The present invention relates in general o the field of vehicle attitude control.
Many modern vehicles require thruster control during certain phases of flight. Conventionally, such vehicles utilize solid gas generators or attitude control motors to achieve thruster control. These control devices can be placed on the fore or aft ends for control moment applications or generally in the center of the body for direct force control. Generally, solid gas generators use a larger grain volume and a valve system to direct the thrust in the desired direction. While these systems are able to package more impulse in a given volume, the mass flow must remain fairly constant so that venting is required to prevent overpressurization, which wastes much of the desired packaged propellant. Systems employing solid gas generators are also expensive due to the valve and actuation systems required. Jet interaction is fan shaped in such systems and is, therefore, more complicated. Conventional attitude control motor systems employ banks of individual, self-contained attitude control motors that are fired in the desired direction to achieve forward thruster control. Conventional attitude control motors are generally circular in cross-section to efficiently contain pressurization forces when the motor is operated. Such conventional motors, however, are bulky, self-contained pressure vessels when compared to their thrust output; that is, the motors require a significant volume of the vehicle when compared to their thrust output. Some vehicles, therefore, cannot employ conventional attitude control motors, as insufficient volume exists in the vehicle.
While there are attitude control motor systems well known in the art, considerable room for improvement remains.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. However, the invention itself, as well as a preferred mode of use, and further objectives and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which the leftmost significant digit(s) in the reference numerals denote(s) the first figure in which the respective reference numerals appear, wherein:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
In the specification, reference may be made to the spatial relationships between various components and to the spatial orientation of various aspects of components as the devices are depicted in the attached drawings. However, as will be recognized by those skilled in the art after a complete reading of the present application, the devices, members, apparatuses, etc. described herein may be positioned in any desired orientation. Thus, the use of terms such as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” or other like terms to describe a spatial relationship between various components or to describe the spatial orientation of aspects of such components should be understood to describe a relative relationship between the components or a spatial orientation of aspects of such components, respectively, as the device described herein may be oriented in any desired direction.
The present invention concerns a monolithic structure that utilizes shared pressure vessel walls of adjacent attitude control motors to distribute the operational pressure loads throughout the structure, thus allowing less structure as compared with self-contained pressure vessels.
The present invention relates to a monolithic attitude control motor frame that includes a monolithic structure comprising an outer surface of revolution and a plurality of side walls defining a plurality of cavities extending radially from the outer surface of revolution. Adjacent cavities of the plurality of cavities share a side wall or side wall portion therebetween. Each of the cavities is configured to receive an attitude control motor.
The present invention further relates to a monolithic attitude control motor system that includes a monolithic frame comprising an outer surface of revolution and a plurality of side walls defining a plurality of cavities extending radially from the outer surface of revolution. The system further includes a plurality of attitude control motors corresponding to the plurality of cavities, such that an attitude control motor of the plurality of attitude control motors is disposed in each cavity of the plurality of cavities. Adjacent attitude control motors share a side wall or a portion of a side wall therebetween and wherein pressurization loads generated by operation of one of the plurality of attitude control motors are transmitted to the monolithic frame.
The present invention also relates to a vehicle that includes a body and a monolithic attitude control system operably associated with the body. The monolithic attitude control system includes a monolithic frame comprising an outer surface of revolution and a plurality of side walls defining a plurality of cavities extending radially from the outer surface of revolution. The system further includes a plurality of attitude control motors corresponding to the plurality of cavities, such that an attitude control motor of the plurality of attitude control motors is disposed in each cavity of the plurality of cavities. Adjacent attitude control motors share a side wall or a portion of a side wall therebetween and pressurization loads generated by operation of one of the plurality of attitude control motors are transmitted to the monolithic frame.
The present system is particularly useful to provide thruster control to many various types of vehicles, for example, air-traveling vehicles, such as aircraft, missiles, projectiles, rockets, air-traveling munitions, and the like; water-traveling vehicles, such as torpedoes, submarine vehicles, water-traveling munitions, and the like; exoatmospheric vehicles, such as spacecraft, satellites, space-traveling munitions, and the like.
Still referring to the embodiment illustrated in
Still referring to the embodiment of
Referring to
The present invention contemplates many different arrangements, shapes, and sizes of attitude control motors in the monolithic attitude control motor system and, thus, contemplates many different arrangements, shapes, and sizes of cavities defined by the monolithic attitude control motor frame.
In the embodiment of
As described herein, the present monolithic attitude control motor system, such as system 101, may be operatively associated with many various types of vehicles for providing vehicle thrust control.
The present invention provides significant advantages, including: (1) providing an attitude control motor system that exhibits higher packaging efficiency than conventional attitude control motor systems; (2) providing an attitude control motor system that provides a large amount of total impulse than conventional attitude control motor systems; and (3) providing an attitude control motor system that better resolves pressurization forces during operation of the attitude control motors.
The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below. It is apparent that an invention with significant advantages has been described and illustrated. Although the present invention is shown in a limited number of forms, it is not limited to just these forms, but is amenable to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3028807 | Burton | Apr 1962 | A |
3034434 | Swaim | May 1962 | A |
3316719 | Loprete | May 1967 | A |
3374967 | Plumley | Mar 1968 | A |
4408735 | Metz | Oct 1983 | A |
4444119 | Caponi | Apr 1984 | A |
4581998 | Horst, Jr | Apr 1986 | A |
4641801 | Lynch, Jr. | Feb 1987 | A |
5028014 | Anderson, Jr. | Jul 1991 | A |
5044156 | Deffayet | Sep 1991 | A |
5054712 | Bar | Oct 1991 | A |
5433399 | Becker | Jul 1995 | A |
5657948 | Roucoux | Aug 1997 | A |
6178741 | Nelson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6315238 | Kirschner, Jr. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322023 | Soranno et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6367735 | Folsom | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6565036 | Palathingal | May 2003 | B1 |
6752351 | John | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7000377 | Knight | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7004423 | Folsom | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7281367 | Rohrbaugh et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7610747 | Kim | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7800031 | Rastegar | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8084725 | Dryer | Dec 2011 | B1 |
9151581 | Rastegar | Oct 2015 | B2 |
11543835 | Schroeder | Jan 2023 | B2 |
20080188150 | Hine et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100206195 | Rastegar | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110204177 | Ritchie | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110309186 | Dryer | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, dated Mar. 17, 2011. |
Kyle Mizokami, “The Navy has shot down an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile for the first time”, Popular Mechanics, Nov. 17, 2020 [www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a34702702/navy-destroyer-shoots-down-icbm-watch-historic-test/accessed on Dec. 14, 2020] (Year: 2020). |
Max Fisher, et al., “Did American Missile Defense Fail in Saudi Arabia?”, New York Times Company, Dec. 4, 2017 )Year: 2017). |
Truncated square tiling webpage [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truncated_square_tiling accessed on Nov. 21, 2019] (Year: 2019). |
Hexagonal tiling webpage [en.wikipedia.org/Hexagonal_tiling accessed on Nov. 21, 2019] (Year: 2019). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230044244 A1 | Feb 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61295496 | Jan 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15564942 | US | |
Child | 17963632 | US |