Microstructures including hydrophilic particles

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6780491
  • Patent Number
    6,780,491
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 21, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 24, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A substrate is placed on a charging surface, to which a first voltage is applied. Etch-resistant dry particles are placed in a cup in a nozzle to which a second voltage, less than the first voltage, is applied. A carrier gas is directed through the nozzle, which projects the dry particles out of the nozzle toward the substrate. The particles pick up a charge from the potential applied to the nozzle and are electrostatically attracted to the substrate. The particles adhere to the substrate, where they form an etch mask. The substrate is etched and the particles are removed. Emitter tips for a field emission display may be formed in the substrate.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to the fabrication of microstructures on a substrate and, in particular, to processes for fabricating masks for the fabrication of microstructures, such as emitter tips for field emission displays, on a substrate.




The fabrication of micron and sub-micron structures or patterns into the surface of a substrate typically involves a lithographic process to transfer patterns from a mask onto the surface of the material. Such fabrication is of particular importance in the electronics industry, where the material is often a semiconductor.




Generally, the surface of the substrate is coated with a resist, which is a radiation-sensitive material. A projecting radiation, such as light or X-rays, is then passed through a mask onto the resist. The portions of the resist that are exposed to the radiation are chemically altered, changing their susceptibility to dissolution by a solvent. The resist is then developed by treating the resist with the solvent, which dissolves and removes the portions that are susceptible to dissolution by the solvent. This leaves a pattern of exposed substrate corresponding to the mask.




Next, the substrate is exposed to a liquid or gaseous etchant, which etches those portions that are not masked by the remaining resist. This leaves a pattern in the substrate that corresponds to the mask. Finally, the remaining resist is stripped off the substrate, leaving the substrate surface with the etched pattern corresponding to the mask.




Another method useful for fabricating certain types of devices involves the use of a wet dispense of colloidal particles. An example of this technique is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,407,695, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. With the wet dispense method, a layer of colloidal particles contained in solution is disposed over the surface of a substrate. Typically, this is done though a spin-coating process, in which the substrate is spun at a high rate of speed while the colloidal solution is applied to the surface. The spinning of the substrate distributes the solution across the surface of the substrate.




The particles themselves serve as an etchant, or deposition, mask. If the substrate is subject to ion milling, each particle will mask off an area of the substrate directly underneath it. Therefore, the etched pattern formed in the substrate surface is typically an array of posts or columns corresponding to the pattern of particles.




Although the wet dispense method has some advantages over the lithographic process, it has its own deficiencies. For example, the spinning speed must be precisely controlled. If the spin speed is too low, then a multilayer coating will result, instead of the desired monolayer of colloidal particles. On the other hand, if the spin speed is too high, then gaps will occur in the coating. Further, owing to the very nature of the process, a radial nonuniformity is difficult to overcome with this method.




Another problem with colloidal coating methods is that they require precise control of the chemistry of the colloidal solution so that the colloidal particles will adhere to the substrate surface. For example, if the colloidal particles are suspended in water, the pH of the water must be controlled to generate the required surface chemistry between the colloidal particles and the substrate. However, it is not always desirable to alter the pH or other chemical properties of the colloidal solution. Also, if the colloidal solution fails to wet the surface of the substrate, the particle coating may not be uniform.




In addition, wet dispense methods tend to be expensive and prone to contaminating the substrate.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the present invention, dry particles coat a substrate, forming a pattern for etching the substrate. In a preferred embodiment, both the substrate and the particles are electrically charged, so as to create an electrostatic attraction. The dry particles are projected through a nozzle onto the substrate with a carrier gas that is not reactive with the particles or the substrate, such as nitrogen or a chlorofluorocarbon. Preferably, the dry particles are beads made from latex or glass.




The dry particles are etch resistant and serve as an etching mask. The substrate is etched, leaving columns under the particles. The columns can be further refined, for example, by shaping them into emitter tips for a field emission display.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




For a more complete understanding of the invention, reference is made to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for use with the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a three-dimensional view of a substrate on which particles have been dispensed according to an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 3A

is a cross-sectional view of a substrate on which particles have been dispensed according to an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 3B

is a cross-sectional view of the substrate shown in

FIG. 3A

after patterning of the hardmask.





FIG. 3C

is a cross-sectional view of the substrate shown in

FIG. 3A

after etching.





FIG. 3D

is a cross-sectional view of the substrate shown in

FIG. 3A

after removal of the hardmask.





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view of a substrate on which particles have been dispensed according to a second embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 5

is a cross-sectional view of a substrate after processing according to a third embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 6

is a cross-sectional view of a substrate after removal of the hardmask according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




As shown in

FIG. 1

, dispensing apparatus


120


includes a charging surface


100


, which is connected to a voltage source


116


. A substrate


102


is placed on top of charging surface


100


. When surface


100


is charged by surface voltage source


116


, substrate


102


may also be charged. Preferably, substrate


102


is a silicon substrate. However, other substrates may also be used.




Nozzle


104


is mounted above substrate


102


, with the exit end


126


of nozzle


104


directed toward the upper surface


112


of substrate


102


. Nozzle


104


is connected to nozzle voltage source


118


. Surface voltage source


116


and nozzle voltage source


118


bring substrate


102


and nozzle


104


to different voltages to create adequate electrostatic attraction between particles projected through nozzle


104


and substrate


102


. Preferably, surface voltage source


116


brings substrate


102


to a potential approximately 5000 to 80,000 volts above (or below) the potential to which nozzle voltage source


118


brings nozzle


104


.




Nozzle


104


, substrate


102


, and charging surface


100


are enclosed by walls


114


of dispensing apparatus


120


, to prevent contamination of substrate


102


. Laminar or stagnant air or another gas fills dispensing apparatus


120


.




Pressurized gas container


108


is connected to nozzle


104


by line


106


. Container


108


contains carrier gas


122


. Dry particles


110


are held in cup-shaped holder


124


within nozzle


104


. Alternatively, dry particles


110


could be injected into nozzle


104


through line


106


or through a separate line.




In a preferred embodiment, dry particles


110


are etch-resistant beads made of glass or latex. For example, the particles could be polystyrene latex microspheres manufactured by IDC, Inc. The microspheres may be hydrophilic or hydrophobic. In a preferred embodiment, hydrophilic microspheres are formed by a carboxylate modified latex with a diameter of approximately 1.0 micron or hydrophobic microspheres are formed from zwitterionic amidine carboxyl latex with a diameter of approximately 0.87 micron. Alternatively, the dry particles may be silicon dioxide beads, such as those manufactured by Bangs Laboratories having a diameter of approximately 1.0 micron. Preferably, carrier gas


122


is not reactive with dry particles


110


or with substrate


102


. For example, carrier gas


122


could be nitrogen or a chlorofluorocarbon, such as freon.




In operation, carrier gas


122


flows into nozzle


104


, and then flows out the exit end


126


, carrying with it dry particles


110


. Preferably, dry particles


110


are between approximately 0.5 and 1.5 microns in diameter and the openings in nozzle


104


are on the order of 200 microns in diameter. More generally, dry particles


110


are typically between approximately 0.1 and 2.0 microns in diameter. The potential on nozzle


104


imparts a charge on dry particles


110


leaving nozzle


104


. Consequently, dry particles


110


are electrostatically attracted to the upper surface


112


of substrate


102


.




In one embodiment, a brief burst or “puff” of gas pressure from container


108


through line


106


is used to carry dry particles


110


out of holder


124


and out of the exit end of nozzle


104


. Preferably, the gas pressure is between about 40 and 100 psi. For example, the gas pressure could be 80 psi. Generally, the puff lasts between about 0.01 and 2 seconds. Preferably, the puff lasts for between 0.1 and 1 second.




The currents formed by the carrier gas


122


leaving nozzle


104


cause dry particles


110


to be approximately evenly distributed in a region


126


(depicted approximately in

FIG. 1

with dotted lines) above substrate


102


. Also, it is preferable that the particles do not aggregate as they are projected from nozzle


104


, as this could result in unevenly sized masking areas. Similarly, it is preferable that dry particles


110


form a monolayer on the upper surface


112


of substrate


102


.




Electrostatic attraction from substrate


102


and gravity then cause dry particles


110


to settle approximately evenly onto the upper surface


112


of substrate


102


. The settling time depends in part on the size of the particles, the distance from the exit end of nozzle


104


to the upper surface


112


of substrate


102


, and the amount of electrostatic force. Typically, the settling time is between about 20 and 30 seconds.




When used to manufacture emitters on substrates for use in field emission displays, the dry particles are etch-resistant beads


200


that are distributed onto the upper surface


112


of substrate


102


, as shown in FIG.


2


. The spacing between the beads


200


may be controlled by varying the pressure of the carrier gas, the size of the nozzle, the electrostatic charge between the nozzle and the substrate, and the distance between the nozzle and the substrate. For example, it has been found that a pressure of 35 psi, passed through a 500 micron nozzle having a 0.5 ounce dose of particles, wherein the nozzle is at 5000 volts and the substrate is at 0 volts and the nozzle is 300 millimeters above the substrate, will tend to cause the particles to be evenly distributed at a density of approximately 40,000 particles per square millimeter.




As shown in cross-section in

FIG. 3A

, substrate


102


has an upper surface


112


, on which have been disposed etch-resistant dry beads


200


. In this embodiment, substrate


102


is formed of silicon and the upper surface


112


is a silicon dioxide layer formed on the silicon. Upper surface


112


serves as a hardmask.




After applying the beads


200


, upper surface


112


is etched, using, for example, an anisotropic plasma etch, such as CHF


3


/CF


4


/He, or other known etchant. The portions of upper surface


112


that are covered by beads


200


are not etched by the beam. After the etching, columns


212


remain in upper surface


112


under each of the beads


200


, as shown in FIG.


3


B.




The substrate under columns


212


may then be etched to form emitter tips


202


through chemical etching, oxidation, or other techniques known in the art. The resulting emitter tips


202


are shown in FIG.


3


C.




After the emitter tips


202


are formed, columns


212


and beads


200


are removed, as shown in FIG.


3


D. This can be done with an HF-based wet etchant for oxide based beads and columns. Alternatively, beads


200


may be removed after columns


212


are formed in the upper surface, but before forming emitter tips


202


. This may be accomplished by immersion in an ultrasonic bath of DI for 10 minutes at room temperature.





FIG. 4

shows another embodiment of the invention, in which the dry particles are melted in an oven after they have been disposed onto the silicon dioxide upper surface


112


of substrate


102


. The resulting particles


220


are correspondingly larger in diameter than the as-deposited beads. The processing can then continue as described above.




After the emitter tips are formed, the substrate


102


may receive further processing, as shown in FIG.


5


. For example, the silicon substrate


102


may be oxidized to sharpen the tips and then additional layers may be deposited and etched to form insulators


206


between each emitter


204


and gate electrode


208


.




Although the above process has been described with the emitters formed in a silicon substrate, it is understood that the substrate could be a suitable layer deposited on top of an insulator. For example, with a silicon-on-glass process, the emitters


202


would be formed in the silicon


230


on top of the glass insulator


232


, as shown in FIG.


6


.




While there have been shown and described examples of the present invention, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Accordingly, the invention is limited only by the following claims and equivalents thereto.



Claims
  • 1. A microstructure comprising:a substrate; and a plurality of etch-resistant dry particles, at least some of which particles comprise hydrophilic particles, each particle separated from any other particle disposed on a top surface of the substrate.
  • 2. A microstructure as in claim 1, wherein the substrate includes a layer coating on at least a portion of the top surface of the substrate and the plurality of dry particles is discontinuously disposed on top of the layer.
  • 3. A microstructure as in claim 1, wherein the plurality of dry particles is electrostatically held to the substrate.
  • 4. A microstructure comprising:a substrate; a plurality of etch-resistant dry particles discontinuously disposed on a top surface of the substrate; and wherein the substrate includes a layer coating a least a portion of the top surface of the substrate and the plurality of dry particles is discontinuously disposed on top of the layer and wherein the plurality of dry particles includes a plurality of hydrophilic particles.
  • 5. A microstructure comprising:a substrate; and a plurality of etch-resistant dry particles, at least some of which particles comprise hydrophilic particles, disposed on a top surface of the substrate and wherein the particles are distributed having a density of approximately 40,000 particles per square millimeter.
  • 6. A microstructure comprising:a substrate; and a monolayer of separated etch-resistant dry particles, at least some of which particles comprise hydrophilic particles, each particle being about 0.5 to about 1.5 microns in diameter.
  • 7. A microstructure comprising:a substrate; and a plurality of etch-resistant dry particles, at least some of which particles comprise hydrophilic particles, electrostatically held to a top surface of the substrate.
  • 8. A microstructure comprising:a substrate of a first material and with defined emitter tips extending from an upper surface of the substrate, and wherein columns made of a material different than that of the substrate are positioned above the emitter tips; and particles positioned above the columns, at least some of the particles comprising hydrophilic particles.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 09/120,558 filed on Jul. 22, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,110,394, which is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 08/764,756 filed on Dec. 12, 1996 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,817,373 issued on Oct. 6, 1998, expressly incorporated herewith by reference.

GOVERNMENT RIGHTS

This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. DABT63-93-C-0025 awarded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). The Government has certain rights in this invention.

US Referenced Citations (15)
Number Name Date Kind
3556255 Lomax, Jr. Jan 1971 A
3895127 Comizzoli Jul 1975 A
4407695 Deckman et al. Oct 1983 A
4664748 Ueno et al. May 1987 A
4715989 Sullivan et al. Dec 1987 A
4806202 Tang et al. Feb 1989 A
5312514 Kumar May 1994 A
5399238 Kumar Mar 1995 A
5411630 Nagase et al. May 1995 A
5503880 Matschke Apr 1996 A
5510156 Zhao Apr 1996 A
5588894 Jin et al. Dec 1996 A
5665422 Endo et al. Sep 1997 A
5676853 Alwan Oct 1997 A
5945213 Nagaike et al. Aug 1999 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
362152676 Jul 1987 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Advanced Display Systems, Inc., Richardson, Texas, “ASDM-05 Automatic Spacer Distributor Machine,” No Date. (As cited in the parent application, now U.S. patent No. 6,110,394, and grandparent application, now U.S. patent No. 5,817,373).
Thesis by Mark Allen Gilmore, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, Jul. 30, 1992, “The Application of Field Emitter Arrays to Gaseous Ion Production,” pp. 1-107.