This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/392,104, the contents of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
1. Statement of the Technical Field
The inventive concepts relate to the design and manufacture of boxes and other types of containers, such as but not limited to multifaceted and fluted containers.
2. Description of Related Art
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,935,997, hereinafter referred to as “the '997 patent,” a method for designing folded sheet structures is described where the corresponding flat unfolded sheet may have a creasing pattern that forms a tessellation on the sheet. The term tessellation refers to a mosaic pattern or other division of a sheet into polygonal or curved regions, or in some cases may refer more specifically to the edges and vertices between the regions in such a division.
Designing folding patterns that have multiple vertices located away from the boundary of a sheet can be difficult. A sheet with one such interior vertex may be produced by conventional methods by having fold creases emanating as rays from the vertex in alternate up-fold/down-fold convexity to yield a coffee-filter like structure. In both the folded and unfolded form the total angle of material surrounding the interior vertex is 360 degrees. To design folding tessellations that have multiple interior vertices is more difficult. Each vertex in the folded three-dimensional form must have emanating fold edges in both convexities, the angles surrounding the vertices must total 360 degrees, and the lengths of the edges between the vertices must be selected to agree trigonometrically with the pleat angles belonging to each of the vertices. In the '997 patent a family of methods for designing folding tessellations is given.
In corrugated materials the corrugations give added bending moment that resists bending across the flutes. This is seen in many materials, including corrugated cardboard, corrugated roofs, and corrugated pipe. In these cases the material has added strength due to the fluted pattern. For generally round shapes, forming the corrugations in the circumferential direction requires the sheet material to be deformed due to the difference in length between the inner and outer radius. This is seen in corrugated pipe, where the sheet material must have enough plasticity to enable the in-plane deformation of the fluting process. For circumferential flutes, as the depth of the flutes increases the required deformation also increases. For paper and other materials with nearly no plasticity, this means that the additional strength resulting from the presence of flutes is not available when a conventional circumferential corrugation methodology is used.
Methods for designing containers and boxes from foldable sheets produce advanced three-dimensional structures with improved characteristics. This includes boxes for consumer items, containers for industrial products, shipping packages, display packages and other applications. The method may be described by applying and adapting the methods disclosed in the '997 patent, and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/233,524, hereinafter referred to as “the '524 application.” The contents of the '997 patent and the '524 application are incorporated by reference herein in their respective entireties.
Methods are disclosed herein for providing containers and boxes with multifaceted and/or fluted side walls. The boxes, including their floors and lids, may be easily assembled from a single die-cut pattern. In other embodiments the sidewalls of the box may be folded from a single sheet of material, with the floor and lid attached separately.
The multifaceted or fluted side walls may be designed for improved crush resistance, improved vibration absorption, improved hand gripping, and improved visibility and recognition. In some applications, crush resistance is of primary importance to protect the goods within the box, and circumferentially fluted boxes generally have relatively high crush resistance. For delicate bottles and other goods the flute depth provides an energy absorbing zone between the goods and an impact source.
In the same or other embodiments the multifaceted surface may be designed for its properties as an ideal gripping surface, with undulations naturally conforming to a finger pattern so that the box is easily handled without dropping and with much advantage over existing smooth-walled boxes. In the same or other embodiments the multifaceted surface may be designed so that it is easily recognized and distinguishable from other boxes. This feature can result in advantages such as the ability to readily identify boxes containing hazardous materials, or in providing brand recognition in retail displays. In other embodiments the side walls may be designed for a combination of the above advantages, including a container with improved crush resistance, improved gripping and improved recognition. The multifaceted surface can also be designed so that the boxes can pack efficiently.
Plastics can be formed into containers with complex surface geometry. Similarly, paper-mâché and various multi-piece cardboard assembly techniques can be used to construct boxes with fluted side-walls. However these processes do not provide an inexpensive manufacturing process that applies broadly to sheet materials. Sheet materials may be purchased efficiently on rolls. The folding of sheet materials is a very efficient construction technique. Conventional folding techniques do not provide a methodology for designing box constructions with folding patterns having multiple interior vertices. The application of the inventive concepts disclosed herein can potentially extend the economic benefits of using folding sheet materials by providing methods for producing complex box and container geometries with diversely tailored structural advantages.
The inventive concepts disclosed herein enable boxes and other containers to be given circumferential flutes by using advanced folding patterns that require no in-plane deformation of the material. The patterns may have the box floors and lids incorporated into a one-piece folding pattern. Multiple floor and lid systems are available using single or multiple piece construction, including removable lids, integrated or attached lids with holes therein for dispensing items, and lids with convex or concave geometry.
Embodiments will be described with reference to the following drawing figures, in which like numerals represent like items throughout the figures and in which:
The tessellation pattern depicted in
a and
a and
The inventive concepts are described with reference to the attached figures. The figures are not drawn to scale and they are provided merely to illustrate the instant inventive concepts. Several aspects of the inventive concepts are described below with reference to example applications for illustration. It should be understood that numerous specific details, relationships, and methods are set forth to provide a full understanding of the inventive concepts. One having ordinary skill in the relevant art, however, will readily recognize that the inventive concepts can be practiced without one or more of the specific details or with other methods. In other instances, well-known structures or operation are not shown in detail to avoid obscuring the inventive concepts. The inventive concepts is not limited by the illustrated ordering of acts or events, as some acts may occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts or events. Furthermore, not all illustrated acts or events are required to implement a methodology in accordance with the inventive concepts.
The inventive concepts disclosed herein can be applied to the design of multifaceted or fluted sidewall boxes or containers. The boxes may be generally cylindrical or polygonal. The boxes can have a whole in the center of a lid for dispensing items. The lid may be planer, concave, convex, or of more complex geometry. Changing the tab design, which sides of the box the lid and floor are attached to, and other variations will produce a box that is functionally similar. This boxes can be used, for example, for dispensing tissues, string, ribbon, latex gloves, candy and other products, and for receiving objects including business cards, coins, and other items.
The boxes may have a cross-section at certain heights that is a hexagon. Other polygons may be used similarly. The boxes may include circumferential flutes that have, for example, square and octagonal cross sections at various heights.
The inventive methods disclosed herein can be applied to the design of boxes or containers as follows:
The above steps can be performed as follows to design an octagonal box with facets that are primarily triangular surfaces, and square lid and floor offset 45 degrees from each other. This particular application is described for exemplary purposes only. The inventive concepts disclosed herein can be used to design containers having other types of geometries.
To produce a generally octagonal box, the initial choice for CCS is the octagon. As the CCS is used to define a reflection pattern, and it takes two adjacent segments to define a reflection, only the interior vertices of the CCS have this reflection defined. In particular, a polyline (piecewise linear curve, chain of segments) with eight segments has nine vertices, of which two are end vertices. Thus, only the seven interior vertices are locations in the Column Cross-Section Algorithm that generate the RED wave folds. The seven interior vertices have six segments between them. Thus an eight segment CCS may produce a tessellation with only six polygons in the column direction. For repeating planer core materials the reduction by two in the column length does not cause complication. But for box designs that must close to form a connected tube, the missing segments and facets of the generated surface at first pose a problem. To address this problem, the CCS needs to be adapted from a simple sequence of eight segments forming an octagon, to a sequence of ten segments going around the octagon with two extra steps in overlap. This will generate the connected tube with edges that meet exactly or close to exactly. However, in practice this could require the seam of the tube to be taped or glued edge-to-edge. It may be desirable to have an overlap region when the cylinder is closed. Glue may be applied to the overlapping surfaces in the overlap region to prevent the cylinder from unfolding and opening. To provide the overlap region, the CCS may be chosen to have three overlapping segments and in the case of the octagon follow around the octagon to produce a CCS that is eleven segments long. An example of a surface generated with a CCS that had only one overlapping segment is shown in
Next, the row data is chosen to produce a final pattern with mostly triangular surfaces. Since the chosen CCS is an extended octagon, it has vertex angles all of the same convexity. Thus, the successive RED waves alternate in sign. The waves may be configured to be large enough so that successive waves meet at vertices on the tessellation and thereby produce triangles in the tessellation. In a preferred embodiment, the selected RED wave is the triangle wave, also called the zig-zag wave, that is the wave with segments of common length, common slope magnitude and alternate slope sign. By choosing the amplitude of the RED wave to be sufficiently large (402), and having successive RED waves alternate in sign, the neighboring RED waves may be made to meet and divide the surface into triangles, as seen in
The above illustrates how the CCS and RED may be adapted for use in the Wave Fold Method to produce the wall structure for a container with fluted side walls, including the full closed tube, the glue tabs, and controlled floor and lid perimeter geometry.
The Column Strip Map Method may also be adapted and augmented to generate the above-described triangulated box surface. The entry data may be selected with column data in the form of a CSM, and row data in the form of the RCS. The CCS described above may be seen as a reflection scheme in generating the box geometry. By drawing the extended octagonal CCS in the plane, and drawing the reflection line at each vertex, the CCS may be widened into a strip map. To do this, the CCS is offset maximally within the limits of maintaining the same reflection line sequence. The process is shown for a generalized CCS in
To design and incorporate glue tabs using the CSM and Strip Map Method, one or more initial polygons in the strip map are duplicated to their cyclically connecting position at the end of the strip map. This is done in
In the unfolded CSM, the triangles connect in sequence to form a strip (
To produce the triangle faceted surface, the RCS wave may have sufficient amplitude to offset from the CCS to meet the vertices of the CSM. The amplitude of (302) is the combined offset in both directions of the vertices from the center line (301), and should be equal to the width of the unfolded CSM in
The lid and floor perimeter may be addressed next. The triangle wave RCS may have first and last segments that end with positive or negative amplitude, or are shortened for an intermediate amplitude. In embodiments with an octagonal floor or lid, the end vertices of the RCS may lie on the wave's center line, midway between maximal and minimal amplitude vertices. This is done where the triangle wave (302) has initial vertex on centerline (301). This may be done by reducing the corresponding first or last segment of the RCS to half length, so that the endpoint vertex would lie over the midline in the unfolded CSM. These end vertices may then generate an octagonal lid or floor perimeter. The floor perimeter generated by the initial endpoint of (302) is (405) on the unfolded pattern and seen as an octagon in the folded
The above method illustrates how the CSM and RCS may be adapted for use in the Column Strip Map Method to produce the wall structure for a container with fluted side walls, including the full closed tube, the glue tabs, and controlled floor and lid perimeter geometry.
The column data in the Wave Tessellation Method is the CET. To design boxes with anticipated overall shape using the Wave Tessellation Method may require some experimentation because this methodology produces the tessellation for the folded pattern without first generating the three-dimensional image. In a preferred embodiment the user may generate the three-dimensional image using the Two Cross-Section Method, the Strip Map Method, or the Wave Fold Method, and may then back-calculate the tessellation. The CET may be read from the tessellation. A choice of CET is shown as the dashed line (401). The CET has vertices where it crosses the lines of the tessellation. The CET contains in addition to the spacing distance between these vertices, a factor for each vertex that corresponds to the relative amplitude of the RED crossing through that vertex. Because of the symmetry of this octagon example, the RED (402) shown in broken boldface line, is repeated at each vertex of the CET (401) with the same or opposite sign amplitude.
As the three-dimensional form was cylindrical, i.e. tube-like, the first and last RET waves in the tessellation will be identical. In particular, the first and last vertex of the CET will have RET wave amplitudes that are of the same sign and magnitude. To outfit the tessellation with glue areas for closing the cylinder, a short segment may be added to the CET with new vertex the same magnitude and sign as the previous vertex. This yields an additional RET wave that is parallel to the last one and offset by the length of the segment. The resulting tessellation will have glue tabs of uniform width (403). In cases when the first and second RET waves meet or are less than the offset distance apart, it may be desirable to trim the glue tabs further so that for each value on the row axis, their width does not exceed the distance between the first and second RET waves.
The above methodology illustrates how the CET and RET may be adapted for use in the Wave Tessellation Method to produce the wall structure for a container with fluted side walls, including the full closed tube, the glue tabs, and controlled floor and lid perimeter geometry.
For each of the algorithms disclosed in the '997 patent, the column data must be modified from the expected closed loop data to produce a tessellation pattern that folds into the desired cylindrical form with the required contacts and glue areas. The extended column data may give at least a row of additional polygons, which than can be cropped to smaller size to provide convenient glue tabs conforming to the geometry of the mating wall facets. The row data is also modified to yield the lid and floor perimeters with a chosen geometry. After the general wave pattern of the row is selected, the amplitude of the endpoints of the wave may be altered. This may be done by cropping the first or last portions of the wave, or by attaching other curves to the wave ends. By selecting the final endpoint of correct amplitude, the container structure is provided with the geometry that mates to the desired lid or floor perimeter.
In each of these cases the column data may be adapted to produce a folding pattern with glue tabs extending beyond the closed cylindrical form and conforming to the faceted structure to securely seal the tube closed. Depending on the pattern generation method and the corresponding form of the column data, various geometric components may be translated, reproduced, and trimmed. In preferred embodiments one may translate between the CCS, CET, and CSM by interpolating between the folding algorithms. This enables the column data to be adapted by intermixing the augmentation and trimming principles described above.
Similarly, one may translate between the RET, RED and RCS data by interpolating between the folding algorithms. Based on the choice of the column data, choosing the amplitude of the endpoints of the RCS will produce various lid and floor perimeters. In preferred embodiments the RCS, RED or RET endpoints may be cropped, chosen or extended to generate the desired lid or floor perimeters. In this way the algorithms of the '997 patent may be specialized and further adapted to produce tessellation patterns with glue tabs that close and connect to form cylinder-like, tube-like, box wall and container wall constructions that have specified top and bottom geometries matching desired lid and floor perimeters.
After the box wall design has been determined with flutes, facet geometries, and lid and floor perimeters, the lid or floor pattern can be designed to custom specifications, or can be selected from one that is known in the art. A particular design may be selected based on the requirements of a specific application, whether the floor will be glued, taped, re-opened, or other factors. Some examples of lid and floor options are shown in the figures. For box patterns where the lid or base is attached to the wall system, there may be multiple choices of which side wall to use that result in boxes of equivalent utility. In this case it may be preferred to select the pattern configuration that packs most efficiently on the stock material to reduce waste.
In one embodiment requiring a square base, the leaves/flaps of the floor can be selected to provide a joint-free appearance on the inner and outer side of the box. One way to do this is to have one pair of opposing flaps being rectangles of approximately half the size of the square floor perimeter, and the other pair of opposing flaps being approximately the same size as the perimeter of the square floor. The shorter sides fold in to meet and form the square, with the other two sides covering the inner and outer sides. In this case the floor may be glued together for a three layer thick floor design. This is shown (1803) for a rectangular base and in the floor tabs of
It may be desirable to open and close the top or lid. Several options for a fold-down lid are available, including two shorter side flaps (501) serving as shoulders to support the fold-down lid (502). The fold-down piece may be a square of approximately the same size as the lid perimeter that is attached to one edge of the perimeter with a tongue flap (503) attached to the opposite side of the fold-down piece, so that it tucks in to help the lid remain closed.
After the lid and floor have been designed, the tessellation corresponding to the finalized row and column information may be calculated. This may be done using the wave tessellation method described in the '997 patent. The floor and lid components may then be attached to the tessellation along the corresponding edges. The tessellation, if designed with an extra row of facets for glue regions, may have these facets trimmed to make smaller glue tabs. The folding pattern may be modified according to standard practice to provide small slits near the ends of the lid or floor fold lines to induce folding. Similarly, interference may be reduced by trimming the flaps slightly. The floor tabs (1803) are slightly smaller than the base edges of the tessellation. Other optimization techniques known in the box making art may be employed.
The steps listed above can be varied and/or completed in an order different than the above-described order. In some applications it may be preferred to design the floor and lid first, select the desired row data, and then construct the column data in concordance with the floor, lid, and row constraints. In other applications the floor lid and column data may be chosen first, and then the row data can be selected in concordance with the floor, lid, and column constraints. Similarly the glue tabs for securing the cylinder closed may be added or trimmed at various stages in the process. For example, it may be preferable to add just two segments to the CCS, complete the design steps for the row, floor and lid, examine the tessellation pattern for walls, floor and lid, and then apply the column augmentation step to the CET and tessellation data to design and attach the glue tabs needed to conform to the cylindrical closure.
Once the lid and floor perimeters are determined, a commercially-available lid and floor system that conform to the perimeters can be procured. In some embodiments, flaps may be hinged by fold creases along each of the edges of the lid or floor perimeter. In some embodiments, these flaps when closed may lie generally flat, surface to surface, in approximately the same plane as the lid or floor perimeter. In the same or other embodiments, at least one of the flaps may have the approximate shape of the lid or floor perimeter, and may closely coincide in position to it when in the closed box state. Moreover, in the same or other embodiments, at least one of the flaps can have at least one additional fold edge for a connecting tongue or secondary flap so that in the closed folded state the tongue or secondary flap protrudes through the plane of the floor or lid perimeter to generally conform to the wall geometry. In the same or other embodiments a flap may have a series of additional folded appendages that protrude through the plane of the lid or floor perimeter to subdivide the interior space of the box or container.
In some embodiments, the lid or floor may have a three-dimensional structure that extends above or below the plane of the lid or floor perimeter. This may provide structural advantage to the lid or floor design. For boxes or containers that dispense materials, a lid with three-dimensional structure may be preferred due to its ability to resist the mechanical force of pulling material through the dispensing opening of the lid. For dispensing boxes or containers, a lid with three-dimensional structure may be preferred for its characteristics in funneling the hand to meet the material and/or for funneling the material from the box. For boxes or containers that receive materials through an opening, a lid with three-dimensional structure may be preferred for its characteristics in funneling the hand to meet the material and/or for funneling the material into the box.
The lid or floor may be constructed separately from the wall tessellation pattern, and then attached to the box or container. In this case the lid or floor perimeter should match the lid or floor perimeter provided by the wall geometry. The lid or floor may be attached by gluing, by rolling the lips together, or by other means. The lid or floor may be constructed to form fit the box walls so that it slides on or is easily removable. The lid or floor may be manufactured from the same or similar foldable material as the wall construction, from another type of foldable material, or by a non-folding process. In some embodiments, the box walls may be formed of a paper product, and the lid or floor may be formed from plastic.
In some embodiments, the lid or floor may be constructed from a folding pattern that is incorporated with the wall tessellation pattern on the same sheet of foldable material. The lid or floor portion of the folding pattern may have pleats so that at least two flaps adjoining the wall portion are also connected to each other through the pleats. The use of pleats can simplify assembly, and may offer additional opportunities for three-dimensional structure.
In some embodiments, the two or more wall constructions may be stacked. In this case the lid perimeter of a lower container and the floor perimeter of the container adjacently above should match. Alternatively, the lid and floor may be omitted, and the said adjacent wall portions can be joined or fit together. For stacks with several wall constructions, it may be preferred for only the lowest floor and highest lid to be constructed, with the adjacent wall portions joined to form a single container or box. The joining of stacked wall components may be done in the unfolded sheet to form one tessellation pattern, or may be done after the tubes are closed. One possible advantage of the stacked construction is that it enables multiple CCS waves to be used at various heights of the container, preferably with the corresponding RCS waves chosen to produce mating lid and floor perimeters on adjacent wall portions.
The fluted box or container may be manufactured as follows: Once the folding pattern is determined the pattern is die cut with each of the fold edges receiving an etching, mechanical imprint, stamp, or other mark to induce folding on the marking. The wall section of the pattern may then be then cupped into the generally circular form of the cylinder uniformly, while inducing the folds, with the height of the wall pattern reducing as the folding occurs. As the arc radius of the cupped form reduces, the ends of the pattern may close together to form the cylinder.
The folding machine comprises an articulating die. The die dynamics match the folding parameter of the box wall pattern. This may be achieved by manufacturing the die with plates approximately the same size as the polygons of the pattern, and with hinging between the plates simulating the folding action. Hydraulic, pneumatic, mechanical or other means induce the die to fold along the fold parameter. The die is also outfitted with vacuum holes, so that it may pick the precut sheet up and hold the marked polygons consistently in position against the corresponding polygons of the die. Once the material is secured to the die by the vacuum, the die is articulated with its prescribed dynamics. This causes the sheet to fold with it, and folding occurs along the markings of the sheet pattern. In a preferred embodiment the articulating die may fold the side wall portion of the box, and then convention box/container forming machinery used to fold and glue the remaining steps as needed. In another preferred embodiment the articulating die forms all folds in pattern, with sequenced folding of the box side walls, floor, and lid as needed. Tabs or other methods may then be used to fasten the box wall ends together to make a cylindrical of other form.
A collection of wave patterns is shown in
Each of the waves has a general structure that is recognizable by those skilled in the art of box making. Wave (2801) is the triangle wave used in (302) and many other of the examples. Wave (2804) is similar but with line segments having slopes of distinct absolute value. Wave (2803) has segments of zero slope. The segments with non-zero slope have the same slope absolute value. A variation is possible with non-zero slopes resembling (2804). Wave (2806) is often called the square wave, and has horizontal and vertical segments whose lengths are selected as a parameter in various applications. Wave (2807) has for defining components a half-circle and horizontal line segment. A variation on (2807) uses a parabolic arch or other arch type in substitution for the half circle. Wave (2810) has vertices between arched components. The two endpoints of each of these arched components lie on distinct horizontal lines. The arched components of (2810) are also connected in alternating minor image. Wave (2817) combines both arched components and line segments.
The waves shown in
In
In embodiments where the box is used for dispensing facial tissues it may be desirable to coil the tissues on a roll, so that the dispensed tissues are drawn from the inside of the roll. It may be desirable to use z-folding on a sequential chain or string of tissues, and then to roll the z-folded condensed material onto the coil. This enables the tissues to dispense from the box without entangling or excessively twisting. The z-folding and/or a light connection method may be used so that dispensing one tissue causes the next one to pull out far enough that it is conveniently accessible for the next time. For string and other materials it may also be desirable to have the material unwound from the center of a ball or winding.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3302321 | Walker | Feb 1967 | A |
3698879 | Lucien | Oct 1972 | A |
3992152 | Okinaka et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4001964 | Hooker | Jan 1977 | A |
4472473 | Davis et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4518544 | Carter et al. | May 1985 | A |
5008140 | Schmertz | Apr 1991 | A |
5028474 | Czaplicki | Jul 1991 | A |
5049123 | Breton et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5090672 | Ballestrazzi et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5134013 | Parker | Jul 1992 | A |
5179770 | Block et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5234727 | Hoberman | Aug 1993 | A |
5344379 | Garrone | Sep 1994 | A |
5393579 | Witte | Feb 1995 | A |
5484378 | Braithwaite | Jan 1996 | A |
5694803 | Ervin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712020 | Parker | Jan 1998 | A |
5723201 | Czetto, Jr. | Mar 1998 | A |
5894044 | Norcom et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899842 | Di Pilla | May 1999 | A |
5937519 | Strand | Aug 1999 | A |
5980444 | Dickhoff | Nov 1999 | A |
6005216 | Rethwish et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6185476 | Sakai | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6256595 | Schwalb et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6358191 | Greever | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6640605 | Gitlin et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6935997 | Kling | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20080020188 | Gale | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100006210 | Kling | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO9806517 | Feb 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action Issued on May 12, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/174,800. |
Office Action issued on Nov. 29, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/952,057. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61392104 | Oct 2010 | US |