The present disclosure relates to apparatus and methods for manufacturing operations using non-contact position sensing.
The fabrication of large structures may involve the performance of a large number of manufacturing operations on the structure, such as the drilling of a large number of holes. Conventional structures that require a large number of manufacturing operations include, for example, aircraft, missiles, ships, railcars, sheet metal buildings, and other similar structures. In particular, conventional aircraft fabrication processes typically involve the drilling of a large number of holes in wing sections of the aircraft to allow these sections to be attached to each other and to the airframe.
A variety of devices have been developed to facilitate drilling operations involving the drilling of a large number of holes. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,850,763 issued to Jack et al. discloses a drilling system that includes a pair of rails temporarily attached to an aircraft fuselage. A support carriage is slideably coupled to the rails and supports a drill assembly. A template attached to the aircraft fuselage provides an indication of the desired locations of the holes that are to be formed in the aircraft fuselage. As the carriage is moved along the rails, a locking mechanism (or trigger) interacts with the template to securely position the carriage for a subsequent drilling operation.
Although desirable results have been achieved using the prior art drilling systems, there is room for improvement. For example, prior art assemblies typically need to be carefully oriented on the workpiece prior to performing manufacturing operations to ensure that the manufacturing operations are performed in the proper locations. Orienting the prior art assemblies on the workpiece may require physical contacts between the support carriage or other portions of the assembly and one or more contact points on the workpiece. Such physical contacts may be subject to degradation, especially through repeated usage, and may also adversely impact the quality of some types of workpiece surfaces. Therefore, a need exists for an improved position orientation system for performing manufacturing operations on a workpiece.
Furthermore, prior art manufacturing assemblies typically include a controller that is positioned remotely from the support carriage that supports a tool assembly over the workpiece, as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,550,129 B1 issued to Buttrick and U.S. Pat. No. 6,073,326 issued to Banks et al. In such systems, control signals for commanding movement of the support carriage and for controlling manufacturing operations using the tool assembly are transmitted via a system of control cables that extend between the remotely-positioned controller and the components of the support carriage and the tool assembly. Although desirable results have been achieved using such manufacturing assemblies, the extent of movement of the support carriage and the operation of the tool assembly may be limited by the lengths of the control cables or by the mobility of the controller within the confines of the manufacturing environment.
The present invention is directed to apparatus and methods for manufacturing operations using position sensing. Apparatus and methods in accordance with the present invention may advantageously improve the accuracy, efficiency, and throughput of manufacturing operations on a workpiece.
In one embodiment, an apparatus for performing a manufacturing operation on a workpiece includes a track assembly adapted to be attached to the workpiece, a carriage assembly moveably coupled to the track assembly and moveable relative to the workpiece, and a position sensor. The position sensor is operatively coupled to the carriage assembly and includes a sensor element adapted to be operatively positioned relative to the workpiece. The sensor element is further adapted to detect at least one edge of an index feature on the workpiece from a distance away from the index feature. Because the sensor element detects an edge of the index feature from a distance away from the index feature, the sensor element advantageously does not physically contact the index feature, and may therefore provide improved reliability and maintainability in comparison with prior art systems.
In another embodiment, an apparatus for performing a manufacturing operation on a workpiece includes a track assembly adapted to be attached to the workpiece, a carriage assembly moveably coupled to the track assembly and moveable relative to the workpiece, and a position sensor operatively coupled to the carriage assembly. The position sensor includes a sensor element adapted to be operatively positioned relative to the workpiece, and a sensing circuit having a first portion coupled to the sensing element, the first portion being adapted to receive an analog input signal and provide a conditioned analog output signal on a first output node. The sensing circuit further includes a second portion coupled to the first portion and adapted to receive the conditioned analog output signal and to provide a digital output signal on a second output node. Thus, the sensor element advantageously provides both analog and digital output signals to the relevant controller apparatus, thereby improving the versatility and accuracy of the manufacturing system.
In a further embodiment, an apparatus for performing a manufacturing operation on a workpiece including a track assembly adapted to be attached to the workpiece, a carriage assembly moveably coupled to the track assembly and including a drive assembly operable to translate the carriage assembly along the track assembly, and a controller mounted on the carriage assembly and operatively coupled to the drive assembly. The controller is adapted to transmit control signals to the drive assembly to control movement of the carriage assembly over the workpiece. Because the controller is mounted on the carriage assembly, the carriage assembly may operate autonomously to perform manufacturing operations on the workpiece, and the amount of support equipment may be reduced.
The preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings.
The present invention relates to apparatus and methods for manufacturing operations using position sensing. Many specific details of certain embodiments of the invention are set forth in the following description and in
As further shown in
The widths of the rails 22, 24 extend substantially parallel to the surface of the workpiece 20 when the vacuum cup assemblies 14 are attached to the workpiece surface 102. Because the rails 22, 24 may bend relatively easily about the widthwise directions and to twist about their longitudinal axes, the rails 22, 24 may flex and twist as needed to substantially follow the surface of the workpiece 20 and the vacuum cup assemblies 14 maintain each rail at a substantially constant distance from the surface of the workpiece 20. In this manner, the major surfaces of the rails 22, 24 may be substantially perpendicular to the surface normal of the workpiece 20 at any point along each rail.
With continued reference to
The spring plates 34, 36 on which the rollers 32 are mounted may flex and twist as needed (i.e. as dictated by the contour of the workpiece surface 102 as the carriage assembly 120 traverses the rails 22, 24) to allow a limited degree of relative movement to occur between the x-axis carriage 30 and the rollers 32. This is facilitated by making the spring plates 34, 36 relatively narrow at their middles and wider at their ends, so that the plates 34, 36 preferentially bend and twist at approximately the middle rather than at the ends where the rollers 32 are mounted. Thus, a limited degree of relative movement can occur between the x-axis carriage 30 and the rails 22, 24. The net result is that the x-axis carriage 30 enables the carriage assembly 120 to traverse the rails 22, 24 along the x-axis (i.e. the axis parallel to the length direction of the rails 22, 24) even though the rails 22, 24 may be bending and twisting in somewhat different ways relative to each other. In effect, the rails 22, 24 conform to the contour of the workpiece 20 and thus, the thickness direction of the rails 22, 24 is approximately normal to the surface of the workpiece 20 at any point along the path defined by the rails 22, 24. Consequently, a reference axis of the carriage assembly 120 (in the illustrated embodiment, a z-axis normal to the plane of the x-axis carriage 30) is maintained substantially normal to the workpiece 20 at any position of the carriage assembly 120 along the rails 22, 24.
As best shown in
To improve accuracy of the x-axis position of the carriage assembly 120, the pinion gear 44 may have a constant height relative to the rack 38 at any point along the reference rail 24. To accomplish this height control, the rotation axis of the pinion gear 44 may preferably lie in the same plane as that defined by the rotational axes of the two rollers 32 mounted on the end of the spring plate 36. More particularly, the axes of the rollers 32 may be substantially parallel to each other and substantially normal to the workpiece surface 102, and the axis of the pinion gear 44 may be substantially parallel to the workpiece surface 102 and may lie in the plane of the roller axes.
As further shown in
In operation, the manufacturing assembly 100 may be mounted onto the workpiece 20 and vacuum may be provided to the vacuum assemblies 14, thereby securing the track assembly 110 to the workpiece 20 in a desired position. The carriage assembly 120 may then be moved to a desired position along the track assembly 110. The controller 130 may transmit control signals to the first drive motor 40, rotating the first drive gear 44 which engages with the rack 38 to drive the carriage assembly 120 along the track assembly 110. Similarly, the controller 130 may transmit control signals to the second drive motor 60 to adjust the position of the y-axis carriage 50 relative to the x-axis carriage 30.
As shown in
It will be appreciated that the tool assembly 150 may be a drill spindle module or other drilling device suitable for performing drilling operations, including, for example, those drilling devices commercially-available from Cooper Tools, Inc. of Lexington, S.C., West Coast Industries, Inc. of Seattle, Wash., Recoules, S. A. of Ozoir-la-Ferriere, France, or Global Industrial Technologies, Inc. of Dallas, Tex. In alternate embodiments, the tool assembly 150 may be any of a wide variety of manufacturing tools, including, for example, riveters, mechanical and electromagnetic dent pullers, welders, wrenches, clamps, sanders, nailers, screw guns, routers, degreasers, washers, etchers, deburring tools, lasers, tape applicators, or virtually any other desired type of manufacturing tools or measuring instruments.
With reference to
In one aspect, the sensing element 148 includes a bright LED coaxial fiber optic cable that uses a lens system to focus incident or illuminating light onto the workpiece 20. In brief, the incident light may be transmitted through the center fiber of the coaxial fiber optic cable, through a lens, and may be reflected by the surface of the workpiece 20. The reflected light may then be collected through the lens and returned to a sensor amplifier through the outer portion of the coaxial fiber optic cable. The sensor amplifier may then convert the intensity of the light into an analog electrical signal. The output from the sensor amplifier may be calibrated to a focal point of the lens by reading the reflected light from a standard white reflective surface. As the scan path encounters various features on the surface, the reflected light may be analyzed and when the collected data match a defined set of parameters, a known index feature (e.g. fastener, hole, etc.) can be recognized. The signal may be read and correlated to a position on the surface by using feedback from a positioning system. This location information may then be used to position other equipment on the surface of the workpiece 20, making it possible to control a system of tools or processes, as described more frilly below.
With continued reference to
Eventually, based on the reflected signals 203, the first edge 207 (
Next, in step 212, the method 200 uses the coordinates of the first and second edges 207, 209 to calculate a first center 211 along the first path 205, and repositions the sensor 144 at a location spaced apart from the index feature 21 with a value along the first direction (e.g. the y coordinate) that corresponds to the value of the first center 211. The sensor 144 is then advanced along a second path 213 (shown as the x direction in
With reference to
As shown in
After the additional sweep 232 is conducted, the method 200 may again determine whether the desired degree of accuracy has been reached in step 228. If not, additional sweeps similar to the third sweep 232 may be conducted along, for example, different paths. If additional sweeps are not desired, then the method 200 proceeds to step 230, and the coordinates of the index center are output. The results of the third sweep 232 (or more sweeps) may provide an improved indication of the index center of the index feature 21. For example, the index center may be determined as the average of the coordinates of the second and third centers 219, 227. After the index center of the index feature 21 is output (step 230), the method 200 may continue in step 248 to the next phase of manufacturing operations.
It may be appreciated that the particular locations and directions of the first, second, and third paths 205, 213, 221 of the method 200 may be varied from the particular embodiment shown in
As further shown in
More specifically, the leading and trailing edges 306, 308 may be computed from the signal level 302 by first computing an ambient reflectivity level (portion A), such as by computing a running average of the sensor level 302. During the sensor sweep 304, as the sensor level 302 drops below a predetermined threshold, such as a predetermined percentage of the ambient reflectivity level, an edge detection procedure may be invoked. The edge detection procedure may store the minimum sensor value (location C) corresponding to the leading edge 306 and the position coordinates thereof, and may also store the same information from the minimum sensor value corresponding to the trailing edge 308 (location F). A center may then be mathematically computed from the positions of the two minimum sensor values (locations C and F).
It will be appreciated that the characteristics of the sensor level may vary, and that various index features may provide sensor levels having different shapes, trends, and characteristics than that shown in the graph 300 of
In operation, the position sensor assembly 140 may be employed to determine the locations of one or more index features 21 on the workpiece 20, thereby precisely defining the position of the manufacturing assembly 100 on the workpiece 20. This information may then be stored in a memory device of the controller 130. After the position sensor assembly 140 has been employed for this purpose, the position sensor assembly 140 may be removed from the carriage assembly 120, and the tool assembly 150 may be installed on the carriage assembly 120. Using command and control information stored in its memory device, the controller 130 may then autonomously control the carriage assembly 120 and the tool assembly 150 to perform the desired manufacturing operations at the desired locations on the workpiece 20. Different tool assemblies may be interchanged to and from the carriage assembly 120 to perform different manufacturing operations as desired.
Manufacturing assemblies having the position sensor assembly in accordance with the teachings of the present invention may advantageously improve the quality and efficiency of manufacturing operations on a workpiece. The position sensor assembly may provide a relatively fast, automated method of precisely locating the manufacturing assembly on the workpiece using an indexing feature that may already be part of the workpiece or the structure. The need for physical contact index points, the accuracy of which may become degraded, is thereby reduced or eliminated. The need to precisely position the track assembly on the workpiece at the start of manufacturing operations is also reduced or eliminated. The position sensor may accurately determine the location of the manufacturing assembly on the workpiece, and the data corresponding to the desired locations of the manufacturing operations (e.g. the hole pattern for a plurality of drilling operations) which are stored in memory may simply be rotated or transformed in machine space into proper alignment and orientation with the actual location of the track assembly on the workpiece using standard transformation matrix algorithms. In this way, the accuracy, consistency, and efficiency of the manufacturing operations on the workpiece may be improved, and the costs associated with performing, inspecting, and reworking the workpiece may be reduced.
The manufacturing assembly 100 having the position sensor assembly 140 further provides the capability to detect an index feature on the workpiece 20 without the need for physical contact between contact sensors, feeler gauges, or other physical contact devices on the carriage assembly 120 and corresponding contact features on the workpiece 20. The sensor element may detect the index feature from a distance away from the index feature, thereby eliminating any need for physical contact between the sensor element and the index feature. Because there is no physical contact, the position sensor assembly may provide improved performance over alternate sensor systems that require physical contact and that may be bent, damaged, or otherwise degraded during transport, storage, or during the performance of manufacturing operations. In this way, the position sensor assembly may improve the accuracy of the manufacturing processes, and may reduce the labor associated with the process of orienting the manufacturing assembly on the workpiece. Also, the position sensor assembly may advantageously reduce or eliminate the possibility of damage to the surface of the workpiece that may otherwise be caused by physical contact with the surface, reducing the need for repairs and reworking of the workpiece. Thus, the overall efficiency and throughput of the manufacturing operation may be improved.
It may be appreciated that a variety of alternate embodiments of apparatus and methods may be conceived in accordance with the present invention, and that the invention is not limited to the particular apparatus and methods described above and shown in the accompanying figures. For example, it may be noted that the carriage assembly 120 and the track assembly 110 may assume a wide variety of alternate embodiments, including, for example, the rail and carriage assemblies taught by U.S. Pat. No. 4,850,763 issued to Jack et al, and any of the carriage assemblies and track assemblies disclosed in co-pending, commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/016,524, which application is incorporated herein by reference.
In another aspect, a control circuit 400 may be employed that receives and enhances an output signal of an analog sensor of the position sensor assembly 140. For example,
Manufacturing assemblies that includes the sensing circuit 400 may provide improved position accuracy over alternate systems. Because the sensing circuit 400 may receive an analog signal from the sensing element and provides both a conditioned analog output and a digital output, the sensing circuit may provide a capability of cross-checking the results of the position detection of an index feature by enabling the controller to compare and utilize both analog and digital output signals. The sensing circuit 400 may also provide improved versatility by enabling the position sensor assembly to be utilized with both analog or digital controllers or other desired electronic components.
It may be appreciated that the various operations of the manufacturing assembly 100 may be controlled by the controller 130, including the positioning of the carriage assembly 120 on the track assembly 110, the operations of the position sensor assembly 140, and the positioning and engagement of the tool assembly 150 with respect to the workpiece 20. These operations may be accomplished in an automated or semi-automated manner using the controller 134 equipped with computerized numerically-controlled (CNC) methods and algorithms. Alternately, the positioning may be performed manually or partially-manually by an operator, such as, for example, by having the operator provide manual control inputs to the controller 134, or by temporarily disabling or neutralizing the above-referenced motors and actuators of the carriage and clamp-up assemblies 120, 160 to permit manual movement.
Typically, to provide a desired degree of positional accuracy for performing manufacturing operations, the index centers of two index features 21 may be determined using the methods and apparatus described above. After the one or more index centers of the index features 21 have been determined, control algorithms of the manufacturing assembly 100 may be used to transform a data pattern stored in a memory of a control system (e.g. in the controller 130) into machine space for controlling the manufacturing operations performed by the manufacturing assembly 100 on the workpiece 20. These transformations may be performed using standard, well-known mathematical algorithms commonly employed in presently-existing CNC machining processes.
Referring again to
The manufacturing assembly 100 having the controller 130 mounted to the carriage assembly 120 may further improve the efficiency and throughput of the manufacturing operations. Because the controller 130 is mounted on the carriage assembly 120, the amount of cables extending between the controller 130 and the portions of the carriage assembly (e.g. the drive assembly, the position sensor assembly, etc.) and the tool assembly 150 may be reduced compared with prior art manufacturing assemblies. Thus, the manufacturing assembly may provide improved mobility of the carriage assembly over the track assembly because the movement of the carriage assembly is not limited by the lengths of the control cables extending between the carriage assembly to a remotely-located controller, or by the mobility of a remotely-located controller within the confines of the manufacturing environment. The combination of the carriage assembly 120 and the controller 130 may even allow for a single operator to move these components between various locations to conduct manufacturing operations at different locations or on different workpieces, thereby further improving the efficiency and throughput of the manufacturing process.
In operation, each of the sensor and tool units 502, 504 may operate autonomously under the control of their respective controllers 130, or semi-autonomously under the control of both the controller 130 and the master controller 506, or may be fully controlled by the master controller 506. In one embodiment, the sensor unit 502 may perform the function of locating various indexing features distributed over the workpiece 520 in the manner described above, which information may be transmitted to the master controller 506. The master controller 506 may then provide command and control signals to one or more tool units 504 to precisely position the tool units 504 and to perform the desired manufacturing operations on the workpiece 520. Alternately, the locations of the indexing features may be transmitted from the sensor unit 502 directly to one or more of the tool units 504, and the tool units 504 may operate autonomously to perform the desired manufacturing operations at the appropriate locations on the workpiece 520. After locating the indexing features on a first portion of the workpiece 520, the sensor unit 502 may move automatically to a next portion, or may be commanded to proceed to the next portion of the workpiece 520 by the master controller 506 to make room for the tool units 504 or to locate additional index features.
The manufacturing assembly 500 may further improve the efficiency and throughput of manufacturing operations. As noted above, because the controller 130 of each unit 502, 504 is mounted to the carriage assembly 120, the number of cables and wires associated with each unit 502, 504 may be reduced, thereby improving the mobility of each unit over the workpiece 520. Because the need for cables extending between each of the units 502, 504 and a remotely-located controller may be reduced, the number of different units 502, 504 that may be located and operated in relatively close proximity on a single track assembly may be increased. Thus, the efficiency and throughput of manufacturing operations may be improved.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should not be limited by the disclosure of the specific embodiments set forth above. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
This patent application is a divisional application of commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,473, filed on Jun. 25, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,926,094, entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Manufacturing Operations Using Non-Contact Position Sensing,” which is related to commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/016,524 entitled “Flexible Track Drilling Machine” filed Dec. 10, 2001, and to the following commonly-owned U.S. patent applications filed on Jun. 25, 2003: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,443 entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Counterbalance-Assisted Manufacturing Operations”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,472 entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Manufacturing Operations Using Opposing-Force Support Systems”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,625 entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Track Members Having a Neutral-Axis Rack”, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,402 entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Servo-Controlled Manufacturing Operations.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1676206 | Ratliff | Jul 1928 | A |
1741044 | Whipple et al. | Dec 1929 | A |
2151205 | Hawn | Mar 1939 | A |
RE21795 | Verderber | May 1941 | E |
2911860 | Winslow et al. | Nov 1959 | A |
2946246 | Allan | Jul 1960 | A |
2963927 | Hanger | Dec 1960 | A |
3156126 | Olsen | Nov 1964 | A |
3348248 | Milkert | Oct 1967 | A |
3456738 | Harry | Jul 1969 | A |
3575364 | Frederick | Apr 1971 | A |
3592095 | Passa et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3599958 | Schindler et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3627436 | Adams et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3633433 | Schurch | Jan 1972 | A |
3663115 | Vindez et al. | May 1972 | A |
3732608 | Knopf | May 1973 | A |
3772930 | Lamport et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3851536 | Zeldman | Dec 1974 | A |
3874244 | Rasmussen et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3878734 | Zeldman et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3935985 | Prudhomme et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4031931 | Balcombe | Jun 1977 | A |
4091712 | Geiger | May 1978 | A |
4123187 | Turner | Oct 1978 | A |
4149822 | Lehmkuhl | Apr 1979 | A |
4268949 | Sato | May 1981 | A |
4353308 | Brown | Oct 1982 | A |
4388890 | Wester et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4396318 | Jensen et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4468159 | Oster | Aug 1984 | A |
4520684 | Meyer et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4561814 | Dahlgren et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4570542 | Cable et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4591301 | Pelfrey | May 1986 | A |
4599018 | Woods | Jul 1986 | A |
4686397 | Becker | Aug 1987 | A |
4720897 | Orrell et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4740117 | Schaff Deleury et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
D297144 | Kazlauskas | Aug 1988 | S |
4761876 | Kosmowski | Aug 1988 | A |
4778317 | Earle, II et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4787786 | Freud et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4850763 | Jack et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4932814 | York | Jun 1990 | A |
4958967 | Adachi | Sep 1990 | A |
5032051 | Gilmore | Jul 1991 | A |
5062746 | Deremo | Nov 1991 | A |
5070792 | Harris | Dec 1991 | A |
5072948 | Kosrzewski | Dec 1991 | A |
5129865 | Brock et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5173015 | Maynard | Dec 1992 | A |
5297907 | Strait et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5323962 | Jassby et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5348429 | Pfister | Sep 1994 | A |
5352069 | Rourke | Oct 1994 | A |
5383751 | Wheetley et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390557 | Tsukada | Feb 1995 | A |
5395187 | Slesinski et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403133 | Kim | Apr 1995 | A |
5437580 | Doring | Aug 1995 | A |
5468099 | Wheetley et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477597 | Catania et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5482411 | McGlasson | Jan 1996 | A |
5537927 | Rogovein et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542796 | Bratten et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5573076 | McCannon, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582067 | Snider | Dec 1996 | A |
5609444 | Valsecchi | Mar 1997 | A |
5661892 | Catania et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664311 | Banks et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5697413 | Fuller | Dec 1997 | A |
5934848 | Hamalainen | Aug 1999 | A |
6007278 | Arsenault | Dec 1999 | A |
6036409 | Rissler | Mar 2000 | A |
6073326 | Banks et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6210084 | Banks et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220099 | Marti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240332 | Buttrick et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6283684 | Jarvis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309145 | Tremblay et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6334745 | Bennett, Sr. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6357101 | Sarh et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6382889 | Brown et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413022 | Sarh | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428452 | Dahlstrom et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6428453 | Hoppe et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430796 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439813 | Repossini | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467385 | Buttrick et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494307 | Kozak et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505393 | Stoewer et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6547496 | Chun et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6550129 | Buttrick, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6612792 | Barclay | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6634838 | Kitamura et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6796014 | Sarh | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6843328 | Boyl-Davis et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855099 | Hazlehurst et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6902362 | Ferrari et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6926094 | Arntson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20020001511 | Reguzzi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020127069 | Luigi | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020168241 | David et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030207742 | Hazlehurst et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040076484 | Alam et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040234352 | Vanderpol et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040245879 | Hirzel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050158134 | Roders | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19834702 | Feb 2000 | DE |
55-120910 | Sep 1980 | JP |
58028442 | Feb 1983 | JP |
401064711 | Mar 1989 | JP |
01210207 | Aug 1989 | JP |
05318215 | Dec 1993 | JP |
05318218 | Dec 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050251985 A1 | Nov 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10606473 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 11165730 | US |