Missile detection and neutralization system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6825792
  • Patent Number
    6,825,792
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 6, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 30, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
The present invention is intended to provide a system for determining the precise launch point of ballistic missiles, and may additionally provide the capability of neutralizing said threats. The invention provides a mobile object information means configured to classify electromagnetic frequency activity within satellite and land based commercial and private broadcast and telecommunications spectra in a given geographical area, said means also configured to classify associated area weather normality and anomalies. The system includes a software algorithm configured to extract from said database, a missile launch in a given geographical zone by “tagging” an electromagnetic wave disturbance caused by the high intensity initial fuel burn of said missile launch. Additionally, the system is intended to affect the electrical functioning of a missile guidance system or warhead detonator by transmitting a precisely tuned frequency wave combination from a defensive missile borne frequency generator, or from a network of satellite or land based transmitters.
Description




BACKGROUND




Field of Invention




The present invention relates generally to apparatus and processes that detect the launching of a missile or other high speed, propellant or electromagnetically fired projectile, pinpoint the geographical location of said launch, determine the trajectory of said missile, and destroy said missile.




BACKGROUND




Description of Prior Art




Various Anti-Ballistic Missile systems have been developed that determine the launch position and trajectory of a propellant fired missile. These include AN/SPY series radar system of the type deployed on U.S. Navy Aegis cruisers. Additional GPS related missile tracking systems are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,278,945 to Lin, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,232,922 to McIntosh.




Prior art ABM systems using trajectory trisection technology such as disclosed in Millard's U.S. Pat. No. 5,757,310, offer the benefit that significant time is available to track the incoming ballistic missiles, calculate their trajectory, and distinguish decoys from actual ballistic missiles. However, one of the major drawbacks of such a system is that the incoming ballistic missile is relatively close to its target by the time such an ABM system can launch an interceptor missile. If the interceptor missile misses or experiences a malfunction, inadequate time is left to take alternate defensive measures. Such drawbacks are discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,340,056 to Guelman et al. Other antiballistic missile technology is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,464,174 to Lauren. Additionally, Redano's U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,222 discloses a mobile, ship based ballistic missile detection and defense system intended to be deployed in the vicinity of rogue nations which may pose a ballistic missile threat to the United States.




These prior art missile tracking and anti-ballistic missile defense systems may be moderately useful for defending against localized, small scale ballistic missile attacks, but in the event of a wide area, multiple missile assault, no prior art provides the technology to neutralize virtually ALL incoming threats. Every current ABM system depends on a “one-to-one” kill approach. In other words, one kill projectile is launched for every incoming assault missile.




The present invention discloses technologies intended to detect a missile launch using a unique analysis of ambient electromagnetic frequencies; therefore, additional related art includes airport radar matrix databases which are configured to trigger an alarm or alert condition when an “unexpected” or “out-of-range” object anomaly is detected.




The present invention also discloses technologies intended to neutralize the guidance systems of missiles and destroy the missile threat from a distance. Therefore, other technologies which must be considered relevant prior art are microwave, or other EM pulse transmitters such as may be related to Kremeyer's U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,221, which discloses a process in which a shock wave in a fluid is modified by emitting energy to form an extended path in the fluid.




Since no current ABM system has demonstrated 100% effectiveness at current “threat-to-kill” ratios, it is clearly unlikely that prior art can provide true missile defense security. The present invention provides improved capabilities to detect and neutralize single and multiple simultaneous missile threats.




SUMMARY AND OBJECTIVES OF THE INVENTION




The objective of the present invention is to provide the capability to detect and neutralize missiles in close proximity to the launch point. In today's volatile political climate, a system capable of detecting and neutralizing projectile borne weapons anywhere on the globe is critical to the defense of all nations.




Many systems are already being employed and developed for missile launch detection that take advantage of satellite mounted visual, and thermal detection systems, but these are only effective if they already happen to be pointing at potential threats. There are currently not enough airborne systems of this type to effectively cover the globe. The present invention may provide a solution to the problem of global missile launch detection.




Many years ago, the “Emergency Broadcast System” was established to use a network of all available broadcast transmitters to output a common “alert tone frequency” to warn the US population of a civil or military emergency. The present invention provides a unique and novel enhancement to this notification system. By creating a network of all available TV, radio, and telecommunications satellite and land based transmitters and receivers in all commercial and private spectra, and using precisely tuned electromagnetic frequency reading algorithms—operable on and through said network—a missile launch may be detected within moments of the initial fuel burn.




Another primary objective of the present invention is to provide a simplified multiple target tracking data format that allows rapid updating of the missile launch response section of the present invention.




Another primary objective of the present invention is to provide a missile neutralization system that disables or destroys the guidance system of a missile—or multiple missiles simultaneously—as well as any carried warheads, as close to the geographical launch point as possible. This is disclosed as a unique wide area missile threat neutralization system that utilizes a network of electromagnetic frequency pulses to disrupt the guidance systems of missiles after detection, create false target images, and disable or destroy the explosive materials within the warhead. Though there are numerous ways to adversely affect electrical devices remotely in prior art, no effective portable means has been available to stop the operational capabilities of missiles. The present invention disclosed herein may affect such results.




A more complete understanding of the present invention, as well as further features and advantages, will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description and drawings. Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in the dependent claims.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic block diagram illustrating a missile detection and neutralization system per the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The primary objective of the present invention is to provide the capability to detect a missile launch anywhere on the globe within a fraction of a second after launch, and subsequently neutralize the guidance systems and warheads of said missiles before said missiles can destroy their intended target. There has been much discussion, both pro and con regarding the “Star Wars” missile defense system proposed during the Reagan administration. In this inventor's opinion, a missile defense system is absolutely necessary if there are missiles anywhere on the globe which can be launched by a rogue nation. However, since a laser or particle beam, space-based system will be extremely costly and—due to the nature of lasers—highly inefficient, it is only justifiable if it works precisely. Anyone who has attempted to hit a baseball with a bat when the baseball is thrown at speeds approaching a hundred miles an hour can attest to the difficulty of the task. Even the best ball players only hit well thrown pitches some of the time. Trying to hit multiple supersonic projectiles with space-based high powered laser or particle beam weapons—or even with multiple other supersonic projectiles simultaneously—is almost impossible. The present invention may provide a more functional and cost effective solution.




Many years ago, the “Emergency Broadcast System” was established to use a network of all available broadcast transmitters to output a common “alert tone frequency” to warn the US population of a civil or military emergency. The present invention provides a novel enhancement to this notification system and integrates it as a key component.




The preferred embodiment of a missile detection and neutralization system in accordance with the present invention, as shown in

FIG. 1

, combines a series of discreet subsystems including a broadcaster network


10


, which is comprised of electronic communication links to telecommunications, TV, and radio satellite and land based transmitters and receivers, as well as airport radar systems in all commercial and private frequency spectra. A first computer processing system


11


is electrically coupled to said broadcaster network


10


through an electrical connection


12


—which may be either wired or wireless—and said computer processing system


11


may incorporate a real time aberrant frequency targeting algorithm


13


coded to quantify and analyze all frequency wave data received and or transmitted by broadcaster network


10


in frequency usage database


15


. Said analysis provides an “ambient frequency baseline matrix


14


” drawn from the signal strength and amplitude characteristics of broadcaster network


10


.




A missile threat identity authentication database


16


is also provided within computer processing system


11


as a look-up table to reference known missile launch electromagnetic data to said frequency usage database


15


. Additionally, since weather conditions affect the ambient electromagnetic frequency spectrum, a “local area weather anomalies database


17


”, said data acquired through an electrical connection


12


links to weather service providers, is also incorporated within processing system


11


to further refine the ambient frequency baseline matrix


14


within processing system


11


.




Aberrant frequency targeting algorithm


13


is configured that immediate confirmations of aberrant frequency disturbances can be identified and verified by processing system


11


. The present invention effectively provides a global missile launch detection system that is capable of sensing a missile launch in any given geographical area


18


by “tagging” an out-of-range “electromagnetic wave disturbance


19


” caused by the high intensity initial fuel burn


20


of a missile


21


, and the subsequent continuing electromagnetic wave disturbance


19


of said missile


21


.




By utilizing precisely tuned electromagnetic frequency reading algorithms within processing system


11


—applied to the frequency data accessed through said broadcaster network


10


—a missile launch may be detected within moments of the initial fuel burn. Aberrant frequency targeting algorithm


13


may be written in any computer language including C, C++, assembly, or other format capable of rapid database analysis and sorting. The details of the software code are not a limiting factor in the system design of the present invention, and therefore not necessary to describe in detail. This electromagnetic wave disturbance


19


activates the “response system


22


” of the invention, which uses typical, and currently active prior art additional satellite or land based electromagnetic, visual, and/or thermal missile launch confirmation system


23


units—all linked to computer processing system


11


through electrical connection


12


, to ultimately confirm or deny the missile launch.




The missile launch response system


22


may include a second computer processing system


24


to manage the electromagnetic wave disturbance


19


analysis output by Computer processing system


11


through electrical connection


12


, and to catalogue said disturbance in a target tracking database


25


.




The preferred embodiment of the missile tracking section of the present invention as shown in

FIG. 1

would require that any confirmation system


23


unit, be oriented to observe a geographical area


18


, as well as any missile


21


contained within geographical area


18


following an alert by processing system


11


. All confirmation system


23


units would also be linked to processing system


24


, which may be a standard computer configured to extract position information from a confirmation system


23


about the missile


21


locations within geographical area


18


, and render said position information as a target data file


27


. Processing system


24


may also be configured to digitize the colors, gestures, and angular orientation of said missile


21


within said geographical area


18


as elements of a data file


27


. Second computer processing means


18


would also be linked to computer processing system


11


through electrical connection


12


.




Another key component of the present invention is the format of target data file


27


that allows rapid updating of target tracking database


25


. Said format may use a minimum of transmitted data to update the geographical location—in three dimensional space—of hundreds of missiles


23


simultaneously to the ambient frequency database computer processing system


11


, which then activates a visual or thermal detection system


23


.




The multiple target tracking data format for a target data file


27


specifications are as follows:




1. Each target location is represented in the x/y/z axes relative to a “zero” point on a three dimensional environment model mapped to a real world environment, provided at a resolution of ten CM over a range of twelve KM.




2. Each target's location in the x, y, and z axes is mapped to the environmental model with the same resolution of ten CM over a range of twelve KM, using two bytes (sixteen bits) per axis.




3. Each target is identified with a one byte ID tag. The target locations are updated at least thirty times per second with a global four byte time stamp.




5. Target data is available in real time and as a recorded data file.




6. An array of statistical outputs from the target data can be extrapolated including;




a. trajectory lines of targets through the environmental model.




b. acceleration/deceleration of targets over time.




c. speed over time.




d. g-forces at vector change.




7. CRC (error correction) codes are added.




8. As an example of efficiency, this format may allow approximately forty-five simultaneous target positions to be streamed at under fifty-six K.




Multiple visual or thermal detection system


23


units may receive a target tracking signal


28


from missile launch response system


22


. Where there is a danger of multiple ballistic missiles being launched toward the United States, designated signal processing units coupled to computer processing systems


11


and


24


through electrical connection


12


, can be configured to receive a tracking signal


28


which is specific to a particular type of ballistic missile or to a pre-selected geographic region from which a ballistic missile launch is detected. Alternatively, certain signal processing units may be configured to receive a tracking signal indicative of a ballistic missile launch location and to produce an intercept trajectory—all programmed to guide a defensive missile


29


to the ballistic missile


21


launch site, while other signal processing units may be configured to produce an intercept trajectory program.




A key problem that the United States, or any other country, faces from a missile borne threat, is the difficulty in determining with certainty the final trajectory of a missile once it's been launched. If a missile is outfitted with a state-of-the art “threat reactive” guidance system, most current trajectory analysis technology will fail. These guidance systems can be programmed to sense the presence of an incoming “anti-missile” threat, and change course temporarily for evasive maneuvers. The most effective way to neutralize this capability is to disable the on-board computer guidance system


30


of a missile


21


so that a fixed trajectory


31


can then be established and determined, and an anti-ballistic missile


29


—as disclosed herein as an interceptor missile armed with wide area electromagnetic transmission and/or concussion burst capability—or another prior art neutralization system


42


enabled. Neutralization system


42


may be a satellite borne laser, microwave or other electromagnetic pulse, a particle beam generator, anti-ballistic missile, or a combination of these, and may used to launch a defensive missile


29


.




Land launched “kill vehicles”, intended to intercept an incoming ballistic missile in midcourse represent the choice of the USDoD for the National Missile Defense (“NMD” ) system, however, such a system provides less time to evaluate the trajectory of the incoming ballistic missile than a final phase trajectory trisection system, such as the one disclosed in the Millard patent. Alternatively, such a system provides more time to evaluate the trajectory of the incoming ballistic missile than an initial phase trajectory trisection system.




The only truly failsafe missile shield is a system capable of effectively disabling the missile guidance systems—thereby defining an observable, stable trajectory for each projectile—and subsequently neutralizing or triggering the onboard ordinance and/or warheads, and rendering the missiles useless. Assuming multiple missiles are fired simultaneously, it is necessary to destroy or disable the ordinance components of ALL the missiles for a “missile shield” to be truly successful.




The present invention discloses a unique wide area missile threat neutralization system that utilizes a network of electromagnetic frequency pulses—which may be partially output by broadcaster network


10


, to disrupt the guidance system of a missile


21


after detection by a detection system


23


unit, and create false target images, and/or disable or destroy the explosive materials within a warhead


32


of a missile


21


. Additionally, the present invention may provide a missile neutralization system intended to disable or destroy a missile and its warhead close to the geographical launch point.




Electrical circuit destabilizing effects resulting from “voltage burst” devices are well known. Many product testing agencies use cattle prods to stress electrical circuitry to the point of destruction. Applying static electricity to a sensitive integrated circuit can have similar results. Paniagua's U.S. Pat. No. 3,971,292 describes a double-barreled pistol for simultaneously projecting two, continuous, parallel streams of conductive fluid to kill or stun prey. Coakley, et al's U.S. Pat. No. 5,625,525 also describes a device and method for stunning a human or other living animal by employing a nozzle or other such means through which a conductive fluid stream can be discharged toward the living animal.




In order to shut down the guidance circuitry of a missile, it is necessary to disrupt or overload the “intelligent” portions of the circuitry. Low voltage, low current integrated circuits (ICs) and central processing units (CPUs) are integral parts of all guidance systems. These ICs and CPUs can be destroyed with DC, AC, and/or static electrical charges of the correct voltage, frequency, and current makeup.




The present invention discloses two discrete systems intended to neutralize a missile threat. They may be effective individually or when used in combination.

FIG. 2

is a schematic diagram of an apparatus comprised of a high voltage, high current, and/or high frequency electrical discharge means deployed from a projectile, which may disperse conductive media within and around a missile


21


shell, to create a dispersed “lightning” effect, to disrupt the electron flow in the IC and CPU components. This may be used to create false target images, and/or interrupt or destroy the missile


21


guidance system


30


, and then allow for the broad distribution of a tailored electromagnetic frequency pulse and/or deactivate the triggering system of a warhead


32


.




The embodiment of the present invention as illustrated in

FIG. 1

is intended to create negative or positive electrostatic or electromagnetic polarization in a solid, liquid, or gaseous medium, augmented by an electrically destructive frequency burst. An anti-ballistic missile


29


is provided. One or more frequency generators


33


are mechanically located inside missile


29


, and electrically coupled to one or more transducer/antennae arrays


47


. An “active natural resonant” frequency data set for any given guidance system


30


or warhead


32


is provided that may induce desired atomic or molecular component polarization effects in a surrounding medium


36


, and is preloaded into one or more frequency generators


33


.




Those frequency waves that are most absorbed by the electrical components in a guidance system


30


or a warhead


32


may be considered the “active natural resonance” fundamental frequencies of said devices. Said frequencies must initially be identified through laboratory experimentation and are then integrated within frequency generator


33


, which may be capable of outputting precisely tuned electrostatic and electromagnetic waves emulating those that are generated and radiated during a nuclear explosion.




For any guidance system


30


or warhead


32


, there is a “key” fundamental active natural resonance frequency which may be applied by frequency generator


33


to catalyze destruction of the electronic components. Initially altering a single specific molecular or atomic structure within a guidance system


30


or warhead


32


, and concurrently altering the ensuing applied frequencies, may then propagate state changes in all the associated structures. For example, if a molecule of a given component is comprised of ten atomic elements arranged in a particular way, modifying the polarity of the third most abundant atomic element in the molecule will have a different effect than modifying the first most abundant—and vice versa.




Frequency Generator


33


is capable of generating single or multiple frequency waves from DC to gigahertz ranges and above—combined with single or multiple harmonics, inversions, and dissonances in said frequency ranges at variable amplitudes. The resultant frequency waves


41


are projected by transducer/antennae array


34


at given points in space in any surrounding medium


36


. Said transducer/antennae array


34


is electrically coupled to frequency generator


33


, and mechanically coupled to the shell of defensive missile


29


.




A catalytic fluid or gaseous media may also be used to initiate a chain reaction of desired effect. Antiballistic missile


29


may be loaded with an electrically conductive fluid


37


which is dispersed in the area of a target missile


21


to create a conductive matrix to allow a “focused lightning effect” to conduct the key frequencies output by frequency generator


33


to the guidance system circuitry of a missile


21


, which generally operates at low DC voltages and current. By overdriving the sensitive integrated circuits in the guidance system and possibly the warhead detonator with a flood of precisely tuned electrical spikes, results may range from a temporary disruption of the vehicle guidance system


30


, to total destruction of the onboard warhead


32


.




A secondary stage


38


of missile


29


may be provided, and configured with an explosive concussion warhead


39


designed to trigger any missile


21


borne warheads within a wide area from a distance. This enables the simultaneous destruction of multiple missiles


23


. After a guidance system


30


and/or a warhead


32


is disabled—a missile


21


may then be rendered mechanically non-functional with said stage


38


.




Kremeyer's U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,221 discloses a process in which a shock wave in a fluid is modified by emitting energy to form an extended path in the fluid; heating fluid along the path to form a volume of heated fluid expanding outwardly from the path; and directing a path. The volume of heated fluid passes through the shock wave and modifies the shock wave. This allows for the transmission of a destructive EM pulse—tuned by the capabilities disclosed in the present invention—to destroy an incoming missile threat.




Those frequencies that are absorbed by a surrounding medium


36


are its “active natural resonance” fundamental frequencies. “Overdriving” the amplitude of said frequencies with respect to the base rate of absorption may result in the ionization, and therefore affect the electrical conductivity, of surrounding medium


36


. For any surrounding medium


36


, there is a “key” fundamental active natural resonance frequency which may then be manipulated and augmented by the addition of frequency inversions, harmonics, dissonance, and offsets of said “overdriving” frequencies, to said overdriving frequencies, to induce an electrical discharge.




In the context of the present invention as illustrated in

FIG. 1

, Computer processing system


11


may be configured to direct broadcaster network


10


—and Multiple visual or thermal detection system


23


units may be directed by missile launch response system


22


—to transmit specific electromagnetic and electrostatic frequency pulses


40


—as defined by additional coding in aberrant frequency targeting algorithm


13


, toward multiple geographical areas


18


, or a surrounding medium


36


independently or simultaneously, to enhance negative or positive electrostatic or electromagnetic, polarization waves


41


—augmented by a frequency burst destructive to electrical components—in a solid, liquid, or gaseous medium surrounding medium


36


(which may be the atmosphere) through which a missile


21


is traversing. Said frequencies may be designed to ionize the surrounding medium


36


around said missile


21


launch, and alter the electrical conductivity of said surrounding medium


36


, to destroy or disable a guidance system


30


and/or a warhead


32


, and/or to optimize the effectiveness of frequency generator


37


, borne by a defensive missile


29


. The effects of said frequency pulses


40


may also be to distract, disable, and/or destroy said launched missile


21


threat.




An additional objective of the invention as detailed in

FIG. 1

is to provide protection for a commercial aircraft


43


. Said aircraft


43


may be wirelessly linked to broadcaster network


10


and missile response system


22


. In the event of a missile


21


threat aimed at aircraft


43


, a defensive missile


29


may be launched from aircraft


43


. Further, a frequency Generator


33


and transducer/antennae array


34


combination may be integrated into the avionics package within aircraft


43


to project a frequency polarization wave


41


at given points in space to affect the guidance system and warhead of a missile


21


.




It is to be understood that the embodiments and variations shown and described herein are merely illustrative of the principles of this invention and that various modifications may be implemented by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A missile detection and neutralization system comprising;a first computer program product, said computer program residing on a computer readable medium, and configured to classify and analyze electromagnetic frequencies transmitted or received by satellite or land based commercial and private broadcast and telecommunications means; a second computer program product, said second computer program also residing on said computer readable medium, and configured to classify and analyze weather conditions in at least one geographical area; and a third computer program product, said third computer program also residing on said computer readable medium, and configured to detect from said weather and frequency classification and analysis functions, the position of a missile launched within said geographical area by targeting the electromagnetic frequency disturbance caused by the fuel burn of said missile, and the ensuing electromagnetic frequency aberrations resulting from the atmospheric disturbance caused by said missile.
  • 2. A missile detection and neutralization system according to claim 1 that includes;hardware means configured to classify and analyze electromagnetic frequencies transmitted or received by satellite or land based commercial and private broadcast and telecommunications means, and configured to classify and analyze weather conditions in at least one geographical area, and configured to detect from said weather and frequency classification and analysis functions, the position of a missile launched within said geographical area by targeting the electromagnetic frequency disturbance caused by the fuel bum of said missile, and the ensuing electromagnetic frequency aberrations resulting from the atmospheric disturbance caused by said missile.
  • 3. A missile detection and neutralization system according to claim 1 that includes at least one missile launch confirmation means capable of targeting said launched missile after detection, and defining an accurate trajectory for said launched missile.
  • 4. A missile detection and neutralization system according to claim 1 that includes at least one means to create an ionized, or other electrically conductive path through the air or fluid medium that said missile is traversing.
  • 5. A missile detection and neutralization system according to claim 1 that includes at least one means to transmit a precisely tuned electromagnetic frequency pulse configured to interrupt or destroy a missile guidance system, or detonate said missile's fuel source, or deactivate the triggering system of the warhead carried by said missile.
  • 6. A missile detection and neutralization system according to claim 1 that includes a frequency transmission means configured to affect the molecular structure within a missile guidance system or warhead detonator by transmitting at least one frequency wave combination, wherein said frequency wave combination is configured by the addition or subtraction of at least one second frequency wave amplification, harmonic, dissonance, inversion, or an offset of at least one first frequency wave to or from said first frequency wave.
  • 7. A missile detection and neutralization system according to claim 1 that includes a target location data file configured as follows:each target location is represented in the x/y/z axes relative to a “zero” point on a three dimensional environment software model that matches at least one real world environment, provided at a resolution of ten CM over a variable range of KM; each target's location in the x, y, and z axes is mapped to said environmental model with the same resolution of CM over a range of twelve KM, using two bytes per axis; each target is identified with a one byte ID tag, the target locations are updated at least thirty times per second with a global four byte time stamp, with CRC codes added; and target data is available in real time and as a recorded data file, and an array of statistical outputs from the target data are configured to be extrapolated including: a. trajectory lines of targets through the environmental model; b. acceleration/deceleration of targets over time; c. speed over time; d. g-forces at vector change.
  • 8. A missile detection and neutralization system that includes means to create an ionized or other electrically conductive path through the air or fluid medium that a missile is traversing, comprising:means for generating at least one frequency wave combination, wherein said frequency wave combination is configured by the addition or subtraction of at least one second frequency wave amplification, harmonic, dissonance, inversion, or offset of at least one first frequency wave to or from said first frequency wave; and means for transmitting at least one frequency wave combination, wherein said frequency wave combination is configured by the addition or subtraction of at least one second frequency wave amplification, harmonic, dissonance, inversion, or offset of at least one first frequency wave to or from said first frequency wave.
  • 9. A missile detection and neutralization system that includes means to transmit a precisely tuned electromagnetic pulse configured to interrupt or destroy a missile guidance system, or detonate said missile's fuel source, or deactivate the triggering system of the warhead carried by said missile, comprising:means for generating at least one frequency wave combination, wherein said frequency wave combination is configured by the addition or subtraction of at least one second frequency wave amplification, harmonic, dissonance, inversion, or offset of at least one first frequency wave to or from said first frequency wave; and means for transmitting at least one frequency wave combination, wherein said frequency wave combination is configured by the addition or subtraction of at least one second frequency wave amplification, harmonic, dissonance, inversion, or offset of at least one first frequency wave to or from said first frequency wave.
US Referenced Citations (24)
Number Name Date Kind
3061727 Roth et al. Oct 1962 A
3160795 Aune Dec 1964 A
3320420 Paglee et al. May 1967 A
3727225 Adrian Apr 1973 A
3848129 Figler et al. Nov 1974 A
3971292 Paniagua Jul 1976 A
3982713 Martin Sep 1976 A
5053622 Kessler Oct 1991 A
5157401 Doucet Oct 1992 A
5198607 Livingston et al. Mar 1993 A
5340056 Guelman et al. Aug 1994 A
5361069 Klimek et al. Nov 1994 A
5400688 Eninger et al. Mar 1995 A
5428221 Bushman Jun 1995 A
5464174 Lauren Nov 1995 A
5625525 Coakley et al. Apr 1997 A
5757310 Millward May 1998 A
5828334 Deegan Oct 1998 A
5850285 Hill et al. Dec 1998 A
6232922 McIntosh May 2001 B1
6278945 Lin Aug 2001 B1
6527221 Kremeyer Mar 2003 B1
6527222 Redano Mar 2003 B1
6677571 Clark et al. Jan 2004 B1