Methods for treating bioprosthetic tissue using a nucleophile/electrophile in a catalytic system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10238771
  • Patent Number
    10,238,771
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 7, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 26, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
Methods for treating a bioprosthetic tissue are described herein. The methods comprise contacting the bioprosthetic tissue with at least one nucleophile and/or at least one electrophile in the presence of a catalytic system comprising at least one or a combination of a fluoride-based salt, a cesium-based salt, a potassium-based salt, a rubidium-based salt, or a carbonate-based salt. The methods may be used to alter functional groups on biological tissue which represent actual and potential calcium binding sites and also processes for cross-linking bioprosthetic tissue. Both processes may be used in conjunction with known fixative techniques, such as glutaraldehyde fixation, or may be used to replace known fixative techniques.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to methods for treating bioprosthetic tissue for implantation in a patient and, more particularly, to methods for capping and/or crosslinking bioprosthetic tissue using a nucleophile and/or an electrophile in a catalytic system.


BACKGROUND

Significant challenges are presented by the use of non-autologous tissue in bioprosthetic implants. Chief among the challenges are preventing immunological rejection of the bioprosthetic implant by the host and calcification of the tissue, which results in the undesirable stiffening and degradation of the tissue. Immunological rejection and calcification are particularly problematic for bioprosthetic heart valves, as calcification of valve leaflets after implantation will adversely affect its ability to maintain a one-way flow of blood and prevent undesirable leaking or regurgitation of blood.


Glutaraldehyde has long been the reagent of choice for fixing and sterilizing tissue intended for bioprosthetic implants. The use of glutaraldehyde for fixing bioprosthetic tissue, however, has many significant disadvantages. Because glutaraldehyde tends to polymerize in solution, glutaraldehyde-fixed tissues are often characterized as having residual aldehyde groups associated with the fixed tissue.


Additionally, glutaraldehyde reacts with the free amines in the tissue to generate labile Schiff bases. Both the residual aldehydes and Schiff bases in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissues represent potential calcium binding sites that may lead to in viva calcification. Moreover, because glutaraldehyde is cytotoxic, it inhibits the desired cellular in-growth and integration of the implanted and glutaraldehyde-treated bioprosthetic tissue.


What is therefore needed are strategies that may be used in place of, or in conjunction with, glutaraldehyde fixation for mitigating some of the undesirable interactions between implanted bioprosthetic tissue and the host.


BRIEF SUMMARY

Described herein are processes for altering functional groups on biological tissues which represent actual and potential calcium binding sites and also processes for cross-linking bioprosthetic tissue. Both these processes can be used in conjunction with known fixative techniques, such as glutaraldehyde fixation, or can be used to replace known fixative techniques.


In one embodiment, a method for treating a bioprosthetic tissue is provided. The method comprises contacting the bioprosthetic tissue with one of a nucleophile or an electrophile in the presence of a catalytic system. The catalytic system comprises at least one or a combination of a fluoride-based salt, a cesium-based salt, a potassium-based salt, a rubidium-based salt, and a carbonate-based salt.


In accordance with a first aspect, the contacting is performed with a nucleophile. The nucleophile comprises one or more functional groups selected from the group consisting of: an amine, a hydroxyl and a sulfhydryl.


In accordance with a second aspect, the nucleophile is 2-mercaptoethanol, ethanolamine or a combination thereof.


In accordance with a third aspect, the nucleophile comprises one or a combination of polyamines, polyols and polythiols.


In accordance with a fourth aspect, the polyamines comprise one or more selected from the group consisting of: cystamine, ethylenediamine, 1,3-diaminopropane, putrescine, cadaverine, and hexamethylenediamine.


In accordance with a fifth aspect, the polyols comprise one or more selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, and octane-1,8-diol.


In accordance with a sixth aspect, the contacting is performed with an electrophile. The electrophile comprises one or more carbonyl functional groups.


In accordance with a seventh aspect, the electrophile comprises one or both of a polyaldehyde and a polycarboxylic acid. The polyaldehyde is selected from the group consisting of: glutaraldehyde, glyoxal, malondialdehyde, and succinaldehyde. The polycarboxylic acid is selected from the group consisting of oxalic acid, malonic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, pimelic acid, suberic acid, azelaic acid, sebacic acid, aconitic acid, propane-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid, and 5-oxopentanoic acid.


In accordance with an eighth aspect, the catalytic system further comprises at least one pyridinium salt.


In accordance with a ninth aspect, the pyridinium salt comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of: 2-fluoro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (FMPTS), 2-fluoro-1-ethylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (FEPTS), 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (CEPTS), and 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium iodide (CMPI).


In accordance with a tenth aspect, the catalytic system comprises FMPTS and CsF.


In accordance with an eleventh aspect, the catalytic system comprises one or both of the fluoride-based salt and the carbonate-based salt.


In accordance with a twelfth aspect, the fluoride-based salt is one or a combination of CsF, RbF and KF.


In accordance with a thirteenth aspect, the cesium-based salt is one or a combination of CsF and Cs2CO3.


In accordance with a fourteenth aspect, the potassium-based salt is one or a combination of KF and K2CO3.


In accordance with a fifteenth aspect, the rubidium-based salt is one or a combination of RbF and Rb2CO3.


In accordance with a sixteenth aspect, the contacting is performed in a solvent system. The solvent system comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of: an alcohol, a nitrile, a ketone, an ester, an amide, a sulfoxide, an ether, a cyclic ether, a lactone, and a lactam.


In accordance with a seventeenth aspect, the solvent system comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of: acetonitrile, butyl acetate, ethyl acetate, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 1,4-dioxane, glycerol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, pyridine, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and diglyme.


In accordance with an eighteenth aspect, the contacting is performed in a solvent system comprising glycerol and ethanol.


In accordance with a nineteenth aspect, the contacting is performed in a solvent system comprising one or more selected from the group consisting of: water, saline, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), buffers having a pH of 1-13, and mixtures of organic solvents with water or buffers having a pH of 1-13.


In accordance with a twentieth aspect, the contacting is performed with a nucleophile in the presence of a solvent system, wherein the nucleophile is cystamine, wherein the catalytic system comprises CsF and FMPTS, and wherein the solvent system comprises DMSO or glycerol and ethanol.


In accordance with a twenty-first aspect, the contacting is performed with a nucleophile in the presence of a solvent system, wherein the nucleophile is cystamine, wherein the catalytic system comprises CsF and FMPTS, and wherein the solvent system comprises a buffered aqueous solution.


Other objects, features and advantages of the described preferred embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. It is to be understood, however, that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments, are given by way of illustration and not limitation. Many changes and modifications within the scope of the present disclosure can be made without departing from the spirit thereof, and the disclosure includes all such modifications.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a flow chart of an exemplary process for cross-linking and capping bioprosthetic tissue in either an anhydrous or a non-aqueous solvent system.



FIG. 2 is a flow chart of an exemplary process for cross-linking and capping bioprosthetic tissue in an aqueous solvent system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Specific, non-limiting embodiments of the methods for cross-linking bioprosthetic tissue will now be described with reference to the drawings. It should be understood that such embodiments are by way of example only and merely illustrative of but a small number of embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure. Various changes and modifications obvious to one skilled in the art to which the present disclosure pertains are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and contemplation of the present disclosure as further defined in the appended claims.


The preferred embodiments described herein are directed to methods for treating biological tissue for use in connection with an implantable bioprosthesis. Because biological tissues used for implantable bioprostheses originate from non-autologous sources, the biological tissue must be treated prior to implantation to maintain a sufficient degree of mechanical strength and dimensional stability. At the same time, the biological tissue must also be treated to reduce its antigenicity in the patient and to reduce actual and potential binding sites for calcium. The biological tissue can be derived from animal sources, such as from pericardial tissue, and in particular, from bovine pericardial tissue.


Fixation Process. In one preferred embodiment, the biological tissue can be subjected to a fixation process, as a result of which the biological tissue is rendered less antigenic and is at least partially or completely cross-linked. The fixation process is understood to include any chemical, heat or other processes as a result of which the biological tissue is preserved and rendered mechanically and dimensionally stable.


The fixation process can include contacting the tissue with one or more fixatives. Known fixatives include aldehydes, polyaldehydes, diisocyanates, carbodiimides, photooxidation agents, and polyepoxide compounds. In a preferred embodiment, the fixative used is glutaraldehyde. Glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue, however, is particularly vulnerable to calcification since glutaraldehyde fixation results in the generation of residual aldehyde groups and labile Schiff bases. The residual aldehydes and Schiff bases are potential binding sites for calcium. The aldehyde groups may oxidize to carboxylic acid groups, which are known to attract and bind calcium.


Various techniques have therefore been developed to reduce the aldehyde and acid levels of glutaraldehyde-fixed tissues, and thus to its propensity to calcify after implantation in the patient.


The fixation process can include adjusting the pH of the glutaraldehyde fixative in solution to reduce the generation of calcium binding sites, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,878,168 to Edwards Lifesciences, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.


The fixation process can also further include the addition of a heat-treating step after contacting with the one or more fixatives. Glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue have demonstrated a reduced aldehyde and carboxylic acid content after heat treatment, and thus a marked reduction in calcification after implantation, as compared to glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue without heat treatment. Heat treatment of glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,561,970, issued May 13, 2003 to Edwards Lifesciences, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. The heat treatment of glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue is also commercially known as the Carpentier-Edwards ThermaFix® (TFX) tissue treatment process from Edwards Lifesciences.


The fixation process can also further include subjecting the biological tissue to pre-conditioning, pre-stressing or pre-damaging fixed tissue to generate additional acid binding sites which can subsequently be capped, as described in U.S. Pub. No. 2008/0302372, entitled “Methods for Pre-Stressing and Capping Bioprosthetic Tissue” to Edwards Lifesciences, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.


The fixation process can be preceded by, followed by, or replaced by one or both of a treatment with a nucleophile and/or an electrophile in a catalytic system. Among the advantages of selecting and utilizing one or a combination of nucleophiles and/or electrophiles described herein is that it permits either one or both of the capping or cross-linking of the bioprosthetic tissue based on any one or a combination of the different tissue functional groups, including aldehydes, carboxylic acids, amines, hydroxyls, and sulfhydryl groups.


The terms “cap” or “capping” refers to the blocking, removal, or alteration of a functional group that actually or potentially produces an undesirable interaction between the implanted biological tissue and the host, such as calcification, an immunological rejection, etc.


The terms “cross-link” or “cross-linking” refers to the coupling or formation of covalent bonds between proteins in the bioprosthetic tissue directly via known agents, such as glutaraldehyde, or via the nucleophiles and/or electrophiles disclosed herein. For example, the polyfunctional nucleophiles or electrophiles described herein can form covalent bonds with the functional groups of the amino acid residues of collagenous tissue.


As the relative number of the different functional groups (i.e., aldehydes, carboxylic acids, amines, hydroxyls and sulfhydryl groups) in a bioprosthetic tissue necessarily differs, the nucleophilic and/or electrophilic treatment methods permit the bioprosthetic tissue to be variably cross-linked based on the selection of the particular nucleophile and/or electrophile and the extent to which the tissue functional groups targeted by the selected nucleophile and/or electrophile are present in the bioprosthetic tissue. The combination of the nucleophiles and/or electrophiles, the catalytic system and the solvent system provides significantly improved reaction efficiency with respect to the various functional groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue that are capped, crosslinked or both.


In accordance with one embodiment, a method for capping and/or cross-linking aldehyde and carboxylic acid functional groups in a bioprosthetic tissue is provided. The method comprises treating the bioprosthetic tissue with a polyfunctional agent in the presence of a catalytic system in a solvent system. The polyfunctional agent preferably comprises at least two functional groups selected from the group consisting of: aldehydes, carboxylic acids, amines, hydroxyls, and sulfhydryls. The catalytic system preferably comprises at least one pyridinium salt and at least one or a combination of a fluoride-based salt, a cesium-based salt, a potassium-based salt, a rubidium-based salt, and a carbonate-based salt.


Treatment with Nucleophile in a Catalytic System. Prior to, subsequent to or in place of the traditional fixation processes described above (e.g., glutaraldehyde fixation), the bioprosthetic tissue can be contacted with at least one nucleophile in the presence of a catalytic system, preferably in a solvent system. The nucleophile can react with one or a combination of aldehyde or carboxylic acid groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue. The catalytic system comprises at least one fluoride-based salt, a cesium-based salt or a carbonate-based salt. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the catalytic system further comprises at least one pyridinium salt. The catalytic system is believed to significantly improve the efficiency of the reaction between the nucleophile, on the one hand, and the free aldehydes and/or carboxylic acid groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue, on the other hand. This, in turn, increases the extent to which the aldehyde and carboxylic acid groups are capped, cross-linked, or both, depending on the type of nucleophile used in the process.


In a preferred embodiment, the nucleophile can comprise one or more functional groups selected from an amine, a hydroxyl and a sulfhydryl, such that the nucleophile can be an amine, an alcohol, a thiol, or compound with heterogenous functional groups.


In one preferred embodiment, the nucleophile is 2-mercaptoethanol, ethanolamine or a combination thereof.


For purposes of capping, the nucleophile preferably comprises at least one functional group that is capable of reacting with the aldehyde and/or carboxylic acid groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue.


The location of the functional group(s) on the nucleophile is preferably a terminal position or a non-terminal position that is not sterically hindered from reacting with the aldehyde and carboxylic acid groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue. The nucleophile can also comprise more than one functional group and thus can be a polyamine, polyol or a polysulfhydryl to enhance the capping efficiency of the nucleophile.


In one preferred embodiment, the polyamine is one or more of cystamine, ethylenediamine, 1,3-diaminopropane, putrescine, cadaverine, and hexamethylenediamine.


In another preferred embodiment, the polyol is one or more of ethylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, and octane-1,8-diol.


For the additional purpose of achieving at least a partial cross-linking of the tissue, the nucleophile preferably comprises two or more functional groups such that a single nucleophile is capable of reacting with at least two aldehyde groups, at least two carboxylic acid groups or at least one aldehyde and at least one carboxylic acid groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue. The two or more functional groups for a given nucleophile can be homogenous or heterogeneous and can also be selected from an amine, a hydroxyl and a sulfhydryl.


The nucleophile can have a straight or branched structure, with the functional groups preferably being located on the terminal portions of the straight or branched portions or be located in a position where the functional group is not sterically hindered from reacting with the aldehyde or carboxylic acid groups.


The functional groups can be separated by a length which corresponds to how closely adjacent collagen molecules are to be cross-linked. This, in turn, will affect the relative stiffness of the bioprosthetic tissue, with a short separation between functional groups giving rise to a stiffer tissue and a longer separation between functional groups giving rise to a more pliable or flexible tissue. Additional bio-functional molecules can further be provided within the nucleophile between or adjacent to the functional groups.


In one preferred embodiment, the nucleophile is a polyamine and, more particularly, a diamine having the formula:

NH2—R1-Mn-R2—NH2

wherein R1 and R2, independently of one another, is a straight or branched C1-C10 alkyl, an alkenyl, an alkynyl, and aryl, M is selected from S; and n is 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4.


In a particularly preferred embodiment, the polyamine is a cystamine. The functional group represented by M is such that it can impart additional properties to the nucleophile. Cystamine, for example, comprises a disulfide bond (e.g., wherein M is S and n is 2) which can be enzymatically cleaved, which in turn presents the ability to alter the extent to which the bioprosthetic tissue is cross-linked.


In accordance with one preferred embodiment, the bioprosthetic tissue is fixed with glutaraldehyde and subjected to one or a combination of heat and/or pH treatment as part of the fixation process. The glutaraldehyde-fixed bioprosthetic tissue is then exposed to a combination of cystamine and a catalytic system in a solvent system. The catalytic system can preferably comprise FMPTS and cesium fluoride. The solvent system can be one of a DMSO solution (non-aqueous), a combination of glycerol and ethanol (non-aqueous), or a phosphate-buffered saline solution (aqueous).



FIG. 1 depicts exemplary steps of the methods described herein, with FIG. 1 describing the nucleophilic/electrophilic treatment processes in either an anhydrous or alternatively a non-aqueous solvent system and FIG. 2 describing the nucleophilic/electrophilic treatment processes in connection with an aqueous solvent system. It is noted that in either of the processes described in FIGS. 1 and 2, the fixation step and the capping and reduction steps with ethanolamine and sodium borohydride, respectively, are not required but can be incorporated based on the objectives of the treatment processes.


For example, in embodiments where cross-linking of the tissue without the use of glutaraldehyde is desired, the fixation step can be omitted and the nucleophilic/electrophilic treatment can include use of a polyfunctional nucleophile or electrophile that is capable of establishing tissue cross-linkages by coupling functional groups associated with the tissue.


Moreover, the additional ethanolamine and sodium borohydride capping and reducing steps are not required; however, in the event that the electrophile or nucleophile chosen in the process results in the generation of free aldehyde groups, as may be the case where a polyfunctional electrophile having carbonyl groups is employed, the additional capping and reducing step with ethanolamine and sodium borohydride can ensure that free aldehyde groups present in the fixed tissue are adequately capped.


Treatment of the bioprosthetic tissue with the cystamine and the FMPTS/CsF catalytic system in one of the three solvent systems is believed to produce significant capping of aldehyde and carboxylic acid groups of the fixed tissue. The combination of cystamine, FMPTS/CsF in the DMSO solvent system has been demonstrated to be particularly effective in capping carboxylic acid groups and the combination of cystamine, FMPTS/CsF in the glycerol and ethanol solvent system or the phosphate-buffered saline solution has been demonstrated to be particularly effective in capping aldehyde groups in the bioprosthetic tissue.


Treatment with Electrophile in a Catalytic System. Alternatively or in addition to (either before or after) the above-described nucleophilic treatment, the bioprosthetic tissue can be subjected to a treatment with an electrophile in a catalytic system, also preferably in a solvent system. The electrophile can react with one or more of an amine group, a hydroxyl group or a sulfhydryl group associated with the bioprosthetic tissue. The catalytic system comprises at least one fluoride-based salt or a cesium-based salt or a carbonate-based salt. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the catalytic system further comprises at least one pyridinium salt. The catalytic system is believed to significantly improve the efficiency of the reaction between the electrophile, on the one hand, and the free amine, hydroxyl or sulfhydryl groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue, on the other hand. This, in turn, increases the extent to which the amine, hydroxyl and sulfhydryl groups are capped, cross-linked, or both, depending on the type of electrophile used in the process.


In a preferred embodiment, the electrophile can comprise one or more functional groups selected from an aldehyde group and a carboxylic acid group. The electrophile can be an aldehyde or a carboxylic acid.


Alternatively, the electrophile can be a polyaldehyde, such as glutaraldehyde, glyoxal, malondialdehyde, and succinaldehyde, or a polycarboxylic acid, such as oxalic acid, malonic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, pimelic acid, suberic acid, azelaic acid, sebacic acid, aconitic acid, propane-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid, and 5-oxopentanoic acid.


For purposes of capping, the electrophile preferably comprises at least one functional group that is capable of reacting with the amine, hydroxyl and sulfhydryl groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue. Thus, the location of the functional group(s) of the electrophile is preferably a terminal group or a non-terminal group that is not sterically hindered from reacting with the amine, hydroxyl and/or sulfhydryl groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue.


For the additional purpose of achieving at least a partial cross-linking of the tissue, the electrophile preferably comprises two or more functional groups such that a single electrophile is capable of reacting with at least two functional groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue. Each one of the two functional groups can be selected from the group consisting of aldehyde and carboxylic acid groups and a given electrophile can comprise heterogeneous or homogenous functional groups.


The electrophile can have a straight or branched structure, with the functional groups preferably being located on the terminal portions of the straight or branched portions or being located in a position where the functional group is not sterically hindered from reacting with the amine, hydroxyl, and sulfhydryl groups on the tissue. The functional groups can be separated by a length which corresponds to how closely adjacent collagen molecules are to be cross-linked. This, in turn, will affect the relative stiffness of the bioprosthetic tissue, with a short separation between functional groups giving rise to a stiffer tissue and a longer separation between functional groups giving rise to a more pliable or flexible tissue. Additional bio-functional molecules can further be provided within the nucleophile between or adjacent to the functional groups.


Catalytic System. As discussed above with respect to the nucleophilic and electrophilic treatment processes, the catalytic system comprises at least one or a combination of a fluoride-based salt, a cesium-based salt, a potassium-based salt, a rubidium-based salt, and a carbonate-based salt. The catalytic system can additionally comprise one or a combination of pyridinium-based salts.


It is believed that the use of the catalytic system significantly increases the nucleophilic and/or electrophilic reaction efficiency such that it provides a greater degree of predictability as to the extent of the capping and/or cross-linking of the bioprosthetic tissue. While a combination of at least one of a fluoride-based salt, cesium-based salt potassium-based salt, rubidium-based salt, or a carbonate-based salt with a pyridinium-based salt produces superior nucleophilic and/or electrophilic reaction efficiency, it is understood that the catalytic system can also comprise only one of the foregoing catalysts to produce partial capping and/or cross-linking of the bioprosthetic tissue by either one or both of the nucleophile(s) and/or the electrophile(s).


In a preferred embodiment, the catalytic system comprises one or both of the fluoride-based salt and the carbonate-based salt.


In another preferred embodiment, the fluoride-based salt can be one or a combination of cesium fluoride (CsF), potassium fluoride (KF), and rubidium fluoride (RbF).


In yet another preferred embodiment, the cesium-based salt can be one or a combination of CsF and cesium carbonate (Cs2CO3).


In a further preferred embodiment, the potassium-based salt can be one or a combination of KF and potassium carbonate (K2CO3).


In yet another preferred embodiment, the rubidium-based salt can be one or a combination of RbF or Rb2CO3.


In yet a further preferred embodiment, the pyridinium salt can comprise one or a combination of 2-fluoro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (FMPTS), 2-fluoro-1-ethylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (FEPTS), 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (CEPTS), and 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium iodide (CMPI).


In a particularly preferred embodiment, the catalytic system comprises FMPTS and CsF. Alternatively, rubidium and potassium-based catalysts can additionally be included in the catalytic system.


Solvent System. The solvent system is further believed to contribute to the reaction efficiency of the electrophile(s)/nucleophile(s) with the tissue functional groups. The solvent system can be an anhydrous, non-aqueous or an aqueous system.


The term “non-aqueous,” as it refers to the solvent system, is understood to mean a solvent system in which less than 50% by weight of the solvent system is water. Thus, a non-aqueous solvent system does not exclude the presence of water, either as an impurity or in amounts less than 50% by weight. It is further understood that where the methods are disclosed as utilizing anhydrous solvent systems, corresponding non-aqueous solutions may be substituted for anhydrous solutions.


In a preferred embodiment, the solvent system includes one or a combination of an alcohol, a nitrile, a ketone, an ester, an amide, a sulfoxide, an ether, a cyclic ether, a lactone, and a lactam.


The anhydrous or non-aqueous solvent can comprise one or a combination of alcohol (CnH2n+1OH), acetonitrile, butyl acetate, ethyl acetate, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 1,4-dioxane, glycerol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, pyridine, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and diglyme. In a preferred embodiment, the solvent system comprises one or a combination of glycerol, alcohol and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).


The aqueous solvent can comprise a saline solution, preferably a buffered aqueous or saline solution or one or a combination of water, 0.9% saline, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), any buffers having a pH of 1 to 13, and mixtures of any organic solvents with water or buffers having a pH of 1 to 13.


Treatment with Capping and/or Reducing Agents. Following the processes of fixation, the treatment with the nucleophile, electrophile, or both, as described above, the process can further comprise a treatment with a capping and reducing agent. Insofar as the reaction of aldehydes and amines result in the formation of labile Schiff bases, it is desirable to reduce the Schiff base and replace it with a more stabile amine.


Moreover, insofar as residual aldehydes can be present in the tissue following the processes of fixation and/or treatment with the nucleophiles or electrophiles, the bioprosthetic tissue can be subjected to a further capping process by contacting the tissue with ethanolamine and a reducing agent. In a preferred embodiment, the reducing agent is sodium borohydride. Exemplary capping and reducing agents and processes are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,972,376, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.


Oxidation of Residual Aldehydes. As an alternative to the treatment with reducing agent described above, residual aldehydes can also be oxidized to carboxylic acids and the carboxylic acids can be reacted with an ethanolamine to produce a more stable peptide bond and to cap the carboxylic acids with an alcohol. The carboxylic acid groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue can also be capped or cross-linked by the nucleophilic or electrophilic treatment, as described above.


Glycerol Treatment. The bioprosthetic tissue can further undergo treatment with anhydrous, non-aqueous or aqueous solutions to substantially, if not completely, dehydrate the bioprosthetic tissue for dry storage.


In a preferred embodiment, the anhydrous or non-aqueous solution comprises glycerol and, more preferably, a solution of 75 wt % glycerol and 25 wt % ethanol, and the bioprosthetic tissue is soaked in the glycerol solution for at least one hour. The bioprosthetic tissue is then removed and placed in a clean hood to allow removal of excess solution.


In a preferred embodiment, the anhydrous or non-aqueous solution is a solution of glycerol and a C1-C3 alcohol, wherein the treatment solution comprises 60-95% by volume glycerol. Suitable treatments for the biological tissues are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,992, issued Aug. 30, 2011, to Edwards Lifesciences Corp., the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.


In another preferred embodiment, an aqueous glycerol solution can be used to at least partially dehydrate the tissue, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,534,004, issued Mar. 18, 2003, issued to The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.


The terms “dry” or “dehydrated,” as used herein, are understood to include residual treatment solution or moisture or humidity from the ambient environment following treatment with the anhydrous, non-aqueous or aqueous glycerol solutions.


Ethylene Oxide Sterilization. The dehydrated bioprosthetic tissue is provided in a sealed package, preferably in a double sterile barrier packaging consisting of a rigid tray (PETG) with a Tyvek lid. The package is sealed in a clean room, and sterilized in 100% ethylene oxide.


It is to be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the present disclosure, are given by way of illustration and not limitation. Many changes and modifications within the scope of the present disclosure may be made without departing from the spirit thereof, and the disclosure includes all such modifications.

Claims
  • 1. A method for treating a bioprosthetic tissue comprising: contacting the bioprosthetic tissue with a nucleophile in the presence of a catalytic system to at least partially cross-link the bioprosthetic tissue;wherein the nucleophile directly reacts with tissue functional groups associated with the bioprosthetic tissue, and wherein the nucleophile comprises cystamine;wherein the catalytic system comprises at least one or a combination of a fluoride-based salt, a cesium-based salt, a potassium-based salt, or a rubidium-based salt;wherein the bioprosthetic tissue is not treated with a glutaraldehyde to at least partially cross-link the bioprosthetic tissue; andwherein the bioprosthetic tissue has reduced antigenicity and reduced binding sites for calcium after implantation.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the catalytic system further comprises at least one pyridinium salt.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the pyridinium salt comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of: 2-fluoro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (FMPTS), 2-fluoro-1-ethylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (FEPTS), 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (CEPTS), and 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium iodide (CMPI).
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the catalytic system comprises FMPTS and CsF.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the catalytic system comprises one or both of the fluoride-based salt and the carbonate based salt.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the fluoride-based salt is one or a combination of CsF, RbF and KF.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the cesium-based salt is one or a combination of CsF and Cs2CO3.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the potassium-based salt is one or a combination of KF and K2CO3.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the rubidium-based salt is one or a combination of RbF and Rb2CO3.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the contacting is performed in a solvent system, and wherein the solvent system comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of: an alcohol, a nitrile, a ketone, an ester, an amide, a sulfoxide, an ether, a cyclic ether, a lactone, and a lactam.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the solvent system comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of: acetonitrile, butyl acetate, ethyl acetate, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 1,4-dioxane, glycerol, 3-methyl-1-mutanol, 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, pyridine, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and diglyme.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the contacting is performed in a solvent system comprising glycerol and ethanol.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the contacting is performed in a solvent system comprising one or more selected from the group consisting of: water, saline, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), buffers having a pH of 1-13, and mixtures of organic solvents with water or buffers having a pH of 1-13.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the catalytic system comprises CsF and FMPTS; and wherein the contacting is performed in a solvent system comprising DMSO or glycerol and ethanol.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the catalytic system comprises CsF and FMPTS; and wherein the contacting is performed in a solvent system comprising a buffered aqueous solution.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, further comprising treating the bioprosthetic tissue with glycerol.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the bioprosthetic tissue is treated with glycerol after the bioprosthetic tissue is contacted with the nucleophile in the presence of the catalytic system.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/723,958, filed on Nov. 8, 2012, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

US Referenced Citations (342)
Number Name Date Kind
2393580 Weiskopf Jan 1946 A
2484813 Bower Oct 1949 A
2567929 Fessenden Sep 1951 A
3002895 Freedman Oct 1961 A
3093439 Bothwell Jun 1963 A
3870789 Mikat Mar 1975 A
3927422 Sawyer Dec 1975 A
3961097 Gravlee, Jr. Jun 1976 A
3966401 Hancock et al. Jun 1976 A
4050893 Hancock et al. Sep 1977 A
4067091 Backman Jan 1978 A
4082507 Sawyer Apr 1978 A
4120649 Schechter Oct 1978 A
4120991 Ornstein et al. Oct 1978 A
4207689 Romera-Sierra et al. Jun 1980 A
4294753 Urist Oct 1981 A
4320157 von Hagens Mar 1982 A
4323358 Lentz et al. Apr 1982 A
4328256 Romero-Sierra et al. May 1982 A
4347671 Dias et al. Sep 1982 A
4350492 Wright et al. Sep 1982 A
4372743 Lane Feb 1983 A
4378224 Nimni et al. Mar 1983 A
4402697 Pollock et al. Sep 1983 A
4405327 Pollock Sep 1983 A
4481009 Nashef Nov 1984 A
4553974 Dewanjee Nov 1985 A
4599084 Nashef Jul 1986 A
4624822 Arru et al. Nov 1986 A
4647283 Carpentier et al. Mar 1987 A
4648881 Carpentier et al. Mar 1987 A
4655773 Grassi Apr 1987 A
4676070 Linner Jun 1987 A
4729139 Nashef Mar 1988 A
4729766 Bergentz et al. Mar 1988 A
4753652 Langer et al. Jun 1988 A
4758151 Arru et al. Jul 1988 A
4770665 Nashef Sep 1988 A
4776853 Klement et al. Oct 1988 A
4786287 Nashef et al. Nov 1988 A
4793344 Cumming et al. Dec 1988 A
4800603 Jaffe Jan 1989 A
4831065 Pietsch et al. May 1989 A
4838888 Nashef Jun 1989 A
4865871 Livesey et al. Sep 1989 A
4885005 Nashef et al. Dec 1989 A
4891319 Roser Jan 1990 A
4911713 Sauvage et al. Mar 1990 A
4958008 Petite et al. Sep 1990 A
4969912 Kelman et al. Nov 1990 A
4975526 Kuberasampath et al. Dec 1990 A
4976733 Girardot Dec 1990 A
4990131 Dardik et al. Feb 1991 A
4994030 Glowczewskie, Jr. et al. Feb 1991 A
4994237 Login et al. Feb 1991 A
4996054 Pietsch et al. Feb 1991 A
5002566 Carpentier et al. Mar 1991 A
5011494 von Recum et al. Apr 1991 A
5011913 Benedict et al. Apr 1991 A
5024830 Linner Jun 1991 A
5044165 Linner et al. Sep 1991 A
5051401 Sikes Sep 1991 A
5068086 Sklenak et al. Nov 1991 A
5068100 McClanahan Nov 1991 A
5080670 Imamura et al. Jan 1992 A
5094661 Levy et al. Mar 1992 A
5104405 Nimni Apr 1992 A
5108923 Benedict et al. Apr 1992 A
5116564 Jansen et al. May 1992 A
5131908 Dardik et al. Jul 1992 A
5147514 Mechanic Sep 1992 A
5149621 McNally et al. Sep 1992 A
5149653 Roser Sep 1992 A
5154007 Piunno et al. Oct 1992 A
5163955 Love et al. Nov 1992 A
5200399 Wettlaufer et al. Apr 1993 A
5215541 Nashef et al. Jun 1993 A
5275954 Wolfinbarger et al. Jan 1994 A
5279612 Eberhardt Jan 1994 A
5288288 Lewis et al. Feb 1994 A
5290558 O'Leary et al. Mar 1994 A
5296583 Levy Mar 1994 A
5329846 Bonutti Jul 1994 A
5332475 Mechanic Jul 1994 A
5336616 Livesey et al. Aug 1994 A
5368608 Levy et al. Nov 1994 A
5397353 Oliver et al. Mar 1995 A
5424047 Zwingenberger et al. Jun 1995 A
5436291 Levy et al. Jul 1995 A
5437287 Phillips et al. Aug 1995 A
5447536 Girardot et al. Sep 1995 A
5447724 Helmus et al. Sep 1995 A
5460962 Kemp Oct 1995 A
5476516 Seifter et al. Dec 1995 A
5507813 Dowd et al. Apr 1996 A
5509932 Keogh et al. Apr 1996 A
5554184 Machiraju Sep 1996 A
5556379 Wolfinbarger Sep 1996 A
5558875 Wang Sep 1996 A
5595571 Jaffe et al. Jan 1997 A
5613982 Goldstein Mar 1997 A
5632778 Goldstein May 1997 A
5645587 Chanda et al. Jul 1997 A
5674298 Levy et al. Oct 1997 A
5679112 Levy et al. Oct 1997 A
5695820 Davis et al. Dec 1997 A
5697972 Kim et al. Dec 1997 A
5713953 Vallana et al. Feb 1998 A
5716399 Love Feb 1998 A
5720777 Jaffe et al. Feb 1998 A
5720894 Neev et al. Feb 1998 A
5733339 Girardot et al. Mar 1998 A
5746775 Levy et al. May 1998 A
5762600 Bruchman et al. Jun 1998 A
5766520 Bronshtein Jun 1998 A
5769780 Hata et al. Jun 1998 A
5770193 Vacanti et al. Jun 1998 A
5773285 Park Jun 1998 A
5776182 Bruchman et al. Jul 1998 A
5782914 Schankereli Jul 1998 A
5782915 Stone Jul 1998 A
5782931 Yang et al. Jul 1998 A
5792603 Dunkelman et al. Aug 1998 A
5843180 Jaffe et al. Dec 1998 A
5843181 Jaffe et al. Dec 1998 A
5843182 Goldstein Dec 1998 A
5855620 Bishopric et al. Jan 1999 A
5856102 Bierke-Nelson et al. Jan 1999 A
5856172 Greenwood et al. Jan 1999 A
5862806 Cheung Jan 1999 A
5865849 Stone Feb 1999 A
5873812 Ciana et al. Feb 1999 A
5879383 Bruchman et al. Mar 1999 A
5882850 Khor et al. Mar 1999 A
5882918 Goffe Mar 1999 A
5899936 Goldstein May 1999 A
5902338 Stone May 1999 A
5904718 Jefferies May 1999 A
5911951 Girardot et al. Jun 1999 A
5913900 Stone Jun 1999 A
5919472 Trescony et al. Jul 1999 A
5921980 Kirn Jul 1999 A
5922027 Stone Jul 1999 A
5931969 Carpentier et al. Aug 1999 A
5935168 Yang et al. Aug 1999 A
5945319 Keogh Aug 1999 A
5977153 Camiener Nov 1999 A
5987720 Yamamoto Nov 1999 A
5993844 Abraham et al. Nov 1999 A
6008292 Lee et al. Dec 1999 A
6017741 Keogh Jan 2000 A
6024735 Wolfinbarger, Jr. Feb 2000 A
6039726 Lewis et al. Mar 2000 A
6063120 Stone May 2000 A
6066160 Colvin et al. May 2000 A
6086580 Mordon et al. Jul 2000 A
6093204 Stone Jul 2000 A
6093530 McIlroy et al. Jul 2000 A
6106555 Yang Aug 2000 A
6117979 Hendriks et al. Sep 2000 A
6121041 Mirsch, II et al. Sep 2000 A
6126686 Badylak et al. Oct 2000 A
6129758 Love Oct 2000 A
6132472 Bonutti Oct 2000 A
6132473 Williams et al. Oct 2000 A
6132986 Pathak et al. Oct 2000 A
6156030 Neev Dec 2000 A
6156531 Pathak et al. Dec 2000 A
6165215 Rottenberg et al. Dec 2000 A
6166184 Hendriks et al. Dec 2000 A
6174331 Moe et al. Jan 2001 B1
6177514 Pathak et al. Jan 2001 B1
6190407 Ogle et al. Feb 2001 B1
6193749 Schroeder et al. Feb 2001 B1
6203755 Odland Mar 2001 B1
6206873 Paolini et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206917 Williams et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210957 Carpentier et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214054 Cunanan et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214055 Simionescu et al. Apr 2001 B1
6231608 Stone May 2001 B1
6231614 Yang May 2001 B1
6251579 Moore et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254635 Schroeder et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258320 Persing et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267786 Stone Jul 2001 B1
6277555 Duran et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287338 Sarnowski et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290991 Roser et al. Sep 2001 B1
6302909 Ogle et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312474 Francis et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322593 Pathak et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322994 Reid Nov 2001 B1
6328762 Anderson et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334873 Lane et al. Jan 2002 B1
6352708 Duran et al. Mar 2002 B1
6364905 Simpson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6372228 Gregory Apr 2002 B1
6375680 Carlyle Apr 2002 B1
6376244 Atala Apr 2002 B1
6383732 Stone May 2002 B1
6391538 Vyavahare et al. May 2002 B1
6394096 Constantz May 2002 B1
6448076 Dennis et al. Sep 2002 B2
6468660 Ogle et al. Oct 2002 B2
6471723 Ashworth et al. Oct 2002 B1
6479079 Pathak et al. Nov 2002 B1
6482199 Neev Nov 2002 B1
6506339 Girardot et al. Jan 2003 B1
6509145 Torrianni Jan 2003 B1
6527979 Constantz et al. Mar 2003 B2
6528006 Jansen Mar 2003 B1
6531310 Mirsch, II et al. Mar 2003 B1
6534004 Chen et al. Mar 2003 B2
6547827 Carpentier et al. Apr 2003 B2
6561970 Carpentier et al. May 2003 B1
6569200 Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. May 2003 B2
6582464 Gabbay Jun 2003 B2
6586006 Roser et al. Jul 2003 B2
6586573 Besman et al. Jul 2003 B1
6589591 Mansouri et al. Jul 2003 B1
6605079 Shanks et al. Aug 2003 B2
6605667 Badejo et al. Aug 2003 B1
6613278 Mills et al. Sep 2003 B1
6617142 Keogh et al. Sep 2003 B2
6630001 Duran et al. Oct 2003 B2
6652594 Francis et al. Nov 2003 B2
6653062 DePablo et al. Nov 2003 B1
6660265 Chen et al. Dec 2003 B1
6676654 Balle-Petersen et al. Jan 2004 B1
6676655 McDaniel Jan 2004 B2
6682559 Myers et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685940 Andya et al. Feb 2004 B2
6696074 Dai et al. Feb 2004 B2
6734018 Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. May 2004 B2
6753181 Atala Jun 2004 B2
6790229 Berreklouw Sep 2004 B1
6797000 Simpson et al. Sep 2004 B2
6828310 Barresi et al. Dec 2004 B2
6872226 Cali et al. Mar 2005 B2
6878168 Carpentier et al. Apr 2005 B2
6893666 Spievack May 2005 B2
6908591 MacPhee et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911043 Myers et al. Jun 2005 B2
6919172 DePablo et al. Jul 2005 B2
6933326 Griffey et al. Aug 2005 B1
6939378 Fishman et al. Sep 2005 B2
7008763 Cheung Mar 2006 B2
7022119 Hohla Apr 2006 B2
7037333 Myers et al. May 2006 B2
7063726 Crouch et al. Jun 2006 B2
7078163 Torrianni Jul 2006 B2
7087723 Besman et al. Aug 2006 B2
7141064 Scott et al. Nov 2006 B2
7143769 Stoltz et al. Dec 2006 B2
7147846 Anderson et al. Dec 2006 B2
7217265 Hennings et al. May 2007 B2
7238200 Lee et al. Jul 2007 B2
7318998 Goldstein et al. Jan 2008 B2
7338757 Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. Mar 2008 B2
7354749 Fisher et al. Apr 2008 B2
7358284 Griffey et al. Apr 2008 B2
7367969 Stoltz et al. May 2008 B2
7498565 Silberberg et al. Mar 2009 B2
7594974 Cali et al. Sep 2009 B2
7648676 Mills et al. Jan 2010 B2
7682304 Heyninck-Jantz et al. Mar 2010 B2
7871434 Case et al. Jan 2011 B2
7914569 Nguyen et al. Mar 2011 B2
7919112 Pathak et al. Apr 2011 B2
7963958 Stoltz et al. Jun 2011 B2
7972376 Dove et al. Jul 2011 B1
8043450 Cali et al. Oct 2011 B2
8075615 Eberhardt et al. Dec 2011 B2
8136218 Millwee et al. Mar 2012 B2
20010000804 Goldstein et al. May 2001 A1
20010020191 Williams et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010025196 Chinn et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010027344 Bonutti Oct 2001 A1
20010032024 Cunanan et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010039459 Stone Nov 2001 A1
20020001834 Keogh et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020049498 Yuksel et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020091441 Guzik Jul 2002 A1
20020111532 Pathak et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030035843 Livesey et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030125805 Johnson et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135284 Crouch et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030167089 Lane Sep 2003 A1
20030212454 Scott et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040030381 Shu Feb 2004 A1
20040086543 Keogh et al. May 2004 A1
20040158320 Simionescu et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040193259 Gabbay Sep 2004 A1
20050010773 Lapstun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050024460 McNally et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050059800 Sudhakar et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050079200 Rathenow et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050119736 Zilla et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050136510 Hendriks et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050211680 Li et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050244460 Alferiev et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060084957 Delfyett et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060099326 Keogh et al. May 2006 A1
20060110370 Pathak et al. May 2006 A1
20060159641 Girardot et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060177426 Gibson et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060210960 Livesey et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060217804 Dove Sep 2006 A1
20060217805 Dove Sep 2006 A1
20060228391 Seyedin et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070010804 Rathjen et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070048340 Ferren et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070050014 Johnson Mar 2007 A1
20070073392 Heyninck-Jantz et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070203576 Lee et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070254005 Pathak et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070292459 Cooper et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080195123 Gainor et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080302372 Davidson et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090041729 Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090112309 Jaramillo et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090118716 Brownell May 2009 A1
20090130162 Pathak et al. May 2009 A2
20090137999 Silberberg et al. May 2009 A1
20090164005 Dove et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090188900 Cali et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090281530 Korn Nov 2009 A1
20090326524 Cali et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100036484 Hariton et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100100084 Girard et al. Apr 2010 A1
20110028957 Raksi et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110092966 Guo et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110118609 Goldshleger et al. May 2011 A1
20110165675 Dove et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110177150 Pathak et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110238167 Dove et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110295363 Girard et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120035720 Cali et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059487 Cunanan et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120067855 Guo et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120328905 Guo et al. Dec 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
0169259 Jan 1986 EP
8401894 May 1984 WO
9009102 Aug 1990 WO
WO9009102 Aug 1990 WO
9511047 Apr 1995 WO
95022361 Aug 1995 WO
95034332 Dec 1995 WO
96004028 Feb 1996 WO
96013227 May 1996 WO
98007452 Feb 1998 WO
98043556 Oct 1998 WO
00032252 Jun 2000 WO
03037227 May 2003 WO
04082536 Sep 2004 WO
2006026325 Mar 2006 WO
2006099334 Sep 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (23)
Entry
Steinmetz et al. The broad scope of cesium salts. Organic Chemistry. 2011;1-12.
Invitrogen. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Crosslinking and photoactivatable reagents. 2010;171-188.
Parenteau-Bareil et al. Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Materials. 2010;3:1863-1887.
Al-Fagih, M.R., et al., “Aortic Valve Repair Using Bovine Pericardium for Cusp Extenstion,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 760-764, 7988.
Carpentier, A., et al., “Biological Factors Affecting Long-Term Results of Valvular Heterografts,” Forty-ninth Meeting of the American Assoication for Thoracic Surgery, San Francisco, CA, Mar. 31-Apr. 2, 1969.
Chanda, J., et al., “Heparin in Calcification Prevention of Porcine Pericardial Bioprostheses,” Biomaterials, Elsevier Science Publishers, vol. 18, No. 16, ISSN: 0142-9612, Aug. 1, 1997.
Chvapil, M., et al., “Use of Chemically Purified and Cross-Linked Bovine Pericardium as a Ligament Substitute,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 1383-1394, 1987, University of Arizona Health Science Center, Tucson, AZ.
Dahm, Manfred, et al., “Effects of Surface Seeding with Vital Cells on the Calcium Uptake of Biological Materials for Heart Valve Replacement,” J Heart Valve dis, Vole. 5, No. 2, Mar. 1996, pp. 148-151.
Fanner, P., et al., “Systematic Review of Preservation Methods and Clinical Outcome of Infrainguinal Vascular Allografts,” Jounral of Vascular Surgery, vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 518-524, 2006.
Fumoto, H., et al., “Performance of Bioprosthetic Valves After Glycerol Dehydration, Ethylene Oxide Sterilization, and Rehydration,” Innovations, vol. 6, No. 1, Jan./ Feb. 2011.
Grant, R.A., et al., “The Effects of Irradiation with High Energy Electrons on the Structure and Reactivity of Native and Cross-Linked Collagen Fibres,” J. Cell Sci. vol. 7, 99. 387-405, 1970.
Hauschka, P., et al., “Direct Identification of the Calcium-Binding Amino Acid, y-Carboxyglutamate, in Mineralized Tissue,” Proc. nat. Acas. Sci, vol. 72, No. 10, pp. 3925-3929, Oct. 1975.
International Search Report from corresponding PCT Case No. PCT/US2011/029654 dated Dec. 23, 2011.
Jayakrishnan, A., et al., “Glutaraldehyde as a Fixative in Bioprostheses and Drug Delivery Matrices,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, Issue 5, 1995, pp. 471-484.
Khor, Eugene, “Methods for the Treatment of Collagenous Tissues for Bioprostheses,” Biomaterials, vol. 18, Issue 2, Jan. 1997, pp. 95-105.
Ohan, M., et al., “Glucose Stabilizes Collagen Sterilized with Gamma Irradiation,” Wiley Periodicals, Inc., pp. 1188-1195, 2003.
Olde Damink, L.H.H., et al., “Influence of Ethylene Oxide Gas Treatment on the in vitro Degradation Behavior of Dermal Sheep Collagen,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Resaerch, vol. 29, pp. 149-155, 1995.
Parker, R., et al., “Storage of Heart Valve Allografts in Glycerol with Subsequent Antibiotic Sterilization,” Thorax, British Thoracic Society, vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 638-645, 1978.
Saegeman, V., et al., “Short and long term bacterial inhibiting effect of high concentrations of glycerol used in the prevention of skin allografts,” Science Direct, Burns, No. 34, Mar. 2008.
Schmidt, C., et al., “Acellular Vascular Tissues: Natural Biomaterials for Tissue Repair and Tissue Engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 21, pp. 2215-2231, 2000.
Zilla, P., et al., “Carbodiimide Treatment Dramatically Potentiates the Anticalcific Effect of Alpha-Amino Oleic Acid on Glutaraldehyde-Fixed Aortic Wall Tissue,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Elsevier, vol. 79, No. 3, ISSN: 0003-4975; Mar. 1, 2005.
International Search Report from Corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/069230, dated Feb. 12, 2014.
Acros Organics: “Catalysts Cesium Contents”, Nov. 5, 2006 (Nov. 5, 2006), XP055528926, retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://www.acros.com/_Rainbow/pdf/brochure_cesium_v2.pdf [retrieved on Nov. 30, 2018].
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140127804 A1 May 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61723958 Nov 2012 US