Passive load pull systems have been widely used to characterize microwave devices. Load pull involves measuring a Device Under Test (DUT) under controlled conditions, including controlled impedances seen by the DUT. The controlled impedances may include the impedance on any port of the DUT, and they may be at the fundamental operating frequency or at a harmonic or intermodulation frequency. A typical load pull measurement would measure the DUT performance at multiple impedances to show the effect of impedance on the DUT performance. Some other conditions that may be controlled and/or varied include frequency, power level, bias values, or temperature.
In this document, impedance, reflection, reflection coefficient, or gamma are all used as general terms to describe the radio frequency (RF) termination seen at an RF port. They are functions of the signal coming out of an RF port and the signal at the same frequency coming into the port. For example, gamma is a term meaning reflection coefficient, and the reflection coefficient at the load port of the DUT at frequency f can be defined as:
Reflection coefficient is related to impedance by the expression
where Z is the impedance and F is the reflection coefficient. Both terms contain the same information, so that if one is known, the other is also known. Therefore, in this document these terms will be used interchangeably. Also, the terms “RF port” and “reference plane” are used interchangeably in the context of impedance control.
In a load pull system, one RF signal is typically used to drive the input of the DUT, and the measurement instruments of the load pull system will typically measure the signals coming out of the DUT at each DUT port, including the reflected signal at the DUT input. If the DUT is non-linear, the output signals may include signals at frequencies other than that of the input drive signal, including harmonic frequencies, intermodulation frequencies, or other frequencies. In this case, the measurement instruments may be setup to measure the signals at each output frequency of interest.
A load pull system works by setting a specified impedance seen by the DUT, and then measuring signals to determine the effect of that impedance. In general, multiple impedances, at different DUT ports or different DUT output frequencies, may be set. Setting an impedance means creating a reflected signal returning to the DUT. The reflected signal will have a specific amplitude and phase relative to the output signal from the DUT.
A “passive tuner” controls the impedance at a reference plane with a passive reflection. This means that it reflects a portion of a signal coming out of a port back into that port. It controls the amplitude or phase of the reflected signal by changing RF hardware settings. The maximum reflection is limited by the physical hardware and losses between the tuner and the reference plane.
An “active tuner” controls an impedance at a reference plane by feeding (or injecting) a signal back to that reference plane with a specific amplitude and phase relative to the signal coming out of that reference plane. The amplitude and phase of the injected signal relative to the signal coming out of the DUT determines the impedance seen by the DUT. The injected signal is generated and amplified external to the DUT. Thus, the impedance seen by the DUT will be based on the “active” signal fed back to the DUT. The active tuner is said to be operating, or controlling the impedance, at the frequency of the “active” injection signal. In principle, the maximum effective reflection can be up to or even greater than unity. In practice, this is limited by the amount of power generated by the measurement system that can be fed back to the DUT to synthesize that impedance.
Active tuning load pull systems typically use two or more RF signals. In addition to the drive signal, an active load pull system works by injecting a separate signal at a DUT output frequency back into the DUT instead of passively reflecting the signal coming out of the DUT. The frequency of the injected signal is a measurement frequency, and may be any frequency where the DUT has an output. More than two signals are used if more than one frequency or more than one DUT port needs to be tuned simultaneously.
The additional signals used for active load pull have generally been created using RF signal sources which are phase locked to the RF source providing the driving signal to the DUT. This guarantees that the frequency of the two signals (the one coming out of the DUT, and the one injected back into the DUT) will be the same frequency. The phase lock loop circuit always creates some phase jitter, but this is often insignificant when the signal is phase locked at the measurement frequency.
When the measurement frequency is extended to millimeter wave frequencies, RF sources tend to be limited and expensive. Amplitude control is possible, but phase control is often not available or is very expensive.
Features and advantages of the disclosure will readily be appreciated by persons skilled in the art from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the drawing wherein:
In the following detailed description and in the several figures of the drawing, like elements are identified with like reference numerals. The figures are not to scale, and relative feature sizes may be exaggerated for illustrative purposes.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention solve the aforementioned problems by doing the amplitude and phase control at low frequencies, and then upconverting the signal to the millimeter wave measurement frequencies to do active tuning at millimeter wave frequencies. RF sources at low frequencies are much more common and economical, and both amplitude control and phase control are much simpler and more economical to implement.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention comprise a load pull system configured for tuning gamma at a millimeter wave frequency F1 using amplitude and phase control at a subfrequency F2. The subfrequency F2 is then upconverted to the frequency of interest F1 using a millimeter wave extender or multiplier or mixer. Gamma control at frequency F1 can be achieved by changing amplitude and phase of the RF signal at frequency F2 which is a lower frequency than F1.
RF Source 21A produces the output-side injection signal, and is set to the same frequency and phase locked to RF Source 11. The output-side phase controller, in this example phase shifter 2A, and output-side amplitude controller, in this example variable attenuator 3A, adjusts the phase and amplitude respectively of the output-side injection signal. The output-side upconverter 7A then upconverts the output-side signal at frequency F2 to a much higher frequency F1. If the input-side and output-side upconversion ratios are the same, then the output-side upconverter 7A produces a signal at the same higher frequency F1 as the signal at the DUT input. The injection signal is then amplified by the output-side RF amplifier 4A, and then passes through the output-side dual directional coupler 5A to the DUT output.
From the DUT's point of view, the output-side injected signal acts like a reflection, to create a load impedance. The 4 channel analyzer 6 measures the incident and reflected signals from the input and output coming from both dual directional couplers. In this example, the output-side signal injected into the DUT output at frequency F1 has the same frequency as the drive signal at the DUT input for active tuning at the fundamental frequency F1 at the DUT output port.
In
The term RF source in this document means something that generates an RF signal. It can be a stand-alone signal generator, or it could be part of a multi-source signal generator. It also can be a signal source in an instrument such as a VNA or oscilloscope. Some VNAs, for example, include multiple internal RF sources.
The RF sources in
If the upconverters 7, 7A have different upconvert ratios, then the upconverted output-side signal will be at a different frequency F3 than the signal at the DUT input at frequency F1. This allows active tuning at the different frequency F3, such as an intermodulation frequency or a harmonic frequency.
One limitation of the circuit in
The phase jitter caused by
Another exemplary embodiment of this invention shown in
In the exemplary embodiment of
If the DUT is driven with only one input signal, as in
In
In this document, millimeter wave frequencies are defined as frequencies where a suitable combination of amplitude and phase control of RF sources is unavailable, difficult to implement, or uneconomical. Generally, this might be above 50 GHz, but sometimes might apply to lower frequencies, such as down to 40 GHz.
One advantage of the embodiments of
Different types of upconverters may be used. An upconverter may be a multiplier, which multiplies a frequency by an integer amount. Multiplier ratios of 6-10 are common. An upconverter may be a mixer, which is used with a local oscillator (LO) to upconvert to an arbitrary frequency. An upconverter may also be a frequency extender, which is a package containing RF components needed for the upconversion. For example, in
Some DUTs may include an upconverter, so that the input frequency is a low frequency, but with a higher output frequency. In this case, the input-side upconverter is not required, and
In some instances, based on the operation of available hardware components, either the phase shifter or the variable attenuator may be moved to a location on the DUT side of the upconverter. One example would be when the upconverter is a multiplier that works best with a constant input power. In that case, the variable attenuator at the F2 frequency could be removed, and replaced with a millimeter wave step attenuator located after the upconverter.
An alternate method of controlling the amplitude and phase at the sub-frequency is to use an I/O modulator, as shown in
One way to make a phase shifter is shown in
The block diagram of
The block diagram of
Although the foregoing has been a description and illustration of specific embodiments of the subject matter, various modifications and changes thereto can be made by persons skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/739,791 filed Sep. 28, 2018, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6639393 | Tasker | Oct 2003 | B2 |
7038468 | Verspecht | May 2006 | B2 |
8456175 | Marchetti | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8497689 | Tsironis | Jul 2013 | B1 |
9214718 | Mow | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9459336 | Tsironis | Oct 2016 | B1 |
20030102907 | Tasker et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20120161784 | Benedikt | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102004049421 | Jun 2006 | DE |
Entry |
---|
Y. Takayama, “A New Load-Pull Characterization Method for Microwave Power Transistors,” 1976 IEEE-MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, Cherry Hill, NJ, USA, 1976, pp. 218-220, doi: 10.1109/MWSYM.1976.1123701. |
Roberto Quaglia et al., Frequency extension of system level characterization and predistortion set up for on-wafer microwave power amplifiers, 2014 Proceedings of the 44th European Microwave Conference, pp. 1432-1435. |
Valeria, Teppati et al., A W-Band On-Wafer Active Load-Pull System Based on Down-Conversion Techniques, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 62, No. 1, Jan. 2014, pp. 148-153. |
L. Galantro et al., Large Signal Characterization of Millimeter Wave Devices using Mixed Signal Active Load-Pull, Electronics Research Laboratory/DIMES, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg, The Netherlands 82nd ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference, IEEE, Nov. 18, 2013, pp. 1-5, Nov. 10, 2013. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty PCT International Search Report, International application No. PCT/US2019/052918, Applicant Maury Microwave, Inc. 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Patent Cooperation Treaty PCT, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International application No. PCT/US2019/052918, Applicant Maury Microwave, Inc. 10 pages. |
F. van Raay and G. Kompa, “Waveform Measurements—The Load-Pull Aspect,” 55th ARFTG Conference Digest, Boston, MA, USA, 2000, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/ARFTG.2000.327394. |
Galatro, L. et al., “60 GHz mixed signal active load-pull system for millimeter wave devices characterization,” 80th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference, San Diego, CA, 2012, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ARFTG.2012.6422434. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200103447 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62739003 | Sep 2018 | US |