Patent Application
20120263754
The Sequence Listing associated with this application is provided in text format in lieu of a paper copy, and is hereby incorporated by reference into the specification. The name of the text file containing the Sequence Listing is 480271—403P1_SEQUENCE_LISTING.txt. The text file is 148 KB, was created on Feb. 15, 2011, and is being submitted electronically via EFS-Web.
1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates generally to methods for enhancing the specific immune response to an immunogen by concurrently or sequentially administering an adjuvant.
2. Description of the Related Art
The immune system of a host provides the means for quickly and specifically mounting a protective response to pathogenic microorganisms and also for contributing to rejection of malignant tumors. Immune responses have been generally described as including humoral responses, in which antibodies specific for antigens are produced by differentiated B lymphocytes, and cell mediated responses, in which various types of T lymphocytes eliminate antigens by a variety of mechanisms. For example, CD4 (also called CD4+) helper T cells that are capable of recognizing specific antigens may respond by releasing soluble mediators such as cytokines to recruit additional cells of the immune system to participate in an immune response. CD8 (also called CD8+) cytotoxic T cells are also capable of recognizing specific antigens and may bind to and destroy or damage an antigen-bearing cell or particle. In particular, cell mediated immune responses that include a cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response can be important for elimination of tumor cells and virus-infected cells.
Cancer includes a broad range of diseases and affects approximately one in four individuals worldwide. A CTL response is a key feature of effective cancer vaccines; effective CD4 T cell help is also likely to play a critical role in productive CD8 T cell activation and provide clinical benefit. The autologous dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccine Sipuleucel-T (PROVENGE®) was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of metastatic, castrate-resistant prostate cancer though the survival benefit associated with this treatment is a modest 4.1 months, leaving significant need for improvement (see, e.g., Kantoff, et al., New Engl. J. Med. 363(5):411 (2010)). The poxvirus-vector based vaccine ProstVac® VF also shows a significant survival benefit in Phase II (see, e.g., Kantoff, et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 28(7):1099 (2010)). Active immune therapies such as Sipuleucel-T and ProstVac® VF have generally been better tolerated than the chemotherapeutic regimens that comprise the current standard of care for castrate-resistant disease (see, e.g., Petrylak, et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 351(15):1513 (2004); Sylwester, et al., J. Exp. Med. 202(5):673 (2005)). These clinical successes demonstrate that the immune response can be harnessed in a cancer setting to provide improved patient outcomes and extended survival.
Many foreign (that is, non-self) antigens are poorly immunogenic and require administration of an adjuvant to provide a satisfactory immune response to an antigen. Adjuvants may also be used to bias an immune response toward a humoral response or a cell-mediated response, and certain adjuvants may also be used to bias the antibody response to a particular antibody isotype or bias a cellular response toward a particular T-cell subset. The choice of adjuvant and/or mode of delivery of an adjuvant for inducing or enhancing the immune response to immunogens can be important aspects of therapeutic and prophylactic vaccine development.
A need exists for vaccines, including improved vaccines, against infectious disease microorganisms, such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), malaria, antibiotic resistant bacteria, for which inducing a robust humoral and/or cell-mediated response is important for successful prevention and treatment of infection. In addition, despite positive impacts on survival of patients with cancer, a clear relationship between vaccine-induced tumor-specific immunity and patient benefit has not been conclusively demonstrated, indicating that considerable potential and need exists for improved cancer vaccine potency.
Methods are provided herein for inducing an immune response to an immunogen that is introduced into a subject by separately administering (a) a vector particle comprising a recombinant expression vector, which vector comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding the immunogen of interest and (b) at least one adjuvant. Administering adjuvant in this manner enhances (or improves) the immune response to the immunogen, compared with the specific immune response obtained in the absence of administering the adjuvant.
In one embodiment, a method is provided herein for inducing an immune response specific for an immunogen in a subject that comprises administering concurrently or sequentially to the subject (a) a first composition comprising a vector particle, the vector particle comprising a recombinant expression vector wherein the recombinant expression vector comprises a polynucleotide encoding the immunogen, and wherein the polynucleotide is operatively linked to at least one regulatory expression sequence; and (b) a second composition comprising a pharmaceutically suitable adjuvant, wherein the first composition and the second composition each further comprise a pharmaceutically suitable excipient. In a particular embodiment, the first composition and the second composition are administered concurrently, wherein the first composition is administered to the subject at a first site and the second composition is administered to the subject at a second site, wherein the first site and the second site are different. In certain embodiments, the first composition is administered at the first site via a first route and the second composition is administered at the second site via a second route. In particular embodiments, the first route and the second route are different and each is selected from parenteral, enteral, oral, intramuscular, intradermal, subcutaneous, intratumoral, intranodal, intranasal, transdermal, inhalation, mucosal, and topical. In other particular embodiments, the first route and the second route are each the same and selected from parenteral, intramuscular, intradermal, subcutaneous, intratumoral, intranodal, percutaneous, transdermal, and topical.
In another embodiment of the method for inducing an immune response specific for an immunogen in a subject the first composition and the second composition are administered sequentially. In one particular embodiment, the first composition is administered to the subject at a first site and the second composition is administered to the subject at a second site, wherein the first site and the second site are the same or different. In yet another particular embodiment, the first composition is administered at the first site via a first route and the second composition is administered at the second site via a second route. In certain embodiments, the first route and the second route are different and each is selected from parenteral, enteral, oral, intramuscular, intradermal, subcutaneous, intratumoral, intranodal, intranasal, transdermal, inhalation, mucosal, and topical. In still other particular embodiments, the first route and the second route are each the same and selected from parenteral, enteral, oral, intramuscular, intradermal, subcutaneous, intratumoral, intranodal, intranasal, transdermal, inhalation, mucosal, and topical. In yet another certain embodiment, the first site and the second site are the same, and wherein the first route and the second route are different and each route is selected from parenteral, intramuscular, intradermal, subcutaneous, intratumoral, intranodal, percutaneous, transdermal, and topical. In one particular embodiment, the first composition is administered prior to administration of the second composition. In another particular embodiment, the second composition is administered prior to administration of the first composition.
With respect to the methods described above and herein, the recombinant expression vector is selected from a lentiviral vector genome, poxvirus vector genome, vaccinia virus vector genome, adenovirus vector genome, adenovirus-associated virus vector genome, herpes virus vector genome, alpha virus vector genome, and plasmid DNA. In a more particular embodiment, the vector particle is a lentiviral vector particle that comprises the lentiviral vector genome; a poxvirus vector particle that comprises the poxvirus vector genome; a vaccinia virus vector particle that comprises the vaccinia virus vector genome; an adenovirus vector particle that comprises the adenovirus vector genome; an adenovirus-associated virus vector particle that comprises the adenovirus-associated virus vector genome; a herpes virus vector particle that comprises the herpes virus vector genome; or an alpha virus vector particle that comprises the alpha virus vector genome. In yet another specific embodiment, the vector particle is the lentiviral vector particle that comprises the lentiviral vector genome. In specific embodiments, the vector particle delivers the recombinant expression vector to an antigen-presenting cell, and in certain particular embodiments, the antigen-presenting cell is a dendritic cell. In certain embodiments, the lentiviral vector particle further comprises an envelope comprising a Sindbis virus E2 glycoprotein having at least one amino acid change compared to SEQ ID NO:1, wherein residue 160 is either absent or is an amino acid other than glutamic acid, and wherein E2 glycoprotein is not part of a fusion protein with Sindbis virus E3 protein. In specific embodiments, the vector particle delivers the recombinant expression vector to an antigen-presenting cell, and in certain particular embodiments, the antigen-presenting cell is a dendritic cell.
Also with respect to the methods described above and herein, the immunogen is a tumor-associated antigen. In particular embodiments, the tumor-associated antigen is selected from a renal cell carcinoma antigen, a prostate cancer antigen, a mesothelioma antigen, a pancreatic cancer antigen, a melanoma antigen, a breast cancer antigen, a lung cancer antigen, or an ovarian cancer antigen. In more particular embodiments, the prostate cancer antigen is prostatic acid phosphatase, prostate specific antigen, NKX3.1, or prostate specific membrane antigen. In still other particular embodiments, the renal cell carcinoma antigen is carbonic anhydrase IX. In other specific embodiments, the immunogen immunogen is from an infectious microorganism selected from a virus, a bacterium, a fungus, or a parasite.
In certain embodiments of the methods described above and herein, the induced immune response comprises a cytotoxic T lymphocyte immune response. In still other embodiments, the induced immune response comprises production of an immunogen specific antibody.
With respect to the methods described above and herein, in certain embodiments, the adjuvant is a non-toxic lipid A-related adjuvant. In a more specific embodiment, the non-toxic lipid A-related adjuvant is glucopyranosyl lipid A (GLA). In another particular embodiment, GLA is formulated in a stable oil-in-water emulsion.
In yet other certain embodiments of the methods described above and herein, the second composition comprising the adjuvant inhibits induction of the immune response to the immunogen when (a) the second composition is administered together with the first composition as a single composition; or (b) the first composition and the second composition are administered concurrently at the same site and via the same route.
As used herein, the term “isolated” means that a material is removed from its original environment (e.g., the natural environment if it is naturally occurring). For example, a naturally occurring nucleic acid or polypeptide present in a living animal is not isolated, but the same nucleic acid or polypeptide, separated from some or all of the co-existing materials in the natural system, is isolated. Such a nucleic acid could be part of a vector. A nucleic acid, which may be part of a vector, may still be isolated in that the nucleic acid is not part of the natural environment for the nucleic acid. An isolated polypeptide or protein, or fragment thereof, could be a component of a composition, and still be isolated in that the composition is not part of the natural environment for the polypeptide. The term “gene” means the segment of DNA involved in producing a polypeptide chain; a gene includes regions preceding and following the coding region “leader and trailer” as well as intervening sequences (introns) between individual coding segments (exons). Amino acids may be referred to herein according to the single letter and three letter codes, which are common textbook knowledge in the art, and therefore with which a person skilled in the art is familiar. The term “fusion polypeptide” used herein may also be used interchangeably with “fusion protein,” and unless specifically indicated otherwise, the two terms are not meant to indicate molecules that have distinguishable properties or characteristics.
As used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “an antigen” includes a plurality of such antigens, and reference to “a cell” or “the cell” includes reference to one or more cells and equivalents thereof (e.g., plurality of cells) known to those skilled in the art, and so forth. Similarly, reference to “a compound” or “a composition” includes a plurality of such compounds or compositions, and refers to one or more compounds or compositions, respectively, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The term “about” when referring to a number or a numerical range means that the number or numerical range referred to is an approximation within experimental variability (or within statistical experimental error), and thus the number or numerical range may vary between 1% and 15% of the stated number or numerical range. The term “comprising” (and related terms such as “comprise” or “comprises” or “having” or “including”) is not intended to exclude that in other certain embodiments, for example, an embodiment of any composition of matter, composition, method, or process, or the like, described herein, may “consist of” or “consist essentially of” the described features.
Methods are provided herein for inducing an immune response (a humoral response (i.e., a B cell response) or a cell-mediated response (including a cytotoxic T cell response) or both) to an immunogen that is introduced into a subject by administering a vector particle comprising a recombinant expression vector, which vector comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding the immunogen of interest. As described herein, the recombinant expression vector is included (i.e., incorporated) in a cell or a particle (e.g., a virus particle) that bears or expresses the immunogen. The recombinant expression vector further comprises at least one (i.e., one or more) regulatory expression sequence that is operatively linked to the nucleotide sequence encoding the immunogen. The methods described herein further comprise administering at least one adjuvant that enhances (or improves) the immune response to the immunogen (i.e., the specific immune response to the immunogen is enhanced in a statistically, biologically, and/or clinically significant manner compared with the specific immune response obtained in the subject in the absence of administering the adjuvant).
The methods are particularly useful in instances when a particular adjuvant inhibits (i.e., impairs, reduces, abrogates, suppresses, minimizes, or in some way adversely affects) the specific immune response to the expressed immunogen of interest when certain administration protocols are practiced. For example, an adjuvant administered in the same composition as the vector particle comprising the recombinant expression vector encoding the immunogen may inhibit or not effectively enhance the specific immune response to the immunogen, or an adjuvant administered concurrently at the same site and via the same route as the vector particle may inhibit or not effectively enhance the immune response to the immunogen. Without being bound by any particular theory, under the aforementioned circumstances, an immune response specific for the immunogen may be suppressed or minimized by induction of an immune response against one or more components of the vector particle. This undesired result may be abrogated by using the methods described herein wherein the adjuvant composition is administered sequentially and/or if administered concurrently with the immunogenic composition, is administered via a different route and/or at a different site as the immunogenic composition.
As described in greater detail herein, methods are provided for inducing a specific immune response to an immunogen of interest by administering to the subject a vector particle comprising a recombinant expression vector encoding the immunogen and concurrently or sequentially administering an adjuvant. In particular embodiments, the vector particle comprising the recombinant expression vector and the adjuvant are administered concurrently (or substantially concurrently) at different sites and/or by different routes. In still other embodiments, the vector particle comprising the recombinant expression vector and the adjuvant are administered sequentially at a time interval that is sufficient to permit enhancement of the specific immune response to the encoded immunogen of interest by the adjuvant.
Without wishing to be bound by theory, when two or more immunogens are present in an immunogenic composition, immune interference may occur by which an immunized host produces an immune response to one immunogen and the immune response to a second immunogen is inhibited, minimized, impaired, or suppressed. Alternatively, or in addition, a vector particle comprising the recombinant expression vector and/or the vector encoding an immunogen of interest, and the adjuvant may exhibit some level of chemical incompatibility that results in an undesired immune response (e.g., low level or lack of response to the immunogen of interest). Further, without being bound by any particular theory and by way of example, an adjuvant delivered in the same composition or concurrently and at the same site as the recombinant expression vector or as a vector particle (e.g., a virus particle) that comprises a recombinant expression vector for expressing an immunogen (or immunogens) of interest, may induce or enhance a specific immune response to one or more vector particle components and compromise the immune response to the particular immunogen of interest. Alternatively or in addition, the adjuvant may induce an innate immune response, such as but not limited to, inducing type-1 interferon production, that may compromise the ability of the vector to deliver successfully the immunogen of interest. As described herein, this problem has been overcome by delivering the vector particle comprising the recombinant expression vector and the adjuvant at different sites and/or via different routes or by delivering the vector particle comprising the recombinant expression vector and the adjuvant sequentially with sufficient time between the administration of the vector particle and administration of the adjuvant such that the adjuvant sufficiently enhances the immune response to the immunogen(s) of interest.
In one embodiment, methods are provided herein for inducing an immune response specific for an immunogen by administering to a subject in need thereof a composition comprising a vector particle comprising a recombinant expression vector, which recombinant expression vector comprises a polynucleotide encoding the immunogen (also called herein a first composition or an immunogenic composition), wherein the polynucleotide is operatively linked to at least one regulatory expression sequence. Concurrently or sequentially, a second composition comprising a pharmaceutically suitable adjuvant (also called herein an adjuvant composition) is administered to the subject. The adjuvant is administered at a time and in a manner sufficient that the adjuvant enhances the immune response to the immunogen; that is, the level of the immune response specific for the immunogen (i.e., humoral response, cell-mediated response, or both a humoral response and cell-mediated response) is greater (or increased) in a statistically, clinically, and/or biologically significant manner compared with the level of the immune response specific to the immunogen when the immunogen is administered in the absence of the adjuvant. In those instances when an antigen is incapable of inducing a detectable specific immune response in the absence of an adjuvant, induction of a detectable, specific immune response represents enhancement of the immune response.
The methods described herein for inducing and/or enhancing an immune response to an immunogen are particularly useful when the adjuvant, if administered in the same composition as the vector particle comprising the recombinant expression vector, and/or concurrently via the same route at the same site, inhibits (i.e., adversely affects, fails to enhance, minimizes, interferes with, impairs, reduces, suppresses, or abrogates) the immune response to the immunogen. As described in greater detail herein, inhibition of the immune response to the immunogen may be avoided by administering the adjuvant and the recombinant expression vector in two separate compositions and either at different times, at different sites, and/or via different routes of administration. Accordingly, unless specified otherwise herein, the vector particle comprising the recombinant expression vector encoding the immunogen(s) of interest and the adjuvant are not combined together in a single composition. In other words, the composition comprising the vector particle that comprises the recombinant expression vector that encodes an immunogen (i.e., immunogenic composition) lacks an adjuvant, and the composition comprising the adjuvant lacks the recombinant expression vector or lacks the vector particle comprising the vector that encodes the immunogen of interest. In other particular embodiments of the methods described herein, when a composition comprising the immunogen-encoding vector and a composition comprising the adjuvant are administered at the same time (i.e., concurrently), each composition is administered at a different site. When each composition is administered at a different site, each composition may be administered via the same or different routes. Alternatively, each composition may be administered via a different route at the same site.
Accordingly, in more particular embodiments, when the immunogenic composition and the adjuvant composition are administered concurrently to the subject, the immunogenic composition is administered via one route (i.e., a first route) and the adjuvant composition is administered via a second, different route. Routes of administration from which the first and second routes may be independently selected include, but are not limited to, topical, oral, enteral, nasal (i.e., intranasal), inhalation, intrathecal, rectal, vaginal, intraocular, subconjunctival, sublingual, intradermal, transdermal, or parenteral administration, including subcutaneous, percutaneous, intravenous, intramuscular, intratumoral, intranodal, intrasternal, intracavernous, intrameatal or intraurethral injection or infusion. In certain more particular embodiments, the first and second routes are different and each selected from parenteral, oral, enteral, sublingual, intranasal, intramuscular, intradermal, subcutaneous, intratumoral, intranodal, percutaneous, transdermal, and topical. In a more specific embodiment, the first and second routes are different and selected from intramuscular, subcutaneous, percutaneous, intratumoral, intranodal, intranasal, and oral. The immunogenic and adjuvant compositions are formulated appropriately for delivery by different routes as described in the art and discussed in greater detail herein.
In other specific embodiments, when the immunogenic composition and the adjuvant composition are each administered concurrently to the subject, the compositions may be administered at different sites of the subject. The different sites are sufficiently physically separated from each other to permit induction or enhancement of the immune response to the immunogen. When each composition is administered at a different site, the compositions may be administered via the same route or may be administered by different routes. By way of example and for purposes of illustration only, the immunogenic composition may be administered subcutaneously or intramuscularly to an extremity (e.g., an arm) of the subject and the adjuvant composition may be administered subcutaneously or intramuscularly, respectively, to a different extremity (e.g., a leg) of the subject. By way of an additional example, administration of each composition concurrently at different sites but by the same route may include administration of the immunogenic composition to an extremity (e.g., an arm or a leg) and administration of the adjuvant composition to another (or second) extremity of the same type. In other particular embodiments, when the immunogenic composition and the adjuvant composition are administered concurrently at the same site, the routes of administration for each of the immunogenic and adjuvant compositions are different and each is selected from oral, enteral, parenteral, intramuscular, intradermal, subcutaneous, intratumoral, intranodal, percutaneous, transdermal, sublingual, and topical. By way of example, one composition may be delivered orally to be ingested, and the second composition may be delivered sublingually. As another example, one composition may be delivered intramuscularly at a site, and the second composition delivered subcutaneously or percutaneously at approximately the same site (e.g., the same arm or the same leg).
Selection of a route of administration will depend upon a number of factors, including the composition delivered, the age of the subject, and the body mass of the subject. The route of administration and the site of administration are typically chosen to maximize the amount of an active ingredient in a composition delivered to the subject in the safest manner. Typical sites for intramuscular administration of an immunogenic composition and/or adjuvant composition include the anterolateral thigh muscle and the deltoid muscle. In humans, intramuscular injection of the deltoid muscle is typically used by persons skilled in the vaccine art to deliver a vaccine to adults, and in certain instances to children and teens and toddlers between 1 and 2 years old. The vastus lateralis muscle in the anterolateral thigh is typically recommended for intramuscular injection of infants (i.e., less than one year of age) and may also be the site of intramuscular delivery in older children and adults. Alternatively, the site of an intramuscular injection in humans may be the ventrogluteal area. Those skilled in the art appreciate that suboptimal delivery of a vaccine may occur if the immunogenic composition is delivered to a dorsogluteal site or upper outer quadrant of the buttock.
By way of example, typical sites for subcutaneous administration of an immunogenic or an adjuvant composition include fatty tissue over the anterolateral thigh muscle or fatty tissue over the triceps. The thigh muscle is the preferred site for subcutaneous administration of a composition to a human infant. Percutaneous administration may be at the deltoid muscle or at the anterolateral thigh muscle.
In another embodiment, the first composition comprising a vector particle comprising a recombinant expression vector that comprises a polynucleotide encoding at least one immunogen and the second composition comprising an adjuvant are administered sequentially. In certain embodiments, the immunogenic composition is administered prior to the adjuvant composition (i.e., the adjuvant composition is administered subsequent to administration of the immunogenic composition). In other certain embodiments, the adjuvant composition is administered prior to administration of the immunogenic composition (i.e., the immunogenic composition is administered subsequent to administration of the adjuvant composition).
In a more particular embodiment when the immunogenic composition and the adjuvant composition are each administered sequentially to the subject in need thereof, each administration is separated by hours or by days. In certain embodiments, the immunogenic composition is administered at least one, at least two, at least three, at least four, at least five, at least six, least seven, at least eight, at least nine, at least ten, or at least 12 hours, or at least 18 hours prior to administration of the adjuvant composition. In other particular embodiments, the immunogenic composition is administered at least one, at least two, at least three, at least four, at least five, at least six, or at least seven days prior to administration of the adjuvant composition. In yet other certain embodiments, the adjuvant composition is administered prior to the immunogenic composition and is administered at least one, at least two, at least three, at least four, at least five, at least six, least seven, at least eight, at least nine, at least ten, or at least 12 hours, or at least 18 hours prior to administration of the immunogenic composition. In still other specific embodiments, the adjuvant composition is administered prior to the immunogenic composition and is administered at least one, at least two, at least three, at least four, at least five, at least six, or at least seven days prior to administration of the immunogenic composition. The optimum time interval between administration of each composition may be determined by a person skilled in the art by appropriately designed pre-clinical and clinical trial studies. The optimum time interval may depend on the immunogen of interest and/or the particular adjuvant administered.
In still other embodiments, the immunogenic composition and the adjuvant composition are each administered sequentially to the subject in need thereof, more than once (e.g., twice, three times, or four times). In a specific embodiment, the adjuvant composition may be administered the same number of times as the immunogenic composition. In yet another embodiment, the adjuvant composition may be administered a lesser number of times than the immunogenic composition. By way of non-limiting example, when the immunogenic composition is administered more than once, the adjuvant composition may be administered only prior to or subsequent to administration of the first administration of the immunogenic composition and not prior to or subsequent to any subsequent (i.e., second, third, or fourth) administration of the immunogenic composition. In yet another specific embodiment, the adjuvant composition may be administered more times than the immunogenic composition is administered.
In other embodiments, the adjuvant composition may be administered at least one time more than the immunogenic composition. For example, if the adjuvant is capable of inducing an innate (or nonspecific) immune response, the adjuvant composition may be administered at a sufficient time interval prior to administration of the immunogenic composition to induce or stimulate an innate immune response. The adjuvant composition may then also be administered concurrently (which concurrent administration may be at a different site or via a different route) or sequentially with the first administration of the immunogenic composition.
When the adjuvant composition and the immunogenic composition are administered sequentially, each of the compositions may be administered via the same route or may be administered by different routes. Routes of administration for delivery of each of the adjuvant and immunogenic compositions may be independently selected include, but are not limited to, topical, oral, enteral, nasal (i.e., intranasal), inhalation, intrathecal, rectal, vaginal, intraocular, subconjunctival, sublingual, intradermal, intratumoral, intranodal, transdermal, or parenteral administration, including subcutaneous, percutaneous, intravenous, intramuscular, intrasternal, intracavernous, intrameatal or intraurethral injection or infusion. In certain embodiments, the first and second routes are different and each is selected from parenteral, oral, enteral, sublingual, intranasal, intramuscular, intradermal, intratumoral, intranodal, subcutaneous, percutaneous, transdermal, and topical.
When the immunogenic composition and the adjuvant composition are administered to the subject by the same route, each of the compositions may be administered at the same site on the subject or may be administered at different sites on the subject. In other specific embodiments, when the adjuvant composition and the immunogenic composition are administered sequentially, each composition may be delivered by a different route but at sites sufficiently proximal to be considered the same site. By way of non-limiting example, an immunogenic composition may be administered intramuscularly into an extremity of the subject (e.g., an arm (deltoid muscle) or a leg (thigh muscle)), and prior to or subsequent to administration of the immunogenic composition, the adjuvant composition is administered subcutaneously at the same site on the extremity of the subject (e.g., the same arm (deltoid muscle) or the same leg (thigh muscle), respectively). By way of a second non-limiting example, an adjuvant composition may be administered intramuscularly into an extremity of the subject (e.g., an arm (deltoid muscle) or a leg (thigh muscle)), and prior to or subsequent to administration of the adjuvant composition, the immunogenic composition is administered subcutaneously at the same site on the extremity of the subject (e.g., the same arm (deltoid muscle) or the same leg (thigh muscle), respectively).
As discussed herein, the choice of site and route of administration may depend on factors including but not necessarily limited to the age, health status, and/or size of the subject to be immunized; the recombinant expression vector or vector particle comprising the vector; the immunogen(s) encoded by the recombinant expression vector; and/or the adjuvant. The condition, disease, or disorder to be treated or prevented by administration of an immunogenic composition and the type of immune response desired may be additional factors considered by a person skilled in the art in determining the route of administration and the site of administration for maximizing the therapeutic and/or prophylactic benefit of the immunogenic and adjuvant compositions.
During the course of an immunization protocol or regimen, the level of the immune response to the immunogen may be monitored. Thus, the number of times the immunogenic composition and the adjuvant composition are each administered to the subject may be determined by monitoring the level of the immune response to the immunogen after each administration of the immunogenic composition. Techniques and methods for monitoring an immune response are routinely practiced in the art and are described herein and in the art.
As described herein, the immune response to an immunogen(s) is enhanced when an adjuvant composition is administered to the host according to the methods described in detail herein. An immunogen that may be used in these methods includes any immunogen for which induction of a specific immune response is desired. The immunogen, particularly when administered sequentially or concurrently as described herein with an adjuvant, is capable of inducing a humoral response (i.e., a B cell response) or a cell-mediated response (including a cytotoxic T cell response) or both.
A cell-mediated immune response includes a cytotoxic T lymphocyte response, which response may destroy or damage a cell (e.g., a tumor cell, bacterial cell, virus, parasite, or fungal cell) or infectious particle (e.g., a virus particle) that produces or expresses the immunogen. Any antigen that is associated with a disease or disorder for which a humoral response or cell-mediated immune response or both is beneficial to the immunized subject can be used as an immunogen. In particular embodiments, these immunogens may be delivered to antigen presenting cells, particularly dendritic cells, using the vector particles described herein that comprise a recombinant expression vector.
Antigens associated with many diseases and disorders are well known in the art. An antigen may be previously known to be associated with the disease or disorder, or may be identified by any method known in the art. For example, an antigen associated with a type of cancer from which a patient is suffering may be known, such as a tumor-associated antigen, or may be identified from the tumor itself by any of a variety of methods known in the art. In certain embodiments, the immunogen is a tumor-associated antigen (also called herein a tumor antigen) derived from a cancer cell (i.e., tumor cell), and one or more such tumor antigens may be useful for the immunotherapeutic treatment of cancers. By way of non-limiting example, tumor-associated antigens may be derived from prostate, breast, colorectal, lung, pancreatic, renal, mesothelioma, ovarian, or melanoma cancers. These and additional tumor-associated antigens are described herein and in the art.
Exemplary tumor or tumor cell-derived antigens include MAGE 1, 3, and MAGE 4 (or other MAGE antigens such as those disclosed in International Patent Application Publication No. WO99/40188); PRAME; BAGE; RAGE, Lage (also known as NY ESO 1); SAGE; and HAGE (see, e.g., International Patent Application Publication No. WO 99/53061) or GAGE (Robbins et al., Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8:628-36 (1996); Van den Eynde et al., Int. J. Clin. Lab. Res. 27:81-86 (1997); Van den Eynde et al., Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9:648-93 (1997); Correale et al. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 89: 293 (1997)). These non-limiting examples of tumor antigens are expressed in a wide range of tumor types such as melanoma, lung carcinoma, sarcoma and bladder carcinoma. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,544,518. Prostate cancer tumor-associated antigens include, for example, prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostatic acid phosphates, NKX3.1, and six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate (STEAP) (Hubert et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 14523-28, 1999); see also, e.g., Reiter et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95:1735-40, 1998; Nelson, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:3114-19 (1999); WO 98/12302; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,955,306; 5,840,871 and 5,786,148; Int'l Patent Appl. Publication Nos. WO 98/20117; WO 00/04149; WO 98/137418).
Other tumor associated antigens useful as immunogens include Plu-1 (J. Biol. Chem. 274:15633-45, 1999), HASH-1, HasH-2, Cripto (Salomon et al., Bioessays 199, 21:61-70; U.S. Pat. No. 5,654,140) and Criptin (U.S. Pat. No. 5,981,215). Additionally, a tumor antigen may be a self peptide hormone, such as whole length gonadotrophin hormone releasing hormone (GnRH, Int'l Patent Appl. Publication No. WO 95/20600), a short 10 amino acid long peptide, useful in the treatment of many cancers.
Tumor antigens that may be useful as immunogens as described herein and therefore useful for treating any cancer include tumor antigens derived from cancers that are characterized by tumor associated antigen expression, such as HER-2/neu expression. Tumor associated antigens that may be used as immunogens include lineage-specific tumor antigens such as the melanocyte-melanoma lineage antigens MART-1/Melan-A, gp100, gp75, mda-7, tyrosinase and tyrosinase-related protein. Illustrative tumor-associated antigens include, but are not limited to, tumor antigens derived from or comprising any one or more of, p53, Ras, c-Myc, cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinases (e.g., A-Raf, B-Raf, and C-Raf, cyclin-dependent kinases), MAGE-A1, MAGE-A2, MAGE-A3, MAGE-A4, MAGE-A6, MAGE-A10, MAGE-A12, MART-1, BAGE, DAM-6, -10, GAGE-1, -2, -8, GAGE-3, -4, -5, -6, -7B, NA88-A, MART-1, MC1R, Gp100, PSA, PSM, Tyrosinase, TRP-1, TRP-2, ART-4, CAMEL, CEA, Cyp-B, hTERT, hTRT, iCE, MUC1, MUC2, Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks), TRK receptors, PRAME, P15, RU1, RU2, SART-1, SART-3, Wilms' tumor antigen (WT1), AFP, β-catenin/m, Caspase-8/m, CEA, CDK-4/m, ELF2M, GnT-V, G250, HSP70-2M, HST-2, KIAA0205, MUM-1, MUM-2, MUM-3, Myosin/m, RAGE, SART-2, TRP-2/INT2, 707-AP, Annexin II, CDC27/m, TPI/mbcr-abl, BCR-ABL, interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4), ETV6/AML, LDLR/FUT, Pml/RARα, Tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 1 (TACSTD1) TACSTD2, receptor tyrosine kinases (e.g., Epidermal Growth Factor receptor (EGFR) (in particular, EGFRvIII), platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)), cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases (e.g., src-family, syk-ZAP70 family), integrin-linked kinase (ILK), signal transducers and activators of transcription STAT3, STATS, and STATE, hypoxia inducible factors (e.g., HIF-1α and HIF-2α), Nuclear Factor-Kappa B (NF-κB), Notch receptors (e.g., Notch1-4), c-Met, mammalian targets of rapamycin (mTOR), WNT, extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), and their regulatory subunits, PMSA, PR-3, MDM2, Mesothelin, renal cell carcinoma—5T4, SM22-alpha, carbonic anhydrases I (CAI) and IX (CAIX) (also known as G250), STEAD, TEL/AML1, GD2, proteinase3, hTERT, sarcoma translocation breakpoints, EphA2, ML-IAP, EpCAM, ERG (TMPRSS2 ETS fusion gene), NA17, PAX3, ALK, androgen receptor, cyclin B1, polysialic acid, MYCN, RhoC, GD3, fucosyl GM1, mesothelian, PSCA, sLe, PLAC1, GM3, BORIS, Tn, GLoboH, NY-BR-1, RGsS, SART3, STn, PAXS, OY-TES1, sperm protein 17, LCK, HMWMAA, AKAP-4, SSX2, XAGE 1, B7H3, legumain, TIE2, Page4, MAD-CT-1, FAP, MAD-CT-2, fos related antigen 1, and idiotype.
Immunogens also include tumor antigens that comprise epitopic regions or epitopic peptides derived from genes mutated in tumor cells or from genes transcribed at different levels in tumor cells compared to normal cells, such as telomerase enzyme, survivin, mesothelin, mutated ras, bcr/abl rearrangement, Her2/neu, mutated or wild-type p53, cytochrome P450 1B1, and abnormally expressed intron sequences such as N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-V; clonal rearrangements of immunoglobulin genes generating unique idiotypes in myeloma and B-cell lymphomas; tumor antigens that comprise epitopic regions or epitopic peptides derived from oncoviral processes, such as human papilloma virus proteins E6 and E7; Epstein bar virus protein LMP2; nonmutated oncofetal proteins with a tumor-selective expression, such as carcinoembryonic antigen and alpha-fetoprotein. See also Boon et al., Ann. Rev. Immunol. 12:337-65 (1994); Renkvist et al., Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 50:3-15 (2001).
An immunogen may be obtained or derived from a pathogenic microorganism or from an opportunistic pathogenic microorganism, and include a virus, fungus, parasite, and bacterium. In certain embodiments, immunogens include full-length proteins derived from such a microorganism. In other certain embodiments, an immunogen comprises one or more immunogenic fragments that contain one or more epitopes from such proteins. In still other embodiments, an immunogen comprises a fusion polypeptide that comprises one, two, or more immunogenic fragments of a protein derived from a microorganism. In other embodiments, a fusion polypeptide may be a chimeric polypeptide that comprises one or more immunogenic fragments derived from each of two or more proteins present in a particular microorganism. Fusion proteins and chimeric proteins may comprise, in additional to the immunogenic polypeptide or peptide, at least one polypeptide or peptide, which is sometimes referred to as a carrier protein in the immunology art, that enhances the immune response to the immunogen of interest.
Illustrative pathogenic organisms whose antigens are contemplated as immunogens for use in the immunogenic compositions and that are encoded by the vectors and vector particles described herein include human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Influenza A, B, and C, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), Staphylococcus species including Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Streptococcus species including Streptococcus pneumoniae. As would be understood by the skilled person, proteins derived from these and other pathogenic microorganisms for use as immunogens as described herein are known in the art and the amino acid sequences of such proteins (and species thereof) and nucleotide sequences encoding the proteins may be identified in publications and in public databases such as GENBANK, Swiss-Prot, and TrEMBL.
Antigens derived from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that may be immunogens and used as described herein include any of the HIV virion structural proteins (e.g., gp120, gp41, p17, p24), protease, reverse transcriptase, or HIV proteins encoded by tat, rev, nef, vif, vpr and vpu. HIV proteins and immunogenic fragments thereof are well known to the skilled person and may be found in any of a number of public databases (see, e.g., Vider-Shalit et al., AIDS 23(11):1311-18 (2009); Watkins, Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 103(2):119-29 (2008); Gao et al., Expert Rev. Vaccines (4 Suppl):5161-68 (2004)). (See also, e.g., Klimstra et al., 2003. J. Virol. 77:12022-32; Bernard et al., Virology 276:93-103 (2000); Byrnes et al., J. Virol. 72: 7349-56 (1998); Lieberman et al., AIDS Res Hum. Retroviruses 13(5): 383-92 (1997); Menendez-Arias et al., Viral Immunol. 11(4): 167-181 (1998).
Antigens derived from herpes simplex virus (e.g., HSV 1 and HSV2) that are contemplated for use as immunogens in the compositions described herein and encoded by vectors and vector particles described herein include, but are not limited to, proteins expressed from HSV late genes. The late group of genes predominantly encodes proteins that form the virion particle. Such proteins include the five proteins from (UL) which form the viral capsid: UL6, UL18, UL35, UL38 and the major capsid protein UL19, UL45, and UL27, each of which may be used as an immunogens as described herein (see, e.g., McGeoch et al., Virus Res. 117:90-104 (2006); Mettenleiter et al., Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9: 423-29 (2006)). Other illustrative HSV proteins contemplated for use as immunogens herein include the ICP27 (H1, H2), glycoprotein B (gB) and glycoprotein D (gD) proteins. The HSV genome comprises at least 74 genes, each encoding a protein that could potentially be used as an immunogen to induce a T cell response (including a CTL response), B cell response, or both a CTL response and a B cell response.
Antigens derived from cytomegalovirus (CMV) that are contemplated for use in certain embodiments of the present immunogenic compositions include CMV structural proteins, viral antigens expressed during the immediate early and early phases of virus replication, glycoproteins I and III, capsid protein, coat protein, lower matrix protein pp 65 (ppUL83), p52 (ppUL44), IE1 and IE2 (UL123 and UL122), protein products from the cluster of genes from UL128-UL150 (Rykman, et al., J. Virol. 2006 January; 80(2):710-22), envelope glycoprotein B (gB), gH, gN, and pp 150. As would be understood by the skilled person, CMV proteins for use as immunogens described herein may be identified in public databases such as GenBank, Swiss-Prot, and TrEMBL (see e.g., Bennekov et al., Mt. Sinai J. Med. 71 (2): 86-93 (March 2004) PMID 15029400; Loewendorf et al., J. Intern. Med. 267(5):483-501 (2010); Marschall et al., Future Microbiol. 4:731-42 (2009)).
Antigens derived from Epstein-Ban virus (EBV) that are contemplated for use in certain embodiments include EBV lytic proteins gp350 and gp110, EBV proteins produced during latent cycle infection including Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1, EBNA-2, EBNA-3A, EBNA-3B, EBNA-3C, EBNA-leader protein (EBNA-LP) and latent membrane proteins (LMP)-1, LMP-2A and LMP-2B (see, e.g., Lockey et al., Front. Biosci. 13:5916-27 (2008)). Antigens derived from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) that are contemplated for use as immunogens as described herein include any of the eleven proteins encoded by the RSV genome, or immunogenic fragments thereof: NS1, NS2, N (nucleocapsid protein), M (Matrix protein) SH, G and F (viral coat proteins), M2 (second matrix protein), M2-1 (elongation factor), M2-2 (transcription regulation), RNA polymerase, and phosphoprotein P.
Antigens derived from Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) that are contemplated for use as immunogens include any one of the five major proteins encoded by the VSV genome, and immunogenic fragments thereof: large protein (L), glycoprotein (G), nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (P), and matrix protein (M) (see, e.g., Rieder et al., J. Interferon Cytokine Res. (2009) (9):499-509; Roberts et al., Adv. Virus Res. (1999) 53:301-19).
Antigens derived from an influenza virus that are contemplated for use in certain embodiments include hemagglutinin (HA), neuraminidase (NA), nucleoprotein (NP), matrix proteins M1 and M2, NS1, NS2 (NEP), PA, PB1, PB1-F2, and PB2. See e.g., Nature 437 (7062): 1162-66.
Examples of immunogens that are viral antigens also include, but are not limited to, adenovirus polypeptides, alphavirus polypeptides, calicivirus polypeptides (e.g., a calicivirus capsid antigen), coronavirus polypeptides, distemper virus polypeptides, Ebola virus polypeptides, enterovirus polypeptides, flavivirus polypeptides, hepatitis virus (AE) polypeptides (a hepatitis B core or surface antigen, a hepatitis C virus E1 or E2 glycoproteins, core, or non-structural proteins), herpesvirus polypeptides (as discussed herein and including a herpes simplex virus or varicella zoster virus glycoprotein), infectious peritonitis virus polypeptides, leukemia virus polypeptides, Marburg virus polypeptides, orthomyxovirus polypeptides, papilloma virus polypeptides, parainfluenza virus polypeptides (e.g., the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase polypeptides), paramyxovirus polypeptides, parvovirus polypeptides, pestivirus polypeptides, picorna virus polypeptides (e.g., a poliovirus capsid polypeptide), pox virus polypeptides (e.g., a vaccinia virus polypeptide), rabies virus polypeptides (e.g., a rabies virus glycoprotein G), reovirus polypeptides, retrovirus polypeptides, and rotavirus polypeptides.
In certain embodiments, bacterial antigens that may be useful as immunogens for inducing an immune response include antigens that have a portion or portions of the polypeptide exposed on the outer cell surface of the bacteria. The portions of the polypeptide immunogens exposed on the cell surface are accessible to immune cells and/or antibodies in the host and thus may be useful immunogens encoded by the recombinant expression vectors described herein.
Antigens derived from Staphylococcus species including Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) that are contemplated for use as immunogens include virulence regulators, such as the Agr system, Sar and Sae, the Arl system, Sar homologues (Rot, MgrA, SarS, SarR, SarT, SarU, SarV, SarX, SarZ and TcaR), the Srr system and TRAP. Other Staphylococcus proteins that may serve as immunogens include Clp proteins, HtrA, MsrR, aconitase, CcpA, SvrA, Msa, CfvA and CfvB (see, e.g., Staphylococcus: Molecular Genetics, 2008 Caister Academic Press, Ed. Jodi Lindsay). The genomes for two species of Staphylococcus aureus (N315 and Mu50) have been sequenced and are publicly available, for example at PATRIC (PATRIC: The VBI PathoSystems Resource Integration Center, Snyder et al., Nucleic Acids Res. (2007) 35 (Database issue) 401-406. PMID: 17142235). As would be understood by the skilled person, Staphylococcus proteins for use as immunogens may also be identified in other public databases such as GenBank, Swiss-Prot, and TrEMBL.
Antigens derived from Streptococcus pneumoniae that are contemplated for use as immunogens in certain embodiments described herein include pneumolysin, PspA, choline-binding protein A (CbpA), NanA, NanB, SpnHL, PavA, LytA, and pilin proteins (RrgA; RrgB; RrgC). Immunogenic proteins of Streptococcus pneumoniae are also known in the art and are contemplated for use as immunogens (see, e.g., Zysk et al., Infect. Immun. 2000 68(6):3740-43). The complete genome sequence of a virulent strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae has been sequenced (see, e.g., Tettelin H, et al., Science (2001) 293(5529):498-506) and, as would be understood by the skilled person, S. pneumoniae proteins for use in the compositions described herein may also be identified in other public databases such as GenBank, Swiss-Prot, and TrEMBL. Proteins of particular interest for immunogens according to the present disclosure include virulence factors and proteins predicted to be exposed at the surface of the pneumococci (see, e.g., Tettelin H., et al. supra; Frolet et al., BMC Microbiol. (2010) July 12; 10:190; Rigden, et al., Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2003) 38(2):143-68; Jedrzejas, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. (2001) 65(2):187-207).
Examples of bacterial antigens that may be used as immunogens include, but are not limited to, Actinomyces polypeptides, Bacillus polypeptides, Bacteroides polypeptides, Bordetella polypeptides, Bartonella polypeptides, Borrelia polypeptides (e.g., B. burgdorferi OspA), Brucella polypeptides, Campylobacter polypeptides, Capnocytophaga polypeptides, Chlamydia polypeptides, Corynebacterium polypeptides, Coxiella polypeptides, Dermatophilus polypeptides, Enterococcus polypeptides, Ehrlichia polypeptides, Escherichia polypeptides, Francisella polypeptides, Fusobacterium polypeptides, Haemobartonella polypeptides, Haemophilus polypeptides (e.g., H. influenzae type b outer membrane protein), Helicobacter polypeptides, Klebsiella polypeptides, L-form bacteria polypeptides, Leptospira polypeptides, Listeria polypeptides, Mycobacteria polypeptides, Mycoplasma polypeptides, Neisseria polypeptides, Neorickettsia polypeptides, Nocardia polypeptides, Pasteurella polypeptides, Peptococcus polypeptides, Peptostreptococcus polypeptides, Pneumococcus polypeptides (i.e., S. pneumoniae polypeptides) (see description herein), Proteus polypeptides, Pseudomonas polypeptides, Rickettsia polypeptides, Rochalimaea polypeptides, Salmonella polypeptides, Shigella polypeptides, Staphylococcus polypeptides, group A streptococcus polypeptides (e.g., S. pyogenes M proteins), group B streptococcus (S. agalactiae) polypeptides, Treponema polypeptides, and Yersinia polypeptides (e.g., Y. pestis F1 and V antigens).
Examples of fungal antigens that may be immunogens include, but are not limited to, Absidia polypeptides, Acremonium polypeptides, Alternaria polypeptides, Aspergillus polypeptides, Basidiobolus polypeptides, Bipolaris polypeptides, Blastomyces polypeptides, Candida polypeptides, Coccidioides polypeptides, Conidiobolus polypeptides, Cryptococcus polypeptides, Curvalaria polypeptides, Epidermophyton polypeptides, Exophiala polypeptides, Geotrichum polypeptides, Histoplasma polypeptides, Madurella polypeptides, Malassezia polypeptides, Microsporum polypeptides, Moniliella polypeptides, Mortierella polypeptides, Mucor polypeptides, Paecilomyces polypeptides, Penicillium polypeptides, Phialemonium polypeptides, Phialophora polypeptides, Prototheca polypeptides, Pseudallescheria polypeptides, Pseudomicrodochium polypeptides, Pythium polypeptides, Rhinosporidium polypeptides, Rhizopus polypeptides, Scolecobasidium polypeptides, Sporothrix polypeptides, Stemphylium polypeptides, Trichophyton polypeptides, Trichosporon polypeptides, and Xylohypha polypeptides.
Examples of protozoan parasite antigens include, but are not limited to, Babesia polypeptides, Balantidium polypeptides, Besnoitia polypeptides, Cryptosporidium polypeptides, Eimeria polypeptides, Encephalitozoon polypeptides, Entamoeba polypeptides, Giardia polypeptides, Hammondia polypeptides, Hepatozoon polypeptides, Isospora polypeptides, Leishmania polypeptides, Microsporidia polypeptides, Neospora polypeptides, Nosema polypeptides, Pentatrichomonas polypeptides, Plasmodium polypeptides Examples of helminth parasite antigens include, but are not limited to, Acanthocheilonema polypeptides, Aelurostrongylus polypeptides, Ancylostoma polypeptides, Angiostrongylus polypeptides, Ascaris polypeptides, Brugia polypeptides, Bunostomum polypeptides, Capillaria polypeptides, Chabertia polypeptides, Cooperia polypeptides, Crenosoma polypeptides, Dictyocaulus polypeptides, Dioctophyme polypeptides, Dipetalonema polypeptides, Diphyllobothrium polypeptides, Diplydium polypeptides, Dirofilaria polypeptides, Dracunculus polypeptides, Enterobius polypeptides, Filaroides polypeptides, Haemonchus polypeptides, Lagochilascaris polypeptides, Loa polypeptides, Mansonella polypeptides, Muellerius polypeptides, Nanophyetus polypeptides, Necator polypeptides, Nematodirus polypeptides, Oesophagostomum polypeptides, Onchocerca polypeptides, Opisthorchis polypeptides, Ostertagia polypeptides, Parafilaria polypeptides, Paragonimus polypeptides, Parascaris polypeptides, Physaloptera polypeptides, Protostrongylus polypeptides, Setaria polypeptides, Spirocerca polypeptides Spirometra polypeptides, Stephanofilaria polypeptides, Strongyloides polypeptides, Strongylus polypeptides, Thelazia polypeptides, Toxascaris polypeptides, Toxocara polypeptides, Trichinella polypeptides, Trichostrongylus polypeptides, Trichuris polypeptides, Uncinaria polypeptides, and Wuchereria polypeptides. (e.g., P. falciparum circumsporozoite (PfCSP)), sporozoite surface protein 2 (PfSSP2), carboxyl terminus of liver state antigen 1 (PfLSA1c-term), and exported protein 1 (PfExp-1), Pneumocystis polypeptides, Sarcocystis polypeptides, Schistosoma polypeptides, Theileria polypeptides, Toxoplasma polypeptides, and Trypanosoma polypeptides.
Examples of ectoparasite antigens include, but are not limited to, polypeptides (including protective antigens as well as allergens) from fleas; ticks, including hard ticks and soft ticks; flies, such as midges, mosquitoes, sand flies, black flies, horse flies, horn flies, deer flies, tsetse flies, stable flies, myiasis-causing flies and biting gnats; ants; spiders, lice; mites; and true bugs, such as bed bugs and kissing bugs.
Induction of an immune response, including either a humoral response (i.e., a B cell response) or a cell-mediated response (including a cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response) or both may also contribute to phagocytosis or killing of additional organisms such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. leprae, and Listeria innocula. A CTL immune response contributes to killing of P. aeruginosa, M. tuberculosis, M. leprae, and L. innocula (see, e.g., Oykhman et al., J. Biomed. Biotechnol. (2010:249482); published on-line Jun. 23, 2010). Accordingly, immunogens useful for the immunogenic compositions described herein and that may be encoded by the recombinant expression vectors and vector particles comprising the vectors may also be derived from these bacteria. The amino acid sequences of numerous polypeptides encoded by the bacterial genome of any one of the bacteria species and expressed by the bacteria can be readily identified in the art and in publicly available protein sequence data bases. (See also, e.g., Stover et al., Nature 406:959 (2000)).
Immunogens as described herein may be obtained or derived from fungi or parasites. Exemplary parasites that induce an immune response, including a CTL immune response, include Schistosoma mansoni, Entameoba histolytica, Toxoplasma gondii, and Plasmodium falciparum (see, e.g., Oykhman, supra). Accordingly, protein antigens derived or obtained from these parasites may be useful as immunogens to induce an immune response against the respective parasite. Immunogens may also be obtained or derived from species of fungus, including without limitation, Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans (see, e.g., Oykhman, supra).
Polypeptides that comprise at least one immunogenic fragment of an immunogenic polypeptide (e.g., any of the tumor associated antigens or microbial antigens described herein and/or in the art) may be used as immunogens and encoded by the recombinant expression vectors described herein. An immunogenic fragment comprises at least one T cell epitope or at least one B cell epitope. The immunogenic fragment may consist of at least 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, or more contiguous amino acids of an immunogenic polypeptide. The immunogenic fragments may comprise a sufficient number of contiguous amino acids that form a linear epitope and/or may comprise a sufficient number of contiguous amino acids that permit the fragment to fold in the same (or sufficiently similar) three-dimensional conformation as the full-length polypeptide from which the fragment is derived and to present a non-linear epitope or epitopes (also referred to in the art as conformational epitopes). The three-dimensional conformation of a polypeptide fragment is sufficiently similar to the full-length polypeptide when the capability to bind and the level of binding of an antibody that specifically binds to the full-length polypeptide is substantially the same for the fragment as for the full-length polypeptide.
Assays for assessing whether the immunogenic fragment folds into a conformation comparable to the full-length polypeptide include, for example, the ability of the protein to react with mono- or polyclonal antibodies that are specific for native or unfolded epitopes, the retention of other ligand-binding functions, and the sensitivity or resistance of the polypeptide fragment to digestion with proteases (see, e.g., Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3d ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY (2001)). Additional methods for identifying epitopic regions include methods described in Hoffmeister et al., Methods 29:270-281 (2003); Maecker et al., J. Immunol. Methods 255:27-40 (2001). Assays for identifying epitopes are described herein and known to the skilled artisan and include, for example, those described in Current Protocols in Immunology, Coligan et al. (Eds), John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y. (1991).
Identifying an immunogenic region and/or epitope of an immunogen of interest can be readily determined empirically by a person skilled in the art or by computer analysis and computer modeling, using methods and techniques that are routinely practiced by persons skilled in the art. Empirical methods include, by way of example, synthesizing polypeptide fragments comprising a particular length of contiguous amino acids of a protein, or generating fragments by use of one or more proteases and then determining the immunogenicity of the fragments using any one of numerous binding assays or immunoassay methods routinely practiced in the art. Exemplary methods for determining the capability of an antibody (polyclonal, monoclonal, or antigen-binding fragment thereof) to specifically bind to a fragment include, but are not limited to, ELISA, radioimmunoassay, immunoblot, competitive binding assays, fluorescence activated cell sorter analysis (FACS), and surface plasmon resonance.
Determination of the three-dimensional structures of a polypeptide, or immunogenic fragment thereof, of interest may be performed by routine methodologies to determine whether the immunogenic fragment retains the spatial positioning of the amino acids as found in the full-length polypeptide. See, for instance, Bradley et al., Science 309: 1868-1871 (2005); Schueler-Furman et al., Science 310:638 (2005); Dietz et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 103:1244 (2006); Dodson et al., Nature 450:176 (2007); Qian et al., Nature 450:259 (2007). Also available in the art are software tools, for example, PSORT or PSORT II, and Spscan (Wisconsin Sequence Analysis Package, Genetics Computer Group) that are useful for predicting transmembrane segments and membrane topology of polypeptides that are known or believed to traverse a cellular membrane (see, for example, Nakai et al., Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:34-36 (1999)).
Separately, or in combination with the above-described techniques, and given an exemplary amino acid sequence of a polypeptide of interest, a person skilled in the art can identify potential epitopes of the polypeptide (see, e.g., Jameson and Wolf, Comput. Appl. Biosci. 4:181-86 (1988)). By way of another example, Hopp and Woods describe the hydrophilicity method, which is based on empirical demonstrations of the close correlation between the hydrophilicity of polypeptide regions and their antigenicity (see, e.g., Hopp, Pept. Res. 6:183-90 (1993); Hofmann et al., Biomed. Biochim. Acta 46:855-66 (1987)). Computer programs are also available for identifying B cell or T cell epitopes. A BASIC program called EPIPLOT predicts B-cell antigenic sites in proteins from their primary structures by calculating and plotting flexibility, hydrophilicity, and antigenicity profiles using 13 different scales (see, for example, Menendez et al., Comput. Appl. Biosci. 6:101-105 (1990)). See also, such as, Van Regenmortel, Methods: a companion to Methods in Enzymology, 9: 465-472 (1996); Pellequer et al., “Epitope predictions from the primary structure of proteins,” In Peptide antigens: a practical approach (ed. G.B. Wisdom), pp. 7-25; Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994); Van Regenmortel, “Molecular dissection of protein antigens” In Structure of antigens (ed. M.H.V. Van Regenmortel), Vol. 1, pp. 1-27. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1992).
T cell epitopes of an immunogen may also be identified using a peptide motif searching program based on algorithms developed by Rammensee, et al. (Immunogenetics 50: 213-219 (1999)); by Parker, et al. (supra), or by using methods such as those described by Doytchinova and Flower in Immunol. Cell Biol. 80(3):270-9 (2002); Blythe et al., Bioinformatics 18:434-439 (2002); Guan et al., Applied Bioinformatics 2:63-66 (2003); Flower et al., Applied Bioinformatics 1:167-176 (2002); Mallios, Bioinformatics 17: 942-48 (2001); Schirle et al., J. Immunol. Meth. 257:1-16 (2001).
Epitopic regions of microbial and antigens and tumor antigens that may be used as immunogens in the methods described herein are also described in the art. See by way of example, Lamb et al., Rev. Infect. Dis. March-Apruk: Suppl 2:s443-447 (1989); Lamb et al., EMBO J. 6:1245-49 (1987); Lamb et al., Lepr. Rev. Suppl 2:131-137 (1986); Mehra et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:7013-27 (1986); Horsfall et al., Immunol. Today 12:211-13 (1991); Rothbard et al., Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 155:143-52 (1990); Singh et al., Bioinformatics 17:1236-37 (2001); DeGroot et al., Vaccine 19:4385-95 (2001); DeLalla et al., J. Immunol. 163:1725-29 (1999); Cochlovius et al., J. Immunol. 165:4731-41 (2000); Consogno et al., Blood 101:1039-44 (2003); Roberts et al., AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 12:593-610 (1996); Kwok et al., Trends Immunol. 22:583-88 (2001); Novak et al., J. Immunol. 166:6665-70 (2001).
In certain instances when antigen-specific T cell lines or clones are available, for example tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), virus-specific or bacteria-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), these cells may be used to screen for the presence of relevant epitopes using target cells prepared with specific antigens. Such targets can be prepared using random, or selected, synthetic peptide libraries, which would be used to sensitize the target cells for lysis by the CTL. Another approach to identify a relevant epitope when T cell lines or clones are available is to use recombinant DNA methodologies. Gene or cDNA libraries from CTL-susceptible targets are first prepared and transfected into non-susceptible target cells. This allows the identification and cloning of the gene encoding the protein precursor of the peptide containing the CTL epitope. The second step in this process is to prepare truncated genes from the relevant cloned gene, in order to narrow down the region that encodes for the at least one CTL epitope. This step is optional if the gene is not too large. The third step is to prepare synthetic peptides of, for example, approximately 10-20 amino acids in length, overlapping by 5-10 residues, which are used to sensitize targets for the CTL. When a peptide, or peptides, is shown to contain the relevant epitope, and if desired, smaller peptides can be prepared to establish the peptide of minimal size that contains the epitope. These epitopes are typically, but not necessarily, contained within 9-10 residues for CTL epitopes and up to 20 or 30 residues for helper T lymphocyte (HTL) epitopes.
Alternatively, epitopes may be defined by direct elution of peptides that are non-covalently bound by particular major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules followed by amino acid sequencing of the eluted peptides (see, for example, Engelhard et al., Cancer J. 2000 May; 6 Suppl 3:S272-80). Briefly, the eluted peptides are separated using a purification method such as HPLC, and individual fractions are tested for their capacity to sensitize targets for CTL lysis or to induce proliferation of cytokine secretion in HTL. When a fraction has been identified as containing the peptide, it is further purified and submitted to sequence analysis. The peptide sequence can also be determined using tandem mass spectrometry. A synthetic peptide is then prepared and tested with the CTL or HTL to corroborate that the correct sequence and peptide have been identified.
Epitopes may also be identified using computer analysis, such as the Tsites program (see, e.g., Rothbard and Taylor, EMBO J. 7:93-100, 1988; Deavin et al., Mol. Immunol. 33:145-155, 1996), which searches for peptide motifs that have the potential to elicit Th responses. CTL peptides with motifs appropriate for binding to murine and human class I or class II MHC may be identified according to BIMAS (Parker et al., J. Immunol. 152:163, 1994) and other HLA peptide binding prediction analyses. Briefly, the protein sequences, for example from microbial components or antigens, or tumor cell components or tumor antigens, are examined for the presence of MHC-binding motifs. These binding motifs, which exist for each MHC allele, are conserved amino acid residues, usually at positions 2 (or 3) and 9 (or 10) for MHC class I binding peptides that are typically 9-10 residues long. Synthetic peptides are then prepared that comprise those sequences bearing the MHC binding motifs, and subsequently such peptides are tested for their ability to bind to MHC molecules. The MHC binding assay can be carried out either using cells which express high numbers of empty (unoccupied) MHC molecules (cellular binding assay), or using purified MHC molecules. Lastly, the MHC binding peptides are then tested for their capacity to induce a CTL response in naive individuals, either in vitro using human lymphocytes, or in vivo using HLA-transgenic animals. These CTL are tested using peptide-sensitized target cells, and targets that naturally process the antigen, such as viral infected cells or tumor cells. To further confirm immunogenicity, a peptide may be tested using an HLA A2 transgenic mouse model and/or any of a variety of in vitro stimulation assays.
In certain embodiments, an immunogen (i.e., a tumor associated antigen or antigen from an infectious disease microorganism) includes polypeptide species that have one or more amino acid substitutions, insertions, or deletions in an amino acid sequence that is known and available in the art for the respective immunogen. Conservative substitutions of amino acids are well known and may occur naturally in the polypeptide or may be introduced when the polypeptide is recombinantly produced. Amino acid substitutions, deletions, and additions may be introduced into a polypeptide using well-known and routinely practiced mutagenesis methods (see, e.g., Sambrook et al. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3d ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY 2001)). Oligonucleotide-directed site-specific (or segment specific) mutagenesis procedures may be employed to provide an altered polynucleotide that has particular codons altered according to the substitution, deletion, or insertion desired. Deletion or truncation variants of immunogens may also be constructed by using convenient restriction endonuclease sites adjacent to the desired deletion. Subsequent to restriction, overhangs may be filled in and the DNA re-ligated. Alternatively, random mutagenesis techniques, such as alanine scanning mutagenesis, error prone polymerase chain reaction mutagenesis, and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis may be used to prepare immunogen polypeptide variants (see, e.g., Sambrook et al., supra). Variants of a particular immunogen (or polypeptide fragment thereof) include a polypeptide immunogen that has at least 85%, 90%, 95%, or 99% amino acid sequence identity to any of the exemplary amino acid sequences known in the art.
These polypeptide immunogen variants retain one or more biological activities or functions of the respective immunogen. In particular, variants of an immunogen retain, in a statistically, clinically, or biologically significant manner, the capability to induce an immune response (e.g., a humoral response (i.e., B cell response), cell-mediated response (i.e., T cell response (including a cytotoxic T lymphocyte response)) or both a humoral and cell-mediated response in a subject. Given the many molecular biology, protein expression, and protein isolation techniques and methods routinely practiced in the art for introducing mutations in a polypeptide, preparing polypeptide fragments, isolating the fragments and variants, and analyzing same, immunogen polypeptide variants and fragments having the desired biological activities can be made readily and without undue experimentation.
A variety of criteria known to persons skilled in the art indicate whether an amino acid that is substituted at a particular position in a peptide or polypeptide is conservative (or similar). For example, a similar amino acid or a conservative amino acid substitution is one in which an amino acid residue is replaced with an amino acid residue having a similar side chain. Similar amino acids may be included in the following categories: amino acids with basic side chains (e.g., lysine, arginine, histidine); amino acids with acidic side chains (e.g., aspartic acid, glutamic acid); amino acids with uncharged polar side chains (e.g., glycine, asparagine, glutamine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, cysteine, histidine); amino acids with nonpolar side chains (e.g., alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, phenylalanine, methionine, tryptophan); amino acids with beta-branched side chains (e.g., threonine, valine, isoleucine), and amino acids with aromatic side chains (e.g., tyrosine, phenylalanine, tryptophan). Proline, which is considered more difficult to classify, shares properties with amino acids that have aliphatic side chains (e.g., leucine, valine, isoleucine, and alanine). In certain circumstances, substitution of glutamine for glutamic acid or asparagine for aspartic acid may be considered a similar substitution in that glutamine and asparagine are amide derivatives of glutamic acid and aspartic acid, respectively. As understood in the art “similarity” between two polypeptides is determined by comparing the amino acid sequence and conserved amino acid substitutes thereto of the polypeptide to the sequence of a second polypeptide (e.g., using GENEWORKS, Align, the BLAST algorithm, or other algorithms described herein and practiced in the art).
As described herein for immunogenic fragments, assays for assessing whether a respective variant folds into a conformation comparable to the non-variant polypeptide or fragment include, for example, the ability of the protein to react with mono- or polyclonal antibodies that are specific for native or unfolded epitopes, the retention of ligand-binding functions, and the sensitivity or resistance of the mutant protein to digestion with proteases (see Sambrook et al., supra). Such variants can be identified, characterized, and/or made according to methods described herein or other methods known in the art, which are routinely practiced by persons skilled in the art.
Immunogenic compositions that are administered to a subject according to the methods described herein may include at least one pharmaceutically (or physiologically) suitable excipient. Any physiological or pharmaceutically suitable excipient or carrier (i.e., a non-toxic material that does not interfere with the activity of the active ingredient) known to those of ordinary skill in the art for use in pharmaceutical compositions may be employed in the immunogenic compositions described herein. Exemplary excipients include diluents and carriers that maintain stability and integrity of proteins. Excipients for therapeutic use are well known, and are described, for example, in Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy (Gennaro, 21st Ed. Mack Pub. Co., Easton, Pa. (2005)), and are described in greater detail herein.
The methods described herein comprise administering to a subject at least one adjuvant that is intended to enhance (or improve, augment) the immune response to the immunogen (i.e., increase the level of the specific immune response to the immunogen in a statistically, biologically, or clinically significant manner compared with the level of the specific immune response in the absence of administering the adjuvant). Methods and techniques for determining the level of an immune response are discussed in greater detail herein and are routinely practiced in the art.
Exemplary adjuvants that may be used in the methods described herein include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following. Adjuvants that may be used in the methods described herein include adjuvants that may be useful for enhancing the CTL response to the immunogen (or to the immunogen-containing cell or particle) and/or enhancing the memory CD4 T cell response. Desired adjuvants augment the response to the immunogen without causing conformational changes in the immunogen that might adversely affect the qualitative form of the response. Suitable adjuvants include aluminum salts, such as alum (potassium aluminum sulfate), or other aluminum containing adjuvants; nontoxic lipid A-related adjuvants such as, by way of non-limiting example, nontoxic monophosphoryl lipid A (see, e.g., Tomai et al., J. Biol. Response Mod. 6:99-107 (1987)), GLA described herein; 3 De-O-acylated monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) (see, e.g., United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB 2220211); adjuvants such as QS21 and QuilA, that comprise a triterpene glycoside or saponin isolated from the bark of the Quillaja saponaria Molina tree found in South America (see, e.g., Kensil et al., in Vaccine Design: The Subunit and Adjuvant Approach (eds. Powell and Newman, Plenum Press, NY, 1995); U.S. Pat. No. 5,057,540). Other suitable adjuvants include oil in water emulsions (such as squalene or peanut oil), optionally in combination with immune stimulants, such as monophosphoryl lipid A (see, e.g., Stoute et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 336, 86-91 (1997)). Another suitable adjuvant is CpG (Bioworld Today, Nov. 15, 1998). Other suitable adjuvants include Toll-like receptor agonists and lipid A mimetics such as amino-alkyl glucosaminide 4-phosphates (AGPs) (see, e.g., RC527 described in Baldridge et al., Expert Opin. Biol. Ther., 4(7):1129-1138 (2004), and RC-544 described in Persing et al., Trends in Microbiology, 10(10) (suppl.):S32-S37 (2002)).
As described herein, a suitable adjuvant is an aluminum salt, such as aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, aluminum sulfate. Such adjuvants can be used with or without other specific immunostimulating agents such as MPL or 3-DMP, QS21, polymeric or monomeric amino acids such as polyglutamic acid or polylysine. Another class of suitable adjuvants is oil-in-water emulsion formulations (also called herein stable oil in water emulsions). Such adjuvants can be optionally used with other specific immunostimulating agents such as muramyl peptides (e.g., N-acetylmuramyl-L-threonyl-D-isoglutamine (thr-MDP), N-acetyl-normuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine (nor-MDP), N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutaminyl-L-alanine-2-(1′-2′ dipalmitoyl-sn-1-glycero-3-hydroxyphosphoryloxy)-ethylamine (MTP-PE), N-acetylglucsaminyl-N-acetylmuramyl-L-Al-D-isoglu-L-Ala-dipalmitoxy propylamide (DTP-DPP) Theramide™), or other bacterial cell wall components. Oil-in-water emulsions include (1) MF59 (WO 90/14837), containing 5% Squalene, 0.5% Tween 80, and 0.5% Span 85 (optionally containing various amounts of MTP-PE) formulated into submicron particles using a microfluidizer such as Model 110Y microfluidizer (Microfluidics, Newton Mass.); (2) SAF, containing 10% Squalane, 0.4% Tween 80, 5% pluronic-blocked polymer L121, and thr-MDP, either microfluidized into a submicron emulsion or vortexed to generate a larger particle size emulsion, and (3) Ribi adjuvant system (RAS), (Ribi Immunochem, Hamilton, Mont.) containing 2% squalene, 0.2% Tween 80, and one or more bacterial cell wall components from the group consisting of monophosphorylipid A (MPL), trehalose dimycolate (TDM), and cell wall skeleton (CWS), preferably MPL+CWS (Detox™). Also as described above, suitable adjuvants include saponin adjuvants, such as Stimulon™ (QS21, Aquila, Worcester, Mass.) or particles generated therefrom such as ISCOMs (immunostimulating complexes) and ISCOMATRIX. Other adjuvants include Complete Freund's Adjuvant (CFA) (which is suitable for non-human use but not for human use) and Incomplete Freund's Adjuvant (IFA). Other adjuvants include cytokines, such as interleukins (IL-1, IL-2, and IL-12), macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF).
Another adjuvant that may be used in the compositions described herein is identified by chemical formula (I) and referred to as glucopyranosyl lipid A (GLA):
wherein the moieties A1 and A2 are independently selected from the group of hydrogen, phosphate, and phosphate salts. Sodium and potassium are exemplary counterions for the phosphate salts. The moieties R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6 are independently selected from the group of hydrocarbyl having 3 to 23 carbons, represented by C3-C23. For added clarity it will be explained that when a moiety is “independently selected from” a specified group having multiple members, it should be understood that the member chosen for the first moiety does not in any way impact or limit the choice of the member selected for the second moiety. The carbon atoms to which R1, R3, R5 and R6 are joined are asymmetric, and thus may exist in either the R or S stereochemistry. In one embodiment all of those carbon atoms are in the R stereochemistry, while in another embodiment all of those carbon atoms are in the S stereochemistry.
“Hydrocarbyl” refers to a chemical moiety formed entirely from hydrogen and carbon, where the arrangement of the carbon atoms may be straight chain or branched, noncyclic or cyclic, and the bonding between adjacent carbon atoms maybe entirely single bonds, i.e., to provide a saturated hydrocarbyl, or there may be double or triple bonds present between any two adjacent carbon atoms, i.e., to provide an unsaturated hydrocarbyl, and the number of carbon atoms in the hydrocarbyl group is between 3 and 24 carbon atoms. The hydrocarbyl may be an alkyl, where representative straight chain alkyls include methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, n-butyl, n-pentyl, n-hexyl, and the like, including undecyl, dodecyl, tridecyl, tetradecyl, pentadecyl, hexadecyl, heptadecyl, octadecyl, etc.; while branched alkyls include isopropyl, sec-butyl, isobutyl, tert-butyl, isopentyl, and the like. Representative saturated cyclic hydrocarbyls include cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, and the like; while unsaturated cyclic hydrocarbyls include cyclopentenyl and cyclohexenyl, and the like. Unsaturated hydrocarbyls contain at least one double or triple bond between adjacent carbon atoms (referred to as an “alkenyl” or “alkynyl”, respectively, if the hydrocarbyl is non-cyclic, and cycloalkeny and cycloalkynyl, respectively, if the hydrocarbyl is at least partially cyclic). Representative straight chain and branched alkenyls include ethylenyl, propylenyl, 1-butenyl, 2-butenyl, isobutylenyl, 1-pentenyl, 2-pentenyl, 3-methyl-1-butenyl, 2-methyl-2-butenyl, 2,3-dimethyl-2-butenyl, and the like; while representative straight chain and branched alkynyls include acetylenyl, propynyl, 1-butynyl, 2-butynyl, 1-pentynyl, 2-pentynyl, 3-methyl-1-butynyl, and the like.
The adjuvant of formula (I) may be obtained by synthetic methods known in the art, for example, the synthetic methodology disclosed in PCT International Publication No. WO 2009/035528, which is incorporated herein by reference, as well as the publications identified in WO 2009/035528, where each of those publications is also incorporated herein by reference. Certain of the adjuvants may also be obtained commercially. A preferred adjuvant is Product No. 699800 as identified in the catalog of Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster Ala. (see E1 in combination with E10, below).
In various embodiments of the invention, the adjuvant has the chemical structure of formula (I) but the moieties A1, A2, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6 are selected from subsets of the options previously provided for these moieties, wherein these subsets are identified below by E1, E2, etc.
E1: A1 is phosphate or phosphate salt and A2 is hydrogen.
E2: R1, R3, R5 and R6 are C3-C21 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are C5-C23 hydrocarbyl.
E3: R1, R3, R5 and R6 are C5-C17 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are C7-C19 hydrocarbyl.
E4: R1, R3, R5 and R6 are C7-C15 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are C9-C17 hydrocarbyl.
E5: R1, R3, R5 and R6 are C9-C13 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are C11-C15 hydrocarbyl.
E6: R1, R3, R5 and R6 are C9-C15 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are C11-C17 hydrocarbyl.
E7: R1, R3, R5 and R6 are C7-C13 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are C9-C15 hydrocarbyl.
E8: R1, R3, R5 and R6 are C11-C20 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are C12-C20 hydrocarbyl.
E9: R1, R3, R5 and R6 are C11 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are C13 hydrocarbyl.
E10: R1, R3, R5 and R6 are undecyl and R2 and R4 are tridecyl.
In certain embodiments, each of E2 through E10 is combined with embodiment E1, and/or the hydrocarbyl groups of E2 through E9 are alkyl groups, preferably straight chain alkyl groups. The adjuvant of formula (I) may be formulated into a pharmaceutical composition, optionally with a co-adjuvant, each as discussed below. In this regard reference is made to U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0131466 that provides formulations, such as aqueous formulation (AF) and stable emulsion formulations (SE) for GLA adjuvant, wherein these formulations may be used for any of the adjuvants of formula (I).
In another embodiment, the adjuvant is a synthetic lipid A type adjuvant as described in PCT International publication No. WO 2010/141861, and has a structure selected from the following chemical formula (II):
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, wherein: L1, L2, L3, L4, L5 and L6 are the same or different and are independently selected from —O—, —NH—, and —(CH2)—; L7, L8, L9 and L10 are the same or different, and at any occurrence may be either absent or —C(═O)—; Y1 is an acid functional group; Y2 and Y3 are the same or different and are each independently selected from —OH, —SH, and an acid functional group; Y4 is —OH or —SH; R1, R3, R5 and R6 are the same or different and are each independently selected from the group of C8-C13 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are the same or different and are each independently selected from the group of C6-C11 alkyl.
Optionally, as described in greater detail below and herein, two or more different adjuvants can be used simultaneously, such as by way of non-limiting example, an aluminum salt with MPL, an aluminum salt with QS21, MPL with QS21, and alumna aluminum salt, QS21, and MPL together. Also, Incomplete Freund's adjuvant can be used (see, e.g., Chang et al., Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 32, 173-186 (1998)), optionally in combination with any of an aluminum salt, QS21, and MPL and all combinations thereof.
In certain embodiments, the adjuvant of formula (I) may be formulated into a pharmaceutical (or adjuvant composition), optionally with a co-adjuvant as described above, each as discussed below or any other adjuvant described herein or available in the art. In this regard reference is made to U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0131466 that provides formulations, such as aqueous formulation (AF) and stable emulsion formulations (SE) for GLA adjuvant, which formulations may be used with respect to any of the adjuvants of formula (I).
As provided herein the adjuvant of formula I may be used in combination with a second adjuvant, referred to herein as a co-adjuvant. In three exemplary embodiments, the co-adjuvant may be a delivery system, or it may be an immunopotentiator, or it may be a composition that functions as both a delivery system and an immunopotentiator (see, e.g., O'Hagan et al., Pharm. Res. 21(9):1519-30 (2004)). The co-adjuvant may be an immunopotentiator that operates via a member of the Toll-like receptor family biomolecules. For example, the co-adjuvant may be selected for its primary mode of action, as either a TLR4 agonist, or a TLR8 agonist, or a TLR9 agonist. Alternatively, or in supplement, the co-adjuvant may be selected for its carrier properties; for example, the co-adjuvant may be an emulsion, a liposome, a microparticle, or alum.
In one embodiment, the co-adjuvant is alum, where this term refers to aluminum salts, such as aluminum phosphate (AlPO4) and aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)3). When alum is used as the co-adjuvant, the alum may be present in a dose of vaccine in an amount of about 100 to 1,000 μg, or 200 to 800 μg, or 300 to 700 μg or 400 to 600 μg. The adjuvant of formula (1) is typically present in an amount less than the amount of alum, and in various specific embodiments the adjuvant of formula (1), on a weight basis, is present at 0.1-1%, or 1-5%, or 1-10%, or 1-100% relative to the weight of alum.
In one particular embodiment, the adjuvant is an emulsion having vaccine adjuvanting properties. Such emulsions include oil-in-water emulsions. Freund's incomplete adjuvant (IFA) is one such adjuvant. Another suitable oil-in-water emulsion is MF59™ adjuvant, which contains squalene, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (also known as Tween™ 80 surfactant), and sorbitan trioleate. Squalene is a natural organic compound originally obtained from shark liver oil, although also available from plant sources (primarily vegetable oils), including amaranth seed, rice bran, wheat germ, and olives. Other suitable adjuvants are Montanide™ adjuvants (Seppic Inc., Fairfield N.J.) including Montanide™ ISA 50V, which is a mineral oil-based adjuvant; Montanide™ ISA 206; and Montanide™ IMS 1312. While mineral oil may be present in the co-adjuvant, in one embodiment the oil component(s) of the vaccine compositions of the present invention are all metabolizable oils.
Examples of immunopotentiators that may be used in the practice of the methods described herein as co-adjuvants include: MPL™; MDP and derivatives; oligonucleotides; double-stranded RNA; alternative pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPS); saponins; small-molecule immune potentiators (SMIPs); cytokines; and chemokines.
In one embodiment, the co-adjuvant is MPL™ adjuvant, which is commercially available from GlaxoSmithKline (originally developed by Ribi ImmunoChem Research, Inc. Hamilton, Mont.). See, e.g., Ulrich and Myers, Chapter 21 from Vaccine Design: The Subunit and Adjuvant Approach, Powell and Newman, eds. Plenum Press, New York (1995). Related to MPL™ adjuvant, and also suitable as co-adjuvants for use in the compositions and methods described herein, are AS02™ adjuvant and AS04™ adjuvant. AS02™ adjuvant is an oil-in-water emulsion that contains both MPL™ adjuvant and QS-21™ adjuvant (a saponin adjuvant discussed elsewhere herein). AS04™ adjuvant contains MPL™ adjuvant and alum MPL™ adjuvant is prepared from lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Salmonella minnesota R595 by treating LPS with mild acid and base hydrolysis followed by purification of the modified LPS.
In another embodiment, the co-adjuvant is a saponin such as those derived from the bark of the Quillaja saponaria tree species, or a modified saponin (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,057,540; 5,273,965; 5,352,449; 5,443,829; and 5,560,398). The product QS-21™ adjuvant sold by Antigenics, Inc. Lexington, Mass. is an exemplary saponin-containing co-adjuvant that may be used with the adjuvant of formula (1). An alternative co-adjuvant, related to the saponins, is the ISCOM™ family of adjuvants, originally developed by Iscotec (Sweden) and typically formed from saponins derived from Quillaja saponaria or synthetic analogs, cholesterol, and phospholipid, all formed into a honeycomb-like structure.
In yet another embodiment, the co-adjuvant is a cytokine that functions as a co-adjuvant (see, e.g., Lin et al., Clin. Infect. Dis. 21(6):1439-49 (1995); Taylor, Infect. Immun. 63(9):3241-44 (1995); and Egilmez, Chap. 14 in Vaccine Adjuvants and Delivery Systems, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2007)). In various embodiments, the cytokine may be, for example, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (see, e.g., Change et al., Hematology 9(3):207-15 (2004); Dranoff, Immunol. Rev. 188:147-54 (2002); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,679,356); or an interferon, such as a type I interferon (e.g., interferon-α (IFN-α) or interferon-β (IFN-β), or a type II interferon (e.g., interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (see, e.g., Boehm et al., Ann. Rev. Immunol. 15:749-95 (1997); and Theofilopoulos et al., Ann. Rev. Immunol. 23:307-36 (2005)); an interleukin, specifically including interleukin-1α (IL-1α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-2 (IL-2) (see, e.g., Nelson, J. Immunol. 172(7):3983-88 (2004); interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-7 (IL-7), interleukin-12 (IL-12) (see, e.g., Portielje et al., Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 52(3):133-44 (2003); and Trinchieri, Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3(2):133-46 (2003)); interleukin-15 (1′-15), interleukin-18 (IL-18); fetal liver tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt3L), or tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα). The adjuvant of formula (I) may be co-formulated with the cytokine prior to combination with the vaccine antigen, or the antigen, adjuvant of formula (I) and cytokine co-adjuvant may be formulated separately and then combined.
A composition comprising the immunogen or a composition comprising a recombinant expression vector that encodes the immunogen or a vector particle comprising the vector are packaged and supplied in separate vials than those containing the adjuvant. Appropriate labels are typically packaged with each composition indicating the intended therapeutic application. The choice of an adjuvant and/or the excipient depends on the stability of the immunogen, recombinant expression vector, and/or vector particle; the route of administration; the dosing schedule; and the efficacy of the adjuvant for the species being vaccinated. For administration in humans, a pharmaceutically acceptable adjuvant is one that has been approved or is approvable for human administration by pertinent regulatory bodies. For example, as discussed herein and known in the art, Complete Freund's adjuvant is not suitable for human administration.
Adjuvants useful for use in the methods described herein are physiologically or pharmaceutically suitable adjuvants for the subject to whom the adjuvant is administered. Adjuvant compositions comprise at least one adjuvant (i.e., one or more adjuvants) and, optionally, at least one physiologically or pharmaceutically suitable (or acceptable) excipient. Any physiological or pharmaceutically suitable excipient or carrier (i.e., a non-toxic material that does not interfere with the activity of the active ingredient) known to those of ordinary skill in the art for use in pharmaceutical compositions may be employed in the adjuvant compositions described herein. Exemplary excipients include diluents and carriers that maintain stability and integrity of the component(s) of the adjuvant. Excipients for therapeutic use are well known, and are described, for example, in Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy (Gennaro, 21st Ed. Mack Pub. Co., Easton, Pa. (2005)), and are described in greater detail herein.
In one embodiment, recombinant expression vectors are provided that comprise a polynucleotide sequence encoding at least one immunogen that induces an immune response to the immunogen. To obtain efficient transcription and translation of the immunogen, the encoding polynucleotide sequences in each vector should include at least one appropriate expression control sequence (also called a regulatory expression sequence or feature) (e.g., promoter, enhancer, leader), which are described in greater detail herein, that is operatively linked to the encoding polynucleotide sequence(s). These recombinant expression vectors are thus provided for directing expression of the immunogen or for directing co-expression of at least two immunogens in any appropriate host cell that has been transformed, transduced, or transfected with the recombinant expression vector or into which a vector particle containing the recombinant expression vector has been introduced.
The recombinant expression vectors described herein may encode one or more immunogens (i.e., at least one, at least two, at least three immunogens, etc.), which immunogens are described in greater detail herein. In particular embodiments, at least one, two, or three, or more immunogens from an infectious microorganism (e.g., a virus, bacteria, fungus, or parasite) may be encoded by a recombinant expression vector. In another specific embodiment, a recombinant expression vector described herein may encode at least one, two, three, or more tumor-associated antigens. These tumor associated antigens are described in greater detail herein and may be, for example, a tumor-associated antigen from a renal cell carcinoma antigen, a prostate cancer antigen (e.g., prostatic acid phosphatase, prostate specific antigen, NKX3.1, and prostate specific membrane antigen), a mesothelioma antigen, a pancreatic cancer antigen, a melanoma antigen, a breast cancer antigen, a colorectal cancer antigen, a lung cancer antigen, an ovarian cancer antigen, or any cancer or tumor-associate antigen described herein and in the art.
Recombinant expression vectors may be used for expression of any one or more of the immunogens described herein. In particular embodiments, the recombinant expression vector is delivered to an appropriate cell (for example, an antigen-presenting cell i.e., a cell that displays a peptide/MHC complex on its cell surface, such as a dendritic cell) or tissue (e.g., lymphoid tissue) that will induce the desired immune response (i.e., a specific humoral response (i.e., B cell response) and/or induction of a specific cell-medicated immune response, which may include an immunogen-specific CTL response). The recombinant expression vectors may therefore also include, for example, lymphoid tissue-specific transcriptional regulatory elements (TRE) such as a B lymphocyte, T lymphocyte, or dendritic cell specific TRE. Lymphoid tissue specific TRE are known in the art (see, e.g., Thompson et al. (1992), Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 1043-1053; Todd et al. (1993), J. Exp. Med. 177, 1663-1674; Penix et al. (1993), J. Exp. Med. 178, 1483-1496).
In a particular embodiment, the recombinant expression vector is plasmid DNA or cosmid DNA. Plasmid DNA or cosmid DNA containing one or more polynucleotides encoding an immunogen as described herein are readily constructed using standard techniques well known in the art. The vector genome may be typically constructed in a plasmid form that can then be transfected into a packaging or producer cell line. The plasmid generally comprises sequences useful for replication of the plasmid in bacteria. Such plasmids are well known in the art. In addition, vectors that include a prokaryotic origin of replication may also include a gene whose expression confers a detectable or selectable marker such as a drug resistance. Typical bacterial drug resistance products are those that confer resistance to ampicillin or tetracycline. For analysis to confirm that the correct nucleotide sequences are incorporated in plasmids, the plasmid may be replicated in E. coli, purified, and analyzed by restriction endonuclease digestion and/or its nucleotide sequence determined by conventional methods.
In other particular embodiments, the recombinant expression vector is a viral vector. Exemplary recombinant expression viral vectors include a lentiviral vector genome, poxvirus vector genome, vaccinia virus vector genome, adenovirus vector genome, adenovirus-associated virus vector genome, herpes virus vector genome, and alpha virus vector genome. Viral vectors may be live, attenuated, replication conditional or replication deficient, and typically is a non-pathogenic (defective), replication competent viral vector.
By way of example, in a specific embodiment, when the viral vector is a vaccinia virus vector genome, the polynucleotide encoding an immunogen of interest may be inserted into a non-essential site of a vaccinia viral vector. Such non-essential sites are described, for example, in Perkus et al., Virology 152:285 (1986); Hruby et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:3411 (1983); Weir et al., J. Virol. 46:530 (1983)). Suitable promoters for use with vaccinia viruses include but are not limited to P7.5 (see, e.g., Cochran et al., J. Virol. 54:30 (1985); P11 (see, e.g., Bertholet, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:2096 (1985)); and CAE-1 (see, e.g., Patel et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:9431 (1988)). Highly attenuated strains of vaccinia are more acceptable for use in humans and include Lister, NYVAC, which contains specific genome deletions (see, e.g., Guerra et al., J. Virol. 80:985-98 (2006); Tartaglia et al., AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses 8:1445-47 (1992)), or MVA (see, e.g., Gheradi et al., J. Gen. Virol. 86:2925-36 (2005); Mayr et al., Infection 3:6-14 (1975)). See also Hu et al. (J. Virol. 75:10300-308 (2001), describing use of a Yaba-Like disease virus as a vector for cancer therapy); U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,698,530 and 6,998,252. See also, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,964. See also U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,247,615 and 7,368,116.
In certain embodiments, an adenovirus vector or adenovirus-associated virus vector may be used for expressing an immunogen of interest. Several adenovirus vector systems and methods for administering the vectors have been described (see, e.g., Molin et al., J. Virol. 72:8358-61 (1998); Narumi et al., Am J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 19:936-41 (1998); Mercier et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:6188-93 (2004); U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,143,290; 6,596,535; 6,855,317; 6,936,257; 7,125,717; 7,378,087; 7,550,296).
Retroviral vector genomes may include those based upon murine leukemia virus (MuLV), gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV), ecotropic retroviruses, simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and combinations (see, e.g., Buchscher et al., J. Virol. 66:2731-39 (1992); Johann et al., J. Virol. 66:1635-40 (1992); Sommerfelt et al., Virology 176:58-59 (1990); Wilson et al., J. Virol. 63:2374-78 (1989); Miller et al., J. Virol. 65:2220-24 (1991); Miller et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:4239 (1990); Kolberg, NIH Res. 4:43 1992; Cornetta et al., Hum Gene Ther. 2:215 (1991)).
In a more specific embodiment, the recombinant expression viral vector is a lentiviral vector genome. The genome can be derived from any of a large number of suitable, available lentiviral genome based vectors, including those identified for human gene therapy applications (see, e.g., Pfeifer et al., Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum Genet. 2:177-211 (2001)). Suitable lentiviral vector genomes include those based on Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1), HIV-2, feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), equine infectious anemia virus, Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV), and maedi/visna virus. A desirable characteristic of lentiviruses is that they are able to infect both dividing and non-dividing cells, although target cells need not be dividing cells or be stimulated to divide. Generally, the genome and envelope glycoproteins will be based on different viruses, such that the resulting viral vector particle is pseudotyped. Safety features of the vector genome are desirably incorporated. Safety features include self-inactivating LTR and a non-integrating genome. Exemplary vectors contain a packaging signal (psi), a Rev-responsive element (RRE), splice donor, splice acceptor, central poly-purine tract (cPPT), and WPRE element. In certain exemplary embodiments, the viral vector genome comprises sequences from a lentivirus genome, such as the HIV-1 genome or the SIV genome. The viral genome construct may comprise sequences from the 5′ and 3′ LTRs of a lentivirus, and in particular may comprise the R and U5 sequences from the 5′ LTR of a lentivirus and an inactivated or self-inactivating 3′ LTR from a lentivirus. The LTR sequences may be LTR sequences from any lentivirus from any species. For example, they may be LTR sequences from HIV, SIV, FIV or BIV. Typically, the LTR sequences are HIV LTR sequences.
The vector genome may comprise an inactivated or self-inactivating 3′ LTR (see, e.g., Zufferey et al., J. Virol. 72: 9873, 1998; Miyoshi et al., J. Virol. 72:8150, 1998; both of which are incorporated in their entirety). A self-inactivating vector generally has a deletion of the enhancer and promoter sequences from the 3′ long terminal repeat (LTR), which is copied over into the 5′ LTR during vector integration. In one instance, the U3 element of the 3′ LTR contains a deletion of its enhancer sequence, the TATA box, Sp1 and NF-kappa B sites. As a result of the self-inactivating 3′ LTR, the provirus that is generated following entry and reverse transcription will comprise an inactivated 5′ LTR. The rationale is to improve safety by reducing the risk of mobilization of the vector genome and the influence of the LTR on nearby cellular promoters. The self-inactivating 3′ LTR may be constructed by any method known in the art.
Optionally, the U3 sequence from the lentiviral 5′ LTR may be replaced with a promoter sequence in the viral construct, such as a heterologous promoter sequence. This can increase the titer of virus recovered from the packaging cell line. An enhancer sequence may also be included. Any enhancer/promoter combination that increases expression of the viral RNA genome in the packaging cell line may be used. In one example, the CMV enhancer/promoter sequence is used (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,385,839 and 5,168,062).
In certain embodiments, the risk of insertional mutagenesis is minimized by constructing the lentiviral vector genome to be integration defective. A variety of approaches can be pursued to produce a non-integrating vector genome. These approaches entail engineering a mutation(s) into the integrase enzyme component of the pol gene, such that it encodes a protein with an inactive integrase. The vector genome itself can be modified to prevent integration by, for example, mutating or deleting one or both attachment sites, or making the 3′ LTR-proximal polypurine tract (PPT) non-functional through deletion or modification. In addition, non-genetic approaches are available; these include pharmacological agents that inhibit one or more functions of integrase. The approaches are not mutually exclusive, that is, more than one of them can be used at a time. For example, both the integrase and attachment sites can be non-functional, or the integrase and PPT site can be non-functional, or the attachment sites and PPT site can be non-functional, or all of them can be non-functional.
Integrase is involved in cleavage of viral double-stranded blunt-ended DNA and joining the ends to 5′-phosphates in the two strands of a chromosomal target site. Integrase has three functional domains: N-terminal domain, which contains a zinc-binding motif (HHCC); the central domain core, which contains the catalytic core and a conserved DD35E motif (D64, D116, E152 in HIV-1); and a C-terminal domain, which has DNA binding properties. Point mutations introduced into integrase are sufficient to disrupt normal function. Many integrase mutations have been constructed and characterized (see, e.g., Philpott and Thrasher, Human Gene Therapy 18:483, 2007; Apolonia, Thesis submitted to University College London, April 2009, pp, 82-97; Engelman et al., J. Virol. 69: 2729, 1995; Nightingale et al., Mol. Therapy, 13: 1121, 2006). The sequence encoding the integrase protein can be deleted or mutated to render the protein inactive, preferably without significantly impairing reverse transcriptase activity or nuclear targeting, thereby only preventing integration of the provirus into the target cell genome. Acceptable mutations can reduce integrase catalysis, strand transfer, binding to att sites, binding to host chromosomal DNA, and other functions. For example, a single aspartic acid to asparagine substitution at residue 35 of HIV or SIV integrase completely abolishes viral DNA integration. Deletions of integrase will generally be confined to the C-terminal domain. Deletion of coding sequence for residues 235-288 result in a useful non-functional integrase (see, e.g., Engelman et al., J. Virol. 69:2729, 1995). As further examples, mutations can be generated, for example, Asp64 (residue numbers are given for HIV-1, corresponding residue numbers for integrase from other lentiviruses or retroviruses can be readily determined by one of ordinary skill) (e.g., D64E, D64V), Asp116 (e.g., D116N), Asn120 (e.g., N120K), Glu152, Gln148 (e.g., Q148A), Lys156, Lys159, Trp235 (e.g., W235E), Lys264 (e.g., K264R), Lys266 (e.g., K266R), Lys273 (e.g., K273R). Other mutations can be constructed and tested for integration, transgene expression, and any other desirable parameter. Assays for these functions are well known. Mutations can be generated by any of a variety of techniques, including site-directed mutagenesis and chemical synthesis of nucleic acid sequence. One mutation may be made or more than one of these mutations can be present in integrase. For example, an integrase may have mutations at two amino acids, three amino acids, four amino acids, and so on.
Alternatively or in combination with the use of integrase mutant(s), the attachment sites (att) in U3 and U5 can also be mutated. Integrase binds to these sites and the 3′-terminal dinucleotide is cleaved at both ends of the vector genome. A CA dinucleotide is located at the recessed 3′ end; the CA is required for processing, mutation of the nucleotides blocks integration into the host chromosome. The A of the CA dinucleotide is the most critical nucleotide for integration, and mutations at both ends of the genome will give the best results (see, e.g., Brown et al., J. Virol. 73:9011 (1999)). In one exemplification, the CA at each end is changed to TG. In other exemplifications, the CA at each end is changed to TG at one end and GT at the other end. In other exemplifications, the CA at each end is deleted; in other exemplifications, the A of the CA is deleted at each end.
Integration can also be inhibited by mutation or deletion of polypurine tract (PPT) (see, e.g., WO 2009/076524), located proximally to the 3′ LTR. The PPT is a polypurine sequence of about 15 nucleotides that can serve as a primer binding site for plus-strand DNA synthesis. In this instance, mutations or deletions of PPT targets the reverse transcription process. Without wishing to be held to a particular mechanism, by mutating or deleting PPT, production of linear DNA is radically reduced, and essentially only 1-LTR DNA circles are produced. Integration requires a linear double-stranded DNA vector genome, and integration is essentially eliminated without it. As stated herein, a PPT can be made non-functional by mutation or by deletion. Typically, the entire about 15 nt PPT is deleted, although in some embodiments, shorter deletions of 14 nt, 13, nt, 12 nt, 11 nt, 10 nt, 9 nt, 8 nt, 7 nt, 6 nt, 5 nt, 4 nt, 3 nt and 2 nt may be made. When mutations are made, typically multiple mutations are made, especially in the 5′ half of the PPT (see, e.g., McWilliams et al., J. Virol. 77:11150, 2003), although single and double mutations in the first four bases still reduce transcription. Mutations made at the 3′ end of PPT generally have a more dramatic effect (see, e.g., Powell et al., J. Virol. 70:5288, 1996).
These different approaches to make a vector genome non-integrating can be used individually or in combination. Using more than one approach may be used to build a fail-safe vector through redundant mechanisms. Thus, PPT mutations or deletions can be combined with att site mutations or deletions or with Integrase mutations or PPT mutations or deletions can be combined with both att site mutations or deletions and Integrase mutations. Similarly, att site mutations or deletions and Integrase mutations may be combined with each other or with PPT mutations or deletions.
As described herein, lentiviral vector constructs contain a promoter for expression in mammalian cells. Promoters, which are discussed in greater detail herein, include, for example, the human ubiquitin C promoter (UbiC), the cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter (CMV), and the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) promoter. The U3 region may comprise a PPT (polypurine tract) sequence immediately upstream. In certain specific embodiments, any one of at least three different U3 regions (at the 3′ end) may be included in the lentiviral vector (see SEQ ID NOS:21-23). The constructs contain deletions in the U3 regions. The SIN construct has a deletion of about 130 nucleotides in the U3 (see, e.g., Miyoshi, et al. J. Virol. 72: 8150, 1998; Yu et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 3194, 1986), which removes the TATA box, thereby abolishing LTR promoter activity. The deletions in constructs 703 and 704 increase expression from lentivirus vectors (see, e.g., Bayer et al., Mol. Therapy. 16: 1968, 2008). In addition, construct 704 contains a deletion of the 3′ PPT, which decreases integration of the vector (see, e.g., WO 2009/076524). See also U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/842,609 and International Patent Application No. PCT/US10/042,870, which each is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Regulatory Expression Sequences
As described herein, the recombinant expression vector comprises at least one regulatory expression sequence. In certain embodiments, when the recombinant expression vector comprises a viral vector genome, expression of the at least one immunogen is desired in particular target cells. Typically, for example, in a lentiviral vector the polynucleotide sequence encoding the immunogen is located between the 5′ LTR and 3′ LTR sequences. Further, the encoding nucleotide sequence(s) is preferably operatively linked in a functional relationship with other genetic or regulatory sequences or features, for example transcription regulatory sequences including promoters or enhancers, that regulate expression of the immunogen in a particular manner. In certain instances, the useful transcriptional regulatory sequences are those that are highly regulated with respect to activity, both temporally and spatially. Expression control elements that may be used for regulating the expression of the encoded polypeptides are known in the art and include, but are not limited to, inducible promoters, constitutive promoters, secretion signals, enhancers, and other regulatory sequences.
The polynucleotide encoding the immunogen and any other expressible sequence is typically in a functional relationship with internal promoter/enhancer regulatory sequences. With respect to lentiviral vector constructs, an “internal” promoter/enhancer is one that is located between the 5′ LTR and the 3′ LTR sequences in the viral vector and is operatively linked to the encoding polynucleotide sequence of interest. The internal promoter/enhancer may be any promoter, enhancer or promoter/enhancer combination known to increase expression of a gene with which it is in a functional relationship. A “functional relationship” and “operatively linked” mean, without limitation, that the sequence is in the correct location and orientation with respect to the promoter and/or enhancer such that the sequence of interest will be expressed when the promoter and/or enhancer is contacted with the appropriate molecules.
The choice of an internal promoter/enhancer is based on the desired expression pattern of the immunogen and the specific properties of known promoters/enhancers. Thus, the internal promoter may be constitutively active. Non-limiting examples of constitutive promoters that may be used include the promoter for ubiquitin (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,510,474; WO 98/32869); CMV (see, e.g., Thomsen et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:659, 1984; U.S. Pat. No. 5,168,062); beta-actin (Gunning et al. 1989 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:4831-4835); and pgk (see, for example, Adra et al. 1987 Gene 60:65-74; Singer-Sam et al. 1984 Gene 32:409-417; and Dobson et al. 1982 Nucleic Acids Res. 10:2635-2637).
Alternatively, the promoter may be a tissue specific promoter. In some embodiments, the promoter is a target cell-specific promoter. For example, the promoter can be from any product expressed by dendritic cells, including CD11c, CD103, TLRs, DC-SIGN, BDCA-3, DEC-205, DCIR2, mannose receptor, Dectin-1, Clec9A, MHC class II. In addition, promoters may be selected to allow for inducible expression of the immunogen. A number of systems for inducible expression are known in the art, including the tetracycline responsive system, the lac operator-repressor system, as well as promoters responsive to a variety of environmental or physiological changes, including heat shock, metal ions, such as metallothionein promoter, interferons, hypoxia, steroids, such as progesterone or glucocorticoid receptor promoter, radiation, such as VEGF promoter. A combination of promoters may also be used to obtain the desired expression of each of the immunogen-encoding polynucleotide sequences. The artisan of ordinary skill will be able to select a promoter based on the desired expression pattern of the polynucleotide sequence in the organism or the target cell of interest.
A recombinant expression vector, including a viral vector genome, may comprise at least one RNA Polymerase II or III responsive promoter. This promoter can be operatively linked to the polynucleotide sequence of interest and can also be linked to a termination sequence. In addition, more than one RNA Polymerase II or III promoter may be incorporated. RNA polymerase II and III promoters are well known to persons of skill in the art. A suitable range of RNA polymerase III promoters can be found, for example, in Paule and White, Nucleic Acids Res., Vol. 28, pp 1283-1298 (2000). RNA polymerase II or III promoters also include any synthetic or engineered DNA fragment that can direct RNA polymerase II or III to transcribe downstream RNA coding sequences. Further, the RNA polymerase II or III (Pol II or III) promoter or promoters used as part of the viral vector genome can be inducible. Any suitable inducible Pol II or III promoter can be used with the methods described herein. Particularly suited Pol II or III promoters include the tetracycline responsive promoters provided in Ohkawa and Taira, Human Gene Therapy, Vol. 11, pp 577-585 (2000) and in Meissner et al., Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 29, pp 1672-1682 (2001).
An internal enhancer may also be present in the recombinant expression vector, including a viral vector genome, to increase expression of the polynucleotide sequence of interest. For example, the CMV enhancer (see, e.g., Boshart et al., Cell 41:521, 1985) may be used. Many enhancers in viral genomes, such as HIV, CMV, and in mammalian genomes have been identified and characterized (see, e.g., publically available databases such as GenBank). An enhancer can be used in combination with a heterologous promoter. One of ordinary skill in the art will be able to select the appropriate enhancer based on the desired expression pattern.
When targeting delivery of a recombinant expression vector, including a viral vector genome, to a particular target cell, the vector genome will usually contain a promoter that is recognized by the target cell and that is operatively linked to the sequence of interest, viral components (when the vector is a viral vector), and other sequences discussed herein. A promoter is an expression control element formed by a nucleic acid sequence that permits binding of RNA polymerase and transcription to occur. Promoters may be inducible, constitutive, temporally active or tissue specific. The activity of inducible promoters is induced by the presence or absence of biotic or abiotic factors. Inducible promoters can be a useful tool in genetic engineering because the expression of genes to which they are operatively linked can be turned on or off at certain stages of development of an organism, its manufacture, or in a particular tissue. Inducible promoters can be grouped as chemically-regulated promoters, and physically-regulated promoters. Typical chemically-regulated promoters include, not are not limited to, alcohol-regulated promoters (e.g., alcohol dehydrogenase I (alcA) gene promoter), tetracycline-regulated promoters (e.g., tetracycline-responsive promoter), steroid-regulated promoter (e.g., rat glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-based promoter, human estrogen receptor (ER)-based promoter, moth ecdysone receptor-based promoter, and the promoters based on the steroid/retinoid/thyroid receptor superfamily), metal-regulated promoters (e.g., metallothionein gene-based promoters), and pathogenesis-related promoters (e.g., Arabidopsis and maize pathogen-related (PR) protein-based promoters). Typical physically-regulated promoters include, but are not limited to, temperature-regulated promoters (e.g., heat shock promoters), and light-regulated promoters (e.g., soybean SSU promoter). Other exemplary promoters are described elsewhere, for example, in patents and published patent applications that can be identified by searching the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office databases.
One of skill in the art will be able to select an appropriate promoter based on the specific circumstances. Many different promoters are well known in the art, as are methods for operatively linking the promoter to the polynucleotide sequence to be expressed. Both native promoter sequences and many heterologous promoters may be used to direct expression in the packaging cell and target cell. Heterologous promoters are typically used because they generally permit greater transcription and higher yields of the desired protein as compared to the native promoter.
The promoter may be obtained, for example, from the genomes of viruses such as polyoma virus, fowlpox virus, adenovirus, bovine papilloma virus, avian sarcoma virus, cytomegalovirus, a retrovirus, hepatitis-B virus and Simian Virus 40 (SV40). The promoter may also be, for example, a heterologous mammalian promoter, for example, the actin promoter or an immunoglobulin promoter, a heat-shock promoter, or the promoter normally associated with the native sequence, provided such promoters are compatible with the target cell. In one embodiment, the promoter is the naturally occurring viral promoter in a viral expression system. In some embodiments, the promoter is a dendritic cell-specific promoter. The dendritic cell-specific promoter can be, for example, CD11c promoter.
Transcription may be increased by inserting an enhancer sequence into the vector(s). Enhancers are typically cis-acting elements of DNA, usually about 10 to 300 bp in length, that act on a promoter to increase its transcription. Many enhancer sequences are now known from mammalian genes (globin, elastase, albumin, alpha-fetoprotein, and insulin) and from eukaryotic cell viruses. Examples include the SV40 enhancer on the late side of the replication origin (bp 100-270), the cytomegalovirus early promoter enhancer, the polyoma enhancer on the late side of the replication origin, and adenovirus enhancers. The enhancer may be spliced into the vector at a position 5′ or 3′ to the antigen-specific polynucleotide sequence, but is preferably located at a site 5′ from the promoter.
Expression vectors may also contain sequences necessary for the termination of transcription and for stabilizing the mRNA. These sequences are often found in the 5′ and, occasionally 3′, untranslated regions of eukaryotic or viral DNAs or cDNAs and are well known in the art.
A recombinant expression construction, including a viral vector genome, may also contain additional genetic elements. The types of elements that may be included in the construct are not limited in any way and may be chosen to achieve a particular result. For example, a signal that facilitates nuclear entry of the recombinant expression vector or viral genome in the target cell may be included. An example of such a signal is the HIV-1 flap signal. Additional regulatory sequences may be included that facilitate the characterization of the provirus integration site in the target cell. For example, a tRNA amber suppressor sequence may be included in the construct. An insulator sequence, for example from chicken β-globin, may also be included in the viral genome construct. This element reduces the chance of silencing an integrated provirus in the target cell due to methylation and heterochromatinization effects. In addition, the insulator may shield the internal enhancer, promoter and exogenous polynucleotide sequences from positive or negative positional effects from surrounding DNA at the integration site on the chromosome. In addition, the recombinant construct, including the vector genome, may contain one or more genetic elements designed to enhance expression of the gene of interest. For example, a woodchuck hepatitis virus responsive element (WRE) may be placed into the construct (see, e.g., Zufferey et al. 1999. J. Virol. 74:3668-3681; Deglon et al., 2000. Hum Gene Ther. 11:179-190).
When the recombinant expression vector is a viral vector genome, the viral vector genome is typically constructed in a plasmid form that may be transfected into a packaging or producer cell line for production of the viral vector genome construct. The plasmid generally comprises sequences useful for replication of the plasmid in bacteria. Such plasmids are well known in the art. In addition, vectors that include a prokaryotic origin of replication may also include a gene whose expression confers a detectable or selectable marker such as a drug resistance. Typical bacterial drug resistance products are those that confer resistance to ampicillin or tetracycline.
In certain configurations, recombinant expression vectors contain polynucleotide sequences that encode dendritic cell (DC) maturation/stimulatory factors. Exemplary stimulatory molecules include GM-CSF, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-15, IL-21, IL-23, TNFα, B7.1, B7.2, 4-1BB, CD40 ligand (CD40L), drug-inducible CD40 (iCD40), and the like. These polynucleotides are typically under the control of one or more regulatory elements that direct the expression of the coding sequences in dendritic cells. Maturation of dendritic cells contributes to successful vaccination (see, e.g., Banchereau et al., Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5:296-306 (2005); Schuler et al., Cum Opin. Immunol. 15:138-147 (2003); Figdor et al., Nat. Med. 10:475-480 (2004)). Maturation can transform DCs from cells actively involved in antigen capture into cells specialized for T cell priming. For example, engagement of CD40 by CD40L on CD4-helper T cells is a critical signal for DC maturation, resulting in potent activation of CD8+ T cells. Such stimulatory molecules are also referred to as maturation factors or maturation stimulatory factors. Immune checkpoints represent significant barriers to activation of functional cellular immunity in cancer, and antagonistic antibodies specific for inhibitory ligands on T cells including CTLA4 and programmed death-1 (PD-1) are examples of targeted agents being evaluated in the clinics A significant tolerance mechanism in chronic infections and cancer is the functional exhaustion of antigen-specific T cells that express high levels of PD-1. As the potency of therapeutic immunization has been shown to be significantly enhanced by combination with immune checkpoint control, as a non-limiting example, it can be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that an alternative approach to inhibiting immune checkpoint is to inhibit the expression of programmed death (PD) ligands one and two (PD-L1/L2). One way to accomplish inhibition is by the expression of RNA molecules such as those described herein, which repress the expression of PD-L1/L2 in the DCs transduced with a viral vector genome, such as the lentivirus vector genome, encoding one or more of the relevant molecules. Maturation of DCs or expression of particular elements such as immune checkpoints, for example PD-1 ligands, can be characterized by flow cytometry analysis of up-regulation of surface marker such as MHC II, and by profiling expressed chemokines and cytokines, for example, by performing techniques and methods described herein.
A sequence encoding a detectable product, usually a protein, can be included to allow for identification of cells that are expressing the desired immunogen. For example, a fluorescent marker protein, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP), is incorporated into the recombinant expression construct along with a polynucleotide sequence of interest (i.e., encoding an at least one immunogen). In other instances, the protein may be detectable by an antibody, or the protein may be an enzyme that acts on a substrate to yield a detectable product, or may be a protein product that allows selection of a transfected or transduced target cell, for example confers drug resistance, such as hygromycin resistance. Typical selection genes encode proteins that confer resistance to antibiotics or other toxins suitable for use in eukaryotic cells, for example, neomycin, methotrexate, blasticidine, among others known in the art, or complement auxotrophic deficiencies, or supply critical nutrients withheld from the media. The selectable marker can optionally be present on a separate plasmid and introduced by co-transfection.
With respect to vector particles described herein, one or more multicistronic expression units may be used that include two or more of a polynucleotide sequence encoding an immunogen, and a sequence encoding an envelope molecule as described herein or one or more DC maturation factors necessary for production of the desired vector particle in packaging cells. The use of multicistronic vectors reduces the total number of nucleic acid molecules required and thus may avoid the possible difficulties associated with coordinating expression from multiple vector genomes. In a multicistronic vector the various elements to be expressed are operatively linked to one or more promoters (and other expression control elements as necessary). In some configurations, a multicistronic vector comprises a sequence encoding an at least one immunogen (i.e., one or more) of interest, a sequence encoding a reporter product, and a sequence encoding one or more vector particle components. In certain embodiments in which the recombinant construct comprises a polynucleotide that encodes an immunogen, the construct optionally encodes a DC maturation factor. In certain other embodiments, a multicistronic vector comprises a polynucleotide sequences that encode each of an immunogen, a DC maturation factor, and optionally viral components when the expression vector is a viral expression vector.
Each component to be expressed in a multicistronic expression vector may be separated, for example, by an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) element or a viral 2A element, to allow for separate expression of the various proteins from the same promoter. IRES elements and 2A elements are known in the art (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,190; de Felipe et al. 2004. Traffic 5: 616-626). In one embodiment, oligonucleotides such as furin cleavage site sequences (RAKR) (see, e.g., Fang et al. 2005 Nat. Biotech. 23: 584-590) linked with 2A-like sequences from foot-and-mouth diseases virus (FMDV); equine rhinitis A virus (ERAV); and thosea asigna virus (TaV) (see, e.g., Szymczak et al. 2004 Nat. Biotechnol. 22: 589-594) are used to separate genetic elements in a multicistronic vector. The efficacy of a particular multicistronic vector can readily be tested by detecting expression of each of the genes using standard protocols.
In a specific exemplification, a viral vector genome comprises: a cytomegalovirus (CMV) enhancer/promoter sequence; the R and U5 sequences from the HIV 5′ LTR; a packaging sequence (ψ); the HIV-1 flap signal; an internal enhancer; an internal promoter; a gene of interest; the woodchuck hepatitis virus responsive element; a tRNA amber suppressor sequence; a U3 element with a deletion of its enhancer sequence; the chicken β-globin insulator; and the R and U5 sequences of the 3′ HIV LTR. In some exemplifications, the vector genome comprises an intact lentiviral 5′ LTR and a self-inactivating 3′ LTR (see, e.g., Iwakuma et al. Virology 15:120, 1999).
Construction of the vector genome can be accomplished using any suitable genetic engineering techniques known in the art, including, without limitation, the standard techniques of restriction endonuclease digestion, ligation, transformation, plasmid purification, and DNA sequencing, for example as described in Sambrook et al. (1989 and 2001 editions; Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY); Coffin et al. (Retroviruses. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, N.Y. (1997)); and “RNA Viruses: A Practical Approach” (Alan J. Cann, Ed., Oxford University Press, (2000), each of the foregoing which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Vectors constructed for transient expression in mammalian cells may also be used. Transient expression involves the use of an expression vector that is able to replicate efficiently in a host cell, such that the host cell accumulates many copies of the expression vector and, in turn, synthesizes high levels of a the polypeptide encoded by the immunogen-specific polynucleotide in the expression vector. See Sambrook et al., supra, pp. 16.17-16.22, 1989. Other vectors and methods suitable for adaptation to the expression of polypeptides are well known in the art and are readily adapted to the specific circumstances.
By using the teachings provided herein and the knowledge in the art, a person skilled in the art will recognize that the efficacy of a particular expression system can be tested by transfecting packaging cells with a vector comprising a polynucleotide sequence encoding a reporter protein and measuring the expression using a suitable technique, for example, measuring fluorescence from a green fluorescent protein conjugate. Other suitable reporter genes are well known in the art.
A recombinant expression vector that comprises a polynucleotide sequence that encodes an immunogen may be used for production of the immunogen. Recombinant expression vectors include at least one regulatory expression sequence, such as a promoter or enhancer, that is operatively linked to the polynucleotide encoding the immunogen. Each of the expression vectors may be used to transform, transducer, or transfect an appropriate host cell for recombinant production of a respective immunogen. Suitable host cells for production of the immunogen include prokaryotes, yeast and higher eukaryotic cells (e.g., CHO and COS). The immunogen may each be isolated from the respective host cell or host cell culture using any one of a variety of isolation methods (e.g., filtration, diafiltration, chromatography (including affinity chromatography, high pressure liquid chromatography), and preparative electrophoresis) known and routinely practiced in the protein art. In certain embodiments, as described herein, the isolated immunogen may then be formulated with a pharmaceutically suitable excipient to provide an immunogenic composition.
Particular methods for producing polypeptides recombinantly are generally well known and routinely used. For example, molecular biology procedures are described by Sambrook et al. (Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, 1989; see also Sambrook et al., 3rd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, (2001)). DNA sequencing can be performed as described in Sanger et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5463 (1977)) and the Amersham International plc sequencing handbook and including improvements thereto.
In another embodiment, vector particles are provided. A vector particle comprises any one of the recombinant expression vectors described herein that comprise a polynucleotide sequence encoding at least one immunogen. In certain other embodiments, a vector particle comprises a recombinant expression system that comprises one recombinant expression vector (also called a first recombinant expression vector) comprising a polynucleotide sequence encoding at least one immunogen that induces a specific immune response. Also provided herein are methods for delivering a polynucleotide encoding at least one immunogen (as described herein) to a target cell. In particular embodiments, the target cell is an immune cell that is an antigen-presenting cell; in more specific embodiments and as described herein, the target cell is a dendritic cell. Such methods comprise contacting (i.e., permitting interaction) of the target cell with a vehicle that delivers the polynucleotide. In particular embodiments, described in detail herein, methods for delivering the polynucleotide comprise contacting the cell by administering to a subject a vector particle that comprises a recombinant expression vector that contains a polynucleotide sequence that encodes the immunogen. The vector particles, recombinant expression vectors, polynucleotides, and immunogens are discussed in greater detail herein.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are essential antigen presenting cells for the initiation and control of immune responses. DCs can develop along two pathways: one pathway is independent of monocytes and the second pathway is derived from monocytes (Mo-DCs). Blood monocytes, upon culture with GM-CSF and IL-4 acquire a dendritic morphology and strong capacities to initiate adaptive immunity (see, e.g., Bender, et al., J. Immunol. Methods 196(2), 121 (1996); Sallusto et al., J. Exp. Med. 179(4), 1109 (1994), including in vivo in humans (see, e.g., Dhodapkar, et al., J. Clin. Invest 104(2), 173 (1999); Schuler-Thurner, et al., J. Immunol. 165(6), 3492 (2000)). A more effective immunogen-specific T cell responses may be achieved by using a vector particle vaccine, in particular a lentiviral vector particle system that efficiently delivers immunogens directly to Mo-DCs in vivo, without the need for ex vivo cellular manipulation. Human Mo-DCs express high levels of two C-type lectin receptors, mannose receptor (MMR) and DC-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN). As described in greater detail herein, expression of immunogens may be targeted to Mo-DCs using a recombinant lentiviral vector engineered to target DC-SIGN.
A DC-SIGN-targeting envelope, SVGmu, consisting of an engineered Sindbis virus (SIN) glycoprotein that selectively binds DC-SIGN has been modified as described (see description herein and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/842,609 and International Patent Application No. PCT/US10/042,870). The lentiviral vector induced highly functional CD8 T cell immune responses after a single immunization in mice (see, e.g., Dai, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A (2009); Yang, et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 26(3), 326 (2008)). This prototype has been significantly advanced by two major modifications. This lentiviral vector described herein comprises a glycoprotein envelope (termed SINvar1) based on native SIN, an arbovirus known to infect dermal DCs via the DC-SIGN receptor (see, e.g., Gardner, et al., J. Virol. 74(24), 11849 (2000); Klimstra, et al., J. Virol. 77(22), 12022 (2003)) that is modified to prevent binding to ubiquitous heparan sulfate receptors (see, e.g., Klimstra et al., J. Virol. 72(9), 7357 (1998)). The SINvar1 envelope confers both increased productivity and in vivo function compared with the parental SVGmu envelope. The vector is also redundantly integration incompetent through the combination of a mutant Integrase (polD64V), rendering it non-functional (see, e.g., Apolonia, et al., Mol. Ther. 15(11), 1947 (2007)), and a vector backbone deleted of the U3 region of the LTR (up to att) and the 3′ LTR poly-purine tract (PPT). Thus, in addition to a disabled Integrase, the composition of the vector backbone prevents transcription of the full-length vector genome (self-inactivating mutation) resulting in single-LTR reverse transcribed episomal dsDNA circles in the infected DC, which are not a template for chromosomal integration (see, e.g., Bayer, et al., Mol. Ther. 16(12), 1968 (2008); Breckpot et al., J. Virol. (2010); Ma et al., Mol. Ther. 10(1):139 (2004)). Approximately 75% of the parental HIV genome has been removed from DC-NILV, including all of the regulatory and accessory proteins except for Rev. After a single injection, DC-NILV induces highly robust tumor antigen-specific CD8 T cell response. The potency of lentivector vaccination is dependent at least in part on engagement of TLR3 and TLR7 pattern recognition receptors (see, e.g., Beignon et al., J. Virol. (2009); Breckpot et al., supra). DC-NILV can induce immune responses of equivalent magnitude to its integrating counterpart and can be used in a homologous prime-boost regimen.
In certain embodiments, the vector particle is a viral vector particle and in other certain embodiments, the vector particle is a particle derived from a bacteria such as, for example, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., Mycobacterium bovis, Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., and Yersinia spp. (see, e.g., Paterson, Semin Immunol (2010) 22:183; Loessner, Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. (2004) 4:157; Daudel, Expert Rev. Vaccines (2007) 6:97). Exemplary viral vector particles include a lentiviral vector particle that comprises a lentiviral vector genome; a poxvirus vector particle that comprises a poxvirus vector genome; a vaccinia virus vector particle that comprises a vaccinia virus vector genome; an adenovirus vector particle that comprises a adenovirus vector genome; an adenovirus-associated virus vector particle that comprises a adenovirus-associated virus vector genome; a herpes virus vector particle that comprises a herpes virus vector genome (e.g., Herpes simplex virus I or II); or an alpha virus vector particle that comprises an alpha virus vector genome.
In a more particular embodiment, the vector particle is a lentiviral vector particle that comprises a lentiviral vector genome (which is described in detail above). Methods and compositions are provided herein for targeting cells and targeting dendritic cells (DCs) in particular by using a lentiviral vector particle (which may also be called a virion, a lentivirus particle) for delivering a sequence that encodes at least one immunogen to DCs. The lentiviral vector particle comprises an envelope glycoprotein variant derived from Sindbis virus E2, and a recombinant expression construct that comprises the genome that includes the sequences of interest, and optionally other components. The glycoprotein variant exhibits reduced binding to heparan sulfate compared to the glycoprotein from HR, a reference Sindbis virus strain. The envelope glycoprotein facilitates infection of dendritic cells by the lentiviral vector particles. “Facilitates” infection, as used herein, is the same as facilitates transduction and refers to the role of the envelope glycoprotein, acting alone or in concert with other molecules, in promoting or enhancing receptor-mediated entry of a pseudotyped retrovirus or lentivirus particle into a target cell.
In general, the lentiviral vector particles are produced by a cell line that contains one or more plasmid vectors and/or integrated elements that together encode the components necessary to generate functional vector particles. These lentiviral vector particles are typically not replication-competent, i.e., they are only capable of a single round of infection. Most often, multiple plasmid vectors or individual expression cassettes integrated stably into the producer cell chromosome are utilized to separate the various genetic components that generate the lentiviral vector particles; however, a single plasmid vector having all of the lentiviral components can be used. In one exemplification, the packaging cell line is transfected with one or more plasmids containing the viral vector genome, including LTRs, a cis-acting packaging sequence, and the sequences of interest (i.e., at least a nucleotide sequence encoding one immunogen), at least one plasmid encoding the virus enzymatic and structural components (e.g., gag and pol), and at least one plasmid encoding an Arbovirus envelope glycoprotein. Viral particles bud through the cell membrane and comprise a core that includes typically two RNA genomes containing the sequences of interest and an Arbovirus envelope glycoprotein that targets dendritic cells. In certain embodiments, the Arbovirus glycoprotein is a Sindbis virus E2 glycoprotein, and the glycoprotein is engineered to have reduced binding to heparan sulfate compared to E2 from the reference strain HR. This usually involves at least one amino acid change compared to the HR E2 glycoprotein sequence. As well, the E2 glycoprotein may be engineered to increase targeting specificity to dendritic cells.
Without wishing to be bound by theory, binding of the viral particle to a cell surface is believed to induce endocytosis, bringing the virus into an endosome, triggering membrane fusion, and allowing the virus core to enter the cytosol. For certain embodiments, which utilize integrating lentiviral vector particles, following reverse transcription and migration of the product to the nucleus, the genome of the virus integrates into the target cell genome, incorporating the sequences of interest into the genome of the target cell. To reduce the chance of insertional mutagenesis and to promote transient expression of a designated immunogen(s), however, other embodiments utilize non-integrating lentiviral vector particles (i.e., those which do not integrate into the target cell genome), but instead express the sequences of interest from an episome. In either instance, the infected DC then expresses the sequences of interest (e.g., an immunogen and optionally a stimulatory molecule). The immunogen can then be processed by dendritic cells and presented to T and B cells, generating an antigen-specific immune response. The specific pathway described above is not required so long as the dendritic cell is able to stimulate an antigen-specific immune response.
The viral particles can be administered to a subject in order to provide a prophylactic or therapeutic effect. Following infection of dendritic cells and expression of the immunogen product, an immune response is generated to the products.
Viral Vector Envelope
Arthropod-borne viruses (Arboviruses) are viruses that are transmitted to a host, such as humans, horses, or birds by an infected arthropod vector such as a mosquito. Arboviruses are further divided into sub-families of viruses including alphaviruses and flaviviruses, which have a single-stranded RNA genome of positive polarity and a glycoprotein-containing envelope. For example, dengue fever virus, yellow fever virus and West Nile virus belong to the flavivirus family, and Sindbis virus, Semliki Forest virus and Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis virus, are members of the alphavirus family (see, e.g., Wang et al., J. Virol. 66, 4992 (1992)). The envelope of Sindbis virus includes two transmembrane glycoproteins (see, e.g., Mukhopadhyay et al. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 3, 13 (2005)): E1, believed to be responsible for fusion, and E2, believed to be responsible for cell binding. Sindbis virus envelope glycoproteins are known to pseudotype other retroviruses, including oncoretroviruses and lentiviruses.
As discussed herein, an arbovirus envelope glycoprotein can be used to pseudotype a lentiviral-based vector genome. A “pseudotyped” lentivirus is a lentiviral particle having one or more envelope glycoproteins that are encoded by a virus that is distinct from the lentiviral genome. The envelope glycoprotein may be modified, mutated or engineered as described herein. Thus, lentiviral vector particles described herein include lentivirus pseudotyped with an arbovirus envelope glycoprotein, e.g. an alphavirus or flavivirus envelope glycoprotein, e.g. an E2 glycoprotein that may be modified, mutated or engineered. Lentiviruses may also be pseudotyped with other envelopes, including VSV-G, influenza virus, arenavirus, rhabdovirus, orthomyxovirus, HIV1, HIV2 and SIV.
The envelope of Sindbis virus and other alphaviruses incorporates into the lipid bilayer of the viral particle membrane, and typically includes multiple copies of two glycoproteins, E1 and E2. Each glycoprotein has membrane-spanning regions; E2 has an about 33 residue cytoplasmic domain whereas the cytoplasmic tail of E1 is very short (about 2 residues). Both E1 and E2 have palmitic acids attached in or near the membrane-spanning regions. E2 is initially synthesized as a precursor protein that is cleaved by furin or other Ca2+-dependent serine proteinase into E2 and a small glycoprotein called E3. Located between sequences encoding E2 and E1 is a sequence encoding a protein called 6K. E3 and 6K are signal sequences which serve to translocate the E2 and E1 glycoproteins, respectively, into the membrane. In the Sindbis virus genome, the coding region for Sindbis envelope proteins includes sequence encoding E3, E2, 6K, and E1. As used herein, “envelope” of an arbovirus virus includes at least E2, and may also include E1, 6K, and E3. An exemplary sequence of envelope glycoproteins of Sindbis virus, strain HR, is presented as SEQ ID NO:17. Sequences of envelope glycoproteins for other arboviruses can be found in publically available databases, such as GenBank. For example, sequences encoding Dengue virus glycoproteins can be found in Accession GQ252677.1 (among others in GenBank) and in the virus variation database at NCBI (GenBank accessions and virus variation database are incorporated by reference for envelope glycoprotein sequences) and an exemplary sequence encoding Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus envelope glycoproteins in Accession NP—040824.1 (incorporated by reference for sequences of envelope glycoproteins).
Although the cellular receptor(s) on dendritic cells for alphaviruses, and Sindbis virus in particular, have not been definitively identified to date, one receptor appears to be DC-SIGN (see, e.g., Klimstra et al., J. Virol. 77:12022, 2003). The use of the terms “attachment,” “binding,” “targeting” and the like are used interchangeably and are not meant to indicate a mechanism of the interaction between Sindbis virus envelope glycoprotein and a cellular component. DC-SIGN (Dendritic Cell Specific ICAM-3 (Intracellular Adhesion Molecules 3)-Grabbing Nonintegrin; also known as CD209) is a C-type lectin-like receptor capable of rapid binding and endocytosis of materials (see, e.g., Geijtenbeek et al. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 22: 33-54, 2004). E2 appears to target virus to dendritic cells through DC-SIGN. As shown herein, cells expressing DC-SIGN are transduced by viral vector particles pseudotyped with Sindbis virus E2 better (at least 2-fold, at least 3-fold, at least 4-fold, at least 5-fold, at least 6-fold, at least 7-fold, at least 8-fold, at least 9-fold, or at least 10-fold better) than isogenic cells that do not express DC-SIGN. The mechanism of how E2 glycoprotein facilitates viral infection appears to involve DC-SIGN, possibly through direct binding to DC-SIGN or causing a change in conformation or some other mechanism. Regardless of the actual mechanism, the targeting by E2 is preferential for cells expressing DC-SIGN, namely dendritic cells.
Sindbis virus also appears to bind to cells via heparan sulfate (see, e.g., Klimstra et al., J. Virol. 72: 7357, 1998; Burmes et al., J. Virol. 72: 7349, 1998). Because heparan sulfate and other cell surface glycosaminoglycans are found on the surface of most cell types, it is desirable to reduce interaction between heparan sulfate and Sindbis envelope glycoproteins. This can be accomplished by diminishing the binding of Sindbis virus envelope to heparan sulfate or increasing the binding, e.g., increasing avidity, of Sindbis virus envelope to dendritic cells or both. As a result, nonspecific binding to other molecules, which may be expressed by other cell types and which may occur even if the envelope is specific for DC-SIGN, is reduced, and the improved specificity may serve to avoid undesired side effects, such as side effects that may reduce the desired immune response, or side effects associated with off-target transduction of other cell types. Alternatively or in addition to the advantages of relatively specific transduction of cells expressing DC-SIGN, viral particles pseudo-typed with Sindbis virus envelope E2 glycoprotein may offer other advantages over viral particles pseudo-typed with glycoproteins such as VSV-G. Examples of such advantages include reduced complement-mediated lysis and/or reduced neuronal cell targeting, both of which are believed to associate with administration of VSV-G pseudo-typed viral particles.
In various exemplifications, the lentiviral vector particles specifically bind to cells expressing DC-SIGN and have reduced or abrogated binding to heparan sulfate. That is, a Sindbis virus envelope E2 glycoprotein may be modified to preferentially direct the virus to dendritic cells that express DC-SIGN relative to other cell types. Such envelope glycoproteins preferentially bind dendritic cells, especially dendritic cells expressing DC-SIGN, relative to other cell types that ubiquitously express heparin sulfate such as myeloid or lymphoid cells. As described below, this preferential binding ideally results in preferential infection of dendritic cells, especially those expressing DC-SIGN. Based on information obtained from structural studies and molecular modeling among other studies, variant sequences of envelope proteins, especially E2 and E1 glycoproteins, are designed and generated such that the glycoproteins maintain their functions as envelope proteins, but have the desired binding specificity, avidity, or level of binding. Candidate variant sequences may be created for each glycoprotein and assayed using the methods described below, or other methods known in the art, to identify envelope glycoproteins with the most desirable characteristics.
Certain variant sequences of Sindbis E2 have at least one amino acid alteration at residue 160 as compared to SEQ ID NO:1. Residue 160 is deleted or changed to an amino acid other than glutamic acid. An alteration is most commonly a substitution of at least one amino acid, but alternatively can be an addition or deletion of one or more amino acids. Preferably, any additional amino acids are few in number and do not comprise an antigenic epitope (e.g., hemagglutinin tag sequence), which may compromise safety. When there are two or more alterations, they can both be of the same type (e.g., substitution) or differing types (e.g., a substitution and a deletion). Multiple alterations can be scattered or located contiguously in the protein sequence.
By way of example, variant sequences comprise at least one amino acid alteration in the region of about residue 50 to about residue 180 of SEQ ID NO:1. Within this region are amino acids that are involved with binding to heparan sulfate. By reducing the net positive charge of E2, electrostatic interaction with heparan sulfate can be reduced, resulting in decreased binding to heparan sulfate. Candidate positively charged amino acids in this region include lysines at residues 63, 70, 76, 84, 97, 104, 129, 131, 133, 139, 148, 149, 159 and arginine at residues 65, 92, 128, 137, 157, 170, 172 (see, e.g., Bear et al., Virology 347: 183-190, 2006) (see SEQ ID NO:1). At least several of these amino acids are directly implicated in E2 binding to heparan sulfate. Net positive charge can be reduced by deletion of lysine or arginine or substitution of lysine or arginine with a neutral or negatively charged amino acid. For example, one or more of these lysines and arginines may be replaced with glutamic or aspartic acid. Certain embodiments have at least one substitution of lysine 70, 76 or 159. Exemplary amino acid sequences of the E2 glycoprotein are set forth in SEQ ID NOS:3 (e.g., residues 66 to 488), 4 (e.g., residues 66 to 488), and 5 (e.g., residues 66 to 486). In cases where E2 is expressed as a polyprotein with E3, the lysine located adjacent to the natural E3/E2 cleavage site is maintained—that is, the recognition sequence and cleavage site is unaltered. Alternatively, the native endopeptidase cleavage site sequence is replaced with a recognition sequence for a different endopeptidase.
Certain variants of E2 are also modified in a way that positively impacts binding to dendritic cells. Alteration of the glutamic acid found at residue 160 in the reference HR sequence can improve binding to dendritic cells (see, e.g., Gardner et al., J. Virol. 74, 11849, 2000). Alterations, such as a deletion of residue 160 or substitution of residue 160 are found in certain variants. In particular variants, a non-charged amino acid is substituted for Glu, in other variants, a non-acidic amino acid is substituted for Glu. Typically, Glu160 is replaced with one of the small or aliphatic amino acids, including glycine, alanine, valine, leucine or isoleucine.
Other variants comprise two or more amino acid alterations. Typically in these variants one of the alterations is Glu160 and the remaining alteration(s) are changes of one or more of the lysines and arginines in the region spanning residue about 50 to about 180 of SEQ ID NO:1. Certain of the variants comprise an alteration of Glu160 to a non-acidic residue or deletion and one or more alterations of lysine 70, lysine 76, or lysine 159 with a non-basic amino acid. Some specific variants comprise a Glu160 to Gly, Lys 70 to Glu, and Lys 159 to Glu; a Glu 160 to Gly, Lys 70, 76 and 159 to Glu; a deletion of Glu 160 and Lys 70 and 159 to Glu; and a deletion of Glu 160 and Lys 70, 76, and 159 to Glu. It is understood that the numbering of positions used herein is done with reference to SEQ ID NO: 1, such that, e.g. if an amino acid is deleted or inserted, the numbering adjusts accordingly. For example, if residue 1 is absent, then position 160 refers to position 159.
In certain embodiments, E2 protein is first expressed as a polyprotein in fusion with at least E3 or in fusion with a leader sequence. Regardless of whether the leader sequence is E3 or another sequence, E2 in the viral envelope should be free of the E3 or other leader sequence. In other words, E2 is preferably not an E3/E2 fusion protein (e.g., the E3/E2 fusion protein called SVGmu). In certain embodiments, E2 is expressed as part of E3-E2-6K-E1 polyprotein. Sindbis virus naturally expresses E2 as part of a polyprotein and the junction regions for E3/E2, E2/6K, and 6K/E1 have sequences recognized and cleaved by endopeptidases. Normally, the E3/E2 junction is cleaved by furin or a furin-like serine endopeptidase between residues 65 and 66. Furin has specificity for paired arginine residues that are separated by two amino acids. To maintain E3/E2 cleavage by furin, residues 62-66 (RSKRS; SEQ ID NO: 26) should maintain the two arginine residues with two amino acid separation and the serine residue. Alternatively, a different cleavage sequence can be used in place of the E3/E2 furin cleavage sequence or any of the other cleavage sequences. Recognition and cleavage sites can be incorporated for endopeptidases, including, without limitation, aspartic endopeptidases (e.g., cathepsin D, chymosin, HIV protease), cysteine endopeptidases (bromelains, papain, calpain), metalloendopeptidases, (e.g., collagenase, thermolysin), serine endopeptidases (e.g., chymotrypsin, factor IXa, factor X, thrombin, trypsin), streptokinases. The recognition and cleavage site sequences for these enzymes are well known.
Amino acids in E2, other than those already mentioned, may also be altered. Generally, a variant E2 sequence will have at least 80% sequence amino acid identity to the reference E2 sequence, or it may have at least 82%, at least 85%, at least 87%, at least 90%, at least 92%, at least 95%, or at least 98% sequence identity. Thus, any of the variant E2 glycoproteins described above, with any of the mutations described above (including but not limited to the mutation at position 160, or at one or more of the lysines and arginines in the region spanning residue about 50 to about 180, e.g., 70, 76 and/or 159), may have at least 80% sequence amino acid identity to any of the reference E2 sequences, e.g. the mature E2 glycoprotein sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, 3 (e.g., residues 66 to 488), 4 (e.g., residues 66 to 488) or 5 (e.g., residues 66 to 486). The variant glycoprotein should exhibit biological function, such as the ability to facilitate infection of dendritic cells by a viral particle having an envelope comprising E2. Experiments have identified regions of envelope glycoproteins that appear to have an important role in various aspects of viral assembly, attachment to cell surface, and infection. When making variants, the following information can be used as guidelines. The cytoplasmic tail of E2—approximately residues 408 to 415—is important for virus assembly (see, e.g., West et al. J. Virol. 80: 4458-4468, 2006; incorporated in its entirety). Other regions are involved in forming secondary structure (approximately residues 33-53), and involved in transport and protein stability (approximately residues 86-119) (see, e.g., Navaratmarajah et al., J. Virol. 363:124-147, 2007; incorporated in its entirety). The variant may retain hydrophobic character of a region that spans the membrane, approximately residues 370-380. The variant may retain one or both N-linked glycosylation sites residues NIT (residues 196-198) and NFT (residues 318-320) and may retain one or more of the sites that are palmitoylated (C-396, C416 and C417) (see, e.g., Strauss et al., Microbiol. Rev. 58, 491-562, 1994; pp. 499-509 incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). On the other hand, many regions of E2 may be altered without deleterious event. For example, insertions of transposons at many different locations in E2 still resulted in viable virus (see, e.g., Navaratmarajah, supra).
In certain embodiments, a tag peptide may be incorporated into E3, 6K, or E1 proteins. For some purposes, a tag may be incorporated into E2, but a tag is not desirable for use in a product for administration to human patients. A tag peptide, which is a short sequence (e.g., 5-30 amino acids), can be used to facilitate detection of envelope expression and its presence in viral particles. For detection purposes, a tag sequence will typically be detectable by antibodies or chemicals. Another use for a tag is to facilitate purification of viral particles. A substrate containing a binding partner for the tag can be used to absorb virus. Elution of the virus can be accomplished by treatment with a moiety that displaces the tag from the binding partner or when the tag sequence is in linkage with a cleavable sequence, treatment with the appropriate endopeptidase will conveniently allow release of virus. (See, for example, QiaGEN® catalog, Factor Xa Protease System). Removal of the tag peptide is generally desirable for safety purposes of the virus particles use in animal subjects. If the tag is not removed, an immune response to the tag may occur.
Suitable tags include, without limitation, FLAG (DYKDDDDK) (SEQ ID NO:35) (U.S. Pat. No. 4,703,004, incorporated in its entirety), for which antibodies are commercially available, chitin binding protein, maltose binding protein, glutathione-S-transferase, poly(His) (U.S. Pat. No. 4,569,794, incorporated in its entirety), thioredoxiin, HA (hemagglutinin)-tag, among others. Poly(His) can be adsorbed onto affinity media containing bound metal ions, such as, nickel or cobalt, and eluted with a low pH medium.
The vector particles may be evaluated to determine the specificity of the envelope glycoprotein incorporated into the virus that targets dendritic cells. For example, a mixed population of bone marrow cells can be obtained from a subject and cultured in vitro. Alternatively, isogenic cells lines that express or do not express DC-SIGN can be obtained and used. The recombinant virus can be administered to the mixed population of bone marrow cells or isogenic cell lines, and expression of a reporter gene incorporated into the virus can be assayed in the cultured cells. Certain embodiments may employ a limiting dilution analysis, in which the mixed population of cells is split into separate parts, which are then separately incubated with decreasing amounts of virus (e.g., 2-fold, 5-fold, 10-fold less virus in each part). In some embodiments, at least about 50%, or at least about 60%, 70%, 80% or 90%, or at least about 95% of infected cells in the mixed cell population are dendritic cells that express DC-SIGN. In certain embodiments, the ratio of infected dendritic cells to infected non-dendritic cells (or non DC-SIGN expressing cells) is at least about 2:1, at least about 3:1, at least about 4:1, at least about 5:1, at least about 6:1, at least about 7:1, at least about 8:1, at least about 9:1, at least about 10:1, at least about 20:1, at least about 30:1, at least about 40:1, at least about 50:1, at least about 100:1, at least about 200:1, at least about 500:1, at least about 1000:1, at least about 5000:1, at least about 10,000:1, or more. For limiting dilution, greater selectivity is typically seen at higher dilutions (i.e., lower amounts) of input virus.
Activity of pseudotyped viral particles can be determined by any of a variety of techniques. For example, a preferred method to measure infectivity efficiency (IU, infectious units) is by administering viral particles to cells and measuring expression of a product encoded in the vector genome. Any product that can be assayed may be used. One convenient type of product is a fluorescent protein, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP). Other products that can be used include proteins expressed on a cell surface (e.g., detection by antibody binding), enzymes, and the like. If the product is an antigen and cells are dendritic cells, infectivity/activity can be assessed by determining an immune response. Furthermore, it is possible to ascertain side effects in a mammal. The ability to specifically target dendritic cells can also be tested directly, for example, in cell culture as described below.
Vector particles, which include the viral particles described herein can also be prepared and tested for their selectivity and/or their ability to facilitate penetration of the target cell membrane. Viral particles that have an envelope with unmodified glycoproteins can be used as controls for comparison. Briefly, cells expressing a receptor for an envelope glycoprotein are infected by the virus using a standard infection assay. After a specified time, for example 48 hours post-infection, cells can be collected and the percentage of cells infected by the virus can be determined by flow cytometry, for example. Selectivity can be scored by calculating the percentage of cells infected by virus. Similarly, the effect of a variant envelope glycoprotein on viral titer can be quantified by dividing the percentage of cells infected by virus comprising a variant envelope by the percentage of cells infected by virus comprising the corresponding wild type (unmodified) envelope glycoprotein. A particularly suitable variant will have the best combination of selectivity and infectious titer. Once a variant is selected, viral concentration assays may be performed to confirm that these viruses can be concentrated without compromising activity. Viral supernatants are collected and concentrated by ultracentrifugation. The titers of viruses can be determined by limited dilution of viral stock solution and infection of cells expressing the receptor for the envelope glycoprotein, measuring the expression of a product expressed by the viruses as described above.
The entry of a lentiviral vector particle into a target cell is another type of evaluation of activity. BlaM-Vpr (beta-lactamase Vpr) fusion protein has been used to evaluate HIV-1 viral penetration; a fusion of BlaM and a Sindbis virus envelope glycoprotein, such as E1 or an E2/E1 fusion protein can be used to assess the efficacy of an envelope protein in facilitating fusion and penetration into a target cell. Viral particles may be prepared, for example, by transient transfection of packaging cells with one or more vectors comprising the viral elements, BlaM-Vpr, and the variant envelope of interest (and an affinity molecule if appropriate). The resulting viruses can be used to infect cells expressing a molecule the targeting molecule (or affinity molecule) specifically binds in the absence or presence of the free inhibitor of binding (such as an antibody). Cells can then be washed with CO2-independent medium and loaded with CCF2 dye (Aurora Bioscience). After incubation at room temperature to allow completion of the cleavage reaction, the cells can be fixed by paraformaldehyde and analyzed by flow cytometry and microscopy. The presence of blue cells indicates the penetration of viruses into the cytoplasm; fewer blue cells would be expected when blocking antibody is added (see, e.g., Cavrois et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 20:1151-54, 2002).
To investigate whether penetration is dependent upon a low pH, and to identify envelope glycoproteins with the desired pH dependence, NH4Cl or other compound that alters pH can be added at the infection step (NH4Cl will neutralize the acidic compartments of endosomes). In the case of NH4Cl, the disappearance of blue cells will indicate that penetration of viruses is low pH-dependent. In addition, to confirm that the activity is pH-dependent, lysosomotropic agents, such as ammonium chloride, chloroquine, concanamycin, bafilomycin Al, monensin, nigericin, etc., may be added into the incubation buffer. These agents elevate the pH within the endosomal compartments (see, e.g., Drose et al., J. Exp. Biol. 200, 1-8, 1997). The inhibitory effect of these agents will reveal the role of pH for viral fusion and entry. The different entry kinetics between viruses displaying different fusogenic molecules may be compared and the most suitable selected for a particular application.
PCR-based entry assays can be utilized to monitor reverse transcription and measure kinetics of viral DNA synthesis as an indication of the kinetics of viral entry. For example, viral particles comprising a particular envelope protein molecule are incubated with target cells, such as 293T cells, DCs, or any other cells that have been engineered to express, or which naturally express, the appropriate binding partner (receptor) for the envelope protein molecule. Either immediately, or after a time increment (to allow infection to occur), unbound viruses are removed and aliquots of the cells are analyzed for viral nucleic acids. DNA is extracted from these aliquots and subjected to amplification analysis, generally in a semi-quantitative assay, primed with LTR-specific primers. The appearance of LTR-specific DNA products indicates the success of viral entry.
Following viral infection with the viral vector particle, the immunogen is expressed by the target dendritic cells. If contacted ex vivo, the target dendritic cells are then transferred back to the patient, for example by injection, where they interact with immune cells that are capable of generating an immune response against the desired antigen. In preferred embodiments, the recombinant virus is injected into the patient where it transduces the targeted dendritic cells in situ. The dendritic cells then express the particular antigen associated with a disease or disorder to be treated, and the patient is able to mount an effective immune response against the disease or disorder.
The viral vector genome may contain a polynucleotide sequence encoding more than one immunogen, and upon transduction of a target dendritic cell, generates immune responses to each immunogen delivered to the cell. In some embodiments, the immunogens are related to a single disease or disorder. In other embodiments, the immunogens are related to multiple diseases or disorders.
In some of the vector particles, DC maturation factors that activate and/or stimulate maturation of the DCs are delivered in conjunction with the immunogen-encoding sequence of interest. In certain alternative embodiments, the DCs are activated by delivery of DC maturation factors prior to, simultaneously with, or after delivery of the vector particles. DC maturation factors may be provided separately from administration of the vector particles.
As described herein, one or more immune modulation or DC maturation factors can be encoded by one or more sequences that are contained in the vector particle and expressed after the particle enters or infects a dendritic cell. The sequences encoding immune modulation factors can also be provided in a separate vector that is co-transfected with the vector particle encoding one or more immunogens in a packaging cell line.
The methods described herein may be used for adoptive immunotherapy in a subject. As described above, an immunogen against which an immune response is desired is identified. A polynucleotide encoding the desired immunogen(s) is obtained and packaged into a vector particle. Target dendritic cells are obtained from the patient and transduced with the vector particle containing a polynucleotide that encodes the desired immunogen. The dendritic cells are then transferred back into the patient.
The vector particles (e.g., the viral vector particles described herein) may be injected in vivo, where the particles infect DCs and deliver the immunogen-encoding nucleotide sequence of interest. The amount of viral particles is at least 3×106 infectious units (IU), and can be at least 1×107 IU, at least 3×107 IU, at least 1×108 IU, at least 3×108 IU, at least 1×109 IU, or at least 3×109 IU. At selected intervals, DCs from the recipient's lymphoid organs may be used to measure expression, for example, by observing marker expression, such as GFP or luciferase if co-expressed by a polynucleotide sequence present in the recombinant expression vector included in the vector particle. Nucleic acid monitoring techniques and measurements of reverse transcriptase (RT) activity can also be used to analyze the biodistribution of vector particles when the vector particle is a lentiviral vector particle. T cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, lymph nodes, spleens, or malignant or target pathogen-infected tissue of vector particle (including lentiviral vector particle) treated recipients may be measured from the magnitude and durability of response to antigen stimulation. Tissue cells other than DCs, such as epithelial cells and lymphoid cells, may be analyzed for the specificity of in vivo gene delivery.
As described herein, methods are provided for inducing an immune response to an immunogen. Cells of the immune system that are involved in an immune response are referred to, generally, as immune cells and include a lymphocyte and a non-lymphoid cell such as accessory cell. Lymphocytes are cells that specifically recognize and respond to foreign antigens, and accessory cells are those that are not specific for certain antigens but are involved in the cognitive and activation phases of immune responses. For example, mononuclear phagocytes (macrophages), other leukocytes (e.g., granulocytes, including neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils), and dendritic cells function as accessory cells in the induction of an immune response. The activation of lymphocytes by a foreign antigen leads to induction or elicitation of numerous effector mechanisms that function to eliminate the antigen. Accessory cells such as mononuclear phagocytes that affect or are involved with the effector mechanisms are also called effector cells.
Major classes of lymphocytes include B lymphocytes (B cells), T lymphocytes (T cells), and natural killer (NK) cells, which are large granular lymphocytes. B cells are capable of producing antibodies. T lymphocytes are further subdivided into helper T cells (CD4+ (also referred to herein and in the art as CD4)) and cytolytic or cytotoxic T cells (CD8+ (also referred to herein and in the art as CD8)). Helper cells secrete cytokines that promote proliferation and differentiation of the T cells and other cells, including B cells and macrophages, and recruit and activate inflammatory leukocytes. Another subgroup of T cells, called regulatory T cells or suppressor T cells actively suppress activation of the immune system and prevent pathological self-reactivity, that is, autoimmune disease.
The methods described herein for inducing an immune response may induce a humoral response, also called a B cell response herein and in the art, or may induce a cell-mediated immune response involving various types of T cells (i.e., T lymphocytes). A humoral response includes production of antibodies that specifically bind to an antigen (or immunogen). Antibodies are produced by differentiated B lymphocytes known as plasma cells. In a cell mediated response, the various types of T lymphocytes act to eliminate an antigen by a number of mechanisms. For example, helper T cells that are capable of recognizing specific antigens may respond by releasing soluble mediators such as cytokines to recruit additional cells of the immune system to participate in an immune response. Also, cytotoxic T cells are capable of specifically recognizing an antigen and may respond by binding to and destroying or damaging an antigen-bearing cell or particle.
An immune response in a host or subject may be determined by any number of well-known immunological methods described herein and with which those having ordinary skill in the art will be familiar. As described herein, methods and techniques for determining the presence and level of an immune response include, for example, fluorescence resonance energy transfer, fluorescence polarization, time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer, scintillation proximity assays, reporter gene assays, fluorescence quenched enzyme substrate, chromogenic enzyme substrate and electrochemiluminescence, immunoassays, (such as enzyme-linked immunosorbant assays (ELISA), radioimmunoassay, immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry, and the like), surface plasmon resonance, cell-based assays such as those that use reporter genes, and functional assays (e.g., assays that measure immune function and immunoresponsiveness).
Such assays include, but need not be limited to, in vivo or in vitro determination of the presence and level of soluble antibodies, soluble mediators such as cytokines (e.g., IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IL-12, IL-6, IL-23, TNF-α, and TGF-β), lymphokines, chemokines, hormones, growth factors, and the like, as well as other soluble small peptide, carbohydrate, nucleotide and/or lipid mediators. Immunoassays also include determining cellular activation state changes by analyzing altered functional or structural properties of cells of the immune system, for example, cell proliferation, altered motility, induction of specialized activities such as specific gene expression or cytolytic behavior; cell maturation, such as maturation of dendritic cells in response to a stimulus; alteration in relationship between a Th1 response and a Th2 response; cellular differentiation by cells of the immune system, including altered surface antigen expression profiles or the onset of apoptosis (programmed cell death). Procedures for performing these and similar assays are may be found, for example, in Lefkovits (Immunology Methods Manual: The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Techniques, 1998). See also Current Protocols in Immunology; Weir, Handbook of Experimental Immunology, Blackwell Scientific, Boston, Mass. (1986); Mishell and Shigii (eds.) Selected Methods in Cellular Immunology, Freeman Publishing, San Francisco, Calif. (1979); Green and Reed, Science 281:1309 (1998) and references cited therein).
Determining the presence and/or level of antibodies that specifically bind to an immunogen of interest may be determined using any one of several immunoassays routinely practiced in the art, including but not limited to, ELISAs, immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis, radioimmunoassays, dot blot assays, inhibition or competition assays, and the like (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,376,110 and 4,486,530; Harlow et al., Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (1988)) Immunoassays may also be performed to determine the class and isotype of an antibody that specifically binds to an immunogen. Antibodies (polyclonal and/or monoclonal or antigen-binding fragments thereof) that specifically bind to an immunogen and which may be used as controls in immunoassays detecting an antibody-specific immune response in an immunized subject, may generally be prepared by any of a variety of techniques known to persons having ordinary skill in the art. See, e.g., Harlow et al., Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (1988); Peterson, ILAR J. 46:314-19 (2005); (Kohler et al., Nature, 256:495-97 (1976); Kohler et al., Eur. J. Immunol. 6:511-19 (1975); Coligan et al. (eds.), Current Protocols in Immunology, 1:2.5.1-2.6.7 (John Wiley & Sons 1991); U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,902,614, 4,543,439, and 4,411,993; Monoclonal Antibodies, Hybridomas: A New Dimension in Biological Analyses, Plenum Press, Kennett et al. (eds.) (1980); Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Harlow and Lane (eds.), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1988); see also, e.g., Brand et al., Planta Med. 70:986-92 (2004); Pasqualini et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:257-59 (2004). The immunogen, or immunogenic fragments thereof, or a cell or particle bearing the immunogen or immunogenic fragment thereof may be used for immunizing an animal for production of either polyclonal antibodies or monoclonal antibodies.
Levels of cytokines may be determined according to methods described herein and practiced in the art, including for example, ELISA, ELISPOT, intracellular cytokine staining, and flow cytometry and combinations thereof (e.g., intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry). Immune cell proliferation and clonal expansion resulting from an antigen-specific elicitation or stimulation of an immune response may be determined by isolating lymphocytes, such as spleen cells or cells from lymph nodes, stimulating the cells with antigen, and measuring cytokine production, cell proliferation and/or cell viability, such as by incorporation of tritiated thymidine or non-radioactive assays, such as MTT assays and the like. The effect of an immunogen described herein on the balance between a Th1 immune response and a Th2 immune response may be examined, for example, by determining levels of Th1 cytokines, such as IFN-, IL-12, IL-2, and TNF-β, and Type 2 cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-10, and IL-13.
The level of a CTL immune response and the level of a memory CD4 T cell response may be determined by any one of numerous immunological methods described herein and routinely practiced in the art. The level of a CTL immune response may be determined prior to administration of any one of the compositions, vectors, or vector particles described herein and then used for comparison with the level of CTL immune response at an appropriate time point after one or more administrations of the compositions, vectors, or vector particles that provide memory CD4 T cell help. Cytotoxicity assays for determining CTL activity may be performed using any one of several techniques and methods routinely practiced in the art (see, e.g., Henkart et al., “Cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes” in Fundamental Immunology, Paul (ed.) (2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa.), pages 1127-50, and references cited therein).
For example, when the composition comprising the adjuvant and composition comprising the vector particles containing the polynucleotide encoding the immunogen are administered according to the methods described herein, the level of the CTL immune response, or CD8+ T cell response, is enhanced (improved) compared to administering the adjuvant in the same composition as the vector particle. For example, a 50% improvement may be observed when measured by functional T cell assays such as intracellular cytokine staining; ELISPOT; or measurement of soluble cytokine secretion by Luminex for 1-4 weeks after administration of both compositions.
As used herein, binding partner or an antibody is said to be “immunospecific,” “specific for” or to “specifically bind” an immunogen of interest if the antibody reacts at a detectable level with the immunogen or immunogenic fragment thereof, preferably with an affinity constant, Ka, of greater than or equal to about 104 M-1, or greater than or equal to about 105 M-1, greater than or equal to about 106 M-1, greater than or equal to about 107 M-1, or greater than or equal to 108 M-1. Affinity of an antibody for its cognate antigen is also commonly expressed as a dissociation constant KD, and an antibody specifically binds to the immunogen of interest if it binds with a KD of less than or equal to 10-4 M, less than or equal to about 10-5 M, less than or equal to about 10-6 M, less than or equal to 10-7 M, or less than or equal to 10-8 M.
Affinities of binding partners or antibodies can be readily determined using conventional techniques, for example, those described by Scatchard et al. (Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. USA 51:660 (1949)) and by surface plasmon resonance (SPR; BIAcore™, Biosensor, Piscataway, N.J.). For surface plasmon resonance, target molecules are immobilized on a solid phase and exposed to a binding partner (or ligand) in a mobile phase running along a flow cell. If ligand binding to the immobilized target occurs, the local refractive index changes, leading to a change in SPR angle, which can be monitored in real time by detecting changes in the intensity of the reflected light. The rates of change of the SPR signal can be analyzed to yield apparent rate constants for the association and dissociation phases of the binding reaction. The ratio of these values gives the apparent equilibrium constant (affinity) (see, e.g., Wolff et al., Cancer Res. 53:2560-2565 (1993)).
A biological sample may be obtained from the subject for determining the presence and level of an immune response to an immunogen in the subject who has received a composition comprising a vector particle that contains a recombinant expression vector comprising a polynucleotide encoding at least one immunogen and a composition comprising an adjuvant according to the methods described herein. A “biological sample” as used herein may be a blood sample (from which serum or plasma may be prepared), biopsy specimen, body fluids (e.g., lung lavage, ascites, mucosal washings, synovial fluid), bone marrow, lymph nodes, tissue explant, organ culture, or any other tissue or cell preparation from the subject or a biological source.
With respect to all immunoassays and methods described herein for determining an immune response, a person skilled in the art will also readily appreciate and understand which controls are appropriately included when practicing these methods. Concentrations of reaction components, buffers, temperature, and time period sufficient to permit interaction of the reaction components can be determined and/or adjusted according to methods described herein and with which persons skilled in the art are familiar
Once an antigen has been identified and selected as an immunogen for inducing an immune response, a polynucleotide sequence that encodes the desired immunogen is identified and selected. The recombinant expression vector comprising the polynucleotide sequence or a vector particle comprising the vector is then formulated in an immunogenic composition with at least one pharmaceutically suitable excipient or carrier. As described herein, an adjuvant is formulated with at least one pharmaceutically suitable excipient or carrier. Both the immunogenic composition and adjuvant composition are formulated in a manner appropriate for the immunogen and adjuvant, respectively, and for the route (or mode) of administration.
As described herein, the at least one immunogen or immunogenic composition is administered to a subject in need thereof in an amount sufficient to induce an effective immune response, which may be an effective humoral response and/or an effective cell-mediated immune response (which may include a cytotoxic T cell response). As described herein the adjuvant or adjuvant composition administered to the subject enhances or improves the immune response to the at least one immunogen.
The immunogenic compositions, recombinant expression vectors, and vector particles may therefore be useful in methods for preventing (i.e., reducing the likelihood of occurrence or recurrence of) and/or treating a disease or disorder, for example, an infectious disease or a cancer. The infectious disease to be prevented or treated is caused by the infectious disease microorganism (e.g., virus, bacteria, parasite, or fungus) from which the immunogen is derived. When the disease or disorder to be treated is a cancer, the immunogen is a tumor-associated antigen that is believed to be or known to be expressed by one or more of the particular cancer cells. Each of the various immunogens that may be administered to a subject and each of the related infectious organism or cancers are described in detail herein.
Exemplary immunogens and adjuvants that may be used in these methods are described in greater detail herein. In particular specific embodiments, at least one, two, or three, or more immunogens from an infectious microorganism (e.g., a virus, bacteria, fungus, or parasite) may be encoded by a nucleotide sequence incorporated in a recombinant expression vector that is incorporated into a vector particle and included in the immunogenic composition. By way of example, at least one, two, or three or more immunogens, includes at least one, two, or three or more HIV antigens, which are described in greater detail herein and in the art. In another specific embodiment, at least one, two, or three or more immunogens encoded by a recombinant expression vector and used in the methods described herein, may include at least one, two, three, or more tumor-associated antigens. These tumor associated antigens are described in greater detail herein and may be, for example, a tumor-associated antigen from a renal cell carcinoma antigen (e.g., carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX)), a prostate cancer antigen (e.g., prostatic acid phosphatase, prostate specific antigen, NKX3.1, and prostate specific membrane antigen), a mesothelioma antigen, a pancreatic cancer antigen, a melanoma antigen, a breast cancer antigen, a colorectal cancer antigen, a lung cancer antigen, an ovarian cancer antigen, or any cancer or tumor-associate antigen described herein and in the art.
As understood by a person skilled in the medical art, the terms, “treat” and “treatment,” refer to medical management of a disease, disorder, or condition of a subject (i.e., patient) (see, e.g., Stedman's Medical Dictionary). In general, an appropriate dose and treatment regimen provide the immunogen and adjuvant in an amount sufficient to provide therapeutic and/or prophylactic benefit. Therapeutic and/or prophylactic benefit includes, for example, an improved clinical outcome, both therapeutic treatment and prophylactic or preventative measures, wherein the object is to prevent or slow or retard (lessen) an undesired physiological change or disorder, or to prevent or slow or retard (lessen) the expansion or severity of such disease or disorder. Beneficial or desired clinical results from treating a subject include, but are not limited to, abatement, lessening, or alleviation of symptoms that result from or are associated the disease or disorder to be treated; decreased occurrence of symptoms; improved quality of life; longer disease-free status (i.e., decreasing the likelihood or the propensity that a subject will present symptoms on the basis of which a diagnosis of a disease is made); diminishment of extent of disease; stabilized (i.e., not worsening) state of disease; delay or slowing of disease progression; amelioration or palliation of the disease state; and remission (whether partial or total), whether detectable or undetectable; and/or overall survival. “Treatment” can also mean prolonging survival when compared to expected survival if a subject were not receiving treatment. Subjects in need of treatment include those who already have the disease or disorder as well as subjects prone to have or at risk of developing the disease or disorder. Subjects in need of prophylactic treatment include subjects in whom the disease, condition, or disorder is to be prevented (i.e., decreasing the likelihood of occurrence or recurrence of the disease or disorder).
Recombinant expression vectors and vector particles may be administered to a subject in a pharmaceutically or physiologically acceptable or suitable excipient or carrier. Pharmaceutically acceptable excipients are biologically compatible vehicles, e.g., physiological saline, which are described in greater detail herein, that are suitable for administration to a human or other non-human subject including a non-human mammalian subject. A therapeutically effective amount provides an amount of the polynucleotide which is capable of producing a medically desirable result (i.e., a sufficient amount of the immunogen is expressed to induce or enhance the immune response specific for the immunogen (humoral and/or cell-mediated response, including a cytotoxic T cell response) in a statistically, biologically, and/or significant manner) in a treated human or non-human animal. As is well known in the medical arts, the dosage for any one patient depends upon many factors, including the patient's size, body surface area, age, the particular compound to be administered, sex, time and route of administration, general health, and other drugs being administered concurrently. Doses will vary, but a preferred dose for administration of a vector particle comprising a recombinant expression vector is sufficient to provide approximately 106 to 1012 copies of the vector polynucleotide molecule.
Pharmaceutical compositions, including immunogenic and adjuvant compositions described herein, may be administered in a manner appropriate to the disease to be treated (or prevented) as determined by persons skilled in the medical art. An appropriate dose and a suitable duration and frequency of administration will be determined by such factors as the condition of the patient, the type and severity of the patient's disease, the particular form of the active ingredient, and the method of administration. In general, an appropriate dose and treatment regimen provides the composition(s) in an amount sufficient to provide therapeutic and/or prophylactic benefit (such as described herein, including an improved clinical outcome, such as more frequent complete or partial remissions, or longer disease-free and/or overall survival, or a lessening of symptom severity). For prophylactic use, a dose should be sufficient to prevent, delay the onset of, or diminish the severity of a disease associated with disease or disorder.
In general, the amount of an immunogen, including fusion polypeptides as described herein, present in a dose, or produced in situ by an encoding polynucleotide present in a dose, ranges from about 0.01 μg to about 1000 μg per kg of host. The use of the minimum dosage that is sufficient to provide effective therapy is usually preferred. Patients may generally be monitored for therapeutic or prophylactic effectiveness using assays suitable for the condition being treated or prevented, which assays will be familiar to those having ordinary skill in the art and which are described herein. When administered in a liquid form, suitable dose sizes will vary with the size of the patient, but will typically range from about 1 ml to about 500 ml (comprising from about 0.01 μg to about 1000 μg per kg) for a 10-60 kg subject. Optimal doses may generally be determined using experimental models and/or clinical trials. The optimal dose may depend upon the body mass, weight, or blood volume of the subject. As described herein, the appropriate dose may also depend upon the patient's (e.g., human) condition, that is, stage of the disease, general health status, as well as age, gender, and weight, and other factors familiar to a person skilled in the medical art.
Pharmaceutical compositions may be formulated for any appropriate manner of administration, including, for example, topical, oral, enteral, nasal (i.e., intranasal), inhalation, intrathecal, rectal, vaginal, intraocular, subconjunctival, sublingual, intradermal, intranodal, intratumoral, transdermal, or parenteral administration, including subcutaneous, percutaneous, intravenous, intramuscular, intrasternal, intracavernous, intrameatal or intraurethral injection or infusion. Methods of administration are described in greater detail herein.
For parenteral administration, the carrier preferably comprises water, saline, alcohol, a fat, a wax or a buffer. For oral administration, any of the above excipients or a solid excipient or carrier, such as mannitol, lactose, starch, magnesium stearate, sodium saccharine, talcum, cellulose, kaolin, glycerin, starch dextrins, sodium alginate, carboxymethylcellulose, ethyl cellulose, glucose, sucrose and/or magnesium carbonate, may be employed.
An immunogenic composition and a composition comprising the recombinant vector construct or the vector particle may be formulated for delivery by any route that provides an effective dose of the immunogen. Such administrations methods include oral administration or delivery by injection and may be in the form of a liquid. A liquid pharmaceutical composition may include, for example, one or more of the following: a sterile diluent such as water for injection, saline solution, preferably physiological saline, Ringer's solution, isotonic sodium chloride, fixed oils that may serve as the solvent or suspending medium, polyethylene glycols, glycerin, propylene glycol or other solvents; antibacterial agents; antioxidants; chelating agents; buffers and agents for the adjustment of tonicity such as sodium chloride or dextrose. A parenteral preparation can be enclosed in ampoules, disposable syringes or multiple dose vials made of glass or plastic. The use of physiological saline is preferred, and an injectable pharmaceutical composition is preferably sterile.
For pharmaceutical compositions comprising a nucleic acid molecule such as the recombinant expression vectors described herein, the nucleic acid molecule may be present within any of a variety of delivery systems known to those of ordinary skill in the art, including nucleic acid, and bacterial, viral and mammalian expression systems such as, for example, vector particles and recombinant expression constructs as provided herein. Techniques for incorporating a polynucleotide (e.g., DNA) into such expression systems are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. In other certain embodiments, the DNA may also be “naked,” as described, for example, in Ulmer et al., Science 259:1745-49, 1993 and reviewed by Cohen, Science 259:1691-1692, 1993. The uptake of naked DNA may be increased by coating the DNA onto biodegradable beads, which are efficiently transported into the cells.
Nucleic acid molecules may be delivered into a cell according to any one of several methods described in the art (see, e.g., Akhtar et al., Trends Cell Bio. 2:139 (1992); Delivery Strategies for Antisense Oligonucleotide Therapeutics, ed. Akhtar, 1995, Maurer et al., Mol. Membr. Biol. 16:129-40 (1999); Hofland and Huang, Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 137:165-92 (1999); Lee et al., ACS Symp. Ser. 752:184-92 (2000); U.S. Pat. No. 6,395,713; International Patent Application Publication No. WO 94/02595); Selbo et al., Int. J. Cancer 87:853-59 (2000); Selbo et al., Tumour Biol. 23:103-12 (2002); U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2001/0007666, and 2003/077829). Such delivery methods known to persons having skill in the art, include, but are not restricted to, encapsulation in liposomes, by iontophoresis, or by incorporation into other vehicles, such as biodegradable polymers; hydrogels; cyclodextrins (see, e.g., Gonzalez et al., Bioconjug. Chem. 10:1068-74 (1999); Wang et al., International Application Publication Nos. WO 03/47518 and WO 03/46185); poly(lactic-co-glycolic)acid (PLGA) and PLCA microspheres (also useful for delivery of peptides and polypeptides and other substances) (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,447,796; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/130430); biodegradable nanocapsules; and bioadhesive microspheres, or by proteinaceous vectors (International Application Publication No. WO 00/53722). In another embodiment, the nucleic acid molecules can also be formulated or complexed with polyethyleneimine and derivatives thereof, such as polyethyleneimine-polyethyleneglycol-N-acetylgalactosamine (PEI-PEG-GAL) or polyethyleneimine-polyethyleneglycol-tri-N-acetylgalactosamine (PEI-PEG-triGAL) derivatives (see also, e.g., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0077829).
In particular embodiments of the methods described herein, the subject is a human or non-human animal A subject in need of the treatments described herein may exhibit symptoms or sequelae of a disease, disorder, or condition described herein or may be at risk of developing the disease, disorder, or condition. Non-human animals that may be treated include mammals, for example, non-human primates (e.g., monkey, chimpanzee, gorilla, and the like), rodents (e.g., rats, mice, gerbils, hamsters, ferrets, rabbits), lagomorphs, swine (e.g., pig, miniature pig), equine, canine, feline, bovine, and other domestic, farm, and zoo animals.
The compositions provided herein can be in various forms, e.g., in solid, liquid, powder, aqueous, or lyophilized form. Examples of suitable pharmaceutical excipients and carriers for administering a vector particle, including a viral vector particle and a bacterial vector particle, immunogenic compositions, and recombinant expression vectors are known in the art. Such excipients, carriers, and/or additives can be formulated by conventional methods and can be administered to the subject at a suitable dose. Stabilizing agents such as lipids, nuclease inhibitors, polymers, and chelating agents that may be included in the compositions described herein can assist preservation of the compositions and components of the compositions from degradation within the body.
The vector particles, including a viral vector particle and a bacterial vector particle, immunogenic compositions, adjuvant compositions, and recombinant expression vectors provided herein can be packaged as kits. Kits can optionally include one or more components such as instructions for use, devices, and additional reagents, and components, such as tubes, containers, e.g. vials, and syringes for practice of the methods. Exemplary kits can optionally include instructions for use, a device or reagents for detecting a vector particle, the recombination expression vector, or the immunogen in a subject, and a device for administering the composition or compositions to a subject.
Kits comprising polynucleotides encoding an immunogen are also contemplated herein. Such a kit may also include at least one plasmid that encodes virus packaging components and a vector encoding Sindbis virus E2 glycoprotein variant. Some kits will contain at least one plasmid encoding virus packaging components, a vector encoding Sindbis virus E2 glycoprotein variant, and a vector encoding at least one DC maturation factor.
Kits comprising a viral vector encoding a sequence of interest (typically encoding an antigen or immunogen) and optionally, a polynucleotide sequence encoding a DC maturation factor are also contemplated herein. In some kits, the kit includes at least one plasmid encoding virus packaging components and a vector encoding Sindbis virus E2 glycoprotein variant.
A kit may also contain instructions. Instructions typically describe methods for administration, including methods for determining the proper state of the subject, the proper dosage amount, and the proper administration method, for administering the composition. Instructions can also include guidance for monitoring the subject over the duration of the treatment time.
Kits provided herein also can include a device for administering an immunogenic composition comprising a vector particle that comprises a recombinant expression vector, and/or an adjuvant composition to a subject. Any of a variety of devices known in the art for administering medications or vaccines can be included in the kits provided herein. Exemplary devices include, but are not limited to, a hypodermic needle, an intravenous needle, a catheter, a needle-less injection device, an inhaler, and a liquid dispenser, such as an eyedropper. Typically, the device for administering a composition is compatible with the active components of the kit. For example, a needle-less injection device such as a high pressure injection device can be included in kits with vector particles, polynucleotides, and polypeptides not damaged by high pressure injection, but is typically not included in kits that include vector particles, polynucleotides, and polypeptides that may be damaged by high pressure injection.
Other embodiments and uses will be apparent to one skilled in the art in light of the present disclosures. The following examples are provided merely as illustrative of various embodiments and shall not be construed to limit the invention in any way.
This Example describes the effect on the CD8 T cell immune response to an immunogen when an adjuvant is administered separately and at a different site from a lentiviral vector encoding the immunogen.
The vector used for these experiments, termed dendritic cell-targeting non-integrating lentiviral vector (DC-NILV), is a self-inactivating, integration-defective lentivector that uses a modified Sindbis virus envelope glycoprotein to selectively enter DCs. A glycoprotein envelope (termed SINvar1) was developed as previously described (see, e.g., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/842,609; International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/042870) and used for the experiments described herein. Briefly, the native envelope glycoprotein from Sindbis virus (SIN). The vector is redundantly integration incompetent. Seventy-five percent of the parental HIV genome has been removed from DC-NILV, including all of the regulatory and accessory proteins, except for Rev.
The antigen specific immune response was determined when DC-NILV encoding AH1A5 (1 μg p24) was administered subcutaneously to BALB/c mice and an adjuvant was administered intraperitoneally. AH1A5 (SPSYAYHQF; SEQ ID NO:25) is a high affinity altered peptide of AH1 (SPSYVYHQF, SEQ ID NO:35), which is the immunodominant CD8 T cell epitope from CT26 colon carcinoma cells and is derived from the gp70 protein of an endogenous murine leukemia virus (see, e.g., Huang et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:9730 (1996)). CD8 T cell responses were measured against both AH1A5 and its lower affinity related peptide AH1. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with the either the adjuvants GLA (10 μg) in PBS or Poly(I:C) (50 μg) in PBS or were injected with PBS alone (no adjuvant). After 10 days, spleen cells were isolated from the animals, and immune responses were evaluated by measuring the frequency of IFN-γ-secreting CD8 T cells by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) followed by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). The results are presented in
These data indicate that adjuvants delivered at a second injection site can augment the immune response induced by a vectored vaccine. Further, this enhancing effect was apparent for GLA, a Toll-like receptor δ agonist.
This Example describes the effect on the CD8 T cell immune response to an immunogen when an adjuvant is mixed with a lentiviral vector encoding the immunogen and both adjuvant and vector are administered together.
The effect of two adjuvants, GLA and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), on the immune response to the CD8 T cell epitope AH1A5 was determined. DC-NILV encoding AH1A5 (1 μg p24) was mixed with PBS (control group), 4 μg GLA, 20 μg GLA, or 4 μg lipopolysaccaride (LPS) and then administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to groups of BALB/c mice. After 10 days, spleen cells were isolated from animals in each group, and the CD8 T cell response was evaluated by determining the level of TNF-α and IFN-γ by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) followed by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). The results are presented in
These data indicate that when GLA is coadministered with the lentivector vaccine, as is the normal practice for vaccine adjuvants, this surprisingly results in an inhibition of vaccine-induced immune responses, highlighting the importance of separating the administration of the vaccine vector and adjuvant as in Example 1. The inhibitory effect was not a unique attribute of GLA, but is also observed with the adjuvant LPS, suggesting that adjuvants in general are incompatible to be coadministered with vectored vaccines.
This Example describes the effect on the CD8 T cell immune response to an immunogen when a lentiviral vector encoding the immunogen is administered subcutaneously and an adjuvant is administered intramuscularly.
CD8 T cell responses against three epitopes were determined in C57BL/6 mice that were immunized with DC-NILV encoding a recombinant polypeptide antigen including each of the epitopes. The epitopes were from lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoprotein (GP33: sequence KAVYNFATM), chicken ovalbumin (OVA257: sequence SIINFEKL), and simian immunodeficiency virus Gag protein (SIV Gag: sequence AAVKNWMTQTL). Mice received DC-NILV (1 μg p24) subcutaneously as well as intramuscular administration of a dose range of GLA (0.16-20 μg) in a stable oil-in-water emulstion (SE) or SE alone (0 μg). On day 12, spleen cells were isolated from the animals, and the CD8 T cell response was evaluated by determining the percent of cells expressing IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 by intracellular cytokine staining. The results are presented in
These data indicate that GLA is also effective at enhancing subcutaneous vector immunization when delivered via the intramuscular route, an injection site that is more clinically relevant than the intraperitoneal route described in Example 1. The data also show that second-site application of GLA adjuvant is effective at enhancing immune responses across a broad dose range.
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. Examples of embodiments include:
1A. A method for inducing an immune response to an immunogen in a subject, said method comprising administering (a) a first composition comprising a vector particle which comprises a polynucleotide encoding the immunogen, and (b) a second composition comprising an adjuvant. It is understood that the first and second compositions are separate compositions. It is also understood that the polynucleotide encoding the immunogen is preferably part of a recombinant expression vector as described herein. Thus the vector particle comprises a recombinant expression vector that comprises a polynucleotide encoding the immunogen.
Other examples of embodiments include kits, or packages, which may comprise, in separate containers, the composition comprising the vector particle, and the composition comprising the adjuvant, optionally with instructions for the methods or uses described herein. Thus, these examples of embodiments include
1B. A kit comprising (a) a first composition comprising a vector particle which comprises a polynucleotide encoding the immunogen, and (b) a second composition comprising an adjuvant. It is understood that the first and second compositions are separate compositions.
These aspects of the invention include all of the following embodiments:
2. A composition comprising a vector particle that comprises a polynucleotide encoding an immunogen for use in inducing an immune response to the immunogen, characterized in that the composition is for administration with a separate composition comprising an adjuvant. It is understood that this type of embodiment includes use of such a vector particle for preparation of a medicament for use in inducing an immune response to the immunogen, characterized in that the composition is for administration with a separate composition comprising an adjuvant. All of the description herein regarding the methods of inducing an immune response, and the types of compositions and vector particles for use in such methods, apply to such compositions for use in inducing an immune response, as well as to uses in preparation of a medicament for inducing an immune response.
3. A composition comprising an adjuvant for use in enhancing an immune response, including a nonspecific immune response, characterized in that the composition is for administration with a separate composition comprising a vector particle that comprises a polynucleotide encoding an immunogen. The adjuvant is expected to enhance the immune response induced by the vector particle. It is understood that this type of embodiment includes use of such an adjuvant for preparation of a medicament for use in inducing an immune response to the immunogen, characterized in that the composition is for administration with a separate composition comprising the vector particle. All of the description herein regarding the methods of inducing an immune response, and the types of compositions and vector particles for use in such methods, apply to such compositions for use in inducing an immune response, as well as to uses in preparation of a medicament for inducing an immune response.
4. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the vector particle is a cell, virus vector particle, or virus-like particle, optionally a lentivirus vector particle pseudotyped with a glycoprotein from an arbovirus.
5. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the vector particle is a lentivirus vector particle pseudotyped with a glycoprotein from an alphavirus, optionally a Sindbis virus, and optionally a Sindbis virus comprising a mutation at position 160.
6. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the adjuvant is a TLR ligand, e.g. [TLR4, TLR8 or TLR9] ligand.
7. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the adjuvant is a TLR4 agonist, optionally a non-toxic lipid A-related adjuvant, optionally a monophosphoryl lipid A, or 3 De-O-acylated monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), or a lipid A mimetic, or GLA of formula I as described above, or GLA of formula (Ia):
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, where: R1, R3, R5 and R6 are C11-C20 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are C12-C20 alkyl; in a more specific embodiment, the GLA has the formula (Ia) set forth above wherein R1, R3, R5 and R6 are C11-14 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are C12-15 alkyl; in a further more specific embodiment, the GLA has the formula (Ia) set forth above wherein R1, R3, R5 and R6 are C11 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are C13 alkyl; or the GLA has a structure selected from the following chemical formula (Ib):
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, wherein: L1, L2, L3, L4, L5 and L6 are the same or different and are independently selected from —O—, —NH—, and —(CH2)—; L7, L8, L9 and L10 are the same or different, and at any occurrence may be either absent or —C(═O)—; Y1 is an acid functional group; Y2 and Y3 are the same or different and are each independently selected from —OH, —SH, and an acid functional group; Y4 is —OH or —SH; R1, R3, R5 and R6 are the same or different and are each independently selected from the group of C8-C13 alkyl; and R2 and R4 are the same or different and are each independently selected from the group of C6-C11 alkyl. In examples of embodiments, the GLA is present in an amount of 0.1-10 μg/injection, or in an amount of 0.2-5 μg/injection, or in an amount of 0.5-2.5 μg/injection, where an injection is given to a person of at least 50 Kg body mass.
8. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the composition comprising an adjuvant is substantially devoid of immunogenic antigens.
9. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the composition comprising an adjuvant comprises a second co-adjuvant, optionally an oil-in-water emulsion.
10. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the two compositions are administered concurrently at different sites, optionally by different routes of administration.
11. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the two compositions are administered sequentially, optionally at different sites, and optionally by different routes of administration.
12. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the route of administration is parenteral, enteral, oral, intramuscular, intradermal, subcutaneous, intratumoral, intranodal, intranasal, transdermal, inhalation, mucosal, or topical.
13. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the composition comprising the vector particle is administered subcutaneously or intradermally.
14. Any of embodiments 12-13 wherein the composition comprising the adjuvant is administered subcutaneously or intramuscularly, or orally-preferred routes.
15. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the vector particle binds preferentially to dendritic cells. Optionally the vector particle preferentially infects dendritic cells, e.g. the ratio of infected dendritic cells to infected non-dendritic cells (or non DC-SIGN expressing cells) is at least about 2:1, at least about 3:1, at least about 4:1, at least about 5:1, at least about 6:1, at least about 7:1, at least about 8:1, at least about 9:1, at least about 10:1, at least about 20:1, at least about 30:1, at least about 40:1, at least about 50:1, at least about 100:1, at least about 200:1, at least about 500:1, at least about 1000:1, at least about 5000:1, at least about 10,000:1, or more.
16. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the immunogen is a tumor-associated antigen, e.g. a renal cell carcinoma antigen, a prostate cancer antigen, a mesothelioma antigen, a pancreatic cancer antigen, a melanoma antigen, a breast cancer antigen, a lung cancer antigen, or an ovarian cancer antigen, optionally pro static acid phosphatase, prostate specific antigen, NKX3.1, or prostate specific membrane antigen, or optionally carbonic anhydrase IX.
17. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the immunogen is from an infectious microorganism, e.g., a viral antigen, bacterial antigen, fungal antigen, or parasite antigen.
18. Any of the preceding embodiments wherein the immune response is an immunogen-specific antibody response or an immunogen-specific T cell response.
19. Embodiment 18 includes a measurable immunogen-specific antibody response or a measurable immunogen-specific T cell response.
20. The foregoing methods, compositions and uses involving inducing an immune response are also expected to be used, e.g. for treating or preventing cancer, in the case of an immune response to a tumor-associated antigen, or for treating or preventing an infectious disease, in the case of an immune response to a viral antigen, bacterial antigen, fungal antigen, or parasite antigen.
21. A composition comprising any of the foregoing vector particles that comprises a polynucleotide encoding an immunogen for use in preventing or treating cancer, characterized in that the composition is for administration with a composition comprising any of the foregoing adjuvants.
22. A composition comprising any of the foregoing adjuvants for use in preventing or treating cancer, characterized in that the composition is for administration with a composition comprising any of the foregoing vector particles that comprises a polynucleotide encoding an immunogen.
23. A composition comprising any of the foregoing vector particles that comprises a polynucleotide encoding an immunogen for use in preventing or treating an infectious disease, characterized in that the composition is for administration with a composition comprising any of the foregoing adjuvants.
24. A composition comprising any of the foregoing adjuvants for use in preventing or treating an infectious disease, characterized in that the composition is for administration with a composition comprising any of the foregoing vector particles that comprises a polynucleotide encoding an immunogen.
25. A composition comprising any of the foregoing adjuvants for co-administration with a separate composition comprising any of the foregoing vector particles.
It is understood that these embodiment include use of the respective compositions in preparation of a medicament for such uses.
All U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, U.S. patent application, foreign patents, foreign patent applications, and non-patent publications referred to in this specification and/or listed in the Application Data Sheet are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety. Aspects of the embodiments can be modified, if necessary to employ concepts of the various patents, application and publications to provide yet further embodiments.
These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61443194 | Feb 2011 | US |
