This application is a national stage of Application No. PCT/NL2016/050719 filed Oct. 20, 2016, which claims priority from Netherlands Application No. 2016659 filed Apr. 22, 2016 and Netherlands Application No. 2015654 filed Oct. 23, 2015, which are all incorporated by reference in their entireties.
The present invention relates to a mixer feeder comprising a mobile chassis, a tub provided on the chassis and at least one auger provided for rotation about a respective vertical axis of rotation in the tub, wherein, seen in vertical cross-section, the wall of the tub extends at least substantially upright from the bottom of the tub. Such mixer feeders are known in various embodiments thereof, for example as self-propelled or drawn mixer feeders. To prevent feed from undesirably moving out of the tub via the open upper side thereof during mixing, it is known to provide a tube on the inner side of the endless upper edge of the tube, which tube is welded to the inner side of the tub wall via regularly spaced connecting plates. In practice it has been found that feed remnants frequently remain behind on the upper side of the tub. Such feed remnants can become mouldy and eventually fall in the tub all the same and be mixed with the feed the next time the tub is loaded.
The object of the invention is to provide a mixer feeder as described in the introduction by which the above risk is reduced or even eliminated. In order to achieve that object, the tub wall curves inward at the upper side of the tub, sloping up and then extending downward. On top of the upright portion of the wall, the inward-curved, upward-sloping part and the downwardly extending portion form an upside-down gutter, as it were, thereby reducing the risk of material subjected to the operation of the orders unintentionally moving out of the tub. In addition, the inward-curved, sloping part has the advantage that the risk of material remaining behind on the upper side of the tub is reduced or, practically speaking, even eliminated.
The capacity of the mixer feeder can be increased in a simple manner if the tub is provided with a raised circumferential rim that is fixed to the downwardly extending portion of the tub wall. Such a raised rim can be made of rubber, plastic or steel, for example.
It may be advantageous if the raised rim is fixed to the downwardly extending portion of the tub wall by fastening means. The raised rim can thus be mounted or demounted in a simple manner. A practical example of fastening means of the detachable type are bolt and nuts.
It has been found to be advantageous if the upper side of the raised rim is at least 5 cm higher than the upper side of the upward-sloping part, so that a significant capacity increase of the tub can be realised. On the other hand it is preferable if the raised rim is at most 60 cm lower than the upper side of the upward-sloping part, so that no problems will be encountered upon loading the tub, for example.
It has also been found to be advantageous if the downwardly extending portion of the tub wall has a height of at least 4 cm. In this way overflow of feed from the tub is efficiently prevented, and in addition a sufficiently large surface is created for a raised rim to bear thereagainst. Said height is preferably at most 12 cm so as to limit the use of material for the tub and the weight of the tub.
Preferably, the wall of the tub is curved inward, seen in top view, over the entire circumference of the tub at the upper side thereof, sloping up at the upper side of the tub and then extending downward. The advantages of this specific shape in that case apply over the entire circumference of the tub.
In one embodiment, the tub may be provided with downwardly extending teeth near the downwardly extending portion of the tub wall for reducing feed in the tub.
A constructionally simple embodiment can be obtained if the downwardly extending teeth form part of at least one elongated tooth element that is fixed to the downwardly extending portion of the tub wall, and if the raised rim (if provided) and the tooth element are fixed to the downwardly extending portion of the tub wall with the same fastening means, in particular if the raised rim is clamped between the downwardly extending portion of the tub wall and the tooth element by the fastening means.
Alternatively, the downwardly extending teeth may form part of the downwardly extending portion of the tub wall, with the teeth thus forming a permanent part of the tub wall. It may be decided to mask the teeth in a situation in which the presence of the teeth should not be desirable.
In general it can be stated that, seen in top view, the circumference of the tub preferably has the shape of two opposite curved parts, opposite ends of which are connected via straight parts, wherein the teeth are provided over at least part of the length of the curved parts and wherein the straight parts are free from said teeth over at least part of their length and that, seen in top view, the tub is provided with the teeth over the entire circumference thereof.
It may also be advantageous if, seen in vertical cross-section, at least part of the downwardly extending portion of the wall extends in a straight line. Because of its straight configuration, the downwardly extending portion is quite suitable as a contact surface for fixing the raised rim thereto.
The invention will now be explained in more detail by means of a description of three possible embodiments of a mixer feeder according to the invention, in which reference is made to the following figures:
The downwardly extending portion 15 moreover has the advantage that a raised rim 17 can be fixed thereto in a relatively simple manner, as is shown in
The retaining strip 20 is provided with downwardly extending teeth 21 at the bottom side. In use, said teeth 21 can contribute toward retaining feed within the tub 4 and also toward reducing the feed. Is also possible not to configure the retaining strip 19 with downwardly extending teeth, as a shown in
It is also possible not to make use of a retaining strip 20 and to clamp the raised rim 17 directly to the downwardly extending portion 15 using the bolt and nut combination 19, as is shown in
The raised rim 17 typically projects a distance H of 25 cm from the upper side of the inwardly extending, upward-sloping portion 14. The raised rim 17 may also be connected to the downwardly extending portion by means other than bolt and nut connections 19, for example by means of a welded joint. The use of the raised rim 17 leads to an increased capacity of the tub 4.
The inner side of the wall 12 of the tub may be coated with a wear-resistant coating. An advantageous wear-resistant coating is formed by an epoxy coating, for example a phenol-epoxy coating as for example marketed by the Sigma company under the name of Sigmashield 1200. The use of a wear-resistant coating as suggested above can also be advantageous in the case of conventional mixer feeders, which may or may not be fitted with a tub comprising a wall which is curved inward at the upper side of the tub, sloping up and then extending downward.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2015654 | Oct 2015 | NL | national |
2016659 | Apr 2016 | NL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/NL2016/050719 | 10/20/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/069621 | 4/27/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5590963 | Schuler | Jan 1997 | A |
6945485 | Douglas | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7874720 | Hendriks | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20090296517 | Tamminga | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100315898 | Liet | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
203635108 | Jun 2014 | CN |
298 06 252 | Sep 1999 | DE |
20 2009 008 215 | Dec 2010 | DE |
1 042 951 | Oct 2000 | EP |
2 901 853 | Aug 2015 | EP |
3 364 753 | Sep 2019 | EP |
WO 03028891 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/NL2016/050719, dated Dec. 12, 2017, 6 pages. |
Siloking, “Siloking Tenchnische Daten 2010: Siloking Duo Avant,” Published Nov. 15, 2009 (3 pages). |
DAIReXNET, “Managing TMR Variation: Proper Mixing Action for a Vertical Wagon,” Web page, <https://www.slideshare.net/DAIReXNET/managing-tmr-variation>, Published online Dec. 5, 2011, Retrieved from Internet Mar. 31, 2020 (1 page). |
Strautmann, “Verti-Mix 400/500,” Web page, <https://www.strautmann.com/en/verti-mix-40050070>, Published online Dec. 2013, English information on Verti-Mix 400/500 (16 pages). |
Supreme International, “Twin Auger Pull Type Mixers,” Web page, <http://www.supremeinternational.com/specs/Twin_Auger_Pull_Types.pdf>, Published online May 1, 2015, Retrieved from Internet Jun. 4, 2020 (2 pages). |
Schuler, “Multi-Screw Mixers: MS550, MS750,” Web page, <http://schulermfg.net/Twin-Auger-Mixer/Schuler_MS550_Ms750.pdf>, Published online Sep. 27, 2015, Retrieved from Internet Jun. 4, 2020 (3 pages). |
Bruese, C., “Peecon: Future,” Profi Magazin far Professionelle Agrartechnik,.<https://www.profi.de/aktuell/neuheiten/peecon-future-11745929.html>, Published online Nov. 13, 2015, Retrieved from Internet May 12, 2020 (2 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180303060 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |