Methods for controlling microloading variation in semiconductor wafer layout and fabrication

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9122832
  • Patent Number
    9,122,832
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 30, 2009
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 1, 2015
    10 years ago
Abstract
Problematic open areas are identified in a semiconductor wafer layout. The problematic open areas have a size variation relative to one or more neighboring open areas of the layout sufficient to cause adverse microloading variation. In one embodiment, the adverse microloading variation is controlled by shifting a number of layout features to interdict the problematic open areas. In another embodiment, the adverse microloading variation is controlled by defining and placing a number of dummy layout features to shield actual layout features that neighbor the problematic open areas. In another embodiment, the adverse microloading variation is controlled by utilizing sacrificial layout features which are actually fabricated on the wafer temporarily to eliminate microloading variation, and which are subsequently removed from the wafer to leave behind the desired permanent structures.
Description
BACKGROUND

In the fabrication of semiconductor devices such as integrated circuits, memory cells, and the like, a series of manufacturing operations are performed to define features within a chip on a semiconductor wafer (“wafer” hereafter). The chip on the wafer includes integrated circuit devices in the form of multi-level structures defined on a silicon substrate. At a substrate level of the chip, transistor devices with diffusion regions are formed. In subsequent levels of the chip, interconnect metallization lines are patterned and electrically connected to the transistor devices to define a desired integrated circuit device. Also, patterned conductive layers are insulated from other conductive layers by dielectric materials.


The series of manufacturing operations for defining features within the chip on the wafer can include an etching process in which particular portions of a material layer are etched away from the surface of the wafer, such that remaining portions of the material layer form structures to be used in the integrated circuit device. In the etching process, variations in the size and location of areas to be etched away from the surface of the wafer can cause differences in the rate at which material is etched away from one area relative to another area. The variations in the size and location of areas to be etched away from the surface of the wafer is referred to as microloading variation. Therefore, microloading variation across the wafer can cause differences in etch rate across the wafer.


The etching process should continue until each area is etched to completion. Therefore, if a given area is etched to completion faster than other areas, due to differences in etch rate across the wafer caused by microloading variation, the given area will be subjected to a localized overetch period. During the localized overetch period, etching by-products from the etching environment may settle within the given area causing a variation in dimension of the given area, which may correspond to an adverse change in critical dimension of a structure to be defined on the wafer in relation to the given area. Therefore, microloading variation in a given layout to be utilized in an etching process on a wafer may adversely effect dimensional characteristics of correspondingly fabricated structures on the wafer.


SUMMARY

In one embodiment, a method is disclosed for controlling microloading variation in a semiconductor wafer layout. The method includes an operation for defining a first layout that includes both permanent layout features and a number of sacrificial layout features. The method also includes an operation for fabricating structures corresponding to both the permanent layout features and the number of sacrificial layout features of the first layout in a target material layer on a wafer. The method further includes an operation for defining a second layout to remove structures corresponding to the sacrificial layout features. The method also includes an operation for utilizing the second layout to remove the structures corresponding to the sacrificial layout features from the target material layer on the wafer.


In another embodiment, a method is disclosed for controlling microloading variation in a semiconductor wafer layout. The method includes an operation for identifying a first open area in a layout having a size variation relative to one or more neighboring open areas of the layout sufficient to cause adverse microloading variation. The method also includes an operation for repositioning a number of layout features within the layout so as to interdict the first open area such that the size variation of the first open area relative to the one or more neighboring open areas is reduced.


In another embodiment, a method is disclosed for controlling microloading variation in a semiconductor wafer layout. The method includes an operation for identifying a first open area in a layout having a size variation relative to one or more neighboring open areas of the layout sufficient to cause adverse microloading variation. The method also includes an operation for defining and placing dummy layout features within the first open area so as to shield actual layout features in the layout neighboring the first open area from adverse microloading variation.


Other aspects and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the present invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A shows an exemplary wafer having been prepared for a subtractive etch process;



FIG. 1B shows the exemplary wafer of FIG. 1A following patterning and development of the photoresist layer;



FIG. 1C shows the exemplary wafer of FIG. 1B following an etching process to remove portions of the hard mask layer that are exposed;



FIG. 1D shows the exemplary wafer of FIG. 1C following a stripping of the remaining photoresist;



FIG. 1E shows microloading defined by the wafer surface areas to be etched;



FIG. 1F shows the exemplary wafer of FIG. 1E following a continuation of the etching process;



FIG. 2A is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for controlling microloading variation in a layout, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2B shows a layout that includes a number of linear shaped features placed in pairs in an array-like manner, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2C shows the layout of FIG. 2B with the linear shaped features in particular rows shifted to interdict the problematic open area, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3A is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for utilizing dummy layout features to control microloading variation in a layout, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3B shows a gate level layout that includes a pair of linear gate electrode features placed within an isolation guard ring, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3C shows the gate level layout of FIG. 3B with a number of dummy layout features defined and placed within the identified problematic open area of the layout, so as to shield actual layout features which neighbor the problematic open area of the layout from the effects of adverse microloading variation, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4A shows a flowchart of a method for utilizing sacrificial layout features to control microloading variation in a layout, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4B is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for fabricating structures corresponding to the first layout in the target material layer on the wafer, in accordance with operation 403, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4C is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for utilizing the second layout, in accordance with operation 407, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5A shows an exemplary final layout to be defined within a target material layer, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5B shows an exemplary first layout pattern that can be used in conjunction with the method of FIG. 4A to fabricate the final layout pattern of FIG. 5A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5C shows an exemplary second layout pattern that can be used in conjunction with the method of FIG. 4A to fabricate the final layout pattern of FIG. 5A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6A shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 425, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6B shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 427, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6C shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 429, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6D shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 431, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6E shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 433, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6F shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 441, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6G shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 443, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6H shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 445, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6I shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 447, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 7A shows an exemplary final layout to be defined within a target material layer, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 7B shows an exemplary first layout pattern that can be used in conjunction with the method of FIG. 4A to fabricate the final layout pattern of FIG. 7A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 7C shows an exemplary second layout pattern that can be used in conjunction with the method of FIG. 4A to fabricate the final layout pattern of FIG. 7A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 8A shows an exemplary final layout to be defined within a target material layer, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 8B shows an exemplary first layout pattern that can be used in conjunction with the method of FIG. 4A to fabricate the final layout pattern of FIG. 8A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 8C shows an exemplary second layout pattern that can be used in conjunction with the method of FIG. 4A to fabricate the final layout pattern of FIG. 8A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.


A semiconductor fabrication process may include a subtractive etch process in which portions of a given material layer are etched away from the semiconductor wafer (“wafer” hereafter) to leave selected features defined by the given material layer on the wafer. A layout associated with the selected features to be formed through the subtractive etch process may influence the performance of the subtractive etch process. For example, a layout defined to form polygon shapes through a subtractive etch process may cause an etch rate to vary sufficiently over an area of the wafer such that suboptimal polygon shapes are formed. It should be understood that the etch rate as referenced herein refers to a rate at which material is removed from the exposed surface of the wafer.


A variation in shape density or pattern within a mask to be used in a subtractive etch process may cause the etch rate to vary across the mask. More specifically, shape density or pattern variation across the mask corresponds to a spatial variation in the size of wafer surface areas to be etched, which in turn may cause some wafer surface areas to etch at a different rate than other wafer surface areas. Therefore, some wafer surface areas may be etched through before others. Because the etching process needs to continue until the wafer surface area of slowest etch rate is etched to completion, the wafer surface areas of faster etch rate will be exposed to the etching process and associated environment for a longer duration than necessary. If a given wafer surface area is etched through but continues to be exposed to the etching process and associated environment, etching byproducts from the processing environment may deposit within the etched cavity of the given wafer surface area, thereby forming undesirable sidewall deposition within the etched cavity of the given wafer surface area.


Sidewall deposition can cause a variation in critical dimension of features to be defined on the wafer through the subtractive etch process. Such variation in feature critical dimension may cause adverse electrical performance of fabricated devices or even device failure. Therefore, it is of interest to maintain the etch rate as uniform as possible across portions of the wafer where functional features are to be defined.


In view of the foregoing, it should be understood that spatial variation in the size and relative location of wafer surface areas to be etched may cause a corresponding variation in etch rate. The spatial variation in the sizes and relative locations of wafer surface areas to be etched is referred to herein as microloading. Therefore, variation in microloading across the wafer surface may cause corresponding variation in etch rate across the wafer surface, which may in turn cause undesirable artifacts to be formed across the wafer surface, such as sidewall deposition.



FIGS. 1A-1F illustrate the above-described situation in which variation in microloading across the wafer surface causes variation in etch rate and corresponding undesirable artifacts. FIG. 1A shows an exemplary wafer having been prepared for a subtractive etch process. The wafer includes a substrate 101, a gate electrode material layer 103 disposed over the substrate 101, a hard mask layer 105 disposed over the gate electrode material layer 103, and a photoresist layer 107 disposed over the hard mask layer 105. FIG. 1B shows the exemplary wafer of FIG. 1A following patterning and development of the photoresist layer 107. In one embodiment, the photoresist layer 107 is lithographically patterned using a mask defined for a given feature layout to be formed on the wafer. Development of the photoresist layer 107 leaves a pattern of photoresist on the hard mask layer 105 corresponding to the mask pattern.



FIG. 1C shows the exemplary wafer of FIG. 1B following an etching process to remove portions of the hard mask layer 105 that are exposed, i.e., that are not protected by the remaining pattern of photoresist 107. Therefore, the remaining hard mask 105 generally corresponds to the mask pattern formed within the photoresist layer 107. FIG. 1D shows the exemplary wafer of FIG. 1C following a stripping of the remaining photoresist 107. The remaining hard mask 105 serves to protect underlying wafer areas from another etching process defined to remove the exposed gate electrode material 103. Therefore, the pattern defined by the remaining hard mask 105 features will be also be formed within the gate electrode material layer 103.


In the exemplary embodiment, effects of variation in microloading become apparent in the etching of the gate electrode material 103. As shown in FIG. 1E, the microloading is defined by the wafer surface areas to be etched, which respectively correspond to areas of widths w1, w2, and w3. The exposed (i.e., etchable) wafer surface areas of larger size (i.e., width w3 relative to widths w2 and w1, and width w2 relative to width w1) will generally experience a faster etch rate than the areas of smaller size. Therefore, when the gate electrode material 103 within the area of width w3 is completely etched through a full depth d3, the gate electrode material 103 within the areas of widths w1 and w2 are only etched to depths of d1 and d2, respectively, which is not sufficient to terminate the etching process, as each of the surfaces areas of widths w1, w2, and w3 need to be etched through to the full depth d3. Therefore, the etching process continues until the wafer surface area of smallest size/slowest etch rate (e.g., the area of width w1) is etched through the full depth d3.



FIG. 1F shows the exemplary wafer of FIG. 1E following a continuation of the etching process until the wafer surface areas of widths w1 and w2 are etched through the full depth d3. Once a wafer surface area is fully etched to form a trench-like structure, continued exposure of the trench-like structure to the etching environment may cause byproducts of the etching process to settle on surfaces within the trench-like structure, thereby forming sidewall deposition. For example, because the trench-like structures associated with the wafer surface areas of widths w3 and w2 continue to be exposed to the etching process after they are fully etched, sidewall deposition 109 and 111, respectively, may occur therein. Consequently, due to the sidewall deposition 109/111, critical dimensions CD2 and CD1 of resulting gate electrode features may be unsatisfactory.


The present invention provides layout and wafer fabrication methodology embodiments that recognize and prevent undesirable effects resulting from variation in microloading across a given layout to be fabricated on a wafer. For example, in one embodiment, a method is disclosed herein for microloading variation control to limit critical dimension variance in a subtractive etch wafer fabrication process. This particular method involves control of sizing and placement of exposed and etchable wafer surface areas around features to be defined on the wafer, i.e., around features to be left on the wafer through subtractive etching of material present within the exposed and etchable wafer surface areas.



FIG. 2A is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for controlling microloading variation in a layout, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The method includes an operation 220 for identifying problematic open areas in a layout that are sized sufficiently different from neighboring open areas in the layout so as to cause adverse microloading variation. For example, FIG. 2B shows a layout that includes a number of linear shaped features 201 placed in pairs in an array-like manner. Specifically, each pair of closely spaced adjacent linear shaped features 201 are separated from each other by a distance 205. Also, each pair of closely spaced adjacent linear shaped features 201 are separated from neighboring pairs of closely spaced adjacent linear shaped features 201 by distances 207 and 203. The separation distance 207 extends perpendicularly between linear shaped features 201 within a given row of linear shaped features 201, where the exemplary layout of FIG. 2B includes rows 240, 241, 242, 243 of linear shaped features 201. The separation distance 203 extends between ends of linear shaped features 201 in adjacent rows 240, 241, 242, 243.


Because the linear shaped features 201 in adjacent rows 240, 241, 242, 243 are placed in an end-to-end manner, the separation distance 207 forms a problematic open area 209 that extends parallel to the linear shaped features 201 and that is sized sufficiently different from the separation distance 205 of neighboring open areas so as to cause adverse microloading variation within the layout. It should be appreciated that separation distance 207 may already be set at a minimum allowable size given layout rules associated with electrostatic discharge. Therefore, it may not be possible to simply reduce the separation distance 207 in an attempt to reduce the microloading variation within the layout. However, the method includes another operation 222 for repositioning a number of layout features to interdict the identified problematic open areas as identified in operation 220. It should be understood that interdiction of the identified problematic open areas with repositioned layout features will serve to reduce a variance in open area size within the layout, and thereby serve to reduce the variation in microloading within the layout.



FIG. 2C shows the layout of FIG. 2B with the linear shaped features 201 in each of rows 241 and 243 shifted to interdict the problematic open area 209. As a result, the problematic open area 209 is eliminated in exchange for an open area 211 having a size smaller than the problematic open area 209. Therefore, with the linear shaped features 201 in each of rows 241 and 243 shifted to interdict the problematic open area 209, the microloading variation within the layout is reduced, thereby providing a corresponding reduction in the potential for adverse effects on critical dimension.



FIG. 3A is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for utilizing dummy layout features to control microloading variation in a layout, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. The method includes an operation 301 for identifying problematic open areas in a layout that are sized sufficiently different from neighboring open areas in the layout so as to cause adverse microloading variation. For example, FIG. 3B shows a gate level layout that includes a pair of linear gate electrode features 321A placed within an isolation guard ring 323, wherein the isolation guard ring 323 is defined within the substrate. A number of additional linear gate electrode features 321B are defined outside of the isolation guard ring 323.


Within the gate level layout of FIG. 3B, the linear gate electrodes 321A within the isolation guard ring 323 are separated from the linear gate electrodes 321B outside the isolation guard ring 323 by an open area defined by distances 325, 327, 329, and 331. Due to sizing differences between this open area and the spacings between adjacently placed linear gate electrode features 321A/321B, there is a potential for adverse microloading variation within the gate level layout. To address this potential for adverse microloading variation, the method of FIG. 3A includes another operation 303 for defining and placing dummy layout features within identified problematic open areas of the layout, so as to shield actual layout features which neighbor the problematic open areas of the layout from the effects of adverse microloading variation. The dummy layout features referred to herein correspond to physical structures defined on the semiconductor wafer that are not connected within an electrical circuit.


For example, FIG. 3C shows the gate level layout of FIG. 3B with a number of dummy layout features 333 defined and placed within the identified problematic open area of the layout, so as to shield actual layout features 321A/321B which neighbor the problematic open area of the layout from the effects of adverse microloading variation. Specifically, dummy layout features 333 are placed next to the gate electrode features 321A/321B and within the problematic open area, such that a spacing between the gate electrode features 321A/321B and their proximally placed dummy layout features 333 are substantially similar to a regular spacing that exists between neighboring gate electrode features 321A and 321B, respectively. Therefore, the problematic open area within the layout of FIG. 3B is reduced in size. Specifically, the open area distances 325, 327, 329, 331 are reduced to distances 325A, 327A, 329A, 331A, respectively.


It should be appreciated that the method of FIG. 3A can be utilized with essentially any layout portion of essentially any chip level in which the layout portion includes a problematic open area large enough to cause adverse microloading variation. Therefore, it should be understood that the particular gate level layout example of FIGS. 3B-3C is provided by way of example for discussion purposes, and is not intended to convey a limitation of the method of FIG. 3A. Generally speaking, the method of FIG. 3A provides for bounding of a problematic open layout area by dummy layout features, such that actual layout features that surround the problematic open layout area are shielded from the effects of adverse microloading variation by the dummy layout features.



FIG. 4A shows a flowchart of a method for utilizing sacrificial layout features to control microloading variation in a layout, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. In the method of FIG. 4A, sacrificial layout features correspond to structures that are temporarily defined on the wafer to reduce microloading variation. Thus, sacrificial structures are temporarily fabricated on the wafer to support fabrication of permanent structures corresponding to actual layout features. Following fabrication of the sacrificial structures and permanent structures in a given chip level, the sacrificial structures are removed from the wafer while leaving the permanent structures on the wafer.


The method of FIG. 4A includes an operation 401 for defining a first layout that includes sacrificial layout features. Specifically, the first layout includes layout shapes that correspond to permanent structures to be defined on the wafer, and also includes layout shapes that correspond to sacrificial structures to be defined on the wafer. The layout shapes that correspond to sacrificial structures are defined and placed in the layout so as to reduce or eliminate adverse microloading variation effects and thereby support fabrication of the permanent structures. For example, the sacrificial structures can be defined and placed to limit the variation in size and relative location of open areas in the layout between actual layout features that correspond to permanent structures to be defined on the wafer.



FIG. 5A shows an exemplary final layout to be defined within a target material layer, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The final layout pattern includes linear layout features 540-551. FIG. 5B shows an exemplary first layout pattern that can be used in conjunction with the method of FIG. 4A to fabricate the final layout pattern of FIG. 5A. The first layout pattern of FIG. 5B includes a number of linear layout features 501-506. The linear layout features 501-506 actually include portions that will eventually define permanent structures corresponding to layout features 540-551 of the final layout pattern, and sacrificial layout features 530-538 that will define sacrificial structures to assist in fabrication of layout features 540-551 by reducing microloading variation.


With reference back to FIG. 4A, the method proceeds with an operation 403 for fabricating structures corresponding to the first layout in a target material layer on the wafer. It should be understood that the target material layer can correspond to essentially any type of material used in semiconductor fabrication. It should be further understood that the target material layer can correspond to essentially level of a chip defined on the wafer. In one embodiment, the target material layer is formed of an electrically conductive material, such as polysilicon or metal. For example, in one embodiment, the target material layer is formed of polysilicon, such that permanent structures formed on the wafer from the target material define gate electrodes of transistor devices. In another embodiment, the target material layer is formed of an electrically insulating material, i.e., dielectric material.



FIG. 4B is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for fabricating structures corresponding to the first layout in the target material layer on the wafer, in accordance with operation 403, and in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Also, FIGS. 6A-6E show a series of illustrations depicting results of various operations performed in the method of FIG. 4B. Each of FIGS. 6A-6E depicts a vertical cross-section of an exemplary wafer portion 601 corresponding to a view A-A as identified in each of FIGS. 5A-5C.


In the method of FIG. 4B, an operation 421 is performed to deposit a layer of target material on a wafer. In an operation 423, a hardmask material layer is deposited over the target material layer. In an operation 425, a photoresist material layer is deposited over the hardmask material layer. In one embodiment, each of the target material layer, the hardmask material layer, and the photoresist material layer can be deposited on the wafer through a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process. However, it should be understood that in other embodiments, each of the target material layer, the hardmask material layer, and the photoresist material layer can be respectively deposited through essentially any type of suitable material deposition process. FIG. 6A shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 425. Specifically, FIG. 6A shows a target material layer 603 deposited on a wafer 601, a hardmask layer 605 deposited over the target material layer 603, and a photoresist layer 607 deposited over the hardmask layer 605.


The method continues with an operation 427 for defining the first layout pattern within the photoresist material layer, such that the first layout pattern as defined within the patterned photoresist material layer can be transferred to the hardmask material layer. For example, in one embodiment the photoresist material layer is exposed to a light pattern corresponding to the first layout pattern. Then the photoresist material layer is developed such that the remaining photoresist material includes exposed areas that correspond to the first layout pattern. FIG. 6B shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 427.


An operation 429 is then performed to etch through the hardmask material layer within the exposed areas of the patterned photoresist material. FIG. 6C shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 429. Then, in an operation 431, the remaining photoresist material is removed. In this manner the first layout pattern is etched within the hardmask material layer. FIG. 6D shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 431. An operation 433 is then performed to etch through the conductive material layer within areas exposed through the patterned hardmask material, thereby defining the first layout pattern within the conductive material layer, including the sacrificial layout features. FIG. 6E shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 433.


With reference back to the method of FIG. 4A, following the operation 403, the method proceeds with an operation 405 for defining a second layout to remove the sacrificial structures from the target material layer. Also, if required, the second layout is further defined to cut structures within the target material layer, thereby leaving the desired permanent structures. Therefore, the second layout includes openings defined to uncover the sacrificial structures fabricated in the target material layer and, if required, to cut otherwise permanent structures fabricated in the target material layer.



FIG. 5C shows an exemplary second layout pattern that can be used in conjunction with the method of FIG. 4A to fabricate the final layout pattern of FIG. 5A. The second layout pattern of FIG. 5C includes a number of openings 513-518. It should be understood that the linear layout shapes 501-506 are shown in FIG. 5C for contextual purposes and are not actually part of the second layout pattern. Specifically, the second layout pattern in the example of FIG. 5C is defined by the cross-hatched opening shapes 513-518. The openings 513 and 518 in the second layout are defined to enable cutting of structures within the target material layer. The openings 514, 515, 516, 517 are defined to expose the sacrificial structures 531, 532, 534, 536, respectively, so that they can be removed from the target material layer.


With reference back to FIG. 4A, the method proceeds with an operation 407 for utilizing the second layout to remove the sacrificial structures from the target material layer, and if so defined, to cut other permanent structures within the target material layer. FIG. 4C is an illustration showing a flowchart of a method for utilizing the second layout, in accordance with operation 407, and in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. An operation 441 is performed to deposit a photoresist material layer over the wafer so as to cover the remaining hardmask material, the remaining target material, and the exposed wafer material underlying the target material. FIG. 6F shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 441. As shown, a photoresist material 609 is deposited over the wafer so as to cover the remaining hardmask material 605, the remaining target material 603, and the exposed wafer 601 underlying the target material.


An operation 443 is then performed to define the second layout within the photoresist material layer, wherein the second layout includes openings to expose the sacrificial structures in the target material layer, and if so defined, to expose cut portions of other permanent structures within the target material layer. FIG. 6G shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 443. As shown, the photoresist material 609 is patterned to create open areas which expose sacrificial features 532 and 534.


An operation 445 is then performed to subtractively etch the hardmask material portions and target material portions within the openings in the patterned photoresist material corresponding to the second layout. FIG. 6H shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 445. As shown, the hardmask material 605 and target material 603 within the openings in the patterned photoresist material 609 are removed through subtractive etching. An operation 447 is then performed to remove the remaining photoresist material and the remaining hardmask material from the wafer. FIG. 6I shows the cross-sectional view A-A following operation 447. As shown, the remaining photoresist material 609 and the remaining hardmask material 605 are removed through subtractive etching, thereby leaving the target material 603 corresponding to permanent structures 546, 547, 549, and 550. As previously mentioned, the final layout pattern of FIG. 5A represents the permanent structures formed on the wafer from the target material.


In one embodiment, the first layout referenced in operations 401 and 403 of the method of FIG. 4A includes all layout features corresponding to the permanent structures to be defined on the wafer, in addition to a number of layout features corresponding to appropriate sacrificial structures. In another embodiment, a multiple patterning technique is utilized in which the permanent structures to be defined in the target material layer are split among a plurality of layouts. In this embodiment, defining the first layout in operation 401 includes defining each of the plurality of layouts among which the permanent structures to be defined in the target material layer are split. Also in this embodiment, defining the first layout within the photoresist material layer, as recited in operation 427 of FIG. 4B, includes successively defining within the photoresist material layer each of the plurality of layouts among which the permanent structures to be defined in the target material layer are split. Therefore, it should be understood that the method for utilizing sacrificial layout features to control microloading variation in a layout, as described with regard to FIGS. 4A-4C, can be equally implemented in conjunction with a multiple patterning technique.



FIGS. 7A-7C illustrate another exemplary application of the method for utilizing sacrificial layout features to control microloading variation in a layout, as described with regard to FIGS. 4A-4C, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 7A shows an exemplary final layout to be defined within a target material layer. The final layout pattern includes linear layout features 731 and 733. In one embodiment, the linear layout features 731 and 733 correspond to linear gate electrode features defined within the gate level of a chip. The linear layout features 733 are defined and placed inside of an isolation ring 741, whereas the linear layout features 731 are defined outside of the isolation ring 741. The open area of the layout between the linear layout features 731 and the linear layout features 733 may represent a substantial variation in microloading. The microloading variation in the layout of FIG. 7A can avoided by utilizing sacrificial layout features as provided in the methods of FIGS. 4A-4C.


Specifically, FIG. 7B shows an exemplary first layout pattern that can be used in conjunction with the method of FIG. 4A to fabricate the final layout pattern of FIG. 7A. The first layout pattern of FIG. 7B includes a number of linear layout features 701-716. Portions of the linear layout features 701-716 will define permanent structures corresponding to layout features 731 and 733 of the final layout pattern of FIG. 7A, and other portions of the linear layout features 701-716 will define sacrificial layout features to assist in fabrication of layout features 731 and 733 by reducing microloading variation.



FIG. 7C shows an exemplary second layout pattern that can be used in conjunction with the method of FIG. 4A to fabricate the final layout pattern of FIG. 7A. The second layout pattern of FIG. 7C includes a number of openings 721, 723, 725, 727, and 729. It should be understood that the linear layout shapes 701-716 are shown in FIG. 7C for contextual purposes and are not actually part of the second layout pattern. Specifically, the second layout pattern in the example of FIG. 7C is defined by the cross-hatched opening shapes 721, 723, 725, 727, and 729. Each of the openings 721, 723, 725, 727, and 729 in the second layout are defined to enable cutting of structures formed within the target material layer using the first layout pattern of FIG. 7B. Specifically, the openings 721, 723, 725, 727, and 729 are defined to expose sacrificial portions of the linear layout features 701-716 so that they can be removed from the target material layer through the subtractive etching process of operation 407 of the method of FIG. 4A.



FIGS. 8A-8C illustrate another exemplary application of the method for utilizing sacrificial layout features to control microloading variation in a layout, as described with regard to FIGS. 4A-4C, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 8A shows an exemplary final layout to be defined within a target material layer. The final layout pattern includes linear layout features 831-838. In one embodiment, the linear layout features 831-838 correspond to linear gate electrode features defined within the gate level of a chip. The open area 841 of the layout between the linear layout features 831-838 may represent a substantial variation in microloading. The microloading variation in the layout of FIG. 8A can avoided by utilizing sacrificial layout features as provided in the methods of FIGS. 4A-4C.


Specifically, FIG. 8B shows an exemplary first layout pattern that can be used in conjunction with the method of FIG. 4A to fabricate the final layout pattern of FIG. 8A. The first layout pattern of FIG. 8B includes a number of linear layout features 801-815. Portions of the linear layout features 803, 805, 811, and 813 will define permanent structures corresponding to layout features 831-838 of the final layout pattern of FIG. 8A, and the linear layout features 801-802, 804, 806-810, 812, and 814-815 define sacrificial layout features to assist in fabrication of layout features 831-838 by reducing microloading variation.



FIG. 8C shows an exemplary second layout pattern that can be used in conjunction with the method of FIG. 4A to fabricate the final layout pattern of FIG. 8A. The second layout pattern of FIG. 8C includes an opening 821. It should be understood that the linear layout shapes 801-815 are shown in FIG. 8C for contextual purposes and are not actually part of the second layout pattern. Specifically, the second layout pattern in the example of FIG. 8C is defined by the cross-hatched opening shape 821. The opening 821 in the second layout is defined to enable cutting of structures formed within the target material layer using the first layout pattern of FIG. 8B, and to remove sacrificial layout structures formed within the target material layer using the first layout pattern of FIG. 8B. Specifically, portions of structures 803, 805, 811, and 813 are exposed within the opening 821 so that they can be removed from the target material layer through the subtractive etching process of operation 407 of the method of FIG. 4A, thereby cutting structures 803, 805, 811, and 813 to form structures 831-838. Also, sacrificial structures 801-802, 804, 806-810, 812, and 814-815 are fully exposed within the opening 821 so that they can be fully removed from the target material layer through the subtractive etching process of operation 407 of the method of FIG. 4A.


It should be understood that the methods described herein can be utilized to control microloading variation in essentially any subtractive etch semiconductor fabrication process. Moreover, it should be appreciated and understood that the methods described herein can also be utilized in conjunction with essentially any type of damascene semiconductor fabrication process. Additionally, the methods disclosed herein for reducing microloading variation in a layout can be implemented to enable adjustment of an etch process to focus more on across-wafer uniformity. Specifically, wafer fabrication etch recipes and chamber hardware are designed to allow a trade-off between across-wafer uniformity versus microloading. With the methods disclosed herein for reducing microloading, the etch process can be modified to improve across-wafer uniformity. For example, using the methods disclosed herein to handle reduction of microloading it is possible to modify the etch process to reduce across-wafer non-uniformity by about one-half, e.g., from about 2% non-uniformity to about 1% non-uniformity.


It should be understood that the layouts associated with the methods disclosed herein can be stored in a tangible form, such as in a digital format on a computer readable medium. For example, the layouts defined in accordance with the methods disclosed herein can be stored in a layout data file as part of one or more cells, selectable from one or more libraries of cells. The layout data file can be formatted as a GDS II (Graphic Data System) database file, an OASIS (Open Artwork System Interchange Standard) database file, or any other type of data file format suitable for storing and communicating semiconductor device layouts. Also, the layouts can be included within a multi-level layout of a larger semiconductor device. The multi-level layout of the larger semiconductor device can also be stored in the form of a layout data file, such as those identified above.


Also, the methods disclosed herein can be embodied as computer readable code, i.e., program instructions, on a computer readable medium. Also, the computer readable code can include the layout data file within which layouts are stored. The computer readable code can further include program instructions for selecting one or more layout libraries and/or cells that include the layouts. The layout libraries and/or cells can also be stored in a digital format on a computer readable medium.


The computer readable medium mentioned herein is any data storage device that can store data which can thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable medium include hard drives, network attached storage (NAS), read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, CD-Rs, CD-RWs, magnetic tapes, and other optical and non-optical data storage devices. The computer readable medium can also be distributed over a network of coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.


Any of the operations described herein that form part of the invention are useful machine operations. The invention also relates to a device or an apparatus for performing these operations. The apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purpose, such as a special purpose computer. When defined as a special purpose computer, the computer can also perform other processing, program execution or routines that are not part of the special purpose, while still being capable of operating for the special purpose. Alternatively, the operations may be processed by a general purpose computer selectively activated or configured by one or more computer programs stored in the computer memory, cache, or obtained over a network. When data is obtained over a network the data maybe processed by other computers on the network, e.g., a cloud of computing resources.


The embodiments of the present invention can also be defined as a machine that transforms data from one state to another state. The data may represent an article, that can be represented as an electronic signal and electronically manipulate data. The transformed data can, in some cases, be visually depicted on a display, representing the physical object that results from the transformation of data. The transformed data can be saved to storage generally, or in particular formats that enable the construction or depiction of a physical and tangible object. In some embodiments, the manipulation can be performed by a processor. In such an example, the processor thus transforms the data from one thing to another. Still further, the methods can be processed by one or more machines or processors that can be connected over a network. Each machine can transform data from one state or thing to another, and can also process data, save data to storage, transmit data over a network, display the result, or communicate the result to another machine.


It should be further understood that the layouts defined in accordance with the methods disclosed herein can be manufactured as part of a semiconductor device or chip. In the fabrication of semiconductor devices such as integrated circuits, memory cells, and the like, a series of manufacturing operations are performed to define features on a semiconductor wafer. The wafer includes integrated circuit devices in the form of multi-level structures defined on a silicon substrate. At a substrate level, transistor devices with diffusion regions are formed. In subsequent levels, interconnect metallization lines are patterned and electrically connected to the transistor devices to define a desired integrated circuit device. Also, patterned conductive layers are insulated from other conductive layers by dielectric materials.


While this invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art upon reading the preceding specifications and studying the drawings will realize various alterations, additions, permutations and equivalents thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention includes all such alterations, additions, permutations, and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for controlling microloading variation in a semiconductor wafer layout, comprising: identifying, by using a computer, a first open area in a layout having a size variation relative to one or more neighboring open areas of the layout sufficient to cause adverse microloading variation, the first open area located between layout features of a first set of linear-shaped conductive structures and layout features of a second set of linear-shaped conductive structures, each layout feature of the first and second sets of linear-shaped conductive structures oriented to extend lengthwise in a first direction, end-by-end positioned layout features of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures separated by a first distance as measured in the first direction, side-by-side positioned layout features of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures separated by a second distance as measured in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction; anddefining and placing dummy layout features, by using the computer, within the first open area so as to shield layout features of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures from adverse microloading variation, wherein each dummy layout feature is defined to form a corresponding physical structure having a linear-shape extending lengthwise in the first direction, and wherein each physical structure corresponding to a given dummy layout feature is not connected within an electrical circuit, and wherein each dummy layout feature that is positioned end-by-end with a given layout feature of any of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is separated from the given layout feature by the first distance as measured in the first direction, and wherein each dummy layout feature that is positioned side-by-side with a given layout feature of any of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is separated from the given layout feature by the second distance as measured in the second direction,wherein the dummy layout features are defined and placed around the first open area on each of four perpendicularly related sides of the first open area to provide for shielding of the layout features of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures neighboring the first open area, wherein multiple dummy layout features are placed along each of the four perpendicularly related sides of the first open area; andrecording the layout in a digital format on a computer readable medium for fabrication.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein microloading variation is a variation in size and location of material areas to be etched from a semiconductor wafer.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the adverse microloading variation is an unacceptable variation in etch rate between different locations on the semiconductor wafer.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein an open area in a layout is a space between layout shapes to be lithographically resolved during fabrication.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the digital format is a data file format for storing and communicating one or more semiconductor device layouts.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the computer readable medium includes program instructions for accessing and retrieving the layout in the digital format from the computer readable medium.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the program instructions for accessing and retrieving include program instructions for selecting a library, a cell, or both library and cell including the layout in the digital format.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein end-by-end positioned layout features of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are separated by a third distance as measured in the first direction.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein side-by-side positioned layout features of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures separated by a fourth distance as measured in the second direction perpendicular to the first direction.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein each dummy layout feature that is positioned end-by-end with a given layout feature of any of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is separated from the given layout feature by the third distance as measured in the first direction.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein each dummy layout feature that is positioned side-by-side with a given layout feature of any of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is separated from the given layout feature by the fourth distance as measured in the second direction.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the layout features of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures are positioned inside of an isolation guard ring, and the layout features of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are positioned outside of the isolation guard ring.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the layout features of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures are positioned inside of an isolation guard ring, and the layout features of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are positioned outside of the isolation guard ring.
  • 14. A semiconductor device, comprising: a first set of linear-shaped conductive structures, each of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures oriented to extend lengthwise in a first direction, wherein end-by-end positioned ones of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures are separated by a first distance as measured in the first direction, wherein side-by-side positioned ones of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures are separated by a second distance as measured in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction;a second set of linear-shaped conductive structures, each of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures oriented to extend lengthwise in the first direction, the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures separated from the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures by a first area that does not include functional conductive structures;dummy structures positioned within the first area, wherein each dummy structure has a linear-shape extending lengthwise in the first direction, wherein each dummy structure is not connected within an electrical circuit, wherein each dummy structure that is positioned end-by-end with any given structure of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is separated from the given structure by the first distance as measured in the first direction, and wherein each dummy structure that is positioned side-by-side with any given structure of the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures is separated from the given structure by the second distance as measured in the second direction;wherein the dummy structure are positioned around the first area on each of four perpendicularly related sides of the first area; andwherein multiple dummy structures are positioned along each of the four perpendicularly related sides of the first area.
  • 15. The semiconductor device of claim 14, wherein end-by-end positioned ones of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are separated by a third distance as measured in the first direction.
  • 16. The semiconductor device of claim 15, wherein side-by-side positioned ones of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are separated by a fourth distance as measured in the second direction perpendicular to the first direction.
  • 17. The semiconductor device of claim 16, wherein each dummy structure that is positioned end-by-end with any given structure of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is separated from the given structure by the third distance as measured in the first direction.
  • 18. The semiconductor device of claim 17, wherein each dummy structure that is positioned side-by-side with any given structure of the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures is separated from the given structure by the fourth distance as measured in the second direction.
  • 19. The semiconductor device of claim 18, wherein the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures are positioned inside of an isolation guard ring, and the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are positioned outside of the isolation guard ring.
  • 20. The semiconductor device of claim 14, wherein the first set of linear-shaped conductive structures are positioned inside of an isolation guard ring, and the second set of linear-shaped conductive structures are positioned outside of the isolation guard ring.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/085,800, filed Aug. 1, 2008, entitled “Methods for Controlling Microloading Variation in Semiconductor Wafer Layout and Fabrication,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (789)
Number Name Date Kind
4197555 Uehara et al. Apr 1980 A
4417161 Uya Nov 1983 A
4424460 Best Jan 1984 A
4613940 Shenton et al. Sep 1986 A
4657628 Holloway et al. Apr 1987 A
4682202 Tanizawa Jul 1987 A
4745084 Rowson et al. May 1988 A
4780753 Ohkura et al. Oct 1988 A
4801986 Chang et al. Jan 1989 A
4804636 Groover, III Feb 1989 A
4812688 Chu et al. Mar 1989 A
4884115 Michel et al. Nov 1989 A
4928160 Crafts May 1990 A
4975756 Haken et al. Dec 1990 A
5068603 Mahoney Nov 1991 A
5079614 Khatakhotan Jan 1992 A
5097422 Corbin et al. Mar 1992 A
5117277 Yuyama et al. May 1992 A
5121186 Wong et al. Jun 1992 A
5208765 Turnbull May 1993 A
5224057 Igarashi Jun 1993 A
5242770 Chen et al. Sep 1993 A
5268319 Harari Dec 1993 A
5298774 Ueda et al. Mar 1994 A
5313426 Sakuma et al. May 1994 A
5351197 Upton et al. Sep 1994 A
5359226 DeJong Oct 1994 A
5365454 Nakagawa et al. Nov 1994 A
5367187 Yuen Nov 1994 A
5378649 Huang Jan 1995 A
5396128 Dunning et al. Mar 1995 A
5420447 Waggoner May 1995 A
5461577 Shaw et al. Oct 1995 A
5471403 Fujimaga Nov 1995 A
5497334 Russell et al. Mar 1996 A
5497337 Ponnapalli et al. Mar 1996 A
5526307 Lin et al. Jun 1996 A
5536955 Ali Jul 1996 A
5545904 Orbach Aug 1996 A
5581098 Chang Dec 1996 A
5581202 Yano et al. Dec 1996 A
5612893 Hao et al. Mar 1997 A
5636002 Garofalo Jun 1997 A
5656861 Godinho et al. Aug 1997 A
5682323 Pasch et al. Oct 1997 A
5684311 Shaw Nov 1997 A
5684733 Wu et al. Nov 1997 A
5698873 Colwell et al. Dec 1997 A
5705301 Garza et al. Jan 1998 A
5723883 Gheewalla Mar 1998 A
5723908 Fuchida et al. Mar 1998 A
5740068 Liebmann et al. Apr 1998 A
5745374 Matsumoto Apr 1998 A
5764533 deDood Jun 1998 A
5774367 Reyes et al. Jun 1998 A
5780909 Hayashi Jul 1998 A
5789776 Lancaster et al. Aug 1998 A
5790417 Chao et al. Aug 1998 A
5796128 Tran et al. Aug 1998 A
5796624 Sridhar et al. Aug 1998 A
5798298 Yang et al. Aug 1998 A
5814844 Nagata et al. Sep 1998 A
5825203 Kusunoki et al. Oct 1998 A
5834851 Ikeda et al. Nov 1998 A
5838594 Kojima Nov 1998 A
5841663 Sharma et al. Nov 1998 A
5847421 Yamaguchi Dec 1998 A
5850362 Sakuma et al. Dec 1998 A
5852562 Shinomiya et al. Dec 1998 A
5858580 Wang et al. Jan 1999 A
5898194 Gheewala Apr 1999 A
5900340 Reich et al. May 1999 A
5908827 Sirna Jun 1999 A
5915199 Hsu Jun 1999 A
5917207 Colwell et al. Jun 1999 A
5920486 Beahm et al. Jul 1999 A
5923059 Gheewala Jul 1999 A
5923060 Gheewala Jul 1999 A
5929469 Mimoto et al. Jul 1999 A
5930163 Hara et al. Jul 1999 A
5935763 Caterer et al. Aug 1999 A
5949101 Aritome Sep 1999 A
5973507 Yamazaki Oct 1999 A
5977305 Wigler et al. Nov 1999 A
5977574 Schmitt et al. Nov 1999 A
5998879 Iwaki et al. Dec 1999 A
6009251 Ho et al. Dec 1999 A
6026223 Scepanovic et al. Feb 2000 A
6037613 Mariyama Mar 2000 A
6037617 Kumagai Mar 2000 A
6044007 Capodieci Mar 2000 A
6054872 Fudanuki et al. Apr 2000 A
6063132 DeCamp et al. May 2000 A
6077310 Yamamoto et al. Jun 2000 A
6080206 Tadokoro et al. Jun 2000 A
6084437 Sako Jul 2000 A
6091845 Pierrat et al. Jul 2000 A
6099584 Arnold et al. Aug 2000 A
6100025 Wigler et al. Aug 2000 A
6114071 Chen et al. Sep 2000 A
6144227 Sato Nov 2000 A
6159839 Jeng et al. Dec 2000 A
6166415 Sakemi et al. Dec 2000 A
6166560 Ogura et al. Dec 2000 A
6174742 Sudhindranath et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182272 Andreev et al. Jan 2001 B1
6194104 Hsu Feb 2001 B1
6194252 Yamaguchi Feb 2001 B1
6194912 Or-Bach Feb 2001 B1
6209123 Maziasz et al. Mar 2001 B1
6230299 McSherry et al. May 2001 B1
6232173 Hsu et al. May 2001 B1
6240542 Kapur May 2001 B1
6249902 Igusa et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255600 Schaper Jul 2001 B1
6255845 Wong et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262487 Igarashi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269472 Garza et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275973 Wein Aug 2001 B1
6282696 Garza et al. Aug 2001 B1
6291276 Gonzalez Sep 2001 B1
6297668 Schober Oct 2001 B1
6297674 Kono et al. Oct 2001 B1
6303252 Lin Oct 2001 B1
6331733 Or-Bach et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331791 Huang Dec 2001 B1
6335250 Egi Jan 2002 B1
6338972 Sudhindranath et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347062 Nii et al. Feb 2002 B2
6356112 Tran et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359804 Kuriyama et al. Mar 2002 B2
6370679 Chang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378110 Ho Apr 2002 B1
6380592 Tooher et al. Apr 2002 B2
6388296 Hsu May 2002 B1
6393601 Tanaka et al. May 2002 B1
6399972 Masuda et al. Jun 2002 B1
6400183 Yamashita et al. Jun 2002 B2
6415421 Anderson et al. Jul 2002 B2
6416907 Winder et al. Jul 2002 B1
6417549 Oh Jul 2002 B1
6421820 Mansfield et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425112 Bula et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425117 Pasch et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426269 Haffner et al. Jul 2002 B1
6436805 Trivedi Aug 2002 B1
6445049 Iranmanesh Sep 2002 B1
6445065 Gheewala et al. Sep 2002 B1
6467072 Yang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469328 Yanai et al. Oct 2002 B2
6470489 Chang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476493 Or-Bach et al. Nov 2002 B2
6477695 Gandhi Nov 2002 B1
6480032 Aksamit Nov 2002 B1
6480989 Chan et al. Nov 2002 B2
6492066 Capodieci et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496965 van Ginneken et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504186 Kanamoto et al. Jan 2003 B2
6505327 Lin Jan 2003 B2
6505328 van Ginneken et al. Jan 2003 B1
6507941 Leung et al. Jan 2003 B1
6509952 Govil et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514849 Hui et al. Feb 2003 B1
6516459 Sahouria Feb 2003 B1
6523156 Cirit Feb 2003 B2
6525350 Kinoshita et al. Feb 2003 B1
6536028 Katsioulas et al. Mar 2003 B1
6543039 Watanabe Apr 2003 B1
6553544 Tanaka et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553559 Liebmann et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553562 Capodieci et al. Apr 2003 B2
6566720 Aldrich May 2003 B2
6570234 Gardner May 2003 B1
6571140 Wewalaarachchi May 2003 B1
6571379 Takayama May 2003 B2
6574786 Pohlenz et al. Jun 2003 B1
6578190 Ferguson et al. Jun 2003 B2
6583041 Capodieci Jun 2003 B1
6588005 Kobayashi et al. Jul 2003 B1
6590289 Shively Jul 2003 B2
6591207 Naya et al. Jul 2003 B2
6609235 Ramaswamy et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610607 Armbrust et al. Aug 2003 B1
6617621 Gheewala et al. Sep 2003 B1
6620561 Winder et al. Sep 2003 B2
6621132 Onishi et al. Sep 2003 B2
6632741 Clevenger et al. Oct 2003 B1
6633182 Pileggi et al. Oct 2003 B2
6635935 Makino Oct 2003 B2
6642744 Or-Bach et al. Nov 2003 B2
6643831 Chang et al. Nov 2003 B2
6650014 Kariyazaki Nov 2003 B2
6661041 Keeth Dec 2003 B2
6662350 Fried et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664587 Guterman et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673638 Bendik et al. Jan 2004 B1
6677649 Minami et al. Jan 2004 B2
6687895 Zhang Feb 2004 B2
6690206 Rikino et al. Feb 2004 B2
6691297 Misaka et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700405 Hirairi Mar 2004 B1
6703170 Pindo Mar 2004 B1
6709880 Yamamoto et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714903 Chu et al. Mar 2004 B1
6732334 Nakatsuka May 2004 B2
6732338 Crouse et al. May 2004 B2
6732344 Sakamoto et al. May 2004 B2
6734506 Oyamatsu May 2004 B2
6737199 Hsieh May 2004 B1
6737318 Murata et al. May 2004 B2
6737347 Houston et al. May 2004 B1
6745372 Cote et al. Jun 2004 B2
6745380 Bodendorf et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749972 Yu Jun 2004 B2
6750555 Satomi et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760269 Nakase et al. Jul 2004 B2
6765245 Bansal Jul 2004 B2
6777138 Pierrat et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777146 Samuels Aug 2004 B1
6787823 Shibutani Sep 2004 B2
6789244 Dasasathyan et al. Sep 2004 B1
6789246 Mohan et al. Sep 2004 B1
6792591 Shi et al. Sep 2004 B2
6792593 Takashima et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794677 Tamaki et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794914 Sani et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795332 Yamaoka et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795358 Tanaka et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795952 Stine et al. Sep 2004 B1
6795953 Bakarian et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800883 Furuya et al. Oct 2004 B2
6807663 Cote et al. Oct 2004 B2
6809399 Ikeda et al. Oct 2004 B2
6812574 Tomita et al. Nov 2004 B2
6818389 Fritze et al. Nov 2004 B2
6818929 Tsutsumi et al. Nov 2004 B2
6819136 Or-Bach Nov 2004 B2
6820248 Gan Nov 2004 B1
6826738 Cadouri Nov 2004 B2
6834375 Stine et al. Dec 2004 B1
6841880 Matsumoto et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850854 Naya et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854096 Eaton et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854100 Chuang et al. Feb 2005 B1
6867073 Enquist Mar 2005 B1
6871338 Yamauchi Mar 2005 B2
6872990 Kang Mar 2005 B1
6877144 Rittman et al. Apr 2005 B1
6881523 Smith Apr 2005 B2
6884712 Yelehanka et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885045 Hidaka Apr 2005 B2
6889370 Kerzman et al. May 2005 B1
6897517 Van Houdt et al. May 2005 B2
6897536 Nomura et al. May 2005 B2
6898770 Boluki et al. May 2005 B2
6904582 Rittman et al. Jun 2005 B1
6918104 Pierrat et al. Jul 2005 B2
6920079 Shibayama Jul 2005 B2
6921982 Joshi et al. Jul 2005 B2
6922354 Ishikura et al. Jul 2005 B2
6924560 Wang et al. Aug 2005 B2
6928635 Pramanik et al. Aug 2005 B2
6931617 Sanie et al. Aug 2005 B2
6953956 Or-Bach et al. Oct 2005 B2
6954918 Houston Oct 2005 B2
6957402 Templeton et al. Oct 2005 B2
6968527 Pierrat Nov 2005 B2
6974978 Possley Dec 2005 B1
6977856 Tanaka et al. Dec 2005 B2
6978436 Cote et al. Dec 2005 B2
6978437 Rittman et al. Dec 2005 B1
6980211 Lin et al. Dec 2005 B2
6992394 Park Jan 2006 B2
6992925 Peng Jan 2006 B2
6993741 Liebmann et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994939 Ghandehari et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003068 Kushner et al. Feb 2006 B2
7009862 Higeta et al. Mar 2006 B2
7016214 Kawamata Mar 2006 B2
7022559 Barnak et al. Apr 2006 B2
7028285 Cote et al. Apr 2006 B2
7041568 Goldbach et al. May 2006 B2
7052972 Sandhu et al. May 2006 B2
7053424 Ono May 2006 B2
7063920 Baba-Ali Jun 2006 B2
7064068 Chou et al. Jun 2006 B2
7065731 Jacques et al. Jun 2006 B2
7079413 Tsukamoto et al. Jul 2006 B2
7079989 Wimer Jul 2006 B2
7093208 Williams et al. Aug 2006 B2
7093228 Andreev et al. Aug 2006 B2
7103870 Misaka et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105871 Or-Bach et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107551 de Dood et al. Sep 2006 B1
7115343 Gordon et al. Oct 2006 B2
7115920 Bernstein et al. Oct 2006 B2
7120882 Kotani et al. Oct 2006 B2
7124386 Smith et al. Oct 2006 B2
7126837 Banachowicz et al. Oct 2006 B1
7132203 Pierrat Nov 2006 B2
7137092 Maeda Nov 2006 B2
7141853 Campbell et al. Nov 2006 B2
7143380 Anderson et al. Nov 2006 B1
7149999 Kahng et al. Dec 2006 B2
7152215 Smith et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155685 Mori et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155689 Pierrat et al. Dec 2006 B2
7159197 Falbo et al. Jan 2007 B2
7174520 White et al. Feb 2007 B2
7175940 Laidig et al. Feb 2007 B2
7176508 Joshi et al. Feb 2007 B2
7177215 Tanaka et al. Feb 2007 B2
7185294 Zhang Feb 2007 B2
7188322 Cohn et al. Mar 2007 B2
7194712 Wu Mar 2007 B2
7200835 Zhang et al. Apr 2007 B2
7202517 Dixit et al. Apr 2007 B2
7205191 Kobayashi Apr 2007 B2
7208794 Hofmann et al. Apr 2007 B2
7214579 Widdershoven et al. May 2007 B2
7219326 Reed et al. May 2007 B2
7221031 Ryoo et al. May 2007 B2
7225423 Bhattacharya et al. May 2007 B2
7227183 Donze et al. Jun 2007 B2
7228510 Ono Jun 2007 B2
7231628 Pack et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235424 Chen et al. Jun 2007 B2
7243316 White et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252909 Shin et al. Aug 2007 B2
7264990 Rueckes et al. Sep 2007 B2
7266787 Hughes et al. Sep 2007 B2
7269803 Khakzadi et al. Sep 2007 B2
7278118 Pileggi et al. Oct 2007 B2
7279727 Ikoma et al. Oct 2007 B2
7287320 Wang et al. Oct 2007 B2
7294534 Iwaki Nov 2007 B2
7302651 Allen et al. Nov 2007 B2
7308669 Buehler et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312003 Cote et al. Dec 2007 B2
7315994 Aller et al. Jan 2008 B2
7327591 Sadra et al. Feb 2008 B2
7329938 Kinoshita Feb 2008 B2
7335966 Ihme et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337421 Kamat Feb 2008 B2
7338896 Vanhaelemeersch et al. Mar 2008 B2
7345909 Chang et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346885 Semmler Mar 2008 B2
7350183 Cui et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353492 Gupta et al. Apr 2008 B2
7360179 Smith et al. Apr 2008 B2
7360198 Rana et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366997 Rahmat et al. Apr 2008 B1
7367008 White et al. Apr 2008 B2
7376931 Kokubun May 2008 B2
7383521 Smith et al. Jun 2008 B2
7397260 Chanda et al. Jul 2008 B2
7400627 Wu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402848 Chang et al. Jul 2008 B2
7404154 Venkatraman et al. Jul 2008 B1
7404173 Wu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7411252 Anderson et al. Aug 2008 B2
7421678 Barnes et al. Sep 2008 B2
7423298 Mariyama et al. Sep 2008 B2
7424694 Ikeda Sep 2008 B2
7424695 Tamura et al. Sep 2008 B2
7426710 Zhang et al. Sep 2008 B2
7432562 Bhattacharyya Oct 2008 B2
7434185 Dooling et al. Oct 2008 B2
7441211 Gupta et al. Oct 2008 B1
7442630 Kelberlau et al. Oct 2008 B2
7444609 Charlebois et al. Oct 2008 B2
7446352 Becker et al. Nov 2008 B2
7449371 Kemerling et al. Nov 2008 B2
7458045 Cote et al. Nov 2008 B2
7459792 Chen Dec 2008 B2
7465973 Chang et al. Dec 2008 B2
7466607 Hollis et al. Dec 2008 B2
7469396 Hayashi et al. Dec 2008 B2
7480880 Visweswariah et al. Jan 2009 B2
7480891 Sezginer Jan 2009 B2
7484197 Allen et al. Jan 2009 B2
7485934 Liaw Feb 2009 B2
7487475 Kriplani et al. Feb 2009 B1
7492013 Correale, Jr. Feb 2009 B2
7500211 Komaki Mar 2009 B2
7502275 Nii et al. Mar 2009 B2
7503026 Ichiryu et al. Mar 2009 B2
7504184 Hung et al. Mar 2009 B2
7506300 Sezginer et al. Mar 2009 B2
7508238 Yamagami Mar 2009 B2
7509621 Melvin, III Mar 2009 B2
7509622 Sinha et al. Mar 2009 B2
7512017 Chang Mar 2009 B2
7512921 Shibuya Mar 2009 B2
7514959 Or-Bach et al. Apr 2009 B2
7523429 Kroyan et al. Apr 2009 B2
7527900 Zhou et al. May 2009 B2
7538368 Yano May 2009 B2
7543262 Wang et al. Jun 2009 B2
7563701 Chang et al. Jul 2009 B2
7564134 Lee et al. Jul 2009 B2
7568174 Sezginer et al. Jul 2009 B2
7569309 Blatchford et al. Aug 2009 B2
7569310 Wallace et al. Aug 2009 B2
7569894 Suzuki Aug 2009 B2
7575973 Mokhlesi et al. Aug 2009 B2
7598541 Okamoto et al. Oct 2009 B2
7598558 Hashimoto et al. Oct 2009 B2
7614030 Hsu Nov 2009 B2
7625790 Yang Dec 2009 B2
7632610 Wallace et al. Dec 2009 B2
7640522 Gupta et al. Dec 2009 B2
7646651 Lee et al. Jan 2010 B2
7653884 Furnish et al. Jan 2010 B2
7665051 Ludwig et al. Feb 2010 B2
7700466 Booth et al. Apr 2010 B2
7712056 White et al. May 2010 B2
7739627 Chew et al. Jun 2010 B2
7749662 Matthew et al. Jul 2010 B2
7755110 Gliese et al. Jul 2010 B2
7770144 Dellinger Aug 2010 B2
7791109 Wann et al. Sep 2010 B2
7802219 Tomar et al. Sep 2010 B2
7825437 Pillarisetty et al. Nov 2010 B2
7842975 Becker et al. Nov 2010 B2
7873929 Kahng et al. Jan 2011 B2
7882456 Zach Feb 2011 B2
7888705 Becker et al. Feb 2011 B2
7898040 Nawaz Mar 2011 B2
7906801 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7908578 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7910958 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7910959 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7917877 Singh et al. Mar 2011 B2
7917879 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7923266 Thijs et al. Apr 2011 B2
7923337 Chang et al. Apr 2011 B2
7923757 Becker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7932544 Becker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7932545 Becker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7934184 Zhang Apr 2011 B2
7943966 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7943967 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7948012 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7948013 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7952119 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7956421 Becker Jun 2011 B2
7958465 Lu et al. Jun 2011 B2
7962867 White et al. Jun 2011 B2
7962879 Tang et al. Jun 2011 B2
7964267 Lyons et al. Jun 2011 B1
7971160 Osawa et al. Jun 2011 B2
7989847 Becker et al. Aug 2011 B2
7989848 Becker et al. Aug 2011 B2
7992122 Burstein et al. Aug 2011 B1
7994583 Inaba Aug 2011 B2
8004042 Yang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8022441 Becker et al. Sep 2011 B2
8030689 Becker et al. Oct 2011 B2
8035133 Becker et al. Oct 2011 B2
8044437 Venkatraman et al. Oct 2011 B1
8058671 Becker et al. Nov 2011 B2
8058690 Chang Nov 2011 B2
8072003 Becker et al. Dec 2011 B2
8072053 Li Dec 2011 B2
8088679 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088680 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088681 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088682 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089098 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089099 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089100 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089101 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089102 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089103 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089104 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8101975 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8110854 Becker et al. Feb 2012 B2
8129750 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129751 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129752 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129754 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129755 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129756 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129757 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129819 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8130529 Tanaka Mar 2012 B2
8134183 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134184 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134185 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134186 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8138525 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8161427 Morgenshtein et al. Apr 2012 B2
8178905 Toubou May 2012 B2
8178909 Venkatraman et al. May 2012 B2
8198656 Becker et al. Jun 2012 B2
8207053 Becker et al. Jun 2012 B2
8214778 Quandt et al. Jul 2012 B2
8217428 Becker et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225239 Reed et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225261 Hong et al. Jul 2012 B2
8245180 Smayling et al. Aug 2012 B2
8247846 Becker Aug 2012 B2
8253172 Becker et al. Aug 2012 B2
8253173 Becker et al. Aug 2012 B2
8258547 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258548 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258549 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258550 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258551 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258552 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264007 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264008 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264009 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8283701 Becker et al. Oct 2012 B2
8316327 Herold Nov 2012 B2
8356268 Becker et al. Jan 2013 B2
8378407 Audzeyeu et al. Feb 2013 B2
8395224 Becker et al. Mar 2013 B2
8402397 Robles et al. Mar 2013 B2
8405163 Becker et al. Mar 2013 B2
8422274 Tomita et al. Apr 2013 B2
8436400 Becker et al. May 2013 B2
8453094 Kornachuk et al. May 2013 B2
8575706 Becker et al. Nov 2013 B2
8667443 Smayling et al. Mar 2014 B2
8701071 Kornachuk et al. Apr 2014 B2
8735995 Becker et al. May 2014 B2
8756551 Becker et al. Jun 2014 B2
8836045 Becker et al. Sep 2014 B2
8839162 Amundson et al. Sep 2014 B2
8839175 Smayling et al. Sep 2014 B2
8847329 Becker et al. Sep 2014 B2
8863063 Becker et al. Oct 2014 B2
20020003270 Makino Jan 2002 A1
20020015899 Chen et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020030510 Kono et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020068423 Park et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020079927 Katoh et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020149392 Cho Oct 2002 A1
20020166107 Capodieci et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020194575 Allen et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030042930 Pileggi et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030046653 Liu Mar 2003 A1
20030061592 Agrawal et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030088839 Watanabe May 2003 A1
20030088842 Cirit May 2003 A1
20030103176 Abe et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030106037 Moniwa et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030117168 Uneme et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030124847 Houston et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030125917 Rich et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030126569 Rich et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145288 Wang et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145299 Fried et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030177465 MacLean et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030185076 Worley Oct 2003 A1
20030203287 Miyagawa Oct 2003 A1
20030229868 White et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229875 Smith et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040029372 Jang et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040049754 Liao et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040063038 Shin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040115539 Broeke et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040139412 Ito et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040145028 Matsumoto et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153979 Chang Aug 2004 A1
20040161878 Or-Bach et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040169201 Hidaka Sep 2004 A1
20040194050 Hwang et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040196705 Ishikura et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040229135 Wang et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040232444 Shimizu Nov 2004 A1
20040243966 Dellinger Dec 2004 A1
20040262640 Suga Dec 2004 A1
20050009312 Butt et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050009344 Hwang et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050012157 Cho et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050055828 Wang et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050076320 Maeda Apr 2005 A1
20050087806 Hokazono Apr 2005 A1
20050093147 Tu May 2005 A1
20050101112 Rueckes et al. May 2005 A1
20050110130 Kitabayashi et al. May 2005 A1
20050135134 Yen Jun 2005 A1
20050136340 Baselmans et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050138598 Kokubun Jun 2005 A1
20050156200 Kinoshita Jul 2005 A1
20050185325 Hur Aug 2005 A1
20050189604 Gupta et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050189614 Ihme et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050196685 Wang et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050205894 Sumikawa et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050212018 Schoellkopf et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050224982 Kemerling et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050229130 Wu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251771 Robles Nov 2005 A1
20050264320 Chan et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050264324 Nakazato Dec 2005 A1
20050266621 Kim Dec 2005 A1
20050268256 Tsai et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278673 Kawachi Dec 2005 A1
20050280031 Yano Dec 2005 A1
20060038234 Liaw Feb 2006 A1
20060063334 Donze et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060070018 Semmler Mar 2006 A1
20060084261 Iwaki Apr 2006 A1
20060091550 Shimazaki et al. May 2006 A1
20060095872 McElvain May 2006 A1
20060101370 Cui et al. May 2006 A1
20060112355 Pileggi et al. May 2006 A1
20060113567 Ohmori et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060120143 Liaw Jun 2006 A1
20060121715 Chang et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060123376 Vogel et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060125024 Ishigaki Jun 2006 A1
20060131609 Kinoshita et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060136848 Ichiryu et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060146638 Chang et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060151810 Ohshige Jul 2006 A1
20060158270 Gibet et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060177744 Bodendorf et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060181310 Rhee Aug 2006 A1
20060195809 Cohn et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060197557 Chung Sep 2006 A1
20060206854 Barnes et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060223302 Chang et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060248495 Sezginer Nov 2006 A1
20070001304 Liaw Jan 2007 A1
20070002617 Houston Jan 2007 A1
20070007574 Ohsawa Jan 2007 A1
20070038973 Li et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070074145 Tanaka Mar 2007 A1
20070094634 Seizginer et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070101305 Smith et al. May 2007 A1
20070105023 Zhou et al. May 2007 A1
20070106971 Lien et al. May 2007 A1
20070113216 Zhang May 2007 A1
20070172770 Witters et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070186196 Tanaka Aug 2007 A1
20070196958 Bhattacharya et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070209029 Ivonin et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070210391 Becker et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070234252 Visweswariah et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070234262 Uedi et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070256039 White Nov 2007 A1
20070257277 Takeda et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070274140 Joshi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070277129 Allen et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288882 Kniffin et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070290361 Chen Dec 2007 A1
20070294652 Bowen Dec 2007 A1
20070297249 Chang et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080005712 Charlebois et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021689 Yamashita et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080022247 Kojima et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080046846 Chew et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080081472 Tanaka Apr 2008 A1
20080082952 O'Brien Apr 2008 A1
20080086712 Fujimoto Apr 2008 A1
20080097641 Miyashita et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080098334 Pileggi et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080098341 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080099795 Bernstein et al. May 2008 A1
20080127000 Majumder et al. May 2008 A1
20080127029 Graur et al. May 2008 A1
20080134128 Blatchford et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080144361 Wong Jun 2008 A1
20080148216 Chan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080163141 Scheffer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080168406 Rahmat et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080211028 Suzuki Sep 2008 A1
20080216207 Tsai Sep 2008 A1
20080244494 McCullen Oct 2008 A1
20080251779 Kakoschke et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080265290 Nielsen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080276105 Hoberman et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080283910 Dreeskornfeld et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080285331 Torok et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080308848 Inaba Dec 2008 A1
20080315258 Masuda et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090014811 Becker et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024974 Yamada Jan 2009 A1
20090031261 Smith et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090032898 Becker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090032967 Becker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090037864 Becker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090057780 Wong et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090075485 Ban et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090077524 Nagamura Mar 2009 A1
20090085067 Hayashi et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090087991 Yatsuda et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090101940 Barrows et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106714 Culp et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090155990 Yanagidaira et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090181314 Shyu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187871 Cork Jul 2009 A1
20090206443 Juengling Aug 2009 A1
20090224408 Fox Sep 2009 A1
20090228853 Hong et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090228857 Kornachuk et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090273100 Aton et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090280582 Thijs et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090302372 Chang et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090319977 Saxena et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100001321 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006897 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006898 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006899 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006900 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006901 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006902 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006903 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006947 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006948 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006950 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006951 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006986 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011327 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011328 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011329 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011330 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011331 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011332 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011333 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012981 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012982 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012983 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012984 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012985 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012986 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017766 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017767 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017768 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017769 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017770 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017771 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017772 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019280 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019281 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019282 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019283 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019284 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019285 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019286 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019287 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019288 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019308 Chan et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023906 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023907 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023908 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023911 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100025731 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025732 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025733 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025734 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025735 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025736 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032722 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032723 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032724 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032726 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100037194 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100037195 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100096671 Becker et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100203689 Bernstein et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100224943 Kawasaki Sep 2010 A1
20100229140 Strolenberg et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100232212 Anderson et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100252865 Van Der Zanden Oct 2010 A1
20100264468 Xu Oct 2010 A1
20100270681 Bird et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100287518 Becker Nov 2010 A1
20110016909 Mirza et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110108890 Becker et al. May 2011 A1
20110108891 Becker et al. May 2011 A1
20110154281 Zach Jun 2011 A1
20110207298 Anderson et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110260253 Inaba Oct 2011 A1
20110298025 Haensch et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120012932 Perng et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120273841 Quandt et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130097574 Balabanov et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130200465 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130200469 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130207198 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130207199 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130254732 Kornachuk et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140197543 Kornachuk et al. Jul 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (63)
Number Date Country
0102644 Jul 1989 EP
0788166 Aug 1997 EP
1394858 Mar 2004 EP
1670062 Jun 2006 EP
1833091 Aug 2007 EP
1730777 Sep 2007 EP
2251901 Nov 2010 EP
2860920 Apr 2005 FR
58-182242 Oct 1983 JP
61-182244 Aug 1986 JP
S63-310136 Dec 1988 JP
H01284115 Nov 1989 JP
03-165061 Jul 1991 JP
H05211437 Aug 1993 JP
H05218362 Aug 1993 JP
H07-153927 Jun 1995 JP
2684980 Jul 1995 JP
1995-302706 Nov 1995 JP
1997-09289251 Nov 1997 JP
10-116911 May 1998 JP
1999-045948 Feb 1999 JP
2001-068558 Mar 2001 JP
2001-168707 Jun 2001 JP
2002-026125 Jan 2002 JP
2002-026296 Jan 2002 JP
2002-184870 Jun 2002 JP
2001-056463 Sep 2002 JP
2002-258463 Sep 2002 JP
2002-289703 Oct 2002 JP
2001-272228 Mar 2003 JP
2003-264231 Sep 2003 JP
2004-013920 Jan 2004 JP
2004-200300 Jul 2004 JP
2004-241529 Aug 2004 JP
2004-342757 Dec 2004 JP
2005-020008 Jan 2005 JP
2003-359375 May 2005 JP
2005-135971 May 2005 JP
2005-149265 Jun 2005 JP
2005-183793 Jul 2005 JP
2005-203447 Jul 2005 JP
2005-268610 Sep 2005 JP
2005-114752 Oct 2006 JP
2006-303022 Nov 2006 JP
2007-013060 Jan 2007 JP
2007-043049 Feb 2007 JP
10-0417093 Jun 1997 KR
10-1998-087485 Dec 1998 KR
1998-0084215 Dec 1998 KR
10-1999-0057943 Jul 1999 KR
10-2000-0028830 May 2000 KR
10-2002-0034313 May 2002 KR
10-2002-0070777 Sep 2002 KR
2003-0022006 Mar 2003 KR
10-2005-0030347 Mar 2005 KR
2005-0037965 Apr 2005 KR
2006-0108233 Oct 2006 KR
386288 Apr 2000 TW
WO 2005104356 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006014849 Feb 2006 WO
WO 2006052738 May 2006 WO
WO 2007014053 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2007103587 Sep 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (203)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 60/625,342, filed Aug. 25, 2006, Pileggi et al.
Acar, et al., “A Linear-Centric Simulation Framework for Parametric Fluctuations”, 2002, IEEE, Carnegie Mellon University USA, pp. 1-8.
Amazawa, et al., “Fully Planarized Four-Level Interconnection with Stacked VLAS Using CMP of Selective CVD-A1 and Insulator and its Application to Quarter Micron Gate Array LSIs”, 1995, IEEE, Japan, pp. 473-476.
Axelrad et al. “Efficient Full-Chip Yield Analysis Methodology for OPC-Corrected VLSI Design”, 2000, International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED).
Balasinski et al. “Impact of Subwavelength CD Tolerance on Device Performance”, 2002, SPIE.
Burkhardt, et al., “Dark Field Double Dipole Lithography (DDL) for Back-End-Of-Line Processes”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65200K.
Capetti, et al., “Sub k1 = 0.25 Lithography with Double Patterning Technique for 45nm Technology Node Flash Memory Devices at λ = 193nm”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65202K.
Capodieci, L., et al., “Toward a Methodology for Manufacturability-Driven Design Rule Exploration,” DAC 2004, Jun. 7-11, 2004, San Diego, CA.
Chandra, et al., “An Interconnect Channel Design Methodology for High Performance Integrated Circuits”, 2004, IEEE, Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 1-6.
Cheng, et al., “Feasibility Study of Splitting Pitch Technology on 45nm Contact Patterning with 0.93 NA”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65202N.
Chow, et al., “The Design of a SRAM-Based Field-Programmable Gate Array—Part II: Circuit Design and Layout”, 1999, IEEE, vol. 7 # 3 pp. 321-330.
Clark et al. “Managing Standby and Active Mode Leakage Power in Deep Sub-Micron Design”, Aug. 9-11, 2004, ACM.
Cobb et al. “Using OPC to Optimize for Image Slope and Improve Process Window”, 2003, SPIE.
Devgan “Leakage Issues in IC Design: Part 3”, 2003, CCAD.
DeVor, et al., “Statistical Quality Design and Control”, 1992, Macmillan Publishing Company, pp. 264-267.
Dictionary.com, “channel,” in Collins English Dictionary—Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition. Source location: HarperCollins Publishers. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/channel. Available: http://dictionary.reference.com.
Dusa, et al. “Pitch Doubling Through Dual Patterning Lithography Challenges in Integration and Litho Budgets”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65200G.
El-Gamal, “Fast, Cheap and Under Control: The Next Implementation Fabric”, Jun. 2-6, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 354-355.
Firedberg, et al., “Modeling Within-Field Gate Length Spatial Variation for Process-Design Co-Optimization,” 2005 Proc. of SPIE vol. 5756, pp. 178-188.
Frankel, “Quantum State Control Interference Lithography and Trim Double Patterning for 32-16nm Lithography”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65202L.
Garg, et al. “Lithography Driven Layout Design”, 2005, IEEE.
Grobman et al. “Reticle Enhancement Technology Trends: Resource and Manufacturability Implications for the Implementation of Physical Designs” Apr. 1-4, 2001, ACM.
Grobman et al. “Reticle Enhancement Technology: Implications and Challenges for Physical Design” Jun. 18-22, 2001, ACM.
Gupta et al. “Enhanced Resist and Etch CD Control by Design Perturbation”, Oct. 4-7, 2006, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Gupta et al. “A Practical Transistor-Level Dual Threshold Voltage Assignment Methodology”, 2005, Sixth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED).
Gupta et al. “Detailed Placement for Improved Depth of Focus and CD Control”, 2005, ACM.
Gupta et al. “Joining the Design and Mask Flows for Better and Cheaper Masks”, Oct. 14-17, 2004, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Gupta et al. “Manufacturing-Aware Physical Design”, 2003, ACM.
Gupta et al. “Selective Gate-Length Biasing for Cost-Effective Runtime Leakage Control”, Jun. 7-11, 2004, ACM.
Gupta et al. “Wafer Topography-Aware Optical Proximity Correction for Better DOF Margin and CD Control”, Apr. 13-15, 2005, SPIE.
Gupta, Puncct, et al., “Manufacturing-aware Design Methodology for Assist Feature Correctness,” 2005.
Ha et al., “Reduction in the Mask Error Factor by Optimizing the Diffraction Order of a Scattering Bar in Lithography,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 46, No. 5, May 2005, pp. 1213-1217.
Hakko, et al., “Extension of the 2D-TCC Technique to Optimize Mask Pattern Layouts,” 2008 Proc. of SPIE vol. 7028, 11 pages.
Halpin et al., “Detailed Placement with Net Length Constraints,” Publication Year 2003, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on System-on-Chip for Real-Time Applications, pp. 22-27.
Hayashida, et al., “Manufacturable Local Interconnect technology Fully Compatible with Titanium Salicide Process”, Jun. 11-12, 1991, VMIC Conference.
Heng, et al., “A VLSI Artwork Legalization Technique Base on a New Criterion of Minimum Layout Perturbation”, 1997, ACM Press, pp. 116-121.
Heng, et al., “Toward Through-Process Layout Quality Metrics”, Mar. 3-4, 2005, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Hu, et al., “Synthesis and Placement Flow for Gain-Based Programmable Regular Fabrics”, Apr. 6-9, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 197-203.
Hur et al., “Mongrel: Hybrid Techniques for Standard Cell Placement,” Publication Year 2000, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design, ICCAD-2000, pp. 165-170.
Hutton, et al., “A Methodology for FPGA to Structured-ASIC Synthesis and Verification”, 2006, EDAA, pp. 64-69.
INTEL Core Microarchitecture White Paper “Introducing the 45 nm Next-Generation Intel Core Microarchitecture,” 2007, Intel Corporation.
Jayakumar, et al., “A Metal and VIA Maskset Programmable VLSI Design Methodology using PLAs”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 590-594.
Jhaveri, T. et al., Maximization of Layout Printability/Manufacturability by Extreme Layout Regularity, Proc. of the SPIE, Apr. 2006.
Kang, S.M., Metal-Metal Matrix (M3) for High-Speed MOS VLSI Layout, IEEE Trans. on CAD, vol. CAD-6, No. 5, Sep. 1987.
Kawashima, et al., “Mask Optimization for Arbitrary Patterns with 2D-TCC Resolution Enhancement Technique,” 2008 Proc. of SPIE vol. 6924, 12 pages.
Kheterpal, et al., “Design Methodology for IC Manufacturability Based on Regular Logic-Bricks”, DAC, Jun. 13-17, 2005, IEEE/AMC, vol. 6520.
Kheterpal, et al., “Routing Architecture Exploration for Regular Fabrics”, DAC, Jun. 7-11, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 204-207.
Kim, et al., “Double Exposure Using 193nm Negative Tone Photoresist”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65202M.
Kim, et al., “Issues and Challenges of Double Patterning Lithography in DRAM”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65200H.
Koorapaty, et al., “Exploring Logic Block Granularity for Regular Fabrics”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 1-6.
Koorapaty, et al., “Heterogeneous Logic Block Architectures for Via-Patterned Programmable Fabric”, 13th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL) 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Sep. 2003, Springer-Verlag, vol. 2778, pp. 426-436.
Koorapaty, et al., “Modular, Fabric-Specific Synthesis for Programmable Architectures”, 12th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL—2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)), Sep. 2002, Springer-Verlag, vol. 2438 pp. 132-141.
Kuh et al., “Recent Advances in VLSI Layout,” Publication Year 1990, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 78, Issue 2, pp. 237-263.
Lavin et al. “Backend DAC Flows for “Restrictive Design Rules””, 2004, IEEE.
Li, et al., “A Linear-Centric Modeling Approach to Harmonic Balance Analysis”, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-6.
Li, et al., “Nonlinear Distortion Analysis Via Linear-Centric Models”, 2003, IEEE, pp. 897-903.
Liebmann et al., “Integrating DfM Components into a Cohesive Design-to-Silicon Solution,” Proc. SPIE 5756, Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing III, 1 (May 13, 2005).
Liebmann et al., “Optimizing Style Options for Sub-Resolution Assist Features,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4346, 2001, pp. 141-152.
Liebmann, et al., “High-Performance Circuit Design for the RET-Enabled 65nm Technology Node”, Feb. 26-27, 2004, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 5379 pp. 20-29.
Liebmann, L. W., Layout Impact of Resolution Enhancement Techniques: Impediment or Opportunity?, International Symposium on Physical Design, 2003.
Liu et al., “Double Patterning with Multilayer Hard Mask Shrinkage for Sub 0.25 k1 Lithography,” Proc. SPIE 6520, Optical Microlithography XX, 65202J (Mar. 27, 2007).
Mansfield et al., “Lithographic Comparison of Assist Feature Design Strategies,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4000, 2000, pp. 63-76.
Miller, “Manufacturing-Aware Design Helps Boost IC Yield”, Sep. 9, 2004, http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=47102054.
Mishra, P., et al., “FinFET Circuit Design,” Nanoelectronic Circuit Design, pp. 23-54, 2011.
Mo, et al., “Checkerboard: A Regular Structure and its Synthesis, International Workshop on Logic and Synthesis”, 2003, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, UC Berkeley, California, pp. 1-7.
Mo, et al., “PLA-Based Regular Structures and Their Synthesis”, 2003, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, IEEE, pp. 723-729.
Mo, et al., “Regular Fabrics in Deep Sub-Micron Integrated-Circuit Design”, 2004, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Entire Book.
Moore, Samuel K., “Intel 45-nanometer Penryn Processors Arrive,” Nov. 13, 2007, IEEE Spectrum, http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/design/intel-45nanometer-penryn-processors-arrive.
Mutoh et al. “1-V Power Supply High-Speed Digital Circuit Technology with Multithreshold-Voltage CMOS”, 1995, IEEE.
Op de Beek, et al., “Manufacturability issues with Double Patterning for 50nm half pitch damascene applications, using RELACS® shrink and corresponding OPC”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65200I.
Or-Bach, “Programmable Circuit Fabrics”, Sep. 18, 2001, e-ASIC, pp. 1-36.
Otten, et al., “Planning for Performance”, DAC 1998, ACM Inc., pp. 122-127.
Pack et al. “Physical & Timing Verification of Subwavclength-Scale Designs-Part I: Lithography Impact on MOSFETs”, 2003, SPIE.
Pandini, et al., “Congestion-Aware Logic Synthesis”, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-8.
Pandini, et al., “Understanding and Addressing the Impact of Wiring Congestion During Technology Mapping”, ISPD Apr. 7-10, 2002, ACM Press, pp. 131-136.
Patel, et al., “An Architectural Exploration of Via Patterned Gate Arrays, ISPD 2003”, Apr. 6, 2003, pp. 184-189.
Pham, D., et al., “FINFET Device Junction Formation Challenges,” 2006 International Workshop on Junction Technology, pp. 73-77, Aug. 2006.
Pileggi, et al., “Exploring Regular Fabrics to Optimize the Performance-Cost Trade-Offs, Proceedings of the 40th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2003”, Jun. 2003, ACM Press, pp. 782-787.
Poonawala, et al., “ILT for Double Exposure Lithography with Conventional and Novel Materials”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65202Q.
Qian et al. “Advanced Physical Models for Mask Data Verification and Impacts on Physical Layout Synthesis” 2003. IEEE.
Ran, et al., “An Integrated Design Flow for a Via-Configurable Gate Array”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 582-589.
Ran, et al., “Designing a Via-Configurable Regular Fabric”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC). Proceedings of the IEEE, Oct. 2004, Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 423-426.
Ran, et al., “On Designing Via-Configurable Cell Blocks for Regular Fabrics” Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2004, Jun. 2004, ACM Press, s 198-203.
Ran, et al., “The Magic of a Via-Configurable Regular Fabric”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) Oct. 2004.
Ran, et al., “Via-Configurable Routing Architectures and Fast Design Mappability Estimation for Regular Fabrics”, 2005, IEEE, pp. 25-32.
Reis, et al., “Physical Design Methodologies for Performance Predictability and Manufacturability”, Apr. 14-16, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 390-397.
Robertson, et al., “The Modeling of Double Patterning Lithographic Processes”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65200J.
Rosenbluth, et al., “Optimum Mask and Source Patterns to Print a Given Shape,” 2001 Proc. of SPIE vol. 4346, pp. 486-502.
Rovner, “Design for Manufacturability in Via Programmable Gate Arrays”, May 2003, Graduate School of Carnegie Mellon University.
Sengupta, “An Integrated CAD Framework Linking VLSI Layout Editors and Process Simulators”, 1998, Thesis for Rice University, pp. 1-101.
Sengupta, et al., “An Integrated CAD Framework Linking VLSI Layout Editors and Process Simulators”, 1996, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 2726; pp. 244-252.
Sherlekar, “Design Considerations for Regular Fabrics”, Apr. 18-21, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 97-102.
Shi et al., “Understanding the Forbidden Pitch and Assist Feature Placement,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4562, 2002, pp. 968-979.
Smayling et al., “APF Pitch Halving for 22 nm Logic Cells Using Gridded Design Rules,” Proceedings of SPIE, USA, vol. 6925, Jan. 1, 2008, pp. 69251E-1-69251E-7.
Socha, et al., “Simultaneous Source Mask Optimization (SMO),” 2005 Proc. of SPIE vol. 5853, pp. 180-193.
Sreedhar et al. “Statistical Yield Modeling for Sub-Wavelength Lithography”, 2008, IEEE.
Stapper, “Modeling of Defects in Integrated Circuit Photolithographic Patterns”, Jul. 1, 1984, IBM, vol. 28 # 4, pp. 461-475.
Taylor, et al., “Enabling Energy Efficiency in Via-Patterned Gate Array Devices”, Jun. 7-11, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 874-877.
Tian et al. “Model-Based Dummy Feature Placement for Oxide Chemical—Mechanical Polishing Manufacturability” 2000, ACM.
Tong, et al., “Regular Logic Fabrics for a Via Patterned Gate Array (VPGA), Custom Integrated Circuits Conference”, Sep. 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 53-56.
Vanleenhove, et al., “A Litho-Only Approach to Double Patterning”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65202F.
Wang, et al., “Performance Optimization for Gridded-Layout Standard Cells”, 2004, vol. 5567 SPIE.
Wang, J. et al., Standard Cell Layout with Regular Contact Placement, IEEE Trans. on Semicon. Mfg., vol. 17, No. 3, Aug. 2004.
Webb, Clair, “45nm Design for Manufacturing,” Intel Technology Journal, vol. 12, Issue 02, Jun. 17, 2008, ISSN 1535-864X, pp. 121-130.
Webb, Clair, “Layout Rule Trends and Affect upon CPU Design”, 2006, vol. 6156 SPIE.
Wenren, et al., “The Improvement of Photolithographic Fidelity of Two-dimensional Structures Though Double Exposure Method”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65202I.
Wilcox, et al., “Design for Manufacturability: A Key to Semiconductor Manufacturing Excellence”, 1998, IEEE, pp. 308-313.
Wong, et al., “Resolution Enhancement Techniques and Design for Manufacturability: Containing and Accounting for Variabilities in Integrated Circuit Creation,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Jul.-Sep. 2007, vol. 6(3), 2 pages.
Wu, et al., “A Study of Process Window Capabilities for Two-dimensional Structures under Double Exposure Condition”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65202O.
Xiong, et al., “The Constrained Via Minimization Problem for PCB and VLSI Design”, 1988, ACM Press/IEEE, pp. 573-578.
Yamamaoto, et al., “New Double Exposure Technique without Alternating Phase Shift Mask”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 652052P.
Yamazoe, et al., “Resolution Enhancement by Aerial Image Approximation with 2D-TCC,” 2007 Proc. of SPIE vol. 6730, 12 pages.
Yang, et al., “Interconnection Driven VLSI Module Placement Based on Quadratic Programming and Considering Congestion Using LFF Principles”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 1243-1247.
Yao, et al., “Multilevel Routing With Redundant Via Insertion”, Oct. 2006, IEEE, pp. 1148-1152.
Yu, et al., “True Process Variation Aware Optical Proximity Correction with Variational Lithography Modeling and Model Calibration,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Jul.-Sep. 2007, vol. 6(3), 16 pages.
Zheng, et al.“Modeling and Analysis of Regular Symmetrically Structured Power/Ground Distribution Networks”, DAC, Jun. 10-14, 2002, ACM Press, pp. 395-398.
Zhu, et al., “A Stochastic Integral Equation Method for Modeling the Rough Surface Effect on Interconnect Capacitance”, 2004, IEEE.
Zhu, et al., “A Study of Double Exposure Process Design with Balanced Performance Parameters for Line/Space Applications”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; 65202H.
Zuchowski, et al., “A Hybrid ASIS and FPGA Architecture”, 2003, IEEE, pp. 187-194.
Alam, Syed M. et al., “A Comprehensive Layout Methodology and Layout-Specific Circuit Analyses for Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” Mar. 21, 2002.
Alam, Syed M. et al., “Layout-Specific Circuit Evaluation in 3-D Integrated Circuits,” May 2003.
Aubusson, Russel, “Wafer-Scale Integration of Semiconductor Memory,” Apr. 1979.
Bachtold, “Logic Circuits with Carbon,” Nov. 9, 2001.
Baker, R. Jacob, “CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation (2nd Edition),” Nov. 1, 2004.
Baldi et al., “A Scalable Single Poly EEPROM Cell for Embedded Memory Applications,” pp. 1-4, Fig. 1, Sep. 1997.
Cao, Ke, “Design for Manufacturing (DFM) in Submicron VLSI Design,” Aug. 2007.
Capodieci, Luigi, “From Optical Proximity Correction to Lithography-Driven Physical Design (1996-2006): 10 years of Resolution Enhancement Technology and the roadmap enablers for the next decade,” Proc. SPIE 6154, Optical Microlithography XIX, 615401, Mar. 20, 2006.
Chang, Leland et al., “Stable SRAM Cell Design for the 32 nm Node and Beyond,” Jun. 16, 2005.
Cheung, Peter, “Layout Design,” Apr. 4, 2004.
Chinnery, David, “Closing the Gap Between ASIC & Custom: Tools and Techniques for High-Performance ASIC Design,” Jun. 30, 2002.
Chou, Dyiann et al., “Line End Optimization through Optical Proximity Correction (OPC): A Case Study,” Feb. 19, 2006.
Clein, Dan, “CMOS IC Layout: Concepts, Methodologies, and Tools,” Dec. 22, 1999.
Cowell, “Exploiting Non-Uniform Access Time,” Jul. 2003.
Das, Shamik, “Design Automation and Analysis of Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” May 1, 2004.
Dehaene, W. et al., “Technology-Aware Design of SRAM Memory Circuits,” Mar. 2007.
Deng, Liang et al., “Coupling-aware Dummy Metal Insertion for Lithography,” p. 1, col. 2, 2007.
Devoivre et al., “Validated 90nm CMOS Technology Platfoir 1 with Low-k Copper Interconnects for Advanced System-on-Chip (SoC),” 2002.
Enbody, R. J., “Near-Optimal n-Layer Channel Routing,” 1986.
Ferretti, Marcos et al., “High Performance Asynchronous ASIC Back-End Design Flow Using Single-Track Full-Buffer Standard Cells,” Apr. 23, 2004.
Garg, Manish et al., “Litho-driven Layouts for Reducing Performance Variability,” p. 2, Figs. 2b-2c, May 23, 2005.
Greenway, Robert et al., “32nm 1-D Regular Pitch SRAM Bitcell Design for Interference-Assisted Lithography,” 2008.
Gupta et al., “Modeling Edge Placement Error Distribution in Standard Cell Library,” Feb. 23-24, 2006.
Grad, Johannes et al., “A standard cell library for student projects,” Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education, Jun. 2, 2003.
Hartono, Roy et al., “Active Device Generation for Automatic Analog Layout Retargeting Tool,” May 13, 2004.
Hartono, Roy et al., “IPRAIL—Intellectual Property Reuse-based Analog IC Layout Automation,” Mar. 17, 2003.
Hastings, Alan, “The Art of Analog Layout (2nd Edition),” Jul. 4, 2005.
Hurata et al., “A Genuine Design Manufacturability Check for Designers,” 2006.
Institute of Microelectronic Systems, “Digital Subsystem Design,” Oct. 13, 2006.
Ishida, M. et al., “A Novel 6T-SRAM Cell Technology Designed with Rectangular Patterns Scalable beyond 0.18 pm Generation and Desirable for Ultra High Speed Operation,” 1998.
Jakusovszky, “Linear IC Parasitic Element Simulation Methodology,” Oct. 1, 1993.
Jangkrajarng, Nuttorn et al., “Template-Based Parasitic-Aware Optimization and Retargeting of Analog and RF Integrated Circuit Layouts,” Nov. 5, 2006.
Kahng, Andrew B., “Design Optimizations DAC-2006 DFM Tutorial, part V),” 2006.
Kang, Sung-Mo et al., “CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits Analysis & Design,” Oct. 29, 2002.
Kottoor, Mathew Francis, “Development of a Standard Cell Library based on Deep Sub-Micron SCMOS Design Rules using Open Source Software (MS Thesis),” Aug. 1, 2005.
Kubicki, “Intel 65nm and Beyond (or Below): IDF Day 2 Coverage (available at http://www.anandtech.com/show/1468/4),” Sep. 9, 2004.
Kuhn, Kelin J., “Reducing Variation in Advanced Logic Technologies: Approaches to Process and Design for Manufacturability of Nanoscale CMOS,” p. 27, Dec. 12, 2007.
Kurokawa, Atsushi et al., “Dummy Filling Methods for Reducing Interconnect Capacitance and Number of Fills, Proc. of ISQED,” pp. 586-591, 2005.
Lavin, Mark, “Open Access Requirements from RDR Design Flows,” Nov. 11, 2004.
Liebmann, Lars et al., “Layout Methodology Impact of Resolution Enhancement Techniques,” pp. 5-6, 2003.
Liebmann, Lars et al., “TCAD development for lithography resolution enhancement,” Sep. 2001.
Lin, Chung-Wei et al., “Recent Research and Emerging Challenges in Physical Design for Manufacturability/Reliability,” Jan. 26, 2007.
McCullen, Kevin W., “Layout Techniques for Phase Correct and Gridded Wiring,” pp. 13, 17, Fig. 5, 2006.
MOSIS, “Design Rules MOSIS Scalable CMOS (SCMOS) (Revision 8.00),” Oct. 4, 2004.
MOSIS, “MOSIS Scalable CMOS (SCMOS) Design Rules (Revision 7.2), 1995.”.
Muta et al., “Manufacturability-Aware Design of Standard Cells,” pp. 2686-2690, Figs. 3, 12, Dec. 2007.
Na, Kee-Yeol et al., “A Novel Single Polysilicon EEPROM Cell With a Polyfinger Capacitor,” Nov. 30, 2007.
Pan et al., “Redundant Via Enahnced Maze Routing for Yield Improvement,” 2005.
Park, Tae Hong, “Characterization and Modeling of Pattern Dependencies in Copper Interconnects for Integrated Circuits,” Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, 2002.
Patel, Chetan, “An Architectural Exploration of Via Patterned Gate Arrays (CMU Master's Project),” May 2003.
Pease, R. Fabian et al., “Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics,” 2008.
Serrano, Diego Emilio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Facultad De Ingenieria, Departamento De Electronica, “Diseño De Multiplicador 4 X 8 en VLSI, Introduccion al VLSI,” 2006.
Pramanik, “Impact of layout on variability of devices for sub 90nm technologies,” 2004.
Pramanik, Dipankar et al., “Lithography-driven layout of logic cells for 65-nm node (SPIE Proceedings vol. 5042),” Jul. 10, 2003.
Roy et al., “Extending Aggressive Low-K1 Design Rule Requirements For 90 and 65 Nm Nodes Via Simultaneous Optimization of Numerical Aperture, Illumination and Optical Proximity Correction,” J.Micro/Nanolith, MEMS MOEMS, 4(2), 023003, Apr. 26, 2005.
Saint, Christopher et al., “IC Layout Basics: A Practical Guide,” Chapter 3, Nov. 5, 2001.
Saint, Christopher et al., “IC Mask Design: Essential Layout Techniques,” 2002.
Scheffer, “Physical CAD Changes to Incorporate Design for Lithography and Manufacturability,” Feb. 4, 2004.
Smayling, Michael C., “Part 3: Test Structures, Test Chips, In-Line Metrology & Inspection,” 2006.
Spence, Chris, “Full-Chip Lithography Simulation and Design Analysis: How OPC is changing IC Design, Emerging Lithographic Technologies IX,” May 6, 2005.
Subramaniam, Anupama R., “Design Rule Optimization of Regular layout for Leakage Reduction in Nanoscale Design,” pp. 474-478, Mar. 24, 2008.
Tang, C. W. et al., “A compact large signal model of LDMOS,” 2002.
Taylor, Brian et al., “Exact Combinatorial Optimization Methods for Physical Design of Regular Logic Bricks,” Jun. 8, 2007.
Tian, Ruiqi et al., “Dummy Feature Placement for Chemical-Mechanical Uniformity in a Shallow Trench Isolation Process,” IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 63-71, Jan. 2002.
Tian, Ruiqi et al., “Proximity Dummy Feature Placement and Selective Via Sizing for Process Uniformity in a Trench-First-Via-Last Dual-Inlaid Metal Process,” Proc. of IITC, pp. 48-50, 2001.
Torres, J. A. et al., “RET Compliant Cell Generation for sub-130nm Processes,” 2002.
Uyemura, John P., “Introduction to VLSI Circuits and Systems,” Chapters 2, 3, 5, and Part 3, 2002.
Uyemura, John, “Chip Design for Submicron VLSI: CMOS Layout and Simulation,” Chapters 2-5, 7-9, Feb. 8, 2005.
Verhaegen et al., “Litho Enhancements for 45nm-nod MuGFETs,” Aug. 1, 2005.
Wong, Ban P., “Bridging the Gap between Dreams and Nano-Scale Reality (DAC-2006 DFM Tutorial),” 2006.
Wang, Dunwei et al., “Complementary Symmetry Silicon Nanowire Logic: Power-Efficient Inverters with Gain,” 2006.
Wang, Jun et al., “Effects of grid-placed contacts on circuit performance,” pp. 135-139, Figs. 2, 4-8, Feb. 28, 2003.
Wang, Jun et al., “Standard cell design with regularly placed contacts and gates (SPIE vol. 5379),” 2004.
Wang, Jun et al., “Standard cell design with resolution-enhancement-technique-driven regularly placed contacts and gates,” J. Micro/Nanolith, MEMS MOEMS, 4(1), 013001, Mar. 16, 2005.
Watson, Bruce, “Challenges and Automata Applications in Chip-Design Software,” pp. 38-40, 2007.
Weste, Neil et al., “CMOS VLSI Design: A Circuits and Systems Perspective, 3rd Edition,” May 21, 2004.
Wingerden, Johannes van, “Experimental verification of proved printability for litho-driven designs,” Mar. 14, 2005.
Wong, Alfred K., “Microlithography: Trends, Challenges, Solutions,, and Their Impact on Design,” 2003.
Xu, Gang, “Redundant-Via Enhanced Maze Routing for Yield Improvement,” 2005.
Yang, Jie, “Manufacturability Aware Design,” pp. 93, 102, Fig. 5.2, 2007.
Yongshun, Wang et al., “Static Induction Devices with Planar Type Buried Gate,” 2004.
Zobrist, George (editor), “Progress in Computer Aided VLSI Design: Implementations (Ch. 5),” 1990.
Petley, Graham, “VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Library Design,” from website www.vlsitechnology.org, Jan. 11, 2005.
Liebmann, Lars, et al., “Layout Optimization at the Pinnacle of Optical Lithography,” Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing II, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5042, Jul. 8, 2003.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100031211 A1 Feb 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61085800 Aug 2008 US