This invention is in the field of optically-based biological or chemical sensors useful for detecting and identifying chemicals such as pollutants, chemical warfare agents, or biochemical matter such as DNA, proteins, or other bio-molecules.
A unique and highly sensitive chemical detection device can be created using guided-mode surface structure hologram optical filters as taught by Hobbs and Cowan in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,791,757 and 6,870,624, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Guided mode surface structure filters produce exceptionally narrow optical resonances that can be disturbed by the accumulation of material depositing on the structure surface. This disturbance is detected as a shift in the wavelength of the light resonating within the structural waveguide. The design of both reflection- and transmission-mode wave-guide resonant structures is further taught by Magnusson in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,216,680, 5,598,300, and 6,154,480, and in the literature by Peng and Morris, “Resonant Scattering from two-dimensional gratings”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 13, No. 5, p. 993, May 1996; Magnusson and Wang, “New Principle for optical filters,” Applied Physics Letters, 61, No. 9, p. 1022, August 1992; and Hobbs, “Laser-Line Rejection or Transmission Filters Based on Surface Structures Built on Infrared Transmitting Materials”, Proceedings SPIE Vol. 5786, Window and Dome Technologies and Materials IX, March 2005.
The utility of employing a surface structure resonator, or SSR, to detect the presence and concentration of organic chemicals has been demonstrated by Hobbs and Cunningham in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2002/0168295 and 2004/0132172, and by Cunningham in “Colorimetric resonant reflection as a direct biochemical assay technique”, Sensors and Actuators B, Vol. 81, 2002.
The wavelength of light that resonates in an SSR device is dependent on the angle of incidence of the light striking the SSR, and the SSR signal must be observed at a specific viewing angle, an angle equal to the angle of incidence of the interrogating light. To use an SSR to detect chemicals in an environment that is a large distance from the environment of the observer, an SSR sensor must be configured to operate on interrogating light that is incident at an angle very close to zero degrees, or normal to the SSR surface. In addition, the SSR is most commonly configured as a narrow-band reflector where the energy returned to the observer will be small compared to the energy in the broadband interrogating light beam. These considerations limit the practical use of an SSR to detect chemicals at distances of more than a few centimeters, and the use of inexpensive flexible materials such as plastic in the fabrication of SSR sensors.
Historically, applications of label-free sensors have relied primarily on bio-molecules such as antibodies, proteins, or nucleic acids. These biologically derived molecules tend to suffer from instability issues, which arise from sensitivity to changes in temperature, chemical environments, and the like. This invention provides for incorporation of robust, durable, selective capture agents such as molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPS) and other organic/inorganic molecules with selective affinity for target molecules.
Typical chemical and biochemical assays used for environmental monitoring require sample collection in the field, followed by field assays (utilizing portable instruments), or return of samples to a central facility for processing. Such assays cannot be performed in remote locations such as challenging terrain, aquatic environments, space, chemical reaction vessels, or bioreactors. Hence, there are practical limitations to the rate and scope of environmental vigilance, due to cost and logistical issues.
There remains an immediate need for a sensor device with the target selectivity and high sensitivity typical of an SSR that is capable of detecting the concentration of chemicals in an environment that is remote from the observer.
An optical device that can efficiently reflect an interrogating light beam back to an observer regardless of the illumination angle is known in the art as a retro-reflector. Retro-reflectors are common elements in street signs and highway lane markers where they serve to reflect the light from a car's headlights back to the driver. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,036,322, Nilsen describes the design and fabrication of retro-reflecting microstructures that can be produced in plastic sheets using conventional high-volume replication methods. One aspect of the present invention involves the use of a reflector, preferably a retro-reflector, with an SSR chemical sensor, to provide a sensitive chemical detection system that can be interrogated from a remote location. High-speed detection is achieved directly without the use of intermediate chemical labels such as fluorescent materials. The invention will find particular use in environmental applications such as the monitoring of the levels of algae-related toxins in lake water, and in military applications such as the remote detection of chemical warfare agents and explosives.
Another aspect of the present invention is directed towards such an SSR chemical sensor that provides a sensitive chemical sensor that can be interrogated from a remote location using an interrogating light beam that strikes the SSR sensor at non-normal incidence.
Another aspect of the present invention is directed towards an array of such SSR chemical sensors that provides a sensitive chemical sensor for a multitude of chemicals.
These aspects are generally achieved by providing a guided-mode SSR filter that is formed of dielectric bodies of various predetermined shapes such as lines, or elliptical or rectangular posts or holes repeated over the surface of a substrate and arranged in a predetermined pattern such as with an asymmetric grating or a symmetric two dimensional array such as a square grid or honeycomb, hexagonal grid. It is noted that the term “body” as used herein may include “holes” filled with air or some other dielectric material. The SSR device is then coated with a chemical capture material, or an array of different chemical capture materials specific to the chemical to be detected, using a variety of conventional chemical application methods. The complete SSR sensor is then located in front of a large-scale reflector, preferably a retro-reflecting device such as a corner cube, or in a preferred embodiment, laminated on top of an array of retro-reflecting microstructures.
In one application, an SSR sensor is integrated with a corner cube retro-reflector and placed in an enclosed high humidity environment. A light beam is directed from a source outside the enclosed environment into the environment containing the retro-reflecting SSR. A measure of the concentration of water molecules in the air within the enclosed environment can be obtained as a shift in the wavelength that resonates with the SSR in response to water condensing on the surface of the SSR. The observation is enabled using the light that transmits through the SSR and is returned to the source point through retro-reflection from the corner cube.
In another application, an SSR sensor is fabricated in plastic and laminated with a retro-reflecting micro-prism array that is also fabricated in one surface of a plastic sheet. The surface structures of the SSR sensor are then coated with a thin layer of material that is designed to chemically bind or adhere to one specific target chemical. Such a material is known as a receptor layer, or capture agent, and can be a MIP layer designed to maintain its receptor function in an aquatic environment. The MIP layer is designed to capture only microcystin, an aquatic cyanobacterial toxin generated by blue-green algae that is hazardous to humans. The retro-reflecting SSR with MIP layer is then placed on the shore of a lake or stream providing a means for monitoring the levels of microcystin in the lake water from a remote location.
In another application, a retro-reflecting SSR system coated with a capture agent specific to TNT can be deployed ahead of a military unit to detect the presence of explosives such as land mines.
These advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following specification and claims.
This invention features an apparatus for remotely detecting the presence and concentration of matter in contact with a surface structure optical filter by observation of a shift in the wavelength of filtered electromagnetic waves, the apparatus comprising a first substrate having a surface relief structure containing at least one dielectric body with at least one physical dimension smaller than the wavelength of the filtered electromagnetic waves, such structures repeated in a one or two dimensional array covering at least a portion of the surface of the first substrate. The surface relief structure are composed of or covered by a material sufficient to form a guided mode resonance filter. There is also a retro-reflecting structure that reflects and redirects the electromagnetic waves transmitted through the first substrate back through the first substrate in a direction substantially parallel to the propagation direction of the filtered electromagnetic waves. When a sample material is deposited on the surface relief structures, an observable shift in the wavelength of the filtered electromagnetic waves is produced that is in proportion to the amount of sample material accumulated.
Also featured in the invention is an apparatus for remotely detecting the concentration of matter in a material layer by observation of a shift in the wavelength of filtered electromagnetic waves, the apparatus comprising a substrate having a surface relief structure containing at least one dielectric body with at least one physical dimension smaller than the wavelength of the filtered electromagnetic waves, such structures repeated in a one or two dimensional array covering at least a portion of the surface of the substrate, a material coating the surface relief structures of the substrate to form a guided mode resonance filter, a material layer over the material coating and which adheres, chemically binds, or chemically reacts to a sample material thereby producing an observable shift in the wavelength of the filtered electromagnetic waves, and a retro-reflecting structure that reflects and redirects the electromagnetic waves transmitted through the first substrate back through the first substrate in a direction substantially parallel to the propagation direction of the filtered electromagnetic waves. The top material layer may be a selective capture layer comprised of biomolecules such as protein, nucleic acids, lipids, saccharides, and other biomolecular species, which have selective affinity for target molecules. The top material layer may be a selective capture layer comprised of organic or inorganic molecules with selective affinity for target molecules. The top material layer may be a selective capture layer comprised of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) with selective affinity for target molecules.
The spacing of the surface relief structures in the arrays may be substantially the same, and less than the wavelength of the filtered electromagnetic waves. The dimensions of and the composition of the surface relief structures in the arrays may produce more than one range of wavelengths of filtered electromagnetic waves. The individual dielectric bodies in the surface relief structures may be arranged in a two dimensional array forming a honeycomb pattern with circular symmetry. The individual dielectric bodies in the surface relief structures may be arranged in a one-dimensional array forming a grating pattern. The individual dielectric bodies in the surface relief structures may be circularly shaped.
The substrate may be made of glass, plastic, or epoxy, for example. The propagation direction of electromagnetic waves resonantly reflected from the surface structures, or transmitted through the substrate, is preferably not altered by the accumulation of sample material on the surface structures. The retro-reflecting structure may be configured as a single corner-cube with dimensions much larger than the area illuminated by the electromagnetic waves. Alternatively, the retro-reflecting structure may be configured as a one- or two-dimensional array of micro prisms.
The individual dielectric bodies comprising the surface texture may have conical, elliptical, square, rectangular, sinusoidal, hexagonal, or octagonal cross sectional profiles. Alternatively, the individual dielectric bodies comprising the surface texture may be lines with a width less than the wavelength of the filtered electromagnetic waves and a length substantially equivalent to the substrate dimension, repeated in an array with a spacing less than the wavelength of the filtered electromagnetic waves. The dielectric bodies comprising the surface relief structures may be comprised of a material selected from the group consisting of zinc sulfide, titanium oxide, tantalum oxide, and silicon nitride. The surface relief structures may comprise a conductive material. The apparatus may further comprise means for applying a voltage to the surface relief structure to produce an electric field. The apparatus may further comprise a second resonant structure proximate the first substrate to provide a static reference signal which can be used to determine the difference between a shifted signal due to a deposited material layer and a shifted signal due to varying ambient conditions.
The sample material may comprise an organic substance or an inorganic substance, or a biochemically-derived substance.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
Device 10, shown in the cross sectional diagram of
The chemical sensing surface structure optical filter is built upon a platform or substrate 12 with an optical index of refraction n2. The filter consists of a uniform material layer 14 with refractive index n3 and a surface relief structure 16 configured as a close-packed two-dimensional array of columns or posts with a rectangular cross sectional profile also made of a material with refractive index n3. The posts could have other cross-sectional shapes set forth above, such as circular. The surface relief structure can be composed of a conductive material. This allows the application of an electric field through the provision of a voltage source suitably connected to the device. The space between the posts 16 is filled with a material with refractive index n1. The posts 16 are repeated in an array across the surface of the uniform material layer 14 on substrate 12 with a periodic spacing, or pitch of Λ. The array of posts 16 may be arranged in a honeycomb pattern with circular symmetry, for example. To serve as a chemical sensing optical filter, the periodic spacing must be less than the wavelength of the light to be filtered. Such a grating is referred to as ‘sub-wavelength’ in the art. When a material layer 18 with refractive index n4 begins to accumulate on the surface structures 16, the wavelength of light that resonates with the structures 16 is shifted in an amount that is proportional to the amount of material that has deposited on the structures, and is reflected as light beam 22. In addition, the surface structure filter must be fabricated with materials that form a waveguide. This requires that the refractive index of the material layers are such that n2<n3>n1, and n3≧n4.
The performance of the chemical sensing surface structure optical filter design 10 is simulated using a rigorous vector diffraction calculation. The software simulation predicts the spectral reflectance and transmittance of broad spectrum light through a user defined three-dimensional surface texture composed of multiple structured and uniform materials. The calculation accounts for arbitrary polarization states and light incident angles. Measured data for the optical constants of a library of materials is included.
One large retro-reflecting corner cube is not practical in many applications. An array of retro-reflecting microstructures fabricated in a thin substrate can provide the same function as a single large corner cube. Such a corner cube array can be fabricated in one surface of a substrate such as plastic, with the SSR sensor structures fabricated in the opposite surface.
As described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,791,757 and 6,870,624, a secondary resonant structure can be embedded below the surface structure upon which a chemical deposits to provide a static reference wavelength that is not disturbed by the accumulation of the target chemical. By observing an increase in the separation of the two spectral components reflected by the doubly resonant structure, environmental factors such as temperature that effect the resonant wavelength, can be eliminated. Such a self referencing sensor design combined with a retro-reflecting microstructure prism array, is shown as device 70 in
Asymmetric resonant structures can also be used to further isolate the chemical sensing signal onto channels that are defined by the polarization state of the illuminating light.
For a cross section taken in the P-polarization direction, device 90 appears identical to the cross section of device 30 of
Although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not others, this is for convenience only as the features may be combined in other manners in accordance with the invention. Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims:
This application claims priority of Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/574,494, filed on May 25, 2004 entitled “Surface Relief Structure”.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3857641 | Gass | Dec 1974 | A |
4126396 | Hartmann et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
6239875 | Verheijen | May 2001 | B1 |
6870624 | Hobbs et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7118710 | Cunningham | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20030027328 | Cunningham et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030210396 | Hobbs et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040132172 | Cunningham et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060285116 | Metcalfe | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070097371 | Parker | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070036680 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60574494 | May 2004 | US |