Fiber rovings have been employed in a wide variety of applications. For example, such rovings have been utilized to form fiber-reinforced composite rods. The rods may be utilized as lightweight structural reinforcements. For example, power umbilicals are often used in the transmission of fluids and/or electric signals between the sea surface and equipment located on the sea bed. To help strengthen such umbilicals, attempts have been made to use pultruded carbon fiber rods as separate load carrying elements.
Another application that is particularly suited for the use of fiber rovings is in the formation of profiles. Profiles are pultruded parts with a wide variety of cross-sectional shapes, and may be employed as a structural member for window lineals, decking planks, railings, balusters, roofing tiles, siding, trim boards, pipe, fencing, posts, light posts, highway signage, roadside marker posts, etc. Hollow profiles have been formed by pulling (“pultruding”) continuous fiber rovings through a resin and then shaping the fiber-reinforced resin within a pultrusion die.
Further, fiber rovings may generally be utilized in any suitable applications to form, for example, suitable fiber reinforced plastics. As is generally known in the art, rovings utilized in these applications are typically combined with a polymer resin.
There are many significant problems, however, with currently known rovings and the resulting applications that utilize such rovings. For example, many rovings rely upon thermoset resins (e.g., vinyl esters) to help achieve desired strength properties. Thermoset resins are difficult to use during manufacturing and do not possess good bonding characteristics for forming layers with other materials. Further, attempts have been made to form rovings from thermoplastic polymers in other types of applications. U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0186410 to Bryant, et al., for instance, describes attempts that were made to embed carbon fibers into a thermoplastic resin to form a composite core of an electrical transmission cable. Unfortunately, Bryant, et al. notes that these cores exhibited flaws and dry spots due to inadequate wetting of the fibers, which resulted in poor durability and strength. Another problem with such cores is that the thermoplastic resins could not operate at a high temperature.
As such, a need currently exists for an improved impregnation section of a die and method for impregnating a fiber roving. Specifically, a need currently exists for an impregnation section and method that produce fiber rovings which provide the desired strength, durability, and temperature performance demanded by a particular application.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, an impregnation section of a die is disclosed for impregnating at least one fiber roving with a polymer resin. The impregnation section includes an impregnation zone configured to impregnate the roving with the resin, and a gate passage in fluid communication with the impregnation zone for flowing the resin therethrough such that the resin coats the roving. The impregnation section further includes a surface disposed upstream of the impregnation zone in a run direction of the roving for contacting the roving.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a method is disclosed for impregnating at least one fiber roving with a polymer resin. The method includes traversing at least one fiber roving over a surface, flowing a polymer resin through a gap, the gap being in the range between approximately 0.1 millimeters and approximately 4 millimeters, coating the roving with the resin, and traversing the coated roving through an impregnation zone to impregnate the roving with the resin.
Other features and aspects of the present invention are set forth in greater detail below.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof to one skilled in the art, is set forth more particularly in the remainder of the specification, including reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
Repeat use of reference characters in the present specification and drawings is intended to represent the same or analogous features or elements of the present invention.
It is to be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present discussion is a description of exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended as limiting the broader aspects of the present invention.
Generally speaking, the present invention is directed to an impregnation section for a die and a method for impregnating fiber rovings with a polymer resin. The impregnated fiber rovings may be utilized in composite rods, profiles, or any other suitable fiber reinforced plastic applications. The impregnation section generally includes an impregnation zone and a gate passage in fluid communication with the impregnation zone. The gate passage flows a polymer resin therethrough such that the resin coats a roving or rovings that are traversed through the die. After being coated with the resin, the rovings are traversed through the impregnation zone and impregnated therein with the resin. The impregnation section further includes a surface disposed upstream of the impregnation zone. As discussed below, the surface ensures that the rovings traversing through the die are generally consistently spaced apart when coated with the resin, and further locates the rovings desirably close to an outlet of the gate passage.
According to further aspects of the present invention, an extrusion device may be employed in conjunction with the die to impregnate the rovings with the polymer. Among other things, the extrusion device further facilitates the ability of the polymer to be applied to the entire surface of the fibers, as discussed below.
Referring to
A continuous fiber roving 142 or a plurality of continuous fiber rovings 142 may be supplied from a reel or reels 144 to die 150. The rovings 142 may be spread apart before being supplied for impregnation, and may be supplied vertically, horizontally, or at any suitable angle. After being supplied, the rovings 142 may be generally positioned side-by-side, with minimal to no distance between neighboring rovings, before impregnation. The feedstock 127 may further be heated inside the die by heaters 133 mounted in or around the die 150. The die is generally operated at temperatures that are sufficient to cause and/or maintain the proper melt temperature for the polymer, thus allowing for the desired level of impregnation of the rovings by the polymer. Typically, the operation temperature of the die is higher than the melt temperature of the polymer, such as at temperatures from about 200° C. to about 450° C. When processed in this manner, the continuous fiber rovings 142 become embedded in the polymer matrix, which may be a resin 214 (
As used herein, the term “roving” generally refers to a bundle of individual fibers. The fibers contained within the roving can be twisted or can be straight. The rovings may contain a single fiber type or different types of fibers. Different fibers may also be contained in individual rovings or, alternatively, each roving may contain a different fiber type. The continuous fibers employed in the rovings possess a high degree of tensile strength relative to their mass. For example, the ultimate tensile strength of the fibers is typically from about 1,000 to about 15,000 Megapascals (“MPa”), in some embodiments from about 2,000 MPa to about 10,000 MPa, and in some embodiments, from about 3,000 MPa to about 6,000 MPa. Such tensile strengths may be achieved even though the fibers are of a relatively light weight, such as a mass per unit length of from about 0.05 to about 2 grams per meter, in some embodiments from about 0.4 to about 1.5 grams per meter. The ratio of tensile strength to mass per unit length may thus be about 1,000 Megapascals per gram per meter (“MPa/g/m”) or greater, in some embodiments about 4,000 MPa/g/m or greater, and in some embodiments, from about 5,500 to about 20,000 MPa/g/m. Such high strength fibers may, for instance, be metal fibers, glass fibers (e.g., E-glass, A-glass, C-glass, D-glass, AR-glass, R-glass, S1-glass, S2-glass, etc.), carbon fibers (e.g., amorphous carbon, graphitic carbon, or metal-coated carbon, etc.), boron fibers, ceramic fibers (e.g., alumina or silica), aramid fibers (e.g., Kevlar® marketed by E. I. duPont de Nemours, Wilmington, Del.), synthetic organic fibers (e.g., polyamide, polyethylene, paraphenylene, terephthalamide, polyethylene terephthalate and polyphenylene sulfide), and various other natural or synthetic inorganic or organic fibrous materials known for reinforcing thermoplastic and/or thermoset compositions. Carbon fibers are particularly suitable for use as the continuous fibers, which typically have a tensile strength to mass ratio in the range of from about 5,000 to about 7,000 MPa/g/m. The continuous fibers often have a nominal diameter of about 4 to about 35 micrometers, and in some embodiments, from about 9 to about 35 micrometers. The number of fibers contained in each roving can be constant or vary from roving to roving. Typically, a roving contains from about 1,000 fibers to about 50,000 individual fibers, and in some embodiments, from about 5,000 to about 30,000 fibers.
Any of a variety of thermoplastic or thermoset polymers may be employed to form the polymer matrix in which the continuous fibers are embedded. For example, suitable thermoplastic polymers for use in the present invention may include, for instance, polyolefins (e.g., polypropylene, propylene-ethylene copolymers, etc.), polyesters (e.g., polybutylene terephalate (“PBT”)), polycarbonates, polyamides (e.g., Nylon™), polyether ketones (e.g., polyetherether ketone (“PEEK”)), polyetherimides, polyarylene ketones (e.g., polyphenylene diketone (“PPDK”)), liquid crystal polymers, polyarylene sulfides (e.g., polyphenylene sulfide (“PPS”), poly(biphenylene sulfide ketone), poly(phenylene sulfide diketone), poly(biphenylene sulfide), etc.), fluoropolymers (e.g., polytetrafluoroethylene-perfluoromethylvinylether polymer, perfluoro-alkoxyalkane polymer, petrafluoroethylene polymer, ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene polymer, etc.), polyacetals, polyurethanes, polycarbonates, styrenic polymers (e.g., acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (“ABS”)), and so forth.
The properties of the polymer matrix are generally selected to achieve the desired combination of processability and performance. For example, the melt viscosity of the polymer matrix is generally low enough so that the polymer can adequately impregnate the fibers. In this regard, the melt viscosity typically ranges from about 25 to about 1,000 Pascal-seconds (“Pa-s”), in some embodiments from 50 about 500 Pa-s, and in some embodiments, from about 60 to about 200 Pa-s, determined at the operating conditions used for the polymer (e.g., about 360° C.). Likewise, when the impregnated rovings are intended for applications involving high temperatures (e.g., high voltage transmission cables), a polymer is employed that has a relatively high melting temperature. For example, the melting temperature of such high temperature polymers may range from about 200° C. to about 500° C., in some embodiments from about 225° C. to about 400° C., and in some embodiments, from about 250° C. to about 350° C.
Polyarylene sulfides are particularly suitable for use in the present invention as a high temperature matrix with the desired melt viscosity. Polyphenylene sulfide, for example, is a semi-crystalline resin that generally includes repeating monomeric units represented by the following general formula:
These monomeric units typically constitute at least 80 mole %, and in some embodiments, at least 90 mole %, of the recurring units, in the polymer. It should be understood, however, the polyphenylene sulfide may contain additional recurring units, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,075,381 to Gotoh, et al., which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference thereto for all purposes. When employed, such additional recurring units typically constitute no more than about 20 mole % of the polymer. Commercially available high melt viscosity polyphenylene sulfides may include those available from Ticona, LLC (Florence, Ky.) under the trade designation FORTRON®. Such polymers may have a melting temperature of about 285° C. (determined according to ISO 11357-1,2,3) and a melt viscosity of from about 260 to about 320 Pascal-seconds at 310° C.
A pressure sensor 137 (
Perspective views of one embodiment of a die 150 according to the present disclosure are further shown in
Within the impregnation die, it is generally desired that the rovings 142 are traversed through an impregnation zone 250 to impregnate the rovings with the polymer resin 214. In the impregnation zone 250, the polymer resin may be forced generally transversely through the rovings by shear and pressure created in the impregnation zone 250, which significantly enhances the degree of impregnation. This is particularly useful when forming a composite from ribbons of a high fiber content, such as about 35% weight fraction (“Wf”) or more, and in some embodiments, from about 40% Wf or more. Typically, the die 150 will include a plurality of contact surfaces 252, such as for example at least 2, at least 3, from 4 to 7, from 2 to 20, from 2 to 30, from 2 to 40, from 2 to 50, or more contact surfaces 252, to create a sufficient degree of penetration and pressure on the rovings 142. Although their particular form may vary, the contact surfaces 252 typically possess a curvilinear surface, such as a curved lobe, pin, etc. The contact surfaces 252 are also typically made of a metal material.
As shown in
The plurality of channels 222 may, in exemplary embodiments as shown in
If desired, the runners 222 may include a second branched runner group 234 diverging from the first branched runner group 232, as shown in
If desired, the runners 222 may include a third branched runner group 236 diverging from the second branched runner group 234, as shown in
In some exemplary embodiments, as shown in
Further, the manifold assembly 220 may in some embodiments define an outlet region 242. The outlet region 242 is that portion of the manifold assembly 220 wherein resin 214 exits the manifold assembly 220. Thus, the outlet region 242 generally encompasses at least a downstream portion of the channels or runners 222 from which the resin 214 exits. In some embodiments, as shown in
In some embodiments, as shown in
As shown in
It should be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the above disclosed embodiments of the manifold assembly 220. Rather, any suitable manifold assembly 220 is within the scope and spirit of the present disclosure. In particular, manifold assemblies 220 which may provide generally even, uniform distribution of resin 214, such as coat-hanger, horseshoe, flex-lip, or adjustable slot manifold assemblies, are within the scope and spirit of the present disclosure.
As further illustrated in
In some embodiments, as shown in
Further, as shown in
Upon exiting the manifold assembly 220 and the gate passage 270 of the die 150 as shown in
As shown in
For example, a gap 274 may be defined between the outlet 272 of the gate passage 270 and the adjacent surface of the roving 142, such as the upper surface 216 or lower surface. In some embodiments, the gap 274 may be in the range between approximately 0.1 millimeters (“mm”) and approximately 4 mm, such as between approximately 0.1 mm and approximately 3 mm, such as between approximately 0.1 mm and approximately 1 mm. It should be understood, however, that the present disclosure is not limited to the above disclosed ranges, and rather that any suitable gap 274 size or range of gap 274 sizes is within the scope and spirit of the present disclosure.
By minimizing the size of the gap 274, necking and other irregular flows of the resin 214 are minimized or eliminated. The surface 253 elevates the rovings 142 in order to minimize the gap 274 and thus provide better flow of the resin 214 from the gate passage 270 to the rovings 142.
In some embodiments, the surface 253 may include a curvilinear portion proximate the gate passage 270, as shown in
As shown in
For example, as discussed above, in exemplary embodiments as shown in
In some embodiments, as shown in
In exemplary embodiments, as shown in
Angle 254 at which the rovings 142 traverse the contact surfaces 252 may be generally high enough to enhance shear and pressure, but not so high to cause excessive forces that will break the fibers. Thus, for example, the angle 254 may be in the range between approximately 1° and approximately 30°, and in some embodiments, between approximately 5° and approximately 25°.
As stated above, contact surfaces 252 typically possess a curvilinear surface, such as a curved lobe, pin, etc. Further, in many exemplary embodiments, the impregnation zone 250 has a waveform cross-sectional profile. In one exemplary embodiment as shown in
In other embodiments, as shown in
In other alternative embodiments, as shown in
In further alternative embodiments, the contact surfaces 252 and impregnation zone 250 may comprise any suitable shapes and/or structures for impregnating the rovings 142 with the resin 214 as desired or required.
To further facilitate impregnation of the rovings 142, they may also be kept under tension while present within the die 150, and specifically within the impregnation zone 250. The tension may, for example, range from about 5 to about 300 Newtons, in some embodiments from about 50 to about 250 Newtons, and in some embodiments, from about 100 to about 200 Newtons per roving 142 or tow of fibers.
As shown in
As further shown in
Additionally, other components may be optionally employed to assist in the impregnation of the fibers. For example, a “gas jet” assembly may be employed in certain embodiments to help uniformly spread a roving of individual fibers, which may each contain up to as many as 24,000 fibers, across the entire width of the merged tow. This helps achieve uniform distribution of strength properties. Such an assembly may include a supply of compressed air or another gas that impinges in a generally perpendicular fashion on the moving rovings that pass across exit ports. The spread rovings may then be introduced into a die for impregnation, such as described above.
The impregnated rovings that result from use of the die and method according to the present disclosure may have a very low void fraction, which helps enhance their strength. For instance, the void fraction may be about 3% or less, in some embodiments about 2% or less, in some embodiments about 1% or less, and in some embodiments, about 0.5% or less. The void fraction may be measured using techniques well known to those skilled in the art. For example, the void fraction may be measured using a “resin burn off” test in which samples are placed in an oven (e.g., at 600° C. for 3 hours) to burn out the resin. The mass of the remaining fibers may then be measured to calculate the weight and volume fractions. Such “burn off” testing may be performed in accordance with ASTM D 2584-08 to determine the weights of the fibers and the polymer matrix, which may then be used to calculate the “void fraction” based on the following equations:
Vf=100*(ρt−ρc)/ρt
where,
Vf is the void fraction as a percentage;
ρc is the density of the composite as measured using known techniques, such as with a liquid or gas pycnometer (e.g., helium pycnometer);
ρt is the theoretical density of the composite as is determined by the following equation:
ρt=1/[Wf/ρf+Wm/ρm]
ρm is the density of the polymer matrix (e.g., at the appropriate crystallinity);
ρf is the density of the fibers;
Wf is the weight fraction of the fibers; and
Wm is the weight fraction of the polymer matrix.
Alternatively, the void fraction may be determined by chemically dissolving the resin in accordance with ASTM D 3171-09. The “burn off” and “dissolution” methods are particularly suitable for glass fibers, which are generally resistant to melting and chemical dissolution. In other cases, however, the void fraction may be indirectly calculated based on the densities of the polymer, fibers, and ribbon in accordance with ASTM D 2734-09 (Method A), where the densities may be determined ASTM D792-08 Method A. Of course, the void fraction can also be estimated using conventional microscopy equipment.
The present disclosure is further directed to a method for impregnating at least one fiber roving 142 or a plurality of fiber rovings 142 with a polymer resin 214. The method includes traversing at least one fiber roving 142 or a plurality of fiber rovings 142 over a surface 253, as discussed above. The method additionally includes flowing a polymer resin 214 through a gap 274, as discussed above. Further, the method includes coating the roving 142 with the resin 214, and traversing the coated roving 142 through an impregnation zone 250 to impregnate the roving 142 with the resin 214, as discussed above.
In some embodiments, the surface 253 may have a curvilinear portion, as discussed above. Additionally, in some embodiments, the rovings 142 may be under a tension of from about 5 Newtons to about 300 Newtons within the impregnation zone 250, as discussed above. Further, in some embodiments, the method may include flowing the resin 214 through a gate passage 270, as discussed above.
As discussed above, after exiting the impregnation die 150, the impregnated rovings 142, or extrudate 152, may be consolidated into the form of a ribbon. The number of rovings employed in each ribbon may vary. Typically, however, a ribbon will contain from 2 to 20 rovings, and in some embodiments from 2 to 10 rovings, and in some embodiments, from 3 to 5 rovings. To help achieve the symmetric distribution of the rovings, it is generally desired that they are spaced apart approximately the same distance from each other within the ribbon. Referring to
A pultrusion process may further be utilized according to the present disclosure for certain particular applications. For example, in some embodiments, such process may be utilized to form a rod. In these embodiments, continuous fibers of rovings 142 may be oriented in the longitudinal direction (the machine direction “A” of the system of
In general, ribbons may be supplied to the pultrusion system directly from impregnation die 150, or may be supplied from spindles or other suitable storage apparatus. A tension-regulating device may be employed to help control the degree of tension in the ribbons as they are drawn through the pultrusion system. An oven may be supplied in the device for heating the ribbons. The ribbons may then be provided to a consolidation die, which may operate to compress the ribbons together into a preform, and to align and form the initial shape of the desired product, such as a rod. If desired, a second die (e.g., calibration die) may also be employed that compresses the preform into a final shape. Cooling systems may additionally be incorporated between the dies and/or after either die. A downstream pulling device may be positioned to pull products through the system.
These and other modifications and variations of the present invention may be practiced by those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. In addition, it should be understood that aspects of the various embodiments may be interchanged both in whole or in part. Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the foregoing description is by way of example only, and is not intended to limit the invention so further described in such appended claims.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/457,714 filed on Apr. 27, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/480,448, filed Apr. 29, 2011, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3803965 | Alderfer | Apr 1974 | A |
4531959 | Kar et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4588538 | Chung et al. | May 1986 | A |
4728387 | Hilakos | Mar 1988 | A |
RE32772 | Hawley | Oct 1988 | E |
4864964 | Hilakos | Sep 1989 | A |
4883625 | Glemet et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4923134 | Kinnan | May 1990 | A |
4957422 | Glemet et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4997703 | Gehrig | Mar 1991 | A |
5002712 | Goldmann et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5068142 | Nose et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5084305 | Marttila | Jan 1992 | A |
5114516 | Pilling et al. | May 1992 | A |
5114633 | Stewart | May 1992 | A |
5116450 | Spoo et al. | May 1992 | A |
5207850 | Parekh | May 1993 | A |
5268050 | Azari | Dec 1993 | A |
5277566 | Augustin et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5294461 | Ishida | Mar 1994 | A |
5529652 | Asai et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5658513 | Amaike et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5783129 | Shirai et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5798068 | Vlug | Aug 1998 | A |
5895808 | Schmid et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5935508 | Fernyhough et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948473 | Saito et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6045876 | Fellers et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048598 | Bryan, III et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6090319 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6117591 | Takeuchi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6244014 | Barmakian | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248262 | Kubotera et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258453 | Montsinger | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260343 | Pourladian | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270851 | Lee et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6329056 | Deve et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334293 | Poethke et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344270 | McCullough et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346325 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6391959 | Ninomiya et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6455143 | Ishibashi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6517654 | Heckel et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6656316 | Dyksterhouse | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6658836 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6846857 | Lindner | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6872343 | Edwards et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7015395 | Goldsworthy et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7059091 | Paulshus et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060326 | Hiel et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7093416 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7131308 | McCullough et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7179522 | Hiel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7211319 | Hiel et al | May 2007 | B2 |
7220492 | Fick et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7291263 | Ward et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7326854 | Varkey | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7368162 | Hiel et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7402753 | Varkey et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7438971 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7650742 | Ushijima | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7705242 | Winterhalter | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7754966 | Figenschou | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20010010248 | Vodermayer et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020019182 | Ishibashi et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020041049 | McCullough | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020125603 | Sakai et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030037529 | Hanna et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030082380 | Hager et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030157280 | Boissonnat et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040098963 | Calleeuw et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040115422 | Levit et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040182597 | Smith et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040224590 | Rawa et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040265558 | Berard | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050181228 | McCullough et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186410 | Bryant et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050244231 | Liao et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060021729 | Werner et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024489 | Werner et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024490 | Werner et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060049541 | Sutton et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060204739 | Papke et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070128435 | Hiel et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070193767 | Guery et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202331 | Davis et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070269645 | Raghavendran et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271897 | Hanna et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080006337 | Quigley et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080141614 | Knouff et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080250631 | Buckley | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282664 | Chou | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282666 | Chou | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090229452 | Milwich et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100038112 | Grether | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100163275 | Hiel et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100181012 | Hiel et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100206606 | Winterhalter | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0287427 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0312842 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0320653 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0383290 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0415517 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0520347 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0707939 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0712716 | May 1996 | EP |
1291332 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1775092 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1790448 | May 2007 | EP |
2 836 591 | Aug 2003 | FR |
2240997 | Aug 1991 | GB |
58138616 | Aug 1983 | JP |
3119188 | May 1991 | JP |
5033278 | Jul 1991 | JP |
5148780 | Nov 1991 | JP |
5050432 | Mar 1993 | JP |
7279940 | Oct 1995 | JP |
11348140 | Dec 1999 | JP |
300935 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2004-300609 | Oct 2004 | JP |
WO 9957413 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 2004026565 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004080698 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2008075964 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2009130525 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2011163349 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2011163365 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 20111633357 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160151937 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61480448 | Apr 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13457714 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 15016314 | US |