1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to an improved micromechanical detection structure for a MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems) acoustic transducer, in particular a microphone of a capacitive type, and to a corresponding manufacturing process.
2. Description of the Related Art
As is known, a MEMS acoustic transducer of a capacitive type generally comprises a mobile electrode, provided as a diaphragm or membrane, set facing a substantially fixed electrode so as to form the plates of a detection capacitor.
The mobile electrode is generally anchored, by means of a perimetral portion thereof, to a substrate, whereas a central portion is free to move or bend in response to acoustic-pressure waves impinging upon one of its surfaces. The mobile electrode and the fixed electrode provide a detection capacitor, and bending of the membrane that constitutes the mobile electrode causes a variation of capacitance of this detection capacitor. During operation, the variation of capacitance is converted, by suitable processing electronics, into an electrical signal, which is supplied as an output signal of the MEMS acoustic transducer.
A MEMS acoustic transducer of a known type is, for example, described in detail in US patent application No. 2010/0158279 A1 (which is incorporated by reference herein), filed in the name of the present Applicant.
The micromechanical structure 1 comprises a substrate 2 made of semiconductor material, and a mobile membrane (or diaphragm) 3. The membrane 3 is made of conductive material and faces a fixed electrode or rigid plate 4, generally known as “back plate”, which is rigid, at least when compared to the membrane 2, which is instead flexible and undergoes deformation as a function of incident acoustic-pressure waves.
Membrane 3 is anchored to substrate 2 by means of membrane anchorages 5, formed by protuberances of the same membrane 3, which extend from peripheral regions thereof towards the substrate 2.
For instance, membrane 3 has in a top plan view, i.e., in a horizontal plane of main extension, a substantially square shape, and the membrane anchorages 5, which are four in number, are set at the vertices of the square.
The membrane anchorages 5 perform the function of suspending the membrane 3 above the substrate 2, at a certain distance therefrom. The value of this distance is a function of a compromise between the linearity of response at low frequencies and the noise of the acoustic transducer.
In order to enable relief of the residual stresses (tensile and/or compressive stresses) on the membrane 3, for example deriving from the manufacturing process, through openings (not illustrated herein) may be formed through the membrane 3, in particular in the proximity of each membrane anchorage 5, in order to “equalize” the static pressure present on the surfaces of the same membrane 3.
The rigid plate 4 is formed by a first plate layer 4a, made of conductive material and facing the membrane 3, and by a second plate layer 4b, made of insulating material.
The first plate layer 4a forms, together with the membrane 3, the detection capacitor of the micromechanical structure 1.
In particular, the second plate layer 4b is set on the first plate layer 4a, except for portions in which it extends through the first plate layer 4a so as to form bumps 6 of the rigid plate 4, which extend as far as the underlying membrane 3 and have the function of preventing adhesion of the membrane 3 to the rigid plate 4, as well as of limiting the oscillations of the same membrane 3.
For instance, the thickness of the membrane 3 is in the range 0.3-1.5 μm, for example equal to 0.7 μm; the thickness of the first plate layer 4a is in the range 0.5-2 μm, for example equal to 0.9 μm; and the thickness of the second plate layer 4b is in the range 0.7-2 μm, for example equal to 1.2 μm.
The rigid plate 4 moreover has a plurality of holes 7, which extend through the first and second plate layers 4a, 4b, have, for example, a circular cross section, and perform the function of allowing, during the manufacturing steps, removal of underlying sacrificial layers. Holes 7 are, for example, set so as to form a lattice, in a horizontal plane, parallel to the substrate. Furthermore, in use, the holes 7 enable free circulation of air between the rigid plate 4 and the membrane 3, making the rigid plate 4 acoustically transparent. Holes 7 hence act as acoustic access ports in order to enable the acoustic-pressure waves to reach and deform the membrane 3.
The rigid plate 4 is anchored to the substrate 2 by means of plate anchorages 8, which are connected to peripheral regions of the same rigid plate 4.
In particular, plate anchorages 8 are formed by vertical pillars (i.e., extending in a direction orthogonal to the horizontal plane and to the substrate), which are made of the same conductive material as the first plate layer 4a and hence form a single piece with the rigid plate 4. In other words, the first plate layer 4a has prolongations that extend as far as the substrate 2 to define the anchorages of the rigid plate 4.
The membrane 3 is moreover suspended and directly faces a first cavity 9a, formed through the substrate 2, by means of a through trench etched starting from a back surface 2b of the substrate 2, which is opposite to a front surface 2a thereof, on which the membrane anchorages 5 rest (the first cavity 9a hence defines a through hole that extends between the front surface 2a and the back surface 2b of the substrate 2). In particular, the front surface 2a lies in the horizontal plane.
The first cavity 9a is also known as “back chamber”, in the case where the acoustic-pressure waves impinge first upon the rigid plate 4 and then upon the membrane 3. In this case, the front chamber is formed by a second cavity 9b, which is delimited at the top and at the bottom, respectively, by the first plate layer 4a and by the membrane 3.
Alternatively, it is in any case possible for the pressure waves to reach the membrane 3 through the first cavity 9a, which in this case performs the function of acoustic access port, and, hence, of front chamber.
In greater detail, the membrane 3 has a first surface 3a and a second surface 3b, which are opposite to one another and face, respectively, the first cavity 9a and the second cavity 9b, to be in fluid communication, respectively, with the back chamber and with the front chamber of the acoustic transducer.
Furthermore, the first cavity 9a is formed by two cavity portions 9a′, 9a′: a first cavity portion 9a′ is set at the front surface 2a of the substrate 2 and has a first extension in the horizontal plane; the second cavity portion 9a′ is set at the back surface 2b of the substrate 2 and has a second extension in the horizontal plane, greater than the first extension.
In a known way, the sensitivity of the acoustic transducer depends on the mechanical characteristics of the membrane 3, as well as on the assembly of the membrane 3 and of the rigid plate 4.
Furthermore, the performance of the acoustic transducer depends on the volume of the back chamber and the volume of the front chamber. In particular, the volume of the front chamber determines the upper resonance frequency of the acoustic transducer, and hence its performance at high frequencies. In general, indeed, the smaller the volume of the front chamber, the higher the upper cut-off frequency of the acoustic transducer. Furthermore, a large volume of the back chamber enables improvement of the frequency response and the sensitivity of the same acoustic transducer.
The present Applicant has found that the micromechanical structure 1 of a known type described previously is subject to some drawbacks, related in particular to manufacturing of the rigid plate 4 and to its anchorage to the substrate 2.
In particular, it is known that in a capacitive microphone the rigid plate (or reference plate) should be as planar as possible (given that it forms the reference plate of the detection capacitor), and moreover as rigid as possible (in order to prevent movements correlated to the acoustic-pressure waves or other undesired movements).
However, in the micromechanical structure 1 described previously, the rigid plate 4 may undergo a bending stress, as shown by the curved arrow represented with a solid line in
The factors affecting the aforesaid residual stresses are multiple and are due, for example, to the properties of the materials used, to the techniques of deposition of the same materials, to the conditions (temperature, pressure, etc.) at which deposition is carried out, and to possible subsequent thermal treatments.
In other words, a sort of spring, or elastic element, is formed at the plate anchorages 8, i.e., at the vertical pillar portions of the rigid plate 4 towards the substrate 2.
On account of its mechanical deformation, the rigid plate 4 may have a lower stiffness and moreover may not be perfectly planar or horizontal, thus affecting, even significantly, the performance of the acoustic transducer, for example reducing its sensitivity.
Furthermore, from the standpoint of the manufacturing process of the micromechanical structure 1, it is evident that formation of the plate anchorages 8, given their conformation, requires a large thickness of a resist layer, during the step of lithographic definition (the so-called “patterning”) of the last layers, or levels, of material.
In particular, this makes control of the manufacturing process problematical and moreover generates markedly vertical geometries, which may be particularly critical for chemical etchings (in particular, dry etches), considerably increasing the time required for execution of the same etchings.
According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, a micromechanical detection structure for a MEMS acoustic transducer, and a corresponding manufacturing process are provided.
One embodiment includes a micromechanical structure comprising a semiconductor substrate having a first surface and an anchorage structure including a plurality of pillar elements. The micromechanical structure further comprises a detection capacitor that includes a membrane coupled to said substrate. The membrane is configured to deform in response to acoustic-pressure waves. The detection capacitor further includes a fixed electrode that is rigid with respect to said acoustic-pressure waves and is coupled to said substrate by the anchorage structure. The anchorage structure is configured to support the fixed electrode in a suspended position facing said membrane.
For a better understanding of the present disclosure, preferred embodiments thereof are now described, purely by way of non-limiting example and with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
As will be described in detail hereinafter, the general idea underlying the present disclosure envisages providing, during the manufacturing process of the micromechanical detection structure of the acoustic transducer, a supporting and anchoring structure for the rigid plate, distinct from the same rigid plate, such as to support the rigid plate and create an equivalent force that will reduce the bending stresses to which it is subjected on account of the residual stresses in the materials, and moreover such as to enable a reduction in the thickness of the resist layers required in the last process steps for definition of the same rigid plate.
The manufacturing process of a micromechanical detection structure for a MEMS acoustic transducer according to one aspect of the present solution is now described, with reference first to
In an initial step (
As illustrated in
The first sacrificial layer 14 is subjected to a chemical etching with etch-stop on the silicon, such as to open membrane-anchorage openings 17 throughout the thickness of the first sacrificial layer 14, in desired positions (for example, at the vertices of what will be the square occupied in plan view by the membrane).
According to one aspect of the present solution, the mask used to execute the chemical etching for definition of the first sacrificial layer 14 is moreover configured for enabling formation, substantially at a same time, of first plate-anchorage openings 18, laterally shifted with respect to the membrane-anchorage openings 17, on the opposite side with respect to the first anti-adhesion recesses 15.
As shown also in the schematic plan view of
The position of the membrane anchorages 5 is moreover shown in
As shown in
Accordingly, the membrane anchorages 5 are formed, as well as membrane anti-adhesion elements 20 (also referred to as “bumps”), designed to define protuberances of the membrane, once again designated by 3, in order to prevent adhesion thereof to the underlying substrate 12. In particular, membrane anchorages 5 comprise vertical portions of the first conductive layer 19 formed within the membrane-anchorage openings 17, in direct contact with the front surface 12a of the substrate 12, and a portion of the first sacrificial layer 14 between the same vertical portions.
In this process step, a bottom portion is moreover formed of what will become, at the end of the manufacturing process, the anchorage structure of the rigid plate of the acoustic transducer. In particular, this bottom portion comprises vertical portions 19′ of the first conductive layer 19 formed within the plate-anchorage openings 18, in direct contact with the front surface 12a of the substrate 12, and portions 14′ of the first sacrificial layer 14 between vertical portions 19′ adjacent to, and overlaid by, horizontal portions 19″ of the same first conductive layer 19 (which are joined to the aforesaid vertical portions 19′).
As shown in the same
After definition of the first conductive layer 19, also the horizontal portions 19″ remain, arranged in the area of the plate-anchorage structure, whereas the remaining part of the first conductive layer 19 is removed.
In this etching step, one or more through openings 21 are moreover defined throughout the thickness of the membrane 3, which are aimed at equalizing the front and back surfaces of the membrane 3.
As shown in
The second sacrificial layer 22 is then defined, for example etching with etch-stop on the first conductive layer 19, so as to form a plurality of anti-adhesion openings 23, which have the function of enabling, during subsequent steps of the manufacturing process, formation of anti-adhesion elements for the rigid plate of the micromechanical structure of the acoustic transducer.
A third sacrificial layer 24 is then deposited on the wafer 13 (
As shown in
In particular, by means of a chemical etching with etch-stop on the first conductive layer 19, second plate-anchorage openings 26 are formed, which are arranged vertically in a position corresponding to the position previously assumed by the first plate-anchorage openings 18, and have a width, in the horizontal plane xy, greater than, or equal to, the width previously assumed by the same first plate-anchorage openings 18.
As shown in
The second conductive layer 28 is then selectively removed by chemical etching with etch-stop on the underlying second sacrificial layer 24 in order to expose the depressions 25 in the same second sacrificial layer 24. The remaining portions of the second conductive layer 28, arranged above the membrane 3, are designed to form the first plate layer 4a of what will be the rigid plate 4 of the micromechanical detection structure.
Furthermore, the second conductive layer 28, in an area corresponding to the anchorage structure of the rigid plate 4, fills the second plate-anchorage openings 26, coming into contact with the underlying portions of the first conductive layer 19.
The top portion of the anchorage structure of the rigid plate 4 of the acoustic transducer is thus formed, here designated as a whole by 30.
This top portion comprises: vertical portions 28′ of the second conductive layer 28, formed within the second plate-anchorage openings 26; the residual portions 22′, 24′ set on top of one another of the second and third sacrificial layers 22, 24 between adjacent vertical portions 28′; and the overlying horizontal portions 28″ of the second conductive layer 28 (which are joined to the aforesaid vertical portions 28′). In particular, the vertical portions 28′ hence constitute prolongations of the first plate layer 4a of the rigid plate 4, being integral with the rigid plate 4 itself at an edge portion thereof. These vertical portions 28′ terminate at a distance from the front surface 12a of the substrate 12, in particular at a distance comparable (i.e., substantially equivalent) to the height in the vertical direction of the same vertical portions 28′.
As shown in
The passivation layer 32 is hence deposited on the second conductive layer 28 to form the second plate layer 4b of the rigid plate 4 and fills, in particular, the depressions 25, thus forming the bumps 6 of the rigid plate 4, which extend towards the underlying membrane 3 with anti-adhesion function.
The passivation layer 32 moreover extends above the anchorage structure 30, by which it is supported at the same level (with respect to the horizontal plane xy) as the rigid plate 4.
A subsequent etching step of the passivation layer 32 and of the underlying second conductive layer 28, with etch-stop on the third sacrificial layer 24, provides formation of the holes 7, which traverse the entire thickness of the rigid plate 4. As previously mentioned, holes 7 may be arranged to form a lattice in the horizontal plane xy.
Furthermore, a further etching step (by means of a further lithographic step) for etching the passivation layer 32, with etch-stop on the underlying second conductive layer 28, enables formation of at least one contact opening 36 through the passivation layer 32, laterally with respect to the underlying anchorage structure 30.
As shown in the same
The contact pad 37 is, for example, made of gold, by means of the cathode-sputtering technique.
As shown in
In particular, by means of successive steps of etching and mechanical polishing (the so-called “grinding” operation), the back of the wafer 13 (at the back surface 12b of the substrate 12) is polished and thinned until a thickness of, for example, 400 μm is reached. To protect the front of the wafer 13 during these steps of polishing and thinning, it may be advantageous to deposit a protective layer (not shown), which is then removed.
By means of successive lithography and etching steps, the first cavity 9a of the micromechanical structure 10 of the acoustic transducer is then formed, in particular, using a double dry etching.
First, a layer of TEOS oxide is grown on the back of the wafer 13 and is defined to form first mask regions 40, by etching with etch-stop on the underlying substrate 12.
This is followed by a first deep dry etch of the substrate 12, starting from the back surface 12b.
The area of the substrate 12 subjected to etching is defined by the first mask regions 40, whereas the depth of the portion of substrate 12 etched is equal to the depth that it is desired to obtain for the first cavity portion 9a′.
As shown in
The second mask portions 41 are then removed.
As shown in
It should be noted that, during the aforesaid etching step, the anchorage structure 30 operates like a sort of a dyke, which is not involved by the wet etching. In particular, due to the presence of the vertical portions 19′, 28′ of the first and second conductive layers 19, 28, the portions of the sacrificial layers inside the anchorage structure 30 itself are not removed.
In the resulting micromechanical structure 10, the rigid plate 4 is coupled to the substrate 12 by means of the anchorage structure 30, which hence comprises a plurality of pillar elements 45, each formed by stacked portions of the first, second, and third sacrificial layers 14, 22 and 24 and by the horizontal portions 19″, 28″ of the first and second conductive layers 19, 28 (which together constitute a body portion 45a of each pillar element 45). Adjacent pillar elements 45 are separated laterally by the vertical portions 19′, 28′ of the first and second conductive layers 19, 28 (which, being stacked in a vertical direction, together constitute wall portions 45b of the pillar elements 45).
In particular, as previously mentioned, the wall portions 45b of the pillar elements 45 have a protection and confinement function with respect to the body portions 45a of the same pillar elements 45, during the wet etching step leading to removal of the sacrificial regions, where they are not protected.
As is evident from what has been illustrated in
As shown schematically in the aforesaid
In a possible embodiment, a termination pillar element 46 at the scribe line SL has a lateral extension that is greater (i.e., a greater extension of the corresponding body portion, designated by 46a) as compared to that of the pillar elements 45 of the anchorage structure 30, and supports the contact pad 37 at the top.
In any case, it is clear that the manufacturing steps described may be used for manufacturing a plurality of micromechanical detection structures 10 for corresponding acoustic transducers on one and the same wafer 13.
The electronic device 100 comprises, in addition to the MEMS acoustic transducer 101, a microprocessor 104, a memory block 105, connected to the microprocessor 104, and an input/output interface 106, for example including a keyboard and a display, which is also connected to the microprocessor 104. The MEMS acoustic transducer 101 communicates with the microprocessor 104 via the electronic circuit 102. Furthermore, a speaker 108 for generating sounds on an audio output (not shown) of the electronic device 100 may be present.
The electronic device 100 is preferably a mobile communication device, such as for example a mobile phone, a PDA, a notebook, but also a voice recorder, a reader of audio files with voice-recording capacity, etc. Alternatively, the electronic device 100 may be a hydrophone, capable of working under water. The electronic device may be a wearable device.
The advantages of the solution described emerge clearly from the foregoing discussion.
It is in any case once again emphasized that the particular anchorage structure 30 for the rigid plate 4 of the micromechanical detection structure 10 affords the dual advantage of: eliminating, or in any case markedly reducing, the bending stresses to which the rigid plate 4 is subjected, thus improving the electrical characteristics of the corresponding acoustic transducer 101; and simplifying the manufacturing process, given the greater “horizontality” of the micromechanical detection structure 10, and the absence of vertical elements that have to be coated with thick resist layers.
In particular, tests made by the present Applicant have shown that in the micromechanical structure 10 of the present solution the rigid plate 4 is subjected to deformations not greater than 0.2 μm, much less (in particular, by at least one order of magnitude) than the deformations present in traditional solutions, which have values in the region of a few microns.
Furthermore, the deformations in the micromechanical structure 10 of the present solution are altogether repeatable in different production lots, unlike traditional solutions, where the deformations vary even markedly in different production lots (being linked to the residual stresses in the materials, which are also markedly dependent upon the specific production lot).
Furthermore, the manufacturing process described does not involve additional process steps as compared to known solutions, only using different conformations of the lithography and chemical-etching masks that lead to definition of the various layers and levels of the micromechanical detection structure 10.
Finally, it is clear that modifications and variations may be made to what has been described and illustrated herein, without thereby departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
In particular, it is clear that the number of pillar elements 45, of which the anchorage structure 30 is made, may vary with respect to what has been illustrated, according to the specific requirements of the micromechanical structure 10. In this regard, by increasing the number of pillar elements 45 the resulting mechanical strength may be increased; moreover, the redundancy thus introduced would prove advantageous in the presence of defectiveness that would enable permeation of the wet etching in the internal area of the anchorage.
Furthermore, also the geometrical conformation of the anchorage structure 30 in the horizontal plane may possibly differ from what has been illustrated. In particular, in a position corresponding to the contact pads 37, the anchorage structure 30 may have a smaller number of pillar elements 45, for example just one pillar element 45 having a larger horizontal extension.
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
TO2013A0313 | Apr 2013 | IT | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7620192 | Yamaoka | Nov 2009 | B2 |
8036401 | Poulsen | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20100158279 | Conti et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007 267049 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2007 267252 | Oct 2007 | JP |
10 2008 0087172 | Sep 2008 | KR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140314254 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |