This technology relates to network traffic management and, more particularly, to methods and devices for presteering network traffic to facilitate optimization of content corresponding to the network traffic.
In many communication service provider networks, it is advantageous to steer a subset of the overall subscriber traffic to value-added service (VAS) server devices that can process the traffic based upon a classification of the traffic. By way of example only, traffic associated with video type content can be steered through a VAS server device with a video optimizer application that can process or optimize the content prior to forwarding the content to requesting client devices.
Currently, in order to retrieve content, a client device can request that a Domain Name System (DNS) server device resolve a domain name and receive an Internet Protocol (IP) address in response. With the IP address, the client device can establish a connection with a server device and request the content. Upon the content being sent to the client device from the server device, the content and associated domain name can be classified (e.g., as video type content). Thereafter, requests for content associated with the domain name can be steered based on the classification.
However, this process is repeated for subsequent requests for content associated with the domain name from other client devices. Since the classification can only occur subsequent to retrieved content being classified, initial requests by the other client devices for the content associated with the domain name will not be steered, which is undesirable.
A method for network traffic presteering includes forwarding, by a traffic manager computing device, a request to resolve a domain name from a client device to a Domain Name System (DNS) server device and a response from the DNS server device including an original Internet Protocol (IP) address corresponding to the domain name to the client device. Content is retrieved, by the traffic manager computing device, from a location associated with the domain name in response to a request for the content received from the client device. Classification information comprising at least a type of the retrieved content is determined by the traffic manager computing device. The retrieved content is sent, by the traffic manager computing device, to the client device in response to the request for the content. A determination is made, by the traffic manager computing device, when a confidence threshold has been exceeded based on the classification information. At least a steering endpoint IP address, identified based on the type of the retrieved content, is sent, by the traffic manager computing device, to the DNS server device, when the determining indicates that the confidence threshold has been exceeded.
A traffic manager computing device includes a processor and a memory coupled to the processor which is configured to be capable of executing programmed instructions comprising and stored in the memory to forward a request to resolve a domain name from a client device to a DNS server device and a response from the DNS server device including an original IP address corresponding to the domain name to the client device. Content is retrieved from a location associated with the domain name in response to a request for the content received from the client device. Classification information comprising at least a type of the retrieved content is determined. The retrieved content is sent to the client device in response to the request for the content. A determination is made when a confidence threshold has been exceeded based on the classification information. At least a steering endpoint IP address, identified based on the type of the retrieved content, is sent to the DNS server device, when the determining indicates that the confidence threshold has been exceeded.
A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for network traffic presteering comprising executable code which when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform steps including forwarding a request to resolve a domain name from a client device to a DNS server device and a response from the DNS server device including an original IP address corresponding to the domain name to the client device. Content is retrieved from a location associated with the domain name in response to a request for the content received from the client device. Classification information comprising at least a type of the retrieved content is determined. The retrieved content is sent to the client device in response to the request for the content. A determination is made when a confidence threshold has been exceeded based on the classification information. At least a steering endpoint IP address, identified based on the type of the retrieved content, is sent to the DNS server device, when the determining indicates that the confidence threshold has been exceeded.
A method for network traffic presteering includes receiving, by a Domain Name System (DNS) server device, a request originating from a client device to resolve an original Internet Protocol (IP) address of a domain name included in the request. A determination is made, by the DNS server device, when a steering endpoint IP address corresponding to the original IP address is stored. The corresponding steering endpoint IP address is sent, by the DNS server device, to the client device in response to the request, when the determining indicates that the steering endpoint IP address corresponding to the original IP address is stored. The original IP address is resolved, by the DNS server device, and sent to the client device in response to the request, when the determining indicates that the steering endpoint IP address corresponding to the original IP address is not stored.
A Domain Name System (DNS) server device includes a processor and a memory coupled to the processor which is configured to be capable of executing programmed instructions comprising and stored in the memory to receive a request originating from a client device to resolve an original IP address of a domain name included in the request. A determination is made when a steering endpoint IP address corresponding to the original IP address is stored. The corresponding steering endpoint IP address is sent to the client device in response to the request, when the determining indicates that the steering endpoint IP address corresponding to the original IP address is stored. The original IP address is resolved and sent to the client device in response to the request, when the determining indicates that the steering endpoint IP address corresponding to the original IP address is not stored.
A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for network traffic presteering comprising executable code which when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform steps including receiving a request originating from a client device to resolve an original IP address of a domain name included in the request. A determination is made when a steering endpoint IP address corresponding to the original IP address is stored. The corresponding steering endpoint IP address is sent to the client device in response to the request, when the determining indicates that the steering endpoint IP address corresponding to the original IP address is stored. The original IP address is resolved and sent to the client device in response to the request, when the determining indicates that the steering endpoint IP address corresponding to the original IP address is not stored.
This technology has a number of associated advantages including providing methods, non-transitory computer readable media, traffic manager computing devices, and DNS server devices that facilitate more efficient and effective presteering of network traffic to optimization devices prior to delivery to requested client devices. With this technology, DNS is used to route network traffic associated with previously classified domain names to value-added service (VAS) server devices that optimize the content associated with the network traffic. Accordingly, client devices can advantageously receive presteered, optimized content relatively quickly.
Referring to
Referring to
The processor 30 of the traffic manager computing device 12 may execute programmed instructions stored in the memory 32 of the traffic manager computing device 12 for the any number of the functions identified above and described and illustrated herein. The processor 30 of the traffic manager computing device 12 may include one or more CPUs or general purpose processors with one or more processing cores, by way of example only.
The memory 32 of the traffic manager computing device 12 stores these programmed instructions for one or more aspects of the present technology, as described and illustrated herein, although some or all of the programmed instructions could be stored and executed elsewhere. A variety of different types of memory storage devices, such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), hard disk, or other computer readable media which is read from and written to by a magnetic, optical, or other reading and writing system that is coupled to the processor 30, can be used for the memory 32.
In this example, the memory 32 includes a steering endpoint Internet Protocol (IP) address table 38 and a classification information table 40. The steering endpoint IP address table 38 stores IP addresses for steering endpoints, which can correspond with virtual servers hosted by the steering endpoint device 16, by way of example only. Accordingly, the traffic manager computing device 12 uses the steering endpoint IP address table 38 to identify available and appropriate steering endpoint IP address to send to the local DNS server device 14, as described and illustrated in more detail later.
The classification information table 40 includes per-domain name information regarding the type of content retrieved and the number of times content of a certain type has been observed by the traffic manager computing device 12, by way of example only. Additionally, the classification information table 40 in this particular example includes an indication of whether a domain name has been classified for a specific one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n). The traffic manager computing device 12 uses the classification information table 40 to determine when a confidence threshold has been exceeded such that all subsequent first requests for content associated with a domain name from one or more of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) should be presteered, as described and illustrated in more detail later.
The communication interface 34 in the traffic manager computing device 12 operatively couples and communicates between the traffic manager computing device 12 and at least the client devices 20(1)-2(n), server devices 24(1)-24(n), local DNS server device 14, and VAS server device 18, which are all coupled together by the access network 22, provider network 26, and the Internet 28, although other types and/or numbers of communication networks or systems with other types and/or numbers of connections and configurations to other devices and elements can also be used.
By way of example only, the access network 22, provider network 26, and/or Internet 28 can use TCP/IP over Ethernet and industry-standard protocols, although other types and/or numbers of communication networks, can be used. The access network 22, provider network 26, and/or Internet 28 in this example may employ any suitable interface mechanisms and network communication technologies including, by way of example only, teletraffic in any suitable form (e.g., voice, modem, and the like), Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTNs), Ethernet-based Packet Data Networks (PDNs), combinations thereof, and the like.
Referring to
The processor 42 of the local DNS server device 14 may execute programmed instructions stored in the memory 44 of the local DNS server device 14 for the any number of the functions identified above and described and illustrated herein. The processor 42 of the local DNS server device 14 may include one or more CPUs or general purpose processors with one or more processing cores, by way of example only.
The memory 44 of the local DNS server device 14 stores these programmed instructions for one or more aspects of the present technology, as described and illustrated herein, although some or all of the programmed instructions could be stored and executed elsewhere. A variety of different types of memory storage devices, such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), hard disk, or other computer readable media which is read from and written to by a magnetic, optical, or other reading and writing system that is coupled to the processor 42, can be used for the memory 44.
In this particular example, the memory 44 includes an IP address mapping table 52. The IP address mapping table 52 stores original IP addresses and/or domain names corresponding with steering endpoint IP address, as received from the traffic manager computing device 12, as described and illustrated in more detail later. Accordingly, the local DNS server device 14 uses the IP address mapping table 52 to determine when a steering endpoint IP address has been previously stored for the domain name so that the local DNS server device 14 can resolve the domain name to the steering endpoint IP address and thereby steer requests from one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) associated with the domain name through the steering endpoint device 16 and VAS server device 18.
The communication interface 46 in the local DNS server device 14 operatively couples and communicates between the local DNS server device 14 and at least the traffic manager computing device 12, which are all coupled together by the access network 22 in this example, although other types and/or numbers of communication networks or systems with other types and/or numbers of connections and configurations to other devices and elements can also be used.
The steering endpoint device 16 in this example includes a processor, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other types and/or numbers of network devices could be used. The steering endpoint device 16 can host a plurality of virtual services each having an associated steering endpoint IP address and configured to forward certain requests received from the client devices 20(1)-20(n) through the VAS server device 18 to one or more of the server devices 24(1)-24(n) hosting the requested content.
The VAS server device 18 in this example includes a processor, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other types and/or numbers of network devices could be used. The VAS server device 18 hosts application(s) configured to process or optimize content requested by the client devices 20(1)-20(n) such as a video optimizer application, by way of example only, although any other type of application can be used. Accordingly, the VAS server device 18 can receive client device requests from virtual servers hosted by the steering endpoint device 16 and forward the requests to appropriate ones of the server devices 24(1)-24(n). The responses from the server devices 24(1)-24(n) are routed back to through the VAS server device 18, the requested content is processed or optimized, and the processed or optimized content is then returned to the requesting ones of the client devices 20(1)-20(n), as described and illustrated in more detail later.
Each of the server devices 24(1)-24(n) includes a processor, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other types and/or numbers of network devices could be used. Generally, the server devices 24(1)-24(n) process requests received from requesting client devices 20(1)-20(n) via the access network 22, the provider network 26, and the Internet 28 according to the HTTP-based application RFC protocol, by way of example only, and respond to the client devices 20(1)-20(n) with the requested content. The server devices 24(1)-24(n) may be hardware or software or may represent a system with multiple servers in a server device pool, which may include internal or external networks.
Each of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) in this example include a processor, a memory, and a communication interface, which are coupled together by a bus or other communication link, although other types and/or numbers of network devices could be used. The client devices 20(1)-20(n) may run interface applications, such as Web browsers by way of example only, that may provide an interface to make requests for and receive content stored on one or more of the server devices 24(1)-24(n) via the access network 22, the provider network 26, and the Internet 28. Each of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) may further include a display device, such as a display screen or touchscreen, and/or an input device, such as a keyboard by way of example only.
Although the exemplary network environment 10 with the traffic manager computing device 12, local DNS server device 14, steering endpoint device 16, VAS server device 18, client devices 20(1)-20(n), server devices 24(1)-24(n), access network 22, provider network 26, and the Internet 28 are described and illustrated herein, other types and/or numbers of systems, devices, components, and elements in other topologies can be used. The systems of the examples described herein are for exemplary purposes, as many variations of the specific hardware and software used to implement the examples are possible, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the relevant art(s).
In addition, two or more computing systems or devices can be substituted for any one of the systems or devices in any example. Accordingly, principles and advantages of distributed processing, such as redundancy and replication also can be implemented, as desired, to increase the robustness and performance of the devices and systems of the examples. The examples may also be implemented on computer system(s) that extend across any suitable network using any suitable interface mechanisms and traffic technologies, including by way of example only teletraffic in any suitable form (e.g., voice and modem), wireless traffic media, wireless traffic networks, cellular traffic networks, G3 traffic networks, Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTNs), Packet Data Networks (PDNs), the Internet, intranets, and combinations thereof.
The examples may also be embodied as non-transitory computer readable media having instructions stored thereon for one or more aspects of the present technology as described and illustrated by way of the examples herein, which when executed by a processor, cause the processor to carry out the steps necessary to implement the methods of the examples, as described and illustrated herein.
An exemplary method for network traffic presteering will now be described with reference to
In step 402, the traffic manager computing device 12 receives a response to the request from the local DNS server device 14, stores the domain name associated with an original IP address included in the response, and sends the response to the requesting one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n). The traffic manager computing device 12 can store the domain name as associated with the corresponding original IP address in an entry of the classification information table 40, by way of example only, although the domain name and original IP address can also be stored elsewhere.
In step 404, the traffic manager computing device 12 receives a request from the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) for content at a location associated with the domain name. In the example described and illustrated later with reference to
In step 406, the traffic manager computing device 12 determines whether the domain name was previously classified. Domain names can be classified for a specific one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) even if a confidence threshold has not been exceeded for the domain name, as described and illustrated in more detail later. Domain names can be classified for one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) based on an established policy and can be stored in the entry of the classification information table 40 for the domain name.
By way of example only, the traffic manager computing device 12 can classify a domain name for one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) when a specified number of received requests associated with the domain name are for content of a specific type, such as video by way of example only. Accordingly, a first request for content associated with a domain name will not be previously classified since the requested content and associated characteristics have not been observed yet by the traffic manager computing device 12. However, if the request is a second or subsequent request for content associated with a domain name, and the traffic manager computing device 12 determines in step 406 that the domain name has been previously classified, then the Yes branch is taken to step 408.
In step 408, the traffic manager computing device 12 sends the request to the VAS server device 18 and forwards the content received from the VAS server device 18 back to the requesting one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n). The location or IP address of the VAS server device 18 can be stored in the memory 32 of the traffic manager computing device 12 as part of an initial configuration, by way of example only. In examples in which multiple VAS server devices are present in the network environment, the classification information table 40 can include an indication of the appropriate one of the VAS server devices for the classification associated with the domain name.
As described and illustrated in more detail later, the VAS server device 18 retrieves the requested content from one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n), processes or otherwise optimizes the content, and sends the processed or otherwise optimized content to the traffic manager computing device 12 for forwarding to the requesting one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n). Accordingly, the content returned to the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) in step 408 in this example is the processed or otherwise optimized content.
Referring back to step 406, if the traffic manager computing device 12 determines that the domain name has not been previously classified, then the No branch is taken to step 410. In step 410, the traffic manager computing device 12 retrieves the content from the one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n) hosting the content and sends the content to the requesting one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n).
Irrespective of whether the Yes or No branch is taken from step 406, and step 408 or 410 is performed, respectively, the traffic manager computing device 12 proceeds to step 412. In step 412, the traffic manager computing device 12 determines and stores classification information for the domain name in the classification table 40. Exemplary classification information can include the type of the content that was requested and/or a number of times content of the type has been requested from a location associated with the domain name, by way of example only, although other types and/or numbers of information can also be determined and stored in step 412.
By way of example only, the traffic manager computing device 12 may determine, such as from an HTTP header in the response by way of example only, that the requested content was of a video type. Accordingly, in step 412, the traffic manager computing device 12 may retrieve the entry for the domain name from the classification information table 40, determine that video type content has been previously requested and retrieved a specified number of times, and increment the number to reflect the most recent request for content of the video type from a location associated with the domain name.
In step 414, the traffic manager computing device 12 determines whether a confidence threshold has been exceeded based on the classification information stored in the classification information table 40 for the domain name. The traffic manager computing device 12 can determine whether a confidence threshold has been exceeded based on a stored policy. The determination is indicative of the likelihood that a subsequent request associated with the domain name will be for content of a certain type. By way of example only, the traffic manager computing device 12 can determine a confidence threshold has been exceeded when a specified number of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) have requested content of a certain type from location(s) associated with the domain name. In other examples, other types and/or numbers of classification information or other data can be used to determine whether a confidence threshold has been exceeded.
If the traffic manager computing device 12 determines that a confidence threshold has not been exceeded for the domain name, then the No branch is taken to step 416. In step 416, the traffic manager computing device 12 determines whether the domain name should be classified for the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) even though the confidence threshold has not been exceeded. In one example, the domain name can be classified based on a stored policy requiring a specified number of requests associated with the domain name for content of a certain type from the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n), although the policy can utilize any other type or number of classification information.
If the traffic manager computing device 12 determines in step 416 that the domain name should be classified, then the Yes branch is taken to step 418. In step 418, the traffic manager computing device 12 updates the entry for the domain name in the classification information table 40 to indicate that the domain name is classified for the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) along with the classification such as video type content by way of example only.
Subsequent to updating the classification information, or if the traffic manager computing device 12 determines in step 416 that the domain name should not be classified and the No branch is taken, the traffic manager computing device 12 proceeds back to step 400 and another request from one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) to resolve a domain name is received. In another example, the traffic manager computing device 12 can proceed back to step 404 and another request from the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) can be received for content at a location associated with the domain name. Since the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) already received the original IP address for the domain name in step 402, subsequent requests from the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) for content at locations associated with the domain name will not require that the domain name first be resolved by the local DNS server device and will therefore be received in step 404.
Referring back to step 414, if the traffic manager computing device 12 determines that the confidence threshold has been exceeded, then the Yes branch is taken to step 420. In step 420, the traffic manager computing device 12 sends a steering endpoint IP address to the local DNS server device 14. The steering endpoint IP address sent to the local DNS server device 14 can be retrieved by the traffic manager computing device 12 from the steering endpoint IP address table 38 stored in the memory 32. The steering endpoint IP address table 32 can store steering endpoint IP addresses corresponding with content classifications.
Accordingly, the traffic manager computing device 12 can query the steering endpoint IP address table 32 based on the classification of the content (e.g., video type content) to identify a corresponding steering endpoint IP address. The steering endpoint IP address can point to a virtual server hosted by the steering endpoint device 16, by way of example only. Subsequent requests from the client devices 20(1)-20(n) to resolve the domain name will result in the local DNS server device 14 returning the steering endpoint IP address instead of the original IP address, as described and illustrated in more detail later.
In step 422, the traffic manager computing device 12 determines whether the request received in step 404, and associated network traffic, is based on the HTTP protocol. If the traffic manager computing device 12 determines that the request conforms to the HTTP protocol, then the Yes branch is taken back to step 400 and another request from one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) to resolve a domain name is received. Since the host header is a required header in the HTTP protocol, when a subsequent request for content at a location associated with the domain name is received from another one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) by the steering endpoint device 16, the steering endpoint device 16 will be able to inspect the HTTP host header and resolve the IP destination to steer the request through the VAS server device 18 to the one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n) hosting the content, as described and illustrated in more detail later.
However, if the traffic manager computing device 12 determines in step 422 that the request is not an HTTP request, then the No branch is taken to step 424. In step 424, the traffic manager computing device 12 sends the original IP address to the steering endpoint device 16 associated with the steering endpoint IP address sent to the local DNS server device 14 in step 420. Accordingly, a subsequent non-HTTP request for content at a location associated with the domain name from another one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) that is received by the steering endpoint device 16 will be able to be processed by the steering endpoint device 16 since the original IP address will be stored locally, as described and illustrated in more detail later. The original IP address can be retrieved from an entry of the classification information table 40 as stored as described and illustrated earlier with reference to step 402, although the original IP address can be obtained in other manners.
Subsequent to sending the original IP address to the steering endpoint device 16, the traffic manager computing device 12 proceeds back to step 400 and another request from one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) to resolve a domain name is received. In another example, the traffic manager computing device 12 can proceed back to step 404 and receive another request from the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) for content at a location associated with the domain name. Although the domain name has been classified, the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) already has the original IP address and subsequent traffic will be steered through the VAS server device 18 by the traffic manager computing device 12, as described and illustrated earlier with reference to steps 406 and 408. However, requests for content at a location associated with the domain name by other of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) will be steered through the VAS server device 18 by the steering endpoint device 16, as described and illustrated in more detail later with reference to
Referring more specifically to
In step 502, the local DNS server device 12 determines whether a steering endpoint IP address corresponding to the original IP address of the domain name, or the domain name itself, has been previously received and stored locally, such as in the IP address mapping table 52 by way of example only, as described and illustrated in more detail later. The steering endpoint IP address could have been received by the local DNS server device 14 as sent by the traffic manager computing device 12, as described and illustrated in more detail earlier with reference to step 420 of
In step 504, the local DNS server device 12 sends the corresponding steering endpoint IP address to the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) in response to the request. If there is a corresponding steering endpoint IP address, then the traffic manager computing device 12 previously determined that a confidence threshold was exceeded for the domain name and that associated request traffic should be sent to the steering endpoint device 16 to be steered through the VAS server device 18. Accordingly, the steering endpoint IP address is sent to the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) instead of the original IP address for the domain name. Subsequent to sending the corresponding steering endpoint IP address to the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n), the local DNS server device 14 proceeds back to step 500 and another request to resolve a domain name is received from one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n).
However, if the local DNS server device 14 determines in step 502 that there is not a corresponding steering endpoint IP address for the domain name, then the No branch is taken to step 506. In step 506, the local DNS server device 14 resolves the domain name and sends the original IP address for the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) in response to the request. Optionally, the local DNS server device 14 can send the response including the original IP address to the traffic manager computing device 12 to be forwarded to the one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n), as described and illustrated in more detail earlier with reference to step 402 of
Subsequent to resolving the domain name and sending the response including the original IP address, the local DNS server device 14 proceeds to step 508. In step 508, the local DNS server device 14 determines whether a steering endpoint IP address is received for the domain name from the traffic manager computing device 12. The steering endpoint IP address can be sent by the traffic manager computing device 12 as described and illustrated earlier with reference to step 420 of
However, if the local DNS server device 14 determines in step 508 that a steering endpoint IP address has been received for the domain name, then the Yes branch is taken to step 510. In step 510, the steering endpoint IP address is stored as associated with the domain name and/or the original IP address corresponding to the domain name. The steering endpoint IP address can be stored in the IP address mapping table 52, by way of example only, although the steering endpoint IP address and corresponding domain name and/or original IP address can also be stored elsewhere. Accordingly, subsequent requests to resolve the domain name from another of the client devices 20(1)-20(n) will result in the local DNS server device 14 comparing the domain name, by way of example only, to the IP address mapping table 52 and retrieving and returning the steering endpoint IP address associated with the domain name in the IP address mapping table 52.
Referring more specifically to
In step 602, the steering endpoint device 16 determines whether the request is an HTTP request. If the steering endpoint device 16 determines that the request is an HTTP request, then the Yes branch is taken to step 604. In step 604, the steering endpoint device 16 resolves an original IP address for a domain name included in a host header of the request. The original IP address can be resolved by communicating with the local DNS server device 14 or another DNS server device, by way of example only, although other methods of resolving the original IP address can also be used.
Referring back to step 602, if the steering endpoint device 16 determines that the request is not an HTTP request, then the No branch is taken to step 606. In step 606, the steering endpoint device 16 retrieves an original IP address from local storage. The retrieved original IP address could have been sent to the steering endpoint device 16 by the traffic manager computing device 12, as described and illustrated earlier with reference to step 424 of
Irrespective of whether the steering endpoint device 16 resolves or retrieves the original IP address in step 604 or 606, respectively, the steering endpoint device 16 proceeds to step 608. In step 608, the steering endpoint device 16 sends a request including the original IP address to the VAS server device 18 to be forwarded by the VAS server device 18 to one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n) hosting the requested content. The VAS server device 18 can forward the request to the appropriate one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n) using the original IP address. By sending the request through the VAS server device 18, the one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n) will respond to the VAS server device 18 with the content, as described and illustrated in more detail later. Subsequent to sending the request, the steering endpoint device 16 can proceed back to step 600 and receive another request for content from one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n).
Referring more specifically to
In step 702, the VAS server device 18 can receive the content from the one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n) as sent in response to the forwarded request. In step 704, the VAS server device 18 can optimize the content. By way of example only, the VAS server device 18 can optimize video files for communication through the provider network 26 and the access network 22 to the requesting one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n), although other types of content can also be optimized and the VAS server device 18 can process the content in other ways. In step 706, the VAS server device 18 sends the optimized content to the requesting one of the client devices 20(1)-20(n). Accordingly, request traffic in this example can advantageously be steered through the VAS server device 18, and content sent in response can be optimized, subsequent to the traffic manager computing device 12 determining that a confidence threshold has been exceeded for the domain name associated with the content.
Referring more specifically to
In step 804, the client device 20(1) sends a request for content at a location (“/video/free” in this example) associated with the domain name to the traffic manager computing device 12. In this example, the request is an HTTP GET request, although other types of requests associated with other protocols can also be used. In step 806, the traffic manager computing device 12 forwards the request for content to the Internet 28 and one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n) (not shown) located at the original IP address included in the request for content.
In step 808, the traffic manager computing device 12 receives a response from the Internet 28, and the one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n), which includes the content and an indication of the content type (“video/mp4” in this example). In step 810, the traffic manager computing device 12 determines and stores classification information in an entry of the classification information table 40 for the domain name based on the information included in the response and forwards the response with the requested content to the client device 20(1).
In step 812, the client device 20(1) sends another request for content at a location (“/video/free2” in this example) associated with the domain name to the traffic manager computing device 12. Since the client device 20(1) previously resolved the original IP address for the domain name, the other request for content can be sent directly to the traffic manager computing device 12. In step 814, the traffic manager computing device 12 forwards the request for content directly to the VAS server device 18 (referred to as “Video Optimizer” in this example). Accordingly, in this example, the traffic manager computing device 12 also determined in step 810 that the domain name should be classified for the client device 20(1) as associated with video content based on the classification information indicating that video type content was retrieved from a location associated with the domain name one time by the client device 20(1).
In step 816, the VAS server device 18 forwards the request for content to the Internet 28 and one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n) associated with an original IP address included in the request for content. In step 818, the VAS server device 18 receives a response including the requested content from the Internet 28 and the one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n). In step 820, the VAS server device 18 optimizes the video content included in the response and sends the response with the optimized video content to the traffic manager computing device 12. In step 822, the traffic manager computing device 12 determines and stores classification information in the classification information table 40 based on the response and forwards the response with the optimized content to the client device 20(1).
In step 824, another client device 20(2) (referred to as “Client 1+n” in this example) sends a request to the local DNS server device 14 to resolve the same domain as included in the request sent in step 800 by the client device 20(1). In step 826, the local DNS server device 14 sends a steering endpoint IP address (“2.2.2.2” in this example) to the client device 20(2) in response.
Accordingly, the traffic manager computing device 12 previously determined, such as in step 822, by way of example only, or during any other sequence of servicing a request for the client device 20(1) or any number of other client devices for content at a location associated with the domain name, that the confidence threshold was exceeded and there was sufficient likelihood that content associated with the domain name is of the video type. Therefore, the traffic manager computing device 12 sent the steering endpoint IP address to the local DNS server device 14 so that the local DNS server device 14 would steer request traffic associated with the domain name to the steering endpoint device 16 (referred to as “(PEM (Video VS) 2.2.2.2” in this example).
In step 828, the client device 20(2) sends a request for content at a location (“/video/free” in this example) associated with the domain name to the steering endpoint IP address received in step 826, which is associated with the steering endpoint device 16. In step 830, the steering endpoint device 16, or a virtual server located at the steering endpoint IP address and hosted by the steering endpoint device 16, sends the request to the VAS server device 18. The request can be sent to an appropriate application hosted by the VAS server device 18 for processing or optimizing content of the type for which the domain name has been classified, and to which the request was sent as described and illustrated earlier with reference to step 814.
Additionally, the steering endpoint device 16 resolves the original IP address using the domain name included in the host header of the request since the request is an HTTP GET request in this example. In other examples in which the request is not an HTTP request, the steering endpoint device 16 can retrieve the original IP address from local storage as stored in response to receiving the original IP address from the traffic manager computing device 12 subsequent to the traffic manager computing device 12 determining the confidence threshold had been exceeded for the domain name.
In step 832, the VAS server device 18 inserts the resolved original IP address into the request and forwards the request to the Internet 28 and the one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n). In step 834, the one of the server devices 24(1)-24(n) and the Internet 28 sends a response including the requested content to the VAS server device 18. In step 836, the VAS server device 18 optimizes the video content and sends a response including the optimized content to the client device 20(2). Accordingly, the client device 20(2) is steered through the VAS server device 18 and receives optimized video content without ever having to receive video content that is not optimized since the content is at a location associated with a domain name for which the traffic manager computing device 12 previously determined a confidence threshold was exceeded and was likely to be associated with content of the video type.
Accordingly, with this technology, domain names can be classified as associated with content of a specified type based on a confidence threshold being exceeded. Using DNS, request traffic associated with the domain names from client devices sent subsequent to the confidence threshold being exceeded can then be presteered through VAS server device(s) so that the content can be optimized. Accordingly, the client devices receiving optimized content that is presteered can receive the content relatively quickly and in an optimized format. Advantageously, both HTTP and non-HTTP network traffic can be presteered through a highly scalable process.
Having thus described the basic concept of the invention, it will be rather apparent to those skilled in the art that the foregoing detailed disclosure is intended to be presented by way of example only, and is not limiting. Various alterations, improvements, and modifications will occur and are intended to those skilled in the art, though not expressly stated herein. These alterations, improvements, and modifications are intended to be suggested hereby, and are within the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the recited order of processing elements or sequences, or the use of numbers, letters, or other designations therefore, is not intended to limit the claimed processes to any order except as may be specified in the claims. Accordingly, the invention is limited only by the following claims and equivalents thereto.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/037,935, filed on Aug. 15, 2014, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3950735 | Patel | Apr 1976 | A |
4644532 | George et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4897781 | Chang et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4965772 | Daniel et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5023826 | Patel | Jun 1991 | A |
5053953 | Patel | Oct 1991 | A |
5167024 | Smith et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5299312 | Rocco, Jr. | Mar 1994 | A |
5327529 | Fults et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5367635 | Bauer et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371852 | Attanasio et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5406502 | Haramaty et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5475857 | Dally | Dec 1995 | A |
5517617 | Sathaye et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519694 | Brewer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519778 | Leighton et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521591 | Arora et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528701 | Aref | Jun 1996 | A |
5581764 | Fitzgerald et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596742 | Agarwal et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606665 | Yang et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611049 | Pitts | Mar 1997 | A |
5663018 | Cummings et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5752023 | Choucri et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761484 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768423 | Aref et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790554 | Pitcher et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802052 | Venkataraman | Sep 1998 | A |
5812550 | Sohn et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825772 | Dobbins et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832283 | Chou et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5875296 | Shi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5892914 | Pitts | Apr 1999 | A |
5892932 | Kim | Apr 1999 | A |
5898876 | James | Apr 1999 | A |
5919247 | Van Hoff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936939 | Des Jardins et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941988 | Bhagwat et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946690 | Pitts | Aug 1999 | A |
5949885 | Leighton | Sep 1999 | A |
5951694 | Choquier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959990 | Frantz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974460 | Maddalozzo, Jr. et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983281 | Ogle et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988847 | McLaughlin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006260 | Barrick, Jr. et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006264 | Colby et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026452 | Pitts | Feb 2000 | A |
6028857 | Poor | Feb 2000 | A |
6051169 | Brown et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6078956 | Bryant et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085234 | Pitts et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092196 | Reiche | Jul 2000 | A |
6108703 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111876 | Frantz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128279 | O'Neil et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128657 | Okanoya et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160874 | Dickerman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170022 | Linville et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178423 | Douceur et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182139 | Brendel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192051 | Lipman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6233612 | Fruchtman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246684 | Chapman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249801 | Zisapel et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253226 | Chidambaran et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253230 | Couland et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263368 | Martin | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289012 | Harrington et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298380 | Coile et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327622 | Jindal et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343324 | Hubis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347339 | Morris et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360270 | Cherkasova et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374300 | Masters | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6396833 | Zhang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6430562 | Kardos et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434618 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434801 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6480476 | Willars | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484261 | Wiegel | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490624 | Sampson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510135 | Almulhem et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510458 | Berstis et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519643 | Foulkes et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6601084 | Bhaskaran et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6636503 | Shiran et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636894 | Short et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650640 | Muller et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650641 | Albert et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654701 | Hatley | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661802 | Homberg et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6683873 | Kwok et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691165 | Bruck et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6694517 | James et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6708187 | Shanumgam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718380 | Mohaban et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6742045 | Albert et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6751663 | Farrell et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754228 | Ludwig | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760775 | Anerousis et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772219 | Shobatake | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6779039 | Bommareddy et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781986 | Sabaa et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6798777 | Ferguson et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804542 | Haartsen | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816901 | Sitaraman et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816977 | Brakmo et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826698 | Minkin et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829238 | Tokuyo et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6868082 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876629 | Beshai et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6876654 | Hegde | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888836 | Cherkasova | May 2005 | B1 |
6928082 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947985 | Hegli et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950434 | Viswanath et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6954780 | Susai et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6957272 | Tallegas et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959394 | Brickell et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6975592 | Seddigh et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6986040 | Kramer et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6987763 | Rochberger et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7007092 | Peiffer | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7058633 | Gnagy et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7113993 | Cappiello et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7133944 | Song et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139792 | Mishra et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7185359 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7228422 | Morioka et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7287082 | O'Toole, Jr. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7295827 | Liu et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308703 | Wright et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308709 | Brezak et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7310339 | Powers et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7319696 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7321926 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7333999 | Njemanze | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7343413 | Gilde et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349391 | Ben-Dor et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7383570 | Pinkas et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398552 | Pardee et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7433962 | Janssen et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7437478 | Yokota et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454480 | Labio et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7490162 | Masters | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7500243 | Huetsch et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7500269 | Huotari et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505795 | Lim et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7516492 | Nisbet et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7522581 | Acharya et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526541 | Roese et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7558197 | Sindhu et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7580971 | Gollapudi et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7590732 | Rune | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7624424 | Morita et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7644137 | Bozak et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7668166 | Rekhter et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7689710 | Tang et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7724657 | Rao et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725093 | Sengupta et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7769845 | Baron | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778187 | Chaturvedi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801978 | Susai et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7808913 | Ansari et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831662 | Clark et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7908314 | Yamaguchi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925908 | Kim | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930365 | Dixit et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7933946 | Livshits et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7945908 | Waldspurger et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7984141 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8041022 | Andreasen et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8103781 | Wu et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8130650 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8149819 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8189567 | Kavanagh et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8199757 | Pani et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8205246 | Shatzkamer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8239954 | Wobber et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8274895 | Rahman et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8321908 | Gai et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8351333 | Rao et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8380854 | Szabo | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8417817 | Jacobs | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8447871 | Szabo | May 2013 | B1 |
8447970 | Klein et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8452876 | Williams et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8464265 | Worley | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8468247 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8468267 | Yigang | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8521851 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8521880 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8359224 | Henderson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8566474 | Kanode et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8578050 | Craig et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8606921 | Vasquez et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615022 | Harrison et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8646067 | Agarwal et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8665868 | Kay | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8701179 | Penno et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8725836 | Lowery et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8726338 | Narayanaswamy et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8737304 | Karuturi et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8778665 | Glide et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8804504 | Chen | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8819109 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8819419 | Carlson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8830874 | Cho et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8873753 | Parker | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8875274 | Montemurro et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8886981 | Baumann et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8908545 | Chen et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8918330 | Winkler | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8954080 | Janakiraman et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9036529 | Erickson et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9037166 | de Wit et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9047259 | Ho et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9077554 | Szabo | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9083760 | Hughes et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9171086 | Panda | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9172753 | Jiang et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9246819 | Thirasuttakorn | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9319921 | Kuroda | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9407539 | Dickinson | Aug 2016 | B1 |
20010009554 | Katseff et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010023442 | Masters | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010052016 | Skene | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010783 | Primak et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020027504 | Davis | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032777 | Kawata et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046291 | O'Callaghan et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049842 | Huetsch et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059428 | Susai et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083067 | Tamayo | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095498 | Chanda et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112061 | Shih et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138615 | Schmeling | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161913 | Gonzalez et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194342 | Lu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198993 | Cudd et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030037070 | Marston | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046291 | Fascenda | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058839 | D'Souza | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065653 | Overton et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030065951 | Igeta et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069918 | Lu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069974 | Lu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070069 | Belapurkar et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086415 | Bernhard et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105807 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105983 | Brakmo et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108052 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120948 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128708 | Inoue et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135509 | Davis | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145062 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145233 | Poletto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163578 | Janssen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030200311 | Baum | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208596 | Carolan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225485 | Fritz et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003287 | Zissimopoulos et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040072569 | Omae et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078487 | Cernohous | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103283 | Hornak | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111523 | Hall et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111621 | Himberger et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117493 | Bazot et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148520 | Talpade et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151186 | Akama | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040190522 | Aerrabotu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040268358 | Li et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199762 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210663 | Phillips et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225713 | Abbasi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255000 | Simionescu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264472 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264481 | Darling et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267920 | Hydrie et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267948 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004887 | Igakura et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021736 | Carusi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027869 | Johnson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044213 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050052440 | Kim et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055435 | Gbadegesin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071283 | Randle et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078604 | Yim | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050122942 | Rhee et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122977 | Lieberman | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129001 | Backman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154837 | Keohane et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187866 | Lee | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188220 | Nilsson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198310 | Kim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050262238 | Reeves et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050288939 | Peled et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002405 | Le Sauze et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031520 | Bedekar et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036764 | Yokota et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059267 | Cugi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077902 | Kannan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077986 | Rune | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083205 | Buddhikot et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095573 | Carle et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106802 | Giblin et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112176 | Liu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112272 | Morioka et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129684 | Datta | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135198 | Lee | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156416 | Huotari et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161577 | Kulkarni et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168070 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171365 | Borella | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179153 | Lee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060182103 | Martini et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184647 | Dixit et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209853 | Hidaka et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230148 | Forecast et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233106 | Achlioptas et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242300 | Yumoto et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060268704 | Ansari et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291483 | Sela | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294054 | Kudo et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070006293 | Balakrishnan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016662 | Desai et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019658 | Park et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070050843 | Manville et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058670 | Konduru et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064661 | Sood et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083646 | Miller et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088822 | Coile et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106796 | Kudo et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107048 | Halls et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118879 | Yeun | May 2007 | A1 |
20070174491 | Still et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070220598 | Salowey et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233809 | Brownell et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255848 | Sewall | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258451 | Bouat | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070297410 | Yoon et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297551 | Choi | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008202 | Terrell et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025297 | Kashyap | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028456 | O'Rourke et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031258 | Acharya et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034136 | Ulenas | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072303 | Syed | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120370 | Chan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130812 | Eom et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080133518 | Kapoor et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134311 | Medvinsky et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148340 | Powell et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159145 | Muthukrishnan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165801 | Sheppard | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178278 | Grinstein et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201331 | Eriksen | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201599 | Ferraiolo et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205613 | Lopez | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209053 | Shen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222646 | Sigal et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225710 | Raja et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229415 | Kapoor et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235508 | Ran et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239986 | Xu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253395 | Pandya | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256224 | Kaji et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279200 | Shatzkamer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282354 | Wobber et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288661 | Galles | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301760 | Lim | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316922 | Riddle et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090028337 | Balabine et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040926 | Li et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049230 | Pandya | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070617 | Arimilli et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077619 | Boyce | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094610 | Sukirya | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119504 | van Os et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125496 | Wexler et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125532 | Wexler et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125622 | O'Sullivan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125625 | Shim et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138749 | Moll et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141891 | Boyen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157678 | Turk | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090193126 | Agarwal et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193513 | Agarwal et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196282 | Fellman et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228956 | He et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248893 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287935 | Aull et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296624 | Ryu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300407 | Kamath et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011420 | Drako | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011434 | Kay | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017846 | Huang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023582 | Pedersen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042693 | Eriksson | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100071048 | Novak et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088417 | Amemiya | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115236 | Bataineh et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122091 | Huang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100150154 | Viger et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154031 | Montemurro et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100165877 | Shukla et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188976 | Rahman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189052 | Kavanagh et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100242092 | Harris et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251330 | Kroeselberg et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100279733 | Karsten et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299451 | Yigang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100322250 | Shetty et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325277 | Muthiah et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029654 | Takeda et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040889 | Garrett et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047620 | Mahaffey et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052016 | Nishii | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066718 | Susai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110107077 | Henderson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110141900 | Jayawardena et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153822 | Rajan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154443 | Thakur et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173295 | Bakke et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184733 | Yu et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110197059 | Klein et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202676 | Craig et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110246800 | Accpadi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271005 | Bharrat | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273984 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277016 | Hockings et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282997 | Prince et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110314178 | Kanode et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110321122 | Mwangi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016994 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030341 | Jensen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039341 | Latif et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041965 | Vasquez et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120063314 | Pignataro et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066489 | Ozaki et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079055 | Robinson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101952 | Raleigh et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120124372 | Dilley et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143883 | Chen | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191847 | Nas et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198043 | Hesketh et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198512 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120210416 | Mihelich et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120210417 | Shieh | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224531 | Karuturi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120311153 | Morgan | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317266 | Abbott | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130003106 | Lowery et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029726 | Berionne et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044757 | Rai et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130091002 | Christie et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130163758 | Swaminathan et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130198322 | Oran et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130205361 | Narayanaswamy et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212127 | Kitamura | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130336122 | Baruah et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339429 | Richardson | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140040478 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059678 | Parker | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140095661 | Knowles et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140162705 | de Wit et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140171089 | Janakiraman et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140269484 | Dankberg et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140317404 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150127830 | Brown | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0744850 | Nov 1996 | EP |
WO 9114326 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO 9505712 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9709805 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9745800 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9905829 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9906913 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9910858 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9939373 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9964967 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0004422 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0004458 | Jan 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“A Process for Selective Routing of Servlet Content to Transcoding Modules,” Research Disclosure 422124, Jun. 1999, pp. 889-890, IBM Corporation. |
“BIG-IP Controller with Exclusive OneConnect Content Switching Feature Provides a Breakthrough System for Maximizing Server and Network Performance,” F5 Networks, Inc. Press Release, May 8, 2001, 2 pages, Las Vegas, Nevada. |
“Servlet/Applet/HTML Authentication Process With Single Sign-On,” Research Disclosure 429128, Jan. 2000, pp. 163-164, IBM Corporation. |
“Traffic Surges; Surge Queue; Netscaler Defense,” 2005, PowerPoint Presentation, slides 1-12, Citrix Systems, Inc. |
“Windows Server 2003 Kerberos Extensions,” Microsoft TechNet, 2003, 8 pages, (Updated Jul. 31, 2004), http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc738207, Microsoft Corporation. |
Abad, C., et al., “An Analysis on the Schemes for Detecting and Preventing ARP Cache Poisoning Attacks”, IEEE, Computer Society, 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW'07), 2007, pp. 1-8. |
Crescendo Networks, “Application Layer Processing (ALP),” 2003-2009, pp. 168-186, Chapter 9, CN-5000E/5500E, Foxit Software Company. |
European Search Report for corresponding EP Application No. 14753736.9, Sep. 23, 2016, pp. 1-8. |
F5 Networks Inc., “Configuration Guide for Local Traffic Management,” F5 Networks Inc., Jan. 2006, version 9.2.2, 406 pgs. |
F5 Networks. BIG-IP GTM and BIG-IP Link Controller, Release Notes, Jul. 20, 2015, v.11.6.0. |
F5 Networks. BIG-IP Virtual, Release Notes, Dec. 8, 2014, Edition 11.6.0. |
F5 Networks. BIG-IP® Global Traffic Manager™: Implementations, Manual, Apr. 17, 2015, pp. 1-118, v11.6. |
F5 Networks. BIG-IP® TMOS®: Routing Administration, Manual, Apr. 10, 2015, pp. 1-140, v11.6. |
F5 Networks. Local Traffic Manager and Global Traffic Manager Operations Guide, Manual, Jan. 21, 2015, pp. 1-144, v1.0. |
Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1,” Network Working Group, RFC: 2068, Jan. 1997, pp. 1-162. |
Floyd et al., “Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance,” Aug. 1993, pp. 1-22, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, California. |
Hochmuth, Phil, “F5, CacheFlow pump up content-delivery lines,” Network World Fusion, May 4, 2001, 1 page, Las Vegas, Nevada. |
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/026615 (Jul. 4, 2013). |
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/018431 (Jul. 9, 2014). |
Macvittie L., “Message-Based Load Balancing,” Technical Brief, Jan. 2010, pp. 1-9, F5 Networks, Inc. |
OWASP, “Testing for Cross site scripting”, OWASP Testing Guide v2, Table of Contents, Feb. 24, 2011, pp. 1-5, (www.owasp.org/index.php/Testing_for_Cross_site_scripting). |
Schaefer, Ken, “IIS and Kerberos Part 5—Protocol Transition, Constrained Delegation, S4U2S and S4U2P,” Jul. 18, 2007, 21 pages, http://www.adopenstatic.com/cs/blogs/ken/archive/2007/07/19/8460.aspx. |
Williams et al., “The Ultimate Windows Server 2003 System Administrator's Guide: Forwarding Authentication,” 2003, 2 pages, Figure 10.7, Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, Massachusetts. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62037935 | Aug 2014 | US |