The subject matter described herein relates to providing E.164 number (ENUM) mapping service in a communications network. More particularly, the subject matter described herein relates to methods, systems, and computer program products for using an ENUM database for message service message routing resolution among 2G and subsequent generation network systems.
Cellular communications networks have evolved over time such that there are now a variety of network technologies available in the marketplace. As technology advances, newer systems are deployed. However, older legacy systems cannot be made immediately obsolete. Older legacy systems require maintenance for a variety of reasons. For example, the cost of upgrading equipment may be prohibitive. As well, an installed customer base may rely on installed equipment and resist expenditures for newer technology.
Two such presently deployed network technologies are second generation (2G) cellular systems and third generation (3G) cellular systems. 3G networks are the newer generation of the two and provide many existing 2G services as well as adding additional services. Examples of 2G networks include interim standard-41 (IS-41) and global system for mobile communications (GSM) networks. Examples of 3G networks include session initiation protocol (SIP)-based networks, Internet protocol (IP) multimedia subsystem (IMS) networks and cellular internet access networks.
One service that is available in both systems is short message service (SMS). Short message service (SMS), which was first introduced by European wireless network operators in 1991, enables mobile subscribers to easily send and receive text messages via wireless handsets. Although specifications and industry standards related to SMS are constantly evolving and being modified, SMS messages have traditionally been used to convey readable text information, where the text may include any combination of characters that may be entered via a keypad or keyboard. Multimedia message service (MMS) extends the basic SMS concept to include a variety of message content types, including text, still images, video, and audio.
SMS delivery service provides a mechanism for transmitting messages to and from SMS capable terminals (e.g., wireless handsets, personal computers, etc.) via a signaling component of the wireless communication network. With particular regard to the sending and receiving of SMS messages by a wireless handset, a signaling network provides the transport facilities necessary to communicate short messages between a store-and-forward network element, known as a short message service center (SMSC), and a wireless handset.
In contrast to earlier text message transmission services, such as alphanumeric paging, SMS technology is designed to provide guaranteed delivery of an SMS message to a destination. That is, if a temporary network failure or the unavailability of a message recipient prohibits the immediate delivery of an SMS message, then the SMS message is stored in the network (i.e., at an SMSC) until the destination/intended message recipient becomes available. Another of the key and distinguishing characteristics of SMS service, with respect to previously available message communication services, is that an active mobile handset is able to send or receive a short message at any time, regardless of whether or not a voice or data call is in progress.
Internet engineering task force (IETF) request for comments number 2916 (RFC 2916) describes an ENUM system for facilitating the interconnection of communications networks that rely on telephone numbers with the communications networks that utilize the domain name system (DNS). In particular, the ENUM system can map a particular number referred to as an E.164 number to one or more uniform resource identifiers (URIs) in the DNS. URIs are strings of characters that identify resources, such as documents, images, files, databases, e-mail addresses, websites or other resources or services in a common structured format. A URI can include among other things a SIP URI, an instant messaging (IM) identifier, an e-mail address identifier, an Internet chat session identifier, and an IP address.
To assist with the routing of SMS messages in a 3G network, the ENUM system may be used to find a delivery address of an SMS message recipient. However, improper provisioning of the ENUM database or the absence of a 3G delivery address for the SMS message may result in the SMS message being undeliverable even when the intended message recipient is reachable via a 2G network address. Accordingly, there exists a need for improved methods, systems, and computer program products for using an E.164 number (ENUM) database for message service message routing resolution among 2G and 3G network systems.
According to one aspect, the subject matter described herein comprises methods, systems, and computer program products for messaging service message routing resolution among 2G and subsequent generation network systems. One method includes receiving a message service message including message service content and a 2G message recipient identifier associated with a messaging service message recipient. An ENUM database is queried using the 2G message recipient identifier. A response is received from the ENUM database. Based on the response, unavailability of a subsequent generation network address for the recipient is determined. In response to the unavailability, delivery of the message service content to the recipient is attempted via a 2G network.
As used herein, a subsequent generation network includes a third generation (3G) network, a fourth generation (4G) network, and any later generation network. Accordingly, all subsequent generation networks after 2G are considered within the scope of the subject matter described herein. The term “message service message” is intended to refer to a message that carries non-call media content between subscribers of 2G and subsequent generation networks. Examples of message service messages include SMS messages, MMS messages, and instant messages.
The subject matter described herein providing message service message routing resolution among 2G and 3G network systems may be implemented using a computer program product comprising computer executable instructions embodied in a computer readable medium. Exemplary computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include disk memory devices, programmable logic devices, application specific integrated circuits, and downloadable electrical signals. In addition, a computer readable medium that implements the subject matter described herein may be distributed across multiple physical devices and/or computing platforms.
Preferred embodiments of the subject matter described herein will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings of which:
According to one aspect of the subject matter described herein, a method for message service message routing resolution among 2G and 3G networks is provided.
2G/3G message service routing resolution application 110 may query ENUM database 112 to obtain the delivery address for a message service message received by 2G/3G message service gateway 104. If a 3G delivery address is provisioned for an intended recipient in ENUM database 112, 2G/3G message service routing resolution application 110 may insert that address in the message and attempt to deliver the message to 3G network 108. If, however, a 3G delivery address is not provisioned for the intended recipient in ENUM database 112, 2G/3G message service routing resolution application 110 may attempt to deliver the message based on a 2G delivery address contained in the message. Detailed message flow examples for both of these cases will be described below.
In the illustrated example, 2G network 106 includes IS-41 network 114 and GSM network 116. Similarly, 3G network 108 includes IMS network 118, SIP network 120, and Internet 122. It should be understood that the 2G and 3G network examples illustrated in
In the message flow example illustrated in
In one embodiment, gateway 104 may be adapted to re-format the message recipient identifier into an E.164 form for use with ENUM database 112. For instance, an E.212 formatted message recipient identifier may be re-formatted to an E.164 form prior to querying of the ENUM database 112. In this example, it is assumed that ENUM database 112 has a 3G delivery address corresponding to the message recipient identifier. Accordingly, ENUM database 112 performs a lookup based on the message recipient identifier and returns an NAPTR record including one or more 3G delivery addresses for the intended recipient. 2G/3G message service message gateway 104 receives the message including the NAPTR record for the subscriber and formulates a SIP message (e.g., SIP MESSAGE or SIP INFO message) for delivering the message service message to 3G network 108.
In line 4 of the message flow diagram, 2G/3G message service message gateway formulates a SIP MESSAGE message including the message service message content and forwards the message to a SIP session server 200. In line 5 of the message flow diagram, 2G/3G message service message gateway 104 sends an IS-41 response message indicating that the SMDPP message in line 1 has been delivered to the 3G network.
In line 6 of the message flow diagram, SIP session server 200 formulates a SIP MESSAGE message and sends the message to message application server 202. In line 7 of the message flow diagram, message application server 202 formulates a 200 OK message and sends the message to SIP session server 200. It should be noted that message application server 202 may perform operations on the SIP message and may modify the SIP message prior to delivery. Accordingly, in line 8 of the message flow diagram, message application server 202 formulates a SIP MESSAGE message and sends the message to SIP session server 200. In line of the message flow diagram, SIP session server 200 formulates a SIP MESSAGE message including the message service message content and forwards the message to mobile SIP client 204. In line 10 of the message flow diagram, mobile SIP client 204 sends a 200 OK message to SIP session server 200. In line 11 of the message flow diagram, SIP session server 200 sends a 200 OK message to message application server 202. In line 12 of the message flow diagram, SIP session server 200 sends a 200 OK message to message service message gateway 104 concluding the message delivery transaction.
In response to receiving the message indicating that a 3G address is not provisioned for the subscriber, 2G/3G message service message gateway 104 attempts to deliver the message via 2G network 106. In the illustrated example, 2G/3G message service message gateway may extract a 2G message service message delivery address from the message and deliver the message to the appropriate 2G network. In this example, the subscriber is located in GSM network 116. Accordingly, 2G/3G message service message gateway sends a GSM forward short message message to GSM network 116.
Accordingly, in 2G/3G MS gateway 104 may attempt to deliver the message via the 2G network. In line 4 of the message flow diagram, 2G/3G MS gateway formulates and sends an IS-41 SMDPP message to the short message service center associated with the destination mobile subscriber. In this example, the destination mobile subscriber is referred to as mobile station A or MS_A. The address of the message center serving the mobile subscriber may be determined by performing a global title translation on the SMS destination address stored in the MAP portion of the SMDPP message. In line 5 of the message flow diagram, IS-41 SMSC 400 sends an SMS request message to IS-41 HLR 402 to determine the system that is currently serving mobile station A. In line 6 of the message flow diagram, IS-41 HLR 402 responds with the SMS address of the serving MSC. In line 7 of the message flow diagram, IS-41 SMSC 400 sends an SMDPP message including the short message content to IS-41 MSC 404.
In lines 8 and 9 of the message flow diagram, IS-41 MSC 404 delivers the message service message to mobile station A 406 and receives acknowledgement from mobile station A 406. In lines 10 and 11 of the message flow diagram, acknowledgement of delivery of the message service message is communicated to IS-41 SMSC 400 and 2G/3G message service gateway 104.
Although the examples in
In yet another alternate implementation, 2G/3G message service gateway 104 may store information for subscribers with dual mode handsets capable of operating in IS-41 and GSM networks. In such an implementation, 2G/3G message service message gateway may store information indicating the type of network in which the subscriber is currently registered and use that information to formulate the appropriate message to IS-41 network 114 or GSM network 116. Detailed examples of methodology suitable for deriving IS-41 or GSM registration information and storing that information in a signaling message routing node is described in commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2004/0219935 A1, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The subject matter described herein is not limited to attempting to deliver a message to a 2G subscriber in response to determining that a record for the subscriber is not provisioned in ENUM database 112. For example, a message service gateway according to an embodiment of the subject matter described herein may also attempt to deliver a message to a subscriber via the 2G network when ENUM database 112 determines that the subscriber is not available via any of the subscribers provisioned 3G delivery addresses based on presence information.
The subject matter described herein is not limited to having the ENUM database query the presence database. In an alternate implementation, gateway 104 may query an internal or external presence database to determine the 3G address availability.
In yet another enhancement of the subject matter described herein, 2G/3G message service message gateway may store preference data indicative of whether a subscriber desires to have messages delivered via 3G network 108, 2G network 106, or both.
Returning to step 602, if the subscriber's delivery preference is determined to be 3G only, control proceeds to step 606 where gateway 104 queries ENUM database 112. In step 608, gateway 104 receives a response from ENUM database 112. In step 610, it is determined whether the response indicates an available 3G delivery address. If the response indicates an available 3G delivery address, control proceeds to step 612 where the message is forwarded to the 3G delivery address returned by ENUM database 112. In step 610, if the response does not indicate an available 3G delivery address, the ENUM database may be queried a predetermined number of times until an available delivery address is provisioned or an address that is currently unavailable becomes available. Accordingly, in step 614, it is determined whether the maximum number of retries has been exceeded. If the maximum number of retries has not been exceeded, steps 606-610 are repeated until the message can be delivered. If the maximum number of retries is exceeded, control proceeds to step 616 where a 3G delivery failure is indicated.
Returning to step 602, if it is determined that the subscriber delivery preference is other than 2G only or 3G only, control proceeds to step 618 where ENUM database 112 is queried. In step 620, a response is received. In step 622, it is determined whether the response indicates an available 3G delivery address. If the response does not indicate an available 3G delivery address, control returns to step 604 where the message is attempted to be delivered via the 2G network. If the message contains an available 3G delivery address, control proceeds to step 624 where the message is attempted to be delivered via the 2G and/or the 3G network in accordance with subscriber preferences. For example, if 2G and 3G delivery addresses are available, the subscriber may prefer 3G delivery addresses, and the message may be delivered via the 3G network. In another example, a subscriber may prefer 2G addresses over 3G addresses and delivery may be attempted via the 2G network. In yet another example, a subscriber may prefer to receive messages via both the 2G and 3G networks for maximum reliability.
MASP pair 704 implements a maintenance and administration subsystem function that is not particularly relevant to a discussion of the 2G/3G message service message routing of the present disclosure. Accordingly, a detailed discussion of their function is not provided herein.
LIM 706 interfaces with one or more external signaling links. LIM 706 may have a number of sub-components. In
MTP level 3 discrimination function 714 may receive signaling messages from the lower processing layers and perform discrimination operations, which may include determining whether a received message (e.g., an SS7 message) is to be allowed into gateway 104 and determining whether the received message packet requires processing by an internal processing subsystem or is simply to be through switched (i.e., routed on to another node in the network). Examples of received SS7 messages that may require internal processing include signaling connection control part messages in need of global title translation (GTT) and signaling network management messages. By providing this discrimination functionality, discrimination function 714 may effectively provide 2G/3G message service gateway 104 with a network firewall. Discrimination function 714 may examine received message parameters, including message transfer part (MTP) routing label parameters, signaling connection control part (SCCP) layer parameters, transaction capabilities application part (TCAP) layer parameters, and mobile application part (MAP) layer parameters. Exemplary discrimination parameters include origination point code (OPC)/destination point code (DPC) parameters, a service indicator (SI) parameter, SCCP called and calling party address parameters, an SCCP subsystem (SSN) parameter, a translation type (TT) parameter, a MAP operation code (OpCode) parameter, and others. Discrimination based on these parameters enables function 714 to determine whether internal processing is required.
For signaling connection control part (SCCP) messages that require GTT or other processing by 2G/3G DSM 710, message distribution function 716 may receive such messages from discrimination function 714 and direct the messages to 2G/3G DSM 710 via IMT bus 702.
For messages that contain message service message content, discrimination function 714 may identify such messages and forward these messages to distribution function 716. Distribution function 716 may distribute such messages to one of a plurality of identically provisioned DSM modules 710. This type of internal distribution of messages within 2G/3G message service message gateway 104 should not be confused with message routing, which refers to selecting an external signaling link over which a received message may be forwarded.
Routing function 718 is responsible for examining an incoming message and determining on which outbound linkset and link the message is to be transmitted. Unlike conventional MTP routing functions that select routes based only in DPC and route cost, routing function 718 may utilize origination or source entity information associated with non-adjacent nodes (e.g., an OPC value, a source IP address, a calling party dialed number, etc.) during route selection process. As such, messages addressed to the same destination point code but sent from different origins may be forwarded over different routes to the same destination independently of the intermediate network between the signaling message origin and 2G/3G message service gateway 104. Once route selection is made, routing function 718 may ensure that the message is directed internally to the appropriate communication module (e.g., SS7 LIM, DCM, 2G/3G DSM, etc.) for outbound transmission.
DCM 708 includes an IP transport function 720, a signaling protocol adaptation/translation function 722, a discrimination function 724, a distribution function 726, and a routing function 728. IP transport function 720 includes hardware and software for implementing OSI layers 1-3. For example, IP transport function may implement a physical layer protocol, such as Ethernet, a network layer protocol, such as IP, and a transport layer protocol, such as transmission control protocol (TCP), user datagram protocol (UDP), and/or stream control transmission protocol (SCTP). According to one exemplary embodiment of the subject matter disclosed herein, adaptation and translation function 722 may receive a signaling message from an IP network that is formatted according to a first signaling protocol (e.g., M3UA), and adapt or reformat the message into a second signaling protocol (e.g., MTP). It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that M3UA is considered to be a protocol for adapting native SS7 signaling messages for transport via an IP communication link. According to another exemplary mode of operation, adaptation and translation function 722 may receive a signaling message, such as a SIP message, and translate the SIP message into an equivalent SS7 or SS7-adaptation protocol message, and vice-versa. These adaptation and translation processing operations may be performed on in-bound and out-bound signaling messages. In yet another embodiment of the subject matter disclosed herein, an adaptation and translation function similar to function 722 may be located on LIM and high speed link (HSL) communication modules, thereby enabling signaling message adaptation and translation operations to be performed on some or all LIM and HSL interfaces in an SMG routing node.
Discrimination function 724 performs discrimination operations similar to those described above with respect to discrimination function 714, and as such discrimination function 724 may provide 2G/3G message service gateway 104 with a network firewall. In addition to the SS7 and SS7-adaptation protocol discrimination parameters described above, discrimination function 724 may also examine received SIP message parameters including a To parameter, a From parameter, a Via parameter, a source IP address parameter, a destination IP address parameter, and others. Discrimination based on these parameters enables function 724 to determine whether screening or internal processing is required. According to one embodiment, discrimination function 724 may copy a received signaling message, such that the original message may be routed to the target destination and the message copy may be processed by one or more processing subsystems associated with the SMG.
Distribution function 726 handles the internal routing of message packets that require additional processing prior to final routing. Such messages may include signaling messages associated with message service messages such as SMS, MMS, and IM services (e.g., SIP INFO message, SIP MESSAGE message, SIP INVITE message, etc.), as well as mobility management messages. Routing function 728 is adapted to access network routing rule information, which may include SS7 and IP network routing rules, and apply these routing rules to messages that require routing.
DSM 710 may include 2G/3G message service routing resolution application 110 described above. In addition, DSM 710 may include one or more databases 734, 736, and 738 for processing message service messages. In the illustrated example, database 734 stores subscriber preferences indicating whether a subscriber prefers 2G or 3G delivery. Database 736 is a message buffer for buffering message service messages or parameters for messages while ENUM and/or presence database is being queried. Database 738 stores ENUM and/or presence information. For example, ENUM database 112 may reside entirely within gateway 104. In such an implementation, database 738 may perform the functions of ENUM database 112 described above. Similarly, presence information may be stored on DSM 710. In such an implementation, database 738 may include presence information for global communications subscribers. In yet another alternate implementation, database 738 may cache ENUM and/or presence information received from responses to external queries to presence and/or ENUM databases.
In the example illustrated in
It will be understood that various details of the subject matter described herein may be changed without departing from the scope of the subject matter described herein. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation, as the subject matter described herein is defined by the claims as set forth hereinafter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4310727 | Lawser | Jan 1982 | A |
4754479 | Bicknell et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
5089954 | Rago | Feb 1992 | A |
5237604 | Ryan | Aug 1993 | A |
5247571 | Kay et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5251248 | Tokunaga et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5400390 | Salin | Mar 1995 | A |
5420916 | Sekiguchi | May 1995 | A |
5422941 | Hasenauer et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423068 | Hecker | Jun 1995 | A |
5430719 | Weisser, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5442683 | Hoogeveen | Aug 1995 | A |
5455855 | Hokari | Oct 1995 | A |
5457736 | Cain et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5475732 | Pester, III | Dec 1995 | A |
5481603 | Gutierrez et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5502726 | Fischer | Mar 1996 | A |
5504804 | Widmark et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526400 | Nguyen | Jun 1996 | A |
5579372 | Åström | Nov 1996 | A |
5590398 | Matthews | Dec 1996 | A |
5594942 | Antic et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5623532 | Houde et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5689548 | Maupin et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5706286 | Reiman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711002 | Foti | Jan 1998 | A |
5812639 | Bartholomew et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819178 | Cropper | Oct 1998 | A |
5822694 | Coombes et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832382 | Alperovich | Nov 1998 | A |
5841854 | Schumacher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852660 | Lindquist et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854982 | Chambers et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862481 | Kulkarni et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867788 | Joensuu | Feb 1999 | A |
5878347 | Joensuu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878348 | Foti | Mar 1999 | A |
5889849 | Ban et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890063 | Mills | Mar 1999 | A |
5953662 | Lindquist et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953663 | Maupin et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5983217 | Khosravi-Sichani et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006098 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011803 | Bicknell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014557 | Morton et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018657 | Kennedy, III et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038456 | Colby et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049714 | Patel | Apr 2000 | A |
6094578 | Purcell et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097960 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115463 | Coulombe et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
H1895 | Hoffpauir et al. | Oct 2000 | H |
6128377 | Sonnenberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6134441 | Äström et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137806 | Martinez | Oct 2000 | A |
6138007 | Bharatia | Oct 2000 | A |
6138016 | Kulkarni et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138017 | Price et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138023 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144857 | Price et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148204 | Urs et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175743 | Alperovich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178181 | Glitho | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192242 | Rollender | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205210 | Rainey et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208870 | Lorello et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226517 | Britt et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236365 | LeBlanc et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6263212 | Ross et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292669 | Meuronen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298232 | Marin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308075 | Irten et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324279 | Kalmanek et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327350 | Spangler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338140 | Owens et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356529 | Zarom | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363431 | Hammer et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377674 | Chong et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377807 | Iparrea et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411632 | Lindgren et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6424832 | Britt et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434127 | Ha | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453174 | Cunningham et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463055 | Lupien et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493551 | Wang et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505046 | Baker | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512926 | Henry-Labordere | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515997 | Feltner et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519242 | Emery et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519468 | Donovan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529524 | Liao et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535746 | Yu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539077 | Ranalli et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560216 | McNiff et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560456 | Lohtia et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574481 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577723 | Mooney | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594258 | Larson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611516 | Pirkola et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615037 | Bharatia et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625461 | Bertacchi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643511 | Rune et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662017 | McCann et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683881 | Mijares et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684073 | Joss et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6697620 | Lamb et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6731926 | Link, II et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738636 | Lielbriedis | May 2004 | B2 |
6745041 | Allison et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748057 | Ranalli et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6795701 | Baker et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801781 | Provost et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819932 | Allison et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826397 | Vasa | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6836477 | West, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6850768 | Foll | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865191 | Bengtsson et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873849 | de la Red et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885872 | McCann et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6912389 | Bright et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6917612 | Foti et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6950441 | Kaczmarczyk et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6993038 | McCann | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7035239 | McCann et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039037 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043002 | Delaney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7079524 | Bantukul et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079853 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085260 | Karaul et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092505 | Allison et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113800 | Linkola | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7145875 | Allison et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7181194 | McCann et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190959 | Palmer et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7221952 | Cho et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7257401 | Dizdarevic et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7274683 | Segal | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7286839 | McCann et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7366530 | McCann et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7397773 | Qu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7551608 | Roy | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7746864 | Asawa et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
20010006897 | Kang et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010029182 | McCann et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030957 | McCann et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010040957 | McCann et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010046856 | McCann | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020132636 | Stockhusen | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147845 | Sanchez-Herrero et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173320 | Aitken et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176382 | Madour et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003930 | Allison et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030007482 | Khello et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016684 | Prasad et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026289 | Mukherjee et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032432 | Red et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030054844 | Anvekar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061234 | Ali et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065788 | Salomaki | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081754 | Esparza et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109271 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128693 | Segal | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157938 | Haase et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030193967 | Fenton et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227899 | McCann | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040076126 | Qu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081206 | Allison et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082332 | McCann et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087300 | Lewis | May 2004 | A1 |
20040125925 | Marsot | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142707 | Midkiff et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040198351 | Knotts | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202187 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040219935 | McCann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246965 | Westman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264674 | Delaney et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050003838 | McCann et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050119017 | Lovell, Jr. et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050238048 | Delaney et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050286531 | Tuohino et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060034256 | Addagatla et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060067338 | Hua et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060098621 | Plata Andres et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060136557 | Schaedler et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060281492 | Jiang | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070061397 | Gregorat et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066326 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070104184 | Ku et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121879 | McGary et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070203909 | Marathe | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070207802 | Palmer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070286379 | Wiatrowski et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080019356 | Marsico | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080130856 | Ku et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080248820 | Lohtia | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080311917 | Marathe et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090043704 | Bantukul et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090103707 | McGary et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090227276 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 512 962 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0 788 283 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0 936 825 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0 944 276 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1 558 004 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1 742 452 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1 950 942 | Jul 2008 | EP |
10-2004-0107271 | Dec 2004 | KR |
WO 9512292 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9611557 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9733441 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9818269 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9856195 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9911087 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9957926 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0016583 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0060821 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0147297 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0148981 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0154444 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 02060192 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03005664 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03021982 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03105382 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004006534 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 20040087686 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004075507 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004102345 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005002311 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005013538 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2006072473 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2007045991 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007092205 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007095379 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007146257 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008011101 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008157213 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009023573 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070133574 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |