METHODS FOR GENERATING NEW GENES IN ORGANISM AND USE THEREOF

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20230062179
  • Publication Number
    20230062179
  • Date Filed
    May 12, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Published
    March 02, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to the technical fields of genetic engineering and bioinformatics, in particular, to a method for creating a new gene in an organism in the absence of an artificial DNA template, and a use thereof. The method comprises simultaneously generating DNA breaks at two or more different specific sites in the organism's genome, wherein the specific sites are genomic sites capable of separating different gene elements or different protein domains, and the DNA breaks are ligated to each other through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous repair to generate a new combination of the different gene elements or different protein domains that is different from the original genome sequence, thereby creating a new gene. The new gene of the invention can change the growth, development, resistance, yield and other traits of the organism, and has great value in application.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to the technical fields of genetic engineering and bioinformatics, and in particular, a method for creating a new gene in an organism in the absence of an artificial DNA template, and use thereof.


BACKGROUND ART

Generally speaking, a complete gene expression cassette in an organism comprises a promoter, 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR), coding region (CDS) or non-coding RNA region (Non-coding RNA), 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR), a terminator and many other elements. Non-coding RNA can perform its biological functions at the RNA level, including rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA and microRNA. The CDS region contains exons and introns. After the transcribed RNA is translated into a protein, the amino acids of different segments usually form different domains. The specific domains determine the intracellular localization and function of the protein (such as nuclear localization signal, chloroplast leading peptide, mitochondrial leading peptide, DNA binding domain, transcription activation domain, enzyme catalytic center, etc.). For non-coding RNA, different segments also have different functions. When one or several elements of a gene change, a new gene will be formed, which may have new functions. For example, an inversion event of a 1.7 Mb chromosome fragment occurred upstream of the PpOFP1 gene of flat peach may result in a new promoter, which will significantly increase the expression of PpOFP1 in peach fruit with flat shape in the S2 stage of fruit development as compared to that in peach fruit with round shape, thereby inhibit the vertical development of peach fruit and result in the flat shape phenotype in flat peach (Zhou et al. 2018. A 1.7-Mb chromosomal inversion downstream of a PpOFP1 gene is responsible for flat fruit shape in peach. Plant Biotechnol. J. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13455).


The natural generation of new genes in biological genomes requires a long evolutionary process. According to the research work, the molecular mechanisms for the generation of new genes include exon rearrangement, gene duplication, retrotransposition, and integration of movable elements (transposons, retrotransposons), horizontal gene transfer, gene fusion splitting, de novo origination, and many other mechanisms, and new genes may be retained in species under the action of natural selection through the derivation and functional evolution. The relatively young new genes that have been identified in fruit flies, Arabidopsis thaliana, and primates have a history of hundreds of thousands to millions of years according to a calculation (Long et al. 2012. The origin and evolution of new genes. Methods Mol Biol. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-585-5_7). Therefore, in the field of genetic engineering and biological breeding, taking plants as an example, if it is desired to introduce a new gene into a plant (even if all the gene elements of the new gene are derived from different genes of the species itself), it can only be achieved through the transgenic technology. That is, the elements from different genes are assembled together in vitro to form a new gene, which is then transferred into the plant through transgenic technology. It is characterized in that the assembly of new gene needs to be carried out in vitro, resulting in transgenic crops.


The gene editing tools represented by CRISPR/Cas9 and the like can efficiently and accurately generate double-strand breaks (DSB) at specific sites in the genome of an organism, and then the double-strand breaks (DSB) are repaired through the cell's own non-homologous end repair or homologous recombination mechanisms, thereby generating site-specific mutations. The current applications of the gene editing technique mainly focus on the editing of the internal elements of a single gene, mostly the editing of a CDS exon region. Editing an exon usually results in frameshift mutations in the gene, leading to the function loss of the gene. For this reason, the gene editing tools such as CRISPR/Cas9 are also known as gene knockout (i.e., gene destruction) tools. In addition to the CDS region, the promoter, 5′UTR and other regions can also be knocked out to affect the expression level of a gene. These methods all mutate existing genes without generating new genes, so it is difficult to meet some needs in production. For example, for most genes, the existing gene editing technology is difficult to achieve the up-regulation of gene expression, and it is also difficult to change the subcellular localization of a protein or change the functional domain of protein. There are also reports in the literature of inserting a promoter or enhancer sequence upstream of an existing gene to change the expression pattern of the gene so as to produce new traits (Lu et al. 2020. Targeted, efficient sequence insertion and replacement in rice. Nat Biotechnol. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0581-5), but this method requires the provision of foreign DNA templates, so strict regulatory procedures similar to genetically modified crops apply, and the application is restricted.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In order to solve the above-mentioned problems in the prior art, the present invention provides a method for creating a new gene in an organism in the absence of an artificial DNA template by simultaneously generating two or more DNA double-strand breaks at a combination of specific sites in the organism's genome, and use thereof.


In one aspect, the present invention provides a method for creating a new gene in an organism, comprising the following steps:


simultaneously generating DNA breaks at two or more different specific sites in the organism's genome, wherein the specific sites are genomic sites capable of separating different genetic elements or different protein domains, ligating the DNA breaks to each other by a non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous repair, generating a new combination of the different genetic elements or different protein domains that is different from the original genome sequence, thereby creating the new gene.


In another aspect, the present invention provides a method for in vivo creation of new genes that can be stably inherited in an organism, characterized by comprising the following steps:


(1) simultaneously generating double-stranded DNA breaks at two or more different specific sites in the organism's genome, wherein the specific sites are capable of separating different gene elements or different protein domains, and the DNA breaks are then ligated to each other by a non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous repair, generating a new combination or assemble of the different gene elements or different protein domains derived from the original genomic sequence, thereby the new gene is generated;


in a specific embodiment, it also includes (2) designing primer pairs that can specifically detect the above-mentioned new combination or assemble, then cells or tissues containing the new genes can be screened out by PCR test, and the characteristic sequences of new combinations of gene elements can be determined by sequencing; and


(3) cultivating the above-screened cells or tissues to obtain T0 generation organisms, and perform PCR tests and sequencing on the organisms for two consecutive generations including the T0 generation and its bred T1 or at least three consecutive generations to select the organisms containing the above-mentioned characteristic sequence of new combination of gene elements, namely, a new gene that can be stably inherited has been created in the organism;


optionally, it also includes (4) testing the biological traits or phenotypes related to the function of the new gene, to determine the genotype that can bring beneficial traits to the organism, and to obtain a new functional gene that can be stably inherited.


In a specific embodiment, in the step (1), DNA breaks are simultaneously generated at two different specific sites in the genome of the organism, wherein one site is the genomic locus between the promoter region and the coding region of a gene, meanwhile, the other site is between the promoter region and the coding region of another gene with different expression patterns, resulting in a new combination of the promoter of one gene and the coding region of the other gene that has a different expression pattern; preferably, a combination of the strong promoter and the gene of interest is eventually produced.


In another specific embodiment, in the step (1), DNA breaks are simultaneously generated at three different specific sites in the genome of the organism, the three specific sites include two genomic sites whose combination capable of cutting off the promoter region of a highly expressed gene and the third genomic site between the coding region and the promoter region of the gene of interest that has a different expression pattern; or a genomic site between the promoter region and the coding region of a highly expressed gene and another two genomic sites whose combination capable of cutting off the coding region fragment of the gene of interest that has a different expression pattern; then through gene editing at the above-mentioned sites, translocation editing events can be generated, in which the strong promoter fragment that is inserted upstream of the coding region of the gene of interest, or the coding region fragment of the gene of interest is inserted the downstream of the promoter of another highly expressed gene, finally, the combination of the promoter of one gene and the coding region of the other gene of interest with different expression patterns is generated.


In a specific embodiment, the “two or more different specific sites” may be located on the same chromosome or on different chromosomes. When they locate on the same chromosome, the chromosome fragment resulting from the DNA breaks simultaneously occurring at two specific sites may be deleted, inversed or replicating doubled after repair; when they locate on different chromosomes, the DNA breaks generated at two specific sites may be ligated to each other after repair to produce a crossover event of the chromosome arms. These events can be identified and screened by PCR sequencing with specifically designed primers.


In a specific embodiment, the “two or more different specific sites” may be specific sites on at least two different genes, or may be at least two different specific sites on the same gene.


In a specific embodiment, the transcription directions of the “at least two different genes” may be the same or different (opposite or toward each other).


The “gene elements” comprise a promoter, a 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR), a coding region (CDS) or non-coding RNA region (Non-coding RNA), a 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) and a terminator of the gene.


In a specific embodiment, the combination of different gene elements refers to a combination of the promoter of one of the two genes with different expression patterns and the CDS or non-coding RNA region of the other gene.


In another specific embodiment, the combination of different gene elements refers to a combination of a region from the promoter to the 5′UTR of one of two genes with different expression patterns and the CDS or non-coding RNA region of the other gene.


In a specific embodiment, the “different expression patterns” refer to different levels of gene expression.


In another specific embodiment, the “different expression patterns” refer to different tissue-specific of gene expression.


In another specific embodiment, the “different expression patterns” refer to different developmental stage-specificities of gene expression.


In another specific embodiment, the combination of different gene elements is a combination of adjacent gene elements within the same gene.


The “protein domains” refer to a DNA fragment corresponding to a specific functional domain of a protein; it includes but is not limited to nuclear localization signal, chloroplast leading peptide, mitochondrial leading peptide, phosphorylation site, methylation site, transmembrane domain, DNA binding domain, transcription activation domain, receptor activation domain, enzyme catalytic center, etc.


In a specific embodiment, the combination of different protein domains refers to a combination of a localization signal region of one of two protein coding genes with different subcellular localizations and a mature protein coding region of the other gene.


In a specific embodiment, the “different subcellular locations” include, but are not limited to, a nuclear location, a cytoplasmic location, a cell membrane location, a chloroplast location, a mitochondrial location, or an endoplasmic reticulum membrane location.


In another specific embodiment, the combination of different protein domains refers to a combination of two protein domains with different biological functions.


In a specific embodiment, the “different biological functions” include, but are not limited to, recognition of specific DNA or RNA conserved sequence, activation of gene expression, binding to protein ligand, binding to small molecule signal, ion binding, or specific enzymatic reaction.


In another specific embodiment, the combination of different protein domains refers to a combination of adjacent protein domains in the same gene.


In another specific embodiment, the combination of gene elements and protein domains refers to a combination of protein domains and adjacent promoters, 5′UTR, 3′UTR or terminators in the same gene.


Specifically, the exchange of promoters of different genes can be achieved by inversion of chromosome fragments: when two genes located on the same chromosome have different directions, DNA breaks can be generated at specific sites between the promoter and CDS of each of the two genes, the region between the breaks can be inverted, thereby the promoters of these two genes would be exchanged, and two new genes would be generated at both ends of the inverted chromosome segment. The different directions of the two genes may be that their 5′ ends are internal, namely both genes are in opposite directions, or their 5′ ends are external, namely both genes are towards each other. Where the genes are in opposite directions, the promoters of the genes would be inverted, as shown in Scheme 1 of FIG. 2; where the genes are towards each other, the CDS regions of the genes would be inverted, as shown in Scheme 1 of FIG. 4. The inverted region can be as short as less than 10 kb in length, with no other genes therebetween; or the inverted region can be very long, reaching up to 300 kb-3 Mb, and containing hundreds of genes.


It is also possible to create a new gene by doubling a chromosome fragment: where two genes located on the same chromosome are in the same direction, DNA breaks can be generated in specific sites between the promoter and CDS of each of the two genes, the region between the breaks can be doubled by duplication, and a new gene would be created at the junction of the doubled segment by fusing the promoter of the downstream gene to the CDS region of the upstream gene, as shown in FIG. 1 Scheme 1 and FIG. 3. The length of the doubled region can be in the range of 500 bp to 5 Mb, which can be very short with no other genes therebetween, or can be very long to contain hundreds of genes. Although this method will induce point mutations in the regions between the promoters and the CDS region of the original two genes, such small-scale point mutations generally have little effect on the properties of the gene expression, while the new genes created by promoter replacement will have new properties of expression. Or alternatively, DNA breaks can be generated at specific positions on both sides of a protein domain of a same gene, and the region between the breaks can be doubled by duplication, thereby creating a new gene with doubled specific functional domains.


The present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method.


Compared with the original genes, the new gene may have different promoter and therefore have expression characteristics in terms of tissues or intensities or developmental stages, or have new amino acid sequences.


The “new amino acid sequence” can either be a fusion of the whole or partial coding regions of two or more gene, or a doubling of a partial protein coding region of the same gene.


The present invention further provides use of the gene in conferring or improving a resistance/tolerance trait or growth advantage trait in an organism.


In a specific embodiment, in the combination of different gene elements, one element is a plant endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR, and the other is the HPPD, EPSPS, PPO, ALS, ACCase, GS, PDS, DHPS, DXPS, HST, SPS, cellulose synthesis, VLCFAS, fatty acid thioesterase, serine threonine protein phosphatase or lycopene cyclase gene coding region of the same plant.


In a specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the plant endogenous wild-type HPPD, EPSPS, PPO, ALS, ACCase, GS, PDS, DHPS, DXPS, HST, SPS, cellulose synthesis, VLCFAS, fatty acid thioesterase, serine threonine protein phosphatase or lycopene cyclase gene.


In a specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in the improvement of the resistance or tolerance to a corresponding inhibition of HPPD, inhibition of EPSPS, inhibition of PPO, inhibition of ALS, inhibition of ACCase, inhibition of GS, inhibition of PDS, inhibition of DHPS, inhibition of DXPS, inhibition of HST, inhibition of SPS, inhibition of cellulose synthesis, inhibition of VLCFAS, inhibition of fatty acid thioesterase, inhibition of serine threonine protein phosphatase or inhibition of lycopene cyclase herbicide in a plant cell, a plant tissue, a plant part or a plant.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different gene elements, one element is an endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR of the organism, and the other is a gene coding region of any one of the P450 family in the same organism.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the corresponding endogenous wild-type P450 gene of the organism.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in enhancing biological detoxification capability, stress tolerance or secondary metabolic ability.


In another specific embodiment, the said P450 gene is rice OsCYP81A gene or maize ZmCYP81A9 gene.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the rice endogenous OsCYP81A6 gene or maize endogenous ZmCYP81A9 gene, respectively.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in the improvement of the resistance or tolerance of rice or maize to a herbicide.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different gene elements, one element is a maize endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR, and the other is the coding region of maize gene ZMM28 (Zm00001d022088), ZmKNR6 or ZmBAMld.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the plant endogenous wild-type ZMM28 gene, ZmKNR6 gene or ZmBAMld gene, respectively.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in the improvement of maize yield.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different gene elements, one element is a rice endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR, and the other is the coding region of rice gene COLD1 or OsCPK24.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the rice endogenous wild-type COLD1 or OsCPK24 gene, respectively.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in the improvement of cold tolerance in rice.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different gene elements, one element is an endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR of the organism, and the other is a gene coding region of any one of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family in the same organism.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the corresponding endogenous wild-type ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter gene of the organism.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in enhancing biological detoxification capability or stress tolerance.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different gene elements, one element is a plant endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR of the plant, and the other is a gene coding region of any one of the NAC transcription factor family in the same plant.


In another specific embodiment, the said NAC transcription factor family gene is OsNAC045, OsNAC67, ZmSNAC1, OsNAC006, OsNAC42, OsSNAC1 or OsSNAC2.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the corresponding plant endogenous wild-type NAC transcription factor family gene.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in enhancing plant stress tolerance or plant yield.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different gene elements, one element is a plant endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR, and the other is the gene coding region of any one of MYB, MADS, DREB and bZIP transcription factor family in the same plant.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the corresponding plant endogenous wild-type MYB transcription factor gene, MADS transcription factor family gene, DREB transcription factor family gene coding region or bZIP transcription factor family gene, respectively.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides the use of new gene in enhancing plant stress tolerance or regulating plant growth and development.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different gene elements, one element is the promoter of any one of overexpression or tissue-specific expression rice genes listed in Table A, and the other is the protein coding region or the non-coding RNA region of another gene that is different from the selected promoter corresponding to the rice gene.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the expression pattern of the new gene is changed relative to the selected protein coding region or the non-coding RNA region of the rice endogenous gene.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides the use of new gene in regulating the growth and development of rice.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different gene elements, one element is a protein coding region or non-coding RNA region selected from any one of the biological functional genes listed in Table B to K, and the other is the promoter region of another gene that is different from the selected functional gene of the biological genome corresponding to the selected gene.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the expression pattern of the new gene is changed relative to the selected functional gene.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in regulating the growth and development of organism.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different gene elements, one element is an endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR of the organism, and the other is a gene coding region of any one of the GST (glutathione-s-transferases) family in the same organism.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the corresponding endogenous GST (glutathione-s-transferases) family gene of the organism.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in enhancing biological detoxification capability or stress tolerance.


In another specific embodiment, the said GST family gene is wheat GST Cla47 (AY064480.1) gene, wheat GST 19E50 (AY064481.1), wheat GST28E45 (AY479764.1), maize ZmGSTIV, maize ZmGST6, maize ZmGST31, maize GSTI, maize GSTIII, maize GSTIV, maize GST5 or maize GST7 gene.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the endogenous wheat GST Cla47 (AY064480.1) gene, wheat GST 19E50 (AY064481.1), wheat GST28E45 (AY479764.1), maize ZmGSTIV, maize ZmGST6, maize ZmGST31, maize GSTI, maize GSTIII, maize GSTIV, maize GST5 or maize GST7 gene, respectively.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in the improvement of the resistance or tolerance of wheat or maize to a herbicide.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different gene elements, one element is a rice endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR, and the other is the coding region of any one of gene protein in rice GIF1 (Os04g0413500), NOG1 (OsO1g075220), LAIR (Os02g0154100), OSA1 (Os03g0689300), OsNRT1.1A (Os08g0155400), OsNRT2.3B (OsO1g0704100), OsRac1 (OsO1g0229400), OsNRT2.1 (Os02g0112100), OsGIF1 (Os03g0733600), OsNAC9 (Os03g0815100), CPB1/D11/GNS4 (Os04g0469800), miR1432 (Os04g0436100), OsNLP4 (Os09g0549450), RAG2 (Os07g0214300), LRKI1 (Os02g0154200), OsNHX1 (Os07t0666900), GW6 (Os06g0623700), WG7 (Os07g0669800), D11/OsBZR1 (Os04g0469800, Os07g0580500), OsAAP6 (Os07g0134000), OsLSK1 (Os01g0669100), IPA1 (Os08g0509600), SMG11 (Os01g0197100), CYP72A31 (Os01g0602200), SNAC1 (Os03g0815100), ZBED (Os01g0547200), OsSta2 (Os02g0655200), OsASR5 (Os11g0167800), OsCPK4 (Os02g03410), OsDjA9 (Os06g0116800), EUI (Os05g0482400), JMJ705 (Os01g67970), WRKY45 (Os05t0322900), OsRSR1 (Os05g0121600), OsRLCK5 (OsO1g0114100), APIP4 (OsO1g0124200), OsPAL6 (Os04t0518400), OsPAL8 (Os11g0708900), TPS46 (Os08t0168000), OsERF3 (Os01g58420) and OsYSL15 (Os02g0650300).


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the corresponding endogenous gene.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in rice breeding.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different gene elements, one element is a fish endogenous strong promoter, and the other is a gene coding region of GH1 (growth hormone 1) in the selected fish.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a fish endogenous high expression GH1 gene obtainable by the method.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the fish endogenous high expression GH1 gene in fish breeding.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different protein domains, one element is a wheat endogenous protein chloroplast localization signal domain, and the other is a wheat mature protein coding region of cytoplasmic localization phosphoglucose isomerase (PGIc).


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the new gene locates the phosphoglucose isomerase gene relative to the coding cytoplasm and its mature protein is located in the chloroplast.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in the improvement of wheat yield.


In another specific embodiment, in the combination of different protein domains, one element is a rice protein chloroplast localization signal domain (CTP), and the other is the mature protein coding region of OsGLO3, OsOXO3 or OsCATC.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a new gene obtainable by the present method, the mature protein of the new gene is located in chloroplast different from OsGLO3, OsOXO3 or OsCATC.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the new gene in improving the photosynthetic efficiency of rice.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a chloroplast localized protein OsCACT, the nucleotide encoding the protein has a sequence selected from the group consisting of:


(1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 28, or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof;


(2) a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% to any one of the sequences as defined in (1); or


(3) a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to the sequence as shown in (1) or (2) under a stringent condition.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a chloroplast localized protein OsGLO3, the nucleotide encoding the protein has a sequence selected from the group consisting of:


(1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 29, or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof;


(2) a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% to any one of the sequences as defined in (1); or


(3) a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to the sequence as shown in (1) or (2) under a stringent condition.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention also provides use of the protein in improving the photosynthetic efficiency of rice.


The present invention further provides a composition, which comprises:


(a) the promoter of one of two genes with different expression patterns and a coding region or non-coding RNA region of the other gene;


(b) a region between the promoter and the 5′ untranslated region of one of two genes with different expression patterns and a coding region or non-coding RNA region of the other gene;


(c) a localization signal region of one of the two protein coding genes with different subcellular localizations and a mature protein coding region of the other gene;


(d) gene coding regions of protein domains with different biological functions derived from two genes with different functions;


wherein, the composition is non-naturally occurring, and is directly connected on the biological chromosome and can be inherited stably.


In a specific embodiment, the “different expression patterns” refers to different levels of gene expression.


In another specific embodiment, the “different expression patterns” refers to different tissue-specific of gene expression.


In another specific embodiment, the “different expression patterns” refers to different developmental stage-specificities of gene expression.


In a specific embodiment, the “different subcellular locations” include, but are not limited to, nuclear location, cytoplasmic location, cell membrane location, chloroplast location, mitochondrial location, or endoplasmic reticulum membrane location.


In a specific embodiment, the “different biological functions” include, but are not limited to, recognition of specific DNA or RNA conserved sequence, activation of gene expression, binding to protein ligand, binding to small molecule signal, ion binding, or specific enzymatic reaction.


In a specific embodiment, the composition is fused in vivo.


The present invention also provides an editing method for regulating the gene expression level of a target endogenous gene in an organism, which is independent of an exogenous DNA donor fragment, which comprises the following steps:


simultaneously generating DNA breaks separately at selected sites between the promoter and the coding region of each of the target endogenous gene and an optional endogenous inducible or tissue-specific expression gene with a desired expression pattern; ligating the DNA breaks to each other by means of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous repair, thereby generating an in vivo fusion of the coding region of the target endogenous gene and the optional inducible or tissue-specific expression promoter to form a new gene with expected expression patterns.


In a specific embodiment, the target endogenous gene and the optional endogenous inducible or tissue-specific expression gene with a desired expression pattern are located on the same chromosome or on different chromosomes.


In a specific embodiment, the target endogenous gene is yeast ERG9 gene, the endogenous inducible expression gene is HXT1 gene, and the inducible expression promoter is HXT1 in response to glucose concentration.


The present invention also provides a yeast endogenous inducible ERG9 gene obtainable by the editing method.


The present invention also provides use of the yeast endogenous inducible ERG9 gene in synthetic biology.


In particular, the present invention also provides an editing method of increasing the expression level of a target endogenous gene in an organism independent of an exogenous DNA donor fragment, which comprises the following steps: simultaneously generating DNA breaks at specific sites between the promoter and the CDS of each of the target endogenous gene and an optional endogenous highly-expressing gene; ligating the DNA breaks to each other via non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous repair to form an in vivo fusion of the coding region of the target endogenous gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter, thereby creating a new highly-expressing endogenous gene. This method is named as an editing method for knocking-up an endogenous gene.


In a specific embodiment, the target endogenous gene and the optional highly-expressing endogenous gene are located on the same chromosome.


In another specific embodiment, the target endogenous gene and the optional highly-expressing endogenous gene are located on different chromosomes.


In another aspect, the present invention provides an editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous HPPD gene in a plant, comprising fusing the coding region of the HPPD gene with a strong plant endogenous promoter in vivo to form a new highly-expressing plant endogenous HPPD gene. That is, simultaneously generating DNA breaks at specific sites between the promoter and the CDS of each of the HPPD gene and an optional endogenous highly-expressing gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway to form an in vivo fusion of the coding region of the HPPD gene and the optional endogenous strong promoter, thereby creating a new highly-expressing HPPD gene. In rice, the strong promoter is preferably a promoter of the ubiquitin2 gene.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing plant endogenous HPPD gene obtainable by the above editing method.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing rice endogenous HPPD gene which has a sequence selected from the group consisting of:


(1) a nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 9, SEQ ID NO: 10, SEQ ID NO: 18, SEQ ID NO: 19 or SEQ ID NO: 27 or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof;


(2) a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% to any one of the sequences as defined in (1); or


(3) a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to the sequence as shown in (1) or (2) under a stringent condition.


In another aspect, the present invention provides an editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous EPSPS gene in a plant, which comprises fusing the coding region of an EPSPS gene with a strong plant endogenous promoter in vivo to form a new highly-expressing plant endogenous EPSPS gene. That is, simultaneously generating DNA breaks at specific sites between the promoter and the CDS of each of the EPSPS gene and an optional highly-expressing endogenous gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway to form an in vivo fusion of the coding region of the EPSPS gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter, thereby creating a new highly-expressing EPSPS gene. In rice, the strong promoter is preferably a promoter of the TKT gene.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing plant endogenous EPSPS gene obtainable by the above editing method.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing rice endogenous EPSPS gene which has a sequence selected from the group consisting of:


(1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 11, SEQ ID NO: 12, SEQ ID NO: 13 or SEQ ID NO: 14 or a partial sequence thereof or a complementary sequence thereof;


(2) a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% to any one of the sequences as defined in (1); or


(3) a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to the sequence as shown in (1) or (2) under a stringent condition.


In another aspect, the present invention provides an editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous PPO (PPOX) gene in a plant, which comprises fusing the coding region of the PPO gene with a strong plant endogenous promoter in vivo to form a new highly-expressing plant endogenous PPO gene. That is, simultaneously generating DNA breaks at specific sites between the promoter and the CDS of each of the PPO gene and an optional highly-expressing endogenous gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway to form an in vivo fusion of the coding region of the PPO gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter, thereby creating a new highly-expressing PPO gene. In rice, the strong promoter is preferably a promoter of the CP12 gene. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the strong promoter is preferably a promoter of the ubiquitin10 gene.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing plant endogenous PPO gene obtainable by the above editing method.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing rice endogenous PPO1 gene having a sequence selected from the group consisting of:


(1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 15, SEQ ID NO: 16, SEQ ID NO: 17, SEQ ID NO: 20, SEQ ID NO: 21, SEQ ID NO: 22, SEQ ID NO: 23, SEQ ID NO: 24, SEQ ID NO: 25, or SEQ ID NO: 26 or a partial sequence thereof or a complementary sequence thereof, (2) a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% to any one of the sequences as defined in (1); or


(3) a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to the sequence as shown in (1) or (2) under a stringent condition.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing rice endogenous PPO2 gene, which has a sequence selected from the group consisting of:


(1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 30, SEQ ID NO: 31, SEQ ID NO: 32, SEQ ID NO: 33, SEQ ID NO: 34, SEQ ID NO: 35, SEQ ID NO: 36, SEQ ID NO: 37, SEQ ID NO: 38, SEQ ID NO: 39, SEQ ID NO: 40, SEQ ID NO:41, SEQ ID NO: 42, SEQ ID NO: 43, SEQ ID NO: 44, SEQ ID NO: 45, SEQ ID NO: 46 or SEQ ID NO: 47, or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof;


(2) a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% to any one of the sequences as defined in (1); or


(3) a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to the sequence as shown in (1) or (2) under a stringent condition.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing maize endogenous PPO2 gene, which has a sequence selected from the group consisting of:


(1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 48 or SEQ ID NO: 49, or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof;


(2) a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% to any one of the sequences as defined in (1); or


(3) a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to the sequence as shown in (1) or (2) under a stringent condition.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing wheat endogenous PPO2 gene, which has a sequence selected from the group consisting of:


(1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 50, SEQ ID NO: 51, SEQ ID NO: 52, SEQ ID NO: 53, SEQ ID NO: 54, SEQ ID NO: 55 or SEQ ID NO: 56, or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof;


(2) a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% to any one of the sequences as defined in (1); or


(3) a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to the sequence as shown in (1) or (2) under a stringent condition.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing oilseed rape endogenous PPO2 gene, which has a sequence selected from the group consisting of:


(1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 57, SEQ ID NO: 58, SEQ ID NO: 59, SEQ ID NO: 60 or SEQ ID NO: 61, or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof;


(2) a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% to any one of the sequences as defined in (1); or


(3) a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to the sequence as shown in (1) or (2) under a stringent condition.


The present invention also provides use of the gene in the improvement of the resistance or tolerance to a corresponding inhibitory herbicide in a plant cell, a plant tissue, a plant part or a plant.


The present invention also provides a plant or a progeny derived therefrom regenerated from the plant cell which comprises the gene.


The present invention also provides a method for producing a plant with an increased resistance or tolerance to an herbicide, which comprises regenerating the plant cell which comprises the gene into a plant or a progeny derived therefrom.


In a specific embodiment, the plant with increased herbicide resistance or tolerance is a non-transgenic line obtainable by crossing a plant regenerated from the plant host cell of the invention with a wild-type plant to remove the exogenous transgenic component through genetic segregation.


The present invention also provides a herbicide-resistant rice, which comprises one or a combination of two or more of the rice new gene, highly-expressing rice endogenous HPPD gene, highly-expressing rice endogenous EPSPS gene, highly-expressing rice endogenous PPO1 gene, and highly-expressing rice endogenous PPO2 gene.


In a specific embodiment, the herbicide-resistant rice is non-transgenic.


The present invention also provides a maize, wheat or oilseed rape resistant to a herbicide, which comprises one or a combination of two or more of the maize new gene, the wheat or maize new gene, the highly-expressing maize PPO2 gene, the highly-expressing wheat PPO2 gene, and the highly-expressing oilseed rape PPO2 gene.


In a specific embodiment, the maize, wheat or oilseed rape is non-transgenic.


The present invention also provides a method for controlling a weed in a cultivation site of a plant, wherein the plant is selected from the group consisting of the plant, a plant prepared by the method, the rice, or the maize, wheat or oilseed rape, wherein the method comprises applying to the cultivation site one or more corresponding inhibitory herbicides in an amount for effectively controlling the weed.


The present invention also provides an editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous WAK gene in a plant, characterized in that it comprises fusing the coding region of the WAK gene with a strong endogenous promoter of a plant in vivo to form a new highly-expressing plant endogenous WAK gene. That is, simultaneously generating DNA breaks respectively in selected specific sites between the promoter and the coding region of each of the WAK gene and an optional endogenous highly-expressing gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway, generating in vivo a fusion of the coding region of the WAK gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter to form a new highly-expressing WAK gene.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing plant endogenous WAK gene obtainable by the editing method.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing rice WAK gene, which has a sequence selected from the group consisting of:


(1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 62, SEQ ID NO: 63, SEQ ID NO: 64, SEQ ID NO: 65, SEQ ID NO: 66, SEQ ID NO: 67 or SEQ ID NO: 68, or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof;


(2) a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% to any one of the sequences as defined in (1); or


(3) a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to the sequence as shown in (1) or (2) under a stringent condition.


The present invention also provides an editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous CNGC gene in a plant, characterized in that it comprises fusing the coding region of the CNGC gene with a strong endogenous promoter of a plant in vivo to form a new highly-expressing plant endogenous CNGC gene. That is, simultaneously generating DNA breaks respectively in selected specific sites between the promoter and the coding region of each of the CNGC gene and an optional endogenous highly-expressing gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway, generating in vivo a fusion of the coding region of the CNGC gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter to form a new highly-expressing CNGC gene.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing plant endogenous CNGC gene obtainable by the editing method.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing rice CNGC gene, which has a sequence selected from the group consisting of:


(1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 69, SEQ ID NO: 70, SEQ ID NO: 71 or SEQ ID NO: 72, or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof;


(2) a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% to any one of the sequences as defined in (1); or


(3) a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to the sequence as shown in (1) or (2) under a stringent condition.


The present invention also provides use of the gene in conferring or improving a resistance to rice blast in rice.


The present invention also provides a rice resistant to rice blast, which comprises one or a combination of two or more of the highly-expressing rice WAK gene, and the highly-expressing rice CNGC gene.


Preferably the rice is non-transgenic.


The present invention also provides an editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous GH1 gene in a fish, characterized in that it comprises fusing the coding region of the GH1 gene with a strong endogenous promoter of a fish in vivo to form a new highly-expressing fish endogenous GH1 gene. That is, simultaneously generating DNA breaks respectively in selected specific sites between the promoter and the coding region of each of the GH1 gene and an optional endogenous highly-expressing gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway, generating in vivo a fusion of the coding region of the GH1 gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter to form a new highly-expressing GH1 gene; the strong promoter is preferably the corresponding fish ColIA1a (Collagen type I alpha 1a) gene promoter, RPS15A (ribosomal protein S15a) gene promoter, Actin promoter or DDX5 [DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box helicase 5] gene promoter.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing fish endogenous GH1 gene obtainable by the editing method.


The present invention also provides use of the highly-expressing fish endogenous GH1 gene in fish breeding.


The present invention also provides an editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous IGF2 (Insulin-like growth factor 2) gene in a pig, characterized in that it comprises fusing the coding region of the IGF2 gene with a strong endogenous promoter of a pig in vivo to form a new highly-expressing pig endogenous IGF2 gene. That is, simultaneously generating DNA breaks respectively in selected specific sites between the promoter and the coding region of each of the IGF2 gene and an optional endogenous highly-expressing gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway, generating in vivo a fusion of the coding region of the IGF2 gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter to form a new highly-expressing IGF2 gene; the strong promoter is preferably one of the pig TNNI2 and TNNT3 gene promoter.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing pig endogenous IGF2 gene obtainable by the editing method.


The present invention also provides use of the highly-expressing pig endogenous IGF2 gene in pig breeding.


The present invention also provides an editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous IGF1 (Insulin-like growth factor 1) gene in a chicken embryo fibroblast, characterized in that it comprises fusing the coding region of the IGF1 gene with a strong endogenous promoter of a chicken in vivo to form a new highly-expressing chicken endogenous IGF1 gene. That is, simultaneously generating DNA breaks respectively in selected specific sites between the promoter and the coding region of each of the IGF1 gene and an optional endogenous highly-expressing gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway, generating in vivo a fusion of the coding region of the IGF1 gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter to form a new highly-expressing IGF1 gene; the strong promoter is preferably chicken MYBPC1 (myosin binding protein C) gene promoter.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing chicken endogenous IGF1 gene obtainable by the editing method.


The present invention also provides use of the highly-expressing chicken endogenous IGF1 gene in chicken breeding.


The present invention also provides an editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous EPO (Erythropoietin) gene in an animal cell, characterized in that it comprises fusing the coding region of the EPO gene with a strong endogenous promoter of an animal in vivo to form a new highly-expressing endogenous EPO gene. That is, simultaneously generating DNA breaks respectively in selected specific sites between the promoter and the coding region of each of the EPO gene and an optional endogenous highly-expressing gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway, generating in vivo a fusion of the coding region of the EPO gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter to form a new highly-expressing EPO gene.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing animal endogenous EPO gene obtainable by the editing method.


The present invention also provides use of the highly-expressing animal endogenous EPO gene in animal breeding.


The present invention also provides an editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous p53 gene in an animal cell, characterized in that it comprises fusing the coding region of the p53 gene with a strong endogenous promoter of an animal in vivo to form a new highly-expressing endogenous p53 gene. That is, simultaneously generating DNA breaks respectively in selected specific sites between the promoter and the coding region of each of the p53 gene and an optional endogenous highly-expressing gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway, generating in vivo a fusion of the coding region of the p53 gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter to form a new highly-expressing p53 gene.


The present invention also provides a highly-expressing animal endogenous p53 gene obtainable by the editing method.


The present invention also provides use of the highly-expressing animal endogenous p53 gene in animal breeding or cancer prevention.


In a specific embodiment, the “DNA breaks” are produced by delivering a nuclease with targeting property into a cell of the organism to contact with the specific sites of the genomic DNA. There is no essential difference between this type of DNA breaks and the DNA breaks produced by traditional techniques (such as radiation or chemical mutagenesis).


In a specific embodiment, the “nuclease with targeting property” is selected from Meganuclease, Zinc finger nuclease (ZFN), TALEN and the CRISPR/Cas system.


Among them, the CRISPR/Cas system can generate two or more DNA double-strand breaks at different sites in the genome through two or more leading RNAs targeting different sequences; by separately designing the ZFN protein or TALEN protein in two or more specific site sequences, the Zinc finger nuclease and TALEN systems can simultaneously generate DNA double-strand breaks at two or more sites. When two breaks are located on the same chromosome, repair results such as deletion, inversion and doubling may occur; and when two breaks are located on two different chromosomes, crossover of chromosomal arms may occur. The deletion, inversion, doubling and exchange of chromosome segments at two DNA breaks can recombine different gene elements or protein domains, thereby creating a new functional gene.


In a specific embodiment, the said CRISPR/Cas system is Cas9 nuclease system or Cas12 nuclease system.


In a specific embodiment, the “nuclease with targeting property” exists in the form of DNA.


In another specific embodiment, the “nuclease with targeting property” exists in the form of mRNA or protein, rather than the form of DNA.


In a specific embodiment, the method for delivering the nucleases with targeting property into the cell is selected from a group consisting of: 1) PEG-mediated cell transfection; 2) liposome-mediated cell transfection; 3) electric shock transformation; 4) microinjection; 5) gene gun bombardment; 6) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation; 7) viral vector-mediated transformation method; or 8) nanomagnetic bead mediated transformation method.


The present invention also provides a DNA containing the gene.


The present invention also provides a protein encoded by the gene, or biologically active fragment thereof.


The present invention also provides a recombinant expression vector, which comprises the gene and a promoter operably linked thereto.


The present invention also provides an expression cassette containing the gene.


The present invention also provides a host cell, which comprises the expression cassette.


The present invention further provides an organism regenerated from the host cell.


In the research work of the inventors, it was found that in cells simultaneously undergoing dual-target or multi-target gene editing, a certain proportion of the ends of DNA double-strand breaks at different targets were spontaneously ligated to each other, resulting in events of deletion, inversion or duplication-doubling of the fragments between the targets on the same chromosome, and/or the exchange of chromosome fragments between targets on different chromosomes. It has been reported in the literature that this phenomenon commonly exists in plants and animals (Puchta et al. 2020. Changing local recombination patterns in Arabidopsis by CRISPR/Cas mediated chromosome engineering. Nat Commun. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18277-z; Li et al. 2015. Efficient inversions and duplications of mammalian regulatory DNA elements and gene clusters by CRISPR/Cas9. J Mol Cell Biol. DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjv016).


The present inventors surprisingly discovered that, by inducing DNA double-strand breaks in a combination of gene editing targets near specific elements of a gene of interest, causing spontaneous repair ligation, directed combination of different gene elements can be achieved at the genome level without the need to provide a foreign DNA template, it is possible to produce therefrom a new functional gene. This strategy greatly accelerates the creation of new genes and has great potential in animal and plant breeding and gene function research.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION

In the present invention, unless otherwise specified, the scientific and technical terms used herein have the meanings commonly understood by those skilled in the art. In addition, protein and nucleic acid chemistry, molecular biology, cell and tissue culture, microbiology, immunology related terms and laboratory procedures used herein are all terms and routine procedures widely used in the corresponding fields. For example, the standard recombinant DNA and molecular cloning techniques used in the present invention are well known to those skilled in the art and are fully described in the following documents: Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E F and Maniatis, T., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, 1989. For a better understanding of the present invention, definitions and explanations of related terms are provided below.


The term “genome” as used herein refers to all complements of genetic material (genes and non-coding sequences) present in each cell or virus or organelle of an organism, and/or complete genome inherited from a parent as a unit (haploid).


Table A lists some of the ubiquitously-expressed genes and tissue-specific expressed genes in rice. Generally, in production applications, a DNA sequence within 3 kb upstream of the start codon of ubiquitously-expressed genes or tissue-specific genes is used as the promoter region and the 5′ non-coding region, where the promoter region of ubiquitously expressed genes is used as a representative of strong promoters, and the promoter region of tissue-specifically expressed genes is used as a representative of tissue-specific promoters. It is known that ubiquitously-expressed genes and tissue-specific genes in other species similar to rice can be found in public databases such as NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), JGI (https://jgi.doe).gov/).









TABLE A





The ubiquitously-expressed genes and tissue-specific expressed genes in rice.
















Ubiquitously-expressed



genes
Annotation of gene functions





LOC_Os02g06640
ubiquitin family protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g51600
tubulin/FtsZ domain containing protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g46770
ubiquitin family protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os11g43900
translationally-controlled tumor protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g67860
fructose-bisphospate aldolase isozyme, putative, expressed


LOC_Os07g26690
aquaporin protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g27310
histone H3, putative, expressed


LOC_Os05g41060
ADP-ribosylation factor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os08g03290
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os05g07700
ribosomal protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g08010
elongation factor Tu, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g48560
fatty acid desaturase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g05490
triosephosphate isomerase, cytosolic, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g08020
elongation factor Tu, putative, expressed


LOC_Os10g33800
lactate/malate dehydrogenase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g04030
histone H3, putative, expressed


LOC_Os04g57220
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, putative, expressed


LOC_Os08g09250
glyoxalase family protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g08050
elongation factor Tu, putative, expressed


LOC_Os08g02340
60S acidic ribosomal protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g50885
actin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os09g26420
AP2 domain containing protein, expressed


LOC_Os03g12670
expressed protein


LOC_Os05g49890
ras-related protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os05g06770
40S ribosomal protein S27a, putative, expressed


LOC_Os10g08550
enolase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os04g53620
ubiquitin family protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os05g39960
40S ribosomal protein S26, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g01560
40S ribosomal protein S4, putative, expressed


LOC_Os08g03640
60S acidic ribosomal protein P0, putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g23440
eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, putative, expressed


LOC_Os10g32920
ribosomal protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g60410
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g22490
40S ribosomal protein S27a, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g13170
ubiquitin fusion protein, putative, expressed





Seed specificity highly



expressed genes
MSU_Annotation





LOC_Os07g10580
PROLM26-Prolamin precursor, expressed


LOC_Os01g55690
glutelin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os10g26060
glutelin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os07g11330
RAL2-Seed allergenic protein RA5/RA14/RA17 precursor,



expressed


LOC_Os07g11510
RAL6-Seed allergenic protein RA5/RA14/RA17 precursor,



expressed


LOC_Os05g41970
SSAl-2S albumin seed storage family protein precursor,



expressed


LOC_Os07g11380
RAL4-Seed allergenic protein RA5/RA14/RA17 precursor,



expressed


LOC_Os07g10570
PROLM25-Prolamin precursor, expressed


LOC_Os02g16820
glutelin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g25640
glutelin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g16830
glutelin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g15150
glutelin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g31360
glutelin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g15169
glutelin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g15178
glutelin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g31070
PROLM24-Prolamin precursor, expressed


LOC_Os03g46100
cupin domain containing protein, expressed


LOC_Os07g11410
RAL5-Seed allergenic protein RA5/RA14/RA17 precursor,



expressed


LOC_Os08g03410
glutelin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os07g11920
PROLM22-Prolamin precursor, expressed


LOC_Os07g11360
RAL3-Seed allergenic protein RA5/RA14/RA17 precursor,



expressed


LOC_Os03g57960
cupin domain containing protein, expressed


LOC_Os11g33000
SSA5-2S albumin seed storage family protein precursor,



expressed


LOC_Os07g11650
LTPL164-Protease inhibitor/seed storage/LTP family protein



precursor, expressed


LOC_Os11g37270
AMBP1-Antimicrobial peptide MBP-1 family protein precursor,



expressed


LOC_Os07g11910
PROLM20-Prolamin precursor, expressed


LOC_Os12g16890
PROLM28-Prolamin precursor, expressed


LOC_Os07g11900
PROLM19-Prolamin precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g15090
glutelin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os08g08960
Cupin domain containing protein, expressed


LOC_Os10g35050
aquaporin protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os04g46200
oleosin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os05g35690
GASR6-Gibberellin-regulated GASA/GAST/Snakin family



protein precursor, expressed


LOC_Os07g11630
LTPL163-Protease inhibitor/seed storage/LTP family protein



precursor, expressed


LOC_Os05g26350
PROLM4-Prolamin precursor, expressed


LOC_Os06g04200
starch synthase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os05g26770
PROLM18-Prolamin precursor, expressed


LOC_Os05g26720
PROLM16-Prolamin precursor, expressed


LOC_Os10g39420
CAMK_CAMK_like.8-CAMK includes calcium/calmodulin



dependent protein kinases, expressed


LOC_Os04g33150
desiccation-related protein PCC13-62 precursor, putative,



expressed


LOC_Os06g51084
1,4-alpha-glucan-branching enzyme, chloroplast precursor,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g46284
glycosyl hydrolase, family 31, putative, expressed





Stamen specificity



highly expressed genes
Annotation of gene functions





LOC_Os10g40090
expansin precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g21410
arabinogalactan peptide 23 precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os05g46530
invertase/pectin methylesterase inhibitor family protein, putative,



expressed


LOC_Os04g32680
POEI20-Pollen Ole e I allergen and extensin family protein



precursor, expressed


LOC_Os01g27190
C2 domain containing protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g17450
expressed protein


LOC_Os01g69020
retrotransposon protein, putative, unclassified, expressed


LOC_Os10g32810
beta-amylase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g05670
expressed protein


LOC_Os07g15530
expressed protein


LOC_Os04g57280
expressed protein


LOC_Os05g20570
invertase/pectin methylesterase inhibitor family protein, putative,



expressed


LOC_Os03g04770
beta-amylase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os05g40740
monocopper oxidase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g02450
transposon protein, putative, unclassified, expressed


LOC_Os04g33710
expressed protein


LOC_Os10g35930
OsPLIM2c-LIM domain protein, putative actin-binding protein



and transcription factor, expressed


LOC_Os06g03390
expressed protein


LOC_Os02g03520
THION25-Plant thionin family protein precursor, expressed


LOC_Os01g39970
protein kinase domain containing protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os12g42650
pollen preferential protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os08g02880
CXXXC11-Cysteine-rich protein with paired CXXXC motifs



precursor, expressed


LOC_Os10g17680
profilin domain containing protein, expressed


LOC_Os01g21970
protein kinase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os05g13850
TsetseEP precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os04g57270
expressed protein


LOC_Os02g26290
fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein 8 precursor, putative,



expressed


LOC_Os07g13440
RALFL12-Rapid ALkalinization Factor RALF family protein



precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os10g17660
profilin domain containing protein, expressed


LOC_Os04g25160
pollen allergen, putative, expressed


LOC_Os05g13830
TsetseEP precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os04g26220
pollen allergen, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g01610
expansin precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g01650
expansin precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os04g11130
DEF9-Defensin and Defensin-like DEFL family, expressed


LOC_Os06g44470
pollen allergen, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g23880
expressed protein


LOC_Os08g12520
expressed protein


LOC_Os04g11195
gamma-thionin family domain containing protein, expressed





Pistil specificity highly



expressed genes
Annotation of gene functions





LOC_Os05g33150
CHIT6-Chitinase family protein precursor, expressed


LOC_Os07g38130
polygalacturonase inhibitor 1 precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os11g44810
auxin-repressed protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os09g37910
HMG1/2, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g42520
expressed protein


LOC_Os12g38000
60S ribosomal protein L8, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g08500
AP2 domain containing protein, expressed


LOC_Os04g18090
histone H1, putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g04030
histone H3, putative, expressed


LOC_Os10g40730
expansin precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os07g48910
retrotransposon protein, putative, unclassified, expressed


LOC_Os03g22270
auxin-repressed protein, putative, expressed





Leaf specificity highly



expressed genes
Annotation of gene functions





LOC_Os12g17600
ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small chain, chloroplast



precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os11g47970
AAA-type ATPase family protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os12g19381
ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small chain, chloroplast



precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os11g07020
fructose-bisphospate aldolase isozyme, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g41710
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os09g17740
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g45274
carbonic anhydrase, chloroplast precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g45914
expressed protein


LOC_Os06g01210
plastocyanin, chloroplast precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os08g10020
photosystem II 10 kDa polypeptide, chloroplast precursor,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g39610
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g31690
oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 1, chloroplast precursor,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os07g37240
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os07g37550
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os04g38600
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os08g33820
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os11g13890
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g21590
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g10390
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os09g36680
ribonuclease T2 family domain containing protein, expressed


LOC_Os08g44680
photosystem I reaction center subunit II, chloroplast precursor,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os12g19470
ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small chain, chloroplast



precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os07g05480
photosystem I reaction center subunit, chloroplast precursor,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os07g04840
PsbP, putative, expressed


LOC_Os08g01380
2Fe-2S iron-sulfur cluster binding domain containing protein,



expressed


LOC_Os04g33830
membrane protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os05g48630
expressed protein


LOC_Os01g52240
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g10400
expressed protein


LOC_Os04g38410
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Osl2g23200
photosystem I reaction center subunit XI, chloroplast precursor,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os07g38960
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g19740
calvin cycle protein CP 12, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g64960
chlorophyll A-B binding protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g03720
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os12g08770
photosystem I reaction center subunit N, chloroplast precursor,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g02890
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g47020
phosphoribulokinase/Uridine kinase family protein, expressed


LOC_Os07g25430
photosystem I reaction center subunit IV A, chloroplast precursor,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g17170
magnesium-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester



cyclase, chloroplast precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os07g36080
oxygen evolving enhancer protein 3 domain containing protein,



expressed


LOC_Os11g06720
abscisic stress-ripening, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g03910
catalase domain containing protein, expressed


LOC_Os03g52840
serine hydroxymethyltransferase, mitochondrial precursor,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os12g08760
carboxyvinyl-carboxyphosphonate phosphorylmutase, putative,



expressed


LOC_Os05g41640
phosphoglycerate kinase protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os09g30340
photosystem I reaction center subunit, chloroplast precursor,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os04g21350
flowering promoting factor-like 1, putative, expressed


LOC_Os04g16680
fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os07g47640
ultraviolet-B-repressible protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os12g08730
thioredoxin, putative, expressed


LOC_Os12g33120
expressed protein


LOC_Os03g56670
photosystem I reaction center subunit III, chloroplast precursor,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g22370
ultraviolet-B-repressible protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g57220
hydroxy acid oxidase 1, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g56680
photosystem II reaction center W protein, chloroplast precursor,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g51080
FAD binding domain containing protein, expressed


LOC_Os07g32880
ATP synthase gamma chain, putative, expressed


LOC_Os03g17070
ATP synthase B chain, chloroplast precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os01g13690
ligA, putative, expressed


LOC_Os04g52260
LTPL124-Protease inhibitor/seed storage/LTP family protein



precursor, expressed


LOC_Os12g43600
RNA recognition motif containing protein, expressed


LOC_Os01g51410
glycine dehydrogenase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g40940
glycine dehydrogenase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g15400
expressed protein


LOC_Os12g02320
LTPL12-Protease inhibitor/seed storage/LTP family protein



precursor, expressed


LOC_Os07g01760
aminotransferase, classes I and II, domain containing protein,



expressed


LOC_Os08g39300
aminotransferase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g04270
transketolase, chloroplast precursor, putative, expressed


LOC_Os08g04500
terpene synthase, putative, expressed


LOC_Os02g44630
aquaporin protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os12g23180
3-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/isomerase family protein,



putative, expressed


LOC_Os06g51220
HMG1/2, putative, expressed


LOC_Os04g41560
B-box zinc finger family protein, putative, expressed


LOC_Os04g56400
glutamine synthetase, catalytic domain containing protein,



expressed









Table B lists some functional genes that have been reported to be related to plant metabolites. Up-regulated expression of these genes or specific expression in fruits, leaves and other organs may enhance the economic value of such plants.









TABLE B







Genes related to secondary metabolites of plants.










Plant
Gene name
Utility
Reference





Carex
CrUGT87A1
Flavonoids,
Zhang, K., et al. (2021). “CrUGT87A1, a UDP-sugar


rigescens

Salt
glycosyltransferases (UGTs) gene from Carex




tolerance
rigescens, increases salt tolerance by accumulating





flavonoids for antioxidation in Arabidopsis thaliana.”





Plant Physiol Biochem 159: 28-36.


Solanum
S1MYB14
Flavonoids
Li, Z., et al. (2021). “S1MYB14 promotes flavonoids


lycopersicum


accumulation and confers higher tolerance to





2,4,6-trichlorophenol in tomato.” Plant Sci 303:





110796.


Citrus
CsPH4
Proanthocyanidin
Zhang, Y., et al. (2020). “Citrus PH4-Noemi regulatory





complex is involved in proanthocyanidin biosynthesis





via a positive feedback loop.” J Exp Bot 71(4):





1306-1321.


Ginkgo
GbF3′H1
Epigallocatechin,
Wu, Y., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of the GbF3′H1


biloba

Gallocatechin,
Gene Enhanced the Epigallocatechin, Gallocatechin,


L.

and Catechin
and Catechin Contents in Transgenic Populus.” J Agric





Food Chem 68(4): 998-1006.


L.
LrMYB1
Flavonoids
Wang, C., et al. (2020). “Comparative transcriptome


ruthenicum


analysis of two contrasting wolfberry genotypes during





fruit development and ripening and characterization of





the LrMYB1 transcription factor that regulates





flavonoid biosynthesis.” BMC Genomics 21(1): 295.


Citrus
CsCYT75B1
Flavonoids,
Rao, M. J., et al. (2020). “CsCYT75B1, a Citrus


sinensis

Drought
CYTOCHROME P450 Gene, Is Involved in




tolerance
Accumulation of Antioxidant Flavonoids and Induces





Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis.”





Antioxidants (Basel) 9(2).


Pear
PpMYB17
Flavonoids
Premathilake, A.T., et al. (2020). “R2R3-MYB





transcription factor PpMYB17 positively regulates





flavonoid biosynthesis in pear fruit.” Planta 252(4): 59.


Raphanus
RsPAP2
Anthocyanins
Fan, L., et al. (2020). “A genome-wide association


sativus


study uncovers a critical role of the RsPAP2 gene in


L.


red-skinned Raphanus sativus L.” Hortic Res 7: 164.


Pear
PbMYB12b
Flavonoids
Zhai, R., et al. (2019). “The MYB transcription factor





PbMYB12b positively regulates flavonol biosynthesis





in pear fruit.” BMC Plant Biol 19(1): 85.


Rosa
RrMYB5-/
Flavonoids
Shen, Y., et al. (2019). “RrMYB5-and


rugosa
RrMYB10
proanthocyanidin
RrMYB10-regulated flavonoid biosynthesis plays a





pivotal role in feedback loop responding to wounding





and oxidation in Rosa rugosa.” Plant Biotechnol J





17(11): 2078-2095.


Carthamus
CtCHI
Flavonoids
Liu, X., et al. (2019). “Molecular cloning and


tinctorius


functional characterization of chaicone isomerase from





Carthamus tinctorius.” AMB Express 9(1): 132.


Salvia
SmANS
Anthocyanin
Li, H., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of SmANS


miltiorrhiza


Enhances Anthocyanin Accumulation and Alters





Phenolic Acids Content in Salvia miltiorrhiza and





Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge f alba Plantlets.” Int J Mol Sci





20(9).


Solanum
S1MYB75
Anthocyanin
Jian, W., et al. (2019). “S1MYB75, an MYB-type


lycopersicum


transcription factor, promotes anthocyanin





accumulation and enhances volatile aroma production





in tomato fruits.” Hortic Res 6: 22.


Oryza
Lsi1
Stresstolerance
Fang, C., et al. (2019). “Lsi1 modulates the antioxidant


sativa


capacity of rice and protects against ultraviolet-B


L.


radiation.” Plant Sci 278: 96-106.


Fraxinus
Fm4CL-like
Lignin
Chen, X., et al. (2019). “Molecular cloning and


mandschurica
1

functional analysis of 4-Coumarate:CoA ligase





4(4CL-like 1)from Fraxinus mandshurica and its role in





abiotic stress tolerance and cell wall synthesis.” BMC





Plant Biol 19(1): 231.


Peach
PpMYB15/
Flavonoids
Cao, Y., et al. (2019). “PpMYB15 and PpMYBF1



PpMYBF1

Transcription Factors Are Involved in Regulating





Flavonol Biosynthesis in Peach Fruit.” J Agric Food





Chem 67(2): 644-652.


Carthamus
CtCYP82G24
Flavonoids
Ahmad, N., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of a Novel


tinctorius


Cytochrome P450 Promotes Flavonoid Biosynthesis





and Osmotic Stress Tolerance in Transgenic





Arabidopsis.” Genes (Basel) 10(10).


Vitis
VbDFR
Anthocyanins,
Zhu, Y., et al. (2018). “Molecular Cloning and


bellula

Proanthocyanidins
Functional Characterization of a Dihydroflavonol





4-Reductase from Vitis bellula.” Molecules 23(4).


Ginkgo
GbMYBFL
Flavonoids
Zhang, W., et al. (2018). “Characterization and


biloba


functional analysis of a MYB gene (GbMYBFL) related


L.


to flavonoid accumulation in Ginkgo biloba.” Genes





Genomics 40(1): 49-61.


Malus
MdWRKY11
Flavonoids
Wang, N., et al. (2018). “Transcriptomic Analysis of


domestica


Red-Fleshed Apples Reveals the Novel Role of





MdWRKY11 in Flavonoid and Anthocyanin





Biosynthesis.” J Agric Food Chem 66(27): 7076-7086.


Gossypium
GhSPL10
Flavonoids
Wang, L., et al. (2018). “The GhmiR157a-GhSPL10


hirsutum


regulatory module controls initial cellular





dedifferentiation and callus proliferation in cotton by





modulating ethylene-mediated flavonoid biosynthesis.”





J Exp Bot 69(5): 1081-1093.


Salvia
SmJMT
Phenolic
Wang, B., et al. (2018). “Molecular Characterization


miltiorrhiza

acids
and Overexpression of SmJMT Increases the





Production of Phenolic Acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza.”





Int JMol Sci 19(12).


Malus
MdATG18a
Anthocyanin
Sun, X., et al. (2018). “MdATG18a overexpression


domestica


improves tolerance to nitrogen deficiency and regulates





anthocyanin accumulation through increased autophagy





in transgenic apple.” Plant Cell Environ 41(2): 469-480.


Citrus
UGTs
Flavonoids
Liu, X., et al. (2018). “Functional Characterization of a


sinensis


Flavonoid Glycosyltransferase in Sweet Orange (Citrus





sinensis).” Front Plant Sci 9: 166.


Arabidopsis
UGT76E11
Flavonoids
Li, Q., et al. (2018). “Ectopic expression of


thaliana


glycosyltransferase UGT76E11 increases flavonoid





accumulation and enhances abiotic stress tolerance in





Arabidopsis.” Plant Biol (Stuttg) 20(1): 10-19.


Arabidopsis
AtMYB12
Flavonoids
Bhatia, C., et al. (2018). “Low Temperature-Enhanced


thaliana


Flavonol Synthesis Requires Light-Associated





Regulatory Components in Arabidopsis thaliana.” Plant





Cell Physiol 59(10): 2099-2112.


Antirrhinum
AmDEL
Flavonoids
Wang, F., et al. (2016). “The Antirrhinum AmDEL





gene enhances flavonoids accumulation and salt and





drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis.” Planta





244(1): 59-73.


Lycium
LcF3H
Flavonoids
Song, X., et al. (2016). “Molecular cloning and


chinense

Drought
identification of a flavanone 3-hydroxylase gene from




tolerance
Lycium chinense, and its overexpression enhances





drought stress in tobacco.” Plant Physiol Biochem 98:





89-100.


Sorghum
SbMyb60
Phenylpropanoid
Scully, E.D., et al. (2016). “Overexpression of


bicolor

Drought
SbMyb60 impacts phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and




tolerance
alters secondary cell wall composition in Sorghum





bicolor.” Plant J 85(3): 378-395.


Vitis
VvibZIPC22
Flavonoids
Malacame, G., et al. (2016). “The grapevine


vinifera


VvibZIPC22 transcription factor is involved in the





regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis.” J Exp Bot





67(11): 3509-3522.


Eupatorium
EaCHS1
Flavonoids
Lijuan, C., et al. (2015). “Chaicone synthase EaCHSI


adenophorum


from Eupatorium adenophorum functions in salt stress





tolerance in tobacco.” Plant Cell Rep 34(5): 885-894.


Arabidopsis
AtROS1
Flavonoids
Bharti, P., et al. (2015). “AtROS1 overexpression


thaliana


provides evidence for epigenetic regulation of genes





encoding enzymes of flavonoid biosynthesis and





antioxidant pathways during salt stress in transgenic





tobacco.” J Exp Bot 66(19): 5959-5969.


Malus
MdMYB9/
Anthocyanin,
An, X.H., et al. (2015). “MdMYB9 and MdMYB11 are


domestica
MdMYB11
proanthocyanidin
involved in the regulation of the JA-induced





biosynthesis of anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin in





apples.” Plant Cell Physiol 56(4): 650-662.


Arabidopsis
PAP1
Flavonoids
Mitsunami, T., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of the


thaliana


PAP1 transcription factor reveals a complex regulation





of flavonoid and phenylpropanoid metabolism in





Nicotiana tabacum plants attacked by Spodoptera





litura.” PLoS One 9(9): el08849.


Carnellia
CsF3H
Flavonoids
Mahajan, M. and S. K. Yadav (2014). “Overexpression


sinensis


of a tea flavanone 3-hydroxylase gene confers tolerance





to salt stress and Alternaria solani in transgenic





tobacco.” Plant Mol Biol 85(6): 551-573.


Arabidopsis
UVR8
Flavonoids
Fasano, R., et al. (2014). “Role of Arabidopsis UV


thaliana


RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 in plant growth reduction





under osmotic stress and low levels of UV-B.” Mol





Plant 7(5): 773-791.


Fagopyrum
FtMYB1/
Proanthocyanidins
Bai, Y.C., et al. (2014). “Characterization of two


tataricum
FtMYB2,

tartary buckwheat R2R3-MYB transcription factors and


Gaertn


their regulation of proanthocyanidin biosynthesis.”





Physiol Plant 152(3): 431-440.


Ipomoea
IbDFR
Anthocyanin
Wang, H., et al. (2013). “Functional characterization of


batatas


Dihydroflavonol-4-reductase in anthocyanin


Lam.


biosynthesis of purple sweet potato underlies the direct





evidence of anthocyanins function against abiotic





stresses.” PLoS One 8(11): e78484.


Theobroma
TcANR/
Proanthocyanidin
Liu, Y., et al. (2013). “Proanthocyanidin synthesis in


cacao
TcLAR

Theobroma cacao: genes encoding anthocyanidin





synthase, anthocyanidin reductase, and





leucoanthocyanidin reductase.” BMC Plant Biol 13:





202.


Solanum
DFR
Flavonoids
Kostyn, K., et al. (2013). “Transgenic potato plants


tuberosum

vitamin C
with overexpression of dihydroflavonol reductase can





serve as efficient nutrition sources.” J Agric Food





Chem 61(27): 6743-6753.


Epimedium
EsMYBA1
Anthocyanin
Huang, W., et al. (2013). “A R2R3-MYB transcription


sagittatum


factor from Epimedium sagittatum regulates the





flavonoid biosynthetic pathway.” PLoS One 8(8):





e70778.


Gentiana
GtMYBP3/
Flavonoids
Nakatsuka, T., et al. (2012). “Isolation and


triflora
GtMYBP4

characterization of GtMYBP3 and GtMYBP4,





orthologues of R2R3-MYB transcription factors that





regulate early flavonoid biosynthesis, in gentian





flowers.” J Exp Bot 63(18): 6505-6517.


Triticum
TaMYB4
Flavonoids
Ma, Q.H., et al. (2011). “TaMYB4 cloned from wheat


aestivum L.


regulates lignin biosynthesis through negatively





controlling the transcripts of both cinnamyl alcohol





dehydrogenase and cinnamoyl-CoA reductase genes.”





Biochimie 93(7): 1179-1186.


Fragaria
EGS/IGS
Eugenol,
Hoffmann, T., et al. (2011). “Metabolic engineering in


vesca

Isoeugenol
strawberry fruit uncovers a dormant biosynthetic





pathway.” Metab Eng 13(5): 527-531.


Populus
MYB134
Proanthocyanidins
Mellway, R.D., et al. (2009). “The wound-, pathogen-,


spp.


and ultraviolet B-responsive MYB134 gene encodes an





R2R3 MYB transcription factor that regulates





proanthocyanidin synthesis in poplar.” Plant Physiol





150(2): 924-941.


Saussure
CHI
Apigenin
Li, F.X., et al. (2006). “Overexpression of the


amedusa


Saussurea medusa chaicone isomerase gene in S.





involucrata hairy root cultures enhances their





biosynthesis of apigenin.” Phytochemistry 67(6):





553-560.


Vitis
VvMYB5a
Phenolic
Deluc, L., et al. (2006). “Characterization of a


vinifera

compounds
grapevine R2R3-MYB transcription factor that





regulates the phenylpropanoid pathway.” Plant Physiol





140(2): 499-511.


Medicago
MtDFR1
Flavonoids
Xie, D.Y., et al. (2004). “Molecular and biochemical


truncatula


analysis of two cDNA clones encoding





dihydroflavonol-4-reductase from Medicago





truncatula.” Plant Physiol 134(3): 979-994.


Solanum
CHS/CHI/DFR
Phenolic acids,
Lukaszewicz, M., et al. (2004). “Antioxidant capacity


tuberosum L.

Anthocyanins
manipulation in transgenic potato tuber by changes in





phenolic compounds content.” J Agric Food Chem





52(6): 1526-1533.


Zea
LC/C1
Flavonoids
Le Gall, G., et al. (2003). “Characterization and content


mays L.


of flavonoid glycosides in genetically modified tomato





(Lycopersicon esculentum) fruits.” J Agric Food Chem





51(9): 2438-2446.


Petunia
Petunia chi-a
Flavonoids
Muir, S.R., et al. (2001). “Overexpression of petunia





chaicone isomerase in tomato results in fruit containing





increased levels of flavonols.” Nat Biotechnol 19(5):





470-474.


Taxus
TcCYP725A
Taxol
Liao, W., et al. (2019). “Sub-cellular localization and


chinensis
22

overexpressing analysis of hydroxylase gene





TcCYP725A22 of Taxus chinensis.” Sheng Wu Gong





Cheng Xue Bao 35(6): 1109-1116.


Lycopersicon
MI0X4
Vitamin C
Munir, S., et al. (2020). “Genome-wide analysis of


esculenturn


Myo-inositol oxygenase gene family in tomato reveals





their involvement in ascorbic acid accumulation.” BMC





Genomics 21(1): 284.


Zea mays L./
ZmPTPN
Vitamin C,
Zhang, H., et al. (2020). “Enhanced Vitamin C


Arabidopsis
AtPTPN
Drought
Production Mediated by an ABA-Induced PTP-like


thaliana

tolerance
Nucleotidase Improves Plant Drought Tolerance in





Arabidopsis and Maize.” Mol Plant 13(5): 760-776.


Elaeis
EgHGGT
Vitamin E
Luo, T., et al. (2020). “Identifying Vitamin E


guineensis


Biosynthesis Genes in Elaeis guineensis by





Genome-Wide Association Study.” J Agric Food Chem





68(2): 678-685.


Zea
ZmTMT
Vitamin E
Zhang, L., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of the maize


mays


gamma-tocopherol methyltransferase gene (ZmTMT)


L.


increases alpha-tocopherol content in transgenic





Arabidopsis and maize seeds.” Transgenic Res 29(1):





95-104.


Zea
ZmPORB2
Vitamin E
Zhan, W., et al. (2019). “An allele of ZmPORB2


mays


encoding a protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase


L.


promotes tocopherol accumulation in both leaves and





kernels of maize.” Plant J 100(1): 114-127.


Pyrus
PbrWRKY53
Vitamin C
Liu, Y., et al. (2019). “A WRKY transcription factor


betulaefolia


PbrWRKY53 from Pyrus betulaefolia is involved in





drought tolerance and As A accumulation.” Plant





Biotechnol J 17(9): 1770-1787.


Arabidopsis
PDX-II
Vitamin B6
Bagri, D.S., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of PDX-II


thaliana.


gene in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) leads to the





enhanced accumulation of vitamin B6 in tuber tissues





and tolerance to abiotic stresses.” Plant Sci 272:





267-275.


Brassica
BjHMGS1
Vitamin E
Liao, P., et al. (2018). “Improved fruit


juncea


alpha-tocopherol, carotenoid, squalene and phytosterol





contents through manipulation of Brassica juncea





3-HYDROXY-3-METHYLGLUTARYL-COA





SYNTHASE1 in transgenic tomato.” Plant Biotechnol J





16(3): 784-796.


Hordeum
HvHGGT
Vitamin E
Chen, J., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of HvHGGT


vulgare L.


Enhances Tocotrienol Levels and Antioxidant Activity





in Barley.” J Agric Food Chem 65(25): 5181-5187.


Medicago
MsHPPD
Vitamin E
Jiang, J., et al. (2017).


sativa L.


“P -HYDROXYPHENYLPYRUVATE





DIOXYGENASE from Medicago sativa is involved in





vitamin E biosynthesis and abscisic acid-mediated seed





germination.” Sci Rep 7: 40625.


Arabidopsis
AtOxR
Vitamin C
Bu, Y., et al. (2016). “Overexpression of AtOxR gene


thaliana


improves abiotic stresses tolerance and vitamin C





content in Arabidopsis thaliana.” BMC Biotechnol





16(1): 69.


Medicago
MsTMT
Vitamin E
Jiang, J., et al. (2016). “Overexpression of Medicago


sativa L.


sativa TMT elevates the alpha-tocopherol content in





Arabidopsis seeds, alfalfa leaves, and delays





dark-induced leaf senescence.” Plant Sci 249: 93-104.


Arabidopsis
AtGCHI
Vitamin B9
Ramirez Rivera, N. G., et al. (2016). “Metabolic


thaliana


engineering of folate and its precursors in Mexican





common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).” Plant





Biotechnol J 14(10): 2021-2032.


Lactuca
LsMT
Vitamin E
Tang, Y., et al. (2016). “Roles of MPBQ-MT in


sativa


Promoting alpha/gamma-Tocopherol Production and





Photosynthesis under High Light in Lettuce.” PLoS





One 11(2): e0148490.


Arabidopsis
VTE6
Vitamin E
Vom Dorp, K., et al. (2015). “Remobilization of Phytol


thaliana


from Chlorophyll Degradation Is Essential for





Tocopherol Synthesis and Growth of Arabidopsis.”





Plant Cell 27(10): 2846-2859.


Triticum
CrtB
Beta-carotene
Zeng, J., et al. (2015). “Metabolic Engineering of


aestivum L.


Wheat Provitamin A by Simultaneously Overexpressing





CrtB and Silencing Carotenoid Hydroxylase (TaHYD).”





J Agric Food Chem 63(41): 9083-9092.


Solanum
SIVKOR
Drought
Yu, Z.B., et al. (2016). “A homologue of vitamin K


lycopersicum

tolerance
epoxide reductase in Solanum lycopersicum is involved




Salt
in resistance to osmotic stress.” Physiol Plant 156(3):




tolerance
311-322.


Oryza
GTPCHI/
Vitamin B9/
Dong, W., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of folate


sativa
ADCS/DHFS/
folate
biosynthesis genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and


L.
FPGS

evaluation of their impact on seed folate content.” Plant





Foods HumNutr 69(4): 379-385.


Strawberry
FaGalUR
Vitamin C
Amaya, I., et al. (2015). “Increased antioxidant capacity





in tomato by ectopic expression of the strawberry





D-galacturonate reductase gene.” Biotechnol J 10(3):





490-500.


Arabidopsis
myo-inositol
Vitamin C
Lisko, K.A., et al. (2013). “Elevating vitamin C


thaliana
oxygenase/

content via overexpression of myo-inositol oxygenase



1-gulono-1,4-

and 1-gulono-1,4-lactone oxidase in Arabidopsis leads



lactone

to enhanced biomass and tolerance to abiotic stresses.”



oxidase

In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 49(6): 643-655.


Perilla
TMT
Vitamin E
Arun, M., et al. (2014). “Transfer and targeted


frutescens


overexpression of gamma-tocopherol methyltransferase





(gamma-TMT) gene using seed-specific promoter





improves tocopherol composition in Indian soybean





cultivars.” Appl Biochem Biotechnol 172(4):





1763-1776.


Arabidopsis
AtTMT
Vitamin E
Zhang, G.Y., et al. (2013). “Increased


thaliana


alpha-tocotrienol content in seeds of transgenic rice





overexpressing Arabidopsis gamma-tocopherol





methyltransferase.” Transgenic Res 22(1): 89-99.


Oryza
NAS
Increase Zn
Johnson, A.A., et al. (2011). “Constitutive


sativa

Fe
overexpression of the OsNAS gene family reveals


L.


single-gene strategies for effective iron- and





zinc-biofortification of rice endosperm.” PLoS One





6(9): e24476.


Zea
crtB/crt1
Vitamin A
Aluru, M., et al. (2008). “Generation of transgenic


mays


maize with enhanced provitamin A content.” J Exp Bot


L.


59(13): 3551-3562.


Arabidopsis
PT/V-TE2 &
Vitamin E
Lee, K., et al. (2007). “Overexpression of Arabidopsis


thaliana
TC/VTE1

homogentisate phytyltransferase or tocopherol cyclase





elevates vitamin E content by increasing





gamma-tocopherol level in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.).”





Mol Cells 24(2): 301-306.


Arabidopsis
VTE1
Vitamin E
Kanwischer, M., et al. (2005). “Alterations in


thaliana


tocopherol cyclase activity in transgenic and mutant





plants of Arabidopsis affect tocopherol content,





tocopherol composition, and oxidative stress.” Plant





Physiol 137(2): 713-723.


Hordeum
4-hydroxyphenyl-
Vitamin E
Falk, J., et al. (2003). “Constitutive overexpression of


vulgare
pyruvate

barley 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase in


L.
dioxygenase

tobacco results in elevation of the vitamin E content in





seeds but not in leaves.” FEBS Lett 540(1-3): 35-40.


Triticum
DHAR
Vitamin C
Chen, Z., et al. (2003). “Increasing vitamin C content of


aestivum L.


plants through enhanced ascorbate recycling.” Proc





Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(6): 3525-3530.


Strawberry
GalUR
Vitamin C
Agius, F., et al. (2003). “Engineering increased vitamin





C levels in plants by overexpression of a





D-galacturonic acid reductase.” Nat Biotechnol 21(2):





177-181.


Arabidopsis
gamma-tocopherol
Vitamin E
Shintani, D. and D. DellaPenna (1998). “Elevating the


thaliana
methyltransferase

vitamin E content of plants through metabolic





engineering.” Science 282(5396): 2098-2100.









Table C lists the important functional genes in oilseed rape. The combination of such genes with those endogenous promoters of oilseed rape can be used to create non-transgenic endogenous high-expression new genes or tissue-specific expression genes by applying the method in the present invention to bring about more application scenarios for breeding. There are also a large number of genes with reported functions in rice, corn, wheat, soybeans and other species. For those functional genes or non-coding RNAs that need to be up-regulated to realize competitive advantages for crops, their combinations with known strong expression promoters are available for creating customized new genes with new expression patterns as per needed by using the method in the present invention.









TABLE C







Important functional genes in oilseed rape









Gene name
Application
Reference





Metallothionein
To improve tolerance to
Pan, Y., et al. (2018). “Genome-Wide


Family
heavy metal toxicity
Characterization and Analysis of Metallothionein


Genes (MT)-

Family Genes That Function in Metal Stress


metallothionein

Tolerance in Brassica napus L.” Int J Mol Sci




19(8).


Alternative
To confer tolerance to
Yang, H., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of


oxidases
osmotic and salt stress
BnaAOX1b Confers Tolerance to Osmotic and Salt


(AOXs)
in oilseed rape
Stress in Rapeseed.” G3 (Bethesda) 9(10):




3501-3511.


CBF/DREB1-
To improve freezing
Savitch, L. V., et al. (2005). “The effect of


like
tolerance and regulate
overexpression of two Brassica CBF/DREB1-like


transcription
chloroplast
transcription factors on photosynthetic capacity and


factors
development, thus to
freezing tolerance in Brassica napus.” Plant Cell


(BnCBF5 and 17)
improve photochemical
Physiol 46(9): 1525-1539.



efficiency and




photosynthetic capacity



Mitogen-
To indicate the
Wang, Z., et al. (2021). “Genome-Wide


activated protein
transcriptional level of
Identification and Analysis of MKK and MAPK


kinase
BnaMKK and
Gene Families in Brassica Species and Response to


(MAPK), Mito
BnaMAPK is usually
Stress in Brassica napus.” Int J Mol Sci 22(2).


gen-activated
regulated by growth,



protein kinase
development and stress



(MAPK)
signal.



Family Genes




pyrab actin
Abiotic stress response
Di, F., et al. (2018). “Genome-Wide Analysis of the


resistance

PYL Gene Family and Identification of PYL Genes


1-like

That Respond to Abiotic Stress in Brassica napus.”


(PYR/PYL)

Genes (Basel) 9(3).


protein gene




family




BnPCS1;
Key factors in cadmium
Ding, Y., et al. (2018). “Screening of candidate


BnHMAs
stress response
gene responses to cadmium stress by RNA




sequencing in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.).”




Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(32): 32433-32446.


APETALA2/e
Cold stress response
Du, C., et al. (2016). “Dynamic transcriptome


thylene

analysis reveals AP2/ERF transcription factors


response

responsible for cold stress in rapeseed (Brassica


factor

napus L.).” Mol Genet Genomics 291(3):


(AP2/ERF)

1053-1067.


transcription




factor (TF)




superfamily




dehydrin,
Cold stress response
Edrisi Maryan, K., et al. (2019). “Analysis of


DHNs

Brassica napus dehydrins and their Co-Expression




regulatory networks in relation to cold stress.”




Gene Expr Patterns 31: 7-17.


WRKY
To adapt to low boron
Feng, Y., et al. (2020). “Transcription factor


transcription
environmental stress
BnaA9.WRKY47 contributes to the adaptation of


factor

Brassica napus to low boron stress by up-regulating


families;

the boric acid channel gene BnaA3.NIP5; 1.” Plant


NIP5.1

Biotechnol J 18(5): 1241-1254.


phosphatidylinositol-
Drought resistance,
Georges, F., et al. (2009). “Over-expression of


phospholipase C2
early flowering and
Brassica napus phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase



maturation
C2 in canola induces significant changes in gene




expression and phytohormone distribution patterns,




enhances drought tolerance and promotes early




flowering and maturation.” Plant Cell Environ




32(12): 1664-1681.


GRAS gene
Root stress response
Guo, P., et al. (2019). “Genome-wide survey and


family

expression analyses of the GRAS gene family in




Brassica napus reveals their roles in root




development and stress response.” Planta 250(4):




1051-1072.


Annexins
Cold stress response
He, X., et al. (2020). “Comprehensive analyses of


(ANN)

the annexin (ANN) gene family in Brassica rapa,


genes

Brassica oleracea and Brassica napus reveals their




roles in stress response.” Sci Rep 10(1): 4295.


CaM
Abiotic stress response
He, X., et al. (2020). “Genome-wide identification


(Calmodulin)/
genes
and expression analysis of CaM/CML genes in


CML

Brassica napus under abiotic stress.” J Plant Physiol


(calmodulin-like)

255: 153251.


genes




WRINKLED1,
Heat tolerance
Huang, R., et al. (2019). “Heat Stress Suppresses


BnWRI1

Brassica napus Seed Oil Accumulation by




Inhibition of Photosynthesis and BnWRI1




Pathway.” Plant Cell Physiol 60(7): 1457-1470.


WAX
To promote growth and
Liu, N., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of WAX


INDUCER1/
increase oil content
INDUCER1/SHINE1 Gene Enhances Wax


SHINE1

Accumulation under Osmotic Stress and Oil


(WIN1)

Synthesis in Brassica napus.” Int J Mol Sci 20(18).


Cytokinin
Relates to pod length
Liu, P., et al. (2018). “Genome-Wide Identification


oxidase/

and Expression Profiling of Cytokinin


dehydrogenases

Oxidase/Dehydrogenase (CKX) Genes Reveal


(CKXs)

Likely Roles in Pod Development and Stress




Responses in Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.).”




Genes (Basel) 9(3).


mitogen-activated
Disease resistance
Wang, Z., et al. (2009). “Overexpression of


protein kinases 4,

Brassica napus MPK4 enhances resistance to


MAPK4

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in oilseed rape.” Mol Plant




Microbe Interact 22(3): 235-244.


ABSCISIC
Stress response
Xu, P. and W. Cai (2019). “Function of Brassica


ACID

napus BnABI3 in Arabidopsis gs1, an Allele of


INSENSITIVE3

AtABI3, in Seed Development and Stress




Response.” Front Plant Sci 10: 67.


Alternative
Tolerance to salt stress
Yang, H., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of


oxidases

BnaAOXlb Confers Tolerance to Osmotic and Salt


(AOXs)

Stress in Rapeseed.” G3 (Bethesda) 9(10):




3501-3511.


Glucosinolate
Resistance to
Zhang, Y., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of Three


Biosynthesis
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Glucosinolate Biosynthesis Genes in Brassica



and Botrytis cinerea
napus Identifies Enhanced Resistance to Sclerotinia




sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea.” PLoS One




10(10): e0140491.


tropinone
Cold resistance
Huang, Y., et al. (2020). “A Brassica napus


reductase

Reductase Gene Dissected by Associative




Transcriptomics Enhances Plant Adaption to




Freezing Stress.” Front Plant Sci 11: 971.


aminoalcohol
Cold resistance
Qi, Q., et al. (2003). “Molecular and biochemical


phosphotransferase

characterization of an


(AAPT1)

aminoalcoholphosphotransferase (AAPT1) from




Brassica napus: effects of low temperature and




abscisic acid treatments on AAPT expression in




Arabidopsis plants and effects of over-expression




of BnAAPT1 in transgenic Arabidopsis.” Planta




217(4): 547-558.


BnSIP1-1
Tolerance to osmotic
Luo, J., et al. (2017). “BnSIP1-1, a Trihelix Family


Trihelix
stress and salt stress
Gene, Mediates Abiotic Stress Tolerance and ABA


Family Gene

Signaling in Brassica napus.” Front Plant Sci 8: 44.


BnGLIP1
Resistance to
Ding, L.N., et al. (2020). “Arabidopsis GDSL1



Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
overexpression enhances rapeseed Sclerotinia




sclerotiorum resistance and the functional




identification of its homolog in Brassica napus.”




Plant Biotechnol J 18(5): 1255-1270.


BnLEA (B.
Resistance to drought
Park, B.J., et al. (2005). Genetic improvement of


napus group 3
and salt stress
Chinese cabbage for salt anddrought tolerance by


late

constitutive expressionof a B. napusLEA gene.


embryogenesis

Plant Science 169: 553-558.


abundant gene




BnPIP1 (B.
Drought resistance
Yu, Q., et al. (2005). Sense and antisense


napus plasma

expression of plasma membrane aquaporin BnPIP1


membrane

from Brassica napus in tobacco and its effects on


aquaporin

plant drought resistance. Plant Science 169:




647-656.


BnLEA 4-1
Drought resistance
Dalal, M., et al. (2019). Abiotic stress and




ABA-inducible Group 4 LEA from Brassica napus




plays a key role in salt and drought tolerance.




Journal of Biotechnology 139: 137-145.


BnCIPK6
Salt resistance, low
Chen, L., et al. (2012) The Brassica napus


(CBL-interact
phosphorous tolerance
Calcineurin B-Like 1/CBL-interacting protein


ing protein

kinase 6 (CBL1/CIPK6) component is involved in


kinase 6)

the plant response to abiotic stress and ABA.


BnCIPK6M

Journal of Experimental Botany 63: 6211-6222.


(CIPK6




phosphomimic




form)




AINTEGUM
High yield
Kuluev, B.R., et al. (2013). “[Morphological


ENTA (ANT)

features of transgenic tobacco plants expressing the


gene

AINTEGUMENTA gene of rape under control of




the Dahlia mosaic virus promoter].” Ontogenez




44(2): 110-114.


BnCOR25
Cold resistance
Chen, L., et al. (2011). “A novel cold-regulated




gene, COR25, of Brassica napus is involved in




plant response and tolerance to cold stress.” Plant




Cell Rep 30(4): 463-471.


BnVQ7
Disease resistance
Zou, Z., et al. (2020). “Genome-Wide Identification


(BnMKS1)

and Analysis of VQ Motif-containing Gene Family




in Brassica napus and Functional Characterization




of BnMKS1 in Response to Leptosphaeria




maculans.” Phytopathology.


b-ketoacyl-A
To improve quality
Gupta, M., et al. (2012). “Transcriptional activation


CP synthase

of Brassica napus beta-ketoacyl-ACP synthase II


II (KASII)

with an engineered zinc finger protein transcription




factor.” Plant Biotechnol J 10(7): 783-791.


BnLEA3,
Drought resistance
Liang, Y., et al. (2019). “Drought-responsive genes,


BnVOC

late embryogenesis abundant group3 (LEA3) and




vicinal oxygen chelate, function in lipid




accumulation in Brassica napus and Arabidopsis




mainly via enhancing photosynthetic efficiency and




reducing ROS.” Plant Biotechnol J 17(11):




2123-2142.


BnaA3.MYB28
To improve quality
Liu, S., et al. (2020). “Dissection of genetic




architecture for glucosinolate accumulations in




leaves and seeds of Brassica napus by genome-wide




association study.” Plant Biotechnol J 18(6):




1472-1484.


BnaA9.CYP78A9
To increase yield
Shi, L., et al. (2019). “A CACTA-like transposable


P450

element in the upstream region of


monooxygenase

BnaA9.CYP78A9 acts as an enhancer to increase




silique length and seed weight in rapeseed.” Plant J




98(3): 524-539.


BnHO-1
Tolerance to Hg
Shen, Q., et al. (2011). “Expression of a Brassica



pollution
napus heme oxygenase confers plant tolerance to




mercury toxicity.” Plant Cell Environ 34(5):




752-763.


Al-activated
Tolerance to aluminum
Ligaba, A., et al. (2006). “The BnALMT1 and


malate
toxicity
BnALMT2 genes from rape encode


transporter)

aluminum-activated malate transporters that




enhance the aluminum resistance of plant cells.”




Plant Physiol 142(3): 1294-1303.


SUPPRESSOR
To increase pod seed
Li, S., et al. (2015). “BnaC9.SMG7b Functions as a


WITH
number
Positive Regulator of the Number of Seeds per


MORPHOGENETIC

Silique in Brassica napus by Regulating the


EFFECTS ON

Formation of Functional Female Gametophytes.”


GENITALIA

Plant Physiol 169(4): 2744-2760.


7




BnaA03.MPK6,
Resistance to
Wang, Z., et al. (2020). “BnaMPK6 is a


mitogen-activated
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
determinant of quantitative disease resistance


protein kinases

against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in oilseed rape.”




Plant Sci 291: 110362.


PHT1
To improve phosphate
Ren, F., et al. (2014). “A Brassica napus PHT1


phosphate
uptake
phosphate transporter, BnPht1; 4, promotes


transporter,

phosphate uptake and affects roots architecture of


BnPht1; 4

transgenic Arabidopsis.” Plant Mol Biol 86(6):




595-607.


proline-rich,
To increase yield
Haffani, Y. Z., et al. (2006). “Altered Expression of


extensin-like

PERK Receptor Kinases in Arabidopsis Leads to


receptor

Changes in Growth and Floral Organ Formation.”


kinase

Plant Signal Behav 1(5): 251-260.


(PERK)




BnSIP1-1
Tolerance to osmotic
Luo, J., et al. (2017). “BnSIP1-1, a Trihelix Family



and salt stress in
Gene, Mediates Abiotic Stress Tolerance and ABA



germination stage
Signaling in Brassica napus.” Front Plant Sci 8: 44.


LTP2
To increase trichome
Peng, D., et al. (2018). “Enhancing freezing



density, change
tolerance of Brassica napus L. by overexpression of



secondary metabolite
a stearoyl-acyl carrier protein desaturase gene



concentration
(SAD) from Sapium sebiferum (L.) Roxb.” Plant




Sci 272: 32-41.


BnPGIP2
Resistance to
Wang, Z., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of



Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
OsPGIP2 confers Sclerotinia sclerotiorum




resistance in Brassica napus through increased




activation of defense mechanisms.” J Exp Bot




69(12): 3141-3155.


BnLAS
To increase plant
Yang, M., et al. (2011). “Overexpression of the



drought tolerance
Brassica napus BnLAS gene in Arabidopsis affects




plant development and increases drought




tolerance.” Plant Cell Rep 30(3): 373-388.


CBF/
To improve
Savitch, L.V., et al. (2005). “The effect of


dreb1type
photosynthetic capacity
overexpression of two Brassica CBF/DREB1-like


transcription
and freezing tolerance
transcription factors on photosynthetic capacity and


factor

freezing tolerance in Brassica napus.” Plant Cell




Physiol 46(9): 1525-1539.


BnWRKY33
To enhance resistance
Wang, Z., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of



to Sclerotinia
BnWRKY33 in oilseed rape enhances resistance to



sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.” Mol Plant Pathol 15(7):




677-689.


BnSCE3
To inhibit sinapine
Clauss, K., et al. (2011). “Overexpression of



accumulation
sinapine esterase BnSCE3 in oilseed rape seeds




triggers global changes in seed metabolism.” Plant




Physiol 155(3): 1127-1145.


MYB43
Positively regulates
Jiang, J., et al. (2020). “MYB43 in Oilseed Rape



vascular lignification,
(Brassica napus) Positively Regulates Vascular



plant morphology and
Lignification, Plant Morphology and Yield



Yield potential but
Potential but Negatively Affects Resistance to



negatively affects
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.” Genes (Basel) 11(5).



resistance to Sclerotinia




sclerotiorum



PAT15
To increase branch and
Peng, D., et al. (2018). “Increasing branch and seed



seed yield
yield through heterologous expression of the novel




rice S-acyl transferase gene OsPAT15 in Brassica




napus L.” Breed Sci 68(3): 326-335.


BnNRT2.2
To increase nitrate
Faure-Rabasse, S., et al. (2002). “Effects of nitrate



influx rates
pulses on BnNRT1 and BnNRT2 genes: mRNA




levels and nitrate influx rates in relation to the




duration of N deprivation in Brassica napus L.” J




Exp Bot 53(375): 1711-1721.









Table D lists important functional genes in some horticulture crops. Methods in the present invention can be used to edit such genes and create new genes by designing new combinations of different gene elements or different protein domain.









TABLE D







Important functional genes in horticulture crops










Crop
Gene name
Application
Reference





Apple
MdATG18a
Thermo tolerance
Huo, L., et al. (2020). “MdATG18a





overexpression improves basal





thermotolerance in transgenic apple by





decreasing damage to chloroplasts.” Hortic





Res 7: 21.


Apple
MdSPL13
Salt stressresistance
Ma, Y., et al. (2021). “The miR156/SPL





module regulates apple salt stress tolerance





by activating MdWRKY100 expression.”





Plant Biotechnol J 19(2): 311-323.


Apple
MdDREB76
Drought tolerance
Sharma, V., et al. (2019). “An apple




and salt resistance
transcription factor, MdDREB76, confers salt





and drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco





by activating the expression of





stress-responsive genes.” Plant Cell Rep





38(2): 221-241.


Apple
MdANK2B
Salt tolerance and
Zhang, F. J., et al. (2021). “The ankyrin




ABA sensitivity
repeat-containing protein MdANK2B





regulates salt tolerance and ABA sensitivity





in Malus domestica.” Plant Cell Rep 40(2):





405-419.


Apple
MdbHLH3
Quality,
Yu, J.Q., et al. (2021). “The apple bHLH




carbohydrate and
transcription factor MdbHLH3 functions in




malic acid
determining the fruit carbohydrates and





malate.” Plant Biotechnol J 19(2): 285-299.


Apple
MdIAA24
Drought tolerance
Huang, D., et al. (2021). “Overexpression of





MdIAA24 improves apple drought resistance





by positively regulating strigolactone





biosynthesis and mycorrhization.” Tree





Physiol 41(1): 134-146.


Apple
MdNAC42
Anthocyanin
Zhang, S., et al. (2020). “A novel NAC





transcription factor, MdNAC42, regulates





anthocyanin accumulation in red-fleshed





apple by interacting with MdMYB10.” Tree





Physiol 40(3): 413-423.


Apple
MdHAL3
Salt tolerance
Yang, S., et al. (2020). “MdHAL3, a





4′-phosphopantothenoylcysteine





decarboxylase, is involved in the salt





tolerance of autotetraploid apple.” Plant Cell





Rep 39(11): 1479-1491.


Apple
MdWRKY11-
Copper tolerance
Shi, K., et al. (2020). “MdWRKY11 improves



MdHMA5

copper tolerance by directly promoting the





expression of the copper transporter gene





MdHMA5.” Hortic Res 7: 105.


Apple
MdATG9
Nitrogen stress
Huo, L., et al. (2020). “The Apple





Autophagy-Related Gene MdATG9 Confers





Tolerance to Low Nitrogen in Transgenic





Apple Callus.” Front Plant Sci 11: 423.


Apple
MdATG10
Salt tolerance
Huo, L., et al. (2020). “Increased autophagic





activity in roots caused by overexpression of





the autophagy-related gene MdATG10 in





apple enhances salt tolerance.” Plant Sci 294:





110444.


Apple
MdTYDC
alleviate replant
Gao, T., et al. (2020). “Exogenous dopamine




disease
and overexpression of the dopamine synthase





gene MdTYDC alleviated apple replant





disease.” Tree Physiol.


Apple
MdWRKY26/
Salt tolerance and
Dong, Q., et al. (2020). “MdWRKY30, a



28/30
osmotic stress
group Ila WRKY gene from apple, confers





tolerance to salinity and osmotic stresses in





transgenic apple callus and Arabidopsis





seedlings.” Plant Sci 299: 110611.


Apple
MdCERK1-2
resistance to
Chen, Q., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of an




pathogenic fungus
apple LysM-containing protein gene,





MdCERK1-2, confers improved resistance to





the pathogenic fungus, Alternaria alternata, in





Nicotiana benthamiana.” BMC Plant Biol





20(1): 146.


Apple
MdBAK1
Growth and
Zheng, L., et al. (2019). “Transcriptome




development
Analysis Reveals New Insights into





MdBAK1-Mediated Plant Growth in Malus





domestica.” J Agric Food Chem 67(35):





9757-9771.


Apple
MdWRKY100
Resistance to
Zhang, F., et al. (2019). “MdWRKY100




Colletotrichum
encodes a group I WRKY transcription factor




gloeosporioides
in Malus domestica that positively regulates




infection
resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides





infection.” Plant Sci 286: 68-77.


Apple
Ma10
Acidity
Ma, B., et al. (2019). “A Ma10 gene encoding





P-type ATPase is involved in fruit organic





acid accumulation in apple.” Plant Biotechnol





J 17(3): 674-686.


Apple
MdNAC1
Drought resistance
Jia, D., et al. (2019). “An apple (Malus





domestica) NAC transcription factor enhances





drought tolerance in transgenic apple plants.”





Plant Physiol Biochem 139: 504-512.


Apple
MdIAA9
Osmotic stress
Huang, D., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of





MdIAA9 confers high tolerance to osmotic





stress in transgenic tobacco.” PeerJ 7: e7935.


Apple
MdABCG28
Stem growth
Feng, Y., et al. (2019). “Genome-Wide





Identification and Characterization of ABC





Transporters in Nine Rosaceae Species





Identifying MdABCG28 as a Possible





Cytokinin Transporter linked to Dwarfing.”





Int J Mol Sci 20(22).


Apple
MdWRKY9
Dwarfing
Zheng, X., et al. (2018). “MdWRKY9





overexpression confers intensive dwarfing in





the M26 rootstock of apple by directly





inhibiting brassinosteroid synthetase





MdDWF4 expression.” New Phytol 217(3):





1086-1098.


Apple
MdERF1B
Anthocyanin
Zhang, J., et al. (2018). “The ethylene





response factor MdERF1B regulates





anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin





biosynthesis in apple.” Plant Mol Biol 98(3):





205-218.


Apple
MdATG18a
Drought tolerance
Sun, X., et al. (2018). “Improvement of





drought tolerance by overexpressing





MdATG18a is mediated by modified





antioxidant system and activated autophagy in





transgenic apple.” Plant Biotechnol J 16(2):





545-557.


Apple
MdWRKY79-
Fungus resistance
Meng, D., et al. (2018). “Sorbitol Modulates



MdNLR16

Resistance to Alternaria altemata by





Regulating the Expression of an NLR





Resistance Gene in Apple.” Plant Cell 30(7):





1562-1581.


Apple
MdSAP15
Drought tolerance
Dong, Q., et al. (2018). “Genome-Wide





Analysis and Cloning of the Apple





Stress-Associated Protein Gene Family





Reveals MdSAP15, Which Confers Tolerance





to Drought and Osmotic Stresses in





Transgenic Arabidopsis.” Int J Mol Sci 19(9).


Pepper
CaNAC46
Salt and drought
Ma, J., et al. (2021). “The NAC-type




tolerance
transcription factor CaNAC46 regulates the





salt and drought tolerance of transgenic





Arabidopsis thaliana.” BMC Plant Biol 21(1):





11.


Pepper
CaSBP08
Phytophthora
Zhang, H.X., et al. (2020). “Identification of




capsici resistance
Pepper CaSBP08 Gene in Defense Response





Against Phytophthora capsici Infection.”





Front Plant Sci 11: 183.


Pepper
CaMLO6
Thermo resistance
Yang, S., et al. (2020). “Pepper CaMLO6





Negatively Regulates Ralstonia solanacearum





Resistance and Positively Regulates High





Temperature and High Humidity Responses.”





Plant Cell Physiol 61(7): 1223-1238.


Pepper
CaCBL1
Ralstonia
Shen, L., et al. (2020). “CaCBL1 Acts as a




solanacearum
Positive Regulator in Pepper Response to




resistance
Ralstonia solanacearum.” Mol Plant Microbe





Interact 33(7): 945-957.


Pepper
CaNHL4
Pathogenic bacteria
Liu, C., et al. (2020). “Genome-wide analysis




resistance
of NDR1/HIN1-like genes in pepper





(Capsicum annuum L.) and functional





characterization of CaNHL4 under biotic and





abiotic stresses.” Hortic Res 7: 93.


Pepper
CaHsp26.5
Virus defense
Foong, S. L. et al. (2020). “Capsicum annum





Hsp26.5 promotes defense responses against





RNA viruses via ATAF2 but is hijacked as a





chaperone for tobamovirus movement





protein.” J Exp Bot 71(19): 6142-6158.


Pepper
CaChiVI2
Thermo tolerance
Ali, M., et al. (2020). “The CaChiVI2 Gene of




and disease
Capsicum annuum L. Confers Resistance




resistance
Against Heat Stress and Infection of





Phytophthora capsici.” Front Plant Sci 11:





219.


Pepper
CaLRR-RLK1
Ralstonia
Mou, S., et al. (2019). “CaLRR-RLK1, a




solanacearum
novel RD receptor-like kinase from Capsicum




resistance
annuum and transcriptionally activated by





CaHDZ27, act as positive regulator in





Ralstonia solanacearum resistance.” BMC





Plant Biol 19(1): 28.


Pepper
CaHSP16.4
Thermo and
Huang, L.J., et al. (2019). “CaHSP16.4, a




drought tolerance
small heat shock protein gene in pepper, is





involved in heat and drought tolerance.”





Protoplasma 256(1): 39-51.


Pepper
CaWRKY41
Ralstonia
Dang, F., et al. (2019). “A feedback loop




solanacearum
between CaWRKY41 and H2O2 coordinates




resistance
the response to Ralstonia solanacearum and





excess cadmium in pepper.” J Exp Bot 70(5):





1581-1595.


Pepper
CaC3H14
Ralstonia
Qiu, A., et al. (2018). “CaC3H14 encoding a




solanacearum
tandem CCCH zinc finger protein is directly




resistance
targeted by CaWRKY40 and positively





regulates the response of pepper to





inoculation by Ralstonia solanacearum.” Mol





Plant Pathol 19(10): 2221-2235.


Pepper
CaWRKY22
Ralstonia
Hussain, A., et al. (2018). “CaWRKY22 Acts




solanacearum
as a Positive Regulator in Pepper Response to




resistance
Ralstonia Solanacearum by Constituting





Networks with CaWRKY6, CaWRKY27,





CaWRKY40, and CaWRKY58.” Int J Mol Sci





19(5).


Pepper
CaHSL1
Thermo tolerance
Guan, D., et al. (2018). “CaHSL1 Acts as a





Positive Regulator of Pepper





Thermotolerance Under High Humidity and Is





Transcriptionally Modulated by





CaWRKY40.” Front Plant Sci 9: 1802.


Pepper
HsfB2a
Thermo tolerance
Ashraf, M.F., et al. (2018). “Capsicum




and Ralstonia
annuum HsfB2a Positively Regulates the




solanacearum
Response to Ralstonia solanacearum Infection




resistance
or High Temperature and High Humidity





Forming Transcriptional Cascade with





CaWRKY6 and CaWRKY40.” Plant Cell





Physiol 59(12): 2608-2623.


Pepper
CanPI7
Insect resistance
Tanpure, R.S., et al. (2017). “Improved





tolerance against Helicoverpa armigera in





transgenic tomato over-expressing





multi-domain proteinase inhibitor gene from





Capsicum annuum.” Physiol Mol Biol Plants





23(3): 597-604.


Pepper
CaRDR1
Resistance to
Qin, L., et al. (2017). “CaRDR1, an




TMV
RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Plays a





Positive Role in Pepper Resistance against





TMV.” Front Plant Sci 8: 1068.


Pepper
CaLRR51
Ralstonia
Cheng, W., et al. (2017). “A novel




solanacearum
leucine-rich repeat protein, CaLRR51, acts as




resistance
a positive regulator in the response of pepper





to Ralstonia solanacearum infection.” Mol





Plant Pathol 18(8): 1089-1100.


Pepper
CabZIP63
High temperature
Shen, L., et al. (2016). “Pepper CabZIP63




tolerance
acts as a positive regulator during Ralstonia





solanacearum or high temperature-high





humidity challenge in a positive feedback





loop with CaWRKY40.” J Exp Bot 67(8):





2439-2451.


Pepper
CaWRKY6
Ralstonia
Cai, H., et al. (2015). “CaWRKY6




solanacearum
transcriptionally activates CaWRKY40,




resistance
regulates Ralstonia solanacearum resistance,





and confers high-temperature and





high-humidity tolerance in pepper.” J Exp Bot





66(11): 3163-3174.


Pepper
CaDSR6
Drought and salt
Kim, E.Y., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of




tolerance
CaDSR6 increases tolerance to drought and





salt stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants.”





Gene 552(1): 146-154.


Pepper
CaWRKY27
Ralstonia
Dang, F., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of




solanacearum
CaWRKY27, a subgroup lie WRKY




resistance
transcription factor of Capsicum annuum,





positively regulates tobacco resistance to





Ralstonia solanacearum infection.” Physiol





Plant 150(3): 397-411.


Pepper
CaAMP1
Fungus resistance
Lee, S.C., et al. (2008). “Involvement of the





pepper antimicrobial protein CaAMP1 gene in





broad spectrum disease resistance.” Plant





Physiol 148(2): 1004-1020.


Pepper
CaPMEI1
Fungus resistance
An, S.H., et al. (2008). “Pepper pectin





methylesterase inhibitor protein CaPMEI1 is





required for antifungal activity, basal disease





resistance and abiotic stress tolerance.” Planta





228(1): 61-78.


Grape
VvChi5,
Fungus resistance,
Zheng, T., et al. (2020). “Chitinase family



VvChi17,
fruit storage
genes in grape differentially expressed in a



VvChi22,

manner specific to fruit species in response to



VvChi26

Botrytis cinerea.” Mol Biol Rep 47(10):



VvChi31

7349-7363.


Albizia
IpDGAT2
Lipid content
Fan, R., et al. (2021). “Characterization of


julibrissin


diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2 from Idesia





polycarpa and function analysis.” Chem Phys





Lipids 234: 105023.


Grape
VvBAP1
Thermo stress
Ye, Q., et al. (2020). “VvBAPI1 a Grape C2




tolerance
Domain Protein, Plays a Positive Regulatory





Role Under Heat Stress.” Front Plant Sci 11:





544374.


Grape
VvKCS
Salt tolerance
Yang, Z., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of





beta-Ketoacyl-CoA Synthase From Vitis





vinifera L. Improves Salt Tolerance in





Arabidopsis thaliana.” Front Plant Sci 11:





564385.


Grape
VvCKX5
To reduce the
Moriyama, A., et al. (2020). “Crosstalk




number of flower
Pathway between Trehalose Metabolism and




buds per
Cytokinin Degradation for the Determination




inflorescence
of the Number of Berries per Bunch in





Grapes.” Cells 9(11).


Grape
VvCEB1opt
Drought tolerance
Lim, S.D., et al. (2020). “Plant tissue





succulence engineering improves water-use





efficiency, water-deficit stress attenuation and





salinity tolerance in Arabidopsis.” Plant J





103(3): 1049-1072.


Grape
VvERF1
Botrytis cinerea
Dong, T., et al. (2020). “The Effect of




resistance
Ethylene on the Color Change and Resistance





to Botrytis cinerea Infection in ‘Kyoho’ Grape





Fruits.” Foods 9(7).


Grape
VvSUC11,
To enhance drought
Cai, Y., et al. (2020). “Expression of Sucrose



VvSUC27
resistance
Transporters from Vitis vinifera Confer High





Yield and Enhances Drought Resistance in





Arabidopsis.” Int J Mol Sci 21(7).


Grape
VvWRKY30
improve salt stress
Zhu, D., et al. (2019). “VvWRKY30, a grape




tolerance
WRKY transcription factor, plays a positive





regulatory role under salinity stress.” Plant





Sci 280: 132-142.


Grape
VvSWEET10
increase sugar
Zhang, Z., et al. (2019). “VvSWEET10




accumulation
Mediates Sugar Accumulation in Grapes.”





Genes (Basel) 10(4).


Grape
VvDOF3
enhance powdery
Yu, Y.H., et al. (2019). “Grape (Vitis




mildew resistance
vinifera) VvDOF3 functions as a transcription





activator and enhances powdery mildew





resistance.” Plant Physiol Biochem 143:





183-189.


Grape
VvTIFY9
Closely relates to
Yu, Y., et al. (2019). “Functional




sa-mediated
Characterization of Resistance to Powdery




powdery mildew
Mildew of VvTIFY9 from Vitis vinifera.” Int




resistance in grapes
J Mol Sci 20(17).


Grape
VdMYB1
Positively regulates
Yu, Y., et al. (2019). “The grapevine




defensive response
R2R3-type MYB transcription factor




and increases
VdMYB1 positively regulates defense




resveratrol content
responses by activating the stilbene synthase




in leaves
gene 2 (VdSTS2).” BMC Plant Biol 19(1):





478.


Grape
VaERF092
improve cold
Sun, X., et al. (2019). “The ethylene response



VaWRKY33
tolerance
factor VaERF092 from Amur grape regulates





the transcription factor VaWRKY33,





improving cold tolerance.” Plant J 99(5):





988-1002.


Grape
VqSTS6
enhance ethylene
Liu, M., et al. (2019). “Expression of stilbene




compounds
synthase VqSTS6 from wild Chinese Vitis




accumulation and
quinquangularis in grapevine enhances




improve disease
resveratrol production and powdery mildew




resistance
resistance.” Planta 250(6): 1997-2007.


Grape
VbDFR
To increase
Zhu, Y., et al. (2018). “Molecular Cloning




anthocyanin
and Functional Characterization of a




production in
Dihydroflavonol 4-Reductase from Vitis




flowers
bellula.” Molecules 23(4).


Grape
VvCEB1opt
To show larger
Lim, S.D., et al. (2018). “A Vitis vinifera




cells, organ size
basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor




and vegetative
enhances plant cell size, vegetative biomass




biomass
and reproductive yield.” Plant Biotechnol J.


Grape
VpSBP16
To improve
Hou, H., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of a




tolerance to salt and
SBP-Box Gene (VpSBP16) from Chinese




drought stress
Wild Vitis Species in Arabidopsis Improves





Salinity and Drought Stress Tolerance.” Int J





Mol Sci 19(4).


Grape
VpTNL1
Resistance to strong
Wen, Z., et al. (2017). “Constitutive




pathogenic bacteria
heterologous overexpression of a




pseudomonas
TIR-NB-ARC-LRR gene encoding a putative




syringae
disease resistance protein from wild Chinese





Vitis pseudoreticulata in Arabidopsis and





tobacco enhances resistance to





phytopathogenic fungi and bacteria.” Plant





Physiol Biochem 112: 346-361.


Grape
VpRH2
Resistance to
Wang, L., et al. (2017). “RING-H2-type E3




powdery mildew
gene VpRH2 from Vitis pseudoreticulata





improves resistance to powdery mildew by





interacting with VpGRP2A.” J Exp Bot 68(7):





1669-1687.


Grape
VvVHP1; 2
To improve
Sun, T., et al. (2017). “VvVHP2; 2 Is




anthocyaninaccumu
Transcriptionally Activated by VvMYBA1




lation
and Promotes Anthocyanin Accumulation of





Grape Berry Skins via Glucose Signal.” Front





Plant Sci 8: 1811.


Grape
VaPUB
Be able to have
Jiao, L., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of a




quick response to
stress-responsive U-box protein gene VaPUB




biotic and abiotic
affects the accumulation of resistance related




stress and
proteins in Vitis vinifera ‘Thompson




obviously affect
Seedless’.” Plant Physiol Biochem 112:




accumulation of
53-63.




disease resistance





related proteins



Epimedium
EsMYB9
To increase
Huang, W., et al. (2017). “Functional




anthocyanin and
Characterization of a Novel R2R3-MYB




flavonol content
Transcription Factor Modulating the





Flavonoid Biosynthetic Pathway from





Epimedium sagittatum.” Front Plant Sci 8:





1274.


Grape
VvSUC27
To play an
Cai, Y., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of a




important role in
Grapevine Sucrose Transporter (VvSUC27) in




biotic and abiotic
Tobacco Improves Plant Growth Rate in the




stress response,
Presence of Sucrose In vitro.” Front Plant Sci




especially in the
8: 1069.




presence of sucrose



Grape
VqDUF642
To promote plant
Xie, X. and Y. Wang (2016). “VqDUF642, a




growth, reduce
gene isolated from the Chinese grape Vitis




botrytis cinerea
quinquangularis, is involved in berry




sensibility and
development and pathogen resistance.” Planta




enhance resistance
244(5): 1075-1094.




to erysipelas and





Metarhizium





anisopliae



Grape
VaCPK20
To make stress
Dubrovina, A.S., et al. (2015). “VaCPK20, a




response in
calcium-dependent protein kinase gene of




non-stress
wild grapevine Vitis amurensis Rupr.,




conditions,
mediates cold and drought stress tolerance.” J




post-freezing and
Plant Physiol 185: 1-12.




drought stress



Grape
VaCPK29
Positively regulates
Aleynova, O.A., et al. (2015). “Regulation of



VaCPK20
factors take part in
resveratrol production in Vitis amurensis cell




the biosynthesis of
cultures by calcium-dependent protein




resveratrol
kinases.” Appi Biochem Biotechnol 175(3):





1460-1476.


Grape
VvABF2
The overexpression
Nicolas, P., et al. (2014). “The basic leucine




strongly enhances
zipper transcription factor ABSCISIC ACID




the accumulation of
RESPONSE ELEMENT-BINDING




diphenylethene
FACTOR2 is an important transcriptional




(resveratrol) which
regulator of abscisic acid-dependent grape




is beneficial to
berry ripening processes.” Plant Physiol




plant defense and
164(1): 365-383.




human healthy



Grape
VvDRT100-L
To obtain
Fujimori, N., et al. (2014). “Plant




adaptability,
DNA-damage repair/toleration 100 protein




tolerance and DNA
repairs UV-B-induced DNA damage.” DNA




repairation to
Repair (Amst) 21: 171-176.




ultraviolet light





stress



Grape
VvWRKY1
To enhance
Marchive, C., et al. (2013). “Over-expression




resistance to downy
of VvWRKY1 in grapevines induces




mildew in grapes
expression of jasmonic acid pathway-related





genes and confers higher tolerance to the





downy mildew.” PLoS One 8(1): e54185.


Grape
VvIAA19
To hasten growth
Kohno, M., et al. (2012).




speed, including
“Auxin-nonresponsive grape Aux/IAA19 is a




root elongation and
positive regulator of plant growth.” Mol Biol




flower
Rep 39(2): 911-917.




transformation



Grape
VvCBF2
Tolerance to cold,
Kobayashi, M., et al. (2012).



VvZFPL
drought and salt
“Characterization of grape C-repeat-binding




stress
factor 2 and B-box-type zinc finger protein in





transgenic Arabidopsis plants under stress





conditions.” Mol Biol Rep 39(8): 7933-7939.


Grape
VvMYB5b
Anthocyanin and
Deluc, L., et al. (2008). “The transcription




procyanidine
factor VvMYB5b contributes to the regulation




derivate
of anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin




accumulation
biosynthesis in developing grape berries.”





Plant Physiol 147(4): 2041-2053.


Grape
VvWRKY2
Resistance to
Mzid, R., et al. (2007). “Overexpression of




fungal pathogens
VvWRKY2 in tobacco enhances broad





resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens.”





Physiol Plant 131(3): 434-447.


Grape
VvWRKY1
Resistance to
Marchive, C., et al. (2007). “Isolation and




fungal pathogens
characterization of a Vitis vinifera





transcription factor, VvWRKY1, and its





effect on responses to fungal pathogens in





transgenic tobacco plants.” J Exp Bot 58(8):





1999-2010.


Grape
VvMYBSa
To increase the
Deluc, L., et al. (2006). “Characterization of a




biosynthesis of
grapevine R2R3-MYB transcription factor




condensed tannins
that regulates the phenylpropanoid pathway.”




and change xylogen
Plant Physiol 140(2): 499-511.




metabolism



Eggplant
SmMYB44
Ralstonia
Qiu, Z., et al. (2019). “The eggplant




solanacearum
transcription factor myb44 enhances




resistance
resistance to bacterial wilt by activating the





expression of spermidine synthase”. Journal





of Experimental Botany(19), 19.


Eggplant
SmMYB1
Anthocyanin
Zhang, Y., et al. (2014). “Anthocyanin




accumulation
accumulation and molecular analysis of





anthocyanin biosynthesis-associated genes in





eggplant (Solanum melongena L.).” Journal





of Agricultural & Food Chemistry 62(13):





2906.


Eggplant
SmCBFs
Anthocyanin
Zhou, L., et al. (2019). “CBFs Function in



SmMYB113
accumulation
Anthocyanin Biosynthesis by Interacting with





MYB113 in Eggplant (Solanum melongena





L.).” Plant and Cell Physiology(2): 2.


Eggplant
SmMLO1
Powdery mildew
Bracuto, V., et al. (2017). “Functional




susceptibility genes
characterization of the powdery mildew





susceptibility gene SmMLO1 in eggplant





(Solanum melongena L.).” Transgenic





Research 26(3): 1-8.


Chinese
BrANT-1
To regulate organ
Ding, Q., et al. (2018). “Ectopic expression of


cabbage

size of Chinese
a Brassica rapa AINTEGUMENTA gene




cabbage
(BrANT-1) increases organ size and stomatal





density in Arabidopsis.” Sci Rep 8(1):





10528.8(1):10528-.


Chinese
Brnym1
To keep green
Wang, N., et al. (2020). “Defect in Brnym1, a


cabbage

phenotype of leaves
magnesium-dechelatase protein, causes a





stay-green phenotype in an EMS-mutagenized





Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp.





pekinensis) line.” Hortic Res 7(1): 8.


Chinese
BrARGOS
To regulate organ
Wang, B., et al. (2010). “Ectopic expression


cabbage

size of Chinese
of a Chinese cabbage BrARGOS gene in




cabbage
Arabidopsis increases organ size.” Transgenic





Res 19(3): 461-472.


Chinese
Bra040093
Relates to petal
Peng, S., et al. (2019). “Mutation of ACX1, a


cabbage

development in
Jasmonic Acid Biosynthetic Enzyme, Leads




Chinese cabbage
to Petal Degeneration in Chinese Cabbage





(Brassica campestris ssp. pekinensis).” Int J





Mol Sci 20(9).


Chinese
BrpSPL9-2
Early-maturing
Wang, Y., et al. (2014). “BrpSPL9 (Brassica


cabbage

improvement
rapa ssp. pekinensis SPL9) controls the





earliness of heading time in Chinese





cabbage.” Plant Biotechnol J 12(3): 312-321.


Chinese
BrWRKY12
Resistance to carrot
Kim, H.S., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of


cabbage

bacterial blight
the Brassica rapa transcription factor





WRKY12 results in reduced soft rot





symptoms caused by Pectobacterium





carotovorum in Arabidopsis and Chinese





cabbage.” Plant Biol (Stuttg) 16(5): 973-981.


Radish
RsPAP2
Anthocyanin
Fan, L., et al. (2020). “A genome-wide




accumulation
association study uncovers a critical role of





the RsPAP2 gene in red-skinned Raphanus





sativus L.” Hortic Res 7: 164.


Radish
RsCPA31
Salt stress tolerance
Wang, Y., et al. (2020). “Genome-Wide



(RsNHX1)

Identification and Functional Characterization





of the Cation Proton Antiporter (CPA) Family





Related to Salt Stress Response in Radish





(Raphanus sativus L.).” Int J Mol Sci 21(21).


Radish
RsOFP2.3
To regulate
Wang, Y., et al. (2020). “Characterization of




tuberous root shape
the OFP Gene Family and its Putative





Involvement of Tuberous Root Shape in





Radish.” Int J Mol Sci 21(4).


Pepper
CaASR1
Ralstonia
Huang, J., et al. (2020). “CaASR1 promotes




solanacearum
salicylic acid- but represses jasmonic




resistance
acid-dependent signaling to enhance the





resistance of Capsicum annuum to bacterial





wilt by modulating CabZIP63.” J Exp Bot





71(20): 6538-6554.


Pepper
CaChiVI2
Thermo and
Ali, M., et al. (2020). “The CaChiVI2 Gene of




drought tolerance
Capsicum annuum L. Confers Resistance





Against Heat Stress and Infection of





Phytophthora capsici.” Front Plant Sci 11:





219.


Pepper
CaNACO35
Tolerance to abiotic
Zhang, H., et al. (2020). “Molecular and




stresses
Functional Characterization of CaNAC035,





an NAC Transcription Factor From Pepper





(Capsicum annuum L.).” Front Plant Sci 11:





14.









Table E lists the representative functional genes in soybean. Methods in the present invention can be used to edit such genes and create new genes by designing new combinations of different gene elements or different protein domain, and can be utilized in soybean breeding program.









TABLE E







Important functional genes in soybean










Gene name
Gene number
Application
Reference





GmDIR27
Glyma.05g213400
Resistance to
Ma, X., et al. (2021). “Functional




pod cracking
characterization of soybean (Glycine max)





DIRIGENT genes reveals an important role of





GmDIR27 in the regulation of pod





dehiscence.” Genomics 113(1 Pt 2): 979-990.


GmG6PDH2
Glyma.19G082300
Salt tolerance
Zhao, Y., et al. (2020). “Genome-Wide





Analysis of the Glucose-6-Phosphate





Dehydrogenase Family in Soybean and





Functional Identification of GmG6PDH2





Involvement in Salt Stress.” Front Plant Sci





11: 214.


GmPLDalpha1
Glyma.01G215100
Root nodule
Zhang, G., et al. (2020). “Phospholipase D-




development
and phosphatidic acid-mediated phospholipid





metabolism and signaling modulate symbiotic





interaction and nodulation in soybean (Glycine






max).” Plant J.



GmGPA3
Glyma.20G32900
Growth
Wei, Z., et al. (2020). “GmGPA3 is involved in




development
post-Golgi trafficking of storage proteins and





cell growth in soybean cotyledons.” Plant Sci





294: 110423.


GmNMHC5
Glyma.13G255200
Development
Wang, W., et al. (2020). “GmNMHC5, A




stage
Neoteric Positive Transcription Factor of





Flowering and Maturity in Soybean.” Plants





(Basel) 9(6).


GmPRR37
Glyma.12G073900
Development
Wang, L., et al. (2020). “Natural variation and




stage
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutation in





GmPRR37 affect photoperiodic flowering and





contribute to regional adaptation of soybean.”





Plant Biotechnol J 18(9): 1869-1881.


GmDRR1
Glyma.11G150400.1
Root nodule
Shi, Y., et al. (2020). “RNA




development
Sequencing-Associated Study Identifies





GmDRR1 as Positively Regulating the





Establishment of Symbiosis in Soybean.” Mol





Plant Microbe Interact 33(6): 798-807.


GmMYB29A2
Glyma.02G005600
Resistance to
Jahan, M. A., et al. (2020). “Glyceollin




phytophthora
Transcription Factor GmMYB29A2 Regulates




sojae
Soybean Resistance to Phytophthora sojae.”





Plant Physiol 183(2): 530-546.


GmMYB68
Glyma.04G042300.1
Salt alkali
He, Y., et al. (2020). “Functional activation of




tolerance
a novel R2R3-MYB protein gene, GmMYB68,





confers salt-alkali resistance in soybean





(Glycine max L.).” Genome 63(1): 13-26.


GmCDF1
Glyma.08G102000
Salt tolerance
Zhang, W., et al. (2019). “A cation diffusion





facilitator, GmCDF1, negatively regulates salt





tolerance in soybean.” PLoS Genet 15(1):





e1007798.


GmBTB/POZ
Glyma.04G244900
Resistance to
Zhang, C., et al. (2019). “GmBTB/POZ, a




phytophthora
novel BTB/POZ domain-containing nuclear




sojae
protein, positively regulates the response of





soybean to Phytophthora sojae infection.” Mol





Plant Pathol 20(1): 78-91.


GmSnRK1.1
Glyma.08G240300
Resistance to
Wang, L., et al. (2019). “GmSnRK1.1, a




phytophthora
Sucrose Non-fermenting-1(SNF1)-Related




sojae
Protein Kinase, Promotes Soybean Resistance





to Phytophthora sojae.” Front Plant Sci 10:





996.


GmSIN1
Glyma.12G221500.1
Salt tolerance
Li, S., et al. (2019). “A





GmSIN1/GmNCED3s/GmRbohBs





Feed-Forward Loop Acts as a Signal Amplifier





That Regulates Root Growth in Soybean





Exposed to Salt Stress.” Plant Cell 31(9):





2107-2130.


GmHsp90A2
Glyma.16G178800
Thermo
Huang, Y., et al. (2019). “GmHsp90A2 is




tolerance
involved in soybean heat stress as a positive





regulator.” Plant Sci 285: 26-33.


GmPI4L
NM.001256363.1
Resistance to
Chen, X., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of a




phytophthora
soybean 4-coumaric acid: coenzyme A ligase




sojae
(GmPI4L) enhances resistance to Phytophthora





sojae in soybean.” Funct Plant Biol 46(4):





304-313.


GmPT7
Glyma.14G188000
Root nodule
Chen, L., et al. (2019). “A nodule-localized




development;
phosphate transporter GmPT7 plays an




increase yield
important role in enhancing symbiotic N2





fixation and yield in soybean.” New Phytol





221(4): 2013-2025.


GmbZIP1
Glyma.02G131700
Root nodule
Xu, S., et al. (2021). “GmbZIP1 negatively




development
regulates ABA-induced inhibition of





nodulation by targeting GmENOD40-1 in





soybean.” BMC Plant Biol 21(1): 35.


GmCRY1b
Glyma.06G103200
Tolerance to
Lyu, X., et al. (2021). “GmCRY1s modulate




close planting
gibberellin metabolism to regulate soybean





shade avoidance in response to reduced blue





light.” Mol Plant 14(2): 298-314.


GmNAC06
Glyma.06g21020.1
Salt tolerance
Li, M., et al. (2021). “GmNAC06, aNAC





domain transcription factor enhances salt stress





tolerance in soybean.” Plant Mol Biol 105(3):





333-345.


GmbZIP2
Glyma.14G002300
Salt and
Yang, Y., et al. (2020). “The Soybean bZIP




drought
Transcription Factor Gene GmbZIP2 Confers




tolerance
Drought and Salt Resistances in Transgenic





Plants.” Int J Mol Sci 21(2).


GmNAC8
Glyma.16G151500.1
Drought
Yang, C., et al. (2020). “GmNAC8 acts as a




tolerance
positive regulator in soybean drought stress.”





Plant Sci 293: 110442.


GmPAP12
Glyma.06G028200
Root nodule
Wang, Y., et al. (2020). “GmPAP12 Is




development
Required for Nodule Development and





Nitrogen Fixation Under Phosphorus





Starvation in Soybean.” Front Plant Sci 11:





450.


GmNFYA13
Glyma.13G202300
Salt and
Ma, X. J., et al. (2020). “GmNFYA13




drought
Improves Salt and Drought Tolerance in




tolerance
Transgenic Soybean Plants.” Front Plant Sci





11: 587244.


GmAAP6a
Glyma.17g192000
Tolerance to
Liu, S., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of




nitrogen
GmAAP6a enhances tolerance to low nitrogen




deficiency
and improves seed nitrogen status by





optimizing amino acid partitioning in





soybean.” Plant Biotechnol J 18(8):





1749-1762.


GmPRR3b
Glyma.12G073900.1
To regulate
Li, C., et al. (2020). “A




development
Domestication-Associated Gene GmPRR3b




stage
Regulates the Circadian Clock and Flowering





Time in Soybean.” Mol Plant 13(5): 745-759.


GmMYB14
Glyma.15G259400
Tolerance to
Chen, L., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of




close planting
GmMYBl4 improves high-density yield and




and drought
drought tolerance of soybean through





regulating plant architecture mediated by the





brassinosteroid pathway.” Plant Biotechnol J.


GmAP1
Glyma.16G091300
To increase
Chen, L., et al. (2020). “Soybean AP1




yield
homologs control flowering time and plant





height.” J Integr Plant Biol 62(12): 1868-1879.


GmUBC9
Glyma.03G199900
Drought
Chen, K., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of




tolerance; late
GmUBC9 Gene Enhances Plant Drought




maturing
Resistance and Affects Flowering Time via





Histone H2B Monoubiquitination.” Front Plant





Sci 11: 555794.


GmOLEO1
Glyma.20G196600
High seed oil
Zhang, D., et al. (2019). “Artificial selection




content
on GmOLEO1 contributes to the increase in





seed oil during soybean domestication.” PLoS





Genet 15(7): e1008267.


GmKR3
Glyma.06G267300
Resistance to
Xun, H., et al. (2019). “Over-expression of




viral diseases
GmKR3, a TIR-NBS-LRR type R gene,





confers resistance to multiple viruses in





soybean.” Plant Mol Biol 99(1-2): 95-111.


GmYUC2a
Glyma.08G038600
Root nodule
Wang, Y., et al. (2019). “GmYUC2a mediates




development
auxin biosynthesis during root development





and nodulation in soybean.” J Exp Bot 70(12):





3165-3176.


GmNFR1alpha
Glyma.02G270800
Root nodule
Indrasumunar, A., et al. (2011). “Nodulation




development
factor receptor kinase 1alpha controls nodule





organ number in soybean (Glycine max L.





Merr).” Plant J 65(1): 39-50.


GmHsfA1
Glyma.16G091800.1
Thermo
Zhu, B., et al. (2006). “Identification and




tolerance
characterization of a novel heat shock





transcription factor gene, GmHsfA1, in





soybeans (Glycine max).” J Plant Res 119(3):





247-256.


GmMPK1
Glyma.08G309500
To enhance
Wu, D., et al. (2020). “Identification of a




resistance to
candidate gene associated with isoflavone




phytophthora
content in soybean seeds using genome-wide




sojae; to
association and linkage mapping.” Plant J




increase
104(4): 950-963.




isoflavone




content


GmIFR
NM_001254100
Resistance to
Cheng, Q., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of




phytophthora
Soybean Isoflavone Reductase (GmIFR)




sojae in
Enhances Resistance to Phytophthora sojae in




soybean
Soybean.” Front Plant Sci 6: 1024.


GmCnx1
NM_001255600
Resistance to
Zhou, Z., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of a




mosaic virus
GmCnxl gene enhanced activity of nitrate




SMV
reductase and aldehyde oxidase, and boosted





mosaic virus resistance in soybean.” PLoS One





10(4): e0124273.


GmPRP
KM506762
Resistance to
Jiang, L., et al. (2015). “Isolation and




phytophthora
Characterization of a Novel




sojae No. 1
Pathogenesis-Related Protein Gene (GmPRP)




physiological
with Induced Expression in Soybean (Glycine




race in

max) during Infection with Phytophthora





soybean
sojae.” PLoS One 10(6): e0129932.


GmIFR
NM_001254100,
Resistance to
Cheng, Q., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of




phytophthora
Soybean Isoflavone Reductase (GmIFR)




sojae in
Enhances Resistance to Phytophthora sojae in




soybean
Soybean.” Front Plant Sci 6: 1024.


GmCBS21
Glyma.06G032200
Nitrogen use
Hao, Q., et al. (2016). “Identification and




efficiency
Comparative Analysis of CBS





Domain-Containing Proteins in Soybean





(Glycine max) and the Primary Function of





GmCBS21 in Enhanced Tolerance to Low





Nitrogen Stress.” Int J Mol Sci 17(5).


GA20OX,
Glyma07g08950,
Seed weight
Lu, X., et al. (2016). “The transcriptomic


NFYA
Glyma02g47380
and seed oil
signature of developing soybean seeds reveals




content
the genetic basis of seed trait adaptation during





domestication.” Plant J 86(6): 530-544.


GmDIR22
HQ_993047
Resistance to
Li, N., et al. (2017). “A Novel Soybean




phytophthora
Dirigent Gene GmDIR22 Contributes to




sojae in
Promotion of Lignan Biosynthesis and




soybean
Enhances Resistance to Phytophthora sojae.”





Front Plant Sci 8: 1185.


GmZF351
Glyma06g44440
To increase
Li, Q. T., et al. (2017). “Selection for a




seed oil
Zinc-Finger Protein Contributes to Seed Oil




content in
Increase during Soybean Domestication.” Plant




soybean
Physiol 173(4): 2208-2224.


GmORG3
Glyma03g28630
Resistance to
Xu, Z., et al. (2017). “The Soybean Basic




chromium
Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor




stress
ORG3-Like Enhances Cadmium Tolerance via





Increased Iron and Reduced Cadmium Uptake





and Transport from Roots to Shoots.” Front





Plant Sci 8: 1098.


GmESR1
JN590243.1
To promote
Zhang, C., et al. (2017). “Functional analysis




seed
of the GmESR1 gene associated with soybean




germination
regeneration.” PLoS One 12(4): e0175656.


GmAGL1
AW433203
To promote
Zeng, X., et al. (2018). “Soybean MADS-box




plant
gene GmAGL1 promotes flowering via the




maturation for
photoperiod pathway.” BMC Genomics 19(1):




early
51.




flowering and




early maturing


GmPIP1; 6
Gm08g01860.1
Salt tolerance
Zhou, L., et al. (2014). “Constitutive





overexpression of soybean plasma membrane





intrinsic protein GmPIP1; 6 confers salt





tolerance.” BMC Plant Biol 14: 181.


GmAKT2
Glym08g20030.1
SMV tolerance
Zhou, L., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of





GmAKT2 potassium channel enhances





resistance to soybean mosaic virus.” BMC





Plant Biol 14: 154.









Table F lists the representative functional genes in corn. Methods in the present invention can be used to edit such genes and create new genes by designing new combinations of different gene elements or different protein domain, and can be utilized in corn breeding program.









TABLE F







Important functional genes in corn









Gene name
Application
Reference





ZmMKK1
Drought and salt
Cai, G., et al. (2014). “A maize mitogen-activated protein



tolerance
kinase kinase, ZmMKK1, positively regulated the salt and




drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis.” J Plant Physiol




171(12): 1003-1016.


ZmCesA7
To increase
de Castro, M., et al. (2014). “Early cell-wall modifications of



cellulose content in
maize cell cultures during habituation to dichlobenil.” J Plant



cells
Physiol 171(2): 127-135.


ZmCesA8
To increase
de Castro, M., et al. (2014). “Early cell-wall modifications of



cellulose content in
maize cell cultures during habituation to dichlobenil.” J Plant



cells
Physiol 171(2): 127-135.


ZmARGOS1
To increase grain
Guo, M., et al. (2014). “Maize ARGOS1 (ZAR1) transgenic



yield and improve
alleles increase hybrid maize yield.” J Exp Bot 65(1):



drought tolerance
249-260.


ZmARF25
To control corn leaf
Li, C., et al. (2014). “Ectopic expression of a maize hybrid



size
down-regulated gene ZmARF25 decreases organ size by




affecting cellular proliferation in Arabidopsis.” PLoS One




9(4): e94830.


ZmLEA5C
Stress resistance
Liu, Y., et al. (2014). “Group 5 LEA protein, ZmLEA5C,




enhance tolerance to osmotic and low temperature stresses in




transgenic tobacco and yeast.” Plant Physiol Biochem 84:




22-31.


ZmVP1
Seed development
Suzuki, M., et al. (2014). “Distinct functions of COAR and




B3 domains of maize VP1 in induction of ectopic gene




expression and plant developmental phenotypes in




Arabidopsis.” Plant Mol Biol 85(1-2): 179-191.


ZmRACK1
Disease resistance
Wang, B., et al. (2014). “Maize ZmRACK1 is involved in the




plant response to fungal phytopathogens.” Int J Mol Sci




15(6): 9343-9359.


ZmGRF10
To affect leaf size
Wu, L., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of the maize GRF10,



and plant height
an endogenous truncated growth-regulating factor protein,




leads to reduction in leaf size and plant height.” J Integr Plant




Biol 56(11): 1053-1063.


Zm
To increase urea
Zanin, L., et al. (2014). “Isolation and functional


urea-proton
uptake
characterization of a high affinity urea transporter from roots


symporter

of Zea mays.” BMC Plant Biol 14: 222.


DUR3


ZmMPK5
To participate in
Zhang, D., et al. (2014). “The overexpression of a maize



signal transduction
mitogen-activated protein kinase gene (ZmMPK5) confers



pathway of salt
salt stress tolerance and induces defence responses in



stress, oxidative
tobacco.” Plant Biol (Stuttg) 16(3): 558-570.



stress and pathogen



defense


ZmSOC1
Early flowering
Zhao, S., et al. (2014). “ZmSOC1, a MADS-box transcription




factor from Zea mays, promotes flowering in Arabidopsis.”




Int J Mol Sci 15(11): 19987-20003.


Zmhdz10
Drought and salt
Zhao, Y., et al. (2014). “A novel maize homeodomain-leucine



tolerance
zipper (HD-Zip) I gene, Zmhdz10, positively regulates




drought and salt tolerance in both rice and Arabidopsis.”




Plant Cell Physiol 55(6): 1142-1156.


ZmPIF3
Drought and salt
Gao, Y., et al. (2015). “A maize phytochrome-interacting



tolerance
factor 3 improves drought and salt stress tolerance in rice.”




Plant Mol Biol 87(4-5): 413-428.


ZmpsbA
Drought tolerance
Huo, Y., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of the Maize psbA




Gene Enhances Drought Tolerance Through Regulating




Antioxidant System, Photosynthetic Capability, and Stress




Defense Gene Expression in Tobacco.” Front Plant Sci 6:




1223.


ZmIRT1
Iron uptake
Li, S., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of ZmIRT1 and




ZmZIP3 Enhances Iron and Zinc Accumulation in Transgenic




Arabidopsis.” PLoS One 10(8): e0136647.


ZmZIP3
Zinc uptake
Li, S., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of ZmIRT1 and




ZmZIP3 Enhances Iron and Zinc Accumulation in Transgenic




Arabidopsis.” PLoS One 10(8): e0136647.


ZmBDF
Drought and salt
Liu, Y., et al. (2015). “Characterization and functional



tolerance
analysis of a B3 domain factor from Zea mays.” J Appl Genet




56(4): 427-438.


ZmARGOS8
Drought tolerance,
Shi, J., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of ARGOS Genes



yield increase
Modifies Plant Sensitivity to Ethylene, Leading to Improved




Drought Tolerance in Both Arabidopsis and Maize.” Plant




Physiol 169(1): 266-282.


ZmCPK1
Cold stress
Weckwerth, P., et al. (2015). “ZmCPK1, a




calcium-independent kinase member of the Zea mays CDPK




gene family, functions as a negative regulator in cold stress




signalling.” Plant Cell Environ 38(3): 544-558.


ZmMAPK1
Drought tolerance
Wu, L., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of ZmMAPK1



and thermos stress
enhances drought and heat stress in transgenic Arabidopsis




thaliana.” Plant Mol Biol 88(4-5): 429-443.


ZmGRF
To promote plant
Xu, M., et al. (2015). “ZmGRF, a GA regulatory factor from



flowering, stem
maize, promotes flowering and plant growth in Arabidopsis.”



elongation and cell
Plant Mol Biol 87(1-2): 157-167.



expansion, GA



singal


ZmCCaMK
Antioxidant defense
Yan, J., et al. (2015). “Calcium and ZmCCaMK are involved




in brassinosteroid-induced antioxidant defense in maize




leaves.” Plant Cell Physiol 56(5): 883-896.


ZmJAZ14
Drought tolerance
Zhou, X., et al. (2015). “A maize jasmonate Zim-domain



and growth
protein, ZmJAZ14, associates with the JA, ABA, and GA



promotion
signaling pathways in transgenic Arabidopsis.” PLoS One



regulation
10(3): e0121824.


ZmMADS1
Early flowering
Alter, P., et al. (2016). “Flowering Time-Regulated Genes in




Maize Include the Transcription Factor ZmMADS1.” Plant




Physiol 172(1): 389-404.


ZmSAD1
To adjust contents
Du, H., et al. (2016). “Modification of the fatty acid



of stearic acid, oil
composition in Arabidopsis and maize seeds using a



acid and long chain
stearoyl-acyl carrier protein desaturase-1 (ZmSAD1) gene.”



saturated acid and
BMC Plant Biol 16(1): 137.



the proportion of



saturated fatty acid



and unsaturated



fatty acid


ZmGOLS2
Stress resistance
Gu, L., et al. (2016). “ZmGOLS2, a target of transcription




factor ZmDREB2A, offers similar protection against abiotic




stress as ZmDREB2A.” Plant Mol Biol 90(1-2): 157-170.


ZmOXS2b
Stress resistance
He, L., et al. (2016). “Maize OXIDATIVE STRESS2




Homologs Enhance Cadmium Tolerance in Arabidopsis




through Activation of a Putative SAM-Dependent




Methyltransferase Gene.” Plant Physiol 171(3): 1675-1685.


ZmO2L1
Stress resistance
He, L., et al. (2016). “Maize OXIDATIVE STRESS2




Homologs Enhance Cadmium Tolerance in Arabidopsis




through Activation of a Putative SAM-Dependent




Methyltransferase Gene.” Plant Physiol 171(3): 1675-1685.


ZmEREB156
Starch synthesis
Huang, H., et al. (2016). “Sucrose and ABA regulate starch




biosynthesis in maize through a novel transcription factor,




ZmEREB156.” Sci Rep 6: 27590.


ZmZIP7
To stimulate
Li, S., et al. (2016). “Constitutive expression of the ZmZIP7



endogenous iron and
in Arabidopsis alters metal homeostasis and increases Fe and



zinc uptake
Zn content.” Plant Physiol Biochem 106: 1-10.


ZmLEA3
To enhance
Liu, Y., et al. (2016). “Group 3 LEA Protein, ZmLEA3, Is



tolerance to cold
Involved in Protection from Low Temperature Stress.” Front



stress
Plant Sci 7: 1011.


Baby boom
To improve
Lowe, K., et al. (2016). “Morphogenic Regulators Baby


(BBM)
transformation
boom and Wuschel Improve Monocot Transformation.” Plant



efficiency
Cell 28(9): 1998-2015.


Wuschel2
To improve
Lowe, K., et al. (2016). “Morphogenic Regulators Baby



transformation
boom and Wuschel Improve Monocot Transformation.” Plant



efficiency
Cell 28(9): 1998-2015.


ZmABA2
Drought and salt
Ma, F., et al. (2016). “ZmABA2, an interacting protein of



tolerance
ZmMPK5, is involved in abscisic acid biosynthesis and




functions.” Plant Biotechnol J 14(2): 771-782.


ZmNAC55
Drought tolerance
Mao, H., et al. (2016). “ZmNAC55, a maize stress-responsive




NAC transcription factor, confers drought resistance in




transgenic Arabidopsis.” Plant Physiol Biochem 105: 55-66.


ZmVPP5
To enhance salt
Sun, X., et al. (2016). “Maize ZmVPP5 is a truncated



sensitivity
Vacuole H(+) -PPase that confers hypersensitivity to salt




stress.” J Integr Plant Biol 58(6): 518-528.


ZmArf2
Active GTP
Wang, Q., et al. (2016). “A maize ADP-ribosylation factor



combination,
ZmArf2 increases organ and seed size by promoting cell



endosperm
expansion in Arabidopsis.” Physiol Plant 156(1): 97-107.



development


ZmSEC14p
Cold stress
Wang, X., et al. (2016). “Isolation and functional



resistance
characterization of a cold responsive phosphatidylinositol




transfer-associated protein, ZmSEC14p, from maize (Zea





may L.).” Plant Cell Rep 35(8): 1671-1686.



ZmCBL9
Stress resistance
Zhang, F., et al. (2016). “Characterization of the calcineurin




B-Like (CBL) gene family in maize and functional analysis




of ZmCBL9 under abscisic acid and abiotic stress




treatments.” Plant Sci 253: 118-129.


ZmXerico1
Drought tolerance
Brugiere, N., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of RING Domain




E3 Ligase ZmXerico1 Confers Drought Tolerance through




Regulation of ABA Homeostasis.” Plant Physiol 175(3):




1350-1369.


ZmXerico2
Drought tolerance
Brugiere, N., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of RING Domain




E3 Ligase ZmXerico1 Confers Drought Tolerance through




Regulation of ABA Homeostasis.” Plant Physiol 175(3):




1350-1369.


ZmGRAS20
Starch synthesis
Cai, H., et al. (2017). “A novel GRAS transcription factor,




ZmGRAS20, regulates starch biosynthesis in rice




endosperm.” Physiol Mol Biol Plants 23(1): 143-154.


ZmWRKY17
Salt stress response
Cai, R., et al. (2017). “The maize WRKY transcription factor




ZmWRKY17 negatively regulates salt stress tolerance in




transgenic Arabidopsis plants.” Planta 246(6): 1215-1231.


ZmNLP6
Nitrogen utilization
Cao, H., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of the Maize




ZmNLP6 and ZmNLP8 Can Complement the Arabidopsis




Nitrate Regulatory Mutant nlp7 by Restoring Nitrate




Signaling and Assimilation.” Front Plant Sci 8: 1703.


ZmNLP8
Nitrogen utilization
Cao, H., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of the Maize




ZmNLP6 and ZmNLP8 Can Complement the Arabidopsis




Nitrate Regulatory Mutant nlp7 by Restoring Nitrate




Signaling and Assimilation.” Front Plant Sci 8: 1703.


TRU1
To improve plant
Dong, Z., et al. (2017). “Ideal crop plant architecture is



morphology
mediated by tassels replace upper ears1, a BTB/POZ ankyrin




repeat gene directly targeted by TEOSINTE BRANCHED1.”




Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114(41): E8656-E8664.


UNBRANCH
To regulate
Du, Y., et al. (2017). “UNBRANCHED3 regulates branching


ED3/UB3
vegetative and
by modulating cytokinin biosynthesis and signaling in maize



reproductive
and rice.” New Phytol 214(2): 721-733.



branching


ZmWRKY4
Oxidation resistance
Hong, C., et al. (2017). “The role of ZmWRKY4 in




regulating maize antioxidant defense under cadmium stress.”




Biochem Biophys Res Commun 482(4): 1504-1510.


ZmMGT10
To enhance
Li, H., et al. (2017). “The maize CorA/MRS2/MGT-type Mg



tolerance to Mg
transporter, ZmMGT10, responses to magnesium deficiency



deficiency in corn
and confers low magnesium tolerance in transgenic




Arabidopsis.” Plant Mol Biol 95(3): 269-278


ZmGOLS2
To increase seed
Li, T., et al. (2017). “Regulation of Seed Vigor by



vigor
Manipulation of Raffinose Family Oligosaccharides in Maize




and Arabidopsis thaliana.” Mol Plant 10(12): 1540-1555.


ZmRS
To reduce seed
Li, T., et al. (2017). “Regulation of Seed Vigor by



vigor
Manipulation of Raffinose Family Oligosaccharides in Maize




and Arabidopsis thaliana.” Mol Plant 10(12): 1540-1555.


ZmINCW1
To increase grain
Liu, J., et al. (2017). “The Conserved and Unique Genetic



size/weight
Architecture of Kernel Size and Weight in Maize and Rice.”




Plant Physiol 175(2): 774-785.


ZmDHN13
To enhance
Liu, Y., et al. (2017). “Functional characterization of KS-type



tolerance to
dehydrin ZmDHN13 and its related conserved domains under



oxidative stress
oxidative stress.” Sci Rep 7(1): 7361.


ZmPIF4
To respond to
Shi, Q., et al. (2017). “Functional Characterization of the



phytochrome singals
Maize Phytochrome-Interacting Factors PIF4 and PIF5.”




Front Plant Sci 8: 2273.


ZmPIF5
To respond to
Shi, Q., et al. (2017). “Functional Characterization of the



phytochrome singals
Maize Phytochrome-Interacting Factors PIF4 and PIF5.”




Front Plant Sci 8: 2273.


ABP9
Stress resistance
Wang, C., et al. (2017). “ABP9, a maize bZIP transcription




factor, enhances tolerance to salt and drought in transgenic




cotton.” Planta 246(3): 453-469.


ZmPP2AA1
Low phosphate
Wang, J., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of the protein



response
phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit a gene ZmPP2AA1




improves low phosphate tolerance by remodeling the root




system architecture of maize.” PLoS One 12(4): e0176538.


ZmMYB14
Starch synthesis
Xiao, Q., et al. (2017). “ZmMYB14 is an important




transcription factor involved in the regulation of the activity




of the ZmBT1 promoter in starch biosynthesis in maize.”




FEBS J 284(18): 3079-3099.


ZmPR10
Resistance to plant
Zandvakili, N., et al. (2017). “Cloning, Overexpression and



pathogenic fungi
in vitro Antifungal Activity of Zea Mays PR10 Protein.” Iran




J Biotechnol 15(1): 42-49.


SFA1
Cellulose hydrolysis
Zhu, L., et al. (2020). Overexpression of SFA1 in engineered




Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increase xylose utilization and




ethanol production from different lignocellulose




hydrolysates. Bioresour Technol 313, 123724.


ZmSCE1b
Paraquat resistance
Wang, H., et al. (2021). The maize SUMO conjugating




enzyme ZmSCE1b protects plants from paraquat toxicity.




Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 211, 111909.


ZmEREB20
Salt stress resistance
Fu, J., et al. (2021). Maize transcription factor ZmEREB20




enhanced salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant




Physiol Biochem 159, 257-267.


ZmMPKL1
Drought tolerance
Zhu, D., et al. (2020). MAPK-like protein 1 positively




regulates maize seedling drought sensitivity by suppressing




ABA biosynthesis. Plant J 102, 747-760.


ZmCCD10a
Phosphate stress
Zhong, Y., et al. (2020). ZmCCD10a Encodes a Distinct Type




of Carotenoid Cleavage Dioxygenase and Enhances Plant




Tolerance to Low Phosphate. Plant Physiol 184, 374-392.


ZmBZR1
Organ development
Zhang, X., Guo, W., Du, D., Pu, L., and Zhang, C. (2020).




Overexpression of a maize BR transcription factor ZmBZR1




in Arabidopsis enlarges organ and seed size of the transgenic




plants. Plant Sci 292, 110378.


ZmTMT
Quality
Zhang, L., et al. (2020). Overexpression of the maize



improvement
gamma-tocopherol methyltransferase gene (ZmTMT)




increases alpha-tocopherol content in transgenic Arabidopsis




and maize seeds. Transgenic Res 29, 95-104.


ZmPTPN
Drought tolerance
Zhang, H., et al. (2020). Enhanced Vitamin C Production




Mediated by an ABA-Induced PTP-like Nucleotidase




Improves Plant Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis and Maize.




Mol Plant 13, 760-776.


ZmMYB59
Seed germination
Zhai, K., et al. (2020). Overexpression of Maize ZmMYB59




Gene Plays a Negative Regulatory Role in Seed Germination




in Nicotiana tabacum and Oryza sativa. Front Plant Sci 11,




564665.


ZmERF105
Resistance to
Zang, Z., et al. (2020). A Novel ERF Transcription Factor,



exserohilum
ZmERF105, Positively Regulates Maize Resistance to



turcicum
Exserohilum turcicum. Front Plant Sci 11, 850.


ZmNAC126
To accelerate
Yang, Z., et al. (2020). The transcription factor ZmNAC126



maturation
accelerates leaf senescence downstream of the ethylene




signalling pathway in maize. Plant Cell Environ 43,




2287-2300.


EMP32
Seed development
Yang, Y. Z., et al. (2020). EMP32 is required for the




cis-splicing of nad7 intron 2 and seed development in maize.




RNA Biol, 1-11.


ZmPt9
Phosphate
Xu, Y., et al. (2020). Overexpression of a phosphate



transportation to
transporter gene ZmPt9 from maize influences growth of



promote crop
transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem Biophys Res



growth
Commun.


ZmNAC49
Drought tolerance
Xiang, Y., et al. (2020). ZmNAC49 reduces stomatai density




to improve drought tolerance in maize. J Exp Bot.


NIGT1.2
To maintain
Wang, X., et al. (2020). The Transcription Factor NIGT1.2



nitrogen and
Modulates Both Phosphate Uptake and Nitrate Influx during



phosphorus balance
Phosphate Starvation in Arabidopsis and Maize. Plant Cell




32, 3519-3534.


ZmmCCHA1
Photosynthesis
Wang, C., et al.(2020). Functional characterization of a




chloroplast-localized Mn(2+)(Ca(2+))/H(+) antiporter,




ZmmCCHA1 from Zea mays ssp. mexicana L. Plant Physiol




Biochem 155, 396-405.


ZmBES1/BZR1-5
Grain development,
Sun, F., et al. (2020). Maize transcription factor



yield increase
ZmBES1/BZR1-5 positively regulates kernel size. J Exp Bot.


ZM-BG1H1
Yield increase
Simmons, C. R., et al. (2020). Maize BIG GRAIN1 homolog




overexpression increases maize grain yield. Plant Biotechnol




J 18, 2304-2315.


ZmCCA1a
Photoperiod
Shi, Y., et al. (2020). ZmCCA1a on Chromosome 10 of



regulation
Maize Delays Flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant




Sci 11, 78.


Dtbn1
To control tassel
Qin, X., et al. (2020). Q(Dtbn1), an F-box gene affecting



branch number
maize tassel branch number by a dominant model. Plant




Biotechnol J.


ZmTMM1
To regulate lateral
Liu, Y., et al. (2020). Involvement of a truncated MADS-box



root development
transcription factor ZmTMM1 in root nitrate foraging. J Exp




Bot 71, 4547-4561.


Zm-miR164e
To increase branch
Liu, M., et al. (2020). Analysis of the genetic architecture of



number
maize kernel size traits by combined linkage and association




mapping. Plant Biotechnol J 18, 207-221.


ZmRAFS
Drought tolerance
Li, T., et al. (2020). Raffinose synthase enhances drought




tolerance through raffinose synthesis or galactinol hydrolysis




in maize and Arabidopsis plants. J Biol Chem 295,




8064-8077.


ZmPHYC1
To drawf plant
Li, Q., et al. (2020). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout and


ZmPHYC2
height and spike
overexpression studies reveal a role of maize phytochrome C



height
in regulating flowering time and plant height. Plant




Biotechnol J 18, 2520-2532.


GRF5
To increase
Kong, J., et al. (2020). Overexpression of the Transcription



transformation
Factor GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR5 Improves



efficiency
Transformation of Dicot and Monocot Species. Front Plant




Sci 11, 572319.


KNR6
Yield increase
Jia, H., et al. (2020). A serine/threonine protein kinase




encoding gene KERNEL NUMBER PER ROW6 regulates




maize grain yield. Nat Commun 11, 988.


ZmRLK7
To regulate plant
He, C., et al. (2020). Overexpression of an Antisense RNA of



structure and organ
Maize Receptor-Like Kinase Gene ZmRLK7 Enlarges the



size
Organ and Seed Size of Transgenic Arabidopsis Plants. Front




Plant Sci 11, 579120.


ZmDREB1A
Cold tolerance
Han, Q., et al. (2020). ZmDREB1A Regulates RAFFINOSE




SYNTHASE Controlling Raffinose Accumulation and Plant




Chilling Stress Tolerance in Maize. Plant Cell Physiol 61,




331-341.


ZmDREB2A
To regulate corn
Han, Q., et al. (2020). ZmDREB2A regulates ZmGH3.2 and



seed longevity and
ZmRAFS, shifting metabolism towards seed aging tolerance



increase aging
over seedling growth. Plant J 104, 268-282.



tolerance


ZmMYC2
To regulate JA
Fu, J., et al. (2020). ZmMYC2 exhibits diverse functions and



mediated growth,
enhances JA signaling in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell



development and
Rep 39, 273-288.



defensive reaction


CENH3
Development
Feng, C., et al. (2020). The deposition of CENH3 in maize is



regulation
stringently regulated. Plant J 102, 6-17.


ZmAT6
To enhance
Du, H., et al. (2020). A Maize ZmAT6 Gene Confers



tolerance to
Aluminum Tolerance via Reactive Oxygen Species



aluminum toxicity
Scavenging. Front Plant Sci 11, 1016.



in corn to scavenge



active oxygen



species


PIP2; 5
Drought tolerance
Ding, L., et al. (2020). Modification of the Expression of the



and yield increase
Aquaporin ZmPIP2; 5 Affects Water Relations and Plant




Growth. Plant Physiol 182, 2154-2165.


ZmVPS29
To promote grain
Chen, L., et al. (2020). The retromer protein ZmVPS29



development
regulates maize kernel morphology likely through an




auxin-dependent process(es). Plant Biotechnol J 18,




1004-1014.


ZmOSCA
Drought tolerance
Cao, L., et al. (2020). Systematic Analysis of the Maize




OSCA Genes Revealing ZmOSCA Family Members Involved




in Osmotic Stress and ZmOSCA2.4 Confers Enhanced




Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci




21.


ZmWRKY114
To participate in salt
Bo, C., et al. (2020). Maize WRKY114 gene negatively



stress tolerance
regulates salt-stress tolerance in transgenic rice. Plant Cell



through
Rep 39, 135-148.



ABA-mediated



pathways


ZmPGIP3
Disease resistance
Zhu, G., et al. (2019). ZmPGIP3 Gene Encodes a




Polygalacturonase-Inhibiting Protein that Enhances




Resistance to Sheath Blight in Rice. Phytopathology 109,




1732-1740.


ZmGPDH1
Tolerance to salt
Zhao, Y., et al. (2019). A cytosolic NAD(+)-dependent



and osmotic stress
GPDH from maize (ZmGPDH1) is involved in conferring salt




and osmotic stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biol 19, 16.


ZmDi19-1
To respond to salt
Zhang, X., et al. (2019). A maize stress-responsive Di19



stress
transcription factor, ZmDi19-1, confers enhanced tolerance to




salt in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep 38, 1563-1578.


ZmPORB2
To increase
Zhan, W., et al. (2019). An allele of ZmPORB2 encoding a



tocopherol
protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase promotes tocopherol



accumulation
accumulation in both leaves and kernels of maize. Plant J




100, 114-127.


ZmVQ52
To participate in
Yu, T., et al. (2019). Overexpression of the maize



circadian rhythm
transcription factor ZmVQ52 accelerates leaf senescence in



and photosynthetic
Arabidopsis. PLoS One 14, e0221949.



pathway


ZmAPRG
To increase APA
Yu, T., et al. (2019). ZmAPRG, an uncharacterized gene,



and Pi
enhances acid phosphatase activity and Pi concentration in



concentration in
maize leaf during phosphate starvation. Theor Appl Genet



corn leaves
132, 1035-1048.


ZmEREB180
Waterlogging
Yu, F., et al. (2019). A group VII ethylene response factor



tolerance
gene, ZmEREB180, coordinates waterlogging tolerance in




maize seedlings. Plant Biotechnol J 17, 2286-2298.


Zmm28
To improve growth
Wu, J., et al. (2019). Overexpression of zmm28 increases



and photosynthetic
maize grain yield in the field. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116,



capacity of corn
23850-23858.



plants and nitrogen



use efficiency


ZmDOF36
To regulate starch
Wu, J., et al. (2019). The DOF-Domain Transcription Factor



synthesis in corn
ZmDOF36 Positively Regulates Starch Synthesis in



endosperm
Transgenic Maize. Front Plant Sci 10, 465.


ZmSCE1d
Drought tolerance
Wang, H., et al. (2019). The Maize Class-I SUMO




Conjugating Enzyme ZmSCE1d Is Involved in Drought




Stress Response. Int J Mol Sci 21.


ZmSCE1e
Stress resistance
Wang, H., et al. (2019). Overexpression of a maize SUMO




conjugating enzyme gene (ZmSCE1e) increases Sumoylation




levels and enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic




tobacco. Plant Sci 281, 113-121.


ZmGLR
To regulate leaf
Wang, C., et al. (2019). ZmGLR, a cell membrane localized



morphogenesis in
microtubule-associated protein, mediated leaf morphogenesis



corn
in maize. Plant Sci 289, 110248.


ZmDEF1
Resistance to weevil
Vi, T. X. T., et al. (2019). Overexpression of the ZmDEF1



larvae
gene increases the resistance to weevil larvae in transgenic




maize seeds. Mol Biol Rep 46, 2177-2185.


ZmCCT10
Corn vegetative and
Stephenson, E., et al. (2019). Over-expression of the



reproductive
photoperiod response regulator ZmCCT10 modifies plant



development
architecture, flowering time and inflorescence morphology in




maize. PLoS One 14, e0203728.


ZmHAK1
Stress resistance
Qin, Y. J., et al. (2019). ZmHAK5 and ZmHAK1 function in




K(+) uptake and distribution in maize under low K(+)




conditions. J Integr Plant Biol 61, 691-705.


ZmHAK5
To enhance K(+)
Qin, Y. J., et al. (2019). ZmHAK5 and ZmHAK1 function in



uptake activity and
K(+) uptake and distribution in maize under low K(+)



promote growth
conditions. J Integr Plant Biol 61, 691-705.


ZmNAC34
Starch synthesis
Peng, X., et al. (2019). A maize NAC transcription factor,




ZmNAC34, negatively regulates starch synthesis in rice.




Plant Cell Rep 38, 1473-1484.


ZmMYB-IF35
To increase
Meng, C., et al. (2019). Overexpression of maize MYB-IF35



resistance to cold
increases chilling tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol



and oxidative stress
Biochem 135, 167-173.


ZmNAC33
Drought tolerance
Liu, W., et al. (2019). Function analysis of ZmNAC33, a




positive regulator in drought stress response in Arabidopsis.




Plant Physiol Biochem 145, 174-183.


ZmRAD51A
Disease resistance
Liu, F., et al. (2019). DNA Repair Gene ZmRAD51A




Improves Rice and Arabidopsis Resistance to Disease. Int J




Mol Sci 20.


ZmMADS69
Early flowering
Liang, Y., et al. (2019). ZmMADS69 functions as a flowering




activator through the ZmRap2.7-ZCN8 regulatory module




and contributes to maize flowering time adaptation. New




Phytol 221, 2335-2347.


ZmASR3
Drought tolerance
Liang, Y., et al. (2019). ZmASR3 from the Maize ASR Gene




Family Positively Regulates Drought Tolerance in




Transgenic Arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci 20.


ZmPTF1
Drought tolerance
Li, Z., et al. (2019). The bHLH family member ZmPTF1




regulates drought tolerance in maize by promoting root




development and abscisic acid synthesis. J Exp Bot 70,




5471-5486.


ZmZIP5
To play a role in
Li, S., et al. (2019). Improving Zinc and Iron Accumulation



absorption and
in Maize Grains Using the Zinc and Iron Transporter



rhizome
ZmZIP5. Plant Cell Physiol 60, 2077-2085.



transformation of



zinc and iron


ZmUBP15
To respond to
Kong, J., et al. (2019). Maize factors ZmUBP15, ZmUBP16


ZmUBP16Z
cadium stress and
and ZmUBP19 play important roles for plants to tolerance the


mUBP19
salt stress
cadmium stress and salt stress. Plant Sci 280, 77-89.


ZmCtl1
To improve stalk
Jiao, S., et al. (2019). Chitinase-likel Plays a Role in Stalk



tensile strength
Tensile Strength in Maize. Plant Physiol 181, 1127-1147.


ZmPP2C-A
Drought tolerance
He, Z., et al. (2019). The Maize Clade A PP2C Phosphatases




Play Critical Roles in Multiple Abiotic Stress Responses. Int




J Mol Sci 20.


ZmPGH1
To suppress
He, Y., et al. (2019). A maize polygalacturonase functions as



programmed cell
a suppressor of programmed cell death in plants. BMC Plant



death
Biol 19, 310.


ZmNAC071
Stress response
He, L., et al. (2019). Novel Maize NAC Transcriptional




Repressor ZmNAC071 Confers Enhanced Sensitivity to ABA




and Osmotic Stress by Downregulating Stress-Responsive




Genes in Transgenic Arabidopsis. J Agric Food Chem 67,




8905-8918.


ZmPEPC
To improve carbon
Giuliani, R., et al. (2019). Transgenic maize



metabolism
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase alters leaf-atmosphere




CO2 and (13)CO2 exchanges in Oryza sativa. Photosynth Res




142, 153-167.


ZmBBM2
To promote callus
Du, X., et al. (2019). Transcriptome Profiling Predicts New



induction and
Genes to Promote Maize Callus Formation and



transformation
Transformation. Front Plant Sci 10, 1633.


ZmbZIP22
To regulate starch
Dong, Q., et al. (2019). Overexpression of ZmbZIP22 gene



synthesis
alters endosperm starch content and composition in maize




and rice. Plant Sci 283, 407-415.


ZmMADS1a
Positively regulates
Dong, Q., et al. (2019). Functional analysis of ZmMADS1a



starch synthesis
reveals its role in regulating starch biosynthesis in maize




endosperm. Sci Rep 9, 3253.


ZmTCP42
Drought tolerance
Ding, S., et al. (2019). Genome-Wide Analysis of TCP Family




Genes in Zea mays L. Identified a Role for ZmTCP42 in




Drought Tolerance. Int J Mol Sci 20.


ATG8
To obviously
Chen, Q., et al. (2019). Overexpression of ATG8 in



improve nitrogen
Arabidopsis Stimulates Autophagic Activity and Increases



remobilization
Nitrogen Remobilization Efficiency and Grain Filling. Plant



efficiency
Cell Physiol 60, 343-352.


SUMO1
To regulate floral
Chen, J., et al. (2019). Overexpression of SUMO1 located



development
predominately to euchromatin of dividing cells affects




reproductive development in maize. Plant Signal Behav 14,




e1588664.


ZmMYB167
To increase biomass
Bhatia, R., et al. (2019). Modified expression ofZmMYB167




in Brachypodium distachyon and Zea mays leads to increased




cell wall lignin and phenolic content. Sci Rep 9, 8800.


ZmLEC1
Fatty acid synthesis
Zhu, Y., et al. (2018). A transgene design for enhancing oil




content in Arabidopsis and Camelina seeds. Biotechnol




Biofuels 11, 46.


ZmPIP1; 1
Drought tolerance
Zhou, L., et al. (2018). Overexpression of a maize plasma



and salt stress
membrane intrinsic protein ZmPIP1; 1 confers drought and




salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 13, e0198639.


ZmAIRP4
Drought tolerance
Yang, L., et al. (2018). Overexpression of the maize E3




ubiquitin ligase gene ZmAIRP4 enhances drought stress




tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol Biochem 123, 34-42.


ZmNBS42
Disease resistance
Xu, Y., et al. (2018). Expression of a maize NBS gene




ZmNBS42 enhances disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant




Cell Rep 37, 1523-1532.


ZmNBS25
Disease resistance
Xu, Y., et al. (2018). The Maize NBS-LRR Gene ZmNBS25




Enhances Disease Resistance in Rice and Arabidopsis. Front




Plant Sci 9, 1033.


ZmPt9
To increase
Xu, Y., et al. (2018). The mycorrhiza-induced maize ZmPt9



axial root length and
gene affects root development and phosphate availability in



promote lateral root
nonmycorrhizal plant. Plant Signal Behav 13, e1542240.



formation


ZmDA1
To increase influx
Xie, G., et al. (2018). Over-expression of mutated ZmDA1 or


ZmDAR1
of sugar to organ
ZmDAR1 gene improves maize kernel yield by enhancing



pool from com grain
starch synthesis. Plant Biotechnol J 16, 234-244.



and enhance starch



synthesis


SAT
To increase
Xiang, X., et al. (2018). Overexpression of serine



prolamine
acetyltransferase in maize leaves increases seed-specific



accumulation
methionine-rich zeins. Plant Biotechnol J 16, 1057-1067.


ZmSO
Drought tolerance
Xia, Z., et al. (2018). Overexpression of the Maize Sulfite




Oxidase Increases Sulfate and GSH Levels and Enhances




Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Tobacco. Front Plant Sci 9,




298.


ZmWRKY40
Drought tolerance
Wang, C. T., et al. (2018). The Maize WRKY Transcription




Factor ZmWRKY40 Confers Drought Resistance in




Transgenic Arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci 19.


ZmWRKY106
To participate in
Wang, C. T., et al. (2018). Maize WRKY Transcription Factor



several stress
ZmWRKY106 Confers Drought and Heat Tolerance in



response pathways
Transgenic Plants. Int J Mol Sci 19.



of abiotic resistance


ZmNF-YB16
To increase corn
Wang, B., et al. (2018). ZmNF-YB16 Overexpression



yield
Improves Drought Resistance and Yield by Enhancing




Photosynthesis and the Antioxidant Capacity of Maize Plants.




Front Plant Sci 9, 709.


ZmLAC3
To increase
Sun, Q., et al. (2018). MicroRNA528 Affects Lodging



lignin content in
Resistance of Maize by Regulating Lignin Biosynthesis under



corn stalk
Nitrogen-Luxury Conditions. Mol Plant 11, 806-814.


ZmbZIP4
To positively
Ma, H., et al. (2018). ZmbZIP4 Contributes to Stress



regulate plant
Resistance in Maize by Regulating ABA Synthesis and Root



abiotic stress
Development. Plant Physiol 178, 753-770.



response and



participate in corn



root development


ZmNAGK
Drought tolerance
Liu, W., et al. (2018). Over-Expression of a Maize




N-Acetylglutamate Kinase Gene (ZmNAGK) Improves




Drought Tolerance in Tobacco. Front Plant Sci 9, 1902.


ZmPIN1a
Form
Li, Z., et al. (2018). Enhancing auxin accumulation in maize



well-developed root
root tips improves root growth and dwarfs plant height. Plant



system to make
Biotechnol J 16, 86-99.



seminal root longer



and lateral root



denser


UFGT2
To increase abiotic
Li, Y. J., et al. (2018). The maize secondary metabolism



stress tolerance of
glycosyltransferase UFGT2 modifies flavonols and



plants
contributes to plant acclimation to abiotic stresses. Ann Bot




122, 1203-1217.


ZmSRO1b
To enhance
Li, X., et al. (2018). Maize similar to RCD1 gene induced by



resistance to salt
salt enhances Arabidopsis thaliana abiotic stress resistance.



stress, cadmium
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 503, 2625-2632.



stress and oxidative



stress


ZmDREB4.1
Development
Li, S., et al. (2018). A DREB-Like Transcription Factor From



regulation
Maize (Zea mays), ZmDREB4.1, Plays a Negative Role in




Plant Growth and Development. Front Plant Sci 9, 395.


Bt2
To increase seed
Li, N., et al. (2011). “Over-expression of AGPase genes


Sh2
weight and starch
enhances seed weight and starch content in transgenic



content
maize.” Planta 233(2): 241-250.


LC
Synthesis of
Le Gall, G., et al. (2003). “Characterization and content of


C1
flavonoid
flavonoid glycosides in genetically modified tomato




(Lycopersicon esculentum) fruits.” J Agric Food Chem 51(9):




2438-2446.


ZmbZIP72
To increase stress
Ying, S., et al. (2012). “Cloning and characterization of a



resistance
maize bZIP transcription factor, ZmbZIP72, confers drought




and salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis.” Planta 235(2):




253-266.


ZmCBL4
Salt tolerance
Wang, M., et al. (2007). “Overexpression of a putative maize




calcineurin B-like protein in Arabidopsis confers salt




tolerance.” Plant Mol Biol 65(6): 733-746.


ZmCIPK16
To enhance salt
Zhao, J., et al. (2009). “Cloning and characterization of a



tolerance
novel CBL-interacting protein kinase from maize.” Plant Mol




Biol 69(6): 661-674.


ZmCPK4
To enhance drought
Jiang, S., et al. (2013). “A maize calcium-dependent protein



tolerance
kinase gene, ZmCPK4, positively regulated abscisic acid




signaling and enhanced drought stress tolerance in transgenic




Arabidopsis.” Plant Physiol Biochem 71: 112-120.


ZmDREB1A
To enhance drought
Qin, F., et al. (2004). “Cloning and functional analysis of a



tolerance, salt
novel DREB1/CBF transcription factor involved in



tolerance and cold
cold-responsive gene expression in Zea mays L.” Plant Cell



tolerance
Physiol 45(8): 1042-1052.


ZmEF-Tu1
To enhance thermo
Fu, J. and Z. Ristic (2010). “Analysis of transgenic wheat



tolerance
(Triticum aestivum L.) harboring a maize (Zea mays L.) gene




for plastid EF-Tu: segregation pattern, expression and effects




of the transgene.” Plant Mol Biol 73(3): 339-347.


ZmLEAFY
To increase seed oil
Barthole, G., et al. (2012). “Controlling lipid accumulation in


COTYLEDON1
content
cereal grains.” Plant Sci 185-186: 33-39.


ZmWRINKLED1


ZmLTP3
Salt tolerance
Zou, H. W., et al. (2013). “Isolation and Functional Analysis




of ZmLTP3, a Homologue to Arabidopsis LTP3.” Int J Mol




Sci 14(3): 5025-5035.


ZmMKK4
Salt and cold
Kong, X., et al. (2011). “ZmMKK4, a novel group C



tolerance
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in maize (Zea mays),




confers salt and cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis.”




Plant Cell Environ 34(8): 1291-1303.


ZmPEAMT1
To promote root
Wu, S., et al. (2007). “Cloning, characterization, and



growth and enhance
transformation of the phosphoethanolamine



salt tolerance
N-methyltransferase gene (ZmPEAMT1) in maize (Zea mays




L.).” Mol Biotechnol 36(2): 102-112.


ZmPIS
Drought tolerance
Zhai, S. M., et al. (2012). “Overexpression of the




phosphatidylinositol synthase gene from Zea mays in tobacco




plants alters the membrane lipids composition and improves




drought stress tolerance.” Planta 235(1): 69-84


ZmPP2C2
Cold tolerance
Hu, X., et al. (2010). “Enhanced tolerance to low temperature




in tobacco by over-expression of a new maize protein




phosphatase 2C, ZmPP2C2.” J Plant Physiol 167(15):




1307-1315.


ZmRFP1
Drought tolerance
Liu, J., et al. (2013). “Overexpression of a maize E3 ubiquitin




ligase gene enhances drought tolerance through regulating




stomatai aperture and antioxidant system in transgenic




tobacco.” Plant Physiol Biochem 73: 114-120.


ZmSAPK8
Salt tolerance
Ying, S., et al. (2011). “Cloning and characterization of a




maize SnRK2 protein kinase gene confers enhanced salt




tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis.” Plant Cell Rep 30(9):




1683-1699.


ZmSIMK1
Salt tolerance
Gu, L., et al. (2010). “Overexpression of maize




mitogen-activated protein kinase gene, ZmSIMK1 in




Arabidopsis increases tolerance to salt stress.” Mol Biol Rep




37(8): 4067-4073.


ZmLEC1
To increase seed oil
Shen, B., et al. (2010). “Expression of ZmLEC1 and


ZmWRI1
content
ZmWRI1 increases seed oil production in maize.” Plant




Physiol 153(3): 980-987.


ZmWrinkled1
To increase seed oil
Pouvreau, B., et al. (2011). “Duplicate maize Wrinkled1



content
transcription factors activate target genes involved in seed oil




biosynthesis.” Plant Physiol 156(2): 674-686.









Table G lists the representative functional genes in barley. Methods in the present invention can be used to edit such genes and create new genes by designing new combinations of different gene elements or different protein domain, and can be utilized in barley breeding program.









TABLE G







Important functional genes in barley









Gene name
Application
Reference





HGGT
Grain size and
Chen, J., et al. (2017). Overexpression of hvhggt enhances


(LOC548177)
weight
tocotrienol levels and antioxidant activity in barley. J. Agric.




Food Chem..


HvSERK2
Resistance to
Liu,Y. B., et al. (2018). Transient overexpression of hvserk2



powdery mildew
improves barley resistance to powdery mildew. International




Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(4), 1226.


HvAKT1
Drought
Feng, X., et al. (2020). Overexpression of hvakt1 improves



tolerance
barley drought tolerance by regulating root ion homeostasis




and ros and no signaling. Journal of Experimental Botany.


HvADH-1
Disease
Kasbauer Christoph L, et al. (2017). Barley ADH-1 modulates


(LOC548236)
resistance
susceptibility to Bgh and is involved in chitin-induced




systemic resistance. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry.


HvOS2
To delay
Greenup, A. G., et al. (2010). Oddsoc2 is a MADS box floral



blooming
repressor that is down-regulated by vernalization in temperate




cereals. Plant physiology, 153(3), 1062-1073.


HvCO1/
Vernalization
Mulki M A., Korff M V. (2015). Constans controls floral


HvFT1
regulation
repression by upregulating vernalization 2 (vrn-h2) in barley.




Plant Physiology, 170(1), 325.


Hvhak1
Drought
Feng, X., et al. (2020). Hvakt2 and hvhak1 confer drought



tolerance
tolerance in barley through enhanced leaf mesophyl1 h+




homoeostasis. Wiley-Blackwell Online Open, 18(8), 1683.


DREB1
Stress resistance
Xu, Z. S., et al. (2009). Isolation and functional




characterization of hvdreb1-a gene encoding a




dehydration-responsive element binding protein in hordeum




vulgare. Journal of Plant Research, 122(1), 121-130.


CslF6
Yield increase
Lim, W. L., et al. (2019). Overexpression of hvcslf6 in barley




grain alters carbohydrate partitioning plus transfer tissue and




endosperm development. Journal of Experimental Botany,




71(1).


HvPIP2; 3/
Salt tolerance
Lim, W. L., et al. (2019). Overexpression of hvcslf6 in barley


HvPIP2; 4/

grain alters carbohydrate partitioning plus transfer tissue and


HvPIP2; 1

endosperm development. Journal of Experimental Botany,




71(1).


HvNAS1
To increase zinc
Hiroshi, Masuda., et al. (2009). Overexpression of the Barley



and iron content
Nicotianamine Synthase GeneHvNAS1Increases Iron and Zinc



in grains
Concentrations in Rice Grains., 2(4), 155-166.


NHX2
Salt tolerance
Bayat F, et al. (2011). Overexpression of hvnhx2, a vacuolar




na+/h+ antiporter gene from barley, improves salt tolerance in




‘arabidopsis thaliana’. Australian Journal of Crop Science,




5(4), 428-432.


VRN1
Vernalization
Daniel P Woods, et al. (2016). Evolution of vrn2/ghd7-like



regulation
genes in vernalization-mediated repression of grass flowering.




Plant Physiology, 170 (4), 2124-2135.









Table H lists the representative functional genes in rice. Methods in the present invention can be used to edit such genes and create new genes by designing new combinations of different gene elements or different protein domain, and can be utilized in rice breeding program.









TABLE H







Important functional genes in rice









Gene name
Application
Reference





OsATG8b
Grain quality
Fan, T., et al. (2020). “A Rice Autophagy Gene




OsATG8b Is Involved in Nitrogen Remobilization and




Control of Grain Quality.” Front Plant Sci 11: 588.


OsGsa1
To increase grain size
Dong, N. Q., et al. (2020). “UDP-glucosyltransferase



and enhance abiotic
regulates grain size and abiotic stress tolerance



stress tolerance
associated with metabolic flux redirection in rice.”




Nat Commun 11(1): 2629.


OsI-BAK1
Grain filling and leaf
Khew, C. Y., et al. (2015). “Brassinosteroid



development
insensitive 1-associated kinase 1 (OsI-BAK1) is




associated with grain filling and leaf development in




rice.” J Plant Physiol 182: 23-32.


OsCATA
Grain development
Suppression of phospholipase D genes improves




chalky grain production by




high temperature during the grain-filling stage in rice


OsGRF4
Grain size and yield
Duan, P., et al. (2015). “Regulation of OsGRF4 by




OsmiR396 controls grain size and yield in rice.” Nat




Plants 2: 15203.


small grain
Grain yield
Fang, N., et al. (2016). “SMALL GRAIN 11 Controls


D2/SMG11

Grain Size, Grain Number and Grain Yield in Rice.”




Rice (NY) 9(1): 64.


OsHk6
Grain yield
Choi, J., et al. (2012). “Functional identification of




OsHk6 as a homotypic cytokinin receptor in rice with




preferential affinity for iP.” Plant Cell Physiol 53(7):




1334-1343.


OsRAA1
Growth of axial root
Han, Y., et al. (2005). “Biochemical character of the



and lateral root
purified OsRAA1, a novel rice protein with




GTP-binding activity, and its expression pattern in





Oryza sativa.” J Plant Physiol 162(9): 1057-1063.



OsHDAC1
Plant architecture
Jang, I. C., et al. (2003). “Structure and expression of




the rice class-I type histone deacetylase genes




OsHDAC1-3: OsHDAC1 overexpression in transgenic




plants leads to increased growth rate and altered




architecture.” Plant J 33(3): 531-541.


OsbHLH073
Plant architecture
Lee, J., et al. (2020). “OsbHLH073 Negatively




Regulates Internode Elongation and Plant Height by




Modulating GA Homeostasis in Rice.” Plants (Basel)




9(4).


OsBAK1
Plant architecture
Li, D., et al. (2009). “Engineering OsBAK1 gene as a




molecular tool to improve rice architecture for high




yield.” Plant Biotechnol J 7(8): 791-806.


TIFY11b
Plant height and grain
Hakata, M., et al. (2012). “Overexpression of a rice



size
TIFY gene increases grain size through enhanced




accumulation of carbohydrates in the stem.” Biosci




Biotechnol Biochem 76(11): 2129-2134.


OsPSK3
Plant height and
Huang, J. Y., et al. (2010). “[Over-expression of



chlorophyll content
OsPSK3 increases chlorophyll content of leaves in




rice].” Yi Chuan 32(12): 1281-1289.


CYP94
Plant height
Kurotani, K. I., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of a




CYP94 family gene CYP94C2b increases internode




length and plant height in rice.” Plant Signal Behav




10(7): e1046667.


OsRSR1
Seed quality and yield
Fu, F. F., et al. (2010). “Coexpression analysis




identifies Rice Starch Regulator1, a rice AP2/EREBP




family transcription factor, as a novel rice starch




biosynthesis regulator.” Plant Physiol 154(2):




927-938.


RPBF
Seed quality
Yamamoto, M. P., et al. (2006). “Synergism between




RPBF Dof and RISBZ1bZIP Activators in the




Regulation of Rice SeedExpression Genes.” Plant




Physiol


PDI
Seed storage proteins
Hiroshi, Yasuda., et al. (2009). “Overexpression of BiP




has Inhibitory Effects on theAccumulation of Seed




Storage Proteins in EndospermCells of Rice.” Plant &




Cell Physiology, 50(8), 1532.


BiP
Seed storage proteins
Hiroshi, Yasuda., et al. (2009). “Overexpression of




BiP has Inhibitory Effects on the Accumulation of




Seed Storage Proteins in Endosperm Cells of Rice.”




Plant & Cell Physiology, 50(8), 1532.


OsWRKY22
To positively regulate
Ge, Z. L., et al. (2018). “Transcription factor



tolerance to aluminum
WRKY22 promotes aluminum tolerance viaactivation




of OSFRDL4 expression and enhancement of citrate




secretion in rice (oryza sativa)”. New Phytologist,




219.


OsDof12
To affect flowering
Li, D., et al. (2009). “Functional characterization of



under long day length
rice OsDof12.” Planta 229(6): 1159-1169.



conditions


BSR1
To enhance immune
Kanda, Y., et al. (2019). “Broad-Spectrum Disease



response
Resistance Conferred by the Overexpression of Rice




RLCK BSR1 Results from an Enhanced Immune




Response to Multiple MAMPs.” Int J Mol Sci 20(22).


OsTLP27
To increase
Hu, F., et al. (2012). “Overexpression of OsTLP27 in



photosynthesis
rice improves chloroplast function and photochemical




efficiency.” Plant Sci 195: 125-134.


OsSRT1
To enhance tolerance
Huang, L., et al. (2007). “Down-regulation of a



to oxidative
SILENT INFORMATION REGULATOR2-related



responsive stress
histone deacetylase gene, OsSRT1, induces DNA




fragmentation and cell death in rice.” Plant Physiol




144(3): 1508-1519.


LSCHL4
To increase yield
Zhang, G. H., et al. “LSCHL4 from Japonica Cultivar,




Which Is Allelic to NAL1, Increases Yield of Indica




Super Rice 93-11.” Molecular Plant(8), 1350-1364.


OsNRT2.1
To increase yield and
Luo, B., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of a



weight
High-Affinity Nitrate Transporter OsNRT2.1




Increases Yield and Manganese Accumulation in Rice




UnderAlternating Wet and Dry Condition.” Frontiers




in Plant ence, 9, 1192.


GABA
To maintain iron
Zhu, C., et al. (2020). “γ-Aminobutyric Acid



homeostasis in rice
Suppresses Iron Transportation from Roots to Shoots



seedlings
in Rice Seedlings by InducingAerenchyma




Formation.” International Journal of Molecular




Sciences, 22(1), 220.


Roc5
Leaf shape
Zou, L. P., et al. (2011). “Leaf rolling controlled by




the homeodomain leucine zipper class IV gene Roc5




in rice.” Plant Physiol 156(3): 1589-1602.


OsPCF8
Leaf morphogenesis
Yang, C., et al.(2013). “Overexpression of



and cold tolerance
microRNA319 impacts leaf morphogenesis and leads




to enhanced cold tolerance in rice (Oryza sativaL.).”




Plant Cell & Environment, 36(12).


OsPCF5
Leaf morphogenesis
Yang, C., et al. (2013). “Overexpression of



and cold tolerance
microRNA319 impacts leaf morphogenesis and leads




to enhanced cold tolerance in rice (Oryza sativaL.)”.




Plant Cell & Environment, 36(12).


Osa-MIR319a
Leaf morphogenesis
Yang, C., et al. (2013). “Overexpression of



and cold tolerance
microRNA319 impacts leaf morphogenesis and leads




to enhanced cold tolerance in rice (Oryza sativaL.).”




Plant Cell & Environment, 36(12).


OsClpP6
Leaf senescence
Zhao, X., et al. (2021). “OsNBL1, a Multi-Organelle




Localized Protein, Plays Essential Roles in Rice




Senescence, Disease Resistance, and Salt




Tolerance.” Rice, 14(1).


RAV6
Leaf angle and seed
Zhang, XQ., et al. (2015). Epigenetic mutation of



size
RAV6 affects leaf angle and seed size in rice. PLANT




PHYSIOL, 2015, 169(3), 2118-2128.


OsHDY1
Chloroplast
Zhao, J., et al. (2015). Functional inactivation of



development
putative photosynthetic electron acceptor ferredoxin




c2 (fdc2) induces delayed heading date and decreased




photosynthetic rate in rice. Pios One, 10.


OsTRM13
Salt stress tolerance
Youmei, Wang., et al. (2017). The




2′-o-methyladenosine nucleoside modification gene




ostrml3 positively regulates salt stress tolerance in




rice. Journal of Experimental Botany.


OsHKT2; 4
Salt balance
Chi, Zhang., et al. (2017). The rice high-affinity k+




transporter OsHKT2; 4 mediates Mg2+ homeostasis




under high-Mg2+ conditions in transgenic




arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8.


OsXDH
To delay leaf
Han, R., et al. (2020). “Enhancing xanthine



senescence and
dehydrogenase activity is an effective way to delay



increase rice yield
leaf senescence and increase rice yield.” Rice (NY)




13(1): 16.


TDC
To delay leaf
Kang, K., et al. (2009). “Senescence-induced



senescence
serotonin biosynthesis and its role in delaying




senescence in rice leaves.” Plant Physiol 150(3):




1380-1393.


OsDOS
To delay leaf
Kong, Z., et al. (2006). “A novel nuclear-localized



senescence
CCCH-type zinc finger protein, OsDOS, is involved




in delaying leaf senescence in rice.” Plant Physiol




141(4): 1376-1388.


bHLH142
Male sterility
Ko, S. S., et al. (2017). “Tightly Controlled




Expression of bHLH142 Is Essential for Timely




Tapetai Programmed Cell Death and Pollen




Development in Rice.” Front Plant Sci 8: 1258.


OsZIP8
Zinc uptake and
Lee, S., et al. (2010). “Zinc deficiency-inducible



distribution
OsZIP8 encodes a plasma membrane-localized zinc




transporter in rice.” Mol Cells 29(6): 551-558.


OsZIP5
Zinc distribution
Lee, S., et al. (2010). “OsZIP5 is a plasma membrane




zinc transporter in rice.” Plant Mol Biol 73(4-5):




507-517.


OsZIP4
Zinc distribution
Ishimaru, Y., et al. (2007). “Overexpression of the




OsZIP4 zinc transporter confers disarrangement of




zinc distribution in rice plants.” J Exp Bot 58(11):




2909-2915.


APO1
Spikelet number
Ikeda, K., et al. (2007). “Rice ABERRANT PANICLE




ORGANIZATION 1, encoding an F-box protein,




regulates meristem fate.” Plant J 51(6): 1030-1040.


OsPGIP4
Resistance to bacterial
Feng, C., et al. (2016). “The



leaf streak in rice
polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein 4 (OsPGIP4), a




potential component of the qBlsr5a locus, confers




resistance to bacterial leaf streak in rice.” Planta




243(5): 1297-1308.


OsGAP1
Resistance to bacterial
Cheung, M. Y., et al. (2008). “Constitutive expression



pathogen
of a rice GTPase-activating protein induces defense




responses.” New Phytol 179(2): 530-545.


BBM1
Vegetative
Khanday, I., et al. (2019). “A male-expressed rice



propagation
embryogenic trigger redirected for asexual




propagation through seeds.” Nature 565(7737): 91-95.


OsGSTU5
Resistance to sheath
Tiwari, M., et al. (2020). “Functional characterization



blight disease
of tau class glutathione-S-transferase in rice to




provide tolerance against sheath blight disease.” 3




Biotech 10(3): 84.


OsPGIP1
Resistance to sheath
Chen, X. J., et al. (2016). “Overexpression of



blight disease
OsPGIP1 Enhances Rice Resistance to Sheath Blight.”




Plant Dis 100(2): 388-395.


RGG1 and
Sheath blight disease
Swain, D. M., et al. (2019). “Concurrent


RGB1

overexpression of rice G-protein beta and gamma




subunits provide enhanced tolerance to sheath blight




disease and abiotic stress in rice.” Planta 250(5):




1505-1520.


OsMYB4
Sheath blight disease
Pooja, S., et al. (2015). “Homotypic clustering of




OsMYB4 binding site motifs in promoters of the rice




genome and cellular-level implications on sheath




blight disease resistance.” Gene 561(2): 209-218.


OsNLA1
To maintain phosphate
Yue, W., et al. (2017). Osnla1, a ring-type ubiquitin



homeostasis
ligase, maintains phosphate homeostasis in oryza





sativa via degradation of phosphate transporters. The





Plant Journal, 90(6), 1040.


OsYSL15
Iron uptake
Lee, S., et al. (2009). “Disruption of OsYSL15 leads




to iron inefficiency in rice plants.” Plant Physiol




150(2): 786-800.


OsYSL13
Iron distribution
Chang., et al. (2018). OsYSL13 is involved in iron




distribution in rice. International Journal of Molecular




Sciences.


OsIRT1
Iron and zinc uptake
Lee, S. and G. An (2009). “Over-expression of




OsIRT1 leads to increased iron and zinc




accumulations in rice.” Plant Cell Environ 32(4):




408-416.


OsVIT2
Iron and zinc
Zhang, Y., et al.(2012). Vacuolar membrane



translocation
transporters osvit1 and osvit2 modulate iron




translocation between flag leaves and seeds in rice.




Plant Journal for Cell & Molecular Biology, 72(3),




400-410.


OsVIT1
Iron and zinc
Zhang, Y., et al.(2012). Vacuolar membrane



translocation
transporters osvit1 and osvit2 modulate iron




translocation between flag leaves and seeds in rice.




Plant Journal for Cell & Molecular Biology, 72(3),




400-410.


OsYSL2
Iron and manganese
Ishimaru, Y., et al. (2010). “Rice metal-nicotianamine



uptake
transporter, OsYSL2, is required for the long-distance




transport of iron and manganese.” Plant J 62(3):




379-390.


OsGSTU12
To regulate leaf
Zhao, N., et al.(2020). Over-expression of HDA710



senescence
delays leaf senescence in rice (oryza sativa l.).




Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8,




471.


HDA710
To regulate leaf
Zhao, N., et al.(2020). Over-expression of HDA10



senescence
delays leaf senescence in rice (oryza sativa l.).




Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8,




471.


OsDof4
To regulate flowering
Qi, W., et al. (2017). Constitutive expression of



period
osdof4, encoding a c2-c2 zinc finger transcription




factor, confesses its distinct flowering effects under




long- and short-day photoperiods in rice (oryza sativa




l.). BMC Plant Biology, 17.


RFT1
To regulate flowering
Lichao Zhang., et al.(2016). The wheat MYB-related



time
transcription factor TaMYB72 promotes flowering in




rice. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 08(v.58),




7-10.


Hd3a
To regulate flowering
Lichao Zhang., et al.(2016). The wheat MYB-related



time
transcription factor TaMYB72 promotes flowering in




rice. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 08(v.58),




7-10.


OsLAC13
To regulate seed
Yu, Y., et al. (2017). Laccase-13 regulates seed



setting rate
setting rate by affecting hydrogen peroxide dynamics




and mitochondrial integrity in rice. Frontiers in Plant




Science, 8.


OsHXK1
To regulate
Zheng, S., et al. (2019). Pnas plus: osago2 controls ros



anther development
production and the initiation of tapetai ped by




epigenetically regulating oshxk1 expression in rice




anthers. Proceedings of the National Academy of




Sciences of the United States of America, 116(15).


OsAGO2
To regulate
Zheng, S., et al. (2019). Pnas plus: osago2 controls ros



anther development
production and the initiation of tapetai ped by




epigenetically regulating oshxk1 expression in rice




anthers. Proceedings of the National Academy of




Sciences of the United States of America, 116(15).


TAWAWA1
To regulate
Yoshida, A., et al (2013). TAWAWA1, a regulator



growth development
of rice inflorescence architecture, functions through




the suppression of meristem phase transition.




Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,




110(2), 767-772.


MAIF1
To regulate root
C, Yong., et al. (2010). Overexpression of an f-box



growth
protein gene reduces abiotic stress tolerance and




promotes root growth in rice. Molecular Plant, 4(1),




190-197.


osa-miR171b
Stripe virus
Tong, A., et al. (2017). “Altered accumulation of




osa-miR171b contributes to rice stripe virus infection




by regulating disease symptoms.” J Exp Bot 68(15):




4357-4367.


OsSERK1
To generate somatic
Hu, H., et al. (2005). “Rice SERK1 gene positively



embryogenesis and
regulates somatic embryogenesis of cultured cell and



enhance rice blast
host defense response against fungal infection.” Planta



resistance
222(1): 107-117.


OsNRT1.1A
To improve crop yield
Wang, W., et al. (2018). “Expression of the Nitrate



and shorten crop
Transporter Gene OsNRT1.1A/OsNPF6.3 Confers



maturation
High Yield and Early Maturation in Rice.” Plant Cell




30(3): 638-651.


OsPT8
To improve inorganic
Jia, H., et al. (2011). “The phosphate transporter gene



phosphate uptake
OsPht1; 8 is involved in phosphate homeostasis in




rice.” Plant Physiol 156(3): 1164-1175.


OsDRF1
To enhance disease
Cao, Y., et al. (2008). “Overexpression of a rice



resistance (mosaic
defense-related F-box protein gene OsDRFl in



virus and
tobacco improves disease resistance through




pseudomonas)

potentiation of defense gene expression.” Physiol




Plant 134(3): 440-452.


PHD1
To increase
Li, C., et al. (2011). “A rice plastidial nucleotide sugar



photosynthetic
epimerase is involved in galactolipid biosynthesis and



efficiency and crop
improves photosynthetic efficiency.” PLoS Genet



yield
7(7): e1002196.


OsIRL
To improve tolerance
Kim, S. G., et al. (2010). “Overexpression of rice



to peroxides
isoflavone reductase-like gene (OsIRL) confers




tolerance to reactive oxygen species.” Physiol Plant




138(1): 1-9.


RAG2
To increase yield and
“Overexpression of the 16-kDa a-amylase/trypsin



quality
inhibitor RAG2 improves grain yield and quality of




rice”


OsAT10
To enhance
Li, G., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of a rice BAHD



saccharification
acyltransferase gene in switchgrass (Panicum





virgatum L.) enhances saccharification.” BMC





Biotechnol 18(1): 54.


OsSec18
To increase rice plant
Sun, Y., et al. (2015). “The OsSec18 complex



height and thousand
interacts with P0(P1-P2)2 to regulate vacuolar



kernel weight
morphology in rice endosperm cell.” BMC Plant Biol




15: 55.


OsPGIP2
To enhance sheath
Chen, X., et al. (2019). “Amino acid substitutions in a



blight resistance in
polygalacturonase inhibiting protein (OsPGIP2)



rice
increases sheath blight resistance in rice.” Rice (NY)




12(1): 56.


OsWRKY4
Sheath blight
Wang, H., et al. (2015). “Rice WRKY4 acts as a



resistance in rice
transcriptional activator mediating defense responses




toward Rhizoctonia solani, the causing agent of rice




sheath blight.” Plant Mol Biol 89(1-2): 157-171.


Pti1a
Rice resistance
Takahashi, A., et al. (2007). “Rice Pti1a negatively




regulates RAR1-dependent defense responses.” Plant




Cell 19(9): 2940-2951.


OsCDC48
Rice resistance
Shi, L., et al. (2019). “OsCDC48/48E complex is




required for plant survival in rice (Oryza sativa L.).”




Plant Mol Biol 100(1-2): 163-179.


OsFLS2
Bacteria resistance in
Wang, S., et al. (2015). “Rice OsFLS2-Mediated



rice
Perception of Bacterial Flagellins Is Evaded by





Xanthomonas oryzae pvs. oryzae and oryzicola.” Mol





Plant 8(7): 1024-1037.


SNAC3
Drought tolerant and
Fang, Y., et al. (2015). “A stress-responsive NAC



heat resistant gene in
transcription factor SNAC3 confers heat and drought



rice
tolerance through modulation of reactive oxygen




species in rice.” J Exp Bot 66(21): 6803-6817.


KNAT7
Lodging resistance
Wang, S., et al. (2019). “Rice Homeobox Protein



and yield of rice
KNAT7 Integrates the Pathways Regulating Cell




Expansion and Wall Stiffness.” Plant Physiol 181(2):




669-682.


OsRLR1&OSWRKY19
Disease resistance in
Du, D., et al. (2020). “The CC-NB-LRR OsRLR1



rice
mediates rice disease resistance through interaction




with OsWRKY19.” Plant Biotechnol J.


OsCDR1
Disease resistance and
Prasad, B. D., et al. (2009). “Overexpression of rice



defensive mechanism
(Oryza sativa L.) OsCDR1 leads to constitutive



of rice
activation of defense responses in rice and




Arabidopsis.” Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22(12):




1635-1644.


OsRDR1
Virus resistance in
Wang, H., et al. (2016). “A Signaling Cascade from



rice
miR444 to RDR1 in Rice Antiviral RNA Silencing




Pathway.” Plant Physiol 170(4): 2365-2377.


OsWRKY13
Disease resistance in
Qiu, D., et al. (2007). “OsWRKY13 mediates rice



rice
disease resistance by regulating defense-related genes




in salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent signaling.”




Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20(5): 492-499.


GIF1
Rice grain-filling and
Wang, E., et al. (2008). “Control of rice grain-filling



yield
and yield by a gene with a potential signature of




domestication.” Nat Genet 40(11): 1370-1374.


OsAAP5
Rice tiller number and
Wang, J., et al. (2019). “The Amino Acid Permease 5



yield
(OsAAP5) Regulates Tiller Number and Grain Yield




in Rice.” Plant Physiol 180(2): 1031-1045.


OsRIP1
Rice development
Wytynck, P., et al.(2021). Effect of rip overexpression




on abiotic stress tolerance and development of rice.




International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(3),




1434.


OsmiR156b
Rice development
Kabin Xie., et al. (2006). Genomic organization,




differential expression, and interaction of squamosa




promoter-binding-like transcription factors and




microrna156 in rice. Plant Physiology, 142(1),




280-93.


OsMADS57
Rice development
Yin, X., et al. (2019). OsMADS18, a




membrane-bound MADS-box transcription factor,




modulates plant architecture and the abscisic acid




response in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany(15),




3895-3909.


OsMADS18
Rice development
Yin, X., et al. (2019). OsMADS18, a




membrane-bound MADS-box transcription factor,




modulates plant architecture and the abscisic acid




response in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany(15),




3895-3909.


OsMADS15
Rice development
Yin, X., et al. (2019). OsMADS18, a




membrane-bound MADS-box transcription factor,




modulates plant architecture and the abscisic acid




response in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany(15),




3895-3909.


OsMADS14
Rice development
Yin, X., et al. (2019). OsMADS18, a




membrane-bound MADS-box transcription factor,




modulates plant architecture and the abscisic acid




response in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany(15),




3895-3909.


NF-YC12
Rice development
Xiong, Y., et al. (2019). NF-YC12 is a key




multi-functional regulator of accumulation of seed




storage substances in rice. Journal of Experimental




Botany(15), 15.


CCP1
Rice development
Yan, D., et al. (2015). Curved chimeric palea 1




encoding an EMF1-like protein maintains epigenetic




repression of OsMADS58 in rice palea development.




Plant Journal, 82(1), 12-24.


LPA1
Resistance to sheath
Sun, Q., et al. (2020). “Indeterminate Domain Proteins



blight disease in rice
Regulate Rice Defense to Sheath Blight Disease.”




Rice (NY) 13(1): 15.


EPSPS
To improve
Achary, V. M. M., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of



glyphosate tolerance
improved EPSPS gene results in field level glyphosate



and increase grain
tolerance and higher grain yield in rice.” Plant



yield in rice
Biotechnol J 18(12): 2504-2519.


Dehydroascorbate
Rice yield and
Do, H., et al. (2016). “Structural understanding of the


reductase
biomass
recycling of oxidized ascorbate by dehydroascorbate


OsDHAR

reductase (OsDHAR) from Oryza sativa L. japonica.”




Sci Rep 6: 19498.


OsECS(gamma-ecs)
Rice yield and its
Choe, Y. H., et al. (2013). “Homologous expression of



tolerance to
gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase increases grain



environmental stresses
yield and tolerance of transgenic rice plants to




environmental stresses.” J Plant Physiol 170(6):




610-618.


WRKY45
Rice blast resistance
Ueno, Y., et al. (2017). “WRKY45 phosphorylation at




threonine 266 acts negatively on WRKY45-dependent




blast resistance in rice.” Plant Signal Behav 12(8):




e1356968.


Pikh Gene
Rice blast resistance
Azizi, P., et al. (2016). “Over-Expression of the Pikh




Gene with a CaMV 35S Promoter Leads to Improved




Blast Disease (Magnaporthe oryzae) Tolerance in




Rice.” Front Plant Sci 7: 773.


EcGDH
To improve nitrogen
Tang, D., et al. (2018). “Ectopic expression of fungal



assimilation and grain
EcGDH improves nitrogen assimilation and grain



yield in rice
yield in rice.” J Integr Plant Biol 60(2): 85-88.


NADH-GOGAT
To improve nitrogen
Tomoyuki Yamaya1, 2, 4, Mitsuhiro Obara1, Hiroyuki



utilization and grain
Nakajima1, Shohei Sasaki1,



filling in rice
Toshihiko Hayakawa1 and Tadashi Sato3


Fie1
Rice yield (grain size)
Dhatt, B. K., et al. (2021). “Allelic variation in rice




Fertilization Independent Endosperm 1 contributes to




grain width under high night temperature stress.” New




Phytol 229(1): 335-350.


OsMYB1R1-VP64
Rice yield
Wang, J., et al. (2016). “Overexpression of




OsMYB1R1-VP64 fusion protein increases grain yield




in rice by delaying flowering time.” FEBS Lett




590(19): 3385-3396.


OsMIR530
Rice yield
Sun, W., et al. (2020). “OsmiR530 acts downstream of




OsPIL15 to regulate grain yield in rice.” New Phytol




226(3): 823-837.


OsLOGL5
Rice yield
Wang, C., et al. (2020). “A cytokinin-activation




enzyme-like gene improves grain yield under various




field conditions in rice.” Plant Mol Biol 102(4-5):




373-388.


OsDim1
Rice yield
Doku, H. A., et al. (2019). “The expression pattern of




OsDim1 in rice and its proposed function.” Sci Rep




9(1): 18492.


OsMYC2
Resistance to bacterial
Uji, Y., et al. (2016). “Overexpression of OsMYC2



leaf blight in rice
Results in the Up-Regulation of Early JA-Rresponsive




Genes and Bacterial Blight Resistance in Rice.” Plant




Cell Physiol 57(9): 1814-1827.


Rice NH1
Resistance to bacterial
Bart, R. S., et al. (2010). “Rice Snl6, a



leaf blight in rice
cinnamoyl-CoA reductase-like gene family member,




is required for NH1-mediated immunity to





Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae.” PLoS Genet 6(9):





e1001123.


OsTFX1
Resistance to bacterial
Sugio, A., et al. (2007). “Two type III effector genes



leaf blight in rice
of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae control the




induction of the host genes OsTFIIAgamma1 and




OsTFX1 during bacterial blight of rice.” Proc Natl




Acad Sci USA 104(25): 10720-10725.


DAO
To improve auxin
Zhao, Z., et al. (2013). A role for a dioxygenase in



catabolism and
auxin metabolism and reproductive development in



maintain auxin
rice. Developmental Cell, 27(1), 113-122.



homeostasis


OsSWEET5
Growth development
Zhou, Y., et al. (2014). Overexpression of




OsSWEET5 in rice causes growth retardation and




precocious senescence. Plos One, 9(4), e94210.


OsPHR2
Growth development
Wu, P., et al.(2008). Role of OsPHR2 on phosphorus




homeostasis and root hairs development in rice (oryza





sativa. L.). Plant Signaling & Behavior, 3(9), 674-675.



OsPHR1
Growth development
Wu, P., et al.(2008). Role of OsPHR2 on phosphorus




homeostasis and root hairs development in rice (oryza





sativa. L.). Plant Signaling & Behavior, 3(9), 674-675.



OsPHF1
Growth development
Wu, Z., et al. (2011). Investigating the contribution of




the phosphate transport pathway to arsenic




accumulation in rice. Plant Physiology, 157(1),




498-508.


OsMGH3
Growth development
Vijayraghavan, U.. (2011). Auxin-responsive




OsMGH3, a common downstream target of




OsMADS1 and OsMADS6, controls rice floret




fertility. Plant & Cell Physiology, 52(12), 2123-2135.


BZR1
Growth development
Zhang, L. Y., et al. (2009). Antagonistic HLH/bHLH




transcription factors mediate brassinosteroid




regulation of cell elongation and plant development in




rice and arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 21(12), 3767-3780.


OsCPK10
Biotic and abiotic
Fu, L., et al. (2013). “Overexpression of constitutively



stress (resistance to
active OsCPK10 increases Arabidopsis resistance




Magnaporthe grisea)

against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and rice




resistance against Magnaporthe grisea.” Plant Physiol




Biochem 73: 202-210.


PME1
Synthesis of
Kang, K., et al. (2011). “Methanol is an endogenous



tryptophan
elicitor molecule for the synthesis of tryptophan and




tryptophan-derived secondary metabolites upon




senescence of detached rice leaves.” Plant J 66(2):




247-257.


OsMYB5P
Tolerance to
Yang, W. T., et al. (2018). Rice OsMYB5P improves



phosphorous
plant phosphate acquisition by regulation of phosphate



deficiency
transporter. PloS one, 13(3), e0194628.


TOND1
Tolerance to nitrogen
Zhang., et al. (2015).”TOND1 confers tolerance to



deficiency
nitrogen deficiency in rice.”The Plant




Journal, 81(3): 367-376.


OsRZFP34
To enhance stomata
Hsu, K. H., et al. (2014). “Expression of a gene



opening
encoding a rice RING zinc-finger protein, OsRZFP34,




enhances stomata opening.” Plant Mol Biol 86(1-2):




125-137.


P5CS
To increase synthesis
Kaikavoosi, K., et al. (2015). “2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline



of proline and
augmentation in scented indica rice (Oryza sativa L.)



augment rice scent
varieties through Delta(1)-pyrroline-5-carboxylate




synthetase (P5CS) gene transformation.” Appl




Biochem Biotechnol 177(7): 1466-1479.


OsSultr1; 1
Tolerance to heavy
Kumar, S., et al. (2019). “Arsenic-responsive



mental
high-affinity rice sulphate transporter, OsSultr1; 1,




provides abiotic stress tolerance under limiting




sulphur condition.” J Hazard Mater 373: 753-762.


OsCPK4
Salt and drought
Campo, S., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of a



tolerance
Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase Confers Salt and




Drought Tolerance in Rice by Preventing Membrane




Lipid Peroxidation.” Plant Physiol 165(2): 688-704.


oscpk12
Salt tolerance and
Asano, T., et al. (2012). “A rice calcium-dependent



blast disease
protein kinase OsCPK12 oppositely modulates



resistance
salt-stress tolerance and blast disease resistance.”




Plant J 69(1): 26-36.


serine-threonine
Salt tolerance
Diedhiou, C. J., et al. (2008). “The SNF1-type


protein kinase

serine-threonine protein kinase SAPK4 regulates


SAPK4

stress-responsive gene expression in rice.” BMC Plant




Biol 8: 49.


Rab16A
Salt tolerance
Ganguly, M., et al. (2012). “Overexpression of




Rab16A gene in indica rice variety for generating




enhanced salt tolerance.” Plant Signal Behav 7(4):




502-509.


STRK1
Salt stress tolerance
Zhou, Y., et al. (2018). The receptor-like cytoplasmic




kinase STRK1 phosphorylates and activates Catc,




thereby regulating H2O2 homeostasis and improving




salt tolerance in rice. Plant Cell, tpc.01000.2017.


OsDREB2A
Salt stress tolerance
Zhang, X. X., et al. (2013). OsDREB2A, a rice




transcription factor, significantly affects salt tolerance




in transgenic soybean. Plos One, 8(12), e83011.


OsCam1
Salt stress tolerance
Worawat., et al. (2018). Downstream components of




the calmodulin signaling pathway in the rice salt




stress response revealed by transcriptome profiling




and target identification. BMC Plant Biology.


OsiSAP8
Salt, drought and cold
Kanneganti, V. and A. K. Gupta (2008).



tolerance
“Overexpression of OsiSAP8, a member of stress




associated protein (SAP) gene family of rice confers




tolerance to salt, drought and cold stress in transgenic




tobacco and rice.” Plant Mol Biol 66(5): 445-462.


OsTZF1
Salt and drought
Jan, A., et al. (2013). “OsTZF1, a CCCH-tandem zinc



tolerance
finger protein, confers delayed senescence and stress




tolerance in rice by regulating stress-related genes.”




Plant Physiol 161(3): 1202-1216.


OsLEA5
Salt and drought
Huang, L., et al. (2018). “An Atypical Late



tolerance
Embryogenesis Abundant Protein OsLEA5 Plays a




Positive Role in ABA-Induced Antioxidant Defense in





Oryza sativa L.” Plant Cell Physiol 59(5): 916-929.



ZFP182
Salt tolerance
Huang, J., et al (2007). A novel rice C2H2-type zinc




finger protein lacking DLN-box/EAR-motif plays a




role in salt tolerance. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta




(BBA)-Gene Structure and Expression, 1769(4),




220-227.


OsSta2
Salt tolerance
Kumar, M., et al. (2017). “Ectopic Expression of




OsSta2 Enhances Salt Stress Tolerance in Rice.” Front




Plant Sci 8: 316.


OsMSRA4.1
Salt tolerance
Guo, X., et al. (2009). “OsMSRA4.1 and OsMSRB1.1,




two rice plastidial methionine sulfoxide reductases,




are involved in abiotic stress responses.” Planta




230(1): 227-238.


OsMPG1
Salt tolerance
Kumar, R., et al. (2012). “Functional screening of




cDNA library from a salt tolerant rice genotype




Pokkali identifies mannose-1-phosphate guanyl




transferase gene (OsMPG1) as a key member of




salinity stress response.” Plant Mol Biol 79(6):




555-568.


OsMKK6
Salt tolerance
Kumar, K. and A. K. Sinha (2013). “Overexpression




of constitutively active mitogen activated protein




kinase kinase 6 enhances tolerance to salt stress in




rice.” Rice (NY) 6(1): 25.


OsHAK1
Salt tolerance
Chen, G., et al. (2015). “Rice potassium transporter




OsHAK1 is essential for maintaining




potassium-mediated growth and functions in salt




tolerance over low and high potassium concentration




ranges.” Plant Cell Environ 38(12): 2747-2765.


OsEXPA7
Salt tolerance
Jadamba, C., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of Rice




Expansin7 (Osexpa7) Confers Enhanced Tolerance to




Salt Stress in Rice.” Int J Mol Sci 21(2).


MIPS
Salt tolerance
Kusuda, H., et al. (2015). “Ectopic expression of




myo-inositol 3-phosphate synthase induces a wide




range of metabolic changes and confers salt tolerance




in rice.” Plant Sci 232: 49-56.


CYP94C2b
Salt tolerance
Kurotani, K., et al. (2015). “Stress Tolerance Profiling




of a Collection of Extant Salt-Tolerant Rice Varieties




and Transgenic Plants Overexpressing Abiotic Stress




Tolerance Genes.” Plant Cell Physiol 56(10):




1867-1876.


CYP94C2b
Salt tolerance
Kurotani, K., et al. (2015). “Elevated levels of CYP94




family gene expression alleviate the jasmonate




response and enhance salt tolerance in rice.” Plant




Cell Physiol 56(4): 779-789.


SUB1A
Flooding tolerance
Fukao, T., et al. (2011). “The submergence tolerance




regulator SUB1A mediates crosstalk between




submergence and drought tolerance in rice.” Plant Cell




23(1): 412-427.


OsCBL10
Flooding tolerance
Ye, N. H., et al. (2018). Natural variation in the




promoter of rice calcineurin b-like protein10




(OsCBL10) affects flooding tolerance during seed




germination among rice subspecies. Plant Journal for




Cell & Molecular Biology.


SNAC2
Stress tolerance
Hu, H., et al. (2008). “Characterization of




transcription factor gene SNAC2 conferring cold and




salt tolerance in rice.” Plant Mol Biol 67(1-2):




169-181.


OsNCED5
Stress tolerance
Huang, Y., et al. (2019). “OsNCED5, a




9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene, regulates




salt and water stress tolerance and leaf senescence in




rice.” Plant Sci 287: 110188.


OsLea14-A
Stress tolerance
Hu, T., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of OsLea14-A




improves the tolerance of rice and increases Hg




accumulation under diverse stresses.” Environ Sci




Pollut Res Int 26(11): 10537-10551.


OsCYP20-2
Stress tolerance
Kim, S. K., et al. (2012). “The rice thylakoid lumenal




cyclophilin OsCYP20-2 confers enhanced




environmental stress tolerance in tobacco and




Arabidopsis.” Plant Cell Rep 31(2): 417-426.


OsGLYII-2
Salt tolerance
Ghosh, A., et al. (2014). “A glutathione responsive




rice glyoxalase II, OsGLYII-2, functions in salinity




adaptation by maintaining better photosynthesis




efficiency and anti-oxidant pool.” Plant J 80(1):




93-105.


OsDREB1B
Biotic and abiotic
Gutha, L. R. and A. R. Reddy (2008). “Rice DREB1B



stress tolerance
promoter shows distinct stress-specific responses, and




the overexpression of cDNA in tobacco confers




improved abiotic and biotic stress tolerance.” Plant




Mol Biol 68(6): 533-555.


OsPRX38
Arsenic tolerance
Kidwai, M., et al. (2019). “Oryza sativa class III




peroxidase (OsPRX38) overexpression in Arabidopsis




thaliana reduces arsenic accumulation due to




apoplastic lignification.” J Hazard Mater 362:




383-393.


OsAIR2
Arsenic tolerance
Hwang, S. G., et al. (2017). “Molecular




characterization of rice arsenic-induced RING finger




E3 ligase 2 (OsAIR2) and its heterogeneous




overexpression in Arabidopsis thaliana.” Physiol Plant




161(3): 372-384.


OsAIR1
Arsenic tolerance
Hwang, S. G., et al. (2016). “Molecular




characterization of Oryza sativa arsenic-induced




RING E3 ligase 1 (OsAIR1): Expression patterns,




localization, functional interaction, and heterogeneous




overexpression.” J Plant Physiol 191: 140-148.


OsRGB1
Thermo and salt
Biswas, S., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of



tolerance
heterotrimeric G protein beta subunit gene (OsRGB1)




confers both heat and salinity stress tolerance in rice.”




Plant Physiol Biochem 144: 334-344.


OsPTF1
Low Phosphate
Keke Yi., et al. OsPTF1, a Novel Transcription Factor



tolerance
Involved inTolerance to Phosphate Starvation in Rice


OsSHMT,
Chilling tolerance
Fang, C., et al. (2020). “Serine


Lsi1 gene

hydroxymethyltransferase localised in the


(Lsi1-OX)

endoplasmic reticulum plays a role in scavenging




H2O2 to enhance rice chilling tolerance.” BMC Plant




Biol 20(1): 236.


OsICE
Chilling tolerance
Deng, C., et al. (2017). “The rice transcription factors




OsICE confer enhanced cold tolerance in transgenic




Arabidopsis.” Plant Signal Behav 12(5): e1316442.


ZFP252
Drought and salt
Dong-Qing Xu., et al (2008). Overexpression of a



tolerance
TFIIIA-type zinc finger protein geneZFP252 enhances




drought and salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.)


OsETOL1
Drought and flooding
Du, H., et al. (2014). “A homolog of ETHYLENE



tolerance
OVERPRODUCER, OsETOL1, differentially




modulates drought and submergence tolerance in




rice.” Plant J 78(5): 834-849.


OsRab7
To improve drought
El-Esawi, M. A. and A. A. Alayafi (2019).



and heat tolerance and
“Overexpression of Rice Rab7 Gene Improves



increase rice yield
Drought and Heat Tolerance and Increases Grain




Yield in Rice (Oryza sativa L.).” Genes (Basel) 10(1).


OsGH3-2
Drought and cold
Du, H., et al. (2012). “A GH3 family member,



tolerance
OsGH3-2, modulates auxin and abscisic acid levels




and differentially affects drought and cold tolerance in




rice.” J Exp Bot 63(18): 6467-6480.


OsbZIP23
Drought tolerance and
Dey, A., et al. (2016). “Enhanced Gene Expression



yield increase
Rather than Natural Polymorphism in Coding




Sequence of the OsbZIP23 Determines Drought




Tolerance and Yield Improvement in Rice




Genotypes.” PLoS One 11(3): e0150763.


ScMYBAS1
Drought tolerance
Favero Peixoto-Junior, R., et al. (2018).




“Overexpression of ScMYBAS1 alternative splicing




transcripts differentially impacts biomass




accumulation and drought tolerance in rice transgenic




plants.” PLoS One 13(12): e0207534.


OsTF1L
Drought tolerance
Bang, S. W., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of




OsTFIL, a rice HD-Zip transcription factor, promotes




lignin biosynthesis and stomatai closure that improves




drought tolerance.” Plant Biotechnol J 17(1): 118-131.


OsPLDα1
Drought tolerance
Abreu, F. R. M., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of a




phospholipase (OsPLDalpha1) for drought tolerance




in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.).” Protoplasma 255(6):




1751-1761.


OsDIL
Drought tolerance
Guo, C., et al. (2013). “The rice OsDIL gene plays a




role in drought tolerance at vegetative and




reproductive stages.” Plant Mol Biol 82(3): 239-253.


DST
Drought and salt
Cui, L. G., et al. (2015). “DCA1 Acts as a


&DCA1
tolerance
Transcriptional Co-activator of DST and Contributes




to Drought and Salt Tolerance in Rice.” PLoS Genet




11(10): e1005617.


OsAHL1
Drought tolerance
Zhou, L., et al (2016). “A novel gene OsAHL1




improvesboth drought avoidance anddrought tolerance




in rice.” Scientific reports, 6(1), 1-15.


OsNAC5
Drought tolerance and
Jeong, J. S., et al. (2013). “OsNAC5 overexpression



yield increase
enlarges root diameter in rice plants leading to




enhanced drought tolerance and increased grain yield




in the field.” Plant Biotechnol J 11(1): 101-114.


OsMAPK5
Drought, salt, and cold
Xiong, L., et al.(2003). “Disease Resistance and



tolerance; disease
Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Rice Are Inversely



resistance
Modulated by an Abscisic Acid-Inducible




Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase.” Plant Cell.


OsNAC10
Drought, salt and cold
Jeong, J. S., et al. (2010). “Root-specific expression of



tolerance
OsNAC10 improves drought tolerance and grain yield




in rice under field drought conditions.” Plant Physiol




153(1): 185-197.


ONAC022
Drought and salt
Hong, Y., et al. (2016). “Overexpression of a



tolerance
Stress-Responsive NAC Transcription Factor Gene




ONAC022 Improves Drought and Salt Tolerance in




Rice.” Front Plant Sci 7: 4.


ZFP245
Tolerance to drought,
Huang, J., et al. (2009). “Increased tolerance of rice to



cold and oxidative
cold, drought and oxidative stresses mediated by the



stresses
overexpression of a gene that encodes the zinc finger




protein ZFP245.” Biochem Biophys Res Commun




389(3): 556-561.


OsASR1
Drought and cold
Joo, J., et al. (2013). “Abiotic stress responsive rice



tolerance
ASR1 and ASR3 exhibit different tissue-dependent




sugar and hormone-sensitivities.” Mol Cells 35(5):




421-435.


AP37
Drought, high salt and
Kim, Y. S. and J. K. Kim (2009). “Rice transcription



cold tolerance
factor AP37 involved in grain yield increase under




drought stress.” Plant Signal Behav 4(8): 735-736.


OSRIP18
Drought and heat
Jiang, S. Y., et al. (2012). “Over-expression of



tolerance
OSRIP18 increases drought and salt tolerance in




transgenic rice plants.” Transgenic Res 21(4):




785-795.


WRKY13
Drought tolerance
Xiao, J., et al.(2013). “Rice WRKY13 Regulates Cross




Talk between Abiotic and Biotic Stress Signaling




Pathways by Selective Binding to Different




cis-Elements.” Plant Physiology, 163(4), 1868-1882.


SNAC1
Drought tolerance
Hu, H., et al. (2006). “Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF,




and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought




resistance and salt tolerance in rice.” Proc Natl Acad




Sci USA 103(35): 12987-12992.


OsRBGD3
Drought tolerance
Lenka, S. K., et al. (2019). “Heterologous expression




of rice RNA-binding glycine-rich (RBG) gene




OsRBGD3 in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana confers




cold stress tolerance.” Funct Plant Biol 46(5):




482-491.


OsPYL6
Drought tolerance
Kumar, V. V. S., et al. (2020). “ABA receptor




OsPYL6 confers drought tolerance to indica rice




through dehydration avoidance and tolerance




mechanisms.” J Exp Bot.


OsPYL3
Drought tolerance
Lenka, S. K., et al. (2018). “Ectopic Expression of




Rice PYL3 Enhances Cold and Drought Tolerance in




Arabidopsis thaliana.” Mol Biotechnol 60(5):




350-361.


OsNF-YA7
Drought tolerance
Lee, D. K., et al. (2015). “The NF-YA transcription




factor OsNF-YA7 confers drought stress tolerance of




rice in an abscisic acid independent manner.” Plant




Sci 241: 199-210.


OsNADK1
Drought tolerance
Wang, X., et al. (2020). “The NAD kinase OsNADK1




affects theintracellular redox balance and enhances




the tolerance of rice to drought.” BMC Plant Biology,




20.


OsNAC6
Drought tolerance
Lee, D. K., et al. (2017). “The rice OsNAC6




transcription factor orchestrates multiple molecular




mechanisms involving root structural adaptions and




nicotianamine biosynthesis for drought tolerance.”




Plant Biotechnol J 15(6): 754-764.


OsIAA6
Drought tolerance
Jung, H., et al. (2015). “OsIAA6, a member of the rice




Aux/IAA gene family, is involved in drought




tolerance and tiller outgrowth.” Plant Sci 236:




304-312.


OsERF71
Drought tolerance
Lee, D. K., et al. (2017). “Rice OsERF71-mediated




root modification affects shoot drought tolerance.”




Plant Signal Behav 12(1): e1268311.


OsDRAP1
Drought tolerance
Huang, L., et al. (2018). “Characterization of




Transcription Factor Gene OsDRAP1 Conferring




Drought Tolerance in Rice.” Front Plant Sci 9: 94.


OsCYP18-2
Drought tolerance
Lee, S. S., et al. (2015). “Rice cyclophilin OsCYP18-2




is translocated to the nucleus by an interaction with




SKIP and enhances drought tolerance in rice and




Arabidopsis.” Plant Cell Environ 38(10): 2071-2087.


OsCPK9
Drought tolerance
Shuya, Wei., et al.(2014). “A rice calcium-dependent




protein kinase OsCPK9positively regulates drought




stress tolerance andspikelet fertility.” BMC Plant




Biology, 14(1), 133-133.


OsADF
Drought tolerance
Huang, Y. C., et al. (2012). “Comprehensive analysis




of differentially expressed rice actin depolymerizing




factor gene family and heterologous overexpression of




OsADF3 confers Arabidopsis Thaliana drought




tolerance.” Rice (NY) 5(1): 33.


OCPI1
Drought tolerance
Huang, Y., et al. (2007). “Characterization of a stress




responsive proteinase inhibitor gene with positive




effect in improving drought resistance in rice.” Planta




226(1): 73-85.


CDPK13
Drought tolerance
Komatsu, S., et al. (2007). “Over-expression of




calcium-dependent protein kinase 13 and calreticulin




interacting protein 1 confers cold tolerance on rice




plants.” Mol Genet Genomics 277(6): 713-723.


OsDREB1D
Cold and salt tolerance
Zhang, Y., et al. (2009). “Expression of a rice DREB1




gene, OsDREB1D, enhances cold and high-salt




tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis.” Bmb Reports,




42(8), 486-492.


OsWRKY71
Cold tolerance
Kumar, M., et al. (2017). “Genome-Wide




Identification and Analysis of Genes, Conserved




between japonica and indica Rice Cultivars, that




Respond to Low-Temperature Stress at the Vegetative




Growth Stage.” Front Plant Sci 8: 1120.


OsLti6b
Cold tolerance
Kim, S. H., et al. (2007). “Isolation of cold




stress-responsive genes in the reproductive organs,




and characterization of the OsLti6b gene from rice




(Oryza sativa L.).” Plant Cell Rep 26(7): 1097-1110.


OsAOX1a
Cold tolerance
Li, C. R., et al. (2013). “Overexpression of an




alternative oxidase gene, OsAOX1a, improves cold




tolerance in Oryza sativa L.” Genet Mol Res 12(4):




5424-5432.


OsREX1-S
Cadmium tolerance
Kunihiro, S., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of rice




OsREX1-S, encoding a putative component of the




core general transcription and DNA repair factor IIH,




renders plant cells tolerant to cadmium- and




UV-induced damage by enhancing DNA excision




repair.” Planta 239(5): 1101-1111.


OsMYB45
Cadmium tolerance
Hu, S., et al. (2017). “OsMYB45 plays an important




role in rice resistance to cadmium stress.” Plant Sci




264: 1-8.


OsSIRP1
Tolerance to salinity
Hwang, S. G., et al. (2016). “Molecular dissection of



and other stresses

Oryza sativa salt-induced RING Finger Protein 1





(OsSIRP1): possible involvement in the sensitivity




response to salinity stress.” Physiol Plant 158(2):




168-179


OsJRL
Tolerance to salinity
He, X., et al. (2017). “A rice jacalin-related



and other stresses
mannose-binding lectin gene, OsJRL, enhances





Escherichia coli viability under high salinity stress





and improves salinity tolerance of rice.” Plant Biol




(Stuttg) 19(2): 257-267.


SLG1
Heat tolerance
Xu, Y., et al.(2020). “Natural variations of SLG1




confer high-temperaturetolerance in indica




rice.”Nature Communications, 11(1), 5441.


SBPase
Heat tolerance
Feng, L., et al. (2007). “Overexpression of SBPase




enhances photosynthesis against high temperature




stress in transgenic rice plants.” Plant Cell Rep 26(9):




1635-1646.


OsCDPK1
Drought tolerance
Ho, S. L., et al. (2013). “Sugar starvation- and




GA-inducible calcium-dependent protein kinase 1




feedback regulates GA biosynthesis and activates a




14-3-3 protein to confer drought tolerance in rice




seedlings.” Plant Mol Biol 81(4-5): 347-361.


OsASR5
Drought tolerance
Li, J., et al. (2017).”OsASR5 enhances drought




tolerance through a stomatai closure pathway




associated with ABA and H2O2 signalling in




rice.”Plant Biotechnology Journal..


OsZFP350
Abiotic stress
Kang, Z., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of the zinc



tolerance
finger protein gene OsZFP350 improves root




development by increasing resistance to abiotic stress




in rice.” Acta Biochim Pol 66(2): 183-190.


OsTOP6A1
Abiotic stress
Jain, M., et al. (2008). “Constitutive expression of a



tolerance
meiotic recombination protein gene homolog,




OsTOP6A1, from rice confers abiotic stress tolerance




in transgenic Arabidopsis plants.” Plant Cell Rep




27(4): 767-778.


OsGSTL2
Abiotic stress
Kumar, S., et al. (2013). “Expression of a rice Lambda



tolerance
class of glutathione S-transferase, OsGSTL2, in




Arabidopsis provides tolerance to heavy metal and




other abiotic stresses.” J Hazard Mater 248-249:




228-237.


OsCyp2-P
Abiotic stress
Kumari, S., et al. (2015). “Expression of a cyclophilin



tolerance
OsCyp2-P isolated from a salt-tolerant landrace of




rice in tobacco alleviates stress via ion homeostasis




and limiting ROS accumulation.” Funct Integr




Genomics 15(4): 395-412.


ZFP177
To enhance tolerance
Huang, J., et al. (2008). “Expression analysis of rice



to high and low
A20/AN1-type zinc finger genes and characterization



temperatures and
of ZFP177 that contributes to temperature stress



sensitivity to salt and
tolerance.” Gene 420(2): 135-144.



drought


OsCAF1B
Low-temperature
Fang, J. C., et al. (2021). “A CCR4-associated factor



tolerance
1, OsCAF1B, confers tolerance of low-temperature




stress to rice seedlings.” Plant Mol Biol 105(1-2):




177-192.


OsPEX1
Lignin content
Ke, S., et al. (2019). “Rice OsPEX1, an extensin-like




protein, affects lignin biosynthesis and plant growth.”




Plant Mol Biol 100(1-2): 151-161.


OsLRR1
Immune response
Liang, Z., et al. (2010). “A novel simple extracellular




leucine-rich repeat (eLRR) domain protein from rice




(OsLRR1) enters the endosomal pathway and interacts




with the hypersensitive-induced reaction protein 1




(OsHIRl).” Plant Cell & Environment, 32.


OsHIR1
Immune response
Liang, Z., et al. (2010). “A novel simple extracellular




leucine-rich repeat (eLRR) domain protein from rice




(OsLRR1) enters the endosomal pathway and interacts




with the hypersensitive-induced reaction protein 1




(OsHIR1).” Plant Cell & Environment, 32.


OsPIN2
Aluminium tolerance
D Wu., et al.(2015). “Overexpressing OsPIN2




enhances aluminium internalization by elevating




vesicular trafficking in rice root apex.” Journal of




Experimental Botany, 66(21), 6791-6801.


PGL2
Grain length and
Heang, D. and H. Sassa (2012). “An atypical bHLH



weight
protein encoded by POSITIVE REGULATOR OF




GRAIN LENGTH 2 is involved in controlling grain




length and weight of rice through interaction with a




typical bHLH protein APG.” Breed Sci 62(2):




133-141.


PGL1
Grain length and
Heang, D. and H. Sassa (2012). “Antagonistic actions



weight
of HLH/bHLH proteins are involved in grain length




and weight in rice.” PLoS One 7(2): e31325.


OsCKX2
Grain number and
Yang, J., et al. (2018). “Chromatin interacting factor



yield
OsVIL2 increases biomass and rice grain yield.” Plant




Biotechnology Journal.


OsGL1-2
Wax accumulation and
Islam, M. A., et al. (2009). “Characterization of



drought resistance
Glossy1-homologous genes in rice involved in leaf




wax accumulation and drought resistance.” Plant Mol




Biol 70(4): 443-456.


GLA1
To regulate grain size
Wang, T., et al. (2019). “GRAIN LENGTH AND




AWN 1 negatively regulates grain size in rice.” J




Integr Plant Biol 61(10): 1036-1042.


OsIQD14
To regulate grain
Yang, B. J., et al. “Rice microtubule-associated



shape
protein IQ67-DOMAIN14 regulates grain shape by




modulating microtubule cytoskeleton




dynamics.” Wiley-Blackwell Online Open, 18(5).


OsAPx2
Salt tolerance
Guan, Q., et al. (2012). “Genetic transformation and




analysis of rice OsAPx2 gene in Medicago sativa.”




PLoS One 7(7): e41233.


TPS46
Aphid resistance
Sun, Y., et al. (2017). “TPS46, a Rice Terpene




Synthase Conferring Natural Resistance to Bird




Cherry-Oat Aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi (Linnaeus).”




Front Plant Sci 8: 110.


OsNCED3
Stress resistance
Huang, Y., et al. (2018). “9-cis-Epoxycarotenoid




Dioxygenase 3 Regulates Plant Growth and Enhances




Multi-Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Rice.” Front Plant




Sci 9: 162.


OsNPR1
Rice bacterial leaf
Yuexing Yuan., et al.(2010). “Functional analysis of



blight resistance
rice NPR1-like genes reveals that OsNPR1/NH1 is the




rice orthologue conferring disease resistance with




enhance herbivore susceptibility.” Plant Biotechnology




Journal, 5(2), 313-324.


OsOXO4
Sheath blight
Kutubuddin A Molla., et al.(2013). “Rice oxalate



resistance
oxidase gene driven by green tissue-specific promoter




increases tolerance to sheath blight pathogen




(Rhizoctonia solani) in transgenic rice. “Molecular




Plant Pathology, 14(9).


RDR6
Rice stripe disease
Hong, W., et al. (2015). “OsRDR6 plays role in host



resistance
defense against double-stranded RNA virus, Rice




Dwarf Phytoreovirus.” Sci Rep 5: 11324.


OsHsp18.0
Biotic and abiotic
Kuang, J., et al. (2017). “A Class II small heat shock



stress tolerance
protein OsHsp18.0 plays positive roles in both biotic




and abiotic defense responses in rice.” Sci Rep 7(1):




11333.


OsTPP1
Salt stress, cold stress
Ge, L. F., et al. (2008). “Overexpression of the



tolerance
trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase gene OsTPP1




confers stress tolerance in rice and results in the




activation of stress responsive genes.” Planta 228(1):




191-201.


ZFP185
Stress resistance
Ye, Zhang., et al.(2016). “An A20/AN1-type zinc




finger protein modulates gibberellins and abscisic acid




contents and increases sensitivity to abiotic stress in




rice (Oryza sativa).” Journal of Experimental Botany.


M2H
Stress resistance
Choi, G. H. and K. Back (2019). “Suppression of




Melatonin 2-Hydroxylase Increases Melatonin




Production Leading to the Enhanced Abiotic Stress




Tolerance against Cadmium, Senescence, Salt, and




Tunicamycin in Rice Plants.” Biomolecules 9(10).


OsSAP1
Stress resistance
Kothari, K. S., et al. (2016). “Rice Stress Associated




Protein 1 (OsSAP1) Interacts with Aminotransferase




(OsAMTR1) and Pathogenesis-Related 1a Protein




(OsSCP) and Regulates Abiotic Stress Responses.”




Front Plant Sci 7: 1057.


OsNAS2
Stress tolerance
Lee, S., et al. (2012). “Activation of Rice




nicotianamine synthase 2 (OsNAS2) enhances iron




availability for biofortification.” Mol Cells 33(3):




269-275.


OsNAC9
Drought tolerance and
Redillas, M. C., et al. (2012). “The overexpression of



crop yield
OsNAC9 alters the root architecture of rice plants




enhancing drought resistance and grain yield under




field conditions.” Plant Biotechnol J 10(7): 792-805.


OsTPKb
Drought tolerance
Ahmad, I., et al. (2016). “Overexpression of the




potassium channel TPKb in small vacuoles confers




osmotic and drought tolerance to rice.” New Phytol




209(3): 1040-1048.


OsFTL10
Drought tolerance
Fang, M., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of OsFTL10




induces early flowering and improves drought




tolerance in Oryza sativa L.” PeerJ 7: e6422.


OsbZIP16
Drought tolerance
Chen, H., et al. (2012). “Basic leucine zipper




transcription factor OsbZIP16 positively regulates




drought resistance in rice.” Plant Sci 193-194: 8-17.


OsAKT1
Drought tolerance
Ahmad, I., et al. (2016). “Overexpression of the rice




AKT1 potassium channel affects potassium nutrition




and rice drought tolerance.” J Exp Bot 67(9):




2689-2698.


OsITPK2
Drought and salt
Du, H., et al. (2011). “Characterization of an inositol



tolerance
1,3,4-trisphosphate 5/6-kinase gene that is essential




for drought and salt stress responses in rice.” Plant




Mol Biol 77(6): 547-563.


OsSRO1c
Drought tolerance and
You, J., et al.(2013) “The SNAC1-targeted gene



oxidation resistance
OsSRO1c modulates stomatai closure and oxidative




stress tolerance by regulating hydrogen peroxide in




rice.”Journal of Experimental Botany(2), 569.


OsbZIP46CA1&SAPK6
Drought and
Chang, Y., et al. (2017). “Co-overexpression of the



temperature tolerance
Constitutively Active Form of OsbZIP46 and




ABA-Activated Protein Kinase SAPK6 Improves




Drought and Temperature Stress Resistance in Rice.”




Front Plant Sci 8: 1102.


DSM2/OsBCH1
Drought tolerance and
Du, H., et al. (2010). “Characterization of the



oxidation resistance
beta-carotene hydroxylase gene DSM2 conferring




drought and oxidative stress resistance by increasing




xanthophylls and abscisic acid synthesis in rice.” Plant




Physiol 154(3): 1304-1318.


ZBED
Drought tolerance and
Zuluaga, A. P., et al. (2020). “The Rice DNA-Binding



disease resistance
Protein ZBED Controls Stress Regulators and




Maintains Disease Resistance After a Mild Drought.”




Front Plant Sci 11: 1265.


ROC4
Drought tolerance
Wang, Z., et al. (2018).”The E3 Ligase DROUGHT




HYPERSENSITIVE Negatively Regulates Cuticular




Wax Biosynthesis by Promoting the Degradation of




Transcription Factor ROC4 in Rice.” Plant Cell,




tpc.00823.2017.


OsPP18
Drought tolerance
You, J., et al. (2014). “A STRESS-RESPONSIVE




NAC1-Regulated Protein Phosphatase Gene Rice




Protein Phosphatase18 Modulates Drought and




Oxidative Stress Tolerance through Abscisic




Acid-Independent Reactive Oxygen Species




Scavenging in Rice. “Plant Physiology, 166(4),




2100-14.


OsERF71
Drought tolerance
Lee, D. K., et al. (2016). “Overexpression of the




OsERF71 Transcription Factor Alters Rice Root




Structure and Drought Resistance.” Plant Physiol




172(1): 575-588.


OsDERF1
Drought tolerance
Wan, L., et al. (2011). “Transcriptional activation of




OsDERF1 in OsERF3 and OsAP2-39 negatively




modulates ethylene synthesis and drought tolerance in




rice.” PLoS One 6(9): e25216.


LRK2
Drought tolerance
Kang, J., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of the




leucine-rich receptor-like kinase gene LRK2 increases




drought tolerance and tiller number in rice.” Plant




Biotechnol J 15(9): 1175-1185.


DHS
Drought tolerance
“The E3 Ligase DROUGHT HYPERSENSITIVE




Negatively Regulates Cuticular Wax Biosynthesis by




Promoting the Degradation of Transcription Factor




ROC4 in Rice”


OsCTZFP8
Cold resistance
Jin, Y. M., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of a New




Zinc Finger Protein Transcription Factor OsCTZFP8




Improves Cold Tolerance in Rice.” Int J Genomics




2018: 5480617.


OsPYL/RCAR5
Abiotic stress
Kim, H., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of PYL5 in



tolerance
rice enhances drought tolerance, inhibits growth, and




modulates gene expression.” J Exp Bot 65(2):




453-464.


OsF3H
Plant hopper
Jan, R., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of OsF3H



resistance
modulates WBPH stress by alteration of




phenylpropanoid pathway at a transcriptomic and




metabolomic level in Oryza sativa.” Sci Rep 10(1):




14685.


OsACS2

Magnaporthe oryzae

Helliwell, E. E., et al. (2013). “Transgenic rice with



and Rhizoctonia solani
inducible ethylene production exhibits broad-spectrum



disease resistance
disease resistance to the fungal pathogens





Magnaporthe oryzae and Rhizoctonia solani.” Plant





Biotechnol J 11(1): 33-42.


OsWRKY76

Magnaporthe oryzae

Naoki, Y., et al. (2013). “WRKY76 is a rice



resistance and drought
transcriptional repressor playing opposite roles in



tolerance
blast disease resistance and cold stress




tolerance.” Journal of Experimental Botany(16),




5085-5097.


OsEREB1

Magnaporthe oryzae

Jisha, V., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of an



and xanthomonas
AP2/ERF Type Transcription Factor OsEREBP1




oryzae resistance;

Confers Biotic and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Rice.”



drought tolerance
PLoS One 10(6): e0127831.


OsWRKY31

Magnaporthe oryzae

Juan., et al.(2008) “Constitutive expression of



resistance
pathogen-inducible OsWRKY31 enhances disease




resistance and affects root growth and auxin response




in transgenic rice plants.” Cell Research.


OsMBL1

Magnaporthe oryzae

Han, Y., et al. (2019). “A Magnaporthe Chitinase



resistance
Interacts with a Rice Jacalin-Related Lectin to




Promote Host Colonization.” Plant Physiol 179(4):




1416-1430.


CYP71Z18

Magnaporthe oryzae

Shen, Q., et al. (2019). “CYP71Z18 overexpression



resistance
confers elevated blast resistance in transgenic rice.”




Plant Mol Biol 100(6): 579-589.


OsEXTL
Plant lodging
Fan, C., et al. (2018). “Ectopic expression of a novel



resistance
OsExtensin-like gene consistently enhances plant




lodging resistance by regulating cell elongation and




cell wall thickening in rice.” Plant Biotechnol J 16(1):




254-263.


S1R109944
Disease resistance
Qiao, L., et al. (2020). “Expression of rice siR109944




in Arabidopsis affects plant immunity to multiple




fungal pathogens.” Plant Signal Behav 15(4):




1744347.


OsPrx114
Disease resistance
Wally, O. and Z. K. Punja (2010). “Enhanced disease




resistance in transgenic carrot (Daucus carota L.)




plants over-expressing a rice cationic peroxidase.”




Planta 232(5): 1229-1239.


OsWRKY89
Disease resistance
Wang, H., et al. (2007). “Overexpression of rice




WRKY89 enhances ultraviolet B tolerance and




disease resistance in rice plants.” Plant Mol Biol




65(6): 799-815.


miR528
Virus resistance
Shengze, et al. (2019). Transcriptional regulation of




mir528 by OsSPL9 orchestrates antiviral response in




rice. custom-character   1114-1122.


OsCDPK1
Disease resistance
He, S. L., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of a




constitutively active truncated form of OsCDPK1




confers disease resistance by affecting OsPR10a




expression in rice.” Sci Rep 8(1): 403.


OsPR10a
Bacterial leaf blight
Huang, L. F., et al. (2016). “Multiple Patterns of



and streak disease
Regulation and Overexpression of a



resistance
Ribonuclease-Like Pathogenesis-Related Protein




Gene, OsPR10a, Conferring Disease Resistance in




Rice and Arabidopsis.” PLoS One 11(6): e0156414.


OsWRKY11
Bacterial leaf blight
Lee, H., et al. (2018). “Rice WRKY11 Plays a Role in



resistance
Pathogen Defense and Drought Tolerance.” Rice




(NY) 11(1): 5.


OsPUB41
Bacterial leaf blight
Kachewar, N. R., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of



resistance
OsPUB41, a Rice E3 ubiquitin ligase induced by cell




wall degrading enzymes, enhances immune responses




in Rice and Arabidopsis.” BMC Plant Biol 19(1): 530.


OsFWL5
Bacterial leaf blight
Li, B., et al. (2019). “Overexpression a “fruit-weight



resistance
2.2-like” gene OsFWL5 improves rice resistance.”




Rice (NY) 12(1): 51.


OsCM
Bacterial leaf blight
Jan, R., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of OsCM



resistance
alleviates BLB stress via phytohormonal accumulation




and transcriptional modulation of defense-related




genes in Oryza sativa.” Sci Rep 10(1): 19520.


OsMlo2
Powdery mildew
Elliott, C., et al. (2002). “Functional conservation of



resistance
wheat and rice Mlo orthologs in defense modulation to




the powdery mildew fungus.” Mol Plant Microbe




Interact 15(10): 1069-1077.


SE5
Flowering
Izawa, T., et al. (2000). “Phytochromes confer the




photoperiodic control of flowering in rice (a short-day




plant).” Plant J 22(5): 391-399.


OsMADS50
Flowering
Lee, S., et al. (2004). “Functional analyses of the




flowering time gene OsMADS50, the putative




SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO




1/AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 (SOC1/AGL20) ortholog in




rice.” Plant J 38(5): 754-764.


OsMADS1
Flowering
Jeon, J. S., et al. (2000). “leafy hull sterile1 is a




homeotic mutation in a rice MADS box gene affecting




rice flower development.” Plant Cell 12(6): 871-884.


OsGI
Flowering
Hayama, R., et al. (2003). “Adaptation of




photoperiodic control pathways produces short-day




flowering in rice.” Nature 422(6933): 719-722.


OsGR2
Detoxication
Zhang, Z., et al.(2020). Two glyoxylate reductase




isoforms are functionally redundant but required




under high photorespiration conditions in rice. BMC




Plant Biology, 20(1).


OsGR1
Detoxication
Zhang, Z., et al.(2020). Two glyoxylate reductase




isoforms are functionally redundant but required




under high photorespiration conditions in rice. BMC




Plant Biology, 20(1).


OsD-LDH2
To relieve biotic stress
Jain, M., et al. (2020). “A D-lactate dehydrogenase



tolerance
from rice is involved in conferring tolerance to




multiple abiotic stresses by maintaining cellular




homeostasis.” Sci Rep 10(1): 12835.


OsRab6a
Environment singal
Yang, A., et al. (2016). “A Small GTPase, OsRab6a,



(iron) response
is Involved in the Regulation of Iron Homeostasis in




Rice.” Front Plant Sci 11: 595439.


OsGGP
Overexpression on
Broad, R. C., et al. (2020). “Effect of Rice



ascorbate
GDP-L-Galactose Phosphorylase Constitutive



concentration; stress
Overexpression on Ascorbate Concentration, Stress



tolerance
Tolerance, and Iron Bioavailability in Rice.” Front




Plant Sci 11: 595439.


OsMADS58
Floral organ
Ming, Zheng ., et al.(2015). “DEFORMED FLORAL



development
ORGAN1 (DFO1) regulates floral organ identity by




epigenetically repressing the expression of




OsMADS58 in rice (Oryza sativa).” New Phytologist,




206(4).


DFO1
Floral organ
Ming, Zheng., et al.(2015). “DEFORMED FLORAL



development
ORGAN1 (DFO1) regulates floral organ identity by




epigenetically repressing the expression of




OsMADS58 in rice (Oryza sativa).” New Phytologist,




206(4).


OsUCL23
Pollen development
Zhang, Y. C., et al.(2019). “OsmiR528 regulates




rice-pollen intine formationby targeting an uclacyanin




to influence flavonoid metabolism.” Proceedings of the




National Academy of Sciences, 117(1), 201810968.


allene oxide
Brown planthopper
Chu, H., et al. (2013). “A CLE-WOX signalling


cyclase
resistance
module regulates root meristem maintenance and




vascular tissue development in rice.” J Exp Bot




64(17): 5359-5369.


Os6PGDH1
Brown planthopper
Chen, L., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of a Cytosolic




6-Phosphogluconate Dehydrogenase Gene Enhances




the Resistance of Rice to Nilaparvata lugens.” Plants




(Basel) 9(11).


OsGID1
Brown planthopper
Chen, L., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of OsGID1




Enhances the Resistance of Rice to the Brown




Planthopper Nilaparvata lugens.” Int J Mol Sci 19(9).


OsSPL7
Hydrogen peroxide
Hoang, T. V., et al. (2019). “Heat stress transcription



accumulation, rice
factor OsSPL7 plays a critical role in reactive oxygen



blast resistance,
species balance and stress responses in rice.” Plant Sci



bacterial blight
289: 110273.



resistance, cold



tolerance


OsNAS2
zinc and ironconten
Moreno-Moyano, L. T., et al.(2016). “Association of



in rice gains
Increased Grain Iron and Zinc Concentrations with




Agro-morphological Traits ofBiofortified




Rice.” Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1463.


OsGrxC2.2
increasegrain weight
Liu, S., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of a




CPYC-Type Glutaredoxin, OsGrxC2.2, Causes




Abnormal Embryos and an Increased Grain Weight in




Rice”


OsBBI1
broad spectrum
Wei Li., et al.(2011). “Rice RING protein OsBBI1



resistance to
with E3 ligase activity confers broad-spectrum




Magnaporthe oryzae

resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae by modifying




the cell wall defence.” Cell Research, 21(5), 835-848.


SDG711
large inflorescence
Liu, X., et al. (2015). “Regulation of Histone




Methylation and Reprogramming of Gene Expression




in the Rice Inflorescence Meristem.” Plant Cell, 27(5),




1428-44.


PMM1
increaseyield and
Li, Y., et al.(2018). “Panicle Morphology Mutant 1



grain weight
(PMM1) determines the inflorescence architecture of




rice by controlling brassinosteroid biosynthesis.” BMC




Plant Biology, 18(1).


SDG701
early flowering
Liu, K. P., et al.(2017). “SET DOMAIN GROUP701




encodes a H3K4-methytransferase and regulates




multiple key processes of rice plant




development.” NEW PHYTOL, 2017,215(2)(—),




609-623.


SAPK10
early flowering
Xixi, Liu., et al. (2019). “Protein Interactomic




Analysis of SAPKs and ABA-Inducible bZIPs




Revealed Key Roles of SAPK10 in Rice




Flowering.” International Journal of Molecular




Sciences.


OsPAP10c
phosphorus utilization
Lu, L., et al. (2016). “OsPAP10c, a novel secreted




acid phosphatase in rice, plays an important role in the




utilization of external organic phosphorus.” Plant, Cell




& Environment.


OsHsfA7
salt and drought
Liu, A. L., et al. (2013). “Over-expression of



tolerance
OsHsfA7 enhanced salt and drought tolerance in




transgenic rice.” BMB Reports, 46(1).


OsMYB3R-2
cold tolerance
Qibin Ma., et al.(2009). “Enhanced T olerance to




Chilling Stress in OsMYB3R-2T ransgenic Rice Is




Mediated by Alteration in Cell Cycle and Ectopic




Expression of Stress Genes.” Plant Physiology,




150(1), 244-256.


OsDREB1G
cold tolerance
Moon, S. J., et al.(2019). “Ectopic Expression of




OsDREB1G, a Member of the OsDREB1 Subfamily,




Confers Cold Stress Tolerance in Rice.” Frontiers in




plant science, 10.


SAPK1
salt tolerance
Lou, D., et al.(2018). “The sucrose


SAPK2

non-fermenting-1-related protein kinases SAPK1 and




SAPK2 function collaboratively as positive regulators




of saltstress tolerance in rice.” BMC Plant Biology,




18(1).


OsRacB
salt tolerance
Min, L., et al.(2010). Rice gtpase osracb: potential




accessory factor in plant salt-stress signaling. Acta




Biochimica Et Biophysica Sinica, 38(6), 393-402.


OsCNX6
salt tolerance
Xin Liu., et al.(2018). Identification and




characterization of the rice pre-harvest sprouting




mutants involved in molybdenum cofactor




biosynthesis. The New Phytologist.


OsCIPK30
tolerance to rice
Liu, Y., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of OsCIPK30



stripe virus
Enhances Plant T olerance to Rice stripe




virus” Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 2322.


OsGAPB
low light
“Proteomic Analysis of Rice Subjected to Low Light



stresstolerance
Stress and Overexpression of OsGAPB Increases the




Stress Tolerance.” Rice, 13(1).


OsERF3
stress resistance
Jing, L., et al. (2011). “An EAR-motif-containing ERF




transcription factor affects herbivore-induced




signaling, defense and resistance in rice.” Plant




Journal, 68(4), 583-596.


OsARD1
stress resistance
Liang, S., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of OsARD1




Improves Submergence, Drought, and Salt Tolerances




of Seedling Through the Enhancement of Ethylene




Synthesis in Rice.” Frontiers in Plant Science, 10.


OsDHODH1
drought and salt
Liu, W. Y., et al.(2009). “The OsDHODH1 Gene is



tolerance
Involved in Salt and Drought Tolerance in




Rice.” Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 51(009),




825-833.


RWC3
drought tolerance
Lian, H. L., et al.(2004). “The Role of Aquaporin




RWC3 in Drought A voidance in Rice.” Plant & Cell




Physiology.


bZIP73
cold tolerance
Liu, C., et al. (2019). “The bZIP73 transcription factor




controls rice cold tolerance at the reproductive




stage” Plant Biotechnology Journal, 17(9).


OsPdk1
rice blast disease
Hirochika, H., et al. (2010). “Pdk1 Kinase Regulates



resistance and
Basal Disease Resistance Through the



bacterial leaf blight
OsOxi1-OsPti1a Phosphorylation Cascade in



disease
Rice.” Plant & Cell Physiology, 51(12), 2082-91.


OsCBSX3
rice blast disease
Mou, S., et al.(2015). Over-expression of rice CBS



resistance
domain containing protein, OsCBSX3, confers rice




resistance to magnaporthe oryzae inoculation.




International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(7),




15903-15917.


OsAAA-ATPase1
rice blast disease
Liu, X., et al. (2020). Rice OsAAA-ATPase1 is



resistance
induced during blast infection in a salicylic




acid-dependent manner, and promotes blast fungus




resistance. International Journal of Molecular




Sciences, 21(4), 1443.


XA3
bacterial leaf blight
Liu, F., et al. (2020). The rice xa3 gene confers



disease resistance
resistance to xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in the




model rice kitaake genetic background. Frontiers in




Plant Science, 11.


OsTGA2
bacterial leaf blight
Seok-Jun., et al.(2018). OsTGA2 confers disease



disease resistance
resistance to rice against leaf blight by regulating




expression levels of disease related genes via




interaction with NH1. PloS one, 13(11), e0206910.


OsCYP71Z2
bacterial leaf blight
Wenqi, L., et al.(2019). Overexpressing CYP71z2



disease resistance
enhances resistance to bacterial blight by suppressing




auxin biosynthesis in rice. PloS one.


OsPIANK1
bacterial leaf blight
Mou, S., et al., (2013). Functional analysis and



diseaseresistance
expressional characterization of rice ankyrin




repeat-containing protein, ospiank1, in basal defense




against magnaporthe oryzae attack. Plos One, 8.


NOE1/OsCATC
programmed cell death
Runlong, M., et al.(2013). Nitric Oxide and Protein




S-Nitrosylation Are Integral to Hydrogen




Peroxide-Induced Leaf Cell Death in Rice


OsEXPA8
facilitating cell
Ma, N., et al, (2013). Overexpression of OsEXPA8, a



extension
root-specific gene, improves rice growth and root




system architecture by facilitating cell extension.




PLOS ONE, 8(10), e75997-.


OsSnRK1a
Broad spectrum
Filipe, O., et al. (2018). “The energy sensor



disease resistance
OsSnRK1a confers broad-spectrum disease resistance



(rice blast)
in rice.” Sci Rep 8(1): 3864.


OsMADS25
Root development
Ning Xu., et al.(2018). Rice transcription factor




OsMADS25 modulates root growth and confers




salinity tolerance via the ABA-mediated regulatory




pathway and ROS scavenging. PLoS genetics.


MHZ5
Root and coleoptile
Yin, C. C., et al. (2015). Ethylene responses in rice



growth
roots and coleoptiles are differentially regulated by a




carotenoid isomerase-mediated abscisic acid pathway.




Plant Cell, 27(4), 1061-1081.


OsPIN1
Root development and
Xu, M., et al.(2005)A pin1 family gene, ospin1,



tillering
involved in auxin-dependent adventitious root




emergence and tillering in rice. Plant & Cell




Physiology (10), 1674.


OsRDCP1
Drought stress
Bae, H., et al. (2011). “Overexpression of OsRDCP1,



tolerance
a rice RING domain-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase,




increased tolerance to drought stress in rice (Oryza





sativa L.).” Plant Sci 180(6): 775-782.



OsRPK1
Negatively regulate
Zou, Y., et al. (2014). “OsRPK1, a novel leucine-rich



plant height and tiller
repeat receptor-like kinase, negatively regulates polar



number
auxin transport and root development in rice.”




Biochim Biophys Acta 1840(6): 1676-1685.


ONAC095
Negatively regulates
Huang, L., et al. (2016). “Rice NAC transcription



drought tolerance and
factor ONAC095 plays opposite roles in drought and



positively regulates
cold stress tolerance.” BMC Plant Biol 16(1): 203.



cold tolerance


OsAAP4
Tillering and yield
Fang, Z., et al. (2021). “The Amino Acid Transporter




OsAAP4 Contributes to Rice Tillering and Grain




Yield by Regulating Neutral Amino Acid Allocation




through Two Splicing Variants.” Rice (NY) 14(1): 2.


OsRAN2
Abiotic stress
Zang, A., et al. (2010). Overexpression of OsRAN2 in




rice and Arabidopsis renders transgenic plants




hypersensitive to salinity and osmotic stress. Journal




of experimental botany, 61(3), 777-789.


OsCYP71D8L
Abiotic stress
Zhou, J., et al (2020). CYP71D8L is a key regulator




involved in growth and stress responses by mediating




gibberellin homeostasis in rice. Journal of




experimental botany, 71(3), 1160-1170.


OsTRXh1
Development and
Zhang, C. et al (2011). An apoplastic h-type



stress response
thioredoxin is involved in the stress response through




regulation of the apoplastic reactive oxygen species in




rice. Plant Physiology, 157(4), 1884-1899.


RF2a
To exert strong
Petruccelli, S., et al. (2001). “Transcription factor



negative effect on the
RF2a alters expression of the rice tungro bacilliform



development of
virus promoter in transgenic tobacco plants.” Proc



transgenic plants
Natl Acad Sci USA 98(13): 7635-7640.


OsPM1
Response to drought
Yao, L., et al. (2018). The AWPM-19 family protein




OsPM1 mediates abscisic acid influx and drought




response in rice. The Plant Cell, 30(6), 1258-1276.


OsCO3
To delay flowering in
Kim, S. K., et al. (2008). “OsCO3, a



the conditions of short
CONSTANS-LIKE gene, controls flowering by



daylight
negatively regulating the expression of FT-like genes




under SD conditions in rice.” Planta 228(2): 355-365


OsLsi1
Resistance to cold
Fang, C., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of Lsi1 in



stress
cold-sensitive rice mediates transcriptional regulatory




networks and enhances resistance to chilling stress.”




Plant Sci 262: 115-126.


Perox3
Rice blast resistance
Zhu, Z., et al. (2020). “New insights into




bsr-d1-mediated broad-spectrum resistance to rice




blast.” Mol Plant Pathol 21(7): 951-960.


OsWRKY53
Rice blast resistance
Chujo, T., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of




phosphomimic mutated OsWRKY53 leads to




enhanced blast resistance in rice.” PLoS One 9(6):




e98737.


OsSPK1
Rice blast resistance
Wang, Q., et al. (2018). “Resistance protein Pit




interacts with the GEF OsSPK1 to activate OsRac1




and trigger rice immunity.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA




115(49): E11551-E11560.


OsDjA9
Rice blast resistance
Xu, G., et al. (2020). “A fungal effector targets a heat




shock-dynamin protein complex to modulate




mitochondrial dynamics and reduce plant immunity.”




Sci Adv 6(48).


OsCPK4
Rice blast resistance
Bundo, M. and M. Coca (2016). “Enhancing blast




disease resistance by overexpression of the




calcium-dependent protein kinase OsCPK4 in rice.”




Plant Biotechnol J 14(6): 1357-1367.


Osa-miR162
Rice blast resistance
Li, X. P., et al. (2020). “Osa-miR162a fine-tunes rice




resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae and Yield.” Rice




(NY) 13(1): 38.


APIP4
Rice blast
Zhang, C., et al. (2020). “A fungal effector and a rice




NLR protein have antagonistic effects on a




Bowman-Birk trypsin inhibitor.” Plant Biotechnol J




18(11): 2354-2363.


OsTPS19
Rice blast
Chen, X., et al. (2018). “The rice terpene synthase




gene OsTPS19 functions as an (S)-limonene synthase




in planta, and its overexpression leads to enhanced




resistance to the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae.”




Plant Biotechnol J 16(10): 1778-1787.


RBBI2-3
Rice blast
Qu, L. J., et al. (2003). “Molecular cloning and




functional analysis of a novel type of Bowman-Birk




inhibitor gene family in rice.” Plant Physiol 133(2):




560-570.


TLH
Rice blast
Rehmeyer, C., et al. (2006). “Organization of




chromosome ends in the rice blast fungus,





Magnaporthe oryzae.” Nucleic Acids Res 34(17):





4685-4701.


Rirlb
Rice blast
Schaffrath, U., et al. (2000). “Constitutive expression




of the defense-related Rir1b gene in transgenic rice




plants confers enhanced resistance to the rice blast




fungus Magnaporthe grisea.” Plant Mol Biol 43(1):




59-66.


MoSDT1
Rice blast
Wang, C., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of





Magnaporthe Oryzae Systemic Defense Trigger 1





(MoSDT1) Confers Improved Rice Blast Resistance in




Rice.” Int J Mol Sci 20(19).


Met6
Rice blast
Saint-Macary, M. E., et al. (2015). “Methionine




biosynthesis is essential for infection in the rice blast




fungus Magnaporthe oryzae.” PLoS One 10(4):




e0111108.


Cpk2
Rice blast
Selvaraj, P., et al. (2017). “Cpk2, a Catalytic Subunit




of Cyclic AMP-PKA, Regulates Growth and




Pathogenesis in Rice Blast.” Front Microbiol 8: 2289.


APIP12
Rice blast
Tang, M., et al. (2017). “The Nup98 Homolog APIP12




Targeted by the Effector AvrPiz-t is Involved in Rice




Basal Resistance Against Magnaporthe oryzae.” Rice




(NY) 10(1): 5.


SEP1
Rice blast
Saunders, D. G., et al. (2010). “Spatial uncoupling of




mitosis and cytokinesis during appressorium-mediated




plant infection by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe





oryzae.” Plant Cell 22(7): 2417-2428.



OsATG8a
Nitrogen use
Yu, J., et al (2019). Increased autophagy of rice can



efficiency
increase yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE).




Frontiers in plant science, 10, 584.


RDD1
To improve nutrient
Iwamoto, M. and A. Tagiri (2016).



uptake and increase
“MicroRNA-targeted transcription factor gene RDD1



yield
promotes nutrient ion uptake and accumulation in




rice.” Plant J 85(4): 466-477.


OsCCT19
Head sprouting
Zhang, L., et al (2015). Three CCT domain-containing




genes were identified to regulate heading date by




candidate gene-based association mapping and




transformation in rice. Scientific reports, 5(1), 1-11.


OsCCT11
Head sprouting
Zhang, L., et al (2015). Three CCT domain-containing




genes were identified to regulate heading date by




candidate gene-based association mapping and




transformation in rice. Scientific reports, 5(1), 1-11.


OsCCT01
Head sprouting
Zhang, L., et al (2015). Three CCT domain-containing




genes were identified to regulate heading date by




candidate gene-based association mapping and




transformation in rice. Scientific reports, 5(1), 1-11.


SLRL1
Gibberellin signaling
Itoh, H., et al. (2005). “Overexpression of a GRAS



repressor
protein lacking the DELLA domain confers altered




gibberellin responses in rice.” Plant J 44(4): 669-679.


OsGIF1
Yield and plant
He, Z., et al. (2017). “OsGIF1 Positively Regulates



morphology
the Sizes of Stems, Leaves, and Grains in Rice.” Front




Plant Sci 8: 1730.


OsDHAR1
Yield and biomass
Kim, Y. S., et al. (2013). “Homologous expression of




cytosolic dehydroascorbate reductase increases grain




yield and biomass under paddy field conditions in




transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L. japonica).” Planta




237(6): 1613-1625.


WG7
Yield
Huang, Y., et al. (2020). “Wide Grain 7 increases




grain width by enhancing H3K4me3 enrichment in the




OsMADS1 promoter in rice (Oryza sativa L.).” Plant J




102(3): 517-528.


PDH45
Yield
Sahoo, R. K., et al. (2012). “Pea DNA helicase 45




promotes salinity stress tolerance in IR64 rice with




improved yield.” Plant Signal Behav 7(8): 1042-1046.


OsSUS3
Yield
Fan, C., et al. (2019). “Sucrose Synthase Enhances




Hull Size and Grain Weight by Regulating Cell




Division and Starch Accumulation in Transgenic




Rice.” Int J Mol Sci 20(20).


OsSND2
Yield
Ye, Y., et al (2018). OsSND2, aNAC family




transcription factor, is involved in secondary cell wall




biosynthesis through regulating MYBs expression in




rice. Rice, 11(1), 1-14.


OsSGL
Yield
Wang, M., et al. (2016). “OsSGL, a novel pleiotropic




stress-related gene enhances grain length and yield in




rice.” Sci Rep 6: 38157.


OsRac1
Yield
Zhang, Y., et al (2019). The Rho-family GTPase




OsRac1 controls rice grain size and yield by




regulating cell division. Proceedings of the National




Academy of Sciences, 116(32), 16121-16126


OsqLL9
Yield
Fu, X., et al. (2019). “Enhanced Expression of QTL




qLL9/DEP1 Facilitates the Improvement of Leaf




Morphology and Grain Yield in Rice.” Int J Mol Sci




20(4).


OsNRT2.3b
Yield
Fan, X., et al. (2016). “Overexpression of a




pH-sensitive nitrate transporter in rice increases crop




yields.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(26):




7118-7123.


OsNPF7.2
Yield
Wang, J., et al. (2018). “Rice nitrate transporter




OsNPF7.2 positively regulates tiller number and grain




yield.” Rice (NY) 11(1): 12.


OsNLP4
Yield
Wu, J.,et al (2021). Rice NIN-LIKE PROTEIN 4 plays




a pivotal role in nitrogen use efficiency. Plant




biotechnology journal, 19(3), 448-461.


OsMYB103L
Yield
Yang, C., et al(2014). OsMYB103L, an R2R3-MYB




transcription factor, influences leaf rolling and




mechanical strength in rice (Oryza sativa L.). BMC




plant biology, 14(1), 1-15.


OsMPH1
Yield
Zhang, Y., et al(2017). OsMPH1 regulates plant




height and improves grain yield in rice. PLoS one,




12(7), e0180825.


OsmiR156
Yield
Zhao, M., et al (2015). Regulation of OsmiR156h




through alternative polyadenylation improves grain




yield in rice. PloS one, 10(5), e0126154.


OsLSK1
Yield
Zou, X., et al. (2015). “Over-expression of an




S-domain receptor-like kinase extracellular domain




improves panicle architecture and grain yield in rice.”




J Exp Bot 66(22): 7197-7209.


OsEATB
Yield
Qi, W., et al. (2011). “Rice ethylene-response




AP2/ERF factor OsEATB restricts internode




elongation by down-regulating a gibberellin




biosynthetic gene.” Plant Physiol 157(1): 216-228.


OsCu/Zn-SOD
Yield
Guan, Q., et al. (2017). “Tolerance analysis of




chloroplast OsCu/Zn-SOD overexpressing rice under




NaCl and NaHCO3 stress.” PLoS One 12(10):




e0186052.


OsbHLH107
Yield
Yang, X., et al (2018). Overexpression of




OsbHLH107, a member of the basic helix-loop-helix




transcription factor family, enhances grain size in rice




(Oryza sativa L.). Rice, 11(1), 1-12.


OsbHLH079
Yield
Seo, H., et al. (2020). “The Rice Basic




Helix-Loop-Helix 79 (OsbHLH079) Determines Leaf




Angle and Grain Shape.” Int J Mol Sci 21(6).


OsATG8c
Yield
Zhen, X., et al(2019). OsATG8c-mediated increased




autophagy regulates the yield and nitrogen use




efficiency in rice. International journal of molecular




sciences, 20(19), 4956.


OsASN1
Yield
Lee, S., et al. (2020). “OsASN1 Overexpression in




Rice Increases Grain Protein Content and Yield under




Nitrogen-Limiting Conditions.” Plant Cell Physiol




61(7): 1309-1320.


OsAP2-39
Yield
Yaish, M. W., et al(2010). The APETALA-2-like




transcription factor OsAP2-39 controls key




interactions between abscisic acid and gibberellin in




rice. PLoS Genet, 6(9), el001098.


OsAFB6
Yield
He, Q., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of an auxin




receptor OsAFB6 significantly enhanced grain yield




by increasing cytokinin and decreasing auxin




concentrations in rice panicle.” Sci Rep 8(1): 14051.


OsACBP2
Yield
Guo, Z. H., et al. (2019). “The overexpression of rice




ACYL-CoA-BINDING PROTEIN2 increases grain




size and bran oil content in transgenic rice.” Plant J




100(6): 1132-1147.


OsABCG18
Yield
Zhao, J.,et al (2019). ABC transporter OsABCG18




controls the shootward transport of cytokinins and




grain yield in rice. Journal of experimental botany,




70(21), 6277-6291.


OsAAP6
Yield
Ji, Y., et al. (2020). “The amino acid transporter




AAP1 mediates growth and grain yield by regulating




neutral amino acid uptake and reallocation in Oryza





sativa.” J Exp Bot 71(16): 4763-4777.



OSA1
Yield
Zhang, M., et al (2021). Plasma membrane H+-ATPase




overexpression increases rice yield via simultaneous




enhancement of nutrient uptake and photosynthesis.




Nature communications, 12(1), 1-12.


NOG1
Yield
Huo, X., et al. (2017). “NOG1 increases grain




production in rice.” Nat Commun 8(1): 1497.


miR1432
Yield
Zhao, Y. F., et al(2019). “miR1432-OsACOT




(Acyl-CoA thioesterase) module determines grain




yield via enhancing grain filling rate in rice.” Plant




biotechnology journal, 17(4), 712-723.


LRK1
Yield
Zha, X.,et.al (2009). “Overexpression of the rice




LRK1 gene improves quantitative yield components.”




Plant biotechnology journal, 7(7), 611-620.


LAIR
Yield
Wang, Y., et al (2018). “Overexpressing IncRNA




LAIR increases grain yield and regulates




neighbouring gene cluster expression in rice.” Nature




communications, 9(1), 1-9.


HD1
Yield
Piao, R., et al. (2014). “Isolation and characterization




of a dominant dwarf gene, d-h, in rice.” PLoS One




9(2): e86210.


GW6
Yield
Shi, C. L., et al. (2020). “A quantitative trait locus




GW6 controls rice grain size and yield through the




gibberellin pathway.” Plant J 103(3): 1174-1188.


GNS4
Yield
Zhou, Y., et al (2017). “GNS4, a novel allele of




DWARF11, regulates grain number and grain size in a




high-yield rice variety.” Rice, 10(1), 1-11.


DEGs
Yield
Swamy, B. P., et al. (2013). “Genetic, physiological,




and gene expression analyses reveal that multiple




QTL enhance yield of rice mega-variety IR64 under




drought.” PLoS One 8(5): e62795.


CPB1/D11
Yield
Wu, Y., et al (2016). “CLUSTERED PRIMARY




BRANCH 1, a new allele of DWARF 11, controls




panicle architecture and seed size in rice.” Plant




biotechnology journal, 14(1), 377-386.


Big Grain 1
Yield
Liu, L., et al. (2015). “Activation of big grain1




significantly improves grain size by regulating auxin




transport in rice.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.




112: 11102-11107.


AtGolS2
Yield
Selvaraj, M. G., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of an




Arabidopsis thaliana galactinol synthase gene




improves drought tolerance in transgenic rice and




increased grain yield in the field.” Plant Biotechnol J




15(11): 1465-1477.


OsNLP1(NIN-LIKE
Yield
Alfatih, A., et al. (2020). “Rice NIN-LIKE PROTEIN


PROTEIN 1)

1 rapidly responds to nitrogen deficiency and




improves yield and nitrogen use efficiency.” J Exp




Bot 71(19): 6032-6042.


OsNHX1
Yield
Qu, M., et al. (2020). “Alterations in stomatai




response to fluctuating light increase biomass and




yield of rice under drought conditions.” Plant J




104(5): 1334-1347.


CYP734A4
Yield
Qian, W., et al. (2017). “Novel rice mutants




overexpressing the brassinosteroid catabolic gene




CYP734A4.” Plant Mol Biol 93(1-2): 197-208.


AtICE1
Yield
Verma, R. K., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of




Arabidopsis ICE1 enhances yield and multiple abiotic




stress tolerance in indica rice.” Plant Signal Behav




15(11): 1814547.


OsGH3.1
Resistance to a fungal
Domingo, C., et al. (2009). “Constitutive expression



pathogen
of OsGH3.1 reduces auxin content and enhances




defense response and resistance to a fungal pathogen




in rice.” Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22(2): 201-210.


OsHAP2E
Tolerance to
Alam, M. M., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of a rice



pathogens, salinity
heme activator protein gene (OsHAP2E) confers



and drought
resistance to pathogens, salinity and drought, and




increases photosynthesis and tiller number.” Plant




Biotechnol J 13(1): 85-96.


Oshox4
Semi-dwarfing
Dai, M., et al. (2008). “Functional analysis of rice



phenotype
HOMEOBOX4 (Oshox4) gene reveals a negative




function in gibberellin responses.” Plant Mol Biol




66(3): 289-301.


EUI
Resistance to bacterial
Yang, D. L., et al (2008). “Altered Disease



leaf blight and leaf
Development in the eui Mutants



blast in rice
and Eui Overexpressors Indicates that Gibberellins




Negatively Regulate Rice Basal Disease




Resistance.” Molecular plant, 1(3), 528-537.


LRR1
Resistance to bacterial
Caddell, D. F., et al. (2017). “Silencing of the Rice



leaf blight in rice
Gene LRR1 Compromises Rice Xa21 Transcript




Accumulation and XA21-Mediated Immunity.” Rice




(NY) 10(1): 23.


GH3-8,
Resistance to bacterial
Ding, X., et al. (2008). “Activation of the



leaf blight in rice
indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase GH3-8




suppresses expansin expression and promotes




salicylate- and jasmonate-independent basal immunity




in rice.” Plant Cell 20(1): 228-240.


OsSWEET14
Resistance to bacterial
Tran, T. T., et al. (2018). “Functional analysis of



leaf blight in rice
African Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae TALomes




reveals a new susceptibility gene in bacterial leaf




blight of rice.” PLoS Pathog 14(6): e1007092.


cecropin B
Resistance to bacterial
Sharma, A., et al. (2000). “Transgenic expression of



leaf blight in rice
cecropin B, an antibacterial peptide from Bombyx




mori, confers enhanced resistance to bacterial leaf




blight in rice.” FEBS Lett 484(1): 7-11.


OsAMT1-1
Ammonium uptake
Hoque, M. S., et al. (2006). “Over-expression of the




rice OsAMT1-1 gene increases ammonium uptake and




content, but impairs growth and development of plants




under high ammonium nutrition.” Funct Plant Biol




33(2): 153-163.


OsWRKY36
Dwarfing
Lan, J., et al. (2020). “Small grain and semi-dwarf 3, a




WRKY transcription factor, negatively regulates plant




height and grain size by stabilizing SLR1 expression




in rice.” Plant Mol Biol 104(4-5): 429-450


bHLH6
Pi uptake
He, Q., et al. (2020). “OsbHLH6 interacts with




OsSPX4 and regulates the phosphate starvation




response in rice.” Plant J.


OsNPF7.7
Nitrogen uptake and
Huang, W., et al. (2018). “Two Splicing Variants of



utilization
OsNPF7.7 Regulate Shoot Branching and Nitrogen




Utilization Efficiency in Rice.” Front Plant Sci 9: 300.


OsIMA1
Fe uptake
Kobayashi, T., et al. (2020). “Iron




deficiency-inducible peptide coding genes OsIMA1




and OsIMA2 positively regulate a major pathway of




iron uptake and translocation in rice.” J Exp Bot.


SAPK9
Drought tolerance and
Dey, A., et al. (2016). “The sucrose non-fermenting



grain yield
1-related kinase 2 gene SAPK9 improves drought




tolerance and grain yield in rice by modulating




cellular osmotic potential, stomatai closure and




stress-responsive gene expression.” BMC Plant Biol




16(1): 158.


DNG701
DNA methylation
La, H., et al. (2011). “A 5-methylcytosine DNA




glycosylase/lyase demethylates the retrotransposon




Tos17 and promotes its transposition in rice.” Proc




Natl Acad Sci USA 108(37): 15498-15503.


OsSLG
grain yield
Feng, Z., et al. (2016). “SLG controls grain size and




leaf angle by modulating brassinosteroid homeostasis




in rice.” J Exp Bot 67(14): 4241-4253.









Table I lists the representative functional genes in wheat. Methods in the present invention can be used to edit such genes and create new genes by designing new combinations of different gene elements or different protein domain, and can be utilized in wheat breeding program.









TABLE I







Important functional genes in wheat









Gene name
Application
Reference





TaDOG1L1
Seed
Ashikawa I, et al. (2010). Ectopic expression of wheat and barley



dormancy
dog1-like genes promotes seed dormancy in arabidopsis. Plant




Science An International Journal of Experimental Plant Biology,




179(5), 536-542.


CTR1
Salt
Cai-Li B I, et al. (2010). Cloning and characterization of a



resistance
putative Ctrl gene from wheat. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,




9(009), 1241-1250.


TaPIEP1
Pathogenic
Dong N, et al. (2010). Overexpression of tapiep1, a



bacteria
pathogen-induced erf gene of wheat, confers host-enhanced



resistance
resistance to fungal pathogen bipolaris sorokiniana. Functional &




Integrative Genomics, 10(2), 215-226.


1Dy12
Flour
Valquiria R M Pierucci, et al. (2009). Effects of overexpression



quality
of high molecular weight glutenin subunit 1dy10 on wheat tortilla




properties. J Agric Food Chern, 57(14), 6318-6326.


STRP
Salt
Zhou W, et al. (2009). Overexpression of tastrg gene improves



resistance
salt and drought tolerance in rice. Journal of Plant Physiology,




166(15), 1660-1671.


TaAIDFa
Signal
Xu Z S, et al. (2008). Characterization of the taaidfa gene



transduction
encoding a crt/dre-binding factor responsive to drought, high-salt,




and cold stress in wheat. Molecular Genetics & Genomics,




280(6), 497-508.


Waox1a
Cold
Sugie A, et al. (2006). Overexpression of wheat alternative



tolerance
oxidase gene waox1a alters respiration capacity and response to




reactive oxygen species under low temperature in transgenic




arabidopsis. Genes & Genetic Systems, 81(5), 349-354.


skp1
Promotion
Li C, et al. (2006). Cloning and expression analysis of tsk1, a



of cell
wheat skp1 homologue, and functional comparison with



division
arabidopsis ask1 in male meiosis and auxin signalling. Functional




Plant Biology, 33(4), 381-390.


TaSNAC8-
Drought
Mao, H., et al. (2020). “Regulatory changes in TaSNAC8-6A are


6A
tolerance in
associated with drought tolerance in wheat seedlings.” Plant



seedling
Biotechnol J 18(4): 1078-1092.



stage



TaCML36
Sheath
Lu, L., et al. (2019). “TaCML36, a wheat calmodulin-like protein,



blight
positively participates in an immune response to Rhizoctonia



disease
cerealis.” Crop Journal 7(5): 608-618.



resistance



TdPIP2; 1
Salt and
Ayadi, M., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of a Wheat Aquaporin



drought
Gene, TdPIP2; 1, Enhances Salt and Drought Tolerance in



tolerance
Transgenic Durum Wheat cv. Maali.” Int J Mol Sci 20(10).


TaCIPK10
Stripe rust
Liu, P., et al. (2019). “TaCIPK10 interacts with and



resistance
phosphorylates TaNH2 to activate wheat defense responses to




stripe rust.” Plant Biotechnol J 17(5): 956-968.


TaCML20
Drought
Kalaipandian, S., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of TaCML20, a



tolerance
calmodulin-like gene, enhances water soluble carbohydrate



and growth
accumulation and yield in wheat.” Physiol Plant 165(4): 790-799.



promoting



TaJAZ1
Powdery
Jing, Y., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of TaJAZ1 increases



mildew
powdery mildew resistance through promoting reactive oxygen



resistance
species accumulation in bread wheat.” Sci Rep 9(1): 5691.


TaCOLD1
Reduced
Dong, H., et al. (2019). “TaCOLD1 defines anew regulator of



height of
plant height in bread wheat.” Plant Biotechnol J 17(3): 687-699.



plant



TaMYB86B
Salt and
Song, Y., et al. (2020). “TaMYB86B encodes a R2R3-type MYB



drought
transcription factor and enhances salt tolerance in wheat.” Plant



tolerance
Sci 300: 110624.


TaUGT6
FHB
He, Y., et al. (2020). “TaUGT6, a Novel



resistance
UDP-Glycosyltransferase Gene Enhances the Resistance to FHB




and DON Accumulation in Wheat.” Front Plant Sci 11: 574775.


TaEXPA2
Drought
Yang, J.J., et al. (2020). “Expansin gene TaEXPA2 positively



tolerance
regulates drought tolerance in transgenic wheat (Triticum




aestivum L.).” Plant Science 298: 14.


TaDof1
N and C
Hasnain, A., et al. (2020). “Transcription Factor TaDof1



assimilation
Improves Nitrogen and Carbon Assimilation Under Low-Nitrogen




Conditions in Wheat.” Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 38(3):




441-451.


TaPRX-2A
Salt
Su, P., et al. (2020). “A member of wheat class III peroxidase



tolerance
gene family,TaPRX-2A, enhanced the tolerance of salt stress.”




BMC Plant Biol 20(1).


TaPUB1
Salt
Wang, W., et al. (2020). “The involvement of wheat U-box E3



tolerance
ubiquitin ligase TaPUB1 in salt stress tolerance.” J Integr Plant




Biol 62(5): 631-651.


TaZFP1B
Drought
Cheuk, A., et al. (2020). “The barley stripe mosaic virus



tolerance
expression system reveals the wheat C2H2 zinc finger protein




TaZFP1B as a key regulator of drought tolerance.” BMC Plant




Biol 20(1): 144.


TaWAK6
Leaf rust
Dmochowska-Boguta, M., et al. (2020). “TaWAK6 encoding



resistance
wall-associated kinase is involved in wheat resistance to leaf rust




similar to adult plant resistance.” PLoS One 15(1): e0227713.


TaGATA1
sheath
Liu, X., et al. (2020). “The wheat LLM-domain-containing



blight
transcription factor TaGATA1 positively modulates host immune



disease
response to Rhizoctonia cerealis.” J Exp Bot 71(1): 344-355.



resistance



TaMAPK16
Drought
Zhao, Y.J., et al. (2020). “Characterization on the water



tolerance
deprivation-associated physiological traits as well as the related




differential genes during seed filling stage in wheat (T. aestivum




L.).” Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 140(3): 605-618.


TaPEPKR2
Heat and
Zang, X., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of the Wheat (Triticum



drought
aestivum L.) TaPEPKR2 Gene Enhances Heat and Dehydration



tolerance
Tolerance in Both Wheat and Arabidopsis.” Front Plant Sci 9:




1710.


TaWRKY2
Drought
Gao, H., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of a WRKY Transcription



tolerance
Factor TaWRKY2 Enhances Drought Stress Tolerance in




Transgenic Wheat.” Front Plant Sci 9: 997.


TaNBP1
Low
Liu, Z., et al. (2018). “TaNBP1, a guanine nucleotide-binding



nitrogen
subunit gene of wheat, is essential in the regulation of N



tolerance
starvation adaptation via modulating N acquisition and ROS




homeostasis.” BMC Plant Biol 18(1): 167.


TaMIR2275
Low
Qiao, Q.H., et al. (2018). “Wheat miRNA member TaMIR2275



nitrogen
involves plant nitrogen starvation adaptation via enhancement of



tolerance
the N acquisition-associated process.” Acta Physiologiae




Plantarum 40(10): 13.


TaSHN1
Drought
Bi, H., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of the TaSHN1



tolerance
transcription factor in bread wheat leads to leaf surface




modifications, improved drought tolerance, and no yield penalty




under controlled growth conditions.” Plant Cell Environ 41(11):




2549-2566.


TaGS2-2Ab
Promoting
Hu, M., et al. (2018). “Transgenic expression of plastidic



nitrogen
glutamine synthetase increases nitrogen uptake and yield in



use
wheat.” Plant Biotechnol J 16(11): 1858-1867.



efficiency



TaRNAC1
To enhance
Chen, D., et al. (2018). “Overexpression of a predominantly



drought
root-expressed NAC transcription factor in wheat roots enhances



tolerance
root length, biomass and drought tolerance.” Plant Cell Rep



of root
37(2): 225-237.



system



TaEDS1
Powdery
Chen, G., et al. (2018). “TaEDS1 genes positively regulate



mildew
resistance to powdery mildew in wheat.” Plant Mol Biol 96(6):



resistance
607-625.


Ta-UGT (3)
Head blight
Xing, L.P., et al. (2018). “Over-expressing a



resistance
UDP-glucosyltransferase gene (Ta-UGT (3)) enhances Fusarium




Head Blight resistance of wheat.” Plant Growth Regulation 84(3):




561-571.


aCOMT-3D
Sheath
Wang, M., et al. (2018). “A wheat caffeic acid



blight
3-O-methyltransferase TaCOMT-3D positively contributes to



disease
both resistance to sharp eyespot disease and stem mechanical



resistance
strength.” Sci Rep 8(1): 6543.


TaCIPK23
Drought
Cui, X.Y., et al. (2018). “Wheat CBL-interacting protein kinase



tolerance
23 positively regulates drought stress and ABA responses.” BMC




Plant Biol 18(1): 93.


TaSAP5
Drought
Zhang, N., et al. (2017). “The E3 Ligase TaSAP5 Alters Drought



tolerance
Stress Responses by Promoting the Degradation of DRIP




Proteins.” Plant Physiol 175(4): 1878-1892.


TaTAR2.1-
To increase
Shao, A., et al. (2017). “The Auxin Biosynthetic TRYPTOPHAN


3A
yield and
AMINOTRANSFERASE RELATED TaTAR2.1-3A Increases



biomass
Grain Yield of Wheat.” Plant Physiol 174(4): 2274-2288.


TaRCR1
Sheath
Zhu, X., et al. (2017). “The wheat NB-LRR gene TaRCR1 is



blight
required for host defence response to the necrotrophic fungal



disease
pathogen Rhizoctonia cerealis.” Plant Biotechnol J 15(6):



resistance
674-687.


TaPIMP2
root rot
Wei, X., et al. (2017). “TaPIMP2, a pathogen-induced MYB



resistance
protein in wheat, contributes to host resistance to common root




rot caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana.” Sci Rep 7(1): 1754.


TaNF-YB3; 1
Drought
Yang, M.Y., et al. (2017). “Wheat nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) B



tolerance
subfamily gene TaNF-YB3; 1 confers critical drought tolerance




through modulation of the ABA-associated signaling pathway.”




Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 128(1): 97-111.


TaFER-5B
Heat and
Zang, X., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of wheat ferritin gene



other
TaFER-5B enhances tolerance to heat stress and other abiotic



tolerance
stresses associated with the ROS scavenging.” BMC Plant Biol




17(1): 14.


TaCAD12
Sheath
Rong, W., et al. (2016). “A Wheat Cinnamyl Alcohol



blight
Dehydrogenase TaCAD12 Contributes to Host Resistance to the



disease
Sharp Eyespot Disease.” Front Plant Sci 7: 1723.



resistance



TaCPK7-D
Sheath
Wei, X., et al. (2016). “The wheat calcium-dependent protein



blight
kinase TaCPK7-D positively regulates host resistance to sharp



disease
eyespot disease.” Mol Plant Pathol 17(8): 1252-1264.



resistance



TabHLH1
Nitrogen
Yang, T., et al. (2016). “TabHLH1, a bHLH-type transcription



and
factor gene in wheat, improves plant tolerance to Pi and N



phosphorus
deprivation via regulation of nutrient transporter gene



stress
transcription and ROS homeostasis.” Plant Physiol Biochem 104:



tolerance
99-113.


TaRIM1
Sheath
Shan, T., et al. (2016). “The wheat R2R3-MYB transcription



blight
factor TaRIM1 participates in resistance response against the



disease
pathogen Rhizoctonia cerealis infection through regulating



resistance
defense genes.” Sci Rep 6: 28777.


TaBASS2
Salt
Zhao, Y., et al. (2016). “A putative pyruvate transporter



tolerance
TaBASS2 positively regulates salinity tolerance in wheat via




modulation of ABI4 expression.” BMC Plant Biol 16(1): 109.


TaSOD2
Salt stress
Wang, M., et al. (2016). “A wheat superoxide dismutase gene



and other
TaSOD2 enhances salt resistance through modulating redox



stresses
homeostasis by promoting NADPH oxidase activity.” Plant Mol




Biol 91(1-2): 115-130.


TaRLK1/
Powdery
Chen, T., et al. (2016). “Two members of TaRLK family confer


TaRLK2
mildew
powdery mildew resistance in common wheat.” BMC Plant Biol



resistance
16: 27.


Wknox1
Formation
Ryoko Morimoto, et al. (2005)Intragenic diversity and functional



of leaf
conservation of the three homoeologous loci of the KN1-type



blade
homeobox gene Wknox1 in common wheat. Plant Molecular




Biology, 57(6).


FKBP
Stress
Kurek L, et al. (2002) Overexpression of the wheat fk506-binding



response
protein 73 (fkbp73) and the heat-induced wheat fkbp77 in



and
transgenic wheat reveals different functions of the two isoforms.



photosynthesis
Transgenic Res, 11(4): 373-9.



enhancing



TaMloA/B/D
Powdery
Elliott C., et al. (2002) Functional conservation of wheat and rice



mildew
mio orthologs in defense modulation to the powdery mildew



resistance
fungus. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 15(10): 1069-77.


GLP
Disease
Christensen A.B., et al.(2004), The germinlike protein glp4



resistance
exhibits superoxide dismutase activity and is an important




component of quantitative resistance in wheat and barley [J]. Mol




Plant Microbe Interact, 17(1): 109-17.


Q gene
wide
Simons K.J., et al. (2006), Molecular characterization of the



adaptability,
major wheat domestication gene q. Genetics, 172(1): 547-55.



plant




morphology



TaGI1
Flowering
Zhao X.Y., et al. (2005), The wheat tagi1, involved in



time
photoperiodic flowering, encodes an arabidopsis gi ortholog[J].



regulation
Plant Mol Biol, 58(1): 53-64..


TaWRKY45
Head blight
Bahrini, L, et al. (2011). “Overexpression of the



resistance
pathogen-inducible wheat TaWRKY45 gene confers disease




resistance to multiple fungi in transgenic wheat plants.” Breed Sci




61(4): 319-326.


Rht-A1
Regulation
Pearce, S., et al. (2011). “Molecular characterization of Rht-1



of plant
dwarfing genes in hexapioid wheat.” Plant Physiol 157(4):



height
1820-1831.


TaSnRK2.7
Abio-stress
Zhang, H., et al. (2011). “Characterization of a common wheat



tolerance
(Triticum aestivum L.) TaSnRK2.7 gene involved in abiotic stress




responses.” J Exp Bot 62(3): 975-988.


BLF
Head blight
Han, J., et al. (2012). “Transgenic expression of lactoferrin



resistance
imparts enhanced resistance to head blight of wheat caused by




Fusarium graminearum.” BMC Plant Biol 12: 33.


HvCO9
Flowering
Kikuchi, R., et al. (2012). “The differential expression of HvCO9,



time
a member of the CONSTANS-like gene family, contributes to the



regulation
control of flowering under short-day conditions in barley.” J Exp




Bot 63(2): 773-784.


DELLA
Disease
Saville, R. J., et al. (2012). “The ‘Green Revolution’ dwarfing



resistance
genes play a role in disease resistance in Triticum aestivum and




Hordeum vulgare.” J Exp Bot 63(3): 1271-1283.


TaBI-1
Stripe rust
Wang, X., et al. (2012). “Wheat BAX inhibitor-1 contributes to



resistance
wheat resistance to Puccinia striiformis.” J Exp Bot 63(12):




4571-4584.


TaGAMYB
Anther
Wang, Y., et al. (2012). “TamiR159 directed wheat TaGAMYB



development
cleavage and its involvement in anther development and heat



and heat
response.” PLoS One 7(11): e48445.



response



TaMYB32
Salt
Zhang, L., et al. (2012). “Molecular characterization of 60



tolerance
isolated wheat MYB genes and analysis of their expression during




abiotic stress.” J Exp Bot 63(1): 203-214.


TaOPR1
Salt
Dong, W., et al. (2013). “Wheat oxophytodienoate reductase gene



tolerance
TaOPR1 confers salinity tolerance via enhancement of abscisic




acid signaling and reactive oxygen species scavenging.” Plant




Physiol 161(3): 1217-1228.


FgLaeA
Fusarium
Kim, H.K., et al. (2013). “Functional roles of FgLaeA in



graminearum
controlling secondary metabolism, sexual development, and



resistance
virulence in Fusarium graminearum.” PLoS One 8(7): e68441.


TiMYB2R-1
full rot
Liu, X., et al. (2013). “Transgenic wheat expressing Thinopyrum



disease
intermedium MYB transcription factor TiMYB2R-1 shows




enhanced resistance to the take-all disease.” J Exp Bot 64(8):




2243-2253.


FgStuA
Fusarium
Pasquali, M., et al. (2013). “FeStuA from Fusarium culmorum



culmorum
controls wheat foot and root rot in a toxin dispensable manner.”




PLoS One 8(2): e57429.


TaWRKY71-1
Dormancy
Qin, Z., et al. (2013). “Ectopic expression of a wheat WRKY



regulation
transcription factor gene TaWRKY71-1 results in hyponastic




leaves in Arabidopsis thaliana.″ PLoS One 8(5): e63033.


AbaA
Fusarium
Son, H., et al. (2013). ″AbaA regulates conidiogenesis in the



graminearum
ascomycete fungus Fusarium graminearum.” PLoS One 8(9):



resistance
e72915.


ZCCT
Flowering
Gulyas, Z., et al. (2014). “Central role of the flowering repressor



regulation
ZCCT2 in the redox control of freezing tolerance and the initial




development of flower primordia in wheat.” BMC Plant Biol 14:




91.


Ta-sro1
Abio-stress
Liu, S., et al. (2014). “A wheat SIMILAR TO RCD-ONE gene



tolerance
enhances seedling growth and abiotic stress resistance by




modulating redox homeostasis and maintaining genomic




integrity.” Plant Cell 26(1): 164-180.


TaTEF-7A
Yield
Zheng, J., et al. (2014). “TEF-7A, a transcript elongation factor




gene, influences yield-related traits in bread wheat (Triticum




aestivum L.).” J Exp Bot 65(18): 5351-5365.


TaNAC2-5A
Yield
He, X., et al. (2015). “The Nitrate-Inducible NAC Transcription




Factor TaNAC2-5A Controls Nitrate Response and Increases




Wheat Yield.” Plant Physiol 169(3): 1991-2005.


TaFROG
Fusarium
Perochon, A., et al. (2015). “TaFROG Encodes a Pooideae



graminearum
Orphan Protein That Interacts with SnRK1 and Enhances




Resistance to the Mycotoxigenic Fungus Fusarium graminearum.”



resistance
Plant Physiol 169(4): 2895-2906.


PsANT
Disease
Tang, C., et al. (2015). “PsANT, the adenine nucleotide



resistance
translocase of Puccinia striiformis, promotes cell death and




fungal growth.” Sci Rep 5: 11241.


SbPIP1
Salt
Yu, G.H., et al. (2015). “Changes in the Physiological



tolerance
Parameters of SbPIP1-Transformed Wheat Plants under Salt




Stress.” Int J Genomics 2015: 384356.


TaNAC47
Abio-stress
Zhang, L., et al. (2015). “The Novel Wheat Transcription Factor



tolerance
TaNAC47 Enhances Multiple Abiotic Stress Tolerances in




Transgenic Plants.” Front Plant Sci 6: 1174.


TaFBA1
Anti-oxidation
Zhou, S.M., et al. (2015). “The involvement of wheat F-box




protein gene TaFBA1 in the oxidative stress tolerance of plants.”




PLoS One 10(4): e0122117.


CMPG1-V
Powdery
Zhu, Y., et al. (2015). “E3 ubiquitin ligase gene CMPG1-V from



mildew
Haynaldia villosa L. contributes to powdery mildew resistance in



resistance
common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).” Plant J 84(1): 154-168.


TaAGC1
Rhizoctonia
Zhu, X., et al. (2015). “The wheat AGC kinase TaAGC1 is a



cerealis
positive contributor to host resistance to the necrotrophic



resistance
pathogen Rhizoctonia cerealis.” J Exp Bot 66(21): 6591-6603.


TaNAC-S
Late
Zhao, D., et al. (2015). “Overexpression of aNAC transcription



maturing,
factor delays leaf senescence and increases grain nitrogen



improve
concentration in wheat.” Plant Biol (Stuttg) 17(4): 904-913.



grain seed




quality



TabZIP60
Abio-stress
Zhang, L., et al. (2015). “A novel wheat bZIP transcription factor,



tolerance
TabZIP60, confers multiple abiotic stress tolerances in transgenic




Arabidopsis.” Physiol Plant 153(4): 538-554.


TaNF-YB4
Promoting
Yadav, D., et al. (2015). “Constitutive overexpression of the



yield
TaNF-YB4 gene in transgenic wheat significantly improves grain




yield.” J Exp Bot 66(21): 6635-6650.


TaHsfA6f
Heat
Xue, G.P., et al. (2015). “TaHsfA6f is a transcriptional activator



response
that regulates a suite of heat stress protection genes in wheat




(Triticum aestivum L.) including previously unknown Hsf




targets.” J Exp Bot 66(3): 1025-1039.


TaNAC29
Salt
Xu, Z., et al. (2015). “Wheat NAC transcription factor TaNAC29



tolerance
is involved in response to salt stress.” Plant Physiol Biochem 96:




356-363.


CYP51
Aluminum
Wagatsuma, T., et al. (2015). “Higher sterol content regulated by



tolerance
CYP51 with concomitant lower phospholipid content in




membranes is a common strategy for aluminium tolerance in




several plant species.” J Exp Bot 66(3): 907-918.


TaGBF1
Blue light
Sun, Y., et al. (2015). “The wheat TaGBF1 gene is involved in the



response
blue-light response and salt tolerance.” Plant J 84(6): 1219-1230.



and salt




tolerance



EF-Tu
Disease
Schoonbeek, H.J., et al. (2015). “Arabidopsis EF-Tu receptor



resistance
enhances bacterial disease resistance in transgenic wheat.” New




Phytol 206(2): 606-613.


Chs3b
Disease
Cheng, W., et al. (2015). “Host-induced gene silencing of an



resistance
essential chitin synthase gene confers durable resistance to




Fusarium head blight and seedling blight in wheat.” Plant




Biotechnol J 13(9): 1335-1345.


PsSRPKL
Fusarium
Cheng, Y., et al. (2015). “Characterization of protein kinase



head blight
PsSRPKL, a novel pathogenicity factor in the wheat stripe rust



resistance
fungus.” Environ Microbiol 17(8): 2601-2617.


TdSHN1
Abio-stress
Djemal, R. and H. Khoudi (2015). “Isolation and molecular



tolerance
characterization of a novel WIN1/SHN1 ethylene-responsive




transcription factor TdSHN1 from durum wheat (Triticum




turgidum. L. subsp. durum).” Protoplasma 252(6): 1461-1473.


WD40
Abio-stress
Kong, D., et al. (2015). “Identification of TaWD40D, a wheat



tolerance
WD40 repeat-containing protein that is associated with plant




tolerance to abiotic stresses.” Plant Cell Rep 34(3): 395-410.


TaCYP78A3
Grain size
Ma, M., et al. (2015). “Expression of TaCYP78A3, a gene



regulation
encoding cytochrome P450 CYP78A3 protein in wheat (Triticum




aestivum L.), affects seed size.” Plant J 83(2): 312-325.


TaDOGIL4
Seed
Ashikawa, I., et al. (2014). “A transgenic approach to controlling



dormancy
wheat seed dormancy level by using Triticeae DOG1-like genes.”



regulation
Transgenic Res 23(4): 621-629.


TaEXPB23
Promoting
Han, Y.Y., et al. (2014). “The involvement of expansins in



uptake of
responses to phosphorus availability in wheat, and its potentials



phosphorus
in improving phosphorus efficiency of plants.” Plant Physiol




Biochem 78: 53-62.


TaNHX3
Salt
Lu, W., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of TaNHX3, a vacuolar



tolerance
Na(+)/H(+) antiporter gene in wheat, enhances salt stress




tolerance in tobacco by improving related physiological




processes.” Plant Physiol Biochem 76: 17-28.


TaERF3
Abio-stress
Rong, W., et al. (2014). “The ERF transcription factor TaERF3



tolerance
promotes tolerance to salt and drought stresses in wheat.” Plant




Biotechnol J 12(4): 468-479.


TaABL1
Abio-stress
Xu, D.B., et al. (2014). “ABI-like transcription factor gene



tolerance
TaABL1 from wheat improves multiple abiotic stress tolerances




in transgenic plants.” Funct Integr Genomics 14(4): 717-730.


TaHsfC2a
Thermo
Xue, G.P., et al. (2014). “The heat shock factor family from



tolerance
Triticum aestivum in response to heat and other major abiotic




stresses and their role in regulation of heat shock protein genes.”




J Exp Bot 65(2): 539-557.


TaLTP
Chilling
Yu, G., et al. (2014). “Identification of wheat non-specific lipid



tolerance
transfer proteins involved in chilling tolerance.” Plant Cell Rep




33(10): 1757-1766.


TaCLP1
Stripe rust
Feng, H., et al. (2013). “Target of tae-miR408, a



resistance
chemocyanin-like protein gene (TaCLP1), plays positive roles in




wheat response to high-salinity, heavy cupric stress and stripe




rust.” Plant Mol Biol 83(4-5): 433-443.


TaLSD1
Stripe rust
Guo, J., et al. (2013). “Wheat zinc finger protein TaLSD1, a



resistance
negative regulator of programmed cell death, is involved in wheat




resistance against stripe rust fungus.” Plant Physiol Biochem 71:




164-172.


TaLSU1
Starch
Kang, G., et al. (2013). “Increasing the starch content and grain



content
weight of common wheat by overexpression of the cytosolic




AGPase large subunit gene.” Plant Physiol Biochem 73: 93-98.


TaDREB3
Chilling
Kovalchuk, N., et al. (2013). “Optimization of TaDREB3 gene



tolerance
expression in transgenic barley using cold-inducible promoters.”




Plant Biotechnol J 11(6): 659-670.


TaS3
Powdery
Li, S., et al. (2013). “Wheat gene TaS3 contributes to powdery



mildew
mildew susceptibility.” Plant Cell Rep 32(12): 1891-1901.


TaHMA2
Heavy-metal
Tan, J., et al. (2013). “Functional analyses of TaHMA2, a



tolerance
P(1B)-type ATPase in wheat.” Plant Biotechnol J 11(4): 420-431.


TaSnRK2.3
Abio-stress
Tian, S., et al. (2013). “Cloning and characterization of



tolerance
TaSnRK2.3, a novel SnRK2 gene in common wheat.” J Exp Bot




64(7): 2063-2080.


TaMYB3R1
Abio-stress
Cai, H., et al. (2011). “Identification of a MYB3R gene involved



tolerance
in drought, salt and cold stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).”




Gene 485(2): 146-152.


TaLTP5
Fusarium
Zhu, X., et al. (2012). “Overexpression of wheat lipid transfer



graminearum
protein gene TaLTP5 increases resistances to Cochliobolus



resistance
sativus and Fusarium graminearum in transgenic wheat.” Funct




Integr Genomics 12(3): 481-488.


TaCHP
Salt
Zhao, X., et al. (2012). “The role of TaCHP in salt stress



resistance
responsive pathways.” Plant Signal Behav 7(1): 71-74.


TaDAD2
Stripe rust
Wang, X., et al. (2011). “TaDAD2, a negative regulator of



resistance
programmed cell death, is important for the interaction between




wheat and the stripe rust fungus.” Mol Plant Microbe Interact




24(1): 79-90.









Table J lists some representative functional genes in tomato.









TABLE J







Important functional genes in in tomato









Gene name
Application
Reference





SlWRKY3
SlWRKY3 as a positive
Chinnapandi, B., et al. (2019). “Tomato



regulator of induced
SlWRKY3 acts as a positive regulator for



resistance in response
resistance against the root-knot nematode



to nematode invasion
Meloidogyne javanica by activating lipids and



and infection, mostly
hormone-mediated defense-signaling pathways.”



during the early stages
Plant Signal Behav 14(6): 1601951.



of nematode infection.



SlSAMS1
tolerance to alkali
Gong, B., et al. (2014). “Overexpression of



stress
S-adenosyl-L-methionine synthetase increased




tomato tolerance to alkali stress through




polyamine metabolism.” Plant Biotechnol J




12(6): 694-708.


SlCYP90B3
BR biosynthesis
Hu, S., et al. (2020). “Regulation of fruit




ripening by the brassinosteroid biosynthetic gene




SlCYP90B3 via an ethylene-dependent pathway




in tomato.” Hortic Res 7: 163.


SlTLFP8
decreased stomatai
Li, S., et al. (2020). “SlTLFP8 reduces water loss



density
to improve water-use efficiency by modulating




cell size and stomatal density via




endoreduplication.” Plant Cell Environ 43(11):




2666-2679.


DWARF
improved seed
Li, X.J., et al. (2016). “DWARF overexpression



germination, root
induces alteration in phytohormone homeostasis,



development and early
development, architecture and carotenoid



growth vigour
accumulation in tomato.” Plant Biotechnol J




14(3): 1021-1033.


SlAGO7
increased fruit yield
Lin, D., et al. (2016). “Ectopic expression of




SlAGO7 alters leaf pattern and inflorescence




architecture and increases fruit yield in tomato.”




Physiol Plant 157(4): 490-506.


LeNHX4
increased fruit size
Maach, M., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of




LeNHX4 improved yield, fruit quality and salt




tolerance in tomato plants




(Solanumlycopersicum L.).” MolBiol Rep 47(6):




4145-4153.


SlBRI1
improve multiple major
Nie, S., et al. (2017). “Enhancing



agronomic traits
Brassinosteroid Signaling via Overexpression of




Tomato (Solanumlycopersicum) SlBRI1




Improves Major Agronomic Traits.” Front Plant




Sci 8: 1386.


SlCDF4
increased yield
Renau-Morata, B., et al. (2020). “The targeted




overexpression of SlCDF4 in the fruit enhances




tomato size and yield involving gibberellin




signalling.” Sci Rep 10(1): 10645.


SlJUB1
drought tolerance
Thirumalaikumar, V.P., et al. (2018). “NAC




transcription factor JUNGBRUNNEN1 enhances




drought tolerance in tomato.” Plant Biotechnol J




16(2): 354-366.


SlNAP1
drought tolerance
Wang, J., et al. (2020). “Transcriptomic and




genetic approaches reveal an essential role of the




NAC transcription factor SlNAP1 in the growth




and defense response of tomato.” Hortic Res




7(1): 209.


SlRING1
cadmium (Cd)
Ahammed, G.J., et al. (2020). “Overexpression



tolerance
of tomato RING E3 ubiquitin ligase gene




SlRING1 confers cadmium tolerance by




attenuating cadmium accumulation and oxidative




stress.” Physiol Plant.


SlAREB1
regulates primary
Bastias, A., et al. (2014). “The transcription



metabolic pathways
factor AREB1 regulates primary metabolic




pathways in tomato fruits.” J Exp Bot 65(9):




2351-2363.


HsfA1a
cadmium (Cd)
Cai, S.Y., et al. (2017). “HsfA1a upregulates



tolerance
melatonin biosynthesis to confer cadmium




tolerance in tomato plants.” J Pineal Res 62(2)


SlUPA-like
regulation of plant
Cui, B., et al. (2016). “Overexpression of



development and stress
SlUPA-like induces cell enlargement, aberrant



tolerance
development and low stress tolerance through




phytohormonal pathway in tomato.” Sci Rep 6:




23818


MYB49
tolerance to drought
Cui, J., et al. (2018). “Tomato MYB49 enhances



and salt stresses
resistance to Phytophthorainfestans and




tolerance to water deficit and salt stress.” Planta




248(6): 1487-1503.


LetAPX
tolerance to chilling
Duan, M., et al. (2012). “Overexpression of



stress
thylakoidalascorbate peroxidase shows enhanced




resistance to chilling stress in tomato.” J Plant




Physiol 169(9): 867-877.


SlBZR1D
regulates BR signaling
Jia, C., et al. (2021). “Tomato BZR/BES



and salt tolerance
transcription factor SlBZR1 positively regulates




BR signaling and salt stress tolerance in tomato




and Arabidopsis.” Plant Sci 302: 110719.


SlMBP22
drought tolerance
Li, F., et al. (2020). “Overexpression of




SlMBP22 in Tomato Affects Plant Growth and




Enhances Tolerance to Drought Stress.” Plant




Sci 301: 110672.


SlCOMT1
salt tolerance
Liu, D.D., et al. (2019). “Overexpression of the




Melatonin Synthesis-Related Gene SlCOMT1




Improves the Resistance of Tomato to Salt




Stress.” Molecules 24(8).


SlGRAS40
enhances tolerance to
Liu, Y., et al. (2017). “Overexpression of



Abiotic Stresses and
SlGRAS40 in Tomato Enhances Tolerance to



influences Auxin and
Abiotic Stresses and Influences Auxin and



Gibberellin signaling
Gibberellin Signaling.” Front Plant Sci 8: 1659.


SlGMEs
increased ascorbate
Zhang, C., et al. (2011). “Overexpression of



accumulation and
SIGMEs leads to ascorbate accumulation with



improved tolerance to
enhanced oxidative stress, cold, and salt



abiotic stresses
tolerance in tomato.” Plant Cell Rep 30(3):




389-398.


SlMAPK3
regulates tolerance to
Muhammad, T., et al. (2019). “Overexpression



Cd(2+) and drought
of a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase



stress
SlMAPK3 Positively Regulates Tomato




Tolerance to Cadmium and Drought Stress.”




Molecules 24(3).









Table K lists some representative functional genes in potato and sweet potato.









TABLE K







Important functional genes in potato and sweetpotato










Crop
Gene name
Application
Reference





potato
StERF94
Salt
Charfeddine M, et al.(2019). “Investigation of




tolerance
the response to salinity of transgenic potato





plants overexpressing the transcription factor





StERF94”. Journal of Biosciences, 44(6).


potato
STARCH
To reduce
Brummell D A, et al. (2015). “Overexpression



BRANCHING
gelatinization
of STARCH BRANCHING ENZYME II



ENZYME
temperature,
increases short-chain branching of



II(SBEII)
to change
amylopectin and alters the physicochemical




starch
properties of starch from potato tuber”. BMC




properties
Biotechnology.


potato
potato protease
Reduced
Dong T, et al. (2020). “Cysteine protease



inhibitors (StPIs)
enzymatic
inhibitors reduce enzymatic browning of




browning
potato by lowering the accumulation of free





amino acids”. Journal of Agricultural and Food





Chemistry.


potato
NAC family
Wilt
Chang Y, et al. (2020). “NAC transcription



transcription
resistance in
factor involves in regulating bacterial wilt



factor (StNACb4)
potato
resistance in potato”. Functional Plant





Biology, 47.


potato
nitrate transporter
Increased
KLAASSEN M T, et al. (2020).



gene(StNPF1.11)
nitrogen use
“Overexpression of a putative nitrate




efficiency,
transporter (StNPF1.11) increases plant height,




plant height,
leaf chlorophyll content and tuber protein




leaf
content of young potato plants”. Funct Plant




chlorophyll
Biol, 47(5): 464-472




content and





tuber protein





content



potato
eukaryotic
PVY
Sanchez P A G, et al. (2020). “Overexpression



translation
resistance
of a modified eIF4E regulates potato virus Y



initiation factor 4E

resistance at the transcriptional level in



(eIF4E)

potato”. BMC Genomics, 21.


potato
StPOTHR1
Late blight
Chen Q, et al. (2018). “StPOTHR1, a




resistance
NDR1/HIN1-like gene in Solanumtuberosum,





enhances resistance against





Phytophthorainfestans”. Biochemical &





Biophysical Research





Communications,1 155-1161.


potato
Snakin-1 (SN1)
Enhance
NATALIA, et al. (2008). “Overexpression of




resistance to
snakin-1 gene enhances resistance to




bacterial
Rhizoctoniasolani and Erwiniacarotovora in




disease
transgenic potato plants”. Molecular Plant





Pathology, 9(3):329-338.


potato
Phosphate
Growth
Cao M, et al. (2020). “Functional Analysis of



Transporter
promoting
StPHT1; 7, a Solanumtuberosum L. Phosphate



PHT1; 7

Transporter Gene, in Growth and Drought





Tolerance”. Plants, 9(10): 1384.


potato
StBUS/ELS
Tolerance to
Varun Dwivedi, et al. (2020). “Functional




certain
characterization of a defense-responsive




bacteria and
bulnesol/elemol synthase from potato”.




fungi
PhysiologiaPlantarum.


potato
StDREB1
Increase
Donia Bouaziz, et al. (2013). “Overexpression




tolerance to
of StDREB1 Transcription Factor Increases




salt
Tolerance to Salt in Transgenic Potato Plants”.





Molecular Biotechnology, 54(3):803-817


potato
StMAPK11
To promote
Zhu X, et al. (2021). “Mitogen-activated




growth under
protein kinase 11 (MAPK11) maintains growth




drought
and photosynthesis of potato plant under




condition
drought condition”. Plant Cell Reports,1-16.


potato
POTH1
Enlarged
Rosin F M, et al. (2003). “Overexpression of a




tube
Knotted-like Homeobox Gene of Potato Alters





Vegetative Development by Decreasing





Gibberellin Accumulation”. Plant Physiology,





132(1): 106-117.


potato
StMPKl
Late blight
Yamamizo C, et al. (2006). “Rewiring




resistance
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascade by





Positive Feedback Confers Potato Blight





Resistance”. Plant Physiology, 140(2):681-692


potato
S.
Cold and salt
Lee H E, et al. (2007). “Ethylene responsive



tuberosumethylene
stress
element binding protein 1 (StEREBP1) from



responsive
tolerance
Solanumtuberosum increases tolerance to



element binding

abiotic stress in transgenic potato plants”.



protein

Biochemical & Biophysical Research



(StEREBP1)

Communications, 353(4): 863-868.


potato
StBEL5
Enlarged
Mithu Chatterjee, et al, (2007). “A




tube
BELL1-Like Gene of Potato Is Light Activated





and Wound Inducible”. Plant Physiology,





Volume 145, Issue 4, 1435-1443,


potato
StRFP1
Broad
Ni X, et al. (2010). “Cloning and molecular




spectrum
characterization of the potato RING finger




resistance to
protein gene StRFP1 and its function in potato




late blight
broad-spectrum resistance against





Phytophthorainfestans”. Journal of Plant





Physiology, 167(6):488-496.


potato
StMYB1R-1
Drought
Shin D, et al. (2011). “Expression of




tolerance
StMYB1R-1, a novel potato single MYB-like





domain transcription factor, increases drought





tolerance”. Plant Physiology, 155(l):421-432.


potato
StInvInh2A
Reduced
Liu X, et al. (2013). “StInvInh2 as an inhibitor



StInvInh2B
cold-induced
of StvacINV1 regulates the cold-induced




sweetening
sweetening of potato tubers by specifically




of potato
capping vacuolar invertase activity”. Plant





Biotechnology Journal, 11(5):640-647.


potato
StAN11
Increased
Li W, et al. (2013). “Cloning and




anthocyanin
characterization of a potato StAN11 gene




accumulation
involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis





regulation”. Journal of Integrative Plant





Biology, 56(4):364-372.


potato
STANN1
Drought
Michal, et al. (2015). “Potato Annexin




tolerance
STANN1 Promotes Drought Tolerance and





Mitigates Light Stress in Transgenic





Solanumtuberosum L. Plants”. Plos One.


sweet
IbOr
Increased
Goo Y M, et al. (2015). “Overexpression of


potato

accumulation
the sweet potato IbOr gene results in the




of carotenoid
increased accumulation of carotenoid and




and confers
confers tolerance to environmental stresses in




tolerance to
transgenic potato”. ComptesRendusBiologies.




salt stress



sweet
IbPSS1
Increased
Yu Y, et al. (2020). “Overexpression of


potato

salt tolerance
phosphatidylserine synthase IbPSS1 affords




in root
cellular Na+ homeostasis and salt tolerance by





activating plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiport





activity in sweet potato roots”. Horticulture





Research, 7:131.


sweet
IbLCY-e
Increased
Kim S H, et al. (2013). “Downregulation of the


potato

salt tolerance
lycopene-cyclase gene increases carotenoid





synthesis via the P-branch-specific pathway





and enhances salt-stress tolerance in sweet





potato transgenic calli”. Physiologia





Plantarum, 147(4):432-442.


sweet
IbNFU1
Increased
Liu, D.G., et al (2014b)


potato

salt tolerance
Anlpomoeabatatasiron-sulfur cluster scaffold





protein gene, IbNFU1, is involved in salt





tolerance. PLoS One, 9, e93935


sweet
IbP5CR
Increased
Liu, D.G. et al (2014a) Overexpression


potato

salt tolerance
of IbP5CR enhances salt tolerance in





transgenie sweet potato. Plant Cell, Tissue





Organ Cult. 117(1),1-16


sweet
IbMas
Increased
Liu, D.G., et al (2014c) A novela/b-hydrolase


potato

salt tolerance
gene IbMas enhances salt tolerance in





transgenic sweetpotato PLoS One, 9, e115128.


sweet
IbSIMT1
Increased
Liu, D.G., et al (2015) IbSIMT1, a novel


potato

salt tolerance
salt-induced methyltransferase gene from





Ipomoea batatas, is involved in salt





tolerance .Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult.





120, 701-715


sweet
IbMIPS1
Increased
Hong, et al. (2016). “A


potato

salt and
myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase gene,




drought
IbMIPSI, enhances salt and drought tolerance




tolerance
and stem nematode resistance in transgenic





sweet potato”. Plant Biotechnology Journal.
















TABLE L







List of herbicide resistance genes












Gene



Crop
Gene name
number
Reference





wheat
Imi1
AY210407.1
Perez-Jones, A., et al. (2006). “Introgression of an





imidazolinone-resistance gene from winter wheat





(Triticum aestivum L.) into jointed goatgrass (Aegilops





cylindrica Host).” Theor Appl Genet114(l): 177-186.


wheat
GST Cla47
AY064480.1
Theodoulou, F.L., et al. (2003). “Co-induction of





glutathione-S-transferases and multi drug resistance





associated protein by xenobiotics in wheat.” Pest Manag





Sci59(2): 202-214.


wheat
GST 19E50
AY064481.1
Theodoulou, F.L., et al. (2003). “Co-induction of





glutathione-S-transferases and multi drug resistance





associated protein by xenobiotics in wheat.” Pest Manag





Sci59(2): 202-214.


wheat
GST 28e45
AF479764.1
Theodoulou, F.L., et al. (2003). “Co-induction of





glutathione-S-transferases and multi drug resistance





associated protein by xenobiotics in wheat.” Pest Manag





Sci59(2): 202-214.


wheat
MRP1
AY064479.1
Theodoulou, F.L., et al. (2003). “Co-induction of





glutathione-S-transferases and multi drug resistance





associated protein by xenobiotics in wheat.” Pest Manag





Sci59(2): 202-214.


wheat
cytochrome
LOC543123
Busi, R., et al. (2020). “Cinmethylin controls multiple



P450

herbicide-resistant Lolium rigidum and its wheat





selectivity is P450-based.” Pest Manag Sci76(8):





2601-2608.


corn
ZmSCE1b

Wang, H., et al. (2021). “The maize SUMO conjugating





enzyme ZmSCE1b protects plants from paraquat





toxicity.” Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 211: 111909.


corn
ZmGSTIV

Sun, L., et al. (2018). “The expression of detoxification





genes in two maize cultivars by interaction of





isoxadifen-ethyl and nicosulfuron.” Plant Physiol





Biochem 129: 101-108.


corn
ZmGST6

Sun, L., et al. (2018). “The expression of detoxification





genes in two maize cultivars by interaction of





isoxadifen-ethyl and nicosulfuron.” Plant Physiol





Biochem 129: 101-109.


corn
ZmGST31

Sun, L., et al. (2018). “The expression of detoxification





genes in two maize cultivars by interaction of





isoxadifen-ethyl and nicosulfuron.” Plant Physiol





Biochem 129: 101-110.


corn
ZmMRP1

Sun, L., et al. (2018). “The expression of detoxification





genes in two maize cultivars by interaction of





isoxadifen-ethyl and nicosulfuron.” Plant Physiol





Biochem 129: 101-111.


corn
GSTI

Li, D., et al. (2017). “Characterization of glutathione





S-transferases in the detoxification of metolachlor in





two maize cultivars of differing herbicide tolerance.”





Pestic Biochem Physiol 143: 265-271.


corn
GSTIII

Li, D., et al. (2017). “Characterization of glutathione





S-transferases in the detoxification of metolachlor in





two maize cultivars of differing herbicide tolerance.”





Pestic Biochem Physiol 143: 265-271.


corn
GSTIV

Li, D., et al. (2017). “Characterization of glutathione





S-transferases in the detoxification of metolachlor in





two maize cultivars of differing herbicide tolerance.”





Pestic Biochem Physiol 143: 265-271.


corn
GST5

Li, D., et al. (2017). “Characterization of glutathione





S-transferases in the detoxification of metolachlor in





two maize cultivars of differing herbicide tolerance.”





Pestic Biochem Physiol 143: 265-271.


corn
GST6

Li, D., et al. (2017). “Characterization of glutathione





S-transferases in the detoxification of metolachlor in





two maize cultivars of differing herbicide tolerance.”





Pestic Biochem Physiol 143: 265-271.


corn
GST7

Li, D., et al. (2017). “Characterization of glutathione





S-transferases in the detoxification of metolachlor in





two maize cultivars of differing herbicide tolerance.”





Pestic Biochem Physiol 143: 265-271.


corn
bifunctional

Mahmoud, M., et al. (2020). “Identification of



3-dehydroquinate

Structural Variants in Two Novel Genomes of Maize



dehydratase

Inbred Lines Possibly Related to Glyphosate





Tolerance.” Plants (Basel) 9(4).


corn
shikimate

Mahmoud, M., et al. (2020). “Identification of



dehydrogenase

Structural Variants in Two Novel Genomes of Maize





Inbred Lines Possibly Related to Glyphosate





Tolerance.” Plants (Basel) 9(5).


corn
chorismate

Mahmoud, M., et al. (2020). “Identification of



synthase

Structural Variants in Two Novel Genomes of Maize





Inbred Lines Possibly Related to Glyphosate





Tolerance.” Plants (Basel) 9(6).


corn
(T102I + P10

Yu, Q., et al. (2015). “Evolution of a double amino acid



6S [TIPS])

substitution in the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate



(EPSPS)

synthase in Eleusine indica conferring high-level





glyphosate resistance.” Plant Physiol 167(4):





1440-1447.


corn
CYP81A9
Zm00001
Liu, X., et al. (2019). “Rapid identification of a




d013230
candidate nicosulfuron sensitivity gene (Nss) in maize





(Zea mays L.) via combining bulked segregant analysis





and RNA-seq.” Theor Appl Genet 132(5): 1351-1361.


soybean
GmHRA

Mathesius, C.A., et al. (2009). “Safety assessment of a





modified acetolactate synthase protein (GM-HRA) used





as a selectable marker in genetically modified





soybeans.” Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 55(3): 309-320.









“The expression level of a new gene is upregulated” in the present invention means that the expression level of a new gene relative to the endogenous wild-type gene of the corresponding organism is increased, preferably the expression level is increased by at least 0.5 times, at least 1 time, at least 2 times, at least 3 times, at least 4 times or at least 5 times.


The term “gene editing” refers to strategies and techniques for targeted specific modification of any genetic information or genome of living organisms. Therefore, the term includes editing of gene coding regions, but also includes editing of regions other than gene coding regions of the genome. It also includes editing or modifying other genetic information of nuclei (if present) and cells.


The term “CRISPR/Cas nuclease” may be a CRISPR-based nuclease or a nucleic acid sequence encoding the same, including but not limited to: 1) Cas9, including SpCas9, ScCas9, SaCas9, xCas9, VRER-Cas9, EQR-Cas9, SpG-Cas9, SpRY-Cas9, SpCas9-NG, NG-Cas9, NGA-Cas9 (VQR), etc.; 2) Cas12, including LbCpf1, FnCpf1, AsCpf1, MAD7, etc., or any variant or derivative of the aforementioned CRISPR-based nuclease; preferably, wherein the at least one CRISPR-based nuclease comprises a mutation compared to the corresponding wild-type sequence, so that the obtained CRISPR-based nuclease recognizes a different PAM sequence. As used herein, “CRISPR-based nuclease” is any nuclease that has been identified in a naturally occurring CRISPR system, which is subsequently isolated from its natural background, and has preferably been modified or combined into a recombinant construct of interest, suitable as a tool for targeted genome engineering. As long as the original wild-type CRISPR-based nuclease provides DNA recognition, i.e., binding properties, any CRISPR-based nuclease can be used and optionally reprogrammed or otherwise mutated so as to be suitable for various embodiments of the invention.


The term “CRISPR” refers to a sequence-specific genetic manipulation technique that relies on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, which is different from RNA interference that regulates gene expression at the transcriptional level.


“Cas9 nuclease” and “Cas9” are used interchangeably herein, and refer to RNA-guided nuclease comprising Cas9 protein or fragment thereof (for example, a protein containing the active DNA cleavage domain of Cas9 and/or the gRNA binding domain of Cas9). Cas9 is a component of the CRISPR/Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats and associated systems) genome editing system. It can target and cut DNA target sequences under the guidance of guide RNA to form DNA double-strand breaks (DSB).


“Cas protein” or “Cas polypeptide” refers to a polypeptide encoded by Cas (CRISPR-associated) gene. Cas protein includes Cas endonuclease. Cas protein can be a bacterial or archaeal protein. For example, the types I to III CRISPR Cas proteins herein generally originate from prokaryotes; the type I and type III Cas proteins can be derived from bacteria or archaea species, and the type II Cas protein (i.e., Cas9) can be derived from bacterial species. “Cas proteins” include Cas9 protein, Cpfl protein, C2c1 protein, C2c2 protein, C2c3 protein, Cas3, Cas3-HD, Cas5, Cas7, Cas8, Cas10, Cas12a, Cas12b, or a combination or complex thereof.


“Cas9 variant” or “Cas9 endonuclease variant” refers to a variant of the parent Cas9 endonuclease, wherein when associated with crRNA and tracRNA or with sgRNA, the Cas9 endonuclease variant retains the abilities of recognizing, binding to all or part of a DNA target sequence and optionally unwinding all or part of a DNA target sequence, nicking all or part of a DNA target sequence, or cutting all or part of a DNA target sequence. The Cas9 endonuclease variants include the Cas9 endonuclease variants described herein, wherein the Cas9 endonuclease variants are different from the parent Cas9 endonuclease in the following manner: the Cas9 endonuclease variants (when complexed with gRNA to form a polynucleotide-directed endonuclease complex capable of modifying a target site) have at least one improved property, such as, but not limited to, increased transformation efficiency, increased DNA editing efficiency, decreased off-target cutting, or any combination thereof, as compared to the parent Cas9 endonuclease (complexed with the same gRNA to form a polynucleotide-guided endonuclease complex capable of modifying the same target site).


The Cas9 endonuclease variants described herein include variants that can bind to and nick double-stranded DNA target sites when associated with crRNA and tracrRNA or with sgRNA, while the parent Cas endonuclease can bind to the target site and result in double strand break (cleavage) when associated with crRNA and tracrRNA or with sgRNA.


“Guide RNA” and “gRNA” are used interchangeably herein, and refer to a guide RNA sequence used to target a specific gene for correction using CRISPR technology, which usually consists of crRNA and tracrRNA molecules that are partially complementary to form a complex, wherein crRNA contains a sequence that has sufficient complementarity with the target sequence so to hybridize with the target sequence and direct the CRISPR complex (Cas9+crRNA+tracrRNA) to specifically bind to the target sequence. However, it is known in the art that a single guide RNA (sgRNA) can be designed, which contains both the properties of crRNA and tracrRNA.


The terms “single guide RNA” and “sgRNA” are used interchangeably herein, and refer to the synthetic fusion of two RNA molecules, which comprises a fusion of a crRNA (CRISPR RNA) of a variable targeting domain (linked to a tracr pairing sequence hybridized to tracrRNA) and a tracrRNA (trans-activating CRISPR RNA). The sgRNA may comprise crRNA or crRNA fragments and tracrRNA or tracrRNA fragments of the type II CRISPR/Cas system that can form a complex with the type II Cas endonuclease, wherein the guide RNA/Cas endonuclease complex can guide the Cas endonuclease to a DNA target site so that the Cas endonuclease can recognize, optionally bind to the DNA target site, and optionally nick the DNA target site or cut (introduce a single-strand or double-strand break) the DNA target site.


In certain embodiments, the guide RNA(s) and Cas9 can be delivered to a cell as a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex. RNP is composed of purified Cas9 protein complexed with gRNA, and it is well known in the art that RNP can be effectively delivered to many types of cells, including but not limited to stem cells and immune cells (Addgene, Cambridge, Mass., Mirus Bio LLC, Madison, Wis.).


The protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) herein refers to a short nucleotide sequence adjacent to a (targeted) target sequence (prespacer) recognized by the gRNA/Cas endonuclease system. If the target DNA sequence is not adjacent to an appropriate PAM sequence, the Cas endonuclease may not be able to successfully recognize the target DNA sequence. The sequence and length of PAM herein can be different depending on the Cas protein or Cas protein complex in use. The PAM sequence can be of any length, but is typically in length of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20 nucleotides.


Cytochrome P450 enzyme system (CYP) is discovered as a protein that can be bound to CO. In 1958, Klingenberg discovered this pigment protein in rat liver microsomes. Cytochrome P450 was so named because of its maximum absorption value at 450 nm wavelength when combined with CO in its reduced state. As the largest superfamily of oxidoreductases, P450 is widely distributed in the vast majority of organisms, including but not limited to animals, plants, fungi, bacteria, archaea and viruses. Cytochrome P450 enzymes include those reviewed in the following literature: Van Bogaert et al, 2011, FEBS J. 278(2): 206-221, or Urlacherand Girhard, 2011, Trends in Biotechnology 30(1): 26-36, or the following websites:http://drnelson.uthsc.edu/CytochromeP450.html and http://p450.riceblast.snu.ac.kr/index.php?a=view. Its naming is based on the English abbreviation CYP (Cytochrome P450) with numbers+letters+numbers, respectively representing the family, subfamily and individual enzymes.


For some embodiments, the said cytochrome P450s include but not limited to the following as per list:












Example enzymes.










Family
Gene







CYP1
CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1



CYP2
CYP2A6, CYP2A7, CYP2A13, CYP2B6,




CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, CYP2C19,




CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP2F1, CYP2I2,




CYP2R1, CYP2S1, CYP2U1, CYP2W1



CYP3
CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP3A7, CYP3A43



CYP4
CYP4A11, CYP4A22, CYP4B1, CYP4F2,




CYP4F3, CYP4FB, CYP4F11, CYP4F12,




CYP4F22, CYP4Y2, CYP4X1, CYP4Z1



CYP5
CYP5A1



CYP7
CYP7A1, CYP7B1



CYP8
CYP8A1 (prostacyclin synthase), CYP8B1




(bile acid biosyntheses)



CYP11
CYP11A1, CYP11B1, CYP11B2



CYP17
CYP17A1



CYP19
CYP19A1



CYP20
CYP20A1



CYP21
CYP21A2



CYP24
CYP24A1



CYP26
CYP26A1, CYP26B1, CYP26C1



CYP27
CYP27A1 (bile acid biosynthesis), CYP27B1




(vitamin D3 1-alpha hydroxylase, activates




vitamin D3). CYP27C1 (unknown function)



CYP39
CYP29A1



CYP46
CYP46A1



CYP51
CYP51A1 (lancsterol 14-alpha demethylase)










For some embodiments, the rice cytochrome P450s include but not limited to the following as per list:
















MSU/TIGR locus ID
CYP name









LOC_Os01g08800
CYP96D1



LOC_Os01g08810
CYP96E1



LOC_Os01g10040
CYP90D2v1



LOC_Os01g10040
CYP90D2v2



LOC_Os01g11270
CYP710A5



LOC_Os01g11280
CYP710A6



LOC_Os01g11300
CYP710A7



LOC_Os01g11340
CYP710A8



LOC_Os01g12740
CYP71T1



LOC_Os01g12750
CYP71T2



LOC_Os01g12760
CYP71T3



LOC_Os01g12770
CYP71T4



LOC_Os01g24780
CYP709D1



LOC_Os01g24810
CYP89D1



LOC_Os01g27890
CYP71K1



LOC_Os01g29150
CYP734A6



LOC_Os01g36294
CYP71C19P



LOC_Os01g38110
CYP76M14



LOC_Os01g41800
CYP72A31P



LOC_Os01g41810
CYP72A32



LOC_Os01g41820
CYP72A33



LOC_Os01g43700
CYP72A17v1



LOC_Os01g43700
CYP72A17v2



LOC_Os01g43710
CYP72A18



LOC_Os01g43740
CYP72A20



LOC_Os01g43750
CYP72A21



LOC_Os01g43760
CYP72A22



LOC_Os01g43774
CYP72A23



LOC_Os01g43844
CYP72A24



LOC_Os01g43851
CYP72A25



LOC_Os01g50490
CYP706C2



LOC_Os01g50530
CYP711A2



LOC_Os01g50580
CYP711A3



LOC_Os01g50590
CYP711A4



LOC_Os01g52790
CYP72A35



LOC_Os01g58950
CYP94D13



LOC_Os01g58960
CYP94D12



LOC_Os01g58970
CYP94D11



LOC_Os01g58990
CYP94D10



LOC_Os01g59000
CYP94D9



LOC_Os01g59020
CYP94D7



LOC_Os01g59050
CYP94D6



LOC_Os01g60450
CYP73A35P



LOC_Os01g63540
CYP86A9



LOC_Os01g63930
CYP94C3v1



LOC_Os01g63930
CYP94C3v2



LOC_Os01g72260
CYP94E2



LOC_Os01g72270
CYP94E1



LOC_Os01g72740
CYP71AA3



LOC_Os01g72760
CYP71AA2



LOC_Os02g01890
CYP89E1



LOC_Os02g02000
CYP74F1



LOC_Os02g02230
CYP51H5



LOC_Os02g07680
CYP97B4vl



LOC_Os02g07680
CYP97B4v2



LOC_Os02g07680
CYP97B4v3



LOC_Os02g07680
CYP97B4v4



LOC_Os02g07680
CYP97B4v5



LOC_Os02g09190
CYP71X12



LOC_Os02g09200
CYP71X11



LOC_Os02g09220
CYP71X10



LOC_Os02g09240
CYP71X8



LOC_Os02g09250
CYP71X7



LOC_Os02g09290
CYP71X4



LOC_Os02g09310
CYP71X3



LOC_Os02g09320
CYP71X2



LOC_Os02g09330
CYP71X1P



LOC_Os02g09390
CYP71K3



LOC_Os02g09400
CYP71K4



LOC_Os02g09410
CYP71K5



LOC_Os02g11020
CYP734A2



LOC_Os02g12540
CYP71V5



LOC_Os02g12550
CYP71V4



LOC_Os02g12680
CYP74E1



LOC_Os02g12690
CYP74E2



LOC_Os02g12890
CYP711A5v1



LOC_Os02g12890
CYP711A5v2



LOC_Os02g17760
CYP71U3



LOC_Os02g21810
CYP51H4



LOC_Os02g26770
CYP73A40



LOC_Os02g26810
CYP73A39



LOC_Os02g29720
CYP76N1P



LOC_Os02g29960
CYP92A15



LOC_Os02g30080
CYP81L5



LOC_Os02g30090
CYP81L4



LOC_Os02g30100
CYP81L3



LOC_Os02g30110
CYP81L2



LOC_Os02g32770
CYP71Z5



LOC_Os02g36030
CYP76M5



LOC_Os02g36070
CYP76M8



LOC_Os02g36110
CYP76M17



LOC_Os02g36150
CYP71Z6



LOC_Os02g36190
CYP71Z7



LOC_Os02g36280
CYP76M6



LOC_Os02g38290
CYP86E1v1



LOC_Os02g38290
CYP86E1v2



LOC_Os02g38930
CYP71X13P



LOC_Os02g38940
CYP71X14



LOC_Os02g44654
CYP86A10v1



LOC_Os02g44654
CYP86A10v2



LOC_Os02g45280
CYP87A5



LOC_Os02g47470
CYP707A5vl



LOC_Os02g47470
CYP707A5v2



LOC_Os02g47470
CYP707A5v3



LOC_Os02g57290
CYP97A4v1



LOC_Os02g57290
CYP97A4v2



LOC_Os02g57290
CYP97A4v3



LOC_Os02g57290
CYP97A4v4



LOC_Os02g57810
CYP715B1



LOC_Os03g02180
CYP84A6



LOC_Os03g04190
CYP78A17



LOC_Os03g04530
CYP96B6



LOC_Os03g04630
CYP96B2



LOC_Os03g04640
CYP96B9



LOC_Os03g04650
CYP96B3



LOC_Os03g04660
CYP96B5



LOC_Os03g04680
CYP96B4



LOC_Os03g07250
CYP704B2



LOC_Os03g12260
CYP94D15



LOC_Os03g12500
CYP74A5



LOC_Os03g12660
CYP90B2



LOC_Os03g14400
CYP76H4



LOC_Os03g14420
CYP76H5



LOC_Os03g14560
CYP76Q1



LOC_Os03g21400
CYP714B2



LOC_Os03g25150
CYP75A11



LOC_Os03g25480
CYP709E1



LOC_Os03g25490
CYP709E2Pv1



LOC_Os03g25490
CYP709E2Pv2



LOC_Os03g30420
CYP78A12



LOC_Os03g37080
CYP71E6P



LOC_Os03g37290
CYP79A7



LOC_Os03g39540
CYP71AC3P



LOC_Os03g39650
CYP71W1



LOC_Os03g39690
CYP71W3



LOC_Os03g39760
CYP71W4



LOC_Os03g40540
CYP85A1



LOC_Os03g40600
CYP78A14



LOC_Os03g44740
CYP92C21



LOC_Os03g45619
CYP87C2v1



LOC_Os03g45619
CYP87C2v2



LOC_Os03g55240
CYP81A6



LOC_Os03g55260
CYP81A8



LOC_Os03g55800
CYP74A4



LOC_Os03g61980
CYP733A1



LOC_Os03g63310
CYP71E4



LOC_Os04g01140
CYP93G1v1



LOC_Os04g01140
CYP93G1v2



LOC_Os04g03870
CYP723A2



LOC_Os04g03890
CYP723A3



LOC_Os04g08824
CYP79A10



LOC_Os04g08828
CYP79A9



LOC_Os04g09430
CYP79A9P



LOC_Os04g09920
CYP99A3



LOC_Os04g10160
CYP99A2



LOC_Os04g18380
CYP81M1



LOC_Os04g27020
CYP71Z1



LOC_Os04g33370
CYP77A18



LOC_Os04g39430
CYP724B1



LOC_Os04g40460
CYP71S2



LOC_Os04g40470
CYP71S1



LOC_Os04g47250
CYP86A11



LOC_Os04g48170
CYP87A6



LOC_Os04g48200
CYP87B4



LOC_Os04g48210
CYP87A4v1



LOC_Os04g48210
CYP87A4v2



LOC_Os04g48460
CYP704A3



LOC_Os05g01120
CYP722B1



LOC_Os05g08850
CYP96D2



LOC_Os05g11130
CYP90D3



LOC_Os05g12040
CYP51G3



LOC_Os05g25640
CYP73A38



LOC_Os05g30890
CYP72A34



LOC_Os05g31740
CYP94E3



LOC_Os05g33590
CYP721B2



LOC_Os05g33600
CYP721B1



LOC_Os05g34325
CYP51H6



LOC_Os05g34330
CYP51H7P



LOC_Os05g34380
CYP51H8



LOC_Os05g35010
CYP71AD1



LOC_Os05g37250
CYP94C4



LOC_Os05g40384
CYP714D1



LOC_Os05g41440
CYP98A4v1



LOC_Os05g41440
CYP98A4v2



LOC_Os05g43910
CYP71R1



LOC_Os06g01250
CYP93G2



LOC_Os06g02019
CYP88A5



LOC_Os06g03930
CYP704A4



LOC_Os06g09210
CYP709C10



LOC_Os06g09220
CYP709C11



LOC_Os06g15680
CYP71R2P



LOC_Os06g19070
CYP76Q2



LOC_Os06g22020
CYP71C20



LOC_Os06g22340
CYP89C1



LOC_Os06g24180
CYP84A7



LOC_Os06g30179
CYP71AB3



LOC_Os06g30500
CYP71AB2



LOC_Os06g30640
CYP76M9



LOC_Os06g36920
CYP711A6



LOC_Os06g37224
CYP701A9



LOC_Os06g37300
CYP701A8



LOC_Os06g37330
CYP701A19



LOC_Os06g37364
CYP701A6v1



LOC_Os06g37364
CYP701A6v2



LOC_Os06g37364
CYP701A6v3



LOC_Os06g39780
CYP76M7



LOC_Os06g39880
CYP734A4



LOC_Os06g41070
CYP93F1



LOC_Os06g42610
CYP89B12P



LOC_Os06g43304
CYP71Y7



LOC_Os06g43320
CYP71Y6



LOC_Os06g43350
CYP71Y5



LOC_Os06g43370
CYP71Y4



LOC_Os06g43384
CYP71Y3



LOC_Os06g43410
CYP71Y1P



LOC_Os06g43420
CYP71K10



LOC_Os06g43430
CYP71K9



LOC_Os06g43440
CYP71K8



LOC_Os06g43480
CYP71K7P



LOC_Os06g43490
CYP71K6



LOC_Os06g43520
CYP71AF1



LOC_Os06g45960
CYP71AC2



LOC_Os06g46680
CYP77B2



LOC_Os07g11739
CYP71Z2



LOC_Os07g11870
CYP71Z21



LOC_Os07g11970
CYP71Z22



LOC_Os07g19130
CYP71Q2



LOC_Os07g19210
CYP71Q1



LOC_Os07g23570
CYP709C9



LOC_Os07g23710
CYP709C12P



LOC_Os07g26870
CYP89G1



LOC_Os07g28160
CYP51H1



LOC_Os07g29960
CYP87B5



LOC_Os07g33440
CYP728B3



LOC_Os07g33480
CYP728C9v1



LOC_Os07g33480
CYP728C9v2



LOC_Os07g33540
CYP728C7



LOC_Os07g33550
CYP728C5



LOC_Os07g33560
CYP728C4



LOC_Os07g33580
CYP728C3



LOC_Os07g33610
CYP728C1v1



LOC_Os07g33610
CYP728Clv2



LOC_Os07g33620
CYP728B1



LOC_Os07g37970
CYP51H9



LOC_Os07g37980
CYP51G4P



LOC_Os07g41240
CYP78A13



LOC_Os07g44110
CYP709C8



LOC_Os07g44130
CYP709C6



LOC_Os07g44140
CYP709C5



LOC_Os07g45000
CYP727A1



LOC_Os07g45290
CYP734A5



LOC_Os07g48330
CYP714B1



LOC_Os08g01450
CYP71C12



LOC_Os08g01470
CYP71C13P



LOC_Os08g01490
CYP71C17



LOC_Os08g01510
CYP71C15



LOC_Os08g01520
CYP71C16



LOC_Os08g03682
CYP703A3



LOC_Os08g05610
CYP89C8P



LOC_Os08g05620
CYP89C9



LOC_Os08g12990
CYP76H11



LOC_Os08g16260
CYP96B8



LOC_Os08g16430
CYP96B7



LOC_Os08g33300
CYP735A3



LOC_Os08g35510
CYP92A12



LOC_Os08g36310
CYP76M1



LOC_Os08g36860
CYP707A6



LOC_Os08g39640
CYP76M11P



LOC_Os08g39660
CYP76M10



LOC_Os08g39694
CYP76M4Pv1



LOC_Os08g39694
CYP76M4Pv2



LOC_Os08g39694
CYP76M4Pv3



LOC_Os08g39730
CYP76M2



LOC_Os08g43390
CYP78A15



LOC_Os08g43440
CYP706C1



LOC_Os09g08920
CYP92A13



LOC_Os09g08990
CYP92A14



LOC_Os09g10340
CYP71V2



LOC_Os09g21260
CYP728A1



LOC_Os09g23820
CYP735A4



LOC_Os09g26940
CYP92A11



LOC_Os09g26960
CYP92A9



LOC_Os09g26970
CYP92A8



LOC_Os09g26980
CYP92A7



LOC_Os09g27500
CYP76L1



LOC_Os09g27510
CYP76K1



LOC_Os09g28390
CYP707A37



LOC_Os09g35940
CYP78A16



LOC_Os09g36070
CYP71T8



LOC_Os09g36080
CYP71AK2



LOC_Os10g05020
CYP89B11



LOC_Os10g05490
CYP76P1



LOC_Os10g08319
CYP76H9



LOC_Os10g08474
CYP76H8



LOC_Os10g08540
CYP76H6



LOC_Os10g09090
CYP76V1



LOC_Os10g09160
CYP71AB1



LOC_Os10g16974
CYP75B11



LOC_Os10g17260
CYP75B3



LOC_Os10g21050
CYP76P3



LOC_Os10g23130
CYP729A2



LOC_Os10g23180
CYP729A1v1



LOC_Os10g23180
CYP729A1v2



LOC_Os10g26340
CYP78A11



LOC_Os10g30380
CYP71Z3



LOC_Os10g30390
CYP71Z4



LOC_Os10g30410
CYP71Z8



LOC_Os10g34480
CYP86B3



LOC_Os10g36740
CYP89F1



LOC_Os10g36848
CYP84A5



LOC_Os10g36960
CYP89B10



LOC_Os10g36980
CYP89B9



LOC_Os10g37020
CYP89B8P



LOC_Os10g37034
CYP89B7P



LOC_Os10g37050
CYP89B6



LOC_Os10g37070
CYP89B5P



LOC_Os10g37100
CYP89B4



LOC_Os10g37110
CYP89B3



LOC_Os10g37120
CYP89B2



LOC_Os10g37160
CYP89B1



LOC_Os10g38090
CYP704A7



LOC_Os10g38110
CYP704A5v1



LOC_Os10g38110
CYP704A5v2



LOC_Os10g38120
CYP704A6



LOC_Os10g39930
CYP97C2v1



LOC_Os10g39930
CYP97C2v2



LOC_Os11g02710
CYP714C16P



LOC_Os11g04290
CYP94D5



LOC_Os11g04310
CYP94D4



LOC_Os11g04710
CYP90A3



LOC_Os11g05380
CYP94C2



LOC_Os11g18570
CYP87B1



LOC_Os11g27730
CYP71C32



LOC_Os11g28060
CYP71C33



LOC_Os11g29290
CYP94B4



LOC_Os11g29720
CYP78D1



LOC_Os11g32240
CYP51G1



LOC_Os11g41680
CYP71K11



LOC_Os11g41710
CYP71K12



LOC_Os12g02630
CYP714C1



LOC_Os12g02640
CYP714C2



LOC_Os12g04100
CYP94D63



LOC_Os12g04110
CYP94D64



LOC_Os12g04480
CYP90A19



LOC_Os12g05440
CYP94C79



LOC_Os12g09500
CYP76P2



LOC_Os12g09790
CYP76M13



LOC_Os12g16720
CYP71P1



LOC_Os12g18820
CYP87C5P



LOC_Os12g25660
CYP94B5



LOC_Os12g32850
CYP71E5



LOC_Os12g39240
CYP81N1



LOC_Os12g39300
CYP81N1P



LOC_Os12g39310
CYP81P1



LOC_Os12g44290
CYP71V3










As used herein, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family are a family of membrane transporter proteins that regulate the transport of a wide variety of pharmacological agents, potentially toxic drugs, and xenobiotics, as well as anions. ABC transporters are homologous membrane proteins that bind and use cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for their specific activities. And the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter proteins comprise a large family of prokaryotic and eukaryotic membrane proteins involved in the energy-dependent transport of a wide range of substrates across membranes (Higgins, C. F. et al., Ann. Rev. Cell Biol., 8:67-113 (1992)). In eukaryotes, ABC transport proteins typically consist of four domains that include two conserved ATP-binding domains and two transmembrane domains (Hyde et al., Nature, 346:362-5 (1990)).


As used herein, NAC transcription factors are unique transcription factors in plants and are numerous and widely distributed in terrestrial plants. They constitute one of the largest transcription factor families and play an important role in multiple growth development and stress response processes. Wherein, NAC is an acronym derived from the names of the three genes first described as containing a NAC domain, namely NAM (no apical meristem), ATAF1,2 and CUC2 (cup-shaped cotyledon).


As used herein, wherein, the Myb gene was found to encode a transcription factor (Biedenkapp H., et al., 1988, Nature, 335: 835-837), represent a family comprising many related genes, and exist in a wide variety of species, including yeast, nematodes, insects and plants, as well as vertebrates (Masaki Iwabuchi and Kazuo Shinozaki, Shokubutsu genomu kinou no dainamizumu: tensha inshi ni yoru hatsugen seigyo (Dynamism of Plant Genome functions: Expression control by transcriptional factor), Springer Japan, 2001). Plant transcription factor MYB (v-myb avian myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog) is a type of transcription factor discovered in recent years that is related to the regulation of plant growth and development, physiological metabolism, cell morphology and pattern formation and other physiological processes. It is ubiquitous in plants and is also one of the largest transcription families in plants, MYB transcription factors play an important role in plant metabolism and regulation. Most MYB proteins contain a Myb domain composed of amino acid residues at the N-terminus. According to the structural characteristics of this highly conserved domain, MYB transcription factors can be divided into four categories: 1R-MYB/MYB-related; R2R3-MYB; 3R-MYB; 4R-MYB (4 repetitions of R1/R2). MYB transcription factors have a variety of biological functions and are widely involved in the growth and development of plant roots, stems, leaves, and flowers. At the same time, the MYB gene family also responds to abiotic stress processes such as drought, salinity, and cold damage. In addition, MYB transcription factors are also closely related to the quality of certain cash crops.


As used herein, the family of MADS transcription factors that play critical roles in diverse developmental process in plants including flower and seed development (Minster, et al., 2002; Parenicova, et al., 2003). MADS protein is composed of domains such as MADS (M), Intervening (I), Keratin 2 like (K) and C2 terminal (C), which belong to domain proteins.


As used herein, the DREB (dehydration responsive element binding protein) type transcription factor is a subfamily of the AP2/EREBP (APETALA2/an ethylene-responsive element binding protein) transcription factor family. It has a conserved AP2 domain and can specifically combine with DRE cis-acting elements in the promoter region of stress resistance genes to regulate the expression of a series of downstream stress response genes under conditions of low temperature, drought, saline-alkali and so on. It is a key regulatory factor in stress adaptation.


As used herein, the bZIP (basic region/leucine zipper) family of transcription factors comprises the simplest motif that nature uses for targeting specific DNA sites: a pair of short α-helices that recognize the DNA major groove with sequence-specificity and high affinity (Struhl, K., Ann. Rev. Biochem., 1989, 58, 1051; Landschulz, W. H., et al., Science, 1988, 240, 1759-1764).


As used herein, plant bZIP transcription factors are a class of proteins that are widely distributed in eukaryotes and relatively conserved. Its basic region is highly conserved and contains about 20 amino acid residues. According to the difference in the structure of bZIP, it can be divided into 10 subfamilies The transcription factors of different subgroups perform different functions, mainly including the expression of plant seed storage genes, the regulation of plant growth and development, light signal transduction, disease prevention, stress response and ABA sensitivity and other signal responses.


As used herein, Glutathione-S-Transferases (GSTs) family are a large family of enzymes ubiquitously expressed in animals, plants and microorganism. It is a superfamily of enzymes that are encoded by multiple genes and have multiple functions. They are combined with harmful heterologous substances or oxidation products through glutathione to promote the metabolism, regional isolation or elimination of such substances, and involved in cellular defense against a broad spectrum of cytotoxic agents (see Gate and Tew, Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 5: 477, 2001). Over 400 different GST sequences have been identified and based on their genetic characteristics and substrate specificity can be classified in four different classes α, μ, π, and θ (see Mannervik et al., Biochem. J. 282:305, 1992). Each allelic variant encoded at the same gene locus is distinguished by a letter. According to the homology and gene structure characteristics of plant proteins, the GST family is divided into 8 subfamilies: F (Phi), U (Tau), T (Theta), Z (Zeta), L (Lambda), DHAR, EF1Bγ and TCHQD. The F and U families are unique to plants. Compared with other subfamilies, they have the most members and the most abundant content. Soluble GST is mainly distributed in the cytoplasm, a few in chloroplasts and microbodies, and a small amount in the nucleus and apoplasts. Plant GST was first discovered in corn (Zea mays L.), and subsequently found in plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana, soybean (Glycine max), rice (Oryza sativa L.), and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.).


As used herein, the term “organism” includes animals, plants, fungi, bacteria, and the like.


As used herein, the term “host cell” includes plant cells, animal cells, fungal cells, bacterial cells, and the like.


In the present invention, the term “animal” includes any member of the animal kingdom, for example, invertebrates and vertebrates. Invertebrates include but not limited to protozoa (such as amoeba), helminthes, molluscs (such as escargots, snails, freshwater mussels, oysters and devilfishes), arthropods (such as insects, spiders, and crabs), etc.; vertebrates include but not limited to fishes (such as zebrafish, salmon, crucian carp, carp or tilapia and other edible economic fish that can be raised artificially), amphibians (such as frogs, toads and newts), reptiles (such as snakes, lizards, iguanas, turtles and crocodiles), birds (such as chickens, geese, ducks, turkeys, ostriches, quails, pheasants, parrots, finches, hawks, eagles, kites, vultures, harriers, ospreys, owls, crows, guinea fowls, pigeons, emus and cassowaries), mammals (such as humans, non-human primates (such as lemurs, tarsier, monkeys, apes and orangutans), pigs, cattle, sheep, horses, camels, rabbits, kangaroos, deer, polar bears, canines (such as dogs, wolves, foxes and jackals), felines (such as lions, tigers, cheetahs, lynxes and cats) and rodents (such as mice, rats, hamsters and guinea pigs)] etc. The term “non-human” does not include humans.


The term “animal” also includes individual animals at every developmental stage (including newborn, embryo, and fetus stage).


The term “fungus” refers to any member of eukaryotic organisms generated by saprophytic and parasitic spores. Generally, they are filamentous organisms and previously they are classified as chlorophyll deficiency plants, including but not limited to basidiomycotina, deuteromycotina, ascomycotina, mastigomycotina, zygomycotina, etc. However, it should be understood that the fungal classification is constantly evolving, and as a result, the specific definition of the fungal kingdom might be adjusted in the future. The macro-fungi can be divided into four categories: edible fungi, medicinal fungi, poisonous fungi and fungi with unknown uses. Most of the edible fungi and medicinal fungi belong to basidiomycotina, for example, Tremella fuciformis, Phlogiotis helvelloides, Tremella aurantialba, Auricularia auricular, Auricularia polytricha, Auricularia delicate, Auricularia messenterica, Auricularia rugosissima, Calocera cornea, Fistulina hepatica, Poria cocos, Grifola frondosa, Grifola umbellate, Ganoderma applanatum, Coriolus versicolor, Ganoderma capense, Ganoderma lucifum, Ganoderma cochlear, Ganoderma lobatum, Ganoderma tsugae, Ganderma sinense, Polyporus rhinoceros, Omphalia lapidescens, Phellinus baumii, Cryptoporus volvatus, Pycnoporus cinnabarinus, Fuscoporus obliqus, Sparassis crispa, Hericium erinaceus, Thelephora vialis, Ramaria flava, Ramaria botrytoides, Ramaria stricta, Ramaria botrytis, Clavicorona pyxidata, Clavulina cinerea, Cantharellus cibarius, Hydnum repandum, Lycoperdon perlatum, Lycoperdon Polymorphum, Lycoperdon pusllum, Lycoperdon aurantium, Lycoperdon flavidum, Lycoperdon poleroderma, Lycoperdon verrucosum, Boletus albidus, Boletus aereus, Boletus rubellus, Suillus grevillea, Suillus granulatus, Suillus luteus, Fistulina hepatica, Russula integra, Russula alutacea, Russula zoeteus, Russula Viresceu, Pleurotus citrinopileatus, Pleurotus ostreatus, Pleurotus sapidus, Pleurotus ferulae, Pleurotus abalonus, Pleurotus cornucopiae, Pleurotus cystidiosus, Pleurotus djamor, Pleurotus salmoneostramineus, Pleurotus eryngii (DC. ex Fr.) Quel. var. eryngii, Pleurotus eryngii (DC. ex Fr.) Quel.var. ferulae Lanzi, Pleurotus nebrodensis, Pleurotus ostreatus, Pleurotus florida, Pleurotus pulmonarius, Pleurotus tuber-regium, Hohenbuchelia serotine, Agaricus bisporus, Agaricus arvensis, Agaricus blazei, Tricholoma matsutake, Tricholoma gambosum, Tricholoma conglobatum, Tricholoma album, Tricholoma mongolicum, Armillaria mellea, Armillariella ventricosa, Armillariella mucida, Armillariella tabescens, Collybia radicata, Collybia radicata (Relh.ex Fr.) Quel. var. furfuracea PK., Marasmius androsaceus, Termitomyces albuminosus, Tricholoma giganteum, Hypsizigus marmoreus, Lepista sordida, Lyophyllum ulmarium, Lyophyllum shimeji, Flammulina velutipes, Cortinarius armillatus, Amanita caesarea, Amanita caesarea (Scop. ex Fr.) Pers. ex Schw. var. alba Gill, Amanita strobiliformis, Amanita vaginata, Volvariella volvacea, Pholiota adiposa, Pholiot squarrosa, Pholiot mutabilis, Pholiota nameko, Stropharia rugoso-annulata, Coprinus sterquilinus, Coprinus fuscesceus, Coprinus atramentarius, Coprinus comatus, Coprinus ovatus, Dictyophora indusiata, Dictyophora duplicate, Dictyophora echino-volvata, Schizphylhls commne, Agrocybe cylindracea, Lentinus edodes; some are Ascomycotina, for example, Morchella esculenta, Cordyceps sinensis, Cordyceps militaris, Claviceps purpurea, Cordyceps sobolifera, Engleromyces geotzii, Podostroma yunnansis, Shiraia bambusiicola, Hypocrella bambusea, Xylaria nigripes, Tuber spp.


In the present invention, the “plant” should be understood to mean any differentiated multicellular organism capable of performing photosynthesis, in particular monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plants, for example, (1) food crops: Oryza spp., like Oryza sativa, Oryza latifolia, Oryza sativa, Oryza glaberrima; Triticum spp., like Triticum aestivum, T. Turgidum ssp. durum; Hordeum spp., like Hordeum vulgare, Hordeum arizonicum; Secale cereale; Avena spp., like Avena sativa, Avena fatua, Avena byzantine, Avena fatua var.sativa, Avena hybrida; Echinochloa spp., like Pennisetum glaucum, Sorghum, Sorghum bicolor, Sorghum vulgare, Triticale, Zea mays or Maize, Millet, Rice, Foxtail millet, Proso millet, Sorghum bicolor, Panicum, Fagopyrum spp., Panicum miliaceum, Setaria italica, Zizania palustris, Eragrostis tef, Panicum miliaceum, Eleusine coracana; (2) legume crops: Glycine spp. like Glycine max, Soja hispida, Soja max, Vicia spp., Vigna spp., Pisum spp., field bean, Lupinus spp., Vicia, Tamarindus indica, Lens culinaris, Lathyrus spp., Lablab, broad bean, mung bean, red bean, chickpea; (3) oil crops: Arachis hypogaea, Arachis spp, Sesamum spp., Helianthus spp. like Helianthus annuus, Elaeis like Eiaeis guineensis, Elaeis oleifera, soybean, Brassicanapus, Brassica oleracea, Sesamum orientale, Brassica juncea, Oilseed rape, Camellia oleifera, oil palm, olive, castor-oil plant, Brassica napus L., canola; (4) fiber crops: Agave sisalana, Gossypium spp. like Gossypium, Gossypium barbadense, Gossypium hirsutum, Hibiscus cannabinus, Agave sisalana, Musa textilis Nee, Linum usitatissimum, Corchorus capsularis L, Boehmeria nivea (L.), Cannabis sativa, Cannabis sativa; (5) fruit crops: Ziziphus spp., Cucumis spp., Passiflora edulis, Vitis spp., Vaccinium spp., Pyrus communis, Prunus spp., Psidium spp., Punica granatum, Malus spp., Citrullus lanatus, Citrus spp., Ficus carica, Fortunella spp., Fragaria spp., Crataegus spp., Diospyros spp., Eugenia unifora, Eriobotrya japonica, Dimocarpus longan, Carica papaya, Cocos spp., Averrhoa carambola, Actinidia spp., Prunus amygdalus, Musa spp. (Musa acuminate), Persea spp. (Persea Americana), Psidium guajava, Mammea Americana, Mangifera indica, Canarium album (Oleaeuropaea), Caricapapaya, Cocos nucifera, Malpighia emarginata, Manilkara zapota, Ananas comosus, Annona spp., Citrus reticulate (Citrus spp.), Artocarpus spp., Litchi chinensis, Ribes spp., Rubus spp., pear, peach, apricot, plum, red bayberry, lemon, kumquat, durian, orange, strawberry, blueberry, hami melon, muskmelon, date palm, walnut tree, cherry tree; (6) rhizome crops: Manihot spp., Ipomoea batatas, Colocasia esculenta, tuber mustard, Allium cepa (onion), eleocharis tuberose (water chestnut), Cyperus rotundus, Rhizoma dioscoreae; (7) vegetable crops: Spinacia spp., Phaseolus spp., Lactuca sativa, Momordica spp, Petroselinum crispum, Capsicum spp., Solanum spp. (such as Solanum tuberosum, Solanum integrifolium, Solanum lycopersicum), Lycopersicon spp. (such as Lycopersicon esculentum, Lycopersicon lycopersicum, Lycopersicon pyriforme), Macrotyloma spp., Kale, Luffa acutangula, lentil, okra, onion, potato, artichoke, asparagus, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, carrot, cauliflower, celery, collard greens, squash, Benincasa hispida, Asparagus officinalis, Apium graveolens, Amaranthus spp., Allium spp., Abelmoschus spp., Cichorium endivia, Cucurbita spp., Coriandrum sativum, B. carinata, Rapbanus sativus, Brassica spp. (such as Brassica napus, Brassica rapa ssp., canola, oilseed rape, turnip rape, turnip rape, leaf mustard, cabbage, black mustard, canola (rapeseed), Brussels sprout, Solanaceae (eggplant), Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper), cucumber, luffa, Chinese cabbage, rape, cabbage, calabash, Chinese chives, lotus, lotus root, lettuce; (8) flower crops: Tropaeolum minus, Tropaeolum majus, Canna indica, Opuntia spp., Tagetes spp., Cymbidium (orchid), Crinum asiaticum L., Clivia, Hippeastrum rutilum, Rosa rugosa, Rosa Chinensis, Jasminum sambac, Tulipa gesneriana L., Cerasus sp., Pharbitis nil (L.) Choisy, Calendula officinalis L., Nelumbo sp., Bellis perennis L., Dianthus caryophyllus, Petunia hybrida, Tulipa gesneriana L., Lilium brownie, Prunus mume, Narcissus tazetta L., Jasminum nudiflorum Lindl., Primula malacoides, Daphne odora, Camellia japonica, Michelia alba, Magnolia liliiflora, Viburnum macrocephalum, Clivia miniata, Malus spectabilis, Paeonia suffruticosa, Paeonia lactiflora, Syzygium aromaticum, Rhododendron simsii, Rhododendron hybridum, Michelia figo (Lour.) Spreng., Cercis chinensis, Kerria japonica, Weigela florida, Fructus forsythiae, Jasminum mesnyi, Parochetus communis, Cyclamen persicum Mill., Phalaenophsis hybrid, Dendrobium nobile, Hyacinthus orientalis, Iris tectorum Maxim, Zantedeschia aethiopica, Calendula officinalis, Hippeastrum rutilum, Begonia semperflorenshybr, Fuchsia hybrida, Begonia maculata Raddi, Geranium, Epipremnum aureum; (9) medicinal crops: Carthamus tinctorius, Mentha spp., Rheum rhabarbarum, Crocus sativus, Lycium chinense, Polygonatum odoratum, Polygonatum Kingianum, Anemarrhena asphodeloides Bunge, Radix ophiopogonis, Fritillaria cirrhosa, Curcuma aromatica, Amomum villosum Lour., Polygonum multiflorum, Rheum officinale, Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch, Astragalus membranaceus, Panax ginseng, Panax notoginseng, Acanthopanax gracilistylus, Angelica sinensis, Ligusticum wallichii, Bupleurum sinenses DC., Datura stramonium Linn., Datura metel L., Mentha haplocalyx, Leonurus sibiricus L., Agastache rugosus, Scutellaria baicalensis, Prunella vulgaris L., Pyrethrum carneum, Ginkgo biloba L., Cinchona ledgeriana, Hevea brasiliensis (wild), Medicago sativa Linn, Piper Nigrum L., Radix Isatidis, Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz; (10) raw material crops: Hevea brasiliensis, Ricinus communis, Vernicia fordii, Morus alba L., Hops Humulus lupulus, Betula, Alnus cremastogyne Burk., Rhus vemiciflua stokes; (11) pasture crops: Agropyron spp., Trifolium spp., Miscanthus sinensis, Pennisetum sp., Phalaris arundinacea, Panicum virgatum, prairiegrasses, Indiangrass, Big bluestem grass, Phleum pratense, turf, cyperaceae (Kobresia pygmaea, Carex pediformis, Carex humilis), Medicago sativa Linn, Phleum pratense L., Medicago sativa, Melilotus suavcolen, Astragalus sinicus, Crotalaria juncea, Sesbania cannabina, Azolla imbircata, Eichhornia crassipes, Amorpha fruticosa, Lupinus micranthus, Trifolium, Astragalus adsurgens pall, Pistia stratiotes linn, Alternanthera philoxeroides, Lolium; (12) sugar crops: Saccharum spp., Beta vulgaris; (13) beverage crops: Camellia sinensis, Camellia Sinensis, tea, Coffee (Coffea spp.), Theobroma cacao, Humulus lupulus Linn.; (14) lawn plants: Ammophila arenaria, Poa spp. (Poa pratensis (bluegrass)), Agrostis spp. (Agrostis matsumurae, Agrostis palustris), Lolium spp. (Lolium), Festuca spp. (Festuca ovina L.), Zoysia spp. (Zoysia japonica), Cynodon spp. (Cynodon dactylon/bermudagrass), Stenotaphrum secunda tum (Stenotaphrum secundatum), Paspalum spp., Eremochloa ophiuroides (centipedegrass), Axonopus spp. (carpetweed), Bouteloua dactyloides (buffalograss), Bouteloua var. spp. (Bouteloua gracilis), Digitaria sanguinalis, Cyperus rotundus, Kyllinga brevifolia, Cyperusa muricus, Erigeron canadensis, Hydrocotylesibthorpioides, Kummerowia striata, Euphorbia humifusa, Viola arvensis, Carex rigescens, Carex heterostachya, turf; (15) tree crops: Pinus spp., Salix spp., Acer spp., Hibiscus spp., Eucalyptus spp., Ginkgo biloba, Bambusa sp., Populus spp., Prosopis spp., Quercus spp., Phoenix spp., Fagus spp., Ceiba pentandra, Cinnamomum spp., Corchorus spp., Phragmites australis, Physalis spp., Desmodium spp., Populus, Hedera helix, Populus tomentosa Carr, Viburnum odoratissinum, Ginkgo biloba L., Quercus, Ailanthus altissima, Schima superba, Ilex pur-purea, Platanus acerifolia, Ligustrum lucidum, Buxus megistophylla Levl., Dahurian larch, Acacia mearnsii, Pinus massoniana, Pinus khasys, Pinus yunnanensis, Pinus finlaysoniana, Pinus tabuliformis, Pinus koraiensis, Juglans nigra, Citrus limon, Platanus acerifolia, Syzygium jambos, Davidia involucrate, Bombax malabarica L., Ceiba pentandra (L.), Bauhinia blakeana, Albizia saman, Albizzia julibrissin, Erythrina corallodendron, Erythrina indica, Magnolia gradiflora, Cycas revolute, Lagerstroemia indica, coniferous, macrophanerophytes, Frutex; (16) nut crops: Bertholletia excelsea, Castanea spp., Corylus spp., Carya spp., Juglans spp., Pistacia vera, Anacardium occidentale, Macadamia (Macadamia integrifolia), Carya illinoensis Koch, Macadamia, Pistachio, Badam, other plants that produce nuts; (17) others: Arabidopsis thaliana, Brachiaria eruciformis, Cenchrus echinatus, Setaria faberi, Eleusine indica, Cadaba farinose, algae, Carex elata, ornamental plants, Carissa macrocarpa, Cynara spp., Daucus carota, Dioscorea spp., Erianthus sp., Festuca arundinacea, Hemerocallis fulva, Lotus spp., Luzula sylvatica, Medicago sativa, Melilotus spp., Morms nigra, Nicotiana spp., Olea spp., Ornithopus spp., Pastinaca sativa, Sambucus spp., Sinapis sp., Syzygium spp., Tripsacum dactyloides, Triticosecale rimpaui, Viola odorata, and the like.


In a specific embodiment, the plant is selected from rice, maize, wheat, soybean, sunflower, sorghum, rape, alfalfa, cotton, barley, millet, sugarcane, tomato, tobacco, cassava, potato, sweet potato, Chinese cabbage, cabbage, cucumber, Chinese rose, Scindapsus aureus, watermelon, melon, strawberry, blueberry, grape, apple, citrus, peach, pear, banana, etc.


As used herein, the term “plant” includes a whole plant and any progeny, cell, tissue or part of plant. The term “plant part” includes any part of a plant, including, for example, but not limited to: seed (including mature seed, immature embryo without seed coat, and immature seed); plant cutting; plant cell; plant cell culture; plant organ (e.g., pollen, embryo, flower, fruit, bud, leaf, root, stem, and related explant). Plant tissue or plant organ can be seed, callus tissue, or any other plant cell population organized into a structural or functional unit. Some plant cells or tissue cultures can regenerate a plant that has the physiological and morphological characteristics of the plant from which the cell or tissue is derived, and can regenerate a plant that has substantially the same genotype as the plant. In contrast, some plant cells cannot regenerate plants. The regenerable cells in plant cells or tissue cultures can be embryos, protoplasts, meristematic cells, callus, pollen, leaves, anthers, roots, root tips, silks, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, husks, or stems.


The plant parts comprise harvestable parts and parts that can be used to propagate offspring plants. The plant parts that can be used for propagation include, for example, but not limited to: seeds, fruits, cuttings, seedlings, tubers and rootstocks. The harvestable parts of plants can be any of useful parts of plants, including, for example, but not limited to: flowers, pollen, seedlings, tubers, leaves, stems, fruits, seeds and roots.


The plant cells are the structural and physiological units of plants. As used herein, the plant cells include protoplasts and protoplasts with partial cell walls. The plant cells may be in a form of isolated single cells or cell aggregates (e.g., loose callus and cultured cells), and may be part of higher order tissue units (e.g., plant tissues, plant organs, and intact plants). Therefore, the plant cells can be protoplasts, gamete-producing cells, or cells or collection of cells capable of regenerating a whole plant. Therefore, in the embodiments herein, a seed containing a plurality of plant cells and capable of regenerating into a whole plant is considered as a “plant part”.


As used herein, the term “protoplast” refers to a plant cell whose cell wall is completely or partially removed and whose lipid bilayer membrane is exposed. Typically, the protoplast is an isolated plant cell without cell wall, which has the potential to regenerate a cell culture or a whole plant.


The plant “offspring” includes any subsequent generations of the plant.


The terms “inhibitory herbicide tolerance” and “inhibitory herbicide resistance” can be used interchangeably, and both refer to tolerance and resistance to an inhibitory herbicide. “Improvement in tolerance to inhibitory herbicide” and “improvement in resistance to inhibitory herbicide” mean that the tolerance or resistance to the inhibitory herbicide is improved as compared to a plant containing the wild-type gene.


Generally, if the herbicidal compounds as described herein, which can be employed in the context of the present invention are capable of forming geometrical isomers, for example E/Z isomers, it is possible to use both, the pure isomers and mixtures thereof, in the compositions according to the invention. If the herbicidal compounds as described herein have one or more centers of chirality and, as a consequence, are present as enantiomers or diastereomers, it is possible to use both, the pure enantiomers and diastereomers and their mixtures, in the compositions according to the invention. If the herbicidal compounds as described herein have ionizable functional groups, they can also be employed in the form of their agriculturally acceptable salts. Suitable are, in general, the salts of those cations and the acid addition salts of those acids whose cations and anions, respectively, have no adverse effect on the activity of the active compounds. Preferred cations are the ions of the alkali metals, preferably of lithium, sodium and potassium, of the alkaline earth metals, preferably of calcium and magnesium, and of the transition metals, preferably of manganese, copper, zinc and iron, further ammonium and substituted ammonium in which one to four hydrogen atoms are replaced by C1-C4-alkyl, hydroxy-C1-C4-alkyl, C1-C4-alkoxy-C1-C4-alkyl, hydroxy-C1-C4-alkoxy-C1-C4-alkyl, phenyl or benzyl, preferably ammonium, methylammonium, isopropylammonium, dimethylammonium, diisopropylammonium, trimethylammonium, heptylammonium, dodecylammonium, tetradecylammonium, tetramethylammonium, tetraethylammonium, tetrabutylammonium, 2-hydroxyethylammonium (olamine salt), 2-(2-hydroxyeth-1-oxy)eth-1-ylammonium (diglycolamine salt), di(2-hydroxyeth-1-yl)ammonium (diolamine salt), tris(2-hydroxyethyl)ammonium (trolamine salt), tris(2-hydroxypropyl)ammonium, benzyltrimethylammonium, benzyltriethylammonium, N,N,N-trimethylethanolammonium (choline salt), furthermore phosphonium ions, sulfonium ions, preferably tri(C1-C4-alkyl)sulfonium, such as tri-methylsulfonium, and sulfoxonium ions, preferably tri(C1-C4-alkyl)sulfoxonium, and finally the salts of polybasic amines such as N,N-bis-(3-aminopropyl)methylamine and diethylenetri amine. Anions of useful acid addition salts are primarily chloride, bromide, fluoride, iodide, hydrogensulfate, methylsulfate, sulfate, dihydrogenphosphate, hydrogenphosphate, nitrate, bi-carbonate, carbonate, hexafluorosilicate, hexafluorophosphate, benzoate and also the anions of C1-C4-alkanoic acids, preferably formate, acetate, propionate and butyrate.


The herbicidal compounds as described herein having a carboxyl group can be employed in the form of the acid, in the form of an agriculturally suitable salt as mentioned above or else in the form of an agriculturally acceptable derivative, for example as amides, such as mono- and di-C1-C6-alkylamides or arylamides, as esters, for example as allyl esters, propargyl esters, C1-C10-alkyl esters, alkoxyalkyl esters, tefuryl ((tetra-hydrofuran-2-yl)methyl) esters and also as thioesters, for example as C1-C10-alkylthio esters. Preferred mono- and di-C1-C6-alkylamides are the methyl and the dimethylamides. Preferred arylamides are, for example, the anilides and the 2-chloroanilides. Preferred alkyl esters are, for example, the methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, isobutyl, pentyl, mexyl (1-methyl hexyl), meptyl (1-methylheptyl), heptyl, octyl or isooctyl (2-ethylhexyl) esters. Preferred C1-C4-alkoxy-C1-C4-alkyl esters are the straight-chain or branched C1-C4-alkoxy ethyl esters, for example the 2-methoxyethyl, 2-ethoxyethyl, 2-butoxyethyl (butotyl), 2-butoxypropyl or 3-butoxypropyl ester. An example of a straight-chain or branched C1-C6-alkylthio ester is the ethylthio ester.


(1) Inhibition of HPPD (Hydroxyphenyl Pyruvate Dioxygenase): a substance that has herbicidal activity per se or a substance that is used in combination with other herbicides and/or additives which can change its effect, and the substance can act by inhibiting HPPD. Substances which are capable of producing herbicidal activity by inhibiting HPPD are well known in the art, including but not limited to the following types:


1) triketones, e.g., sulcotrione (CAS NO.: 99105-77-8), mesotrione (CAS NO.: 104206-82-8), bicyclopyrone (CAS NO.: 352010-68-5), tembotrione (CAS NO.: 335104-84-2), tefuryltrione (CAS NO.: 473278-76-1), benzobicyclon (CAS NO.: 156963-66-5);


2) diketonitriles, e.g., 2-cyano-3-cyclopropyl-1-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-trifluoromethylphenyl)propane-1,3-dione (CAS NO.: 143701-75-1), 2-cyano-3-cyclopropyl-1-(2-methylsulfonyl-3,4-dichlorophenyl)propane-1,3-dione (CAS NO.: 212829-55-5), 2-cyano-1-[4-(methylsulfonyl)-2-trifluoromethylphenyl]-3-(1-methyl cycloprop-yl)propane-1,3-dione (CAS NO.: 143659-52-3);


3) isoxazoles, e.g., isoxaflutole (CAS NO.: 141112-29-0), isoxachlortole (CAS NO.: 141112-06-3), clomazone (CAS NO.: 81777-89-1);


4) pyrazoles, e.g., topramezone (CAS NO.: 210631-68-8); pyrasulfotole (CAS NO.: 365400-11-9), pyrazoxyfen (CAS NO.: 71561-11-0); pyrazolate (CAS NO.: 58011-68-0), benzofenap (CAS NO.: 82692-44-2), bipyrazone (CAS NO.: 1622908-18-2), tolpyralate (CAS NO.: 1101132-67-5), fenpyrazone (CAS NO.: 1992017-55-6), cypyrafluone (CAS NO.: 1855929-45-1), tripyrasulfone (CAS NO.: 1911613-97-2);


5) benzophenons;


6) others: lancotrione (CAS NO.: 1486617-21-3), fenquinotrione (CAS NO.: 1342891-70-6), fufengcao'an (CAS NO:2421252-30-2);


and those mentioned in patent CN105264069A.


(2) Inhibition of EPSPS (Enolpyruvyl Shikimate Phosphate Synthase): e.g., sulphosate, Glyphosate, glyphosate-isopropylammonium, and glyphosate-trimesium.


(3) Inhibition of PPO (Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase) can be divided into pyrimidinediones, diphenyl-ethers, phenylpyrazoles, N-phenylphthalimides, thiadiazoles, oxadiazoles, triazolinones, oxazolidinedionesand other herbicides with different chemical structures.


In an exemplary embodiment, pyrimidinediones herbicides include but not limited to butafenacil (CAS NO: 134605-64-4), saflufenacil (CAS NO: 372137-35-4), benzfendizone (CAS NO: 158755-95-4), tiafenacil (CAS NO: 1220411-29-9), ethyl [3-[2-chloro-4-fluoro-5-(1-methyl-6-trifluoromethyl-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidin-3-yl)phenoxy]-2-pyridyloxy]acetate (Epyrifenacil, CAS NO: 353292-31-6), 1-Methyl-6-trifluoromethyl-3-(2,2,7-trifluoro-3-oxo-4-prop-2-ynyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[1,4]oxazin-6-yl)-1H-pyrimidine-2,4-dione (CAS NO: 1304113-05-0), 3-[7-Chloro-5-fluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-benzimidazol-4-yl]-1-methyl-6-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrimidine-2,4-dione (CAS NO: 212754-02-4), flupropacil (CAS NO: 120890-70-2), uracil containing isoxazoline disclosed in CN105753853A (for example, the compound




embedded image


uracil pyridines disclosed in WO2017/202768 and uracils disclosed in WO2018/019842;


Diphenyl-ethers herbicides include but not limited to fomesafen (CAS NO: 72178-02-0), oxyfluorfen (CAS NO: 42874-03-3), aclonifen (CAS NO: 74070-46-5), ethoxyfen-ethyl (CAS NO: 131086-42-5), lactofen (CAS NO: 77501-63-4), chlomethoxyfen (CAS NO: 32861-85-1), chlomitrofen (CAS NO: 1836-77-7), fluoroglycofen-ethyl (CAS NO: 77501-90-7), Acifluorfen or Acifluorfen sodium (CAS NO: 50594-66-6 or 62476-59-9), Bifenox (CAS NO: 42576-02-3), ethoxyfen (CAS NO: 188634-90-4), fluoronitrofen (CAS NO: 13738-63-1), furyloxyfen (CAS NO: 80020-41-3), nitrofluorfen (CAS NO: 42874-01-1), and halosafen (CAS NO: 77227-69-1);


Phenylpyrazoles herbicides include but not limited to pyraflufen-ethyl (CAS NO: 129630-19-9), and fluazolate (CAS NO: 174514-07-9);


N-phenylphthalimides herbicides include but not limited to flumioxazin (CAS NO: 103361-09-7), cinidonethyl (CAS NO: 142891-20-1), Flumipropyn (CAS NO: 84478-52-4), and flumiclorac-pentyl (CAS NO: 87546-18-7);


Thiadiazoles herbicides include but not limited tofluthiacet-methyl (CAS NO: 117337-19-6), fluthiacet (CAS NO: 149253-65-6), and thidiazimin (CAS NO: 123249-43-4);


Oxadiazoles herbicides include but not limited to Oxadiargyl (CAS NO: 39807-15-3), and Oxadiazon (CAS NO: 19666-30-9);


Triazolinones herbicides include but not limited to carfentrazone (CAS NO: 128621-72-7), carfentrazone-ethyl (CAS NO: 128639-02-1), sulfentrazone (CAS NO: 122836-35-5), azafenidin (CAS NO: 68049-83-2), and bencarbazone (CAS NO: 173980-17-1);


Oxazolidinediones herbicides include but not limited to pentoxazone (CAS NO: 110956-75-7);


Other herbicides include but not limited to pyraclonil (CAS NO: 158353-15-2), flufenpyr-ethyl (CAS NO: 188489-07-8), profluazol (CAS NO: 190314-43-3), trifludimoxazin (CAS NO: 1258836-72-4), N-ethyl-3-2,6-dichloro-4-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-5-methyl-1H-pyrazole-1-carboxamide (CAS NO: 452098-92-9), N-tetrahydrofurfuryl-3-(2,6-dichloro-4-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-5-methyl-1H-pyrazole-1-carboxamide (CAS NO: 915396-43-9), N-ethyl-3-(2-chloro-6-fluoro-4-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-5-methyl-1H-pyrazole-1-carboxamide (CAS NO: 452099-05-7), N-tetrahydrofurfuryl-3-(2-chloro-6-fluoro-4-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-5-methyl-1H-pyrazole-1-carboxamide (CAS NO: 452100-03-7), 3-[7-fluoro-3-oxo-4-(prop-2-ynyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[1,4]oxazin-6-yl]-1,5-dimethyl-6-thioxo-[1,3,5]triazinan-2,4-dione (CAS NO: 451484-50-7), 2-(2,2,7-Trifluoro-3-oxo-4-prop-2-ynyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[1,4]oxazin-6-yl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-isoindole-1,3-dione (CAS NO: 1300118-96-0), methyl (E)-4-[2-chloro-5-[4-chloro-5-(difluoromethoxy)-1H-methyl-pyrazol-3-yl]-4-fluoro-phenoxy]-3-methoxy-but-2-enoate (CAS NO: 948893-00-3), phenylpyridines disclosed in WO2016/120116, benzoxazinone derivatives disclosed in EP09163242.2, and compounds represented by general formula I




embedded image


(See patent CN202011462769.7);


In another exemplary embodiment, Q represents




embedded image


embedded image


Y represents halogen, halo C1-C6 alkyl or cyano;


Z represents halogen


M represents CH or N;


X represents —CX1X2—(C1-C6 alkyl)n-, —(C1-C6 alkyl)-CX1X2—(C1-C6 alkyl)n- or —(CH2)r—; n represents 0 or 1; r represents an integer of 2 or more;


X1, X2 each independently represent H, halogen, C1-C6 alkyl, C2-C6 alkenyl, C2-C6 alkynyl, halo C1-C6 alkyl, halo C2-C6 alkenyl, halo C2-C6 alkynyl, C3-C6 cycloalkyl, C3-C6 cycloalkyl C1-C6 alkyl, C1-C6 alkoxy, C1-C6 alkylthio, hydroxy C1-C6 alkyl, C1-C6 alkoxy C1-C6 alkyl, phenyl or benzyl;


X3, X4 each independently represent O or S;


W represents hydroxy, C1-C6 alkoxy, C2-C6 alkenyloxy, C2-C6 alkynyloxy, halo C1-C6 alkoxy, halo C2-C6 alkenyloxy, halo C2-C6 alkynyloxy, C3-C6 cycloalkyloxy, phenyloxy, sulfhydryl, C1-C6 alkylthio, C2-C6 alkenylthio, C2-C6 alkynylthio, halo C1-C6 alkylthio, halo C2-C6 alkenylthio, halo C2-C6 alkynylthio, C3-C6 cycloalkylthio, phenylthio, amino or C1-C6 alkylamino.


In another exemplary embodiment, the compound represented by the general formula I is selected from compound A: Q represents




embedded image


Y represents chlorine; Z represents fluorine; M represents CH; X represents—C*X1X2—(C1-C6 alkyl)n-(C* is the chiral center, R configuration), n represents 0; X1 represents hydrogen; X2 represents methyl; X3 and X4 each independently represent O; W represents methoxy.


4) Inhibition of ALS (Acetolactate Synthase) including but not limited to the following herbicides or their mixtures:


(1) sulfonylureas such as amidosulfuron, azimsulfuron, bensulfuron, bensulfuron-methyl, chlorimuron, chlorimuron-ethyl, chlorsulfuron, cinosulfuron, cyclosulfamuron, ethametsulfuron, ethametsulfuron-methyl, ethoxysulfuron, flazasulfuron, flucetosulfuron, flupyrsulfuron, flupyrsulfuron-methyl-sodium, foramsulfuron, halosulfuron, halosulfuron-methyl, imazosulfuron, iodosulfuron, iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium, iofensulfuron, iofensulfuron-sodium, mesosulfuron, metazosulfuron, metsulfuron, metsulfuron-methyl, nicosulfuron, orthosulfamuron, oxasulfuron, primisulfuron, primisulfuron-methyl, propyrisulfuron, prosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, rimsulfuron, sulfometuron, sulfometuron-methyl, sulfosulfuron, thifensulfuron, thifensulfuron-methyl, triasulfuron, tribenuron, tribenuron-methyl, trifloxysulfuron, trifloxysulfuron-sodium, triflusulfuron, triflusulfuron-methyl and tritosulfuron;


(2) imidazolinones such as imazamethabenz, imazamethabenz-methyl, imazamox, imazapic, imazapyr, imazaquin and imazethapyr;


(3) triazolopyrimidine herbicides and sulfonanilides such as cloransulam, cloransulam-methyl, diclosulam, flumetsulam, florasulam, metosulam, penoxsulam, pyroxsulam, pyrimisulfan and triafamone;


(4) pyrimidinylbenzoates such as bispyribac, bispyribac-sodium, pyribenzoxim, pyriftalid, pyriminobac, pyriminobac-methyl, pyrithiobac, pyrithiobac-sodium, 4-[[[2-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)oxy]phenyl]methyl]amino]-benzoic acid-1-methylethyl ester (CAS NO.: 420138-41-6), 4-[[[2-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl) oxy]phenyl]methyl]amino]-benzoic acid propyl ester (CAS NO.: 420138-40-5), N-(4-bromophenyl)-2-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)oxy]benzenemethanamine (CAS NO.: 420138-01-8);


(5) sulfonylaminocarbonyl-triazolinone herbicides such as flucarbazone, flucarbazone-sodium, propoxycarbazone, propoxycarbazone-sodium, thiencarbazone and thiencarbazone-methyl;


5) Inhibition of ACCase (Acetyl CoA Carboxylas): Fenthiaprop, alloxydim, alloxydim-sodium, butroxydim, clethodim, clodinafop, clodinafop-propargyl, cycloxydim, cyhalofop, cyhalofop-butyl, diclofop, diclofop-methyl, fenoxaprop, fenoxaprop-ethyl, fenoxaprop-P, fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, fluazifop, fluazifop-butyl, fluazifop-P, fluazifop-P-butyl, haloxyfop, haloxyfop-methyl, haloxyfop-P, haloxyfop-P-methyl, metamifop, pinoxaden, profoxydim, propaquizafop, quizalofop, quizalofop-ethyl, quizalofop-tefuryl, quizalofop-P, quizalofop-P-ethyl, quizalofop-P-tefuryl, sethoxydim, tepraloxydim, tralkoxydim, 4-(4′-Chloro-4-cyclopropyl-2′-fluoro[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-5-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-2H-pyran-3(6H)-one (CAS NO. 1312337-72-6); 4-(2′,4′-Dichloro-4-cyclopropyl[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-5-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-2H-pyran-3(6H)-one (CAS NO.: 1312337-45-3); 4-(4′-Chloro-4-ethyl-2′-fluoro[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-5-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-2H-pyran-3(6H)-one (CAS NO.: 1033757-93-5); 4-(2′,4′-Dichloro-4-ethyl[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-2H-pyran-3,5(4H,6H)-dione (CAS NO.: 1312340-84-3); 5-(Acetyloxy)-4-(4′-chloro-4-cyclopropyl-2′-fluoro[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-3,6-dihydro-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-2H-pyran-3-one (CAS NO.: 1312337-48-6); 5-(Acetyloxy)-4-(2′,4′-dichloro-4-cyclopropyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-3,6-dihydro-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-2H-pyran-3-one; 5-(Acetyloxy)-4-(4′-chloro-4-ethyl-2′-fluoro [1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-3,6-dihydro-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-2H-pyran-3-one (CAS NO.: 1312340-82-1); 5-(Acetyloxy)-4-(2′,4′-dichloro-4-ethyl[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-3,6-dihydro-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-2H-pyran-3-one (CAS NO.: 1033760-55-2); 4-(4′-Chloro-4-cyclopropyl-2′-fluoro[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-5,6-dihydro-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2H-pyran-3-yl carbonic acid methyl ester (CAS NO.: 1312337-51-1); 4-(2′,4′-Dichloro-4-cyclopropyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-5,6-dihydro-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2H-pyran-3-yl carbonic acid methyl ester; 4-(4′-Chloro-4-ethyl-2′-fluoro [1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-5,6-dihydro-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2H-pyran-3-yl carbonic acid methyl ester (CAS NO.: 1312340-83-2); 4-(2′,4′-Dichloro-4-ethyl [1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-5,6-dihydro-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2H-pyran-3-yl carbonic acid methyl ester (CAS NO.: 1033760-58-5).


(6) Inhibition of GS (Glutamine Synthetase): e.g., Bialaphos/bilanafos, Bilanaphos-natrium, Glufosinate-ammonium, Glufosinate, and glufosinate-P.


(7) Inhibition of PDS (Phytoene Desaturase): e.g., flurochloridone, flurtamone, beflubutamid, norflurazon, fluridone, Diflufenican, Picolinafen, and 4-(3-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-2-(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)pyrimidine (CAS NO: 180608-33-7).


(8) Inhibition of DHPS (Dihydropteroate Synthase): e.g., Asulam.


(9) Inhibition of DXPS (Deoxy-D-Xyulose Phosphate Synthase): e.g., Bixlozone, and Clomazone.


(10) Inhibition of HST (Homogentisate Solanesyltransferase): e.g., Cyclopyrimorate.


(11) Inhibition of SPS (Solanesyl Diphosphate Synthase): e.g., Aclonifen.


(12) Inhibition of Cellulose Synthesis: e.g., Indaziflam, Triaziflam, Chlorthiamid, Dichlobenil, Isoxaben, Flupoxam, 1-cyclohexyl-5-pentafluorphenyloxy-14-[1,2,4,6]thiatriazin-3-ylamine (CAS NO: 175899-01-1), and the azines disclosed in CN109688807A.


(13) Inhibition of VLCFAS (Very Long-Chain Fatty Acid Synthesis) include but not limited to the following types:


1) α-Chloroacetamides: e.g., acetochlor, alachlor, butachlor, dimethachlor, dimethenamid, dimethenamid-P, metazachlor, metolachlor, metolachlor-S, pethoxamid, pretilachlor, propachlor, propisochlor, and thenylchlor;


2) α-Oxyacetamides: e.g., flufenacet, and mefenacet;


3) α-Thioacetamides: e.g., anilofos, and piperophos;


4) Azolyl-carboxamides: e.g., cafenstrole, fentrazamide, and ipfencarbazone;


5) Benzofuranes: e.g., Benfuresate, and Ethofumesate;


6) Isoxazolines: e.g., fenoxasulfone, and pyroxasulfone;


7) Oxiranes: e.g., Indanofan, and Tridiphane;


8) Thiocarbamates: e.g.,


Cycloate, Dimepiperate, EPTC, Esprocarb, Molinate, Orbencarb, Prosulfocarb, Thiobencarb/Benthiocarb, Tri-allate, Vernolate, and isoxazoline compounds of the formulae II.1, II.2, II.3, II.4, II.5, II.6, II.7, II.8 and II.9, and other isoxazoline compounds mentioned in patent WO 2006/024820, WO 2006/037945, WO 2007/071900, WO 2007/096576, etc.




embedded image


(14) Inhibition of fatty acid thioesterase: e.g., Cinmethylin, and Methiozolin;


(15) Inhibition of serine threonine protein phosphatase: e.g., Endothall.


(16) Inhibition of lycopene cyclase: e.g., Amitrole.


The term “wild-type” refers to a nucleic acid molecule or protein that can be found in nature.


In the present invention, the term “cultivation site” comprises a site where the plant of the present invention is cultivated, such as soil, and also comprises, for example, plant seeds, plant seedlings and grown plants. The term “weed-controlling effective amount” refers to an amount of herbicide that is sufficient to affect the growth or development of the target weed, for example, to prevent or inhibit the growth or development of the target weed, or to kill the weed. Advantageously, the weed-controlling effective amount does not significantly affect the growth and/or development of the plant seeds, plant seedlings or plants of the present invention. Those skilled in the art can determine such weed-controlling effective amount through routine experiments.


The term “gene” comprises a nucleic acid fragment expressing a functional molecule (such as, but not limited to, specific protein), including regulatory sequences before (5′ non-coding sequences) and after (3′ non-coding sequences) a coding sequence.


The DNA sequence that “encodes” a specific RNA is a DNA nucleic acid sequence that can be transcribed into RNA. The DNA polynucleotides can encode a RNA (mRNA) that can be translated into a protein, or the DNA polynucleotides can encode a RNA that cannot be translated into a protein (for example, tRNA, rRNA, or DNA-targeting RNA; which are also known as “non-coding” RNA or “ncRNA”).


The terms “polypeptide”, “peptide” and “protein” are used interchangeably in the present invention, and refer to a polymer of amino acid residues. The terms are applied to amino acid polymers in which one or more amino acid residues are artificially chemical analogs of corresponding and naturally occurring amino acids, as well as to naturally occurring amino acid polymers. The terms “polypeptide”, “peptide”, “amino acid sequence” and “protein” may also include their modification forms, including but not limited to glycosylation, lipid linkage, sulfation, γ-carboxylation of glutamic acid residue, hydroxylation and ADP-ribosylation.


The term “biologically active fragment” refers to a fragment that has one or more amino acid residues deleted from the N and/or C-terminus of a protein while still retaining its functional activity.


The terms “polynucleotide” and “nucleic acid” are used interchangeably and comprise DNA, RNA or hybrids thereof, which may be double-stranded or single-stranded.


The terms “nucleotide sequence” and “nucleic acid sequence” both refer to the sequence of bases in DNA or RNA.


Those of ordinary skill in the art can easily use known methods, such as directed evolution and point mutation methods, to mutate the DNA fragments as shown in SEQ ID No. 9 to SEQ ID No. 17 of the present invention. Those artificially modified nucleotide sequences that have at least 75% identity to any one of the foregoing sequences of the present invention and exhibit the same function are considered as derivatives of the nucleotide sequence of the present invention and equivalent to the sequences of the present invention.


The term “identity” refers to the sequence similarity to a natural nucleic acid sequence. Sequence identity can be evaluated by observation or computer software. Using a computer sequence alignment software, the identity between two or more sequences can be expressed as a percentage (%), which can be used to evaluate the identity between related sequences. “Partial sequence” means at least 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% of a given sequence.


The stringent condition may be as follows: hybridizing at 50° C. in a mixed solution of 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5M NaPO4, and 1 mM EDTA, and washing at 50° C. in 2×SSC and 0.1% SDS; or alternatively: hybridizing at 50° C. in a mixed solution of 7% SDS, 0.5M NaPO4 and 1 mM EDTA, and washing at 50° C. in 1×SSC and 0.1% SDS; or alternatively: hybridizing at 50° C. in a mixed solution of 7% SDS, 0.5M NaPO4 and 1 mM EDTA, and washing at 50° C. in 0.5×SSC and 0.1% SDS; or alternatively: hybridizing at 50° C. in a mixed solution of 7% SDS, 0.5M NaPO4 and 1 mM EDTA, and washing at 50° C. in 0.1×SSC and 0.1% SDS; or alternatively: hybridizing at 50° C. in a mixed solution of 7% SDS, 0.5M NaPO4 and 1 mM EDTA, and washing at 65° C. in 0.1×SSC and 0.1% SDS; or alternatively: hybridizing at 65° C. in a solution of 6×SSC, 0.5% SDS, and then membrane washing with 2×SSC, 0.1% SDS and 1×SSC, 0.1% SDS each once; or alternatively: hybridizing and membrane washing twice in a solution of 2×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 68° C., 5 min each time, and then hybridizing and membrane washing twice in a solution of 0.5×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 68° C., 15 min each time; or alternatively: hybridizing and membrane washing in a solution of 0.1×SSPE (or 0.1×SSC), 0.1% SDS at 65° C.


As used in the present invention, “expression cassette”, “expression vector” and “expression construct” refer to a vector such as a recombinant vector suitable for expression of a nucleotide sequence of interest in a plant. The term “expression” refers to the production of a functional product. For example, the expression of a nucleotide sequence may refer to the transcription of the nucleotide sequence (such as transcription to generate mRNA or functional RNA) and/or the translation of RNA into a precursor or mature protein.


The “expression construct” of the present invention can be a linear nucleic acid fragment, a circular plasmid, a viral vector, or, in some embodiments, can be an RNA (such as mRNA) that can be translated.


The “expression construct” of the present invention may comprise regulatory sequences and nucleotide sequences of interest from different sources, or regulatory sequences and nucleotide sequences of interest from the same source but arranged in a way different from those normally occurring in nature.


The “highly-expressing gene” in the present invention refers to a gene whose expression level is higher than that of a common gene in a specific tissue.


The terms “recombinant expression vector” or “DNA construct” are used interchangeably herein and refer to a DNA molecule comprising a vector and at least one insert. Recombinant expression vectors are usually produced for the purpose of expression and/or propagation of the insert or for the construction of other recombinant nucleotide sequences. The insert may be operably or may be inoperably linked to a promoter sequence and may be operably or may be inoperably linked to a DNA regulatory sequence.


The terms “regulatory sequence” and “regulatory element” can be used interchangeably and refer to a nucleotide sequence that is located at the upstream (5′ non-coding sequence), middle or downstream (3′ non-coding sequence) of a coding sequence, and affects the transcription, RNA processing, stability or translation of a related coding sequence. Plant expression regulatory elements refer to nucleotide sequences that can control the transcription, RNA processing or stability or translation of a nucleotide sequence of interest in plants.


The regulatory sequences may include, but are not limited to, promoters, translation leader sequences, introns, and polyA recognition sequences.


The term “promoter” refers to a nucleic acid fragment capable of controlling the transcription of another nucleic acid fragment. In some embodiments of the present invention, the promoter is a promoter capable of controlling gene transcription in plant cells, regardless of whether it is derived from plant cells. The promoter can be a constitutive promoter or a tissue-specific promoter or a developmentally regulated promoter or an inducible promoter.


The term “strong promoter” is a well-known and widely used term in the art. Many strong promoters are known in the art or can be identified by routine experiments. The activity of the strong promoter is higher than the activity of the promoter operatively linked to the nucleic acid molecule to be overexpressed in a wild-type organism, for example, a promoter with an activity higher than the promoter of an endogenous gene. Preferably, the activity of the strong promoter is higher by about 2%, 5%, 8%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 150%, 200%, 250%, 300%, 350%, 400%, 450%, 500%, 600%, 700%, 800%, 900%, 1000% or more than 1000% than the activity of the promoter operably linked to the nucleic acid molecule to be overexpressed in the wild-type organism. Those skilled in the art know how to measure the activity of a promoter and compare the activities of different promoters.


The term “constitutive promoter” refers to a promoter that will generally cause gene expression in most cell types in most cases. “Tissue-specific promoter” and “tissue-preferred promoter” are used interchangeably, and refer to a promoter that is mainly but not necessarily exclusively expressed in a tissue or organ, and also expressed in a specific cell or cell type. “Developmentally regulated promoter” refers to a promoter whose activity is determined by a developmental event. “Inducible promoter” responds to an endogenous or exogenous stimulus (environment, hormone, chemical signal, etc.) to selectively express an operably linked DNA sequence.


As used herein, the term “operably linked” refers to a connection of a regulatory element (for example, but not limited to, promoter sequence, transcription termination sequence, etc.) to a nucleic acid sequence (for example, a coding sequence or open reading frame) such that the transcription of the nucleotide sequence is controlled and regulated by the transcription regulatory element. The techniques for operably linking regulatory element region to nucleic acid molecule are known in the art.


The “introducing” a nucleic acid molecule (such as a plasmid, linear nucleic acid fragment, RNA, etc.) or protein into a plant refers to transforming a cell of the plant with the nucleic acid or protein so that the nucleic acid or protein can function in the plant cell. The term “transformation” used in the present invention comprises stable transformation and transient transformation.


The term “stable transformation” refers to that the introduction of an exogenous nucleotide sequence into a plant genome results in a stable inheritance of the exogenous gene. Once stably transformed, the exogenous nucleic acid sequence is stably integrated into the genome of the plant and any successive generations thereof.


The term “transient transformation” refers to that the introduction of a nucleic acid molecule or protein into a plant cell to perform function does not result in a stable inheritance of the foreign gene. In transient transformation, the exogenous nucleic acid sequence is not integrated into the genome of the plant.


Changing the expression of endogenous genes in organisms includes two aspects: intensity and spatial-temporal characteristics. The change of intensity includes the increase (knock-up), decrease (knock-down) and/or shut off the expression of the gene (knock-out); the spatial-temporal specificity includes temporal (growth and development stage) specificity and spatial (tissue) specificity, as well as inducibility. In addition, it includes changing the targeting of a protein, for example, changing the feature of cytoplasmic localization of a protein into a feature of chloroplast localization or nuclear localization.


Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, the preferred methods and materials are now described.


All publications and patents cited in this description are incorporated herein by reference as if each individual publication or patent is exactly and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference, and is incorporated herein by reference to disclose and describe methods and/or materials related to the publications cited. The citation of any publication which it was published before the filing date should not be interpreted as an admission that the present invention is not eligible to precede the publication of the existing invention. In addition, the publication date provided may be different from the actual publication date, which may require independent verification.


Unless specifically stated or implied, as used herein, the terms “a”, “a/an” and “the” mean “at least one.” All patents, patent applications, and publications mentioned or cited herein are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, with the same degree of citation as if they were individually cited.


The present invention has the following advantageous technical effects:


The present invention comprehensively uses the information of the following two different professional fields to develop a method for directly creating new genes in organisms, completely changing the conventional use of the original gene editing tools (i.e., knocking out genes), realizing a new use thereof for creating new genes, in particular, realizing an editing method for knocking up endogenous genes by using gene editing technology to increase the expression of target genes. The first is the information in the field of gene editing, that is, when two or more different target sites and Cas9 simultaneously target the genome or organism, different situations such as deletion, inversion, doubling or inversion-doubling may occur. The second is the information in the field of genomics, that is, the information about location and distance of different genes in the genome, and specific locations, directions and functions of different elements (promoter, 5′UTR, coding region (CDS), different domain regions, terminator, etc.) in genes, and expression specificity of different genes, etc. By combining the information in these two different fields, breaks are induced at specific sites of two or more different genes or at two or more specific sites within a single gene (specific sites can be determined in the field of genomics), a new combination of different gene elements or functional domains can be formed through deletion, inversion, doubling, and inversion-doubling or chromosome arm exchange, etc. (the specific situations would be provided in the field of gene editing), thereby specifically creating a new gene in the organism.


The new genes created by the present invention are formed by the fusion or recombination of different elements of two or more genes under the action of the spontaneous DNA repair mechanism in the organism to change the expression intensity, spatial-temporal specificity, special functional domains and the like of the original gene without an exogenous transgene or synthetic gene elements. Because the new gene has the fusion of two or more different gene elements, this greatly expands the scope of gene mutation, and will produce more abundant and diverse functions, thus it has a wide range of application prospects. At the same time, these new genes are not linked to the gene editing vectors, so the vector elements can be removed through genetic segregation, and thereby resulting in non-transgenic biological materials containing the new genes for animal and plant breeding. Alternatively, non-integrated transient editing can be performed by delivery of mRNA or ribonucleic acid protein complex (RNP) to create non-genetically modified biological materials containing the new genes. This process is non-transgenic and the resultant edited materials would contain no transgene as well. In theory and in fact, these new genes can also be obtained through traditional breeding techniques (such as radiation or chemical mutagenesis). The difference is that the screening with traditional techniques requires the creation of libraries containing a huge number of random mutants and thus it is time-consuming and costly to screen new functional genes. While in the present invention, new functional genes can be created through bioinformatics analysis combined with gene editing technology, the breeding duration can be greatly shortened. The method of the present invention is not obliged to the current regulations on gene editing organisms in many countries.


In addition, the new gene creation technology of the present invention can be used to change many traits in organisms, including the growth, development, resistance, yield, etc., and has great application value. The new genes created may have new regulatory elements (such as promoters), which will change the expression intensity and and/or spatial-temporal characteristics of the original genes, or will have new amino acid sequences and thus have new functions. Taking crops as an example, changing the expression of specific genes can increase the resistance of crops to noxious organisms such as pests and weeds and abiotic stresses such as drought, waterlogging, and salinity, and can also increase yield and improve quality. Taking fish as an example, changing the expression characteristics of growth hormone in fish can significantly change its growth and development speed.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of creating a new HPPD gene in rice.



FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of creating a new EPSPS gene in rice.



FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram of creating a new PPOX gene in Arabidopsis thaliana.



FIG. 4 shows a schematic diagram of creating a new PPOX gene in rice.



FIG. 5 shows the sequencing results for the HPPD-duplication Scheme tested with rice protoplast.



FIG. 6 shows the map of the Agrobacterium transformation vector pQY2091 for rice.



FIG. 7 shows the electrophoresis results of the PCR products for the detection of new gene fragments in pQY2091 transformed hygromycin resistant rice callus. The arrow indicates the PCR band of the new gene created by the fusion of the promoter of the UBI2 gene with the coding region of the HPPD. The numbers are the numbers of the different callus samples. M represents DNA Marker, and the band sizes are 100 bp, 250 bp, 500 bp, 750 bp, 1000 bp, 2000 bp, 2500 bp, 5000 bp, 7500 bp in order.



FIG. 8 shows the electrophoresis results of the PCR products for the detection of new gene fragments in pQY2091 transformed rice T0 seedlings. The arrow indicates the PCR band of the new gene created by the fusion of the promoter of the UBI2 gene with the coding region of the HPPD. The numbers are the serial numbers of the different T0 seedlings. M represents DNA Marker, and the band sizes are sequentially 100 bp, 250 bp, 500 bp, 750 bp, 1000 bp, 2000 bp, 2500 bp, 5000 bp, 7500 bp.



FIG. 9 shows the test results for the resistance to Bipyrazone of the QY2091 T0 generation of the HPPD gene doubling strain. In the same flowerpot, the wild-type Jinjing 818 is on the left, and the HPPD doubling strain is on the right.



FIG. 10 shows the relative expression levels of the HPPD and UBI2 genes in the QY2091 TO generation of the HPPD gene doubling strain. 818CK1 and 818CK3 represent two control plants of the wild-type Jinjing 818; 13M and 20M represent the primary tiller leaf samples of the QY2091-13 and the QY2091-20 T0 plants; 13 L and 20 L represent the secondary tiller leaf samples of the QY2091-13 and the QY2091-20 T0 plants used in the herbicide resistance test.



FIG. 11 shows a schematic diagram of the possible genotypes of QY2091 T1 generation and the binding sites of the molecular detection primers.



FIG. 12 shows the comparison of the sequencing results detecting the HPPD doubling and the predicted doubled sequences for QY2091-13 and QY2091-20.



FIG. 13 shows the results of the herbicide resistance test for the T1 generation of the QY2091 HPPD doubling strain at the seedling stage.



FIG. 14 shows a schematic diagram of the types of the possible editing event of rice PPO1 gene chromosome fragment inversion and the binding sites of molecular detection primers.



FIG. 15 shows the sequencing results of the EPSPS-inversion detection.



FIG. 16 shows the map of the rice Agrobacterium transformation vector pQY2234.



FIG. 17 shows the electrophoresis results of the PCR products for the detection of new gene fragments of hygromycin resistant rice callus transformed with pQY2234. The arrow indicates the PCR band of the new gene created by the fusion of the promoter of the CP12 gene with the coding region of the PPO1. The numbers are the serial numbers of different callus samples. M represents DNA Marker, and the band sizes are sequentially 100 bp, 250 bp, 500 bp, 750 bp, 1000 bp, 2000 bp, 2500 bp, 5000 bp, 7500 bp.



FIG. 18 shows the resistance test results of the PPO1 gene inversion strain to Compound A of the QY2234 T0 generation. Under the same treatment dose, the left flowerpot is the wild-type Huaidao No. 5 control, and the right is the PPO1 inversion strain.



FIG. 19 shows the relative expression levels of PPO1 and CP12 genes in the QY2234 TO generation PPO1 inversion strain. H5CK1 and H5CK2 represent two wild-type Huaidao No. 5 control plants; 252M, 304M and 329M represent the primary tiller leaf samples of QY2234-252, QY2234-304 and QY2234-329 T0 plants; 252 L, 304 L and 329 L represent secondary tiller leaf samples.



FIG. 20 shows the comparison of the sequencing result of the PPO1 inversion with the predicted inversion sequence in the Huaidao 5 background.



FIG. 21 shows the comparison of the sequencing result of the PPO1 inversion with the predicted inversion sequence in the Jinjing 818 background.



FIG. 22 shows the herbicide resistance test results for the T1 generation of the QY2234 PPO1 inversion strain at seedling stage.



FIG. 23 Duplication created a new GH1 gene cassette in zebrafish embryos. The GH1 gene is the growth hormone gene in zebrafish. Col1A1a is collagen type I alpha 1a gene. Col1A1a-GH1 fusion was the new gene cassette as a result of the duplication. DNA template used for PCR amplification in the Control group (CK) was extracted from young zebrafish without microinjection. DNA template used for PCR amplification in the Treatment group (RNP treat) was DNA sample extracted from young zebrafish after microinjection.



FIG. 24 PPO1 inversion event lines were tested for herbicide resistance in the field at T1 generation of QY2234 rice plants. WT is wild-type Jinjing 818. 5 # and 42 # represent samples from the PPO1 inversion event lines of QY2234/818-5 and QY2234/818-42, respectively. The herbicide tested was PPO inhibitor compound A.



FIG. 25 shows the Western Blot detection of PPO1 protein in the T1 rice plants of the QY2234 lines. 5 #, 42 #, 114 #, and 257 # represent the samples from the inversion event lines of QY2234/818-5, QY2234/818-42, QY2234/818-144, and QY2234/818-257, respectively.



FIG. 26 shows the field assay of HPPD inhibitor herbicide resistance under field conditions at T1 generation of QY2091 rice plants. 12 # and 21 # represent QY2091-12 and QY2091-21 duplication event lines, respectively. The herbicide tested was HHPD inhibitor Bipyrazone.



FIG. 27 A schematic diagram of the duplicated DNA fragment harboring PPO1 gene in rice, and 4 duplicated events were detected in rice protoplast cells using sequencing peak comparison. pQY2648, pQY2650, pQY2651, pQY2653 are the vector numbers tested. R2, F2 were used as sequencing primers. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 28 A schematic diagram of fragment translocation between chromosome1 and chromosome2 that up-regulates HPPD gene expression in rice. After targeted fragment translocation, CP12 gene promoter drives HPPD CDS expression; at the same time, HPPD gene promoter drives CP12 CDS expression. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 29 Fusion of the promoter of CP12 and the coding region of HPPD was detected in rice protoplast cells transformed with pQY2257. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 30 Fusion of the promoter of HPPD and the coding region of CP12 was detected in rice protoplast cells transformed with pQY2259. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 31 A schematic diagram of knocking-up HPPD gene expression as a result of the duplication of the segment between the two targeted cuts in rice, which was mediated by CRISPR/LbCpf1. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 32 A schematic diagram of fusing the OsCATC gene with a chloroplast signal peptide domain (LOC4331514CTP) through the deletion of the segment between the two targeted cuts in rice protoplast, which results in OsCATC protein have a chloroplast signal peptide domain and thus could go to chloroplast after expressed; and the positive events were detected in rice protoplast cells, which was demonstrated by sequencing. CTP stands for chloroplast signal peptide domain. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 33 A schematic diagram of the OsGLO3 gene linking the chloroplast signal peptide domain (LOC4337056CTP) through chromosome fragment inversion between the targeted cuts, which results in OsGLO3 protein have a chloroplast signal peptide domain and thus could go to chloroplast after expressed; while LOC4337056 gene drops its CTP; and the detection results of positive event rice protoplasts. CTP stands for chloroplast signal peptide domain. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 34 A schematic diagram showing knock-up of PPO2 gene by duplication of the DNA fragments between the two targeted cuts in rice. A new gene is produced where the SAMDC strong promoter drives the expression of PPO2. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 35 Positive duplication events were detected in pQY1386-transformed rice calli as indicated by alignment of sequencing data. 28 #, 62 # are two duplication-positive calli. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 36 Positive duplication events were detected in pQY1387-transformed rice calli as indicated by alignment of sequencing data. 64 #, 82 #, 110 #, 145 # are duplication-positive calli. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 37 Positive duplication events were detected in T0 rice plants (QY1387/818-2) emerged from pQY1387-transformed calli. The repair outcomes of two targets as well as the duplication joint were aligned with Sanger sequencing data. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 38 The detection results of the relative expression level of PPO2 in QY1387/818 T0 rice plants. As expected, PPO2 expression significantly increased meanwhile SAMDC expression significantly reduced.



FIG. 39 Herbicide resistance assay of rice QY1387 T0 plants. 2 # represents the 1387/818-2 line, 4 # represents the 1387/818-4 line, and WT is the wild type of Jinjing 818. The herbicide tested is PPO inhibitor compound A



FIG. 40 A schematic diagram of creation of new PPO2 genes by DNA fragment inversion between the two targeted cuts in rice. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 41 Positive inversion events were detected in QY2611-transformed rice calli as indicated by alignment of sequencing data. 10 # represents the QY2611/818-10 callus, 13 # represents the QY2611/818-13 callus. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 42 Positive inversion events were detected in QY2612-transformed rice calli as indicated by alignment of sequencing data. 5 # represents the QY2612/818-5 callus, 34 # represents the QY2612/818-34 callus. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 43 A schematic diagram of successful generation of new PPO2 gene cassette in maize protoplast cells, through duplication of the segment between the two targeted cuts and demonstrated by alignment of Sanger sequencing data. pQY1340 and pQY1341 are test vectors. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 44 A schematic diagram of successful generation of new PPO2-2A gene cassette in wheat protoplast cells transfected with pQY2626 vector, through inversion of the segment between the two targeted cuts, and demonstrated by alignment of Sanger sequencing data. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 45 A schematic diagram of successful generation of new PPO2-2B gene cassette in wheat protoplast cells transfected with pQY2631 vector, through duplication of the segment between the two targeted cuts, and demonstrated by alignment of Sanger sequencing data. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 46 A schematic diagram of successful generation of new PPO2-2D gene cassette in wheat protoplast cells transfected with pQY2635 vector, through duplication of the segment between the two targeted cuts, and demonstrated by alignment of Sanger sequencing data. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 47 Sequencing results of chromosome fragment inverted rice Line QY1085/818-23.



FIG. 48 Sequencing results of chromosome fragment duplicated rice Line QY1089/818-321.



FIG. 49 A schematic diagram of successful generation of new IGF2 (Insulin-like growth factor 2) gene cassette driven by TNNI2 gene promoter, through inversion of the segment between the two targeted cuts, and demonstrated the detection of the positive fusion event of Pig TNNI2 promoter and IGF2 gene in pig primary fibroblast cells. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 50 A schematic diagram of successful generation of new TNNI3 (muscle troponin T) gene cassette driven by IGF2 gene promoter, through inversion of the segment between the two targeted cuts, and demonstrated the detection of the fusion event of Pig IGF2 promoter and TNNT3 gene in pig primary fibroblast cells. The diagram is not in proportion with DNA segment lengths.



FIG. 51 shows the sequencing result of forward and reverse primers. The experiment result shows that the fragments between gh1 gene and col1a1a gene in zebra fish embryo are doubled.



FIG. 52 is the sequencing result. The experiment result shows that the coding area and the coding area & promotor of ddx5 gene and the coding area & the promotor of gh1 gene are exchanged due to the inversion of chromosome fragments;



FIG. 53 is the comparison diagram of inversion and wild type zebra fish. The result shows that the growth of zebra fish with upregulated expression is obviously accelerated.



FIG. 54 is a schematic diagram of Ubi2 promoter translocation to knock-up PPO2 gene in rice.



FIG. 55 shows the herbicide resistance test results for the T1 generation of the QY378-16 translocation rice at seedling stage.





SPECIFIC MODELS FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

The present invention is further described in conjunction with the examples as follows. The following description is just illustrative, and the protection scope of the present invention should not be limited to this.


Example 1: An Editing Method for Knocking Up the Expression of the Endogenous HPPD Gene by Inducing Doubling of Chromosome Fragment in Plant—Rice Protoplast Test

HPPD was a key enzyme in the pathway of chlorophyll synthesis in plants, and the inhibition of the activity of the HPPD would eventually lead to albino chlorosis and death of plants. Many herbicides, such as mesotrione and topramezone, were inhibitors with the HPPD as the target protein, and thus increasing the expression level of the endogenous HPPD gene in plants could improve the tolerance of the plants to these herbicides. The rice HPPD gene (as shown in SEQ ID NO: 6, in which 1-1067 bp is the promoter, and the rest is the expression region) locates on rice chromosome 2. Through bioinformatic analysis, it was found that rice Ubiquitin2 (hereinafter referred to as UBI2) gene (as shown in SEQ ID NO: 5, in which 1-2107 bp was the promoter, and the rest was the expression region) locates about 338 kb downstream of HPPD gene, and the UBI2 gene and the HPPD gene were in the same direction on the chromosome. According to the rice gene expression profile data provided by the International Rice Genome Sequencing Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/index.shtml), the expression intensity of the UBI2 gene in rice leaves was 3 to 10 times higher than that of the HPPD gene, and the UBI2 gene promoter was a strong constitutively expressed promoter.


As shown in FIG. 1, Scheme 1 shows that double-strand breaks were simultaneously generated at the sites between the promoters and the CDS region of the HPPD and UBI2 genes respectively, the event of doubling the region between the two breaks were obtained after screening and identification, and a new gene could be formed by fusing the promoter of UBI2 and the coding region of HPPD together. In addition, according to Scheme 2 as shown in FIG. 1, a new gene in which the promoter of UBI2 and the coding region of HPPD were fused could also be formed by two consecutive inversions. First, the schemes as shown in FIG. 1 were tested in the rice protoplast system as follows:


1. Firstly, the genomic DNA sequences of the rice HPPD and UBI2 genes were input into the CRISPOR online tool (http://crispor.tefor.net/) to search for available editing target sites. After online scoring, the following target sites between the promoters and the CDS regions of HPPD and UBI2 genes were selected for testing:















OsHPPD-guide RNA1
GTGCTGGTTGCCTTGGCTGC





OsHPPD-guide RNA2
CACAAATTCACCAGCAGCCA





OsHPPD-guide RNA3
TAAGAACTAGCACAAGATTA





OsHPPD-guide RNA4
GAAATAATCACCAAACAGAT









The guide RNA1 and guide RNA2 located between the promoter and the CDS region of the HPPD gene, close to the start codon of the HPPD protein, and the guide RNA3 and guide RNA4 located between the promoter and CDS region of the UBI2 gene, close to the UBI2 protein initiation codon.


pHUE411 vector (https://www.addgene.org/62203/) is used as the backbone, and the following primers were designed for the above-mentioned target sites to perform vector construction as described in “Xing H L, Dong L, Wang Z P, Zhang H Y, Han C Y, Liu B, Wang X C, Chen Q J. A CRISPR/Cas9 Toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Nov. 29; 14(1): 327”.













Primer No.
DNA sequence (5′ to 3′)







OsHPPD-sgRN
ATATGGTCTCGGGCGGTGCTGGTTGCCTTGGCTGCGTTTTAGAGC


A1-F
TAGAAATAGCAAG





OsHPPD-sgRN
ATATGGTCTCGGGCGCACAAATTCACCAGCAGCCAGTTTTAGAG


A2-F
CTAGAAATAGCAAG





OsHPPD-sgRN
TATTGGTCTCTAAACTAATCTTGTGCTAGTTCTTAGCTTCTTGGT


A3-R
GCCGCGC





OsHPPD-sgRN
TATTGGTCTCTAAACATCTGTTTGGTGATTATTTCGCTTCTTGGTG


A4-R
CCGCGC









gene editing vectors for the following dual-target combination were constructed following the method provided in the above-mentioned literature. Specifically, with the pCBC-MT1T2 plasmid (https://www.addgene.org/50593/) as the template, sgRNA1+3, sgRNA1+4, sgRNA2+3 and sgRNA2+4 double target fragments were amplified respectively for constructing the sgRNA expression cassettes. The vectorbackbone of pHUE411 was digested with BsaI, and recovered from the gel, and the target fragment was digested and directly used for the ligation reaction. T4 DNA ligase was used to ligate the vector backbone and the target fragment, and the ligation product was transformed into Trans5α competent cells. Different monoclones were picked and sequenced The Sparkjade High Purity Plasmid Mini Extraction Kit was used to extract plasmids from the clones with correct sequences, thereby obtaining recombinant plasmids, respectively named as pQY002065, pQY002066, pQY002067, and pQY002068, as follows:


pQY002065 pHUE411-HPPD-sgRNA1+3 combination of OsHPPD-guide RNA1, guide RNA3


pQY002066 pHUE411-HPPD-sgRNA1+4 combination of OsHPPD-guide RNA1, guide RNA4


pQY002067 pHUE411-HPPD-sgRNA2+3 combination of OsHPPD-guide RNA2, guide RNA3


pQY002068 pHUE411-HPPD-sgRNA2+4 combination of OsHPPD-guide RNA2, guide RNA4


2. Plasmids of high-purity and high-concentration were prepared for the above-mentioned pQY002065-002068 vectors as follows:


Plasmids were extracted with the Promega Medium Plasmid Extraction Kit (Midipreps DNA Purification System, Promega, A7640) according to the instructions. The specific steps were:


(1) Adding 5 ml of Escherichia coli to 300 ml of liquid LB medium containing kanamycin, and shaking at 200 rpm, 37° C. for 12 to 16 hours;


(2) Placing the above bacteria solution in a 500 ml centrifuge tube, and centrifuging at 5,000 g for 10 minutes, discarding the supernatant;


(3) Adding 3 ml of Cell Resuspension Solution (CRS) to resuspend the cell pellet and vortexing for thorough mixing;


(4) Adding 3 ml of Cell Lysis Solution (CLS) and mixing up and down slowly for no more than 5 minutes;


(5) Adding 3 ml of Neutralization Solution and mixed well by overturning until the color become clear and transparent;


(6) Centrifuging at 14,000 g for 15 minutes, and further centrifuging for 15 minutes if precipitate was not formed compact;


(7) Transferring the supernatant to a new 50 ml centrifuge tube, avoiding to suck in white precipitate into the centrifuge tube;


(8) Adding 10 ml of DNA purification resin (Purification Resin, shaken vigorously before use) and mixing well;


(9) Pouring the Resin/DNA mixture was poured into a filter column, and treating by the vacuum pump negative pressure method (0.05 MPa);


(10) Adding 15 ml of Column Wash Solution (CWS) to the filter column, and vacuuming.


(11) Adding 15 ml of CWS, and repeating vacuuming once; vacuuming was extended for 30 s after the whole solution passed through the filter column;


(12) Cutting off the filter column, transferring to a 1.5 ml centrifuge tube, centrifuging at 12,000 g for 2 minutes, removing residual liquid, and transferring the filter column to a new 1.5 ml centrifuge tube;


(13) Adding 200 μL of sterilized water preheated to 70° C., and keeping rest for 2 minutes;


(14) Centrifuging at 12,000 g for 2 minutes to elute the plasmid DNA; and the concentration was generally about 1 μg/μL.


3. Preparing Rice Protoplasts and Performing PEG-Mediated Transformation:


First, rice seedlings for protoplasts were prepared, which is of the variety Nipponbare. The seeds were provided by the Weeds Department of the School of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, and expanded in house. The rice seeds were hulled first, and the hulled seeds were rinsed with 75% ethanol for 1 minute, treated with 5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 20 minutes, then washed with sterile water for more than 5 times. After blow-drying in an ultra-clean table, they were placed in a tissue culture bottle containing ½ MS medium, 20 seeds for each bottle. Protoplasts were prepared by incubating at 26° C. for about 10 days with 12 hours light.


The methods for rice protoplast preparation and PEG-mediated transformation were conducted according to “Lin et al., 2018 Application of protoplast technology to CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis: from single-cell mutation detection to mutant plant regeneration. Plant Biotechnology Journal https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12870”. The steps were as follows:


(1) the leaf sheath of the seedlings was selected, cut into pieces of about 1 mm with a sharp Geely razor blade, and placed in 0.6 M mannitol and MES culture medium (formulation: 0.6 M mannitol, 0.4 M MES, pH 5.7) for later use. All materials were cut and transferred to 20 ml of enzymatic hydrolysis solution (formulation: 1.5% Cellulase R10/RS (YaKult Honsha), 0.5% Mecerozyme R10 (YaKult Honsha), 0.5M mannitol, 20 mM KCl, 20 mM MES, pH 5.7, 10 mM CaCl2), 0.1% BSA, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol), wrapped in tin foil and placed in a 28° C. shaker, enzymatically hydrolyzed at 50 rpm in the dark for about 4 hours, and the speed was increased to 100 rpm in the last 2 minutes;


(2) after the enzymatic lysis, an equal volume of W5 solution (formulation: 154 mM NaCl, 125 mM CaCl2), 5 mM KCl, 15 mM MES) was added, shaken horizontally for 10 seconds to release the protoplasts. The cells after enzymatic lysis were filtered through a 300-mesh sieve and centrifuged at 150 g for 5 minutes to collect protoplasts;


(3) the cells were rinsed twice with the W5 solution, and the protoplasts were collected by centrifugation at 150 g for 5 minutes;


(4) the protoplasts were resuspended with an appropriate amount of MMG solution (formulation: 3.05 g/L MgCl2, 1 g/L MES, 91.2 g/L mannitol), and the concentration of the protoplasts was about 2×106 cells/mL.


The transformation of protoplasts was carried out as follows:


(1) to 200 μL of the aforementioned MMG resuspended protoplasts, endotoxin-free plasmid DNA of high quality (10-20 μg) was added and tapped to mix well;


(2) an equal volume of 40% (w/v) PEG solution (formulation: 40% (w/v) PEG, 0.5M mannitol, 100 mM CaCl2)) was added, tapped to mix well, and kept rest at 28° C. in the dark for 15 minutes;


(3) after the induction of transformation, 1.5 ml of W5 solution was added slowly, tapped to mix the cells well. The cells were collected by centrifugation at 150 g for 3 minutes. This step was repeated once;


(4) 1.5 ml of W5 solution was added to resuspend the cells, and placed in a 28° C. incubator and cultured in the dark for 12-16 hours. For extracting protoplast genomic DNA, the cultivation should be carried out for 48-60 hours.


4. Genome Targeting and Detecting New Gene:


(1) First, protoplast DNAs were extracted by the CTAB method with some modifications. The specific method was as follows: the protoplasts were centrifuged, then the supernatant was discarded. 500 μL of DNA extracting solution (formulation: CTAB 20 g/L, NaCl 81.82 g/L, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 20 mM EDTA, 0.2% β-mercaptoethanol) was added, shaken to mix well, and incubated in a 65° C. water bath for 1 hour; when the incubated sample was cooled, 500 μL of chloroform was added and mixed upside down and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes; 400 μL of the supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 ml centrifuge tube, 1 ml of 70% (v/v) ethanol was added and the mixture was kept at −20° C. for precipitating for 20 minutes; the mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 minutes to precipitate the DNA; after the precipitate was air dried, 50 μL of ultrapure water was added and stored at −20° C. for later use.


(2) The detection primers in the following table were used to amplify the fragments containing the target sites on both sides or the predicted fragments resulting from the fusion of the UBI2 promoter and the HPPD coding region. The lengths of the PCR products were between 300-1000 bp, in which the primer8-F+primer6-R combination was used to detect the fusion fragment at the middle joint after the doubling of the chromosome fragment, and the product length was expected to be 630 bp.













Primer
Sequence (5′ to 3′)







OsHPPDduplicated-
CACTACCATCCATCCATTTGC


primer1-F






OsHPPDduplicated-
GAGTTCCCCGTGGAGAGGT


primer6-R






OsHPPDduplicated-
TCCATTACTACTCTCCCCGATT


primer3-F






OsHPPDduplicated-
GTGTGGGGGAGTGGATGAC


primer7-R






OsHPPDduplicated-
TGTAGCTTGTGCGTTTCGAT


primer5-F






OsHPPDduplicated-
GGGATGCCCTCTTTGTCC


primer2-R






OsHPPDduplicated-
TCTGTGTGAAGATTATTGCCACT


primer8-F






OsHPPDduplicated-
GGGATGCCCTCCTTATCTTG


primer4-R









The PCR reaction system was as follows:
















Components
Volume









2 × 15 buffer solution
5 μL



Forward primer (10 μM)
2 μL



Reverse primer (10 μM)
2 μL



Template DNA
2 μL



Ultrapure water
Added to 50 μL










(3) A PCR Reaction was Conducted Under the Following General Reaction Conditions:

















Step
Temperature
Time









Denaturation
98° C.
30 s




98° C.
15 s



Amplification for
58° C.
15 s



30-35 cycles
72° C.
30 s



Final extension
72° C.
 3 min



Finished
16° C.
 5 min










(4) The PCR reaction products were detected by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The results showed that the 630 bp positive band for the predicted fusion fragment of the UBI2 promoter and the HPPD coding region could be detected in the pQY002066 and pQY002068 transformed samples.


5. The positive samples of the fusion fragment of the UBI2 promoter and the HPPD coding region were sequenced for verification, and the OsHPPDduplicated-primer8-F and OsHPPDduplicated-primer6-R primers were used to sequence from both ends. As shown in FIG. 5, the promoter of the UBI2 gene and the expression region of the HPPD gene could be directly ligated, and the editing event of the fusion of the promoter of rice UBI2 gene and the expression region of the HPPD gene could be detected in the protoplast genomic DNA of the rice transformed with pQY002066 and pQY002068 plasmids, indicating that the scheme of doubling the chromosome fragments to form a new HPPD gene was feasible, a new HPPD gene which expression was driven by a strong promoter could be created, and this was defined as an HPPD doubling event. The sequencing result of the pQY002066 vector transformed protoplast for testing HPPD doubling event was shown in SEQ ID NO: 9; and the sequencing result of the pQY002068 vector transformed protoplast for testing HPPD doubling event was shown in SEQ ID NO: 10.


Example 2: Creation of Herbicide-Resistant Rice with Knock-Up Expression of Endogenous HPPD Gene by Chromosome Fragment Doubling Through Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation

1. Construction of knock-up editing vector: Based on the results of the protoplast test in Example 1, the dual-target combination OsHPPD-guide RNA1: 5′GTGCTGGTTGCCTTGGCTGC3′ and OsHPPD-guide RNA4: 5′GAAATAATCACCAAACAGAT3′ with a high editing efficiency was selected. The Agrobacterium transformation vector pQY2091 was constructed according to Example 1. pHUE411 was used as the vector backbone and subjected to rice codon optimization. The map of the vector was shown in FIG. 6.


2. Agrobacterium Transformation of Rice Callus:


1) Agrobacterium transformation: 1 μg of the rice knock-up editing vector pQY2091 plasmid was added to 10 μl of Agrobacterium EHA105 heat-shock competent cells (Angyu Biotech, Catalog No. G6040), placed on ice for 5 minutes, immersed in liquid nitrogen for quick freezing for 5 minutes, then removed and heated at 37° C. for 5 minutes, and finally placed on ice for 5 minutes. 500 μl of YEB liquid medium (formulation: yeast extract 1 g/L, peptone 5 g/L, beef extract 5 g/L, sucrose 5 g/L, magnesium sulfate 0.5 g/L) was added. The mixture was placed in a shaker and incubated at 28° C., 200 rpm for 2˜3 hours; the bacteria were collected by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 30 seconds, the collected bacteria were spread on YEB (kanamycin 50 mg/L+rifampicin 25 mg/L) plate, and incubated for 2 days in an incubator at 28° C.; the single colonies were picked and placed into liquid culture medium, and the bacteria were stored at −80° C.


2) Cultivation of Agrobacterium: The single colonies of the transformed Agrobacterium on the YEB plate was picked, added into 20 ml of YEB liquid medium (kanamycin 50 mg/L+rifampicin 25 mg/L), and cultured while stirring at 28° C. until the OD600 was 0.5, then the bacteria cells were collected by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 minutes, 20-40 ml of AAM (Solarbio, lot number LA8580) liquid medium was added to resuspend the bacterial cells to reach OD600 of 0.2-0.3, and then acetosyringone (Solarbio, article number A8110) was added to reach the final concentration of 200 μM for infecting the callus.


3) Induction of rice callus: The varieties of the transformation recipient rice were Huaidao 5 and Jinjing 818, purchased from the seed market in Huai'an, Jiangsu, and expanded in house. 800-2000 clean rice seeds were hulled, then washed with sterile water until the water was clear after washing. Then the seeds were disinfected with 70% alcohol for 30 seconds, then 30 ml of 5% sodium hypochlorite was added and the mixture was placed on a horizontal shaker and shaken at 50 rpm for 20 minutes, then washed with sterile water for 5 times. The seeds were placed on sterile absorbent paper, air-dried to remove the water on the surface of the seeds, inoculated on an induction medium and cultivated at 28° C. to obtain callus.


The formulation of the induction medium: 4.1 g/L N6 powder+0.3 g/L hydrolyzed casein+2.878 g/L proline+2 mg/L 2,4-D+3% sucrose+0.1 g/L inositol+0.5 g glutamine+0.45% phytagel, pH 5.8.


4) Infection of rice callus with Agrobacterium: The callus of Huaidao No. 5 or Jinjing 818 subcultured for 10 days with a diameter of 3 mm was selected and collected into a 50 ml centrifuge tube; the resuspension solution of the Agrobacterium AAM with the OD600 adjusted to 0.2-0.3 was poured into the centrifuge tube containing the callus, placed in a shaker at 28° C. at a speed of 200 rpm to perform infection for 20 minutes; when the infection was completed, the bacteria solution was discarded, the callus was placed on sterile filter paper and air-dried for about 20 minutes, then placed on a plate containing co-cultivation medium to perform co-cultivation, on which the plate was covered with a sterile filter paper soaked with AAM liquid medium containing 100 μM acetosyringone; after 3 days of co-cultivation, the Agrobacterium was removed by washing (firstly washing with sterile water for 5 times, then washing with 500 mg/L cephalosporin antibiotic for 20 minutes), and selective cultured on 50 mg/L hygromycin selection medium.


The formulation of the co-cultivation medium: 4.1 g/L N6 powder+0.3 g/L hydrolyzed casein+0.5 g/L proline+2 mg/L 2,4-D+200 μM AS+10 g/L glucose+3% Sucrose+0.45% phytagel, pH 5.5.


3. Molecular Identification and Differentiation into Seedlings of Hygromycin Resistant Callus:


Different from the selection process of conventional rice transformation, with specific primers of the fusion fragments generated after the chromosome fragment doubling, hygromycin resistant callus could be molecularly identified during the callus selection and culture stage in the present invention, positive doubling events could be determined, and callus containing new genes resulting from fusion of different gene elements was selected for differentiation cultivation and induced to emerge seedlings. The specific steps were as follows:


1) The co-cultured callus was transferred to the selection medium for the first round of selection (2 weeks). The formulation of the selection medium is: 4.1 g/L N6 powder+0.3 g/L hydrolyzed casein+2.878 g/L proline+2 mg/L 2,4-D+3% sucrose+0.5 g glutamine+30 mg/L hygromycin (HYG)+500 mg/L cephalosporin (cef)+0.1 g/L inositol+0.45% phytagel, pH 5.8.


2) After the first round of selection was completed, the newly grown callus was transferred into a new selection medium for the second round of selection (2 weeks). At this stage, the newly grown callus with a diameter greater than 3 mm was clamped by tweezers to take a small amount of sample, the DNA thereof was extracted with the CTAB method described in Example 1 for the first round of molecular identification. In this example, the primer pair of OsHPPDduplicated-primer8-F (8F) and OsHPPD duplicated-primer6-R (6R) was selected to perform PCR identification for the callus transformed with the pQY2091 vector, in which the reaction system and reaction conditions were similar to those of Example 1. Among the total of 350 calli tested, no positive sample was detected in the calliof Huaidao 5, while 28 positive samples were detected in the calli of Jinjing 818. The PCR detection results of some calli were shown in FIG. 7.


3) The calli identified as positive by PCR were transferred to a new selection medium for the third round of selection and expanding cultivation; after the diameter of the calli was greater than 5 mm, the callus in the expanding cultivation was subjected to the second round of molecular identification using 8F+6R primer pair, the yellow-white callus at good growth status that was identified as positive in the second round was transferred to a differentiation medium to perform differentiation, and the seedlings of about 1 cm could be obtained after 3 to 4 weeks; the differentiated seedlings were transferred to a rooting medium for rooting cultivation; after the seedlings of the rooting cultivation were subjected to hardening off, they were transferred to a flowerpot with soil and placed in a greenhouse for cultivation. The formulation of the differentiation medium is: 4.42 g/L MS powder+0.5 g/L hydrolyzed casein+0.2 mg/L NAA+2 mg/L KT+3% sucrose+3% sorbitol+30 mg/L hygromycin+0.1 g/L inositol+0.45% phytagel, pH 5.8. The formulation of the rooting medium is: 2.3 g/L MS powder+3% sucrose+0.45% phytagel.


4. Molecular Detection of HPPD Doubling Seedlings (T0 Generation):


After the second round of molecular identification, 29 doubling event-positive calli were co-differentiated to obtain 403 seedlings of T0 generation, and the 8F+6R primer pair was used for the third round of molecular identification of the 403 seedlings, among which 56 had positive bands. The positive seedlings were moved into a greenhouse for cultivation. The PCR detection results of some T0 seedlings were shown in FIG. 8.


5. HPPD Inhibitory Herbicide Resistance Test for HPPD Doubled Seedlings (T0 Generation):


The transformation seedlings of T0 generation identified as doubling event positive were transplanted into large plastic buckets in the greenhouse for expanding propagation to obtain seeds of T1 generation. After the seedlings began to tiller, the tillers were taken from vigorously growing strains, and planted in the same pots with the tillers of the wild-type control varieties at the same growth period. After the plant height reached about 20 cm, the herbicide resistance test was conducted. The herbicide used was Bipyrazone (CAS No. 1622908-18-2) produced by our company, and its field dosage was usually 4 grams of active ingredients per mu (4 g a.i./mu). In this experiment, Bipyrazone was applied at a dosage gradient of 2 g a.i./mu, 4 g a.i./mu, 8 g a.i./mu and 32 g a.i./mu with a walk-in spray tower.


The resistance test results were shown in FIG. 9. After 5-7 days of the application, the wild-type control rice seedlings began to show albino, while the strains of the HPPD doubling events all remained normally green. After 4 weeks of the application, the wild-type rice seedlings were close to death, while the strains of the doubling events all continued to remain green and grew normally. The test results showed that the HPPD gene-doubled strains had a significantly improved tolerance to Bipyrazone.


6. Quantitative Detection of the Relative Expression of the HPPD Gene in the HPPD Doubled Seedlings (T0 Generation):


It was speculated that the improved resistance of the HPPD gene doubled strain to Bipyrazone was due to the fusion of the strong promoter of UBI2 and the HPPD gene CDS that increased the expression of HPPD, so the T0 generation strains QY2091-13 and QY2091-20 were used to take samples from the primary tillers and the secondary tillers used for herbicide resistance test to detect the expression levels of the HPPD and UBI2 genes, respectively, with the wild-type Jinjing 818 as the control. The specific steps were as follows:


1) Extraction of Total RNA (Trizol Method):


0.1-0.3 g of fresh leaves were taken and ground into powder in liquid nitrogen. 1 ml of Trizol reagent was added for every 50-100 mg of tissue for lysis; the Trizol lysate of the above tissue was transferred into a 1.5 ml centrifuge tube, stood at room temperature (15-30° C.) for 5 minutes; chloroform was added in an amount of 0.2 ml per 1 ml of Trizol; the centrifuge tube was capped, shaken vigorously in hand for 15 seconds, stood at room temperature (15-30° C.) for 2-3 minutes, then centrifuged at 12000 g (4° C.) for 15 minutes; the upper aqueous phase was removed and placed in anew centrifuge tube, isopropanol was added in an amount of 0.5 ml per 1 ml of Trizol, the mixture was kept at room temperature (15-30° C.) for 10 minutes, then centrifuged at 12000 g (2-8° C.) for 10 minutes; the supernatant was discarded, and 75% ethanol was added to the pellet in an amount of 1 ml per 1 ml of Trizol for washing. The mixture was vortexed, and centrifuged at 7500 g (2-8° C.) for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded; the precipitated RNA was dried naturally at room temperature for 30 minutes; the RNA precipitate was dissolved by 50 μl of RNase-free water, and stored in the refrigerator at −80° C. after electrophoresis analysis and concentration determination.


2) RNA Electrophoresis Analysis:


An agarose gel at a concentration of 1% was prepared, then 1 μl of the RNA was taken and mixed with 1 μl of 2× Loading Buffer. The mixture was loaded on the gel. The voltage was set to 180V and the time for electrophoresis was 12 minutes. After the electrophoresis was completed, the agarose gel was taken out, and the locations and brightness of fragments were observed with a UV gel imaging system.


3) RNA Purity Detection:


The RNA concentration was measured with a microprotein nucleic acid analyzer. RNA with a good purity had an OD260/OD280 value between 1.8-2.1. The value lower than 1.8 indicated serious protein contamination, and higher than 2.1 indicated serious RNA degradation.


4) Real-Time Fluorescence Quantitative PCR


The extracted total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA with a special reverse transcription kit. The main procedure comprised: first determining the concentration of the extracted total RNA, and a portion of 1-4 μg of RNA was used for synthesizing cDNA by reverse transcriptase synthesis. The resulting cDNA was stored at −20° C.


{circle around (1)} A solution of the RNA template was prepared on ice as set forth in the following table and subjected to denaturation and annealing reaction in a PCR instrument. This process was conducive to the denaturation of the RNA template and the specific annealing of primers and templates, thereby improving the efficiency of reverse transcription.









TABLE 1







Reverse transcription, denaturation and annealing


reaction system










Component
Amounts (μl)







Oligo dT primer (50 μM)
1 μl



dNTP mixture (10 mM each)
1 μl



RNA Template
l-4 μg



RNase free water
Added to 10 μL







Reaction conditions for denaturation and annealing:










65° C.
5 min



 4° C.
5 min










{circle around (2)} The reverse transcription reaction system was prepared as set forth in Table 2 for synthesizing cDNA:









TABLE 2







Reverse transcription reaction system










Component
Amount (μl)







Reaction solution after the above
 10 μl



denaturation and annealing




5× RTase Plus Reaction Buffer
  4 μl



RNase Inhibitor
0.5 μl



Evo M-MLV Plus RTase (200 U/μl)
  1 μl



RNase free water
Added to 20 μL







Reaction conditions for cDNA synthesis:










42° C.
60 min



95° C.
 5 min










{circle around (3)} The UBQ5 gene of rice was selected as the internal reference gene, and the synthesized cDNA was used as the template to perform fluorescence quantitative PCR. The primers listed in Table 3 were used to prepare the reaction solution according to Table 4.









TABLE 3





Sequence (5′ to 3′) of the primer for 


Fluorescence quantitative PCR


















UBQ5-F
ACCACTTCGACCGCCACTACT







UBQ5-R
ACGCCTAAGCCTGCTGGTT







RT-OsHPPD-F
CAGATCTTCACCAAGCCAGTAG







RT-OsHPPD-R
GAGAAGTTGCCCTTCCCAAA







RT-OsUbi2-F
CCTCCGTGGTGGTCAGTAAT







RT-OsUbi2-R
GAACAGAGGCTCGGGACG

















TABLE 4







Reaction solution for real-time quantitative PCR


(Real Time PCR)










Component of mixture
Amount (μl)







SYBR Premix ExTaq II
  5 μl



Forward primer (10 μM)
0.2 μl



Reverse primer (10 μM)
0.2 μl



cDNA
  1 μl



Rox II
0.2 μl



Ultrapure water
3.4 μl



In total
 10 μl










{circle around (4)} The reaction was performed following the real-time quantitative PCR reaction steps in Table 5. The reaction was conducted for 40 cycles.









TABLE 5







Real-time quantitative PCR reaction steps










Temperature (° C.)
Time







50° C.
 2 min



95° C.
10 min



95° C.
15 s



60° C.
20 s



95° C.
15 s



60° C.
20 s



95° C.
15 s










5) Data Processing and Experimental Results


As shown in Table 6, UBQ5 was used as an internal reference, ΔCt was calculated by subtracting the Ct value of UBQ5 from the Ct value of the target gene, and then 2−ΔCt was calculated, which represented the relative expression level of the target gene. The 818CK1 and 818CK3 were two wild-type Jinjing 818 control plants; 13M and 20M represented the primary tiller leaf samples of QY2091-13 and QY2091-20 T0 plants; 13 L and 20 L represented the secondary tiller leaf samples of QY2091-13 and QY2091-20 T0 plants used for herbicide resistance testing.









TABLE 6







Ct values and relative expressionfolds of different genes


















UBQ5
Mean
UBI2
ΔCt
2−ΔCt
Mean
HPPD
ΔCt
2−ΔCt
Mean






















23.27

17.56
−5.88
58.95

20.81
−2.63
6.20




23.55

17.71
−5.73
53.09

21.01
−2.43
5.40


818CK1
23.51
23.44
17.66
−5.78
55.06
55.70
20.98
−2.47
5.52
5.71



23.45

17.88
−5.50
45.20

20.93
−2.44
5.43



23.19

17.94
−5.44
43.41

21.13
−2.24
4.74


818CK3
23.49
23.37
17.72
−5.65
50.26
46.29
21.14
−2.24
4.72
4.96



24.61

19.56
−4.92
30.32

20.23
−4.25
19.07



24.27

19.52
−4.96
31.05

20.29
−4.19
18.28


13M
24.56
24.48
19.16
−5.32
39.97
33.78
20.48
−4.00
15.99
17.78



23.98

18.76
−5.20
36.70

19.02
−4.94
30.64



23.89

18.52
−5.43
43.19

19.07
−4.89
29.56


13L
24.00
23.96
18.81
−5.14
35.34
38.41
19.07
−4.88
29.45
29.88



24.34

19.01
−5.40
42.30

19.37
−5.04
32.98



24.41

19.07
−5.34
40.64

19.33
−5.09
34.05


20M
24.49
24.41
19.29
−5.13
35.00
39.32
19.26
−5.16
35.65
34.22



24.63

19.46
−5.11
34.52

19.88
−4.69
25.83



24.67

19.38
−5.19
36.48

19.91
−4.66
25.31


20L
24.41
24.57
19.42
−5.15
35.61
35.54
19.86
−4.71
26.16
25.77









The results were shown in FIG. 10. The rice UBQ5 was used as an internal reference gene to calculate the relative expression levels of the OsHPPD and UBI2 genes. The results showed that the HPPD expression level of the HPPD doubled strain was significantly higher than that of the wild type, indicating that the fused UBI2 strong promoter did increase the expression level of HPPD, thereby creating a highly-expressing HPPD gene, with the HPPD gene knocked up. The slight decrease in the expression level of UBI2 could be due to the small-scale mutations resulting from the edition of the promoter region, and we had indeed detected base insertions, deletions or small fragment deletions at the UBI2 target site. Compared with the wild type, the expression levels of UBI2 and HPPD significantly tended to be consistent and met the oretical expectations; among them, the HPPD expression level of the 20M sample was about 6 times higher than that of the wild type CK3 group.


The above results proved that, following the effective chromosome fragment doubling program as tested in protoplasts, calli and transformed seedlings with doubling events could be selected by multiple rounds of molecular identification during the Agrobacterium transformation and tissue culturing, and the UBI2 strong promoter in the new HPPD gene fusion generated in the transformed seedlings did increase the expression level of HPPD gene, rendering the plants to get resistance to HPPD inhibitory herbicide Bipyrazone, up to 8 times the field dose, and thus a herbicide-resistant rice with knock-up endogenous HPPD gene was created. Taking this as an example, using the chromosome fragment doubling technical solution of Example 1 and Example 2, a desired promoter could also be introduced into an endogenous gene which gene expression pattern should be changed to create a new gene, and a new variety of plants with desired gene expression pattern could be created through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.


Example 3: Molecular Detection and Herbicide Resistance Test of T1 Generation of Herbicide-Resistant Rice Strain with Knock-Up Expression of the Endogenous HPPD Gene Caused by Chromosome Fragment Doubling

The physical distance between the HPPD gene and the UBI2 gene in the wild-type rice genome was 338 kb, as shown in Scheme 1 in FIG. 1. The length of the chromosome was increased by 338 kb after the chromosome fragment between them was doubled by duplication, and a highly-expressing new HPPD gene was generated with a UBI2 promoter at the joint of the duplicated fragment to drive the expression of the HPPD CDS region. In order to determine whether the new gene could be inherited stably and the effect of the doubling chromosome fragment on the genetic stability, molecular detection and herbicide resistance test was conducted for the T1 generation of the HPPD doubled strains.


First of all, it was observed that the doubling event had no significant effect on the fertility of T0 generation plants, as all positive T0 strains were able to produce normal seeds. Planting test of T1 generation seedlings were further conducted for the QY2091-13 and QY2091-20 strains.


1. Sample Preparation:


For QY2091-13, a total of 36 T1 seedlings were planted, among which 27 grew normally and 9 were albino. 32 were selected for DNA extraction and detection, where No. 1-24 were normal seedlings, and No. 25-32 were albino seedlings.


For QY2091-20, a total of 44 T1 seedlings were planted, among which 33 grew normally and 11 were albino. 40 were selected for DNA extraction and detection, where No. 1-32 were normal seedlings, and No. 33-40 were albino seedlings.


Albino seedlings were observed in the T1 generation plants. It was speculated that, since HPPD was a key enzyme in the chlorophyll synthesis pathway of plants, and the T0 generation plants resulting from the dual-target edition possibly could be chimeras of many genotypes such as doubling, deletion, inversion of chromosome fragments, or small fragment mutation at the edited target site. The albino phenotype could be generated in the plants where the HPPD gene was destroyed, for example, the HPPD CDS region was deleted. Different primer pairs were designed for PCR to determine possible genotypes.


2. PCR Molecular Identification:


1) Sequences of Detection Primers: Sequence 5′-3′













Primer 8F:




TCTGTGTGAAGATTATTGCCACTAGTTC








Primer 6R:




GAGTTCCCCGTGGAGAGGT








Test 141-F:




CCCCTTCCCTCTAAAAATCAGAACAG








Primer 4R:




GGGATGCCCTCCTTATCTTGGATC








Primer 3F:




CCTCCATTACTACTCTCCCCGATTC








Primer 7R:




GTGTGGGGGAGTGGATGACAG








pg-Hyg-R1:




TCGTCCATCACAGTTTGCCA








pg-35S-F:




TGACGTAAGGGATGACGCAC






2) The binding sites of the above primers were shown in FIG. 11. Among them, the Primer 8F+Primer 6R were used to detect the fusion fragment of the UBI2 promoter and the HPPD CDS after the chromosome fragment doubling, and the length of the product was 630 bp; the Test 141-F+Primer 4R were used to detect chromosome fragment deletion event, and the length of the product was 222 bp; and the pg-Hyg-R1+pg-35S-F were used to detect the T-DNA fragment of the editing vector, and the length of the product was 660 bp.


3) PCR reaction system, reaction procedure and gel electrophoresis detection were performed according to Example 1.


3. Molecular Detection Results:


The detection results of doubling and deletion events were shown in Table 7. It could be noted that the chromosome fragment doubling events and deletion events were observed in the T1 generation plants, with different rations among different lines. The doubling events in the QY2091-13 (29/32) were higher than that in the QY2091-20 (21/40), possibly due to the different chimeric ratios in the T0 generation plants. The test results indicated that the fusion gene generated by the doubling was heritable.









TABLE 7





Detection results of doubling and deletion events



































QY2091-20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20





Doubling
+



+
+
+



+





+
+
+



Deletion





+


+


+







































21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40





Doubling

+


+

+
+
+

+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+



Deletion


+
+

+



+
+

+

+




+






























QY2091-13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20





Doubling
+

+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+


Deletion

+

+
+
+

+


+








+

























21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32







Doubling

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+



Deletion


+


+


+
+

+










The pg-Hyg-R1+pg-35S-F primers were used to detect the T-DNA fragment of the editing vector for the above T1 seedlings. The electrophoresis results of the PCR products of QY2091-20-17 and QY2091-13-7 were negative for the T-DNA fragment, indicating that it was a homozygous doubling. It could be seen that doubling-homozygous non-transgenic strains could be segregated from the T1 generation of the doubling events.


4. Detection of Editing Events by Sequencing:


The doubling fusion fragments were sequenced for the doubling-homozygous positive T1 generation samples 1, 5, 7, 11, 18 and 19 for QY2091-20 and for the doubling-homozygous positive T1 samples 1, 3, 7, 9, 10 and 12 for QY2091-13. The left target site of the HPPD gene and the right target site of the UBI2 were amplified at the same time for sequencing to detect the editing events at the target sites. Among them, the Primer 3F+Primer 7R were used to detect the editing event of the left HPPD target site, where the wild-type control product was 481 bp in length; the Primer 8F+Primer 4R were used to detect the editing event of the right UBI2 target site, where the wild-type control product was 329 bp in length.


1) Genotype of the Doubling Events:


The sequencing result of the HPPD doubling in QY2091-13 was shown in SEQ ID NO: 18, and the sequencing result of the HPPD doubling in QY2091-20 was shown in SEQ ID NO: 19, see FIG. 12. Compared with the predicted linker sequences of the doubling, one T base was inserted at the linker in QY2091-13, 19 bases were deleted from the linker in QY2091-20, and both of the insertion and deletion occurred in the promoter region of UBI2 and had no effect on the coding region of the HPPD protein. From the detection results on the expression levels of the HPPD gene in Example 2, it can be seen that the expression levels of these new HPPD genes where the UBI2 promoters were fused to the HPPD CDS region was significantly increased.


2) Editing Events at the Original HPPD and UBI2 Target Sites on Both Sides:


There were more types of editing events at the target sites on both sides. In two lines, three editing types occurred in the HPPD promoter region, namely insertion of single base, deletion of 17 bases, and deletion of 16 bases; and two editing types occurred in the UBI2 promoter region, namely insertion of 7 bases and deletion of 3 bases. The T1 plants used for testing and sampling were all green seedlings and grew normally, indicating that small-scale mutations in these promoter regions had no significant effect on gene function, and herbicide-resistant rice varieties could be selected from their offspring.


5. Herbicide Resistance Test on Seedlings of T1 Generation:


The herbicide resistance of the T1 generation of the QY2091 HPPD doubled strain was tested at the seedling stage. After the T1 generation seeds were subjected to surface disinfection, they germinated on ½ MS medium containing 1.2 μM Bipyrazone, and cultivated at 28° C., 16 hours light/8 hours dark, in which wild-type Jinjing 818 was used as a control.


The test results of resistance were shown in FIG. 13. After 10 days of cultivation in light, the wild-type control rice seedlings showed phenotypes of albinism and were almost all albino, while the lines of the HPPD doubling events QY2091-7, 13, 20, 22 showed phenotype segregation of chlorosis and green seedlings. According to the aforementioned molecular detection results, there was genotype segregation in the T1 generation. Albino seedlings appeared in the absence of herbicide treatment, while green seedlings continued to remain green and grew normally after the addition of 1.2 μM Bipyrazone. The test results indicated that the high resistance to Bipyrazone of the HPPD gene-doubled lines could be stably inherited to the T1 generation.


Example 4: An Editing Method for Knocking Up the Expression of the Endogenous PPO Gene by Inducing Chromosome Fragment Inversion—Rice Protoplast Test

The rice PPO1 (also known as PPOX1) gene (as shown in SEQ ID NO: 7, in which 1-1065 bp was the promoter, the rest was the coding region) was located on chromosome 1, and the calvin cycle protein CP12 gene (as shown in SEQ ID NO: ID NO: 8, in which 1-2088 bp was the promoter, and the rest was the coding region) was located 911 kb downstream of the PPO1 gene with opposite directions. According to the rice gene expression profile data provided by the International Rice Genome Sequencing Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/index.shtml), the expression intensity of the CP12 gene in rice leaves was 50 times that of the PPO1 gene, and the CP12 gene promoter was a strong promoter highly expressing in leaves.


As shown in Scheme 1 of FIG. 4, by simultaneously inducing double-strand breaks between the respective promoters and the CDS region of the two genes and screening, the region between the two breaks could be reversed, with the promoter of PPO1 gene replaced with the promoter of CP12 gene, increasing the expression level of the PPO1 gene and achieving the resistance to PPO inhibitory herbicides, thereby herbicide-resistant lines could be selected. In addition, as shown in Scheme 2 of FIG. 4, a new gene of PPO1 driven by the promoter of CP12 gene could also be created by first inversion and then doubling.


1. First, the rice PPO1 and CP12 genomic DNA sequences were input into the CRISPOR online tool (http://crispor.tefor.net/) to search for available editing target sites. After online scoring, the following target sites were selected between the promoters and the CDS regions of the PPO1 and CP12 genes for testing:
















Name of target sgRNA
Sequence (5′ to 3)









OsPPO-guide RNA1
CCATGTCCGTCGCTGACGAG







OsPPO-guide RNA2
CCGCTCGTCAGCGACGGACA







OsPPO-guide RNA3
GCCATGGCTGGCTGTTGATG







OsPPO-guide RNA4
CGGATTTCTGCGTGTGATGT










The guide RNA1 and guide RNA2 located between the promoter and the CDS region of the PPO1 gene, close to the PPO1 start codon, and the guide RNA3 and guide RNA4 located between the promoter and the CDS region of the CP12 gene, close to the CP12 start codon.


As described in Example 1, primers were designed for the above target sites to construct dual-tar et vectors, with HUE411 as the backbone:













Primer No.
DNA sequence (5′ to 3′)







OsPPO1-
ATATGGTCTCGGGCGCCATGTCCGTCGCTGACGAGGT


sgRNA1-F
TTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAG





OsPPO1-
ATATGGTCTCGGGCGCCGCTCGTCAGCGACGGACAGT


sgRNA2-F
TTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAG





OsPPO1-
TATTGGTCTCTAAACCATCAACAGCCAGCCATGGCGC


sgRNA3-R
TTCTTGGTGCCGCGCCTC





OsPPO1-
TATTGGTCTCTAAACACATCACACGCAGAAATCCGGC


sgRNA4-R
TTCTTGGTGCCGCGCCTC









Specifically, the pCBC-MT1T2 plasmid (https://www.addgene.org/50593/) was used as the template to amplify the sgRNA1+3, sgRNA1+4, sgRNA2+3, sgRNA2+4 dual-target fragments and construct sgRNA expression cassettes, respectively. The pHUE411 vector backbone was digested with BsaI and recovered from gel, and the target fragment was directly used for the ligation reaction after digestion. T4 DNA ligase was used to ligate the vector backbone and the target fragment, the ligation product was transformed into Trans5α competent cells, different monoclones were selected and sequenced. The Sparkjade High Purity Plasmid Mini Extraction Kit was used to extract plasmids with correct sequencing results, thereby obtaining recombinant plasmids, respectively named as pQY002095, pQY002096, pQY002097, pQY002098, as shown below:


pQY002095 pHUE411-PPO-sgRNA1+3 containing OsPPO-guide RNA1, guide RNA3 combination


pQY002096 pHUE411-PPO-sgRNA2+3 containing OsPPO-guide RNA2, guide RNA3 combination


pQY002097 pHUE411-PPO-sgRNA1+4 containing OsPPO-guide RNA1, guide RNA4 combination


pQY002098 pHUE411-PPO-sgRNA2+4 containing OsPPO-guide RNA2, guide RNA4 combination


2. Plasmids of high-purity and high-concentration were prepared for the above-mentioned pQY002095-002098 vectors as described in the step 2 of Example 1.


3. Rice protoplasts were prepared and subjected to PEG-mediated transformation with the above-mentioned vectors as described in step 3 of Example 1.


4. Genomic targeting and detection of new gene with the detection primers shown in the table below for the PCR detection as described in the step 4 of Example 1.
















Primer
Sequence (5′ to 3′)









OsPPOinversion-
GCTATGCCGTCGCTCTTTC



checkF1(PPO-F1)
TC







OsPPOinversion-
CGGACTTATTCCCACCAGA



checkF2(PPO-F2)
A







OsPPOinversion-
GAGAAGGGGAGCAAGAAGA



checkR1(PPO-R1)
CGT







OsPPOinversion-
AAGGCTGGAAGCTGTTGGG



checkR2(PPO-R2)








OsCPinversion-
CATTCCACCAAACTCCCCT



checkF1(CP-F1)
CTG







OsCPinversion-
AGGTCTCCTTGAGCTTGTC



checkF2(CP-F2)
G







OsCPinversion-
GTCATCTGCTCATGTTTTC



checkR1(CP-R1)
ACGGTC







OsCPinversion-
CTGAGGAGGCGATAAGAAA



checkR2(CP-R2)
CGA










Among them, the combination of PPO-R2 and CP-R2 was used to amplify the CP12 promoter-driven PPO1 CDS new gene fragment that was generated on the right side after chromosome fragment inversion, and the combination of PPO-F2 and CP-F2 was used to amplify the PPO1 promoter-driven CP12 CDS new gene fragment that was generated on the left side after inversion. The possible genotypes resulting from the dual-target editing and the binding sites of the molecular detection primers were shown in FIG. 14.


5. The PCR and sequencing results showed that the expected new gene in which the CP12 promoter drove the expression of PPO1 was created from the transformation of rice protoplasts. The editing event where the rice CP12 gene promoter was fused to the PPO1 gene expression region could be detected in the genomic DNA of the transformed rice protoplasts. This indicated that the scheme to form a new PPO gene through chromosome fragment inversion was feasible, and a new PPO gene driven by a strong promoter could be created, which was defined as a PPO1 inversion event. The sequencing results for the chromosome fragment inversion in protoplasts transformed with the pQY002095 vector were shown in SEQ ID NO: 15; the sequencing results for the chromosome fragment deletion in protoplasts transformed with the pQY002095 vector were shown in SEQ ID NO: 16; and the sequencing results for the chromosome fragment inversion in protoplasts transformed with the pQY002098 vector were shown in SEQ ID NO: 17.


Example 5: Creation of Herbicide-Resistant Rice with Knock-Up Expression of the Endogenous PPO Gene Caused by Chromosome Fragment Inversion Through Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation

1. Construction of knock-up editing vector: Based on the results of the protoplast testing, the dual-target combination of OsPPO-guide RNA1: 5′CCATGTCCGTCGCTGACGAG3′ and OsPPO-guide RNA4: 5′CGGATTTCTGCGT-GTGATGT3′ with high editing efficiency was selected to construct the Agrobacterium transformation vector pQY2234. pHUE411 was used as the vector backbone and the rice codon optimization was performed. The vector map was shown in FIG. 16.


2. Agrobacterium Transformed Rice Callus and Two Rounds of Molecular Identification:


The pQY2234 plasmid was used to transform rice callus according to the method described in step 2 of Example 2. The recipient varieties were Huaidao No. 5 and Jinjing 818. In the callus selection stage, two rounds of molecular identification were performed on hygromycin-resistant callus, and the calli positive in inversion event were differentiated. During the molecular detection of callus, the amplification of the CP12 promoter-driven PPO1 CDS new gene fragment generated on the right side after chromosome fragment inversion by the combination of PPO-R2 and CP-R2 was deemed as the positive standard for the inversion event, while the CP12 new gene generated on the left side after inversion was considered after differentiation and seedling emergence of the callus. A total of 734 calli from Huaidao No. 5 were tested, in which 24 calli were positive for the inversion event, and 259 calli from Jinjing 818 were tested, in which 29 calli were positive for the inversion event. FIG. 17 showed the PCR detection results of Jinjing 818 calli No. 192-259.


3. A total of 53 inversion event-positive calli were subjected to two rounds of molecular identification and then co-differentiated, and 9 doubling event-positive calli were identified, which were subjected to two rounds of molecular identification and then co-differentiated to produce 1,875 T0 seedlings, in which 768 strains were from Huaidao No. 5 background, and 1107 strains were from Jinjing 818 background. These 1875 seedlings were further subjected to the third round of molecular identification with the PPO-R2 and CP-R2 primer pair, in which 184 lines from Huaidao No. 5 background showed inversion-positive bands, 350 strains from Jinjing 818 background showed inversion-positive bands. The positive seedlings were moved to the greenhouse for cultivation.


4. PPO Inhibitory Herbicide Resistance Test of PPO1 Inversion Seedlings (T0 Generation):


Transformation seedlings of QY2234 T0 generation identified as inversion event-positive were transplanted into large plastic buckets in the greenhouse to grow seeds of T1 generation. There were a large number of positive seedlings, so some T0 seedlings and wild-type control lines with similar growth period and status were selected. When the plant height reached about 20 cm, the herbicide resistance test was directly carried out. The herbicide used was a high-efficiency PPO inhibitory herbicide produced by the company (“Compound A”). In this experiment, the herbicide was applied at the gradients of three levels, namely 0.18, 0.4, and 0.6 g ai/mu, by a walk-in type spray tower.


The resistance test results were shown in FIG. 18. 3-5 days after the application, the wild-type control rice seedlings began to wither from tip of leaf, necrotic spots appeared on the leaves, and the plants gradually withered, while most of the lines of the PPO1 inversion event maintained normal growth, the leaves had no obvious phytotoxicity. In addition, some lines showed phytotoxicity, probably due to the polygenotypic mosaicism of editing events and the low expression level of PPO1 in the T0 generation lines. Two weeks after the application, the wild-type rice seedlings died, and most of the inversion event strains continued to remain green and grew normally. The test results showed that the PPO1 inversion lines could significantly improve the tolerance of plants to Compound A.


5. Quantitative Detection of Relative Expression Level of PPO1 Gene in PPO1 Inversion Seedlings (T0 Generation):


It was speculated that the increased resistance of the PPO1 gene inversion lines to Compound A was due to the fusion of the strong CP12 promoter and the CDS of the PPO1 gene which would increase the expression level of PPO1. Therefore, the lines of T0 generation QY2234-252, QY2234-304 and QY2234-329 from Huaidao No. 5 background were selected, their primary tillers and secondary tillers were sampled and subjected to the detection of expression levels of PPO1 and CP12 genes. The wild-type Huaidao No. 5 was used as the control. The specific protocols followed step 6 of Example 2, with the rice UBQ5 gene as the internal reference gene. the fluorescence quantitative primers were as follows: 5′-3′


















UBQ5-F
ACCACTTCGACCGCCACTACT







UBQ5-R
ACGCCTAAGCCTGCTGGTT







RT-OsPPO1-F
GCAGCAGATGCTCTGTCAATA







RT-OsPPO1-R
CTGGAGCTCTCCGTCAATTAAG







RT-OsCP12-F1
CCGGACATCTCGGACAA







RT-OsCP12-R1
CTCAGCTCCTCCACCTC










The UBQ5 was used as an internal reference. ΔCt was calculated by subtracting the Ct value of UBQ5 from the Ct value of the target gene. Then 2−ΔCt was calculated, which represented the relative expression level of the target gene. The H5CK1 and H5CK2 were two wild-type control plants of Huaidao No. 5, the 252M, 304M and 329M represented the primary tiller leaf samples of QY2234-252, QY2234-304 and QY2234-329 T0 plants, and the 252 L, 304 L, and 329 L represented their secondary tiller leaf samples. The results were shown in Table 8 below:









TABLE 8







Ct values and relative expression folds of different genes


















UBQ5
Mean
PPO1
ΔCt
2−ΔCt
Mean
CP12
ΔCt
2−ΔCt
Mean






















28.18

25.83
−2.43
5.39

22.28
−3.98
15.77




28.37

25.98
−2.28
4.85

22.06
−4.20
18.44


H5CK1
28.23
28.26
25.93
−2.33
5.03
5.09
22.11
−4.15
17.76
17.32



28.23

25.73
−2.36
5.15

21.63
−6.47
88.58



27.98

26.02
−2.07
4.20

21.53
−6.57
94.87


H5CK2
28.07
28.09
25.92
−2.18
4.52
4.62
21.54
−6.55
93.83
92.43



25.51

25.17
−0.54
1.45

22.26
−3.45
10.95



25.82

25.22
−0.49
1.41

22.36
−3.36
10.23


252M
25.80
25.71
25.22
−0.49
1.41
1.42
22.43
−3.29
9.76
10.31



26.41

23.36
−3.14
8.84

22.30
−4.21
18.49



26.64

23.41
−3.10
8.56

21.95
−4.56
23.55


252L
26.47
26.51
23.46
−3.05
8.28
8.56
21.78
−4.73
26.47
22.84



25.74

24.55
−1.29
2.44

22.51
−3.32
10.02



25.99

24.53
−1.31
2.48

22.45
−3.39
10.47


304M
25.78
25.84
24.48
−1.36
2.57
2.50
22.56
−3.28
9.71
10.07



25.97

23.63
−2.36
5.14

21.60
−4.39
20.97



26.00

23.75
−2.25
4.74

21.43
−4.56
23.55


304L
26.00
25.99
23.56
−2.43
5.39
5.09
22.32
−3.68
12.78
19.10



26.94

23.11
−3.89
14.84

22.23
−4.76
27.16



26.99

23.25
−3.75
13.42

21.85
−5.15
35.39


329M
27.07
27.00
23.22
−3.78
13.71
13.99
21.82
−5.18
36.29
32.95



26.50

23.64
−2.63
6.19

22.00
−4.27
19.30



26.52

23.74
−2.53
5.79

21.97
−4.30
19.71


329L
25.79
26.27
23.77
−2.50
5.65
5.87
22.15
−4.12
17.42
18.81









The relative expression levels of PPO1 and CP12 in different strains were shown in FIG. 19. As the results showed, unlike the doubling event in Example 2, the gene expression levels of these inversion event strains were significantly different. The expression levels of CP12 are very different between the two Huaidao No. 5 CK groups, possibly because of the different growth rates of the seedlings. Compared with the H5CK2 control group, the expression levels of CP12 in the experimental groups all showed a tendency of decrease, while the expression levels of PPO1 for 252 L and 329M increased significantly, and the expression levels of PPO1 for 304 L and 329 L modestly increased, and the expression levels of PPO1 for 252M and 304M decreased. Different from the doubling of chromosome fragments which mainly increased the gene expression level, the inversion of chromosome fragments generated new genes on both sides, so various editing events might occur at the targets on both sides, and the changes in the transcription direction might also affect gene expression level at the same time. That is to say, the T0 generation plants were complex chimeras. There might also be significant differences in gene expression levels between primary and secondary tillers of the same plant. It could be seen from the results of quantitative PCR that the PPO1 inversion events showed a higher likelihood of increasing the PPO1 gene expression level, and thus herbicide-resistant strains with high expression level of PPO1 could be selected out by herbicide resistance selection for the inversion events.


The above results proved that, following the scheme of detecting effective chromosome fragment inversion in protoplasts, calli and transformed seedlings with inversion events could be selected through the multiple rounds of molecular identification during the Agrobacterium transformation and tissue culturing, and the CP12 strong promoter fused with the new PPO1 gene generated in the transformant seedlings could indeed increase the expression level of the PPO1 gene, which could confer the plants with resistance to the PPO inhibitory herbicide Compound A, thereby herbicide-resistant rice with knock-up endogenous PPO gene was created. Taking this as an example, the chromosome fragment inversion protocol of Example 4 and Example 5 also applied to other endogenous genes which gene expression pattern needed to be changed by introducing and fusing with a required promoter, thereby a new gene can be created, and new varieties with a desired gene expression pattern could be created through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in plants.


Example 6: Molecular Detection and Herbicide Resistance Test of the T1 Generation Plants of the Herbicide-Resistant Rice Lines with Knock-Up Expression of the Endogenous PPO1 Gene Through Chromosome Fragment Inversion

The physical distance between the wild-type rice genome PPO1 gene and CP12 gene was 911 kb. As shown in FIG. 14, a highly-expressing PPO1 gene with a CP12 promoter-driven PPO1 CDS region was generated on the right side after the inversion of the chromosome fragment between the two genes. A deletion of chromosome fragment could also occur. In order to test whether the new gene could be inherited stably and the influence of the chromosome fragment inversion on genetic stability, molecular detection and herbicide resistance test was carried out on the T1 generation of the PPO1 inversion strain.


First of all, it was observed that the inversion event had no significant effect on the fertility of the T0 generation plants, as all positive T0 strains were able to produce seeds normally. The T1 generations of QY2234/H5-851 strains with the Huaidao No. 5 background were selected for detection.


1. Sample Preparation:


For QY2234/H5-851, a total of 48 T1 seedlings were planted. All the plants grew normally.


2. PCR molecular Identification:


1) Detection Primer Sequence: 5′-3′













PPO-R2:




AAGGCTGGAAGCTGTTGGG








CP-R2:




CTGAGGAGGCGATAAGAAACGA








PPO-F2:




CGGACTTATTTCCCACCAGAA








CP-F2:




AGGTCTCCTTGAGCTTGTCG








pg-Hyg-R1:




TCGTCCATCACAGTTTGCCA








pg-35S-F:




TGACGTAAGGGATGACGCAC






2) The binding sites of the above primers were shown in FIG. 14, wherein the PPO-R2+CP-R2 was used to detect the fusion fragment of the right CP12 promoter and the PPO1 coding region after the inversion of the chromosome fragment, and the length of the product was 507 bp; the PPO-F2+CP-F2 was used to detect the fusion fragment of the left PPO1 promoter and the CP12 coding region after the inversion of the chromosome fragment, and the length of the product was 560 bp; the PPO-F2+PPO-R2 was used to detect the left PPO target site before the inversion, and the length of the product in the wild-type control was 586 bp; the CP-F2+CP-R2 was used to detect the right CP12 target site before the inversion, and the length of the product in the wild-type control was 481 bp. The pg-Hyg-R1+pg-35S-F was used to detect theT-DNA fragment of the editing vector, and the length of the product was 660 bp.


3) PCR reaction system and reaction conditions:


Reaction System (10 μL System):


















2*KOD buffer
  5 μL



2 mM dNTPs
  2 μL



KOD enzyme
0.2 μL



Primer F
0.2 μL



Primer R
0.2 μL



Water
2.1 μL



Sample
0.3 μL










Reaction Conditions:



















94° C.
 2 minutes













98° C.
20 seconds





60° C.
20 seconds
{close oversize brace}
40 cycles



68° C.
20 seconds













68° C.
 2 minutes




12° C.
 5 minutes










The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel with a voltage of 180V for 10 minutes.


3. Molecular Detection Results:


The detection results were shown in Table 9. A total of 48 plants were detected, of which 12 plants (2/7/11/16/26/36/37/40/41/44/46/47) were homozygous in inversion, 21 plants (1/3/4/5/6/8/9/15/17/20/22/23/24/27/30/31/33/34/39/42/43) were heterozygous in inversion, and 15 plants (10/12/13/14/18/19/21/25/28/29/32/35/38/45/48) were homozygous in non-inversion. The ratio of homozygous inversion: heterozygous inversion:homozygous non-inversion was 1:1.75:1.25, approximately 1:2:1. So the detection results met the Mendel's law of inheritance, indicating that the new PPO1 gene generated by inversion was heritable.









TABLE 9





Results of molecular detection



































QY2234-851
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20





Right side of
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+



+
+
+


+


inversion


Left side of
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+



+
+
+


+


inversion


PPO WT
+

+
+
+
+

+
+
+

+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+


CP12 WT
+

+
+
+
+

+
+
+

+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+





QY2234-851
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40





Right side of

+
+
+

+
+


+
+

+
+

+
+

+
+


inversion


Left side of

+
+
+

+
+


+
+

+
+

+
+

+
+


inversion


PPO WT
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+


+
+



CP12 WT
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+


+
+





















QY2234-851
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48







Right side of
+
+
+
+

+
+




inversion



Left side of
+
+
+
+

+
+




inversion



PPO WT

+
+

+


+



CP12 WT

+
+

+


+










For the above T1 seedlings, the Pg-Hyg-R1+pg-35S-F primers were used to detect the T-DNA fragment of the editing vector. The electrophoresis results of 16 and 41 were negative for T-DNA fragment, indicating homozygous inversion. It could be seen that non-transgenic strains of homozygous inversion could be segregated from the T1 generation of the inversion event.


4. Sequencing Detection of the Editing Events:


The genotype detection of the inversion events focused on the editing events of the new PPO gene on the right side. The mutation events with the complete protein coding frame of the PPO1 gene were retained. The CP12 site editing events on the left side that did not affect the normal growth of plants through the phenotype observation in the greenhouse and field were retained. The genotypes of the editing events detected in the inversion event-positive lines were listed below, in which seamless indicated identical to the predicted fusion fragment sequence after inversion. The genotypes of the successful QY2234 inversion events in Huaidao No. 5 background were as follows:















No.
Genotype
No.
Genotype







2234/H5-295
Right side −1 bp;
2234/H5-650
Right side seamless;



left side −32 bp

left side +1 bp (G)


2234/H5-381
Right side +18 bp
2234/H5-263
Right side seamless;





left side seamless


2234/H5-410
Right side −1 bp;
2234/H5-555
Right side −23 bp



left side +1 bp




2234/H5-159
Right side −16 bp
2234/H5-645
Right side −5 bp, +20 bp,


2234/H5-232
Right side −4 bp









Some of the sequencing peak maps and sequence comparison results were shown in FIG. 20.


The genotypes of the successful QY2234 inversion in the Jinjing818 background were as follows:
















Right side PPO

Right side PPO


No.
genotype
No.
genotype







2234/818-5
Right side seamless
2234/818-144
Right side +1 bp


2234/818-42
Right side −16 bp
2234/818-151
Sight side +2 bp,





−26 bp, pure peak


2234/818-108
Right side −15 bp
2234/818-257
Sight side +1 bp









2234/818-134
Right side +5 bp,




−15 bp









Some of the sequencing peak maps and sequence comparison results were shown in FIG. 21.


The sequencing results of the above different new PPO1 genes with the CP12 promoter fused to the PPO1 coding region were shown in SEQ ID NO: 20, SEQ ID NO: 21, SEQ ID NO: 22, SEQ ID NO: 23, SEQ ID NO: 24, SEQ ID NO: 25, and SEQ ID NO: 26.


5. Herbicide Resistance Test of T1 Generation Seedlings:


The herbicide resistance test was performed on the T1 generation of the QY2234/H5-851 PPO1 inversion lines at seedling stage. The wild-type Huaidao No. 5 was used as a control, and planted simultaneously with the T1 generation seeds of the inversion lines. When the seedlings reached a plant height of 15 cm, Compound A was applied by spraying at four levels of 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 and 1.2 g a.i./mu. The culture conditions were 28° C., with 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness.


The resistance test results were shown in FIG. 22. After 5 days of the application, the wild-type control rice seedlings showed obvious phytotoxicity at a dose of 0.3 g a.i./mu. They began to wither from the tip of leaf, and necrotic spots appeared on the leaves; at a dose of 0.6 g a.i./mu, the plants died quickly. However, QY2234/H5-851 T1 seedlings could maintain normal growth at a dose of 0.3 g a.i./mu, and no obvious phytotoxicity could be observed on the leaves; at doses of 0.6 and 0.9 g ai/mu, some T1 seedlings showed dry leaf tips, but most T1 seedlings could keep green and continue to grow, while the control substantially died off. At a dose of 1.2 g a.i./mu, the control plants were all dead, while some of the T1 seedlings could keep green and continue to grow. The test results indicated that the resistance of the PPO1 gene inversion lines to Compound A could be stably inherited to their T1 generation.


Example 7: An Editing Method for Knocking Up the Expression of the Endogenous EPSPS Gene in Plant

EPSPS was a key enzyme in the pathway of aromatic amino acid synthesis in plants and the target site of the biocidal herbicide glyphosate. The high expression level of EPSPS gene could endow plants with resistance to glyphosate. The EPSPS gene (as shown in SEQ ID NO: 4, in which 1-1897 bp was the promoter, and the rest was the expression region) was located on chromosome 6 in rice. The gene upstream was transketolase (TKT, as shown in SEQ ID NO: 3, in which 1-2091 bp was the promoter, and the rest was the expression region) with an opposite direction. The expression intensity of TKT gene in leaves was 20-50 times that of the EPSPS gene. As shown in FIG. 2, by simultaneously inducing double-strand breaks between the promoter and the CDS region of the two genes respectively, the inversion (Scheme 1) or inversion doubling (Scheme 2) of the region between the two breaks could be obtained after screening. In both cases, the promoter of the EPSPS gene would be replaced with the promoter of the TKT gene, thereby increasing the expression level of the EPSPS gene and obtaining the resistance to glyphosate. In addition, the Schemes 3, 4 and 5 as shown in FIG. 2 could also create new EPSPS genes driven by the TKT gene promoter. The gene structure of EPSPS adjacent to and opposite in direction relative to TKT was conserved in monocotyledonous plants (Table 10). While in dicotyledonous plants, both genes were also adjacent yet in the same direction; therefore, this method was universal in plants.









TABLE 10







Distance between the EPSPS gene and the adjacent TKT


gene in different plants












Distance





from





CDS





region




Location
start site



Species
(chromosome)
(kb)
Direction













Rice
6
4
Reverse <TKT-EPSPS>


Wheat
7A
35
Reverse <TKT-EPSPS>



7D
15
Reverse <TKT-EPSPS>



4A?
50
Reverse <TKT-EPSPS>


Maize
9
22
Reverse <TKT-EPSPS>



Brachypodium

1
5
Reverse <TKT-EPSPS>



distachyon






Sorghum
10
15
Reverse <TKT-EPSPS>


Millet
4
5
Reverse <TKT-EPSPS>


Soybean
3
6
Forward TKT>EPSPS>


Tomato
5
6
Forward TKT>EPSPS>


Peanut
2
6
Forward TKT>EPSPS>



12
5
Forward TKT>EPSPS>


Cotton
9
22
Forward TKT>EPSPS>


Alfalfa
4
8
Forward TKT>EPSPS>



Arabidopsis

2
5
Forward TKT>EPSPS>


Grape
15
17
Forward TKT>EPSPS>









To this end, pHUE411 was used as the backbone, and the following as targets:
















Name of target sgRNA
Sequence (5′ to 3′)









OsEPSPS-guide RNA1
CCACACCACTCCTCTCGCCA







OsEPSPS-guide RNA2
CCATGGCGAGAGGAGTGGTG







OsEPSPS-guide RNA3
ATGGTCGCCGCCATTGCCGG







OsEPSPS-guide RNA4
GACCTCCACGCCGCCGGCAA







OsEPSPS-guide RNA5
TAGTCATGTGACCATCCCTG







OsEPSPS-guide RNA6
TTGACTCTTTGGTTCATGCT










Several different dual-target vectors had been constructed:

    • pQY002061 pHUE411-EPSPS-sgRNA1+3
    • pQY002062 pHUE411-EPSPS-sgRNA2+3
    • pQY002063 pHUE411-EPSPS-sgRNA1+4
    • pQY002064 pHUE411-EPSPS-sgRNA2+4
    • pQY002093 pHUE411-EPSPS-sgRNA2+5
    • pQY002094 pHUE411-EPSPS-sgRNA2+6


(2) With the relevant detection primers shown in the following table, the fragments containing the target sites on both sides or the predicated fragments generated by the fusion of the TKT promoter and the EPSPS coding region were amplified, and the length of the products is between 300-1000 bp.













Primer
Sequence (5′ to 3′)







EPSPSinversion checkF1
ATCCAAGTTACCCCCTCTGC





EPSPSinversion checkR1
CACAAACACAGCCACCTCAC





EPSPSinversion check-nestF2
ATGTCCACGTCCACACCATA





EPSPSinversion check-nestR2
AATGGAATTCACGCAAGAGG





EPSPSinversion checkF3
GTAGGGGTTCTTGGGGTTGT





EPSPSinversion checkR3
CGCATGCTAACTTGAGACGA





EPSPSinversion check-nestF4
GGATCGTGTTCACCGACTTC





EPSPSinversion check-nestR4
CCGGTACAACGCACGAGTAT





EPSPSinversion checkF5
GGCGTCATTCCATGGTTGAT



TGT





EPSPSinversion checknestF6
GATAGACCCAGATGGGCATA



GAATC





EPSPSinversion checkR5
TGCATGCATTGATGGTTGGT



GC





EPSPSinversion checknestR6
CCGGCCCTTAGAATAAAGGT



AGTAG









After protoplast transformation, the detection results showed that the expected inversion events were obtained. As shown in FIG. 15, the sequencing result of the inversion detection of pQY002062 vector transformed protoplast was shown in SEQ ID NO: 11; the sequencing result of the deletion detection of pQY002062 vector transformed protoplast was shown in SEQ ID No: 12; the sequencing result of the inversion detection of the pQY002093 vector transformed protoplast was shown in SEQ ID NO: 13; and the sequencing result of the deletion detection of pQY002093 vector transformed protoplast was shown in SEQ ID NO: 14.


These vectors were transferred into Agrobacterium for transforming calli of rice. Plants containing the new EPSPS gene were obtained. The herbicide bioassay results showed that the plants had obvious resistance to glyphosate herbicide.


Example 8: An Editing Method for Knocking Up the Expression of the Endogenous PPO Gene in Arabidopsis

Protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) was one of the main targets of herbicides. By highly expressing plant endogenous PPO, the resistance to PPO inhibitory herbicides could be significantly increased. The Arabidopsis PPO gene (as shown in SEQ ID NO: 1, in which 1-2058 bp was the promoter, and the rest was the expression region) located on chromosome 4, and the ubiquitin10 gene (as shown in SEQ ID NO: 2, in which 1-2078 bp was the promoter, and the rest was the expression region) located 1.9M downstream with the same direction as the PPO gene.


As shown in the Scheme as shown in FIG. 3, simultaneously generating double-strand breaks at the sites between the promoter and the CDS region of the PPO and the ubiquitin10 genes respectively. Doubling events of the region between the two breaks could be obtained by screening, namely a new gene generated by fusing the ubiquitin10 promoter and the PPO coding region. In addition, following Scheme 2 as shown in FIG. 1, a new gene in which the ubiquitin10 promoter and the PPO coding region were fused together could also be created.


To this end, pHEE401E was used as the backbone (https://www.addgene.org/71287/), and the following locations were used as target sites:
















Name of target sgRNA
Sequence (5′ to 3′)









AtPPO-guide RNA1
CAAACCAAAGAAAAAGTATA







AtPPO-guide RNA2
GGTAATCTTCTTCAGAAGAA







AtPPO-guide RNA3
ATCATCTTAATTCTCGATTA







AtPPO-guide RNA4
TTGTGATTTCTATCTAGATC










The dual-target vectors were constructed following the method described by “Wang Z P, Xing H L, Dong L, Zhang H Y, Han C Y, Wang X C, Chen Q J. Egg cell-specific promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 efficiently generates homozygous mutants for multiple target genes in Arabidopsis in a single generation. Genome Biol. 2015 Jul. 21; 16:144.”:


















pQY002076
pHEE401E-AtPPO-sgRNA1 + 3



pQY002077
pHEE401E-AtPPO-sgRNA1 + 4



pQY002078
pHEE401E-AtPPO-sgRNA2 + 3



pQY002079
pHEE401E-AtPPO-sgRNA2 + 4











Arabidopsis was transformed according to the method as follows:


(1) Agrobacterium Transformation



Agrobacterium GV3101 competent cells were transformed with the recombinant plasmids to obtain recombinant Agrobacterium.


(2) Preparation of Agrobacterium Infection Solution


1) Activated Agrobacterium was inoculated in 30 ml of YEP liquid medium (containing 25 mg/L Rif and 50 mg/L Kan), cultured at 28° C. under shaking at 200 rpm overnight until the OD600 value was about 1.0-1.5.


2) The bacteria were collected by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 10 minutes, and the supernatant was discarded.


3) The bacteria were resuspended in the infection solution (no need to adjust the pH) to reach OD600=0.8 for later use.


(3) Transformation of Arabidopsis


1) Before the plant transformation, the plants shouldgrow well with luxuriant inflorescence and no stress response. The first transformation could be carried out as long as the plant height reached 20 cm. When the soil was dry, watering was carried out as appropriate. On the day before the transformation, the grown siliques were cut with scissors.


2) The inflorescence of the plant to be transformed was immersed in the above solution for 30 seconds to 1 minute with gentle stirring. The infiltrated plant should have a layer of liquid film thereon.


3) After transformation, the plant was cultured in the dark for 24 hours, and then removed to a normal light environment for growth.


4) After one week, the second transformation was carried out in the same way.


(4) Seed Harvest


Seeds were harvested when they were mature. The harvested seeds were dried in an oven at 37° C. for about one week.


(5) Selection of Transgenic Plants


The seeds were treated with disinfectant for 5 minutes, washed with ddH2O for 5 times, and then evenly spread on MS selection medium (containing 30 μg/ml Hyg, 100 μg/ml Cef). Then the medium was placed in a light incubator (at a temperature of 22° C., 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness, light intensity 100-150 μmol/m2/s, and a humidity of 75%) for cultivation. The positive seedlings were selected and transplanted to the soil after one week.


(6) Detection of T1 Mutant Plants


(6.1) Genomic DNA Extraction


1) About 200 mg of Arabidopsis leaves was cut and placed into a 2 ml centrifuge tube. Steel balls were added, and the leaves were ground with a high-throughput tissue disruptor.


2) After thorough grinding, 400 μL of SDS extraction buffer was added and mixed upside down. The mixture was incubated in 65° C. water bath for 15 minutes, and mixed upside down every 5 minutes during the period.


3) The mixture was centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 5 minutes.


4) 300 μL of supernatant was removed and transferred to a new 1.5 ml centrifuge tube, an equal volume of isopropanol pre-cooled at −20° C. was added into the centrifuge tube, and then the centrifuge tube was kept at −20° C. for 1 hour or overnight.


5) The mixture was centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 10 minutes, and the supernatant was discarded.


6) 500 μL of 70% ethanol was added to the centrifuge tube to wash the precipitate, the washing solution was discarded after centrifugation (carefully not discarding the precipitate). After the precipitate was dried at room temperature, 30 μL of ddH2O was added to dissolve the DNA, and then stored at −20° C.


(6.2) PCR Amplification


With the extracted genome of the T1 plant as template, the target fragment was amplified with the detection primers. 5 μL of the amplification product was taken and detected by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and then imaged by a gel imager. The remaining product was directly sequenced by a sequencing company.


The sequencing results showed that the AtPPO1 gene doubling was successfully achieved in Arabidopsis, and the herbicide resistance test showed that the doubling plant had resistance to PPO herbicides.


Example 9: Creation of GH1 Gene with New Expression Characteristics in Zebrafish

The growth hormone (GH) genes in fishes controlled their growth and development speed. At present, highly expressing the GH gene in Atlantic salmons through the transgenic technology could significantly increase their growth rates. The technique was of great economical value, but only approved for marketing after decades. The GH1 gene was the growth hormone gene in zebrafish. In the present invention, suitable promoters in zebrafish (suitable in terms of continuous expression, strength, and tissue specificity) were fused together with the CDS region of GH1 gene in vivo through deletion, inversion, doubling, inversion doubling, chromosome transfer, etc., to create a fast-growing fish variety.


The experiment procedure was as follows:


1. Breeding of Zebra Fish:


1) Preparation of paramecia: The mother liquor of paramecia was purchased online (https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?spm=a230r. 1.14.49.79f774c6C6elpL&id=573612042855 &ns=1&abbucket=18 #detail). A 2 L beaker was washed, sterilized and filled with 200 mL of paramecia mother liquor; two yeast pieces and two sterilized grains of wheat were added thereto; sterile water was added until the volume reaches 2 L; then the opening was covered and sealed with sterilized kraft paper; stationary culture was performed at 25-28° C. for 3-5 d; the mixture was used to feed the juvenile zebra fish when the usable concentration was reached. Each time the paramecia solution was taken, a dense filter screen was used to remove impurities.


2) Incubation of brine shrimp: Brine shrimp, also known as fairy shrimp and artemia, was a marine plankton. Brine shrimp eggs were purchased and stored at 4° C. For the incubation, the mixture was prepared at a ratio of 1 L deionized water: 32 g NaCl:3.5 g brine shrimp eggs; oxygenation was performed at 28.5° C. for 25-30 h; the incubated brine shrimps were collected. The incubated brine shrimps were kept in a small amount of 3.2% NaCl solution, where they could be kept for 2-3 d at 4° C.


3) The standardized large-scale breeding of zebra fish was realized with an independent zebrafish farming system manufactured by Shanghai Haisheng. The tap water treated with a water purifier was kept in a dosing barrel, where an appropriate amount of NaCl and NaHCO3 was added to maintain a specific conductivity of 500 μs/cm and a pH of 7.0. The water circulation system ensured all breeding tanks maintain a constant water level and flow state. A waste treatment system automatically filters the fish feces and remaining fish food; the fish culture water was reused after being sterilized by UV exposure and heated (28.5° C.); the fresh water was automatically replenished after the wastewater was discharged. The lighting was controlled with an automatic timer in fish house to maintain the “14 h-light+10 h-dark cycles”; an air conditioning system kept the indoor temperature at 28° C.; an exhaust fan removed indoor moisture at regular intervals to avoid excessively high humidity. Zebra fish embryos were subjected to stationary culture in a biochemical incubator at 28.5° C., and could be fed with paramecia 5 days after fertilization. Feeding was performed 3-4 times a day. Fresh brine shrimp started to be supplemented gradually after about 13 days. When the bodies of all juveniles became red, it means the zebra fish can completely eat brine shrimp. The juvenile zebra fish was then transferred to the breeding tank. A moderate amount of fresh brine shrimp was fed 3 times a day.


AB varieties of zebra fish were transferred into an incubation box on a 2-female: 2-male basis on the afternoon of the day before reproduction of zebra fish; they were separated by a baffle. The baffle was removed the next morning; the zebra fish generally began to lay eggs in about 10 minutes; embryos were collected within 30 minutes after egg laying and rinsed with E3 culture medium (mass ratio 29.3% NaCl, 3.7% CaCl2), 4% MgSO4, 1.3% KCl, pH7.2) to remove dead eggs.


4) Preparation of injection dish: 1.5% agarose was prepared; 30-40 ml of agarose melt was poured into each plastic culture dish. The surface of agarose was gently covered with the mold to avoid bubbles. The mold was removed after the gel got completely solidified to attain a “V-shaped” groove; a small amount of E3 culture medium was added into the prepared culture dish; it was sealed and kept at 4° C.


2. Preparation of RNP Sample:


For zebrafish GH1 gene initiation codon upstream 100 bp DNA sequence designed sgRNA-GH1 target: 5′aagaacgagtttgtctatct3′, for zebrafish col1a1a gene termination codon designed sgRNA-col1a1a target: 5′atgtagactctttgaggcga3′, and for zebrafish ddx5 gene initiation codon upstream designed sgRNA-ddx5 target: 5′gcaccatcactgcgcgtaca3′. Genscript was entrusted to synthesize the EasyEdit sgRNA. The synthetic sgRNA and the purified Cas9 were mixed at a ratio of 1:3; 10×Cas9 buffer solution (200 mM HEPES, 100 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 1.5 M KCl) was added and RNase-free ultra-pure water was used to dilute it to 1× so that the Cas9 protein concentration was 600 ng/uL, and the sgRNA concentration was 200 ng/uL; after 10 minutes of incubation at 25° C., a small amount of phenol red was added to dye the injection sample for convenient observation during injection; the volume of phenol red was normally less than 10% of the total volume. In the experiment, sgRNA-GH1 combined with sgRNA-col1a1a and sgRNA-ddx5, respectively and the RNP complex was prepared at equal ratio, and the mixture was injected into fish eggs.


3. Microinjection:


Under a stereomicroscope, the tip of injection needle was fractured slightly in a beveled manner using medical pointed toothless forceps for convenient injection. 4 μL of sample containing phenol red was taken by a micro loading tip; the pipette tip inserts into the needle from the end of needle to the tip reaching the point of injection needle; the tip was gently pushed to inject the sample into the needle while the tip was gently pulled out so that the front end of injection needle was filled with the red RNP sample; the injection needle with sample was then inserted into the holder for fixation. The quantitative capillary was 33 mm in length and 1 μL in total volume. The injection pressure was adjusted to increase the length of the liquid column in the capillary by 1 mm after 15 injections; then, each sample injection volume was 1 nL. The injection dish was taken out of the refrigerator in advance, and set aside until the room temperature was reached. The collected one-cell stage fertilized eggs were arranged in the groove of dish; a small amount of E3 culture medium was added so that the liquid level was just over the fertilized eggs. Under a stereomicroscope, the tip of the injection needle was gently penetrated into the membrane of the fertilized egg and reaches the yolk close to the animal pole; RNP sample was injected by stepping on the pedal. Due to the small amount of phenol red in the RNP sample, the light red sample liquid can be clearly observed during the injection. The injected embryos were placed in a disposable plate containing E3 culture medium and cultured in a constant temperature incubator at 28.5° C. The culture medium needs to be replaced every 24 hours to ensure the ion concentration and oxygen content.


4. DNA Extraction:


After each set of injections, the tail fin of survived zebrafish at about 2-3 months old were treated with cell lysate buffer (10 mmol/L Tris, 10 mmol/L EDTA, 200 mmol/L NaCl, 0.5% SDS, 200 μg/mL Proteinase K, pH 8.2). Each tube was filled with 200 μL of lysate and held overnight at 50° C.; they were violently shaken 2-3 times during this period. The tube was centrifuged at 1200 r/min for 5 min at room temperature, and then 200 μL of supernatant was taken. Equal volume of phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) was added and violently shaken. The tube was centrifuged at 12000 r/min at room temperature for 10 min; the supernatant taken was mixed with equal volume of chloroform, and then the tube was violently shaken. The tube was centrifuged at 12000 r/min at room temperature for 10 min; the supernatant was mixed with 1/20-volume 3 mol/L NaCl and 2.5-time volume pre-cooled anhydrous ethanol; the mixture was blended well and should not be made upside down; it's kept on ice for 30 min. The tube was centrifuged at 12000 r/min at 4° C. for 10 min, and the supernatant was abandoned swiftly. 1 mL 70% alcohol was added for rinsing. The tube was centrifuged at 12000 r/min at 4° C. for 10 min. The supernatant was abandoned swiftly, and vacuum drying was performed. Finally, 30 μL of deionized water was added in the end to dissolve the DNA. The solution was kept at −20° C. for future use. After the 0.8% agarose electrophoresis detection, the PCR test was performed with the corresponding primer, and the positive strip was subjected to sequencing verification. Wherein, gh1-R: tgctacaaataaagtgcactacaca and col1a1a-F:gggtctggattggagtcaca were double treated between the amplified col1a1a gene and gh1; gh1-R:tgctacaaataaagtgcactacaca and ddx5-F:acgcgttacgtacgtcagaa, as well as GH1-F:aaatgaccggaatcacaaca and ddx5-R:acgaccatccttaccctctg were inversely treated between the amplified ddx5 gene and gh1.


The experimental results were shown as follows: as shown in FIG. 23, the characteristic fragments of chromosome duplication were detected in the zebrafish embryo samples of the RNP injection group; as shown in FIG. 51, sequencing results showed that the expected duplication event occurred in the chromosome fragments between GH1 and COL1A1A gene targets in zebrafish embryos; as shown in FIG. 52, sequencing results showed that the coding area & promotor of ddx5 gene and the coding area & the promotor of gh1 gene were exchanged due to the inversion of chromosome fragments; as shown in FIG. 53, the growth of zebrafish with upregulated expression was obviously accelerated.


Example 10: Field Herbicide Resistance Test on T1 Generation of Herbicide-Resistant Rice Lines QY2234

T1 generation of inversion lines QY2234/818-5 and QY2234/818-42 PPO1 were subjected to field herbicide resistance test with the wild-type Jinjing 818 rice variety as an herbicide-susceptible control. They were planted in sync with the inversion line T1 generation seeds in a paddy field of Red Flag Team, Nanbin Farm, Sanya, Hainan Province; the test was performed between Nov. 30, 2020 and Apr. 15, 2021. Seedlings were cultivated after 2 days of soaking rice seeds, and transplantation was performed after 3 weeks of seedling; 3 sets of replications were arranged; an herbicide called as compound A was applied in 3 weeks after transplantation, and the concentration was set to 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 ga.i./mu (1 mu= 1/15 ha); the status of rice seedlings was investigated 10 days post application (DPA).


The result of the field herbicide resistance test was shown in FIG. 24. In 10 DPA at a dose of 0.3 ga.i./mu, all wild-type Jinjing 818 rice plants died; QY2234/818-5 and QY2234/818-42 were growing normally; at the dose of 0.6 ga.i./mu, QY2234/818-42 was growing normally, while most individual plants of QY2234/818-5 died, but there were resistant individual plants of QY2234/818-5; at the dose of 0.9 ga.i./mu, most individual plants of QY2234/818-42 and QY2234/818-5 died, but a few resistant plants were green and continued to grow. The test result indicated that the PPO1 gene inverted line exhibited herbicide resistance under field conditions under high light intensity in Hainan; stable resistant lines can be selected from the populations, which provides basic materials for herbicide-resistant rice breeding.


Example 11: Western Blot Test on T1-Generation PPO1 Protein Expression Level of the QY2234 Line Rice

The T1-generation seedling leaves of the four PPO1 inversion rice lines, i.e., QY2234/818-5, QY2234/818-42, QY2234/818-144 and QY2234/818-257, were selected to determine the PPO1 protein expression level. With the wild-type Jinjing 818 rice variety as a control, they were planted in the greenhouse in sync with the inversion line T1 generation seeds; when the seedlings grew to a height of 15 cm, leaf samples were taken with reference to Example 6 for molecular identification; the inversion-positive seedlings were selected for the Western Blot Test on protein expression.


A Western Blot test was performed as per the Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, 1989). The PPO1 protein antibody was rice PPO1 polyclonal antibody prepared by Qingdao Jinmotang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China); a plant endogenous reference Actin protein antibody was purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd. (Art. No. D195301); the secondary antibody was HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sangon, Art. No. D110058); the test was performed according to the operating instructions using the Western Blot Kit (Boster, Art. No. AR0040).


To be more specific, 2 g of single-plant rice sample was taken and ground with liquid nitrogen into powder; an appropriate amount of protein extraction buffer (material: Protein extraction buffer=1:1.5); incubated on ice for 30 min; centrifuged at 4° C. with 27100 g for 15 min; the supernatant was mixed with 5× loading buffer (delivered with the kits); the mixture was boiled for 15 min and subjected to electrophoresis at 110 V for 30 min.


The protein extraction buffer was formulated as follows:
















component
concentration









Tris-HCl (PH8.0)
100 mM



glycerin
 10%



EDTA
 1 mM



AsA (ascorbic acid)
 2 mM



PVPP
0.5%



PVP-40
0.5%



DTT (Add at operation time)
 20 mM



PMSF (Add at operation time)
 1 mM










After the electrophoresis was finished, the gel was removed, and the gel block in an appropriate size was taken depending on the size of target protein, and then the filter paper and PVDF film of approximately the same volume was taken; the gel block was cleaned with clear water and then soaked with transfer solution; the filter paper and PVDF film were also soaked and wetted with the transfer solution; the wet filter paper, PVDF film, SDS-PAGE gel block and filter paper were stacked from bottom to top to expel as many bubbles as possible; they could be flattened with a test tube, while the displacement between layers should be prevented during the flattening; the film was transferred under at 25 V and 1.3 A for 10-30 min; after the transfer, the PVDF film was cleaned with PBST buffer. Upon completion of the cleaning, they were transferred to the blocking buffer solution and blocked at room temperature for 1 h. After the confining, the PVDF film was cleaned with PBST buffer solution for 3 times to remove the blocking liquid, then the primary antibody was incubated at a dilution ratio of approx. 1:1000-1:3000; the incubation time of the primary antibody was 2 h at room temperature, or 12 h at 4° C. Upon completion of the primary antibody incubation, the PVDF film was cleaned with the PBST buffer solution for 3 times with each cycle lasting for 10 min. The secondary antibody was incubated at a dilution ratio of approx. 1:10000-1:20000 for 1 h at room temperature. Upon completion of the secondary antibody incubation, the PVDF film was cleaned with the PBST buffer solution for 3 times with each cycle lasting for 10 min. ECL luminescence: ECL solutions A and B were mixed well in equal volume (prepared when needed), and the liquid mixture was dropped onto the PVDF film evenly; the film was placed in the fluorescence imager for imaging.


The Western Blot test result was shown in FIG. 25. According to the result, the internal-control Actin protein expression levels of the PPO1 inversion-positive lines were the same as the wild-type Jinjing 818, while the expression levels of PPO1 protein were significantly up-regulated. The 4 selected QY2234 lines had different genotypes at the inverted junction region between the CP12 promoter and the PPO1 protein coding region; QY2234/818-5 was identical to the predicted post-inverted fusion fragment sequence; compared with the predicted sequence, QY2234/818-42 lacks 16 bases in the CP12 promoter region; 1 base was inserted in the CP12 promoter region of QY2234/818-144 and QY2234/818-257. The test result showed that all the new genotypes could express PPO1 protein at high levels, and manifested that the method for creating new genes provided by the present invention could produce a variety of functional genotypes in the genome to enrich the gene pool.


Example 12: Field Herbicide Resistance Test on T1 Generation of HPPD-Duplicated Rice Lines QY2091

Through germination test, the T1-generation of HPPD-gene duplicated lines QY2091-12 and QY2091-21 without albino seedling separation were selected for the field herbicide resistance test with the wild-type Jinjing 818 rice variety as a control. They were planted in sync with the T1 generation seeds of QY2091 lines in a paddy field of Red Flag Team, Nanbin Farm, Sanya, Hainan Province; the test was performed between Nov. 1, 2020 and Apr. 10, 2021. Seedlings were cultivated after 2 days of soaking rice seeds, and QY2091 seeds were soaked with 1/30000 herbicide compound Bipyrazone aqueous solution; albino seedlings were removed after emergence; transplantation was performed after 3 weeks of seedling, and 3 sets of repetitions were arranged; herbicide compound Bipyrazone was applied in 3 weeks after the transplantation at a concentration of 4, 8, 16, and 32 ga.i./mu; the seedling status was investigated 21 days after application.


The result of field herbicide resistance test was shown in FIG. 26. In 21 days after application, all wild-type Jinjing 818 rice plants died of albinism at 4 ga.i./mu and 8 ga.i./mu of herbicide compound Bipyrazone, while the QY2091-12 and QY2091-21 were normally growing; at 16 g a.i./mu, the QY2091-12 line was growing normally, while the QY2091-21 line began to exhibit resistance separation: Most individual plants showed resistance, and a few individual plants developed yellowing of new leaves; at 32 g a.i./mu, QY2091-12 and QY2091-21 began to exhibit resistance separation, and a few individual plants died of albinism, while significant yellowing of new leaves was observed in some individual plants; approx. ½ of the individual plants were growing normally and exhibit extremely high resistance. The recommended dosage for field application of herbicide compound Bipyrazone was 4 g a.i./mu. The test result indicated that the edited lines with highly expressive HPPD new genes created through chromosome segment duplication exhibited herbicide resistance under field conditions under high light intensity in Hainan, and could withstand an herbicide dose that was 8 times the recommended field dose. The screening of stable resistant lines will provide basic materials for herbicide-resistant rice breeding.


Example 13: New Gene Creation Activity of NLS-Free Cas9 and Separately Expressed crRNA and tracrRNA in Rice Protoplast

Targets were chosen from upstream and downstream of the PPO1 gene to test whether chromosome fragment duplication events could be produced; furthermore, tests were performed on whether the nuclear localization signal with Cas9 removed could produce duplication event, and on whether replacing sgRNA (single guide RNA) with separated expression of crRNA and tracrRNA could induce cell targeted site editing to produce chromosome fragment duplication events.


Dual-target editing vector pQY2648 was constructed by the method described in Example 1 for the selected target sequence design primers, i.e., OsPPO1-esgRNA3:5′ taggtctccaaacATG GCGTTTTCTGTCCGCGTgcttcttggtgccgcg3′ and OsPPO1-esgRNA2:5′ TaggtctccggcgCAGTT GGATTAGGGAATATGGTTTAAGAGCTATGCTGGAAACAGC3′. The NLS signal peptides at both ends of SpCas9 wereremoved on the basis of pQY2648 to construct the NLS-free rice PPO1 dual-target editing vector pQY2650; the sgRNA expression cassette was modified based on pQY2650 and pQY2648; the fused Scaffold sequence was removed, and the crRNA and tracrRNA sequences were separately expressed. To be more specific, the OsU3 promoter drove the expression of OsPPO1-sgRNA2:5′CAGTTGGATTAGGGAATATGGTTTAAGGCTATGCT3′ crRNA sequence; the TaU3 promoter drove the expression of the OsPPO1-sgRNA3:5′ ACGCGGACAGAAAACGCCATGTTTAAGGCTATGC3′ sequence; the OsU3 promoter drove the expression of the expression cassette of tracrRNA sequence 5′AGCATAGCAAGTTTAAATAAGGCTAGTC CGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGCACCGAGTCGGTGCTTT3′; the NLS-free crRNA rice PPO1 dual-target editing vector pQY2651 and the crRNA rice PPO1 dual-target editing vector pQY2653 containing NLS were constructed; the primers used during the process were as follows:









2650F-BstBI:


5′gtacaaaaaagcaggcttcgaaATGgacaagaagtactcgatcggc3′





2650R-SacI:


5′tgaacgatcggggaaattcgagctcCTAgtcgcccccgagctgag3′





OsU3-HindIII-For2651F:


5′GCAGGTCTCaagcttaaggaatctttaaacatacgaacag3′





CrRNA1-BsaI-R1:


5′GCAGGTCTCCAGGTAAAAAAAAAAAGCATAGCCTTAAACCATATTCCC





TAATCCAACTG3′





TaU3-BsaI-F2:


5′GCAGGTCTCCACCcatgaatccaaaccacacggag3′





CrRNA2-BsaI-R2:


5′GCAGGTCTCGCTAGAAAAAAAAAAGCATAGCCTTAAACATGGCGTTTT





CTGTCCGCGT3′





TraCrRNA-OsU3-BsaIF3:


5′GCAGGTCTCGCTAGaaggaatctttaaacatacgaac3′





TraCrRNA-KpnI-R3:


5′GgtaccAAAAAAAAAAAAGCACCGACTCGGTGCCACTTTTTCAAGTTG





ATAACGGACTAGCCTTATTTAAACTTGCTATGCTCGCCacggatcatctg





cacaac3′,






For the above-mentioned 4 vectors, Example 1 was consulted to prepare the high-purity and high-concentration plasmids for PEG-mediated transformation of rice protoplast; the protoplast DNA was extracted for detection of edit duplication event; PCR primers to amplify the designed duplicated DNA at the junction regions were designed based the targeted cut sites on both sides, and then the PCR amplified fragments were sequenced; the primer sequences were as follows:













OsPPO1Dup-testF1:




CCACTGCTGCCACTTCCAC








OsPPOlDup-testF2:




GGCGACTTAGCATAGCCAG








OsPPO1Dup-testR1:




GCTATTGCGGTGCGTATCC








OsPPOlDup-testR2:




TCCAAGCTAGGGGTGAGAGA






The test result was shown in FIG. 27; chromosome fragment duplication events were detected through the sequencing of PCR products using primers OsPPO1Dup-testF2 or OsPPO1Dup-testR2 and DNA extracted from pQY2648, pQY2650, pQY2651 and pQY2653 transformed rice protoplast samples; small fragments of DNA were missing between two DNA break sites at the expected fragment junction regions. The protoplast test result of pQY2650 demonstrated that the Cas9 without NLS could cut the target effectively to produce and detected the doubling event of chromosome fragments between targeted cuts when chromosomes were edited with the dual-target editing vector. The result of pQY2653 protoplast test demonstrates that the assembled gRNA could effectively guide the target editing in the event of separately expressed crRNA and tracrRNA to produce and detect doubling event of chromosome fragments between targeted cutting sites. The pQY2651 protoplast test result demonstrated that NLS-free Cas9 could work with separately expressed crRNA and tracrRNA and the spontaneously assembled gRNA to effectively guide target editing to produce and detect doubling event of chromosome fragments between cuts, which indicated that the creation of new genes through doubling/duplication, inversion, or translocation of chromosome fragments using the method of the present invention was independent of the nuclear localization signal of Cas9 protein or the fused single guide RNA (sgRNA) system.


Example 14: Different Chromosome Fragment Translocation and Restructure to Create a New HPPD Gene in Rice

As mentioned in example 1 and example 4, rice HPPD gene is located on chromosome 2, CP12 gene is located on chromosome 1 but in opposite direction. Through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated chromosome cutting and naturally occurred inversion of CP12 and PPO1 gene protein coding regions-containing fragment and followed by the chromosomal fragments fusion, a new gene was generated in which CP12 promoter drives PPO1 expression, and as expected PPO1 expression was significantly enhanced, and conferred rice plant herbicide resistance. Taking advantage of the high expression characteristics of the CP12 promoter, a dual-target editing vector was designed and constructed, which cut the two regions upstream two start codons ATGs. After Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and followed by selection and plant-regeneration, a new HPPD gene in which CP12 promoter drives HPPD protein expression was identified through PCR and amplicon sequencing.


According to the analysis of rice gene expression profile data (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/index.shtml) provided by the international rice genome sequencing project (International Rice Genome Sequencing Project), CP12 gene expression intensity is dozens to hundred times that of HPPD gene in rice leaf blade, CP12 gene promoter is strong in leaf blades and seedlings.


With reference to example 1 and example 2, the related genomic DNA sequences of rice HPPD and CP12 genes were input into CRISPOR online tool (http://crispor.tefor.net/) to find and assess available edit targets. After online scoring, the following targets (5′-3′) were selected between the promoters and protein coding regions of HPPD and CP12 genes for testing:


















HPPD-guide RNA1
gtgctggttgccttggctgc







HPPD-guide RNA2
cacaaattcaccagcagcca







CP12-guide RNA1
gccatggctggctgttgatg







CP12-guide RNA2
cggatttctgcgtgtgatgt










HPPD-guide RNA1 and HPPD-guide RNA2 are located between HPPD gene promoter and protein coding region and close to HPPD protein start codon ATG, while CP12-guide RNA1 and CP12-guide RNA2 are located between CP12 gene promoter and protein coding region and close to CP12 protein start codon ATG.


For the above-mentioned targets the following primers were designed and synthesized, the double-target editors pQY2257, pQY2258, pQY2259, pQY2260 were constructed with expectation of the editing events in which CP12 promoter driving HPPD protein coding region could be identified after transformation and selection with hyg, as shown in FIG. 28.














DNA sequence (5′ to 3′)


Primer ID
target sequences are underlined







HPPD-sgRNA1-F
taggtctccggcggtgctggttgccttggctgcgt



tttagagctagaaatagcaagttaaaataaggc





HPPD-sgRNA2-F
taggtctccggcgcacaaattcaccagcagccagt



tttagagctagaaatagcaagttaaaataaggc





CP12-sgRNA1-R
taggtctccaaaccatcaacagccagccatggcgc



ttcttggtgccgcg





CP12-sgRNA2-R
taggtctccaaacacatcacacgcagaaatccggc



ttcttggtgccgeg









Wherein, guide RNA combinations in each editing vector:


pQY2257 contains the combination of HPPD-guide RNA1 and CP12-guide RNA1,


pQY2258 contains the combination of HPPD-guide RNA1 and CP12-guide RNA2 combination,


pQY2259 contains the combination of HPPD-guide RNA2 and CP12-guide RNA1 combination,


pQY2260 contains the combination of HPPD-guide RNA2 and CP12-guide RNA2 combination.


With reference to the example 1 for rice protoplast transformation method, the above pQY2257-2260 vectors with high purity and concentration of the plasmid DNA were prepared, and then the high-quality rice protoplast was prepared as well, PEG mediated transformation of the rice protoplast was carried out, and finally the genome editing and the designed new gene was expected to be detected where CP12 promoter drives HPPD gene expression.


The following detecting primers, OsCP12pro-detection-F and OsHPPDutr-detection-R, were used to amplify the predicted fragment generated by the fusion of CP12 promoter and HPPD coding region, and the length of PCR amplicon was expected to be 305 bp. Similarly, OsHPPDpro-detection-F and OsCP12cds-detection-R were used to detect the fragment produced by the fusion of HPPD promoter and CP12 coding region, and the length of PCR products was expected to be 445 bp.
















Primer ID
Sequence (5′ to 3′)









OsCP12pro-detection-F
ctgaggaggcgataagaaacga







OsHPPDutr-detection-R
gtgtgggggagtggatgac







OsHPPDpro-detection-F
caagagctttactccaagttacc







OsCP12cds-detection-R
acccgccctcggagttgg










The identification results showed that in pQY2257-transformed protoplast samples were detected to have the CP12 promoter fused with the HPPD coding region, as shown in FIG. 29. While in the pQY2259-transformed protoplast samples were detected to have the HPPD promoter fused with the CP12 coding region, as shown in FIG. 30.


The above results show that, using the method described in this invention, can generate recombination between two chromosome fragments derived from two different chromosomes, which is expected to create the new genes as designed.


In this particular example, HPPD gene expression increases driven by the strong promoter of CP12 gene, meanwhile CP12 gene expression decreases driven by the weak promoter of HPPD gene. Therefore, the expression level of the new genes generated through this invention can be regulated as needed by choice of a strong or weak promoter.


Example 15: Creation of a New High-Expression HPPD Gene Caused by Chromosome Fragment Duplication Mediated by LbCpf1 Dual-Target Editing-Rice Protoplast Test

LbCpf1 belongs to the Cas12a type of nucleases, recognizes a TTTV PAM site, and thus is suitable to edit a high AT-content DNA sequence; while Cas9 recognizes a NGGPAM site and is suitable to edit a high GC-content DNA sequence. Therefore, the DNA scope of their editing ability is complementary to each other. In the rice protoplast system, the ability of LbCpf1 to cut and then induce the chromosome fragment to duplicate, i.e. to create a new HPPD gene was tested, as shown in the FIG. 31.


With reference to Example 1, the pHUE411 vector (https://www.addgene.org/62203/) was used as the backbone, and the sgRNA expression cassette was removed by restriction enzyme digestion. The SV40 NLS-LbCpf1-nucleoplasmin NLS gene fragment synthesized in GenScript Biotechnology Company (Nanjing, China) replaced the Cas9 CDS of pHUE411. At 338 kb downstream of HPPD gene is a high-expression Ubi2 gene with a same expression orientation. Thus, a duplication strategy was used to increase the expression of HPPD, which confers resistance to HPPD inhibitor herbicides. To this end, acrRNA was designed in the upstream of the start codon of rice HPPD gene: 5′accccccaccaccaactcctccc3′, and the second crRNA was designed in the upstream of the start codon of rice UBI2 gene: 5′ctatctgtgtgaagattattgcc3′. A tandem crRNA sequence was synthesized with HH ribozyme and HDV ribozyme recognition sites at both ends, as shown below: 5′AAATTACTGATGAGTCCGTGAGGACGAAACGAGTAAGCTCGTCTAATTTCTACT AAGTGTAGATaccccccaccaccaactcctcccTAATTTCTACTAAGTGTAGATctatctgtgtgaagatt attgccTAATTTCTACTAAGTGTAGATGGCCGGCATGGTCCCAGCCTCCTCGCTGGCG CCGGCTGGGCAACATGCTTCGGCATGGCGAATGGGAC3′. It was connected to the end of LbCpf1 protein expression cassette in the vector according to the operating instructions of the Seamless Cloning Kit from HB-infusion Hanbio Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The maize UBI1 promoter was used to drive both Lbcpf1 protein and crRNA in the same expression cassette. This vector was named pQY2658.


With reference to Example 1, plasmids with high-purity and high-concentration were prepared for PEG-mediated transformation of rice protoplasts. After 48-72 hr of transformation protoplast DNA was extracted for detecting duplication-editing events. The primers from both sides of the targets were designed to cover the duplicated area, and the target fragment was expected to be 494 bp. The primer sequences are:













Ubi2pro-Primer 5:




gtagcttgtgcgtttcgatttg








HPPDcds-Primer 10:




tcgacgtggtggaacgcgag






The PCR amplification of the DNA extracted from the pQY2658 transformed rice protoplasts for the duplicated adapter fragments did produce bands with the expected size, and the sequencing result of the amplicon is consistent with the expected chromosome fragment duplicated adapter sequence. The sequencing result is shown in SEQ.No. 27.


The test results on protoplast transformed with pQY2658 proved that LbCpf1 nuclease can effectively cleave the target, generate the detectable duplication of chromosome fragments between the targeted cut sites. It shows that the present invention can be used to create new genes through the duplication, inversion, or translocation of chromosome fragments, which can also be realized on the nuclease system of Cas12a.


Example 16: OsCATC Gene Connected to the Chloroplast Signal Peptide Domain Through Deletion of a Chromosome Segment

Three genes of rice, namely glycolate oxidase OsGLO3, oxalate oxidase OsOXO3 and catalase OsCATC, form a photorespiratory branch, which was referred to as GOC branch. The glycolic acid produced by photorespiration could be directly catalyzed into oxalic acid in chloroplast and finally completely decomposed into CO2 by introducing the GOC branch into rice by transgene and locating it in the chloroplast, thereby creating a photosynthetic CO2 concentration mechanism similar to C4 plants, which helped improve the photosynthetic efficiency and yield of rice (Shen et al. Engineering a New Chloroplastic Photorespiratory Bypass to Increase Photosynthetic Efficiency and Productivity in Rice. Molecular Plant, 2019, 12(2): 199-214).


By using the method presented by the invention, the protein domains of different genes could be recombined by non-transgenic method to add chloroplast signal domains to genes that required chloroplast localization. Primer OsCATC-sgRNA1: 5′gtcctggaacaccgccgcgg3′ was designed at the end of the chloroplast signal peptide domain of LOC4331514 gene of upstream 28 Kb of OsCATC gene; OsCATC-sgRNA2:5′atcagccatggatccctaca3′ was designed in the first five amino acid coding regions of OsCATC gene. The chloroplast signal peptide domain of LOC4331514 gene was expected to fuse with the coding region of OsCATC gene to produce a new CATC gene located in chloroplast after the removal of inter-target fragment. Dual-target editing vector pQY2654 was constructed by the method stated in Example 1, and the primers used were











OsCATC-sgRNA1-For2654F:



taggtctccggcggtcctggaacaccgccgcggGT







TTAAGAGCTATGCTGGAAACAGC,



and







OsCATC-sgRNA2-For2654R:



taggtctccaaactgtagggatccatggctgatgc







ttcttggtgccgcg.







High-purity and high-concentration plasmids were prepared for PEG-mediated transformation of rice protoplast; the protoplast DNA was extracted for detection of deletion edit event; detection primers were designed to extend the linker segment after the middle 28 Kb chromosome segment deletion for the targets on both sides; sequencing was performed, and the primer sequences were shown below:




















OsCATC-TestF:
ccacaaaacgagtggctcag








OsCATC-TestR:
gtgagcgagttgttgttgttcc








OsCATC-seqF:
ctcttccctccactccactg










The test result was shown in FIG. 32. The extraction of DNA from pQY2654 transformed rice protoplast could detect chromosome fragment deletion event through PCR amplification of the expected junction region after the targeted deletion, and then sequencing; the chloroplast signal peptide domain of LOC4331514 gene was fused with the coding region of OsCATC gene to create a new gene; the sequencing result was shown in SEQ ID No: 28. The protoplast test result of pQY2654 indicates that new genes combined from new protein domains could be created through the deletion of chromosome segments between different protein domains by using the method of the present invention.


Example 17: OsGLO3 Gene Connected to the Chloroplast Signal Peptide Domain Through Inversion of a Chromosome Segment

As stated in Example 16, the OsGlO3 gene also needed to be heterotopically expressed in chloroplasts to improve the photosynthetic efficiency of rice. Hence, for the OsGLO3 gene, OsGLO3-gRNA1:5′gtcctggaacaccgccgcgg3′ was designed at the end of chloroplast signal peptide domain of the LOC4337056 gene of the upstream 69 Kb, and OsGLO3-sgRNA2:5′tgatgacttgagcagagaaa3′ was designed in the initiation codon region of the OsCATC gene; the chloroplast signal peptide domain of the LOC4337056 gene was expected to fuse with the coding region of OsGLO3 gene to produce the new GLO gene located in chloroplast after the inversion of inter-target fragments. Dual-target editing vector pQY2655 was constructed as described in Example 1 using primers OsGLO3-sgRNA1-For2655F:taggtctccggcgcgatgcttggtggcaagtgcGTTTAAGAGCTATGCT GGAAACAGC and OsGLO3-sgRNA2-For2655R:taggtctccaaactttctctgctcaagtcatcagcttcttggtgccgcg. High-purity and high-concentration plasmids were prepared for PEG-mediated transformation of rice protoplast; the protoplast DNA was extracted for detection of inversion edit event; detection primers were designed to extend the linker segment after the middle 69 Kb chromosome segment inversion for the targets on both sides; sequencing was performed, and the primer sequences were shown below:


















OsGLO3-TestF1:
cctccttgttcgtgttctccg







OsGLO3-TestF2:
cggtcggttggttcatttcagg







OsGLO3-TestR1:
catccagcagtgtgctaccag







OsGLO3-TestR2:
cttgagaaggcctccctgttc










The test result was shown in FIG. 33. The extraction of DNA from pQY2655 transformed rice protoplast could detect chromosome fragment inversion event through PCR amplification of the expected junction region after the targeted inversion, and then sequencing; the chloroplast signal peptide domain of LOC4337056 gene was fused with the coding region of OsCATC gene to create a new gene; the sequencing result was shown in SEQ ID NO: 29 The protoplast test result of pQY2655 indicated that new genes combined from new protein domains could be created through the inversion of chromosome segments between different protein domains by using the method of the present invention.


Example 18: Creation of Herbicide-Resistant Rice Through Knock-Up of Endogenous PPO2 Gene Expression

The rice PPO2 gene was located on rice chromosome 4; bioinformatics analysis indicated that the S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (hereinafter referred as “SAMDC”) gene was approx. 436 kb downstream the PPO2 gene; the PPO2 gene and SAMDC gene had the same transcription direction on the chromosome. According to the analysis performed with the rice gene expression profile data (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/index.shtml) from the International Rice Genome Sequencing Project, the expression intensity of SAMDC gene in rice leaves was tens to hundreds of times that of PPO2 gene; the promoter of SAMDC gene was a strong and constitutive express promoter.


For the rice PPO2 gene, the genomic DNA sequence of rice PPO2 and SAMDC was entered into the CRISPOR online tool (http://crispor.tefor.net/) respectively, to seek available edit targets following the procedures stated in Examples 1 and 2. Based on the online scoring, the following targets were selected for test between the promoter and CDS region of PPO2 and SAMDC genes:


















PPO2-guide RNA1
gatttacttgttgtcttgtg







PPO2-guide RNA2
ttggggctcttggatagcta







SAMDC-guide RNA1
ggttggtcagaacactgtgc







SAMDC-guide RNA2
actgtgccggagatggagga










PPO2-guide RNA1 and PPO2-guide RNA2 were close to the initiation codon ATG of PPO2 between the promoter and CDS region of PPO2 gene, (i.e. 5′UTR); SAMDC-guide RNA1 and SAMDC-guide RNA2 were also close to the SAMDC protein initiation codon between SAMDC gene promoter and CDS region (i.e. 5′UTR).


The following primers were designed for above-noted targets; dual-target edit vectors pQY1386 and pQY1387 were constructed, and the edit event of chromosome fragment duplication between two targeted cuts was expected to be achieved; the novel gene expressed by PPO2 CDS driven by SAMDC promoter was produced at the duplication fragment linker, as shown in FIG. 34.

















DNA sequence



Primer ID
(5′ to 3′)









PPO2-
taggtctccggcggat



esgRNA1-F
ttacttgttgtcttgt




gGTTTAAGAGCTATGC




TGGAAACAGC







PPO2-
taggtctccggcgttg



esgRNA2-F
gggctcttggatagct




aGTTTAAGAGCTATGC




TGGAAACAGC







SAMDC-
taggtctccaaacgca



esgRNA1-R
cagtgttctgaccaac




cgcttcttggtgccgc




g







SAMDC-
taggtctccaaactcc



esgRNA2-R
tccatctccggcacag




tgcttcttggtgccgc




g










Wherein,


pQY1386 contains the combination of PPO2-guide RNA1 and SAMDC-guide RNA1


pQY1387 contains the combination of PPO2-guide RNA2 and SAMDC-guide RNA2.


Vector plasmids were extracted, and agrobacterium strain EHA105 was electrotransformed. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation was performed with rice variety Jinjing 818 as the receptor by the method stated in Example 2. Several rounds of callus identification were conducted during the transformation and selection, and positive calli of duplication events were selected for differentiation.


The detection primers in the table below were used to amplify the fragments containing target sites on both sides or the fragments produced from the fusion of predicted SAMDC promoter and PPO2 coding region; the length of PCR product was expected to be 300-1000 bp; the primer5-F+primer4-R combination was used to detect the fusion segment at the intermediate linker after chromosome fragment duplication; the predicted product length was 912 bp.

















Sequence



Primer ID
(5′ to 3′)









OsPPO2duplicated-
tctcggacaaa



primer1-F
cagtgcaccc







OsPPO2duplicated-
caaattgtggg



primer2-F
ccgtatgcacg







OsPPO2duplicated-
gcttcctcagc



primer3-R
ctgtacgcc







OsPPO2duplicated-
acccgccctcg



primer4-R
gagttgg







OsPPO2duplicated-
gtgcagtaagt



primer5-F
ggatgtactaa




tggagtc







OsPPO2duplicated-
gccggaggcgt



primer6-F
gaagaagttc




ca







OsPPO2duplicated-
gacacaatggt



primer7-R
gcaccgtgc







OsPPO2duplicated-
ggactcagaga



primer8-R
ggacataggag




tc










According to the final identification result, duplication edit events were detected in QY1386/818-28 # and QY1386/818-62 # calli; the sequencing result at the duplication fragment linker was shown in SEQ ID NO: 30 and SEQ ID NO: 31; The sequence alignment result was shown in FIG. 35; the result at #62 callus linker was exactly in line with expectations; seamless connection was observed, but duplication edit event was not detected in later differentiated seedlings.


Five duplication edit events were detected in the calli of QY1837; the sequencing results at the duplication fragment linker were shown in SEQ ID NO: 32, SEQ ID NO: 33, SEQ ID NO: 34, SEQ ID NO: 35, and SEQ ID NO: 36; some sequence alignment results were shown in FIG. 36.


Duplication events were detected in QY1837 differentiated seedlings; the results of the PCR amplified products and the sequencing at chromosome duplication linkers, PPO2 targets and SAMDC targets of some T0 seedlings were given below:















T0 seedling
Genotype at




No.
duplication point
PPO2 target
SAMDC target







1387/818-2
Heterozygosis:
+T, −11 bp
−6 bp



Seamless, −2 bp




1387/818-4/6/7
Heterozygosis:
+T, −11 bp
−2 bp



Seamless, −2 bp




1387/818-36
No duplication
Heterozygosis,
Heterozygosis,



detected
doublet
doublet


1387/818-38
Heterozygosis:
Heterozygosis,
Heterozygosis,



Seamless, −2 bp
doublet
doublet









The result of comparison of 1387/818-2 with the sequencing peak diagram was shown in FIG. 37; it was obvious that novel PPO2 gene expressed by PPO2 driven by SAMDC promoter developed in the genome; small fragments were deleted on both sides of the target, but this did not affect the integrity of CDS region reading frame.


Quantitative PCR detection of the relative expression of PPO2 gene was performed for TO-generation differentiated seedlings 1387/818-2, 1387/818-4 and 1387/818-6; the experiment operation was in line with Example 2; the quantitative PCR primer sequence was 5′-3′ as follows:


















UBQ5-F
ACCACTTCGACCGCCACTACT







UBQ5-R
ACGCCTAAGCCTGCTGGTT







RT-OsPP02-F
GTATGGCTCTGTCATTGCTGGTG







RT-OsPPO2-R
GTTTATTCCTTCCTTTCCCTGGC







RT-OsSAMDC-F
ACCTATGGTTACCCTTGAAATGTG







RT-OsSAMDC-R
CTGGGATAATGTCAGAGATGCC










With UBQ5 as the internal control, the result was shown in FIG. 35; compared with the wild-type rice Jinjing 818 control, the PPO2 gene expression of double-edited seedlings increases significantly, while SAMDC expression decreases relatively.


The herbicide resistance of T0 seedlings of 1387/818-2 and 1387/818-4 was preliminarily determined as stated in Example 6; wild-type Jinjing 818 seedlings with similar plant heights were taken as the control, and compound A was applied to them and TO seedlings at the same time at a chemical concentration of 0.6 g a.i./mu; the culture temperature was kept at 28° C. on a 16 (light)+8 (dark) basis; pictures were taken to record the results 7 days after application, as shown in FIG. 36. The T0 seedlings of 1387/818-2 and 1387/818-4 were a little dried-up at the top, while a few drug spots appear on the leaf surface; the wild-type Jinjing 818 withered and died; the result indicated that the SAMDC promoter-driven high expression of PPO2 protein enables rice to resist PPO inhibitor herbicides.


Example 19: Creation of Herbicide-Resistant Rice Through Knock-Up Expression of the Endogenous OsPPO2 Gene Caused by CRISPR/Cas9 Targeted Chromosome Cutting and Inversion after Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation

With reference to Example 4 to operate OsPPO2 gene, OsZFF (LOC_OS04G41560), a highly expressed gene at 170 kb downstream from OsPPO2 in the opposite direction, was selected to design two sgRNAs targeting in the regions close to the protein start codons ATGs, and a dual-target editing vector pQY2611 was constructed. Similarly, to increase the inversion probability, the downstream 40 kb from OsPPO2 and highly expressed gene OsNPP (LOC_OS04G41340) in the opposite direction of OsPPO2 was also selected to design another two sgRNAs targeting in the regions close to the protein start codons ATGs, and another dual-target editing vector pQY2612 was constructed. The three selected targets were shown as the following table. It was expected that the editing could produce double-strand DNA cut and then the inversion of chromosome fragments between the targets to form a new gene with high expression of PPO2, respectively, as shown in FIG. 40:


















OsPPO2-guide RNA2
ttggggctcttggatagcta







560-guide RNA3
agttagtttagtcgtctcga







340-guide RNA4
tccggtggegtctgtttggt










The following primers were used to construct the vectors:
















Primer ID
Sequence (5′ to 3′)









OsPPO2-
taggtctccggcgttggggctctt



sgRNA2-F
ggatagctaGTTTAAGAGCTATGC




TGGAAACAGC







560-sgRNA3-R
taggtctccaaactcgagacgact




aaactaactgcttcttggtgccgc




g



340-sgRNA4-R
taggtctccaaacaccaaacagac




gcaagacaagcttcttggtgccgc




g










Wherein,


pQY2611 contains the combination of OsPPO2-guide RNA2 and 560-guide RNA3


pQY2612 contains the combination of OsPPO2-guide RNA2 and 340-guide RNA4


pQY2611 contains the combination of OsPO2-guide RNA2 and 560-guide RNA3


pQY2612 contains the combination of OsPO2-guide RNA2 and 340-guide RNA4


The vector plasmid was extracted and transformed into Agrobacterium tumefacien strain EHA105. The rice variety Jinjing 818 was used as the receptor for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, and the transformation method was referred to Example 2. Several rounds of callus identification were carried out during the transformation-post selection process, and the callus with positive inversion events was selected for differentiation.


The detecting primers in the table below were used to amplify the fragments containing both target sites and the fused fragment between the predicted 560 promoter and the PPO2 coding region. The length of the PCR amplicon was expected 300-1000 bp. Primer2-F+Primer12-R and Primer3-F+Primer10-R were used to detect fused fragments at the junction of OsZFF after chromosome fragmentation and then inversion, and the expected amplicon lengths were 512 bp and 561 bp, respectively. Similarly, Primer2-F+Primer6-R and Primer3-F+Primer7-R were used to detect the fused fragments at the junction of OSNPP after chromosome fragmentation and then inversion, and the expected amplicon lengths were 383 bp and 666 bp, respectively.
















Sequence



Primer ID
(5′ to 3′)








OsPPO2 inverted-
caaattgtgggc



primer2-F
cgtatgcacg






OsPPO2 inverted-
cacgtctccact



primer12-R
ctcccagcc






OsPPO2 inverted-
gcttcctcagc



primer3-F
ctgtacgcc






OsPPO2 inverted-
Gcccgtgcagc



primer10-R
ctagccatc






OsPPO2inverted-
ccacctccccg



primer6-R
gcggtactg






OsPPO2inverted-
gatatgccgga



primer7-R
ccggacatgt









The pQY2611-transformed calli were identified through PCR and amplicon sequencing. 292 samples were identified, 19 of which were positive for the inversion. The identified inversion event genotypes were shown as following table:















Junction sequence between
Junction sequence between


Positive
inverted PPO2 coding region
inverted ZFF coding region


callus ID
and ZFF promoter region
and PPO2 promoter region







2611/818-3
−4 bp, homozygous
+T, homozygous


2611/818-10
seamless, homozygous
no identification


2611/818-13
−2 bp, homozygous
−1 bp, homozygous


2611/818-21
seamless, homozygous
+T, homozygous


2611/818-24
seamless, homozygous
not detect


2611/818-53
−26 bp,
not detect



messychromatogrampeaks



2611/818-54
−30 bp,
not detect



messychromatogrampeaks



2611/818-55
−26 bp,
not detect



messychromatogrampeaks



2611/818-67
−30 bp, homozygous
not detect


2611/818-83
seamless, homozygous
+T, messychromatogrampeaks


2611/818-85
seamless, homozygous
not detect


2611/818-90
+418 bp, homozygous
not detect


2611/818-92
−2 bp, homozygous
+T, messychromatogrampeaks


2611/818-102
seamless, homozygous
+T, messychromatogrampeaks


2611/818-106
seamless, homozygous
+T, messychromatogrampeaks


2611/818-107
−2 bp, homozygous
+T, messychromatogrampeaks


2611/818-108
−2 bp, heterozygous
not detect


2611/818-109
heterozygous
not detect


2611/818-121
−22 bp, homozygous
not detect









The sequencing results of the OsZFF promoter fused with OsPPe2 CDS region were shown in Seq No. 37, Seq No. 38, Seq No. 39, Seq No. 40, Seq No. 41, Seq No. 42, Seq No. 43. The alignment comparison results of 2611/818-10 and 2611/818-13 chromatogram peaks are shown in FIG. 41. The events 2611/818-3, 2611/818-10, 2611/818-54 were differentiated further and obtained inversion positive T0 plants.


Similarly, pQY2612-transformed calli were identified for inversion events. A total of 577 callus samples were identified, and 45 callus samples were detected to be positive for the inversion. The genotypes of inversion events detected were shown as following table:














Positive

genotype of inverted


callus ID
genotype of inverted PPO2
NFF







2612/818-5
seamless, homozygous
−1 A, homozygous


2612/818-29
seamless, homozygous
not detect


2612/818-34
−3 bp, homozygous
not detect


2612/818-62
seamless, homozygous
not detect


2612/818-64
seamless, homozygous
not detect


2612/818-66
+1 T, homozygous
not detect


2612/818-129
seamless, homozygous
Seamless, homozygous


2612/818-156
seamless, homozygous
Seamless, homozygous


2612/818-157
seamless, homozygous
Seamless, homozygous


2612/818-366
seamless, homozygous
−5 bp


2612/818-377
−31 bp, the start codon is broken,
not detect



homozygous



2612/818-419
seamless, homozygous
+1 bp T


2612/818-444
Seamless, homozygous
Seamless, homozygous


2612/818-457
Seamless, homozygous
Seamless, homozygous


2612/818-497
+1 T, homozygous
−3 bp, homozygous









The sequencing results of the OsNPP promoter fused OSPPO2 CDS region were shown in Seq No. 44, Seq No. 45, Seq No. 46, and Seq No. 47. The sequencing results of events 2612/818-5 and 2611/818-34 and the chromatogram peaks are shown in FIG. 42. Eventually only event 2612/818-29 was differentiated successfully and obtained a positive T0 plant with desired inversion.


Example 20: Test on Creation of Novel PPO2 Gene with Maize Protoplasts

As shown in Example 7, the gene distribution on chromosomes was collinear among different plants; the method for successful creation of novel genes like EPSPS, PPO1, PPO2 and HPPD in new mode of expression was versatile among other plant species. According to Example 18, novel PPO2 gene was created through the PPO2 gene selection in maize and the duplication of chromosome fragments between maize SAMDC genes, and then dual-target edit vectors were constructed for maize protoplast test.


The following targets were selected for test between the promoter and CDS region of PPO2 and SAMDC genes: ZmPPO2-sgRNA1:5′ggatttgcttgttgtcgtgg3′ was close to the initiation codon ATG of PPO2 protein between the promoter and CDS region of PPO2 gene (i.e. 5′UTR). ZmSAMDC-sgRNA2:5′gtcgattatcaggaagcagc3′ and ZmSAMDC-sgRNA3:5′acaatgctggagatggaggg3′ were close to the SAMDC protein initiation codon ATG between the promoter and CDS region of SAMDC gene (i.e. 5′UTR).


Dual-target edit vectors pQY1340 and pQY1341 were constructed using the following primers designed for above-noted targets.
















Primer ID
DNA sequence (5′ to 3′)









ZmPP02-sgRNA1-F
Taggtctccggcgggatttgctt




gttgtcgtggGTTTAAGAGCTAT




GCTGGAAACAGC







ZmSAMDC-sgRNA2-R
Taggtctccaaacgtcgattatc




aggaagcagctgcaccagccggg




aatcgaac



ZmSAMDC-sgRNA3-R
Taggtctccaaacacaatgctgg




agatggagggtgcaccagccggg




aatcgaac










Wherein, pQY1340 contained ZmPPO2-sgRNA1 and SAMDC-sgRNA2 targets combination, while pQY1341 contained ZmPPO2-sgRNA1 and SAMDC-sgRNA3 targets combination.


High-concentration plasmids were prepared for above-noted vectors and used for the protoplast transformation in maize following the procedures stated in Example 1 for preparation and transformation of rice protoplasts; it was slightly different from rice in that a vacuum degree of 15 pa should be maintained for 30 minutes before enzymolysis so that the enzymatic hydrolysate contacts the cells more adequately; the maize variety used was B73.


The detection primers in the table below were used to amplify the fragments containing target sites on both sides or the fragments produced from the fusion of predicted SAMDC promoter and PPO2 coding region; the length of PCR product was expected to be 300-1100 bp; the ZmSAMDC test-F1+ZmPPO2 test-R2 combination was used to detect the fusion segment at intermediate linker after chromosome fragment duplication; the expected product length was approx. 597 bp; inner primer ZmSAMDC test-F2 was used for sequencing.
















Primer ID
DNA sequence (5′ to 3′)









ZmSAMDC test-F1
gggtggcaaaaagtctagcag







ZmSAMDC test-R1
ggtgagcaggagcttggtag







ZmSAMDC test-F2
cggaggcgtgaagaagttccag







ZmSAMDC test-R2
ccgtgcaagatccagaacagag







ZmPP02 test-F1
gccatcctgagacctgtagc







ZmPP02 test-R1
gcacaagggcataaagcaccac







ZmPP02 test-F2
gcagtccgaccatacccatacc







ZmPP02 test-R2
cctcgaaggcacaaacacgtac










1% agarose gel electrophoresis test was performed for the PCR reaction product, and the result indicated that the predicted positive band (approx. 597 bp) into which the ZmSAMDC promoter and ZmPPO2 coding region were fused was detected in all pQY1340 and pQY1341 transformed maize protoplast samples. Positive fragments were sequenced, and the PPO2 duplication event sequencing result of pQY1340 vector transformed protoplast test was shown in SEQ ID NO: 48; the PPO2 duplication event sequencing result of pQY1341 vector transformed protoplast test was shown in SEQ ID NO: 49. The result of comparison with the sequence at predicted chromosome segment duplication linker was shown in FIG. 43, indicating that the SAMDC gene promoter and the PPO2 gene expression region can be linked up directly to create novel PPO2 gene with strong promoter-driven expression; thus, it's obvious that the method provided by the present invention for creating novel genes was also applicable to maize.


Example 21: Creation of Novel PPO2 Gene in Wheat Protoplast Test

According to Example 18, in wheat the chromosome fragment region between PPO2 gene and SAMDC gene was selected for dual-target editing to create the novel gene expressed by PPO2 coding region driven by the SAMDC promoter. Wheat was hexaploid, so there were 3 sets of PPO2 genes and SAMDC genes in genomes A, B, and D. The TaPPO2-2A (TraesCS2A02G347900) gene was located at the wheat 2A chromosome, and the TaSAMDC-2A (TraesCS2A02G355400) gene was approx. 11.71 Mb downstream; since the TaSAMDC-2A and TaPPO2-2A gene transcriptions are in opposite directions on the same chromosome, it's necessary to choose inversion editing strategy, as shown in FIG. 44; TaPPO2-2B (TraesCS2B02G366300) was located at the wheat 2B chromosome, and TaSAMDC-2B (TraesCS2B02G372900) was 9.5 Mb downstream; since TaSAMDC-2B and TaPPO2-2B gene expressions are in the same direction on the chromosome, the duplication editing strategy should be used, as shown in FIG. 45; TaPPO2-2D (TraesCS2D02G346200) was located at the wheat 2D chromosome, and TaSAMDC-2D (TraesCS2D02G352900) was 8.3 Mb downstream; since the TaSAMDC-2D and TaPPO2-2D gene transcriptions are in the same direction on the chromosome, the duplication edit event should be selected, as shown in FIG. 46.


The DNA sequence of wheat ABD gene group PPO2 and SAMDC gene was entered into the CRISPOR online tool (http://crispor.tefor.net/) respectively, to seek available edit targets. Based on the online scoring, the following targets were selected for test between the promoter and CDS region of PPO2 and SAMDC genes:
















Primer ID
DNA sequence (5′ to 3′)









2A guide RNA1
GCGGAGTACTAGTAGGTACG







2A guide RNA2
TGTGAATTTGTTTCCTGCAG







2A guide RNA3
ATGACGCAGAGCACTCGTCG







2A guide RNA4
CTTCTCGTAGTTTAGGATTT







2B guide RNA1
CCCTCCTACCTACTACTCCG







2Bguide RNA2
TGTGACATTTTTTTCATCTT







2Bguide RNA3
CGAAGGCGACGACGGAGAGC







2Bguide RNA4
TCACTTCTGTTCAGACATTT







2Dguide RNA1
CCGCGGAGTAGTAGGTAGCA







2Dguide RNA2
GCTTCACGATAATCGACCAG







2Dguide RNA3
CGATGACGCCGACGCAGAGC







2Dguide RNA4
CCAATCTCTCTGGCCTGCTT










2A guide RNA1 and 2A guide RNA2 were close to the initiation codon of PPO2 protein between the promoter and CDS region of PPO2 gene (i.e. 5′UTR); 2A guide RNA3 and 2A guide RNA4 were close to the SAMDC protein initiation codon between SAMDC gene promoter and CDS region (i.e. 5′UTR). 2B and 2D followed the same principle as above.


The following primers were designed for above-noted targets to construct the vector with pHUE411 vector (https://www.addgene.org/62203/) as the framework using the method presented in “Xing H L, Dong L, Wang Z P, Zhang H Y, Han C Y, Liu B, Wang X C, Chen Q J. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Nov. 29; 14(1):327”.
















Primer ID
DNA sequence (5′ to 3′)









TaPPO2A-T2 for
taggtctccggcgGCGGAGTACTAGTAGGT



2626/2627BsaIF
ACGGTTTAAGAGCTATGCTGGAAACAGC







TaSAMDCA-for
taggtctccaaacTGTGAATTTGTTTCCTG



2627/2629BsaIR
CAGgcttcttggtgccgcg







TaPPO2A-T2 for
taggtctccggcgATGACGCAGAGCACTCG



2628/2629BsaIF
TCGGTTTAAGAGCTATGCTGGAAACAGC







TaSAMDCA-for
taggtctccaaacCTTCTCGTAGTTTAGGA



2626/2628BsaIR
TTTgcttcttggtgccgcg







TaPPO2B-T2 for
taggtctccggcgCCCTCCTACCTACTACT



2630/263 IBsaIF
CCGGTTTAAGAGCTATGCTGGAAACAGC







TaSAMDCB for
taggtctccaaacTGTGACATTTTTTTCAT



2630/2632BsaIR
CTTgcttcttggtgccgcg







TaPPO2B for
taggtctccggcgCGAAGGCGACGACGGAG



2632/2633BsaIF
AGCGTTTAAGAGCTATGCTGGAAACAGC







TaSAMDCB for
taggtctccaaacTCACTTCTGTTCAGACA



2631/2633BsaIR
TTTgcttcttggtgccgcg







TaPP02D for
taggtctccggcgCCGCGGAGTAGTAGGTA



2635/2636BsaIF
GCAGTTTAAGAGCTATGCTGGAAACAGC







TaSAMDCD for
taggtctccaaacGCTTCACGATAATCGAC



2634/2636BsaIR
CAGgcttcttggtgccgcg







TaPP02D for
taggtctccggcgCGATGACGCCGACGCAG



2636/2637BsaIF
AGCGTTTAAGAGCTATGCTGGAAACAGC







TaSAMDCD for
taggtctccaaacCCAATCTCTCTGGCCTG



2635/2637BsaIR
CTTgcttcttggtgccgcg










The following dual-target combined gene edit vectors were constructed using the method described in the literature above. To be more specific, pCBC-MT1T2 plasmid (https://www.addgene.org/50593/) was used as template to amplify dual-target fragments sgRNA1+3, sgRNA1+4, sgRNA2+3 and sgRNA2+4 to construct the sgRNA expression cassettes. BsaI digests the pHUE411 vector framework, and the gel was recovered; the target fragment was used for ligation reaction directly after digestion. T4 DNA ligase was used to link up the vector framework and target fragment, and the ligation product was transformed to the Trans5α competent cell; different monoclonal sequences were selected; after the sequences were confirmed by sequencing to be correct, the Sigitech small-amount high-purity plasmid extraction kit was used to extract plasmids and attain recombinant plasmids, which were respectively named as pQY2626, pQY2627, pQY2628, pQY2629, pQY2630, pQY2631, pQY2632, pQY2633, pQY2634, pQY2635, pQY2636, and pQY2637 as follows:


pQY2626 contains the combination of 2A-guide RNA1 and 2A-guide RNA3


pQY2627 contains the combination of 2A-guide RNA1 and 2A-guide RNA4


pQY2628 contains the combination of 2A-guide RNA2 and 2A-guide RNA3


pQY2629 contains the combination of 2A-guide RNA2 and 2A-guide RNA4


pQY2630 contains the combination of 2B-guide RNA1 and 2B-guide RNA3


pQY2631 contains the combination of 2B-guide RNA1 and 2B-guide RNA4


pQY2632 contains the combination of 2B-guide RNA2 and 2B-guide RNA3


pQY2633 contains the combination of 2B-guide RNA2 and 2B-guide RNA4


pQY2634 contains the combination of 2D-guide RNA1 and 2D-guide RNA3


pQY2635 contains the combination of 2D-guide RNA1 and 2D-guide RNA4


pQY2636 contains the combination of 2D-guide RNA2 and 2D-guide RNA3


pQY2637 contains the combination of 2D-guide RNA2 and 2D-guide RNA4


High-concentration plasmids were prepared for above-noted vectors and used for the protoplast transformation in wheat following the procedures stated in Example 1 for preparation and transformation of rice protoplasts; it's slightly different from rice that a vacuum degree of 15 pa should be maintained for 30 minutes before enzymolysis so that the enzymatic hydrolysate contacts the cells more adequately. The variety of wheat used was KN199; the seeds were from the Teaching and Research Office on Weeds, School of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, and were propagated at our lab; the wheat seeds were sown in small pots for dark culture at 26° C. for approx. 10 d-15 d; stems and leaves of the etiolated seedlings were used to prepare protoplasts.


The detection primers in the table below were used to PCR amplify the fragments containing target sites on both sides or the fragments produced from the fusion of predicted SAMDC promoter and PPO2 coding region; the length of PCR product was expected to be 300-1100 bp; the ZmSAMDC test-F1+ZmPPO2 test-R2 combination was used to detect the fusion segment at intermediate linker after chromosome fragment duplication; the PCR product length was expected to be 300-1100 bp; primer pair combinations TaSAMDCA-g600F&TaPPO2A+g480R, TaSAMDCB-g610F &TaPPO2B+g470R, and TaSAMDCD-g510F &TaPPO2D+g490R were respectively used to test the fusion segments at intermediate linker after the chromosome fragment duplication or inversion in the ABD genome; the product length was expected to be approx. 1 kb.













Primer ID
DNA sequence (5′ to 3′)







TaPPO2A-g330F
TCACCAAAAATGTGTGCGCTCGTG





TaPPO2A+g480R
ACACAGGTCGCACCATTCGCTCCAACAC





TaPPO2B-g360F
CACATTCACCAAAAATGTGTGTGCTCGACTG





TaPPO2B+g470R
AGGTCGCACCATTCGCCACAATCC





TaPPO2D-g340F
TGGGTCCGTTTTTTATTGGGCGCTCAAG





TaPPO2D+g490R
CTCAATTCGCTCCAGCATTCGCCG





TaSAMDCA+g670R
CAGACCTCCATCTCGGGAATGATGTCG





TaSAMDCA-g600F
TCCGTATGGCGCTTGTTCGTTGTTCG





TaSAMDCB+g620R
AGCACAGGAGACATGGCCATCAGCAG





TaSAMDCB-g610F
GAATTTGCCGTGGCTTATGGCATCATG





TaSAMDCD+g670R
CCTCCATCTCAGGGATAATGTCAGAGATT





TaSAMDCD-g510F
TACAGCATTCCGTCCCTGCTGTGAC









1% agarose gel electrophoresis test was performed for the PCR reaction product, and the result indicated that the predicted SAMDC promoter and the positive strip/band of approx. 1 kb in the PPO2 coding region fusion segment can be detected in the pQY2626 and PQY2627 transformed samples of the 2A genome, the pQY2630 and pQY2631 transformed samples of 2B genome, and the QY2634, pQY2635 and pQY2636 transformed samples of 2B genome.


PCR amplified positive fragments were sequenced, and the PPO2 inversion event sequencing result of pQY2626 vector transformed protoplast test was shown in SEQ ID NO: 50; the PPO2 inversion event sequencing result of PQY2627 vector transformed protoplast test was shown in SEQ ID NO: 51. The result of sequence comparison at inversion linker of predicted chromosome segment indicated that the TaSAMDC-2A gene promoter and the TaPPO2-2A gene expression region can be linked up directly to create novel PPO2 gene with strong promoter-driven expression.


The PPO2 duplication event sequencing result of pQY2630 vector transformed protoplast test was shown in SEQ ID NO: 52; the PPO2 duplication event sequencing result of pQY2631 vector transformed protoplast test was shown in SEQ ID NO: 53. The result of sequence comparison at duplication linker of predicted chromosome segment indicated that the TaSAMDC-2B gene promoter and the TaPPO2-2B gene expression region can be linked up directly to create novel PPO2 gene with strong promoter-driven expression; the result of pQY2631 sequencing peak diagram comparison was shown in FIG. 45.


The PPO2 duplication event sequencing result of pQY2634 vector transformed protoplast test was shown in SEQ ID NO: 54; the PPO2 duplication event sequencing result of pQY2635 vector transformed protoplast test was shown in SEQ ID NO: 55. The PPO2 duplication event sequencing result of QY2636 vector transformed protoplast test was shown in SEQ ID NO: 56. The comparison with the predicted sequence at chromosome segment duplication linker indicated that TaSAMDC-2D gene promoter and TaPPO2-2D gene expression region can be linked up directly to create novel PPO2 gene with strong promoter-driven expression; the result of pQY2635 sequencing peak diagram comparison was shown in FIG. 46.


According to the results of these protoplast tests, novel PPO2 genes expressed by TaPPO2 driven by TaSAMDC promoter can also be created through chromosome segment inversion or duplication in wheat; therefore, it's obvious that the method presented in the present invention for creating new genes was also applicable to wheat.


Example 22: Creation of Herbicide-Resistant Rape with Knock-Up Endogenous PPO2 Gene Expression Through Agrobacterium Tumefaciens-Mediated Transformation


Brassica napus was tetraploid, where the chromosome set was AACC; the redundancy between the A and C genomes enables the creation of new genes with different combinations of gene elements through the deletion or rearrangement of chromosome segments. To create a rape germplasm resistant to PPO inhibitor herbicides, the up-regulation of endogenous PPO gene expression was a feasible technical route. The analysis of the genomic data of rape C9 chromosome shows that the 30S ribosomal protein S13 gene (hereinafter referred as 30SR) was located at approx. 23 kb upstream the BnC9.PPO2; both were in the same direction for transcription on the same chromosome; the expression levels of rape 30SR and BnC9.PPO2 in various tissues in rapeseed were analyzed with Brassica EDB database (https://brassica.biodb.org/); 30SR and BnC9.PPO2 were principally expressed in leaves, and the expression level of 30SR was significantly higher than that of BnC9.PPO2; the PPO2 protein expression level was expected to rise when the novel gene expressed by BnC9.PPO2 CDS driven by 30SR promoter was created by deleting the chromosome segment between 30SR promoter and BnC9.PPO2 CDS; in that way, rape gained herbicide tolerance.


Targets available were identified by finding the information on C9 chromosome of transformed receptor rape variety Westar at the rape database website (http://cbi.hzau.edu.cn/bnapus/) a total of 6 targets were selected:


















BnC9.PPO2-guide RNA1
TTCCTGTATCCTTCTTCAG







BnC9.PPO2 -guide RNA2
AAGATGAGAGCTACGGATA







BnC9.PPO2 -guide RNA3
AACCCAACAGAAACGCGTC







BnC9.PPO2 -guide RNA4
CGAAAGAGAAGTAGACCAG







BnC9.PPO2 -guide RNA5
CTCCTGAAACGACAACAAA







BnC9.PPO2 -guide RNA6
CTTAAGTTATGTTTCTAAC










Wherein, guide RNA1, guide RNA2 and guide RNA3 were close to the initiation codon ATG of 30SR protein between the promoter and CDS region of 30SR gene (i.e. 5′UTR region); guide RNA4, guide RNA5 and guide RNA6 were close to the BnC9.PPO2 protein initiation codon ATG between BnC9.PPO2 gene promoter and CDS region (i.e. 5′UTR region).


With reference to Example 1, the edit vectors of different target combinations, namely pQY2533, pQY2534, pQY2535 and pQY2536 were constructed with pHSE401 vector as the framework; where:


pQY2533 contains the combination of guide RNA1 and guide RNA4


pQY2534 contains the combination of guide RNA2 and guide RNA5


pQY2535 contains the combination of guide RNA3 and guide RNA6


pQY2536 contains the combination of guide RNA1 and guide RNA5


Vector plasmids were extracted, and agrobacterium strain GV3101 was electrotransformed. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation was performed with rape variety Westar as receptor using the method below:


{circle around (1)} Sowing: Seeds were soaked in 75% alcohol for 1 min, disinfected with 10% sodium hypochlorite solution for 9 min, washed 5 times with sterile water, sown into M0 medium, and cultured in darkness at 24° C. for 5-6 days.


{circle around (2)} Preparation of agrobacterium: 3 mL of liquid LB medium was transferred into the sterile tube; the solution with agrobacterium was subjected to shake culture in a 200-rpm shaker at 28° C. for 20-24 h. The solution with bacteria was incubated for 6-7 h in the LB culture medium. The cultured bacteria solution was poured into a 50 mL sterile centrifuge tube; the tube was centrifuged for 5 min at 6000 rpm; the supernatant was discarded, and a moderate amount of DM suspension was added; the solution was shaken well and the OD600 value of infecting bacteria solution was set to approx. 0.6-0.8.


{circle around (3)} Infection and co-cultivation of explants: The prepared infecting bacteria solution was activated on ice, while the hypocotyls of seedlings cultured in darkness were cut off vertically with sterile forceps and scalpel; the cut-off explant was infected for 12 minutes in a dish, which was shaken every 6 min during infection; the explants were transferred to sterile filter paper after infection, and the excess infection solution was sucked out; then, the explants were placed in M1 culture medium and co-cultured at 24° C. for 48 h.


{circle around (4)} Callus induction: After the co-culture, the explants were transferred to M2 culture medium, where callus was induced for 18-20 days; the culture conditions: Light culture at 22-24° C.; light for 16 hrs/dark for 8 hrs. The conditions for differentiation culture and rooting culture were the same as the present stage.


{circle around (5)} Induced germination: The callus was transferred to M3 culture medium for differentiation culture, and succession was performed every 14 days until germination.


{circle around (6)} Rooting culture and transplantation: After the buds were differentiated to see obvious growth points, the buds were carefully cut off from the callus with sterile forceps and scalpel; the excess callus was removed as much as possible, and then the buds were transferred to M4 medium for rootage. Rooted plants were transplanted into the culture soil; T1-generation seeds were achieved through bagged selfing of the TO-generation regenerated plants.


The formula of culture medium used during the process was as follows:


Sowing Culture Medium M0















Culture
Chemical




medium
name
Dosage
Method of preparation







M0
MS
2.22 g
Dissolved in 1000 mL



Agar
  8 g
of double distilled





water; pH adjusted to





5.8-5.9; autoclaved









DM Transform Buffer Solution















Culture





medium
Chemical name
Dosage
Method of preparation



















DM
MS
4.43
g
Dissolved in 1000 mL



Sucrose
30
g
of double distilled



2,4-D
1
mL
water; pH adjusted to



Kinetin (KT)
1
mL
5.8-5.9; AS added



Acetosyringone (AS)
1
mL
after autoclaving









Co-Culture Medium M1















Culture





medium
Chemical name
Dosage
Method of preparation



















M1
MS
4.43
g
Dissolved in 1000 mL



Sucrose
30
g
of double distilled



Manitol
18
g
water; pH adjusted to



2,4-D
1
mL
5.8-5.9; AS added



Kinetin (KT)
1
mL
after autoclaving



Phytagel
4-5
g




Acetosyringone (AS)
1
mL









Screening Medium M2















Culture





medium
Chemical name
Dosage
Method of preparation



















M2
MS
4.43
g
Dissolved in 1000 mL



Sucrose
30
g
of double distilled



Manitol
18
g
water; pH adjusted to



2,4-D
1
mL
5.8-5.9; silver nitrate,



Kinetin (KT)
1
mL
timentin and



Phytagel
4-5
g
hygromycin added



AgNO3 (silver nitrate)
0.2
mL
after autoclaving



Timentin
1
mL




Hygromycin (Hyg)
0.2
mL




Acetosyringone (AS)
1
mL









Differential Medium M3















Culture





medium
Chemical name
Dosage
Method of preparation



















M3
MS
4.43
g
Dissolved in 1000 mL of



Glucose
10
g
double distilled water; pH



Xylose
0.25
g
adjusted to 5.8-5.9; ZT,



MES
0.6
g
IAA, timentin and



Phytagel
4-5
g
hygromycin added after



Zeatin (ZT)
1
mL
autoclaving



Indoleacetic acid (IAA)
0.2
mL




Timentin
1
mL




Hygromycin (Hyg)
0.2
mL









Rooting Medium M4















Culture





medium
Chemical name
Dosage
Method of preparation







M4
MS
2.2 g
Dissolved in 1000 mL of



Sucrose
 10 g
double distilled water; pH



Indolebutyric acid
  1 mL
adjusted to 5.8-5.9; timentin



(IBA)

added after autoclaving



Agar
 10 g




Timentin
0.5 mL









After the emergence of seedlings, leaves were taken from T0 seedlings for molecular identification. The detection primers in the table below were used to amplify the fragments containing target sites on both sides or the fragments produced from the fusion of predicted 30SR promoter and BnC9.PPO2 coding region; where klenow fragment was removed, the PCR product length should be approx. 700 bp.
















Primer ID
Sequence (5′ to 3′)









30SR PRO-F:
TGACTTTGCATCTCGCCACT







PP02 PRO-R3:
GCAGATGATGATGATGATAAGCTC










363 T0 seedlings from the transformation of the four vectors were tested; Klenow fragment deletion event was observed in 18 plants; the probability of Klenow fragment deletion varied depending on target combination; even the same target combination may bring about different probabilities of Klenow fragment deletion; pQY2534 vector offered the highest probability (10.96%), while pQY2535 vector offered the lowest probability (2%); the average probability was on the order of 5.56%.


Analysis of the sequencing result of 18 individual plants with positive knocked out: The sequencing results of 10 individual plants showed seamless Klenow fragment deletion between two targets; homozygous seamless knockout occurred in QY2533/w-7, and heterozygous knockout occurred in the other 9 plants; compared with the expected sequence after deletion, the insertion or deletion of small fragments of base was observed in 8 individual plants; up to 32 bases were deleted in the 30SR promoter region, and this was not expected to affect the promoter activity; homozygous knockout was observed in QY2533/w-36, QY2533/w-42, QY2535/w-32 and QY2536/w-124; the details of result were as follows.














Plant No.
PCR test result
Sequencing result analysis







QY2533/W-7
With strip/band
Deletion; seamless;




homozygous


QY2533/W-36
With strip/band
Deletion; −2 bp; homozygous


QY2533/W-39
With strip/band
Deletion; −13 bp; heterozygous


QY2533/W-42
With strip/band
Deletion; +1 bp; T;




homozygous


QY2534/W-32
With strip/band
Deletion; seamless;




miscellaneous peaks


QY2534/W-36
With strip/band
Deletion; seamless;




miscellaneous peaks


QY2534/W-40
With strip/band
Deletion; seamless;




miscellaneous peaks


QY2534/W-44
With strip/band
Deletion; −32 bp; miscellaneous




peaks


QY2534/W-53
With strip/band
Deletion; seamless;




miscellaneous peaks


QY2534/W-55
With strip/band
Deletion; seamless;




miscellaneous peaks


QY2534/W-56
With strip/band
Deletion; seamless;




miscellaneous peaks


QY2534/W-59
With strip/band
Deletion; seamless;




miscellaneous peaks


QY2535/W-32
With strip/band
Deletion; +10 bp; homozygous


QY2535/W-46
With strip/band
Deletion; −1 bp; heterozygous


QY2536/W-73
With strip/band
Deletion; seamless;




miscellaneous peaks


QY2536/W-77
With strip/band
Deletion; seamless;




miscellaneous peaks


QY2536/W-78
With strip/band
Deletion; +1 bp; heterozygous


QY2536/W-124
With strip/band
Deletion; +A; homozygous









The sequencing result showed that the 30SR promoter can be directly connected with the BnC9.PPO2 CDS region to create novel PPO2 gene with strong promoter-driven expression after the deletion of inter-target sequence. The sequencing results of the 30SR promoter fused BnC9.PPO2 CDS region were shown in Seq No. 57, Seq No. 58, Seq No. 59, Seq No. 60, and Seq No. 61.


T0 seedling test result indicated that the method presented in the present invention enabled the creation of novel genes expressed by the BnC9.PPO2 CDS region driven by the 30SR promoter; so, it's obvious that the way presented in the present invention to create new genes was also applicable to rape. The results of test on rice, corn, wheat, Arabidopsis thaliana, and rape demonstrate that the method provided by the present invention was designed for purposeful precise creation of novel genes with combinations of different gene elements or different protein domains in both monocotyledons and dicotyledons.


Example 23: Creation of Rice Blast Resistance Through Knock-Up Expression of an Endogenous Gene OsWAK1

OsWAK1 is a novel functional protein kinase. It was reported that overexpression of the OsWAK1 gene can confer resistance to rice blast (Li et al. A novel wall-associated receptor-like protein kinase gene, OsWAK1, plays important roles in rice blast disease resistance. Plant Mol Biol, 2009, 69: 337-346). The OsWAK1 gene locates on rice chromosome 1. Through bioinformatics analysis, it was found that LOC_Os01g044350 (hereinafter referred to as 44350) gene, which is highly expressed in rice, locates about 26 kb upstream of OsWAK1 gene, and the 44350 gene and the OsWAK1 gene are in the opposite direction on the chromosome. The 44350 gene promoter can be used for inversion to increase the expression of OsWAK1 gene. Similarly, BBTI12 (MSU ID: LOC_Os01g04050), which is highly expressed in rice, locates about 206 kb upstream of OsWAK1 gene, and the BBTI12 gene and the OsWAK1 gene are in the same direction on the chromosome. The BBTI12 gene promoter can be used for duplication to increase the expression of OsWAK1 gene.


Similarly, the dual-target combination OsWAK1ts2:5′TTCAGCTAGCTGCTACACAA 3′ and 44350ts2: 5′ TAGAAGCTTTGATGCTTGGA 3′, was used to construct the duplication editing vector pQY1085. The construction primers used were bsaI-OsWAK1 5′UTR ts2-F:









5′AATGGTCTCAggcATTCagctagctgctacacaaGTTTAAGAGCTATG





CTGGAAACAGCAT3′


and





bsaI-44350 5′UTRts2-R:


5′AATGGTCTCAAAACTCCAAGCATCAAAGCTTCTAgcttcttggtgccg





cgc 3′.






Similarly, the dual-target combination OsWAK1ts2: 5′ TTCAGCTAGCTGCTACACAA 3′ and BBTI12ts2: 5′ CAAGTAGAGGAAATAGCTCA 3′ was used to construct the duplication editing vector pQY1089. The construction primers used were bsaI-OsWAK1 5′UTR ts2-F:









5′AATGGTCTCAGGCATTCAGCTAGCTGCTACACAAGTTTAAGAGCTATG





CTGGAAACAGCAT3′


and





bsaI-BBTI12 5′UTRts2-R:


5′AATGGTCTCAAAACTGAGCTATTTCCTCTACTTGGCTTCTTGGTGCCG





CGC3′.






The above two plasmids were extracted to transform Agrobacterium sp. EHA105. The recipient rice variety Jinjing 818 was transformed through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and the transformation method was referenced to Example 2. During the transformation process, genotype identification at the junction regions was performed on the rice calli, and the inversion or duplication event-positive calli were selected to enter the differentiation stage for regeneration of seedlings.


For pQY1085 transformed rice calli, the primer44350tsdet-F+primerOsWAK1tsdet-F combination was used to detect the fusion fragment at the middle joint after the inversion of the chromosome fragment, and the PCR product length was expected to be 713 bp.
















Primer ID
Sequences(5′ to 3′)









44350tsdet-F
CGATCGATTCATCGAGAGGGCT







44350tsdet-R
ATCACCAGCACGTTCCCCTC







OsWAK1TSDET-F
TTTTGTGTGCCGCGACGAATGAG







OsWAK1TSDET-R
CATAACGCTGTCGACAATTGACCTG










For pQY1089 transformed rice calli, the primerOsWAK1tsdet-F+primerBBTI12tsdet-R combination was used to detect the fusion fragment at the middle joint after the duplication of the chromosome fragment, and the PCR product length was expected to be 837 bp.













Primer ID
Sequences(5′ to 3′)







BBTI12tsdet-F
TTTTCTTTTGCAACAGCAGCAAAGATT





BBTI12tsdet-R
AGGGTACATCCTAGACGAGTCCAAG





OsWAK1tsdet-F
TTTTGTGTGCCGCGACGAATGAG





OsWAK1tsdet-R
CATAACGCTGTCGACAATTGACCTG









The above two vectors were referred to in Example 2 for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice callus. After the callus was identified, the inversion or duplication event-positive calli were differentiated, and eventually positive edited seedlings were obtained. The results of molecular identification are shown in the FIG. 47. As shown, the pQY1085-transformed seedlings were detected to identify the inversion editing events in which the Os01g044350 promoter drives the OsWAK1 gene expression and thus a new OsWAK1 gene was formed. The representative sequences of the sequenced inversion events, QY1085/818-57, QY1085/818-107, QY1085/818-167, QY1085/818-23 are shown in SEQ ID NO: 62, SEQ ID NO: 64, SEQ ID NO: 65 and SEQ ID NO: 66.


As shown in the FIG. 48, the pQY1089-transformed seedlings were detected to identify the duplication editing events in which the BBTI12 promoter drives the OsWAK1 gene expression and another new OsWAK1 gene was also formed. The representative sequences of the sequenced duplication events, QY1089/818-595, QY1089/818-321, QY1089/818-312 are shown in SEQ ID NO: 63, SEQ ID NO: 67 and SEQ ID NO: 68.


Example 24: Creation of Blast-Resistant Rice Through Knock-Up Expression of Endogenous OsCNGC9 Gene in Rice

The cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (CNGCs) gene family encodes a set of non-specific, Ca2+ permeable cation channels. It was reported that overexpression of the OsCNGC9 gene can confer resistance to rice blast (Wang et al. A cyclic nucleotide-gated channel mediates cytoplasmic calcium elevation and disease resistance in rice. Cell Research, 2019, epub). The OsCNGC9 gene locates on rice chromosome 9. Through bioinformatics analysis, it was found that LOC_Os09g39180 (hereinafter referred to as 39180) gene, which is highly expressed in rice, locates about 314 kb downstream of OsCNGC9 gene, and the 39180 gene and the OsCNGC9 gene were in the opposite direction on the same chromosome. The 39180 gene promoter can be used for inversion to increase the expression of OsCNGC9 gene. In addition, LOC_Os09g39390 (hereinafter referred to as 39390), which is highly expressed in rice, locates about 456 kb downstream of OsCNGC9 gene, and the 39390 gene and the OsCNGC9 gene were in the same direction on the same chromosome. The 39390 gene promoter can be used for duplication to increase the expression of OsCNGC9 gene.


The dual-target combination OsCNGC9ts1: 5′ ACAGCAAGATTTGGTCCGGG 3′ and 39180ts1: 5′ ATGGAATGGAAGAGAATCGA 3′ was used to construct the inversion editing vector pQY1090. The construction primers used were bsaI-OsCNGC9 5′UTR ts1-F:











5′ AATGGTCTCAGGCAACAGCA







AGATTTGGTCCGGGGTTTAAGAGCTATGCTGGAAACAGCAT3′



and







bsaI-39180 5′UTRts1-R:



5′ AATGGTCTCAAAACTCGATTCTCTTCCATTCCATGCTTCTTG







GTGCCGCGC 3′.






The dual-target combination OsCNGC9ts1: 5′ ACAGCAAGATTTGGTCCGGG 3′ and 39390ts1: 5′ CTACTGGCCTCGATTCGTCG 3′ was used to construct the duplication editing vector pQY1094. The construction primers used were bsaI-OsCNGC9 5′UTR ts1-F:











5′ AATGGTCTCAGGCAACAGCA







AGATTTGGTCCGGGGTTTAAGAGCTATGCTGGAAACAGCAT3′



and







bsaI-39390 5′UTRts1-R:



5′ AATGGTCTCAAAACCGACGAATCGAGGCCAGTAGGCTTCT







TGGTGCCGCGC 3′.






The above two plasmids were extracted to transform Agrobacterium sp. EHA105. The recipient rice variety Jinjing 818 was transformed through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and the transformation method was referenced to Example 2. During the transformation process, molecular identification was performed on the rice calli, and the inversion or duplication event-positive calli were selected to enter the differentiation stage and regeneration of seedlings.


For pQY1090 transformed calli, the primer39180tsdet-R+primerOsCNGC9tsdet-R combination was used to detect the fusion fragment at the middle joint after the inversion of the chromosome fragment, and the PCR product length was expected to be 778 bp.













Primer ID
Sequences(5′ to 3′)







OsCNGC9tsdet-F
ACATCTCATGTGCAAGATCCTAGCA





OsCNGC9tsdet-R
AAACTGGTCCTGTCTCTCATCAGGA





39180tsdet-F
TGGCTCAGCGAAGTCGAGC





39180tsdet-R
CATGGTTGAACTGTCATGCTAATCAGT









For pQY1094 transformed calli, the primer3390tsdet-F3+primerOsCNGC9tsdet-R combination was used to detect the fusion fragment at the middle joint after the duplication of the chromosome fragment, and the PCR product length was expected to be 895 bp.













Primer ID
Sequences(5′ to 3′)







OsCNGC9tsdet-F
ACATCTCATGTGCAAGATCCTAGCA





OsCNGC9tsdet-R
AAACTGGTCCTGTCTCTCATCAGGA





39390tsdet-F3
TACTACAGCCTTTGCCTTTCACGGTTC





39390tsdet-R
GTCTGCCACATGCCGTTGAG









The above two vectors were referred to in Example 2 for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice callus. After the callus was identified, the inversion or duplication event-positive calli were differentiated, and finally positive edited seedlings were obtained. Sequencing results prove that the pQY1090 transformed seedlings were detected to identify the inversion edited events in which the LOC_Os09g39180 promoter drives the OsCNGC9 gene expression and thus a new OsCNGC9 gene was formed. The representative sequences of the sequenced inversion events QY1090/818-192, QY1090/818-554 and QY1090/818-541, are shown in SEQ ID NO: 69, SEQ ID NO: 70 and SEQ ID NO: 71.


Sequencing results prove that the pQY1094 transformed seedlings were detected to identify duplication edited events in which the LOC_Os09g39390 promoter drives the OsCNGC9 gene expression and thus another new OsCNGC9 gene was also formed. The representative sequence of the sequenced duplicated event QY1094/818-202 are shown in SEQ ID NO: 72.


Example 25: Pig IGF2 Gene Expression Knock-Up

IGF-2 (Insulin-like growth factor 2) is one of three protein hormones that have similar structure with insulin. IGF2 is secreted by the liver and circulates in the blood. It has the activity of promoting mitosis and regulating growth.


TNNI2 and TNNT3 encode muscle troponin I and troponin T, respectively, and they are the core components of muscle fibers. These two protein coding genes are constitutively and highly expressed in muscle tissue. Therefore, using the promoters of these two genes to drive the expression of IGF2 gene is expected to significantly increase its expression in muscle cells and promote growth. Since the directions of these two genes are opposite to IGF2 on the same chromosome, knock-up of IGF2 could be achieved by promoters exchange through chromosome segments inversion.


The experiment procedure was as follows:


1. CRISPR/Cas9 Target Site Selection and Vector Construction:


Using the CRISPR target online design tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/), we selected 20 bp sgRNA oligonucleotide sequences in the 5′UTR regions of pig IGF2, TNNI2, and TNNT3 genes respectively. The sgRNA oligos were synthesized by BGI, Qingdao.












IGF2-sgRNA:
5′ccgggtggaaccttcagcaa3′







TNNI2-sgRNA:
5′agtgctgctgcccagacggg3′







TNNT3-sgRNA:
5′acagtgggcacatccctgac3′






Diluting the synthesized sgRNA oligo with deionized water to 100 μmol/L in a reaction system (10 μL): positive strand oligo 1 μL, reverse strand oligo 1 μL, deionized water 8 μL. The annealing program of thermal cycler was set as follows: incubate at 37° C. for 30 min; incubate at 95° C. for 5 min, and then gradually reduce the temperature to 25° C. at a rate of 5° C./min. After annealing, the oligo was diluted by 250 volume using deionized water. pX459 plasmid was linearized with BbsI restriction endonuclease, the annealed product was ligated, and transformed into competent DH5α, a single colony was picked into a shaker tube, incubated at 37° C. for 12-16 h, 1 mL aliquot of bacterial solution was sent for sequencing. After sequencing verification, the bacterial solution was freezed and extracted for preparing the plasmid pX459-IGF2, pX459-TNNI2 and pX459-TNNT3. These plasmids were used for transfection in the following experiment.


2. Cell Transfection:


Thawing and culturing the pig primary fibroblast cell, removal of the culture medium and added preheated PBS for washing before transfection, then removed PBS and added 2 ml of 37° C. prewarmed trypsin solution. Digesting for 3 minutes in room temperature before terminating digestion. Suspending the cells in nucleofection solution, and diluting the volume to 106/100 μl, adding plasmid to 5 μg/100 μl final concentration, performing electro-transformation with optimized program on the electroporator, adding 500 μl of preheated culture medium, and culturing the cell in a concentration of 20% FBS DMEM medium, at 37° C., with 5% carbon dioxide, and saturated humidity.


3. Cell Screening and Test:


When the cells reached 100% cell density, cells were lysed with NP40 buffer. Genomic DNA was extracted, and the target regions were amplified by PCR.


The result is shown in FIG. 49, using the primer pair (T2-F2: tgggggaggccatttatatc/IGF2-R2:acagctcgccactcatcc), the fusion events of the TNNI2 promoter and the IGF2 gene was successfully detected.


As showed in the FIG. 50, using the primer pair (TNNT3-R:CCCCAAGATGCTGTGCTTAG/IGF2-F:CTTGGGCACACAAAATAGCC), the fusion events of the IGF2 promoter and the TNNT3 gene were successfully detected. As affected by repeated sequences, efforts are still taken to detect the fusion events of the TNNT3 promoter and the IGF2 gene.


The invention fused the pig TNNI2 promoter with the IGF2protein coding region in vivo through the inversion editing events of the chromosome segment, which forms a new IGF2 gene with continuously high expression. These editing events created new fast-growing pig cell lines. This example shows that the method of the present invention can be used to create new genes in mammalian organisms.


Example 26: Chicken IGF1 Expression Knock-Up

IGF1 (insulin like growth factor 1) is closely related to the growth and development of chickens. MYBPC1 (myosin binding protein C) is a highly expressed gene downstream of IGF1. A new gene with the MYBPC1 promoter driving IGF1 coding sequence was created through genome editing using a dual-target editing vector.


The experiment procedure was as follows:


1. CRISPR/Cas9 Target Site Selection and Targeted Cutting Vector Construction:


Using the CRISPR target online design tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/), 20 bp sgRNA oligonucleotide sequences were designed in the 5′UTR regions of chicken IGF1 gene and MYBPC1 gene respectively. sgRNA oligoes were synthesized by BGI. Diluting the synthesized sgRNA oligoes with deionized water to 100 μmol/L in a reaction system (10 μL): positive strand oligo 1 μL, reverse strand oligo 1 μL, deionized water 8 μL; the annealing program of thermal cycler was set as follows: incubate at 37° C. for 30 min; Incubate at 95° C. for 5 min, and then gradually reduce the temperature to 25° C. at a rate of 5° C./min; after annealing, the oligo was diluted by 250 volumes of deionized water. pX459 plasmid was linearized with BbsI restriction endonuclease, the annealed product was ligated, and transformed into competent DH5α, a single colony was picked into a shaker tube, incubated at 37° C. for 12-16 h, aliquot 1 mL of bacterial solution was sent for sequencing. After sequencing verification, the bacterial solution was freezed and extracted for preparing the plasmid pX459-IGF1 and pX459-MYBPC1, Those dual-target editing plasmids were used for transfection of chicken DF-1 cells.


2. Cell Culture and Passage of DF-1 Cells:


DF-1 (Douglas Foster-1) cell is chicken embryo fibroblast cell with vigorously proliferation ability, so DF-1 is the most popular cell line for in vitro study. DF-1 cells were thawed in a 37° C. water bath, and then inoculated in a petri dish and placed in a 37° C., 5% CO2 constant temperature incubator for cell culture. The culture medium is 90% DMEM/F12+10% FBS. When the cell density reached more than 90%, passaging cell at a ratio of 1:2 or 1:3.


3. DF-1 Cell Transfection:


{circle around (1)} Preparing two 1.5 ml EP tubes and marked them as A tube and B tube respectively.


{circle around (2)} Placing 250 μl of Opti-MEM medium, 2.5 μg plasmid and 5 μl of P3000™ reagent in tube A.


{circle around (3)} Placing 250 μl of Opti-MEM medium and 3.75 μl of Lipofectamine® 3000 reagent in tube B.


{circle around (4)} Transferring the liquid from tube A to tube B with a pipette, and quickly mixing the liquid of tube A and tube B and vortexing for 10 seconds.


{circle around (5)} Vortexing AB tube mixture (liposome-DNA complex) and incubating at room temperature for 15 minutes.


{circle around (6)} Finally, slowly adding liposome-DNA complex to the DF-1 cell dish after the culture medium had been removed with pipette.


4. DF-1 Cell Screening and Test:


{circle around (1)} Culturing DF-1/PGCs cells, and the transfection efficiency is best when the confluence reaches 60-70%;


{circle around (2)} After 2 days of transfection, add 1 μl g/ml puromycin for screening;


{circle around (3)} After 4 days of transfection, replace with the fresh cell culture medium to remove puromycin, and continue to culture until the 7th day after transfection to increase the number of cells.


{circle around (4)} Collecting the cells and extracting cell DNA with Tiangen's Genomic DNA Kit according to the operating instructions.


{circle around (5)} Designing primers to amplify new gene fragments that are expected to be doubled or inverted.


The invention fused the chicken MYBPC1 promoter with the IGF1CDS region in vivo through the double editing events of the chromosome segment, which forms a new IGF1 gene with continuously high expression. These editing events created new fast-growing avian cell lines. This example shows that the method of the present invention can be used to create new genes in avian organisms.


Example 27: Induced Gene Expression Through Chromosomal Segment Inversion in Yeast

FPP is a key precursor of many compounds in yeast. However, it can be degraded by many metabolic pathways in yeast, which affects the final yield of exogenous products such as terpenoids. The synthesis of squalene using FPP as substrate, is the first step of the ergosterol metabolic pathway, which is catalyzed by the squalene synthase encoded by the ERG9 gene. However, direct knockout of ERG9 gene would lead to the inability of yeast cells to grow, so the expression level of squalene synthase could only be regulated specifically, so that it could accumulate intracellular FPP concentration as well as maintaining its own growth. HXT promoter is a weakly glucose-responsive promoter, whose expression strength decreases with the decrease of glucose concentration in the external environment, which is consistent with the sugar metabolism process in the fermentation process, so it is an ideal inducible promoter.


As found in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome database website (https://www.yeastgenome.org/), both the HXT1 and ERG9 genes are located at the long arm end of chromosome VIII and are transcribed in the opposite direction, so the endogenous ERG9 gene promoter in yeast can be replaced by the HXT1 promoter, whose expression strength is responsive to glucose concentration, through the inversion editing events of the chromosome segment. It is expected that the specific induction of ERG9 gene expression will achieve the purpose of accumulation of FPP in yeast.


1. Vector Design and Construction


Vector design includes Cas9 vector and gRNA vector, which are constructed into two different backbones. For the Cas9 vector, we used pUC19 backbone, driven by yeast TEFl promoter, Cas9 sequence is yeast codon-optimized; gRNA vector used pUC57 backbone, SNR52 promoter and SUP4 terminator. The sgRNA is designed using an online tool (http://crispor.tefor.net/) and selected the following targets between the promoter and coding regions of the HXT1 and ERG9 genes for testing: ERG9 sgRNA: GAAAAGAGAGAGGAAG; HXT1 sgRNA: CCCATAATCAATTCCATCTG. Once vectors are completed, they will be mixed together for transformation.


2. Transformation of Yeast by Electroporation


1) Picked up better-grown mono-clones from a fresh plate and inoculated it with 5 mL YPD medium, grew with vigorously shaking 220 rpm at 30° C. for overnight. 2) Transferred to 50 mL YPD medium so that the initial OD660 would be about 0.2, incubated with vigorously shaking 220 rpm at 30° C. to make OD660 about 1.2. 3) After placing the yeast on ice for 30 min, centrifuged at 5000 g for 5 min at 4° C. to collect the cells. 4) Discarded the supernatant, washed the cells with pre-cooled sterile water twice, and then centrifuged. 5) Discarded the supernatant, washed the cells three times with pre-cooled 1 mol/L sorbitol solution. 6) Centrifuged to collect the cells, washed the cells three times with pre-cooled 200 μL 1 mol/L sorbitol solution. 7) Added 20 μL (about 5 μg) plasmids or DNA fragments to the cell suspension, gently mixed and incubated at ice for 10 min. 8) Transferred the mix into a pre-cooled cup, shocked 5 ms with 1500V. 9) Re-suspended the cells in the cup with 1 mL YPD medium and incubated at 30° C. with vortex for 1-2 hours. 10) Washed the recovered cells with sterile water, and finally re-suspended with 1 mL sterile water, took 100 μL on the corresponding plate. 11) Incubated at 30° C. thermostatic incubator for 3-5 days to select the transformers.


3. Extraction of Yeast Genome DNA


1) Took 5 ml overnight cultured medium, centrifuged to collect cells, after washed with 1 mL PBS twice, centrifuged to collect cells at maximum speed for 1 min; 2) Added 500 μL sorbitol buffer to re-suspend the cells and then added 50 U Lyticase, incubated at 37° C. for 4 h; 3) Centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 1 min to collect cells; 4) Added 500 μL yeast genomic DNA extraction buffer and re-suspended, added 50 μL 10% SDS, and placed immediately at 65° C. water bath for 30 min; 5) Added 200 μL 5M KAc (pH8.9), and incubated at ice for 1 h; 6) Centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 5 min at 4° C., and transferred supernatant to a new EP tube; 7) Added isopropyl alcohol of equal volume, centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 s; 8) discarded the supernatant and added 500 μL 75% ethanol to wash DNA, centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 1 min; 9) After precipitation, added 50 μL TE buffer to dissolve; 10) Took 3 μL DNA for electrophoresis test, the remaining was reserved in −20° C. refrigerator.


4. Detection of Inverted Events


PCR detection of transformed yeast cells using the following primers: HXT1pro-detF: TGCTGCGACATGATGATGGCTTT and ERG9cds-detR:TCGTGGAGAGTGACGACAAGT, respectively. The length of PCR product was expected to be 616 bp.


The invention replaces the yeast ERG9 gene promoter with the HXT1 promoter in vivo through the inversion editing event of the chromosome fragment between the target sites, which forms a new ERG9 gene regulated by glucose concentration. This example shows that the method of the present invention can be used to create new genes in fungal organisms.


Example 28: Knock-Up Expression of EPO Gene in 293T Cell Line

EPO (erythropoietin), is an important cytokine in human, PSMC2 (proteasome 26S subunit ATPase 2) is a regulated subunit of 26S protease complex, ubiquitously expressed in cells. By designing a dual-target editing vector to identify and screen new EPO gene which would driven by PSMC2 promoter in 293T cell lines.


1. Target Design and Editing Vector Construction of CRISPR/Cas9


Using target design online tools of CRISPR (http://crispr.mit.edu/), sequence of 20 bp sgRNA oligos was designed in the 5′UTR region of the human EPO gene and PSMC2 gene, respectively. Oligos were synthesized by BGI Company (Qingdao, China. Diluted the synthetic sgRNA oligo to 100 μmol/L with deionized water. Reaction system (10 μL): for word oligo 1 μl, reverse oligo 1 μl, deionized water 8 μL; annealing program used for PCR: incubated 30 min at 37° C., incubated 5 min at 95° C., then gradually cool down to 25° C. at 5° C./min; diluted the oligo 250 times after annealing. The pX459 plasmid was firstly linearized with BbsI restriction enzyme, and then the annealing product was added, ligated product was transformed into DH5a competent cells. Single clones were selected into the centrifugal tube, incubated with shaking at 37° C. 12 to 16 hours, and then divided into 1 mL for sequencing. After sequence confirmation, plasmids were extracted. Preparation of the plasmid pX459-EPO and pX459-PSMC2 for transfection.


2. Resuscitation of 293T cell: removed the frozen tube from liquid nitrogen or −80° C. refrigerator container, immersed directly into warm water bath at 37° C., and shook it at interval to melt it as soon as possible; removed the frozen tube from the water bath at 37° C., opened the lid in the ultra-clean table, and sucked out the cell suspension with the tips (3 ml of cell complete media has been pre-added in the centrifugal tube), flicked and mixed; centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min; discarded the supernatant, re-suspended cells gently, added 10% FBS cell media, re-suspended cells gently, adjusted cell density, inoculated at petri dishes, and incubated at 37° C. Replaced the cell media once the next day.


3. Transferred steps: removed cell petri dish (60 mm) from the carbon dioxide incubator, sucked out the medium in the bottle at the ultra-clean workbench, added 2 ml 1×PBS solution, gently rotated the petri dish to clean the cells, discarded the 1×PBS solution; added trypsin 0.5 ml and incubated for 3-5 minutes; during the incubation, observed the digested cells under an inverted microscope, and if the cells become round and no longer connected to each other, immediately added 2 volume complete medium (containing serum) in the ultra-clean workbench, added 1 mL of complete medium, blew and kept the cell suspended; the cell suspension was sucked out and placed in a 15 ml centrifugal tube, centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min; discarded the digestive fluid and tapped the bottom of the centrifugal tube to make the cells re-suspended; added 2.5 ml complete medium into two new 60 mm petri dishes, the original digestive dish also added 2.5 ml of complete medium, and marked it; dropped the cell suspension in the centrifugal tube into three petri dishes at 0.5 ml/dish, blew cells with tips several times, and incubated in a carbon dioxide incubator.


4. Trypsin digested the cells and counted in a 100 mm petri dish, making them 60%-70% denser on the day of transfection. Added plasmid DNA with a maximum capacity of 24.0 μg into cell petri dish with a bottom area of 100 mm, diluted with 1.5 mL serum-free medium, mixed and incubated at 5 min at room temperature.


5. Cell transfection: (1) Diluted 80 μl LIPOFECTAMINE 2000 reagent with a 1.5 ml serum-free medium, and mixed diluted DNA within 5 minutes. (2) Mixed diluted plasmid DNA with diluted LIPOFECTAMINE 2000, incubated at room temperature for 20 minutes. (3) The above mixture was then added evenly to the cells. (4) Kept warm for 6 hours at 37° C., 5% CO2, 100% saturated humidity, and added 12 ml of fresh DMEM culture with 10% FBS to each petri dish. After 24 hours, replaced the old medium with a fresh DMEM medium containing 10% FBS and keep incubating.


6. After 48 hours of transfection, centrifuged to collect cells. DNA from 293T cells was extracted using Tiangen's TIAN amp Genomic DNA Kit. The primers were also designed for PCR amplification of the target region.


Example 29: Creation of New Genes with Different Expression Patterns by Translocation of Gene Promoter or Coding Region Fragment

A dual-target combination was designed for cutting off the promoter region of OsUbi2 gene at chromosome 2, wherein target 1 was just before the OsUbi2 initiation codon and target 2 was at the upstream of the OsUbi2 promoter. Third target (Target 3) was designed to cut between the promoter and the initiation codon of OsPPO2 gene at chromosome 4. The sgRNA sequences designed for the three targets were as following:











Target 1: OsUbi2pro-7NGGsgRNA:



5′gaaataatcaccaaacagat3′







Target 2: OsUbi2pro-1960NGGsgRNA:



5′atggatatggtactatacta3′







Target 3: OsPPO2cds-6NGGsgRNA:



5′ttggggctcttggatagcta3′,






As shown in FIG. 54, new gene cassette, which is OsUbi2 promoter driving OsPPO2 gene, is created as a result of designed translocation. The translocation of OsUbi2 promoter resulted in the combination of the OsUbi2 promoter and the OsPPO2 coding region, which is a new gene or new gene expression cassette, ie. OsUbi2 promoter drives OsPPO2 expression. The calli or plantlets derived from the calli harboring such expected new gene may be obtained through PCR screening and genotyping.


The designed sgRNA sequences were ordered from GenScript Biotechnology Company (Nanjing, China). These sgRNAs were respectively assembled with SpCas9 forming RNP complexes, and three RNP complexes were mixed together in equal ratio. The mixture was subjected to biolistic transformation of rice calli (see WO2021088601A1 for specific experimental procedures).


The transformed calli were cultivated for 2 weeks and then sampled by using the following primer pair to test:










OsUBi2pro-1648F:
5′ggaatatgtttgctgtttgatccg3′





OsPPO2-gDNA-236R:
5′cagaactgaacccacggagag3′






PCR detection was preformed to detect whether new genes, which are OsUbi2 promoter driving OsPPO2, were generated. The translocation positive calli continued to be cultivated for 2 weeks, then followed by another round of PCR detection. After 3 rounds of detection, the positive calli were differentiated into seedlings, which were also sampled for PCR detection. The positive T0 seedlings were sequenced to identify the specific genotypes. A total of four different genotypes with OsUbi2 promoter driving OsPPO2 were obtained:









QY378-16: Ubi2pro + PPO2-CDS


5′CCCCCCTTTGGAATATGTTTGCTGTTTGATCCGTTGTTGTGTCCTTAA





TCTTGTGCTAGTTCTTACCCTATCTCCAAGAGCCCCAAATCAGATGCTCT





CTCCTGCCACCACCTTCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCGTCGCCGTCGCGC





GCCCACGCTCGCGCTCCCACCCGCTTCGCGGTCGCAGCATCCGCGCGCGC





CGCACGGTTCCGCCCCGCGCGCGCCATGGCCGCCTCCGACGACCCCCGCG





GCGGGAGGTCCGTCGCCGTCGTCGGCGCCGGCGTCAGT3′





QY378-18: Ubi2pro + PPO2-CDS


5′AATTGGAATATGTTTGCTGTTTGATCCGTTGTTGTGTCCTTAATCTTG





TGTTGTGTCCTTAATCCAAGAGCCCCAAATCAGATGCTCTCTCCTGCCAC





CACCTTCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCGTCGCCGTCGCGCGCCCACGCTC





GCGCTCCCACCCGCTTCGCGGTCGCAGCATCCGCGCGCGCCGCACGGTTC





CGCCCCGCGCGCGCCATGGCCGCCTCCGACGACCCCCGCGGCGGGAGGTC





CGTCGCCGTCGTCGGCGCCGGCGTCAGTGG3′





QY378-41: Ubi2pro + PPO2-CDS


5′ATCTGTGCTAGTTCTTaCCCTATCTCCAGAGCCCCAAATCAGATGCTC





TCTCCTGCCACCACCTTcTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCGTCGCCGTCGCG





CGCCCACGCTCGCGCTCCCACCCGCTTCGCGGTCGCAGCATCCGCGCGCG





CCGCACGGTTCCGCCCCGCGCGCGCCATGGCCGCCTCCGACGACCCCCGC





GGCGGGAGGTCCGTCGCCGTCGTCGGCGCCGGCGTCAGGTGG3′





QY378-374: Ubi2pro + PPO2-CDS


5′GGTGGTCTATCTTGTGTTGTGTCCTTATCCAGAGCCCCAAATCAGATG





CTCTCTCCTGCCACCACCTTCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCGTCGCCGTC





GCGCGCCCACGCTCGCGCTCCCACCCGCTTCGCGGTCGCAGCATCCGCGC





GCGCCGCACGGTTCCGCCCCGCGCGCGCCATGGCCGCCTCCGACGACCCC





CGCGGCGGGAGGTCCGTCGCCGTCGTCGGCGCCGGCGTCAGGTG3′






The T1 generation seedlings were harvested from T0 plants, then tested using PCR. The results confirmed that the above genotypes could be inherited stably. The T1 generation of QY378-16 were selected and treated with compound A by foliar spray. As shown in FIG. 55, it showed significantly improved resistance to PPO-inhibiting herbicide Compound A. The wild-type rice was killed at the rate of 2 g a.i./mu, while the T1 generation of QY378-16 bearing Ubi2pro+PPO2-CDS genotype could survive a rate of 4 g a.i./mu, showing that the new PPO2 gene improved plant tolerance to Compound A.


By referring to this technical route, different target combinations were designed for OsUBi2, OsPPO2 and OsPPO1 using SpCas9 protein as the editing agent:










1. OsUbi2pro-
5′atggatatggtactatacta3′


1960NGGsgRNA:






2. OsUbi2pro-7NGGsgRNA:
5′atctttgtgaagacattgac3′





3. OsPPO2cds-6NGGsgRNA:
5′ttggggctcttggatagcta3′





4. OsPPO2cds-14NGGsgRNA:
5′gcaggagagagcatctgatt3′





5. OsPPO1cds-4NGGsgRNA:
5′ccatgtccgtcgctgacgag3′






The combination of sgRNA 1+2+3 and sgRNA 1+2+4 with Cas9 protein was subjected to RNP transformation, new heritable genes with Ubi2pro+PPO2-CDS were identified after PCR screen selection. Similarly, the combination of sgRNA 1+2+5 with Cas9 protein was also subjected to RNP transformation, new heritable genes with Ubi2 promoter driving PPO1-CDS were also obtained.


Using MAD7 Protein as the Editing Agent:












1. OsUbi2pro-
5′gttggaggtcaaaataacagg3′



1896MAD7crRNA:








2. OsUbi2pro-
5′tgaagacattgaccggcaaga3′



14MAD7crRNA:








3. OsUbi2pro-
5′gtgattatttcttgcagatgc3′



17MAD7crRNA:








4. OsPPO2cds-
5′gggctcttggatagctatgga3′



9MAD7crRNA:








5. OsPPO1cds-
5′ccattccggtgggccattccg3′



125MAD7crRNA:







The combination of crRNA 1+2+4 and crRNA 1+3+4 with MAD7 protein was subjected to RNP transformation, new heritable genes with Ubi2pro+PPO2-CDS were identified after PCR screen selection. Similarly, the combination of crRNA 1+2+5 and crRNA 1+3+5 added with MAD7 protein was subjected to RNP transformation, new heritable genes with Ubi2 promoter driving PPO1-CDS were also obtained.


In these examples, a new gene with different expression pattern was generated by inserting a translocated promoter upstream of the coding region of another gene. Likewisely, following the same technique idea, a new gene with different expression pattern could also be generated by inserting a translocated gene coding region into the downstream region of another promoter, which is covered by the technical solution scope of the present application.


All publications and patent applications mentioned in the description are incorporated herein by reference, as if each publication or patent application is individually and specifically incorporated herein by reference.


Although the foregoing invention has been described in more detail by way of examples and embodiments for clear understanding, it is obvious that certain changes and modifications can be implemented within the scope of the appended claims, such changes and modifications are all within the scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for creating a new gene in an organism, characterized by comprising the following steps: simultaneously generating DNA breaks at two or more different specific sites in the organism's genome, wherein the specific sites are genomic sites capable of separating different genetic elements or different protein domains, and the DNA breaks are ligated to each other by a non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous repair, generating a new combination of the different genetic elements or different protein domains different from the original genomic sequence, thereby creating the new gene; ora method for in vivo creation of new genes that can be stably inherited in an organism, characterized by comprising the following steps:(1) simultaneously generating double-stranded DNA breaks at two or more different specific sites in the organism's genome, wherein the specific sites are capable of separating different gene elements or different protein domains, and the DNA breaks are then ligated to each other by a non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous repair, generating a new combination or assemble of the different gene elements or different protein domains derived from the original genomic sequence, thereby the new gene is generated;optionally, it also includes (2) designing primer pairs that can specifically detect the above-mentioned new combination or assemble, then cells or tissues containing the new genes can be screened out by PCR test, and the characteristic sequences of new combinations of gene elements can be determined by sequencing; and(3) cultivating the above-screened cells or tissues to obtain T0 generation organisms, and perform PCR tests and sequencing on the organisms for two consecutive generations including the T0 generation and its bred T1 or at least three consecutive generations to select the organisms containing the above-mentioned characteristic sequence of new combination of gene elements, namely, a new gene that can be stably inherited has been created in the organism;optionally, it also includes (4) testing the biological traits or phenotypes related to the function of the new gene, to determine the genotype that can bring beneficial traits to the organism, and to obtain a new functional gene that can be stably inherited.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein in the step (1), DNA breaks are simultaneously generated at two different specific sites in the genome of the organism, wherein one site is the genomic locus between the promoter region and the coding region of a gene, meanwhile, the other site is between the promoter region and the coding region of another gene with different expression patterns, resulting in a new combination of the promoter of one gene and the coding region of the other gene that has a different expression pattern; or a combination of the strong promoter and the gene of interest is eventually produced.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein in the step (1), DNA breaks are simultaneously generated at three different specific sites in the genome of the organism, the three specific sites include two genomic sites whose combination capable of cutting off the promoter region of a highly expressed gene and the third genomic site between the coding region and the promoter region of the gene of interest that has a different expression pattern; or a genomic site between the promoter region and the coding region of a highly expressed gene and another two genomic sites whose combination capable of cutting off the coding region fragment of the gene of interest that has a different expression pattern; then through gene editing at the above-mentioned sites, translocation editing events can be generated, in which the strong promoter fragment that is inserted upstream of the coding region of the gene of interest, or the coding region fragment of the gene of interest is inserted the downstream of the promoter of another highly expressed gene, finally, the combination of the promoter of one gene and the coding region of the other gene of interest with different expression patterns is generated.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that said two or more different specific sites locate on the same chromosome or on different chromosomes; optionally, said two or more different specific sites may be specific sites on at least two different genes, or may be at least two different specific sites on the same gene; and said at least two different genes may have the same or different transcription directions.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that said gene elements are selected from the group consisting of a promoter, a 5′ untranslated region, a coding region or non-coding RNA region, a 3′ untranslated region, a terminator of the gene, or any combination thereof.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the combination of different gene elements is a combination of the promoter of one of the two genes with different expression patterns and the coding region or the non-coding RNA region of the other gene, or the combination of different gene elements is a combination of the region from the promoter to 5′UTR of one of the two genes with different expression patterns and the CDS or non-coding RNA region of the other gene, or the combination of different gene elements is a combination of adjacent gene elements of the same gene.
  • 7. The method according to any claim 1, characterized in that the protein domain is a DNA fragment corresponding to a specific functional domain of a protein including a nuclear localization signal, a chloroplast leading peptide, a mitochondrial leading peptide, a phosphorylation site, a methylation site, a transmembrane domain, a DNA binding domain, a transcription activation domain, a receptor activation domain, or an enzyme catalytic center.
  • 8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the combination of different protein domains is a combination of the localization signal region of one of two proteins with different subcellular localizations and the mature protein coding region of the other gene, or a combination of two protein domains with different biological functions, or a combination of adjacent protein domains of the same gene; wherein the different subcellular locations are selected from the group consisting of nuclear location, cytoplasmic location, cell membrane location, chloroplast location, mitochondrial location, and endoplasmic reticulum membrane location; or the different biological functions are selected from the group consisting of recognition of specific DNA or RNA conserved sequence, activation of gene expression, binding to a protein ligand, binding to small molecular signal, binding to an ion, specific enzymatic reaction, and any combination thereof.
  • 9. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the combination of gene elements and protein domains are a combination of protein domains and adjacent promoters, 5′UTR, 3′UTR or terminators of the same gene.
  • 10. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the organism is a non-human animal, a plant or a fungus.
  • 11. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the combination of different gene elements is selected from any of the following: (1) one element is a plant endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR, and the other is the HPPD, EPSPS, PPO, ALS, ACCase, GS, PDS, DHPS, DXPS, HST, SPS, cellulose synthesis, VLCFAS, fatty acid thioesterase, serine threonine protein phosphatase or lycopene cyclase gene coding region of the same plant;(2) one element is an endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR of the organism, and the other is a gene coding region of any one of the P450 family in the same organism;(3) one element is a rice or maize endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR, and the other is a gene coding region of OsCYP81A gene or ZmCYP81A9 gene in the same organism;(4) one element is a maize endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR, and the other is the coding region of maize gene ZMM28 (Zm00001d022088), ZmKNR6 or ZmBAM1d;(5) one element is a rice endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR, and the other is the coding region of rice gene COLD1 or OsCPK24;(6) one element is an endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR of the organism, and the other is a gene coding region of any one of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family in the same organism;(7) one element is a plant endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR of the plant, and the other is a gene coding region of any one of the NAC transcription factor family (for example, OsNAC045, OsNAC67, ZmSNAC1, OsNAC006, OsNAC42, OsSNAC1 or OsSNAC2) in the same plant;(8) one element is a plant endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR, and the other is the gene coding region of any one of MYB, MADS, DREB and bZIP transcription factor family in the same plant;(9) one element is the promoter of any one of overexpression or tissue-specific expression rice genes listed in Table A, and the other is the protein coding region or the non-coding RNA region of another gene that is different from the selected promoter corresponding to the rice gene;(10) one element is a protein coding region or non-coding RNA region selected from any one of the biological functional genes listed in Table B to K, and the other is the promoter region of another gene that is different from the selected functional gene of the biological genome corresponding to the selected gene;(11) one element is an endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR of the organism, and the other is a gene coding region of any one of the GST (glutathione-s-transferases) family in the same organism;(12) one element is a wheat or maize endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR of the organism, and the other is a gene coding region of wheat GST Cla47 (AY064480.1) gene, wheat GST 19E50 (AY064481.1), wheat GST28E45 (AY479764.1), maize ZmGSTIV, maize ZmGST6, maize ZmGST31, maize GSTI, maize GSTIII, maize GSTIV, maize GST5 or maize GST7 gene in the same organism;(13) one element is a rice endogenous strong promoter or the region from a strong promoter to 5′UTR, and the other is the coding region of any one of gene protein in rice GIF1 (Os04g0413500), NOG1 (Os01g075220), LAIR (Os02g0154100), OSA1 (Os03g0689300), OsNRT1.1A (Os08g0155400), OsNRT2.3B (Os01g0704100), OsRac1 (Os01g0229400), OsNRT2.1 (Os02g0112100), OsGIF1 (Os03g0733600), OsNAC9 (Os03g0815100), CPB1/D11/GNS4 (Os04g0469800), miR1432 (Os04g0436100), OsNLP4 (Os09g0549450), RAG2 (Os07g0214300), LRK1 (Os02g0154200), OsNHX1 (Os07t0666900), GW6 (Os06g0623700), WG7 (Os07g0669800), D11/OsBZR1 (Os04g0469800, Os07g0580500), OsAAP6 (Os07g0134000), OsLSK1 (Os01g0669100), IPA1 (Os08g0509600), SMG11 (Os01g0197100), CYP72A31 (Os01g0602200), SNAC1 (Os03g0815100), ZBED (Os01g0547200), OsSta2 (Os02g0655200), OsASR5 (Os11g0167800), OsCPK4 (Os02g03410), OsDjA9 (Os06g0116800), EUI (Os05g0482400), JMJ705 (Os01g67970), WRKY45 (Os05t0322900), OsRSR1 (Os05g0121600), OsRLCK5 (Os01g0114100), APIP4 (Os01g0124200), OsPAL6 (Os04t0518400), OsPAL8 (Os11g0708900), TPS46 (Os08t0168000), OsERF3 (Os01g58420) and OsYSL15 (Os02g0650300);(14) one element is a fish endogenous strong promoter, and the other is a gene coding region of GH1 (growth hormone 1) in the selected fish; or the combination of different protein domains is selected from any of the following:(a) one element is a wheat endogenous protein chloroplast localization signal domain, and the other is a wheat mature protein coding region of cytoplasmic localization phosphoglucose isomerase (PGIc);(b) one element is a rice protein chloroplast localization signal domain (CTP), and the other is the mature protein coding region of OsGLO3, OsOXO3 or OsCATC.
  • 12. A new gene created by the method according to claim 11, characterized in that the new genes formed by any one of the combinations of the different gene elements (1)-(14) respectively have the following characters: (1) the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the plant endogenous wild-type HPPD, EPSPS, PPO, ALS, ACCase, GS, PDS, DHPS, DXPS, HST, SPS, cellulose synthesis, VLCFAS, fatty acid thioesterase, serine threonine protein phosphatase or lycopene cyclase gene;(2) the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the corresponding endogenous wild-type P450 gene of the organism;(3) the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the rice endogenous OsCYP81A6 gene or maize endogenous ZmCYP81A9 gene, respectively;(4) the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the plant endogenous wild-type ZMM28 gene, ZmKNR6 gene or ZmBAM1d gene, respectively;(5) the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the rice endogenous wild-type COLD1 or OsCPK24 gene, respectively;(6) the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the corresponding endogenous wild-type ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter gene of the organism;(7) the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the corresponding plant endogenous wild-type NAC transcription factor family gene;(8) the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the corresponding plant endogenous wild-type MYB transcription factor gene, MADS transcription factor family gene, DREB transcription factor family gene coding region or bZIP transcription factor family gene, respectively;(9) the expression pattern of the new gene is changed relative to the selected protein coding region or the non-coding RNA region of the rice endogenous gene;(10) the expression pattern of the new gene is changed relative to the selected functional gene;(11) the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the corresponding endogenous GST (glutathione-s-transferases) family gene of the organism;(12) the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the endogenous wheat GST Cla47 (AY064480.1) gene, wheat GST 19E50 (AY064481.1), wheat GST28E45 (AY479764.1), maize ZmGSTIV, maize ZmGST6, maize ZmGST31, maize GSTI, maize GSTIII, maize GSTIV, maize GST5 or maize GST7 gene, respectively;(13) the level of the new gene expression is up-regulated relative to the corresponding endogenous gene;(14) the new gene is a fish endogenous high expression GH1 gene; or the new genes formed by any one of the combinations of the different protein domains (a)-(b) respectively have the following characters:(a) the new gene locates the phosphoglucose isomerase gene relative to the coding cytoplasm and its mature protein is located in the chloroplast.(b) the mature protein of the new gene is located in chloroplast different from OsGLO3, OsOXO3 or OsCATC.
  • 13.-17. (canceled)
  • 18. A chloroplast localized protein OsCACT or OsGLO3, the nucleotide encoding the protein has a sequence selected from the group consisting of: (1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 28 or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof, a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% thereto, or a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to one of the foregoing sequences under a stringent condition; and(2) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 29 or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof, a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% thereto, or a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to one of the foregoing sequences under a stringent condition.
  • 19.-20. (canceled)
  • 21. An editing method for regulating the gene expression level of a target endogenous gene in an organism, which is independent of an exogenous DNA donor fragment, which comprises the following steps: simultaneously generating DNA breaks separately at selected sites between the promoter and the coding region of each of the target endogenous gene and an optional endogenous inducible or tissue-specific expression gene with a desired expression pattern; ligating the DNA breaks to each other by means of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous repair, thereby generating an in vivo fusion of the coding region of the target endogenous gene and the optional inducible or tissue-specific expression promoter to form a new gene with expected expression patterns, the target endogenous gene and the optional endogenous inducible or tissue-specific expression gene with a desired expression pattern are located on the same chromosome or on different chromosomes; optionally, the target endogenous gene is yeast ERG9 gene, the endogenous inducible expression gene is HXT1 gene, and the inducible expression promoter is HXT1 in response to glucose concentration.
  • 22. A yeast endogenous inducible ERG9 gene obtainable by the editing method according to claim 21.
  • 23. (canceled)
  • 24. A highly-expressing rice endogenous HPPD gene, rice endogenous PPO2 gene, maize endogenous PPO2 gene, wheat endogenous PPO2 gene, or oilseed rape endogenous PPO2 gene, which has a sequence selected from the group consisting of: (1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 27 or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof, a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% thereto or a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to one of the foregoing sequences under a stringent condition;(2) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 30, SEQ ID NO: 31, SEQ ID NO: 32, SEQ ID NO: 33, SEQ ID NO: 34, SEQ ID NO: 35, SEQ ID NO: 36, SEQ ID NO: 37, SEQ ID NO: 38, SEQ ID NO: 39, SEQ ID NO: 40, SEQ ID NO:41, SEQ ID NO: 42, SEQ ID NO: 43, SEQ ID NO: 44, SEQ ID NO: 45, SEQ ID NO: 46 or SEQ ID NO: 47 or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof, a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% thereto, or a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to one of the foregoing sequences under a stringent condition;(3) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 48 or SEQ ID NO: 49 or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof, a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% thereto, or a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to one of the foregoing sequences under a stringent condition;(4) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 50, SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 52, SEQ ID NO: 53, SEQ ID NO: 54, SEQ ID NO: 55 or SEQ ID NO: 56 or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof, a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% thereto, or a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to one of the foregoing sequences under a stringent condition; and(5) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 57, SEQ ID NO: 58, SEQ ID NO: 59, SEQ ID NO: 60 or SEQ ID NO: 61 or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof, a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% thereto, or a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to one of the foregoing sequences under a stringent condition.
  • 25.-29. (canceled)
  • 30. A plant or a progeny derived therefrom regenerated from the plant cell which comprises the gene (1), (3) or (12) set forth in claim 12.
  • 31. A method for producing a plant with an increased resistance or tolerance to an herbicide, which comprises regenerating the plant cell which comprises the gene (1), (3) or (12) set forth in claim 12 into a plant or a progeny derived therefrom.
  • 32.-33. (canceled)
  • 34. A method for controlling a weed in a cultivation site of a plant, wherein the plant is selected from the group consisting of a plant prepared by the method according to claim 31, wherein the method comprises applying to the cultivation site one or more corresponding inhibitory herbicides in an amount for effectively controlling the weed; wherein the herbicide comprises one or a combination of two or more of inhibition of HPPD, inhibition of EPSPS, inhibition of PPO, inhibition of ALS, inhibition of ACCase, inhibition of GS, inhibition of PDS, inhibition of DHPS, inhibition of DXPS, inhibition of HST, inhibition of SPS, inhibition of cellulose synthesis, inhibition of VLCFAS, inhibition of fatty acid thioesterase, inhibition of serine threonine protein phosphatase or inhibition of lycopene cyclase herbicides.
  • 35. (canceled)
  • 36. An editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous WAK gene or CNGC gene in a plant, characterized in that it comprises fusing the coding region of the WAK gene or CNGC gene with a strong endogenous promoter of a plant in vivo to form a new highly-expressing plant endogenous WAK gene or CNGC gene, respectively; or it comprises the following steps: simultaneously generating DNA breaks respectively in selected specific sites between the promoter and the coding region of each of the WAK gene or CNGC gene and an optional endogenous highly-expressing gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway, generating in vivo a fusion of the coding region of the WAK gene or CNGC gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter to form a new highly-expressing WAK gene or CNGC gene.
  • 37. A highly-expressing plant endogenous WAK gene or CNGC gene obtainable by the editing method according to claim 36, wherein the highly-expressing rice WAK gene or CNGC gene has a sequence selected from the group consisting of: (1) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 62, SEQ ID NO: 63, SEQ ID NO: 64, SEQ ID NO: 65, SEQ ID NO: 66, SEQ ID NO: 67 or SEQ ID NO: 68 or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof, a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% thereto, or a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to one of the foregoing sequences under a stringent condition; and(2) the nucleic acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO: 69, SEQ ID NO: 70, SEQ ID NO: 71 or SEQ ID NO: 72 or a portion thereof or a complementary sequence thereof, a sequence having an identity of at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99% thereto, or a nucleic acid sequence capable of hybridizing to one of the foregoing sequences under a stringent condition.
  • 38.-40. (canceled)
  • 41. A rice resistant to rice blast, which comprises one or a combination of two or more of the highly-expressing rice WAK or CNGC gene according to claim 37.
  • 42. An editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous GH1 gene in a fish, IGF2 (Insulin-like growth factor 2) gene in a pig, or IGF1 (Insulin-like growth factor 1) gene in a chicken embryo fibroblast, characterized in that it comprises fusing the coding region of the GH1, IGF2 or IGF1 gene with a strong endogenous promoter of a fish, pig or chicken in vivo to form a new highly-expressing fish endogenous GH1, pig endogenous IGF2 or chicken endogenous IGF1 gene, respectively; or it comprises the following steps: simultaneously generating DNA breaks respectively in selected specific sites between the promoter and the coding region of each of the GH1, IGF2 or IGF1 gene and an optional endogenous highly-expressing gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway, generating in vivo a fusion of the coding region of the GH1, IGF2 or IGF1 gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter to form a new highly-expressing GH1, IGF2 or IGF1 gene, respectively; wherein the strong promoter of a fish is the corresponding fish Col1A1a (Collagen type I alpha 1a) gene promoter, RPS15A (ribosomal protein S15a) gene promoter, Actin promoter or DDX5 [DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box helicase 5] gene promoter, the strong promoter of a pig is one of the pig TNNI2 and TNNT3 gene promoter, the strong promoter of a chicken is chicken MYBPC1 (myosin binding protein C) gene promoter.
  • 43.-44. (canceled)
  • 45. A highly-expressing fish endogenous GH1 gene, a highly-expressing pig endogenous IGF2 gene or a highly-expressing chicken endogenous IGF1 gene obtainable by the editing method according to claim 42.
  • 46. (canceled)
  • 47. An editing method for knocking up the expression of an endogenous EPO (Erythropoietin) or p53 gene in an animal cell, characterized in that it comprises fusing the coding region of the EPO or p53 gene with a strong endogenous promoter of an animal in vivo to form a new highly-expressing endogenous EPO or p53 gene; or it comprises the following steps: simultaneously generating DNA breaks respectively in selected specific sites between the promoter and the coding region of each of the EPO or p53 gene and an optional endogenous highly-expressing gene, ligating the DNA breaks to each other through an intracellular repair pathway, generating in vivo a fusion of the coding region of the EPO or p53 gene and the optional strong endogenous promoter to form a new highly-expressing EPO or p53 gene.
  • 48. A highly-expressing animal endogenous EPO or p53 gene obtainable by the editing method according to claim 47.
  • 49. (canceled)
  • 50. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that said DNA breaks are achieved by delivering a nuclease with targeting property into a cell of the organism to contact with the specific sites of the genomic DNA; wherein said nuclease with targeting property is selected from the group consisting of Meganuclease, Zinc finger nuclease, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas system.
  • 51. The method according to claim 50, characterized in that the nucleases with targeting property are delivered into the cell by: 1) a PEG-mediated cell transfection method; 2) a liposome-mediated cell transfection method; 3) an electric shock transformation method; 4) a microinjection; 5) a gene gun bombardment; 6) an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method; 7) viral vector-mediated transformation method; or 8) nanomagnetic bead mediated transformation method.
  • 52.-57. (canceled)
  • 58. A composition, which comprises: (a) a promoter of one of two genes with different expression patterns and a coding region or non-coding RNA region of the other gene;(b) a promoter to a 5′ untranslated region of one of two genes with different expression patterns and a coding region or non-coding RNA region of the other gene;(c) a localization signal region of one of the two protein coding genes with different subcellular localizations and a mature protein coding region of the other gene;(d) DNA regions coding two different functional domains that come from two different functional protein-coding genes; wherein, the combination of gene elements said is not naturally exist, but a joined chromosome segment as designed and stable inheritance;which is fused in vivo; and the different expression patterns are different levels of gene expression, different tissue-specific of gene expression, or different developmental stage-specificities of gene expression; or the different subcellular locations are selected from the group consisting of nuclear location, cytoplasmic location, cell membrane location, chloroplast location, a mitochondrial location, an endoplasmic reticulum membrane location, and any combination thereof; or the different biological functions are selected from the group consisting of recognition of specific DNA or RNA conserved sequence, activation of gene expression, binding to protein ligand, binding to small molecular signal, binding to an ion, specific enzymatic reaction, and any combination thereof.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
201911073406.1 Nov 2019 CN national
202011190279.6 Oct 2020 CN national
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 17246971 May 2021 US
Child 17663075 US
Parent 17264367 Jan 2021 US
Child 17246971 US