The present invention relates to an apparatus for cooling and a method thereof. In particular, the apparatus is for an improved electrokinetic pump having substantially straight and very small pore apertures and lengths. The pump is manufactured by a process using semiconductor processing techniques.
High density integrated circuits have evolved in recent years including increasing transistor density and clock speed. The result of this trend is an increase in the power density of modern microprocessors, and an emerging need for new cooling technologies. At Stanford, research into 2-phase liquid cooling began in 1998, with a demonstration of closed-loop systems capable of 130 W heat removal. One key element of this system is an electrokinetic pump, which was capable of fluid flow on the order of ten of ml/min against a pressure head of more than one atmosphere with an operating voltage of 100V.
This demonstration was all carried out with liquid-vapor mixtures in the microchannel heat exchangers because there was insufficient liquid flow to capture all the generated heat without boiling. Conversion of some fraction of the liquid to vapor imposes a need for high-pressure operation, and increases the operational pressure requirements for the pump. Furthermore, two phase flow is less stable during the operation of a cooling device and can lead to transient fluctuations and difficulties in controlling the chip temperature. The pump in that demonstration was based on porous glass filters that are several mm thick. A disadvantage of these structures is that the pore density, structure, and mean diameter is not uniform and also not easily reproduced in a low-cost manufacturing process. Furthermore, the fluid path in these structures is highly tortuous, leading to lower flow rates for a given thickness of pump. Porous ceramic structures with nominally the same character were shown to exhibit pumping characteristics which varied by large amounts.
What is needed is an electrokinetic pumping element that would provides a relatively large flow and pressure within a compact structure and offer much better uniformity in pumping characteristics.
An electrokinetic pump for pumping a liquid includes a pumping body having a predetermined thickness, preferably in the range of 10 microns and 1 millimeter. The body includes a plurality of pore apertures for channeling the liquid through the body, wherein each pore aperture extends from the first outer surface to the second outer surface and are preferably 0.1-2.0 microns in diameter. The pores are preferably narrow, short and straight. The pumping body is preferably oxidized. A pair of electrodes for applying a voltage differential are formed on opposing surfaces of the pumping body at opposite ends of the pore apertures. The pumping body is formed on a support structure to maintain a mechanical integrity of the pumping body.
A method of fabricating an electrokinetic pump preferably uses conventional semiconductor processing techniques and includes providing a first material for a pumping body having a first surface and a second surface. A plurality of pore apertures are formed through the first material. The pumping body including the interior of the pore apertures is oxidized. An electrode is formed on the first and second surfaces. A voltage potential is coupled across the electrodes to move a liquid to flow through the plurality of pore apertures.
Another method of fabricating an electrokinetic pump includes providing a substrate having a first surface. A plurality of etch stop alignment marks is formed on the first surface. A pumping element material is formed on the first surface. A plurality of pore apertures are formed through the pumping material. A support structure is formed under the etch stop alignment marks by removing remaining material. The resulting structure is oxidized including within the pore apertures wherein a voltage differential applied across the pumping element drives liquid through the plurality of capillaries.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent after reviewing the detailed description of the preferred embodiments set forth below.
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred and alternative embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it should be noted that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
The basic performance of an electrokinetic or electro-osmotic pump is modeled by the following relationships:
As shown in equations (1) and (2), Q is the flow rate of the liquid flowing through the pump and ΔP is the pressure drop across the pump and the variable a is the diameter of the pore aperture. In addition, the variable ψ is the porosity of the pore apertures, ζ is the zeta potential, ε is the permittivity of the liquid, V is the voltage across the pore apertures, A is the total Area of the pump, τ is the tortuosity, μ is the viscosity and L is the thickness of the pumping element. The terms in the parenthesis shown in equations (1) and (2) are corrections for the case in which the pore diameters approach the size of the charged layer, called the Debye Layer, λD, which is only a few nanometers. For pore apertures having a diameter in the 0.1 mm range, these expressions simplify to be approximately:
As shown in equations (3) and (4). The amount of flow and pressure are proportional to the amount of voltage potential that is present. However, other parameters are present that affect the performance of the pump. For example, the tortuosity (τ) describes the length of a channel relative to the thickness of the pumping element and can be large for pumps with convoluted, non-parallel channel paths. The length (L) is the thickness of the pumping element. As shown in equations (3) and (4), the tortuosity τ and thickness L of the pumping element are inversely proportional to the flow equation (4) without appearing at all in the pressure equation (4). The square of the diameter a of the pore apertures is inversely proportional to the pressure equation (4) without appearing at all in the flow equation (3).
The pump of the present invention operates at significantly reduced voltages in relation to the prior electrokinetic pumps, but still generate the same or more flow without significant reductions in pressure. Existing pumps have average pore aperture diameters in the range of 0.8 to 1.2 microns. In addition, existing ceramic pump elements have thicknesses of 3-4 mm and a tortuosity of 1.4-2.0. A typical prior electrokinetic pump having a thickness of 2.5 mm produces flow of 25 ml/min at a voltage of 100 V and have a max pressure of 1.00 Atm.
In contrast, the thickness of the pumping element is reduced by 100 times; the tortuosity is improved by a factor of more than 3; and the pore diameter is reduced by 3 times. The reduction in these three factors allows the pump of the present invention to be operated at 10 times reduced voltage and yet be capable of more than 10 times more flow. The pump of the present invention is able to perform under such conditions by reduction: in the diameter of the pore aperture; the thickness of the pumping element; and the tortuosity of the pump apertures.
The support structures 106 are attached to the pumping element 102 at predetermined locations to the bottom surface 114 of the pumping element 102. These predetermined locations are dependent on the required strength of the pump 100 in relation to the pressure differential and flow rate of the liquid passing through the pumping element 102. In between each support structure 106 is a support aperture 108, whereby the liquid passes from the support apertures 108 into the pore apertures 110 in the bottom surface 114 of the pumping element 102. The liquid then flows from the bottom pore apertures 110 through the channels of each pore apertures and exits through the pore apertures 110 opening in the top surface 112 of the pumping element 102. Though the flow is described as liquid moving from the bottom surface 114 to the top surface 112 of the pumping element 102, it will be apparent that reversing the voltage will reverse of the flow of the liquid in the other direction.
The liquid passes through the pumping element 102 under the process of electro-osmosis, whereby an electrical field is applied to the pumping element 102 in the form of a voltage differential. Preferably, electrodes 316 (
Preferably, as shown in
It is theorized that, the flow rate and pressure differential increases are due to the reduction in the pore diameter a, tortuosity τ, and thickness in the pumping element 102. This is shown with regard to equations (3) and (4). As shown in equation (3), the reduction in tortuosity τ in the pore apertures 110 increases the overall flow rate of the liquid passing through the pore apertures 110. In addition, the reduction in thickness, L, of the pumping element 102 also increases the overall flow rate of the liquid passing through the pore apertures according to equation (3). Further, as shown in equation (4), reduction of the pore aperture diameter a substantially increases the amount of pressure differential of the liquid flowing through the pumping element 102. Although the flow rate, Q, and pressure differential, ΔP, increase due to the configuration of the present pump 100, the flow rate and pressure differential can be maintained at a suitable amount while reducing the voltage required to operate the pump 100 accordingly.
The pump of the present invention can be fabricated in several different ways.
As shown in
In
Once the pore apertures 310 are formed, a diffusion oxidation step is performed on the pump 300 whereby all surfaces of the pump 300, including surfaces of the pumping element 302 and support element 304 are oxidized with an oxide layer 318. The oxide layer 318, preferably SiO2, forms a passivation oxide which prevents current from bypassing the electrokinetic osmotic pumping effect caused by the voltage differential between the openings of the pore apertures 310. In addition, the step of growing the oxide layer 318 serves to narrow the channels of the pore apertures 310, because SiO2 forms from oxidized silicon at a high-temperature with O2 gas, as shown in
The support element 304 has large support apertures 308 which offer very little resistance to the flow of liquid through the pump body 302 while still providing adequate structural support. Therefore, the formation of 0.25 microns of this oxide in a silicon pore with a diameter of 1 micron serve to reduce the pore diameter to almost 0.5 microns. This process can be carried out with excellent thickness control, as the growth of gate oxides in silicon is very thoroughly characterized and determinable in the art. As a final step, an electrode is formed on both surfaces of the pumping element 102. Details concerning the electrodes are discussed below.
As shown in
Next, the plurality of pore apertures 410 are formed in the polysilicon layer 409, as shown in
Next, the structure is oxidized to form an oxide layer 318 on all the surfaces of the pumping element 402 and support structure 404 to passivate the surfaces and to reduce the diameters of the pore apertures 410.
As shown in
Once the pumping element 302 and support element 304 are formed by any of the above processes, metal is preferably deposited on the outside surfaces of the pumping element 302, thereby forming electrodes 316 on surfaces of the pumping element, as shown in
The pump of the present invention produces enough flow that sufficient heat rejection with a single-phase fluid is possible. Existing pumps that operate with 100 Watt heat sources require 2-phase heat rejection, whereas single-phase fluids can capture and reject heat at lower temperatures and thereby eliminate possible problems associated with stability and phase change in a 2-phase system. In addition, the reduction in operating voltage to very low levels allows the use of existing voltages in all electronic systems without conversion between phases.
The pump of the present invention is able to operate with complicated fluids, such as antifreeze or water having additives to improve the heat capture and rejection properties. As stated above, current passes into the fluid through a chemical reaction, whereby the current passes through the electrodes 316 (
If an electrokinetic pump operates at high voltage, the overpotentials are so small that they are neglected in the analysis. However, for low-voltage operation, the overpotentials subtract from the voltage being applied to the pumping element 102, thereby causing the actual potential difference within the pumping medium to be reduced by an amount equal to the sum of the overpotentials for the reactions at the 2 electrodes. For a multi-component fluid, the electrochemical reactions will involve all the constituents of the fluid if the applied voltage is large enough to overcome the overpotentials of all the reactions. However, operation at low voltages may allow the electrochemistry to take place with only some of the constituents of the fluid.
For example, if H2O includes additives which inhibit freezing at low temperatures, the overpotentials of the additives are significantly higher than the overpotentials of pure H2O. For the exchange of ions in the electro-osmosis process in regard to H2O, there is a range of applied voltages which are low enough that only the H2O participates in the reactions at the electrodes. The advantage of this circumstance is that the electrochemistry can be kept simple (involving only H2 and O2) even in a fluid that has a complicated chemical makeup. An important advantage of the low-voltage operation enabled by the pump 100 of the present invention is that it becomes possible to generate adequate flow and pressure for high-power device cooling at voltages that are below the overpotentials of some useful additives, such as antifreeze. Some examples of additives which serve the purpose of depressing the freezing point of the liquid being pumped are Cyclohexanol and Acetonitrile. These additives are soluble in water at low concentrations and are well-characterized.
The electrode potentials for these additive chemicals are calculated from theory. However, the overpotentials are typically 2-3 times larger than the theoretical minimum electrode potentials. In addition, the overpotentials are generally a function of chemistry, geometry, roughness, and current density at electrode/electrolyte interface. The values of overpotentials are estimated for a given electrode material/electrolyte pair and depend on the behavior of the type of additive; specific concentration of the additive and the type of specific system within which the additive is used.
Like most thermophysical properties, the electrolytic currents of mixtures are not a linearly superposable or weighted effect of the components of the mixture. Instead, an additive at low concentration tends to have negligible effect on the current of the cell up to some critical concentration. The situation is analogous to a circuit with two diodes in parallel where the threshold potential of each is a function of its concentration in the mixture. The lower threshold diode tends to use all of the current. In the present invention, a low-concentration additive with a higher overpotential than water will only divert a small part of the current in the pump, even if the applied potentials are greater than the overpotentials of the additives. The operating voltage of the pump can still be relatively high, and the electrochemical reactions will still tend not to involve the additives if their overpotentials are higher than the water.
In addition, the effect of the additives on the cryoscopic constants appear not to correlate with the critical concentration. Therefore, cyclohexanol or acetonitrile or some other additive at low concentrations is added and has a beneficial effect on the freezing point without affecting the electrochemical reactions at the electrodes. Therefore, the best additives are soluble chemicals with high cryoscopic constants that are effective at low concentrations.
The present invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments incorporating details to facilitate the understanding of the principles of construction and operation of the invention. Such reference herein to specific embodiments and details thereof is not intended to limit the scope of the claims appended hereto. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications may be made in the embodiment chosen for illustration without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This patent application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/366,121 filed Feb. 12, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,881,039 the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/366,121 claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of the co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/413,194 filed Sep. 23, 2002, and entitled “MICRO-FABRICATED ELECTROKINETIC PUMP”. The Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/413,194 filed Sep. 23, 2002, and entitled “MICRO-FABRICATED ELECTROKINETIC PUMP” is also hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0596062 | Firey | Dec 1897 | A |
2273505 | Florian | Feb 1942 | A |
3267859 | Jutila | Aug 1966 | A |
3524497 | Chu et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3554669 | Reader | Jan 1971 | A |
3654988 | Clayton, III | Apr 1972 | A |
3817321 | Von Cube et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3823572 | Cochran, Jr. | Jul 1974 | A |
3923426 | Theeuwes | Dec 1975 | A |
3993123 | Chu et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4138996 | Cartland | Feb 1979 | A |
4211208 | Lindner | Jul 1980 | A |
4296455 | Leaycraft et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4485429 | Mittal | Nov 1984 | A |
4568431 | Polan et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4726495 | Bavaveas | Feb 1988 | A |
4884331 | Hinshaw | Dec 1989 | A |
4978638 | Buller et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5016090 | Galyon et al. | May 1991 | A |
5088005 | Ciaccio | Feb 1992 | A |
5096388 | Weinberg | Mar 1992 | A |
5131233 | Cray et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5219278 | Van Lintel | Jun 1993 | A |
5239200 | Messina et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5247800 | Mruzek et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5269372 | Chu et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5308429 | Bradley | May 1994 | A |
5309319 | Messina | May 1994 | A |
5316077 | Reichard | May 1994 | A |
5336062 | Richter | Aug 1994 | A |
5371529 | Eguchi | Dec 1994 | A |
5380956 | Loo et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5441613 | McCormick et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5459099 | Hsu | Oct 1995 | A |
5534471 | Carolan et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5590242 | Juang et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5632876 | Zanzucchi et al. | May 1997 | A |
5641400 | Kaltenbach et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5685966 | Aaron et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5703536 | Davis et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704416 | Larson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5759014 | Van Lintel | Jun 1998 | A |
5761037 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5763951 | Hamilton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800690 | Chow et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5829514 | Smith et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835345 | Staskus et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836750 | Cabuz | Nov 1998 | A |
5839290 | Nazeri | Nov 1998 | A |
5858188 | Soane et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863708 | Zanzucchi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870823 | Bezama et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876655 | Fisher | Mar 1999 | A |
5880524 | Xie | Mar 1999 | A |
5901037 | Hamilton et al. | May 1999 | A |
5937557 | Bowker et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940270 | Puckett | Aug 1999 | A |
5942093 | Rakestraw et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953701 | Neti et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960384 | Brash | Sep 1999 | A |
5964092 | Tozuka et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5965001 | Chow et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5965813 | Wan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978220 | Frey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983997 | Hou | Nov 1999 | A |
5989402 | Chow et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997713 | Beetz, Jr. et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5998240 | Hamilton et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007309 | Hartley | Dec 1999 | A |
6010316 | Haller et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6012902 | Parce | Jan 2000 | A |
6013164 | Paul et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019165 | Batchelder | Feb 2000 | A |
6019882 | Paul et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023934 | Gold | Feb 2000 | A |
6054034 | Soane et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068752 | Dubrow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084178 | Cromwell | Jul 2000 | A |
6090251 | Sundberg et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096656 | Matzke et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100541 | Nagle et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6101715 | Fuesser et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103199 | Bjornson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106685 | McBride et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119729 | Oberholzer et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129145 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146103 | Lee et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154226 | York et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154363 | Chang | Nov 2000 | A |
6171067 | Parce | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174675 | Chow et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176962 | Soane et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182742 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6186660 | Kopf-Sill et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210986 | Arnold et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216343 | Leland et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221226 | Kopf-Sill | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227809 | Forster et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234240 | Cheon | May 2001 | B1 |
6238538 | Parce et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6251254 | Katoh et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260579 | Yokota et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272012 | Medin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277257 | Paul et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287440 | Arnold et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301109 | Chu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313992 | Hildebrandt | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321791 | Chow | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322753 | Lindberg et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324058 | Hsiao | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6337794 | Agonafer et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351384 | Daikoku et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6381846 | Insley et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6385044 | Colbert et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388317 | Reyzin | May 2002 | B1 |
6388385 | McGinn et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396706 | Wohlfarth | May 2002 | B1 |
6397932 | Calaman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416642 | Alajoki et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417060 | Tavkhelidze et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6443704 | Darabi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457515 | Vafai et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478258 | Yee | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6495015 | Schoeniger et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6527835 | Manginell et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6572749 | Paul et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6574597 | Mohri et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578626 | Calaman et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6588498 | Reyzin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6632655 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6675875 | Vafai et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6719535 | Rakestraw et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729383 | Cannell et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6770183 | Hencken et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775996 | Cowans | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6865081 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6903929 | Prasher et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6934154 | Prasher et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6986382 | Upadhya et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992891 | Mallik et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
20010016985 | Insley et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010024820 | Mastromatteo et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010044155 | Paul et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010046703 | Burns et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010055714 | Cettour-Rose et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020011330 | Insley et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020031948 | Yasufuku et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020075645 | Kitano et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020096312 | Korin | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020121105 | McCarthy, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020134543 | Estes et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152761 | Patel et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030022505 | Quellet et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030062149 | Goodson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097846 | Novotny et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030121274 | Wightman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040040695 | Chesser et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050231 | Chu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052049 | Wu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052711 | Kondo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040089008 | Tilton et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040099410 | Ghosh | May 2004 | A1 |
20040112585 | Goodson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120827 | Kim et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040206477 | Kenny et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050082666 | Lee et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050083657 | Hamman | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084385 | Corbin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050117298 | Koga et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050257532 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060133039 | Belady | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070115634 | Laing | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
97212126.9 | Mar 1997 | CN |
42 42 841 | Nov 1997 | DE |
1 154 476 | Nov 2001 | EP |
10-99592 | Apr 1998 | JP |
2000-277540 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001-326311 | Nov 2001 | JP |
495062 | Jul 2002 | TW |
510490 | Nov 2002 | TW |
WO 2004036040 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004076857 | Sep 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050084385 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60413194 | Sep 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10366121 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 10968376 | US |