The present invention relates generally to the field of spectroscopy, more particularly to the field of spectrometers comprising a plurality of gratings.
The purpose of a spectrometer is to analyse the spectrum of an input light, by separating the narrow bands of wavelengths composing the input light.
These spectrometers could be used to analyse the spectrum of the light reflected by a sample and to obtain quantitative and/or qualitative information about this sample. By identifying and measuring the narrow bands of wavelength of the light reflected by the sample, it is possible to identify and/or quantify the chemical compounds of the sample.
For that purpose, a spectrometer generally comprises:
A spectrometer further comprises a light detector, for measuring the wavelengths composing the spectrum.
The dispersion device can consist in a prism, and the diffraction device can consist in a diffraction grating, working either in transmission or in reflection.
A light detector measures the intensity of the light projected onto it, and can consist for example in a photodiode.
These spectrometers can be divided in two categories:
To measure simultaneously each narrow band of wavelength, referring to the first category of spectrometer, the spectrum shall be projected onto an array of light detectors. Depending on the considered wavelength range, light detectors can be costly and power-consuming. Additionally, a trade-off between the size and the resolution of the array has to be made. Increasing the number of light detectors improves the resolution but also increases the size of the array of light detectors. The resolution is linked to the number of different narrow bands of wavelength measured, and consequently to the width of the narrowest band of wavelength that can be measured. The resolution is improved when the number of measured bands increases or when the width of the bands decreases.
Additionally, the power consumption of the array of light detectors can be high. It could be a concern when designing a handheld spectrometer.
The second category of spectrometer avoids using an array of light detectors by projecting sequentially each narrow band of wavelength onto a single light detector. It is therefore possible to measure successively the whole spectrum by using only one light detector, and consequently resulting in a compacter, less expensive and less power-consuming spectrometer.
Different solutions can be used in order to selectively project a narrow band of wavelength onto a single light detector. For example, when a diffraction grating or a prism is used to generate the spectrum, it is possible to rotate the grating or the prism. This rotation causes the direction of the spectrum to change. By adequately placing the single light detector, it is possible to project each narrow band of wavelength onto the light detector. However, this solution is difficult to implement since it requires mechanical means in order to rotate the grating. Moreover, in this configuration, it is not possible to diffract or disperse the input light more than once with a single grating.
A second solution, disclosed in document WO 2007/089770, is to project the spectrum onto a microelectromechanical system (MEMS), this MEMS being used to selectively reflect a narrow band or a band of wavelength onto a single light detector. However, this solution has the drawback to require one grating and an additional MEMS for the wavelength selection.
Another solution, disclosed in document WO/2007/082952, is to use a tunable grating. The grating is composed of a plurality of beams, each beam having a tilted reflective flat surface. The grating is stretchable, i.e. the distance between the beams is uniformly adjustable. An input collimated light is projected onto the grating, following a direction normal to the flat surfaces. This configuration, where the input light and the diffracted light are in auto-collimation is called the Littrow configuration, and is known to produce the best energetic efficiency of the diffraction. However, it has the drawback to require a circulator or a beam splitter in order to separate the refracted light from the input collimated light, in order to project only the refracted light onto the single light detector. This additional element increases the cost and the size of the system, and can also reduce the energy efficiency (i.e. reduces the intensity of the narrow bands of wavelength). Moreover, this configuration prevents to diffract the input collimated light more than once on the same active area of the diffraction grating.
The present invention proposes a spectrometer in which these drawbacks are avoided.
The present invention discloses a spectrometer comprising:
The gratings are tunable and arranged to from a 2D-matrix to diffract the collimated input light. A 2D-matrix of gratings comprises at least two gratings disposed in n rows and m columns where n and m are positive integers different from 0. Each of said gratings produces a distinct collimated beam with a narrow band of wavelength. Each of the detectors is associated with one grating among the plurality of gratings. Each of the detectors is arranged to measure the intensity of the distinct collimated beam with a narrow band of wavelength produced by its associated grating.
The present invention also concerns a spectrometer comprising:
The collimated input light is arranged to be parallel to a plane P1 parallel to the longitudinal axis of each of the beams and perpendicular to the first tilted reflective flat surfaces. The collimated input light is diffracted by the grating into a first collimated beam with a narrow band of wavelength. A first mirror and a second mirror are arranged in order for the first collimated beam with a narrow band of wavelength to be parallel to a plane P2 after reflection on the second mirror. This plane P2 is parallel to the longitudinal axis of each of the beams and perpendicular to the second tilted reflective flat surface. The first collimated beam with a narrow band of wavelength is diffracted by the grating into a second collimated beam with a narrow band of wavelength. The detector is arranged to measure the intensity of the second collimated beam with a narrow band of wavelength produced by the grating.
The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become further apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiment taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
a, 1b and 1c are 3D-views of a grating used within standard Littrow condition,
a, 2b and 2c are 3D-views of a grating used within generalized Littrow condition,
a and 3b are 3D-views of a first embodiment of a spectrometer according to the present invention, where a collimated input light is diffracted by a grating and measured by a detector,
a and 7b show the spectral response of two different gratings,
c shows the spectral response of the successive diffraction by the gratings whose spectral response is presented on
a is a 3-D view of a double-sided grating,
a, 1b and 1c depict a blazed grating 100 seen from above in plane x-y, and from a first side according to plane x-z and a second side according to plane y-z. These figures defined the standard Littrow condition where the incident collimated input light 102 is arranged to be normal to the grating reflecting surfaces. Therefore, the refracted output collimated light 104 is also normal to the reflecting surfaces. On one hand, the highest efficiency is obtained. On the other hand, the collimated input and output lights are in autocollimation and require an optical element such as a beamsplitter to separate them.
One aspect of the invention is to retain a high efficiency while removing the additional optical element. This is achieved with a generalized Littrow condition as shown in
The spectrometer 1 comprises:
The entrance aperture, the tunable step grating 2 and the exit aperture act as a monochromator.
The step grating 2 comprises a plurality of elongated beams 4 arranged parallel to each other along an axis x. The longitudinal axis of each beam is perpendicular to the axis x.
The top of each beam forms a reflective flat surface 4a. The plurality of flat surfaces 4a defines planes arranged to be parallel and spaced by a distance d1. This distance d1 is tunable.
The collimator is arranged so that the collimated input light 5 is parallel to a plane a P. This plane P is parallel to the longitudinal axis of the elongated beams and perpendicular to the reflective flat surfaces 4a. The angle α between the collimated input light 5 and the normal to the reflective flat surfaces 4a is different from 0° in compliance with the generalized Littrow condition. Preferably, the angle α shall be within the range [10°; 70°]. More preferably, the angle α shall be within the range [20°; 60°].
When projecting the input collimated light 5 on the plurality of reflective flat surfaces 4a, the combination of the light reflected by each reflective flat surface 4a produces a diffraction of the input collimated light 5, the diffraction being represented as a spectrum 6.
On
Thanks to the orientation of the input collimated light 5, as described above, only one narrow band of wavelength belongs to the plane P. Referring to
The light detector 3 can be a photodiode. It is disposed such as to collect the light diffracted parallel to the plane P. Consequently, the single light detector will only measure the intensity of the narrow band of wavelength that is parallel to the plane P, 6b for
b depicts the same spectrometer as in
By setting successively different values for the distance d, and measuring the intensity of the light projected onto the light detector 3, the spectrum characteristics are sequentially obtained, i.e. the intensity of the wavelengths composing the input collimated light 5.
The orientation of the input collimated light 5 gives two main advantages.
Another advantage will be more apparent below.
The grating 5 can also consist in a blazed grating, comprising a plurality of tilted parallel flat surfaces. For example, the tunable blazed grating disclosed in document WO/2007/082952 is suitable. The collimated input light is projected onto the flat surfaces in the same way as described in reference to
The circulator 21 is implemented in order to distribute the light from the source 11 to the collimator 13, and to distribute the light from the collimator 13 to the detector 19.
Thanks to the present invention, and particularly thanks to the orientation of the collimated input light according to the generalized Littrow condition, the collimated input light is diffracted twice by simply adding a mirror. In the standard Littrow condition, the input light would only be diffracted once.
Projecting a first time a collimated light onto a grating selects a first narrow band of wavelength. Projecting this first narrow band of wavelength a second time selects a narrower band of wavelength. The resolution of the spectrometer is consequently improved (because the width of the narrowest band of wavelength the intensity of which is measured is reduced).
Similarly to the system described in
The setting environment described on
When the distance d1 of the grating 15 and the distance d2 of the grating 23 are equal, the same advantages than the configuration of
When the distance d1 of the gratings 15 and the distance d2 of the grating 23 are different, the periodicity of the spectral response of the grating 15 is different from the periodicity of the spectral response of the grating 23. A grating has a periodic spectral response, being composed of a plurality of periodic peaks. In some applications, some peaks are undesirable, and it could be an objective to suppress (or at least drastically reduce) some peaks. For example, when two peaks are adjacent, one of the peaks may mask a lower peak of interest (i.e. it may be difficult to measure one peak close to a higher peak).
An example of the spectral response of the grating 15 is represented by the peaks 50 of
The spectral response of the two gratings (i.e. the spectral response resulting from the successive use of the two gratings) is obtained by multiplying the spectral response of the grating 50 by the spectral response, and the result is given on
By making minor changes (replacing the collimator 17 by a mirror having the same orientation as in
According to the present invention, the top of each beam 32 comprises, on a first longitudinal side, a first tilted reflective flat surface 32a, and on the second longitudinal side, a second tilted reflective flat surface 32b.
The flat surfaces 32a of two consecutive beams 32 are parallel and are separated by a distance d in the direction of the normal of the flat surfaces 32a. In the same way, the flat surfaces 32b of two consecutive beams 32 are parallel and are separated by the distance d in the direction of the normal of the flat surfaces 32b.
Additionally, the grating 30 is stretchable, i.e. the distance e between two consecutive beams can be uniformly modified, modifying consequently the distance d between two consecutive flat surfaces.
The double-sided tunable grating 30 can be made using known micro fabrication techniques.
The double-sided tunable grating 30 of
In this embodiment, the collimated input light 14 is diffracted twice by the grating, providing the same improvement of the resolution as for the system of
Another embodiment of the present invention is presented in
In this embodiment, the collimated input light is diffracted four times using the same grating. In such a configuration, the resolution of such a spectrometer can be very high thanks to the four successive diffractions, but requires only a few additional equipments (three mirrors), compared to a spectrometer using the standard Littrow condition, performing only one diffraction of the input light.
Each grating has a different distance d. The input collimated light 14 is projected simultaneously onto each spectrometer 61 of the 2D-matrix 60, respecting the configuration described on
In this embodiment, the spectrum is measured in parallel, reducing the time required to get the entire spectrum. If the grating of each spectrometer 61 is not tunable, the whole spectrum is measured simultaneously, each spectrometer 61 measuring a given wavelength. The resolution of such a spectrometer is limited to the number of spectrometers 61 in the matrix 60.
If the grating of each spectrometer 61 is tunable, each spectrometer 61 measures a set of wavelength. The measurement of the spectrum is both sequential and parallel, reducing the measurement time but giving a good resolution.
Of course, it is possible to implement, for the array, the configurations described in
The mirrors used to project again the light onto a grating could also be concave in order to re-collimate the light before diffracting it again.
In another embodiment according to the invention, a spectrometer could furthermore comprise a dispersive element arranged between at least one grating and at least one detector to separate the spatially overlapping spectra of the diffracted collimated output light produced by the grating before falling onto the detector.
The diffracted collimated output light produced by the grating is actually composed of many replicated spectra, each individual spectrum being of a different integral order. In the general case, the individual spectra spatially overlap each other on the detectors. For example, the blue line in the second order-spectrum may overlap with the red portion of the first-order spectrum. This is a significant drawback. It is therefore desirable to analyze a single spectrum by itself without interference from spectra of different orders.
In one embodiment, the dispersive element is a prism. It is arranged to displace the higher order spectra so far beyond the first order so that they do not fall upon the plurality of detectors and only the first order is detected.
In another embodiment, the dispersive element is arranged to displace the spectra away from each other so that they do not overlap. The plurality of detectors can be further arranged to form a line or a 2D matrix of detectors. This 2D matrix forms an array of detectors arranged so that each row corresponds to a spectrum of interest to be read and analyzed. A 2D matrix of detectors could also be form of a single row.
The preceding description is provided as non-limiting examples and one skilled in the art will be able to implement some variations of embodiment without going outside the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09151155 | Jan 2009 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/050729 | 1/22/2010 | WO | 00 | 8/25/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/084174 | 7/29/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3775010 | Chupp et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
4636074 | Levy et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
5596407 | Zander et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5905571 | Butler et al. | May 1999 | A |
6643065 | Silberman | Nov 2003 | B1 |
7458691 | Duncan | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20020021493 | Kaneko | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030142308 | Kojima et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030231308 | Granger | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20070019194 | Chen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070242268 | Dobschal et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080094626 | Becker-Ross et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080309936 | Krapu | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19620807 | Dec 1996 | DE |
19708462 | Aug 1998 | DE |
1 365 279 | Nov 2003 | EP |
08145795 | Jun 1996 | JP |
2005121723 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006077106 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007082952 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007089770 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
F. Havermeyer et al. “Volume holographic grating-based continuously tunable optical filter”, Sep. 2004; Opt. Eng. 43(9) 2017-2021. |
Fuss W. et al.: “A multipass grating spectrograph with a resolving power of 106”, Pure and Applied Optics. Journal of the European Optical Societypart A, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, GB, vol. 2, No. 4, Jul. 1, 1993, pp. 351-358, XP020071107, ISSN: 0963-9659, p. 352, figure 1. |
International Search Report, dated Jul. 29, 2010, from corresponding PCT application. |
European Search Report, dated Aug. 25, 2009, from corresponding European application. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110299078 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |