The present disclosure, in various embodiments, relates generally to methods of preparing nanostructures from self-assembled block copolymer materials selectively permeated with metal oxides and to semiconductor structures including such nanostructures.
A continuing goal of integrated circuit fabrication is to decrease the dimensions thereof. Integrated circuit dimensions can be decreased by reducing the dimensions and spacing of the constituent features or structures. For example, by decreasing the dimensions and spacing of features (e.g., storage capacitors, access transistors, access lines) of a memory device, the overall dimensions of the memory device may be decreased while maintaining or increasing the storage capacity of the memory device.
As the dimensions and spacing of semiconductor device features become smaller, conventional lithographic processes become increasingly more difficult and expensive to conduct. Therefore, significant challenges are encountered in the fabrication of nanostructures, particularly structures having a feature dimension (e.g., critical dimension) of less than a resolution limit of conventional photolithography techniques (about 50 nm). It is possible to fabricate semiconductor structures of such feature dimensions using a conventional lithographic process, such as shadow mask lithography and e-beam lithography. However, use of such processes is limited because the exposure tools are extremely expensive or extremely slow and, further, may not be amenable to formation of structures having dimensions of less than 50 nm.
The development of new lithographic processes, as well as materials useful in such processes, is of increasing importance to make the fabrication of small-scale devices easier, less expensive, and more versatile. One example of a method of fabricating small-scale devices that addresses some of the drawbacks of conventional lithographic techniques is self-assembled block copolymer lithography.
In self-assembled block copolymer lithography, block copolymer materials formed on a substrate are subject to microphase segregation, such as by annealing, to self-assemble the block copolymer materials into ordered nano-scale domains of one block of the block copolymer materials in a matrix of the other block of the block copolymer materials. Then, the domains of one block in the self-assembled block copolymer materials may be selectively removed, leaving the domains of the other block as an etch mask on the substrate. Dimensions of the self-assembled domains so formed are conventionally in the range of 5 nm to 50 nm, which are the dimensions that are extremely difficult to define using conventional lithographic techniques. Therefore, self-assembled block copolymer materials are useful as an etch mask in fabrication of nano-scale semiconductor devices.
Although the self-assembled block copolymer lithography is useful for fabrication of semiconductor structures having dimensions of less than 50 nm, there are still problems that must be addressed. Self-assembled block copolymer structures including the self-assembled block copolymer materials may not provide nano-scale etch masks with sufficient pattern fidelity in terms of line edge and roughness. For example, the self-assembled block copolymer structures often include undesirable random curvatures at the interfaces of domains, resulting in nano-scale etch masks having undesirably high degree of edge roughness and inconsistent widths. One conventional approach to address this problem is by removing (i.e., cutting, chopping) the portions of self-assembled block copolymer domains having undesirable random curvations, prior to further processing the self-assembled block copolymer structures into nano-scale etch masks.
Additionally, the different domains of the self-assembling block copolymer structures often have little or no etch selectivity from one another. Therefore, improving etch selectivity of the self-assembled domains is desirable.
Accordingly, there is a need for more reliable and less expensive fabrication techniques which are suitable for fabricating complex devices with the desired enhanced density to meet future demands.
The following description provides specific details, such as material types, material thicknesses, and processing conditions in order to provide a thorough description of embodiments of the disclosure. However, a person of ordinary skill in the art will understand that embodiments of the present disclosure may be practiced without employing these specific details. Indeed, the embodiments of the present disclosure may be practiced in conjunction with conventional fabrication techniques employed in the industry.
In addition, the description provided herein does not form a complete process flow for forming a semiconductor device structure, and the semiconductor device structures described below do not form a complete semiconductor device. Only those process acts and structures necessary to understand the embodiments of the present disclosure are described in detail below. Additional acts to form the complete semiconductor device may be performed by conventional fabrication techniques. Also, the drawings accompanying the application are for illustrative purposes only, and are thus not necessarily drawn to scale. Elements common between figures may retain the same numerical designation. Furthermore, while the materials described and illustrated herein may be formed as layers, the materials are not limited thereto and may be formed in other three-dimensional configurations.
As used herein, any relational terms, such as “first,” “second” and “third,” or “top,” “middle” and “bottom,” are used for clarity and convenience in understanding the present disclosure and accompanying drawings and does not connote or depend on any specific preference, orientation or order. It is understood that, although the terms “first,” “second,” “third,” “top,” “middle” and “bottom” are used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another.
As used herein, the term “substantially,” in reference to a given parameter, property or condition, means to a degree that one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the given parameter, property, or condition is met with a small degree of variance, such as within acceptable manufacturing tolerances.
As used herein, the tell “substrate” means and includes a base material or construction upon which additional materials are formed. The substrate may be, for example, a semiconductor substrate, a base semiconductor material on a supporting structure, a metal electrode or a semiconductor substrate having one or more materials, structures or regions formed thereon. The substrate may be a conventional silicon substrate, or other bulk substrate comprising a layer of semiconductive material. As used herein, the term “bulk substrate” means and includes not only silicon wafers, but also silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrates, silicon-on-sapphire (SOS) substrates and silicon-on-glass (SOG) substrates, epitaxial layers of silicon on a base semiconductor foundation, or other semiconductor or optoelectronic materials, such as silicon-germanium (Si1-xGex, where x is, for example, a mole fraction between 0.2 and 0.8), germanium (Ge), gallium arsenide (GaAs), gallium nitride (GaN), or indium phosphide (InP), among others. Furthermore, when reference is made to a “substrate” in the following description, previous process acts may have been conducted to form materials, regions, or junctions in the base semiconductor structure or foundation. In one embodiment, the substrate is a silicon-containing material, such as a silicon substrate. The substrate may be doped or undoped.
As used herein, the terms “polymer block” or “block” mean and include a grouping of multiple monomer units of a single type (i.e., a homopolymer block) or multiple types (i.e., a copolymer block) of constitutional units into a continuous polymer chain of a desired length that forms part of a larger polymer of an even greater length.
As used herein, the term “block copolymer” means and includes a polymer composed of chains where each chain contains two or more polymer blocks as defined above and at least two of the blocks are of sufficient segregation strength for those blocks to phase separate. A wide variety of block copolymers are contemplated herein including diblock copolymers (i.e., polymers including two polymer blocks), triblock copolymers (i.e., polymers including three polymer blocks), multiblock copolymers (i.e., polymers including more than three polymer blocks), or combinations thereof.
As used herein, the term “amphiphilic block copolymer” means and includes a block copolymer material as defined above with the two or more polymer blocks having different solubilities (i.e., at least one hydrophilic block and at least one hydrophobic block) in water.
The terms “microphase segregation” or “microphase separation,” as used herein, mean and include the property by which homogeneous blocks of a block copolymer material aggregate mutually, and heterogeneous blocks of a block copolymer material separate into distinct domains.
The terms “annealing” or “anneal,” as used herein, mean and include treatment of the block copolymer material so as to enable sufficient microphase separation between two or more different blocks of the block copolymer material to self-assemble into an ordered pattern defined by repeating structural units formed from the blocks.
The term “preferential wetting,” as used herein, means and includes wetting of a block copolymer material wherein the contacting surface at an interface wets one block of the block copolymer material more easily than the other block(s).
The term “neutral wetting,” as used herein, means and includes wetting of a block copolymer material wherein the contacting surface at an interface wets all blocks of the block copolymer material substantially equally.
The term “activatable catalyst,” as used herein, means and includes a material that functions as catalyst upon application of an activation energy, such as photo or thermal energy, and that does not function as a catalyst unless activated.
As shown in
The block copolymer composition 200 may include a block copolymer material and an activatable catalyst having higher affinity for one block of the block copolymer material than the other block(s) of the block copolymer material. As a non-limiting example, the activatable catalyst may be a hydrophilic compound, and therefore has higher affinity to the more hydrophilic block than the less hydrophilic (i.e., less polar or non-polar) block of the block copolymer material.
In some embodiments, the block copolymer material may include a more polar block and a less polar block, wherein the activatable catalyst has a higher affinity for the more polar block of the block copolymer material relative to the less polar block. In some embodiments, the volume fraction of the more polar block and the less polar block in the block copolymer material may be from about 20:80 to about 50:50.
In some embodiments, the block copolymer material may be an amphiphilic block copolymer that includes at least one hydrophilic block and at least one hydrophilic block, wherein the activatable catalyst has a higher affinity for the hydrophilic block of the block copolymer material relative to the hydrophobic block.
By way of non-limiting examples, the block copolymer material may include poly(styrene)-b-poly(methylmethacrylate) (PS-b-PMMA), poly(styrene)-b-polyacrylate (PS-b-PA), poly(styrene)-b-poly(methacrylate) (PS-b-PMA), poly(styrene)-b-poly(vinylpyridine) (PS-b-PVP), poly(styrene)-b-poly(lactide) (PS-b-PLA), poly(styrene)-b-poly(tert-butyl acrylate) (PS-b-PtBA), poly(styrene)-b-poly(ethylene-co-butylene (PS-b-(PS-co-PB)), poly(styrene)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) (PS-b-PEO), poly(isoprene)-b-poly(ethyleneoxide) (PI-b-PEO), poly(isoprene)-b-poly(methylmethacrylate) (PI-b-PMMA), poly(butadiene)-b-poly(ethyleneoxide) (PBD-b-PEO), polystyrene-block-polydimethylsiloxane (PS-b-PDMS), polyethyleneoxide-b-polymethylmethacrylate (PEO-b-PMMA), polystyrene-b-poly(9,9-bis(6′-N,N,N-trimethylammonium)hexyl)-fluorene phenylene) (PS-b-PFP), polyethylethylene-b-polyethyleneoxide (PEE-b-PEO), polystyrene-b-polyisoprene (PS-b-PI), polystyrene-b-polybutadiene (PS-b-PBD), polystyrene-b-polyferrocenyldimethylsilane (PS-b-PFS), polybutadiene-b-polyvinylpyridine (PBD-b-PVP), polyisoprene-b-polymethylmethacrylate (PI-b-PMMA), poly(styrene)-b-PEO block copolymer having a cleavable junction between PS and PEO blocks, poly(styrene)-b-poly(methylmethacrylate) doped with PEO-coated gold nanoparticles, poly(styrene)-b-poly(2-vinylpyridine) (PS-b-P2VP) block copolymer having a cleavable junction, poly(styrene-b-methyl methacrylate-b-ethylene oxide) (PS-b-PMMA-b-PEO), poly(styrene-b-methyl methacrylate-b-styrene) (PS-PMMA-PS), poly(methyl methacrylate-b-styrene-b-methyl methacrylate) (PMMA-PS-PMMA), poly(styrene-b-poly(isoprene)-b-styrene) (PS-b-PI-b-PS), or combinations thereof.
The activatable catalyst may be activatable acid catalyst, activatable base catalyst, or a mixture thereof. By way of non-limiting examples, the activatable acid catalyst may be photo acid generator (PAG), thermal acid generator (TAG), or a mixture thereof. By way of non-limiting examples, the activatable base catalyst may be photo base generator (PBG), thermal base generator (TBG), or a mixture thereof. Non-limiting examples of PAGs may include iodonium sulfonate compounds, sulfonium sulfonate compounds, sulfonium triflate compounds, iodonium triflate compounds, iodonium phosphate compounds, imide sulfonate compounds, triazine compounds, diazodisulfone compounds, or a mixture thereof. Non-limiting examples of TAGs may include alkyl ester compounds, sulfonic ester compounds, organic sulfonic acid compounds, blocked alkyl phosphoric acid compounds, blocked perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acid compounds, alkyl phosphoric acid/amine complexes, amine compounds, quaternary ammonium compounds, or combinations thereof. Non-limiting examples of PBGs may include sulfonamide compounds, carbamate compounds, O-acyloxime compounds, nifedipine compounds, formamide compounds, ammonium salts, amineimide compounds, alpha-aminoketone compounds, aromatic urea compounds, metallocene compounds, transition metal complexes, or a mixture thereof. Non-limiting examples of TBGs may include acyloxyimino compounds.
As the activatable catalyst has higher affinity for one block of the block copolymer material than the other block(s), the block copolymer material, upon exposure to conditions that cause self assembly of the block copolymer composition, may include activatable catalyst selectively in one block of the copolymer material and not in the other block(s).
The amount of activatable catalyst in the block copolymer composition may be varied depending on various factors, including, but are not limited to, the morphologies of the self-assembled domains of the block copolymer material, the chemical structures of the more polar blocks, the chemical structure of the activatable catalyst, the processing time and temperature, etc. As discussed in detailed hereinafter, the different morphologies of self-assembled domains have different volume fractions of the more and less polar blocks, and therefore different morphologies of self-assembled domains require different amounts of the activatable catalyst. In some embodiments, the amount of the activatable catalyst may not be more than about 20% by weight of the block copolymer composition. When the amount of the activatable catalyst in the composition is too high, the activatable catalyst may affix to the less polar block of the block copolymer material in addition to the more polar block, resulting in poor selectivity of the activatable catalyst for the desired domains of the self-assembled structure, and consequently poor fidelity of the nanostructures. On the contrary, when the amount of the activatable catalyst in the composition is too low, the formation of metal oxide in the self-assembled structure may be unacceptable low due to insufficient reaction of generated catalyst and the metal oxide precursor within reasonable processing conditions.
The block copolymer composition 200 in the trenches 103 may be subject to microphase separation to self-assemble the block copolymer composition into domains of a first block of the block copolymer material and domains of a second block, wherein the first block is more polar than the second block and includes the activatable catalyst. Microphase separation of the block copolymer composition may be achieved using any conventional process and therefore is not described in detail herein. In some embodiments, the block copolymer composition may be subject to annealing process to cause microphase separation. For way of non-limiting examples, the annealing process may include thermal annealing, solvent vapor-assisted annealing, supercritical fluid-assisted annealing, photo annealing, or a combination thereof.
Referring to
In some embodiments, as shown in
In some embodiments, the self-assembled nano-scale structures of the block copolymer composition may be achieved by chemoepitaxy technique, which will be discussed in
Various size and shape of the self-assembled domains may be formed from microphase separation of the block copolymer composition. By way of non-limiting examples, the self-assembled domains may have lamellar, cylindrical, half cylindrical, or spherical morphologies, among others. The size and shape of the self-assembled domains formed from microphase separation of the block copolymer composition may be controlled by various factors depending on the characteristics of the block copolymer material in the composition, as well as the wetting ability of the interface surfaces with the block copolymer composition. The molecular weight and volume fraction of the different polymer blocks of the block copolymer material may contribute to the size and shape of the self-assembled domains. For example, for volume fractions at ratios greater than about 80:20 of the two blocks (A:B) of a diblock AB copolymer, the block copolymer composition may microphase separate and self-assemble into spherical domains with spheres of block B surrounded by a matrix of block A. For volume fractions of the two blocks (A:B) between about 60:40 and about 80:20, the block copolymer composition may self-assemble into a single array or hexagonal array of cylinders of block B within a matrix of block A. For volume fractions of the two blocks (A:B) between about 50:50 and 60:40, alternating lamellar domains of the A and B blocks may be formed. In some embodiments, the size of self-assembled domains may be from about 5 nm to about 50 nm. Furthermore, the morphologies of the self-assembled block copolymer composition may be directed by the wetting abilities of the interface surfaces (e.g., the floor and sidewalls of the trench). As a non-limiting example, when the block copolymer composition is formed within the trench having a neutral wetting floor and preferentially wetting sidewalls, the block copolymer composition may self-assemble into alternating lamellar domains oriented perpendicular to the floor of the trench and parallel to the sidewalls, or cylindrical domains in a single array or hexagonal array perpendicular to the floor of the trench and parallel to the sidewalls. As a non-limiting example, when the block copolymer composition is formed within the trench having preferentially wetting floor and sidewalls, the block copolymer composition may self-assemble into half cylindrical domains oriented parallel to both the floor and sidewalls of the trench.
In
Various known metal oxide precursors may be used. Non-limiting examples of metal oxide precursors may include metal alkoxide, metal chloride, metal β-diketonate, etc. A variety of metal oxides may be selectively permeated in the self-assembled structure. Non-limiting examples of metal for metal oxides may include titanium (Ti), aluminum (Al), zirconium (Zr), hafnium (Hf), or silicon (Si). The metal oxide precursor may be in gas phase, liquid phase, or solid form. In some embodiments, the metal oxide precursor is in gas phase.
In some embodiments, as shown in
A method of forming nanostructures may comprise forming a block copolymer composition within a trench in a material on a substrate, wherein the block copolymer composition may comprise a block copolymer material and an activatable catalyst having a higher affinity for a first block of the block copolymer material compared to a second block of the block copolymer material; self-assembling the block copolymer composition into first domains comprising the first block and the activatable catalyst, and second domains comprising the second block; generating catalyst from the activatable catalyst in at least one portion of the first domains to produce a structure comprising catalyst-containing domains and the second domains, the catalyst-containing domains comprising the first block and the catalyst; and reacting a metal oxide precursor with the catalyst in the catalyst-containing domains to produce a metal oxide-containing structure comprising the first block and metal oxide.
A self-assembled nanostructure may comprise first domains and second domains, wherein the first domains may comprise a first block of a block copolymer material and an activatable catalyst, and the second domains may comprise a second block of the block copolymer material and substantially without the activatable catalyst, and wherein the activatable catalyst is capable of generating catalyst upon application of activation energy, the catalyst capable of reacting with a metal oxide precursor to provide a metal oxide.
As discussed above, the formation of the metal oxide at certain portions of the self-assembled block copolymer structure may be accomplished by applying the activation energy to the selected portions of the structure to generate catalyst from the activatable catalyst at the selected portions, and the generated catalyst reacts with the metal oxide precursor to form metal oxide at the selected portions of the self-assembled block copolymer structure.
In some embodiments, as shown in
In some embodiments, as shown in
A semiconductor structure may comprise a self-assembled nanostructure on a substrate, the self-assembled nanostructure comprising self-assembled domains in a matrix, wherein the self-assembled domains may comprise at least a first portion and a second portion, the first portion comprising a first block of a block copolymer material and a first metal oxide, the second portion comprising the first block of the block copolymer material and a second metal oxide, and wherein the matrix may comprise a second block of the block copolymer material and substantially without any metal oxide.
Although
In
Upon subjecting a semiconductor structure 100′, of
The semiconductor structure 100′ of
A method of forming nanostructures may comprise forming a block copolymer composition on a patterned material, wherein the block copolymer composition may comprise a block copolymer material and an activatable catalyst having higher affinity for a first block of the block copolymer material compared to a second block; self-assembling the block copolymer composition into a structure comprising domains of the first block and the activatable catalyst in a matrix of the second block; applying an activation energy to a first portion of the domains of the first block and the activatable catalyst to produce a catalyst in the first portion of the domains; and exposing the structure to a first metal oxide precursor to form a first metal oxide in the first portion of the domains.
In some embodiments, the domains 202′a, 202′b in the semiconductor structure 100′ of
In some embodiments, as shown in
The semiconductor structures 100, 100′ of
The method of forming nanostructures may provide nano-scale etch masks with improved pattern fidelity in terms of line edge and roughness, and substantially without undesirable random curvature, thereby minimizing, if not eliminating, the need of removing random curvature.
While the present disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein. However, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the present disclosure is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the present disclosure as defined by the following appended claims and their legal equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4623674 | Bailey | Nov 1986 | A |
4797357 | Mura et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4818713 | Feygenson | Apr 1989 | A |
4877647 | Klabunde | Oct 1989 | A |
5328810 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5374367 | Edamura et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382373 | Carlson | Jan 1995 | A |
5482656 | Hiraoka et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5512131 | Kumar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5538655 | Fauteux et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5580700 | Rahman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5620850 | Bamdad et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5622668 | Thomas et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5772905 | Chou | Jun 1998 | A |
5834583 | Hancock et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849810 | Muller | Dec 1998 | A |
5879582 | Havelka et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879853 | Azuma | Mar 1999 | A |
5891356 | Inoue et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904824 | Oh et al. | May 1999 | A |
5925259 | Biebuyck et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5948470 | Harrison et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958704 | Starzl et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6051869 | Pan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6111323 | Carter et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143647 | Pan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6153495 | Kub et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6207787 | Fahey et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6251791 | Tsai et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6270946 | Miller | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309580 | Chou | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310138 | Yonezawa et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312971 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6368871 | Christel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6403382 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414164 | Afzali-Ardakani et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423465 | Hawker et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423474 | Holscher | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6503841 | Criscuolo et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506660 | Holmes et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6517933 | Soane et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518194 | Winningham et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6537920 | Krivokapic | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6548830 | Noguchi et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565763 | Asakawa et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565764 | Hiraoka et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6566248 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569528 | Nam et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6592764 | Stucky et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6630520 | Bruza et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635912 | Ohkubo | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6656308 | Hougham et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679996 | Yao | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6682660 | Sucholeiki et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689473 | Guire et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699797 | Morris et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713238 | Chou et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6746825 | Nealey et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767693 | Okoroanyanwu | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6780492 | Hawker et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781166 | Lieber et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6797202 | Endo et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6809210 | Chandross | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812132 | Ramachandrarao et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825358 | Afzali-Ardakani et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6884842 | Soane et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6887332 | Kagan et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6890624 | Kambe et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6890703 | Hawker et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908861 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911400 | Colburn et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913697 | Lopez et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924341 | Mays et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6926953 | Nealey et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940485 | Noolandi | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6946332 | Loo et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949456 | Kumar | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952436 | Wirnsberger et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6957608 | Hubert et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6962823 | Empedocles et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6989426 | Hu | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992115 | Hawker et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995439 | Hill et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6998152 | Uhlenbrock | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7001795 | Jiang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009227 | Patrick et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7030495 | Colburn et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037738 | Sugiyama et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7037744 | Colburn et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045851 | Black et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056455 | Matyjaszewski et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7056849 | Wan et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060774 | Sparrowe et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066801 | Balijepalli et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7077992 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087267 | Breen et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090784 | Asakawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112617 | Kim | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115305 | Bronikowski et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7115525 | Abatchev et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7115995 | Wong | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7118784 | Xie | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7119321 | Quinlan | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7132370 | Paraschiv et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135144 | Christel et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135241 | Ferraris et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135388 | Ryu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135523 | Ho et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7151209 | Empedocles et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163712 | Chilkoti et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166304 | Harris et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172953 | Lieber et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186613 | Kirner et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7189430 | Ajayan et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7189435 | Tuominen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190049 | Tuominen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7195733 | Rogers et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202308 | Boussand et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208836 | Manning | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7252791 | Wasserscheid et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259101 | Zurcher et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7279396 | Derderian et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7282240 | Jackman et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7291284 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7311943 | Jacobson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7326514 | Dai et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7332370 | Chang et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7332627 | Chandross et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338275 | Choi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347953 | Black et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7368314 | Ufert | May 2008 | B2 |
7407887 | Guo | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7408186 | Merkulov et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419772 | Watkins et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7470954 | Lee et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7514339 | Yang et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7521090 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7553760 | Yang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7569855 | Lai | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7585741 | Manning | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7592247 | Yang et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7605081 | Yang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7632544 | Ho et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7655383 | Mela et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7658773 | Pinnow | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7700157 | Bronikowski et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7767099 | Li et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7888228 | Blanchard | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7959975 | Millward | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7964107 | Millward | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8039196 | Kim et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8083953 | Millward et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083958 | Li et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8097175 | Millward et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8101261 | Millward et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8114300 | Millward | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8114301 | Millward et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8114306 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8206601 | Bosworth et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8287749 | Hasegawa et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8294139 | Marsh et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8426313 | Millward et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8445592 | Millward | May 2013 | B2 |
8808557 | Seino et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
20010024768 | Matsuo et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010049195 | Chooi et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020055239 | Tuominen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020084429 | Craighead et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020158342 | Tuominen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167117 | Chou | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030010241 | Fujihira et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030034329 | Chou | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030068639 | Haneder et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077452 | Guire et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080471 | Chou | May 2003 | A1 |
20030080472 | Chou | May 2003 | A1 |
20030091752 | Nealey et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100822 | Lew et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108879 | Klaerner et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030143375 | Noguchi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157248 | Watkins et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030178707 | Abbott | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180522 | DeSimone et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180966 | Abbott et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185741 | Matyjaszewski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196748 | Hougham et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030222048 | Asakawa et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235930 | Bao et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040023287 | Harnack et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028875 | Van Rijn et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040058059 | Linford et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040076757 | Jacobson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084298 | Yao et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109263 | Suda et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124092 | Black | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040125266 | Miyauchi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127001 | Colburn et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142578 | Wiesner et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040159633 | Whitesides et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163758 | Kagan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175628 | Nealey et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192013 | Ryu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040222415 | Chou et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040242688 | Chandross et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254317 | Hu | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256615 | Sirringhaus et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256662 | Black et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265548 | Ho et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008828 | Libera et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050062165 | Saenger et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074706 | Bristol et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050079486 | Abbott et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100830 | Xu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120902 | Adams et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050124135 | Ayazi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050133697 | Potyrailo et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147841 | Tavkhelidze | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159293 | Wan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167651 | Merkulov et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050176256 | Kudelka | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050208752 | Colburn et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050238889 | Iwamoto et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238967 | Rogers et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250053 | Marsh et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271805 | Kambe et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050272341 | Colburn et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013956 | Angelescu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060014001 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024590 | Sandhu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030495 | Gregg | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060035387 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038182 | Rogers et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046079 | Lee et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046480 | Guo | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060863 | Lu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062867 | Choi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078681 | Hieda et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060097134 | Rhodes | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105562 | Yi | May 2006 | A1 |
20060124467 | Ho et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060128165 | Theiss et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060134556 | Nealey et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060137554 | Kron et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141222 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141245 | Stellacci et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154466 | Lee et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163646 | Black et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060192283 | Benson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205875 | Cha et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060211871 | Dai | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217285 | Destarac | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228635 | Suleski | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060231525 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249784 | Black et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060249796 | Tavkhelidze | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060254440 | Choi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060255505 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060257633 | Inoue et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258159 | Colburn et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060278158 | Tolbert et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281266 | Wells | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286305 | Thies et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286490 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292777 | Dunbar | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070020749 | Nealey et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023247 | Ulicny et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070023805 | Wells et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045562 | Parekh | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070045642 | Li | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071881 | Chua et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072403 | Sakata | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070122749 | Fu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122932 | Kodas et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138131 | Burdinski | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161237 | Lieber et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175859 | Black et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070181870 | Libertino et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183035 | Asakawa et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194403 | Cannon et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200477 | Tuominen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208159 | McCloskey et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070218202 | Ajayan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222995 | Lu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224819 | Sandhu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224823 | Sandhu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070227383 | Decre et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249117 | Kang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070272951 | Lieber et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281220 | Sandhu | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070289943 | Lu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293041 | Yang | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080032238 | Lu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080038467 | Jagannathan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080038923 | Edelstein et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080041818 | Kihara et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047930 | Blanchet et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080064217 | Horii | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073743 | Alizadeh et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078999 | Lai | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080083991 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080085601 | Park et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080093743 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080102252 | Black et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103256 | Kim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080113169 | Cha et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080164558 | Yang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080174726 | Kim | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080176767 | Millward | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080193658 | Millward | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080217292 | Millward et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233297 | de Jong et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233323 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080257187 | Millward | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260941 | Jin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274413 | Millward | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080286659 | Millward | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080311347 | Millward et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080315270 | Marsh et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080318005 | Millward | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090062470 | Millward et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090087664 | Nealey et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090155579 | Greco et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090200646 | Millward et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090206489 | Li et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090212016 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218567 | Mathew et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236309 | Millward et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240001 | Regner | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090263628 | Millward | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267058 | Namdas et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274887 | Millward et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090317540 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100092873 | Sills et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100102415 | Millward et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100124826 | Millward et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137496 | Millward et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163180 | Millward | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100204402 | Millward et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100279062 | Millward et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100316849 | Millward et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100323096 | Sills et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110232515 | Millward | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120028471 | Oyama et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120122292 | Sandhu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133017 | Millward et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135146 | Cheng et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135159 | Xiao et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138570 | Millward et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164389 | Yang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120202017 | Nealey et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120211871 | Russell et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223053 | Millward et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120225243 | Millward | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130295323 | Millward | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130330668 | Wu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130330688 | Hedrick et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140060736 | Millward et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140127626 | Senzaki et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140272723 | Somervell et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150021293 | Morris et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1562730 | Jan 2005 | CN |
1799131 | Jul 2006 | CN |
101013662 | Aug 2007 | CN |
0784543 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1416303 | May 2004 | EP |
1906237 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1593164 | Jun 2010 | EP |
11080414 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2003155365 | May 2003 | JP |
2004335962 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005008882 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005029779 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2006036923 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006055982 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006110434 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007194175 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008036491 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008043873 | Feb 2008 | JP |
20060128378 | Dec 2006 | KR |
20070029762 | Mar 2007 | KR |
100771886 | Nov 2007 | KR |
200400990 | Mar 1992 | TW |
200633925 | Oct 1994 | TW |
200740602 | Jan 1996 | TW |
200802421 | Feb 1996 | TW |
584670 | Apr 2004 | TW |
200419017 | Oct 2004 | TW |
200511364 | Mar 2005 | TW |
I256110 | Jun 2006 | TW |
I253456 | Nov 2007 | TW |
9007575 | Jul 1990 | WO |
9706013 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9839645 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9947570 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0031183 | Jun 2000 | WO |
02018080 | Mar 2002 | WO |
02081372 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03045840 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2005122285 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006003592 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006003594 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006076016 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006078952 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006112887 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007001294 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007013889 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007024241 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007024323 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007019439 | May 2007 | WO |
2007055041 | May 2007 | WO |
2008055137 | May 2008 | WO |
2008091741 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008096335 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008097736 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008118635 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008124219 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008130847 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008145268 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2008156977 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009099924 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009102551 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009117238 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009117243 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009134635 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Li, H, W. Huck; “Ordered Block-Copolymer Assembly Using Nanoimprint Lithography”. Nano. Lett. (2004), vol. 4, No. 9, p. 1633-1636. |
Cheng, J., C. Ross, H. Smith, E. Thomas; “Templated Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers: Top-Down Helps Bottom-Up”. Adv. Mater. (2006), 18, p. 2505-2521. |
Ge et al., Thermal Conductance of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Interfaces, The American Physical Society , PRL 96, (May 12, 2006), pp. 186101-1-186101-4. |
Gelest Inc., Silane Coupling Agents: Connecting Across Boundaries, v2.0, ( 2006), pp. 1-56. |
Genua et al., Functional Patterns Obtained by Nanoimprinting Lithography and Subsequent Growth of Polymer Brushes, Nanotechnology, vol. 18, (2007), pp. 1-7. |
Gillmor et al., Hydrophilic/Hydrophobic Patterned Surfaces as Templates for DNA Arrays, Langmuir 2000, vol. 16, No. 18, (2000), pp. 7223-7228. |
Grubbs, Hybrid Metal-Polymer Composites from Functional Block Copolymers, J. of Polymer Sci.: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 43, Issue 19, (Oct. 1, 2005), pp. 4323-4336. |
Guarini et al., Nanoscale Patterning Using Self-Assembled Polymers for Semiconductor Applications, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19(6), (Nov./Dec. 2001), pp. 2784-2788. |
Gudipati et al., Hyperbranched Fluoropolymer and Linear Poly(ethylene glycol) Based Amphiphilic Crosslinked Networks as Efficient Antifouling Coatings: An Insight into the Surface Compositions, Topographies, and Morphologies, Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 42, (2004), pp. 6193-6208. |
Guo et al., Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Biodegradable Unsaturated Poly(ester amide)/Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate Hydrogels, Abstract only, Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 43, Issue 17, (2005), pp. 3932-3944. |
Hadziioannou, Semiconducting Block Copolymers for Self-Assembled Photovoltaic Devices, MRS Bulletin, (Jun. 2002), pp. 456-460. |
Hamers, Passivation and Activation: How Do Monovalent Atoms Modify the Reactivity of Silicon Surfaces? A Perspective on the Article, “The Mechanism of Amine Formation on Si(100) Activated with Chlorine Atoms,” by C.C. Fustad, A.D. Thorsness, and A.J. Muscat, Surface Sci., vol. 600, (2006), pp. 3361-3362. |
Hamley, I. W., Introduction to Block Copolymers, Developments in Block Copolymers Science and Technology, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (2004), pp. 1-29. |
Hammond et al., Temperature Dependence of Order, Disorder, and Defects in Laterally Confined Diblock Copolymer Cylinder Monolayers, Macromolecules, American Chemical Society, vol. 38, , (Jul. 2005), pp. 6575-6585. |
Harrison et al., Layer by Layer Imaging of Diblock Copolymer Films with a Scanning Electron Microscope, Polymer, vol. 39, No. 13, (1998), pp. 2733-2744. |
Hawker et al., Facile Synthesis of Block Copolymers for Nanolithographic Applications, Polymer Reprints, American Chemical Society, (2005), 2 pages. |
Hawker et al., Improving the Manufacturability and Structural Control of Block Copolymer Lithography, Abstracts of Papers, 232nd ACS National Meeting, San Francisco, CA, (Sep. 10-14, 2006), 1 page, abstract only. |
Hayward et al., Crosslinked Poly(styrene)-block-Poly(2-vinylpyridine) Thin Films as Swellable Templates for Mesostructured Silica and Titania, Advanced Materials, vol. 17, (2005), pp. 2591-2595. |
He et al., Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer Micelles in an Ionic Liquid, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 128, (2006), pp. 2745-2750. |
Helmbold et al., Optical Absorption of Amorphous Hydrogenated Carbon Thin Films, Thin Solid Films, vol. 283, (1996), pp. 196-203. |
Helmuth et al., High-Speed Microcontact Printing, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 128, No. 29, (2006), pp. 9296-9297. |
Hermans et al., Application of Solvent-Directed Assembly of Block Copolymers to the Synthesis of Nanostructured Materials with Low Dielectric Constants, Angewandte Chem. Int. Ed., vol. 45, Issue 40, (Oct. 13, 2006), pp. 6648-6652. |
Horiuchi et al., Three-Dimensional Nanoscale Alignment of Metal Nanoparticles Using Block Copolymer Films as Nanoreactors, Langmuir, vol. 19, (2003), pp. 2963-2973. |
Huang et al., Stretchable Gold Conductors on Elastomeric Substrates, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 82, No. 15, (Apr. 14, 2003), pp. 2404-2406. |
Huang et al., Using Surface Active Random Copolymers to Control the Domain Orientation in Diblock Copolymer Thin Films, Macromolecules, vol. 31, (1998), pp. 7641-7650. |
Hur et al., Nanotransfer Printing by Use of Noncovalent Surface Forces: Applications to Thin-Film Transistors That Use Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Networks and Semiconducting Polymers, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, No. 23, (Dec. 6, 2004), pp. 5730-5732. |
Hutchison et al., Polymerizable Living Free Radical Initiators as a Platform to Synthesize Functional Networks, Chem. Mater., vol. 17, No. 19, (2005), pp. 4789-4797. |
Ikeda et al., Control of Orientation of Thin Films of Organic Semiconductors by Graphoepitaxy, NanotechJapan Bulletin—NIMS International Center for Nanotechnology Network., vol. 3, No. 3,(Dec. 17, 2010), pp. 1-23. |
In et al., Side-Chain-Grafted Random Copolymer Brushes as Neutral Surfaces for Controlling the Orientation of Block Copolymer Microdomains in Thin Films, Langmuir, Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Chemical and Biological Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, vol. 22, No. 18, (2006), pp. 7855-7860. |
Ji et al., Generalization of the Use of Random Copolymers to Control the Wetting Behaviors of Block Copolymer Films, Macromolecules, vol. 41, No. 23, (2008), pp. 9098-9103. |
Ji et al., Molecular Transfer Printing Using Block Copolymers, ACS Nano, vol. 4, No. 2, (2010), pp. 599-609. |
Ji et al., Preparation of Neutral Wetting Brushes for Block Copolymer Films from Homopolymer Blends, submitted to Advanced Materials, vol. 20, No. 16, (Jul. 7, 2008), pp. 3054-3060. |
Jiang et al., Electrochemical Desorption of Self-Assembled Monolayers Noninvasively Releases Patterned Cells from Geometrical Confinements, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 125, No. 9, (2003), pp. 2366-2367. |
Johnson et al., Probing the Stability of the Disulfide Radical Intermediate of Thioredoxin Using Direct Electrochemistry, Letters in Peptide Sci., vol. 10, (2003), pp. 495-500. |
Jun et al., Microcontact Printing Directly on the Silicon Surface, Langmuir, vol. 18, No. 9 (2002), pp. 3415-3417, abstract only. |
Jun et al., Patterning Protein Molecules on Poly(ethylene glycol) Coated Si(111), Biomaterials, vol. 25, (2004), pp. 3503-3509. |
Karim et al., Control of Ordering Kinetics and Morphology Using Zone Annealing of Thin Block Copolymer Films, Abstract submitted for the Mar. 2007 Meeting of the American Physical Society, (Nov. 20, 2006), 2 pages. |
Kavakli et al., Single and Double-Layer Antireflection Coatings on Silicon, Turk J. Phys., vol. 26, (2002), pp. 349-354. |
Kim et al., Self-assembled Hydrogel Nanoparticles Composed of Dextran and Poly (ethylene glycol) Macromer, Int J Pharm., vol. 205, No. 1-2, (Sep. 15, 2000), pp. 109-116, abstract only. |
Kim et al., Epitaxial Self-assembly of Block Copolymers on Lithographically Defined Nanopatterned Substrates, Nature, vol. 424, (Jul. 24, 2003), pp. 411-414. |
Kim et al., Novel Complex Nanostructure from Directed Assembly of Block Copolymers on Incommensurate Surface Patterns, Adv. Mater., vol. 19, (2007), pp. 3271-3275. |
Kim et al., Highly Oriented and Ordered Arrays from Block Copolymers via Solvent Evaporation, Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, No. 3, (Feb. 3, 2004), pp. 226-231. |
Kim et al., Salt Complexation in Block Copolymer Thin Films, Macromolecules 2006, vol. 39, No. 24, (2006), pp. 8473-8479. |
Kim et al., Solvent-Induced Ordering in Thin Film Diblock Copolymer/Homopolymer Mixtures, Advanced Mater., vol. 16, No. 23-24, (Dec. 17, 2004), pp. 2119-2123. |
Kim et al., In Vitro Release Behavior of Dextran-methacrylate Hydrogels Using Doxorubicin and Other Model Compounds, J Biomater Appl., vol. 15, No. 1, (Jul. 2000), pp. 23-46, abstract only. |
Kim et al., Synthesis and characterization of Dextran-methacrylate Hydrogels and Structural Study by SEM, J Biomater Res.,vol. 49, No. 4, (Mar. 15, 2000), pp. 517-527, abstract only. |
Kim et al., Hybrid Nanofabrication Processes Utilizing Diblock Copolymer Nanotemplate Prepared by Self-assembled Monolayer Based Surface Neutralization, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. vol. B26, No. 1, (Jan./Feb. 2008), pp. 189-194. |
Knoll et al., Phase Behavior in Thin Films of Cylinder-Forming Block Copolymers, Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 3, (Jul. 15, 2002), pp. 035501-1 to 035501-4. |
Krishnamoorthy et al., Block Copolymer Micelles as Switchable Templates for Nanofabrication, Languir, vol. 22, No. 8, (2006), pp. 3450-3452. |
Krishnamoorthy et al., Nanopatterned Self-Assembled Monolayers by Using Diblock Copolymer Micelles as Nanometer-Scale Adsorption and Etch Masks, Advanced Materials, (2008), pp. 1-4. |
Krishnamoorthy et al., Nanoscale Patterning with Block Copolymers, Materials Today, vol. 9, No. 9, (Sep. 2006), pp. 40-47. |
Kuhnline et al., Detecting Thiols in a Microchip Device Using Micromolded Carbon Ink Electrodes Modified with Cobalt Phthalocyanine, Analyst, vol. 131, (2006), pp. 202-207. |
Zhang et al., Highly Ordered Nanoporous Thin Films from Cleavable Polystyrene-block-poly(ethylene oxide),Adv. Mater., vol. 19, (2007), pp. 1571-1576. |
Zhang et al., Phase Change Nanodot Arrays Fabricated Using a Self-Assembly Diblock Copolymer Approach, Applied Physics Letter, vol. 91, (2007), pp. 013104-013104-3. |
Zhao et al., Colloidal Subwavelength Nanostructures for Antireflection Optical Coatings, Optics Letters, vol. 30, No. 14, (Jul. 15, 2005), pp. 1885-1887. |
Zhou et al., Nanoscale Metal/Self-Assembled Monolayer/Metal Heterostructures, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 71, No. 5, (Aug. 4, 1997), pp. 611-613. |
Zhu et al., Molecular Assemblies on Silicon Surfaces via Si—O Linkages, Langmuir, vol. 16, (2000), pp. 6766-6772. |
Zhu et al., Grafting of High-Density Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Monolayers on Si(111), Langmuir, vol. 17, (2001), pp. 7798-7803. |
La et al., Directed Assembly of Cylinder-Forming Block Copolymers into Patterned Structures to Fabricate Arrays of Spherical Domains and Nanoparticles, Chem. Mater., vol. 19, No. 18, (2007), pp. 4538-4544. |
La et al., Pixelated Chemically Amplified Resists: Investigation of Material Structure on the Spatial Distribution of Photoacids and Line Edge Roughness, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. vol. B 25, No. 6, (Nov./Dec. 2007), pp. 2508-2513. |
Laracuente et al., Step Structure and Surface Morphology of Hydrogen-terminated Silicon: (001) to (114), Surface Science 545, (2003), pp. 70-84. |
Lentz et al., Whole Wafer Imprint Patterning Using Step and Flash Imprint Lithography: A Manufacturing Solution for Sub 100 nm Patterning, SPIE Advanced Lithography Paper, Molecular Imprints, Inc., Texas, USA, (Feb. 2007), pp. 1-10. |
Li et al., Block Copolymer Patterns and Templates, Materials Today, vol. 9, No. 9, (Sep. 2006), pp. 30-39. |
Li et al., Creation of Sub-20-nm Contact Using Diblock Copolymer on a 300 mm Wafer for Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor Applications, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., vol. B 25, No. 6, (Nov./Dec. 2007), pp. 1982-1984. |
Li et al., Morphology Change of Asymmetric Diblock Copolymer Micellar Films During Solvent Annealing, ScienceDirect, Polymer 48, (2007), pp. 2434-2443. |
Li et al., A Method for Patterning Multiple Types of Cells by Using Electrochemical Desorption of Self-Assembled Monolayers within Microfluidic Channels, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., vol. 46, (2007), pp. 1094-1096. |
Lin et al., A Rapid Route to Arrays of Nanostructures in Thin Films, Adv. Mater. 2002, vol. 14, No. 19, (Oct. 2, 2002), pp. 1373-1376. |
Lin-Gibson et al., Structure-Property Relationships of Photopolymerizable Poly(ethylene glycol) Dimethacrylate Hydrogels, Macromolecules 2005, 38, American Chemical Society, (2005), pp. 2897-2902. |
Liu et al., Pattern Transfer Using Poly(styrene-block-methyl methacrylate) Copolymer Films and Reactive Ion Etching, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 25, No. 6, (Nov./Dec. 2007), pp. 1963-1968. |
Loo et al., Additive, Nanoscale Patterning of Metal Films with a Stamp and a Surface Chemistry Mediated Transfer Process: Applications in Plastic Electronics, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 81, No. 3, (Jul. 15, 2002), pp. 562-564. |
Lopes et al., Hierarchical Self-Assembly of Metal Nanostructures on Diblock Copolymer Scaffolds, Nature, vol. 414, (Dec. 13, 2001), pp. 735-738. |
Lutolf et al., Cell-Responsive Synthetic Hydrogels, Adv. Mater., vol. 15, No. 11, (Jun. 2003), pp. 888-892. |
Lutolf et al., Synthetic Biomaterials as Instructive Extracellular Microenvironments for Morphogenesis in Tissue Engineering, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 23, (2005), pp. 47-55, abstract only. |
Lutz, 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions of Azides and Alkynes: A Universal Ligation Tool in Polymer and Materials Science, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., vol. 46, (2007), pp. 1018-1025. |
Malenfant et al., Self-Assembly of an Organic-Inorganic Block Copolymer for Nano-Ordered Ceramics, Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 2, (Jan. 2007), pp. 43-46. |
Malkoch et al., Synthesis of Well-defined Hydrogel Networks Using Click Chemistry, Chem. Commun., The Royal Society of Chemistry, (2006), pp. 2774-2776. |
Mansky et al., Controlling Polymer-Surface Interactions with Random Copolymer Brushes, Science, vol. 275, (Mar. 7, 1997), pp. 1458-1460. |
Martens et al., Characterization of Hydrogels Formed from Acrylate Modified Poly(vinyl alcohol) Macromers, Polymer, vol. 41, Issue 21, (Oct. 2000), pp. 7715-7722, abstract only. |
Matsuda et al., Photoinduced Prevention of Tissue Adhesion, ASAIO J, vol. 38, No. 3, (Jul.-Sep. 1992), pp. M154-7, abstract only. |
Maye et al., Chemical Analysis Using Force Microscopy, Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 79, No. 2, (Feb. 2002), pp. 207-210. |
Melde et al., Silica Nanostructures Templated by Oriented Block Copolymer Thin Films Using Pore-Filling and Selective-Mineralization Routes, Chem. Mater., vol. 17, No. 18, (Aug. 13, 2005), pp. 4743-4749. |
Metters et al., Network Formation and Degradation Behavior of Hydrogels Formed by Michael-Type Addition Reactions, Biomacromolecules 2005, vol. 6, (2005), pp. 290-301. |
Meyer et al., Controlled Dewetting Processes on Microstructured Surfaces—a New Procedure for Thin Film Microstructuring, Macromollecular Mater. Eng., vol. 276/277, (2000), pp. 44-50. |
Mezzenga et al., On the Role of Block Copolymers in Self-Assembly of Dense Colloidal Polymeric Systems, Langmuir 2003, vol. 19, No. 20, (2003), pp. 8144-8147. |
Mindel et al., A Study of Bredig Platinum Sols, The Chemical Laboratories of New York University, vol. 65, (Jun. 10, 1943), pp. 2112. |
Naito et al., 2.5-Inch Disk Patterned Media Prepared by an Artificially Assisted Self-Assembling Method, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 38, No. 5, (Sep. 2002), pp. 1949-1951. |
Nealey et al., Self-Assembling Resists for Nanolithography, IProceedings of the IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, IEDM Technical Digest, (2005), pp. 356-359. |
Nguyen, K. T., et al., Photopolymerizable Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications, Biomaterials 23, (2002), pp. 4307-4314. |
Nishikubo, T., Chemical Modification of Polymers via a Phase-Transfer Catalyst or Organic Strong Base, American Chemical Society Symposium Series, (1997), pp. 214-230. |
Niu et al., Stability of Order in Solvent-Annealed Block Copolymer Thin Films, Macromolecules, vol. 36, No. 7, 2003, Univ. of Nebraska, USA, pp. 2428-2440, (web release date: Mar. 13, 2003) (http://digitalcommons.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article+1005&contect=chemeng—nanotechnology). |
Niu et al., Selective Assembly of Nanoparticles on Block Copolymer by Surface Modification, Nanotechnology, vol. 18, (2007), pp. 1-4. |
Olayo-Valles et al. Large Area Nanolithographic Templates by Selective Etching of Chemically Stained Block Copolymer Thin Films, J. Mater. Chem., vol. 14, (2004), pp. 2729-2731. |
Parejo et al., Highly Efficient UV-absorbing Thin-film Coatings for Protection of Organic Materials Against Photodegradation, J. Mater. Chem., vol. 16, (2006), pp. 2165-2169. |
Park et al., Fabrication of Highly Ordered Silicon Oxide Dots and Stripes from Block Copolymer Thin Films, Advanced Materials, vol. 20, (2008), pp. 681-685. |
Park et al., High-Aspect-Ratio Cylindrical Nanopore Arrays and Their Use for Templating Titania Nanoposts, Advanced Materials, vol. 20, (2008), pp. 738-742. |
Park et al., Enabling Nanotechnology with Self Assembled Block Copolymer Patterns, Polymer 44, (2003), pp. 6725-6760. |
Park et al., The Fabrication of Thin Films with Nanopores and Nanogrooves from Block Copolymer Thin Films on the Neutral Surface of Self-assembled Monolayers, Nanotechnology, vol. 18, (2007), pp. 1-7. |
Park et al., Block Copolymer Lithography: Periodic Arrays of 1011 Holes in 1 Square Centimeter, Science, vol. 276, No. 5317, (May 30, 1997), pp. 1401-1404. |
Park et al., Directed assembly of lamellae-forming block copolymers using chemically and topographically patterned substrates, Advanced Materials, vol. 19, No. 4, (Feb. 2007), pp. 607-611. |
Park et al., Block Copolymer Multiple Patterning Integrated with Conventional ArF Lithography, Soft Matter, vol. 6, (2010), pp. 120-125. |
Park et al., Controlled Ordering of Block Copolymer Thin Films by the Addition of Hydrophilic Nanoparticles, Macromolecules 2007, vol. 40, No. 22, (2007), pp. 8119-8124. |
Peng, J., et al., Development of Nanodomain and Fractal Morphologies in Solvent Annealed Block copolymer Thin Films, Macromol. Rapid Commun., vol. 28, (2007), pp. 1422-1428. |
Peters et al., Combining Advanced Lithographic Techniques and Self-assembly of Thin Films of Diblock Copolymers to Produce Templates for Nanofabrication, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 18, No. 6, (Nov./Dec. 2000), pp. 3530-3532. |
Peters et al., Morphology of Thin Films of Diblock Copolymers on Surfaces Micropatterned with Regions of Different Interfacial Energy, Macromolecules, vol. 35, No. 5, (2002), pp. 1822-1834. |
Potemkin et al., Effect of the Molecular Weight of AB Diblock Copolymers on the Lamellar Orientation in Thin Films: Theory and Experiment, Macromol. Rapid Commun., (2007), 28, pp. 579-584. |
Reed et al., Molecular Random Access Memory Cell, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 78, No. 23, (Jun. 4, 2001), pp. 3735-3737. |
Resnick et al., Initial Study of the Fabrication of Step and Flash Imprint Lithography Templates for the Printing of Contact Holes, Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst., vol. 3, No. 2, (Apr. 2004), pp. 316-321. |
Rogers, J. A., Slice and Dice, Peel and Stick: Emerging Methods for Nanostructure Fabrication, ACS Nano, vol. 1, No. 3, (2007), pp. 151-153. |
Rozkiewicz, Dorota I., et al., ‘Click’ Chemistry by Microcontact Printing, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., vol. 45, (Jul. 12, 2006); pp. 5292-5296, 2006. |
Ruiz et al., Density Multiplication and Improved Lithography by Directed Block Copolymer Assembly, Science, vol. 321, (Aug. 15, 2008), pp. 936-939. |
Ruiz et al., Induced Orientational Order in Symmetric Diblock Copolymer Thin-Films, Advanced Materials, vol. 19, No. 4, (2007), pp. 587-591. |
Ryu et a., Surface Modification with Cross-Linked Random Copolymers: Minimum Effective Thickness, Macromolecules, vol. 40, No. 12, (2007), pp. 4296-4300. |
Sang et al., Epitaxial Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers on Lithographically Defined Nanopatterned Substrates, Nature, vol. 24, (Jul. 24, 2003), pp. 411-414. |
Saraf et al., Spontaneous Planarization of Nanoscale Phase Separated Thin Film, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, No. 23, (Jun. 10, 2002), pp. 4425-4427. |
Sato et al., Novel Antireflective Layer Using Polysilane for Deep Ultraviolet Lithography, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 17, No. 6, (Nov./Dec. 1999), pp. 3398-3401. |
Sawhney et al., Bioerodible Hydrogels Based on Photopolymerized Poly(ethylene glycol)-co-poly(a-hydroxy acid) Diacrylate Macromers, Macromolecules 1993, vol. 26, (1993), pp. 581-587, abstract only. |
Segalman, R. A., Patterning with Block Copolymer Thin Films, Materials Science and Engineering R 48, (2005), pp. 191-226. |
Shahrjerdi et al., Fabrication of Ni Nanocrystal Flash Memories Using a Polymeric Self-Assembly Approach, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 28, No. 9, (Sep. 2007), pp. 793-796. |
Sharma et al., Ultrathin Poly(ethylene glycol) Films for Silicon-based Microdevices, Applied Surface Science, vol. 206, (2003), pp. 218-229. |
Sigma-Aldrich, 312-315 Tutorial regarding Materials for Lithography/Nanopatterning, http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/Area—of—Interest/Chemistry/Materials—Science/Micro—and—Nanoelectronic website, (retrieved Aug. 27, 2007), 8 pages. |
Sivaniah et al., Observation of Perpendicular Orientation in Symmetric Diblock Copolymer Thin Films on Rough Substrates, Macromolecules 2003, vol. 36, (2003), pp. 5894-5896. |
Sivaniah et al., Symmetric Diblock Copolymer Thin Films on Rough Substrates, Kinetics and Structure Formation in Pure Block Copolymer Thin Films, Macromolecules 2005, vol. 38, (2005), pp. 1837-1849. |
Sohn et al., Fabrication of the Multilayered Nanostructure of Alternating Polymers and Gold Nanoparticles with Thin Films of Self-Assembling Diblock Copolymers, Chem. Mater., vol. 13, (2001), pp. 1752-1757. |
Solak, H. H., Nanolithography with Coherent Extreme Ultraviolet Light, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 39, (2006), pp. R171-188. |
Srinvivasan et al., Scanning Electron Microscopy of Nanoscale Chemical Patterns, ACS Nano, vol. 1, No. 3, (2007), pp. 191-201. |
Stoykovich et al., Directed Assembly of Block Copolymer Blends into Nonregular Device-Oriented Structures, Science, vol. 308, (Jun. 3, 2005), pp. 1442-1446. |
Stoykovich, M. P., et al., Directed Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers for Nanolithography: Fabrication of Isolated Features and Essential Integrated Circuit Geometries, ACS Nano, vol. 1, No. 3, (2007), pp. 168-175. |
Sundrani et al., Guiding Polymers to Perfection: Macroscopic Alignment of Nanoscale Domains, Nano Lett., vol. 4, No. 2, (2004), pp. 273-276. |
Sundrani et al., Hierarchical Assembly and Compliance of Aligned Nanoscale Polymer Cylinders in Confinement, Langmuir 2004, vol. 20, No. 12, (2004), pp. 5091-5099. |
Tadd et al, Spatial Distribution of Cobalt Nanoclusters in Block Copolymers, Langmuir, vol. 18, (2002), pp. 2378-2384. |
Tang et al., Evolution of Block Copolymer Lithography to Highly Ordered Square Arrays, Science, vol. 322, No. 5900, (Sep. 25, 2008), pp. 429-432. |
Trimbach et al., Block Copolymer Thermoplastic Elastomers for Microcontact Printing, Langmuir, vol. 19, (2003), pp. 10957-10961. |
Truskett et al., Trends in Imprint Lithography for Biological Applications, TRENDS in Biotechnology, vol. 24, No. 7, (Jul. 2006), pp. 312-315. |
Tseng et al., Enhanced Block Copolymer Lithography Using Sequential Infiltration Synthesis, J. of Physical Chemistry, (Jul. 11, 2011), 16 pgs. |
Van Poll et al., Self-Assembly Approach to Chemical Micropatterning of Poly(dimethylsiloxane), Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, vol. 46, (2007), pp. 6634-6637. |
Wang et al., One Step Fabrication and characterization of Platinum Nanopore Electrode Ensembles formed via Amphiphilic Block Copolymer Self-assembly, Electrochimica Acta 52, (2006), pp. 704-709. |
Wathier et al., Dendritic Macromers as in Situ Polymerizing Biomaterials for Securing Cataract Incisions, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 126, No. 40, (2004), pp. 12744-12745, abstract only. |
Winesett et al., Tuning Substrate Surface Energies for Blends of Polystyrene and Poly(methyl methacrylate), Langmuir 2003, vol. 19, (2003), pp. 8526-8535. |
Wipf, Handbook of Reagents for Organic Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., (2005), p. 320. |
Wu et al., Self-Assembled Two-Dimensional Block Copolymers on Pre-patterned Templates with Laser Interference Lithography, IEEE, (2007), pp. 153-154. |
Xia et al., An Approach to Lithographically Defined Self-Assembled Nanoparticle Films, Advanced Materials, vol. 18, (2006), pp. 930-933. |
Xia et al., Soft Lithography, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., vol. 28, (1998), pp. 153-184. |
Xiao et al., Graphoepitaxy of Cylinder-forming Block Copolymers for Use as Templates to Pattern Magnetic Metal Dot Arrays, Nanotechnology 16, IPO Publishing Ltd, UK (2005), pp. S324-S329. |
Xu et al., Electric Field Alignment of Symmetric Diblock Copolymer Thin Films, Macromolecules, (2003), 5 pgs. |
Xu et al., Interfacial Interaction Dependence of Microdomain Orientation in Diblock Copolymer Thin Films, Macromolecules, vol. 38, (2005), pp. 2802-2805. |
Xu et al., Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization from Halogen-Terminated Si(111) (Si—X, X = Cl, Br) Surfaces for the Preparation of Well-Defined Polymer—Si Hybrids, Langmuir, vol. 21, No. 8, (2005), pp. 3221-3225. |
Xu et al., The Influence of Molecular Weight on Nanoporous Polymer Films, Polymer 42, Elsevier Science Ltd., (2001), pp. 9091-9095. |
Yamaguchi et al., Resist-Pattern Guided Self-Assembly of Symmetric Diblock Copolymer, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, vol. 19, No. 3, (2006), pp. 385-388. |
Yamaguchi et al., Two-dimensional Arrangement of Vertically Oriented Cylindrical Domains of Diblock Copolymers Using Graphoepitaxy with Artificial Guiding Pattern Layout, Microprocesses and Nanotechnology, 2007, Conference date Nov. 5-8, 2007, pp. 434-435. |
Yan et al., Preparation and Phase Segregation of Block Copolymer Nanotube Multiblocks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 126, No. 32, (2004), pp. 10059-10066. |
Yang et al., Covalently Attached Graft Polymer Monolayer on Organic Polymeric Substrate via Confined Surface Inhibition Reaction, J. Polymer Sci.—A—Polymer Chemistry Ed., vol. 45, Issue 5, (2007), pp. 745-755. |
Yang et al., Guided Self-Assembly of Symmetric Diblock Copolymer Films on Chemically Nanopatterned Substrates, Macromolecules 2000, vol. 33, No. 26, (2000), pp. 9575-9582. |
Yang et al., Nanoscopic Templates Using Self-assembled Cylindrical Diblock Copolymers for Patterned Media, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 22(6), (Nov./Dec. 2004), pp. 3331-3334. |
Yu et al., Contact Printing Beyond Surface Roughness: Liquid Supramolecular Nanostamping, Advanced Materials, vol. 19, (2007), pp. 4338-4342. |
Yurt et al., Scission of Diblock Copolymers into Their Constituent Blocks, Macromolecules 2006, vol. 39, No. 5, (2006), pp. 1670-1672. |
Zaumseil et al., Three-Dimensional and Multilayer Nanostructures Formed by Nanotransfer Printing, Nano Letters, vol. 3, No. 9,(2003), pp. 1223-1227. |
Zehner et al., Selective Decoration of a Phase-Separated Diblock Copolymer with Thiol-Passivated Gold Nanocrystals, Langmuir, vol. 14, No. 2, (Jan. 20, 1998), pp. 241-244. |
Zhang et al., Self-Assembled Monolayers of Terminal Alkynes on Gold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 129, No. 16, (2007), pp. 4876-4877. |
Ali et al., Properties of Self-assembled ZnO Nanostructures, Solid-State Electronics 46 (2002), 1639-1642. |
Arshady et al., The Introduction of Chloromethyl Groups into Styrene-based Polymers, 1, Makromol. Chem., vol. 177, 1976, p. 2911-2918. |
Asakawa et al., Fabrication of Subwavelength Structure for Improvement in Light-Extraction Efficiency of Light-Emitting Devices Using a Self-Assembled Pattern of Block Copolymer, Applied Optics, vol. 44, No. 34, (Dec. 1, 2005), pp. 7475-7482. |
Bae, Joonwon, Surface Modification Using Photo-Crosslinkable Random Copolymers, Abstract submitted for the Mar. 2006 meeting of The American Physical Society, submitted Nov. 30, 2005. (Accessed via the Internet [retrieved on Apr. 5, 2010], URL: http://absimage.aps.org/image/MWS—MAR06-2005-003641.pdf). |
Balsara et al., CPIMA, IRG Technical Programs, Synthesis and application of Nanostructured Materials, Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 2006, http://www.stanford.edu/group/cpima/irg/irg—1.htm. |
Bang, J., The Effect of Humidity on the Ordering of Tri-block Copolymer Thin Films, Abstract submitted for the Mar. 2007 meeting of The American Physical Society, (Nov. 20, 2006), 1 page. |
Bass et al., Microcontact Printing with Octadecanethiol, Applied Surface Science, vol. 226, No. 4, (Apr. 2004), pp. 335-340. |
Bearinger et al., Chemisorbed Poly(propylene sulphide)-based Copolymers Resist Biomolecular Interactions, Nature Materials 2, (2003), pp. 259-264. |
Berry et al., Orientational Order in Block Copolymer Films Zone Annealed Below the Order-Disorder Transition Temperature, Nano Letters vol. 7, No. (Aug. 2007), pp. 2789-2794. |
Berry et al., Effects of Zone Annealing on Thin Films of Block Copolymers, National Institute of Standard and Technology, Polymers Division, Maryland, USA, (2007), 2 pages. |
Black et al., Integration of Self-Assembled Diblock Copolymers for Semiconductor Capacitor Fabrication, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 3, (2001), pp. 409-411. |
Black et al., Integration of Self Assembly for Semiconductor Microelectronics, IEEE 2005 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, (2005), pp. 87-91. |
Black, C. T., Self-aligned self-assembly of multi-nanowire silicon field effect transistors, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 87, (2005), pp. 163116-1 through 163116-3. |
Black, C. T., Polymer Self-Assembly as a Novel Extension to Optical Lithography, American Chemical Society, ACSNano, vol. 1, No. 3, (2007), pp. 147-150. |
Black et al., High-Capacity, Self-Assembled Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Decoupling Capacitors, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 25, No. 9, (Sep. 2004), pp. 622-624. |
Black et al., Nanometer-Scale Pattern Registration and Alignment by Directed Diblock Copolymer Self-Assembly, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, vol. 3, No. 3, (Sep. 2004), pp. 412-415. |
Black et al., Self Assembly in Semiconductor Microelectronics: Self-Aligned Sub-Lithographic Patterning Using Diblock Copolymer Thin Films, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 6153, 615302 (2006). |
Black et al., Polymer Self Assembly in Semiconductor Microelectronics, IBM J. Res. & Dev. vol. 51, No. 5, (Sep. 2007), pp. 605-633. |
Botelho et al., Diblock Copolymer Ultrathin Films Studied by High Resolution Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy, Surface Science, 482-485 (2001), pp. 1228-1234. |
Brydson et al. (chapter authors), Generic Methodologies for Nanotechnology: Classification and Fabrication, Nanoscale Science and Technology, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (Dec. 20, 2005), pp. 1-55. |
Bulpitt et al., New Strategy for Chemical Modification of Hyaluronic Acid: Preparation of Functionalized Derivatives and Their Use in the Formation of Novel Biocompatible Hydrogels, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 47, Issue 2, (Aug. 1999) pp. 152-169, Abstract only. |
Canaria et al., Formation and Removal of Alkylthiolate Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold in Aqueous Solutions, Lab Chip 6, (2006). pp. 289-295. Abstract only. |
Candau et al, Synthesis and Characterization of Polystyrene-poly(ethylene oxide) Graft Copolymers, Polymer, vol. 18, (1977), pp. 1253-1257. |
Cavicchi et al., Solvent Annealed Thin Films of Asymmetric Polyisoprene-Polylactide Diblock Copolymers, Macromolecules 2007, vol. 40, (2007), pp. 1181-1186. |
Cha et al., Biomimetic Approaches for Fabricating High-Density Nanopatterned Arrays, Chem. Mater. vol. 19, (2007), pp. 839-843. |
Chai et al., Assembly of Aligned Linear Metallic Patterns on Silicon, Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 2, (Aug. 2007), pp. 500-506. |
Chai et al., Using Cylindrical Domains of Block Copolymers to Self-Assemble and Align Metallic Nanowires, American Chemical Society, www.acsnano.org, (2008), pp. A-M. |
Chandekar et al, Template-Directed Adsorption of block Copolymers on Alkanethiol-Patterned Gold Surfaces, (circa 2006), http://www.nano.neu.edu/industry/industry—showcase/industry—day/documents/Chandekar.pdf) (Powerpoint template for scientific posters (Swarthmore College)), 1 page. |
Chang, Li-Wen, Diblock Copolymer Directed Self-Assembly for CMOS Device Fabrication, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 6156, ( 2006), 615611-1 to 615611-6. |
Chang, Li-Wen, Experimental Demonstration of Aperiodic Patterns of Directed Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer Lithography for Random Logic Circuit Layout, IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), paper 33.2, (Dec. 6-8, 2010), pp. 33.2.1-33.2.4. |
Chen et al., Highly Ordered Arrays of Mesoporous Silica Nanorods with Tunable Aspect Ratios from Block Copolymer Thin Films, Advanced Materials, vol. 20, (2008), pp. 763-767. |
Cheng et al., Self-Assembled One-Dimensional Nanostructure Arrays, Nano Letters, vol. 6, No. 9, (2006), pp. 2099-2103. |
Cheng et al., Rapid Directed Self Assembly of Lamellar Microdomains from a Block Copolymer Containing Hybrid, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 91, (2007), pp. 143106-143106-3. |
Cheng et al., Templated Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers: Effect of Substrate Topography, Adv. Mater., vol. 15, No. 19, (2003), pp. 1599-1602. |
Cho et al., Nanoporous Block Copolymer Micelle/Micelle Multilayer Films with Dual Optical Properties, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 128, No. 30, (2006), pp. 9935-9942. |
Choi et al., Magnetorheology of Synthesized Core-Shell Structured Nanoparticle, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 41, No. 10, (Oct. 2005), pp. 3448-3450. |
Clark et al., Selective Deposition in Multilayer Assembly: SAMs as Molecular Templates, Supramolecular Science, vol. 4, (1997), pp. 141-146. |
Daoulas et al., Fabrication of Complex Three-Dimensional Nanostructures from Self-Assembling Block Copolymer Materials on Two-Dimensional Chemically Patterned Templates with Mismatched Symmetry, Physical Review Letters 96, week ending Jan. 27, 2006, pp. 036104-1-036104-3. |
Darling, Directing the Self-assembly of Block Copolymers, Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 32, No. 10, (Sep. 28, 2007), pp. 1152-1204. |
Desai et al., Engineered Silicon Surfaces for Biomimetic Interfaces, Business Briefing: Medical Device Manufacturing & Technology, (2002), pp. 1-4. |
Edwards et al., Mechanism and Kinetics of Ordering in Diblock Copolymer Thin Films on Chemically Nanopatterned Substrates, Journal of Polymer Science: Part B Polymer Physics, vol. 43, (2005), pp. 3444-3459. |
Edwards et al., Precise Control over Molecular Dimensions of Block-Copolymer Domains Using the Interfacial Energy of Chemically Nanopatterned Substrates, Advanced Mater., 16, No. 15, (Aug. 4, 2004), pp. 1315-1319. |
Elisseeff et al., Photoencapsulation of Chondrocytes in Poly(ethylene oxide)-based Semi-interpenetrating Networks, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 51, No. 2, (Aug. 2000), pp. 164-171, Abstract only. |
Erlandsson et al., Metallic Zinc Reduction of Disulfide Bonds Between Cysteine Residues in Peptides and Proteins, Int'l J. Peptide Res. & Therapeutics, vol. 11, No. 4, (Dec. 2005), pp. 261-265. |
Fasolka et al., Block Copolymer Thin Films: Physics and Applications, Annual Reviews Materials Res., vol. 31, (Aug. 2001), pp. 323-355. |
Fasolka et al., Morphology of Ultrathin Supported Diblock Copolymer Films: Theory and Experiment, Macromolecules 2000, vol. 33, No. 15, (2000), pp. 5702-5712. |
Fujita et al., Thin Silica Film with a Network Structure as Prepared by Surface Sol-Gel Transcription on the Poly (styrene-b-4-vinylpyridine) Polymer Film, Chemistry Letters, vol. 32, No. 4, (Dec. 31, 2003), pp. 352-353. |
Fukunaga et al., Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer Thin Films Having a Half-Domain-Spacing Thickness: Nonequilibrium Pathways to Achieve Equilibrium Brush Layers Parallel to Substrate, Macromolecules vol. 39, (Aug. 2006), pp. 6171-6179. |
Gates, Nanofabrication with Molds & Stamps, Materials Today, (Feb. 2005), pp. 44-49. |
Gates et al., Unconventional Nanofabrication, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., vol. 34, (2004), pp. 339-372. |
Electronegativity—<http://www.princeton.edu/˜achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Electronegativity.html> website, visited Aug. 28, 2013, 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150091137 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |