This invention relates to monitoring the calling activity and Internet activity of mobile device users. More specifically, it is directed to methods and systems for remotely monitoring and controlling the mobile device use of children.
It is widely recognized that it is effective and important for parents or guardians to monitor the communications of children. The industry has developed a significant collection of tools that allow parents to monitor the telephone and Internet activities of children. To date these are mostly aimed at, and effective for, activities that occur in the home, or on premises controlled by the parents. These tools, for the most part, are ineffective for monitoring mobile phone activities. The so-called V-chip, and similar products, could be designed and implemented for mobile phones. But this approach requires a set of controls that are pre-programmed. A more desirable approach is one that allows dynamic monitoring of mobile device activities, as well as the option for controlling the mobile device activities from a remote location.
We have designed systems, and operation of systems, that allow a parent or other responsible party to monitor the mobile device activities of a child. In addition, it optionally allows the parent to dynamically control the mobile device activities of the child. It relies on software, or a network adjunct, that links a mobile device to a station set or mobile phone under the control of the parent. Calling traffic to and from the mobile device may be routed to a receiver at a location monitored by the parent. In preferred embodiments, software is designed to allow the parent to intervene in the communications of the child. The intervention may take a variety of forms, such as interrupting a call in progress, terminating call activity, interrupting or terminating Internet access. Where the mobile device is provided with pre-programmed restraining software, the intervention may be to modify the restraining software to add new restraints.
The mobile device that is monitored may be a cell phone, a Wi-Fi device, or other mobile communications device. In the following description the party performing the monitoring may be a parent, guardian, or other authorized party, and will be referred to below as the Monitor, and the device used by the monitor, the monitor device. The monitor device is preferably a computer, but may be a land line phone, a wireless phone, a PDA, or other suitable device. The monitor device will typically reside on the premises of the Monitor, e.g., office or home, or it may be a mobile device. In the description below, the mobile communication device being monitored by the monitor will be referred to as the mobile device.
The invention may be better understood when considered in conjunction with the drawing in which:
With reference to
If the request is an “outbound call request,” the logic checks to see if the device user is allowed to call the intended recipient. This is performed by checking either a “permitted call list” and/or a “denied caller list” in a local memory table. If the recipient is permitted, the logic will allow the call to be placed and a message will be sent to the monitor informing the monitor of the call and the associated information (start time, calling party number, etc.). If the recipient is not permitted, the call is blocked, the user receives a blocked message on the wireless device screen, and a message is sent to the monitor informing them of the blocked call (with the associated information).
If the request is an “inbound call request,” the logic checks to see if the device user is allowed to receive a call from the caller. This is performed by checking either a “permitted call list” and/or a “denied caller list” in a local memory table. If the caller is permitted, the logic will allow the call to be received and a message will be sent to the monitor informing the monitor of the call and the associated information (start time, calling party number, etc.). If the caller is not permitted, the call is blocked, the user receives a blocked message on the wireless device screen, and a message is sent to the monitor informing them of the blocked call (with the associated information).
If the request is a “message to send request,” the logic checks to see if the device user is allowed to send a message to the desired destination. This is performed by checking either a “permitted URL/user name list” and/or a “denied URL/user name list” in a local memory table. If the desired destination is permitted, the logic will allow the message to be placed and a message will be sent to the monitor informing the monitor of the message and the associated information (start time, desired destination, content, etc.). If the desired destination is not permitted, the message is blocked, the user receives a blocked message on the wireless device screen, and a message is sent to the monitor informing them of the blocked message (with the associated information).
If the request is a “non-monitor message to receive request,” the logic checks to see if the device user is allowed to receive a message from the sender. This is performed by checking either a “permitted URL/user name list” and/or a “denied URL/user name list” in a local memory table. If the recipient is permitted, the logic will allow the message to be received and a message will be sent to the monitor informing the monitor of the message and the associated information (start time, sender, content, etc.). If the sender is not permitted, the message is blocked, the user receives a blocked message on the wireless device screen, and a message is sent to the monitor informing them of the blocked message (with the associated information).
If the request is a message from the Monitor, the logic authenticates and validates the message and then performs the requested function. This might include updating the policies, updating the filters, interrupting a call, etc.
The traffic flow control system just described controls call set up and message transfer for both telephone and internet traffic and is useful for implementing the service features described more specifically below.
In addition to the wireless toll management system just described, the other main embodiment of the invention is content monitoring. Content monitoring may be implemented using the call acceptance logic flow shown in
One, or any combination of the optional features just described should be considered within the scope of the invention.
In implementing any of these options, the Monitor may be given different levels of monitoring and control, such as a) total access (as illustrated above), b) partial monitoring (allows the monitor some control, but does not allow the monitor to read messages), c) monitor-only (allows monitoring, but no direct control).
In all these embodiments, the Monitor can be provided the ability to configure priority levels to the notifications. For example, calls that meet the filter criteria might have a low priority, whereas those that do not might have a high priority. Similarly, repeat visits to a previously used URL might have low priority, whereas visits to a previously unvisited URL might have high priority. Such prioritization would allow the Monitor to “ignore” low-priority events, yet be alerted to those events deemed a high priority.
The systems described in connection with
The real time access may take one or more of several forms. The address list is either under the unique control of the Monitor, with the ability to remotely control and modify the list, or the Monitor is provided with access to the address list. The Monitor is provided with real time unlimited access to the activity of the mobile device, i.e. duplicate content. The Monitor is provided with notification of activity events (call numbers, URLs). In each case the Monitor has a real time communication link with the mobile device. It is this link that allows effective monitoring, with or without intervention, of the communications activities of the mobile device user.
As mentioned, the Monitor may perform any one or more of the functions described here, in any combination. For example, Internet activity only may be monitored (where normal telephone calls are not monitored). This may be implemented by storing one or more Internet access numbers in the mobile device, and activating notification of the Monitor when an Internet access number is dialed. Upon notification of Internet access, the Monitor may intervene by one or more of the interventions described above. Included among potential interventions is transmitting Internet images to the Monitor device that duplicate Internet images transmitted to the mobile device. If the dialed number is an allowed Internet access number, any subsequent dial address (URL) that is entered in the mobile device may be compared with a stored Allowed/Prohibited URL list for allowing or blocking the URL entered. In this embodiment, i.e. Internet monitoring only, the list referred to in
An example of how the services just described can be implemented in a wireless network environment is shown in
At the monitor, the mobile device information can be displayed in various ways. For example, the monitor can list the URLs for the monitoring person to review. Filters can be used to help the monitoring person consume the data more easily. In another example, the monitor can display the contents of the URLs so that the subscriber can monitor the same content that the mobile device is receiving. If the monitoring person decides that they would like to block the content, the monitoring person can enter a request to the gateway that the URL be blocked for the associated mobile device.
Reference made herein to placing a call or dialing a telephone number may involve entering a conventional sequence of dialed numbers or may, alternatively, involve entering a dial number code into an automatic preprogrammed dialer. These are considered equivalent in the context of “entering a dialed number”.
Reference to amending a dialed number list or a called number list means changing the dialed number list by adding, removing, updating, or otherwise changing the content of the list.
Reference to “remote” in describing the location of the monitor device with respect to the mobile device means that the two devices are not on the same premises. Operating the monitor device to implement the monitor functions described here using a wireless network would normally mean that the two devices are not physically co-located.
Various additional modifications of this invention will occur to those skilled in the art. All deviations from the specific teachings of this specification that basically rely on the principles and their equivalents through which the art has been advanced are properly considered within the scope of the invention as described and claimed.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/077,050, filed Mar. 10, 2005, now abandoned, and entitled “Monitoring Mobile Phone Communications,” which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6345180 | Reichelt | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6785515 | Sommer et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6987843 | Barclay et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7046782 | Miller | May 2006 | B2 |
7298835 | Perry | Nov 2007 | B1 |
20040203897 | Rogers | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208304 | Miller | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050157858 | Rajagopalan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070041523 | Paden et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070127639 | Huang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070230672 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080113646 | Cereceres et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080215961 | Altberg et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080263460 | Altberg et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090034705 | Janssen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090168981 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090290697 | Adams | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312067 | Ahlin | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100105354 | Huang | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100112986 A1 | May 2010 | US | |
20130023246 A9 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11077050 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 12290602 | US |