This application relates to the general field of magnetic tunneling junctions (MTJ) and, more particularly, to customizing the MTJ device structure for improved device performance.
Magnetic memory devices consist of a stack of layers in which two ferromagnetic layers, typically referred to as a reference layer and a free layer, are separated by a thin non-magnetic dielectric layer referred to as a barrier layer. It is challenging to achieve high Tunneling Magneto Resistance (TMR) values due to imperfections in interface quality and defects in crystal growth of materials. The ferro-magnet and non-magnet barrier layer lattice mismatch and interfacial defects caused by undesirable strain results in degradation of device performance. It is desired to customize the MTJ device structure to reduce the crystal defects and improve the interface lattice epitaxy and hence improve the device performance.
Several patents teach adding stress compensating films to the MTJ structure to exert compensating stress on the structure, including U.S. Pat. No. 9,406,874 (Kula et al) and U.S. Pat. No. 9,000,545 (Kajiyama).
It is an object of the present disclosure to provide an improved method of forming MTJ structures wherein stress acting on the MTJ device during the manufacturing process is modulated.
Another object of the present disclosure is to provide an improved method of forming MTJ structures wherein a stress-modulating layer is added to the top and/or bottom of the MTJ device to reduce stress during the manufacturing process.
In accordance with the objectives of the present disclosure, a method for fabricating an improved magnetic tunneling junction (MTJ) structure is achieved. A bottom electrode is provided on a substrate. A MTJ stack is deposited on the bottom electrode. A top electrode is deposited on the MTJ stack. A first stress modulating layer is deposited between the bottom electrode and the MTJ stack, or a second stress modulating layer is deposited between the MTJ stack and the top electrode, or both a first stress modulating layer is deposited between the bottom electrode and the MTJ stack and a second stress modulating layer is deposited between the MTJ stack and the top electrode. The top electrode and MTJ stack are patterned and etched to form a MTJ device. The stress modulating layers reduce crystal growth defects and interfacial defects during annealing and improve the interface lattice epitaxy. This will improve device performance.
Also in accordance with the objectives of the present disclosure, a magnetic tunneling junction (MTJ) structure is achieved comprising a bottom electrode on a substrate, a MTJ device on the bottom electrode, a top electrode on the MTJ device, and a first stress modulating layer between the bottom electrode and the MTJ device, or a second stress modulating layer between the MTJ device and the top electrode, or both a first stress modulating layer between the bottom electrode and the MTJ device and a second stress modulating layer between the MTJ device and the top electrode.
In the accompanying drawings forming a material part of this description, there is shown:
The present disclosure provides a customized magnetic memory device structure. The crystalline properties of the structure, especially that of the ferromagnet/MgO barrier interface, play a very critical role in the device performance and the presence of strain in the structure can change the properties of the device significantly. The disclosed new structure adds a thick soft layer to the magnetic memory device that will manipulate the stress acting on the device and hence control the crystal structure growth and interfacial lattice mismatch. This will improve device performance; for example, it will increase the Tunneling Magneto Resistance (TMR) and Coercivity (Hc) of the device.
The present disclosure proposes not to exert compensating stress on the structure, but rather to release the stress of the structure by using a soft layer which may consist of a conductive material such as Zr, Hf, Al, or Mg having a very low modulus of elasticity. The stress in the structure will be released by dissipation of energy through the low modulus stress absorbing material used. Also the local stress in the structure can be uniformly distributed using this low modulus material.
Magneto resistive tunnel junction (MTJ) devices used in a magnetic random access memory (MRAM) array are formed by depositing a blanket metal stack comprised of a seed layer, a pinned magnetic layer, a tunnel barrier layer, a free magnetic layer and a capping layer on top of a bottom electrode. A hard mask is deposited on top of this stack to transfer the photoresist pattern to the MTJ stack. A standard MTJ film stack is shown in
Bottom electrode 12 has been formed on the substrate 10, patterned, and surrounded by dielectric material 14. The blanket metal stack comprises seed layer 16, pinned layer 18, barrier layer 20, free layer 22, and cap layer 24. Metal hard mask layer 26 completes the structure. After etching, the remaining metal hard mask will become the top electrode.
The MTJ device undergoes high temperature processes. The MTJ film is annealed at high temperatures for crystallization of the magnetic materials, either just after film deposition or at the end of top electrode integration. Also, back end processing involves high temperature processes which can be simulated as high temperature annealing processes. Since the bottom electrode and top electrode are thick metal layers, they will exert high stress on the MTJ device during the annealing process and can change the crystal growth mechanism and device performance significantly. For a desired magnetic orientation in a certain direction, a specific crystal structure is required. Any crystal defect or strain can cause the magnetic orientation to be shifted and result in weak perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA). The shifted magnetic orientation may lower the energy barrier and weaken the thermal stability and may deteriorate data retention of the spin transfer torque (STT) MRAM cell.
The seed layer at the bottom of the MTJ stack helps to promote the growth of large crystal grains on its top surface with correct crystallographic texture. The seed layer under stress can generate more crystal defects. The dislocations and other defects (grain boundaries, twins) pre-existing in the seed layer will continue into the growing crystal over the overlayer. The desired crystal structure growth of the free layer and reference layer during the annealing process also depends on the crystallographic texture of the barrier layer, such as MgO. The MgO layer under stress generated during deposition and/or resulting from a stressed top and bottom electrode will cause crystal defects and these defects will propagate into the adjacent layers. Also, stress can change the lattice parameters which can cause lattice mismatch and can be detrimental to epitaxial growth.
The process of the present disclosure provides a customized MTJ stack. A stress modulation layer is added below the seed layer, or on top of the capping layer, or both below the seed layer and on top of the capping layer. Stress release through the stress modulation layer placed either on top and/or bottom can minimize the stress developed in the MTJ stack and hence improve the crystal structure and reduce the crystal defects.
A blanket bottom electrode is deposited on a CMOS substrate 10 with vias built to connect with the MTJ device. It will be understood that substrate 10 includes standard CMOS metal line connections and vias to connect different metal levels, not shown. The bottom electrode layer is photo patterned and etched to form bottom electrode 12 shown in
In the next step, a thick soft material 30 will be deposited on the bottom electrode 12 before the MTJ stack layers are deposited. A material with very low modulus of elasticity can be applied as the soft material; for example Mg can be used or Al, Hf or Zr. The layer 30 should be between about 1 and 100 nm in thickness, and preferably about 10 nm. This soft material will modulate the stress acting on the MTJ device during deposition as well as during high temperature processes.
Now, the magnetic layers including seed layer 16, pinned layer 18, barrier layer 20, free layer 22, capping layer 24, and hard mask layer 26 are deposited as usual.
In a second preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, as illustrated in
In a third preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, as illustrated in
By adjusting the thickness of the soft material, it is possible to introduce controllable mechanical strain on the device. Application of a thin layer of a more flexible material (lower elastic modulus) leads to the same stress relief as thick layers of a less flexible material. Also, the modulus of the soft material can be adjusted by varying deposition conditions to modulate the extent of stress release. The elastic modulus should be between about 20 gigapascals (GPa) and 400 GPa, and preferably about 50 GPa. This will reduce the interfacial and crystal growth defects and hence improve the device performance.
The bottom electrode and/or top electrode can have high intrinsic stress material. During annealing and backend processing, the device undergoes high temperature processes which may cause high stress in the device due to thermal expansion coefficient mismatch between layers. Therefore, the dominating stress factor may arise from the bottom electrode below the MTJ stack, and hence, we need to use a bottom stress release layer. Alternatively, the dominating stress factor may arise from the top electrode above the MTJ stack, and hence, we need to use a top stress release layer. Both bottom and top electrodes can play dominating roles to exert stress, so both top and bottom stress release layers may be needed. Also the MTJ stack develops intrinsic stress during deposition which can be released using the top and bottom stress modulating layers.
The epitaxial growth of magnetic layers such as CoFeB and barrier layers such as MgO on top of each other is difficult due to their difference in crystal orientation and structure. There is lattice mismatch between the barrier layer MgO and magnetic layers like CoFe. This lattice mismatch between CoFe and MgO films can cause stress build up in the film and results in structural defects like dislocations and aberrations. These intrinsic stresses in the MTJ stack can be released through the stress modulating layer to reduce crystal defects. Without the stress modulation layer(s) of the present disclosure, these stresses can be released by lateral expansion or contraction which may cause undesirable lateral mismatch between interfacial layers. If the stress is released through the stress absorbing soft layer of the present disclosure, no lateral expansion or contraction will occur or it will be minimized. Furthermore, during backend processing, the device undergoes high temperature processes which may cause high stress in the device due to thermal expansion coefficient mismatch between layers. This thermal stress also can be released through the stress modulating layer.
The MTJ devices fabricated according to the process of the present disclosure may be used in a magnetic recording head 100, as shown, for example, in
A head gimbal assembly (HGA) 220 includes a magnetic recording head 100 and a suspension 221 that elastically supports the magnetic recording head 100. The suspension 221 has a plate spring-like load beam 222 formed with stainless steel, a flexure 223 provided at one end portion of the load beam 222, and a base plate 224 provided at the other end portion of the load beam 222. The magnetic recording head 100 is joined to the flexure 223 which gives an appropriate degree of freedom to the magnetic recording head 100. A gimbal part for maintaining a posture of the magnetic recording head 100 at a steady level is provided in a portion of the flexure 223 to which the magnetic recording head 100 is mounted.
A member to which the HGA 220 is mounted to an arm 230 is referred to as a head arm assembly 221. The arm 230 moves the magnetic recording head 100 in the cross track direction y of the magnetic recording medium 114. One end of the arm 230 is mounted to the base plate 224. A coil 231 to be a portion of a voice coil motor is mounted to the other end of the arm 230. A bearing part 233 is provided in the intermediate portion of the arm 230. The arm 230 is rotatably supported by a shaft 234 mounted to the bearing part 233. The arm 230 and the voice coil motor that drives the arm 230 configure an actuator.
Next, with reference to
With reference to
Although the preferred embodiment of the present disclosure has been illustrated, and that form has been described in detail, it will be readily understood by those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the disclosure or from the scope of the appended claims.
This is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/679,498, filed Nov. 11, 2019, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/968,035, filed May 1, 2018 and entitled “Improvement of MTJ Device Performance by Adding Stress Modulation Layer to MTJ Device Structure,” each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8508984 | Ranjan et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8552411 | Aoyama et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
9000545 | Kajiyama | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9406874 | Kula et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
11430945 | Haq | Aug 2022 | B2 |
20040145836 | Kojima et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20080164548 | Ranjan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080225585 | Ranjan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100097846 | Sugiura et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20120018825 | Lim et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120063214 | Min | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130001721 | Peng et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130334630 | Kula et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140175582 | Apalkov et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150137291 | Kula et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20180205009 | Schafer et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190074042 | Lim et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190148630 | Haq et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190172997 | Park | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190341542 | Haq et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190393410 | Lee et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200075844 | Haq et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20210143322 | Sundar et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2014154604 | Aug 2014 | JP |
Entry |
---|
English Translation as used in Rejection; 2014154604 to Iba Yoshihisa, Published Aug. 25, 2014 (Year: 2014). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220384713 A1 | Dec 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15968035 | May 2018 | US |
Child | 16679498 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16679498 | Nov 2019 | US |
Child | 17885079 | US |