Methods for manufacturing multi-layer balloons for medical applications

Description

BACKGROUND
Field

Embodiments of this invention relate generally to balloon catheters and methods for making balloon catheters for medical applications. In particular, embodiments of this invention relate to multi-layer balloon catheters having at least two structural layers and at least one lubricating layer that can be formed through a nesting method.

Description of the Related Art

An increasing number of surgical procedures involve percutaneously inserted devices that employ an inflatable thin wall polymer balloon attached to the distal end of a small diameter hollow shaft called a catheter. The device can be advanced to the treatment site via an artery, vein, urethra, or other available passage beneath the skin. The shaft usually exceeds 130 cm in length so that the balloon can be positioned deep within the patient's body. The opposite (proximal) end of the shaft, typically having an inflation connector, remains external to the patient.

When a balloon is advanced to a treatment site, the balloon is deflated and tightly wrapped around the shaft to minimize its cross-section and facilitate easy insertion and navigation through the passage. After reaching the desired location, the balloon is slowly inflated with a high pressure saline solution. The balloon walls unfold and expand radially. During this process a substantial radial force can be exerted by or on the balloon walls. This hydraulically generated radial force can be utilized for a number of different medical procedures such as, for example, vessel dilation, stent deployment, passage occlusion, and bone compression or distraction (such as distraction of vertebrae in the spinal column).

Several factors can limit the force a balloon can exert while within a patient. For example, for a particular cross-sectional balloon size, the design of a balloon, the material used to construct the balloon, and the structural integrity of a balloon can limit the force a balloon can exert without failing (e.g., bursting). Minimizing the risk of balloon bursting can be important in many medical procedures because, upon bursting, balloon debris may become lodged within a patient causing potentially severe trauma. Additional, higher pressures may be needed to affect the treatment.

The hydraulically generated pressure, as noted above, typically exerts two types of stress on the balloon. Radial stress (or hoop stress) pushes a cylindrically-shaped balloon radially outward. Radial stress can lead to axial bursting of the balloon parallel to its longitudinal axis. Axial stress, on the other hand, pushes a cylindrically-shaped balloon axially outward. Axial stress can lead to radial bursting of the balloon somewhere along the balloon's circumference (e.g., complete fracture of the balloon).

Both radial stress and axial stress have a linear relationship in pressure to the balloon's wall thickness and the ratio of the balloon's diameter to the balloon's wall thickness. As a result, any increase in pressure or diameter size requires an equally proportional increase in the balloon's thickness to avoid a critical pressure level (i.e., burst pressure) that will cause the balloon to burst. Generally, radial stress is twice as large as axial stress, so balloons will frequently burst axially absent some deformity or preprocessing. However, in the presence of balloon deformities, a balloon may burst radially. Such a radial bursting could disadvantageously leave separated sections of the balloon inside the patient after the catheter is removed.

Increasing balloon wall thickness also increases the cross-section of the balloon when deflated and wrapped for insertion. Consequently, a balloon having an increased balloon wall thickness might have limited access to certain areas in a patient due to the balloon's increased size. Typically, the balloon's stiffness varies as a cube of the balloon's thickness. For example, doubling the balloon's wall thickness results in doubling the burst pressure or the balloon diameter without bursting, but also increases the stiffness by a factor of eight. This added wall stiffness impairs one's ability to tightly wrap the balloon around the catheter shaft, which is necessary to limit the size of the balloon's cross-sectional area. If the balloon is bent too much beyond its stiffness, undesirable deformities may result. Usually, a balloon having a wall thickness of less than 0.0022 inches must be used to avoid the above-mentioned problems.

Balloon deformities can be caused in many situations such as during formation, by scratching, by stretching, or by bending. These deformities lead to a concentration of stress when the balloon is subject to pressure, which can lead to further deformation and ultimately a lower critical burst pressure. Scratching of the balloon by a device attached to the catheter, such as a stent, is a relatively common concern.

A number of techniques are being used to modify balloon properties in order to improve balloon functionality. These techniques include blending different types of polymers, adding plasticizers to balloons, and modifying parameters of the balloon forming process. These methods are often not entirely successful in creating a more desirable balloon with improved mechanical characteristics. Typically, these known techniques improve one balloon performance parameter while deteriorating another parameter.

Some have attempted to resolve this problem by using multi-layer balloons. For the reasons described below, these prior art multi-layer balloons also have serious deficiencies.

SUMMARY

One aspect of embodiments of the present invention involves creating multi-layer balloons where each layer is made from tubing that optimizes the inner wall stretch thus providing maximum balloon strength. The multi-layer balloons have very high pressure ratings and toughness, yet excellent folding characteristics. Methods for producing such multi-layer balloons using existing balloon forming equipment are also provided.

Another aspect comprises a balloon with two structural layers having a slip layer disposed between the structural layers. The slip layer advantageously allows sliding between adjacent layers. As a result, flexibility of the multi-layer balloon is increased over single layer balloons having an equal wall thickness. Other aspects involve a different number of structural layers and lubricating layers, such as, for example, three structural layers and two lubricating layers, four structural layers and three lubricating layers, and five structural layers and four lubricating layers.

Another aspect involves a multi-layer balloon where each balloon layer has the same size (e.g., diameter and/or wall thickness), is comprised of the same material or materials having substantially identical mechanical properties, and has the same degree of molecular orientation in the body portion of the balloon. It will be apparent that in some situations it will be desirable to have some balloon layers having different sizes, materials, and/or degree of molecular orientations upon deflation, while at the same time having equivalent size, mechanical properties, and/or orientation upon inflation. For other applications, it will be apparent that one can vary size, material, and/or orientation to at least some degree while still remaining within the spirit of the invention.

Another aspect comprises a balloon with a plurality of layers, wherein at least one structural layer has low friction surfaces. It will be apparent that further variations are possible involving different combinations of lubricating layers and structural layers. These lubricating and structural layers need not be in an alternating configuration.

In yet another aspect, structural layers can be polyamides, polyesters, polyethylenes, polyurethanes and their co-polymers. It will be apparent that further variations are possible involving structural layers of other material or chemical composition.

In one aspect of embodiments of the present invention, the layers can be adapted to the particular stresses, pressures, and deformities to which they might be vulnerable. For example, because the top layer might be exposed to sharp objects (such as stents, calcified plaque, bone, or other natural protrusions within a patient's body), the top layer could be made from a more compliant material that is scratch resistant. The inner layers of the multi-layer balloon, which are generally not exposed to sharp objects, could be made from a less compliant material with a higher burst strength. It will be apparent that further variations are possible, depending on which stresses, pressures, and deformities the layers must withstand in a particular medical application.

In another aspect, lubricating layers can be silicon oil, “bucky balls” (carbon nanopowder), high-density polyethylene, tetrafluoroethylene, or a mixture thereof. It will be apparent that further variations are possible involving lubricating layers of other material or chemical composition.

Another aspect involves a method for creating multi-layer balloons with low friction interfaces by nesting multiple balloons or by nesting co-extruded tubing. It will be apparent that these methods can be combined with each other and other balloon forming methods to produce larger multi-layer balloons.

In one aspect, the bodies of the balloons can be extruded separately on the same mold to ensure that they have equivalent, or substantially equivalent, size. The necks, however, might need to be different sizes to ensure optimal welding and/or attachment to the catheter. It will be apparent that other methods can be used to obtain approximately equivalent sized balloons. It will also be apparent that similar results can be achieved by making the outer balloon wider than the inner balloon.

In another aspect, separately formed balloons can be nested after altering the orientation of one balloon to make it thinner, facilitating insertion. One way to accomplish this is by axial stretching. It will be apparent that other methods can be used to make a balloon thinner.

In another aspect, already nested balloons can be heated, stretched, and inflated simultaneously to achieve optimal molecular alignment. It will be apparent that this need not be done simultaneously, especially when nesting can be done after the balloons are heated, stretched, and inflated to equivalent size and orientation. Similarly, it will be apparent that the balloons need not be formed and processed identically to obtain equivalent burst strengths, sizes, and/or molecular orientations. This is especially true for balloons of different materials. Other suitable methods can also be used to achieve uniform molecular alignment among the balloon layers.

In yet another aspect, lubricant can be added at any stage of the multi-layer balloon forming process. The lubricant can be co-extruded onto or between balloon layers, applied to balloon layers after extrusion but before nesting, or injected between balloon layers after nesting. In one embodiment, lubricant can be kept separate from certain regions of the balloon. This can be valuable to promote friction in that area if desired. This can also be valuable if the lubricant interferes with welding the balloon layers to each other or to the catheter. In another embodiment, lubricant can be distributed between the balloon layers before or after balloon welding. It will be apparent that this can be accomplished under a wide variety of methods.

In another aspect of embodiments of the present invention, already nested or co-extruded balloons can be treated as a single balloon in the context of this invention. As a result, one can manufacture balloons with a greater numbers of layers than those specifically disclosed herein.

In another aspect of embodiments of the present invention, tubing for the outer balloon can be co-extruded with a lubricious layer on its inside wall. Tubing for the inner balloon, which would not possess a lubricious layer, can be stretch longitudinally to fit within the tube for the outer balloon. This nested tube arrangement can then be used to blow a balloon in a single process. Note that longitudinal stretch does not affect the tubing's radial stretch. This embodiment is an important consideration because trying to longitudinally stretch a tube with a co-extruded lubricious layer, such as by stretching a tube with a lubricious outer layer to nest within another tube, would result in sagging or separation of the lubricious layer.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will now be described in connection with preferred embodiments of the invention shown in the accompanying drawings. The illustrated embodiments, however, are merely an example and are not intended to limit the invention. The drawings include twenty-five figures, which are briefly described as follows:

FIG. 1A is a perspective view of an exemplary prior art balloon catheter.

FIG. 1B is an enlarged perspective view of a cross-section of a prior art balloon catheter shaft.

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a balloon catheter having a plurality of flutes.

FIG. 3A is a cross-sectional view of a fluted balloon catheter before wrapping has been performed.

FIG. 3B is a cross-sectional view of a fluted balloon catheter after wrapping.

FIGS. 3C through 3E are enlarged cross-sectional views of three different fluted balloon catheters after wrapping.

FIG. 3F is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a fluted balloon catheter after wrapping and compression.

FIG. 4 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a fluted balloon catheter that has developed a crack deformity upon wrapping.

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a balloon catheter that has developed a scratch deformity.

FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a balloon catheter that has developed a cat-eye deformity.

FIG. 7A is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a fluted multi-layer balloon catheter after wrapping.

FIG. 7B is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a fluted single layer balloon catheter after wrapping.

FIG. 8A is a cross-sectional view of a multi-layer balloon catheter after inflation.

FIG. 8B is a cross-sectional view of a single layer balloon catheter after inflation.

FIG. 9 is a schematic showing the stretching of polymers to align their molecular chains through a blow molding process.

FIG. 10 is a stress-strain curve with strain, or the amount that a balloon will stretch, on the x-axis and stress, or the applied pressure, on the y-axis. FIG. 10 shows that once optimal stretch is achieved, a balloon material will have its greatest strength and will resist further growth.

FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating the inner diameter stretch and the outer diameter stretch of single-layer balloon tubing when expanded and showing that the outer diameter stretch is less than the inner diameter stretch.

FIG. 12 is a stress-strain curve showing that when the inner wall stretch of single-layer balloon tubing is optimized, the outer wall stretch is sub-optimal and will continue to expand when applied pressure is increased.

FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating the inner and outer radii of single-layer balloon tubing in an unexpanded and an expanded state.

FIG. 14 is a graph showing single-layer balloon catheters having diameters of 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm, with wall thickness on the x-axis and the ratio of inner wall stretch to outer wall stretch on the y-axis.

FIG. 15 is a schematic showing the wall profile of a single-layer balloon catheter that is represented in the graph of FIG. 16.

FIG. 16 is a graph of a single-layer balloon catheter showing the relative stretch ratio as a function of wall slice with wall position on the x-axis and percentage of inner balloon stretch on the y-axis.

FIG. 17 is a graph of a single-layer balloon catheter and a two-layer balloon catheter manufactured from co-extruded tubing. FIG. 17 shows the inner stretch of wall slices of the two-layer balloon relative to the inner stretch of corresponding wall slices of the single-layer balloon.

FIG. 18 is a graph of a single-layer balloon catheter and two-layer balloon catheter manufactured from tubing in which the inner wall stretch has been optimized for maximum strength. FIG. 18 shows the inner stretch of wall slices of each layer of the two-layer balloon relative to the inner stretch of corresponding wall slices of the single-layer balloon.

FIG. 19A is a perspective view of a balloon catheter having an element shown aligned in a longitudinal direction and in a lateral direction.

FIG. 19B is an enlarged perspective view of the longitudinally-aligned element of the balloon catheter as shown in FIG. 19A.

FIG. 20A is a diagram of a single layer element with a small thickness bending like a cantilevered beam shown with an applied force and a maximum deflection.

FIG. 20B is a diagram of a single layer element with a large thickness bending like a cantilevered beam shown with an applied force and a maximum deflection.

FIG. 20C is a diagram of a multi-layer element with three layers each having small thicknesses bending like a cantilevered beam shown with an applied force and a maximum deflection.

FIG. 20D is an enlarged side elevational view of the multi-layer element shown in FIG. 20C.

FIG. 21 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of a multi-layer balloon having a discontinuous lubricating layer.

FIG. 22A is a side elevational view of an inner balloon used in a method for nesting balloons to form a multi-layer balloon.

FIG. 22B is a side elevational view of the inner balloon after heating and stretching of the method for nesting multi-layer balloons of FIG. 22A.

FIG. 22C is a side elevational view of the inner balloon after fluting of the method for nesting multi-layer balloons of FIG. 22A.

FIG. 22D is a side elevational view of the heated, stretched, and fluted inner balloon and an outer balloon used in the method for nesting multi-layer balloons of FIG. 22A.

FIG. 22E is a side elevational view of a multi-layer balloon where lubrication is being applied between the inner balloon and the outer balloon of the method for nesting multi-layer balloons of FIG. 22D.

FIG. 22F is a side elevational view of the multi-layer balloon after heating, stretching, and inflating so that the inner balloon and the outer balloon have the same, or a substantially similar, degree of molecular alignment of the method for nesting multi-layer balloons of FIG. 22D.

FIG. 22G is a side elevational view of the multi-layer balloon after fluting of the method for nesting multi-layer balloons of FIG. 22D.

FIG. 23A is a side elevational view of a three layer balloon and a two layer balloon used in a method for co-extruding balloons to form a multi-layer balloon.

FIG. 23B is a side elevational view of the three layer balloon after heating and stretching so as to the decrease the diameter of the three layer balloon prior to insertion into the two layer balloon of the method for co-extruding multi-layer balloons of FIG. 23A.

FIG. 23C is a side elevational view of the three layer balloon having a decreased diameter being inserted into the two layer balloon having its original diameter of the method for co-extruding multi-layer balloons of FIG. 23A.

FIG. 23D is a side elevational view of a multi-layer balloon having five layers after heating, stretching, and inflating so that the three layer balloon component and the two layer balloon component have the same, or a substantially similar, degree of molecular alignment of the method for co-extruding multi-layer balloons of FIG. 23A.

FIG. 24A is a side elevational view of a multi-layer balloon formed using the methods disclosed showing a method for welding the necks of the multi-layer balloon in order to securely attach the balloon layers to each other.

FIG. 24B is a side elevational view of the multi-layer balloon having its necks welded of FIG. 24A.

FIG. 25A is a side elevational view of a single-layer tubular extrusion without a slip layer and a single-layer tubular extrusion of the same size having a slip layer on its inner surface used in a method to form a two-layer high pressure balloon.

FIG. 25B is a side elevational view of the single-layer tubing without a slip layer after axial stretching to decrease its diameter prior to insertion into the single-layer extrusion having a slip layer on its inner surface in the method for nesting two-layer balloons of FIG. 25A.

FIG. 25C is a side elevational view of the single-layer extrusion having a decreased diameter being inserted into the single-layer extrusion having its original diameter in the method for nesting two-layer balloons of FIG. 25A.

FIG. 25D is a side elevational view of a two-layer parison comprising a first balloon layer, a slip layer, and a second balloon layer such that the first balloon layer and the second balloon layer have the same, or a substantially similar, degree of molecular alignment in the method for nesting two-layer balloons of FIG. 25A.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and exemplary of the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.

FIGS. 1A and 1B show an exemplary embodiment of a prior art balloon catheter system 1. A balloon 2 is attached to the distal end of a catheter shaft 3 and is inflated through an inflation lumen 4. A guide wire lumen 5 is provided on the catheter system 1, which allows for external control of the balloon 2 and the catheter 3 when the system 1 is disposed within a patient. It should be noted that further variations (e.g., rapid exchange, concentric lumen, etc.) are possible for this structure.

FIG. 2 illustrates a perspective view of an embodiment of a prior art catheter balloon 2 in an unwrapped and deflated configuration. The balloon 2 is folded into a plurality of flutes 6, typically ranging from three to eight flutes. The plurality of flutes 6 are formed in a direction substantially parallel to a longitudinal direction of the balloon 7. The plurality of flutes 6 are folded with a slight curvature in order to facilitate subsequently wrapping the fluted balloon 2 around the catheter shaft 3 (as shown in FIG. 1A). The balloon 2 attaches to the catheter shaft 3 both at a proximal neck of the balloon 50 and at a distal neck of the balloon 51. The balloon 2 also includes a body portion 52, which can be inflated and deflated when the balloon 2 is disposed within the body of a patient during a particular medical procedure.

FIG. 3A shows a cross-section of an embodiment of a prior art fluted balloon 2 on a catheter shaft 3. The fluted balloon 2 has a plurality of flutes 6. In the illustrated embodiment, the plurality of flutes 6 comprises six flutes. The deflated fluted balloon 2 has a relatively small cross-sectional area, but can have a relatively wide diameter because the thin flutes 6 stretch radially outward from the catheter shaft 3. Upon inflation, the balloon 2 can expand to have a much larger diameter and cross-sectional area 8, as shown in the circular phantom lines in FIG. 3A.

FIG. 3B shows a cross-section of an embodiment of a prior art fluted balloon 2 after it has been wrapped. The plurality of flutes 6 are folded down and about the catheter shaft 3 such that they are in close contact with each other and the catheter shaft 3. Once the balloon 2 is wrapped, the deflated balloon's diameter and cross-sectional area 9 (sometimes referred to as the crossing profile) is much smaller than the inflated balloon's diameter and cross-sectional area 8 (as seen in the circular phantom lines in FIG. 3B). Having a balloon 2 with a small diameter and cross-sectional area 9 allows the catheter 2 to be guided through smaller passageways within a patient's body. Inflating the balloon 2 to have a larger diameter and cross-sectional area 8 advantageously allows for the placement of a larger stent, occlusion of a larger passageway, and generally greater versatility once the catheter 2 has reached a particular treatment site within a patient's body.

FIGS. 3C through 3E generally illustrate enlarged views of several configurations of balloon folding patterns. FIG. 3C illustrates an enlarged side elevational view of a cross-section of a prior art fluted balloon 2c after wrapping. As shown in FIG. 3C, the reduction in size of the wrapped balloon 2c about the catheter shaft 3 is limited by the balloon's bend radius 10c. In general, a balloon's bend radius increases with the thickness and toughness of the balloon, as can be seen by comparing FIG. 3C with FIGS. 3D and 3E. FIG. 3D shows a balloon 2d that is thicker than the balloon 2c shown in FIG. 3C. As can be seen in FIG. 3D, the bend radius 10d for the thicker balloon 2d is larger than the bend radius of the balloon 2c in FIG. 3C. FIG. 3E shows a balloon 2e having the same thickness as the balloon 2c of FIG. 3C, but being composed of a tougher material than that of the balloon in FIG. 3C. As can be seen in FIG. 3E, the bend radius 10e for the tougher balloon 2e is also larger than the bend radius of the balloon 2c in FIG. 3C. Accordingly, both a thicker balloon 2d and a tougher balloon 2e typically cannot be folded into as small a cross-section as the balloon 2c of FIG. 3C. The bend radius of a balloon is important because bending a balloon beyond its bend radius can cause deformities which will lower the balloon's resistance to bursting when inflated.

FIG. 3F shows a balloon 2f wrapped about a catheter shaft 3. The balloon 2f has a negligible bend radius and can, therefore, be tightly wrapped about the catheter shaft 3 without any protrusions developing on the outer surface of the folded and wrapped balloon 2f Advantageously, this configuration permits the diameter and the cross-section of the balloon 2f to be minimized prior to, and during, insertion of the balloon catheter system into a patient's body. In addition, as discussed in further detail below, this configuration minimizes failure of the balloon 2f during a medical application due to a deformity developing on the balloon's outer surface.

FIGS. 4 through 6 generally show deformities that can develop on a balloon's outer surface. As shown in FIG. 4, a wrapped balloon 2 is folded and compressed beyond its bend radius 10 creating a crack 11 in the outer surface of the wrapped balloon 2 near the site of a fold. Such cracking is more likely for less compliant materials, which also generally have higher burst strengths. Thus, there is a general trade off between burst strength and flexibility. Once the crack 11 has formed, stress will concentrate near the crack 11 when the balloon 2 is inflated, causing the crack 11 to expand and ultimately causing failure of the balloon 2 (e.g., by bursting).

FIG. 5 shows another deformity that occurs in balloons. When a medical device such as a stent is applied over a balloon 2, it can create a scratch 12. The scratch 12 generally extends in the longitudinal direction of the balloon 2. Again, the likelihood of scratching can be minimized by using a more compliant material, which also has a lower burst strength. Once the scratch 12 has formed, stress will concentrate near the scratch 12 when the balloon 2 is inflated, causing the scratch 12 to expand and ultimately causing failure of the balloon 2 (e.g., by bursting).

FIG. 6 illustrates yet another type of deformity. When a balloon is formed, there may be regions of low molecular density or imperfections in the molecular lattice. As a result, a small hole 13 can form upon stretching the balloon 2. The hole 13 can grow as the balloon 2 is stretched further, often resembling a “cat-eye.” Stress concentrates near the edges of the cat-eye deformity 13. Since the balloon 2 is stretched during inflation, this can also lead to failure of the balloon 2 (e.g., by bursting).

FIGS. 7A and 8A show an enlarged cross-section of an embodiment of a multi-layer balloon 2 having a first layer 20, a second layer 22, and a third layer 24. In one embodiment, in which the multi-layer balloon 2 comprises a balloon having three structural layers, the first layer 20 comprises a top layer of the multi-layer balloon, the second layer 22 comprises a middle layer of the multi-layer balloon, and the third layer 24 comprises a bottom layer of the multi-layer balloon. The multi-layer balloon 2 is shown in the wrapped position, similar to position illustrated in FIG. 3C. The first layer 20 of the multi-layer balloon has a thickness that is approximately one-third the thickness of the single-layer balloon shown in FIG. 3C. The second layer 22 and the third layer 24 also each have a thickness that is approximately one-third the thickness of the single-layer balloon shown in FIG. 3C. Because each layer 20, 22, 24 is thinner than the single-layer balloon of FIG. 3C, the bend radius 10 is smaller for an equal cumulative thickness 3t. Because the cumulative thickness of the multi-layer balloon 2 of FIG. 7A is substantially the same as the thickness of the single-layer balloon of FIG. 3C, the burst pressure P will also be the substantially the same as long as adjacent balloon layers of the multi-layer balloon can slide relative to each other.

As shown in FIGS. 7B and 8B, a balloon 2 with a single layer has a total thickness 3t that is equivalent the thickness of the multi-layer balloon 2 shown in FIGS. 7A and 8A. As shown in FIG. 7B, the thicker balloon 2 has a larger bend radius 10, and thus cannot be folded as closely to the catheter shaft 3. If a scratch develops on the first layer 20 of the multi-layer balloon during the crimping and wrapping process, the first layer 20 could burst while, at the same time, the other balloon layers 22, 24 retain their structural integrity. More generally, a single balloon layer 20, 22, 24 might fail as a result of a deformity, such as those shown in FIGS. 4 through 6, on any layer 20, 22, 24. As a result, the multi-layer design provides redundancy that could be valuable in certain medical procedures. Furthermore, because the multi-layer design is more flexible, as discussed below, deformities as shown in FIG. 4 are less likely to occur. Meanwhile, the burst pressure P for a multi-layer balloon is substantially the same as that for an equivalent thickness single layer balloon, as can be seen by comparing FIG. 8A with FIG. 8B. It will be apparent that similar effects can be achieved by varying the material in each balloon layer, varying the number of balloon layers, and varying other aspects of this embodiment.

In one embodiment, the first layer 20 of the multi-layer balloon is made of a soft material that is preferably scratch and puncture resistant. When a device such as a stent is applied to the catheter system, it is typically crimped onto the balloon 2. The applied crimping force should be such as to provide a sufficiently strong attachment force, yet it should also not scratch, pierce, or otherwise damage the balloon wall. By using a softer first layer 20 (which can comprise an outer layer of the multi-layer balloon), the risk of failure due to scratching can be decreased.

The second layer 22 and the third layer 24 (which can comprise inner layers of the multi-layer balloon) can be made of a tougher material that is less scratch resistant, but able to withstand higher applied pressures. These layers 22, 24 can be protected from scratching by the soft outer layer 20, but still can provide additional strength to the multi-layer balloon. It should be noted that the above-described effects need not always be achieved simultaneously, and they are not necessarily sensitive to the number of layers, composition of other layers, form of device carried by the catheter, or other aspects of this embodiment.

As is discussed in greater detail below, each layer 20, 22, 24 may be equally sized and shaped in the body portion 52, in order to optimize the burst characteristics of the balloon in accordance with the present invention. As the balloon is inflated, each layer is stretched, causing the thickness to shrink. This causes the third balloon layer 24 to stretch approximately as far as the first balloon layer 20. If the third balloon layer 24 begins with a smaller diameter than that of the first layer 20, then the third layer 24 must stretch an additional amount to match the size of the first balloon layer 20. This can cause the inner balloon layers 22, 24 to burst before the outer balloon layer 20, which can limit the multi-layer balloon's maximum inflation to a level that inflates the larger outer balloon layer 20 below its optimal inflation level. Consequently, using substantially identical balloons for each layer of the multi-layer balloon makes each balloon layer have a substantially similar burst pressure, ensuring that they burst substantially simultaneously and reducing the possibility of sub-optimal inflation of any layer 20, 22, 24 of the multi-layer balloon. It will be apparent that balloons of different material may require different sizes and shapes to achieve this effect. It will also be apparent that, because the balloons still do not stretch to exactly equal diameters upon inflation, it may be practical to make the inner balloons slightly smaller such that each layer stretches to substantially near its optimal inflation level.

One general problem with multi-layer balloons is that the interior balloon layer often bursts before the exterior balloon layer. This occurs because the outer layers have not been optimized for maximum wall strength.

The interior balloon layer bursts prior to exterior balloon layers because the multi-layer balloon does not comprise layers having uniform burst strengths. This is primarily a result of not taking into account the confounding effect of radial expansion on achieving optimal radial stretch during the balloon blow molding process.

With reference to FIGS. 9 and 10, an objective of blow molding in balloon formation is to stretch the polymer material in order to achieve maximum strength and semi-compliance. This is done by aligning the molecular chains as shown in FIG. 9. During the stretching process, the material will grow until the polymer chains are aligned. Once the polymer chains are aligned, the material resists further growth and provides maximum strength. This is shown on the idealized stress-strain curve in FIG. 10. In response to the strain caused by stretching, the material exhibits relatively even stress. Once the polymer chains are aligned, the material resists further growth as shown by an increase in stress. In the ideal cases, all polymer chains will be uniformly stretched. Various polymer materials will have different ideal stretch ratios in order to achieve uniform molecular alignment.

Optimum stretch for a multi-layer, high-pressure, balloon is dependent upon a number of variables. For a given material, there is a calculated optimum stretch that provides optimum strength of the multi-layer balloon. The calculated optimum stretch is dependent upon, for example, the diameter of the balloon and the thickness of the layers which comprise the multi-layer, high-pressure, balloon. Practically, it is very difficult to stretch a balloon to its exact optimum stretch. Thus, for most applications, stretching a material to within 15% of its optimum stretch, and preferably to within less than 10%, will provide optimum balloon strength.

During the balloon forming process, the polymer material is stretched both radially and longitudinally in order to achieve biaxial orientation of the polymer chains. However, radial stress is twice that of longitudinal stress. As a result, optimizing the radial stretch is more important to burst resistance than longitudinal stretch.

With reference to FIGS. 11 and 12, radial stretch confounds the goal to achieve a uniform stretch of the polymer material. The reason for this is that balloons are blow molded from tubing having thicker walls. As shown in FIG. 11, because of the difference in wall thickness the stretch of the inner wall of the initial tubing to that of the balloon will be greater than that of the respective outer wall stretch. In view of the non-uniform stretch between the inner wall and the outer wall of the tubing, a problem encountered in the art is optimizing the radial stretch of the balloon tubing. If the outer wall stretch be optimized, then the inner wall becomes over-stretched. Consequently, the inner wall will develop micro-tears which can lead to premature failure of the balloon tubing. Therefore, a feasible solution to this problem is to optimize the radial stretch based on the inner wall rather than the outer wall.

As shown in the stress-strain curve in FIG. 12, the outer wall is under-stretched when optimizing radial stretch based upon the inner wall of the balloon. When the inner wall achieves optimal alignment of its polymer chains, as shown on the stress-strain curve, the outer wall has not yet reached optimal alignment of its polymer chains, as shown by being further down the stress-strain curve of FIG. 12. If the inner portion of the balloon wall fails, the outer portion will continue to stretch thus providing no additional strength to the balloon wall.

The relative under-stretching of the outer wall can be substantial. This can be shown using a mathematical model relating the radial expansion of a smaller-diameter hollow cylinder with a given wall thickness (the initial extruded tube) to a hollow cylinder with a larger diameter and thinner walls (the blow molded balloon body). FIG. 13 shows the various radii to be taken into account from a cross section of the tube and balloon. Of particular interest will be the inner wall stretch (S_i=R_i/r_i) and the outer wall stretch (S_o=R_o/r_o). As S_iis given as being the optimized radial stretch, the relative ratio of S_o/S_iwill used to demonstrate the confounding effect of radial stretch on uniform wall strength.

Formula I, set forth below, shows the equation for the mass (M) of a hollow cylinder based on its radius (r), length (L) and density (ρ). In expanding the hollow cylinder represented by the tube to a balloon, the mass remains the same. Accordingly, there is a fixed relationship between the radii of tube to that of the balloon as shown in Formula II (the parameters with the subscripted t refers to the tubing and the subscripted B refers to the balloon). Thus, for a balloon of a given diameter (R₀/2) and wall thickness (W_b) with an optimized inner wall stretch, there is a specific tube size that must be used as a starting condition.

M=π(r_o²−r_i²)Lρ I.
π(r_o²−r_i²)L_tρ_t=π(R_o²−R_i²)L_Bρ_B II.

For a given balloon, the required inner radius for the tubing is simply the balloon outer radius less the wall thickness divided by the optimal stretch for the polymer used: r_i=(R_o−W_b)/S_i. Determining the outer tubing radius, r_o, is more complicated but can be derived from the equation in Formula II.

As set forth below, Formula III shows such a derivation with S_Lbeing used to express the longitudinal stretch (S_L=L_BL_t) and ρ the relative change in density (ρ=ρ_B/ρ_t). With these two equations, S_oand S_ican be calculated and the confounding effect of radial stretch shown.

r_o=√{square root over (S_Lρ(2R_oW_B−W_B²)+(R_o−W_B)²/S_i²)} III.

FIG. 14 shows the ratio of S_o/S_ias a function of wall thickness for a number of different balloon diameters. As can be seen, the relative under-stretching of the outer wall can be substantial. For example, the outer wall for a 2 mm balloon with a wall thickness of 0.001 inches has been stretched less than 40% relative to the inner wall. Any increase in wall thickness to try to strengthen the wall shows a further decrease in relative stretching. The same 2 mm balloon with a 0.002 inch wall thickness shows a relative wall stretch of less than 30%.

Turning now to FIGS. 15 and 16, the confounding effect of radial stretch can be shown in more detail by examining the distribution of relative stretch within the wall. This can be done by “mapping” the respective wall slice in the tube to that of the balloon. FIG. 15 shows such a map in which the inner wall has a position of 0% and the outer wall has a position of 100%. By calculating the stretch of a slice for the tube wall, for example the 20% line, to the equivalent slice in the balloon, the distribution of relative radial stretch can be shown. FIG. 16 shows a graph of a representative balloon with the relative stretch ratio as a function of wall slice. As can be seen, the fall off in relative stretch is not proportional and in fact falls off more quickly from the inner wall.

The problem of inner balloon bursting is particularly common for co-extruded multi-layer balloons because the interior balloon necessarily has a more optimized inner wall stretch compared to that of outer layers. This is shown in detail on FIG. 17, in which the relative stretch of the wall slices of a dual layer balloon made from co-extruded tubing is shown relative to a single wall balloon having the same overall wall thickness. Known methods of creating multi-layer balloons primarily focus on co-extruding balloon elements in order to create a multi-layer balloon. Known methods do not typically involve nesting balloons nor has the confounding effect of radial stretch been considered. Even so, in the case of nesting balloons, the interior balloon occasionally is made smaller to facilitate insertion into the exterior balloon, so the problem of varying stretching remains.

In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, in order to substantially increase the overall wall strength of a multi-layer balloon, each balloon layer is molded from tubing in which in the inner wall stretch has been optimized for maximum strength. FIG. 18 shows the relative stretch of wall slices for such a balloon having two layers. As can been seen, the relative amount of optimally stretched material is greater than that afforded by co-extrusion.

Using this design, it is not necessary that the layers be made from the same material or have the same wall thickness. Each layer is made such that the inner wall has been stretched for maximum strength, with the stretch ratio specific for that particular material. As described above, the inner wall should be stretched to within about 15% of its optimal stretch and, in some applications, preferably to within less than 10% of its optimal stretch. As the wall strengths are additive, the burst pressure will be higher than that for any individual layer. Once the burst pressure is reached, all layers will fail. The compliance characteristics for the layers will preferably be equivalent.

FIGS. 19A and 19B illustrate a balloon wall element 14 of a multi-layer balloon catheter 2. To maintain flexibility in each balloon layer 20, 22, 24, friction between these layers must be minimized. To illustrate this point we consider a balloon wall element 14. This element 14 has a thickness t equal to that of the balloon 2, or balloon layers 20, 22, 24, and a small width b and a length 1. The element 14 can be configured either axially or radially. Taking one end of the element 14 as fixed, the element 14 can be viewed as a cantilevered beam for analytical purposes, as described below in FIGS. 20A through 20D.

FIG. 20A shows the balloon element 14 as a single layer of thickness t. A balloon element 14 with thickness t requires a force F₁to bend the element 14 a set distance y. FIG. 20B shows the balloon wall element 14 as a single layer of thickness 3t. This thicker element 14 requires a force F₂, which is twenty-seven times larger than F₁, to bend the element 14 the same distance y as the element 14 in FIG. 20A (that is, because the force required varies as a cube of the element thickness). FIG. 20C shows a multi-layer element 14 comprised of a first element 15, a second element 16, and a third element 17. Each of the elements 15, 16, and 17 has an individual thickness t. As a result, the multi-layer balloon element 14 has a cumulative thickness 3t. Each sub-element 15, 16, and 17 is individually as thick as the balloon element 14 in FIG. 20A, but collectively as thick as the balloon element 14 in FIG. 20B. Each individual element in FIG. 20C requires a force F₁to bend a single balloon element a given distance y. Collectively, the multi-layer balloon element 14 requires a force F₃to bend the element 14 a given distance y, which is three times as large as the force in FIG. 20A, but only one third as large as the force in FIG. 20B. As shown in FIG. 20C, each balloon element layer 15, 16, and 17 preferably slides relative to the other layers a distance Δl. If the balloon element layers 15, 16, and 17 are not permitted to slide, then the multi-layered balloon 14 will likely be equivalent to the equally thick balloon in FIG. 20B.

Referring now to FIG. 20D, because the layers 15, 16, and 17 are in close contact with each other and there is a potentially strong force pushing them together, frictional effects can be very significant and prevent sliding between the layers. To minimize friction between adjacent layers and to allow sliding, lubricating layers 18, 19 can be added in between structural layer 15, 16, and 17. The lubricating layers 18, 19 can be made of any suitable substance, nonexclusively including high density polyethylene, silicon oil, and carbon nanopowder, but in many medical applications should be biocompatible. It should be noted that lubricating layers are not necessary when friction between structural layers is allowable and, in some applications, desirable.

With reference to FIG. 21, in some embodiments, lubricant should be distributed so as to substantially cover the entire surface area between adjacent balloon layers. The consequences of not having lubricant covering substantially the entire surface area are demonstrated in FIG. 21. Between adjacent balloon element layers 15, 16 there are two gaps 60, 62 shown in a lubricious layer 18. With the balloon inflated, this potentially creates substantial friction at the gaps 60, 62. Thus, an abnormally loose region 64 can form between the gaps 60, 62 with abnormally stretched regions adjacent the loose region 64. This unequal distribution of stress can cause a multi-layer balloon to burst prematurely. In some situations, spreading lubricant will be less of a concern. For example, low pressure applications and balloon regions with low stress may not require uniform spreading of a lubricious layer between adjacent balloon layers. It should be note that similar problems can develop between any two adjacent balloon layers if lubricant is not evenly distributed.

Embodiments of the multi-layer balloon disclosed herein can provide a significant performance improvement over current high pressure balloons. The disclosed embodiments allow for balloon catheters to be used in new applications. For example, multi-layer balloons can be used in ultra high pressure applications such as 50 atmospheres or more for up to 10 mm diameter balloons, and for high pressure applications for very large balloons such as 12 atmospheres or more for up to 30 mm diameter balloons. The advantages provided by the multi-layer balloons disclosed herein can be attributed, at least in part, to forming each layer from tubing where the inner wall stretch has been optimized for maximum strength.

FIGS. 22A through 22G generally depict a method for nesting balloons to form a multi-layer balloon. As shown in FIG. 22A, an inner balloon 30 is provided having a proximal neck 50A and a distal neck 51A. The inner balloon 30 is then heated and stretched so that the diameter and cross-sectional area of the inner balloon 30 is decreased, while the length of the inner balloon 30 is at least partially increased, as shown in FIG. 22B. Heating and stretching the inner balloon 30 in this manner typically alters the alignment of the polymer molecules comprising the body of the balloon 30. The inner balloon 30 is then fluted using known fluting methods so that the balloon 30 comprises a plurality of flutes. The inner balloon 30 is then wrapped about a catheter shaft. The fluted and wrapped inner balloon 30 is illustrated in FIG. 22C. The balloon 30 can be fluted and wrapped, for example, using known fluting and wrapping machines. Embodiments of such machines can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/303,546, filed Dec. 16, 2005 and entitled “Balloon Catheter Folding and Wrapping Devices and Methods,” the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Other suitable balloon fluting and wrapping devices, however, can also be used.

With reference to FIG. 22D, the fluted and wrapped inner balloon 30 can be inserted into an outer balloon 31. The outer balloon 31 preferably has properties that are substantially similar, or in some cases identical, to those properties of the unstretched and unheated inner balloon 30 described with reference to FIG. 22A. In one embodiment, the balloons 30, 31 are comprised of tube stock that optimizes the inner wall stretch of the balloons 30, 31.

The outer balloon 31 has a proximal neck 50B and a distal neck 51B. In one embodiment, the proximal neck 50B and the distal neck 51B of the outer balloon 31 have larger diameters than the proximal neck 50A and distal neck 51A of the inner balloon 30. In one embodiment, the inner balloon 30 can be inserted into the outer balloon 31 by drawing it through the outer balloon 31 such that the inner balloon 30 is substantially contained within the outer balloon 31. Other suitable methods can also be used to insert the inner balloon 30 into the outer balloon 31.

In one embodiment of the present multi-layer balloon nesting method, the inner balloon 30 and the outer balloon 31 are blow-molded on the same mold (but preferably at separate times) so that the balloons 30, 31 have a substantially similar shape and size along a body portion of the balloons 30, 31. In this embodiment, the balloons 30, 31 preferably have proximal and distal necks having different sizes, as illustrated in FIGS. 22A and 22D. That is, the proximal and distal necks 50A, 51A of the inner balloon 30 have a smaller diameter than the proximal and distal necks 50B, 51B of the outer balloon 31.

With reference to FIG. 22E, once the inner balloon 30 has been inserted into a cavity of the outer balloon 31, lubrication 32 can be added to a space disposed between the inner balloon 30 and the outer balloon 31. In one embodiment, the lubrication 32 comprises silicon oil. It should be noted that lubrication 32 can be added either before the insertion step shown in FIG. 22D, during the insertion step shown in FIG. 22D, or after the insertion step shown in FIG. 22D. In the illustrated balloon nesting method, as shown in FIG. 22E, lubrication 32 is added after the insertion step in FIG. 22D.

As shown in FIG. 22F, the nested balloons 30, 31 are next heated, stretched, and inflated to bring the respective body portions of the inner balloon 30 and the outer balloon 31 into the same, or a substantially similar, molecular alignment. Embodiments of devices capable of inflating and heating a balloon can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/303,545, filed Dec. 16, 2005 and entitled “Measurement Apparatus and Methods for Balloon Catheters,” the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The embodiments presented can be modified to stretch the balloon as well, and also can be used to verify that the balloons have been stretched to an optimal size and shape. Other embodiments can be used to heat, stretch, and inflate the multi-layer balloons disclosed herein.

In one embodiment of the nesting method, one can heat and stretch the balloon and then begin inflating the balloon while continuing to heat and stretch the balloon. Inflation of the balloon can commence when approximately thirty percent of the stretching remains to be completed. The balloons are preferably stretched to four to five times their initial length. This amount of stretching is meant to optimize biaxial molecular alignment, and it will be apparent that a different method will be suitable for different applications.

With continued reference to FIG. 22F, a containing apparatus 61 can be used to prevent the lubrication 32 from reaching a welding zone 40. After sealing the balloons 30, 31, a lubricating layer 32 can be distributed evenly by mechanical means, if it is not sufficiently distributed during inflation.

As illustrated in FIG. 22G, the multi-layer balloon comprising the inner balloon 30 and the outer balloon 31 can be fluted and wrapped in preparation for attachment to a catheter shaft. In one embodiment, the multi-layer balloon is fluted and wrapped in preparation for insertion into another balloon. In another embodiment, the multi-layer balloon is fluted and wrapped in preparation for having another balloon inserted into a cavity defined by the multi-layer balloon.

The above-disclosed nesting method is particularly suitable for ultra high pressure balloons having large neck diameters relative to their body size. Further variations to the nesting method are possible such as, for example, repetition of this process to produce many-layered balloons, use of non-identically sized or shaped balloons, omission of lubricating layers for certain interfaces, and other suitable methods and processes.

The above-disclosed method comprising independent formation of an inner balloon and an outer balloon and then nesting the balloons allows for a variety of balloon sizes and shapes at each layer. Therefore, this method typically allows for ideal balloon parameters at each layer. However, in some instances, independent formation of balloon layers could be a slower and more costly process, particularly for balloons with small necks relative to their bodies. Typically, the body of the balloon is wider than its neck. However, the body of the inner balloon should still be capable of fitting through the neck of the outer balloon. The body of a balloon can be narrowed by heating, stretching, fluting, and wrapping. The neck of a balloon can possibly be widened by heating and inflating or stretching the balloon radially, but these methods are limited. As a result, it is often practical to form balloons independently and then nest them to create multi-layer balloons with a balloon body diameter to neck diameter ratio of 4 to 1 or less. For larger diameter-to-neck ratios, co-extrusion of some balloon layers might be preferable.

In the co-extrusion method, as discussed in further detail below with reference to FIGS. 23A through 23D, one avoids the difficulty of nesting balloons. However, the process of co-extrusion limits one's control over the size and shape of each balloon layer, potentially causing some of the problems discussed above, as well as others due to the general lost design freedom. In general, co-extrusion is more efficient than nesting in manufacturing larger multi-layer balloons, in the range above approximately 12 mm in diameter.

FIGS. 23A through 23D show one embodiment of forming multi-layer balloons using a co-extrusion method. As shown in FIG. 23A, a three layer balloon 26 and a two layer balloon 27 are provided. The three layer balloon 26 preferably has two structural layers 22, 24 and one lubricating layer 23. The two layer balloon 27 preferably has one structural layer 20 and one lubricating layer 21. In this embodiment, the three layer balloon 26 and the two layer balloon 27 are both co-extruded. In one embodiment, the structural layers comprise a polyamide such as Nylon 12. In one embodiment, the lubricating layers comprise 0.0001 to 0.00015 inch high-density polyethylene and/or carbon nanopowder filler.

With reference to FIG. 23B, the three layer balloon 26 is then processed to reduce its diameter and cross-sectional area in a manner similar to that disclosed above with respect to FIG. 22B of the nesting method. That is, the three layer balloon 26 can be heated and stretched so that the diameter and cross-sectional area of the three layer balloon 26 is decreased, while the length of the balloon 26 is at least partially increased. Heating and stretching the three layer balloon 26 in this manner typically alters the alignment of the molecules comprising the body of the balloon 26.

As shown in FIG. 23C, the three layer co-extruded and stretched balloon 26 (having a decreased diameter) can then be inserted into the two layer co-extruded balloon 27. In one embodiment, the three layer balloon 26 can simply be slid inside the two layer balloon 27. The lubricating layer 21 of the two layer balloon 27 (which can be disposed on an inner surface of the two layer balloon 27) facilitates relatively easy insertion of the three layer balloon 26 into the two layer balloon 27 because it reduces friction between the balloons when a structural layer 22 of the three layer balloon 26 (which can be disposed on an outer surface of the three layer balloon 26) contacts an inner surface of the two layer balloon 27.

With reference to FIG. 23D, the newly-formed five layer multi-layer balloon 25 can be heated, stretched, and inflated such that the inner balloon 26 alters its molecular orientation to an orientation that the inner balloon 26 had prior to the heating and stretching step of FIG. 23B (i.e., its original molecular orientation). As a result, the molecular orientation of the inner balloon 26 becomes substantially similar to, or the same as, the molecular orientation of the outer balloon 27 because these balloons had substantially similar, or the same, molecular orientations after co-extrusion (the step of FIG. 23A) and before drawing down the inner balloon 26 (the step of FIG. 23B).

Other variations of this co-extrusion method are possible such as, for example, repeating the method steps to create additional balloon layers, using additional co-extruded balloon layers, combining co-extrusion with balloon nesting, using alternative methods to achieve molecular alignment among the balloon layers, and other suitable variations. As discussed above with respect to the nesting method, in some embodiments of the co-extrusion method, it is important to have balloon layers comprising the substantially same size and comprised of materials having substantially similar mechanical properties.

Turning now to FIGS. 24A and 24B, before the multi-layer balloon is complete, the structural layers of the balloon are typically welded together. Unless the lubricating layers are to be welded as well, the lubricating layers preferably are kept away from a welding zone 40 of the multi-layer balloon. When a lubricating layer is not co-extruded, it can be injected relatively far from the welding zone and then mechanically dispersed, as shown and described above with respect to FIG. 22E. In FIGS. 24A and 24B, an analogous process is shown for a co-extruded lubricating layer 42 (as opposed to applying a lubricating layer in a nesting method for creating multi-layer balloons). In this embodiment, extrusion of the lubricating layer 42 is periodically halted to make a lubricating layer-free welding zone 40. In one embodiment, this is accomplished with a diverter valve. Use of the diverter valve can be adjusted to create a balloon parison of appropriate length. The structural layers 41, 43 of the multi-layer co-extruded balloon can then be welded together in welding zone 40. Other suitable variations can also be used to separate the lubricating layers from the welding zones.

FIGS. 25A through 25D show an embodiment of a method for forming two-layer balloons with each layer made from tubing that optimizes inner wall stretch for maximized balloon strength. As shown in FIG. 25A, a single-layer extrusion or tube stock 100 and a single-layer extrusion having a slip layer 110 are provided. The single-layer extrusion 100 preferably has a single, structural side wall 102. The single layer tube stock having a slip layer 110 preferably has a single, structural side wall 112 and a slip layer 114 disposed on the inner surface of the side wall 112. The tube stock with a slip layer 110 has a bonding zone 116 at each end of the tube stock 110. The bonding zone 116 defines an area of the tube stock 110 between the longitudinal ends of the side wall 112 and the ends of the slip layer 114. The bonding zone 116 provides an area free from lubrication, which allows the tube stock without a slip layer 100 to be bonded with the tube stock with a slip layer 110.

The single-layer tube stock 100 and the single-layer tube stock having a slip layer 110 are preferably formed from tubing that optimizes the inner wall stretch thus providing optimum balloon strength. In one embodiment, the extrusions 100, 110 may be formed from the same material and are preferably formed from the same, or a substantially similar, diameter of tube stock such that the degree of biaxial molecular orientation between the balloons 100, 110 is substantially similar. If the tube stocks 100, 110 are composed of the same material, then the diameters of the tube stock should be within about 10% of each other in order to provide balloon layers having a substantially similar degree of biaxial molecular orientation.

In one embodiment, the side walls 102, 112 comprise a polyamide such as Nylon 12. In one embodiment, the slip layer 114 comprises a layer composed of 0.0001 to 0.00015 inch high-density polyethylene and/or carbon nanopowder filler (i.e., “bucky balls” or graphite nanocarbon particles).

By way of example, for an 8 mm balloon made from Nylon 12, a tubing size of 0.090 inches by 0.056 inches may be used. The slip layer preferably will, at a minimum, cover a substantial portion of the main body of the balloon comprising the cylindrical portion of the balloon. However, in some applications, the slip layer may extend beyond the body of the balloon to cover at least a portion of the conical section of the balloon.

With reference to FIG. 25B, the single-layer extrusion 100 is then processed to reduce its diameter and cross-sectional area in a manner similar to that disclosed above with respect to FIGS. 22B and 23B. That is, the single-layer tube stock 100 can be heated and stretched axially so that its diameter and cross-sectional area are at least partially decreased, while the length of the extrusion 100 is at least partially increased. Heating and axial stretching the single-layer extrusion 100 in this manner typically alters the axial alignment of the molecules comprising the body of the extrusion 100, but induces little or no change to the radial or circumferential alignment.

As shown in FIG. 25C, the single-layer tube stock 100 (having a decreased diameter) can then be inserted into the single-layer tube stock having a slip layer 110 (having its original, unaltered diameter). In one embodiment, the single-layer extrusion 100 can simply be slid concentrically inside the single-layer extrusion having a slip layer 110. The slip layer 114 of the single-layer tube stock 110 facilitates relatively easy insertion of the single-layer tube stock 100 into the single layer tube stock having a slip layer 110 because it reduces friction between the balloons when the side wall 102 of the single-layer extrusion 100 contacts an inner surface of the single-layer extrusion having a slip layer 110.

With reference to FIG. 25D, the newly-formed two-layer balloon stock or parison 120 can be heated, stretched, and inflated such that the inner tube stock 100 alters its molecular orientation to an orientation that the inner tube stock 100 had prior to the heating and stretching step of FIG. 25B (i.e., its original molecular orientation). As a result, the degree of biaxial molecular orientation of the inner tube stock 100 becomes substantially similar to, or the same as, the degree of biaxial molecular orientation of the outer tube stock 110 because these balloons had substantially similar, or the same, molecular orientations at the beginning of the above-described process (the step of FIG. 25A) and before drawing down the inner tube stock 100 (the step of FIG. 25B).

It should be noted that in some applications of the multi-layer balloons formed using the methods described herein, such as the two-layer parison as described with reference to FIGS. 25A through 25D, the multi-layer parison does not necessarily have lubricating or slip layers. For example, the two-layer parison 120 of FIGS. 25A through 25D can simply comprise two single-layer extrusions formed from a substantially similar sized tube stock without having a slip layer disposed between the two side walls of the two-layer balloon stock 120.

Experiment to Test Superiority of Bi-Layer Balloon with Maximized Radial Expansion

An experiment was conducted to test the superiority of a bi-layer balloon with maximized radial expansion. The experiment was performed using the following three high pressure balloon designs: (1) a bi-layer balloon with both balloons having maximized radial expansion (“Balloon Design 1”); (2) a bi-layer balloon, produced from telescoping extrusion, with balloons having different expansion ratios (“Balloon Design 2”); and (3) a single layer balloon having a relatively thick wall (“Balloon Design 3”). Tests were conducted and utilized to provide statistical proof of certain characteristics of the three high pressure balloon designs, such as burst pressure, compliance, and fatigue testing.

The results of the experiment indicate that a bi-layer balloon with both balloons having maximized radial expansion (i.e., Balloon Design 1) has a 12% greater burst strength and can be subjected to 46% more fatigue cycles than a bi-layer balloon with balloons having different expansion ratios (i.e., Balloon Design 2). The results also demonstrate that a bi-layer balloon with both balloons having maximized radial expansion (i.e., Balloon Design 1) has a 14% greater burst strength and can be subjected to 68% more fatigue cycles than a single layer balloon having a thick wall (i.e., Balloon Design 3).

Purpose of the Experiment:

- Create and test multiple variations of plausible, high pressure, Nylon 12 balloon designs.
- Challenge the theory that two nested balloons with maximized expansion ratios is superior to nested balloons with different expansion ratios and thick single walled balloons.
  
  Tools and Equipment:
- All burst, compliance, and fatigue testing were completed with the following machines:
  - PT-3070 (Pressure Regulation): IA Asset 620
  - Laser Measurement System: IA Asset 326
  - Temperature Control System: IA Asset 519
- Wall Thickness Measurement Tool:
  - Mitutoyo Blade Micrometer: IA Asset 173
- Balloon Blowing Equipment:
  - Balloon Forming Machine: 2210H/110V
  - Computerized Double End Stretcher: CJS-3X12/110V
  - Center Mold: 316061-408
  - Distal End Plug: 502155-35
  - Proximal End Plug: 502155-34
    
    Part Number and Description of the Balloons Used for Patent Testing:
- 1. 511023 (Balloon Design 1): Multilayer balloon with both balloons having maximized radial expansion.
  - a. Inner and outer balloon extrusion part number: 315284-08
  - b. Inner and outer balloon extrusion dimensions: 0.090″×0.056″
- 2. 316085-X1 (Balloon Design 2): Multilayer balloon created from nested extrusion.
  - a. Inner extrusion part number: 315284-08
  - b. Inner extrusion dimensions: 0.090″×0.056″
  - c. Outer extrusion part number: 315284-X1
  - d. Outer extrusion dimensions: 0.126″×0.092″
- 3. 316085-X2 (Balloon Design 3): Thick, single layer balloon.
  - a. Extrusion part number: 315284-X2
  - b. Extrusion dimensions: 0.124″×0.056″
- 4. 316085-X3: Multilayer balloon created from nested extrusion. The inner layer extrusion is the same part number as the outer and is drawn down through a hot die so the outer diameter is slightly smaller than the inner diameter of the original tubing size.
  - a. Extrusion part number: 315284-08
  - b. Extrusion dimensions: 0.090″×0.056″
    
    Description of the Testing Requirements:
- 1. Burst and Compliance Testing: 10 samples per balloon part number.
  - While being submerged in 37° C. water, the balloon diameter is measured and recorded while being stepped in 2 ATM increments. The pressure is stepped and recorded until the balloon bursts. Compliance percentage, average burst, and minimum burst strength (“MBS”) are calculated.
- 2. Fatigue Testing: 10 samples per balloon part number.
  - Once the different balloons have been burst tested, the least MBS calculated will be used for fatigue testing.
  - Each balloon will undergo cycles from 0 to MBS until the balloon bursts. The number of cycles will be recorded and an average will be calculated.
    
    Balloon Development Notes:
- 1. Balloon part numbers 511023, 316085-X1, and 316085-X2 were formed using usual balloon blowing techniques.
- 2. Balloon part number 316085-X3 was not able to be formed.
  - To start the development, the necked down inner tubing was solely used to form the 8 mm balloon.
  - The logic used was if the inner balloon was not able to be formed, the nested extrusion will also not be able to be formed.
  - The extrusion was not able to expand to the walls of the mold due to an inner expansion ratio of approximately 14:1.
    
    Results:

Balloon Wall Thickness Measurements

316085-X1

(Telescoped
316085-X2

316085 & 316086
tubing
(Thick

(Standard)
w/o necking)
wall tubing)

Double Wall Thickness Measurement (Inches)

Burst Sample

Number

1
0.0062
0.0065
0.0068

2
0.0062
0.0063
0.0069

3
0.0064
0.0063
0.0067

4
0.0063
0.0068
0.0067

5
0.0064
0.0064
0.0069

6
0.0062
0.0070
0.0069

7
0.0063
0.0065
0.0068

8
0.0064
0.0065
0.0069

9
0.0064
0.0069
0.0068

10
0.0064
0.0063
0.0068

Average Double Wall
0.0063
0.0066
0.0068

Thickness (In)

St. Dev.
0.0001
0.0003
0.0001

% St. Dev.
1.5%
4.0%
1.2%

Relative Difference
0%
3.6%
7.9%

Fatigue Sample

Number

1
0.0064
0.0066
0.0068

2
0.0064
0.0065
0.0067

3
0.0064
0.0065
0.0067

4
0.0063
0.0063
0.0068

5
0.0064
0.0068
0.0069

6
0.0063
0.0066
0.0069

7
0.0065
0.0067
0.0069

8
0.0064
0.0067
0.0069

9
0.0063
0.0068
0.0068

10
0.0064
0.0067
0.0068

Average Double Wall
0.0064
0.0066
0.0068

Thickness (In)

St. Dev.
0.0001
0.0002
0.0001

% St. Dev.
1.0%
2.3%
1.2%

Relative Difference
0%
3.8%
6.9%

Burst Testing

316085-X1

(Telescoped
316085-X2

Burst Sample
316085 & 316086
tubing
(Thick

Number
(Standard)
w/o necking)
wall tubing)

1
40.04
39.46
36.09

2
41.38
40.03
35.94

3
40.27
37.85
36.08

4
42.19
36.22
35.94

5
42.21
34.03
37.37

6
40.03
37.89
35.94

7
43.76
38.12
36.14

8
40.03
37.4
36.76

9
44.34
34.04
37.85

10
42.75
37.78
35.94

Average Burst (atm)
41.70
37.28
36.41

Relative Burst (atm)
Standard
35.93
33.52

St. Dev.
1.609
2.005
0.690

% St. Dev.
3.9%
5.4%
1.9%

K-Factor
5.203
5.203
5.203

MBS = fatigue pressure
33.33
26.85
32.81

Relative MBS
33.33 (Standard)
25.87
30.22

Minimum (atm)
40.03
34.03
35.94

Maximum (atm)
44.34
40.03
37.85

Fatigue Testing

316085-X1

Fatigue Sample
316085 & 316086
(Telescoped
316085-X2

(number of cycles at
(Nested
tubing
(Thick

fail)
Balloons)
w/o necking)
wall tubing)

Fatigue Pressure (atm)
27
27
27

1
45
41
20

2
71
37
32

3
53
57
25

4
134
64
28

5
150
48
13

6
101
67
24

7
81
38
30

8
82
47
32

9
42
32
32

10
119
41
45

Average Cycle Number
88
47
28

Standard Deviation
37
12
9

% St. Dev.
42.7%
25.1%
30.4%

Relative Average
88 (Standard)
49
30

Description of Balloon Failure:

511023:

12% higher burst and 46% more fatigue cycles than 316085-X1.

14% higher burst and 68% more fatigue cycles than 316085-X2.

The superiority of the nested balloons is due to both balloons having the identical inner and outer expansion ratios.

The stresses caused by inflation and deflation are the same for each balloon when both have the same inner and outer expansion ratios.

When the stresses are the same, the balloons will burst at the same time which ensures maximized burst strength.

316085-X1:

The lower burst strength and fatigue cycles of this balloon are due to the nested tubing having different expansion ratios.

The outer extrusion has a medium expansion ratio of 2.9:1 while the inner extrusion has 4.4:1.

Due to the expansion ratio difference, the balloon layers are undergoing different stresses while being inflated and deflated.

During the burst test, two distinctive “pops” can be heard. The first rupture is the inner balloon and the second rupture is the outer balloon.

Due to the outer balloons lower expansion ratio, it can withstand more pressure and fatigue cycles than the inner balloon.

Once the inner balloon bursts, the second balloon immediately ruptures because the pressure is no longer contained by two layers.

318085-X2:

The lower burst strength and fatigue cycles of the thick walled balloon are caused by the same concept of a balloon with nested tubing having different expansion ratios.

The outer expansion ratio is 2.6:1 while the inner expansion ratio is 5.75:1. The inner diameter has to expand approximately 2.2 times farther than the outer diameter.

During the burst and fatigue testing, the inner surface of the balloon begins to fracture before the outer surface. This is due to the inner surface reaching its maximum expansion while the outer surface proceeds to grow.

Once a fracture begins on the inner surface of the balloon, it quickly tears through the entire wall of the balloon causing premature bursts.

According to the results of the experiment as set forth above, it is concluded that a bi-layer balloon constructed with two balloons with the same expansion ratios (i.e., Balloon Design 1) proves to have superior burst strength and cycle fatigue resistance when compared to a bi-layer balloon with balloons having different expansion ratios (i.e., Balloon Design 2) and to a single layer balloon having a thick wall (i.e., Balloon Design 3).

Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. In addition, while a number of variations of the invention have been shown and described in detail, other modifications, which are within the scope of this invention, will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art based upon this disclosure. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments may be made and still fall within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with or substituted for one another in order to form varying modes of the disclosed invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims.

Claims

1. A method of making a nested balloon comprising: selecting an inner balloon layer and an outer balloon layer, the inner balloon layer and the outer balloon layer comprising the same polymer material;providing a lubricant, wherein the lubricant is configured to be co-extruded onto one or more layers or between layers, applied to one or more layers, or injected between layers;blowing the inner balloon layer and the outer balloon layer separately to stretch the polymer material to align molecular chains along an inner wall of each balloon layer, wherein the inner balloon layer and the outer balloon layer have substantially the same shape and size along a body portion of the inner balloon layer and the outer balloon layer; andpositioning the inner balloon layer within outer balloon layer to form a nested balloon, wherein the nested balloon is configured to be expanded axially and radially in use.
2. The method as in claim 1, wherein blowing is accomplished before positioning the inner balloon layer within the outer balloon layer.
3. The method as in claim 1, wherein the lubricant comprises oil.
4. The method as in claim 1, wherein the outer balloon layer comprises nylon.
5. The method as in claim 1, wherein the inner balloon layer comprises nylon.
6. The method as in claim 1, wherein the inner balloon layer and the outer balloon layer fail at approximately the same pressure when a pressure is applied to the nested balloon.
7. The method as in claim 1, wherein the inner balloon layer and the outer balloon layer are configured to withstand at least about 40 atmospheres of applied pressure.
8. The method as in claim 1, wherein the inner balloon layer and the outer balloon layer are configured to withstand at least about 50 atmospheres of applied pressure.
9. The method as in claim 1, wherein the inner balloon layer and the outer balloon layer have substantially the same inner diameter.
10. The method as in claim 1, wherein the inner balloon layer and the outer balloon layer have substantially the same outer diameter.
11. The method as in claim 1, wherein blowing the inner balloon layer and the outer balloon layer separately comprises blowing the inner balloon layer and an outer balloon layer on the same mold at separate times.
12. The method as in claim 1, wherein the inner balloon layer and the outer balloon layer comprise different necks.
13. A method of making a nested balloon comprising: selecting an inner layer and an outer layer, the inner layer and the outer layer comprising the same material;expanding the inner layer to within approximately 15% of the optimal radial stretch of an inner surface of the inner layer;separately expanding the outer layer to within approximately 15% of the optimal radial stretch of an inner surface of the outer layer, wherein the inner layer and the outer layer have substantially the same shape and size along a body portion of the inner layer and the outer layer after expanding the inner layer and the outer layer; andpositioning the inner layer within outer layer to form a nested balloon.
14. The method as in claim 13, wherein the outer layer comprises nylon.
15. The method as in claim 13, wherein the inner layer comprises nylon.
16. The method as in claim 13, further comprising providing a lubricant, wherein the lubricant comprises oil.
17. A method of making a nested balloon comprising: selecting an inner balloon and an outer balloon, each balloon comprising the same material;providing a lubricant between the inner balloon and the outer bal loon;independently forming each of the inner balloon and the outer balloon by blowing the inner balloon and the outer balloon separately;after independently forming each of the inner balloon and outer balloon, positioning the inner balloon within the outer balloon to form a nested balloon;wherein, after positioning, the inner balloon and the outer balloon are configured to expand axially and radially.
18. The method as in claim 17, wherein the outer balloon comprises nylon.
19. The method as in claim 17, wherein the inner balloon comprises nylon.
20. The method as in claim 17, wherein the lubricant comprises oil.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/065,243 filed Oct. 28, 2013 and currently pending, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/108,868 filed May 16, 2011, which issued on Oct. 29, 2013 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,568,648, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/611,748, filed Dec. 15, 2006, which issued on May 17, 2011 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,942,847 and which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/751,014 filed on Dec. 16, 2005, entitled “Very High Pressure Multi-Layer Balloons for Medical Applications and Methods for Manufacturing Same,” and to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/831,529 filed on Jul. 18, 2006, entitled “Multi-Layer Balloons for Medical Applications and Methods for Manufacturing the Same,” all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (285)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
1051777	Mars	Jan 1913	A
1210895	Brinkman	Jan 1917	A
1894800	Stowe	Jan 1933	A
2030803	Temple	Feb 1936	A
2617319	Richards	Nov 1952	A
3044326	Erich	Jul 1962	A
3273367	Hallden	Sep 1966	A
3374651	Haug	Mar 1968	A
3587287	Vacca	Jun 1971	A
3645126	Kralowetz et al.	Feb 1972	A
3648501	Kralowetz	Mar 1972	A
3668915	Ribback	Jun 1972	A
3845650	Romanov	Nov 1974	A
4047420	Edwards	Sep 1977	A
4327736	Inoue	May 1982	A
4384470	Fiore	May 1983	A
4418458	Hunter	Dec 1983	A
4637396	Cook	Jan 1987	A
4651721	Mikulich et al.	Mar 1987	A
4651738	Demer	Mar 1987	A
4685447	Iversen et al.	Aug 1987	A
4696085	Sauder	Sep 1987	A
4702252	Brooks et al.	Oct 1987	A
4781192	Demer	Nov 1988	A
4891877	Talavera	Jan 1990	A
4932956	Reddy et al.	Jun 1990	A
4932958	Reddy et al.	Jun 1990	A
5105091	Igarashi	Apr 1992	A
5142160	Storbeck	Aug 1992	A
5171299	Heitzmann et al.	Dec 1992	A
5184733	Armarson et al.	Feb 1993	A
5195969	Wang et al.	Mar 1993	A
5201706	Noguchi et al.	Apr 1993	A
5207700	Euteneuer	May 1993	A
5270086	Hamlin	Dec 1993	A
5290306	Trotta et al.	Mar 1994	A
5304340	Downey	Apr 1994	A
5342305	Shonk	Aug 1994	A
5344400	Kaneko et al.	Sep 1994	A
5344401	Radisch et al.	Sep 1994	A
5350361	Tsukashima et al.	Sep 1994	A
5358486	Saab	Oct 1994	A
5358487	Miller	Oct 1994	A
5366442	Wang et al.	Nov 1994	A
5445646	Euteneuer et al.	Aug 1995	A
5447497	Sogard et al.	Sep 1995	A
5478320	Trotta	Dec 1995	A
5499980	Euteneuer	Mar 1996	A
5500180	Bard	Mar 1996	A
5512051	Wang et al.	Apr 1996	A
5514092	Forman et al.	May 1996	A
5538510	Fontirroche et al.	Jul 1996	A
5587125	Roychowdhury	Dec 1996	A
5609056	Seeber	Mar 1997	A
5613979	Trotta et al.	Mar 1997	A
5620649	Trotta	Apr 1997	A
5647848	Jorgensen	Jul 1997	A
5681522	Roychowdhury	Oct 1997	A
5693014	Abele et al.	Dec 1997	A
5746745	Abele et al.	May 1998	A
5752934	Campbell et al.	May 1998	A
5755690	Saab	May 1998	A
5797877	Hamilton et al.	Aug 1998	A
5807327	Green et al.	Sep 1998	A
5820594	Fontirroche et al.	Oct 1998	A
5833657	Reinhardt et al.	Nov 1998	A
5841541	Dlugos	Nov 1998	A
5843027	Stone et al.	Dec 1998	A
5865721	Andrews et al.	Feb 1999	A
5868704	Campbell et al.	Feb 1999	A
5868776	Wright	Feb 1999	A
5879282	Fischell et al.	Mar 1999	A
5879369	Ishida	Mar 1999	A
5908406	Ostapchenko et al.	Jun 1999	A
5947993	Morales	Sep 1999	A
5960379	Shimizu et al.	Sep 1999	A
6004289	Saab	Dec 1999	A
6010480	Abele et al.	Jan 2000	A
6024722	Rau et al.	Feb 2000	A
6024752	Horn et al.	Feb 2000	A
6036697	DiCaprio	Mar 2000	A
6059751	Ostapchenko et al.	May 2000	A
6070446	Blaimschein	Jun 2000	A
6086556	Hamilton et al.	Jul 2000	A
6120477	Campbell et al.	Sep 2000	A
6124007	Wang et al.	Sep 2000	A
6132824	Hamlin	Oct 2000	A
6136011	Stambaugh	Oct 2000	A
6136258	Wang et al.	Oct 2000	A
6141106	Blum	Oct 2000	A
6242063	Ferrera et al.	Jun 2001	B1
6293959	Miller et al.	Sep 2001	B1
6296633	Helgerson	Oct 2001	B1
6308546	Blaimschein et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6319228	Kastenhofer	Nov 2001	B1
6328925	Wang et al.	Dec 2001	B1
6358227	Ferrera et al.	Mar 2002	B1
6360577	Austin	Mar 2002	B2
6395208	Herweck et al.	May 2002	B1
6419685	Di Caprio et al.	Jul 2002	B2
6453729	Muto et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6461326	Yang et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6481262	Ching et al.	Nov 2002	B2
6482348	Wang et al.	Nov 2002	B1
6506202	Dutta et al.	Jan 2003	B1
6517547	Feeser et al.	Feb 2003	B1
6547768	Trotta	Apr 2003	B2
6585688	Ferrera et al.	Jul 2003	B2
6645422	Jung et al.	Nov 2003	B2
6695809	Lee	Feb 2004	B1
6701633	Ohtsuka	Mar 2004	B2
6756094	Wang et al.	Jun 2004	B1
6773447	Laguna	Aug 2004	B2
6787095	Wang et al.	Sep 2004	B2
6866649	Ferrera et al.	Mar 2005	B2
6872215	Crocker et al.	Mar 2005	B2
6881216	Di Caprio et al.	Apr 2005	B2
6896842	Hamilton et al.	May 2005	B1
6902571	Owens et al.	Jun 2005	B2
6911017	Lee et al.	Jun 2005	B2
6923787	Wang	Aug 2005	B2
6946173	Lim et al.	Sep 2005	B2
6951675	Chin et al.	Oct 2005	B2
6955661	Herweck et al.	Oct 2005	B1
6972024	Kilpatrick et al.	Dec 2005	B1
6988881	Motsenbocker et al.	Jan 2006	B2
6993953	Stupecky	Feb 2006	B2
7010953	Stupecky	Mar 2006	B2
7025745	Lim et al.	Apr 2006	B2
7026026	Ferrera et al.	Apr 2006	B2
7037562	Jimenez	May 2006	B2
7105013	Durcan	Sep 2006	B2
7108684	Farnan	Sep 2006	B2
7126694	Bachalo	Oct 2006	B1
7147905	Fukuda et al.	Dec 2006	B2
7172796	Kinoshita et al.	Feb 2007	B2
7290352	Defarme et al.	Nov 2007	B2
7314461	Carter et al.	Jan 2008	B2
7314480	Eidenschink et al.	Jan 2008	B2
7335184	Laguna	Feb 2008	B2
7367989	Eidenschink	May 2008	B2
7389670	Kokish et al.	Jun 2008	B1
7418851	Labro	Sep 2008	B2
7448243	Motsenbocker	Nov 2008	B1
7449010	Hayase et al.	Nov 2008	B1
7553292	Kilpatrick et al.	Jun 2009	B2
7578165	Stupecky	Aug 2009	B1
7637886	Herweck et al.	Dec 2009	B2
7641688	Lesh	Jan 2010	B2
7659000	Burgmeier et al.	Feb 2010	B2
7670364	Dusbabek et al.	Mar 2010	B2
7682335	Pepper et al.	Mar 2010	B2
7682553	Wang et al.	Mar 2010	B2
7713233	Burgmeier et al.	May 2010	B2
7713281	Leeflang et al.	May 2010	B2
7731685	Ragheb et al.	Jun 2010	B2
7758572	Weber et al.	Jul 2010	B2
7762804	Stupecky	Jul 2010	B1
7762984	Kumoyama et al.	Jul 2010	B2
7781038	Hamilton et al.	Aug 2010	B2
7828766	Durcan	Nov 2010	B2
7914486	Chen et al.	Mar 2011	B2
7942847	Stupecky et al.	May 2011	B2
7947059	Chin et al.	May 2011	B2
7951110	Bishop et al.	May 2011	B2
7976497	Shah et al.	Jul 2011	B2
7985228	Phan et al.	Jul 2011	B2
7985234	Wang et al.	Jul 2011	B2
8002744	Pepper et al.	Aug 2011	B2
8025943	Hamilton et al.	Sep 2011	B2
8034066	Goeken et al.	Oct 2011	B2
8043296	Chasmawala et al.	Oct 2011	B2
8043362	Gong et al.	Oct 2011	B2
8048028	Horn et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8052638	Lee et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8066780	Chen et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8070719	Lee	Dec 2011	B2
8122809	Simpson	Feb 2012	B2
8162969	Brister et al.	Apr 2012	B2
8257074	Stupecky	Sep 2012	B1
8388575	Durcan	Mar 2013	B2
8394055	Durcan	Mar 2013	B2
8440090	Haslinger et al.	May 2013	B2
8444608	Haslinger et al.	May 2013	B2
8535596	Durcan	Sep 2013	B2
8568648	Stupecky et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8684963	Qiu et al.	Apr 2014	B2
8752261	Van Sciver	Jun 2014	B2
8864786	Deshmukh	Oct 2014	B2
9089669	Haslinger et al.	Jul 2015	B2
9095689	Durcan	Aug 2015	B2
9211392	Durcan	Dec 2015	B2
9265918	Chen et al.	Feb 2016	B2
9381325	Haslinger et al.	Jul 2016	B2
9625069	Schwager	Apr 2017	B2
9833600	Stupecky	Dec 2017	B2
20010001890	Austin	May 2001	A1
20020018866	Lee et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020090476	Ling et al.	Jul 2002	A1
20020122903	Ferrera et al.	Sep 2002	A1
20020163104	Motsenbocker et al.	Nov 2002	A1
20020165523	Chin et al.	Nov 2002	A1
20020177866	Weikel et al.	Nov 2002	A1
20020187289	Chang et al.	Dec 2002	A1
20030093107	Parsonage et al.	May 2003	A1
20030149468	Wallsten	Aug 2003	A1
20040006359	Laguna	Jan 2004	A1
20040019362	Ferrera et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20040078052	St. Pierre et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040096538	Goff et al.	May 2004	A1
20040098021	Laguna	May 2004	A1
20040181252	Boyle et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040191443	Hamlin	Sep 2004	A1
20040207127	Hamlin	Oct 2004	A1
20050008560	Kataoka et al.	Jan 2005	A1
20050015047	Shah	Jan 2005	A1
20050015105	Tang et al.	Jan 2005	A1
20050027248	Suzuki et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050043679	Devens, Jr. et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050075711	Neary	Apr 2005	A1
20050113856	Epstein et al.	May 2005	A1
20050137619	Schewe et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050209629	Kerr et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050228429	Burgmeier et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050231721	Lnenaga et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050238833	Wang et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050251107	Olson	Nov 2005	A1
20050261721	Radish, Jr. et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20050261760	Weber	Nov 2005	A1
20050266109	Chin et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20050267596	Chen et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20050288630	Conway	Dec 2005	A1
20060079918	Creston	Apr 2006	A1
20060079922	Creston	Apr 2006	A1
20060085023	Davies, Jr. et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060165926	Weber	Jul 2006	A1
20060182873	Klisch et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20070055301	Campbell et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070142772	Deshmukh et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070167973	Stupecky et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20080051760	Schoenle et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080065188	Pallazza	Mar 2008	A1
20080086083	Towler	Apr 2008	A1
20080097301	Alpini et al.	Apr 2008	A1
20080125711	Alpini et al.	May 2008	A1
20080157444	Melsheimer	Jul 2008	A1
20080228138	Van Sloten et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20090048684	Lesh	Feb 2009	A1
20090089079	Goldhaber et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090299401	Tilson	Dec 2009	A1
20090299450	Johnson et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090312806	Sherman et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20100042199	Burton	Feb 2010	A1
20100049123	Alpini et al.	Feb 2010	A1
20100100107	Duggal et al.	Apr 2010	A1
20100145266	Orlowski	Jun 2010	A1
20100174235	Yamaguchi	Jul 2010	A1
20100191089	Stebler et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100234875	Allex et al.	Sep 2010	A1
20100241152	Tilson et al.	Sep 2010	A1
20100252965	Wang et al.	Oct 2010	A1
20100262218	Deshmukh	Oct 2010	A1
20100331965	Dugas et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20110022150	Durcan	Jan 2011	A1
20110022152	Grandt	Jan 2011	A1
20110046724	Heilmann et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110160661	Elton	Jun 2011	A1
20110214802	Stupecky et al.	Sep 2011	A1
20110295203	Hayes et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20120016405	Hamilton et al.	Jan 2012	A1
20120065718	Simpson et al.	Mar 2012	A1
20130184643	Warnack	Jul 2013	A1
20130253425	Haslinger et al.	Sep 2013	A1
20140116606	Stupecky et al.	May 2014	A1
20140155823	Qiu et al.	Jun 2014	A1
20140276401	Lee et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140319750	Stupecky et al.	Oct 2014	A1
20150073468	Yang	Mar 2015	A1
20150105815	Horn et al.	Apr 2015	A1
20150320969	Haslinger et al.	Nov 2015	A1
20150367109	Maeda et al.	Dec 2015	A1
20160008589	Stupecky et al.	Jan 2016	A1
20160058981	Durcan	Mar 2016	A1
20160114141	Mabry et al.	Apr 2016	A1
20160129158	Chen et al.	May 2016	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (32)

Number	Date	Country
863490	Feb 1978	BE
2043346	Nov 1992	CA
2199333	Oct 2000	CA
2775946	Apr 2011	CA
10125998	Nov 2002	DE
0421031	Apr 1991	EP
1611917	Jan 2006	EP
1948286	Aug 2017	EP
2 783 722	Jan 2019	EP
2 029 215	Mar 2019	EP
02119874	May 1990	JP
H09-507141	Jul 1997	JP
H10-314311	Dec 1998	JP
2004-512980	Apr 2004	JP
2009-519770	May 2009	JP
2012-504018	Feb 2012	JP
6486297	Mar 2019	JP
WO 9517920	Jul 1995	WO
WO 9640350	Dec 1996	WO
WO 9732624	Sep 1997	WO
WO 9913924	Mar 1999	WO
WO 2001064278	Sep 2001	WO
WO 2001089619	Nov 2001	WO
WO 200236196	May 2002	WO
WO 2003004248	Jan 2003	WO
WO 2005115496	Dec 2005	WO
WO 2007075585	Jul 2007	WO
WO 2009006748	Jan 2009	WO
WO 2013145479	Mar 2013	WO
WO 2014179505	Nov 2014	WO
WO 2016007928	Jan 2016	WO
WO 2016069640	May 2016	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (15)

Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 14/924,278, filed Oct. 27, 2015, Stupecky et al.
International Search Report with Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 2, 2008, for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US06/48268, filed Dec. 15, 2006.
Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2012 in Japanese Application No. 2008-545887 referencing a Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2011 (total of 4 pages).
Canadian Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2013 in Canadian Application No. 2,633,578 in 3 pages.
European Office Action for European Application No. 06845731.6-1526, dated Jun. 6, 2012 in 5 pages.
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2008-545887, dated Dec. 6, 2011 in 6 pages.
Sample Measurement Testing, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,545, filed Nov. 17, 2008.
European Office Action for European Application No. 06845731.6-1526, dated Feb. 16, 2016 in 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2014/036259 dated Apr. 30, 2015 in 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/0040056 dated Jul. 10, 2015 in 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/057642 dated Oct. 27, 2015 in 10 pages.
OPN NC 35 atm High Pressure Balloon, 4 pages, dated 2012.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15854288, dated Jun. 15, 2018 in 6 pages.
Intention to Grant for European Application No. 06845731.6-1526, dated Jul. 19, 2018 in 7 pages.
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2017-522970, dated Aug. 9, 2019 in 4 pages.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20180064917 A1	Mar 2018	US

Provisional Applications (2)

	Number	Date	Country
	60751014	Dec 2005	US
	60831529	Jul 2006	US

Divisions (1)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	11611748	Dec 2006	US
Child	13108868		US

Continuations (2)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	14065243	Oct 2013	US
Child	15701839		US
Parent	13108868	May 2011	US
Child	14065243		US

Methods for manufacturing multi-layer balloons for medical applications

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Term Extension

Abstract