The present invention is directed to methods for treating bioprosthetic tissue for implantation in a patient and, more particularly, to methods for capping and/or crosslinking bioprosthetic tissue using a nucleophile and/or an electrophile in a catalytic system.
Significant challenges are presented by the use of non-autologous tissue in bioprosthetic implants. Chief among the challenges are preventing immunological rejection of the bioprosthetic implant by the host and calcification of the tissue, which results in the undesirable stiffening and degradation of the tissue. Immunological rejection and calcification are particularly problematic for bioprosthetic heart valves, as calcification of valve leaflets after implantation will adversely affect its ability to maintain a one-way flow of blood and prevent undesirable leaking or regurgitation of blood.
Glutaraldehyde has long been the reagent of choice for fixing and sterilizing tissue intended for bioprosthetic implants. The use of glutaraldehyde for fixing bioprosthetic tissue, however, has many significant disadvantages. Because glutaraldehyde tends to polymerize in solution, glutaraldehyde-fixed tissues are often characterized as having residual aldehyde groups associated with the fixed tissue.
Additionally, glutaraldehyde reacts with the free amines in the tissue to generate labile Schiff bases. Both the residual aldehydes and Schiff bases in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissues represent potential calcium binding sites that may lead to in viva calcification. Moreover, because glutaraldehyde is cytotoxic, it inhibits the desired cellular in-growth and integration of the implanted and glutaraldehyde-treated bioprosthetic tissue.
What is therefore needed are strategies that may be used in place of, or in conjunction with, glutaraldehyde fixation for mitigating some of the undesirable interactions between implanted bioprosthetic tissue and the host.
Described herein are processes for altering functional groups on biological tissues which represent actual and potential calcium binding sites and also processes for cross-linking bioprosthetic tissue. Both these processes can be used in conjunction with known fixative techniques, such as glutaraldehyde fixation, or can be used to replace known fixative techniques.
In one embodiment, a method for treating a bioprosthetic tissue is provided. The method comprises contacting the bioprosthetic tissue with one of a nucleophile or an electrophile in the presence of a catalytic system. The catalytic system comprises at least one or a combination of a fluoride-based salt, a cesium-based salt, a potassium-based salt, a rubidium-based salt, and a carbonate-based salt.
In accordance with a first aspect, the contacting is performed with a nucleophile. The nucleophile comprises one or more functional groups selected from the group consisting of: an amine, a hydroxyl and a sulfhydryl.
In accordance with a second aspect, the nucleophile is 2-mercaptoethanol, ethanolamine or a combination thereof.
In accordance with a third aspect, the nucleophile comprises one or a combination of polyamines, polyols and polythiols.
In accordance with a fourth aspect, the polyamines comprise one or more selected from the group consisting of: cystamine, ethylenediamine, 1,3-diaminopropane, putrescine, cadaverine, and hexamethylenediamine.
In accordance with a fifth aspect, the polyols comprise one or more selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, and octane-1,8-diol.
In accordance with a sixth aspect, the contacting is performed with an electrophile. The electrophile comprises one or more carbonyl functional groups.
In accordance with a seventh aspect, the electrophile comprises one or both of a polyaldehyde and a polycarboxylic acid. The polyaldehyde is selected from the group consisting of: glutaraldehyde, glyoxal, malondialdehyde, and succinaldehyde. The polycarboxylic acid is selected from the group consisting of oxalic acid, malonic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, pimelic acid, suberic acid, azelaic acid, sebacic acid, aconitic acid, propane-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid, and 5-oxopentanoic acid.
In accordance with an eighth aspect, the catalytic system further comprises at least one pyridinium salt.
In accordance with a ninth aspect, the pyridinium salt comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of: 2-fluoro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (FMPTS), 2-fluoro-1-ethylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (FEPTS), 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (CEPTS), and 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium iodide (CMPI).
In accordance with a tenth aspect, the catalytic system comprises FMPTS and CsF.
In accordance with an eleventh aspect, the catalytic system comprises one or both of the fluoride-based salt and the carbonate-based salt.
In accordance with a twelfth aspect, the fluoride-based salt is one or a combination of CsF, RbF and KF.
In accordance with a thirteenth aspect, the cesium-based salt is one or a combination of CsF and Cs2CO3.
In accordance with a fourteenth aspect, the potassium-based salt is one or a combination of KF and K2CO3.
In accordance with a fifteenth aspect, the rubidium-based salt is one or a combination of RbF and Rb2CO3.
In accordance with a sixteenth aspect, the contacting is performed in a solvent system. The solvent system comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of: an alcohol, a nitrile, a ketone, an ester, an amide, a sulfoxide, an ether, a cyclic ether, a lactone, and a lactam.
In accordance with a seventeenth aspect, the solvent system comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of: acetonitrile, butyl acetate, ethyl acetate, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 1,4-dioxane, glycerol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, pyridine, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and diglyme.
In accordance with an eighteenth aspect, the contacting is performed in a solvent system comprising glycerol and ethanol.
In accordance with a nineteenth aspect, the contacting is performed in a solvent system comprising one or more selected from the group consisting of: water, saline, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), buffers having a pH of 1-13, and mixtures of organic solvents with water or buffers having a pH of 1-13.
In accordance with a twentieth aspect, the contacting is performed with a nucleophile in the presence of a solvent system, wherein the nucleophile is cystamine, wherein the catalytic system comprises CsF and FMPTS, and wherein the solvent system comprises DMSO or glycerol and ethanol.
In accordance with a twenty-first aspect, the contacting is performed with a nucleophile in the presence of a solvent system, wherein the nucleophile is cystamine, wherein the catalytic system comprises CsF and FMPTS, and wherein the solvent system comprises a buffered aqueous solution.
Other objects, features and advantages of the described preferred embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. It is to be understood, however, that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments, are given by way of illustration and not limitation. Many changes and modifications within the scope of the present disclosure can be made without departing from the spirit thereof, and the disclosure includes all such modifications.
Illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Specific, non-limiting embodiments of the methods for cross-linking bioprosthetic tissue will now be described with reference to the drawings. It should be understood that such embodiments are by way of example only and merely illustrative of but a small number of embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure. Various changes and modifications obvious to one skilled in the art to which the present disclosure pertains are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and contemplation of the present disclosure as further defined in the appended claims.
The preferred embodiments described herein are directed to methods for treating biological tissue for use in connection with an implantable bioprosthesis. Because biological tissues used for implantable bioprostheses originate from non-autologous sources, the biological tissue must be treated prior to implantation to maintain a sufficient degree of mechanical strength and dimensional stability. At the same time, the biological tissue must also be treated to reduce its antigenicity in the patient and to reduce actual and potential binding sites for calcium. The biological tissue can be derived from animal sources, such as from pericardial tissue, and in particular, from bovine pericardial tissue.
Fixation Process. In one preferred embodiment, the biological tissue can be subjected to a fixation process, as a result of which the biological tissue is rendered less antigenic and is at least partially or completely cross-linked. The fixation process is understood to include any chemical, heat or other processes as a result of which the biological tissue is preserved and rendered mechanically and dimensionally stable.
The fixation process can include contacting the tissue with one or more fixatives. Known fixatives include aldehydes, polyaldehydes, diisocyanates, carbodiimides, photooxidation agents, and polyepoxide compounds. In a preferred embodiment, the fixative used is glutaraldehyde. Glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue, however, is particularly vulnerable to calcification since glutaraldehyde fixation results in the generation of residual aldehyde groups and labile Schiff bases. The residual aldehydes and Schiff bases are potential binding sites for calcium. The aldehyde groups may oxidize to carboxylic acid groups, which are known to attract and bind calcium.
Various techniques have therefore been developed to reduce the aldehyde and acid levels of glutaraldehyde-fixed tissues, and thus to its propensity to calcify after implantation in the patient.
The fixation process can include adjusting the pH of the glutaraldehyde fixative in solution to reduce the generation of calcium binding sites, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,878,168 to Edwards Lifesciences, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The fixation process can also further include the addition of a heat-treating step after contacting with the one or more fixatives. Glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue have demonstrated a reduced aldehyde and carboxylic acid content after heat treatment, and thus a marked reduction in calcification after implantation, as compared to glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue without heat treatment. Heat treatment of glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,561,970, issued May 13, 2003 to Edwards Lifesciences, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. The heat treatment of glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue is also commercially known as the Carpentier-Edwards ThermaFix® (TFX) tissue treatment process from Edwards Lifesciences.
The fixation process can also further include subjecting the biological tissue to pre-conditioning, pre-stressing or pre-damaging fixed tissue to generate additional acid binding sites which can subsequently be capped, as described in U.S. Pub. No. 2008/0302372, entitled “Methods for Pre-Stressing and Capping Bioprosthetic Tissue” to Edwards Lifesciences, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The fixation process can be preceded by, followed by, or replaced by one or both of a treatment with a nucleophile and/or an electrophile in a catalytic system. Among the advantages of selecting and utilizing one or a combination of nucleophiles and/or electrophiles described herein is that it permits either one or both of the capping or cross-linking of the bioprosthetic tissue based on any one or a combination of the different tissue functional groups, including aldehydes, carboxylic acids, amines, hydroxyls, and sulfhydryl groups.
The terms “cap” or “capping” refers to the blocking, removal, or alteration of a functional group that actually or potentially produces an undesirable interaction between the implanted biological tissue and the host, such as calcification, an immunological rejection, etc.
The terms “cross-link” or “cross-linking” refers to the coupling or formation of covalent bonds between proteins in the bioprosthetic tissue directly via known agents, such as glutaraldehyde, or via the nucleophiles and/or electrophiles disclosed herein. For example, the polyfunctional nucleophiles or electrophiles described herein can form covalent bonds with the functional groups of the amino acid residues of collagenous tissue.
As the relative number of the different functional groups (i.e., aldehydes, carboxylic acids, amines, hydroxyls and sulfhydryl groups) in a bioprosthetic tissue necessarily differs, the nucleophilic and/or electrophilic treatment methods permit the bioprosthetic tissue to be variably cross-linked based on the selection of the particular nucleophile and/or electrophile and the extent to which the tissue functional groups targeted by the selected nucleophile and/or electrophile are present in the bioprosthetic tissue. The combination of the nucleophiles and/or electrophiles, the catalytic system and the solvent system provides significantly improved reaction efficiency with respect to the various functional groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue that are capped, crosslinked or both.
In accordance with one embodiment, a method for capping and/or cross-linking aldehyde and carboxylic acid functional groups in a bioprosthetic tissue is provided. The method comprises treating the bioprosthetic tissue with a polyfunctional agent in the presence of a catalytic system in a solvent system. The polyfunctional agent preferably comprises at least two functional groups selected from the group consisting of: aldehydes, carboxylic acids, amines, hydroxyls, and sulfhydryls. The catalytic system preferably comprises at least one pyridinium salt and at least one or a combination of a fluoride-based salt, a cesium-based salt, a potassium-based salt, a rubidium-based salt, and a carbonate-based salt.
Treatment with Nucleophile in a Catalytic System. Prior to, subsequent to or in place of the traditional fixation processes described above (e.g., glutaraldehyde fixation), the bioprosthetic tissue can be contacted with at least one nucleophile in the presence of a catalytic system, preferably in a solvent system. The nucleophile can react with one or a combination of aldehyde or carboxylic acid groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue. The catalytic system comprises at least one fluoride-based salt, a cesium-based salt or a carbonate-based salt. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the catalytic system further comprises at least one pyridinium salt. The catalytic system is believed to significantly improve the efficiency of the reaction between the nucleophile, on the one hand, and the free aldehydes and/or carboxylic acid groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue, on the other hand. This, in turn, increases the extent to which the aldehyde and carboxylic acid groups are capped, cross-linked, or both, depending on the type of nucleophile used in the process.
In a preferred embodiment, the nucleophile can comprise one or more functional groups selected from an amine, a hydroxyl and a sulfhydryl, such that the nucleophile can be an amine, an alcohol, a thiol, or compound with heterogenous functional groups.
In one preferred embodiment, the nucleophile is 2-mercaptoethanol, ethanolamine or a combination thereof.
For purposes of capping, the nucleophile preferably comprises at least one functional group that is capable of reacting with the aldehyde and/or carboxylic acid groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue.
The location of the functional group(s) on the nucleophile is preferably a terminal position or a non-terminal position that is not sterically hindered from reacting with the aldehyde and carboxylic acid groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue. The nucleophile can also comprise more than one functional group and thus can be a polyamine, polyol or a polysulfhydryl to enhance the capping efficiency of the nucleophile.
In one preferred embodiment, the polyamine is one or more of cystamine, ethylenediamine, 1,3-diaminopropane, putrescine, cadaverine, and hexamethylenediamine.
In another preferred embodiment, the polyol is one or more of ethylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, and octane-1,8-diol.
For the additional purpose of achieving at least a partial cross-linking of the tissue, the nucleophile preferably comprises two or more functional groups such that a single nucleophile is capable of reacting with at least two aldehyde groups, at least two carboxylic acid groups or at least one aldehyde and at least one carboxylic acid groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue. The two or more functional groups for a given nucleophile can be homogenous or heterogeneous and can also be selected from an amine, a hydroxyl and a sulfhydryl.
The nucleophile can have a straight or branched structure, with the functional groups preferably being located on the terminal portions of the straight or branched portions or be located in a position where the functional group is not sterically hindered from reacting with the aldehyde or carboxylic acid groups.
The functional groups can be separated by a length which corresponds to how closely adjacent collagen molecules are to be cross-linked. This, in turn, will affect the relative stiffness of the bioprosthetic tissue, with a short separation between functional groups giving rise to a stiffer tissue and a longer separation between functional groups giving rise to a more pliable or flexible tissue. Additional bio-functional molecules can further be provided within the nucleophile between or adjacent to the functional groups.
In one preferred embodiment, the nucleophile is a polyamine and, more particularly, a diamine having the formula:
NH2—R1-Mn-R2—NH2
wherein R1 and R2, independently of one another, is a straight or branched C1-C10 alkyl, an alkenyl, an alkynyl, and aryl, M is selected from S; and n is 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the polyamine is a cystamine. The functional group represented by M is such that it can impart additional properties to the nucleophile. Cystamine, for example, comprises a disulfide bond (e.g., wherein M is S and n is 2) which can be enzymatically cleaved, which in turn presents the ability to alter the extent to which the bioprosthetic tissue is cross-linked.
In accordance with one preferred embodiment, the bioprosthetic tissue is fixed with glutaraldehyde and subjected to one or a combination of heat and/or pH treatment as part of the fixation process. The glutaraldehyde-fixed bioprosthetic tissue is then exposed to a combination of cystamine and a catalytic system in a solvent system. The catalytic system can preferably comprise FMPTS and cesium fluoride. The solvent system can be one of a DMSO solution (non-aqueous), a combination of glycerol and ethanol (non-aqueous), or a phosphate-buffered saline solution (aqueous).
For example, in embodiments where cross-linking of the tissue without the use of glutaraldehyde is desired, the fixation step can be omitted and the nucleophilic/electrophilic treatment can include use of a polyfunctional nucleophile or electrophile that is capable of establishing tissue cross-linkages by coupling functional groups associated with the tissue.
Moreover, the additional ethanolamine and sodium borohydride capping and reducing steps are not required; however, in the event that the electrophile or nucleophile chosen in the process results in the generation of free aldehyde groups, as may be the case where a polyfunctional electrophile having carbonyl groups is employed, the additional capping and reducing step with ethanolamine and sodium borohydride can ensure that free aldehyde groups present in the fixed tissue are adequately capped.
Treatment of the bioprosthetic tissue with the cystamine and the FMPTS/CsF catalytic system in one of the three solvent systems is believed to produce significant capping of aldehyde and carboxylic acid groups of the fixed tissue. The combination of cystamine, FMPTS/CsF in the DMSO solvent system has been demonstrated to be particularly effective in capping carboxylic acid groups and the combination of cystamine, FMPTS/CsF in the glycerol and ethanol solvent system or the phosphate-buffered saline solution has been demonstrated to be particularly effective in capping aldehyde groups in the bioprosthetic tissue.
Treatment with Electrophile in a Catalytic System. Alternatively or in addition to (either before or after) the above-described nucleophilic treatment, the bioprosthetic tissue can be subjected to a treatment with an electrophile in a catalytic system, also preferably in a solvent system. The electrophile can react with one or more of an amine group, a hydroxyl group or a sulfhydryl group associated with the bioprosthetic tissue. The catalytic system comprises at least one fluoride-based salt or a cesium-based salt or a carbonate-based salt. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the catalytic system further comprises at least one pyridinium salt. The catalytic system is believed to significantly improve the efficiency of the reaction between the electrophile, on the one hand, and the free amine, hydroxyl or sulfhydryl groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue, on the other hand. This, in turn, increases the extent to which the amine, hydroxyl and sulfhydryl groups are capped, cross-linked, or both, depending on the type of electrophile used in the process.
In a preferred embodiment, the electrophile can comprise one or more functional groups selected from an aldehyde group and a carboxylic acid group. The electrophile can be an aldehyde or a carboxylic acid.
Alternatively, the electrophile can be a polyaldehyde, such as glutaraldehyde, glyoxal, malondialdehyde, and succinaldehyde, or a polycarboxylic acid, such as oxalic acid, malonic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, pimelic acid, suberic acid, azelaic acid, sebacic acid, aconitic acid, propane-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid, and 5-oxopentanoic acid.
For purposes of capping, the electrophile preferably comprises at least one functional group that is capable of reacting with the amine, hydroxyl and sulfhydryl groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue. Thus, the location of the functional group(s) of the electrophile is preferably a terminal group or a non-terminal group that is not sterically hindered from reacting with the amine, hydroxyl and/or sulfhydryl groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue.
For the additional purpose of achieving at least a partial cross-linking of the tissue, the electrophile preferably comprises two or more functional groups such that a single electrophile is capable of reacting with at least two functional groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue. Each one of the two functional groups can be selected from the group consisting of aldehyde and carboxylic acid groups and a given electrophile can comprise heterogeneous or homogenous functional groups.
The electrophile can have a straight or branched structure, with the functional groups preferably being located on the terminal portions of the straight or branched portions or being located in a position where the functional group is not sterically hindered from reacting with the amine, hydroxyl, and sulfhydryl groups on the tissue. The functional groups can be separated by a length which corresponds to how closely adjacent collagen molecules are to be cross-linked. This, in turn, will affect the relative stiffness of the bioprosthetic tissue, with a short separation between functional groups giving rise to a stiffer tissue and a longer separation between functional groups giving rise to a more pliable or flexible tissue. Additional bio-functional molecules can further be provided within the nucleophile between or adjacent to the functional groups.
Catalytic System. As discussed above with respect to the nucleophilic and electrophilic treatment processes, the catalytic system comprises at least one or a combination of a fluoride-based salt, a cesium-based salt, a potassium-based salt, a rubidium-based salt, and a carbonate-based salt. The catalytic system can additionally comprise one or a combination of pyridinium-based salts.
It is believed that the use of the catalytic system significantly increases the nucleophilic and/or electrophilic reaction efficiency such that it provides a greater degree of predictability as to the extent of the capping and/or cross-linking of the bioprosthetic tissue. While a combination of at least one of a fluoride-based salt, cesium-based salt potassium-based salt, rubidium-based salt, or a carbonate-based salt with a pyridinium-based salt produces superior nucleophilic and/or electrophilic reaction efficiency, it is understood that the catalytic system can also comprise only one of the foregoing catalysts to produce partial capping and/or cross-linking of the bioprosthetic tissue by either one or both of the nucleophile(s) and/or the electrophile(s).
In a preferred embodiment, the catalytic system comprises one or both of the fluoride-based salt and the carbonate-based salt.
In another preferred embodiment, the fluoride-based salt can be one or a combination of cesium fluoride (CsF), potassium fluoride (KF), and rubidium fluoride (RbF).
In yet another preferred embodiment, the cesium-based salt can be one or a combination of CsF and cesium carbonate (Cs2CO3).
In a further preferred embodiment, the potassium-based salt can be one or a combination of KF and potassium carbonate (K2CO3).
In yet another preferred embodiment, the rubidium-based salt can be one or a combination of RbF or Rb2CO3.
In yet a further preferred embodiment, the pyridinium salt can comprise one or a combination of 2-fluoro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (FMPTS), 2-fluoro-1-ethylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (FEPTS), 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (CEPTS), and 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium iodide (CMPI).
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the catalytic system comprises FMPTS and CsF. Alternatively, rubidium and potassium-based catalysts can additionally be included in the catalytic system.
Solvent System. The solvent system is further believed to contribute to the reaction efficiency of the electrophile(s)/nucleophile(s) with the tissue functional groups. The solvent system can be an anhydrous, non-aqueous or an aqueous system.
The term “non-aqueous,” as it refers to the solvent system, is understood to mean a solvent system in which less than 50% by weight of the solvent system is water. Thus, a non-aqueous solvent system does not exclude the presence of water, either as an impurity or in amounts less than 50% by weight. It is further understood that where the methods are disclosed as utilizing anhydrous solvent systems, corresponding non-aqueous solutions may be substituted for anhydrous solutions.
In a preferred embodiment, the solvent system includes one or a combination of an alcohol, a nitrile, a ketone, an ester, an amide, a sulfoxide, an ether, a cyclic ether, a lactone, and a lactam.
The anhydrous or non-aqueous solvent can comprise one or a combination of alcohol (CnH2n+1OH), acetonitrile, butyl acetate, ethyl acetate, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 1,4-dioxane, glycerol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, pyridine, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and diglyme. In a preferred embodiment, the solvent system comprises one or a combination of glycerol, alcohol and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).
The aqueous solvent can comprise a saline solution, preferably a buffered aqueous or saline solution or one or a combination of water, 0.9% saline, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), any buffers having a pH of 1 to 13, and mixtures of any organic solvents with water or buffers having a pH of 1 to 13.
Treatment with Capping and/or Reducing Agents. Following the processes of fixation, the treatment with the nucleophile, electrophile, or both, as described above, the process can further comprise a treatment with a capping and reducing agent. Insofar as the reaction of aldehydes and amines result in the formation of labile Schiff bases, it is desirable to reduce the Schiff base and replace it with a more stabile amine.
Moreover, insofar as residual aldehydes can be present in the tissue following the processes of fixation and/or treatment with the nucleophiles or electrophiles, the bioprosthetic tissue can be subjected to a further capping process by contacting the tissue with ethanolamine and a reducing agent. In a preferred embodiment, the reducing agent is sodium borohydride. Exemplary capping and reducing agents and processes are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,972,376, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Oxidation of Residual Aldehydes. As an alternative to the treatment with reducing agent described above, residual aldehydes can also be oxidized to carboxylic acids and the carboxylic acids can be reacted with an ethanolamine to produce a more stable peptide bond and to cap the carboxylic acids with an alcohol. The carboxylic acid groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue can also be capped or cross-linked by the nucleophilic or electrophilic treatment, as described above.
Glycerol Treatment. The bioprosthetic tissue can further undergo treatment with anhydrous, non-aqueous or aqueous solutions to substantially, if not completely, dehydrate the bioprosthetic tissue for dry storage.
In a preferred embodiment, the anhydrous or non-aqueous solution comprises glycerol and, more preferably, a solution of 75 wt % glycerol and 25 wt % ethanol, and the bioprosthetic tissue is soaked in the glycerol solution for at least one hour. The bioprosthetic tissue is then removed and placed in a clean hood to allow removal of excess solution.
In a preferred embodiment, the anhydrous or non-aqueous solution is a solution of glycerol and a C1-C3 alcohol, wherein the treatment solution comprises 60-95% by volume glycerol. Suitable treatments for the biological tissues are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,992, issued Aug. 30, 2011, to Edwards Lifesciences Corp., the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.
In another preferred embodiment, an aqueous glycerol solution can be used to at least partially dehydrate the tissue, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,534,004, issued Mar. 18, 2003, issued to The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
The terms “dry” or “dehydrated,” as used herein, are understood to include residual treatment solution or moisture or humidity from the ambient environment following treatment with the anhydrous, non-aqueous or aqueous glycerol solutions.
Ethylene Oxide Sterilization. The dehydrated bioprosthetic tissue is provided in a sealed package, preferably in a double sterile barrier packaging consisting of a rigid tray (PETG) with a Tyvek lid. The package is sealed in a clean room, and sterilized in 100% ethylene oxide.
It is to be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the present disclosure, are given by way of illustration and not limitation. Many changes and modifications within the scope of the present disclosure may be made without departing from the spirit thereof, and the disclosure includes all such modifications.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/723,958, filed on Nov. 8, 2012, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2393580 | Weiskopf | Jan 1946 | A |
2484813 | Bower | Oct 1949 | A |
2567929 | Fessenden | Sep 1951 | A |
3002895 | Freedman | Oct 1961 | A |
3093439 | Bothwell | Jun 1963 | A |
3870789 | Mikat | Mar 1975 | A |
3927422 | Sawyer | Dec 1975 | A |
3961097 | Gravlee, Jr. | Jun 1976 | A |
3966401 | Hancock et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4050893 | Hancock et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4067091 | Backman | Jan 1978 | A |
4082507 | Sawyer | Apr 1978 | A |
4120649 | Schechter | Oct 1978 | A |
4120991 | Ornstein et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4207689 | Romera-Sierra et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4294753 | Urist | Oct 1981 | A |
4320157 | von Hagens | Mar 1982 | A |
4323358 | Lentz et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4328256 | Romero-Sierra et al. | May 1982 | A |
4347671 | Dias et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4350492 | Wright et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4372743 | Lane | Feb 1983 | A |
4378224 | Nimni et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4402697 | Pollock et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4405327 | Pollock | Sep 1983 | A |
4481009 | Nashef | Nov 1984 | A |
4553974 | Dewanjee | Nov 1985 | A |
4599084 | Nashef | Jul 1986 | A |
4624822 | Arru et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4647283 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4648881 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4655773 | Grassi | Apr 1987 | A |
4676070 | Linner | Jun 1987 | A |
4729139 | Nashef | Mar 1988 | A |
4729766 | Bergentz et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4753652 | Langer et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4758151 | Arru et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4770665 | Nashef | Sep 1988 | A |
4776853 | Klement et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4786287 | Nashef et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4793344 | Cumming et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4800603 | Jaffe | Jan 1989 | A |
4831065 | Pietsch et al. | May 1989 | A |
4838888 | Nashef | Jun 1989 | A |
4865871 | Livesey et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4885005 | Nashef et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4891319 | Roser | Jan 1990 | A |
4911713 | Sauvage et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4958008 | Petite et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4969912 | Kelman et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4975526 | Kuberasampath et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4976733 | Girardot | Dec 1990 | A |
4990131 | Dardik et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994030 | Glowczewskie, Jr. et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994237 | Login et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4996054 | Pietsch et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5002566 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5011494 | von Recum et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011913 | Benedict et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5024830 | Linner | Jun 1991 | A |
5044165 | Linner et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5051401 | Sikes | Sep 1991 | A |
5068086 | Sklenak et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068100 | McClanahan | Nov 1991 | A |
5080670 | Imamura et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5094661 | Levy et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104405 | Nimni | Apr 1992 | A |
5108923 | Benedict et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5116564 | Jansen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5131908 | Dardik et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5147514 | Mechanic | Sep 1992 | A |
5149621 | McNally et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149653 | Roser | Sep 1992 | A |
5154007 | Piunno et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163955 | Love et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5200399 | Wettlaufer et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5215541 | Nashef et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5275954 | Wolfinbarger et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279612 | Eberhardt | Jan 1994 | A |
5288288 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5290558 | O'Leary et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296583 | Levy | Mar 1994 | A |
5329846 | Bonutti | Jul 1994 | A |
5332475 | Mechanic | Jul 1994 | A |
5336616 | Livesey et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5368608 | Levy et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5397353 | Oliver et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5424047 | Zwingenberger et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5436291 | Levy et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437287 | Phillips et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447536 | Girardot et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5447724 | Helmus et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5460962 | Kemp | Oct 1995 | A |
5476516 | Seifter et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5507813 | Dowd et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509932 | Keogh et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5554184 | Machiraju | Sep 1996 | A |
5556379 | Wolfinbarger | Sep 1996 | A |
5558875 | Wang | Sep 1996 | A |
5595571 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5613982 | Goldstein | Mar 1997 | A |
5632778 | Goldstein | May 1997 | A |
5645587 | Chanda et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5674298 | Levy et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679112 | Levy et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5695820 | Davis et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697972 | Kim et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713953 | Vallana et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716399 | Love | Feb 1998 | A |
5720777 | Jaffe et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720894 | Neev et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5733339 | Girardot et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746775 | Levy et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762600 | Bruchman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766520 | Bronshtein | Jun 1998 | A |
5769780 | Hata et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770193 | Vacanti et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773285 | Park | Jun 1998 | A |
5776182 | Bruchman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782914 | Schankereli | Jul 1998 | A |
5782915 | Stone | Jul 1998 | A |
5782931 | Yang et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792603 | Dunkelman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5843180 | Jaffe et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843181 | Jaffe et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843182 | Goldstein | Dec 1998 | A |
5855620 | Bishopric et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5856102 | Bierke-Nelson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5856172 | Greenwood et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862806 | Cheung | Jan 1999 | A |
5865849 | Stone | Feb 1999 | A |
5873812 | Ciana et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879383 | Bruchman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882850 | Khor et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882918 | Goffe | Mar 1999 | A |
5899936 | Goldstein | May 1999 | A |
5902338 | Stone | May 1999 | A |
5904718 | Jefferies | May 1999 | A |
5911951 | Girardot et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913900 | Stone | Jun 1999 | A |
5919472 | Trescony et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921980 | Kirn | Jul 1999 | A |
5922027 | Stone | Jul 1999 | A |
5931969 | Carpentier et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935168 | Yang et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945319 | Keogh | Aug 1999 | A |
5977153 | Camiener | Nov 1999 | A |
5987720 | Yamamoto | Nov 1999 | A |
5993844 | Abraham et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008292 | Lee et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017741 | Keogh | Jan 2000 | A |
6024735 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039726 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6063120 | Stone | May 2000 | A |
6066160 | Colvin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086580 | Mordon et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093204 | Stone | Jul 2000 | A |
6093530 | McIlroy et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106555 | Yang | Aug 2000 | A |
6117979 | Hendriks et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121041 | Mirsch, II et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126686 | Badylak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129758 | Love | Oct 2000 | A |
6132472 | Bonutti | Oct 2000 | A |
6132473 | Williams et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132986 | Pathak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6156030 | Neev | Dec 2000 | A |
6156531 | Pathak et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165215 | Rottenberg et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166184 | Hendriks et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174331 | Moe et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177514 | Pathak et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190407 | Ogle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193749 | Schroeder et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203755 | Odland | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206873 | Paolini et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206917 | Williams et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210957 | Carpentier et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214054 | Cunanan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214055 | Simionescu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231608 | Stone | May 2001 | B1 |
6231614 | Yang | May 2001 | B1 |
6251579 | Moore et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254635 | Schroeder et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258320 | Persing et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267786 | Stone | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277555 | Duran et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287338 | Sarnowski et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290991 | Roser et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302909 | Ogle et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312474 | Francis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322593 | Pathak et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322994 | Reid | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328762 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334873 | Lane et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352708 | Duran et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364905 | Simpson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372228 | Gregory | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375680 | Carlyle | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376244 | Atala | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383732 | Stone | May 2002 | B1 |
6391538 | Vyavahare et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394096 | Constantz | May 2002 | B1 |
6448076 | Dennis et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6468660 | Ogle et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6471723 | Ashworth et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479079 | Pathak et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482199 | Neev | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506339 | Girardot et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6509145 | Torrianni | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527979 | Constantz et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6528006 | Jansen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531310 | Mirsch, II et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6534004 | Chen et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6547827 | Carpentier et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6561970 | Carpentier et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569200 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6582464 | Gabbay | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6586006 | Roser et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6586573 | Besman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589591 | Mansouri et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605079 | Shanks et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6605667 | Badejo et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613278 | Mills et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6617142 | Keogh et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6630001 | Duran et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652594 | Francis et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653062 | DePablo et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660265 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676654 | Balle-Petersen et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6676655 | McDaniel | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682559 | Myers et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685940 | Andya et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6696074 | Dai et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6734018 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6753181 | Atala | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6790229 | Berreklouw | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6797000 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6828310 | Barresi et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6872226 | Cali et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878168 | Carpentier et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893666 | Spievack | May 2005 | B2 |
6908591 | MacPhee et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911043 | Myers et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6919172 | DePablo et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6933326 | Griffey et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6939378 | Fishman et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7008763 | Cheung | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022119 | Hohla | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037333 | Myers et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063726 | Crouch et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7078163 | Torrianni | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087723 | Besman et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7141064 | Scott et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143769 | Stoltz et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147846 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7217265 | Hennings et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7238200 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7318998 | Goldstein et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7338757 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7354749 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7358284 | Griffey et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367969 | Stoltz et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7498565 | Silberberg et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7594974 | Cali et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7648676 | Mills et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7682304 | Heyninck-Jantz et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7871434 | Case et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7914569 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919112 | Pathak et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7963958 | Stoltz et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972376 | Dove et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8043450 | Cali et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8075615 | Eberhardt et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8136218 | Millwee et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20010000804 | Goldstein et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010020191 | Williams et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010025196 | Chinn et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010027344 | Bonutti | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032024 | Cunanan et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039459 | Stone | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020001834 | Keogh et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020049498 | Yuksel et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020091441 | Guzik | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111532 | Pathak et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030035843 | Livesey et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030125805 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135284 | Crouch et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167089 | Lane | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030212454 | Scott et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040030381 | Shu | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040086543 | Keogh et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040158320 | Simionescu et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193259 | Gabbay | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050010773 | Lapstun et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024460 | McNally et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059800 | Sudhakar et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050079200 | Rathenow et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050119736 | Zilla et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136510 | Hendriks et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050211680 | Li et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050244460 | Alferiev et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060084957 | Delfyett et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060099326 | Keogh et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110370 | Pathak et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060159641 | Girardot et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177426 | Gibson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210960 | Livesey et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217804 | Dove | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217805 | Dove | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228391 | Seyedin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070010804 | Rathjen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070048340 | Ferren et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050014 | Johnson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073392 | Heyninck-Jantz et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070203576 | Lee et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070254005 | Pathak et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070292459 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080195123 | Gainor et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080302372 | Davidson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090041729 | Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090112309 | Jaramillo et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118716 | Brownell | May 2009 | A1 |
20090130162 | Pathak et al. | May 2009 | A2 |
20090137999 | Silberberg et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090164005 | Dove et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090188900 | Cali et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090281530 | Korn | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090326524 | Cali et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100036484 | Hariton et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100100084 | Girard et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110028957 | Raksi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110092966 | Guo et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110118609 | Goldshleger et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110165675 | Dove et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110177150 | Pathak et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110238167 | Dove et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110295363 | Girard et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120035720 | Cali et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059487 | Cunanan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120067855 | Guo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120328905 | Guo et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0169259 | Jan 1986 | EP |
8401894 | May 1984 | WO |
9009102 | Aug 1990 | WO |
WO9009102 | Aug 1990 | WO |
9511047 | Apr 1995 | WO |
95022361 | Aug 1995 | WO |
95034332 | Dec 1995 | WO |
96004028 | Feb 1996 | WO |
96013227 | May 1996 | WO |
98007452 | Feb 1998 | WO |
98043556 | Oct 1998 | WO |
00032252 | Jun 2000 | WO |
03037227 | May 2003 | WO |
04082536 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2006026325 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006099334 | Sep 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Steinmetz et al. The broad scope of cesium salts. Organic Chemistry. 2011;1-12. |
Invitrogen. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Crosslinking and photoactivatable reagents. 2010;171-188. |
Parenteau-Bareil et al. Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Materials. 2010;3:1863-1887. |
Al-Fagih, M.R., et al., “Aortic Valve Repair Using Bovine Pericardium for Cusp Extenstion,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 760-764, 7988. |
Carpentier, A., et al., “Biological Factors Affecting Long-Term Results of Valvular Heterografts,” Forty-ninth Meeting of the American Assoication for Thoracic Surgery, San Francisco, CA, Mar. 31-Apr. 2, 1969. |
Chanda, J., et al., “Heparin in Calcification Prevention of Porcine Pericardial Bioprostheses,” Biomaterials, Elsevier Science Publishers, vol. 18, No. 16, ISSN: 0142-9612, Aug. 1, 1997. |
Chvapil, M., et al., “Use of Chemically Purified and Cross-Linked Bovine Pericardium as a Ligament Substitute,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 1383-1394, 1987, University of Arizona Health Science Center, Tucson, AZ. |
Dahm, Manfred, et al., “Effects of Surface Seeding with Vital Cells on the Calcium Uptake of Biological Materials for Heart Valve Replacement,” J Heart Valve dis, Vole. 5, No. 2, Mar. 1996, pp. 148-151. |
Fanner, P., et al., “Systematic Review of Preservation Methods and Clinical Outcome of Infrainguinal Vascular Allografts,” Jounral of Vascular Surgery, vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 518-524, 2006. |
Fumoto, H., et al., “Performance of Bioprosthetic Valves After Glycerol Dehydration, Ethylene Oxide Sterilization, and Rehydration,” Innovations, vol. 6, No. 1, Jan./ Feb. 2011. |
Grant, R.A., et al., “The Effects of Irradiation with High Energy Electrons on the Structure and Reactivity of Native and Cross-Linked Collagen Fibres,” J. Cell Sci. vol. 7, 99. 387-405, 1970. |
Hauschka, P., et al., “Direct Identification of the Calcium-Binding Amino Acid, y-Carboxyglutamate, in Mineralized Tissue,” Proc. nat. Acas. Sci, vol. 72, No. 10, pp. 3925-3929, Oct. 1975. |
International Search Report from corresponding PCT Case No. PCT/US2011/029654 dated Dec. 23, 2011. |
Jayakrishnan, A., et al., “Glutaraldehyde as a Fixative in Bioprostheses and Drug Delivery Matrices,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, Issue 5, 1995, pp. 471-484. |
Khor, Eugene, “Methods for the Treatment of Collagenous Tissues for Bioprostheses,” Biomaterials, vol. 18, Issue 2, Jan. 1997, pp. 95-105. |
Ohan, M., et al., “Glucose Stabilizes Collagen Sterilized with Gamma Irradiation,” Wiley Periodicals, Inc., pp. 1188-1195, 2003. |
Olde Damink, L.H.H., et al., “Influence of Ethylene Oxide Gas Treatment on the in vitro Degradation Behavior of Dermal Sheep Collagen,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Resaerch, vol. 29, pp. 149-155, 1995. |
Parker, R., et al., “Storage of Heart Valve Allografts in Glycerol with Subsequent Antibiotic Sterilization,” Thorax, British Thoracic Society, vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 638-645, 1978. |
Saegeman, V., et al., “Short and long term bacterial inhibiting effect of high concentrations of glycerol used in the prevention of skin allografts,” Science Direct, Burns, No. 34, Mar. 2008. |
Schmidt, C., et al., “Acellular Vascular Tissues: Natural Biomaterials for Tissue Repair and Tissue Engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 21, pp. 2215-2231, 2000. |
Zilla, P., et al., “Carbodiimide Treatment Dramatically Potentiates the Anticalcific Effect of Alpha-Amino Oleic Acid on Glutaraldehyde-Fixed Aortic Wall Tissue,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Elsevier, vol. 79, No. 3, ISSN: 0003-4975; Mar. 1, 2005. |
International Search Report from Corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/069230, dated Feb. 12, 2014. |
Acros Organics: “Catalysts Cesium Contents”, Nov. 5, 2006 (Nov. 5, 2006), XP055528926, retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://www.acros.com/_Rainbow/pdf/brochure_cesium_v2.pdf [retrieved on Nov. 30, 2018]. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140127804 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61723958 | Nov 2012 | US |