Patent Grant
11739350
The present disclosure relates to microRNA compositions and methods used in treating disease.
The following paragraph is not an admission that anything discussed herewith is prior art or part of the knowledge of persons skilled in the art.
A microRNA (abbreviated miRNA) is a small non-coding RNA molecule that functions in RNA silencing and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. The ability of miRNAs to regulate gene expression illustrates their potential as a therapeutic.
The following introduction is intended to introduce the reader to this specification but not to define any invention. One or more inventions may reside in a combination or sub-combination of the apparatus elements or method steps described below or in other parts of this document. The inventors do not waive or disclaim their rights to any invention or inventions disclosed in this specification merely by not describing such other invention or inventions in the claims.
Viral therapy is a field where specific viruses have been selected or genetically manipulated to treat disease, either by prophylaxis, such as vaccines, or through viral therapy, such as gene therapy or oncolytic viruses. Viruses such as vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), Vaccinia, and herpes simplex virus (HSV) can be modified for use as vaccine backbones or in therapeutic applications, such as gene therapy or oncolytic viral therapy.
Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are viruses used to specifically infect, replicate in, and kill malignant cells, leaving normal tissues unaffected. Several OVs, such as VSV, have reached advanced stages of clinical evaluation for the treatment of various neoplasms.
Although viral therapy is a promising therapeutic strategy, antiviral responses raised by a patient treated with a virus may reduce the therapeutic effectiveness of the virus. Without wishing to be bound by theory, the authors of the present disclosure believe that exemplary miRNAs according to the present disclosure, when encoded by a virus, are produced and released from the infected cell in extracellular vesicles (EV) (cell-derived membranous structures, including exosomes and microvesicles), regulating gene expression in uninfected cells to enhance the therapeutic effectiveness of the virus in the patient. The authors believe that the released extracellular vesicles can circulate in the patient and affect distant cells. In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a miRNA hairpin encoded by a virus that, when processed by a virus-infected cell, increases the therapeutic effectiveness of the virus. In the context of the present disclosure, such a miRNA hairpin may be referred to as a “therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin”. In some examples, the present disclosure provides a virus whose genome includes a nucleotide sequence that encodes at least one miRNA hairpin that enhances the therapeutic effectiveness of the virus. In other examples, the present disclosure provides a plasmid for modifying a genome of a target virus, where the plasmid includes a sequence that, when inserted into the target virus, encodes a miRNA hairpin that enhances the therapeutic effectiveness of the virus.
The authors of the present disclosure have also identified pre-miRNA and pri-miRNA that, when processed by a virus-infected cell, increase EV secretion of the encoded miRNA hairpin by the virus-infected cell. In the context of the present disclosure, such a pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA may be referred to as “an EV-directing pre-miRNA” or “an EV-directing pri-miRNA”, respectively. In another aspect of the present disclosure, the disclosure provides a pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA including a miRNA hairpin that, when processed by an virus-infected cell, increases secretion of the encoded miRNA hairpin via EVs expressed by the virus-infected cell. The pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA may be referred to as an “EV-directing cassette”. In some examples, the present disclosure provides a virus whose genome includes a nucleotide sequence that encodes a pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA that increases EV secretion of the miRNA hairpin. The present disclosure also provides a method of identifying an EV-directing pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA for an oncolytic virus. The present disclosure also provides a plasmid for modifying a genome of a target virus, where the plasmid includes a sequence that, when inserted into the target virus, encodes an EV-directing pre-miRNA or an EV-directing pri-miRNA.
In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a miRNA-hairpin for encoding by a virus that, when processed by a virus-infected cell, increases the therapeutic effectiveness of the virus.
The miRNA-hairpin may include:
The miRNA-hairpin may include a loop sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 17.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a virus whose genome includes a nucleic acid sequence that encodes at least one miRNA-hairpin according to the present disclosure.
In still another aspect, the present disclosure provides a plasmid that comprises a nucleotide sequence that, when inserted into a virus, encodes at least one miRNA hairpin according to the present disclosure.
In yet another aspect, the present disclosure provides a cassette encoded by a virus that, when processed by a cell that is infected by the virus, increases extracellular vesicle secretion of at least one miRNA hairpin encoded by the cassette.
The cassette may include at least one sequence according to: [Z]-[A]-[X]-[Y]-[X′]-[B]-[Z′], wherein [Z] and [Z′] represent optional flanking sequences; [X] and [X′] represent sense and antisense sequences of the miRNA hairpin stem; [Y] represents a loop sequence of the miRNA hairpin; and [A] and [B] represent, respectively: sequences that are up to 5 nucleotides different from SEQ ID NOs: 20 and 21; 23 and 24; 27 and 28; 30 and 31; 33 and 34; 36 and 37; 39 and 40; 42 and 43; 45 and 46; 48 and 49; 51 and 52; 54 and 55; 57 and 58; 60 and 61; 63 and 64; 66 and 67; 69 and 70; 72 and 73; 75 and 76; 78 and 79; 81 and 82; 84 and 85; 87 and 88; 90 and 91; 93 and 94; 96 and 97; 99 and 100; 102 and 103; 105 and 106; 108 and 109; 111 and 112; 114 and 115; 117 and 118; 120 and 121; 123 and 124; 126 and 127; 129 and 130; 132 and 133; 135 and 136; 138 and 139; 141 and 142; 144 and 145; 147 and 148; 150 and 151; or 153 and 154. When the cassette includes more than one sequence according to: [Z]-[A]-[X]-[Y]-[X′]-[B]-[Z′], each sequence is independently selected.
[A] and [B] may represent sequences that are identical to the sequences identified by SEQ ID NO.
[Z] and [Z′] may be present and have sequences that are at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 18 and 19, respectively.
[Y] may have a sequence that is at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NO: 17.
In still another aspect, the present disclosure provides a virus whose genome comprises a nucleotide sequence that encodes one or more cassettes according to the present disclosure. The one or more cassettes may encode 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, or more than 20, such as about 30, about 40, about 50, about 60, about 70, about 80, about 90, or about 100, independently selected sequences according to [Z]-[A]-[X]-[Y]-[X′]-[B]-[Z′]. A virus with a larger genome may have a greater capacity for modification, and may therefore include more cassettes and/or more encoded sequences, than a virus with a smaller genome.
In an further aspect, the present disclosure provides a plasmid that includes a nucleotide sequence that, when inserted into a virus, encodes one or more cassettes according to the present disclosure.
In yet still another aspect, the present disclosure provides a plasmid that includes one or more, independently selected, nucleotide sequences according to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 178-207.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides an oncolytic virus whose genome includes one or more, independently selected, nucleotide sequences according to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 178-207.
Embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the attached Figures.
The use of the term “or” in the claims is used to mean “and/or” unless explicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or the alternatives are mutually exclusive, although the disclosure supports a definition that refers to only alternatives and “and/or.”
As used in this specification and claim(s), the words “comprising” (and any form of comprising, such as “comprise” and “comprises”), “having” (and any form of having, such as “have” and “has”), “including” (and any form of including, such as “includes” and “include”) or “containing” (and any form of containing, such as “contains” and “contain”) are inclusive or open-ended and do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps.
The use of the word “a” or “an” when used in conjunction with the term “comprising” in the claims and/or the specification may mean “one,” but it is also consistent with the meaning of “one or more,” “at least one,” and “one or more than one.”
As used in this specification and claim(s), the expressions “a sequence that encodes a miRNA” and “a sequence that encodes a miRNA hairpin” (and similar expressions) refers to a DNA or RNA sequence that, when processed by a cell, generates the miRNA or miRNA hairpin. The encoding sequence may be, for example: a portion of the genome of a DNA virus, a portion of the genome of an RNA virus, a pri-miRNA sequence or a pre-miRNA sequence. Depending on the nature of the sequence that encodes the miRNA or miRNA hairpin, the encoding sequence may include a sequence that is (i) identical to the miRNA or miRNA hairpin sequence, (ii) complementary to the miRNA or miRNA hairpin sequence, or (iii) reverse complementary to the miRNA or miRNA hairpin sequence. A sequence that encodes pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA may be referred to as a “cassette”.
In the context of the present disclosure, it should be understood that discussions of a plurality of items, such as nucleotide sequences, cassettes, miRNA hairpins, do not require that each item be identical to the other items. For example, a plasmid that encodes “at least one nucleotide sequence that is at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: #” refers to, among other things: a plasmid that encodes a single copy of the nucleotide sequence SEQ ID NO: #“; a plasmid that encodes multiple copies of the nucleotide sequence SEQ ID NO: #”; and a plasmid that encodes a plurality of different nucleotide sequences, all of which being at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: #. The expression “independently selected” refers to one item of a group not influencing the selection of any of the other items in the group. In the above example, each of the plurality of different nucleotides is independently selected.
It will be appreciated that embodiments and examples are provided for illustrative purposes intended for those skilled in the art, and are not meant to be limiting in any way.
In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a miRNA hairpin that, when processed by a virus-infected cell, increases the therapeutic effectiveness of the virus. As noted above, such a miRNA hairpin may be referred to as a “therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin”. A virus according to this aspect of the present disclosure has a genome that includes at least one nucleotide sequence that encodes a therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin.
In the context of the present disclosure, increasing or enhancing the therapeutic effectiveness of a virus may include: enhancing cytotoxicity of the virus, enhancing replication in vivo of the virus, sensitizing an OV-infected cancer cell or a non-infected tumor cell to a chemotherapeutic or other drug (such as a small molecule inhibitor), inducing cytotoxicity of an OV-infected cancer or tumor cell or a non-infected cancer or tumor cell, reducing a neutralizing antibody response to the OV, an enhanced ability to stimulate the immune system, or any combination thereof. In some instances, the non-infected cell may be the same cell type as the infected cell or a different type of cell. It should be understood that “tumor cell” refers to any cell found within a tumor, even if the cell is not cancerous.
The therapeutic effectiveness of an OV may be increased in a cancer cell, such as, but not limited to: HPAC (human pancreatic adenocarcinoma), MiaPaCa-2 (human pancreas carcinoma), Panc02 (mouse pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma), PanC1 (human pancreas epithelioid carcinoma), 786-O (human kidney renal cell adenocarcinoma), HPAF II (human pancreas adenocarcinoma), BxPC3 (human pancreas adenocarcinoma), SKOV3 (human ovarian cancer), cancer-associated fibroblasts (e.g. PCa-CAF), patient-derived cells or any combination thereof.
A miRNA hairpin includes a stem portion and a loop portion according to the established principles in miRbase.org, as recognized in the art. The stem portion is formed from the at least partial pairing of a “sense” sequence and an “anti-sense” sequence. The two sequences are joined by a loop portion (which may also be referred to herein as a loop sequence). The loop portion and part of the stem may be cleaved during cellular processing. The sense and anti-sense sequences form a double stranded miRNA duplex. The double stranded miRNA duplex separates to form at least one single stranded RNA. The single stranded RNA may act to silence or post-transcriptionally regulate expression of one or more genes.
A therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin according to the present disclosure may include a sense sequence and an anti-sense sequence, as shown in Table 1. The therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin also includes a loop portion joining the two sequences. The loop portion may be from 3 to 50 nucleotides in length.
In the context of the present disclosure, reference to a hairpin according to “amiR[#]” refers to a hairpin that includes the sense and the anti-sense sequences as shown in Table 1. For example, the artificial miRNA hairpin “amiR1” includes a sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 1 and a sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 2, where SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2 are joined by a sequence defining the loop portion.
A therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin according to the present disclosure may include a sequence that is: (a) at least 60% identical (such as at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical) to any one of SEQ ID NO: 1-16 and (b) at least 70% identical (such as at least 85% identical) over the middle seven nucleotides of the reference sequence. That is, at least five of the seven middle nucleotides are identical to the reference sequence. Such a miRNA hairpin may be referred to as a “variant” of the corresponding amiR. The authors note that SEQ ID NO: 3 is 91% identical to SEQ ID NO: 5, and the middle seven nucleotides are identical to five of the middle seven nucleotides of SEQ ID NO: 5 (that is, they are about 71% identical over the middle seven nucleotides). Without wishing to be bound by theory, the authors of the present disclosure believe that the middle seven nucleotides may be more active in gene regulation. On that basis, it may be desirable for the sequence to be 100% identical over the middle seven nucleotides of the reference sequence. For example, a therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin according to the present disclosure may include a sequence that is 60% identical to SEQ ID NO: 9 while being 100% identical over the middle seven nucleotides of SEQ ID NO: 9; and a sequence that is 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 10, with the two sequences being joined by a loop sequence. Such a miRNA hairpin may be referred to as a variant of amiR6.
One example of a loop sequence that may be used in a therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin of any one of amiRs 1-10, or a variant thereof, is:
Therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpins are processed by the virus-infected cell to cleave the loop portion and part of the stem of the hairpin, generating one single-stranded RNA with a “sense” sequence and one single-stranded RNA with an “anti-sense” sequence.
A virus according to the present disclosure may encode more than one therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin according to the present disclosure. For example, a virus may include (i) a nucleotide sequence that encodes a hairpin that includes SEQ ID NOs: 9 and 10, as well as (ii) a nucleotide sequence that encodes a hairpin that includes SEQ ID NOs: 11 and 12. The virus may encode: (a) multiple therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpins in tandem with a single promoter, (b) multiple therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpins each having their own promoter; or (c) a combination thereof.
Therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpins are encoded within a pri-miRNA or a pre-miRNA. The sequence encoding the pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA may be referred to as a “therapy-enhancing cassette”. The virus-infected cell processes the pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA to produce the therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin. A virus that encodes a therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin according to the present disclosure may additionally include sequences in the genome defining linkers or restriction sites adjacent to the sequence encoding the pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA.
A virus encoding a therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin according to the present disclosure may include in its genome a cassette including a sequence as shown in Appendix A. Infection of a cell with a virus that includes a cassette having “cassette sequence amiR[#]” results in a virus-infected cell that produces a miRNA hairpin according to amiR[#]. For example, infection of a cell with a virus that includes a cassette having “cassette sequence amiR6” results in a virus-infected cell that produces a miRNA hairpin with nucleotides that include SEQ ID NO: 9 and 10.
The therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin may be encoded by an otherwise wild-type virus, or by a variant of a wild-type virus. The virus may be, for example: Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV), Vaccinia virus, Maraba virus, herpes simplex virus (HSV), Farmington virus, Carajas virus, Muir Springs virus, Bahia grande virus, or a variant thereof.
A variant of a wild-type oncolytic virus or other virus may have: one or more genetic mutations resulting in non-wild type sequences of one or more of the viral gene products; a pseudotyped gene; additional nucleotide sequences that encode one or more biomolecules; a deletion of a gene; an interruption of a gene; a truncation of a gene; or any combination thereof. The genetic changes may confer to the variant virus: increased cytotoxicity, attenuation in non-cancerous cells, enhanced infection rate, enhanced replication rate, enhanced growth in cancerous cells, enhanced ability to stimulate the immune system, or any combination thereof. It should be understood that reference to “enhanced”, “increased” or “reduced” is in comparison to the corresponding wild-type virus. One specific example of such a variant oncolytic virus is: a variant of HSV-1 that: (i) lacks a gene encoding Infected Cell Protein 34.5 (ICP34.5), (ii) lacks a gene encoding Infected Cell Protein 47 (ICP47), and (iii) includes a gene encoding human Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Such a variant is disclosed by BL Liu et al. in Gene Therapy (2010) 10, 292-303.
The nucleotide sequence that encodes the therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin may be inserted anywhere in the genomic backbone of the virus so long as the encoding sequence does not interfere with the production of the vital viral gene products. For example: rhabdoviruses include coding sequences for five proteins in the order 5′-N-P-M-G-L-3′; and the nucleotide sequence may be inserted between the N and the P genes, between the P and the M genes, or between the G and the L genes. In viruses whose genes include non-coding introns, or in viruses whose genomes include non-vital genes, the nucleotide sequence may be inserted within a gene. HVS and Vaccinia virus are examples of viruses that include non-vital genes.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a pre-miRNA that, when expressed by a virus-infected cell, increases EV secretion of the encoded miRNA hairpin by the virus-infected cell. As noted above, such pre-miRNA may be referred to as “an EV-directing pre-miRNA”. The increase in EV secretion of a miRNA hairpin is relative to the amount of the miRNA hairpin secreted in EVs of a virus-infected cell that does not express an EV-directing pre-miRNA or EV-directing pri-miRNA that encodes the miRNA hairpin. An EV-directing pre-miRNA may originate from a cellular miRNA or a virally expressed miRNA. An EV-directing pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA according to the present disclosure may result in about at least a 40-fold increase in EV secretion of the encoded miRNA hairpin for cellular derived miRNA hairpins (Table 2 to Table 4), or at least about 2-fold increase for viral derived miRNA hairpins (Table 5).
In the following tables, exemplary constructs of EV-directing pre-miRNA are illustrated. In the exemplary constructs, stem structure sequences [A] and [B] represent sequences of the pre-miRNA that affect EV secretion, [X] and [X′] represent the sense and anti-sense sequences of the miRNA hairpin stem encoded by the pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA. These sequences are joined by a loop portion, designated [Y]. The loop portion, as part of the secondary structure, may additionally affect EV secretion. The [X] and [X′] sequences are flanked by the stem structure sequences [A] and [B], which are optionally further flanked by flanking sequences [Z] and [Z′] respectively. The illustrated constructs, depicted in
Although the illustrated constructs identify specific loop sequences [Y], it should be understood that specific constructs could have alternative loop sequences or loop sequences from another illustrated construct.
In some embodiments, the [A] and [B] sequences do not have any nucleotides, and are therefore omitted. In such embodiments, the loop portion affects EV secretion. Additional nucleotides, such as up to five nucleotides, may be included between any adjacent portions. These additional nucleotides may be used to encourage the formation of a secondary structure that more closely mimics the secondary structure of the wild-type pre-miRNA.
The optional flanking sequences [Z] and [Z′] may be from 3 to 400 nucleotides in length. If present, the flanking sequences [Z] and [Z′] may include, respectively, sequences that are: at least 80% identical to GAAGGTATATTGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCG (SEQ ID NO: 18) and at least 80% identical to TGCCTACTGCCTCGG (SEQ ID NO: 19). The optional flanking sequences [Z] and [Z′] in a pre-miRNA may be at least 80% identical to sequences derived from the pri-miRNA sequences of the corresponding wild-type pre-miRNA, the sequences of which are available from publicly available databases. An EV-directing pre-miRNA or an EV-directing pri-miRNA according to the present disclosure may include a sequence that is at least 80% identical to a sequence shown in the tables.
It should be understood that the sense and anti-sense sequences of an EV-directing pre-miRNA are sufficiently complementary for the two sequences to participate in the stem portion of the pre-miRNA hairpin even if the sense sequence includes one or more nucleotides that do not pair with nucleotides in the anti-sense sequence. The sense and anti-sense sequences do not need to be fully complementary. For example, the sense and anti-sense sequences may include non-complementary pairs or additional nucleotides on either the [X] or [X′] sequence creating a bubble within the stem portion of the hairpin.
Similarly, it should be understood that various pairs of sequences shown in Table 2 to Table 5 include portions that do not pair. For example, SEQ ID NO: 20 is not fully complementary to SEQ ID NO: 21 since SEQ ID NO: 20 includes 10 nucleotides that do not pair with nucleotides in SEQ ID NO: 21. Without wishing to be bound by theory, the authors believe that the secondary structure conferred by the paired and unpaired nucleotides in a miR stem-loop sequence influence the ability for the pre-miRNA to direct the miRNA hairpin to the EV. On this basis, it may be desirable for an EV-directing pre-miRNA, whose sequence is not 100% identical to a sequence shown in the tables, to maintain the number and location of the paired and unpaired nucleotides. For example, an EV-directing pre-miRNA or cassette according to the present disclosure may have a sequence that is 80% identical to the 26 nucleotides of SEQ ID NO: 20, with the 5 different nucleotides maintaining the paired/unpaired relationship with the corresponding nucleotides of the complementary strand. The number and location of paired and unpaired nucleotides of a miR stem-loop sequence secondary structure may be identified through a search of the name of the originating miRNA stem-loop on any online data base, such as www.mirbase.org.
The [X] and [X′] sequences of any one of the exemplary constructs may be replaced with sequences of 18 to 23 nucleotides corresponding to sequences of naturally occurring mature miRNA, artificially designed mature miRNAs, anti-miRNA, short hairpin RNA (shRNA), or small interfering RNA. For example, the [X] and [X′] sequences of any one of the exemplary constructs may be replaced with sequences that form a therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin according to the present disclosure. For example, [X] and [X′] sequences may be replaced with SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 2; SEQ ID NOs: 8 and 9; or a sequence that is at least 60% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3 while being 100% identical over the middle seven nucleotides of SEQ ID NO: 3, and a sequence that is 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 4.
An EV-directing pre-miRNA cassette may include a sequence as shown in Table 2, or a variant sequence where the [A] and [B] sequences each include up to 5 different nucleotides to maintain the originating pri-miR's secondary structure. Although the nucleotide sequences refer to [Z] and [Z′], these are optional and may not be present. The fold increase reflects a measured increase in mature miRNA encoded by the wild-type pre-miRNA sequence in EVs derived from tumor cells infected by VSV.
An EV-directing pre-miRNA cassette may include a sequence as shown in Table 3, or a variant sequence where the [A] and [B] sequences each include up to 5 different nucleotides to maintain the originating pri-miR's secondary structure. Although the nucleotide sequences refer to [Z] and [Z′], these are optional and may not be present. The fold increase reflects a measured increase in mature miRNA encoded by the wild-type pre-miRNA sequence in EVs derived from tumor cells infected by Vaccinia virus.
An EV-directing pre-miRNA cassette may include a sequence as shown in Table 4, or a variant sequence where the [A] and [B] sequences each include up to 5 different nucleotides to maintain the originating pri-miR's secondary structure. Although the nucleotide sequences refer to [Z] and [Z′], these are optional and may not be present. The fold increase reflects a measured increase in mature miRNA encoded by the wild-type pre-miRNA sequence derived from tumor cells infected by herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1).
An EV-directing pre-miRNA cassette may include a sequence as shown in Table 5, or a variant sequence where the [A] and [B] sequences each include up to 5 different nucleotides to maintain the originating pri-miR's secondary structure. Although the nucleotide sequences refer to [Z] and [Z′], these are optional and may not be present. The fold increase reflects a measured increase in mature miRNA encoded by the wild-type pre-miRNA sequence derived from herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1).
In some examples, the present disclosure provides a virus whose genome includes a nucleotide sequence that encodes an EV-directing pre-miRNA or an EV-directing pri-miRNA. In one example, the virus is a vesicular stomatitis virus, or variant thereof, whose genome includes a nucleotide sequence that encodes a pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA cassette whose sequence includes: stem structure sequence SEQ ID NO: 20, sense miRNA sequence [X], loop sequence SEQ ID NO: 22, anti-sense miRNA sequence [X′], and stem structure sequence SEQ ID NO: 21. The VSV variant may be VSVΔ51, or VSV pseudotyped with LCMV's G protein. In another example, the virus is a vaccinia virus, or variant thereof, whose genome includes a nucleotide sequence that encodes a pre-miRNA or a pri-miRNA cassette whose sequence includes: stem structure sequence SEQ ID NO: 84, sense miRNA sequence [X], loop sequence SEQ ID NO: 86, anti-sense miRNA sequence [X′], and stem structure sequence SEQ ID NO: 85. In yet another example, the virus is a herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), or variant thereof, whose genome includes a nucleotide sequence that encodes a pre-miRNA or a pri-miRNA cassette whose sequences includes: stem structure sequence SEQ ID NO: 93, sense miRNA sequence [X], loop sequence SEQ ID NO: 95, anti-sense miRNA sequence [X′], and stem structure sequence SEQ ID NO: 94. As discussed above, the [X] and [X′] sequences may be replaced with sequences that form a therapy-enhancing miRNA hairpin according to the present disclosure. For example, the [X] and [X′] sequences may be replaced with any one of the pairs of sequences shown in Table 1.
A cassette encoding a miRNA hairpin may be inserted into a virus, resulting in a virus whose genome includes the cassette. The nucleotide sequence of the cassette may be prepared by selecting stem structure sequences [A] and [B] according to Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, a loop sequence [Y], sense and anti-sense sequences [X] and [X′], and optionally flanking sequences [Z] and [Z′]. Nucleotide sequences corresponding to one or more restriction enzyme cleavage sites may be added at each end of the cassette for cloning purposes. As discussed above, it may be beneficial to select sequences that mimic the paired/unpaired relationship of nucleotides in the originating miR stem-loop sequence. Mimicking the paired/unpaired relationship may result in a pre-miRNA or pri-miRNA having a secondary structure that better directs the miRNA hairpin to the EV. A cassette may be cloned into a viral genome using standard techniques.
For example, a homologous recombination approach may be used to generate new recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing a cassette encoding the desired miRNA hairpin. In such an example, Hela cells are transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 with PCR products that contain a cassette sequence, a fluorescent protein marker, and around 400 bp of flanking sequences that overlap with the desired vaccinia virus genome region where the cassette is to be inserted. After 4 hours of transfection, the cells are infected with wild-type vaccinia virus. Cells and supernatant are collected after 48 h and are frozen and thawed 3 times. The sample is then serially diluted and a plaque assay on U2OS cells is conducted. Single plaques that express the fluorescent protein marker are considered new recombinants and are picked using an EVOS microscope and then expanded in U2OS cells. Serial rounds of plaque purification are conducted until all plaques are fluorescent. Once the new recombinant virus is pure, the insertion of the cassette sequence is verified using any DNA or RNA sequencing method or device, such as Sanger sequencing.
In another example, VSV recombinant backbones that express miRNA hairpin sequences may be generated by purchasing or producing complementary synthetic oligonucleotides. In such an example, the complementary oligonucleotide sequences are annealed and digested using restriction enzymes. At the same time, a plasmid encoding the full cDNA sequence for the VSV virus is also digested with the same restriction enzymes and then gel purified. Annealed and digested oligonucleotides and plasmid are then ligated and the ligated product is used to transform competent E. coli strain HB101 bacteria. After identifying positive colonies by colony PCR using specific primers for the inserted cassette, the recombinant plasmid may be confirmed by DNA sequencing, such as Sanger sequencing. Then, new recombinant VSV viruses are rescued and grown as previously described in the literature, for example as disclosed by Lawson et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1995) 92(10):4477-81, or by Ilkow et al. in Nature Medicine (2015) May; 21(5):530-6.
EV-directing pre-miRNA for a virus of interest may be identified by infecting cells with the virus of interest, isolating EVs secreted from the infected cells, and quantifying the extracellular vesicles versus cellular levels of identified miRNA species. The miRNA species may be identified and quantified by RNA sequencing or qPCR analysis. The cells may be cancer cells, such as pancreas carcinoma cells, e.g. MiaPaCa-2 cells.
Identification of Therapy-Enhancing miRNA Hairpins
Approximately 16,000 artificial miRNAs (amiRNAs or amiRs) were inserted in cassettes based on miR30b according to the protocol outlined in Cheng et al. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols (2013), doi10.1101/pdb.prot075835. Then, these cassettes were cloned into a replicating Sindbis virus backbone thus generating a replicating Sindbis virus library encoding the amiRNAs. This library was screened by serial passaging, in cancer cell tissue culture and in mice bearing tumours. The authors of the present disclosure rationalized that miRNAs that enhanced Sindbis virus replication would result in an increase in relative frequency of the encoding Sindbis virus. The viral RNA was isolated from the enriched cells or tumor samples from the animal model, reverse transcribed into cDNA, and identified using a MiSeq sequencing system. This is generally illustrated in
The MiSeq sequencing data was used to generate observed counts for each RNA species in the three replicates. Artificial miRNAs with statistically significant enrichment in the target cell types cells compared to baseline levels in the unpassaged library were identified and prioritized by one-sided t-tests. P-values were corrected for multiple comparisons by the Benjamin-Hochberg false discovery rate approach, as appropriate. The top eight candidates, sequences outlined in Table 1, were identified by fold change increase compared to the original (input) library. The results are shown in Table 6 below.
Vaccinia Virus (W) and Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) Encoding Therapy-Enhancing miRNA Hairpins
The VSV and VV were generated by cloning a cassette into the VSV or VV backbones using the techniques discussed above.
Enhanced Cytotoxicity of VSV Encoding Therapy-Enhancing miRNA Hairpins
A human renal cell adenocarcinoma (786-0 cells) cell line, a human ovarian cancer (SKOV3 cells) cell line, or a mouse pancreatic cancer cell line (Panc02) was infected at the multiplicity of infections (MOI) of 1 with VSV-amiR-GFP (non-targeting control) or VSV-encoding amiRNA sequences shown in Table 1 (“VSV-amiR[#]”).
Cell viability was measured 24, 48 and 72 hours post-infection by Alamar Blue Assay®. The results show that: in 786-0 cells, amiR6 and amiR1 enhance VSV-induced cytotoxicity (as observed at 72 h post-infection) as shown in Table 7; in SKOV3 cells: amiR6, amiR5 and amiR1 enhance VSV-induced cytotoxicity (as observed at 24 and 48 h post-infection) as shown in Table 8; and in Panc02 cells: miR1, miR2, miR3, miR6, miR8, miR9 and miR10 enhance VSV-induced cytotoxicity (as observed at 72 h post-infection) as shown in Table 9.
Enhanced Virus Growth in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines or in Tumor Cores Derived from a Pancreatic Cancer Patient Tumor
Two human pancreatic cancer cell lines (MiaPaCa-2, and PanC1) and a mouse pancreatic (Panc02) cell line were infected with the indicated VSV viruses at a MOI of 0.1 for 48 hours. Then, the supernatants from virally infected cells were collected and infectious virus particle production (virus titers) was quantified by plaque assay as previously described in Ilkow et al. Nat Med. (2015) 21(5):530-6. The viral titers for each VSV-amiR[#] is expressed as fold change compared to virus control (VSV-amiR-GFP). The results are illustrated in the following table.
Tumor cores (approximately 2 mm by 2 mm) derived from a pancreatic cancer patient (P006) were infected with 1E4 pfu (plaque forming units) of VSV-amiR control or VSV-amiR[#] for 48 hours and then infectious virus particles were quantified by plaque assay. Virus titers are expressed as pfu (plaque-forming units) per milliliter (ml). ±SD among replicates (n=6 tumor cores per virus construct) is indicated.
The results show that:
VSV replication or growth;
VSV-miR-GFP (control) or VSV-amiR6 were delivered intravenously (IV) into mice bearing subcutaneously implanted HPAF II tumors (human Pancreatic cancer model). After 72 hours, tumors were collected, homogenized and titered by plaque assay (n=8 per group). The mean virus titres (pfu/mg) were: 3,912 for VSV-miR-GFP, and 35,152.6 for VSV-amiR6 (n=4 animals/tumors per group).
VSV-amiR6 Shows Enhanced Cytotoxicity in Cancer Cells, in Tumors In Vivo, and in Ex Vivo Patient-Derived Tumor Samples
As discussed above, a VSV encoding a cassette containing a sense and anti-sense stem sequence according to SEQ ID NOs: 9 and 10 is referred to as “VSV-amiR6”. In the experimental results discussed herein, the VSV-amiR6 specifically includes a sequence according to SEQ ID NO: 181.
VSV-amiR6 shows enhanced cytotoxicity in 786-0 cells (a human kidney cancer cell line). 786-0 cells were infected with a VSV virus control or with VSV-amiR6 at three different MOIs (0.01, 0.1, and 1). After 24 or 48 hours post-infection (hpi), cells were stained with crystal violet to label live cells and absorbance was quantified using a spectrometer. All MOIs were tested using VSV-amiR6 or a control VSV virus expressing the enhance Green Fluorescent protein (eGFP) as illustrated in Table 12. Values are expressed as a proportion of control (mock infected 786-0 cells at 24 or 48 hours, respectively).
Panc02 and PanC1 (mouse and human pancreatic cancer cell lines, respectively) were mock-infected or infected with VSV control or VSV-amiR6 at an MOI of 0.1 for 48 hours.
Seven different cancer cell lines (HPAC, MiaPaca, PanC1, 786-0, HPAF II, BxPC3, Panc02), pancreatic cancer-associated fibroblasts (PCa-CAF) and normal fibroblasts (GM38) were infected with VSV-amiR6 or VSV-miR-GFP (control virus) at a multiplicity of infection of 1. After 48 hours, cell viability among biological replicates (n=6 per group) was measured by Alamar Blue Assays®. amiR6 did not enhance VSV killing in healthy fibroblasts (GM38) but enhanced killing in all cancer cells lines and cancer associated fibroblasts (PCa-CAF). The results are illustrated below:
PBS (vehicle control), VSV-miR-GFP (control), or VSV-amiR6 (1E8 pfu/mouse) was delivered intratumorally (IT) into mice bearing subcutaneously implanted HPAF II tumors (human Pancreatic cancer model) when the tumors all reached an approximate size of 5×5 mm (day 29 post-tumor implantation). After 59 days post-tumor implantation, tumor volume was measured using calipers. Tumor volumes (mm3) were: 1063.78 for PBS, 636.92 for VSV control, and 277.59 for VSV-amiR6 (average for 4 animals per group).
VSV-miR-NTC (control) or VSV-amiR6 (1E8 pfu/mouse) was delivered intraperitoneally (IP) into C57/BL6 mice bearing orthotopic pancreatic tumors (Panc02 model). After 2 weeks of virus treatment, tumor volumes were measure by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and tumor volumes plotted. The final tumor volumes (cm3) were: 0.58 for PBS treatment; 0.54 for VSV-miR-GFP, and 0.29 for VSV-amiR6.
VSV-miR-NTC (control) or VSV-amiR6 was delivered intraperitoneally (IP) into C57/BL6 mice bearing orthotopic pancreatic tumors (TH04 model). Animals were then left until they reached end-point. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for mortality is shown in
Tumor cores (approximately 2 mm by 2 mm) derived from three pancreatic cancer patients were infected with 1E4 pfu (plaque-forming units) of VSV-amiR control or VSV-amiR6 for 48 hours and then infectious virus particles were quantified by plaque assay. The mean values for virus titres are illustrated below:
Therapy-Enhancing miRNAs are Secreted Via Extracellular-Vesicles
Briefly, cancer cells were mock treated or infected with VSV-amiR6 at a MOI=0.1 and after 48 hours post-infection, supernatants from these samples were collected. The EVs produced and secreted were isolated from the supernatants by a differential centrifugation protocol. Total RNA purified from isolated EVs was extracted using TRIzol® and reverse transcribed to cDNA. Quantification of specific miRNAs in EVs was performed by qPCR analysis using specific primers.
Quantification of amiR6 by qPCR analysis in purified EVs was derived from mock infected HPAF II cells (Mock cell-associated EVs, MCAE) or VSV-amiR6 infected cells (Infected cell-associated EVs, ICAE). The amount of extracellular vesicular amiR6 is indicated as relative to the amount of mock infected cells extracellular vesicular hsa-let-7a (which was arbitrarily set at 1.0), a common extracellular vesicular microRNA. The results are illustrated below:
EV Transfer of amiR6 to Uninfected Cancer Cells Sensitizes the Uninfected Cancer Cells to GSK126
The authors of the present disclosure found that amiR6 targets and downregulates the expression of the AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1A), among other cellular messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Since it is known that pharmacological inhibition of EZH2 by GSK126 represents an anti-cancer treatment strategy when ARID1A is downregulated, the present authors tested and confirmed that EVs produced by VSV-amiR6 infected cancer cells could sensitize uninfected cancer cells to the killing activity of GSK126. This demonstrates that amiR6 increases or enhances the therapeutic effectiveness of VSV and GSK126.
qPCR analysis was used to identify cellular targets of amiR6. The fold change of mRNA levels for six different genes is shown below. Analysis of qPCR data was performed using the delta-delta Cycle Threshold (ΔΔCT method).
The downregulation in expression of ARID1A in infected cells was confirmed by Western blot analysis, with PanC1 cell cells having a 90% reduction in ARID1A expression compared to controls at 24 hours (data not shown).
Human pancreatic (HPAFII, BXPC3, and PanC1), human kidney cancer (786-0), or mouse breast carcinoma (4T1) cell line cultures, or a patient-derived pancreatic cancer cell line (Patient 25), were tested. The cells were mock-infected, or infected with VSV-amiR6 or VSV control at MOI=1. After 18 hours, the cells were then treated with GSK126 (10 μM). After 72 h, the VSV-amiR6/GSK126 treated cells were more affected by the GSK126 cytotoxicity than control cells. Cytotoxicity was measured in the BXPC3, Patient 25, 4T1, and 786-0 samples by staining live cells with crystal violet stain, lifting the stain and quantifying absorbance at 570 nm using a spectrophotometer. In the case of HPAF II, cell viability was quantified using the Alamar Blue® assay. Cell viability of mock treated cells was set at 100%. Cell viability (%) of all experimental samples is expressed relative to their corresponding mock vehicle-treated cells. The results are illustrated in the table below:
Naïve HPAF II, 786-0 cells, Patient 25 or BXPC3 cells were also exposed to isolated EVs derived from their respective counterparts (HPAF II, 786-0, Patient 25, or BXPC3, respectively) mock-infected or infected with VSV control or VSV-amiR6, and after 24 hours were also treated with vehicle control (DMSO) or with GSK126 (10 μM). The results, illustrated below, show that the EVs derived from VSV-amiR6 infected cells induce cytotoxicity to GSK126.
Human pancreatic (HPAFII) cells were grafted as tumours in SCID mice subcutaneously, and were tested as follows. After successful establishment of the tumours, mice were treated intratumorally with PBS (vehicle control), or with VSV-amiR6 (3 doses at 1E8 pfu/mouse). After the first virus injection, animals were treated daily for 10 consecutive days with GSK126 (50 mg per kg mouse total weight) or vehicle control, injected intraperitoneally. Tumor size was measured using calipers, and with tumours initially being of a similar volume (5 mm3), at day 56, tumor volumes were: 1609.3 mm3 for PBS+GSK126, 763.2 mm3 for VSV-amiR6+vehicle control, and 265.1 mm3 for VSV-amiR6+GSK126 (average for 4 animals per group).
In a different tumor model, three doses (every other day) of vehicle control (PBS), VSV-miR-NTC (control) or VSV-amiR6 (1E8 pfu/mouse) were delivered intraperitoneally (IP) into C57/BL6 mice bearing intraperitoneal B16-F10 melanoma tumors. Then, mice were treated intraperitoneally with GSK126 (50 mg/kg) for 10 consecutive days. Animals were then left until they reach end point. Kaplan-Meier survival curve for mortality is shown in
Identification of Extracellular Vesicle-Directing Cassettes
Briefly, MiaPaCa-2 cells were mock treated or infected with (a) VSVΔ51, (b) Vaccinia virus, or (c) HSV-1, at a MOI=0.1 and after 48 hours, supernatants from these samples were collected. The EVs produced and secreted were isolated from the supernatants by a standard differential centrifugation protocol. Total RNA from the cells and their derived EVs was isolated and subjected to small RNA sequencing to identify and quantify the miRNA species enriched in EVs compared to the cells that produced them. Bioinformatic analysis was conducted to calculate fold change of extracellular vesicular versus cellular miRNA levels. The pre-miRs that resulted in more than a 40-fold enrichment of the encoded human origin miRNA hairpins are shown in Table 2 (VSV infection), Table 3 (Vaccinia virus infection), and Table 4 (HSV-1 infection), and the pre-miRs that resulted in more than double enrichment of the encoded viral miRNA hairpins are shown in Table 5 (HSV-1 infection).
Extracellular Vesicle-Directing Cassettes Express Encoded miRNA Hairpins
VSVΔ51, an oncolytic variant of VSV, encoding various miRNA hairpins were prepared. The cassettes encoding the miRNA included stem structure sequences [A] and [B], sense and antisense shRNA sequences [X] and [X′], loop sequence [Y], and optional flanking sequences [Z] and [Z′] in the order: [Z]-[A]-[X]-[Y]-[X′]-[B]-[Z′]. The sequences or their SEQ ID NOs are shown in Table 19, below, with the full sequence of the miR constructs provided in Appendix B. The table identifies the intended target of the shRNA sequences, and the name of the originating miR stem-loop sequence.
The [X] and [X′] shRNA sequences shown in Table 19 were modified from their respective native shRNA so that the resulting cassette mimics the native miRNA's secondary structure. The native shRNA sequences used to target human and/or mouse BRCA1, BRCA2 and PDL1 targets (“BRCA1(h/m)”, “BRCA2(h/m)”, and “PDL1(m)”) were trimmed (resulting in SEQ ID Nos: 156, 158, 159, 161, 165 and 167) to create a cassette mimicking the natural secondary structure of miR451.
RT-qPCR analysis was used to demonstrate the downregulation of BRCA1 upon infection of Human osteosarcoma cells (U205), and human breast cancer (MCF7 and T47D) cell lines with VSVΔ51 encoding a cassette including: SEQ ID NO: 30, followed by SEQ ID NO: 156, followed by SEQ ID NO: 157, followed by SEQ ID NO: 158, and followed by SEQ ID NO 31 (referred to as “VSVΔ51-shRNA-BRCA1(h/m)”). U2OS cells were infected with VSVΔ51 virus control or with VSVΔ51-shRNA-BRCA1(h/m) at an MOI of 0.01. MCF7 and T47D cells were infected at a MOI of 0.1. RNA from infected cells was harvested after 48 h post-infection and processed for RT-qPCR using specific primers for BRCA1. Analysis of qPCR data was performed using the ΔΔCT method. The levels of BRCA1 for cells infected with the VSVΔ51 were set at 1.
Similarly, RT-qPCR analysis was used to demonstrate the downregulation of BRCA2 upon infection of Human osteosarcoma cells (U2OS), and human breast cancer (MCF7 and T47D) cell lines with VSVΔ51 encoding a cassette including: SEQ ID NO: 30, followed by SEQ ID NO: 159, followed by SEQ ID NO: 160, followed by SEQ ID NO: 161, and followed by SEQ ID NO: 31 (referred to as “VSVΔ51-shRNA-BRCA2(h/m)”). U2OS cells were infected with VSVΔ51 virus control or with VSVΔ51-shRNA-BRCA2(h/m) at an MOI of 0.01. MCF7 and T47D cells were infected at a MOI of 0.1. RNA from infected cells was harvested after 48 h post-infection and processed for RT-qPCR using specific primers for BRCA2. Analysis of qPCR data was performed using the ΔΔCT method. The levels of BRCA2 for cells infected with the VSVΔ51 were set at 1.
In another experiment targeting only human BRCA2 (“BRCA(h)”), a cassette was prepared that included sequences according to: SEQ ID NO: 18, followed by SEQ ID NO: 39, followed by SEQ ID NO: 162, followed by SEQ ID NO: 163, followed by SEQ ID NO: 164, followed by SEQ ID NO: 40, and followed by SEQ ID NO: 19. A virus encoding such a cassette may be referred to herein as “[virus]-shRNA-BRCA2(h)”. RT-qPCR analysis was used to demonstrate the downregulation of BRCA2 upon infection of Human osteosarcoma cells (U2OS), and human breast cancer (MCF7) cells with VSVΔ51-shRNA-BRCA2(h). U2OS cells were infected with VSVD51 virus control or with VSVΔ51-shRNA-BRCA2(h) at an MOI of 0.01. MCF7 cells were infected at a MOI of 0.1. RNA from infected cells was harvested after 48 h post-infection and processed for RT-qPCR using specific primers for BRCA2. Analysis of qPCR data was performed using the ΔΔCT method. The levels of BRCA2 for cells infected with the VSVΔ51 were set at 1.
In another experiment targeting mouse PDL1 (“PDL1(m)”), a cassette was prepared that included sequences according to: SEQ ID NO: 30, followed by SEQ ID NO: 165, followed by SEQ ID NO: 166, followed by SEQ ID NO: 167, and followed by SEQ ID NO:31. A virus encoding such a cassette may be referred to herein as “[virus]-shRNA-PDL1(m)”. Western blot analysis was used to demonstrate the downregulation of PDL1 upon infection of mouse breast cancer 4T1 cells with VSVΔ51-shRNA-PDL1(m). 4T1 cells were left untreated or infected with VSVΔ51 virus control or with VSVΔ51-shRNA-PDL1(m) at an MOI of 0.1. Total proteins from mock-treated or infected cells were harvested after 48 h post-infection and processed for Immunoblot analysis using specific antibodies for PDL1 and tubulin. Western blot data was quantified using Image J software and the levels of PDL1 in each sample normalized to tubulin (loading control). VSVΔ51-shRNA-PDL1(m) infected cells have a 47.7% reduction in PDL1 expression relative to VSVΔ51 infected cells.
Extracellular Vesicle-Directing Cassettes Express Multiple Encoded miRNA Hairpins in Tandem
Three miR hairpin casettes (illustrated in Table 19) were prepared:
The three miR hairpin cassettes were cloned in tandem from a single viral promoter (
Extracellular Vesicle-Directing Cassettes Direct Encoded miRNA Hairpins to Extracellular Vesicles
One or more of the identified pre-miRNAs may be used to enhance EV secretion of the encoded miRNA hairpin produced by a viral-infected cell by, for example, including in the viral genome a nucleotide sequence that encodes the EV-directing cassettes for that virus. For example, a vesicular stomatitis virus, or variant thereof, whose genome includes a nucleotide sequence that encodes a pre-miRNA having a sequence that includes: SEQ ID NO: 20, sense miRNA sequence [X], SEQ ID NO: 22, anti-sense miRNA sequence [X′], and SEQ ID NO: 21 enhances EV secretion of the encoded miRNA hairpin (made up of sense and anti-sense sequences [X] and [X′]) when the virus is used to infect a cell.
In one example, a miRNA hairpin that included GTTGGCACCAGCAGCGCAC (SEQ ID NO: 174) as [X] and GTGCGCTGCTGGTGCCAAC (SEQ ID NO: 175) as [X′], and a loop sequence [Y] according to SEQ ID NO: 163 was cloned into a pre-miRNA that included SEQ ID NOs: 39 and 40, and flanking regions [Z] and [Z′] according to SEQ ID NOs: 18 and 19. Together, the resulting cassette included the sequences: SEQ ID NO: 18, followed by SEQ ID NO: 39, followed by SEQ ID NO: 174, followed by SEQ ID NO: 163, followed by SEQ ID NO: 175, followed by SEQ ID NO: 40, and followed by SEQ ID NO: 19. The RNA sequence of SEQ ID NO: 174 is an shRNA that targets Firefly luciferase (shRNA-luciferase). The cassette was cloned into a VSVΔG virus genome, and the virus was used to infect Vero cells. After 24 hpi (hours post-infection), EVs were isolated by differential centrifugation and the total extracellular vesicular RNA was extracted. qPCR analysis indicates that upon its expression from the pre-miRNA backbone, the shRNA-luciferase hairpin was enriched in the extracellular vesicular fraction by a ratio of over 79,000 to 1 (EVs derived from VSV-shRNA-luciferase infected cells: mock infected cells).
In another example, a sequence that encodes the active stem sequence of hsa-miR-1289-1 (sense sequence [X]: UAAAUGCAGACUCUUGGUUUCCA, SEQ ID NO:176; anti-sense sequence [X′]: UGGAGUCCAGGAAUCUGCAUUUU, SEQ ID NO: 177), and a loop sequence [Y] according to SEQ ID NO: 163 was cloned into a cassette based on miR-30b. The cassette based on miR-30b included SEQ ID NOs: 39 and 40, and flanking regions [Z] and [Z′] according to SEQ ID NOs: 18 and 19. Together, the resulting cassette included the sequences: SEQ ID NO: 18, followed by SEQ ID NO: 39, followed by SEQ ID NO: 176 followed by SEQ ID NO: 163, followed by SEQ ID NO: 177, followed by SEQ ID NO: 40, and followed by SEQ ID NO: 19. The hsa-miR-1289 hairpin is a tumor suppressor miRNA. A Vaccinia virus expressing this cassette was used to infect cells. After 48 hpi, EVs were isolated by differential centrifugation and the total extracellular vesicular RNA was extracted. qPCR analysis indicated that the hsa-miR-1289 was expressed from the pre-miRNA, and enriched in the extracellular vesicular fraction. miR-1289 levels were normalized to 18S and levels of mature miR-1289 in mock infected cells was set as 1. A 52.9 fold increase in EVs miR-1289 levels was measured for VV-miR-1289 infected cells over mock infected cells.
Specific Examples of Cassettes Used for Exosome Delivery During Virus Infection
Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5 identified general cassette sequences based on originating miR stem-loop sequences. Appendix C provides specific examples of cassette sequences that include specific [X] and [X′] sequences. The nucleotide sequences in bold correspond to the [A] and [B] sequences, the underlined nucleotide sequences correspond to the [X] and [X′] sequences, and the nucleotide sequence in italics correspond to the loop sequence [Y]. The specific examples shown in Appendix C do not include [Z] or [Z′] sequences, though alternative examples are envisioned with [Z] and [Z′] sequences.
In the preceding description, for purposes of explanation, numerous details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the examples. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details are not required. Accordingly, what has been described is merely illustrative of the application of the described examples and numerous modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings.
Since the above description provides examples, it will be appreciated that modifications and variations can be effected to the particular examples by those of skill in the art. Accordingly, the scope of the claims should not be limited by the particular examples set forth herein, but should be construed in a manner consistent with the specification as a whole.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CA2019/050438 | 4/10/2019 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2019/195936 | 10/17/2019 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8993532 | Hannon et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 20150197749 | Hannon et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20170342410 | Hannon et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2006110688 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| 2012015775 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| 2012044620 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2017054085 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| 2017132552 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| 2018045250 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| 2018213412 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Navqi et al. (Frontiers in Immunology (Mar. 6, 2018) 9:433, pp. 1-16). (Year: 2018). |
| Aguado, et al., “MicroRNA Function is Limited to Cytokine Control in the Acute Response to Virus Infection,” Cell Host & Microbe, Dec. 2015, vol. 18 (6), pp. 714-722. |
| Bitler, et al., “Synthetic Lethality by Targeting EZH2 Methyltransferase Activity in Arid1a-mutated Cancers,” Nature Medicine, Mar. 2015, vol. 21 (3), pp. 231-238. |
| Borden, et al., “Transient Introduction of miR-294 in the Heart Promotes Cardiomyocyte Cell Cycle Reentry After Injury,” Circulation Research, Apr. 2019, vol. 125 (1), pp. 14-25. |
| Chang, et al., “Creating an MiR30-based ShRNA Vector,” Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, Jul. 2013, vol. 7, pp. 631-635. |
| Chen, et al., “In Vivo Delivery of MiRNAS for Cancer Therapy: Challenges and Strategies, ”Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, Jan. 2015, vol. 81, pp. 128-141. |
| Choi, et al., “Multiplexing Seven MiRNA-based ShRNAS to Suppress HIV Replication, ”Molecular Therapy : the Journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, Feb. 2015, vol. 23 (2), pp. 310-320. |
| Edge, et al., “A Let-7 MicroRNA-sensitive Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Demonstrates Tumor-specific Replication,” Molecular Therapy, Aug. 2008, vol. 16 (8), pp. 1437-1443. |
| European Patent Application No. 19784586.0, Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 5, 2022. |
| European Patent Application No. 19784586.0, Partial Supplementary European Search Report dated Feb. 1, 2022. |
| Falcone, et al., “Signaling by Exosomal MicroRNAS in Cancer,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, Dec. 2015, vol. 34 (1), pp. 1-10. |
| Lang, et al., “Mesenchymal Stem Cells as Natural Biofactories for Exosomes Carrying Mir-124a in the Treatment of Gliomas,” Neuro-Oncology, Feb. 2018, vol. 20 (3), pp. 380-390. |
| Guduric-Fuchs, et al., “Selective Extracellular Vesicle-mediated Export of an Overlapping Set of Micromas From Multiple Cell Types,” BMC Genomics, Dec. 2012, vol. 13 (357), pp. 1-14. |
| Grössl, et al., “A Novel Artificial Microma Expressing AAV Vector for Phospholamban Silencing in Cardiomyocytes Improves Ca2+ Uptake Into the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum,” PloS one, Mar. 2014, vol. 9 (3), pp. 1-13. |
| Guse, et al., “Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus for the Treatment of Cancer,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, Feb. 2011, vol. 11 (5), pp. 595-608. |
| Haney, et al., “Exosomes as Drug Delivery Vehicles for Parkinson's Disease Therapy,” Journal of Controlled Release, Mar. 2015, vol. 207, pp. 18-30. |
| Langlois, et al., “In Vivo Delivery of Cytoplasmic RNA Virus-derived MiRNAs,” Molecular Therapy, Feb. 2012, vol. 20 (2), pp. 367-375. |
| Lei, et al., “Combined Expression of MIR-34a and Smac Mediated by Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Synergistically Promote Anti-tumor Effects in Multiple Myeloma,” Scientific Reports, Aug. 2016, vol. 6 (1), pp. 1-11. |
| Pegtel, et al., “Functional Delivery of Viral MiRNAS via Exosomes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Apr. 2010, vol. 107 (14), pp. 6328-6333. |
| Pikor, et al., “Oncolytic Viruses: Exploiting Cancer's Deal With the Devil,” Trends in Cancer, Dec. 2015, vol. 1 (4), pp. 1-12. |
| Rehman, et al., “Into the Clinic: Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC), a First-in-class Intratumoral Oncolytic Viral Therapy,” Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, Sep. 2016, vol. 4 (53), pp. 1-8. |
| Roden, et al., “Novel Determinants of Mammalian Primary Microma Processing Revealed by Systematic Evaluation of Hairpin-containing Transcripts and Human Genetic Variation,” Genome Research, Mar. 2017, vol. 27 (3), pp. 374-384. |
| Rupaimoole, et al., “Microrna Therapeutics: Towards a New Era for the Management of Cancer and Other Diseases,” Nature Reviews: Drug Discovery, Mar. 2017, vol. 16 (3), pp. 203-222. |
| Stojdl et al., “VSV Strains With Defects in Their Ability to Shutdown Innate Immunity Are Potent Systemic Anti-cancer Agents,” Cancer Cell, Oct. 2003, vol. 4 (4), pp. 263-275. |
| Varble, et al., “An in Vivo RNAi Screening Approach to Identify Host Determinants of Virus Replication,” Cell Host & Microbe, Sep. 2013, vol. 14 (3), pp. 346-356. |
| Varble, et al., “Engineered RNA Viral Synthesis of MicroRNAS,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Jun. 2010, vol. 107 (25), pp. 11519-11524. |
| Villarroya-Beltri, et al., “Sumoylated HnRNPA2B1 Controls the Sorting of Mimas Into Exosomes Through Binding to Specific Motifs,” Nature Communications, Dec. 2013, vol. 4 (1), pp. 1-10. |
| Wang, et al., “Widespread Spinal Cord Transduction by Intrathecal Injection of Raav Delivers Efficacious Rnai Therapy for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” Human Molecular Genetics, Feb. 2014, vol. 23 (3), pp. 668-681. |
| Wheatley, et al., “Co-expression of MiRNATargeting the Expression of Perk, but Not Pkr, Enhances Cellular Immunity From an Hiv-1 Env Dna Vaccine,” PloS One, Mar. 2011, vol. 6 (3), pp. 1-12. |
| Zhang, et al., “Exosome and exosomal microRNA: trafficking, sorting, and function,” Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics, Feb. 2015, vol. 13, pp. 17-24. |
| Zomer, et al., “Exosomes: Fit to Deliver Small RNA,” Communicative & Integrative Biology, Sep. 2010, vol. 3 (5), pp. 447-450. |
| International Application No. PCT/CA2019/050438, Written Opinion and International Search Report dated Jul. 12, 2019. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210032662 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62655585 | Apr 2018 | US |
