The present application relates to weapon stabilizer systems. It finds particular application in utilizing a motorized weapon gyroscopic stabilizer to create a stabilizing effect for single shot, semi-automatic, and fully automatic weapons, and will be described with particular reference thereto. It is to be understood, however, that it also finds application in other devices, and is not necessarily limited to the aforementioned application.
Shooting a weapon depends on a high degree of precision. Slight movements made by the shooter significantly alter the accuracy of the shot. This variation in target alignment is made even more significant when compounded over long distances. Over time, shooters have been taught to minimize these movements by using a variety of methods to create stability and support of the weapon during target alignment and firing of the weapon. This desired stability of the target alignment is so critical that a shooter is taught to measure his breaths, and be aware of his heartbeats as he prepares for his shot. A small fraction of a degree in target misalignment when magnified over a long distance is enough to miss the target.
While there are a variety of sights, scopes, and aiming devices available for weapons, they only serve to make the shooter more aware of the existing deviations experienced during aiming and firing at his target. Typically, the shooter has the ability to support his weapon from the middle and/or rear with handgrips, and/or stock supports. When possible, a shooter enhances his stability by supporting the weapon with external stable surfaces available to him in his environment at the time. Unfortunately, due to the different conditions and environments in which a weapon is expected to function, the ideal support for the weapon is not always available. Without the aid of external stable surfaces for the weapon, the shooter is dependent on supporting the unsupported weapon with his skeletal structure incorporated into their position, and the steadiness of their muscles.
With a weapon, during the first shot, the shooter typically experiences recoil from the shot. During this recoil phase, the weapon typically moves as the projectile is fired and propelled and leaves the weapon. Typically, this recoil affects the least supported part of the weapon the most. This recoil causes alignment with the target to be altered, and requires subsequent shots to be made after adjusting target alignment, causing a delay in repeated firing and the ability to aim accurately. The less the natural recoil of the weapon affects the target alignment, the faster the target can be reacquired, and subsequent shots may be made. This recoil problem is present with single shot, semi-automatic, and fully automatic weapons.
Gyroscopes have been utilized in the past in a wide variety of stabilizing applications, but size, weight, and bulk have limited their application related to the handheld weapon field. Gyroscopes are heavy and cumbersome, and while used for applications such as on cameras, missiles, battleship guns, and tanks, they have never been practically used on handheld weapons.
The present application provides a weapon stabilizer system and apparatus which overcomes the above-referenced problems and others.
In accordance with one aspect, a motorized weapon gyroscopic stabilizer system is provided. The system includes a housing including an open core rigidly mounted to a barrel of a weapon. An electronic motor includes a rotor configured to provide gyroscopic stability, the rotor surrounding the open core and including an axis of rotation and a mass element configured to rotate around the axis of rotation.
The motorized weapon gyroscopic stabilizer improves the stability of a weapon during single shots, semi-automatic shots, and fully automatic shots through the use of a lightweight high speed integral brushless motor driven gyroscopic stabilization device. The device relies on the three primary variables involved in creating gyroscopic stability; the mass of the spinning element, the speed of the spinning element, and the diameter of the spinning element. By altering any of these three variables, the gyroscopic stability is altered. However, emphasis may be placed on any of these three variables to overcome the limitations applied to any of the other variables.
To accomplish gyroscopic stability, the motorized weapon gyroscopic stabilizer utilizes a relatively small diameter, low mass, high speed brushless motor driven gyroscope created with integral construction to the weapon, designed to spin on an axis parallel to the weapons direction of fire and/or target alignment method/device. The motorized weapon gyroscopic stabilizer also utilizes a method to increase the speed of the spinning mass to produce extremely high revolutions per minute allowing the device to lower the mass of the spinning mass element while achieving the same gyroscopic stability, thus making the device lighter.
The motorized weapon gyroscopic stabilizer is also designed to be quieter by eliminating traditional electric DC motor construction which requires an electric motor, drive trains and independent gyroscopic spinning mass elements, all of which produce noise. Instead, the device is designed to create its gyroscopic stability through the natural construction of a brushless motor and the spinning mass of its rotor. The brushless motor is designed to spin on an axis parallel to the weapons direction of fire and/or target alignment method/device. Also, because the brushless motor does not utilize traditional electric motor brushes, it eliminates the noise created from the friction of brushes contacting the stator.
The motorized weapon gyroscopic stabilizer is also designed to minimize bulk by integrating the gyroscope into the weapons natural structure emphasizing its attachment in line with the axis parallel to the weapons direction of fire and/or target alignment method/device. The device has a small rotational mass diameter and compensates for this through its high speed rotation. The diameter of the spinning mass element is critical to the function of a gyroscope. Increasing the diameter, increases the gyroscopic stability it generates. The brushless motor eliminates the need to create a separate motor which would require additional gears, pulleys, or drive train mechanisms required to transfer rotation to a gyros secondary diameter of mass, all of which adds to a devices bulk. The motorized gyroscopic weapon stabilizer is designed with a hollow rotational axis which allows it to share space with other functional elements incorporated into all weapons, such as, but not limited to; by way of example in a firearm type weapon; its barrel, its axis parallel to the weapons direction of fire, and/or with the target alignment-line of sight method/device natural to the firearm.
This sharing of space allows the motorized weapon gyroscopic stabilizer to incorporate with the natural form of the weapon, and prevent the bulk of adding a separate large cylindrical shape, which is essential to create a gyroscopic stabilizer, somewhere else on a weapon. Due to this form, it allows the device to be positioned as far away as practical from the already existing support surfaces on the weapon to maximize the gyroscopic stability it provides.
This motorized weapon gyroscopic stabilizer is designed to be either rigidly attached or be made removable from the weapon. The attachment method varies and is dependent on the design and the configuration of the specific weapon, and may be attached either permanently, or temporarily. This is fully capable of being added to, or removed from the weapon, or in being permanently attached or permanently affixed into the weapons structure.
The motorized weapon gyroscopic stabilizer is designed to be either used independently, or incorporated into other devices including but not limited to; barrels, flash suppressors, silencers, noise suppressors, scopes, lasers, optics, holographic sights, target alignment devices, and other devices benefiting from its unique hollow core construction.
Still further advantages of the present invention will be appreciated to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading and understand the following detailed description.
The invention may take form in various components and arrangements of components, and in various steps and arrangements of steps. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating the preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.
With reference to
In
The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Modifications and alterations may occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be constructed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
464806 | Tower | Dec 1891 | A |
640051 | Tower | Dec 1899 | A |
1573028 | Bates | Feb 1926 | A |
2106998 | Fieux | Feb 1938 | A |
2356189 | Tufts | Aug 1944 | A |
2405052 | Poitras et al. | Jul 1946 | A |
2472944 | Furer et al. | Jun 1949 | A |
2532333 | Smith | Dec 1950 | A |
2534225 | Brown | Dec 1950 | A |
2609606 | Draper et al. | Sep 1952 | A |
2679192 | Seeley et al. | May 1954 | A |
2845737 | Hoyer | Aug 1958 | A |
2938435 | Gille | May 1960 | A |
3034116 | Shelley | May 1962 | A |
3078728 | Schlesman | Feb 1963 | A |
3144644 | Getting | Aug 1964 | A |
3165972 | Cumbo | Jan 1965 | A |
3362073 | Hausenblas et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3396630 | Hinterthur et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3424522 | Call | Jan 1969 | A |
3489057 | Tonkin | Jan 1970 | A |
3502062 | Shurts | Mar 1970 | A |
3640178 | Chatham et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3664199 | Lahde | May 1972 | A |
3913870 | Bolick | Oct 1975 | A |
4297905 | Hadekel | Nov 1981 | A |
4307653 | Goes et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4476969 | Dykema | Oct 1984 | A |
4621266 | Le Gall et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4974493 | Yeffman | Dec 1990 | A |
5113745 | Allen | May 1992 | A |
5339789 | Heitz | Aug 1994 | A |
6227098 | Mason | May 2001 | B1 |
6941851 | Urvoy | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7870814 | Lounsbury | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8028611 | Loundsbury | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8220448 | Moggo | Jul 2012 | B1 |
20110275435 | Torre | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120030984 | Andersson | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Dec. 9, 2014 in connection with PCT/US14/11062, filed Jan. 10, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150241161 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61585267 | Jan 2012 | US |