The present invention relates to systems for repairing metal components, such as gas turbine engine components. In particular, the present invention relates to microwave brazing systems for repairing metal components.
Superalloys of nickel, cobalt, and iron, single crystal or equiaxed, are typically employed in gas turbine engine components due to the high mechanical strengths and creep resistances obtained with such alloys. Because gas turbine engine components are exposed to extreme temperatures and pressures, high mechanical strengths and creep resistances are required to preserve the integrity of the engine over the course of operation. However, over time, exposed portions of the components are subject to wear, cracking, and other degradations, which can lead to decreases in operational efficiencies.
Due to economic factors, it is common practice in the aerospace industry to restore turbine engine components rather than replace them. Such restorations desirably restore damaged regions of the engine components to their original dimensions. Engine cracks are typically repaired with brazing operations, which subject the single crystal alloys of the engine components to high temperatures (e.g., 1200° C./2200° F.) for extended durations (e.g., 10 hours). Exposure to the high temperatures for the extended durations, however, reduces the low-temperature (e.g., 815° C.-870° C./1500° F.-1600° F.) creep resistances of the single crystal alloys. This is believed to be due to coarsening of the gamma prime (γ′) phases of the single crystal alloys, which is measurable by increases in the average particle sizes of the γ′ phases. The reduction of the low-temperature creep resistances can cause the alloy structures of the engine components to creep under the applied temperatures and pressures during operation, thereby also reducing operational efficiencies.
One technique for restoring engine components that substantially preserves the low-temperature creep resistances of single crystal alloys involves microwave brazing. Microwave brazing uses microwave-wavelength radiation to melt and fuse a brazing alloy with the base material of the damaged engine component. The microwave brazing process reduces the duration and temperature that the base material is exposed to, thereby substantially preserving the low-temperature creep resistances of the single crystal alloys. A microwave brazing process is typically performed in a brazing chamber under vacuum to provide a uniform braze and to reduce the risk of generating glow discharges and plasmas. However, pressure gauges used to measure the reduced pressure within the brazing chamber are sensitive to the microwaves used in the microwave brazing process. This may provide erroneous pressure measurements during the microwave brazing process, thereby reducing the ability to obtain the desired vacuum environment. As such, there is a need for a system capable of providing accurate pressure measurements during microwave brazing processes.
The present invention relates to a microwave filter for use with a microwave brazing system having a brazing chamber, a vacuum line, and a pressure gauge located proximate the vacuum line. The microwave filter includes a baffle plate configured to be mounted in an opening between the brazing chamber and the pressure gauge, where the baffle plate includes a first face, a second face that opposes the first face, and a plurality of openings through the first face and the second face. The microwave filter further includes a plurality of hollow pipes extending from the second face of the baffle plate at the openings, where the plurality of hollow pipes are configured to substantially prevent the transmission of microwaves from the brazing chamber to the pressure gauge, and are further configured to allow gas to flow between the brazing chamber and the vacuum line.
Brazing chamber 12 is the portion of system 10 that retains one or more metal components (not shown) during a microwave brazing process, and includes chamber wall 20 and door 22. Chamber wall 20 is a metallic casing (e.g., steel casing) that provides an enclosed environment for the microwaves during the microwave brazing process, and includes waveguide port 24 and vacuum entrance 26. Waveguide port 24 is a first opening through chamber wall 20 that provides access to waveguide 14 for receiving the generated microwaves from the microwave generator. Vacuum entrance 26 is a second opening in chamber wall 20 that provides access to vacuum line 16, and, in the embodiment shown in
Waveguide 14 is a waveguide that interconnects brazing chamber 12 (at waveguide port 24) and the microwave generator. While illustrated with a rectangular geometry, waveguide 14 may alternatively exhibit different geometries (e.g., rectangular and circular geometries). Waveguide 14 allows the microwave generator to provide the microwaves to brazing chamber 12 for repairing the metal components with the microwave brazing process. Examples of suitable microwave generators for use with system 12 include systems configured to generate microwaves having frequencies of about 2.45 gigahertz (e.g., magnetron microwave generators).
Vacuum line 16 is a purge line for removing gases from brazing chamber 12 and includes conduit 30, pressure gauges 32 and 34, diffusion pump 36, and mechanical pumps 38 and 40. Conduit 30 is a conduit (i.e., rigid or flexible) having a first end secured to chamber wall 20 at vacuum entrance 30, and a second end secured to diffusion pump 36 with a gate valve. Pressure gauges 32 and 34 are gauges (e.g., pirani and cold cathode gauges) secured to conduit 30, and are configured to measure the pressure within conduit 30. In alternative embodiments, vacuum line 16 may include a different number of pressure gauges such that system 10 includes at least one pressure gauge to measure the pressure within vacuum line 16. Diffusion pump 36 and mechanical pumps 38 and 40 are pumps configured to purge gases from interior region 28 of brazing chamber 12 via conduit 30. Diffusion pump 36 and mechanical pumps 38 and 40 are desirably in signal communication with pressure gauges 32 and 34 via one or more process control loops (not shown), which allows pressure gauges 32 and 34 to control diffusion pump 36 and mechanical pumps 38 and 40 based on the measured pressure within conduit 30.
Microwave filter 18 is a filter disposed through vacuum entrance 26, and is configured to substantially prevent microwaves located in interior region 28 from entering conduit region 42. This prevents the microwaves used in the microwave brazing process from interfering with pressure measurements of pressure gauges 32 and 34. Microwave filter 18 includes baffle plate 42 and hollow pipes 44, where baffle plate 42 is the portion of microwave filter 18 secured to chamber wall 20, and hollow pipes 44 are supported by baffle plate 42 in a cantilevered manner within conduit 30. As discussed below, hollow pipes 44 are configured to allow gases to flow from interior region 28 of brazing chamber 12 to conduit 30. As such, the pressure within conduit 30 is the same as the pressure of interior region 28. This allows pressure gauges 32 and 34 to effectively measure the pressure within interior region 28 while being isolated from the microwaves located within interior region 28. While microwave filter 18 is disposed at vacuum entrance 26 in the embodiment shown in
During a brazing process, door 22 is opened and a metal component containing a brazing alloy (not shown) is inserted within interior region 28. Examples of suitable metal components, brazing alloys, and techniques for applying the brazing alloys for a microwave brazing process are discussed in Garimella, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0071053, which is hereby incorporated in full by reference. Door 22 is then closed, and the gases (e.g., air) are then pumped from interior region 28 of brazing chamber 12 with diffusion pump 36 and mechanical pumps 38 and 40. Pressure gauges 32 and 34 measure the pressure within conduit 30 and identify when a desired pressure is obtained. As discussed above, performing the microwave brazing process under reduced pressure (e.g., vacuum) provides a uniform braze to the metal component and reduces the risk of generating glow discharges and plasmas. Examples of suitable pressures for performing the microwave brazing process include about 13 millipascals (about 10−4 Torr) or less, with more particularly suitable pressures including about 1.3 millipascals (about 10−5 Torr) or less.
After the desired reduced pressure is obtained, pressure gauges 32 and 34 continue to measure the pressure within conduit 30, which corresponds to the pressure within interior region 28. If the pressure within interior region 28 and conduit 30 changes due to the microwave brazing process, pressure gauges 32 and 34 desirably adjust the pumping intensities of diffusion pump 36 and/or mechanical pumps 38 and 40 to stabilize the pressure at the desired reduced pressure.
The microwave generator then emits microwaves to interior region 28 of brazing chamber 12 via waveguide 14 and waveguide port 24 to initiate the microwave brazing process. The microwaves heat the metal component and the brazing alloy as discussed in Garimella, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0071053, thereby allowing the brazing alloy to interdiffuse into the base material of the metal component. Upon entrance to brazing chamber 12, the microwaves bounce off metallic obstructions, such as the metal component, the brazing alloy, chamber wall 20, and door 22. As such, portions of the reflected microwaves attempt to enter conduit 30 via vacuum entrance 26. However, as discussed below, microwave filter 18 substantially prevents the microwaves from entering conduit 30. As used herein, the term “substantially prevents” with respect to the flux of microwaves across microwave filter 18 refers to less than about 1% of the microwaves penetrating through microwave filter 18. Such levels of microwave penetration do not provide observable interferences of pressure measurements with pressure gauges 32 and 34.
Substantially preventing the microwaves entering conduit 30 correspondingly prevents the microwaves from interfering with pressure gauges 32 and 34. If substantial concentrations of microwaves were otherwise allowed to contact pressure gauges, such as pirani gauges and cold cathode gauges, the microwaves may disrupt the pressure measurements, thereby providing erroneous signals to the process control loops controlling diffusion pump 36 and mechanical pumps 38 and 40. For example, a pirani gauge typically incorporates a metallic wire that is heated with an electrical current and is cooled by the gas in a chamber, where the rate of cooling is dependent on the concentration of the gas in the chamber. If the metallic wire is exposed to the microwaves, the microwaves may heat the metallic wire, thereby providing a false temperature reading indicating that the pressure is lower than the actual pressure within conduit 30.
Similarly, a cold cathode gauge measures electrical ions produced when the gas in a chamber is bombarded with electrons, where the number of electrical ions produced is dependent on the concentration of the gas in the chamber. Microwave interference with the cold cathode gauge may result in false identification of electrical ions, which indicates that the pressure is greater than the actual pressure within conduit 30. Accordingly, microwave filter 18 allows pressure gauges 32 and 34 to effectively measure the pressure within brazing chamber 12, while also substantially preventing the microwaves from entering vacuum line 16, thereby preventing interference with pressure gauges 32 and 34. As a result, the pressure within brazing chamber 12 may be accurately measured during the microwave brazing process.
Hollow pipes 44 are a plurality of elongated, hollow pipes extending from inner rear face 46. As discussed above, hollow pipes 46 allow the passage of gases from brazing chamber 12 (shown in
As used herein with respect to a pipe of a microwave filter (e.g., hollow pipes 44 of microwave filter 18), the term “diameter” refers to the average inner diameter of the pipe, where the average inner diameter is taken along the length of the pipe. The actual dimensions of hollow pipes 44 may vary depending on multiple factors, such as the size of conduit 30 and the number of hollow pipes 44. In the embodiment shown in
Examples of suitable length-to-diameter ratios for each of hollow pipes 44 include ratios of at least about 6-to-1, with particularly suitable length-to-diameter ratios including ratios of at least about 10-to-1, and with even more particularly suitable length-to-diameter ratios including ratios of at least about 20-to-1. Examples of suitable lengths for each of hollow pipes 44 from inner rear face 46 range from about 5 centimeters to about 50 centimeters, with particularly suitable lengths ranging from about 10 centimeters to about 20 centimeters. While microwave filter 18 is shown in
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/999,961, filed on Dec. 7, 2007, and which claims priority to Singapore Patent Application No. 200717210-9, filed on Oct. 26, 2007, and entitled “Microwave Filter and Microwave Brazing System Thereof”, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3020645 | Copson | Feb 1962 | A |
4026677 | Galasso et al. | May 1977 | A |
4034454 | Galasso et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4034906 | Carlson et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4285459 | Baladjanian et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4768924 | Carrier et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5004952 | Ikes et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5284290 | Moore et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5476363 | Freling et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5788823 | Warnes et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5989733 | Warnes et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6054693 | Barmetz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6129991 | Warnes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6296447 | Rigney et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306277 | Strangman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6387541 | Gray et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395406 | Sangeeta | May 2002 | B1 |
6428602 | Rosenzweig et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6530971 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531005 | Bezerra et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6609894 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6685431 | Hiskes | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6921014 | Hasz et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6935840 | Romani et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7023307 | Dooley et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7051435 | Subramanian et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7073247 | Rowe et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7121791 | Friedl et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140952 | Juneau et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7157114 | Ackerman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20010025782 | Yamaguchi et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20030200835 | Malie et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040050913 | Philip | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040169063 | Stueber et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060042082 | Minor et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060049236 | Minor et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071053 | Garimella | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060242816 | Magdy | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070087208 | Ng et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
The International Search Report mailed Feb. 1, 2013 for Singapore Application No. 201105399-8. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120241444 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11999961 | Dec 2007 | US |
Child | 13484383 | US |