This application claims priority benefit to United Kingdom Application No. GB 1602648.6, filed Feb. 15, 2016, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Embodiments described herein relate to a missile for use in a laser beam riding missile guidance system and a method for aligning a missile with a target in a laser beam riding missile guidance system.
Beam riding is a known technique for guiding a missile to its target. In this technique, a laser beam coded in azimuth and elevation is projected towards the target, and the missile is provided with light sensors for detecting the beam. Once launched, the missile uses the sensors to correct its position to a specific location within the beam, allowing it to travel along the path of the beam towards the target.
The system comprises a laser operable to generate an intermittently projected laser beam 105. An operator uses an optical sight to align the beam with the target. The laser is scanned in lateral and vertical directions with respect to the direction in which the beam is propagating, so as to form a laser information field 107. The laser information field comprises an array of points or grid, in which the light signal at each point is modulated with information that can be used to identify that point's position within the array.
The missile 101 is provided with aft mounted sensors that can detect the signal encoded in the laser beam and so determine the missile's position with respect to the centre of the laser information field. Then, by use of appropriate guidance mechanisms (e.g. fins), the missile can adjust its position so as to remain aligned with the centre of the beam.
As shown in
According to a first embodiment, there is provided a method for aligning a missile with a target in a laser beam riding missile guidance system, the system including a laser transmitter for generating and projecting a laser information field towards the target and an optical sight for aiming the laser beam towards the target, the method comprising:
In some embodiments, the laser information field is generated by scanning a pulsed laser beam across a region of space, the intervals between successive laser pulses being varied as the laser scans across the region of space. The point in the laser information field with which the missile is currently aligned may be determined based on the time interval between receiving successive laser pulses.
In some embodiments, determining the new point in the laser information field comprises identifying the inter-pulse interval that corresponds to the new point in the laser information field.
In some embodiments, determining the new point in the laser information field comprises determining the spatial resolution of the laser information field at the missile's present distance from the laser source, the spatial resolution defining the lateral distance between points in the field having different inter-pulse intervals.
In some embodiments, the distance of the target from the missile is determined by comparing the distance of the target from the optical sight with the distance of the missile from the laser transmitter.
In some embodiments, the distance of the missile from the laser transmitter is determined by use of an inertial navigation system onboard the missile.
In some embodiments, data conveying the distance of the target from the optical sight is received by the missile via the laser beam.
In some embodiments, the laser transmitter is co-located with the missile launcher from which the missile is launched.
According to a second embodiment, there is provided a missile for use in a laser beam riding missile guidance system, the missile comprising:
In some embodiments, the laser information field is generated by scanning a pulsed laser beam across a region of space, the intervals between successive laser pulses being varied as the laser scans across the region of space. The guidance processor unit may be configured to determine the point in the laser information field with which the missile is currently aligned based on the time interval that occurs between detecting successive laser pulses at the light sensor.
In some embodiments, when determining the new point in the laser information field, the guidance processor unit is configured to identify the inter-pulse interval that corresponds to the new point in the laser information field.
In some embodiments, in determining the new point in the laser information field, the guidance processor unit is configured to determine the spatial resolution of the laser information field at the missile's present distance from the laser transmitter, the spatial resolution defining the lateral distance between points in the field having different inter-pulse intervals.
In some embodiments, the detected light encodes data conveying the distance of the target from an optical sight of the laser transmitter. The guidance processor unit may comprise a range calculator that is configured to determine the distance of the target from the missile by comparing the distance of the target from the optical sight of the laser transmitter with the distance of the missile from the laser transmitter.
In some embodiments, the missile comprises an inertial navigation system for determining the distance of the missile from the laser transmitter.
In some embodiments, the laser transmitter is co-located with the missile launcher from which the missile is launched.
In some embodiments, the missile comprises one or more guidance fins and the guidance control is configured to control the flight of the missile by adjusting the fin(s).
According to a third embodiment, there is provided a laser transmitter for generating a laser information field and projecting the laser information field towards a target; and a missile according to the second embodiment.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Embodiments described herein can help to reduce or remove a primary source of guidance error in a Laser beam riding Line of sight (LBR LOS) missile system, namely the alignment error associated with the centre of the laser beam pattern and the target aimpoint in the optical sight. By doing so, the system can be used to engage smaller targets such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and rockets, artillery and mortars (RAMs).
An embodiment will now be described with reference to
The laser information field 207, shown in cross section in
As shown in
As will be discussed in more detail below, in order to realign itself with the target, the missile 201 will perform calculations based on a number of parameters, including the “target range”, “missile range” and “closing range”. The target range defines the true distance along the line of sight of the target 203 from the optical sight 205, whilst the missile range defines the distance of the missile 201 along the line of sight from the laser transmitter 209.
The target range may be measured on one of several ways known in the art. For example, the target range may be determined using a (separate) laser range finder provided in the same unit as the missile launcher/optical sight; alternatively, the target range may be determined by use of a radar based system, again associated with the same unit as the missile launcher/optical sight. Other conventional means for determining the distance from the optical sight to the target may also be employed. The target range may be communicated to the missile using the laser transmitter 209; that is, in addition to the spatial information encoded in the inter-pulse separation, the laser beam emitted from the laser transmitter 209 may also be used to transmit data to the missile 201 indicating the target range.
As discussed above, the optical sight 205 and laser transmitter 209 are co-located with one another and the missile launcher 211; this means that the target range and missile range are both measured from the same point of origin (in practice, the nature of these devices means that the optical sight and the output of the laser transmitter may be offset from one another slightly; however, since the target range will typically be of the order of one or more kilometers, the assumption that the missile range and target range originate from the same point is valid for the purpose of correcting the missile's trajectory).
The closing range defines the distance of the target 203 from the missile 201, as measured along the current direction of travel of the missile 201. It will be understood that
At the head of the missile, there is provided a sensor 305, which is used to sense the position of the target relative to the missile. The sensor may, for example, comprise a visual sensor, an infra-red sensor or a radar sensor. The sensor 305 is used to determine the angular displacement θ between the missile axis and the target. For example, the sensor may determine the target's portion in the laser information field by detecting a portion of the field reflected by the target in both the vertical and horizontal directions. The sensor will have a defined field of view (FOV) and the angular offset θ can be computed based on the location of the target in that field of view.
The missile 201 also includes an Inertial Navigation System (INS) 307, used to determine the missile's position in space relative to its point of origin (i.e. the missile launcher, and correspondingly, the laser transmitter). The INS 307 may, for example, comprise one or more accelerometers and/or gyrometers for detecting changes in acceleration which can in turn be used to monitor the change in its position with respect to the origin over time. The INS 307 is used to determine the missile range and may also determine the missile's velocity vector.
The missile range and missile velocity vector, as determined by the INS 307, are input to a guidance processor unit 309. The target range and angular displacement, as determined by the optical power receiver(s) 303 and the sensor 305, respectively, are also input to the guidance processor unit 309. The guidance processor unit 309 is used to calibrate for the misalignment between the centre of the laser information field and the aimpoint on the target from the optical sight. In the present embodiment, the guidance processor unit 309 sends commands to the fin control 311 to control the position of the missile by suitable adjustment of the missile fins 313.
The function of the guidance processor unit will now be explained in more detail with reference to
The guidance processor unit also includes a range calculator 405. The range calculator 405 receives as input the target range and missile range. By subtracting the missile range from the target range, the range calculator is able to determine the closing range (i.e. the distance currently remaining between the missile and the target, as measured along the missile axis).
The closing range, as determined by the range calculator 405 is input to an offset calculator 407, together with data indicating the missile's current position in the laser information field, and the angular displacement θ between the target and the missile axis. The data indicating the missile's current position in the laser information field includes the inter-pulse separation currently being detected by the laser optical power receiver; as described above, each point in the laser information field array has an associated inter-pulse separation, which can be used to distinguish that point from others in the array. The offset calculator 407 uses the inputs it receives to determine the target offset in terms of inter-pulse intervals from the missile's current position in the laser information field. Here, the target offset refers to the lateral/vertical distance within the laser information field that the missile must travel in order to remain on course to hit the target. The target offset, as measured in inter-pulse intervals may then be used to compute the distance between the centre of the laser information field and the location in the laser information field with which the missile should seek to align itself.
The target offset is in turn input to the beam offset calculator 409. By knowing the beam resolution at the current point in time, the beam offset calculator is able to determine the coordinates in the laser information field with which the missile should seek to align itself in order to remain on course to hit the target. More specifically, the beam offset calculator 409 determines the inter-pulse separation that when detected by the missile will confirm it as being correctly aligned with the target.
Having determined the position in the laser information field with which the missile must now align itself in order to stay on course for the target, the guidance processor issues instructions to the missile's on-board guidance systems to align the missile with the new position in the laser information field. For example, the guidance processor unit may cause the missile to adjust its fins in such a way as to cause a lateral shift in the missile's position in space. In this way, the missile calibrates for any misalignment between the centre of the laser information field and the target.
As with conventional LBR Line of Sight (LOS) systems, the missile remains under the control of the operator throughout the engagement i.e. the missile can still be self-destructed by removal of the laser information field.
While certain embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Indeed, the novel methods, devices and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of forms; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1602648.6 | Feb 2016 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3363858 | Dobbins et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
4085910 | Baker | Apr 1978 | A |
4111385 | Allen | Sep 1978 | A |
4407465 | Meyerhoff | Oct 1983 | A |
5601255 | Romer et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5944281 | Pittman | Aug 1999 | A |
6606066 | Fawcett | Aug 2003 | B1 |
7397019 | Byars | Jul 2008 | B1 |
8392143 | Burkland | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8451432 | Crawford | May 2013 | B2 |
8502128 | Streuber | Aug 2013 | B1 |
20060049299 | Dubois | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060049300 | Dubois | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20120218628 | Egbert | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140138473 | Yu | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2918858 | Nov 1980 | DE |
4416211 | Nov 1995 | DE |
2338284 | Dec 1999 | GB |
2582308 | Apr 2016 | RU |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 17154263, dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
Search Report for GB Application No. 1602648.6, dated Aug. 12, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170321994 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |