The present invention relates to a micro-mirror device, and in particular to a MEMS micro-mirror device with an electrode spacer enabling the gap between hot and ground electrodes to be independent of any other stiffening structures.
Conventional micro-electro-mechanical (MEMs) micro-mirror devices 1, illustrated in
Typically, as illustrated in
1) A limited scope to improve the stiffness of the mirror platform 2; i.e. since the mirror platform 2 has a uniform rectangular shape, only the thickness of the mirror platform 2 can he adjusted to improve the mass moment of inertia (MOT) thereof, and the mechanical resonance thereof.
2) The process considerations for the width of the hinge 4 puts an upper limit on the thickness of the mirror platform 2, i.e. the stiffness of the mirror platform 2, since the hinge 4 has the same thickness as the mirror platform 2.
3) The mirror swing space for tilt is determined by the electrode gap, thereby constraining the electrode design by the swing space requirement and vice versa.
An object of the present invention is to overcome the shortcomings of the prior art by providing a micro-mirror structure that provides additional mirror stiffness, while maintaining the compensation of hinge stiffness by electrode gap, by means of an electrode spacer.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to a micro-mirror device comprising:
a substrate defining a lower level;
a first spacer extending upwardly from the substrate forming an upper level;
an anchor post extending upwardly from the substrate or the spacer;
a tilting platform pivotally connected to the anchor post above the substrate via a hinge defining a tilting axis, the tilting platform including a first thin section above the upper level of the substrate, and a stiffer section at each end thereof including stiffening ribs in a lower surface thereof above the lower level of the substrate defining a swing space therebetween; and
a first hot electrode on the first spacer below the first thin section defining an electrode gap for pivoting the tilting platform about the tilting axis; and
whereby tolerance variations in hinge thickness are at least partially compensated for by a corresponding variation in electrode gap; and
whereby the swing space is independent of the electrode gap
Another aspect of the present invention relates to a method of manufacturing a micro-mirror device comprising:
a) providing a substrate defining a lower level;
b) providing a first spacer on the substrate defining an upper level;
c) providing an anchor post extending from the first spacer or the substrate;
d) providing a first hot tilt electrodes on the first spacer;
e) providing a tilting mirror platform with a thinner middle section including a hinge and a ground electrode, and stiffer end sections with a reflective coating on at least one of the end sections; and
f) mounting the tilting mirror platform with ground electrode over the hot tilt electrode, and the stiffer end sections over the lower level.
The invention will be described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings which represent preferred embodiments thereof, wherein:
With reference to
In a first embodiment, the mirror wafer 12 is formed in a single-step backside etching process. The etching step forms the pattern of bulkheads 17 and 18 and the pedestal cap 16, along with defining the thickness of the main section of the mirror platform 14. The pattern of the bulkheads 17 and 18 on the underside of the mirror platform 14 provides the required stiffness, and at the same time removes most of the material for mass reduction. A final top-side etch step is conducted to pattern and etch the hinge 15, ideally after the pedestal cap 16 is mounted on the substrate wafer 13.
One or more hot electrodes 19 are disposed on the substrate wafer 13 below the bulkheads 17 for selectively attracting the underside of the bulkheads 17, which act as ground electrodes, for tilting the mirror platform 14, as desired, e.g. for switching optical signals. A single hot electrode 19 can provide limited angular control; however, two or more hot electrodes 19 are preferred to ensure better control and a greater range of angular motion. Ideally, a reflective surface 20 is disposed, e.g. coated, on an upper surface of the mirrored platform 14 on one or both sides of the hinge 15 for reflecting optical signals. Each of the hot electrodes 19 are electrically connected to an adjustable voltage source (not shown) for generating the required amount of voltage to tilt the mirror platform 14 relative to the substrate wafer 13 producing a desired angular position. One or two pedestals 22 extend from the substrate wafer 13 for supporting the one or two pedestal caps 16.
In this case the electrode gap 21 and the thickness of the hinge 15 are independently formed by etching the mirror wafer in two steps: a first backside etch to define the pedestal cap 16 and the bulkheads 17 and 18, and then a second topside etch to define the hinge 15. Any change in the driving torque due to a variation in the electrode gap 21 is decoupled from the stiffness of the hinge 15, and therefore lacks the compensation effect of the hinge stiffness by the electrode gap due to an etch depth tolerance. However, the pedestal 22 does provide a stiffened mirror beam structure. It will be shown later how a spacer design allows a stiffened beam with a compensated electrode gap.
In an alternate embodiment, illustrated in
Stiffening bulkheads 47 and 48 are provided on the underside of each side of the mirror platform 44 to increase the stiffness thereof, and therefore decrease the curvature thereof. The bulkheads 47 and 48 can be laterally extending structures, longitudinally extending ribs, or a combination of both, e.g. longitudinally extending ribs extending from laterally extending structures. In a first embodiment, the mirror wafer 42 is formed in a single step backside etching process. The backside etching step forms the bulkheads 47 and 48 and the pedestal cap 46, along with defining the thickness of the main section of the mirror platform 44, and the hinge 45. The bulkheads 47 and 48 provide an improved stiffness/mass ratio as described earlier. An additional step can be added to adjust the thickness of the hinge 45 or the mirror platform 44, if the thickness of the hinge 45 is required to be different than the thickness of the mirror platform 44. A final topside etching step is conducted to define the hinge 45 separate from the pedestal cap 46.
The substrate wafer 43 is provided with a spacer or riser 55a extending upwardly from the main substrate 43 providing a raised section defining an upper level with a step down to the main substrate 43 at a lower level. The spacer 55a is formed in the substrate wafer 43, e.g. by an etching process.
Ideally, a reflective surface 50 is disposed, e.g. coated, on an upper surface of the mirrored platform 44 for reflecting optical signals on one or both sides of the hinge 45. A structurally stiffer section of the mirror platform 44 is provided by means of the bulkheads 47 and 48, without penalizing mirror inertia; ideally the reflective coating 50 is provided only on the stiffer section of the mirror platform 44. Each of the hot electrodes 49 arc electrically connected to an adjustable voltage source (not shown) for generating the required amount of voltage to tilt the mirror platform 44 relative to the substrate wafer 43 producing a desired angular position. The spacers 55a and 55b also support the pedestal cap 46, which is bonded thereon.
In this case the electrode gap 51 and the thickness of the hinge 45 are formed by the mirror etch process to preserve the aforementioned compensation effect, the spacer 55a or 55b enables the formation of the stiffening bulk heads 47 and 48 in the mirror platform 44, which is then free to swing to the desired angle through the swing gap independent of the spacer 55a or 55b. Moreover, the swing space of the mirror platform 44, i.e. between the ends of the mirror platform 44 and the substrate 43, is decoupled from the electrode gap 51, enabling flexibility in optimizing the electrode gap 51.
Accordingly, the thickness of the spacer 55a or 55b may be relatively large, e.g. 50 μm or more, therefore aerodynamic crosstalk due to pressure gradient created by the motion of the minor platform 44 squeezing the air film underneath is greatly alleviated by the larger swing gap.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is depicted in
In a preferred embodiment, see
The substrate wafer 63, see
Ideally, a reflective surface 70 is disposed, e.g. coated, on an upper surface of the mirrored platform 64 on one or both sides of the hinge 65 for reflecting optical signals. A structurally stiffer section of the mirror platform 64 is provided by means of the bulkheads 67 and ribs 68, without penalizing mirror inertia, and ideally the reflective coating 70 is provided only on the stiffer section of the mirror platform 64 to minimize curvature thereof. Each of the hot electrodes 76a and 76b are electrically connected to separate adjustable voltage sources (not shown) for generating the required amount of voltage to tilt the mirror platform 64 relative to the substrate wafer 63 producing a desired angular position. The spacer 75c supports the pedestal cap 66, which is bonded thereon.
In this case the electrode gap 71 and the thickness of the hinge 65 are formed by the single backside mirror etch, hence preserving the compensation effect, at the same time providing stiffened mirror design. The mirror swing space is increased by using the spacer 75a, and thereby decouples the swing space from the electrode gap 71 providing design degree of freedom for the electrode 76a.
Design of the bulkheads 67 and ribs 68 involves a compromise between mirror inertia and mirror stiffness. As an example, a 30 μm thick mirror wafer 62 with a 20 μm etch to define the bulkheads 67 and ribs 68, and including 100 μm long bulkheads 67, and 500 μm long ribs 68 provides approximately three times the improvement in mirror stiffness, as compared to a uniformly thick 15 um mirror platform with equivalent mass moment of inertia.
An apparent solution to increase the bending stiffness without increasing mirror inertia excessively is to add ribs 68 underneath the mirror platform 64. The approach involves a relatively thin mirror base and relatively thick ribs 68 as depicted in
The present invention claims priority from U.S. Patent Application No. 61/289,473 filed, Dec. 23 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6491404 | Hill | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6704132 | Dewa | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6791730 | Sniegowski et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6956684 | Orcutt | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6999215 | Dewa et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002719 | Tran | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7050211 | Orcutt | May 2006 | B2 |
7071109 | Novotny et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7259900 | Orcutt | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20010022682 | McClelland et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20040081391 | Ko et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040150872 | Neukermans et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050041916 | Miller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050139542 | Dickensheets et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060210238 | Ma et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080018975 | Moidu | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090290205 | Satoh et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100290142 | Krastev et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Kaiser, Todd J., et al, “Silicon Nitride Biaxial Pointing Mirrors with Stiffening Ribs”, Moems and Miniaturized Systems II, San Francisco, CA Oct. 22-24, 2001, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2001, SPIE-INT Soc. Opt. Eng. pp. 276-282. |
Lutzenberger, Jeffrey, et al, “Vertical stiffening Members for Flatness Control of Surface Micromachined Structures”, Moems and Miniaturized Systems II San Francisco, CA Oct. 22-24, 2001, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2001, SPIE-INT Soc. Opt. Eng. pp. 238-246. |
Lin, Hung-Yi, et al, “Rib-Reinforced Micromachined Beam and its Applications”, Journal of Micromeclianics and Microengineering, Mar. 2000, vol. 10, No. 1 pp. 93-99. |
Mita, Makkoto, et al, “An Out-of-Plane Potysilicon Actuator with a Smooth Vertical Mirror for Optical Fiber Switch Application”, Broadband Optical Networks and Technologies: An Emerging Reality/Optical MEMS/Smart Pixels/Organic Optics and Optoelectronics, 1998 IEEE/Leos Summer topical Meetings Monterey, CA Jul. 20-24, 1998, New York NY IEEE pp. II-33-II-34. |
Nee, Jocelyn T., et al, “Stretched-Film Micromirrors for Improved Optical Flatness”, 2000 Ieee, pp. 704-709. |
Himmer, Phillip A., et al, “Micromachined Silicon Nitride deformable Mirrors for Focus Control”, Optics Letters, Optical Society of America, Washington, vol. 26, NR. 16 pp. 1280-1282. |
Nee, Jocelyn T., et al, “Lightweight, Optically Flat Micromirrors for Fast Beam steering”, 2000 IEEE/Leos International conference on Optical MEMS (cat. No. 00EX399), 2000 IEEE/LEOS International Conference on Optical MEMS, Kauai, HI, pp. 21-24 Aug. 2000, Piscataway NJ IEEE, pp. 9-10. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110149361 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61289473 | Dec 2009 | US |