This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/433,008 filed Apr. 30, 2009.
The present disclosure generally relates to document processing devices and methods for operating such devices. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to methods and systems for adjusting the cross-process position of a drive nip in a document processing device to, for example, account for a range of media sizes.
Typical document processing devices typically include one or more sets of nips used to register and transport media (i.e., sheets) within the device. A nip provides a force to a sheet as it passes through the nip to propel it forward through the document processing device. Depending upon the size of the sheet that is being registered or transported, one or more nips in a set of nips might not contact the sheet as it is being registered or transported.
As shown in
Each drive module 205, 210 and 215 is fixed in a known cross-process location. As such, the drive roll of an inbound drive module, such as 205c, may only contact a sheet if the sheet is of sufficient size to contact the drive rolls of all three drive modules 205, 210 and 215. As a result, drive motor 205a, drive belt 205b and drive roll 205c may be underutilized as compared with the drive motors, drive belts and drive rolls of drive modules 210 and 215.
Typical registration systems in a document processing device have fixed location drive modules for orienting a sheet prior to image transfer. The location or placement of each fixed drive module in a cross-process direction is selected in order to enable performance across a wide range of media (i.e., sheet) sizes. However, sheets that are comparatively large in size and/or weight require a wide stance for optimal control. As such, selecting fixed positions that do not account for such sizes can jeopardize hardware registration performance.
Before the present systems, devices and methods are described, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to the particular systems, devices and methods described, as these may vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used in the description is for the purpose of describing the particular versions or embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope.
It must also be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a “nip” is a reference to one or more nips and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Although any methods, materials, and devices similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of embodiments, the preferred methods, materials, and devices are now described. All publications mentioned herein are incorporated by reference. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the embodiments described herein are not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention. As used herein, the term “comprising” means “including, but not limited to.”
In an embodiment, a system may include a moveable drive module comprising a drive roll and a translation drive motor capable of moving the moveable drive module in a cross-process direction, and a plurality of idler rolls. A first idler roll may be configured to be associated with the drive roll when the moveable drive module is in a first position. A second idler roll may be configured to be associated with the drive roll when the moveable drive module is in a second position.
In an embodiment, a system may include a moveable drive module comprising a drive roll, an idler roll associated with the drive roll, and a translation drive motor capable of moving the moveable drive module in a cross-process direction.
In an embodiment, a system may include a moveable drive module comprising a drive roll and a first translation drive motor capable of moving the moveable drive module in a cross-process direction, and a moveable idler module comprising an idler roll and a second translation drive motor capable of moving the moveable idler module in a cross-process direction.
Aspects, features, benefits and advantages of the present invention will be apparent with regard to the following description and accompanying drawings, of which:
The following terms shall have, for the purposes of this application, the respective meanings set forth below.
A “document processing device” refers to a device that performs an operation in the course of producing, replicating, or transforming a document from one format to another format, such as from an electronic format to a physical format or vice versa. Document processing devices may include, without limitation, printers (using any printing technology, such as xerography, ink-jet, or offset); document scanners or specialized readers such as check readers; mail handling machines; fabric or wallpaper printers; or any device in which a document is moved and processed.
A “nip” refers to a location in a document processing device at which a force is applied to a document, such as a sheet, to propel the sheet in a process direction. A nip may include, for example and without limitation, a drive roll and an idler roll.
A “drive roll” refers to a nip component that is designed to propel a document, such as a sheet, in contact with the nip. A drive roll may comprise a compliant material, such as rubber, neoprene or the like. A drive roll may be directly driven via a stepper motor, a DC motor or the like. Alternately, a drive roll may be driven using a gear train, belt transmission or the like.
An “idler roll” refers to a nip component that is designed to provide a normal force against a document, such as a sheet, in order to enable the sheet to be propelled by the drive roll. An idler roll may comprise a non-compliant material, such as plastic.
A “positioning shaft” refers to a shaft on which a moveable drive module (or other moveable module) is mounted which allows the module to be moved in a cross-process direction. A positioning shaft may be a threaded shaft.
A “drive motor” refers to a motor utilized to drive a drive belt. In an embodiment, the drive motor may drive a drive belt operably connected to a drive roll. A drive motor may be included as part of a drive module, although alternate drive motor placements are envisioned within the scope of this disclosure.
A “translation drive motor” refers to a drive motor utilized to move a moveable drive module (or other moveable module) in a cross-process direction. A translation drive motor may be part of or separate from a moveable module. In embodiments described herein, the translation drive motor may drive both a first drive belt operably connected to a drive roll and a second drive belt designed to move a moveable module in a cross-process direction.
A “cross-process direction” is a direction that is substantially perpendicular to the process flow followed by an object to be moved by the system, such as a document in a document processing device. For example, a cross-process direction may be substantially parallel to the length of an axle on which a drive wheel of a document processing device is located.
The system described herein advantageously reduces the cost of a sheet registration and/or transport system that registers sheets of varying sizes by reducing the number of components required for such a system. Rather than including three drive modules as shown in
The outboard drive module 300 may include a drive motor 302, a drive belt 304, and a drive roll 306. The drive belt 304 may be used to operably connect a drive shaft 308 of the drive motor 302 to a pulley 310 in connection with the drive roll 306. In operation, the drive motor 302 may cause the drive shaft 308 to rotate with an angular velocity. The angular velocity of the drive shaft 308 may be based on, for example, the voltage supplied to the drive motor 302. As such, the angular velocity of the drive shaft 308 may be controllable.
The rotation of the drive shaft 308 causes the drive belt 304 to rotate the pulley 310. The angular velocity of the pulley 310 is proportional to the angular velocity of the drive shaft 308 based on the radius of the drive shaft and the pulley. The rotation of the pulley 310 causes the drive roll 306 to rotate via a common axle (not shown).
The elements of the inboard drive module 320 may be substantially similar to those of the outboard drive module 300 (i.e., a drive motor 322, a drive belt 324, a drive roll 326, a drive shaft 328 and a drive pulley 330), except that the drive motor of the inboard drive module may be a translation drive motor. Moreover, the operation of the above-listed elements with respect to imparting an angular velocity to the drive roll 326 may be substantially similar to the operation of the elements of the outboard drive module 300.
The inboard drive module 320 may additionally include a hub 332 that operably connects the inboard drive module to the positioning shaft 340. In an embodiment, the hub 332 may encircle the positioning shaft 340 and may include an internal thread. The positioning shaft 340 may be threaded on its exterior such that the thread of the positioning shaft is engaged with the internal thread of the hub 332.
The inboard drive module 320 may further include a second belt 334 and a second pulley 336. The second belt 334 may operably connect the drive shaft 328 of the translation drive motor 322 to the second pulley 336, which is, in turn, operably connected to the positioning shaft 340. In operation, the translation drive motor 322 may cause the drive shaft 328 to rotate. The rotation of the drive shaft 328 may cause the second belt 334 to rotate the second pulley 336. The rotation of the second pulley 336 causes the positioning shaft 340 to turn on its axis. As a result, the positioning shaft 340 causes movement of the inboard drive module 320 in a cross-process direction by the engagement between the external thread of the positioning shaft and the internal thread of the hub 332.
In an embodiment, the translation drive motor 322 may include a clutch that prevents movement of the drive belt 324 by the translation drive motor when the inboard drive module 320 is to be moved and prevents movement of the second belt 334 by the translation drive motor when the drive roll 326 is to be rotated. In such an embodiment, only one of the drive roll 326 and the inboard drive module 320 may be moved at any given time.
In an embodiment, the translation drive motor 322 may cause the drive shaft 328 and the positioning shaft 340 to rotate in either a clockwise or counterclockwise direction depending upon the direction in which the inboard drive module 320 is desired to be moved. For example, the translation drive motor 322 may be driven in a forward direction to rotate the positioning shaft 340 in a first direction and in a reverse direction to rotate the positioning shaft in a direction opposite the first direction. Additional and/or alternate methods of enabling rotation of the positioning shaft 340 in both a clockwise and counterclockwise direction are included within the scope of this disclosure.
The moveable drive module 400 may include a drive roll 405. In order to form a nip, the drive roll 405 may be required to be associated with an idler roll. As such, a first idler roll 410 may be located such that the drive roll 405 is associated with the first idler roll when the moveable drive module 400 is in an inboard position, as shown in
The moveable drive module 500 may include a drive roll 505. The drive roll 505 may be associated with an idler roll 510. In an embodiment shown in
The moveable idler module 515 may be substantially similar to the moveable drive module 320 described in reference to
In an alternate embodiment, the moveable drive module may further include the idler roll. In such an embodiment, the drive roll and the idler roll may be positioned to form a nip and may move in concert as the moveable drive module moves in an inboard and/or outboard direction. For example, in the embodiment discussed in reference to
It will be appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. It will also be appreciated that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in die art which are also intended to be encompassed by the disclosed embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2632641 | Rice | Mar 1953 | A |
3025055 | Bryant | Mar 1962 | A |
3854315 | Winkler | Dec 1974 | A |
4228994 | Volpe | Oct 1980 | A |
4558373 | Plasencia et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4630815 | Petersen et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4685664 | Petersdorf | Aug 1987 | A |
4833989 | Wieland | May 1989 | A |
4917370 | Batts | Apr 1990 | A |
4971304 | Lofthus | Nov 1990 | A |
4971311 | Tsukimoto | Nov 1990 | A |
5004222 | Dobashi | Apr 1991 | A |
5094442 | Kamprath et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5167751 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5169140 | Wenthe, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5198067 | Sumi et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5209465 | Sayama et al. | May 1993 | A |
5219159 | Malachowski et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5278624 | Kamprath et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5313253 | Martin et al. | May 1994 | A |
5697608 | Castelli et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5778300 | Murakami et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5887996 | Castelli et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6007063 | Park | Dec 1999 | A |
6019365 | Matsumura | Feb 2000 | A |
6059285 | Suga et al. | May 2000 | A |
6137989 | Quesnel | Oct 2000 | A |
6168153 | Richards et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173952 | Richards et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6338483 | Andela et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6374075 | Benedict et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6533268 | Williams et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6736394 | Herrmann et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6817611 | DiRamio | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6860204 | Hashiguchi | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7121546 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7195238 | Suga et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7243917 | Knierim et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252287 | Tsutoh | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258340 | Clark et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7422209 | Hashimoto | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7527263 | DeGruchy et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7677558 | Kinoshita et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686299 | Herrmann | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7819399 | Choi | Oct 2010 | B2 |
20030146567 | Williams et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20060071419 | Lee | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060181015 | Takahashi | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060261540 | Loiselle et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090121419 | deJong et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100090391 | deJong et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100276873 | Richards et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100327513 | Richards et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
60002547 | Jan 1985 | JP |
60082553 | May 1985 | JP |
61229748 | Oct 1986 | JP |
63306145 | Dec 1988 | JP |
1187151 | Jul 1989 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Karns, Kara L., An Empirical Evaluation of Nip Mechanics as it Impacts Paper Drive Variability in a Registration System, Xerox Internal Report Data Sheet, Accession No. X9500117, Issued May 9, 1995. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100276877 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |