This invention relates to a novel method of producing ashable hard masks in semiconductor processing.
Hard masks are used as etch stop layers in semiconductor processing. Ashable hard masks have a chemical composition that allows them to be removed by a technique referred to as ashing once they have served their purpose. An ashable hard mask is generally composed of carbon & hydrogen with trace amount of one or more dopants (e.g., nitrogen, fluorine, boron, silicon). The bonding structure in these hard masks can vary from sp2 (graphite-like) to sp3 (diamond-like) or a combination of both, depending on the deposition conditions. In a typical application, after etching the hard mask has served its purpose and must be removed from the underlying layer. This is generally accomplished, at least in part, by ashing, also referred to as plasma ashing or dry stripping.
Provided are plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition methods of depositing smooth and conformal ashable hard mask films on substrates containing raised or recessed features. The methods involve using precursors having relatively high C:H ratios, such as acetylene (C:H ratio of 1), and plasmas having low ion energies and fluxes. According to various embodiments, the methods involve depositing smooth ashable hard mask films using high frequency radio frequency-generated plasmas with no low frequency component and/or relatively high pressures (e.g., 2-5 Torr). Also provided are methods of depositing ashable hard mask films having good selectivity and improved side wall coverage and roughness. The methods involve depositing a first ashable hard mask film on a substrate having a feature using a process optimized for selectivity and/or optical properties and then depositing a smoothing layer on the first ashable hard mask film using an HF-only process.
a shows a basic schematic illustrating an example of an ashable hard mask film deposited by a conventional process on a raised feature.
b shows a basic schematic illustrating ARL deposition on the ashable hard mask film shown in
a and 3b are SEM images of an ashable hard mask deposited in a trench.
a and 9b are schematics showing combination (first ashable hard mask layer and ashable hard mask smoothing layer) ashable hard mask films deposited on features.
Reference will now be made in detail to specific embodiments of the invention. Examples of the specific embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with these specific embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to such specific embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. The present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
Introduction
Hard masks are used as etch stop layers in semiconductor processing. Ashable hard masks have a chemical composition that allows them to be removed by a technique referred to as ashing once they have served their purpose. An ashable hard mask is generally composed of carbon & hydrogen with trace amount of one or more dopants (e.g., nitrogen, fluorine, boron, silicon). In a typical application, after etching the hard mask has served its purpose and is removed from the underlying layer. This is generally accomplished, at least in part, by ashing, also referred to as “plasma ashing” or “dry stripping.” Substrates with hard masks to be ashed, generally partially fabricated semiconductor wafers, are placed into a chamber under vacuum, and oxygen is introduced and subjected to radio frequency power which creates oxygen radicals (plasma). The radicals react with the hard mask to oxidize it to water, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide. In some instances, complete removal of the hard mask may be accomplished by following the ashing with additional wet or dry etching processes, for example when the ashable hard mask leaves behind any residue that cannot be removed by ashing alone.
Hard mask layers are often used in narrow and/or deep contact etch applications, where photoresist may not be thick enough to mask the underlying layer. This is especially applicable as the critical dimension shrinks.
In certain integration schemes, ashable hard masks are used to pattern layers. An example of a process using an ashable hard mask for patterning according to an embodiment of the present invention is presented in
Ashable hard masks deposited by traditional plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) techniques have poor step coverage, in particular, low side wall coverage when deposited on recessed or raised features such as alignment marks or in double patterning schemes.
Several features of the film as deposited by a conventional process make it difficult to use for various applications. First, side wall coverage is poor. Side wall coverage as used herein refers to the minimum thickness of film deposited on feature side wall/thickness of film deposited on feature top. Thickness of film deposited on the side wall of the raised feature in
Overhang, roughness and poor step coverage result in poor uniformity for the subsequently deposited ARL. ARLs cannot uniformly cover the side walls of ashable hard masks formed by conventional processes. This is shown schematically in
Described herein are ashable hard mask films on raised or recessed features that have improved step coverage, less or no overhang and/or less or no roughness and the methods of depositing these films. Using appropriate precursor selection, frequency of RF power used to generate the plasma, and pressure as described herein to deposit the films, ashable hard mask films may be deposited on raised or recessed features having step coverage ranging from about 50%-100%, reduced roughness and overhang may be formed. These films then provide improvements in downstream processing and enable ashable hard masks to be used for applications that require high step coverage and low roughness.
Precursor selection as well as process conditions have been shown to provide unexpectedly good step coverage and low roughness. As indicated above, one measure of step coverage is comparing side thickness tside to top thickness ttop: the better the side wall coverage is, the closer the ratio tside/ttop is to one. In certain cases (such as those in prior art methods) the thickness of film deposited on a feature side wall varies significantly due to poor deposition uniformity. In these instances, side thickness is measured from the thinnest point. Step coverage of bottom thickness to top thickness may also be examined. In addition to step coverage, overhang and roughness are also quantifiable.
% overhang=A/ttop
% roughness=B/ttop
These two measures can also be combined to provide a measure of the overhang and roughness:
% roughness+overhang=(A+B)/ttop
These measurements may be determined for both sides of the feature.
Conventional ashable hard masks have a step coverage of less than 50% and are produced using various hydrocarbon precursors using a high ion energy/flux process space. These processes have been LF driven to increase deposition rate and etch selectivity. The methods described herein, however, provide significantly improved step coverage as well as reduced roughness and overhang by using a process space using specific precursors and process conditions, including RF frequency and pressure. While the discussion below refers to each of these in turn, it should be noted that certain embodiments, the use of specific precursors in the process space described results in synergistic effects that achieve conformal films. For example, as discussed below, while propylene is commonly used in the formation of ashable hard mask films, it has been found that it does not form smooth and conformal ashable hard mask films.
One characteristic of the process space of the methods described herein to deposit smooth ashable hard mask films is using high frequency only to generate the plasma used to deposit the films. Plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) processes typically use capacitively-coupled plasmas, which may be generated using RF plasma sources. In conventional processes, at least some amount of low frequency (LF) is used. (The high frequency RF component is generally between 2-60 MHz; e.g., 13.56 MHz. The LF component is can be from 100 kHz-1 MHz, typically around 400 kHz.) It has been found, however, that HF-only processes produce films having much higher conformality. The table below shows selected, representative data from different three different processes used to deposit ashable hard mask films: Process A uses 2400 W LFRF and process B is a HF-only process. Side wall step coverage improves over 50%, from 40% to 72% and bottom coverage improves to 94%. Even low amounts of LF were found to significantly affect step coverage: process C is identical to process B, with the exception of the addition of 400 W LF. Step coverage is as poor as with process A.
Without being bound by a particular theory, it is believed that the increase in step coverage using the HF-only process is due to the lower ion energy resulting from removing the LF component. Roughness and overhang are also significantly better for the HF-only processes described herein as compared with conventional processes. Table 2 shows representative data from several processes performed at 300° C.:
Remarkably, process F, the HF-only process, shows no roughness or overhang.
In certain embodiments, another characteristic of the processes used to form smooth ashable hard mask films is relatively high chamber pressure, e.g., at least about 2 Torr, and in particular embodiments at least about 4 Torr. In particular embodiments, pressures between 2-5 Torr are used, e.g., about 4.5 Torr. As with lowering the LF component, increasing pressure lowers the ion energy and so improves step coverage. Removing the LF component from a process lowers the deposition rate; in addition to lowering ion energy, increasing pressure increases deposition rate. Lowering the ion energy is particularly useful for improving the side wall coverage and roughness. Referring back to
In addition to the RF frequency, pressure, temperature and other conditions, precursor selection was found to significantly affect the smoothness and step coverage of the deposited film. Acetylene in particular was found to provide much higher step coverage and lower roughness than commonly used precursor propylene.
As discussed above, side coverage for the acetylene based film can be improved by removing the LF-component. The discrepancies in side wall and overall step coverage between the actelyene and propylene are stark, especially considering the similarity in chemical structure. Without being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that it may be due to the lower C:H ratio in propylene. During a PECVD process, plasma species include CxHy ions and radicals and H ions and radicals. An H radical can saturate a dangling bond or saturate an SP2 bond to make an SP3 bond and a dangling bond. An H radical can also result in a dangling bond by abstraction. At higher temperatures, H radicals result in etching of carbon. Ions displace H atoms from the surface and create dangling bonds. The effective sticking coefficient for CxHy radicals is a strong function of number of dangling bonds. If hydrogen radicals hydrogenate a dangling bond rather than abstracting a hydrogen from the surface, it reduces the number of dangling bonds. CxHy species promote film growth and reduce dangling bonds. Depending on the precursor, however, an incoming CxHy radical could rehybridize after adsorption on the surface and increase the available dangling bonds on the surface, thereby increasing the sticking coefficient. Precursors with lower C:H ratios—such as CH4 (0.25) and C3H6 (0.5)—would result in more H radicals. Similarly higher H flux would also lead to larger H radical flux. The larger H radical flux resulting from these mechanisms would saturate the surface, decrease the number of dangling bonds, and decrease CxHy deposition on the surface. At higher temperatures, the larger H flux may also increase the amount of carbon etching from the side walls. Both of these mechanisms would result in lower step coverage using precursors having lower C:H ratios, consistent with the results in Table 3. (It should be noted that there are many possible reaction mechanisms, and while the described mechanisms are consistent with obtained results, the methods are not limited to them.) In addition to the higher C:H ratio of acetylene, another possible mechanism in good step coverage achieved with acetylene is that the smaller C2H-radicals and ions in the plasma easily rehybridize (SP bond converting to SP2) after adsorption, forming additional dangling bonds and increasing the sticking coefficient. Steric hindrance of large radicals formed the propylene precursor and the need for three adjacent dangling bonds for propylene radicals to stick reduces the effective sticking probability of these radicals.
Table 4 presents step coverage data for three precursors, C2H2, C3H6, and C7H8:
Note that C7H8 has better step coverage than C3H6, suggesting that in this case, the C:H ratio is a more significant indicator of step coverage and side wall deposition than precursor size. Other precursors that have high C:H ratios (e.g., above about 0.75) may be used, including C6H6.
Table 5 shows results for films deposited using a method according to the process described in
Deposition rate, thickness non-uniformity, refractive index (n), extinction coefficient (k), side wall coverage, roughness, overhang, etch rate and etch selectivity were measured for the films. (Deposition rate, thickness non-uniformity, n and k were found for the first layer only). All films were deposited on features of dimension 500 nm. Roughness and overhang measurements reflect averages of the left and right sides of the feature. Results are shown below in Table 6. Notably, in each case using the smoothing layer improves roughness+overhang.
In certain embodiments, a combination layer having a first layer having a k of less than about 0.1 at 633 nm are deposited. In some embodiments, the extinction coefficients are less than about 0.05 at 633 nm.
The methods described herein may be performed using features of any dimension, with step coverage improving as the aspect ratio of the feature decreases. Side coverage of greater than 90% has been obtained for aspect rations of about 1:1, greater than 80% has been obtained for aspect ratios of about 2:1, greater than 60-70% for aspect ratios of about 3:1, greater than about 50-60% for aspect ratios as high as about 5:1. The feature may be an alignment mark or any other feature on a semiconductor substrate. In certain embodiments, e.g., wherein the feature is an alignment mark, side wall coverage is at least 50% or 60% to avoid attack during lithography rework. Lithographic rework generally involves photoresist removal, and may also involve organic anti-reflective coating removal, and in some cases reapplying the photoresist and anti-reflective coating and going through lithography and development again. In certain embodiments, side wall coverage is at least 60%, 70% or 80% as needed for the application. For example, the ashable hard mask films described herein may be used in double patterning schemes to increase feature density. These double patterning applications typically require better side wall coverage than needed to avoid attack during lithography rework.
Apparatus
The present invention is implemented in a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition reactor. Such a reactor may take many different forms. Generally, the apparatus will include one or more chambers or “reactors” (sometimes including multiple stations) that house one or more wafers and are suitable for wafer processing. Each chamber may house one or more wafers for processing. The one or more chambers maintain the wafer in a defined position or positions (with or without motion within that position, e.g. rotation, vibration, or other agitation). In one embodiment, a wafer undergoing hard mask deposition is transferred from one station to another within a reactor chamber during the process. For example, deposition of a highly selective ashable hard mask may take place at one of multiple deposition stations, then transferred to another station for smoothing layer deposition. In another example described briefly above, a portion of an ashable hard mask having the desired selectivity and/or optical properties is deposited in a station. The substrate then remains in that station for smoothing layer deposition before being transferred to a next station for deposition of another combination layer. The full film deposition may occur entirely at a single station or any fraction of the total film thickness may be deposited at any number of stations.
While in process, each wafer is held in place by a pedestal, wafer chuck and/or other wafer holding apparatus. For certain operations in which the wafer is to be heated, the apparatus may include a heater such as a heating plate. A Vector™ (e.g., C3 Vector) or Sequel™ (e.g., C2 Sequel) reactor, produced by Novellus Systems of San Jose, Calif., may be used to implement the invention.
Within the reactor, a wafer pedestal 1118 supports a substrate 1116. The pedestal typically includes a chuck, a fork, or lift pins to hold and transfer the substrate during and between the deposition and/or plasma treatment reactions. The chuck may be an electrostatic chuck, a mechanical chuck or various other types of chuck as are available for use in the industry and/or research.
The process gases are introduced via inlet 1112. Multiple source gas lines 1110 are connected to manifold 1108. The gases may be premixed or not. Appropriate valving and mass flow control mechanisms are employed to ensure that the correct gases are delivered during the deposition and plasma treatment phases of the process. In case the chemical precursor(s) is delivered in the liquid form, liquid flow control mechanisms are employed. The liquid is then vaporized and mixed with other process gases during its transportation in a manifold heated above its vaporization point before reaching the deposition chamber.
Process gases exit chamber 1100 via an outlet 1122. A vacuum pump (e.g., a one or two stage mechanical dry pump and/or a turbomolecular pump) typically draws process gases out and maintains a suitably low pressure within the reactor by a close loop controlled flow restriction device, such as a throttle valve or a pendulum valve.
The invention may be implemented on a multi-station or single station tool. In specific embodiments, the 300 mm Novellus Vector™ tool having a 4-station deposition scheme or the 200 mm Sequel™ tool having a 6-station deposition scheme are used. It is possible to index the wafers after every deposition and/or post-deposition plasma treatment until all the required depositions and treatments are completed, or multiple depositions and treatments can be conducted at a single station before indexing the wafer.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing both the process and compositions of the present invention. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein. The experimental data is provided to further illustrate aspects and advantages of the present invention. These examples are provided to exemplify and more clearly illustrate aspects of the present invention and are in no way intended to be limiting.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/163,670, having the title “METHODS OF DEPOSITING SMOOTH AND CONFORMAL ASHABLE HARD MASK FILMS,” filed Jun. 27, 2008, all of which is incorporated herein by this reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3816976 | Stork et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
4209357 | Gorin et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4274841 | Andersen et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4668261 | Chatzipetros et al. | May 1987 | A |
4673589 | Standley | Jun 1987 | A |
4863493 | Kotani et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4863760 | Schantz et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4975144 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5222549 | Ishii et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5231057 | Doki et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5261250 | Missimer | Nov 1993 | A |
5378316 | Franke et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5470661 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5562952 | Nakahigashi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5670066 | Barnes et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5792269 | Deacon et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5900288 | Kuhman et al. | May 1999 | A |
5985103 | Givens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006797 | Bulow et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6030591 | Tom et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035803 | Robles et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041734 | Raoux et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066209 | Sajoto et al. | May 2000 | A |
6150719 | Saia et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6241793 | Lee et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6286321 | Glater | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6319299 | Shih et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331480 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6367413 | Sill et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387819 | Yu | May 2002 | B1 |
6458516 | Ye et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465051 | Sahin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478924 | Shamouilian et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6541397 | Bencher | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6613434 | Drevillon et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6617553 | Ho et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635185 | Demmin | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6777349 | Fu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787452 | Sudijono et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6787819 | Rhodes et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6967072 | Latchford et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7064078 | Liu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7202176 | Goto et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7205228 | Padhi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220982 | Campbell | May 2007 | B2 |
7223526 | Fairbairn et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7235478 | Geng et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7288484 | Goto et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7314506 | Vininski | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323401 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7381644 | Subramonium et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7399712 | Graff | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7495984 | Kim et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7576009 | Lee et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7803715 | Haimson et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7820556 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7915166 | Yu et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7955990 | Henri et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7981777 | Subramonium | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7981810 | Subramonium et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8110493 | Subramonium et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8114782 | Graff | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8129281 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8227352 | Yu et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8309473 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8435608 | Subramonium et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8563414 | Fox et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8569179 | Graff | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8664124 | Graff | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8669181 | Yu et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
20010021491 | Chen et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020182848 | Joseph et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030044532 | Lee et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030106647 | Koshiishi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040000534 | Lipinski | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040016972 | Singh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018750 | Sophie et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023502 | Tzou et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040140506 | Singh et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040180551 | Biles et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040224504 | Gadgil | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040266195 | Dokumaci et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050042889 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050054202 | Pan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050098119 | Burger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112506 | Czech et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129935 | Kunitake et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130404 | Moghadam et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050167394 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050202683 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050260411 | Ravi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050287771 | Seamons et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060019486 | Yu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060091559 | Nguyen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060154086 | Fuller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060154477 | Geng et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060197881 | Kang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060205223 | Smayling | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231524 | Liu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070032054 | Ramaswamy et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048674 | Wells | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070054500 | Bencher | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070059913 | King et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077780 | Wang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070105303 | Busch et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070125762 | Cui et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070128538 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140029 | Kim et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070166546 | Ichikawa et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070166979 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070202640 | Al-Bayati et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070247073 | Paterson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080073636 | Kim | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080083916 | Kim | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080128907 | Yang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080200003 | Hong et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080242912 | Letessier et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080254639 | Graff | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080254641 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264803 | Agrawal | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090182180 | Huang et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090305516 | Hsu | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100151691 | Henri et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100297853 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110236594 | Haverkamp | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110236600 | Fox | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244142 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120149207 | Graff | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120196446 | Graff | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140057454 | Subramonium et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140239462 | Shamma et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2853313 | Oct 2004 | FR |
62019539 | Jan 1987 | JP |
08152262 | Jun 1996 | JP |
382671 | May 1973 | SU |
2005048367 | May 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Fabtech news release: “New Product: Ashable hard mask process from Novellus targets high aspect ratio etch”. Jun. 28, 2007, pp. 1-2. |
Matheson brochure: “PICO-TRAP AHM: Ultra-Purification System for PECVD of Amorphous Carbon Films”. Apr. 2010, pp. 1-2. |
Subramonium, P. et al., “Low Temperature Ashable Hardmask (AHMtm) Films for sub-45 Patterning”. citation information unavailable, no date available, pp. 1-3. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382, filed Dec. 18, 2006, entitled “Methods of Improving Ashable Hardmask Adhesion to Metal layers”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,208, filed Aug. 31, 2007, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Plasma-Based Deposition”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,670, filed Jun. 27, 2008, entitled “Methods of Depositing Smooth and Conformal Ashable Hard Mask Films”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,721, filed Apr. 23, 2010, entitled “Methods for Forming Conductive Carbon Films by PECVD”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/160,399, filed Jun. 14, 2011, entitled “Methods of Depositing Highly Selective Transparent Ashable Hardmask Films”. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 4, 2006, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,269. |
US Office Action, dated Dec. 14, 2006, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,269. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated May 7, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,269. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,269. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 7, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,269. |
US Office Action, dated Nov. 22, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/048,967. |
US Office Action, dated Apr. 18, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/048,967. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 7, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/048,967. |
US Office Action dated, Dec. 27, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Office Action, dated Jul. 9, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Office Action, dated Jan. 5, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Office Action, dated Sep. 15, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 16, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 21, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Office Action, dated Dec. 30, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 1, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 9, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 13, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 19, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 24, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 12, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Office Action, dated Dec. 9, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Office Action, dated Mar. 26, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/612,382. |
US Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/032,392, filed Feb. 22, 2011, entitled “Improved Diffusion Barrier and Etch Stop Films”. |
US Office Action, dated Jan. 5, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,377. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 19, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,377. |
US Office Action, dated Mar. 31, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,377. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 22, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,377. |
US Office Action, dated Sep. 3, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,208. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 12, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,208. |
US Final Office Action, dated Sep. 14 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,208. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 19, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,670. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 14, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,670. |
US Office Action, dated Jul. 6, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,670. |
US Final Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,670. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 3, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,670. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 2, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/449,983. |
US Supplemental Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 8, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/334,220. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 19, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,223. |
US Office Action, dated Dec. 21, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,223. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 2, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,223. |
US Office Action, dated Nov. 9, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,842. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 19, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,842. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 20, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,842. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 10, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,721. |
US Final Office Action, dated Mar. 14, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,721. |
Korean Office Action, dated Jun. 1, 2010, issued in Application No. 2009/0048358. |
Ikeda et al. (1992) “Top-PECVD”: A New Conformal Plasma Enhanced CVD Technology using TEOS, Ozone and Pulse-modulated RF Plasma, IEEE, pp. 11.2.1-11.2.4. |
Grill, et al. (1990) “Diamondlike carbon films by rf plasma-assisted chemical vapor deposition from acetylene,” IBM J. Res. Develop., vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 849-857. |
Grill, A. (1999) “Diamond-like carbon: state of the art,” Diamond and Related Materials 8,pp. 428-434. |
Grill, A. (1999) “Plasma-deposited diamondlike carbon and related materials,” IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 43, ½, http://research.ibm.com/journal/rd/431/grill.html.,14 pp. |
Kragler et al. (1995) “Scanning tunneling microscopy based lithography employing amorphous hydrogenated carbon as a high resolution resist mask,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 67 (8), pp. 1163-1165. |
Holmes et al. (1987) “Trimethylsilylacetylene”, Organic Syntheses, Coll. vol. 8, p. 606; vol. 65, p. 61. |
Voronkin et al. (1994) “Structure and mechanical properties of a-C:H films deposited onto polymer substrates: Diamond and Related Materials,” 4, pp. 5-9. |
Franz Kreupl et al. (2008) “Carbon-Based Resistive Memory,” IEDM. |
Jacobsohn et al. (1998) “Hydrogenated Carbon-Nitrogen Films Obtained by PECVD Using Acetylyne and Nitrogen as Precursor Gases,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 498: 283-288. |
van de Ven et al. (1990) “Advantages of Dual Frequency PECVD for Deposition of ILD and Passivation Films,” VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference Proceedings, Seventh International IEEE, 194-201. |
US Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/032,392. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 24, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,208. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 28, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,721. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 15, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,184. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 1, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,184. |
Callegari et al. (1993) “Optical properties of hydrogenated amorphous-carbon film for attenuated phase-shift mask applications,” J.Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11(6), pp. 2697-2699. |
Lemaire, P.J., et al. (1990) “Diffussion of Hydrogen Through Hermetic Carbon Films on Silica Fibers,” Mat. Res. Symp. Proc., vol. 172, Materials Research Society, pp. 85-96. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/270,001, filed May 5, 2014, entitled “Sulfur Doped Carbon Hard Masks.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/248,046, filed Apr. 8, 2014, entitled High Selectivity and Low Stress Carbon Hardmask by Pulsed Low Frequency RF Power. |
US Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
US Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 24, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 25, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/032,392. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 28, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,808. |
US Final Office Action, dated Aug. 4, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,808. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 1, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,148. |
US Final Office Action, dated Oct. 24, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,148. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 18, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,148. |
US Office Action, dated May 2, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,148. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 13, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/263,148. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 9, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,363. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 30, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,363. |
Taiwan Office Action, dated May 8, 2014, issued in TW Application No. 098142631. |
Muhl et al. (1999) “A Review of the Preparation of Carbon Nitride Films,” Diamond and Related Materials, 8: 1809-1830. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12163670 | Jun 2008 | US |
Child | 13856364 | US |