Field of the Invention (Technical Field)
Previously, cartilage soft tissue lesion treatment and/or surfacing could not be accomplished without significant collateral tissue necrosis using state of the art surgical devices. Smoothness of finish has always been an issue because the current state of the art involves use of cannulated rotating shavers. The finish these tools leave behind is very rough and is typically characterized by high degrees of necrotic tissue as a result of the less than effective means of cutting employed by these types of tools.
Description of Related Art
Conventional electrosurgical hand pieces do not provide the ability for a user to simultaneously drive a plurality of active electrodes in different modes. In addition, many electrode tip configurations require a user to withdraw the electrode from the treatment site, switch to a different hand piece and insert a different hand piece in order to perform a different mode of operation. The increased rate of insertion and removal of tools from a treatment site increases the chances for iatrogenic damage and infection to tissue. There is thus a present need for an electrosurgical tool which can selectively drive multiple active electrodes simultaneously in different modes.
An embodiment of the present invention relates to an electrosurgical device that includes an electrode tip which has a proximal and distal end, an insulator, a tissue-contacting active electrode, a non-tissue-contacting active electrode, a return electrode, a plenum, a first opening disposed in the plenum, the opening providing a communicable path between an inside of the plenum and a treatment site outside of the plenum, the non-tissue-contacting active electrode disposed at least partially within the plenum, and circuitry configured to operate the non-tissue-contacting active electrode and the tissue-contacting active electrode independently from one another and to selectively power the tissue-contacting active electrode and the non-tissue-contacting active electrode in different modes of operation in reference to the return electrode.
The circuitry can be external of an electrosurgical generator and can optionally be disposed at least partially in a hand piece. The circuitry can include a device for selectively powering the tissue-contacting active electrode in a first and second mode of operation. The circuitry can also include a device for selecting driving the non-tissue-contacting active electrode in a first and second mode of operation. The first mode of operation can include a cut function and the second mode of operation can include a COAG function.
The active electrodes can be driven by a monopolar electrosurgical generator. The plenum can include a non-conductive ridge-shaped structure. The plenum can include a shaped structure which is useful for performing a surgical procedure to tissue. In the electrosurgical device, all of the active electrodes can be powered simultaneously or individually. A second opening can also be disposed in the plenum. The electrosurgical device can include a return electrode, which can be formed onto an outer portion of a lumen and/or which can have a ring-shape.
An embodiment of the present invention also relates to an electrosurgical device that includes an insulator, a plenum that can include a plenum chamber, a tissue-contacting active electrode, a non-tissue-contacting active electrode, a return electrode. Each of the active electrodes and the plenum can be formed into a single insulator and/or insulator-containing element. The electrosurgical device can also include circuitry to selectively power the tissue-contacting active electrode and the non-tissue-contacting active electrode in at least two modes of operation. The electrodes can function as a bipolar probe when connected to a monopolar electrosurgical generator. The circuitry can optionally activate only one of the active electrodes and/or can activate both of the active electrodes simultaneously.
An embodiment of the present invention also relates to performing an electrosurgical procedure at a surgical site by activating a first active electrode with a first mode of operation, then activating a second active electrode with a second mode of operation, the first and second active electrodes formed into a single probe tip and the probe tip is preferably not removed from the surgical site between the first and second modes of operation.
In the procedure, one of the active electrodes is a tissue-contacting active electrode and the other active electrode is a non-tissue-contacting active electrode.
Objects, advantages and novel features, and further scope of applicability of the present invention will be set forth in part in the detailed description to follow, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and form a part of the specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating one or more preferred embodiments of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. In the drawings:
Referring now to the Figs. An embodiment of the present invention relates to dual function electrosurgical device 90 (see
In one embodiment, electrodes 110 and 120 are modally independent of one another. In a one embodiment one of electrodes 110 or 120 acts in the CUT-mode, while the other acts in the COAG-mode. However the differentiation of the two-channel functions of each electrode are preferably not limited to just CUT/COAG functions, as other modal options traditionally called “Blended” functions or “Pulsed” functions may be used in a modally independent manner in the same multi-electrode, modally independent active electrode tip design.
An embodiment of the present invention provides a multiple RF-Probe procedure specific capabilities such as, direct electrode tissue contact for vessel coagulation, while simultaneously offering protected electrode surface engineered irrigant treatments for soft tissue. Alternatively, tissue-contacting electrode 120 may be utilized in the CUT-modality while non-tissue-contacting electrode 110 remains in the COAG-modality. Yet another method is to have both electrodes 110 and 120 use a “blended” modality of different types or both in COAG-modality. All the combinations of modalities may be made across the two distinct active electrodes disposed within and/or upon the singular insulator. For example, in one embodiment, the electrodes 110 and 120 can be selected between any of the modalities illustrated in the following chart:
In one embodiment, any of electrodes 110 and/or 120 can be selectively active in a manner which is limited only by the generator limitations of a connected specific electrosurgical generator and/or the blending options provided on the front of the specific connected electrosurgical generator.
In yet an additional embodiment, the modality of the electrode involves the mechanical implementation of surface contours that can be used for tissue modification and removal as in resection type activities typical of electrosurgical procedures. For example, in one embodiment, the present invention can comprise shapes, sizes, and textures which are useful for performing one or more procedures during the same surgical encounter, such as subacromial decompression and cartilage treatment or ACL stump removal and cartilage treatment as examples.
Although numerous shapes and/or textures can be used to achieve desirable results during a particular surgical procedure, in one embodiment, non-conductive feature 130 optionally comprises one or more of the following: concave surface, convex surface, rasp, file, knife, spatula, potato-peeler shape, melon-bailer shape, wire, currette tip, sharp edged rib or “lip”, a sharp edged tongue or spatula tip, a serrated surface in one of the foregoing shaped tips, a semi-sharp edge applied to any of the aforementioned shapes, combinations thereof, and the like.
While electrodes 110 and 120 act in opposition in one embodiment, this is not necessarily the only configuration or necessarily the optimal configuration for all procedure-specific applications. The angular disposition of the various modal feature sets of the electrode may be altered to best suit the desired surgical procedure, anatomical structure of tissue to be treated, or a combination of those.
An embodiment of the present invention can be used for the treatment of tissue that needs to be excised, ablated, coagulated, vaporized, and/or cut as well as tissue that needs to be modified or preserved. This is because multiple such procedures are typically encountered within a single patient and/or procedure and are often encountered within the same joint upon which a surgical procedure is being performed. This is a real need because tissue surfaces which are accessible to treatment, are structured by water, because all tissue in vivo is in an organized fluid medium that is charge oriented and serves as a barrier to external solutes and charges. This barrier is easily transgressed by mechanical actions using the mechanical features of the probe tip, but preserved by the surficial molecular protic fluid treatment created and/or provided by the protected electrode modality.
An active electrode comprising one or more of multiple, modally independent, separately triggered active electrodes of one embodiment of the present invention provides both a protected electrode 110 for surficial treatment without the concomitant collateral tissue damage of traditional shavers and a traditional exposed electrode 120 for coagulation. This combination enables the surgeon to avoid the problematic heat-affected zone necrosis caused by tissue contacting electrodes, since protected electrode technology is provided on the same device. However, with the paired presence of a tissue contacting electrode blood vessel coagulation, or “bleeders” as they are commonly referred to, can also be accomplished. With further embodiments of the present invention, surgical tissue ablation or cutting is enabled creating a device that can function in both the ablation and the non-ablation modes, allowing the practitioner the ability to treat multiple types of tissues for multiple types of indications.
One embodiment of the present invention provides two or more electrodes which can be of different modalities in a single probe. For example, one electrode can be for tissue preserving, while another electrode can be for tissue contacting. Optionally more than two electrodes can be provided in a single probe tip and each of the different active electrodes can optionally be independently activated to perform a different mode of treatment. An embodiment of the present invention provides the advantage that a surgeon does not have to remove a device and insert another device to perform a second procedure. For example, in one embodiment a user can perform coagulation, ablation, and/or cutting and can switch back-and-forth between such procedures numerous times without the need to remove a device or insert a second device. Overall, this approach not only eliminates the insertion and extraction times for the various tools, but also reduces the opportunity for iatrogenic damage or infection to tissue structures that can be associated with tool insertion and extraction.
A multiple, modally independent, separately-triggered, active electrode, radio-frequency probe provides a direct tissue-contacting electrode as illustrated in the preferred embodiment of
Referring now to
In addition to the angles α and β, the overall angular positioning of the entire electrode insulator assembly can be set at any selected “clock” position in relation to the lumen tube/handle assembly which further aides in addressing proper geometric configuration for anatomical tissue access at a given site. Normal to the plane of view in
Electrical coupling of the electrodes can be achieved by cross-connections as illustrated in
Typical uses of one embodiment of the present invention includes arthroscopic procedures wherein a bleeder is encountered that requires coagulation of the vessel or when tissue requiring ablation or cutting is encountered. An embodiment of the present invention enables the immediate response to the bleeding condition without the surgeon having to remove and insert an alternate coagulation device. Multiple output power modes can be applied to either electrode configuration that provides differing surficial treatments or direct to tissue contacting hemostasis or similar effects.
Applications of the technology extend to multiple specialties that employ direct tissue contacting electrode technology for hemostasis and ablation or cutting and can simultaneously benefit from the novel protected electrode soft tissue surface treatments.
Although insulator 100 is occasionally referred to throughout this application as being a single insulator, embodiments of the present invention also provide two or more insulative components which can be connected and/or joined to create a single insulator.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides the benefit that a surgeon can perform a tissue preservation procedure (with the non-tissue-contacting active electrode) and then perform an ablation type procedure (with the tissue-contacting active electrode without having to use two different electrosurgical hand pieces or even without having to use two different electrosurgical probes. The ability to use a single probe to perform both procedures, not only reduces the possibility of iatrogenic damage or infection to tissue structures that can be associated with tool insertion and extraction, but also reduces the cost of the procedure by providing two previously separate tools in a single unit. Further, by using a “bridged” monopolar output configured to a bi-polar device the surgeon is provided with many more modal options than with just a singular modal configuration of the monopolar electrosurgical generator.
Although the invention has been described in detail with particular reference to these preferred embodiments, other embodiments can achieve the same results. Variations and modifications of the present invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art and it is intended to cover in the appended claims all such modifications and equivalents. The entire disclosures of all references, applications, patents, and publications cited above are hereby incorporated by reference.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of the filing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/737,063, entitled “Multi-Function RF Probe with Dual Electrode Positioning”, filed on Dec. 13, 2012, and the specification thereof is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3903891 | Brayshaw | Sep 1975 | A |
3911107 | Krezanoski | Oct 1975 | A |
3941135 | Von Sturm et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3982017 | Thiele | Sep 1976 | A |
4014777 | Brown | Mar 1977 | A |
4060088 | Morrison et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4094320 | Newton | Jun 1978 | A |
4105017 | Ryaby et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4231372 | Newton | Nov 1980 | A |
4237887 | Gonser | Dec 1980 | A |
4266532 | Ryaby et al. | May 1981 | A |
4266533 | Ryaby et al. | May 1981 | A |
4343308 | Gross | Aug 1982 | A |
4416277 | Newton et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4504493 | Marshall et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4540409 | Nystrom et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4559036 | Wunsch | Dec 1985 | A |
4615347 | Schooley | Oct 1986 | A |
4827927 | Newton | May 1989 | A |
4872865 | Bloebaum et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4901719 | Trenconsky et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4938970 | Hustead et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4971068 | Sahi | Nov 1990 | A |
5014699 | Pollack et al. | May 1991 | A |
5236456 | O'Leary et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5282861 | Kaplan | Feb 1994 | A |
5304724 | Newton | Apr 1994 | A |
5314476 | Prewett et al. | May 1994 | A |
5342357 | Nardella | Aug 1994 | A |
5352463 | Badylak et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5360440 | Andersen | Nov 1994 | A |
5364395 | West, Jr. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366443 | Eggers et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5403825 | Lagarde et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5458596 | Lax et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5472442 | Klicek | Dec 1995 | A |
5494538 | Kirillov et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5498259 | Mourant et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5514130 | Baker | May 1996 | A |
5516533 | Badylak et al. | May 1996 | A |
5554141 | Wendler | Sep 1996 | A |
5569241 | Edwards | Oct 1996 | A |
5569242 | Lax et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5573424 | Poppe | Nov 1996 | A |
5584863 | Rauch et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5622725 | Kross | Apr 1997 | A |
5633578 | Eggers et al. | May 1997 | A |
5669904 | Platt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669907 | Platt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669934 | Sawyer | Sep 1997 | A |
5683366 | Eggers et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697281 | Eggers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697536 | Eggers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697882 | Eggers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697909 | Eggers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5741261 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746896 | Shimamune et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749895 | Sawyer et al. | May 1998 | A |
5772659 | Becker et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5788976 | Bradford | Aug 1998 | A |
5797902 | Netherly | Aug 1998 | A |
5800385 | Demopulos et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820583 | Demopulos et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824015 | Sawyer | Oct 1998 | A |
5840166 | Kaneko | Nov 1998 | A |
5855608 | Brekke | Jan 1999 | A |
5860950 | Demopulos et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871469 | Eggers et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5885277 | Korth | Mar 1999 | A |
5885292 | Moskovitz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891140 | Ginn et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5919191 | Lennox et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5955514 | Huang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964968 | Kaneko | Oct 1999 | A |
6007532 | Netherly | Dec 1999 | A |
6032077 | Pomeranz | Feb 2000 | A |
6033654 | Stedronsky et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6056746 | Goble et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068627 | Orszulak et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086585 | Hovda et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093186 | Goble | Jul 2000 | A |
6112122 | Schwardt et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113596 | Hooven et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117109 | Eggers et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6135998 | Palanker | Oct 2000 | A |
6142992 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149620 | Baker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159194 | Eggers et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162219 | Nilsson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174309 | Wrublewski et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203541 | Keppel | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206875 | Long et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206878 | Bishop et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207134 | Fahlvik et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210403 | Klicek | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213999 | Platt et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214003 | Morgan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224592 | Eggers et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235024 | Tu | May 2001 | B1 |
6241723 | Heim et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6241753 | Knowlton | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261286 | Goble et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264650 | Hovda et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264652 | Eggers et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273883 | Furumoto | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293942 | Goble et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296636 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306134 | Goble et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309387 | Eggers et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322549 | Eggers et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325799 | Goble | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6350276 | Knowlton | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6371967 | Long et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383184 | Sharkey | May 2002 | B1 |
6391025 | Weinstein et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6416509 | Goble et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419815 | Chambers et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442418 | Evans et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461352 | Morgan et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6463336 | Mawhinney | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471993 | Shastri et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6547794 | Auge | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558382 | Jahns et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6743248 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6772013 | Ingle et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6780178 | Palanker et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6824555 | Towler et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6832995 | Towler et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6890332 | Truckai et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902564 | Morgan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7004939 | Mackay | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7066932 | Morgan et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7105011 | Auge | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7131860 | Sartor et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137980 | Buysse et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7160293 | Sturm et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7300435 | Wham et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7354438 | Morgan et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367976 | Lawes et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7393354 | Buchman et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7416437 | Sartor et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7438714 | Phan | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7445619 | Auge et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7481810 | Dumbauld et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7549989 | Morgan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7713269 | Auge et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7771422 | Auge et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7819861 | Auge | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819864 | Morgan et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7879034 | Woloszko | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7955296 | Morgan et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8235979 | Morgan et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8361065 | West, Jr. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8591508 | Morgan et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8623012 | Morgan et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8734441 | Morgan et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20010007940 | Tu et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010039419 | Francischelli et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020165596 | Wilson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183737 | Kristensen | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030028189 | Woloszko et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036753 | Morgan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030216732 | Truckai et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216733 | McClurken et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040030330 | Brassell et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040082945 | Clague et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082946 | Malis et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040167244 | Auge II | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040267255 | Auge II et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015085 | McClurken et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050085806 | Auge II et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050182449 | Auge II et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050283151 | Ebbutt | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060079873 | Scopton | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060210552 | Demopulos et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070016182 | Lipson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080281316 | Carlton et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287948 | Newton et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090030410 | Auge, II et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090306645 | Morgan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100069975 | Auge | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087815 | Morgan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100262136 | Morgan | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110034914 | Auge et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110087308 | Morgan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110196366 | Humble | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110288547 | Morgan | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130060249 | Maeda | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2037920 | Jul 1980 | GB |
9600042 | Jan 1996 | WO |
02102438 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO03015865 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03103522 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03103521 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2011047148 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Auge, “Redox Magnetohydrodynamic Engineered Irrigants Are Based Upon Constituent Charege-to-mass Ratio Profiles”, 6th Annual Conference on the Physics, Chemistry, and Biology of Water, Oct. 20, 2011. |
Babincova, et al., “High-Gradient Magnetic Capture of Ferrofluids: Implications for Drug Targeting and Tumor Embolization”, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung vol. 56-C, 2001, 909-911. |
Brennetot, et al., “Investigation of Chelate Formation, Intramolecular Energy Transfer and Luminescence Efficiency and Lifetimes in the Eu-thenoyltrifluoroacetone-trioctylphosphine oxide-Triton x-100 System Using Absorbance, Fluorescence and Photothermal Measurements”, Spectrochim Acta Part A 56, 2000, 703-715. |
Chen, et al., “Heat-Induced Changes in the Mechanics of a Collagenous Tissue: Isothermal, Isotonic Shrinkage”, Transactions of the ASME vol. 120, 1998, 382-388. |
Edwards, et al., “Thermometric Determination of Cartilage Matrix Temperatures During Thermal Chondroplasty: Comparison of Bipolar and Monopolar Radiofrequency Devices”, Arthroscopy vol. 18 No. 4, 2002, 339-346. |
Fink, et al., “Holmium: YAG Laser-Induced Aseptic Bone Necroses of the Femoral Condyle”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery vol. 12 No. 2, 1996, 217-223. |
Ganguly, et al., “Nanomedical DNA Conduction: Accessing Genomic Control Mechanisms Associated with Biosynthetic Tissue Assembly”, Ninth International Nanomedicine and Drug Delivery Symposium, Oct. 15, 2011, 1-5. |
Gould, et al., “Cellular Contribution of Bone Graft to Fusion”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research vol. 18, 2000, 920-927. |
Grant, et al., “Magentic Field-Controlled Microfluidic Transport”, Journal of Americal Chemical Society vol. 124 No. 3, 2002, 462-467. |
Ito, et al., “Sensitivity of Osteoinductive Activity of Deminerlization and Defatted Rat Femur to Temperature and Duration of Heating”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research No. 316, 1995, 267-275. |
Janzen, et al., “Osteonecrosis After Contact Neodymium: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Arthroscopic Laser Meniscectomy”, AJR 169, 1997, 855-858. |
Lopez, et al., “Effects of Monopolar Radiofrequency Energy on Ovine Joint Capsular Mechanical Properties”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 374, 2000, 286-297. |
Medvecky, et al., “Thermal Capsular Shrinkage: Basic Science and Clinical Applications”, Arthroscopy vol. 17 No. 6, 2001,624-635. |
Millenbaugh, et al., “Gene Expression Changes in the Skin of Rats Induced by Prolonged 35 GHz Millimeter-Wave Exposure”, Radiation Research vol. 169 No. 3, 2010, 288-300. |
Minczykowski, et al., “Effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil Adhesion”, Diagnostics and Medical Technology, Medical Science Monitor vol. 7 No. 3, 2001, 482-488. |
Mourant, et al., “Improvements in Laser “Welding” of Chicken Bone Tibias in vitro”, Proc. SPIE 2395, Lasers in Surgery: Advanced Characterization, Therapeutics, and Systems V, 478; doi:10.1117/12.209134, 1995, 1-8. |
Mourant, et al., “Laser Welding of Bone: Successful in vitro Experiments”, Proc. SPIE 2128, Laser Surgery: Advanced Characterization, Therapeutics, and Systems IV, 484, doi:10.1117/12.184934, 1994, 1-5. |
Rozbruch, et al., “Osteonecrosis of the Knee Following Arthroscopic Laser Meniscectomy”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery vol. 12 No. 2, 1996, 245-250. |
Thal, et al., “Delayed Articular Cartilage Slough: Two Cases Resulting From Holmium: YAG Laser Damage to Normal Articular Cartilage and a Review of the Literature”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery vol. 12 No. 1, 1996, 92-94. |
Torchilin, et al., “Drug Targeting”, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 11 Suppl 2, 2000, S81-S91. |
Wall, et al., “Thermal Modification of Collagen”, J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. vol. 8 No. 4, 1999, 339-344. |
Wallace, et al., “Electrothermal Shrinkage Reduces Laxity but Alters Creep Behavior in a Lapine Ligament Model”, J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. vol. 10 No. 1, 2001, 1-6. |
Weston, et al., “Redox-Magnetohydrodynamic Microfluids Without Cannels and Compatible with Electrochemical Detection Under Immunoassay Conditions”, Analytical Chemistry vol. 87 No. 17, 2010, 7068-7072. |
Zhang, et al., “Effect(s) of the Demineralization Process on the Osteoinductivity of Demineralization Bone Matrix”, J. Periodontol vol. 68, No. 11, 1997, 1085-1092. |
Zohar, et al., “Thermal Imaging of Receptor-Activated Heat Production in Single Cells”, Biophysical Journal vol. 74, 1998, 82-89. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61737063 | Dec 2012 | US |