35103-10. Epub Jul. 10, 2001. |
| Zeng et al., Correction of the Marfan Syndrome Pathogenic FBN1 Mutation by Base Editing in Human Cells and Heterozygous Embryos. Mol Ther. Nov. 7, 2018;26(11):2631-2637. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.08.007. Epub Aug. 14, 2018. |
| Zetsche et al., A split-Cas9 architecture for inducible genome editing and transcription modulation. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2015;33(2):139-42. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3149. |
| Zetsche et al., Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell. Oct. 22, 2015;163(3):759-71 and Supplemental Info. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038. Epub Sep. 25, 2015. |
| Zetsche et al., Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell. Oct. 22, 2015;163(3):759-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038. Epub Sep. 25, 2015. |
| Zettler et al., The naturally split Npu DnaE intein exhibits an extraordinarily high rate in the protein trans-splicing reaction. FEBS Lett. Mar. 4, 2009;583(5):909-14. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.02.003. Epub Feb. 10, 2009. |
| Zhang et al., II-Clamp-mediated cysteine conjugation. Nat Chem. Feb. 2016;8(2):120-8. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2413. Epub Dec. 21, 2015. |
| Zhang et al., A new strategy for the site-specific modification of proteins in vivo. Biochemistry. Jun. 10, 2003;42(22):6735-46. |
| Zhang et al., Adenine Base Editing In Vivo with a Single Adeno-Associated Virus Vector. BioRxiv. Dec. 13, 2021. DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.13.472434. Retrieved from https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.13.472434v1.fu11 on Aug. 1, 2023. 47 pages. |
| Zhang et al., Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell. Sep. 26, 2013;51(6):792-806. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.017. Epub Sep. 12, 2013. |
| Zhang et al., Comparison of non-canonical PAMs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage in human cells. Sci Rep. Jun. 2014;4:5405. |
| Zhang et al., Conditional gene manipulation: Cre-ating a new biological era. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. Jul. 2012;13(7):511-24. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1200042. Review. |
| Zhang et al., Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2009;10:451-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164217. |
| Zhang et al., CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing: progress, implications and challenges. Hum Mol Genet. Sep. 15, 2014;23(R1):R40-6. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu125. Epub Mar. 20, 2014. |
| Zhang et al., Efficient construction of sequence-specific TAL effectors for modulating mammalian transcription. Nat Biotechnol. Feb. 2011;29(2):149-53. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1775. Epub Jan. 19, 2011. |
| Zhang et al., Efficient precise knockin with a double cut HDR donor after CRISPR/Cas9-mediated double-stranded DNA cleavage. Genome Biol. Feb. 20, 2017;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1164-8. |
| Zhang et al., Global analysis of small RNA and mRNA targets of Hfq. Mol Microbiol. Nov. 2003;50(4):1111-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03734.x. |
| Zhang et al., Large genomic fragment deletions and insertions in mouse using CRISPR/Cas9. PLoS One. Mar. 24, 2015;10(3):e0120396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120396. 14 pages. |
| Zhang et al., Myoediting: Toward Prevention of Muscular Dystrophy by Therapeutic Genome Editing. Physiol Rev. Jul. 1, 2018;98(3):1205-1240. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00046.2017. |
| Zhang et al., Programmable base editing of zebrafish genome using a modified CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Commun. Jul. 25, 2017;8(1):118. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00175-6. |
| Zhang et al., Propagated Perturbations from a Peripheral Mutation Show Interactions Supporting WW Domain Thermostability. Structure. Nov. 6, 2018;26(11):1474-1485.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2018.07.014. Epub Sep. 6, 2018. |
| Zhang et al., Reconstitution of 5′-directed human mismatch repair in a purified system. Cell. Sep. 9, 2005;122(5):693-705. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.027. |
| Zhang et al., Reversible RNA Modification N1-methyladenosine (m1A) in mRNA and tRNA. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. Jun. 2018; 16(3):155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2018.03.003. Epub Jun. 14, 2018. |
| Zhang et al., Ribozymes and Riboswitches: Modulation of RNA Function by Small Molecules. Biochemistry. Nov. 2, 2010;49(43):9123-31. doi: 10.1021/bi1012645. |
| Zhang et al., Stabilized plasmid-lipid particles for regional gene therapy: formulation and transfection properties. Gene Ther. Aug. 1999;6(8):1438-47. |
| Zhao et al., An ultraprocessive, accurate reverse transcriptase encoded by a metazoan group II intron. RNA. Feb. 2018;24(2):183-195. doi: 10.1261/rna.063479.117. Epub Nov. 6, 2017. |
| Zhao et al., Crystal structures of a group II intron maturase reveal a missing link in spliceosome evolution. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Jun. 2016;23(6):558-65. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3224. Epub May 2, 2016. |
| Zhao et al., Post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. Jan. 2017;18(1):31-42. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.132. Epub Nov. 3, 2016. |
| Zheng et al., ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol Cell. Jan. 10, 2013;49(1):18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.015. Epub Nov. 21, 2012. |
| Zheng et al., DNA editing in DNA/RNA hybrids by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 7, 2017;45(6):3369-3377. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx050. |
| Zheng et al., Highly efficient base editing in bacteria using a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion. Commun Biol. Apr. 19, 2018;1:32. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0035-5. |
| Zheng et al., Structural basis for the complete resistance of the human prion protein mutant G127V to prion disease. Sci Rep. Sep. 4, 2018;8(1):13211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31394-6. |
| Zhong et al., Rational Design of Aptazyme Riboswitches for Efficient Control of Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells. Elife. Nov. 2, 2016;5:e18858. doi: 10.7554/eLife.18858. |
| Zhou et al., Cas12a variants designed for lower genome-wide off-target effect through stringent PAM recognition. Mol Ther. Jan. 5, 2022;30(1):244-255. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.10.010. Epub Oct. 20, 2021. |
| Zhou et al., Dynamic m(6)A mRNA methylation directs translational control of heat shock response. Nature. Oct. 22, 2015;526(7574):591-4. doi: 10.1038/nature15377. Epub Oct. 12, 2015. |
| Zhou et al., GISSD: Group I Intron Sequence and Structure Database. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 2008;36(Database issue):D31-7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm766. Epub Oct. 16, 2007. |
| Zhou et al., Off-target RNA mutation induced by DNA base editing and its elimination by mutagenesis. Nature. Jul. 2019;571(7764):275-278. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1314-0. Epub Jun. 10, 2019. |
| Zhou et al., Protective V127 prion variant prevents prion disease by interrupting the formation of dimer and fibril from molecular dynamics simulations. Sci Rep. Feb. 24, 2016;6:21804. doi: 10.1038/srep21804. |
| Zhou et al., Seamless Genetic Conversion of SMN2 to SMN1 via CRISPR/Cpf1 and Single-Stranded Oligodeoxynucleotides in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Hum Gene Ther. Nov. 2018;29(11):1252-1263. doi: 10.1089/hum.2017.255. Epub May 9, 2018. |
| Zhu et al., Novel Thrombotic Function of a Human SNP in STXBP5 Revealed by CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. Feb. 2017;37(2):264-270. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308614. Epub Dec. 29, 2016. |
| Zielenski, Genotype and phenotype in cystic fibrosis. Respiration. 2000;67(2):117-33. doi: 10.1159/000029497. |
| Zimmerly et al., An Unexplored Diversity of Reverse Transcriptases in Bacteria. Microbiol Spectr. Apr. 2015;3(2):MDNA3-0058-2014. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0058-2014. |
| Zimmerly et al., Group II intron mobility occurs by target DNA-primed reverse transcription. Cell. Aug. 25, 1995;82(4):545-54. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90027-6. |
| Zimmermann et al., Molecular interactions and metal binding in the theophylline-binding core of an RNA aptamer. RNA. May 2000;6(5):659-67. |
| Zolotukhin et al., Production and purification of serotype 1, 2, and 5 recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors. Methods. Oct. 2002;28(2):158-67. doi: 10.1016/s1046-2023(02)00220-7. |
| Zong et al., Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol. May 2017;35(5):438-440. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3811. Epub Feb. 27, 2017. |
| Zorko et al., Cell-penetrating peptides: mechanism and kinetics of cargo delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. Feb. 28, 2005;57(4):529-45. Epub Jan. 22, 2005. |
| Zou et al., Gene targeting of a disease-related gene in human induced pluripotent stem and embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. Jul. 2, 2009;5(1):97-110. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.023. Epub Jun. 18, 2009. |
| Zufferey et al., Woodchuck hepatitis virus posttranscriptional regulatory element enhances expression of transgenes delivered by retroviral vectors. J Virol. Apr. 1999;73(4):2886-92. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.4.2886-2892.1999. |
| Zuker et al., Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 10, 1981;9(1):133-48. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.1.133. |
| Zuo et al., Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos. Science. Apr. 19, 2019;364(6437):289-292. doi: 10.1126/science.aav9973. Epub Feb. 28, 2019. |
| Zuris et al., Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:73-80. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20240158779 A1 | May 2024 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63116785 | Nov 2020 | US | |
| 63022397 | May 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 18053269 | Nov 2022 | US |
| Child | 18534489 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/US2021/031439 | May 2021 | WO |
| Child | 18053269 | US |
