1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a microwave antenna. More particularly, the invention provides a flat panel array antenna utilizing cavity coupling to simplify corporate feed network requirements.
2. Description of Related Art
Flat panel array antenna technology has not been extensively applied within the licensed commercial microwave point to point or point to multipoint market, where more stringent electromagnetic radiation envelope characteristics consistent with efficient spectrum management are common. Antenna solutions derived from traditional reflector antenna configurations such as prime focus fed axi-symmetric geometries provide high levels of antenna directivity and gain at relatively low cost. However, the extensive structure of a reflector dish and associated feed may require significantly enhanced support structure to withstand wind loads, which may increase overall costs. Further, the increased size of reflector antenna assemblies and the support structure required may be viewed as a visual blight.
Array antennas typically utilize either printed circuit technology or waveguide technology. The components of the array which interface with free-space, known as the elements, typically utilize microstrip geometries, such as patches, dipoles or slots, or waveguide components such as horns, or slots respectively. The various elements are interconnected by a feed network, so that the resulting electromagnetic radiation characteristics of the antenna conform to desired characteristics, such as the antenna beam pointing direction, directivity, and sidelobe distribution.
Flat panel arrays may be formed, for example, using waveguide or printed slot arrays in either resonant or travelling wave configurations. Resonant configurations typically cannot achieve the requisite electromagnetic characteristics over the bandwidths utilized in the terrestrial point-to-point market sector, whilst travelling wave arrays typically provide a mainbeam radiation pattern which moves in angular position with frequency. Because terrestrial point to point communications generally operate with Go/Return channels spaced over different parts of the frequency band being utilized, movement of the mainbeam with respect to frequency may prevent simultaneous efficient alignment of the link for both channels.
Corporate fed waveguide or slot elements may enable fixed beam antennas exhibiting suitable characteristics. However, it may be necessary to select an element spacing which is generally less than one wavelength, in order to avoid the generation of secondary beams known as grating lobes, which do not respect regulatory requirements, and detract from the antenna efficiency. This close element spacing may conflict with the feed network dimensions. For example, in order to accommodate impedance matching and/or phase equalization, a larger element spacing is required to provide sufficient volume to accommodate not only the feed network, but also sufficient material for electrical and mechanical wall contact between adjacent transmission lines (thereby isolating adjacent lines and preventing unwanted interline coupling/cross-talk).
The elements of antenna arrays may be characterized by the array dimensions, such as a 2N×2M element array where N and M are integers. In a typical N×M corporate fed array, (N×M)−1 T-type power dividers may be required, along with N×M feed bends and multiple N×M stepped transitions in order to provide acceptable VSWR performance. Thereby, the feed network requirements may be a limiting factor of space efficient corporate fed flat panel arrays.
Therefore it is an object of the invention to provide an apparatus that overcomes limitations in the prior art, and in so doing present a solution that allows such a flat panel antenna to provide electrical performance approaching that of much larger traditional reflector antennas which meet the most stringent electrical specifications over the operating band used for a typical microwave communication link.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention, where like reference numbers in the drawing figures refer to the same feature or element and may not be described in detail for every drawing figure in which they appear and, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
The inventors have developed a flat panel antenna utilizing a corporate waveguide network and cavity couplers provided in stacked layers. The low loss 4-way coupling of each cavity coupler significantly simplifies the requirements of the corporate waveguide network, enabling higher feed horn density for improved electrical performance. The layered configuration enables cost efficient precision mass production.
As shown in
The RF path comprises a waveguide network 5 coupling an input feed 10 to a plurality of primary coupling cavities 15. Each of the primary coupling cavities 15 is provided with four output ports 20, each of the output ports 20 coupled to a horn radiator 25.
The input feed 10 is demonstrated positioned generally central on a first side 30 of an input layer 35, for example to allow compact mounting of a microwave transceiver thereto, using antenna mounting features (not shown) interchangeable with those used with traditional reflector antennas. Alternatively, the input feed 10 may be positioned at a layer sidewall 40, between the input layer 35 and a first intermediate layer 45, enabling, for example, an antenna side by side with the transceiver configuration where the depth of the resulting flat panel antenna assembly is minimized.
As best shown on
The waveguide network 5 may be provided with a rectangular waveguide cross section, where a long axis of the rectangular cross section normal to a surface plane of the input layer 35 (see
The primary coupling cavities 15, each fed by a connection to the waveguide network 5, provide −6 dB coupling to four output ports 20. The primary coupling cavities 15 have a rectangular configuration with the waveguide network connection and the four output ports 20 on opposite sides. The output ports 20 are provided on a first side 30 of an output layer 75, each of the output ports 20 in communication with one of the horn radiators 25, the horn radiators 25 provided as an array of horn radiators 25 on a second side 50 of the output layer 75. As shown for example in
To balance coupling between each of the output ports 20, each of the output ports 20 may be configured as rectangular slots run parallel to a long dimension of the rectangular cavity and the input waveguide. Similarly, the short dimension of the output ports 20 may be aligned parallel to the short dimension of the cavity which is parallel to the short dimension of the input waveguide.
When using array element spacing of between 0.75 and 0.95 wavelengths to provide acceptable array directivity, with sufficient defining structure between elements, a cavity aspect ratio, may be, for example, 1.5:1.
An exemplary cavity may be dimensioned with:
The array of horn radiators 25 on the second side 50 of the output layer 75 improves directivity (gain), with gain increasing with element aperture until element aperture increases past one wavelength and grating lobes begin to be introduced. One skilled in the art will appreciate that because each of the horn radiators 20 is individually coupled in phase to the input feed 10, the prior low density ½ wavelength output slot spacing typically applied to follow propagation peaks within a common feed waveguide slot configuration has been eliminated, allowing closer horn radiator 20 spacing and thus higher overall antenna gain.
Because an array of small horn radiators 20 with common phase and amplitude are provided, the amplitude and phase tapers observed in a conventional single large horn configuration that may otherwise require adoption of an excessively deep horn or reflector antenna configuration have been eliminated.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that the simplified geometry of the coupling cavities and corresponding reduction of the waveguide network requirements enables significant simplification of the required layer surface features which reduces overall manufacturing complexity. For example, the input, first intermediate, second intermediate (if present) and output layers 35, 45, 75 may be formed cost effectively with high precision in high volumes via injection molding and/or die-casting technology. Where injection molding with a polymer material is used to form the layers, a conductive surface may be applied.
Although the coupling cavities and waveguides are described as rectangular, for ease of machining and/or mold separation, corners may be radiused and/or rounded in a trade-off between electrical performance and manufacturing efficiency.
As frequency increases, wavelengths decrease. Therefore, as the desired operating frequency increases, the physical features within a corporate waveguide network, such as steps, tapers and T-type power dividers, become smaller and harder to fabricate. As use of the coupling cavities simplifies the waveguide network requirements, one skilled in the art will appreciate that higher operating frequencies are enabled by the present flat panel antenna, for example up to 26 GHz, above which the required dimension resolution/feature precision may begin to make fabrication with acceptable tolerances cost prohibitive.
For further ease of cost efficient and/or high precision manufacture, the input layer 35 and waveguide network 5 thereon for a plurality of different flat panel antenna configurations may be formed utilizing one or more modular segments. A generally rectangular, such as a square, segment base 103, as shown for example in
The segment top 121 may be provided with a mirror image of the waveguide network 5, the segment top 121 providing a second half of each of the central waveguides 115, and the peripheral waveguides 117 and the feed waveguides 119 of the segment base 103. Alternatively, the segment top 121 may be provided planar, providing the top sidewall of the waveguide network 5. The segment top 121 may be further provided as one of the additional layers of a flat panel antenna configuration, such as a first intermediate layer 45 or an output layer 75 of a flat panel array antenna 1. Where the segment top 121 is one of the additional layers of the flat panel antenna 1, a single layer may provide a combined segment top of multiple segment bases 103.
A range of different feed, power divider and bypass taps, for example as shown in
In a small waveguide network configuration, for example as shown in
The segment pairs 122 may alternatively be configured side to side, for example as shown in
An even larger waveguide network 5 may be formed from segment pairs 122, for example, by interconnecting sixteen of the segment pairs 122 in a side to side matrix to form a generally planar 4×4 modular segment, for example as shown in
A peripheral feed tap 130 with an input feed 10 is seated within the 4×4 feed aperture 139. The peripheral feed tap 130 is coupled to a bypass tap 145 (see
The corner cavities 109 of each of the segment pairs 122 at a center of each of the 2×2 modular segments 127 combine to form a 2×2 feed aperture 129 and the tap cavities 111 of each of the segment pairs 122 adjacent to one another in each 2×2 modular segment 127 together form a 2×2 power divider cavity 131.
Another peripheral power divider tap 151 is provided in each 2×2 feed aperture 129, coupling with the peripheral power divider tap 151 of the 4×4 power divider cavities 143 via the peripheral waveguide 117 there between. The peripheral power divider taps 151 of the 2×2 feed apertures 129 are coupled to the central power divider taps 135 seated in the 2×2 power divider cavities by at least one of the peripheral waveguides 117 there between. The central power divider taps 135 are each coupled to a feed power divider tap 133 provided in each of the 2×2 power divider cavities 131 via the central waveguide 115 there between. The feed power divider taps 133 are coupled to the output ports 20 of each segment pair 122 via the feed waveguide 119 there between. Thereby, a signal provided at the input feed 10 is distributed to each of the combined two hundred and fifty-six output ports 20 of the corresponding segment tops 121.
The precision alignment and/or mechanical interconnection of the segment pairs 122 with one another and/or with adjacent equipment and/or further layers may be simplified by providing retention features 153 along a periphery of the segment pair 122. For example as shown in
One skilled in the art will appreciate that selection of the feed, power divider and/or bypass taps to interconnect a waveguide path along segment pairs 122 each with an identical array of available waveguide channels enables generation of a waveguide path between the feed aperture 107 and each of the output ports 20 that has a generally equivalent length. Thereby, phase and/or signal strength errors generated by the division of the input signal to each of the output ports 20 may be avoided.
The use of segment pairs 122 may significantly simplify manufacturing requirements of the flat panel antenna 1. The segment base 103 and segment top 121 may be formed, for example, by machining, die casting and/or injection molding. A polymer material machined and/or injection molded segment base 103 and/or segment top 121 may be metalized or metal coated.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that fabrication of a universal segment base 103 and/or segment top 121 may reduce duplicate tooling and quality control requirements for a family of flat panel antennas. Where machining is applied, the segment pairs 122 may be formed via smaller pieces of stock material, reducing material costs and enabling a smaller required range of motion from the machining tool(s). Where fabrication via die casting and/or injection molding is applied, the die size and complexity of the die may be reduced. Further, with a smaller die and/or mold requirement, the separation characteristics are improved which may reduce the compromises required with respect to mold draft requirements. Where a further metal coating and/or metalizing step is applied to a, for example, polymer injection molded base component, such may be similarly simplified by being applied to a smaller total area.
From the foregoing, it will be apparent that the present invention brings to the art a modular feed network usable, for example, as the waveguide network 5 of a high performance flat panel antenna with reduced cross section that is strong, lightweight and may be repeatedly cost efficiently manufactured with a high level of precision. Utilizing segment pairs 122 to form the waveguide network 5 further may enable fabrication of a single segment base 103 and/or segment top 121 cost efficiently and with improved precision. Where the segment pairs 122 are formed via die casting or injection molding, the single die and/or mold required for manufacture of a family of antennas is simplified and the reduced size of such may simplify mold separation and thus draft requirements of the waveguide network features, improving the cross section of the waveguide and thereby overall electrical performance.
Where in the foregoing description reference has been made to materials, ratios, integers or components having known equivalents then such equivalents are herein incorporated as if individually set forth.
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus, methods, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the spirit or scope of applicant's general inventive concept. Further, it is to be appreciated that improvements and/or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of commonly owned co-pending U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 13/297,304, titled “Flat Panel Array Antenna” filed Nov. 16, 2011 by Alexander P. Thomson, Claudio Biancotto and Christopher D. Hills, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2573746 | Watson et al. | Nov 1951 | A |
2981948 | Kurtz | Apr 1961 | A |
3157847 | Williams | Nov 1964 | A |
3193830 | Provencher | Jul 1965 | A |
3243818 | Holtzman | Mar 1966 | A |
3281851 | Goebels, Jr. | Oct 1966 | A |
3340534 | Fee | Sep 1967 | A |
3570007 | Whitehead | Mar 1971 | A |
3599216 | Paine et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3701162 | Seaton | Oct 1972 | A |
3999151 | Baldwin et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4121220 | Scillieri et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4429313 | Muhs, Jr. et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4527165 | de Ronde | Jul 1985 | A |
4679011 | Praba et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4716415 | Kelly | Dec 1987 | A |
4812788 | Wong et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4829309 | Tsukamoto et al. | May 1989 | A |
4857938 | Tsukamoto et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4878060 | Barbier et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4916458 | Goto | Apr 1990 | A |
4949092 | Crail et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4959658 | Collins | Sep 1990 | A |
4985708 | Kelly | Jan 1991 | A |
5010351 | Kelly | Apr 1991 | A |
5019831 | Yee et al. | May 1991 | A |
5086304 | Collins | Feb 1992 | A |
5210543 | Kurtz | May 1993 | A |
5243354 | Stern et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5247268 | Meise | Sep 1993 | A |
5270721 | Tsukamoto et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5321411 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327150 | Cherrette | Jul 1994 | A |
5337065 | Bonnet et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5512906 | Speciale | Apr 1996 | A |
5541612 | Josefsson | Jul 1996 | A |
5579019 | Uematsu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589843 | Meredith et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5619216 | Park | Apr 1997 | A |
5650793 | Park | Jul 1997 | A |
5831583 | Lagerstedt et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5880695 | Brown et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5926147 | Sehm et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6101705 | Wolfson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6127985 | Guler | Oct 2000 | A |
6198456 | Le Halle et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201508 | Metzen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6225960 | Collins | May 2001 | B1 |
6285335 | Snygg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297782 | Matthews et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304228 | Smith et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6476772 | Smith et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6535173 | Ou | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6624787 | Puzella et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6657599 | Solbach | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6720931 | Michisaka et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731241 | Park et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6796126 | Hasegawa et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6861996 | Jeong | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6950066 | Hendler et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6977621 | Kelly et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7064725 | Shtrikman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7205948 | Krikorian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227508 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7391381 | Wang et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
D576344 | Conroy | Sep 2008 | S |
7607942 | Van Swearingen | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7663566 | Engel | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680516 | Lovberg et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7817097 | Margomenos | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7948443 | Bullock et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8010042 | Judd et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8040286 | Matusuo et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20040080463 | Jeong | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20090302971 | Rosenberg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100066463 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100231475 | Ou et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100721871 | May 2007 | KR |
9639730 | Dec 1996 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sung Chul Kang, International Search Report of Counterpart International Application No. PCT/US12/65427, Mar. 29, 2013, Daejeon Metropolitan City, Korea. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130120206 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13297304 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 13677862 | US |