Patent Grant
11833997
The inventors believe that room for improvement exists with respect to how portable computing devices (hereinafter “mobile devices”) are leveraged to support rental vehicle transactions. Toward this end, the inventors disclose various embodiments whereby a wide variety of rental vehicle transactions can be supported by mobile devices in a manner more convenient and efficient to customers.
For example, the inventors disclose an apparatus comprising a mobile device, the mobile device configured to execute a mobile application, the mobile application configured to interact with the mobile device and a remote computer system to perform an automated pickup of a self-rent rental vehicle in response to user input.
In accordance with another exemplary aspect, the inventors disclose a method comprising (1) instructing a mobile device to wirelessly communicate an image of a driver's license for a customer to a remote computer system, (2) receiving data from the remote computer system in response to the wirelessly communicated image, and (3) responsive to the received data, instructing the mobile computing device to communicate an output signal for sensing by a sensor on a proximate self-rent rental vehicle, the output signal configured to permit the customer to access and pick up the proximate self-rent rental vehicle, and wherein the method steps are performed by a processor resident on the mobile device.
Further still, the inventors disclose a computer program product comprising a plurality of instructions executable by a processor of a mobile device and resident on a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, wherein the instructions, upon execution by the mobile device's processor, are configured to cause the mobile device to (1) wirelessly communicate an image of a driver's license for a customer to a remote computer system, (2) receive data from the remote computer system in response to the wirelessly communicated image, and (3) responsive to the received data, communicate an output signal for sensing by a sensor on a proximate self-rent rental vehicle, the output signal configured to permit the customer to access and pick up the proximate self-rent rental vehicle.
In accordance with yet another exemplary aspect, the inventors disclose a method comprising (1) receiving data indicative of a user via a mobile device of the user while the mobile device is in proximity to a rental vehicle, (2) based on the received data, accessing stored data about the user that is indicative of whether the user is deemed to have a valid driver's license, (3) retrieving a rental vehicle reservation record, (4) determining whether the user is authorized to pick up the rental vehicle proximate to the mobile device based on the accessed data and the retrieved rental vehicle reservation record, and (5) in response to the determining step resulting in a determination that the user is authorized to pick up the rental vehicle proximate to the mobile device, enabling the rental vehicle proximate to the mobile device for automated pickup by the user, and wherein the method steps are performed by a processor.
Further still, the inventors disclose an apparatus comprising a processor configured to (1) receive data indicative of a user via a mobile device of the user while the mobile device is in proximity to a rental vehicle, (2) based on the received data, access stored data about the user that is indicative of whether the user is deemed to have a valid driver's license, (3) retrieve a rental vehicle reservation record, (4) determine whether the user is authorized to pick up the rental vehicle proximate to the mobile device based on the accessed data and the retrieved rental vehicle reservation record, and (5) in response a determination that the user is authorized to pick up the rental vehicle proximate to the mobile device, enable the rental vehicle proximate to the mobile device for automated pickup by the user.
The inventors also disclose how rental vehicles can be configured to support automated self-rental without a need to distribute any keys to renters. With such embodiments, machine-sensible items such as mobile devices can be used to effectively replace the role of keys for rental vehicles, including not only door lock/unlock function but also vehicle ignition function.
The mobile device 102 can be a smart phone (e.g., an iPhone, a Google Android device, a Blackberry device, etc.), tablet computer (e.g., an iPad), or the like. Furthermore, the mobile device 102 can be a position tracking-enabled mobile device. That is, the mobile device 102 can be configured to track its geographic position and communicate data regarding same to other computing devices (e.g., to rental computer system 106). The mobile device preferably employs a touchscreen or the like for interacting with a user. However, it should be understood that any of a variety of data display techniques and data input techniques could be employed by the mobile device. For example, to receive inputs from a user, the mobile device need not necessarily employ a touchscreen—it could also or alternatively employ a keyboard or other mechanisms.
The instructions may further include instructions defining a control program 254. The control program can be configured to provide the primary intelligence for the mobile application 250, including orchestrating the data outgoing to and incoming from the I/O programs 256 (e.g., determining which GUI screens 252 are to be presented to the user).
The network 104 can be any data communications network capable of supporting communications between the rental computer system 106 and mobile devices 102 as well as communications between the rental computer system 106 and rental vehicles 108, wherein at least a portion of the data communication is wireless data communication as shown in
The rental computer system 106 can be a server or collection of servers that are configured to support rental vehicle transaction processing as described herein. The rental computer system 106 can be operated by a rental vehicle service provider such as a rental car company. However, it should be understood that other entities may operate the system.
Additional aspects of the process flows of
It should be understood that the rental vehicle transactions supported by
In this business chain, there are four primary parties—the first is the driver (or customer) whose vehicle becomes disabled (thereby creating a need for a replacement rental vehicle), the second is the purchaser of rental vehicle services who books a rental vehicle reservation on behalf of the driver (typically an insurance company, automobile dealer, etc.), the third is the rental vehicle service provider with which the purchaser books the rental vehicle reservation, and the fourth is the repair facility where the driver's disabled vehicle is repaired.
In a typical replacement rental scenario, a driver whose regular vehicle has become disabled (e.g., the driver has had an accident) notifies the purchaser (e.g., the driver's insurance company) of his/her need for a replacement rental vehicle. The purchaser then books a reservation for a replacement rental vehicle with a rental vehicle service provider. Oftentimes, this reservation is consummated when the driver drops his/her disabled vehicle off at the repair facility. An employee of the rental vehicle service provider who has been notified of the booked reservation will meet the driver at the repair facility to provide the driver with the replacement rental vehicle. At this time, the rental vehicle service provider employee will fill out rental contract paperwork with the driver for the replacement rental vehicle, and if the terms are agreeable to the driver, the driver signs the rental contract paperwork to form a rental contract with the rental vehicle service provider.
Another common scenario is that an employee of the rental vehicle service provider will pick the driver up from the repair facility to take the driver to a nearby rental vehicle branch location. From the rental vehicle branch location, the driver and rental vehicle service provider employee can then fill out the rental contract paperwork to form the rental contract. In either event, once the rental contract paperwork has been filled out and signed, the driver is enabled to pick up his/her replacement rental vehicle.
The inventors have sought to improve the efficiency of this process through intelligent leveraging of mobile devices as described herein (see, for example, the embodiments described in connection with
It should further be understood that the rental vehicles underlying the rental vehicle transactions supported by
1. Assessing Whether a Customer is a Licensed Driver
Rental vehicle service providers desire an ability to determine whether the customer who is to drive a rental vehicle is a licensed driver. That is, does the customer have a valid state driver's license? With conventional rental vehicle transactions, this assessment is made at a rental branch by personnel of a rental vehicle service provider. The customer is asked for his/her driver's license, and the employee of the rental vehicle service provider then makes an assessment as to whether he or she believes the license to be facially valid. However, it is desired for rental vehicle transactions involving self-rent rental vehicles to avoid any customer interaction with employees of a rental vehicle service provider. This raises the question of how to satisfy the desire for reviewing a customer's driver's license while permitting the customer to automate the rental vehicle pickup process.
At step 700, the rental computer system receives a message from the customer's mobile device 102 that includes image data representative of the customer's driver's license. A user can employ the camera feature of a mobile device 102 to generate such image data. The user can also load an image of the driver's license onto the mobile device if desired.
At step 702, the rental computer system analyzes the driver's license image data to assess the validity of the driver's license. This operation may involve extracting text from the driver's license image data to obtain information such as the driver's name, address, and date of birth, the state of issuance for the driver's license, a driver's license number, date of expiration, etc. This operation may also involve extracting the patterns that appear in the image data to determine whether the extracted pattern conforms to the appearance of driver's licenses for a state (or for the state extracted from the license text if applicable). Suitable software from third party vendors that use image processing techniques to analyze the validity of driver's licenses can be used to perform step 702.
If the extracted data from the driver's license fails to pass the conditions governing validity, then at step 704, the rental computer system rejects the customer and sends a notification of the rejection to the customer's mobile device 102. If the extracted data from the driver's license is deemed to pass the conditions governing validity, then at step 706, the rental computer system updates a customer record for the customer to reflect that the customer is licensed to drive a motor vehicle.
While the steps of
Also, it should be understood that the customer record 720 can also include a field that identifies the extracted expiration date for the customer's driver's license. Logic can then be applied to either automatically change the validity flag field 730 when the current date falls after the expiration date or perform an expiration date check to assess validity when the customer later attempts to book a reservation or pick up a rental vehicle.
2. Creating Rental Vehicle Reservations and Supporting Rental Vehicle Pickups
At step 802, the rental computer system retrieves the customer record 720 for the customer identified in the reservation request and checks the license validity flag field 730 in the customer record 720. If the license validity flag field 730 of the customer record indicates that the customer has already proven he or she is a validly licensed driver, then the process flow continues to step 806. If the license validity flag field 730 of the customer record indicates that the customer has not proven he or she is a validly licensed driver, then the process flow continues to step 812. At step 812, the rental computer system prompts the customer to provide an image of his/her driver's license to check validity (for execution of the process flow in
In the example of
If step 806 results in a determination by the rental computer system that a rental vehicle is not available as per the reservation request, then at step 810, the rental computer system rejects the reservation request and notifies the customer re same.
If step 806 results in a determination by the rental computer system that a rental vehicle is available as per the reservation request, then at step 808, the rental computer system creates a rental vehicle reservation for the customer and communicates authorization instructions for the reservation to the reserved rental vehicle to enable automated pickup by the customer.
The wireless I/O component 904 can be configured to communicate wirelessly and bidirectionally with the rental computer system 106. For example, the processor 900 can receive the authorization information from the rental computer system 106 via wireless I/O 904 and store that authorization information in memory 902.
The sensor 906 can be configured to sense the customer's mobile device 102 via techniques such as NFC, RFID, BlueTooth, or the like. The sensor 906 is preferably positioned in a location on the rental vehicle which permits the customer to conveniently position the mobile device 102 nearby.
Vehicle interfaces 908 permit the hardware system 600 to communicate with vehicle subsystems such as the vehicle's system for locking/unlocking doors, the vehicle immobilizer to de-immobilize the vehicle, and/or the vehicle's ignition system to start the vehicle.
At step 1002, the processor checks the authorization record for the rental vehicle in memory 902 to assess whether the customer associated with the mobile device 102 is authorized to pick up the rental vehicle. As indicated, the authorization record can comprise the combination of reservation record 820 and the customer record 720 for the customer associated with the reservation. Thus, the processor 900 can compare the sensed information with the mobile device identifier or customer identifier in the authorization record. If there is match, the processor 900 can conclude that the person bearing the mobile device 102 near the rental vehicle is the same as the customer for the reservation. The processor may also perform further authorization checks such as comparing a current date/time with the start date/time field 828 of the authorization record to assess whether the rental vehicle pickup by the customer is timely.
If the processor 900 determines that all of the authorization conditions are met, then at step 1004, the system can provide the customer with access to the rental vehicle. At minimum, this may involve the processor 900 instructing the vehicle to unlock the doors (via vehicle interface 908). In some embodiments, an ignition device (e.g., key or the like) may be left inside the vehicle for use by the customer once the customer gains access to the vehicle's interior (e.g., locating the ignition device in the glove box or locked compartment accessible via a code provided to the customer). In other embodiments, the system 600 may further instruct the vehicle to de-immobile the immobilizer and/or start the vehicle as described hereinafter. Next, at step 1008, the processor 900 logs the customer's vehicle access in memory 902.
If the processor 900 determines that not all of the authorization conditions are met at step 1002, the system can then reject customer access to the vehicle at step 1006. This may involve leaving the vehicle doors locked and leaving the immobilizer in an immobilizing state.
At step 1102, a similar procedure can be followed to capture a photograph of an identifier for the rental vehicle. For example, a bar code or QR code can be provided on the rental vehicle in a location easily photographed by the customer. The car identifier encoded by the bar code or QR code preferably matches the identifier used for the rental vehicle in field 824 of the reservation records 820.
At step 1104, the processor then determines whether the two photographs are sufficiently close in time to be deemed a contemporaneous pair. For example, the customer can be required to take the two photographs within 60 seconds (or some other time limit) of each other. If not sufficiently close in time, the process flow can return to start. Otherwise, the process flow proceeds to step 1106 where the mobile application instructs the mobile device to communicate the photographs to the rental computer system 106.
At step 1202, the rental computer system extracts relevant information from the driver's license image data to enable validity checking as previously described in connection with step 702 of
At step 1204, the rental computer system extracts the car identifier from the image data for the car identifier. This may involve processing a bar code or QR code image to convert such code to a character string.
At step 1206, the rental computer system analyzes the extracted driver's license data to assess validity (using techniques previously described in connection with step 702 of
At step 1208, the rental computer system retrieves rental transaction data for the customer and/or rental vehicle. The rental computer system can retrieve all reservation records 820 that are keyed to the rental vehicle identified by the extracted car identifier (via field 824 of the reservation records).
In a true walk-up rental situation, there will not be a corresponding reservation record for the customer with respect to the rental vehicle. Thus, in the walk-up scenario, the rental computer system will check at step 1210 for any retrieved rental vehicle reservation records 820 with respect to the rental vehicle that are deemed to overlap with the desired rental by the walk-up customer. If there is no deemed overlap, then at step 1212, the rental computer system will communicate rental authorization information to the rental vehicle identified by the extracted car identifier to permit access and pickup by the customer if the customer has otherwise agreed to all necessary terms and conditions for renting the rental vehicle. Thus, the customer would then be able to access the rental vehicle by placing his/her mobile device 102 near sensor 908 to initiate the process flow of
In a scenario where the customer had a pre-existing reservation, the rental computer system will check at step 1210 for congruence between the retrieved rental vehicle reservation and the information from the customer's mobile device. For example, the rental computer system can check for matches between:
The rental computer system at step 1210 can also check for a match between the current time and the reservation start date/time field 828 of the retrieved reservation record 820. The system can be configured to determine that a time match has occurred if the current time is within a specified tolerance of the time in the reservation start date/time field 828. If the reservation is deemed supported by the extracted information, then the rental computer system can proceed to step 1212 as noted above. Otherwise, the rental computer system can proceed to step 1214 as noted above.
It should be understood that a wide number of variations on the process flows of
Furthermore, while the preceding process flows and descriptions are tailored for embodiments with respect to the rental of self-rent rental vehicles, it should be understood that similar techniques can be used to streamline and improve the rent process for other types of rental vehicles with a reduced role for personnel of a rental car company. For example, in some embodiments, a rental car company may choose to provide an automated key box or other kiosk arrangement at a location where rental vehicles can be picked up, and similar techniques can be employed to determine whether to provide a customer with access to a key for a rental vehicle from the automated key box or kiosk.
3. Exemplary Embodiment for Mobility-Enhanced Replacement Rental Vehicle Reservations
3a. Activating the Replacement Rental Vehicle Reservation
At step 1402, a message is sent to the driver's mobile device 102 to notify the driver that he/she has been authorized to pick up a replacement rental vehicle in accordance with the created replacement rental vehicle reservation. This notification can take the form of an email (see
Upon selection by the driver of the “Activate Priority Pass” button as shown in
At step 1404, the rental computer system receives input from the driver's mobile device 102 that is indicative of a request to activate the replacement rental vehicle reservation. This input may take the form of the activation code entered via the GUI screen of
At step 1410, the rental computer system receives selections from the driver's mobile device that were made with respect to the choice options that had been presented to the driver. These selections may comprise a particular rental vehicle (or particular group of rental vehicles such as a rental vehicle class) and a pickup mode (which as noted above will be an automated pickup mode for the purposes of this example). Next, at step 1412, the rental computer system communicates information about the driver's chosen selections to the mobile device for populating a verification GUI screen on the mobile device.
If the driver verifies the information on the GUI screen of
Another task is for the driver to provide proof that he/she has a valid driver's license.
Step 1418 can involve the rental computer system processing the driver's license information as previously described in connection with
It should be understood that if the rental computer system already recognizes the driver as a validly licensed driver as described in connection with step 802 of
In the event that the rental computer system determines that the driver's license and payment information are valid, then at step 1420, the rental computer system can activate the replacement rental vehicle reservation and update the reservation record 820 for the replacement rental vehicle reservation to reflect the activation. For example, an activation flag field in the reservation record 820 for the replacement rental vehicle reservation can be set to mark the reservation as activated. The rental computer system can also communicate this activation to the driver's mobile device for populating a GUI screen of the mobile application (see
3b. Automated Rental Vehicle Pickup for the Activated Reservation
At step 2402, the mobile application 250 checks whether the replacement rental vehicle reservation has already been activated. This step may involve a communication with the rental computer system to gather this information, although this need not be the case if the mobile device locally stores data indicative of the replacement rental vehicle's activation. If the subject replacement rental vehicle reservation has not been activated, then at step 2408, the mobile application can enter the process flow beginning with
This interaction can be accomplished in any of a number of ways. For example, the mobile application can prompt the user at step 2404 to scan a car identifier such as a bar code or a QR code located on the rental vehicle to confirm that the subject rental vehicle is the rental vehicle corresponding to the activated replacement rental vehicle reservation. If the mobile device locally stores the reservation record 820 for the replacement rental vehicle reservation, this may involve comparing a scanned car identifier with the rental vehicle identifier field 804 of the reservation record 820. If the two match, then the mobile application can perform step 2406 (and unlocking is then contingent on the process flow shown in
Also, optionally, telematics technology deployed on the rental vehicle can be configured to automatically detect information such as the rental vehicle's mileage and fuel level at the time of rental vehicle pickup. This information can be communicated from the rental vehicle to the rental computer system and/or mobile device for storage therein in association with the reservation record.
3c. Returning the Rental Vehicle to Complete the Reservation
As discussed in the above-referenced and incorporated patents and patent applications, the automated reservation management computer system 504 can be configured to detect when repairs have been completed to the driver's ordinary vehicle. When such an event happens, the rental computer system or business partner computer system can send a message to the driver's mobile device notifying him or her of same (step 2800).
At step 2802, the rental computer system receives this completion code from the mobile device, and then retrieves the reservation record for the replacement rental vehicle reservation based on the received completion code (step 2804). At step 2806, the rental computer system communicates pre-return information about the replacement rental vehicle reservation to the mobile device for display thereon.
The GUI screen of
At step 2808, the rental computer system receives this pre-return information from the mobile device, and the rental computer system then stores this information in database 308, preferably appending the pre-return information to the reservation record 820 for the replacement rental vehicle reservation. The rental computer system can also communicate a confirmation of its receipt of the pre-return information to the mobile device for display thereon (see
At step 3510, the mobile application causes the mobile device to display a GUI screen, where this GUI screen is configured to present the driver with return status information (see
The GUI screen also be configured to solicit input from the driver to indicate whether the rental vehicle has experienced any noticeable damage during the rental. If the mobile application receives input from the driver indicative of no such damage at step 3512, then the process flow can proceed to step 3516. If the mobile application receives input from the driver indicative of the existence of such damage at step 3512, then the process flow can proceed to step 3514. At step 3514, the mobile application can cause the mobile device to display one or more GUI screens that are configured to solicit details regarding such damage.
At step 3516, the mobile application then causes the mobile device to communicate information to the rental computer system regarding completion of the replacement rental vehicle reservation. In turn, the rental computer system can update its database so that the reservation record for the replacement rental vehicle reservation has its status changed to “closed” or the like. Furthermore, any damage items noted at step 3514 and communicated at step 3516 can be stored in association with the reservation record. A practitioner may also choose to design the mobile application so that a user can capture images of any vehicle damage to be uploaded to the rental system for storage in association with a record for the rental. Upon completion of the replacement rental vehicle reservation, the rental computer system can also communicate an update to the control hardware 600 of the subject rental vehicle to update its authorization record to remove authorization for the driver with respect to the now closed replacement rental vehicle reservation. In this fashion, the driver can be prevented from re-entering the vehicle after return. Another task for the rental computer system upon completion can be sending an electronic receipt for the rental transaction to the mobile device and/or an email address associated with the driver.
Thus, it can be seen that
4. Exemplary Embodiment for Mobility-Enhanced Rental Program Reservations
The mobile application 250 for the rental service can be downloaded by a customer at Stage 1 in response to any of a number of access paths. For example, the customer may visit a website associated with the rental service and download the mobile application from there. As another example, the customer may receive an email invitation or the like with a selectable link for downloading the mobile application. As yet another example, the mobile application can be downloaded from an “app store” or the like that is accessible via the mobile device. To complete initial registration, the rental computer system can email or a text a message to the customer that provides a unique code, QR code, or URL link, that is selectable by the customer to complete his/her registration as shown in
Also, to become enrolled with the rental program, the rental computer system can obtain information about the customer (e.g., name, address, contact information, etc.) for populating a customer record 720. Such information, can, in part, be obtained from the customer prior to downloading the mobile application. Or, all of such information can be obtained from the customer via the mobile application. For example, at step 3900, the mobile application can cause one or more GUI screens to be displayed on the mobile device to solicit customer information. At step 3902, the mobile application receives the enrollment customer information. At step 3904, the mobile application checks whether all necessary customer enrollment information has been received. If no, it continues to request more information from the customer. If yes, the mobile application proceeds to step 3906.
At step 3906, the mobile application displays one or more GUI screens that guide the customer through a driver's license scanning operation (see
The process flow of
It should be understood that a practitioner may choose to implement Stage 4 in different ways. For example, a practitioner may choose to design the rental pickup process so that the customer need not re-submit a driver's license photograph at the time of pick up if the customer record 720 for the customer in the database 308 already shows the customer as a validly licensed driver. In such a case, the customer would need to only scan the car identifier and communicate the scanner car identifier from his/her mobile device to identify himself/herself to the rental computer system. It should be understood that the communication from the mobile device to the rental computer system can include information for uniquely identifying the customer or customer's mobile device.
As another example, the verification process can be performed locally by the control hardware of the rental vehicle rather than by the rental computer system. Upon creation of the reservation, the rental computer system can be configured to communicate an authorization record to the control hardware 600 of the reserved rental vehicle that is a combination of fields from the reservation 820 and the customer record 720 for the customer associated with the reservation. This authorization record can be stored locally by the rental vehicle for use when verifying the customer during pickup (see
The process flow of
5. Exemplary Rental Vehicle Selection Options
Another feature that can be supported by mobile devices to facilitate the rental process can be a feature whereby customers are able to select particular rental vehicles from among a plurality of rental vehicles for their reservation via their mobile devices. In an exemplary embodiment, this selection process can be performed within a defined time period immediately before the customer arrives at a rental location to pick up a reserved rental vehicle.
Then, at step 4202, the rental computer system communicates the rental vehicle pickup options to the mobile device for populating a GUI screen presented through the mobile application. For example, if the customer has reserved a “full-size” rental vehicle and there are 8 available “full-size” rental vehicles at the pickup location, the rental computer system can communicate data regarding these 8 available “full-size” rental vehicles to the customer's mobile device. The mobile application can then cause the mobile device to display one or more GUI screens (see
Upon customer selection of a presented option, the mobile application can communicate this selection to the rental computer system. Upon receipt of the selection (step 4204), the rental computer system can re-check the selected rental vehicle's availability (step 4206). This step may be necessary to accommodate for a situation where multiple customers are choosing from among pools of vehicles that include the selected vehicle at the same time. That is, while the customer was choosing from among the options, another customer may have rendered an option unavailable. If step 4206 results in a determination that the selected rental vehicle is no longer available, the rental computer system can proceed to step 4208 to send a notification about the unavailability to the customer's mobile device and return to step 4202. If step 4206 results in a determination that the selected rental vehicle is still available, the rental computer system can proceed to step 4210.
At step 4210, the rental computer system places a time-limited hold on the selected rental vehicle in favor of the customer. This action prevents another customer from selecting that rental vehicle for pickup during a specified time period (e.g., 30 minutes). The rental computer system can then communicate a confirmation of this hold to the customer's mobile device for display to the customer (see
Next, at step 4212, the rental computer system checks whether it has received a pickup notification for the selected rental vehicle within the pickup time window. As noted above, this notification can take the form of a message from the selected rental vehicle that the customer has accessed or requested access to the selected rental vehicle (e.g., by placing his/her mobile device near the vehicle sensor 906). If the pickup time window expires before receiving such a notification, the rental computer system at step 4216 can communicate a message to the customer's mobile device informing the customer about the expiration, remove the hold on the selected rental vehicle in the database, and return the customer to a vehicle selection process (see
Thus, the operation of the
Also, other techniques can be used to permit a customer to select any rental vehicle for pickup from a class of reserved rental vehicles in accordance with a rental vehicle reservation. In one example, the customer can be free to place his/her mobile device near the sensor 906 of any rental vehicle he/she chooses. If the chosen vehicle is within the class of rental vehicle defined for the reservation, then the rental computer system can permit customer access for pickup.
As another example in instances where the rental computer system communicates authorization records to the rental vehicles, a process flow such as the one in
Also, it should be understood that one of more of the GUI screens presented to a customer during the vehicle selection process can be configured to solicit from the customer input as to whether the customer would like to upgrade their vehicle selection. For example, if the customer had previously reserved an economy class rental vehicle, but at the time of pickup, the customer is desirous of renting a larger vehicle (such as a full-size class rental vehicle), one or more of the GUI screens presented to the customer can be configured to ask the customer whether he or she would like to change the vehicle class for the transaction. Depending on availability, in response to customer input indicative of a desire to upgrade, the system can identify available rental vehicles at the rental location at the higher class and provide the customer with the ability to select a particular one of those vehicles as described above. Further still, in response to a customer request to upgrade, updated pricing information for the upgrade can be presented to the customer through the GUI screens, and the customer can be prompted to provide input as to whether he or she agrees to any new terms and conditions regarding such upgraded rental (e.g., a new rental rate, etc.).
Furthermore, while the exemplary embodiment of
6. Smart Key Emulation
Equipment 5200 such as control hardware 600 can be installed in the rental vehicle. This equipment can include a sensor 5210, a wireless communication interface 5208, authorization logic 5206, and a smart key emulator 5204. The sensor 5210, wireless communication interface 5208, and authorization logic 5206 can operate as described in connection with
The smart key emulator 5204 can be configured to emulate a conventional smart key upon enablement. Thus, the enabled smart key emulator can communicate with the vehicle's (1) door lock/unlock system 5216 to lock and unlock the vehicle doors, (2) immobilizer 5214 to de-immobilize the vehicle, and (3) ignition system 5212 to permit the de-immobilized vehicle to be started. Thus, by only enabling the smart key emulator 5204 to output the appropriate codes for the vehicle in response to the customer being recognized as the customer who has reserved the rental vehicle as reflected in the authorization records for the rental vehicle, the customer will be able to use his/her proximate item 5250 as if it were a smart key to gain access to the vehicle and enable start/stop of the vehicle's engine using methods previously described herein. Furthermore, it should be understood that the smart key emulator 5204 or other components of the equipment 5200 can also be configured to communicate with the vehicle's data bus via a physical connection to the OBDII or CAN bus port for purposes of data collection (and subsequent communication of the collected data back to the rental system 5202). Examples of data to be collected in this fashion can include vehicle location, vehicle identification number (VIN), fuel levels, mileage/odometer readings, etc.
In a preferred embodiment, the machine-sensible item 5250 is a customer's mobile device 102 (such as a smart phone). However, it should be noted that the machine-sensible 5250 could take other forms, such as an RFID tag or the like.
It should also be understood that a practitioner can choose to make the enable signal a simple “yes/no” binary signal, or alternatively a more complicated signal to reduce the opportunity for theft in the event a criminal attempts to steal the vehicle by breaking in and “hotwiring” a “yes” signal onto the communication link between the authorization logic and the smart key emulator 5204. For example, rather than a “yes/no” binary signal, the enable signal can take the form of a multi-bit code. Still further, the enable signal can be an encrypted signal communicated between the authorization logic 5206 and smart key emulator 5204 that changes over time as is used on many remote access computer systems. Thus, upon concluding that the customer is authorized to access and start the rental vehicle, the authorization logic 5206 can be configured to communicate an encrypted “yes/enable” signal to the smart key emulator 5204. The smart key emulator 5204 can then be configured to decrypt the received encrypted signal and condition the enablement on the decryption revealing that the authorization logic provided a “yes/enable” instruction. As noted, the encryption can be configured to change over time to minimize the risk of hacking.
Also, a protective enclosure can be provided around the authorization logic and smart key emulator to reduce the opportunity for a criminal to access the communication link for hotwiring purposes. For example, they can be deployed together in an integrated circuit.
In another exemplary embodiment where the item 5250 is a mobile device 102, the smart key emulator 5204 can be deployed as part of a mobile application resident on the mobile device rather than within equipment on the car.
It should also be understood that equipment 5200 can be an aftermarket addition to a rental vehicle or it can be part of the original equipment from the manufacturer of the rental vehicle.
When a customer is physically present near the vehicle, a mobile application executing on the customer's mobile device can communicate with the remote rental system, where this communication is effectively a request for that customer to use the subject rental vehicle at the particular time. If the rental system determines that the customer is authorized to rent the rental vehicle, the rental system can communicate a cellular command to equipment to wake up (similarly, in an embodiment employing GPS comparisons to assess physical proximity, the rental system can wake the equipment up to check vehicle location). A presence pulse signal can be initiated, and the processor 5512 of the equipment 5500 can obtain the GPS position of the vehicle from GPS system 5514. The processor 5512 can also actuate a data collection component 5516 to access the vehicle through a port 5530 such as an OBDII port to collect data from the engine control unit (ECU) 5528 such as fuel levels, VIN, odometer readings, etc. This collected data along with the GPS position can then be communicated back to the rental system via wireless radio 5518.
While the present invention has been described above in relation to exemplary embodiments, various modifications may be made thereto that still fall within the invention's scope, as would be recognized by those of ordinary skill in the art. Such modifications to the invention will be recognizable upon review of the teachings herein. As such, the full scope of the present invention is to be defined solely by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
This patent application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/784,227, filed Mar. 14, 2013, entitled “Mobile Device-Enhanced Rental Vehicle Transactions”, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. This patent application is also a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/840,711, filed Mar. 15, 2013, entitled “Mobile Device-Enhanced User Selection of Specific Rental Vehicles for a Rental Vehicle Reservation”, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, which claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/784,227, filed Mar. 14, 2013, entitled “Mobile Device-Enhanced Rental Vehicle Transactions”. This patent application is also related to (1) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/212,109, filed this same day, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Driver's License Analysis to Support Rental Vehicle Transactions”, (2) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/212,339, filed this same day, entitled “Mobile Device-Enhanced Rental Vehicle Returns”, and (3) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/212,455, filed this same day, entitled “Smart Key Emulation for Vehicles”.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3624608 | Altman et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3665397 | Di Napoli et al. | May 1972 | A |
| 3754122 | Dinapoli et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
| 4663626 | Smith | May 1987 | A |
| 4803348 | Lohrey et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4817166 | Gonzalez et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4835533 | Akutsu | May 1989 | A |
| 4845636 | Walker | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4895009 | Kleefeldt et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4931789 | Pinnow | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4965821 | Bishop et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5066853 | Brisson | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5159334 | Baumert et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5206643 | Eckelt | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5218367 | Sheffer et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5255547 | Burr et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5289369 | Hirshberg | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5329625 | Kannan et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5420568 | Iida et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5432904 | Wong | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5467080 | Stoll et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5477214 | Bartel | Dec 1995 | A |
| RE35184 | Walker | Mar 1996 | E |
| 5504674 | Chen et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5515285 | Garrett, Sr. et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5541571 | Ochs et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5568120 | LeMense et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5583486 | Kersten | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5604676 | Penzias | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5630209 | Wizgall et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5650597 | Redmayne | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5657233 | Cherrington et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5660246 | Kaman | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5664113 | Worger et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5679984 | Talbot et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5686910 | Timm et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5717595 | Cherrington et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724520 | Goheen | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734330 | Nakamura | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5751073 | Ross | May 1998 | A |
| 5752931 | Nazarian et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5774060 | Ostermann et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5812067 | Bergholz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5835061 | Stewart | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835376 | Smith et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5864623 | Messina et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5898230 | Bartel et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5933090 | Christenson | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5939975 | Tsuria et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5969678 | Stewart | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6006148 | Strong | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6013956 | Anderson, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6028537 | Suman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031465 | Burgess | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6040638 | Howell | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6070155 | Cherrington et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6075458 | Ladner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6094640 | Goheen | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6144293 | Plaschko et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6148091 | DiMaria | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6157315 | Kokubo et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169943 | Simon et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6172608 | Cole | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6181024 | Geil et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6181991 | Kondo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6185487 | Kondo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6192236 | Irvin | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6209026 | Ran et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6225890 | Murphy | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240365 | Bunn | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6253980 | Murakami et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6297811 | Kent et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6326918 | Stewart | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6339745 | Novik | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6356836 | Adolph | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6376930 | Nagao et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6430496 | Smith et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434459 | Wong et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6459967 | Otto | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6463416 | Messina | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6480098 | Flick | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6493616 | Rossow et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6523741 | DiMaria et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6529805 | Aldrich, III et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6535743 | Kennedy, III et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6584401 | Kirshenbaum et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6594579 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6604033 | Banet et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6615046 | Ur | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6617975 | Burgess | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6618650 | Nakai et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6629034 | Kozak et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6636145 | Murakami et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6636790 | Lightner et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6647328 | Walker | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6650977 | Miller | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6664888 | Bishop | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6671594 | Miller | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6675150 | Camer | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6687587 | Kacel | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6693563 | Flick | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6694248 | Smith et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6696981 | Hashimoto | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6697018 | Stewart | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6697024 | Fuerst et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6697730 | Dickerson | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6703946 | Flick | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6708879 | Hunt | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6732031 | Lightner et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6736322 | Gobburu et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6741187 | Flick | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6748211 | Isaac et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6759960 | Stewart | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6765500 | Flick | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6766233 | Odinak et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6771188 | Flick | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6771981 | Zalewski et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6778068 | Wolfe | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6781507 | Birchfield et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6784809 | Flick | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6789003 | Magner et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6792295 | Hanevich et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6798355 | Flick | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6803861 | Flick | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6809636 | Metlitzky et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6816089 | Flick | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6819269 | Flick | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6828902 | Casden | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6838998 | Brown et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6844827 | Flick | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6850153 | Murakami et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6850154 | Emmerling | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6850898 | Murakami et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6853907 | Peterson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6853910 | Oesterling et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6859009 | Jablin | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6877665 | Challa et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6882905 | Hall et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6882906 | Geisler et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6885738 | White et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6892116 | Geisler et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6898493 | Ehrman et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6919865 | Tamaru | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6920437 | Messina | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6924729 | Aschauer et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6925381 | Adamczyk | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6931308 | Read | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6941197 | Murakami et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6944533 | Kozak et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947881 | Murakami et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6952156 | Arshad et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6960990 | McKibbon | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6961707 | Jenkins | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6963794 | Geber et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6965323 | Uehara et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6967567 | Hashimoto | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6968179 | De Vries | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6975248 | Asari et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6975997 | Murakami et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 7027808 | Wesby | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7034655 | Magner et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7035631 | Schwinke et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7042333 | Dix et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7058594 | Stewart | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7062376 | Oesterling | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7069119 | Ueda et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7080019 | Hurzeler | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7082364 | Adamczyk | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7091857 | Lanigan et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7106171 | Burgess | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7106307 | Cok | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7113864 | Smith et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7116989 | Mazzara et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7119709 | Magner et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7129852 | Aslund et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7133659 | Zalewski et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7136747 | Raney | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7142099 | Ross et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7146270 | Nozaki et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7154384 | Nitou | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7167084 | Proefke et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7173517 | Kondo et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7177738 | Diaz | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7181409 | Murakami et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7184744 | Schnabel | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7184866 | Squires et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7188070 | Dar et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7191057 | Adamczyk | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7194106 | Brundage et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7218925 | Crocker et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7219235 | Rumble | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7224261 | Shimomura | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7224266 | Taipale | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7228122 | Oyagi et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7230545 | Nath et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7233227 | Lemoult | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7245997 | Kitao et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248151 | McCall | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7252227 | Chase | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7266435 | Wang et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7271701 | Kokubu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7275038 | Weinstock et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7289024 | Sumcad et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7308581 | Geosimonian | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7312691 | Zambo et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7313467 | Breed et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7321814 | Kanda et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7323970 | Murray et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7327230 | Metlitzky et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7332998 | Beehler et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7340400 | McGinn et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7346439 | Bodin | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7364069 | Chase | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366677 | Liu et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7369685 | DeLean | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7444216 | Rogers et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7477242 | Cross et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7478067 | Messina | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7478492 | Madonia | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7599847 | Block et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7627422 | Adamczyk et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7637631 | McDermott et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7668537 | De Vries | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7710245 | Pickering | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7733332 | Steenwyk et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7738658 | Brundage et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7756633 | Huang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7761062 | Mervine | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7765408 | Geosimonian | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7812712 | White et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7821541 | Delean | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7840427 | O'Sullivan | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7848765 | Phillips et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7852199 | Desai et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7859413 | Nguyen | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7869945 | Huang et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7876201 | Bauchot et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7889931 | Webb et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7899751 | Messina | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7930098 | Huang et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7933808 | Garcia | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7941267 | Adamczyk et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7945076 | DeLean | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949541 | McGinn et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7953618 | Pearce et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7956730 | White et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7970533 | Huang et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7974771 | Cobbold | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7974779 | Huang et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8024578 | Geosimonian | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8036824 | Huang et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8049602 | Bauer et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8050451 | Brundage et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8055534 | Ashby et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8068011 | Sajadi et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| 8074871 | Bates | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8086400 | Huang et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8095305 | Huang et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8095422 | Hallowell et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8140256 | dos-Santos et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8150608 | Cobbold | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8156326 | Di Giusto et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8165799 | Snavely et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8198979 | Haag et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8224571 | Huang et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8230362 | Couch | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8275361 | De Vries | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8280791 | Davis, III et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8285570 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8285571 | Demirdjian et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8326315 | Phillips et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8340890 | Cobbold | Dec 2012 | B1 |
| 8370268 | Ehrman et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8463239 | Koller et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8463487 | Nielsen et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8473148 | Nielsen et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8768565 | Jefferies et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 9499128 | Reh et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9701281 | Reiser | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 10549721 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10899315 | Reh et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 20010000957 | Birchfield et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
| 20010028295 | Brinkmeyer et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010056361 | Sendouda | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010056363 | Gantz et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020008645 | Flick et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020010604 | Block | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020022979 | Whipp et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020027498 | Stephane | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020030105 | Miller et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049663 | Kahana | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020121962 | Wolfe | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020130765 | Flick | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020145593 | Boyd et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020149572 | Schulz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020186144 | Meunier | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020197988 | Hellaker | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030005300 | Noble et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030006277 | Maskatiya et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023463 | Dombroski et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030033175 | Ogura et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030034873 | Chase et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074275 | Salle | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030087636 | Mazzara et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030107469 | Emmerling | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120509 | Bruch et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120522 | Uyeki | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125961 | Janda | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182033 | Underdahl et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182054 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182183 | Pribe | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191568 | Breed | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220812 | Jones | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030222758 | Willats et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040006498 | Ohtake et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040006517 | Takatori | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040009772 | Mazzara | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040012501 | Mazzara et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024621 | Read | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039612 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044454 | Ross et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044592 | Ubik et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049324 | Walker | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049401 | Carr et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049424 | Murray et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068433 | Chatterjee | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073340 | Ueda et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073440 | Garbers et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088392 | Barrett et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040094621 | LaMont | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122688 | Janda | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125764 | Piwowarski et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158483 | Lecouturier | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158816 | Pandipati et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040176969 | Fujinuma | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186902 | Stewart | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193440 | Mawatari | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040203696 | Jijina et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040203969 | Videtich | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225544 | Camer | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230498 | Zimmerman et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040242198 | Oyagi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249818 | Isaac | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050033484 | Geber et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038598 | Oesterling et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050050017 | Ross et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050052426 | Hagermoser et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060070 | Kapolka et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060210 | Levi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050064895 | Oesterling et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065678 | Smith et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085221 | Sumcad | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096939 | Ramseyer | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050099262 | Childress et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108089 | Ehrman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050116816 | Nitou | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125483 | Bergander et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050146465 | Prassmayer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159988 | Ramseyer | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050182671 | Miyauchi | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050190044 | Rutledge | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050200479 | James | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209746 | Kish et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216296 | Kokubu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050225429 | Burzio | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050250440 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256762 | Dar et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261035 | Groskreutz et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060031011 | Oesterling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060038674 | Sumcad et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047373 | Sumcad et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060066439 | Keeling et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060072756 | Leimgruber et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060082471 | Rockett et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060114101 | Schambeck et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060118622 | Zatloukal et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060125620 | Smith et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060132291 | Dourney et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060154643 | Scholz et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060157563 | Marshall | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060158319 | Kim | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173587 | Oesterling et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178949 | McGrath | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060186988 | Proefke et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190419 | Bunn et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060194566 | Oesterling | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060202799 | Zambo et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060214767 | Carrieri | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229780 | Underdahl et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060244588 | Hannah et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258379 | Oesterling et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259353 | Gutmann | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265117 | Cahoon | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060293802 | Kitao et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070001876 | Patenaude et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070018790 | LaFrance | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070021054 | Videtich | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070026876 | Freilich | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070027708 | Brown et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055415 | Taki et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061069 | Christensen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093215 | Mervine | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093943 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094055 | Nakayama et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070106563 | Okada et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070129974 | Chen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070131005 | Clare | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070139182 | O'Connor et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070139397 | Cross | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142028 | Ayoub et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070152877 | Madhaven et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070173992 | McCutchen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179706 | McCutchen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179798 | Inbarajan | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179799 | Laghrari | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179800 | Oesterling | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070191995 | Laghrari | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070194216 | Schwenke | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070197194 | Oyagi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198276 | Hinrichs et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070200671 | Kelley et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203618 | McBride et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070210896 | Schambeck et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070216572 | Schnabel | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070222292 | Shimomura | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070222293 | Shimomura | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070241862 | Dimig et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070244829 | Boswell et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250232 | Dourney et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070275690 | Hunter et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288127 | Haq et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070290789 | Segev et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070293997 | Couch | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080012762 | James | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080014908 | Vasant | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080015908 | Ramseyer | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080021605 | Huber et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080021723 | Devarakonda | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080027604 | Oesterling | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080027606 | Helm | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039995 | Reeser | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080048844 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080074234 | Nelson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091342 | Assael | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097798 | DeVallance | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080129545 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133432 | Ramseyer | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140570 | Vaughn | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154671 | Delk | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161981 | Tessier et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183535 | Kahana | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080228365 | White et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080228533 | McGuire et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080238690 | Plant | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080257706 | Haag | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080270019 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080270204 | Poykko et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080300927 | Kennedy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090005963 | Jarvinen | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090015373 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090018859 | Purifoy et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030747 | Smith et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090049044 | Mitchell | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090055936 | Eberstaller | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090061901 | Arrasvuori et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090096576 | Oman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125230 | Sullivan | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090140846 | Rutledge | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090172009 | Schmith et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187435 | Carr et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210276 | Krumm et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090212978 | Ramseyer | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216600 | Hill | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234573 | Notarantonio | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234658 | Greenwell et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090248587 | Van Buskirk | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090278656 | Lopez et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287499 | Link, II | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100001830 | Woo | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100010873 | Moreau | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100078475 | Lin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100079153 | Maloof et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094482 | Schofield et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100106534 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128931 | Bongard | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138242 | Ferrick et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100153279 | Zahn | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100179725 | Boote et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100201505 | Honary et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211401 | Williams et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100227594 | De Vries | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280884 | Levine et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100305729 | Glitsch et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100305779 | Hassan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100332242 | Kamar et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110016146 | Teufel | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110022422 | Taylor | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110022425 | Block et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029352 | Lau et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110032203 | Pryor | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040692 | Ahroon | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110059693 | O'Sullivan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110060480 | Mottla et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110090097 | Beshke | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110112717 | Resner | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110112969 | Zaid et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125794 | Hutschemaekers | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137520 | Rector et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137691 | Johnson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145089 | Khunger et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161227 | Santo, Jr. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191126 | Hampshire et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202393 | DeWakar et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110209177 | Sela et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213629 | Clark | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110214728 | Veerasamy | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110217451 | Veerasamy | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110217455 | Veerasamy | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110225269 | Yap et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110231354 | O'Sullivan et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276404 | Taysom et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110281562 | Videtich | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282717 | Aschenbrenner et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110288891 | Zaid et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110291796 | Gradussen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301985 | Camp et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301997 | Gale et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110307282 | Camp et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313804 | Camp et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313893 | Weik, III | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313937 | Moore, Jr. et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120002847 | Geosimonian | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120019360 | McGinn et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120024948 | Messina | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120041675 | Juliver et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120045113 | Bates | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120050018 | Sajadi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120078668 | Hirose et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120105197 | Kobres | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120126974 | Phillips et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120129553 | Phillips et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233246 | Guemez | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120290652 | Boskovic | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120323642 | Camp et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130006959 | Mitchell | Jan 2013 | A9 |
| 20130024390 | Zlobinsky | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130035846 | Shih-Chia et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130054139 | Bodin et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130054281 | Thakkar et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130054311 | Kataria et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130060586 | Chen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130080196 | Schroeder et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130080345 | Rassi | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130082820 | Tieman | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130095895 | Asuri et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130096827 | McCall et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130110396 | Choudhury | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130124279 | Bodin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130132140 | Amin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130132246 | Amin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130132887 | Amin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130144667 | Ehrman et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130221101 | Lebaschi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130238167 | Stanfield | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130317693 | Jefferies et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140129053 | Kleve | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140156138 | Klaff et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140242971 | Aladenize et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140266594 | Reiser | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140278555 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140278599 | Reh et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140278608 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140309842 | Jefferies et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20170039489 | Reh et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170294114 | Reiser | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20200331433 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2013903725 | Oct 2013 | AU |
| 4301039 | Jul 1994 | DE |
| 4324762 | Feb 1995 | DE |
| 0451482 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 1128335 | Aug 2001 | EP |
| 1128355 | Aug 2001 | EP |
| 2573738 | Mar 2013 | EP |
| 2575091 | Apr 2013 | EP |
| 2975561 | Nov 2012 | FR |
| 2009176261 | Aug 2009 | JP |
| 199305987 | Apr 1993 | WO |
| 199851548 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| 02057873 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| 02067079 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| 02080646 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| 2004056621 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| 2008150475 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2010000317 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2011147893 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| 2011159331 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| 2013177331 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2014052329 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| 2014152916 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Carney, Dan; “Phone could be the keys to your car”; NBC tech news; https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna31491881; Jun. 24, 2009. (Year: 2009). |
| Schaal, Dennis; “Futuristic RFID is here and now for Hertz on demand and Zipcar”; https://www.phocuswire.com/Futuristic-RFID-is-here-and-now-for-Hertz-on-Demand-and-Zipcar; Apr. 3, 2012. (Year: 2012). |
| Office Action for CA Application 2,906,679 dated Nov. 22, 2018. |
| Office Action for EP Application 14767943.5 dated Apr. 3, 2019. |
| Squatriglia, “Put Onstar in Just About Anything for $299”, Wired Magazine, 2011, retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2011/01/put-onstar-in-just-about-anything-for-299/, 9 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/296,654 dated Jun. 12, 2019. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/212,339 dated Oct. 26, 2017. |
| Office Action for for EP Application 14767943.5 dated Oct. 9, 2020. |
| Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/212,339, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,549,721, filed Mar. 14, 2014, 615 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/778,753 dated Jun. 17, 2022. |
| Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 16/778,753, filed Jan. 31, 2020. |
| Budget Rent a car, Common questions, http://web.archive.org/web/20120208001128/http://www.budget.com/budgetWeb/html/en/customer/commonquestions, Feb. 8, 2012, retrieved Aug. 15, 2015. |
| Extended European Search Report for EP Application 14767943.5 dated Oct. 7, 2016. |
| Flyertalk, Carfirmation Enhancement: Mobile Gold upgrades, http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/hertz-gold-plus-rewards/1412281-carfirmation-enhancement-mobile-gold-upgrades.html, Dec. 3, 2012, retrieved Aug. 15, 2015. |
| http://www.cellocator.com/applications-solutions/lease-rental-cars/, dated Sep. 1, 2012. |
| http://www.convadis.ch/pages/en/home.php, dated Sep. 1, 2012. |
| http://www.invers.com/en-eu/, dated Sep. 1, 2012. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I)for PCT/US2014/028221 dated Sep. 24, 2015. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/212,455 dated Mar. 31, 2016. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/212,109 dated Jul. 19, 2017. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/212,109 dated Nov. 3, 2016. |
| Doerfler, et al., “Advanced Securirty Systems”, VDI-Berichte, 1994, pp. 693-705, vol./Issue 1(1152). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/028221 dated Oct. 3, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/932,574, filed May 31, 2007 (Kennedy). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140278607 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61784227 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13840711 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Child | 14212220 | US |
