Consumers carry and use mobile or portable computing devices nearly everywhere. These mobile computing devices increasingly are connected to wireless networks, such as cellular service networks and the Internet. Connectivity is often provided by mobile service providers which offer vast network capability, typically implemented by a complex network of cellular towers installed in a large number of physical locations, in addition to local Wi-Fi networks connected to the Internet. When consumers use their mobile computing devices to access a network, such as to place a phone call, send a text message, use an application on their mobile device, or access the Internet, mobile service providers can often receive or detect an approximate geographic location of the mobile computing device. This geographic location data which may be of value to mobile service providers as well as businesses and advertisers, who may generate and provide targeted advertising to consumers based on the geographic location data.
The present disclosure describes systems and methods for providing enhanced location analysis and consumer insights using mobile sightings data. An approximate geographic location is useful to mobile service providers and advertisers who wish to provide targeted content to consumers based on their location. However, the location analysis provided by the systems and methods described herein provide more depth and detail not just about the detected geographic location of the consumer, but also insights into business locations visited by the user of the device, consumer/market segments and patterns of behavior (for an individual consumer and/or for aggregated group of consumers), retail trends and patterns, and other profile information.
In many instances a mobile service provider can only detect an approximate geographic location associated with a mobile sighting generated by a mobile computing device used by a consumer. A location profile analytics system, such as the one described herein, can analyze data associated with the mobile sighting to determine a probability that the approximate geographic location actually corresponds to a specific geographic location, such as a business location. Thus, the location profile analytics system may determine that a mobile sighting within a certain range of a plurality of business locations is most likely to have originated from a particular business location.
The analysis performed by the location profile analytics system may be further refined and concentrated to a particular business location based on a number of input parameters in addition to the approximate geographic location. For example, a mobile sighting might include additional data regarding the time and date of the sighting, which the location profile analytics system can comparatively analyze along with other sightings (both concurrent and prior sightings) and sightings trends, in order to assess a general likelihood that the mobile sighting originated from one business location over another. For example, one business location may receive higher retail traffic than another at certain times or days of the week, and such profile information can be used to analyze a mobile sighting to determine a business location from which the mobile sighting likely occurred.
In another example, the location profile analytics system may comparatively analyze patterns of mobile sightings associated with a device or with a user of a device in order to derive a behavior profile as an input to assess a general likelihood that the mobile sighting originated from one business location over another based on, for example, the user's observed tendencies to visit different types of business location by category, time of day, etc. Further, a mobile sighting might include additional data indicating a unique identifier associated with an anonymous consumer profile, which the location profile analytics system can use to develop, access, or link to consumer attributes such as consumer behavior/trends, market segments, demographics, and so on. These “expanded” consumer attributes, linked to the mobile computing device of the consumer, may be also analyzed to assess a general likelihood that the mobile sighting originated from one business location over another. For example, a consumer profile may including sightings trend data that suggests that the consumer using the mobile computing device prefers stopping for coffee on the way to work. The location profile analytics system may in turn use this consumer profile data to analyze a new sighting which occurred nearby to several businesses, including a coffee shop, and determine that the sighting most likely occurred at the coffee shop. Additional consumer insights may also be determined based on the consumer's profile or associated attributes—for example, that the coffee-on-the-way-to-work-consumer is associated with a group of consumers who have above average incomes and generally buy a lot of books.
The location profile analytics system can provide the detailed location information, consumer profile/attributes, and/or other business location data back to the mobile service provider or other third party entity (such as business locations themselves), which can in turn use the analysis to improve marketing efforts and/or provide more targeted content to consumers associated with the mobile sightings. For example, a mobile service provider may find data indicating that a mobile sighting most likely occurred at a certain retail establishment useful in providing targeted content (such as a coupon or a special offer) related to that retail establishment for the consumer to use. Or, a business location may desire to have information regarding retail traffic trends, based on associated mobile sightings, to improve business operations and customer service or assess the attractiveness of a potential new location.
High Level Data Flow
Beginning at action (1), a consumer's mobile computing device 162 registers its location (a “sighting”) at or near locations of one or more businesses 168. For example, the mobile computing device 162 may register its location actively (e.g., when the user of the device places a call, sends a text message, uses an application, etc.), or the mobile computing device 162 may register its location passively such as when an application that is running in the background periodically sends location information to a remote system, such as the mobile service provider 164. The use may be any type of device usage that involves or may be detected by a mobile service provider 164 which provides mobile service for the consumer. For example, the consumer may place a call or send a text or SMS message over a network 170 in communication with the mobile service provider 164. Or, the consumer may access an application (“app”) installed on her mobile computing device 162 in order to access, request, send, and/or receive data over the network 170, such as may occur when the consumer uses the app to access services such as maps, social media, etc.
The mobile service provider may receive data (e.g., a mobile sighting) associated with the usage, such as a device identifier associated with the mobile computing device 162, a consumer identifier associated with the mobile computing device 162 and/or with the consumer (e.g., an identifier associated with the consumer regardless of the specific mobile computing device used), data about the type of use (e.g., a voice call, a text message, an app use, etc.), location data indicating approximately where the use occurred (e.g., latitude and longitude coordinates, Global Positioning System (“GPS”) coordinates, street addresses, or other location-identifying data of any level of granularity and/or ranges), and/or a date/time at which the use occurred.
In the particular example described here with respect to
To provide an ongoing illustrative, non-limiting example to which will be referred throughout the description of
At action (2), the mobile service provider 164 may provide mobile sighting data to a location profile analytics system 100 for analysis. The mobile sighting data may include data for one or more mobile sightings, for one consumer (e.g., Angie in the ongoing example) or for any number of consumers. For example, Angie's coffee stop may be provided to the location profile analytics system 100 in real-time for analysis so that the mobile service provider 164 may immediately use any generated location data, such as to provide a coupon, advertisement, or other information to Angie that may be of use while she is at the coffee shop. In other embodiments, mobile sightings data may be collected and sent to the location profile analytics system 100 in batches on a periodic basis (e.g., hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, etc.) for more comprehensive analysis and processing across multiple sightings and/or multiple consumers.
At action (3), the location profile analytics system 100 analyzes the sightings data received from the mobile service provider 164. The analysis may be performed by the location/profile sightings analysis engine 121 and/or the consumer profile engine 122, for example as discussed in more detail as illustrated and described with reference to processes 300, 400, and 500 of
In one embodiment, the location profile analytics system 100 may, as a result of the analysis performed on the mobile sighting data, determine a business location associated with one or more mobile sightings. The business location may be determined based on a variety of factors, including the date and time of the mobile sighting, the proximity of the geo-location data associated with the mobile sighting to one or more business locations, data associated with the one or more business locations, and/or consumer profile data which may be associated with a particular consumer mobile sighting or with multiple consumer mobile sightings, and other criteria discussed herein.
For example, the location profile analytics system 100 may receive a mobile sighting for the smart phone associated with Angie corresponding to her coffee shop usage described in the ongoing example. The mobile sighting may only include a general geo-location or approximate range, such that the mobile sighting could have occurred at another business or retail location within the area (e.g., one of the nearby restaurants, shops, or other retail services). In one embodiment, the location profile analytics system 100 may determine that the mobile sighting was most likely or probable to have occurred at the coffee shop based on a number of factors considered alone or in combination. For example, the location profile analytics system 100 may access data from the business and/or geo-location data source 166A to identify one or more business locations which may be candidates based on their known location and general proximity to the geo-location data of the mobile sighting. The location profile analytics system 100 may determine, based on this data, that the only candidate business location open for business at 7:30 am is Angie's coffee shop, and determine that the mobile sighting most likely occurred at the coffee shop.
In another instance, the location profile analytics system 100 may access consumer profile data associated with Angie's smart phone (e.g., linked to an identifier associated with Angie's smart phone) which indicates that historically Angie visits coffee shops more frequently than the average consumer, or typically visits the particular coffee shop at around the same time of day (or within a range, such as between 7 am-8 am), from which the location profile analytics system 100 may determine that the mobile sighting most likely occurred at the coffee shop.
In yet another instance, the location profile analytics system 100 may access consumer profile or segment data associated with multiple consumers and business locations which may indicate that the relative frequency of sightings within a certain geographic and/or time of day range of the mobile sighting by business category or specific business location. (e.g., perhaps sightings at or near coffee shops are 5 times as likely between 6 am and 9 am). Thus, the location profile analytics system 100 may determine that another sighting within range of the coffee shop in the morning most likely did occur at the coffee shop.
Continuing to action (4), the location profile analytics system 100 provides consumer attributes and/or business location data back to the mobile service provider. The mobile service provider 164 may then provide targeted content to the device and/or user such as marketing offers, personalized news feeds, personalized traffic alerts, etc.
At action (5), the mobile service provider 164 provides targeted content to the consumer's mobile computing device 162, based on the received consumer attributes and/or business location data. Targeted content may be generated and provided in a number of ways based on the business location profiles and/or consumer profiles. For example, a business location profile provided by the location profile analytics system 100 may indicate that a mobile sighting for hypothetical Angie most likely originated from a coffee shop, and in response the mobile service provider may provide a coupon or special offer for Angie to use at the coffee shop. Or, a consumer profile provided by the location profile analytics system 100 may indicate that hypothetical Angie is associated with a certain consumer profile or segment of consumers which typically go to the supermarket after the coffee shop, and in response the mobile service provider may provide a coupon or special offer for Angie to use at the supermarket after her coffee shop stop.
At action (6), in some embodiments, the location profile analytics system 100 may provide consumer attributes and/or business location data (including business profiles) to the business(es) 168. Such data may be of use or value to a business 168 for use in customer service, marketing efforts, supply chain management, and other business management decisions. For example, targeted content for a customer of a business may be generated in a number of ways based on the business location data. For example, a business location profile provided by the location profile analytics system 100 may indicate for a hypothetical coffee shop (e.g., based on aggregated mobile sightings) what proportion of its 6 am to 9 am customer volume is from mobile device users who work nearby, which might then inform whether or not to run a promotion for a mid-afternoon break. The business 168 may also use business location profiles and/or consumer profiles in other ways, such as to measure overall retail traffic in its area and the proportion of that traffic visiting that business, inform employee staffing decisions (e.g., the coffee shop might need more employees working during peak hours in order to provide better customer service), inventory and demand forecasting (e.g., the coffee shop might be able to forecast when it will run out of coffee based on trends indicated by the business location profiles and/or consumer profiles, and preemptively order more to avoid out-of-stock situations), and so on.
Examples of Data Utilized by a Location Profile Analytics System
The location profile analytics system 100 may use the geo-location data associated with the mobile sighting in order to access, from a business location data source 166A, data regarding one or more candidate business locations which may be at or near the geo-location of the mobile sighting. For example, one or more businesses at or near the latitude-longitude coordinates, or within the associated distance range, may be considered as candidate business locations. As
As will be further described with reference to
The probability of one location being the true location of a mobile sighting may depend on many factors which can vary depending on the particular embodiment. For example, proximity to the location may be given a greater weighting in all instances regardless of other factors, or the proximity may be given a lower weighting depending upon the time of day. Thus, in some instances a sighting that appears directly adjacent to the coffee shop may give a greater weighting to the coffee shop as being the true location, no matter what time of day the sighting occurred. Or, in some instances, the time of day may be given a greater weighting, such that a sighting that appears directly adjacent to the coffee shop may give a lower weighting to the coffee shop as being the true location if it occurred at 11 pm—in such a case it may be determined that the true location is much more likely to be the Italian restaurant, even though both business locations may be open for business at 11 pm and the sighting may appear farther from the Italian restaurant than the coffee shop, based on other factors (e.g., the Italian restaurant may be much more popular at 11 pm than the coffee shop, or a consumer identifier associated with the mobile sighting may indicate that the consumer rarely goes to a coffee shop, and so on).
Examples of Methods Performed by a Location Profile Analytics System
At block 305, the location profile analytics system 100 accesses or receives sighting data indicating one or more sightings for respective mobile devices. Sighting data may be accessed from, for example, the mobile sightings data sources 166C, and may include data for one or more sightings. Each sighting may include a unique identifier the sighting, a unique identifier for a mobile computing device which generated the sighting, a unique and anonymous identifier for a consumer associated with the mobile computing device which generated the sighting, geo-location data for the sighting (e.g., latitude and longitude coordinates, GPS coordinates, data from towers, antennae or other network infrastructure, etc.), a date and time for the sighting, and/or a range or other indication of the accuracy of the sighting.
At block 310, the location profile analytics system 100 accesses business location data for one or more businesses that may be near the sightings (e.g., based on the geo-location data associated with a respective sighting). Business location data may be accessed from, for example, the business location data sources 166A, and may include attributes, profiles, and other data descriptive of or related to the respective business locations. For example, attributes might include a name, a type of business (e.g., food, retail/shopping, service, etc.), hours of operation (e.g., hours during which the business location is open), geo-location information (including street addresses, latitude and longitude coordinates, GPS coordinates, etc.), phone number(s), and any other information available for the business location. Profiles might include, for example, data describing consumer traffic patterns/trends for the business (e.g., which time(s) the business location appears to have a high (or low) level of traffic, which may be based in part on aggregated sightings data) and/or other businesses in the same category (e.g. coffee shops, in general). Profiles might also include ratings and related consumer feedback data, which may be accessed or gathered from popular consumer ratings websites (such as Yelp.com or similar services). The business location data may be used by the location profile analytics system 100 in order to identify one or more businesses that may be associated with the sightings data accessed at block 305, and/or to generate, improve, or enhance profiles for the business locations based at least in part on any relevant new sightings.
At block 315, the location profile analytics system 100 accesses consumer data for consumers associated with the respective mobile devices which generated or provided the mobile sightings data (e.g., based on the unique identifiers associated with a respective sighting). Consumer data may be accessed from, for example, the consumer data sources 166B, and may include attributes, profiles, and other data descriptive of or related to the respective consumers. Consumer data may also include data such as socio-economic attributes, demographics, age, lifestyle segments, behavioral/attitudinal, financial attributes including income and credit data-related attributes, and so on. Consumer data may also include profiles, segmentation or other attributes derived from historical patterns in the mobile sightings data, as determined at block 330, below. The consumer data may be used by the location profile analytics system 100 in order to identify one or more businesses that may be associated with the sightings data accessed at block 305, and/or to generate, improve, or enhance profiles for the business locations based at least in part on any relevant new sightings.
At block 320, the location profile analytics system 100 may optionally apply location filters to remove and/or exclude sightings matching certain locations, types, or other criteria. For example, location filters may be applied in order to resolve or remove sightings which may be associated with a consumer's home and/or work. Location filters may also be applied in order to resolve or remove sightings which may correspond to “in transit” or “in between sightings” which may not correspond to any business locations, in order to reduce the sightings to key times and/or waypoints. This type of filtering may also be based on analyzing differentials in speed data (e.g., a miles-per-hour (“mph”) that may be associated with a sighting) between sightings. In some embodiments, sightings which are removed during the filtering process at block 320 may be saved or stored for later use. For example, “in transit” sightings might be provided for use in automotive insurance underwriting, such as to validate commute distances and approximated miles driven per year to assess proper or more accurate insurance premium calculations. One example of how the filtering at block 320 may be performed is illustrated and discussed in further detail herein with respect to process 400 of
At block 325, the location profile analytics system 100 analyzes the (filtered) sightings data to determine associated trends and/or probabilities that particular sightings correspond to particular business locations. For example, the analysis may be based on a weighted average based on multiple factors or inputs, such as: a distance from a center point of a sighting to a particular business location; prior sightings, trends, or patterns based on a particular business type or time of day; prior sightings, trends, or patterns based on consumer segments, profiles, or attributes; and so on. One example of how the sightings analysis at block 325 may be performed is illustrated and discussed in further detail herein with respect to process 500 of
At block 330, the location profile analytics system 100 generates and/or updates business location profiles and/or the consumer profiles based on the results of the sightings analysis performed at block 325 and/or process 500 of
Similarly, consumer profiles may be updated to reflect better or more accurate segment profiles or consumer-specific profiles over time as more sightings data are aggregated and analyzed. Consumer profiles may be generated based on or using various clustering techniques in order to determine certain segment characteristics, such as commute distance, frequencies of visiting various retail and other locations which may be organized by categories and subcategories, demographic and socioeconomic profiles, and so on. Consumer profiles may also include aggregated segment prevalence data such as micro-geographic aggregation based on home and/or work location sightings. For example, the percentage of consumers who work in a given area might be tabulated according to the area in which they live, the length of their commute, the proportion that routinely stop for coffee on the way to work, etc. One possible result of the consumer profile analysis would be to link or associate an anonymous consumer identifier with particular consumer segments and/or behaviors, such that sightings associated with the consumer identifier may be mapped to the particular consumer segments. In some embodiments, after generating the business location and/or consumer profiles at block 330, the process 300 may return to block 315 and repeat the processes performed at blocks 315 through 330 in order to further refine the profiles associated with the respective sightings and business locations.
At block 335, the location profile analytics system 100 provides the business location profiles and/or consumer profiles to a requesting entity. The business location profiles and/or consumer profiles may then be used by the requesting entity to provide targeted content to consumers, such as targeted advertising, coupons, special offers, customized news feeds, personalized traffic alerts, and the like.
For example, as discussed in more detail with respect to
In another embodiment, the business location profiles and/or consumer profiles may be provided to a business 168. The business 168 may then provide targeted content such as marketing offers to its customers, such that the targeted content may be generated in a number of ways based on the business location profiles and/or consumer profiles. For example, a business location profile provided by the location profile analytics system 100 may indicate for a hypothetical coffee shop (e.g., based on aggregated mobile sightings) what proportion of its 6 am to 9 am customer volume is from mobile device users who work nearby, which might then inform whether or not to run a promotion for a mid-afternoon break. The business 168 may also use business location profiles and/or consumer profiles in other ways, such as to measure overall retail traffic in its area and the proportion of that traffic visiting that business, inform employee staffing decisions (e.g., the coffee shop might need more employees working during peak hours in order to provide better customer service), inventory and demand forecasting (e.g., the coffee shop might be able to forecast when it will run out of coffee based on trends indicated by the business location profiles and/or consumer profiles, and preemptively order more to avoid out-of-stock situations), and so.
In another embodiment, the business location profiles and/or consumer profiles may be provided to other types of third party entities. For example, lenders or lending institutions may be provided with business location profiles in order to determine or assess and associated level of credit risk or fraud which may be associated with a business location. For example, a lender may wish to compare financial or earnings reports from a business location to the business location profile in order to determine or assess whether the earnings reports appear to be accurate: reported high earnings coupled with relatively low traffic counts from the business location profile may signal to the lender that the business location may be fraudulently reporting its earnings. The lender may also wish to measure traffic counts at a business location in relation to those of other comparable businesses in order to gauge relative market share, or measure trends in traffic counts at a business location as part of an assessment of the business location's future prospects. Or, a lender may wish to view business location profiles for areas near a newly proposed business location in order to assess the credit risk of the new venture: high traffic counts for a given area (such as retail shopping mall), particularly among desired consumer segments, may signal a much lower credit risk for a proposed new business location in the given area that caters to those consumer segments.
At block 405, the location profile analytics system 100 accesses or receives initial sighting data for a mobile device. The initial sighting data may be accessed from, for example, the mobile sightings data sources 166C, and may include data for one or more sightings for the mobile device. In one embodiment the initial sighting data may be accessed as part of the process 300 (e.g., at block 305), or otherwise provided to the location profile analytics system 100 or one of its components in conjunction with the process 300.
At block 410, the location profile analytics system 100 identifies one or more locations which may correspond to a residence (e.g., home) or place of employment (e.g., work) for a consumer associated with the mobile device associated with a sighting. For example, the location profile analytics system 100 may access consumer profile data from the consumer data sources 166B, based at least in part on a unique identifier associated with the sighting for the mobile device. The consumer profile data may include residence location data and/or employment location data for the consumer, which the location profile analytics system 100 can analyze and compare to the geo-location data associated with the sighting (e.g., determine if either (1) the residence location data and/or (2) the employment location data matches, or is in close proximity to, the geo-location data associated with the sighting). Mobile sightings associated with estimated residence and/or employment locations may be excluded from further location analysis in order to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the overall sightings analysis process, for example when millions of sightings are being analyzed substantially in parallel and in real time.
At block 415, the location profile analytics system 100 may optionally identify one or more locations which may correspond to in-transit sightings (e.g., sightings which appear to not be associated with any particular location of interest, or that appear to correspond to locations in-between business locations). For example, one set of sightings data for a mobile device may include twenty hypothetical sightings: three sightings at or near a coffee shop, five sightings at or near a supermarket 2 miles away, and twelve sightings at or near a highway between the coffee shop and the supermarket. The twelve sightings at or near the highway may be identified as in-transit sightings that may be excluded from further analysis (unless, perhaps, those sightings might correspond to other business locations along the highway). Removing in-transit sightings can improve the efficiency and accuracy of the overall sightings analysis process, for example when millions of sightings are being analyzed substantially in parallel and in real time.
At block 420, the location profile analytics system 100 may optionally identify or access location filters indicating one or more locations and/or location types which may be excluded or removed from the sightings analysis. In some embodiments, location filters may be associated with a requesting entity (e.g., a mobile service provider, a business location, or other third party) that is interested in analysis related only to sightings for particular locations or types. For example, a coffee shop may only interested in retail sightings and thus desire to have non-retail business locations excluded from the sightings analysis. Other entities may have their own business-specific rules or reasons for excluding certain locations or location types, and the location profile analytics system 100 may store or otherwise have access to customized filters which reflect those business rules or reasons, and apply the filters to sightings data when a request is received from those particular entities which have customized filters.
At block 425, the location profile analytics system 100 removes one or more sightings from the initial sightings data which correspond to any of the identified locations at blocks 410, 415, and 420 in order to generate a set of filtered sightings data. In some instances, none of the identified locations may need to be excluded or removed from the sightings analysis (e.g., no locations are identified at blocks 410, 415, and 420), and thus the filtered sightings data may include all of the sightings in the initial sightings data (e.g. none of the sightings may be removed).
At block 430, the location profile analytics system 100 provides the filtered sightings data. The filtered sightings data may be provided to another process performed by the location profile analytics system 100, such as the process 300 of
At block 505, the location profile analytics system 100 determines an initial list of candidate business locations potentially associated with a sighting. The initial list of candidate business locations may be determined based on proximity to the sighting. In one embodiment, the initial list of candidate business locations might include all business locations within a certain radial distance of the sighting or within a certain radial distance of the range of the sighting, based on the geo-location data associated with the sighting). For example, the initial list of candidate business locations might include all business locations within 1000 feet of the geo-location of the sighting.
In another embodiment, the initial list of candidate business locations might include all business locations within a geographic unit or area (e.g., one or more ZIP codes, ZIP+4 codes, or any size of geographic unit) that is at or near the sighting. For example, the location profile analytics system 100 might determine that the sighting occurred in a certain ZIP+4 code, and the initial list of candidate business locations may be determined to include any business locations sharing the same or nearby ZIP+4 codes.
In another embodiment, the initial list of candidate business locations might include all business locations sharing a common geographic attribute that is also shared or associated with the geo-location of the sighting. For example, the location profile analytics system 100 might determine that the sighting occurred in a retail shopping center, and the initial list of candidate business locations may be determined to include any business locations located within the retail shopping center.
At block 510, the location profile analytics system 100 determines, for each candidate business location, distances (either actual or approximated) from a center point associated with the sighting. As previously described, a sighting may correspond to a range or area of geographic coordinates (e.g., within U distance of a point {X, Y, Z}). Thus, the location profile analytics system 100 may initially calculate an associated center point to approximate the location of the sighting (in some instances the center point may be the geographic coordinates, if known). Using location data associated with each of the business locations on the initial candidate list, the location profile analytics system 100 can determine the distance between each business location and the sighting. One example of this is illustrated and described with reference to
At block 515, the location profile analytics system 100 analyzes business location profiles for each candidate business location to identify related prior sightings (e.g., based on time, location, trends, etc.). Business location profiles might include information indicating, for example, a certain time or times at which sightings have previously occurred a given business location and/or other comparable business locations in the same category. Business location profiles may also include specific attributes of the business location such as hours of operation. Thus, the hypothetical coffee shop might have more sightings at 7 am than at 10 am, while a hypothetical night club or bar might have more sightings at 11 pm than at 11 am. However, the hypothetical coffee shop might also have more sightings at 11 am than the bar at 11 am. These profiles and trends can be analyzed and compared to the time of the sighting as one factor the probabilistic location determination performed at block 525, described below. For example, if the sighting occurred at 7 am or 11 am the location profile analytics system 100 may determine that the sighting more likely occurred at the coffee shop than the bar.
At block 520, the location profile analytics system 100 analyzes consumer profiles for each candidate business location to identify related prior sightings. For example, consumer data may indicate that consumers associated with a particular market segment, demographic, or other attribute tend to visit certain business locations more than others. The sighting might include an identifier for the consumer which the location profile analytics system 100 can use to look up or determine an associated consumer profile. Each candidate business location can then be compared to the associated consumer profile to determine a probability (or a factor weighing in a probability determination) that the consumer associated with the sighting would visit the candidate business location. For example, hypothetical Angie might be associated with a consumer profile or segment of commuters who tend to frequent coffee shops often, or relatively more often than other establishments such as bars. This profile data may then be compared with the candidate business locations to determine that a particular sighting for Angie (or for an anonymous individual with similar attributes to Angie's profile) is more likely to have occurred at a nearby coffee shop than a nearby bar.
At block 525, the location profile analytics system 100 determines, for each candidate business location, a probability that the sighting corresponds to the business location. The determination may be based at least in part on the distances determined at block 510, the business profiles (and related prior sightings) analyzed at block 515, and/or the consumer profiles (and related prior sightings) analyzed at block 520 as discussed above. The probability may be determined in any number of ways, with each of the three example variables described above receiving different weights depending upon the embodiment or based on the actual data involved. For example, distance may be given a higher relative weight if one candidate business location is in very close proximity (e.g., 50 feet) to a sighting and a second candidate business location is relatively farther away (e.g., 500 feet, relative to a sighting with a range of certainty of plus or minus 10 feet). Or, business profiles may be given a higher relative weight if a sighting occurred at a certain time (e.g., 7 am) at which only one or two candidate business locations are actually open for business (e.g., at 7 am the coffee shop is open, but the bar is closed). Or, consumer profiles may be given a higher relative weight if a sighting is associated with a segment of consumers who favor one business candidate location on the list (e.g. coffee shops, book stores), but few or none of the others (e.g., bars, night clubs).
At block 530, once a probability has been determined for each business location the location profile analytics system 100 selects a business location with the highest determined probability and/or assigns fractional shares of the sighting to the business locations in proportion to their calculated probabilities. The allocation of the sighting to business location(s) may then be provided or used by another process performed by the location profile analytics system 100, such as the process 300 of
System Implementation and Architecture
The location profile analytics system 100 includes, for example, a personal computer that is IBM, Macintosh, or Linux/Unix compatible or a server or workstation. In one embodiment, the location profile analytics system 100 comprises a server, a laptop computer, a smart phone, a personal digital assistant, a kiosk, or an media player, for example. In one embodiment, the exemplary location profile analytics system 100 includes one or more central processing unit (“CPU”) 105, which may each include a conventional or proprietary microprocessor. The location profile analytics system 100 further includes one or more memory 130, such as random access memory (“RAM”) for temporary storage of information, one or more read only memory (“ROM”) for permanent storage of information, and one or more mass storage device 120, such as a hard drive, diskette, solid state drive, or optical media storage device. Typically, the modules of the location profile analytics system 100 are connected to the computer using a standard based bus system 180. In different embodiments, the standard based bus system could be implemented in Peripheral Component Interconnect (“PCI”), Microchannel, Small Computer System Interface (“SCSI”), Industrial Standard Architecture (“ISA”) and Extended ISA (“EISA”) architectures, for example. In addition, the functionality provided for in the components and modules of location profile analytics system 100 may be combined into fewer components and modules or further separated into additional components and modules.
The location profile analytics system 100 is generally controlled and coordinated by operating system software, such as Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Server, Unix, Linux, SunOS, Solaris, iOS, Blackberry OS, or other compatible operating systems. In Macintosh systems, the operating system may be any available operating system, such as MAC OS X. In other embodiments, the location profile analytics system 100 may be controlled by a proprietary operating system. Conventional operating systems control and schedule computer processes for execution, perform memory management, provide file system, networking, I/O services, and provide a user interface, such as a graphical user interface (“GUI”), among other things.
The exemplary location profile analytics system 100 may include one or more commonly available input/output (I/O) devices and interfaces 110, such as a keyboard, mouse, touchpad, and printer. In one embodiment, the I/O devices and interfaces 110 include one or more display devices, such as a monitor, that allows the visual presentation of data to a user. More particularly, a display device provides for the presentation of GUIs, application software data, and multimedia presentations, for example. The location profile analytics system 100 may also include one or more multimedia devices 140, such as speakers, video cards, graphics accelerators, and microphones, for example.
In the embodiment of
According to
The business location data source(s) 166A may store, for example, attributes, profiles, and other data descriptive of or related to respective business locations. For example, attributes might include a name, a type of business (e.g., food, retail/shopping, service, etc.), hours of operation (e.g., hours during which the business location is open), geo-location information (including street addresses, latitude longitude coordinates, GPS coordinates, etc.), phone number(s), and any other information available for the business location. Business location profiles might include, for example, data describing consumer traffic patterns/trends for the business (e.g., which time(s) the business location appears to have a high (or low) level of traffic, which may be based in part on aggregated sightings data). Business location profiles might also include ratings and related consumer feedback data, which may be accessed or gathered from popular consumer ratings websites (such as Yelp.com or similar services).
The consumer data source(s) 166B may store, for example, credit bureau data (for example, credit bureau data from File Ones℠) and/or other consumer data. Consumer data source(s) 166B may also store geographic level demographics that include one or more models, such as models that identify lifestyle and/or socio-economic attributes associated with a geographic location (e.g., MOSAIC® segmentation and/or codes) and/or behavioral/attitudinal/psychographic attributes associated with a geographic location (e.g., TrueTouch℠ Touch Points segmentation).
The mobile sightings data source(s) 166C may store, for example, data for one or more sightings for respective mobile devices. Each sighting may include a unique identifier the sighting, a unique identifier for a mobile computing device which generated the sighting, a unique and anonymous identifier for a consumer associated with the mobile computing device which generated the sighting, geo-location data for the sighting (e.g., latitude and longitude coordinates, GPS coordinates, etc.), a date and time for the sighting, and/or a range or other indication of the accuracy of the sighting.
In the embodiment of
In general, the word “module,” as used herein, refers to logic embodied in hardware or firmware, or to a collection of software instructions, possibly having entry and exit points, written in a programming language, such as, for example, Java, Lua, C or C++. A software module may be compiled and linked into an executable program, installed in a dynamic link library, or may be written in an interpreted programming language such as, for example, BASIC, Perl, or Python. It will be appreciated that software modules may be callable from other modules or from themselves, and/or may be invoked in response to detected events or interrupts. Software modules configured for execution on computing devices may be provided on a computer readable medium, such as a compact disc, digital video disc, flash drive, or any other tangible medium. Such software code may be stored, partially or fully, on a memory device of the executing computing device, such as the location profile analytics system 100, for execution by the computing device. Software instructions may be embedded in firmware, such as an EPROM. It will be further appreciated that hardware modules may be comprised of connected logic units, such as gates and flip-flops, and/or may be comprised of programmable units, such as programmable gate arrays or processors. The modules described herein are preferably implemented as software modules, but may be represented in hardware or firmware. Generally, the modules described herein refer to logical modules that may be combined with other modules or divided into sub-modules despite their physical organization or storage.
Each of the processes, methods, and algorithms described in the preceding sections may be embodied in, and fully or partially automated by, code modules executed by one or more computer systems or computer processors comprising computer hardware. The code modules may be stored on any type of non-transitory computer-readable medium or computer storage device, such as hard drives, solid state memory, optical disc, and/or the like. The systems and modules may also be transmitted as generated data signals (e.g., as part of a carrier wave or other analog or digital propagated signal) on a variety of computer-readable transmission mediums, including wireless-based and wired/cable-based mediums, and may take a variety of forms (e.g., as part of a single or multiplexed analog signal, or as multiple discrete digital packets or frames). The processes and algorithms may be implemented partially or wholly in application-specific circuitry. The results of the disclosed processes and process steps may be stored, persistently or otherwise, in any type of non-transitory computer storage such as, e.g., volatile or non-volatile storage.
The various features and processes described above may be used independently of one another, or may be combined in various ways. All possible combinations and subcombinations are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure. In addition, certain method or process blocks may be omitted in some implementations. The methods and processes described herein are also not limited to any particular sequence, and the blocks or states relating thereto can be performed in other sequences that are appropriate. For example, described blocks or states may be performed in an order other than that specifically disclosed, or multiple blocks or states may be combined in a single block or state. The example blocks or states may be performed in serial, in parallel, or in some other manner. Blocks or states may be added to or removed from the disclosed example embodiments. The example systems and components described herein may be configured differently than described. For example, elements may be added to, removed from, or rearranged compared to the disclosed example embodiments.
Conditional language used herein, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” “may,” “e.g.,” and the like, unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without author input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment. The terms “comprising,” “including,” “having,” and the like are synonymous and are used inclusively, in an open-ended fashion, and do not exclude additional elements, features, acts, operations, and so forth. Also, the term “or” is used in its inclusive sense (and not in its exclusive sense) so that when used, for example, to connect a list of elements, the term “or” means one, some, or all of the elements in the list. Conjunctive language such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y and Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is otherwise understood with the context as used in general to convey that an item, term, etc. may be either X, Y or Z. Thus, such conjunctive language is not generally intended to imply that certain embodiments require at least one of X, at least one of Y and at least one of Z to each be present.
While certain example embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure. Thus, nothing in the foregoing description is intended to imply that any particular element, feature, characteristic, step, module, or block is necessary or indispensable. Indeed, the novel methods and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the spirit of the inventions disclosed herein. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope and spirit of certain of the inventions disclosed herein.
It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/748,675, filed on Jun. 24, 2015, which claims priority from provisional U.S. Pat. Appl. No. 62/016,989, filed on Jun. 25, 2014, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4775935 | Yourick | Oct 1988 | A |
4982346 | Girouard et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5201010 | Deaton et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5274547 | Zoffel et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5283731 | Lalonde et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5305195 | Murphy | Apr 1994 | A |
5325509 | Lautzenheiser | Jun 1994 | A |
5347632 | Filepp et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5454030 | de Oliveira et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459306 | Stein et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5504675 | Cragun et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515098 | Carles | May 1996 | A |
5560008 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563783 | Stolfo et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5583380 | Larsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592560 | Deaton et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5627973 | Armstrong et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629982 | Micali | May 1997 | A |
5630127 | Moore et al. | May 1997 | A |
5649114 | Deaton et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5661516 | Carles | Aug 1997 | A |
5689565 | Spies et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696898 | Baker et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5696907 | Tom | Dec 1997 | A |
5717923 | Dedrick | Feb 1998 | A |
5724521 | Dedrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5740549 | Reilly et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745654 | Titan | Apr 1998 | A |
5745694 | Egawa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5774357 | Hoffberg et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774868 | Cragun et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774870 | Storey | Jun 1998 | A |
5809481 | Baton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819092 | Ferguson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819226 | Gopinathan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823879 | Goldberg et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825884 | Zdepski et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828837 | Elkland | Oct 1998 | A |
5848396 | Gerace | Dec 1998 | A |
5857175 | Day et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864822 | Baker, III | Jan 1999 | A |
5870721 | Norris | Feb 1999 | A |
5873068 | Beaumont et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5889799 | Grossman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889958 | Willens | Mar 1999 | A |
5890140 | Clark et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5907608 | Shaffer et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907830 | Engel et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912839 | Ovshinsky et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915243 | Smolen | Jun 1999 | A |
5918014 | Robinson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924082 | Silverman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930764 | Melchione et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930776 | Dykstra et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933811 | Angles et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933813 | Teicher et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944790 | Levy | Aug 1999 | A |
5948061 | Merriman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953707 | Huang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961593 | Gabber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966695 | Melchione et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974396 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991735 | Gerace | Nov 1999 | A |
6014688 | Venkatraman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026368 | Brown et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029139 | Cunningham et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044357 | Garg | Mar 2000 | A |
6055573 | Gardenswartz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061658 | Chou et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061691 | Fox | May 2000 | A |
6064973 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070142 | McDonough et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070147 | Harms et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073241 | Rosenberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078892 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085169 | Walker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101486 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115693 | McDonough et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6144948 | Walker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6178442 | Yamazaki | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202053 | Christiansen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205432 | Gabbard et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208979 | Sinclair | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209033 | Datta et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233566 | Levine et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236977 | Verba et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6269343 | Pallakoff | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289318 | Barber | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298330 | Gardenswartz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308210 | Fields et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317752 | Lee et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324566 | Himmel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330546 | Gopinathan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334110 | Walter et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6385592 | Angles et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6385594 | Lebda et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6412012 | Bieganski et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424956 | Werbos | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442529 | Krishan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442577 | Britton et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445975 | Ramsey | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460036 | Herz | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477509 | Hammons et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487538 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
5870721 | Norris | Jan 2003 | C1 |
6505168 | Rothman et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6513018 | Culhane | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6546257 | Stewart | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549944 | Weinberg et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6604089 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611816 | Lebda et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615247 | Murphy | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623529 | Lakritz | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631356 | Van Horn et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633850 | Gabbard et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640215 | Galperin et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6665715 | Houri | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671818 | Mikurak | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6698020 | Zigmond et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6748426 | Shaffer et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757740 | Parekh et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6801909 | Delgado et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810356 | Garcia-Franco et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6839682 | Blume et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847934 | Lin et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6873979 | Fishman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6901406 | Nabe et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6915269 | Shapiro et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6925441 | Jones, III et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6959281 | Freeling et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6970830 | Samra et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6983478 | Grauch et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6993493 | Galperin et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7003792 | Yuen | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013285 | Rebane | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7023980 | Lenard | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031945 | Donner | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7033792 | Zhong et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039607 | Watarai et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047251 | Reed et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050989 | Hurt et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7054828 | Heching et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7072853 | Shkedi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7072963 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076442 | Lin et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080027 | Luby et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085734 | Grant et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7117172 | Black | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7136448 | Venkataperumal et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7150030 | Eldering et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7152018 | Wicks | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152237 | Flickinger et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155508 | Sankuratripati et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7165037 | Lazarus et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185353 | Schlack | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7191144 | White | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194420 | Ikezawa et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7212979 | Matz et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7240059 | Bayliss et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249048 | O'Flaherty | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7275083 | Seibel et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7296734 | Pliha | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7305364 | Nabe et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308418 | Malek et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310617 | Cunningham | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7313538 | Wilmes et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313622 | Lee et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314166 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328169 | Temares et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343294 | Sandholm et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7346540 | Lin et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7363308 | Dillon et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366694 | Lazerson | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370057 | Burdick et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376603 | Mayr et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376714 | Gerken | May 2008 | B1 |
7386786 | Davis et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392203 | Edison et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7424439 | Fayyad et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7428526 | Miller et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7444302 | Hu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7451095 | Bradley et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7458508 | Shao et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7467106 | Levine et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7472088 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7499868 | Galperin et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7529689 | Rowan | May 2009 | B2 |
7546266 | Beirne et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7546619 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7556192 | Wokaty, Jr. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7562184 | Henmi et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7565153 | Alcock et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7571139 | Giordano et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7580856 | Pliha | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7584126 | White | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7590589 | Hoffberg | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593893 | Ladd et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7606778 | Dewar | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610257 | Abrahams | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7617136 | Lessing et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7617160 | Grove et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7636941 | Blinn et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7653592 | Flaxman et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7668840 | Bayliss et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672865 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7672897 | Chung et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685021 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686214 | Shao et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7689528 | Zheng | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698236 | Cox et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707059 | Reed et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711635 | Steele et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7715546 | Pagel et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720750 | Brody | May 2010 | B2 |
7725300 | Pinto et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7730509 | Boulet et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734570 | Bachman et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739142 | Chand et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742982 | Chaudhuri et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752236 | Williams et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7783515 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7783534 | Armstrong et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788147 | Haggerty et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792702 | Katz et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7793835 | Coggeshall et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7801843 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7814004 | Haggerty et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7835940 | Kowalchuk | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853700 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7877320 | Downey | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7925549 | Looney et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7937286 | Newman | May 2011 | B2 |
7957991 | Mikurak | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962368 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962404 | Metzger, II et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7962501 | Semprevivo et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
RE42663 | Lazarus et al. | Aug 2011 | E |
7996521 | Chamberlain et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005712 | von Davier et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005759 | Hirtenstein et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8006261 | Haberman et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8015045 | Galperin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8015140 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024264 | Chaudhuri et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027871 | Wiliams et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027888 | Chandran et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032409 | Mikurak | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8078453 | Shaw | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8078524 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086524 | Craig et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8104671 | Besecker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126805 | Sulkowski et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8127982 | Casey et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8135607 | Wiliams et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145754 | Chamberlain et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8161104 | Tomkow | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8190470 | Srivastava et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8234498 | Britti et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8255268 | Rane et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8271313 | Williams et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271378 | Chaudhuri et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8280805 | Abrahams et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8285577 | Galperin et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8285656 | Chang et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8296229 | Yellin et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8301574 | Kilger et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8346593 | Fanelli | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364588 | Celka et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8386377 | Xiong et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8392334 | Hirtenstein et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412593 | Song et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8417559 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8438170 | Koran et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8458062 | Dutt et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8468198 | Tomkow | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8515828 | Wolf et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8515862 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8533038 | Bergh et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533322 | Chamberlain et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8560434 | Morris et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8560666 | Low | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8566167 | Munjal | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571919 | Rane et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571929 | Srivastava et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8606626 | DeSoto et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8606695 | Arora et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8620740 | Bergh et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8626563 | Williams et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630929 | Haggerty et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8639920 | Stack et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8694361 | Durvasula et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8732004 | Ramos et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8738515 | Chaudhuri et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8768743 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8943060 | Krishnan et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8966649 | Stack et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9058340 | Chamberlain et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9105048 | Koran et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9152727 | Balducci et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9213646 | LaPanse et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9329715 | Schwarz et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9471928 | Fanelli et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9501781 | Singh et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9547870 | Bradford | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9595051 | Stack et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9704192 | Ainsworth et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9767309 | Patel et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9785890 | Sowani et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9846884 | Milana et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10019593 | Patel et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10089664 | Hamdi et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10169775 | Koltnow et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10292008 | Nack et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10304075 | Walz et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10354311 | Ainsworth, III et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10380619 | Pontious | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10380654 | Hirtenstein et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10423976 | Walz | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10460335 | West | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10467672 | Ainsworth, III et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10657229 | Zoldi et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10664759 | Naik | May 2020 | B2 |
10678894 | Yin et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10685133 | Patel et al. | Jun 2020 | B1 |
10726425 | Korra et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10810605 | Fanelli et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
20010014868 | Herz et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010039523 | Iwamoto | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020004754 | Gardenswartz et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023051 | Kunzle et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029162 | Mascarenhas | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046099 | Frengut et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046105 | Gardenswartz et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049968 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020051020 | Ferrari et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055906 | Katz et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065716 | Kuschill | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069203 | Dar et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077890 | LaPointe et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077964 | Brody et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082892 | Raffel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083043 | Hoshi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099641 | Mills et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099824 | Bender et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099936 | Kou et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116253 | Coyne et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120504 | Gould et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123904 | Amengual et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123928 | Eldering et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128960 | Lambiotte et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129368 | Schlack et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133404 | Pedersen | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138331 | Hosea et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138333 | DeCotiis et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138334 | DeCotiis et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147669 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147695 | Khedkar et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161664 | Shaya et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169655 | Beyer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030018769 | Foulger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023489 | McGuire et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033242 | Lynch et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041050 | Smith et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046222 | Bard et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060284 | Hamalainen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061233 | Manasse et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065563 | Elliott et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093311 | Knowlson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110293 | Friedman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120591 | Birkhead et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030144950 | O'Brien et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158776 | Landesmann | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163708 | Tang | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167222 | Mehrotra et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200135 | Wright | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216965 | Libman | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229507 | Perge | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229892 | Sardera | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233278 | Marshall | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233323 | Bilski et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233655 | Gutta et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024848 | Smith | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039688 | Sulkowski et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049729 | Penfield | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059626 | Smallwood | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062213 | Koss | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078809 | Drazin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083215 | de Jong | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040098625 | Lagadec et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102197 | Dietz | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107125 | Guheen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122730 | Tucciarone et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122735 | Meshkin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128193 | Brice et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128236 | Brown et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138932 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139025 | Coleman | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153509 | Alcorn et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163101 | Swix | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176995 | Fusz | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193487 | Purcell et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199456 | Flint et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199584 | Kirshenbaum et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199789 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205157 | Bibelnieks et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230820 | Hui Hsu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040261116 | Mckeown et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010494 | Mourad et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021397 | Cui et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050027 | Yeh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065809 | Henze | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091077 | Reynolds | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097039 | Kulcsar et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102375 | Varghese | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120045 | Klawon | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050120249 | Shuster | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144067 | Farahat et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144641 | Lewis | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050177442 | Sullivan et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177489 | Neff et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192008 | Desai et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201272 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204381 | Ludvig et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209922 | Hofmeister | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222900 | Fuloria et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222906 | Chen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233742 | Karaoguz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234969 | Mamou et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251820 | Stefanik et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257250 | Mitchell et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261959 | Moyer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273849 | Araujo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278246 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278743 | Flickinger et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288954 | McCarthy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004626 | Holmen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060004731 | Seibel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020611 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041443 | Horvath | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041500 | Diana et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053047 | Garcia et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059062 | Wood et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059073 | Walzak | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080210 | Mourad et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080233 | Mendelovich et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080251 | Fried et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080274 | Mourad | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089914 | Shiel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095363 | May | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100954 | Schoen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122921 | Comerford et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144927 | Love et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155639 | Lynch et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168068 | Ziegert | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173772 | Hayes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178189 | Walker et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178971 | Owen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178983 | Nice et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195866 | Thukral | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206379 | Rosenberg | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206416 | Farias | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212350 | Ellis et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212353 | Roslov et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218079 | Goldblatt et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224696 | King et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229943 | Mathias et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229996 | Keithley et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230415 | Roeding | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241923 | Xu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242046 | Haggerty et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242050 | Haggerty et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247991 | Jin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253323 | Phan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259364 | Strock et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276171 | Pousti | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060277102 | Agliozzo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282327 | Neal et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282328 | Gerace et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282856 | Errico et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287915 | Boulet et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287919 | Rubens et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293921 | McCarthy et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293954 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293955 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294199 | Bertholf | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011020 | Martin | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011039 | Oddo | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011099 | Sheehan | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016518 | Atkinson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022032 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027791 | Young et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033227 | Gaito et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038516 | Apple et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061195 | Liu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061243 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067297 | Kublickis | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067437 | Sindambiwe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078835 | Donnelli | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070121843 | Atazky et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129993 | Alvin | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156515 | Hasselback et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156589 | Zimler et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070157110 | Gandhi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169189 | Crespo et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174122 | Howard et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175986 | Petrone et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192165 | Haggerty et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192409 | Kleinstern et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208619 | Branam et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220553 | Branam et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220611 | Socolow et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233857 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244732 | Chatterji et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070271178 | Davis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271582 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282684 | Prosser et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288271 | Klinkhammer | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288950 | Downey et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288953 | Sheeman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294126 | Maggio | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294163 | Harmon et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299771 | Brody | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004957 | Hildreth et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005313 | Flake et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010206 | Coleman | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021802 | Pendleton | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028067 | Berkhin et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040216 | Dellovo | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059317 | Chandran et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080059352 | Chandran | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065774 | Keeler | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086368 | Bauman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091535 | Heiser et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097928 | Paulson | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080120155 | Pliha | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126476 | Nicholas et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133325 | De et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134042 | Jankovich | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140476 | Anand et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147425 | Durvasula | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167956 | Keithley | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177836 | Bennett | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183564 | Tien et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184289 | Cristofalo et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208548 | Metzger et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215470 | Sengupta et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222127 | Bergin | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228578 | Mashinsky | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228635 | Megdal et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255897 | Megdal et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294540 | Celka et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294546 | Flannery | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301727 | Cristofalo et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006475 | Udezue et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018996 | Hunt et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019027 | Ju et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024462 | Lin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044246 | Sheehan et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090064326 | Goldstein | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076883 | Kilger et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089205 | Bayne | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094640 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113532 | Lapidous | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119169 | Chandratillake et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090119199 | Salahi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132347 | Anderson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132559 | Chamberlain et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132691 | Daurensan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133058 | Kouritzin et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144102 | Lopez | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090144201 | Gierkink et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164293 | Coley | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171755 | Kane et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090172035 | Lessing et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177480 | Chen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090215479 | Karmarkar | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222380 | Choudhuri et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228918 | Rolff et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234665 | Conkel | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234708 | Heiser, II et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234715 | Heiser, II et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249440 | Platt et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265326 | Lehrman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090288109 | Downey et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313163 | Wang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319648 | Dutta et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010935 | Shelton | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017300 | Bramlage et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030649 | Ubelhor | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037255 | Sheehan et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100094704 | Subramanian et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094758 | Chamberlain et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106568 | Grimes | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114663 | Casas et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138290 | Zschocke et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145791 | Canning et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161492 | Harvey et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169159 | Rose et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169264 | O'Sullivan | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185453 | Satyavolu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191598 | Toennis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211445 | Bodington | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100268660 | Ekdahl | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110023115 | Wright | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029388 | Kendall et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047072 | Ciurea | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066495 | Ayloo et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071950 | Ivanovic | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110076663 | Krallman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078018 | Chunilal | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078073 | Annappindi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093327 | Fordyce, III et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110125595 | Neal et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137789 | Kortina et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110164746 | Nice et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178843 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178844 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178845 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178846 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178847 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178848 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178855 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178899 | Huszar | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202407 | Buhrmann et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208578 | Bergh et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110211445 | Chen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110212717 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213641 | Metzger, II et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219421 | Ullman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258050 | Chan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264581 | Clyne | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270618 | Banerjee et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110270661 | Heiser, II et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282739 | Mashinsky et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110307397 | Benmbarek | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120011056 | Ward et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011068 | Dearing et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011158 | Avner et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016733 | Belvin et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016948 | Sinha | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120047219 | Feng et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054592 | Jaffe et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120060207 | Mardikar et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066065 | Switzer | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101892 | LeFebvre | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110677 | Abendroth et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143921 | Wilson | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179536 | Kalb et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203639 | Webster et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209586 | Mieritz et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120239497 | Nuzzi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239515 | Batra et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130080242 | Alhadeff et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080467 | Carson et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130085804 | Left et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130117832 | Gandhi | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132151 | Stibel et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130173481 | Hirtenstein et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130218638 | Kilger et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226857 | Shim | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130252638 | Yang | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262226 | LaChapelle et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293363 | Plymouth | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130332230 | Fanelli et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339087 | Fanelli et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339143 | Drozd et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140025489 | Srivastava et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025815 | Low | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032265 | Paprocki et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140046887 | Lessin | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058818 | Drozd et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140096249 | Dupont et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140164112 | Kala | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164398 | Smith et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188555 | Durvasula | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214482 | Williams et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140222908 | Park et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236706 | Opie et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140279420 | Okerlund et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140330670 | Ainsworth, III et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150019394 | Unser | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150058957 | Halliday et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150095104 | Goldberg | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106270 | Burrell et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150128240 | Richards et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128287 | LaFever | May 2015 | A1 |
20150193821 | Izumori et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150248691 | Pontious | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150262246 | Stack et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150262248 | Chaouki et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150278225 | Weiss et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150295906 | Ufford et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150332391 | Srivastava et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150348200 | Fair et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160055487 | Votaw et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160071175 | Reuss et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092997 | Shen et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160162913 | Linden | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160189192 | Walz | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160267508 | West | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160371740 | Heiser, II et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170032393 | Fanelli et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170186297 | Brenner | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170193315 | El-Khamy et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20180060954 | Yin | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180121940 | Fanelli et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190087848 | Koltnow et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190147519 | Ainsworth, III et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190164184 | Walz | May 2019 | A1 |
20190180327 | Balagopalan et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190230464 | Nack et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190244237 | Magnuson, Jr. et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200043103 | Sheptunov | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200126040 | Chilaka et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200286168 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200294127 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200349240 | Yin et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210019742 | Pontious et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 942 328 | Apr 2020 | CA |
1290372 | May 2001 | CN |
91 08 341 | Oct 1991 | DE |
0 554 083 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 749 081 | Dec 1996 | EP |
1 028 401 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 122 664 | Aug 2001 | EP |
10-293732 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11-068828 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2009-122880 | Jun 2009 | JP |
10-2013-0107394 | Oct 2013 | KR |
I256569 | Jun 2006 | TW |
WO 91003789 | Mar 1991 | WO |
WO 94006103 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 95016971 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 96042041 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 97023838 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 98041913 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 98049643 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 98057285 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 99004350 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 99022328 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 99032985 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 99033012 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 99037066 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 99059375 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 99067731 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 00055789 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 00055790 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 00068862 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 01010090 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 01011522 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 01075754 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 02013025 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 03101123 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2006110873 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2007149941 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008022289 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008057853 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008076343 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008127288 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009132114 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2010045160 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010062537 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010132492 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2010150251 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011005876 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2014018900 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO 2018039377 | Mar 2018 | WO |
200903243 | Mar 2010 | ZA |
Entry |
---|
Philipp Greitsch, “Beginner's Guide to Location-Based Mobile Advertising”, retrieved from https://trendblog.net/beginners-guide-location-based-mobile-advertising/, available on Mar. 8, 2013 (Year: 2013). |
CuneXus, “CuneXus Unveils Click-to-Accept Mobile Lending Platform at Finovate (VIDEO)”, https://cunexusonline.com/cunexus-finovatespring-video-released/, May 2, 2014, pp. 2. |
TransUnion, “DecisionEdge | MobileCredit”, https://www.transunion.co.za/resources/transunion-za/doc/product/resources/product-decisionedge-acquisition-mobilecredit-as.pdf, 2015, pp. 2. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,489, filed Feb. 12, 2010, Bargoli et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,511, filed Feb. 12, 2010, Bargoli et al. |
“Accenture Launches Media Audit and Optimization Service to Help U.S. Companies Measure Return on Investment in Advertising,” Business Wire, May 22, 2006, 2 pages, http://findarticles.eom/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_May_2006_22/ai_n16374159. |
“Accenture Newsroom: Accenture Completes Acquisition of Media Audits: Acquisition Expands Company's Marketing Sciences and Data Services Capabilities,” accenture.com, Dec. 12, 2005, 2 pages, http://accenture.tekgroup.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=428. |
“Aggregate and Analyze Social Media Content: Gain Faster and Broader Insight to Market Sentiment,” SAP Partner, Mantis Technology Group, Apr. 2011, pp. 4. |
Akl, Selim G., “Digital Signatures: A Tutorial Survey,” Computer, Feb. 1983, pp. 15-24. |
“Atlas on Demand, Concurrent, and Everstream Strike Video-on-Demand Advertising Alliance”, www.atlassolutions.com, Jul. 13, 2006, 3 pages. |
“Arbitron 2006 Black Consumers,” Arbitron Inc., lvtsg.com, Jul. 8, 2006, 2 pages, http://www.lvtsg.com/news/publish/Factoids/article_3648.shtml. |
“Atlas on Demand and C-COR Join Forces to Offer Advertising Management Solution for on Demand TV: Global Provider of on Demand Systems Partners with Atlas to Develop and Market Comprehensive VOD Advertising Solution,” www.atlassolutions.com, Jul. 25, 2005, 3 pages. |
“Atlas on Demand and Tandberg Television Join Forces to Enhance Dynamic Ad Placement for on-Demand Television: Combined End-to End Solution to Provide Media Buying and Selling Communities with New Tools for Dynamic Advertising that Eliminate Technical Bar” Jun. 22, 2006—3 pages, http://www.atlassolutions.com/news_20060622.aspx. |
Adzilla, Press Release, “ZILLACASTING Technology Approved and Patent Pending,” http://www.adzilla.com/newsroom/pdf/patent_051605.pdf, May 16, 2005, pp. 2. |
AFX New Limited—AFX International Focus, “Nielsen moving to measure off-TV viewing,” Jun. 14, 2006, 1 page. |
Amo, Tina, “How to Find Out Who Has Lived inYour House Before You”, https://web.archive.org/web/20130327090532/http://homeguides.sfgate.com/out-lived-house-before-50576.html as archived Mar. 27, 2013, pp. 2. |
Applied Geographic Solutions, “What is MOSAIC™”, as captured Feb. 15, 2004 from http://web.archive.org/web/20040215224329/http://www.appliedgeographic.com/mosaic.html in 2 pages. |
Axiom, “Capabilites”, http://www.axiomcom.com/capabilities/, printed May 7, 2015 in 2 pages. |
Bachman, Katy, “Arbitron, VNU Launch Apollo Project,” mediaweek.com Jan. 17, 2006, 3 pages, http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/search/article_display.jsp?schema=&vnu_content id=1001847353. |
Bagozzi et al., “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models”, JAMS, 1988, pp. 74-94. |
“Bank of America Direct Web-Based Network Adds Core Functionality to Meet Day-To-Day Treasury Needs”, Business Wire, Oct. 25, 1999. pp. 2. |
“Bank of America Launches Total Security Protection™; Features Address Cardholders' Financial Safety Concerns; Supported by $26 Million National Advertising Campaign; Free Educational Materials”, PR Newswire, Oct. 9, 2002, pp. 2. |
Bitran et al., “Mailing Decisions in Catalog Sales Industry”, Management Science (JSTOR), vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 1364-1381, Sep. 1996. |
Blackbaud.com, www.blackbaud.com, various pages, retrieved Jan. 22, 2009 from www.archive.org, 23 pages. |
Brown et al., “ALCOD IDSS:Assisting the Australian Stock Market Surveillance Team's Review Process,” Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal, Dec. 1, 1996, pp. 625-641. |
Bult et al., “Optimal Selection for Direct Mail,” Marketing Science, 1995, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 378-394. |
Burr Ph.D., et al., “Utility Payments as Alternative Credit Data: A Reality Check”, Asset Builders of America, Inc., Octobers, 2006, pp. 1-18, Washington, D.C. |
“Cable Solution Now, The Industry Standard for Information Management: Strata's TIM.net Crosses Important Threshold Dominant Solution for All Top 20 TV Markets,” stratag.com, Apr. 28, 2006, 1 page, http://stratag.com/news/cablepress042806.html. |
Caliendo, et al., “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching”, IZA:Discussion Paper Series, No. 1588, Germany, May 2005, pp. 32. |
Card Marketing, Use the Latest CRM Tools and Techniques, www.CardForum.com, vol. 5 No. 10, Dec. 2001. |
“Case Study: Expanding to Non-Traditional Prescreen Marketing Channels Reduces Company's Cost Per Account Booked”, Fairlsaac, https://web.archive.org/web/20060428115326/http://www.fairisaac.com/NR/rdonlyres/048FAE87-14B5-4732-970D-BDF20F09EB2D/0/MSDSRealTimeCS.pdf, Apr. 2003, pp. 2. |
ChannelWave.com, PRM Central—About PRM, http://web.archive.org/web/20000510214859/http://www.channelwave.com as printed on Jun. 21, 2006, May 2000 Archive. |
“Chase Gets Positive,” Bank Technology News, May 6, 2000, vol. 14, No. 5, p. 33. |
Chung, Charles; Internet Retailer, “Multi-channel retailing requires the cleanest data—but don't expect it from the customer”, Jan./Feb. 2002. |
“Claritas Forms Life Insurance Consortium with Worldwide Financial Services Association: Initiative with LIMRA International is First of its Kind to Provide Actual Sales Information at Small Geographic Areas,” Feb. 9, 2006, 3 pages, http://www.claritas.com/claritas/Default/jsp?ci=5&si=1&pn=limra. |
“Claritas Introduces Prizm Ne Consumer Electronic Monitor Profiles: New Information Product Provides Insight Into the Public's Purchasing Behaviors of Consumer Electronics,” May 30, 2006, 3 pages. |
“Cole Taylor Bank Chooses Integrated E-Banking/E-Payments/Reconciliation Solution From Fundtech”, Business Wire, Oct. 21, 1999, pp. 2. |
Click Z, “ISPs Collect User Data for Behavioral Ad Targeting,” dated Jan. 3, 2008, printed from http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=clickz Apr. 16, 2008. |
CNET news.com, “Target me with your ads, please,” dated Dec. 5, 2007, printed from http://www.news.com/2102-1024_3-6221241.html?tag+st.util.print Mar. 18, 2008. |
Creamer, Matthew; Consulting in marketing; Accenture, Others Playing Role in Firms' Processes, Crain's Chicago Business, Jun. 12, 2006, 2 pages. |
Culhane, Patrick, “Data: Powerfully Linking Service and Profitability,” Jul./Aug. 1996, Bank Management, vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 8-12. |
“Database Marketing: A new Approach to the Old Relationships,” Chain Storage Executive Edition, Dialogue, Sep. 1991, pp. 2. |
Davies, Donald W., “Applying the RSA Digital Signature to Electronic Mail,” Computer, Feb. 1983, pp. 55-62. |
Davis et al., “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models”, Management Science, Aug. 1989, vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982-1003. |
DeGruchy, et al., “Geodemographic Profiling Benefits Stop-Smoking Service;” The British Journal of Healthcare Computing & Information Management; Feb. 2007; 24, 7; pp. 29-31. |
Delany et al., “Firm Mines Offline Data to Target Online”, http://web.archive.org/web/20071117140456/http://www.commercialalert.org/news/archive/2007/10/firm-mines-offline-data-to-target-online-ads, Commercial Alert, Oct. 17, 2007, pp. 3. |
demographicsnow.com, sample reports, “Age Rank Report”, Jul. 17, 2006, 3 pages. |
demographicsnow.com, sample reports, “Consumer Expenditure Summary Report”, Jul. 17, 2006, 3 pages. |
demographicsnow.Com, sample reports, “Income Comparison Report”, Jul. 17, 2006, 4 pages. |
Dolnicar, Sara, “Using Cluster Analysis for Market Segmentation—Typical Misconceptions, Established Methodological Weaknesses and Some Recommendations for Improvement,” Australasian Journal of Market Research, 2003, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 5-12. |
Downey, Sarah A., “Smile, you're on Spokeo.com! Concerned? (here's what to do)”, https://www.abine.com/blog/2011/how-to-remove-yourself-from-spokeo/, as posted Jan. 13, 2011 in 7 pages. |
Drawbridge, “Customer Success”, http://www.drawbrid.ge/customer-success, printed May 7, 2015 in 17 pages. |
Drawbridge, “Solutions”, http://www.drawbrid.ge/solutions, printed May 7, 2015 in 5 pages. |
Drawbridge, “Technology”, http://www.drawbrid.ge/technology, printed May 7, 2015 in 3 pages. |
Dstillery, “Products”, http://dstillery.com/how-we-do-it/products/, printed May 7, 2015 in 2 pages. |
Dstillery, “What We do”, http://dstillery.com/what-we-do/, printed May 7, 2015 in 2 pages. |
Dstillery, “Who We are”, http://dstillery.com/who-we-are/, printed May 7, 2015 in 2 pages. |
Dymi, Amilda, Need for Leads Spurs Some Upgrades, Origination News—Special Report, May 1, 2008, vol. vol. 17, Issue No. 8, pp. p. 24, Atlanta, Copyright 2008 SourceMedia, Inc. |
Egol, Len; “What's New in Database Marketing Software,” Direct, Aug. 1994, vol. 6, No. 8, p. 39. |
“Epsilon Leads Discussion on Paradigm Shift in TV Advertising,” epsilon.com, Jun. 24, 2004, 2 pages, http://www.epsilon.com/who-pr_tvad040624.html. |
Experian and AGS Select SRC to Deliver Complete Marketing Solutions; Partnership First to Marketplace with Census2000 Data. PR Newswire. New York: Mar. 21, 2001. p. 1. |
“Experian Launches Portfolio Monitor—Owner NoticesSM”, News Release, Feb. 2003, Costa Mesa, CA. |
Fanelli, Marc, “Building a Holistic Customer View”, MultiChannel Merchant, Jun. 26, 2006, pp. 2. |
Findermind, “PeopleFinders Review”, as archived Jun. 1, 2012 in 4 pages. http://web.archive.org/web/20120601010134/http://www.findermind.com/tag/peoplefinders-review/. |
Frontporch, “Ad Networks-Partner with Front Porch!,” www.frontporch.com printed Apr. 2008 in 2 pages. |
Frontporch, “New Free Revenue for Broadband ISPs!”, http://www.frontporch.com/html/bt/FPBroadbandISPs.pdf printed May 28, 2008 in 2 pages. |
“FTC Testifies: Identity Theft on the Rise”, FTC News Release, Mar. 7, 2000, pp. 3. |
Georges, et al., “KDD'99 Competition: Knowledge Discovery Contest”, SAS Institute, 1999, 6 pages. |
Gilje, Shelby, “Keeping Tabs on Businesses That Keep Tabs on US”, NewsRoom, The Seattle Times, Section: Scene, Apr. 19, 1995, pp. 4. |
Gonul, et al., “Optimal Mailing of Catalogs: A New Methodology Using Estimable Structural Dynamic Programming Models”, 14 pages, Management Science, vol. 44, No. 9, Sep. 1998. |
Halliday, Jean, “Ford Recruits Accenture for Marketing Plan,” Automotive News Feb. 13, 2006, 2 pages, Crain Communications. |
Hartfeil, Guenther, “Bank One Measures Profitability of Customers, Not Just Products,” Journal of Retail Banking Services, Aug. 1996, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 23-29. |
Haughton et al., “Direct Marketing Modeling with CART and CHAID”, Journal of Direct Marketing, Fall 1997, vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 42-52. |
Helm, Burt, “Nielsen's New Ratings Yardstick,” businessweek.com, Jun. 20, 2006, 3 pages, http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2006/tc20060620_054223.htm. |
Hill, Kerry, “Identity Theft Your Social Security Number Provides Avenue for Thieves”, NewsRoom, Wisconsin State Journal, Sep. 13, 1998, pp. 4. |
Hinman, Donald P., “The Perfect Storm: Response Metrics and Digital TV,” chiefmarketer.com, May 17, 2006, 2 pages, http://www.chiefmarketer.com/crm_loop/roi/perfect-storm-051706/index.html. |
Information Resources, Inc. and Navic Networks Form Joint Relationship to Support Next Generation of Technology for Advertising Testing, IRI Expands BehaviorScan® Solution to Meet Digital and on-demand Needs, Feb. 27, 2006, http://us.infores.com/page/news/pr/pr_archive?mode=single&pr_id=117, printed Oct. 4, 2007 in 2 pages. |
“Intelligent Miner Applications Guide”, IBM Corp., Apr. 2, 1999, Chapters 4-7, pp. 33-132. |
“IRI and Acxiom Introduce More Efficient and Actionable Approach to Consumer Segmentation and Targeted Marketing,” eu-marketingportal.de, Jan. 26, 2006, 2 pages, http://www.eu-marketingportal.de. |
Jost, Allen; Neural Networks, Credit World, Mar./Apr. 1993, vol. 81, No. 4, pp. 26-33. |
Karlan et al., “Observing Unobservables:Identifying Information Asymmetries with a Consumer Credit Field Experiment”, Jun. 17, 2006, pp. 58, http://aida.econ.yale.edu/karlan/papers/ObservingUnobservables.KarlanZinman.pdf. |
Lamons, Bob, “Be Smart: Offer Inquiry Qualification Services,” Marketing News, ABI/Inform Global, Nov. 6, 1995, vol. 29, No. 23, pp. 13. |
LeadVerifier: Why Should You Use LeadVerifier?, downloaded from www.leadverifier.com/LeadVerifier_Why.asp, dated Feb. 7, 2006 on www.archive.org. |
Leskovec, Jure, “Social Media Analytics: Tracking, Modeling and Predicting the Flow of Information through Networks”, WWW 2011-Tutorial, Mar. 28-Apr. 1, 2011, Hyderabad, India, pp. 277-278. |
LifeLock, http://web.archive.org/web/20110724011010/http://www.lifelock.com/? as archived Jul. 24, 2011 in 1 page. |
Littwin, Angela, “Beyond Usury: A Study of Credit-Card Use and Preference Among Low-Income Consumers”, Texas Law Review, vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 451-506; Feb. 2008. |
Longo, Tracey, “Managing Money: Your Family Finances”, Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine, Jun. 1, 1995, vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 4. |
Loshin, Intelligent Enterprise: Better Insight for Business Decisions, “Value-Added Data: Merge Ahead”, Feb. 9, 2000, vol. 3, No. 3, 5 pages. |
McManus et al.; “Street Wiser,” American Demographics; ABI/Inform Global; Jul./Aug. 2003; 25, 6; pp. 32-35. |
McNamara, Paul, “Start-up's pitch: The Envelope, please,” Network World, Apr. 28, 1997, vol. 14, No. 17, p. 33. |
“Mediamark Research Inc. Releases Findings From Mobile Marketing Consumer Study; Outback Steakhouse and Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Among Brands Participating in Mobile Marketing Research,” www.thefreelibrary.com, May 9, 2006, 4 pages. |
Morrissey, Brian, “Aim High: Ad Targeting Moves to the Next Level”, Adweek, dated Jan. 21, 2008 as downloaded from http://www.adweek.com/aw/magazine/article_display.isp?vnu on Apr. 16, 2008. |
Muus, et al., “A Decision Theoretic Framework for Profit Maximization in Direct Marketing”, Sep. 1996, pp. 20. |
NebuAd, “Venture Capital: What's New—The Latest on Technology Deals From Dow Jones VentureWire”, Press Release, http://www.nebuad.com/company/media_coverage/media_10_22_07.php, Oct. 22, 2007, pp. 2. |
“New FICO score extends lenders' reach to credit-underserved millions”, Viewpoints: News, Ideas and Solutions from Fair Isaac, Sep./Oct. 2004 as downloaded from http://www.fairisaac.com/NR/exeres/F178D009-B47A-444F-BD11-8B4D7D8B3532,frame . . . in 6 pages. |
“New Privista Product Provides Early Warning System to Combat Identity Theft”, PR Newswire, Oct. 24, 2000, PR Newswire Association, Inc., New York. |
Otter, et al., “Direct Mail Selection by Joint Modeling of the Probability and Quantity of Response”, Jun. 1997, pp. 14. |
Polatoglu et al., “Theory and Methodology, Probability Distributions of Cost, Revenue and Profit over a Warranty Cycle”, European Journal of Operational Research, Jul. 1998, vol. 108, Issue 1, pp. 170-183. |
“PostX to Present at Internet Showcase”, PR Newswire, Apr. 28, 1997, pp. 2. |
PostX, “PostX® Envelope and ActiveView”, http://web.archive.org/web/19970714203719/http://www.postx.com/priducts_fm.html, Jul. 14, 1997 (retrieved Nov. 7, 2013) in 2 pages. |
PR Web: Press Release Newswire, Anchor Launches LeadVerifier to Verify, Correct and Enhance Internet Leads, Jul. 19, 2005, pp. 2 pages, Farmingdale, NY. |
Predictive Behavioral Targeting http://www.predictive-behavioral-targeting.com/index.php.Main_Page as printed Mar. 28, 2008 in 4 pages. |
Privacyguard, http://web.archive.org/web/20110728114049/http://www.privacyguard.com/ as archived Jul. 28, 2011 in 1 page. |
Punj et al., “Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application,” Journal of Marketing Research, May 1983, vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 134-148. |
Reinbach, Andrew, “MCIF Aids Banks in CRA Compliance”, Bank Systems & Technology, Aug. 1995, vol. 32, No. 8, p. 27. |
Rossi et al.; “The Value of Purchasing History Data in Target Marketing”; Marketing Science, Apr. 1996, vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 321-340. |
Schmittlein et al., “Customer Base Analysis: An Industrial Purchase Process Application”, Marketing Science, vol. 13, No. 1, Winter 1994, pp. 41-67. |
Smith, Richard M., “The Web Bug FAQ”, Nov. 11, 1999, Version 1.0, pp. 4. |
“SRC Announces Free Dashups to Mashups Adding Geographic Business Intelligence at Web Speed to the Enterprise on www.FreeDemographics.com/API,”directionsmag.com, Jun. 12, 2006, 3 pages, http://www.directionsmag.com/press.releases/index.php?duty=Show&id=1. |
“SRC Delivers Industry's First Drive Time Engine Developed to Follow Actual Road Networks,” thomasnet.com, May 21, 2006, 4 pages, http://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/485722. |
Stein, Benchmarking Default Prediction Models: Pitfalls and Remedies in Model Validation, Moody's KMV, Revised Jun. 13, 2002, Technical Report #020305; New York. |
Sweat, Jeff; “Know Your Customers,” Information Week, Nov. 30, 1998, pp. 20. |
Tao, Lixin, “Shifting Paradigms with the Application Service Provider Model”; Concordia University, IEEE, Oct. 2001, Canada. |
TARGUSinfo: Lead Verification, Verify Your Leads With Unique Accuracy and Ease, downloaded from www.targusinfo.com/solutions/verify/Default.asp, as printed Aug. 1, 2006. |
TARGUSinfo: Solutions: Services: Verify Express—Verify, Correct and Enhance Customer Provided Data, downloaded from http://web.archive.org/web/20051028122545/http://www.targusinfo.com/solutions/services/verify/, Oct. 28, 2005, as printed Apr. 30, 2011, 27 pgs. |
Thoemmes, Felix, “Propensity Score Matching in SPSS”, Center for Educational Science and Psychology, University of Tübingen, Jan. 2012. |
UPI, “Nielsen Media Research goes electronic,” Jun. 14, 2006, 1 page. |
“VOD Integration Now Available in Strata: Buyers / Sellers Benefit from VOD Component on Popular Platform,” stratag.com, Feb. 21, 2006, 1 page, http://www.stratag.com/news/mediapress022106.html. |
Warshaw, Paul R., “A New Model for Predicting Behavioral Intentions: An Alternative to Fishbein”, Journal of Marketing Research, May 1980, vol. XVII, pp. 153-172. |
Webber, Richard, “The Relative Power of Geodemographics vis a vis Person and Household Level Demographic Variables as Discriminators of Consumer Behavior,” CASA:Working Paper Series, http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/working_papers/paper84.pdf, Oct. 2004, pp. 17. |
White, Ron, “How Computers Work”, Millennium Edition, Que Corporation, Indianapolis, IN, Sep. 1999, pp. 284. |
Whitney, Daisy; Atlas Positioning to Shoulder VOD Ads; Campaign Management Tools Optimize Inventory, Television Week, May 23, 2005, 3 pages. |
Wyner, “Customer valuation: Linking behavior and economics”, Aug. 1996, Marketing Research: A Magazine of Management & Applications vol. 8, No. 2 pp. 36-38. |
Yoon, Chang Woo; “Vicarious Certification and Billing Agent for Web Information Service”, High Spped Network Access Section, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Jan. 21-23, 1998, pp. 344-349. |
Yun et al., “An Efficient Clustering Algorithm for Market Basket Data Based on Small Large Ratios,” Computer Software and Applications Conference, Oct. 2001, pp. 505-510. |
Zen et al., “Value-Added Internet: a Pragmatic TINA-Based Path to the Internet and PSTN Integration”, Global Convergence of Telecommunications and Distribute Object Computing, Nov. 17-20, 1997, pp. 10. |
Declaration of Paul Clark, DSc. for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,504,628 (Symantec Corporation, Petitioner), dated Jan. 15, 2014 in 76 pages. |
Exhibit D to Joint Claim Construction Statement, filed in Epsilon Data Management, LLC, No. 2:12-cv-00511-JRG (E.D. Tex.) (combined for pretrial purposes with RPost Holdings. Inc., et al. v. Experian Marketing Solutions. Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00513-JRG (E.D. Tex.)) Filed Jan. 14, 2014 in 9 pages. |
First Amended Complaint in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-511-JRG (Rpost Holdings, Inc. and Rpost Communications Limited V. Constant Contact, Inc.; et al.) filed Feb. 11, 2013 in 14 pages. |
First Amended Complaint in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-511-JRG (Rpost Holdings, Inc. and Rpost Communications Limited V. Epsilon Data Management, LLC.) filed Sep. 13, 2013 in 9 pages. |
First Amended Complaint in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-513-JRG (Rpost Holdings, Inc. and Rpost Communications Limited V. Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc.) filed Aug. 30, 2013 in 9 pages. |
Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review in U.S. Pat. No. 8,161,104 (Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc., Epsilon Data Management, LLC, and Constant Contact, Inc., v. Rpost Communications Limited) dated Jan. 29, 2014 in 90 pages. |
Source Code Appendix attached to U.S. Appl. No. 08/845,722 by Venkatraman et al., Exhibit A, Part 1 & 2, pp. 32. |
Official Communication in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,381,349, dated May 17, 2013. |
Official Communication in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,381,349, dated Jul. 31, 2014. |
International Preliminary Examination Report in International Application No. PCT/US00/21453 dated Jun. 26, 2001. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2007/021815, dated Sep. 5, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2008/064594, dated Oct. 30, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2008/064594, dated Dec. 10, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US08/083939, dated Jan. 29, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US09/60393, dated Dec. 23, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/034434, dated Jun. 23, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2010/034434, dated Feb. 4, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/052342, dated Nov. 21, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/052342, dated Feb. 5, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/048265, dated Dec. 5, 2017. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2017/048265, dated Mar. 7, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62016989 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14748675 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 16698546 | US |