1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to microscopes with higher resolution with partial spatial superposition in the illumination by an excitation beam and a de-excitation beam and/or a switching beam in a fluorescing sample.
2. Description of Related Art
Methods for increasing the optical resolution in a far-field with diffraction-limited resolution, which methods are based on nonlinear interaction of light with a sample, are known. Among such methods are microscopy with Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,731,588, Ground State Depletion (GSD) as discussed in Hell and Kroug, Appl. Phys. B 60 (1995), pages 495-497, and optical modification (switching) of fluorescent substances as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,064,824 B2.
In both cases, a diffraction-limited distribution of optical light (de-excitation light) is so modified by the diffraction-limited excitation distribution through a nonlinear interaction that the emission of the light can take place only from a sub-region. This sub-region (effectively Point Spread Function: PSF) can thereby be limited in all three spatial directions or only in a lateral direction. Suitable limits of the PSFs are thereby:
Thus, the prior art, which is not so efficient from the viewpoint of the steepness of the gradient, involves the use of phase masks in the pupil of the de-excitation light with radial phase shift (See for example the article written by T. A. Klar, S. Jakobs, M. Dyba, A. Egner, and S. W. Hell, as published in Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 97, page 8206 (2000)) or of phase masks with quadrant-wise phase shift (In the article written by E. Engel et al. in Appl. Phys. B 77, pages 11-17 (2003)).
The use of the spiral masks in the STED microscopy was proposed in Török and P. R. T. Munro, Opt. Expr. 12 (2004), page 3605. However the use of a spiral mask, as described in the aforementioned article, generates neither an excitation distribution that is limited in all spatial directions, nor a distribution that exhibits enlarged depth of focus, as described in the following.
The aim of the invention is to provide a method and microscope with which the corresponding distributions can be generated relatively easily and with greater efficiency (represented by the steepness of the gradients of the distributions).
Compared to generation of the distributions through superposition of several point sources (U.S. Pat. No. 5,866,911 A1), the following solutions are clearly simpler. In addition to that, a more efficient 3D limitation is possible.
The present invention relates to a microscope with higher resolution with partial spatial superposition in the illumination by an excitation beam and a de-excitation beam and/or a switching beam in a fluorescent sample. In the microscope, the light from the sample is deflected. In the excitation beam and/or in the de-excitation and/or switching beam, at least one combination of devices exercising circular and radial influence on the spatial phase is provided.
The present invention also covers a microscopic method accomplishing higher resolution. Under the inventive method, a fluorescent sample is illuminated with an excitation beam and a de-excitation beam and/or a switching beam successively in time. The selected beams are spatially superposed in part, with the spatial phase of the excitation and/or de-excitation and/or switching beam being subjected to circular and radial influence at the same time.
The invention is better understood by reading the following Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawing figures, in which like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout, and in which:
a through 4c graphically show the resulting distributions with de-excitation and the realization according to the first exemplary embodiment shown in
a through 5c graphically show the resulting distribution with the de-excitation according to
a through 6c show the distribution for the excitation in
a through 7c graphically show resulting distributions in the X-Z plane.
a and 8b show the distribution obtained in the prior art under the same conditions, namely with a mask with radial phase shift (
In describing preferred embodiments of the present invention illustrated in the drawings, specific terminology is employed for the sake of clarity. However, the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific terminology so selected, and it is to be understood that each specific element includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose.
Based on the present invention, it is possible to realize the following:
In this way, the phase values are shown with gray scale coding (white=0, black=2π):
R(r)=exp(−jπ) for r<a/√2
S(φ)=exp(−jφ)
SR(r,φ)=R(r)+S(φ)
In the following arrangements, the different excitation and de-excitation beams are shown separately, for example, with reference to STED using short pulses. In this case, the excitation takes place first and the de-excitation takes place thereafter, with time delay, by the stimulated emission as known in the prior art. The remaining excited molecules relax with emission of fluorescence, which is detected.
These arrangements can also be used in other methods for high resolution, such as (A) Ground State Depletion (GSD) (See: S. W. Hell and M. Kroug, Appl. Phys. B 60 (1995) page 495) or (B) switching of dyes (U.S. Pat. No. 7,064,824 B2). In (A), at first the dye is brought into the triplet state through repeated excitation, for which the de-excitation beam is used. The part of the dye remaining in the ground state is then excited by the excitation beam and fluorescence is detected. In (B) the molecules are switched by the de-excitation beam and are thus brought into a non-fluorescent state. Thereafter, the excitation of the molecule takes place with the excitation beam, whereby the molecules remaining in the fluorescent state can emit fluorescent light, which is detected. In both cases, the use of the pulsed light (as in STED) for the excitation and the de-excitation beam is not necessary.
Description of
In
In
The delay must be greater than the coherence length of the source, which can be practically achieved in the case of highly coherent lasers only with fibers. Another possibility of incoherent superposition lies in the use of light with slightly different wavelengths (within the excitation spectrum for fluorescence (GSD) and/or for switching or of an emission spectrum (STED)). This is especially the preferable embodiment in the case of the CW lasers. Thus, for example, for the switching and the excitation of the protein Dronpa, radiations of 488 nm as well as of 477 nm are used. Thus, in the de-excitation beam path in the arrangement of
The image of the pupil must generate a stationary phase distribution in the pupil plane of the objective.
Regardless of the nature of the sample interaction, the excitation and the de-excitation beams arrive at the sample in general one after the other in the course of time. Either the sample is “prepared” with the de-excitation beam and subsequently the prepared state is “polled” by the excitation beam (GSD and switching), or the excitation is modified by a time-delayed de-excitation beam (STED).
With that in mind, incoherent superposition of the excitation and the detection beams is ensured.
Next, the cross sections along the lateral coordinates (horizontal) and the axial coordinates (vertical) are shown for each case, whereby the distributions exhibit rotational symmetry with respect to the axial (optical) axis.
a through 4c show the resulting distributions with de-excitation and the realization according to the first exemplary embodiment shown in
a through 5c show the resulting distribution with the de-excitation according to
a through 6c show the distribution for the excitation in
Simulation Results:
The PSFs (assumed normalized to 1 in equation (1)) used for the switching-off leads to reduction in the excitability (or the excitation) of the dye according to:
A(x, y, z)=exp{−σD·PSFs(x, y, z)} (1)
where σ indicates the cross section of the switching (or of the de-excitation) and D indicates the irradiation energy per unit area. The total PSF obtained from the excitation with a PSFa is then:
PSF(x, y, z)=A(x, y, z)·PSFa(x, y, z)} (2)
Below that, the x-z sections through the PSF for the case of the switchable protein Dronpa are shown (lateral=horizontal, axial=vertical). Thereby, the switching-off with a cross section of 0.07 cm2/mW/s is assumed (See: S. Habuchi et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, page 9511 (2005)).
For irradiation energy of 3 W/cm2/s (that is, for instance, 3 mW in 10 μs focused on 1 μs2), one obtains the distribution as in
For comparison, let the distribution obtained in the prior art under the same conditions, namely with a mask with radial phase shift (
Modifications and variations of the above-described embodiments of the present invention are possible, as appreciated by those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2006 026 204 | May 2006 | DE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5731588 | Hell et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5866911 | Baer | Feb 1999 | A |
| 6555802 | Osipchuk et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 7064824 | Hell | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 20020036824 | Sasaki | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020141052 | Iketaki | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20040207854 | Hell et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080007730 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |